10-K405 1 b42240ame10-k405.htm FORM 10-K405 DATED 12/31/01 FORM 10-K405 DATED 12/31/01
Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

     
CHECKBOX   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
    OF 1934

           For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001

OR

     
BOX   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
    EXCHANGE ACT

       For the Transition period from                      to                    

Commission file number 0-20328

AMTROL Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

     
Rhode Island   05-0246955
(State or Other Jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)   Identification No.)
1400 Division Road, West Warwick, RI   02893
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)   (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (401) 884-6300
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes CHECKBOX No BOX .

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. CHECKBOX

State the aggregate market value of the Registrant’s voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of March 29, 2002: $0

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: $0.01 Par Value: 100 shares outstanding as of March 29, 2002.

Documents Incorporated by Reference: None

 


PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Background
Operations
Products And Markets
Distribution and Marketing
Manufacturing, Raw Materials and Suppliers
Seasonality and Backlog
Patents, Trademarks And Licenses
Competition
Employees
Environmental Matters
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES OF MARKET RISK
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
Report of Independent Public Accountants
Item 14(a)(2) SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
SIGNATURES
EXHIBIT INDEX
EX-10.12 LOAN & SECURITY AGREEMENT (FOOTHILL)
EX-10,13 LOAN & SECURITY AGREEMENT W/CYPRESS
EX-10.14 SUBSIDIARY GUARANTY AGREEMENT (CYPRESS)
EX-10.15 CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT (CYPRESS)
EX-10.16 SUBSIDIARY GUARANTY (FOOTHILL)
EX-10.17 CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT (FOOTHILL)
EX-21 SUBSIDIARIES
EX-99 LETTER TO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMP NT 3T


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

         
PART I       Page
    Item 1- Business    
    Background   3
    Operations   3
    Products and Markets   4
    Distribution and Marketing   6
    Manufacturing, Raw Materials and Suppliers   7
    Seasonality and Backlog   9
    Patents, Trademarks and Licenses   9
    Competition   9
    Employees   9
    Environmental Matters   9
    Item 2- Properties   10
    Item 3- Legal Proceedings   11
    Item 4- Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders   11
PART II        
    Item 5- Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters   11
    Item 6- Selected Financial Data   12
    Item 7- Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations   13
    Item 7A- Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures of Market Risk   20
    Item 8- Financial Statements and Supplementary Data   21
    Item 9- Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure   21
PART III        
    Item 10- Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant   22
    Item 11- Executive Compensation   24
    Item 12- Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management   26
    Item 13- Certain Relationships and Related Transactions   27
PART IV        
    Item 14- Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on    
    Form 8-K   28
         
Report of Independent Public Accountants     29  
Item 14 (a)(2) Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves     48  
Signatures     49  
Exhibit Index     50  
Subsidiaries of Registrant     51  

2


Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1.     BUSINESS

Background

    AMTROL Inc., together with its subsidiaries (“AMTROL” or the “Company”), is a leading international designer, manufacturer and marketer of expansion and pressure control products used in water systems applications and selected sectors of the HVAC market. The Company’s principal products include well water accumulators, hot water expansion controls, water treatment products, indirect-fired water heaters and returnable and non-returnable pressure-rated cylinders used primarily to store, transport and dispense refrigerant, heating and cooking gases. Many of these products are based on a technology originated and developed by the Company, involving a pre-pressurized vessel with an internal diaphragm to handle fluids under pressure.
 
    The Company was incorporated in Rhode Island in 1973, and is the successor of a predecessor Rhode Island corporation which was incorporated in 1946. On November 12, 1996, as a result of a merger agreement with AMTROL Holdings Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, AMTROL Acquisition Inc., the Company became a wholly-owned subsidiary of AMTROL Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation controlled by The Cypress Group L.L.C. (“Cypress”). The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 1400 Division Road, West Warwick, Rhode Island 02893 (telephone number: (401) 884-6300).

Operations

    AMTROL is a market leader in the manufacture of its principal products and a significant participant in certain European, Middle Eastern, African and Asian cylinder markets. The Company’s prominence is attributable to the strength of its brand names, product breadth, quality and innovation, as well as its marketing, distribution and manufacturing expertise. In addition, AMTROL’s principal markets are highly replacement oriented, with more than 50% of the Company’s core business coming from replacement sales. Sales can be affected by extreme weather conditions, as well as significant changes in economic circumstances.
 
    One of the Company’s strengths is its brand names, which are among the most widely recognized in its markets. For example, the Company’s EXTROL® brand is widely recognized by customers as the leading hot water expansion control tank. Other well-known brand names of the Company include Well-X-Trol®, Therm-X-Trol®, Hot Water Maker®, CHAMPION® and Water Worker®. The Company is a recognized technology leader in virtually all of its core product lines. In fact, many of the Company’s major product lines are considered the industry benchmark, a key strategic marketing advantage.
 
    During its 56-year history, AMTROL has established a strong partnership with wholesalers, supporting a broad distribution network serving approximately 2,000 customers throughout North America. The Company’s strong brand recognition and reputation for quality ensure that nearly every significant plumbing, pump specialty and HVAC wholesaler carries at least one line of its products. This facilitates new product introduction, effectively “pulling” the Company’s new products through its distribution

3


Table of Contents

    system. The Company also offers a broad range of products, which allows the Company’s customers to consolidate their suppliers and to purchase and manage inventory more efficiently. These factors have established AMTROL’s products as preferred brands and allow the Company to realize premium pricing on most of its premium branded products.
 
    AMTROL ALFA Metalomecânica, S.A. (“AMTROL ALFA”), located in Guimaraes, Portugal, is Europe’s largest manufacturer of reusable steel gas cylinders, distributed worldwide and used principally for the storage of cooking and heating gases. AMTROL ALFA also produces non-returnable gas cylinders supplied to European and Asian customers which are used principally for the storage of refrigerant gases. AMTROL ALFA’s sales presence within the United States continues to increase as well. AMTROL ALFA provides the Company with the potential for a low-cost international manufacturing base for all of the Company’s container products and is an important source of supply for the Company’s international customers.
 
    AMTROL NOVA GmbH & Co. K.G. (“AMTROL NOVA”), located in Donaueschingen, Germany, manufactures high-end residential and commercial water heaters which are marketed primarily in Germany, Switzerland and Austria.
 
    AMTROL Poland Sp z.o.o. (“AMTROL Poland”), located in Swarzedz, Poland refurbishes returnable gas cylinders primarily for the Polish market. AMTROL Poland also provides AMTROL with a favorable manufacturing cost structure and proximity to gas cylinder markets in eastern Europe.
 
    Net sales in geographic regions outside of the United States and Canada, primarily Europe, the Middle East, Africa and the Far East, accounted for 32.7%, 31.4% and 32.2% of the Company’s total net sales in fiscal years 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively.
 
    The Company continues to review potential acquisitions that may represent good strategic fits with the Company’s lines of business.

Products And Markets

    HVAC Products
 
    The Company’s sales to selected sectors of the HVAC market include products such as expansion accumulators, water heaters and pressure-rated cylinders for heating and refrigerant gases. The Company’s residential HVAC products include expansion vessels for heated water, potable water heaters and other accessories used in residential HVAC systems. The Company’s commercial HVAC products are substantially identical in function to those used in residential applications, but may be modified for design codes and the higher operating pressures of larger systems. The Company’s pressure-rated cylinders for refrigerant gases are used mainly in the storage, transportation and dispensing of gases used principally in air conditioning and refrigeration systems. In addition, the AMTROL-ALFA facility produces returnable pressure-rated cylinders for storing gas used in residential and commercial heating and cooking applications.

4


Table of Contents

    EXTROLs®. The EXTROL® expansion accumulators, the first of the Company’s products for handling fluid under pressure, redefined the standards for controlling the expansion of water in hydronic heating systems. Earlier systems consisted simply of a vessel containing air, resulting in excessive pressure and corrosion. The Company developed a technology which uses a flexible diaphragm inside a pre-pressurized vessel to maintain the separation of air and water and has applied this technology in other HVAC and water system products. This technology controls pressure in the heating system and minimizes problems related to hot water expansion by allowing the volume of water to increase as the temperature of the water increases within a closed system, thereby substantially reducing operating problems.
 
    Therm-X-Trols®. Therm-X-Trols® accumulate expanded hot water from potable water heaters where flow back into the public water supply is prohibited due to the presence of backflow prevention devices. In response to the Clean Water Act of 1984, certain jurisdictions established local codes to require owners of commercial and residential buildings to install backflow prevention devices in order to prevent the contamination of the public water supply. Local codes adopted by organizations that set standards for most of the United States also require a separate device to handle the expanded water and prevent it from flowing back into the public water supply. The principal alternatives are relief valves, which permit water to drain inside the building, and thermal expansion accumulators, such as the Therm-X-Trol®, which capture the water. Therm-X-Trol® satisfies these code requirements, as well as the codes of certain localities that specifically require a thermal expansion accumulator. Additionally, certain domestic water heater manufacturers specify that their warranties are void if thermal expansion accumulators are not used in conjunction with their products where backflow prevention devices are installed.
 
    Indirect-Fired Water Heaters. In response to market demands for both an abundant supply of hot water and energy conservation, the Company has introduced a line of indirect-fired residential and commercial water heaters, which it manufactures and distributes under the brand name Boiler Mate™. Used in conjunction with a new or existing boiler installed to heat living and work areas, these water heaters offer an alternative to conventional gas and electric potable water heaters and tankless coils. Hot water is generated through the use of heat exchangers and circulators which circulate heated water from the boiler through a coil in the core of the water heater’s reservoir. The Boiler Mate Classic Series™, available in 26 and 41 gallon models, is sold primarily for residential applications. The Boiler Mate Premier Series™, a line of stainless steel models, offers sizes ranging from 60 to 120 gallons for light commercial applications and residential customers who require large amounts of hot water and rapid recovery time.
 
    Pressure-Rated Cylinders. The AMTROL ALFA subsidiary produces and distributes reusable liquid propane gas (“LPG”) cylinders and reusable and non-returnable refrigerant cylinders. AMTROL ALFA is the largest producer of reusable steel gas cylinders in Europe. Reusable LPG cylinders are typically purchased by major gas companies or their distributors who fill the cylinders for customers who use the gas for heating and cooking in residential and commercial applications. In 1998, the Company transferred to AMTROL ALFA a non-returnable cylinder production line previously

5


Table of Contents

    located in Singapore and began supplying its European and Asian non-returnable gas cylinder customers from AMTROL ALFA. The Company is one of the world’s two largest manufacturers of non-returnable pressure-rated cylinders used in the storage, transport and dispensing of refrigerant gases for air conditioning and refrigeration systems.
 
    In 1999, the Company established AMTROL Poland which refurbishes returnable gas cylinders principally for the Polish market. The Company believes this market offers many substantial growth opportunities for its products. In addition, through the establishment of a cylinder manufacturing platform in Poland, the Company anticipates supporting opportunities that exist in Eastern Europe.
 
    Water Systems Products
 
    AMTROL’s sales of its water systems products consist primarily of water accumulators for residential and commercial well water systems and products for residential water softening and purification.
 
    Well Water Systems. The Company produces and sells well water accumulators for both residential and commercial applications under the brand names Well-X-Trol® Professional® and CHAMPION®, as well as under several other brand and private label programs. Virtually all of the water accumulators sold by the Company incorporate an internally mounted rubber diaphragm that seals an air charge and allows pressure to increase as water fills the plastic-lined vessel. This design serves to control pressure while maintaining the separation of air and water in the vessel, thereby eliminating water logging (absorption of air into water) as well as reducing wear on switches, pump motors and other system components caused by more frequent on/off cycling. A typical well water system consists of a submersible or jet pump located in the well that pumps water to an AMTROL well water accumulator.
 
    The well water accumulator is connected to the plumbing system in order to provide water on demand within a specific range of pressure as controlled by a pressure switch. As the water level and pressure in the vessel decreases, the diaphragm relaxes and the pressure switch causes the pump to cycle on until a certain pressure is achieved in the system.
 
