XML 29 R2.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT

Pay vs Performance Disclosure - USD ($)

6 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2025

Jul. 11, 2025

Dec. 31, 2025

Dec. 31, 2024

Dec. 31, 2023

Dec. 31, 2022

Dec. 31, 2021

Pay vs Performance Disclosure

Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table

Pay versus Performance

The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s performance and the “compensation actually paid” to our NEOs, as calculated in accordance with the SEC disclosure rules:


							Value of Initial Fixed $100
Year	Summary Compen- sation Table Total for First PEO⁽¹⁾	Compen- sation Actually Paid to First PEO⁽²⁾	Summary Compen- sation Table Total for Second PEO⁽³⁾	Compen- sation Actually Paid to Second PEO⁽²⁾	Average Summary Compen- sation Table Total for non-PEO NEOs⁽⁴⁾	Average Compen- sation Actually Paid to non-PEO NEOs⁽²⁾	Total Shareholder Return⁽⁵⁾	Peer Group Total Shareholder Return⁽⁶⁾	Net Income ($M)	Revenue ($M)⁽⁷⁾
2025	$7,415,991	($750,647)	$2,504,583	$2,899,827	$1,540,887	$1,092,745	$105.47	$187.76	$(61.8)	$810.8
2024	$6,925,254	$1,468,988	N/A	N/A	$1,471,100	$277,176	$137.09	$159.27	$26.1	$830.1
2023	$7,019,878	$5,868,695	N/A	N/A	$1,730,960	$1,540,794	$123.87	$133.14	$56.6	$908.4
2022	$4,545,401	($8,743,936)	N/A	N/A	$1,775,842	($635,938)	$283.37	$104.08	$116.6	$971.6
2021	$5,792,438	$18,065,163	N/A	N/A	$1,404,691	$2,305,335	$161.19	$118.84	$108.1	$932.9

(1)

For fiscal year 2025, the Company’s “First PEO” is R. Colin Gouveia, who served as PEO from January 1, 2025 – July 11, 2025. For fiscal years 2021-2024, the Company had only one PEO, R. Colin Gouveia for 2023 and 2024 and Bruce C. Hoechner for 2021 and 2022 (each referred to as the “First PEO” in the applicable years for purposes of this table). Amounts reported in this column represent the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year in the case of the “First PEO.”

(2)

To calculate compensation actually paid (“CAP”), adjustments were made to the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year. A reconciliation of the adjustments for 2025 for our First PEO and Second PEO and for the average of the other NEOs is set forth following the footnotes to this table.

(3)	For fiscal year 2025, the Company’s “Second PEO” is Ali El-Haj, who commenced his position as the Company’s Interim Principal Executive Officer on July 12, 2025. Amounts reported in this column represent the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for Mr. El-Haj for 2025.

(4)	The Company’s NEOs, other than the PEOs, for the applicable years are as follows:

•	2025: Laura Russell, Jessica A. Morton, Michael R. Webb, Jeffrey Tsao, and Lawrence E. Schmid

•	2024: Laura Russell, Ram Mayampurath, Lawrence E. Schmid, Jessica A. Morton, and Michael R. Webb

•	2023: Ram Mayampurath, Lawrence E. Schmid, Jessica A. Morton, and Michael R. Webb

•	2022: Ram Mayampurath, Robert C. Daigle, Jay B. Knoll, and R. Colin Gouveia

•	2021: Ram Mayampurath, R. Colin Gouveia, Jonathan J. Rountree, Peter B. Williams, and Michael M. Ludwig

Amounts reported in this column represent the average of the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year for the Company’s NEOs (other than the principal executive officers) for such years.

(5)	Pursuant to rules of the SEC, the comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2020. Historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

(6)	The TSR Peer Group is the S&P Small Cap 600 Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Index.

(7)	For 2025, the Compensation & Organization Committee determined that Revenue is a core driver of the Company’s performance and shareholder value creation, as reflected by its use as a performance measure under the AICP.


CAP Adjustments
Year	Summary Compensation Table Total ($)^(a)	(Minus) Change in Accumulated Benefits Under Defined Benefit and Actuarial Pension Plans ($)^(b)	Plus Service Costs Under Defined Benefit and Actuarial Pension Plans ($)^(c)	(Minus) Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year ($)^(d)	Plus Fair Value at Fiscal Year End of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year ($)^(e)	Plus/(Minus) Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years ($)^(f)	Plus Fair Value at Vesting of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year that Vested during Fiscal Year ($)^(g)	Plus/(Minus) Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Years for which Applicable Vesting Conditions were Satisfied During Fiscal Year ($)^(h)	(Minus) Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year End of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years that Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year ($)⁽ⁱ⁾	Equals Compensation Actually Paid ($)
Ali El-Haj
2025	$2,504,583	$0	$0	($1,582,485)	$1,977,729	$0	$0	$0	$0	$2,899,827
R. Colin Gouveia
2025	$7,415,991	$0	$0	($5,228,612)	$0	($869,562)	$0	($120,524)	($1,947,940)	($750,647)
Other NEOs (Average)^(j)
2025	$1,540,887	$0	$0	($874,135)	$713,304	($107,655)	$0	($25,491)	($154,166)	$1,092,745

(a)	Represents Total Compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal year. With respect to the other NEOs, amounts shown represent averages.

