XML 62 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.  The fair value hierarchy prescribed by US GAAP requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.  The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are:

Level 1 – Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets,

Level 2 – Quoted market prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets and

Level 3 – Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable, such as those used in pricing models or discounted cash flow methodologies, for example.

A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Certain of our assets and liabilities are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are summarized below (in thousands):

 
 
 
Estimated fair value measurements
 
Carrying value
 
Quoted prices in active markets (Level 1)
 
Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)
 
Significant other unobservable inputs (Level 3)
December 31, 2013:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets - cash equivalents
$
1,063,500

 
$
1,063,500

 
$

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2012:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets - cash equivalents
$
987,420

 
$
987,420

 
$

 
$



Trade receivables and trade payables, which are also required to be measured at fair value, have carrying values that approximate their fair values due to their short maturities.

Those financial instruments not required to be measured at fair value consist of the Company’s publicly traded debt securities.  Fair values of the Company’s debt securities were provided by one to two brokers who make a market in our debt securities and were measured using a market-approach valuation technique.  Fair value was determined by adding a spread based on actual trades for that security (or a trader quote where actual trades were unavailable) to the applicable benchmark Treasury security with a comparable maturity in order to derive a current yield.  The yield is then used to determine a price given the individual security’s coupon rate and maturity.  Such inputs are considered “significant other observable inputs,” which are categorized as Level 2 inputs in the fair value hierarchy.  Estimated fair values and related carrying values of our long-term debt securities at December 31 are presented below (in thousands):

 
2013
 
2012
 
Fair value
 
Carrying value
 
Fair value
 
Carrying value
5% Senior Notes, due 2017
$
433,879

 
$
398,961

 
$
445,568

 
$
398,678

7.875% Senior Notes, due 2019
603,177

 
498,171

 
617,076

 
497,842

4.875% Senior Notes, due 2022
711,816

 
713,208

 
761,509

 
714,775

5.4% Senior Notes, due 2042
368,602

 
398,360

 
406,493

 
398,303

 
$
2,117,474

 
$
2,008,700

 
$
2,230,646

 
$
2,009,598



Concentrations of Credit Risk

We invest our excess cash primarily in time deposits and high-quality money market accounts at several large commercial banks with strong credit ratings, and therefore believe that our risk of loss is minimal.

The Company’s customers largely consist of international oil and gas exploration companies and national oil companies.  We routinely evaluate the credit quality of potential customers.  In 2013, one customer accounted for 26% and another accounted for 11% of consolidated revenues.  In 2012, one customer accounted for 29% and another accounted for 11% of consolidated revenues.  In 2011, three customers accounted for 29%, 21%, and 11% of consolidated revenues, respectively.  The Company maintains reserves for credit losses when necessary and actual losses have been within management’s expectations.