N-CSR

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act file number			811-5717
	Dreyfus Worldwide Dollar Money Market Fund, Inc.
	(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter)
	c/o The Dreyfus Corporation 200 Park Avenue New York, New York  10166
	(Address of principal executive offices)        (Zip code)
	Michael A. Rosenberg, Esq. 200 Park Avenue New York, New York  10166
	(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code:				(212) 922-6000
Date of fiscal year end:		10/31
Date of reporting period:		10/31/10

FORM N-CSR

Item 1.                        Reports to Stockholders.

-2-

SSL-DOCS2 70128344v15

Dreyfus 

Worldwide Dollar 

Money Market Fund, Inc. 

ANNUAL REPORT October 31, 2010

Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.

The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.

	Contents
	THE FUND
2	A Letter from the Chairman and CEO
3	Discussion of Fund Performance
6	Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses
6	Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses With Those of Other Funds
7	Statement of Investments
9	Statement of Assets and Liabilities
10	Statement of Operations
11	Statement of Changes in Net Assets
12	Financial Highlights
13	Notes to Financial Statements
20	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
21	Important Tax Information
22	Information About the Review and Approval of the Fund’s Management Agreement
26	Board Members Information
28	Officers of the Fund
	FOR MORE INFORMATION
	Back Cover

Dreyfus 

Worldwide Dollar 

Money Market Fund, Inc. 

The Fund

A LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO

Dear Shareholder:

We are pleased to present this annual report for Dreyfus Worldwide Dollar Money Market Fund, Inc., covering the 12-month period from November 1, 2009, through October 31, 2010.

Uncertainty regarding the breadth and strength of the U.S. and global economic recoveries intensified at times over the past year. Former engines of growth appeared to stall as large parts of the developed world remained indebted and burdened by weak housing markets. While some emerging markets have posted more impressive growth rates, their developing economies have not yet provided a meaningful boost to global economic activity. The result has been a subpar U.S. recovery with stubbornly high unemployment rates, low levels of consumer confidence and muted corporate investment.

We do not expect to see a double-dip recession, thanks in part to record low short-term interest rates and quantitative easing measures by the Federal Reserve Board (the “Fed”). Indeed, with inflationary pressures currently negligible, we do not expect the Fed to raise short-term interest rates anytime soon, and money market yields seem likely to stay near historical lows.We currently believe that there may be opportunities in the equity and bond markets, stemming from improved valuations, healthy corporate balance sheets, better-than-expected earnings and higher-yielding alternatives for those willing to assume a higher level of risk tolerance. But are these investments right for you? Talk with your financial advisor, who is best suited to discuss the appropriateness of such investments given your individual profile and to evaluate your portfolio to help determine whether your “liquid asset” a llocations are appropriate given today’s market environment.

For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as general market perspectives, we provide a Discussion of Fund Performance on the pages that follow.

Thank you for your continued confidence and support.

Jonathan R. Baum
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The Dreyfus Corporation
November 15, 2010

2

DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE

For the period of November 1, 2009, through October 31, 2010, as provided by Patricia A. Larkin, Senior Portfolio Manager

Fund and Market Performance Overview

For the 12-month period ended October 31, 2010, Dreyfus Worldwide Dollar Money Market Fund produced a yield of 0.00%. Taking into account the effects of compounding, the fund also produced an effective yield of 0.00%.¹

The Fund’s Investment Approach

The fund seeks as high a level of current income as is consistent with the preservation of capital and the maintenance of liquidity.

To pursue this goal, the fund invests in a diversified portfolio of high-quality, short-term debt securities, including: securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or its agencies or instrumentalities; certificates of deposit, time deposits, bankers’ acceptances and other short-term securities issued by domestic and foreign banks or their subsidiaries or branches; repurchase agreements; asset-backed securities; domestic and dollar-denominated foreign commercial paper; and other short-term corporate obligations, including those with floating or variable rates of interest; and dollar-denominated obligations issued or guaranteed by one or more foreign governments or any of their political subdivisions or agencies. Normally, the fund invests at least 25% of its net assets in domestic or dollar-denominated foreign bank obligations.

