XML 102 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3
Income Taxes
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2019
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]  
Income Taxes

13. Income Taxes

The Company computes its expected annual effective income tax rate in accordance with ASC 740 and makes changes on a quarterly basis, as necessary, based on certain factors such as changes in forecasted annual pre-tax income; changes to actual or forecasted permanent book to tax differences; impacts from tax audits with state, federal or foreign tax authorities; impacts from tax law changes; or change in judgment as to the realizability of deferred tax assets. The Company identifies items which are unusual and non-recurring in nature and treats these as discrete events. The tax effect of discrete items is recorded in the quarter in which the discrete events occur. Due to the volatility of these factors, the Company's consolidated effective income tax rate can change significantly on a quarterly basis.

With the exception of the Buffalo brand joint venture, Iconix Middle East joint venture, Diamond Icon joint venture and Umbro China joint venture, the Company is not responsible for the income taxes related to the non-controlling interest’s share of the joint venture’s earnings.  Therefore, the tax liability associated with the non-controlling interest share of the joint venture’s earnings is not reported in the Company’s income tax expense, despite the joint venture’s entire income being consolidated in the Company’s reported income before income tax expense.  As such, the joint venture’s earnings have the effect of lowering our effective tax rate.  This effect is more pronounced in periods in which joint venture earnings are higher relative to our other earnings.  Since the Buffalo brand joint venture is a taxable entity in Canada, the Iconix Middle East joint venture and Diamond Icon joint venture are taxable entities in the United Kingdom, the Company is required to report its tax liability, including taxes attributable to the non-controlling interest, in its statement of operations.  All other consolidated joint ventures are partnerships and treated as pass-through entities not subject to taxation in their local tax jurisdiction, and therefore the Company includes only the tax attributable to its proportionate share of income from the joint venture in income tax expense.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal and various state and local jurisdictions. For federal income tax purposes, during the fourth quarter of 2016, the Internal Revenue Service initiated an audit of the 2014 federal tax return which is ongoing.  The Company also files returns in numerous foreign jurisdictions that have varied years remaining open for examination, but generally the statute of limitations is three to four years from when the return is filed.

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some or all of the recorded deferred tax assets will be realized.  The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on the generation of future taxable income in the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.  Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.  Based on these items and the consecutive years of pretax losses (resulting from impairment), management determined that enough uncertainty exists relative to the realization of the deferred income tax asset balances to warrant the application of a full valuation allowance for all taxing jurisdictions as of December 31, 2018.  In addition, the Company continues to have deferred tax liabilities related to indefinite lived intangibles on the condensed consolidated balance sheet a portion of which cannot be considered to be a source of taxable income to offset deferred tax assets.  

The Company’s consolidated effective tax rate for the Current Quarter was 1.7% which resulted in a $0.6 million income tax benefit as compared to the consolidated effective tax rate for the Prior Year Quarter of 4.5% which resulted in a $1.0 million income tax provision.  The decrease in the effective tax rate is due to expenses recorded in the Current Quarter for which no tax benefit was able to be recognized and to a trademark impairment recorded in the Prior Year Quarter, for which the Company recognized a tax benefit.

The Company’s consolidated effective tax rate for Current Nine Months was -15% which resulted in a $1.3 million income tax provision as compared to the consolidated effective tax rate for the Prior Year Nine Months of 0.6% which resulted in a $0.1 million income tax benefit.  The decrease in the effective tax rate is due to expenses recorded in the Current Nine Months for which no tax benefit was able to be recognized and to trademark impairments recorded in the Prior Year Nine Months, for which the Company recognized a tax benefit.

Management has not recorded a tax provision for current ongoing tax examinations; however, the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty. If any issues addressed in the Company's tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management's expectations, the Company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs.

The Company has net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards for federal and state income tax purposes which, generally, can be used to reduce future taxable income. Use of the NOL carryforwards is limited under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, as we have had a change in ownership of more than 50% of our capital stock over a three-year period as measured under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. These complex changes of ownership rules generally focus on ownership changes involving shareholders owning directly or indirectly 5% or more of our stock, including certain public “groups” of shareholders as set forth under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, including those arising from new stock issuances and other equity transactions.  Some of these NOL carryforwards will expire if they are not used within certain periods. At this time, we consider it more likely than not that we will not have sufficient taxable income in the future that will allow us to realize these NOL carryforwards.