    Water Treatment/Filtration Products. The Company offers a range of products to meet increasing global demand for improved water quality and water pressure. The Company manufactures and markets water softeners under the Water Soft™ brand. Other products such as reverse osmosis accumulators and related systems distributed by the Company can improve the quality of both municipal-supplied water and well water. The Company also manufactures and markets products under the brand name AMTROL Pressuriser® that boosts water pressure where available pressure is not adequate.

Distribution and Marketing

    The Company’s principal channel of distribution is plumbing, heating and pump specialty wholesalers. The Company maintains its presence in the United States and Canadian wholesale markets through a network of approximately 45 independent manufacturer’s

6


Table of Contents

    representatives arranging sales on a commission basis, as well as approximately eight salaried direct sales professionals. To service its customers with greater efficiency, the Company has streamlined its representative network and, through consolidation of multiple lines of business, has brought a broader range of products to its wholesalers. The Company also provides certain of its products to the rapidly growing retail channel through a separate sales force.
 
    At its Education Center, which is an integral part of the Company’s marketing organization, and at Company-sponsored seminars throughout the United States and selected international locations, the Company provides education and training to wholesalers, contractors and engineers, independent sales representatives and their employees to assist them in understanding the technical aspects of their respective customers’ requirements and the Company’s product lines. As the Company educates contractors and engineers about the benefits of the Company’s products, its products are more effectively “pulled” through its distribution system.
 
    Non-returnable refrigerant pressure-rated cylinders are sold to major chemical companies, which produce and package refrigerant gases, and to independent contractors that purchase bulk refrigerants and fill the cylinders. The Company’s major customers for reusable refrigerant gas cylinders are wholesale distributors who sell the products to service providers and refrigerant recovery equipment manufacturers. AMTROL ALFA’s major customers for reusable LPG cylinders are major European gas companies or their distributors.
 
    With the exception of one cylinder customer to whom global sales were approximately 7.4% of total consolidated net sales, no individual customer represented more than five percent of the Company’s net sales in 2001.

Manufacturing, Raw Materials and Suppliers

    The Company manufactures its water system and HVAC products primarily at its own facilities. Many of its products depend on the Company’s expertise in pressure vessel construction. The Company takes advantage of the material economies and precision inherent in deep-draw stamping technology to manufacture products of superior performance and life.
 
    During 2001, the Company significantly reduced its manufacturing costs with three primary initiatives. First, plant safety performance continued to show substantial year- to-year improvement resulting from a safety overhaul in 1999. Records indicate that the Company enjoyed its best safety performance in its history. Second, quality metrics continued to reflect the strides made in reducing costs. Scrap and rework numbers improved by over 30% in 2001. Lastly, delivery performance hit new highs in 2001. This was even more significant given the 20% reduction in stated lead times to the customer base instituted in the second half of the year.
 
    The Company’s production system is based on proven world-class manufacturing practices, and all components of this platform receive continuous updating and review for effectiveness. Principal building blocks of the Company’s production system include

7


Table of Contents

    a visual factory philosophy, waste elimination through the Kaizen process improvement methodology, a formal corrective action response system, mistake-proofing and automatic source inspection, formal variation reduction processes, total preventive maintenance and the promotion of one-piece flow.
 
    In 2001, AMTROL continued to refine and strengthen its manufacturing platform through intensified training and implementation of the Kaizen methodology in order to garner the maximum amount of efficiencies inherent in one-piece flow and waste elimination. In addition, several capital equipment upgrades took place in the Water Systems product line that improved yield and reduced dependency on overtime.
 
    In 2001, most raw material prices in North America were flat to declining. It is anticipated that major commodity purchases in 2002 will reflect price reductions. This includes major categories such as: steel, rubber, corrugate, paint, copper, electricity, natural gas, and freight. Furthermore, it is expected that the Company’s recent efforts to optimize material utilization and to develop the supply base will generate additional savings. In addition, the Company has embarked on a program to source various castings, valves, and machined parts from Asia, which should favorably impact costs in the second half of 2002. Finally, the Company anticipates that it will be able to purchase all of the components it requires without disruption. The Company also believes that its relationships with its suppliers are good.
 
    On March 5, 2002, the United States government imposed tariffs and quotas on a wide range of steel imports for a three-year period. Many of the Company’s products are made from steel or contain steel parts. While the Company has certain purchase orders in place which set the price of steel purchases, not all purchases are covered by purchase orders and the purchase orders do not extend through the period the quotas and tariffs are imposed. Should price increases result from the imposition of these quotas and tariffs, net income and cash flows of the Company could decline.
 
    The condition of the Company’s facilities and capital equipment is considered good, and capital expenditures made during 2001 are expected to yield further plant efficiencies. As a result, the Company anticipates no capacity restraints in 2002. Improved yields and reduced labor content are also anticipated.
 
    The Company continued to leverage its Enterprise Resource Planning (“ERP”) investment made in 2000 & 1999 to improve business process development. As a result, working capital turns and inventory accuracy continued to improve. Several supply chain initiatives including Vendor Managed Inventory and Electronic Data Imaging will be expanded in 2002.
 
    The Company’s quality systems successfully maintained their ISO 9001 certification, the most complete certification in the ISO 9000 Series from the International Organization for Standardization (“ISO”). ISO certification requires periodic audits of the Company’s systems for product design, development, production, installation and servicing, and has become the international standard of quality required for manufacturers serving the European Economic Community, Southeast Asia, the Middle East and Latin America. The three principal North American facilities plan to seek the newly revised ISO9001/2000 certification by December 2002, ahead of the revised standard effective date of December 2003.

8


Table of Contents

Seasonality and Backlog

    Although the Company’s sales fluctuate with general economic activity, the effect of significant economic volatility is mitigated by the fact that many of the Company’s markets are highly replacement oriented. While sales of certain of its products are seasonal in nature, the Company’s overall business is not highly seasonal. Due to the generally short lead time of its orders, the Company historically has not carried any material backlog.

Patents, Trademarks And Licenses

    While the Company owns a number of patents, the Company believes that its position in its markets depends primarily on factors such as manufacturing expertise, technological leadership, superior service and quality and strong brand name recognition, rather than on patent protection. The Company believes that foreign and domestic competitors have been unable to match the quality of the Company’s branded products.
 
    The Company also holds a number of registered and unregistered trademarks for its products. The Company believes the following registered trademarks, which appear on its products and are widely recognized in its markets, are among those of strategic importance to its business: Well-X-Trol®, Therm-X-Trol®, EXTROL®, Hot Water Maker®, Boiler Mate™, CHAMPION® and Water Worker®.

Competition

    The Company is experiencing increasing competition from a number of foreign and U.S. competitors in each of its markets. AMTROL and its competitors in the water systems products and HVAC markets compete principally on the basis of technology, quality, service and price.

Employees

    As of December 31, 2001, the Company had 577 employees in the United States, none of whom were represented by collective bargaining units. In addition, the Company had 997 employees in its international operations. Some of the Company’s international employees are represented by unions. The Company considers relations with its employees to be good.

Environmental Matters

    Some of the Company’s operations generate or have in the past generated waste materials that are regulated under environmental laws. In the past, certain of the Company’s operations have been named parties in litigation associated with off-site hazardous waste treatment and disposal. Based upon the Company’s experience in matters that have been resolved and the amount of hazardous waste shipped to off-site disposal facilities, the Company believes that any share of costs attributable to it will not be material should any litigation arise or any claims be made in the future. However, there can be no assurance that any liability arising from, for example, contamination at facilities the Company owns or operates or formerly owned or operated (or an entity or business the Company has

9


Table of Contents

    acquired or disposed of), or locations at which waste or contaminants generated by the Company have been deposited (or deposited by an entity or business the Company has acquired or disposed of) will not arise or be asserted against the Company or entities for which the Company may be responsible in a manner that could materially and adversely affect the Company.
 
    The Company monitors and reviews its procedures and policies for compliance with environmental laws. Based upon the Company’s experience to date, the Company operates in substantial compliance with environmental laws, and the cost of compliance with existing regulations is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or competitive position. However, future events, including changes in existing laws and regulations or enforcement policies, may give rise to additional compliance costs which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or competitive position.

ITEM 2.     PROPERTIES

    The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s principal properties each of which is owned by the Company unless otherwise indicated:

             
Location   Square Footage   Principal Use
    (approximate)
West Warwick, RI     270,000     Corporate Headquarters, Manufacturing, and Education Center
Guimaraes, Portugal     196,000     Manufacturing
North Kingstown, RI (a)     206,000     Distribution Center
Donaueschingen, Germany     70,000     Manufacturing and Distribution
Paducah, KY     46,300     Manufacturing
Mansfield, OH (a)     45,000     Manufacturing and Distribution Center
Baltimore, MD     37,000     Manufacturing
Swarzedz, Poland (a)     29,000     Manufacturing
Kitchener, Ontario(a)     18,400     Sales Office and Distribution
     
     
Total   917,700    
     
     


(a)   Leased facilities

    The Company believes that its properties and equipment generally are well maintained, in good operating condition and adequate for its present needs. The Company regularly evaluates its manufacturing requirements and believes that it has sufficient capacity to meet its current and anticipated future needs. The inability to renew any short-term real property lease would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or competitive position.

10


Table of Contents

ITEM 3.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

    From time to time, the Company is named as a defendant in legal actions. These include commercial disputes, agency proceedings and product liability, personal injury and other claims. However, management believes, after review of insurance coverage and consultation with legal counsel, that the ultimate resolution of the pending legal actions to which it is a party will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

ITEM 4.     SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

    Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5.     MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

    All of the common stock of the Company is owned by AMTROL Holdings Inc. (“Holdings”) and no trading market exists for the stock. All of the common stock of Holdings is held by affiliates of Cypress and certain officers, directors and employees of the Company, and likewise there is no trading market for Holdings’ stock. For more information, see Item 12, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management”.

11


Table of Contents

ITEM 6.     SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected consolidated financial data presented below for and as of each of the years and periods in the five-calendar-year period ended December 31, 2001 have been derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company, including the related notes thereto, which have been audited by Arthur Andersen LLP, independent certified public accountants. The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company, including the related notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

                                           
      Year Ended December 31,
     
      1997   1998(b)   1999   2000   2001
     
 
 
 
 
      (In Thousands)
Statement of Operations Data:
                                       
 
Net sales
  $ 186,422     $ 212,890     $ 222,053     $ 197,472     $ 182,325  
 
Cost of goods sold
    141,170       169,355       164,617       151,483       141,278  
 
Provision for abnormal warranty costs
          4,500                    
 
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
 
Total cost of goods sold
    141,170       173,855       164,617       151,483       141,278  
 
Gross profit
    45,252       39,035       57,436       45,989       41,047  
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    25,723       27,827       28,492       25,821       27,878  
 
Plant closing and reorganization costs
    5,500       4,450                    
 
Management restructuring
          3,693                    
 
Amortization of goodwill
    3,995       4,446       4,463       4,463       4,451  
 
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
 
Income (loss) from operations
    10,034       (1,381 )     24,481       15,705       8,718  
 
Interest (expense), net
    (18,256 )     (20,344 )     (19,083 )     (19,070 )     (19,101 )
 
License and distributorship fees
    245       242       234       210       291  
 
Other income (expense), net
    299       1,384       353       1,713       95  
 
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
 
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes
    (7,678 )     (20,099 )     5,985       (1,442 )     (9,997 )
 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    (30 )     (6,728 )     4,125       2,704       (1,026 )
 
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
 
Income (loss) before extraordinary item
    (7,648 )     (13,371 )     1,860       (4,146 )     (8,971 )
 
(Loss) on extraordinary item, net of tax
                            (444 )
 
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
 
Net income (loss)
  $ (7,648 )   $ (13,371 )   $ 1,860     $ (4,146 )   $ (9,415 )
 
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
Other Data:
                                       
 
Depreciation and amortization
  $ 11,541     $ 13,147     $ 14,003     $ 14,005     $ 13,882  
 
Capital expenditures
    8,489       9,858       5,798       8,375       4,199  
 
EBITDA (a)
    26,887       12,454       38,346       29,963       21,972  
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
                                       
 
Working capital
  $ 22,675     $ 6,642     $ 9,001     $ 5,101     $ 8,602  
 
Total assets
    291,945       300,667       281,745       271,104       264,455  
 
Long-term debt, less current maturities
    184,164       173,023       163,385       159,469       157,511  
 
Shareholders’ equity
    58,049       65,948       65,303       59,872       58,219  


(a)   EBITDA represents income (loss) from operations before plant closing charges, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is frequently considered by readers of financial statements and therefore the Company believes that inclusion of EBITDA is useful supplemental information. The method of calculating EBITDA is consistent with the Company’s Loan and Security Agreement and Senior Subordinated Notes Agreement. However, EBITDA is not a measure of true cash flow since it does not incorporate changes of other assets and liabilities that may generate or require cash. EBITDA is not a generally accepted accounting measure.
(b)   Adjusted to reflect a change in the method of determining inventory cost from the LIFO method to the FIFO method.