Monetary Policy Unchanged in Muted Recovery

The reporting period began in the midst of an economic recovery fueled, in part, by an overnight federal funds rate in a historically low range between 0.00% and 0.25%. Indeed, the economic recovery appeared to remain on track, as reflected by an annualized U.S. GDP growth rate of 5.0% during the fourth quarter of 2009.

The Fund 3

DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued)

While economic expansion in the first quarter moderated to a 3.7% annualized rate, it was encouraging news nonetheless for investors eager to see an end to the recession. In fact, job creation began to improve during the first quarter after many months of losses.

Investors were further cheered in May, when 431,000 additional new jobs were created, although most were temporary government workers hired for the 2010 Census. However, the economic outlook soon took a turn for the worse when a sovereign debt crisis in Europe rattled investors. Indeed, U.S. industrial production appeared to moderate in June, and private-sector job growth proved more anemic than many analysts expected. U.S. GDP moderated to an annualized 1.7% rate during the second quarter, appearing to confirm renewed economic concerns.

Yet, in July, industrial production posted a relatively robust 1.0% gain after June’s mild setback, and the manufacturing and service sectors of the U.S. economy expanded for the twelfth and seventh consecutive months, respectively. On the other hand, total nonfarm payroll employment fell by 131,000 jobs in July, reflecting the end of temporary census hiring.

In August, sales of new homes fell to a 47-year low, while purchases of existing homes plummeted to a 15-year low. The unemployment rate rose to 9.6%, as only 67,000 private sector jobs were created during August. In September, the National Bureau of Economic Research announced that the recession had ended in June 2009, but the ensuing recovery has been the slowest sinceWorldWar II. Economic data released in September appeared to support the consensus view that recovery, while intact, remained uncertain; manufacturing activity continued to increase, but employment and housing data showed few, if any, signs of improvement. The U.S. Department of Commerce later estimated that U.S. GDP grew at a 2.5% annualized rate in the third quarter.

In response to the sluggish rebound, the Federal Reserve Board (the “Fed”) indicated in September that it would embark on a second round of quantitative easing by purchasing $600 million of U.S. Treasury securities.This move, which the Fed intends to begin implementing in November, is designed to fight deflationary forces and encourage lending.

4

October brought better economic news. The private sector added 159,000 jobs during the month, with much of the gain coming from the services sector.The manufacturing sector also expanded, as new orders hit their highest level since May. However, housing markets continued to disappoint when issues regarding the banking industry’s foreclosure process muddied an already murky outlook for home values.

An Unwavering Focus on Quality

The economy’s developments had relatively little impact on the money markets.The low federal funds rate kept yields in the short-term credit markets near zero percent, and it continued to make little sense to incur the additional credit and interest-rate risks that longer-dated instruments typically entail. Therefore, we maintained the fund’s weighted average maturity in a range that was roughly in line with industry averages.

Although the economic recovery may be gathering momentum, inflationary pressures have remained negligible. The subpar recovery has convinced many analysts that a shift to higher short-term interest rates is unlikely anytime soon.We intend to maintain the fund’s focus on credit quality and liquidity.

November 15, 2010

	An investment in the fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other
	government agency. Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at
	$1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund.
	Short-term corporate and asset-backed securities holdings, while rated in the highest rating
	category by one or more NRSRO (or unrated, if deemed of comparable quality by
	Dreyfus), involve credit and liquidity risks and risk of principal loss.
1	Effective yield is based upon dividends declared daily and reinvested monthly. Past performance is
	no guarantee of future results.Yields fluctuate.Yields provided reflect the absorption of certain fund
	expenses by The Dreyfus Corporation pursuant to an undertaking in effect that may be extended,
	terminated or modified at any time. Had these expenses not been absorbed, yields would have
	been lower, and in some cases, 7-day yields during the reporting period would have been negative
	absent the expense absorption.

The Fund 5

UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)

As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.