(b)	Represents the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of the applicable NEO’s accumulated benefit under all defined benefit and actuarial pension plans reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal year.

(c)

Represents the sum of the actuarial present value of the applicable NEO’s benefit under all defined benefit and actuarial pension plans attributable to services rendered during the indicated fiscal year, calculated using the same methodology as used in the Company’s financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles.

(d)	Represents the grant date fair value of the stock awards granted during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with the methodology used for financial reporting purposes.

(e)	Represents the fair value as of the indicated fiscal year end of the outstanding and unvested stock awards granted during such fiscal year, computed in accordance with the methodology used for financial reporting purposes.

(f)

Represents the change in fair value during the indicated fiscal year of the outstanding and unvested stock awards held by the applicable NEO as of the last day of the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with the methodology used for financial reporting purposes and, for awards subject to performance-based vesting conditions, based on the probable outcome of such performance-based vesting conditions as of the last day of the fiscal year.

(g)	Represents the fair value at vesting of the stock awards that were granted and vested during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with the methodology used for financial reporting purposes.

(h)	Represents the change in fair value, measured from the prior fiscal year end to the vesting date, of each stock award that was granted in a prior fiscal year and which vested during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with the methodology used for financial reporting purposes.

(i)

Represents the fair value as of the last day of the prior fiscal year of the stock awards that were granted in a prior fiscal year and which failed to meet the applicable vesting conditions in the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with the methodology used for financial reporting purposes.

(j)	See footnote 1 above for the NEOs included in the average for each year.

Company Selected Measure Name

Revenue

Named Executive Officers, Footnote

(1)

(3)	For fiscal year 2025, the Company’s “Second PEO” is Ali El-Haj, who commenced his position as the Company’s Interim Principal Executive Officer on July 12, 2025. Amounts reported in this column represent the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for Mr. El-Haj for 2025.

(4)	The Company’s NEOs, other than the PEOs, for the applicable years are as follows:

•	2025: Laura Russell, Jessica A. Morton, Michael R. Webb, Jeffrey Tsao, and Lawrence E. Schmid

•	2024: Laura Russell, Ram Mayampurath, Lawrence E. Schmid, Jessica A. Morton, and Michael R. Webb

•	2023: Ram Mayampurath, Lawrence E. Schmid, Jessica A. Morton, and Michael R. Webb

•	2022: Ram Mayampurath, Robert C. Daigle, Jay B. Knoll, and R. Colin Gouveia

•	2021: Ram Mayampurath, R. Colin Gouveia, Jonathan J. Rountree, Peter B. Williams, and Michael M. Ludwig

Peer Group Issuers, Footnote

(6)	The TSR Peer Group is the S&P Small Cap 600 Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Index.

Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote

(2)


CAP Adjustments
Year	Summary Compensation Table Total ($)^(a)	(Minus) Change in Accumulated Benefits Under Defined Benefit and Actuarial Pension Plans ($)^(b)	Plus Service Costs Under Defined Benefit and Actuarial Pension Plans ($)^(c)	(Minus) Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year ($)^(d)	Plus Fair Value at Fiscal Year End of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year ($)^(e)	Plus/(Minus) Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years ($)^(f)	Plus Fair Value at Vesting of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year that Vested during Fiscal Year ($)^(g)	Plus/(Minus) Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Years for which Applicable Vesting Conditions were Satisfied During Fiscal Year ($)^(h)	(Minus) Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year End of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years that Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year ($)⁽ⁱ⁾	Equals Compensation Actually Paid ($)
Ali El-Haj
2025	$2,504,583	$0	$0	($1,582,485)	$1,977,729	$0	$0	$0	$0	$2,899,827
R. Colin Gouveia
2025	$7,415,991	$0	$0	($5,228,612)	$0	($869,562)	$0	($120,524)	($1,947,940)	($750,647)
Other NEOs (Average)^(j)
2025	$1,540,887	$0	$0	($874,135)	$713,304	($107,655)	$0	($25,491)	($154,166)	$1,092,745

(a)	Represents Total Compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal year. With respect to the other NEOs, amounts shown represent averages.

(b)	Represents the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of the applicable NEO’s accumulated benefit under all defined benefit and actuarial pension plans reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal year.