12


Table of Contents

ITEM 7.     MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
                   OF OPERATIONS

    This section should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company included elsewhere herein.
 
    The Company and its subsidiaries and their representatives may from time to time make written or oral statements, including statements contained in AMTROL’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and in its reporting to customers, which constitute or contain “forward-looking” statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 or the SEC in its rules, regulations and releases.
 
    All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Form 10-K and elsewhere relating to the Company’s financial position, strategic initiatives and statements addressing industry developments are forward-looking statements. When incorporated in this discussion, the words “expect(s)”, “feel(s)”, “believe(s)”, “anticipate(s)” and similar expressions are intended to identify some of these forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements include those containing these phrases but also any other statements that are not references to historical fact. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are expressed in good faith and are believed to have a reasonable basis, there can be no assurance that such expectations or beliefs will result or be achieved or accomplished. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The following are some of the important factors that can vary or change or involve substantial risk and cause actual results to differ materially from such expectations: the Company’s ability to successfully implement its business strategy; the availability and cost of raw materials; changes in domestic or foreign government regulation or enforcement policies, particularly related to refrigerant gases or cylinders and building and energy efficiency requirements or restrictions or limitations or general reduction in the use of domestic wells; significant weather conditions adverse to the Company’s business; development of competing technologies; acceptance of the Company’s existing and planned new products in international markets; competition in the Company’s markets, particularly price competition; the rate of growth of developing economies and demand for the Company’s products; the ultimate cost of future warranty and other claims relating to the Company’s products and business; whether the Company succeeds in acquiring new businesses; availability of capital; foreign exchange rates; increases in interest rates; the business abilities and judgment of personnel; and general economic, financial and business conditions, both domestically and internationally.

Critical Accounting Policies

    In December 2001, the SEC requested that all registrants list their three to five most “critical accounting policies” in the MD&A per Financial Reporting Release No. 60. The SEC indicated that a “critical accounting policy” is one which is both important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and requires management’s most difficult subjective or complex judgments, often as a need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company believes that the following accounting policies fit this definition.

13


Table of Contents

    Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 101 Revenue Recognition in financial statements as amended by SAB No. 101A and SAB No. 101B. In accordance with SAB No. 101, the Company recognizes revenue only when there is a valid contract or purchase order which includes a fixed price, the goods have been delivered in accordance with the shipping terms; and there is an expectation that the collection of the revenue is reasonably assured. Determination of the criteria are based upon management’s judgments regarding the fixed nature of the price and the ability to collect revenue.
 
    Long-Lived Assets. AMTROL periodically evaluates its long-lived assets for events or changes in circumstances that might indicate the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 121. In assessing the recoverability of goodwill, AMTROL must make assumptions regarding estimated undiscounted future cash flows. The amount of impairment, if any, would be measured based on the fair value of the impaired assets. At December 31, 2001, no such impairment exists. Effective for the Company’s 2002 fiscal year, AMTROL will account for its long-lived assets, other than goodwill, under SFAS No. 144. This statement will provide for use of the accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, whether previously held and used or newly acquired. For discussions involving accounting for goodwill, see SFAS No. 142 description.
 
    In July 2001, the FASB released SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 141 requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001. SFAS No. 142 changes the accounting for goodwill from an amortization method to an impairment-only approach. As a result of SFAS No. 142, amortization of goodwill to earnings will cease and instead, the carrying value of goodwill will be evaluated for impairment on at least an annual basis. The Company will comply with SFAS No. 141 for any future business combinations and will adopt SFAS No. 142 effective January 1, 2002. The Company has until June 30, 2002 to determine the impact of adopting SFAS No. 142 which may require restatement of prior quarters. Amortization of goodwill for the periods ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001 was $4.5 million, $4.5 million and $4.5 million, respectively.
 
    Warranty. The Company provides for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. While the Company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes, including monitoring and evaluating quality of component parts, AMTROL’s warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage and labor costs incurred in correcting a product failure. Should actual product failure rates differ from management’s estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty reserve may be required.

Results of Operations

    The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage relationship to net sales of certain items included in the Company’s statement of operations:

14


Table of Contents

                         
    Year Ended December 31
   
    1999   2000   2001
   
 
 
Net sales
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
Cost of goods sold
    74.1       76.7       77.5  
 
   
     
     
 
Gross profit
    25.9       23.3       22.5  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    12.9       13.1       15.3  
Amortization of goodwill
    2.0       2.2       2.4  
 
   
     
     
 
Income from operations
    11.0       8.0       4.8  
Interest expense
    (8.6 )     (9.7 )     (10.5 )
Other income, net
    0.3       1.0       0.2  
 
   
     
     
 
Income (loss) before income taxes
    2.7       (0.7 )     (5.5 )
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    1.9       1.4       (0.5 )
Income (loss) before extraordinary item
    0.8       (2.1 )     (5.0 )
(Loss) on extraordinary item, net
                (0.2 )
 
   
     
     
 
Net income (loss)
    0.8       (2.1 )     (5.2 )
 
   
     
     
 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2000.

    Net Sales. Net sales in 2001 decreased $15.2 million or 7.7% to $182.3 million from $197.5 million in 2000. In North America, net sales decreased $11.9 million or 8.7% as compared to 2000 due principally to a decline in volume attributable to a continuing weakness in the North American economy, pricing pressures and shifts in product mix. Net sales in Europe decreased $3.3 million or 5.3% as compared to 2000 due principally to the weakening of the Euro against the U.S. dollar. If the value of the Euro had remained at the average level of 2000, reported net sales in Europe for 2001 would have decreased $1.5 million or 2.4% from 2000.
 
    Gross Profit. Gross profit decreased approximately $5.0 million in 2001 to $41.0 million from $46.0 million in 2000. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit in 2001 decreased to 22.5% from 23.3% in 2000. Several factors contributed to the margin decrease, including lower volume, lower selling prices and shifts in product mix. Partially offsetting these decreases were the favorable results of continuing cost reduction efforts and improvements in labor productivity at all of the Company’s manufacturing locations.
 
    Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $2.1 million or 8.0% in 2001 to $27.9 million from $25.8 million in 2000. The increase was principally due to one-time marketing initiatives in the Company’s principal North American markets.
 
    Other Income, Net. Other income, net for 2001 was $0.1 million as compared to 2000 of $1.7 million. The decrease of $1.6 million was principally attributable to the sale of a parcel of land in 2000.
 
    Income Taxes. Income tax expense decreased $3.7 million in 2001 as compared to 2000 reflecting lower pre-tax earning levels.

15


Table of Contents

    Net Income (Loss). The net loss in 2001 of $9.4 million compares to a net loss in 2000 of $4.1 million, an absolute change of $5.3 million.
 
    Earnings Before Interest Expense, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA). EBITDA in 2001 was $22.0 million compared to $30.0 million in 2000, a decrease of $8.0 million or 26.7%. The decline was the result of a decline in net sales, higher selling, general and administrative expenses mitigated by the favorable impacts of cost reduction efforts and improved labor productivity. As a percentage of sales, EBITDA decreased three percentage points, from 15.2% in 2000 to 12.1% in 2001.

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2000 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1999.

    Net Sales. Net sales in 2000 decreased $24.6 million or 11.1% to $197.5 million from $222.1 million in 1999. In North America, net sales decreased $14.1 million or 9.4% as compared to 1999 due principally to increased competition and pricing pressures in the Company’s Water Systems markets and a generally weaker North American economy. Net sales in Europe decreased $10.5 million or 14.4% as compared to 1999 due principally to the weakening of the Euro against the U.S. dollar. If the value of the Euro had remained at the average level of 1999, reported net sales for 2000 would have been $8.9 million higher.
 
    Gross Profit. Gross profit decreased $11.4 million in 2000 to $46.0 million from $57.4 million in 1999. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit in 2000 decreased to 23.3% from 25.9% in 1999. Several factors contributed to the margin decrease, including lower volume, lower selling prices, and an increase in certain material costs, most notably steel costs in the Company’s European operations. Partially offsetting these increases were the favorable results of cost reduction efforts and improvements in labor productivity at all of the Company’s manufacturing locations.
 
    Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $2.7 million or 9.5% in 2000 to $25.8 million from $28.5 million in 1999. The decrease was attributable to lower sales, cost-cutting efforts and substantially reduced accruals for incentive compensation.
 
    Other Income, Net. Other income, net for 2000 was $1.7 million as compared to 1999 of $0.4 million. The increase of $1.3 million was principally attributable to the sale of a parcel of land resulting in pretax income of $1.1 million.
 
    Income Taxes. Income tax expense decreased $1.4 million in 2000 as compared to 1999 reflecting lower pre-tax earning levels.
 
    Net Income (Loss). The net loss in 2000 of $4.1 million compares to a net income in 1999 of $1.9 million, an absolute change of $6.0 million.
 
    Earnings Before Interest Expense, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA). EBITDA in 2000 was $30.0 million compared to $38.3 million in 1999, a decrease of $8.3 million or 21.7%. As a percentage of sales, EBITDA decreased two percentage points, from 17.3% in 1999 to 15.2% in 2000.

16


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

    The Company, on December 26, 2001 completed a refinancing of its senior secured credit facility. In its place, the Company entered into two new credit facilities: a $42.5 million senior first-priority secured credit facility arranged by Foothill Capital Corporation (the “Foothill Facility”) and a $25.0 million senior second-priority secured credit facility with affiliates of The Cypress Group L.L.C. (the “Cypress Facility”). Proceeds from the refinancing were used to repay in full Amtrol’s existing credit facility and to pay fees and expenses related to the refinancing.
 
    The Foothill Facility consists of senior term loans (the “Term Loans”) and a revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). A portion ($10.2 million) of the Term Loans (the “Term Loan A”) is the lower of (a) $10.5 million and (b) the sum of (i) 80% of the net liquidation percentage of eligible equipment located in North America and (ii) 60% of the fair market value of real property located in North America. $7.5 million of the term loans (the “Term Loan B”) was also created. The Revolving Credit Facility is secured by North American accounts receivable and inventories. Aggregate borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are limited to the lesser of (a) $35.0 million less the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Term Loan A less letter of credit usage, and (b) the borrowing base less letter of credit usage. The Foothill Facility is secured by a lien on all of AMTROL's personal property and assets. For a detailed description of the borrowing base see Section 2.1 of the Loan and Security Agreement (the “Agreement”) between the Company and Foothill Capital Corporation dated December 26, 2001, which is attached as Exhibit 10.12. At December 31, 2001, total availability and aggregate borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility were $11.8 million and $5.4 million, respectively.
 
    Term Loan A has a five-year maturity with quarterly principal payments of $426,757 commencing April 1, 2002. The outstanding unpaid principal shall be due and payable on the date of termination of the Agreement, whether by its terms, by prepayment, or by acceleration and bears interest at LIBOR plus 3.5%. Term Loan B has a three-year maturity with quarterly principal payments of $312,500 commencing April 1, 2002. The outstanding unpaid principal shall be due and payable on the date of termination of the Agreement, whether by its terms, by prepayment, or by acceleration and bears interest at the greater of the Wells Fargo Reference Rate (approximates the prime rate) plus 3.5% or 9.25%. The Revolving Credit Facility has a five-year maturity. Amounts borrowed under the Revolving Credit Facility may be repaid and reborrowed at any time during the term of the Agreement and bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.5% for LIBOR based borrowings and the Wells Fargo Reference Rate plus 0.5% for non-LIBOR based borrowings. The Agreement contains certain affirmative and negative covenants and restrictions. As of December 31, 2001, the Company was in compliance with the various covenants of the Foothill Agreement.
 