Review your fund’s expenses

The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus Worldwide Dollar Money Market Fund, Inc. from May 1, 2010 to October 31, 2010. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.

Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment
assuming actual returns for the six months ended October 31, 2010

Expenses paid per $1,000†	$ 1.87
Ending value (after expenses)	$1,000.00

COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited)

Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.

Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended October 31, 2010

Expenses paid per $1,000†	$ 1.89
Ending value (after expenses)	$1,023.34

† Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of .37%, multiplied by the average account value over the 

period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). 

6

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS

October 31, 2010

	Principal
Negotiable Bank Certificates of Deposit—27.2%	Amount ($)		Value ($)
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (Yankee)
0.85%, 11/4/10	25,000,000	a	25,000,021
Banco Santander SA (Yankee)
0.65%, 11/10/10	25,000,000		25,000,000
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi Ltd. (Yankee)
0.30%, 12/16/10	25,000,000		25,000,000
Credit Agricole CIB (Yankee)
0.40%, 11/8/10	25,000,000		25,000,000
Natixis (Yankee)
0.36%, 1/5/11	20,000,000		20,000,000
Royal Bank of Scotland PLC (Yankee)
0.37%, 11/18/10	25,000,000		25,000,000
Total Negotiable Bank Certificates of Deposit
(cost $145,000,021)			145,000,021
Commercial Paper—13.1%
ASB Bank Ltd.
0.38%, 2/24/11	25,000,000	a	24,970,052
Bank of New Zealand
0.40%, 3/30/11	25,000,000		24,958,611
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken
0.33%, 1/4/11	20,000,000	a	19,988,267
Total Commercial Paper
(cost $69,916,930)			69,916,930
Asset-Backed Commercial Paper—23.4%
Atlantis One Funding Corp.
0.35%, 3/8/11	25,000,000	a	24,969,132
CAFCO
0.40%, 3/4/11	25,000,000	a	24,965,833
CHARTA
0.55%, 2/3/11	25,000,000	a	24,964,097
FCAR Owner Trust, Ser. I
0.30%, 1/5/11	25,000,000		24,986,458
Govco
0.55%, 11/10/10	25,000,000	a	24,996,563
Total Asset-Backed Commercial Paper
(cost $124,882,083)			124,882,083

The Fund 7

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued)

	Principal
Repurchase Agreements—36.1%	Amount ($)	Value ($)
Barclays Capital, Inc.
0.22%, dated 10/29/10, due 11/1/10 in the
amount of $68,001,247 (fully collateralized by
$67,446,800 U.S. Treasury Notes, 1.13%-3.13%,
due 12/15/12-1/31/17, value $69,360,018)	68,000,000	68,000,000
Credit Agricole Securities (USA) Inc.
0.21%, dated 10/29/10, due 11/1/10 in the
amount of $50,000,875 (fully collateralized by
$49,185,000 U.S. Treasury Notes, 2.38%,
due 7/31/17, value $51,000,046)	50,000,000	50,000,000
Credit Suisse Securities LLC
0.21%, dated 10/29/10, due 11/1/10 in the amount of
$50,000,875 (fully collateralized by $152,900,000
U.S. Treasury Strips, due 2/15/36, value $51,001,322)	50,000,000	50,000,000
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
0.21%, dated 10/29/10, due 11/1/10 in the amount of
$25,000,438 (fully collateralized by $11,185,000
Federal Home Loan Bank, 4.50%, due 6/21/24, value
$11,412,950, $3,919,000 Federal National Mortgage
Association, 3.10%, due 9/25/15, value $3,964,765 and
$8,800,000 Tennessee Valley Authority, 4.38%, due
6/15/15, value $10,122,594)	25,000,000	25,000,000
Total Repurchase Agreements
(cost $193,000,000)		193,000,000
Total Investments (cost $532,799,034)	99.8%	532,799,034
Cash and Receivables (Net)	.2%	1,197,173
Net Assets	100.0%	533,996,207

a Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.These securities may be resold in 

transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers.At October 31, 2010, these securities 

amounted to $169,853,965 or 31.8% of net assets. 

Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)†
	Value (%)		Value (%)
Banking	40.3	Asset-Backed/Multi-Seller Programs	9.3
Repurchase Agreements	36.1	Asset-Backed/Single Seller	4.7
Asset-Backed/Banking	9.4		99.8
† Based on net assets.
See notes to financial statements.

8

STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

October 31, 2010

	Cost	Value
Assets ($):
Investments in securities—See Statement of
investments (including Repurchase Agreements
of $193,000,000)—Note 1(b)	532,799,034	532,799,034
Cash		1,302,184
Interest receivable		156,009
Prepaid expenses		341,569
		534,598,796
Liabilities ($):
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 2(b)		98,134
Payable for shares of Common Stock redeemed		354,569
Accrued expenses		149,886
		602,589
Net Assets ($)		533,996,207
Composition of Net Assets ($):
Paid-in capital		534,084,365
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments		(88,158)
Net Assets ($)		533,996,207
Shares Outstanding
(25 billion shares of $.001 par value Common Stock authorized)		534,084,365
Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($)		1.00
See notes to financial statements.

The Fund 9

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Year Ended October 31, 2010

Investment Income ($):
Interest Income	1,732,604
Expenses:
Management fee—Note 2(a)	2,860,037
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 2(b)	1,739,621
Professional fees	95,570
Custodian fees—Note 2(b)	93,550
Registration fees	37,427
Directors’ fees and expenses—Note 2(c)	23,902
Miscellaneous	478,222
Total Expenses	5,328,329
Less—reduction in expenses due to undertaking—Note 2(a)	(2,562,318)
Less—reduction in management fee due to undertaking—Note 2(a)	(1,027,493)
Less—reduction in fees due to earnings credits—Note 2(b)	(5,942)
Net Expenses	1,732,576
Investment Income—Net	28
Net Realized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 1(b) ($)	4,524
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations	4,552
See notes to financial statements.

10

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

	Year Ended October 31,
	2010	2009
Operations ($):
Investment income—net	28	2,663,412
Net realized gain (loss) on investments	4,524	(16,931,917)
Net unrealized appreciation
(depreciation) on investments	—	2,750,351
Net increase from payment by affiliate—Note 1(e)	—	15,362,251
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Resulting from Operations	4,552	3,844,097
Dividends to Shareholders from ($):
Investment income—net	(28)	(2,663,417)
Capital Stock Transactions ($1.00 per share):
Net proceeds from shares sold	319,106,608	346,084,494
Capital contribution from affiliate†	1,476,984	—
Dividends reinvested	28	2,597,869
Cost of shares redeemed	(383,530,486)	(423,867,977)
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
from Capital Stock Transactions	(62,946,866)	(75,185,614)
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets	(62,942,342)	(74,004,934)
Net Assets ($):
Beginning of Period	596,938,549	670,943,483
End of Period	533,996,207	596,938,549

See notes to financial statements.

†  See Note 2(d). 

The Fund 11

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The following table describes the performance for the fiscal periods indicated. Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s financial statements.

		Year Ended October 31,
	2010	2009	2008	2007	2006
Per Share Data ($):
Net asset value, beginning of period	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
Investment Operations:
Investment income—net	.000a	.004	.029	.046	.041
Distributions:
Dividends from investment income—net	(.000)a	(.004)	(.029)	(.046)	(.041)
Net asset value, end of period	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
Total Return (%)	.00b	.40c	2.91	4.70	4.20
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%):
Ratio of total expenses
to average net assets	.93	.87	.79	.79	.82
Ratio of net expenses
to average net assets	.30	.68	.76	.75	.75
Ratio of net investment income
to average net assets	.00b	.41	2.88	4.60	4.12
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000)	533,996	596,939	670,943	705,247	700,509

a Amount represents less than $.001 per share. 

b Amount represents less than .01%. 

c If payment pursuant to the Capital Support Agreement was not made, total return would have been (2.61%). 

