XML 44 R26.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Regulatory Matters
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Banking and Thrift [Abstract]  
Regulatory Matters
REGULATORY MATTERS
The Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 restricts the amount of dividends the Company can pay. Accordingly, dividends should generally only be paid out of current earnings, as defined.
The New Jersey Banking Act of 1948 restricts the amount of dividends paid on the capital stock of New Jersey chartered banks. Accordingly, no dividends shall be paid by such banks on their capital stock unless, following the payment of such dividends, the capital stock of Lakeland will be unimpaired, and: (1) Lakeland will have a surplus, as defined, of not less than 50% of its capital stock, or, if not, (2) the payment of such dividend will not reduce the surplus, as defined, of Lakeland. Under these limitations, approximately $507.9 million was available for payment of dividends from Lakeland to the Company as of December 31, 2017.
The Company and Lakeland are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory – and possible additional discretionary – actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s and Lakeland’s consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s and Lakeland’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s and Lakeland’s capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulations to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and Lakeland to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets. Management believes, as of December 31, 2017, that the Company and Lakeland met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
As of December 31, 2017, the most recent notification from the FDIC categorized Lakeland as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, Lakeland must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, common equity Tier 1 capital and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table below. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the institution’s category.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company and Lakeland have the following capital ratios based on the then current regulations:
 
 
 
Actual
 
For Capital
Adequacy Purposes with Capital Conservation Buffer
 
To Be Well Capitalized
Under Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
December 31, 2017
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
 
(dollars in thousands)
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Company
 
$
589,047

 
13.40
%
 
> $
 
406,477

 
> 9.25%

 
 
 
N/A

 
N/A
Lakeland
 
563,910

 
12.86
%
 
 
 
405,552

 
9.25
%
 
> $
 
438,435

 
> 10.00%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Company
 
$
477,453

 
10.87
%
 
> $
 
318,590

 
> 7.25%

 
 
 
N/A

 
N/A
Lakeland
 
525,979

 
12.00
%
 
 
 
317,865

 
7.25
%
 
> $
 
350,748

 
> 8.00%
Common equity Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Company
 
$
447,453

 
10.18
%
 
> $
 
252,675

 
> 5.75%

 
 
 
N/A

 
N/A
Lakeland
 
525,979

 
12.00
%
 
 
 
252,100

 
5.75
%
 
> $
 
284,983

 
> 6.50%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Company
 
$
477,453

 
9.12
%
 
> $
 
209,431

 
> 4.00%

 
 
 
N/A

 
N/A
Lakeland
 
525,979

 
10.06
%
 
 
 
209,239

 
4.00
%
 
> $
 
261,548

 
> 5.00%
 
 
Actual
 
For Capital
Adequacy Purposes with Capital Conservation Buffer
 
To Be Well Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective Action
Provisions
December 31, 2016
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
 
(dollars in thousands)
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Company
 
$
549,391

 
13.48
%
 
> $
 
351,431

 
> 8.625%

 
 
 
N/A

 
N/A
Lakeland
 
530,458

 
13.03
%
 
 
 
350,996

 
8.625
%
 
> $
 
406,952

 
> 10.00
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Company
 
$
442,124

 
10.85
%
 
> $
 
269,940

 
> 6.625%

 
 
 
N/A

 
N/A
Lakeland
 
496,737

 
12.21
%
 
 
 
269,605

 
6.625
%
 
> $
 
325,561

 
> 8.00
Common equity Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Company
 
$
412,124

 
10.11
%
 
> $
 
208,821

 
> 5.125%

 
 
 
N/A

 
N/A
Lakeland
 
496,737

 
12.21
%
 
 
 
208,563

 
5.125
%
 
> $
 
264,519

 
> 6.50
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Company
 
$
442,124

 
9.07
%
 
> $
 
194,927

 
> 4.00%

 
 
 
N/A

 
N/A
Lakeland
 
496,737

 
10.21
%
 
 
 
194,691

 
4.00
%
 
> $
 
243,364

 
> 5.00

The final rules implementing the Basel Committee on Banking Supervisions capital guidelines for U.S. Banks became effective for the Company on January 1, 2015, with full compliance with all the final rule’s requirements phased in over a multi-year schedule, to be fully phased in by January 1, 2019. The Basel Rules require a “capital conservation buffer.” The implementation of the capital conservation buffer began on January 1, 2016 at the 0.625% level and increases by 0.625% every January 1 until it reaches 2.5% on January 1, 2019.