    The Cypress Facility consists of a single $25.0 million term loan (the “Term Loan C”). Term Loan C has a five-year maturity and bears Pay-In-Kind (PIK) interest fixed at 12% per annum paid quarterly, which at the lenders option can be paid in common stock of the Company. In connection with the Cypress Facility, Amtrol Holdings, Inc., which wholly owns AMTROL, has issued the lenders under the Cypress Facility 60,000 warrants to purchase approximately 5.2% of its common stock on a fully diluted basis. The 60,000

17


Table of Contents

    warrants, which have an exercise price of $.01, were valued at approximately $3.4 million using the Black-Scholes model. This amount was recorded as a contra-liability against the Term Loan C debt and included in the Company’s equity section. The Company expects that the effective interest rate associated with the Term Loan C will be greater than 12% given the additional interest expense associated with the warrants. For a detailed description of the Cypress Facility, see the Cypress Loan and Security Agreement (the “Cypress Agreement”) between the Company and affiliates of the Cypress Group L.L.C. dated December 26, 2001, which is attached as Exhibit 10.13. The Cypress Loan Agreement contains certain affirmative and negative covenants and restrictions. As of December 31, 2001, the Company was in compliance with the various covenants of the Cypress Agreement.
 
    In 2001, the Company’s cash flow from operating activities was a deficit of $2.7 million, a decrease of $8.0 million from 2000. The decrease was principally the result of lower operating income and higher working capital requirements. In addition to completing the refinancing of its senior credit facility, the Company reduced capital expenditures in 2001 by $4.2 million as compared to 2000 and received the proceeds from the purchase of $6.0 million of common stock by Cypress in August 2001. At December 31, 2001, the Company’s cash balance was $1.0 million versus $0.7 million at December 31, 2000 and excess availability under the new Revolving Credit Facility was $6.4 million.
 
    The Company’s operating working capital (defined as accounts receivable and inventory, less accounts payable) increased approximately $3.1 million from $24.2 million at December 31, 2000 to $27.3 million at December 31, 2001.
 
    Accounts receivable increased $0.9 million or 3.1% from $27.6 million at December 31, 2000 to $28.5 million at December 31, 2001. The increase in accounts receivable was the result of higher December 2001 versus December 2000 sales and slower customer payments, particularly in the Company’s European operations. However, the Company did not experience any significant changes in credit terms, credit utilization or delinquency in accounts receivable in 2001 as compared to 2000.
 
    The Company’s inventories decreased $0.7 million or 3.3% from $20.5 million at December 31, 2000 to $19.8 million at December 31, 2001. The decrease is consistent with the Company’s reduction in sales and efforts to reduce inventories of low-volume products and maintain optimum levels of high-volume products.
 
    Capital expenditures were $5.8 million, $8.4 million and $4.2 million for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively. Substantially all of the expenditures in 2001 related to ongoing maintenance and upgrading of the Company’s manufacturing technology at all of its production facilities. In 2000, $2.2 million was used to acquire AMTROL Poland’s production line which was previously leased, and $1.0 million was used to enhance and complete the implementation of the Company’s Enterprise Resource Planning System (“ERP”) in North America and at AMTROL ALFA.
 
    On December 18, 2000, the Company sold a parcel of land totaling 11.5 acres adjacent to the Company’s headquarters in West Warwick, Rhode Island. The gross sale price of $2.1 million resulted in the Company recording a net book pre-tax gain of $1.1 million. The net book pre-tax gain was not included in the calculation of EBITDA for purposes of covenant compliance.

18


Table of Contents

    In November 1996 the Company issued, under an Indenture, $115.0 million of Senior Subordinated Notes due 2006 (the “Notes”). The Notes are unsecured obligations of the Company. The Notes bear interest at the rate of 10.625% per annum payable semi-annually on each June 30 and December 31 commencing on June 30, 1997. The Notes are redeemable at the option of the Company on or after December 31, 2001. From and after December 31, 2001, the Notes will be subject to redemption at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, at various redemption prices, declining from 105.313% of the principal amount to par on and after December 31, 2003. Upon a “Change of Control” (as defined in the Indenture), each Note holder has the right to require the Company to repurchase such holder’s Notes at a purchase price of 101% of the principal amount plus accrued interest. The Indenture contains certain affirmative and negative covenants and restrictions. As of December 31, 2001, the Company was in compliance with the various covenants of the Indenture.
 
    The Company intends to fund future working capital, capital expenditures and debt service requirements through cash flows generated from operations and borrowings through its Revolving Credit Facility. Management believes that cash generated from operations, together with borrowings available under the Revolving Credit Facility, will be sufficient to meet the Company’s working capital and capital expenditure needs in the foreseeable future. The Company may consider other options available to it in connection with funding future working capital and capital expenditure needs, including the issuance of additional debt and equity securities.
 
    The Company and/or affiliates of the Company, including entities related to Cypress may, from time to time, depending on market conditions, purchase the Senior Subordinated Notes previously issued by the Company in the open market or by other means.
 
    The Company will continue to selectively pursue strategic acquisitions, such as the acquisitions of AMTROL ALFA and AMTROL NOVA. The Company believes that strategic acquisitions, both domestic and international, provide an effective means of increasing or establishing a market presence in targeted markets and a means of identifying and introducing new products and technologies in markets where it already has a strong presence. The Company also believes that establishing local manufacturing and distribution facilities in international markets significantly enhances its ability to build strong customer relationships, understand local product preferences and be price competitive.
 
    The Company believes that anticipated inflation rates will not have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or financial condition. However, there can be no assurance that sharply increasing raw material or fuel costs will not adversely affect the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
 
    In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. SFAS No. 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated retirement costs. SFAS No. 143 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a

19


Table of Contents

    reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. SFAS No. 143 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002 with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact, if any, of adopting SFAS No. 143 on its consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 7A.     QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES OF MARKET RISK

    The Company is exposed to market risk related to foreign currency exchange rates and changes in interest rates, but the impact on 2001 operating results was not material and the expected impact on 2002 operating results is not anticipated to be material. The Company did not use any material financial or other derivative instruments to hedge its foreign currency exposures, which relate primarily to its operations in Portugal and Germany. A significant portion of revenues from the Company’s Portuguese and German operations were denominated in Euros, and when translated into U.S. dollars, can result in higher or lower earnings due to currency fluctuations. Similarly, a significant portion of revenues from the Company’s Polish operations are denominated in Zlotys which, when translated into U.S. dollars, can cause an increase or decrease in earnings from currency fluctuations. For these operations, management believes a hypothetical 10% fluctuation in the exchange rate between these foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar would not have a material impact on expected 2002 net income. The Company believes that its cash flow exposure resulting from its net foreign-currency-denominated asset positions in Portugal, Germany and Poland is not material.
 
    The Company has one derivative contract consisting of an interest rate swap contract and an interest rate cap (the “Contract”) outstanding as of December 31, 2001, with an initial notional amount of $15 million, decreasing on a consistent basis with repayment terms of the underlying debt. Under this arrangement, which will mature on June 30, 2004, the Company receives the 90-day LIBOR rate and pays a fixed rate of 5.85% for the period from January 1, 2001 through maturity, unless LIBOR increases to 7.1%. If LIBOR increases to 7.1%, then the Company continues to receive the 90-day LIBOR rate but now pays the 90-day LIBOR rate for all subsequent periods capped at a maximum of 7.1%. The LIBOR rate has not exceeded 7.1% since inception of the Contract and it was treated, prior to adoption of SFAS No. 133, as a hedge agreement and accounted for as such. The Contract was designated as a cash flow hedge of variable future cash flows associated with the interest on the previous Bank Credit Agreement, Tranche B Long Term Debt, through May 13, 2004 (the maturity date of the debt). However, the swap was redesignated to the Term Loans A and B upon entering into the Foothill Agreement.
 
    The following sensitivity analysis summarizes the potential impact on AMTROL of additional interest expense resulting from a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in the interest rate indices upon which AMTROL’s floating rate debt instruments are based (000):

20


Table of Contents

                         
    Y/E 2001                
    Exposure   Hypothetical   Effect on
Variable   to Interest   Change in   Amtrol
Rate Debt   Rate Risk   Rate Index   Interest

 
 
 
Revolver
  $ 5,435     100 bps   $ 54  
Term Loan A
    10,242     100 bps     102  
Term Loan B
    7,500     100 bps     75  
 
   
   
   
 
 
  $ 23,177     100 bps   $ 231  
 
   
   
   
 

    The Company believes that the potential effects of a hypothetical 100-basis point increase in its floating rate debt instruments are not material to cash flows, net income or EBITDA.
 
    The Company’s Term Loan C and Senior Subordinated Notes are not subject to interest rate risk since the rate of interest on these securities is fixed until their respective maturities.

ITEM 8.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

             The index to financial statements is included on page 28 of this report.

ITEM 9.     CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
                    FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

             None.

21


Table of Contents

PART III

ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The following table sets forth certain information regarding each of the directors and executive officers of the Company:

             
Name   Age   Position

 
 
Albert D. Indelicato     51     President, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Larry T. Guillemette     46     Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Joseph L. DePaula     47     Vice President-Finance &
Corporate Controller
Patricia A. Pickrel     51     Secretary
John P. Cashman     61     Director
Andrew M. Massimilla     60     Director
David P. Spalding     47     Director
James A. Stern     51     Director
Anthony D. Tutrone (1)     37     Director


(1)   Resigned effective February 22, 2002.

Albert D. Indelicato became President, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer in June 2000. Previously, Mr. Indelicato served as President and Chief Executive Officer since joining the Company in July 1998. From 1996 to 1998, he was President of Litorale Holdings, Inc., a consulting firm specializing in acquisitions. From 1970 to 1996, Mr. Indelicato served in various managerial capacities of Power Control Technologies and its predecessor companies, including most recently as Chief Executive Officer and Director.

Larry T. Guillemette became Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in August 2000. Previously, Mr. Guillemette served as Executive Vice President-Marketing and Business Development since joining the Company in 1998. From 1991 to 1998, Mr. Guillemette was President and Chief Executive Officer of Balcrank Products, Inc.

Joseph L. DePaula became Vice President-Finance & Corporate Controller in April 2001. For the previous five-year period thereto, Mr. DePaula served as Chief Financial Officer of Semi-Alloys Co.

22


Table of Contents

Patricia A. Pickrel, Secretary and General Counsel, joined the Company as General Counsel in 1998 and became Secretary in 1999. Previously, Ms. Pickrel was engaged in the private practice of law.

John P. (“Jack”) Cashman became a Director upon the Merger in November, 1996. In addition, Mr. Cashman served as Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President upon the Merger until Mr. Indelicato joined the Company in July 1998. From 1989 until March 1996, Mr. Cashman served as Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer of R. P. Scherer Corporation.

Andrew M. Massimilla became a Director of the Company in June 1998. Mr. Massimilla has been the sole proprietor of a consulting firm providing management consulting services to various businesses since 1991.

David P. Spalding became a Director of the Company upon the Merger. Mr. Spalding has been Vice Chairman of Cypress since its formation in April 1994. Prior to joining Cypress, Mr. Spalding was Managing Director in the Merchant Banking Group of Lehman Brothers Inc. since February 1991. Mr. Spalding is also a director of Lear Corporation, William Scotsman, Inc., and Frank’s Nursery & Craft, Inc.

James A. Stern became a Director of the Company upon the Merger. Mr. Stern has been Chairman of Cypress since its formation in April 1994. Prior to joining Cypress, Mr. Stern spent his entire career with Lehman Brothers Inc., most recently as head of the Merchant Banking Group. Mr. Stern is a director of Lear Corporation, Cinemark USA, Inc, Wesco International Inc. and Frank’s Nursery & Craft, Inc.

Anthony D. Tutrone became a Director of the Company upon the Merger. Mr. Tutrone, who resigned effective February 22, 2002, was a managing director of Cypress and was a member of the firm since its formation in April 1994. Prior to joining Cypress, Mr. Tutrone was a member of the Merchant Banking Group of Lehman Brothers, Inc. Mr. Tutrone was also a director of Wesco International Inc. and Danka Business Systems PLC.