See notes to financial statements.

12

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:

Dreyfus Worldwide Dollar Money Market Fund, Inc. (the “fund”) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as a diversified open-end management investment company. The fund’s investment objective is to provide investors with as high a level of current income as is consistent with the preservation of capital and the maintenance of liquidity.The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of NewYork Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment adviser. MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares, which are sold to the public without a sales charge.

It is the fund’s policy to maintain a continuous net asset value per share of $1.00; the fund has adopted certain investment, portfolio valuation and dividend and distribution policies to enable it to do so.There is no assurance, however, that the fund will be able to maintain a stable net asset value per share of $1.00.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) is the exclusive reference of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions.Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown.The fund does not anticipate recognizing any loss related to these arrangements.

The Fund 13

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued at amortized cost in accordance with Rule 2a-7 of the Act, which has been determined by the Board of Directors to represent the fair value of the fund’s investments.

The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e. the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of valuation techniques used to measure fair value.This hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).

Additionally, GAAP provides guidance on determining whether the volume and activity in a market has decreased significantly and whether such a decrease in activity results in transactions that are not orderly. GAAP requires enhanced disclosures around valuation inputs and techniques used during annual and interim periods.

Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to fair value measurements.These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:

Level 1—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for
identical investments.

Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted
prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds,
credit risk, etc.).

Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s
own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).

The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, money market securities are valued using amortized cost, in accordance with rules under the Act. Generally, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is

14

not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.

The following is a summary of the inputs used as of October 31, 2010 in valuing the fund’s investments:

	Short-Term
Valuation Inputs	Investments ($)†
Level 1—Unadjusted Quoted Prices	—
Level 2—Other Significant Observable Inputs	532,799,034
Level 3—Significant Unobservable Inputs	—
Total	532,799,034

†  See Statement of Investments for additional detailed categorizations. 

(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Interest income, adjusted for accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments is earned from settlement date and recognized on the accrual basis. Cost of investments represents amortized cost.

The fund may enter into repurchase agreements with financial institutions, deemed to be creditworthy by the Manager, subject to the seller’s agreement to repurchase and the fund’s agreement to resell such securities at a mutually agreed upon price. Securities purchased subject to repurchase agreements are deposited with the fund’s custodian and, pursuant to the terms of the repurchase agreement, must have an aggregate market value greater than or equal to the repurchase price plus accrued interest at all times. If the value of the underlying securities falls below the value of the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the fund will require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults on its repurchase obligation, the fund maintains its right to sell the underlying securities at market value and may claim any resulting loss against the seller.

The Fund  15 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(c) Dividends to shareholders: It is the policy of the fund to declare dividends daily from investment income-net. Such dividends are paid monthly. Dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains.

(d) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.

As of and during the period ended October 31, 2010, the fund did not have any liabilities for any uncertain tax positions.The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.

Each of the tax years in the four-year period ended October 31, 2010 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.

At October 31, 2010, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were substantially the same as for financial reporting purposes.

The accumulated capital loss carryover of $88,158 is available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net securities profits, if any, realized subsequent to October 31, 2010. If not applied, the carryover expires in fiscal 2017.

The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal periods ended October 31, 2010 and October 31, 2009 were all ordinary income.

During the period ended October 31, 2010, as a result of permanent book to tax differences, primarily due to capital contributions by an affiliate, the fund increased accumulated net realized gain (loss) on

16

investments by $1,476,984 and decreased paid-in capital by the same amount. Net assets and net asset value per share were not affected by this reclassification.

At October 31, 2010, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (See the Statement of Investments).