(c)

(d)	Represents the grant date fair value of the stock awards granted during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with the methodology used for financial reporting purposes.

(e)	Represents the fair value as of the indicated fiscal year end of the outstanding and unvested stock awards granted during such fiscal year, computed in accordance with the methodology used for financial reporting purposes.

(f)

(g)	Represents the fair value at vesting of the stock awards that were granted and vested during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with the methodology used for financial reporting purposes.

(h)	Represents the change in fair value, measured from the prior fiscal year end to the vesting date, of each stock award that was granted in a prior fiscal year and which vested during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with the methodology used for financial reporting purposes.

(i)

(j)	See footnote 1 above for the NEOs included in the average for each year.

Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount

$ 1,540,887

$ 1,471,100

$ 1,730,960

$ 1,775,842

$ 1,404,691

Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount

$ 1,092,745

277,176

1,540,794

(635,938)

2,305,335

Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote

(2)


CAP Adjustments
Year	Summary Compensation Table Total ($)^(a)	(Minus) Change in Accumulated Benefits Under Defined Benefit and Actuarial Pension Plans ($)^(b)	Plus Service Costs Under Defined Benefit and Actuarial Pension Plans ($)^(c)	(Minus) Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year ($)^(d)	Plus Fair Value at Fiscal Year End of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year ($)^(e)	Plus/(Minus) Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years ($)^(f)	Plus Fair Value at Vesting of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year that Vested during Fiscal Year ($)^(g)	Plus/(Minus) Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Years for which Applicable Vesting Conditions were Satisfied During Fiscal Year ($)^(h)	(Minus) Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year End of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years that Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year ($)⁽ⁱ⁾	Equals Compensation Actually Paid ($)
Ali El-Haj
2025	$2,504,583	$0	$0	($1,582,485)	$1,977,729	$0	$0	$0	$0	$2,899,827
R. Colin Gouveia
2025	$7,415,991	$0	$0	($5,228,612)	$0	($869,562)	$0	($120,524)	($1,947,940)	($750,647)
Other NEOs (Average)^(j)
2025	$1,540,887	$0	$0	($874,135)	$713,304	($107,655)	$0	($25,491)	($154,166)	$1,092,745

(a)	Represents Total Compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal year. With respect to the other NEOs, amounts shown represent averages.

(b)	Represents the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of the applicable NEO’s accumulated benefit under all defined benefit and actuarial pension plans reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal year.

(c)

(d)	Represents the grant date fair value of the stock awards granted during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with the methodology used for financial reporting purposes.

(e)	Represents the fair value as of the indicated fiscal year end of the outstanding and unvested stock awards granted during such fiscal year, computed in accordance with the methodology used for financial reporting purposes.

(f)

(g)	Represents the fair value at vesting of the stock awards that were granted and vested during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with the methodology used for financial reporting purposes.

(h)	Represents the change in fair value, measured from the prior fiscal year end to the vesting date, of each stock award that was granted in a prior fiscal year and which vested during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with the methodology used for financial reporting purposes.

(i)

(j)	See footnote 1 above for the NEOs included in the average for each year.

Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return

Description of Relationship Between PEOs and Other NEO Compensation Actually Paid and Company Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”)

The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEOs, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our other NEOs, and the Company’s cumulative TSR over the five most recently completed fiscal years.

PEOs AND AVERAGE NEO COMPENSATION ACTUALLY PAID

VERSUS ROGERS CORPORATION TSR AND PEER GROUP TSR

Peer group is S&P Small Cap 600 Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Index.

Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income

Description of Relationship Between PEOs and Other NEO Compensation Actually Paid and Net Income

The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEOs, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our other NEOs, and our net income during the five most recently completed fiscal years.

PEOs AND AVERAGE NEO COMPENSATION ACTUALLY PAID

VERSUS ROGERS CORPORATION NET INCOME

Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure

Description of Relationship Between PEOs and Other NEO Compensation Actually Paid and Revenue

The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEOs, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our other NEOs, and our revenue during the five most recently completed fiscal years.

PEOs AND AVERAGE NEO COMPENSATION ACTUALLY PAID

VERSUS ROGERS CORPORATION REVENUE

Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group

Description of Relationship Between PEOs and Other NEO Compensation Actually Paid and Company Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”)

PEOs AND AVERAGE NEO COMPENSATION ACTUALLY PAID

VERSUS ROGERS CORPORATION TSR AND PEER GROUP TSR

Peer group is S&P Small Cap 600 Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Index.

Tabular List, Table

Tabular List of Performance Measures

Below is a list of performance measures that, in the Company’s assessment, represent the most important financial performance measures used by the Company to link compensation actually paid to the NEOs for 2025.

•

Revenue