23


Table of Contents

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Not applicable

ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table summarizes the compensation paid or accrued by the Company to its Chief Executive Officer and the four other most highly compensated executive officers who earned more than $100,000 in salary and bonus in 2001 in each case for services rendered in all capacities to the Company during the three year period ended December 31, 2001:

Summary Compensation Table

                                         
            Annual                
           
  Long Term        
            Compensation (a) (f)   Compensation        
           
  Awards        
                            Securities        
                            Underlying   All Other
Name and Principal Position   Year   Salary (b)   Bonus   Options/SARs   Compensation (c)

 
 
 
 
 
Albert D. Indelicato (e)
    2001     $ 353,850     $           $ 9,120  
Chairman, President and
    2000       350,000                   10,424  
Chief Executive Officer
    1999       300,000       300,000       30,500 (d)     8,317  
Larry T. Guillemette (e)
    2001       185,000                   9,911  
Executive Vice President,
    2000       185,000                   9,878  
Chief Financial Officer
    1999       159,885       131,100       11,000 (d)     134,610  
and Treasurer
                                       
Christopher A. Laus (e)
    2001       152,250                   7,390  
Vice President — Operations
    2000       152,150                   9,820  
      1999       140,000       110,700       5,000 (d)     60,366  
Robert R. Pape (e)
    2001       155,485                   8,010  
Vice President -
    2000       127,413                   1,868  
Sales & Marketing
    1999                          
Joseph L. DePaula (e)
    2001       124,231                   2,853  
Vice President — Finance
    2000                          
and Corporate Controller
    1999                          

24


Table of Contents


(a)   Any perquisites or other personal benefits received from the Company by any of the named executives were substantially less than the reporting thresholds established by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the lesser of $50,000 or 10% of the individual’s cash compensation).
(b)   Includes portion of salary deferred under the Company’s 401(k) Plan.
(c)   Amounts paid in 2001 include the Company’s contributions under the Company’s 401(k) Plan in the amount of $7,107, $8,621, $6,325, $6,986 and $1,667 for Messrs. Indelicato, Guillemette, Laus, Pape, and DePaula, respectively, and premiums paid by the Company with respect to term life and long-term disability insurance purchased for such executive officers in the amount of $2,013, $1,290, $1,065, $1,024 and $1,186 for Messrs. Indelicato, Guillemette, Laus, Pape and DePaula, respectively.
(d)   These are non-qualified options to purchase common stock of Holdings, the parent corporation of the Company. One half of such options are time based and were fully vested on December 31, 2001. The remaining half of such options are performance based and vest based upon annual and cumulative performance.
(e)   Mr. Indelicato, Mr. Guillemette, Mr. Laus, Mr. Pape and Mr. DePaula joined the Company in July 1998, September 1998, September 1998, January 2000 and April 2001, respectively.
(f)   Mr. Thomas Sturiale, a former officer of the Company, would have been listed in this table had he not resigned. Mr. Sturiale’s 1999, 2000 and 2001 salary and other compensation totaled $175,385 and $168,785, $200,000 and $3,345 and $200,000 and $3,658, respectively.

Option Plans

The following table sets forth certain information regarding currently outstanding options held by the directors and named executive officers as of December 31, 2001.

Aggregated Option/SAR Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Year-End Option/SAR Values

                                 
                    Number of        
                    Securities        
                    Underlying        
                    Unexercised        
    Number of           Option/SARs at        
    Securities           Calendar Year   Value of
    Underlying           End 2001   Unexercised
    Options/SARs           Exercisable/   In-the-Money
Name   Exercised   Value Realized($)   Unexercisable   Options/SAR($)

 
 
 
 
John P. Cashman
    0       0       44,796/0       0/0  
Albert D. Indelicato
    0       0       15,250/15,250       0/0  
Larry T. Guillemette
    0       0       5,500/5,500       0/0  
Andrew M. Massimilla
    0       0       10,520/10,519       0/0  
Robert R. Pape
    0       0       1,500/1,500       0/0  

25


Table of Contents

Supplemental Retirement Plans

    The Company maintains two Supplemental Retirement Plans: Supplemental Retirement Plan I which covers a former officer and director and Supplemental Retirement Plan II which covers three former officers. In the event a participant in either Supplemental Plan dies after retirement, the participant’s beneficiary will receive any remaining benefits which such participant was entitled to receive at the time of the participant’s death.

Employment Agreements and Other Transactions

    The Company has entered into an employment agreement (“Employment Agreement”) with Mr. Indelicato to secure his continued employment with the Company. The Employment Agreement provides for an annual base salary, subject to annual adjustments. In addition, Mr. Indelicato is entitled to participate in incentive compensation plans and all employee benefit arrangements generally appropriate to his responsibilities. In the event Mr. Indelicato’s employment is terminated without cause by the Company, he would be entitled (for a period of 18 months after termination) to continuation of monthly salary, including the pro rata portion of any bonus or other incentive compensation otherwise payable for the fiscal period in which such termination occurs, and maintenance of all life, disability, medical and health insurance benefits to which Mr. Indelicato was entitled immediately prior to termination.
 
    On April 18, 2001, the Company and Mr. Thomas Sturiale entered into an Employment Termination Agreement. Under the terms of the Employment Termination Agreement, Mr. Sturiale continued to receive his base salary of $200,000 through December 31, 2001, and the Company repurchased all outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock held by Mr. Sturiale. The Employment Termination Agreement also includes a non-solicitation/non-compete covenant for the period beginning December 31, 2001 through December 31, 2002.
 
    During calendar 2000, the Company and Mr. Edward J. Cooney entered into a Separation Agreement. Under the terms of the Separation Agreement, Mr. Cooney continued to receive his base salary and was subject to a non-solicitation/non-compete covenant through September 30, 2001.

ITEM 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

    The Company is a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings. The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of Holdings common stock or preferred stock as of March 15 by (i) each person known to the Company to beneficially own more than 5% of Holdings’ outstanding common stock, (ii) each of the Company’s directors and named executive officers and (iii) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. Each share of Holdings preferred stock is convertible at any time into one share of Holdings common stock. Unless otherwise indicated below, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares beneficially owned.

26


Table of Contents

                                 
    Common Stock   Preferred Stock
   
 
    Number   Percentage   Number of   Percentage
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner   of Shares   of Total   Shares   of Total

 
 
 
 
Cypress Merchant Banking Partners L.P.(a)(c)
    847,127       79.9       95,076       93.0  
c/o The Cypress Group L.L.C.
                               
65 East 55th Street, 28th Floor
                               
New York, NY 10022
                               
Cypress Offshore Partners L.P.(a)(c)
    43,873       4.1       4,924       4.8  
c/o The Cypress Group L.L.C.
                               
65 East 55th Street, 28th Floor
                               
New York, NY 10022
                               
John P. Cashman(b)
    62,032       5.8       2,235       2.2  
Larry T. Guillemette(b)
    12,000       1.1              
Albert D. Indelicato(b)
    33,750       3.2              
Andrew M. Massimilla(b)
    21,039       2.1              
Robert R. Pape(b)
    3,000       0.3              
Christopher A. Laus
    6,050       0.6              
Joseph L. DePaula
                       
David P. Spalding(a)
                       
James A. Stern(a)
                       
Anthony D. Tutrone
                       
All directors and executive officers as a group (consisting of 11 persons)
    138,871       13.1       2,235       2.2  


(a)   Cypress Merchant Banking Partners L.P. and Cypress Offshore Partners L.P. are affiliates of The Cypress Group L.L.C. Messrs. Spalding and Stern are executives of The Cypress Group L.L.C. and may be deemed to share beneficial ownership of the shares shown as beneficially owned by such Cypress entities. Each of such individuals disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares. See Item 10, “Directors and Executive Officers of the Company.”
(b)   Includes 44,796, 11,000, 30,500, 21,039, and 3,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options granted to Messrs. Cashman, Guillemette, Indelicato, Massimilla, and Pape, respectively. See Item 11, “Executive Compensation”.
(c)   Includes 57,046 and 2,954 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants granted to Cypress Merchant Banking Partners, L.P. and Cypress Offshore Partners, L.P.

ITEM 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

    A director of the Company, Mr. Massimilla, provides management consulting services to the Company for which he is paid by the Cypress Group L.L.C. The Company reimburses Cypress for its payments to Mr. Massimilla. During 2001, the amount of such payments was $91,410.

27


Table of Contents

PART IV

ITEM 14.    EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) (1) Financial Statements

    The following financial statements are included in a separate section of this Report commencing on the page numbers specified below:

         
    Page
Report of Independent Public Accountants     29  
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 2001     30  
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001     31  
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001     32  
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001     33  
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements     34  

(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedule

         
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001.     48  

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable, and therefore have been omitted.

(a) (3) Exhibits

    See List of Exhibits, Page 49.

(b) Reports filed on Form 8-K

    No reports were filed on Form 8-K for the period.

28


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Public Accountants

To AMTROL Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AMTROL Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AMTROL Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. The financial statement schedule listed in item 14(a)(2) is the responsibility of the Company’s management and is presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and is not part of the basic financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in our audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly states in all material respects, the financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.

  s/s Arthur Andersen LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

March 1, 2002

29


Table of Contents

AMTROL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands)
Assets

                     
            Year Ended December 31
       
        2000       2001
 
   
     
 
Current Assets:
               
 
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 704     $ 983  
 
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $833 and $1,365 in 2000 and 2001, respectively
    27,591       28,456  
 
Inventories (Note 3)
    20,461       19,785  
 
Tax refund receivable
    1,658       1,623  
 
Deferred income taxes — short-term (Note 6)
    1,031       1,739  
 
Prepaid expenses and other
    980       680  
 
   
     
 
   
Total current assets
    52,425       53,266  
 
   
     
 
Property, Plant and Equipment, at cost
    4,988       4,856  
 
Land Buildings and improvements
    12,651       12,462  
 
Machinery and equipment
    48,604       51,783  
 
Furniture and fixtures
    1,210       1,229  
 
Construction-in-progress and other
    7,304       5,243  
 
   
     
 
 
    74,757       75,573  
 
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
    28,431       34,381  
 
   
     
 
 
    46,326       41,192  
 
   
     
 
Other Assets:
               
 
Goodwill
    161,880       157,292  
 
Deferred financing costs
    4,572       4,233  
 
Deferred income taxes — long-term (Note 6)
    4,755       7,209  
 
Other
    1,146       1,263  
 
   
     
 
 
    172,353       169,997  
 
   
     
 
 
  $ 271,104     $ 264,455  
 
   
     
 

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

                     
Current Liabilities:
               
 
Current maturities of long-term debt (Note 5)
  $ 3,873     $ 2,218  
 
Notes payable to banks
    7,010       7,930  
 
Accounts payable
    23,869       20,949  
 
Accrued expenses
    10,538       10,856  
 
Accrued interest
    741       752  
 
Accrued income taxes
    1,293       1,959  
 
   
     
 
   
Total current liabilities
    47,324       44,664  
 
   
     
 
Other Noncurrent Liabilities
    4,439       4,061  
Long-Term Debt, less current maturities (Note 5)
    159,469       157,511  
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 9)
           
Shareholders’ Equity (Note 10)
Capital stock $.01 par value — authorized
1,000 shares, 100 shares issued
           
 
Additional paid-in capital
    89,903       99,273  
 
Retained deficit
    (26,649 )     (36,064 )
 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (3,382 )     (4,990 )
 
   
     
 
   
Total shareholders’ equity
    59,872       58,219  
 
   
     
 
 
  $ 271,104     $ 264,455  
 
   
     
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

30


Table of Contents

AMTROL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands)

                           
      Year Ended December 31
     
      1999   2000   2001
 
   
     
     
 
Net sales (Note 1)
  $ 222,053     $ 197,472     $ 182,325  
Cost of goods sold (Note 1)
    164,617       151,483       141,278  
 
   
     
     
 
 
Gross profit
    57,436       45,989       41,047  
Operating expenses:
                       
 
Selling
    11,130       10,991       11,400  
 
General and administrative
    17,362       14,830       16,478  
 
Amortization of goodwill
    4,463       4,463       4,451  
 
   
     
     
 
Income from operations
    24,481       15,705       8,718  
Other income (expense):
                       
