XML 18 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Litigation
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Litigation [Abstract] 
LITIGATION
(8) LITIGATION
A lawsuit was filed against the Company, its President and Chief Executive Officer and its former Chief Financial Officer on April 6, 2009, in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado (Marjorie and David Mishkin v. Zynex, Inc. et al.). On April 9 and 10, 2009, two other lawsuits were filed in the same court against the same defendants. These lawsuits alleged substantially the same matters and have been consolidated. On April 19, 2010, the plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Class Action Complaint (Civil Action No. 09-cv-00780-REB-KLM). The consolidated lawsuit refers to the April 1, 2009 announcement by the Company that it would restate its unaudited interim financial statements for the first three quarters of 2008. The lawsuit purports to be a class action on behalf of purchasers of the Company’s securities between May 21, 2008 and March 31, 2009. The lawsuit alleges, among other things, that the defendants violated Section 10 and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by making intentionally or recklessly untrue statements of material fact and/or failing to disclose material facts regarding the financial results and operating conditions for the first three quarters of 2008. The plaintiffs asked for a determination of class action status, unspecified damages and costs of the legal action.
On May 17, 2010, the Company filed a Motion to Dismiss. The plaintiffs filed an Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, and on July 5, 2010, the Company filed a Reply in Support of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. On March 30, 2011, the United States District Court of Colorado entered an Order denying the Company’s motion to dismiss. On November 8, 2011, the parties entered into an agreement to settle the lawsuit for a payment of $2.5 million to the plaintiff class in exchange for the dismissal with prejudice of all claims against all defendants in the litigation. The settlement is expected to be fully funded by insurance and is subject to final approval of the court. The Company cannot predict with certainty the outcome of the litigation, and if the settlement is not finally approved by the Court, the Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to the claims in the compliant.
On July 28, 2011, a stockholder derivative suit was filed purportedly on behalf of the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado against the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, its former Chief Financial Officer and certain of its directors (Stephen Hatch, derivatively, on behalf of Zynex Inc. v. Thomas Sandgaard et. al., 11-CV-01964). The lawsuit alleges breach of fiduciary duty by the Company’s officers and directors in connection with the restatement of the Company’s unaudited interim financial statements for the first three quarters of 2008. The plaintiff is seeking, on behalf of the Company, an undisclosed amount of damages and equitable relief. On October 11, 2011, the Company and the individual defendants filed a motion to dismiss, which is currently pending before the Court. On October 18, 2011, certain individual defendants filed a motion requesting the plaintiff to post a security bond pursuant to Nevada law.
The Company has notified its directors and officers liability insurer of this claim. At this time, the Company is not able to determine the likely outcome of the legal matter, nor can it estimate its potential financial exposure. Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and if an unfavorable resolution of this matter occurs, the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial condition could be adversely affected.
The Company is not a party to any other material pending or threatened legal proceedings.