(e) Capital Support Agreement: The fund held notes (the “Notes”) issued by Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (“Lehman”). In order to mitigate the negative impact of holding these securities in light of the bankruptcy of Lehman, on September 16, 2008, the fund entered into a Capital Support Agreement (the “Agreement”) with BNY Mellon, the parent company of the fund’s adviser. Pursuant to the Agreement, BNY Mellon had agreed to provide capital support to the fund, subject to an aggregate limit of $20 million (the “Maximum Capital Support Payment”), if any of the following events resulted in the fund’s net asset value falling below $0.9950:

(i) Any final sale or other final liquidation of the Notes by the fund for cash in an amount, after deduction of costs, which is less than the amortized cost value of the Notes as of the date such sale or liquidation is consummated;

(ii) Receipt by the fund of final payment on the Notes in cash in an amount less than the amortized cost value of the Notes less costs in respect thereof, as of the date such final payment is received; and

(iii) The date upon which a court of competent jurisdiction over the matter discharges Lehman from liability in respect of the Notes, and such discharge results in the receipt of aggregate payments on the Notes in an amount less than the amortized cost value of the Notes, less costs in respect thereof, as of the date such final payment is received.

On September 9, 2009, the fund sold the Notes it held in Lehman which obligated BNY Mellon to make payments to the fund pursuant to the terms of the Agreement.The fund received payments amounting to $15,362,251 and the Agreement was terminated.

The Fund  17 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 2—Management Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:

(a) Pursuant to a management agreement with the Manager, the management fee is computed at the annual rate of .50% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly.The Manager had undertaken from November 1, 2009 through October 31, 2010 to reduce the management fee paid by the fund, if the fund’s aggregate expenses, exclusive of taxes, brokerage fees, interest on borrowings and extraordinary expenses, exceed an annual rate of .75% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets.The reduction in management fee, pursuant to the undertaking, amounted to $1,027,493 during the period ended October 31, 2010.

The Manager has undertaken to reimburse expenses in the event that current yields drop below certain levels. Such limitation may fluctuate daily, is voluntary and not contractual and may be terminated at any time. The reduction in expenses, pursuant to the undertaking, amounted to $2,562,318 during the period ended October 31, 2010.

(b) Under the Shareholder Services Plan, the fund reimburses the Distributor an amount not to exceed an annual rate of .25% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets for certain allocated expenses of providing personal services and/or maintaining shareholder accounts. The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts. During the period ended October 31, 2010, the fund was charged $838,876 pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.

The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dreyfus, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the fund. During the period ended October 31, 2010, the fund was charged $642,219 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.

18

The fund has arrangements with the custodian and cash management bank whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody and cash management fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.

The fund compensates The Bank of NewYork Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus, under a cash management agreement for performing cash management services related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended October 31, 2010, the fund was charged $66,329 pursuant to the cash management agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations. These fees were partially offset by earnings credits of $5,942.

The fund also compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. During the period ended October 31, 2010, the fund was charged $93,550 pursuant to the custody agreement.

During the period ended October 31, 2010, the fund was charged $6,114 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer.

The components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: management fees $227,846, custodian fees $29,887, chief compliance officer fees $2,248 and transfer agency per account fees $111,139, which are offset against an expense reimbursement currently in effect in the amount of $272,986.

(c) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees and attendance fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets.

(d) During the period ended October 31, 2010, BNY Mellon made voluntary capital contributions of $1,476,984 to the fund.These contributions were made to reimburse the fund for previous realized losses experienced by the fund.

The Fund  19 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Shareholders and Board of Directors
Dreyfus Worldwide Dollar Money Market Fund, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of DreyfusWorldwide Dollar Money Market Fund, Inc., including the statement of investments, as of October 31, 2010, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statement of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and financial highlights for each of the years indicated therein.These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement.We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting.Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting p rinciples used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2010 by correspondence with the custodian and others. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dreyfus Worldwide Dollar Money Market Fund, Inc. at October 31, 2010, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the indicated years, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

New York, New York
December 28, 2010

20

IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)

For federal tax purposes the fund hereby designates 94.39% of ordinary income dividends paid during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010 as qualifying interest related dividends.