 
Interest expense
    (19,224 )     (19,298 )     (19,235 )
 
Interest income
    141       228       134  
 
License and distributorship fees
    234       210       291  
 
Other, net (Note 4)
    353       1,713       95  
 
   
     
     
 
Income (loss) before (benefit) provision for income taxes
    5,985       (1,442 )     (9,997 )
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
    4,125       2,704       (1,026 )
 
   
     
     
 
Income (loss) before extraordinary item
    1,860       (4,146 )     (8,971 )
Extraordinary item, net of tax (Note 2)
                (444 )
 
   
     
     
 
Net income (loss)
  $ 1,860     $ (4,146 )   $ (9,415 )
 
   
     
     
 

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
(In thousands)

                         
      Year Ended December 31
     
    1999   2000   2001
 
   
     
     
 
Net income (loss)
  $ 1,860     $ (4,146 )   $ (9,415 )
Foreign currency translation adjustments
    (2,838 )     (1,032 )     (382 )
Derivative instrument valuation
                (511 )
 
   
     
     
 
Comprehensive loss
  $ (978 )   $ (5,178 )   $ (10,308 )
 
   
     
     
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

31


Table of Contents

AMTROL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
(In thousands)

                                 
                            Accumulated
            Additional           Other
    Capital   Paid-in   Retained   Comprehensive
    Stock   Capital   (Deficit)   Income (Loss)
   
 
 
 
Balance, December 31, 1998
  $     $ 89,823     $ (24,363 )   $ 488  
Capital contribution
          333              
Net income
                1,860        
Currency translation adjustment
                      (2,838 )
 
   
     
     
     
 
Balance, December 31, 1999
          90,156       (22,503 )     (2,350 )
Capital contribution
          310              
Repurchase of options and common stock
            (563 )                    
Net loss
                (4,146 )      
Currency translation adjustment
                      (1,032 )
 
   
     
     
     
 
Balance, December 31, 2000
          89,903       (26,649 )     (3,382 )
Capital contribution
          6,016              
Repurchase of options and common stock
          (93 )            
Net loss
                (9,415 )      
Warrant valuation
          3,447              
Derivative instrument valuation
                      (511 )
Currency translation adjustment
                      (1,097 )
 
   
     
     
     
 
Balance, December 31, 2001
  $     $ 99,273     $ (36,064 )   $ (4,990 )
 
   
     
     
     
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

32


Table of Contents

AMTROL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

                                 
            Year Ended December 31,
           
            1999   2000   2001
 
   
     
     
 
Cash Flows Provided by (used in) Operating Activities:
                       
 
Income (loss) before extraordinary item
  $ 1,860     $ (4,146 )   $ (8,971 )
 
(Loss) on extraordinary item
                (444 )
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating
activities -
Depreciation
    8,369       8,297       8,271  
   
Amortization
    5,634       5,708       5,611  
   
Provision for losses on accounts receivable
          13       628  
   
Loss (gain) on sale of fixed assets
    107       (1,180 )     12  
 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                       
   
Accounts receivable, net
    (3,213 )     2,210       (2,330 )
   
Tax refund receivable
    14       (888 )     (52
   
Inventory
    492       1,222       238  
   
Deferred income taxes — short-term
    881       359       (708 )
   
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    1,400       (80 )     289  
   
Other assets
    (567 )     (936 )     (738 )
   
Accounts payable
    3,009       2,024       (2,224 )
   
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
    2,263       (6,579 )     1,014  
   
Other noncurrent liabilities
    (1,643 )     (1,105 )     (859 )
   
Deferred income taxes — long-term
    3,113       337       (2,454 )
 
   
     
     
 
       
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
    21,719       5,256       (2,717 )
 
   
     
     
 
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities:
                       
 
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
    895       2,278       70  
 
Capital expenditures
    (5,798 )     (8,375 )     (4,199 )
 
   
     
     
 
       
Net cash used in investing activities
    (4,903 )     (6,097 )     (4,129 )
 
   
     
     
 
Cash Flows Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities:
                       
 
Repayment of long term debt
    (25,074 )     (21,496 )     (37,662 )
 
Issuance of long term debt
    16,800       18,700       42,550  
 
Repayment of short term debt
    (17,988 )     (19,528 )     (29,156 )
 
Issuance of short term debt
    8,790       23,454       29,444  
 
Extinguishment of senior credit facility (Note 5)
                (52,836 )
 
Issuance of new senior debt and warrants (Note 5)
                48,876  
 
Capital contribution
    333       310       6,016  
 
Repurchase of options and common stock
          (563 )     (93 )
 
   
     
     
 
     
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    (17,139 )     877       7,139  
 
   
     
     
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (323 )     36       293  
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
    (91 )     (6 )     (14 )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    1,088       674       704  
 
   
     
     
 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 674     $ 704     $ 983  
 
   
     
     
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

33


Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)    Basis of Presentation

    AMTROL Inc., a Rhode Island corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively referred to herein as the “Company”), designs, manufactures and markets products used principally in flow control, storage, heating and other treatment of fluids in the water systems market and selected sectors of the heating, ventilating and air conditioning (“HVAC”) market. The Company offers a broad product line of quality fluid handling products and services marketed under widely recognized brand names.
 
    The Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AMTROL Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”), a Delaware corporation formed by The Cypress Group, L.L.C. in 1996 to effect the acquisition of all of the outstanding common stock of the Company. Holdings has no other material assets, liabilities or operations other than those that result from its ownership of the common stock of the Company.

(2)     Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

    Principles of Consolidation
 
    The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
    Use of Estimates
 
    The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
    Fiscal year
 
    The Company uses a calendar fiscal year and three quarterly interim periods ending on Saturday of the thirteenth week of the quarter.
 
    Revenue Recognition
 
    The Company adopted Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, as of January 1, 2001. In accordance with SAB No. 101, the Company recognizes revenue only when there is a valid contract or purchase order, which includes a fixed price; the goods have been delivered in accordance with the shipping terms; and there is an expectation that the collection of the revenue is reasonably assured. The cumulative effect of this adoption had no net effect on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
 
    The Company generally recognizes revenue upon shipment of its products to customers. The Company has reclassed shipping/handling fees and costs to revenue consistent with the presentation required by Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 00-10. An amount of $9.9 million was restated for the twelve months ended December 31, 1999.

34


Table of Contents

(2)    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

    Volume Rebates
 
    The Company adopted EITF 00-22, Accounting for “Points” and Certain Other Time-Based or Volume-Based Sales Incentive Offers, and Offers for Free Products or Services to Be Delivered in the Future, as of January, 2001. EITF 00-22 requires the Company to recognize volume rebate program obligations as a reduction of revenue based on a systematic and rational allocation of the cost of honoring rebates earned and claimed by each customer. The Company historically has recorded an accrual for volume rebates and the cost in the program is recorded against revenue. Accordingly, there was no impact to the Company in adopting EITF 00-22.
 
    Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
    Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and short-term investments that are readily convertible into cash with an original maturity to the Company of three months or less.
 
    Depreciable Property and Equipment
 
    Property, plant, and equipment are stated on the basis of cost. The Company provides for depreciation by charges to income (computed on the straight-line method) in amounts estimated to depreciate the cost of properties over their estimated useful lives which generally fall within the following ranges:

         
Building and improvements
  10-40 years
Machinery and equipment
  3-12 years
Furniture and fixtures
  5-20 years
Other
  3-10 years

    Leasehold improvements are amortized over the life of the lease or the estimated useful life of the improvement, whichever is shorter.
 
    Interest costs, during the construction period, on borrowings used to finance construction of buildings and related property are included in the cost of the constructed property. As of December 31, 2001, the Company had no capitalized interest.
 
    Inventories
 
    The Company’s inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market including material, labor and manufacturing overhead (see Note 3).
 
    Goodwill
 
    The excess of purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired is allocated to goodwill and is included in other assets. Goodwill is being amortized over 40 years. The Company accounts for long-lived and intangible assets in accordance with Statement of Financing Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of. The Company continually reviews its intangible assets for events or changes in circumstances which might indicate

35


Table of Contents

    the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. The Company assesses the recoverability of the assets by determining whether the amortization of such intangibles over their remaining lives can be recovered through projected undiscounted future cash flows. The amount of impairment, if any, is measured based on the fair value of the impaired asset. At December 31, 2001, no such impairment of assets was indicated.

(2)    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

    Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
    In accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments, the Company has determined the estimated fair value of its financial instruments using appropriate market information and valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required to develop the estimates of fair value; thus, the estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current market exchange. The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, senior subordinated notes and bank debt. Based upon information provided by an independent financial advisor, the Company believes that the fair value of the notes is approximately $60 to $65 of a par value of $100. The carrying value of the remaining assets and liabilities is a reasonable estimate of their fair market value at December 31, 2001.
 
    Research and Development Expenses
 
    All costs for research and development, which amounted to approximately $1.1 million, $1.0 million, and $0.8 million for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000, and 2001, respectively, are charged to general and administrative expenses as incurred.
 
    Deferred Financing Costs
 
    Deferred financing costs are stated at cost as a component of other assets and amortized over the life of the related debt using the effective interest method. Amortization of deferred financing costs is included in interest expense.
 
    As a result of the Company’s refinancing its senior debt, $0.4 million, net of tax, was written off and recorded as a loss on extraordinary item in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
 
    Accrued Expenses
 
    Certain customers are allowed a rebate if agreed upon sales targets are achieved for a given year. At December 31, 2000 and 2001, the Company had accrued $3.6 million and $3.8 million, respectively, for such volume allowances. These amounts are included in accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
 
    Foreign Currency Translation
 
    Assets and liabilities of non-U.S. operations have been translated into United States dollars using the year-end rate of exchange. Shareholders’ equity has been converted using historical rates, and revenues and expenses at the average exchange rates prevailing during the year. The cumulative effect of the resulting translation was reflected as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.

36


Table of Contents

(2)   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
 

    Stock Options
 
    The Company accounts for employee stock options in accordance with SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation. As permitted under SFAS No. 123, the Company applies Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees to account for its stock option plans.
 
    Reclassifications
 
    Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.
 
    Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
 
    Effective January 1, 2001, the Company adopted SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, SFAS No. 137, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 133 — an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities — an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (collectively SFAS No. 133 as amended). SFAS No. 133 as amended is required to be adopted no later than the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning on or after June 15, 2000. These standards were adopted as a change in accounting principle and do not apply retroactively to financial statements of prior periods.
 
    The Company has one derivative contract consisting of an interest rate swap contract and an interest rate cap (the “Contract”) outstanding as of December 31, 2001, with an initial notional amount of $15 million. Under this arrangement, which will mature on June 30, 2004, the Company receives the 90-day LIBOR rate and pays a fixed rate of 5.85% for the period from January 1, 2001 through maturity, unless LIBOR increases to 7.1%. If LIBOR increases to 7.1%, then the Company continues to receive the 90-day LIBOR rate but now pays the 90-day LIBOR rate for all subsequent periods capped at a maximum of 7.1%. The LIBOR rate has not exceeded 7.1% since inception of the Contract and it was treated, prior to adoption of SFAS No. 133, as a hedge agreement and accounted for as such. The Contract was redesignated as a cash flow hedge of variable future cash flows associated with the Foothill Agreement Term Loan A and B Debt.
 
    As of December 31, 2001, the fair value of the instrument ($0.5 million) was recorded in other non-current liabilities with a corresponding entry to accumulated other comprehensive loss. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the swap will be recorded through accumulated other comprehensive loss (except for changes related to ineffectiveness, which will be recorded currently through net income). The Company did not realize any material ineffectiveness during 2001 and does not currently anticipate any material ineffectiveness under the hedge for 2002.
 
    Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
    In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. This statement supersedes SFAS Statement No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived

37


Table of Contents

    Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed of, and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations — Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions. This statement provides for use of one accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, whether previously held and used or newly acquired, and broadens the presentation of discontinued operations to include more disposal transactions. The provisions of this statement are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating what the impact of adopting SFAS No. 144 may have and has not yet determined the effect, if any, on its results of operations or financial condition.
 
