XML 101 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Mar. 29, 2013
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

Note 2. Fair Value Measurements 

 

For assets and liabilities measured at fair value, such amounts are based on an expected exit price representing the amount that would be received on the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability, as the case may be, in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value may be based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The authoritative guidance on fair value measurements establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis whereby inputs, used in valuation techniques, are assigned a hierarchical level. The following are the hierarchical levels of inputs to measure fair value:

 

 

 

Level 1:    Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

 

 

 

Level 2:    Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities; or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

 

 

 

Level 3:    Unobservable inputs reflecting our own assumptions incorporated in valuation techniques used to determine fair value. These assumptions are required to be consistent with market participant assumptions that are reasonably available.

 

Assets measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis

 

There have been no transfers between fair value measurement levels during fiscal 2013. The following table summarizes our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, by level, within the fair value hierarchy:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of March 29, 2013

 

As of March 30, 2012

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Total

 

(In millions)

Cash equivalents (1)

$            3,469

 

$                   -

 

$             3,469

 

$             1,483

 

$                    -

 

$             1,483

Marketable equity securities

62 

 

 -

 

62 

 

 

 -

 

____________

 

(1) Cash equivalents consist of investments with remaining maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase, or money market funds for which the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

 

Assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

 

Goodwill.  In fiscal 2012, we recorded an impairment of $19 million as a cumulative-effect adjustment in Accumulated deficit, related to an implied fair value measurement made for our Services reporting unit upon the adoption of a new accounting standard. The valuation technique used to estimate the implied fair value of goodwill was an income approach which relied upon Level 3 inputs, which included discounted estimated future cash flows or profit streams.

 

Indefinite-lived intangible assets.  In fiscal 2012 and 2011, we recorded impairment charges of $4 million and $27 million, respectively, which reduced the gross carrying value of indefinite-lived trade names. The fair value amounts were derived using an income approach which required Level 3 inputs such as discounted estimated future cash flows on profit streams. These impairment charges were due to reductions in expected future cash flows for certain indefinite-lived trade names related to the Security and Compliance segment and the Consumer segment, respectively. These impairment charges were recorded within Impairment of intangible assets in our Consolidated Statements of Income. 

 

   Debt.  In fiscal 2011, we repurchased $500 million of aggregate principal amount of our 0.75% convertible senior notes, which had a net book value of $481 million. Concurrently with the repurchase, we sold a proportionate share of the initial note hedges back to the note hedge counterparties for approximately $13 million. These transactions resulted in a loss from extinguishment of debt of approximately $16 million, which represented the difference between book value of the notes net of the remaining unamortized discount prior to repurchase and the fair value of the liability component of the notes upon repurchase. The fair value of the liability component was calculated to be $497 million upon repurchase using Level 2 inputs based on market prices for similar convertible debt instruments and resulting yields.