    In July 2001, the FASB released SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 141 requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001. SFAS No. 142 changes the accounting for goodwill from an amortization method to an impairment-only approach. As a result of SFAS No. 142, amortization of goodwill to earnings will cease and instead, the carrying value of goodwill will be evaluated for impairment on at least an annual basis. Impairment charges, if any, associated with the initial adoption will be retroactively recorded as cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle during 2002. The Company will comply with SFAS No. 141 for any future business combinations and will adopt SFAS No. 142 effective January 1, 2002. The Company is evaluating the impact of adoption of SFAS No. 142 and has not yet determined whether any impairment loss will be required to be recorded in its consolidated financial statements in 2002. Amortization of goodwill for the periods ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001 was $4.5 million, $4.5 million and $4.5 million, respectively.
 
    In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. SFAS No. 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated retirement costs. SFAS No. 143 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. SFAS No. 143 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002 with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact, if any, of adopting SFAS No. 143 on its consolidated financial statements.

(3)    Inventories

    Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market and consist of the following at December 31 (in thousands):

                 
    2000   2001
 
   
     
 
Raw materials and work in process
  $ 10,322     $ 11,120  
Finished goods
    10,139       8,665  
 
   
     
 
 
  $ 20,461     $ 19,785  
 
   
     
 

38


Table of Contents

(4)    Sale of Property

    On December 18, 2000, the Company sold a parcel of land totaling 11.5 acres adjacent to the Company’s headquarters in West Warwick, Rhode Island. The gross sale price of $2.1 million resulted in the Company recording a net book pre-tax gain of $1.1 million. The net book pre-tax gain was not included in the calculation of EBITDA for purposes of covenant compliance, consistent with the provisions of the previous credit agreement.

(5)    Long-term Debt and Notes Payable to Banks

    Revolving Credit and Term Loans — New Financing
 
    The Company, on December 26, 2001 completed a refinancing of its senior secured credit facility. In its place, the Company entered into two new credit facilities: a $42.5 million senior first-priority secured credit facility arranged by Foothill Capital Corporation (the “Foothill Facility”) and a $25.0 million senior second-priority secured credit facility with affiliates of The Cypress Group L.L.C. (the “Cypress Facility”). Proceeds from the refinancing were used to repay in full AMTROL’s existing credit facility and to pay fees and expenses related to the refinancing.
 
    The Foothill Facility consists of senior term loans (the “Term Loans”) and a revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). A portion ($10.2 million) of the Term Loans (the “Term Loan A”) is the lower of (a) $10.5 million and (b) the sum of (i) 80% of the net liquidation percentage of eligible equipment located in North America and (ii) 60% of the fair market value of real property located in North America. $7.5 million of the term loans (the “Term Loan B”) was also created. The Revolving Credit Facility is secured by North American accounts receivable and inventories. Aggregate borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are limited to the lesser of (a) $35.0 million less the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Term Loan A less letter of credit usage, and (b) the borrowing base less letter of credit usage. At December 31, 2001, total availability and aggregate borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility were $11.8 million and $5.4 million, respectively.
 
    Term Loan A has a five-year maturity with quarterly principal payments of $426,757 commencing April 1, 2002. The outstanding unpaid principal shall be due and payable on the date of termination of the Agreement, whether by its terms, by prepayment, or by acceleration and bears interest at LIBOR plus 3.5%. Term Loan B has a three-year maturity with quarterly principal payments of $312,500 commencing April 1, 2002. The outstanding unpaid principal shall be due and payable on the date of termination of the Agreement, whether by its terms, by prepayment, or by acceleration and bears interest at the greater of the Well Fargo Reference Rate (approximates the prime rate) plus 3.5% and 9.25%. The Revolving Credit Facility has a five-year maturity. Amounts borrowed under the Revolving Credit Facility may be repaid and reborrowed at any time during the term of the Agreement and bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.5% for LIBOR based borrowings and the Wells Fargo Reference Rate plus 0.5% for non-LIBOR based borrowings. The Agreement contains certain affirmative and negative covenants and restrictions. As of December 31, 2001, the Company was in compliance with the various covenants of the Agreement.
 
    The Cypress Facility consists of a single $25.0 million term loan (the “Term Loan C”). Term Loan C has a five-year maturity and bears Pay-In-Kind (PIK) interest fixed at 12% per annum paid quarterly, which at the lenders option can be paid in common stock of the Company. In connection with the Cypress credit facility, Amtrol Holdings, Inc., which

39


Table of Contents

    wholly owns Amtrol, has issued the lenders under the Cypress Facility 60,000 warrants to purchase approximately 5.2% of its common stock on a fully diluted basis. The 60,000 warrants, which have an exercise price of $.01, were valued at $3.4 million using the Black-Scholes model. This amount was recorded as an offset to the Term Loan C debt and included in the Company’s equity section. The Company expects that the effective interest rate associated with Term Loan C will be greater than 12% given the additional interest expense associated with the warrants. The Cypress Agreement contains certain affirmative and negative covenants and restrictions. As of December 31, 2001, the Company was in compliance with the various covenants of the Cypress Agreement. Long-term debt consisted of the following at December 31, (in thousands):

                 
    2000   2001
 
   
     
 
Revolving Credit Facility
  $     $ 5,435  
Tranche A Term Loan
    4,394        
Tranche B Term Loan
    43,318        
Term Loan A
          10,241  
Term Loan B
          7,500  
Term Loan C
          21,553  
Senior subordinated notes, due 2006, 10.625%
    115,000       115,000  
Other
    630        
 
   
     
 
 
    163,342       159,729  
Less: Current maturities of long-term debt
    3,873       2,218  
 
   
     
 
 
  $ 159,469     $ 157,511  
 
   
     
 

    Long-term debt repayable in each of the next five years is as follows (in thousands):

         
2003
    $2,957  
2004
    7,020  
2005
    1,707  
2006
    145,827  
2007
  0  
 
   
 
 
  $ 157,511  
 
   
 

    Revolving Credit and Term Loans — Previous Financing
 
    The Company was party to a Bank Credit Agreement dated as of November 13, 1996 (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”), which provided for secured borrowings from a syndicate of lenders. The Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement were guaranteed by AMTROL Holdings Inc. and each direct and indirect domestic subsidiary of the Company. The Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement were secured by substantially all assets of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement was amended on several occasions, most recently on March 30, 2001 (the “March 30

40


Table of Contents

    Amendment”). The March 30 Amendment modified certain covenants and provided for a capital contribution to the Company and purchase of shares by Cypress Merchant Banking Partners L.P. and/or its affiliates (“Cypress”) if necessary to ensure compliance with the financial covenant terms of the Credit Agreement. In addition, on November 13, 2001 the Company entered into a Waiver and Consent to Credit Agreement and Capital Contribution Agreement (the “Waiver”).
 
    Under the Credit Agreement, a portion of the term loans were bearing an interest rate of LIBOR plus 350 basis points (the “Tranche A Term Loans”) and were to mature on May 13, 2002, with quarterly amortization payments during the term of the loans. The weighted average interest rate on the Tranche A loans for the approximate 12 months ended December 31, 2001 period was 7.56 percent. The Credit Agreement provided for a Credit Facility, with an available amount up to $15 million for working capital needs, which would have matured on May 13, 2002. The remainder of the Term Loans were bearing an interest rate of LIBOR plus 400 basis points (the “Tranche B Term Loans”) which would have matured on May 13, 2004, with nominal quarterly amortization prior to the maturity of the Tranche A Term Loans and with the remaining amounts amortizing on a quarterly basis thereafter. The weighted average interest rate on the Tranche B loans for the approximate 12 month period ended December 31, 2001 was 8.06 percent.
 
    Senior Subordinated Notes
 
    The Company issued $115.0 million of Senior Subordinated Notes due 2006 (the “Notes”). The Notes are unsecured obligations of the Company. The Notes bear interest at a rate of 10.625% per annum which is payable semi-annually on each June 30 and December 31 commencing on June 30, 1997. The Notes are redeemable at the option of the Company on or after December 31, 2001. The Notes will be subject to redemption, in whole or in part, at various redemption prices, declining from 105.313% of the principal amount to par on and after December 31, 2003. Upon a “Change of Control” (as defined in the Indenture), each Note holder has the right to require the Company to repurchase such holder’s Notes at a purchase price of 101% of the principal amount plus accrued interest. The Indenture contains certain affirmative and negative covenants and restrictions. As of December 31, 2001, the Company was in compliance with the various covenants of the Notes.
 
    The Company and/or affiliates of the Company, including entities related to Cypress may, from time to time, purchase the Notes previously issued by the Company in the open market or by other means.
 
    Short-Term Debt
 
    AMTROL ALFA has available revolving credit facilities with local banks providing for short-term working capital loans of up to the equivalent of approximately $9.0 million. Borrowings under these agreements accrue interest at LISBOR plus a premium ranging from 0.725% to 1.00%. The balance outstanding at December 31, 2001 was approximately $6.4 million. The highest amount outstanding under these facilities in 2001 was approximately $8.8 million.

41


Table of Contents

    AMTROL NOVA has available revolving credit facilities with local banks providing for short-term working capital loans of up to the equivalent of approximately $1.9 million. Borrowings under the agreement accrue interest at prevailing market rates which averaged approximately 8.25% during the period ended December 31, 2001. The balance outstanding at December 31, 2001 was approximately $1.5 million. The highest amount outstanding under the facility in 2001 was approximately $1.6 million.
 
    Cash paid for interest amounted to approximately $18.1 million, $18.1 million, and $18.7 million for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively.

(6)    Income Taxes

    The components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes are as follows (in thousands):

                           
      Year Ended December 31,
     
      1999   2000   2001
 
 
   
     
     
 
Current:
                       
 
Federal
  $ 60     $ 48     $  
 
State
          8       50  
 
Foreign
    1,000       1,861       1,751  
 
 
   
     
     
 
 
    1,060       1,917       1,801  
Deferred:
                       
 
Federal
    2,581       704       (2,151 )
 
State
    484       83       (435 )
 
Foreign
                (241 )
 
 
   
     
     
 
 
    3,065       787       (2,827 )
 
 
   
     
     
 
 
  $ 4,125     $ 2,704     $ (1,026 )
 
 
   
     
     
 

    The income tax rate reconciliation of the difference between actual and statutory effective tax rates is as follows:

42


Table of Contents

                         
    Year Ended December 31,
   
    1999   2000   2001
 
   
     
     
 
Provision (Benefit)for income taxes at the Federal statutory rate
  $ 2,036     $ (490 )   $ (3,398 )
State taxes, net of Federal tax effect
    239       (58 )     (254 )
Goodwill amortization not deductible for tax purposes
    1,517       1,517       1,512  
Foreign losses not benefited
    178       762       1,044  
Foreign taxes
    (74 )     870       302  
Other, net
    229       103       (232 )
 
   
     
     
 
Recorded (benefit) provision
  $ 4,125     $ 2,704     $ (1,026 )
 
   
     
     
 

43


Table of Contents

    Significant items giving rise to deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2000 and 2001 are as follows (in thousands):

                   
      2000   2001
 
   
     
 
Deferred Income Taxes short-term
                 
      Warranty reserves — current
  $ 78     $ 136  
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts
    131       154  
 
Plant closing reserve
    127        
 
Accrued vacation
    73       61  
 
UNICAP adjustment
    218       234  
 
Accrued management restructuring
    348        
 
Other
    56       1,154  
 
   
     
 
 
  $ 1,031     $ 1,739  
 
   
     
 
                   
      2000   2001
 
   
     
 
Deferred Income Taxes long-term
       
      Net operating loss carryforward
  $ 6,397     $ 10,821  
 
Accelerated depreciation
    (2,880 )     (2,690 )
 
Warranty reserves — long-term
    899       689  
 
Deferred compensation and restricted stock plan
    611       504  
 
LIFO revaluation
    375        
 
NOL valuation
    (764 )     (2,115 )
 
Other
    117        
 
   
     
 
 
  $ 4,755     $ 7,209  
 
   
     
 

    The net deferred tax assets are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in deferred income taxes-long-term and deferred income taxes-short-term. Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that the full amount of the net deferred tax asset will be realized. However, the amount realizable could be reduced if estimates of future taxable income are reduced. A valuation allowance has been provided for certain foreign net operating loss carryforwards as it is more likely than not that the related deferred tax assets for these carryforwards will not be realizable.
 
    Cash paid for income taxes amounted to $0.3 million, $0.8 million, and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively. At December 31, 2001, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $22.8 million expiring in 2012 through 2018.

(7)    Pension and Profit Sharing Plans

    The Company has a defined contribution 401(k) plan covering substantially all of its domestic employees. Under the Plan, eligible employees are permitted to contribute up to 15% of gross pay, not to exceed the maximum allowed under the Internal Revenue Code. The Company matches each employee contribution up to 6% of gross pay at a rate of $0.25

44


Table of Contents

    per $1 of employee contribution. The Company also contributes 3% of each employee’s gross pay up to the Social Security taxable wage base and 4% of amounts in excess of that level up to approximately $0.2 million of wages. Company contributions to the 401(k) plan totaled approximately $0.8 million, $0.7 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively.

(8)    Lease Commitments

    The Company leases certain plant facilities and equipment. Total rental expenses charged to operations approximated $1.4 million, $1.5 million and $1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively. Minimum rental commitments under all non-cancelable operating leases are as follows (in thousands):

         
2002
  $ 905  
2003
    196  
2004
    154  
2005
    23  
2006
    3  
 
   
 
 
  $ 1,281  
 
   
 

    Certain of the leases provide for renewal options.

(9)    Commitments and Contingencies

    At December 31, 2001, the Foothill Agreement contained a sublimit to support the issuance of letters of credit in the amount of $3.0 million. At December 31, 2001, letters of credit outstanding amounted to $0.7 million.
 
    The Company is involved in various legal proceedings which, in the opinion of management, will not result in a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

(10)   Stock Plans

    The stock option plan includes both time vesting and performance-based vesting options. The options which vest over time are subject to fixed plan accounting under APB 25. Under fixed plan accounting, compensation is measured as the intrinsic value of the option at date of grant. The performance-based plans are accounted for as variable plans under APB 25. Under variable plan accounting, the compensation is measured as the intrinsic value of the actual number of shares that are awarded at the then current fair market value of the stock when the performance conditions are satisfied.
 
    Certain key employees and directors have been granted options to purchase common shares of the Company’s parent, AMTROL Holdings Inc, under the AMTROL Holdings 1997 Incentive Stock Plan. As of December 31, 2001, options to purchase 142,335 shares under the 1997 Plan were outstanding. The outstanding options include 44,796 non-qualified options which are exercisable immediately, provided that purchased shares are subject to repurchase by Holdings at the exercise price until such shares vest under certain circumstances. The remaining 97,539 options are non-qualified options issued in 1999 and 2000, 48,770 of which are exercisable.

45


Table of Contents

    The Company applies APB opinion No. 25 to account for its stock option plans. Accordingly, pursuant to the terms of the AMTROL Holdings 1997 Incentive Stock Plan, no compensation cost related to the issuance of stock options has been recognized in the Company’s financial statements. During 2001, no options were granted under this plan although a portion of previously issued options did vest. If the Company had determined compensation cost for options under the provisions of SFAS No. 123, in 2001, 2000 and 1999, the Company’s net income would have decreased approximately $0.2 million, $0.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively. The fair value of the options granted or vested in 2001, 2000 and 1999 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following key assumptions were used to value the options granted: volatility, 20% in 2001 and 0% in 2000 and 1999; weighted average risk free rate, 5.00% for all periods; average expected life, 3 years for all periods. The weighted average fair value per share of the stock options vested or granted in 2001, 2000 and 1999 amounted to $3.42, $13.92 and $13.92, respectively. It should be noted that the option pricing model used was designed to value readily tradeable stock options with relatively short lives. The options granted are not tradeable. However, management believes that the assumptions used and the model applied to value the awards yield a reasonable estimate of the fair value of the options under the circumstances.

(11)   Business Segment Information

    The Company adopted SFAS No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, in 1998. AMTROL’s reportable segments are delineated geographically. In addition to the geographic delineation, the segments are managed separately because of their different product offerings, markets served and cost structures.
 
    The Company’s North American segment operates manufacturing facilities in Rhode Island, Kentucky, Maryland and Ohio, and operates a distribution facility in Ontario, Canada. This segment manufactures and markets products used principally in flow control, storage, heating, and other treatment of fluids in the water system and HVAC markets. These products are marketed throughout the world but primarily in North America, Western Europe, Asia and Mexico.
 
    The Company’s European segment includes its facilities in Guimaraes, Portugal, Donaueschingen, Germany and Swarzedz, Poland. The Guimaraes facility manufactures returnable and non-returnable steel gas cylinders for storing cooking, heating and refrigerant gases which are marketed worldwide. The Donaueschingen facility manufactures residential and commercial water heaters marketed primarily in Switzerland, Austria and Germany. The Swarzedz facility refurbishes gas cylinders.
 
    The primary criteria by which financial performance is evaluated and resources are allocated include revenues and EBITDA. The following is a summary of key financial data by segment:

46


Table of Contents

                  December 31        
          1999   2000   2001
 
   
     
     
 
Net Sales to external customers
                       
 
North America
                       
     
US
  $ 144,679     $ 129,991     $ 117,898  
     
Other
    4,855       5,415       5,671  
 
Europe
                       
     
Portugal
    56,971       51,060       48,489  
     
Other
    15,548       11,006       10,267  
 
   
     
     
 
 
Consolidated
  $ 222,053     $ 197,472     $ 182,325  
 
   
     
     
 
Income from operations
                       
 
North America
  $ 17,665     $ 14,731     $ 7,717  
 
Europe
    6,816       974       1,001  
 
   
     
     
 
 
Consolidated
  $ 24,481     $ 15,705     $ 8,718  
 
   
     
     
 
EBITDA
                       
 
North America
  $ 29,130     $ 24,668     $ 17,539  
 
Europe
    9,216       5,295       4,433  
 
   
     
     
 
 
Consolidated
  $ 38,346     $ 29,963     $ 21,972  
 
   
     
     
 
Long-Lived assets
                       
 
North America
                       
     
US
  $ 169,554     $ 164,496     $ 156,998  
     
Other
    21       13       9  
   
Europe
                       
     
Portugal
    35,572       33,982       32,304  
     
Other
    8,473       9,715       9,173  
 
   
     
     
 
 
Consolidated
  $ 213,620     $ 208,206     $ 198,484  
 
   
     
     
 

    Income from operations for the North America business segment above is reduced by goodwill amortization for each year presented. EBITDA is earnings (net income/loss) before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The method of calculating EBITDA is consistent with the definition contained in the Foothill Agreement and the Indenture. Readers of financial statements frequently consider EBITDA a useful tool in evaluating a company’s performance. Therefore, the Company believes that inclusion of EBITDA is useful supplemental information. However, EBITDA is not a measure of true cash flow since it does not incorporate changes of other assets or liabilities that may generate or require cash. EBITDA is not a generally accepted accounting measure. Long-Lived assets include property, plant and equipment and goodwill.

47


Table of Contents

Item 14(a)(2) SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES

(in thousands)

                                         
    Balance at                                
    Beginning                   Adjustments/   Balance at
Consolidated   of Period   Provision   Recoveries   Write-Offs   End of Period
   
 
 
 
 
Year ended December 31, 1999
                                       
      Allowance for doubtful accounts
  $ 1,594     $     $     $ (406 )   $ 1,188  
Year ended December 31, 2000
                                       
      Allowance for doubtful accounts
    1,188       13             (368 )     833  
Year ended December 31, 2001
                                       
      Allowance for doubtful accounts
    833       628             (96 )     1,365  

48


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in West Warwick, Rhode Island, on the 29th day of March 2002.

  AMTROL Inc.

  By:    s/s Larry T. Guillemette   
           Larry T. Guillemette
             Chief Financial Officer

  Date:      March 29, 2002              

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the date indicated.

         
Signature   Title   Date

 
 
s/s Albert D. Indelicato
Albert D. Indelicato
  President, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)   March 29, 2002

       
s/s Larry T. Guillemette
Larry T. Guillemette
  Exec. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)   March 29, 2002

       
s/s John P. Cashman
John P. Cashman
  Director   March 29, 2002

       
s/s Andrew M. Massimilla
Andrew M. Massimilla
  Director   March 29, 2002

       
s/s David P. Spalding
David P. Spalding
  Director   March 29, 2002

       
s/s James A. Stern
James A. Stern
  Director   March 29, 2002

49


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

     
Exhibit #   Document Description

 
3.1   Restated Articles of Incorporation of AMTROL Inc. (incorporated by reference from the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration No. 333-18075, declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 2, 1997).
3.2   Bylaws of AMTROL Inc. (incorporated by reference from the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration No. 333-18075, declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 2, 1997).
4.1   Indenture, dated as of November 1, 1996 between AMTROL Acquisition, Inc. and The Bank of New York (incorporated by reference from the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration No. 333-18075, declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 2, 1997).
4.2   Form of 10-5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2006 (included in Exhibit 4.1) (incorporated by reference from the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration No. 333-18075, declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 2, 1997).
4.3   First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 13, 1996, between AMTROL Inc. and The Bank of New York (incorporated by reference from the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration No. 333-18075, declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 2, 1997).
10.1   Credit Agreement, dated as of November 13, 1996, among AMTROL Acquisition, Inc. and AMTROL Holdings, Inc., various lending institutions party thereto, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. as documentation agent, and Bankers Trust Company, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference from the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration No. 333-18075, declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 2, 1997).
10.1.1   First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of June 24, 1997 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 5, 1997).
10.1.2   Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of December 12, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 7(c) in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 22, 1997).
10.1.3   Third amendment to the Credit Agreement dated as of June 24, 1998 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 1998).
10.1.4   Fourth amendment to the Credit Agreement dated as of July 13, 1998 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter ended October 3, 1998).
10.1.5   Fifth amendment to the Credit Agreement dated as of March 30, 2001 (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).
10.2   AMTROL Inc. Pension Plan and Trust (incorporated by reference from the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, Registration No. 33-48413, declared effective by the Commission on March 18, 1993).*
10.3   Amendments to AMTROL Inc. Pension Plan and Trust (incorporated by reference from the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, Registration No. 33-48413, declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18, 1993).*

50


Table of Contents

     
10.4   AMTROL Inc. Executive Cash Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994).*
10.5   AMTROL Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan II (incorporated by reference from the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, Registration No. 33-48413, declared effective by the Commission on March 18, 1993).*
10.6   First Amendment to AMTROL Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan II (incorporated by reference from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995).*
10.10   Employment Agreement dated June 24, 1998 by and between AMTROL Inc. and Albert D. Indelicato (incorporated by reference from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998).*
10.11   AMTROL Holdings Inc. 1997 Incentive Stock Plan dated December 16, 1997 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997).*
10.12   Loan and Security Agreement dated December 26, 2001 among Amtrol Holdings, Inc., Amtrol Inc. and WaterSoft Inc. and Foothill Capital Corporation as the Arranger and Administrative Agent.
10.13   Loan and Security Agreement dated December 26, 2001 among Amtrol Holdings, Inc., Amtrol Inc. and WaterSoft Inc. and Cypress Merchant Banking Partners, L.P. and Cypress Offshore Partners, L.P.
10.14   Subsidiary Guaranty Agreement dated December 26, 2001 among Amtrol International Investments, Inc. and Cypress Merchant Banking Partners, L.P. and Cypress Offshore Partners, L.P.
10.15   Contribution Agreement dated December 26, 2001 among Amtrol Holdings, Inc., Amtrol Inc. and WaterSoft Inc. and Cypress Merchant Banking Partners, L.P. and Cypress Offshore Partners, L.P.
10.16   Subsidiary Guaranty Agreement dated December 26, 2001 among Amtrol International Investments, Inc. and Foothill Capital Corporation.
10.17   Contribution Agreement dated December 26, 2001 among Amtrol Holdings, Inc., Amtrol Inc. and WaterSoft Inc. and Foothill Capital Corporation.
18   Preferability letter regarding change in accounting policy from LIFO to FIFO (incorporated by reference from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998).
21   Subsidiaries of AMTROL Inc.
99   Letter to Commission Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T

*   Management contract or compensatory plan arrangement.

51