The Fund 21

INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL
OF THE FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited)

At a meeting of the fund’s Board of Directors held on July 14 and 15, 2010, the Board considered the re-approval for an annual period (through August 31, 2011) of the fund’s Management Agreement with Dreyfus, pursuant to which Dreyfus provides the fund with investment advisory and administrative services. The Board members, none of whom are “interested persons” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the fund were assisted in their review by independent legal counsel and met with counsel in executive session separate from representatives of Dreyfus.

Analysis of Nature, Extent and Quality of Services Provided to the Fund.The Board members received a presentation from representatives of Dreyfus regarding services provided to the fund and other funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and discussed the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the fund by Dreyfus pursuant to the Management Agreement. Dreyfus’ representatives reviewed the fund’s distribution of accounts and the relationships Dreyfus has with various intermediaries and the different needs of each. Dreyfus’ representatives noted the distribution channels for the fund as well as the diversity of distribution among the funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and Dreyfus’ corresponding need for broad, deep, and diverse resources to be able to provide ongoing shareholder services to each distribution channel, including those of the fund. Dreyfus also provided the number of shareholder accounts in the fund, as well as the fund’s asset size.

The Board members also considered Dreyfus’ research and portfolio management capabilities and that Dreyfus also provides oversight of day-to-day fund operations, including fund accounting and administration and assistance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements. The Board members also considered Dreyfus’ extensive administrative, accounting and compliance infrastructure.

Comparative Analysis of the Fund’s Performance and Management Fee and Expense Ratio. The Board members reviewed the fund’s performance and comparisons to a group of retail no-load money market funds (the “Performance Group”) and to a larger universe of funds,

22

consisting of all retail money market funds (the “Performance Universe”), selected and provided by Lipper, Inc., an independent provider of investment company data.The Board was provided with a description of the methodology Lipper used to select the Performance Group and Performance Universe, as well as the Expense Group and Expense Universe (discussed below). The Board members discussed the results of the comparisons for various periods ended May 31, 2010. The Board members noted that the fund’s total return performance was at or above the Performance Group medians for all periods except the one-year period ended May 31, 2010, when it was below the Performance Group median, and was above the Performance Universe median for all periods except the one-year period ended May 31, 2010, when it was below the Performance Universe median.

The Board members also discussed the fund’s management fee and expense ratio and reviewed the range of management fees and expense ratios as compared to a comparable group of funds (the “Expense Group”) and a broader group of funds (the “Expense Universe”), each selected and provided by Lipper. The Board members noted that the fund’s contractual management fee was higher than the Expense Group median, the fund’s actual management fee was at the Expense Group median and higher than the Expense Universe median and the fund’s total expense ratio was higher than the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians. The Board considered the current fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangement undertaken by Dreyfus.

Representatives of Dreyfus reviewed with the Board members the advisory fees paid by mutual funds managed by Dreyfus or its affiliates with similar investment objectives, policies and strategies, and included within the fund’s Lipper category (the “Similar Funds”). Representatives of Dreyfus also noted that there were no other accounts managed by Dreyfus or its affiliates with similar investment objectives, policies and strategies as the fund.The Board members considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Funds to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee.

The Fund 23

INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE
FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued)

Analysis of Profitability and Economies of Scale. Dreyfus’ representatives reviewed the dollar amount of expenses allocated and profit received by Dreyfus and the method used to determine such expenses and profit.The Board previously had been provided with information prepared by an independent consulting firm regarding Dreyfus’ approach to allocating costs to, and determining the profitability of, individual funds and the entire Dreyfus mutual fund complex. The Board members also had been informed that the methodology had been reviewed by an independent registered public accounting firm which, like the consultant, found the methodology to be reasonable. The consulting firm also analyzed where any economies of scale might emerge in connection with the management of the fund.The Board members evaluated the profitability anal ysis in light of the relevant circumstances for the fund and the extent to which economies of scale would be realized if the fund grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of fund investors.The Board members also considered potential benefits to Dreyfus from acting as investment adviser and noted that there were no soft dollar arrangements with respect to trading the fund’s investments.

It was noted that the Board members should consider Dreyfus’ profitability with respect to the fund as part of their evaluation of whether the fee under the Management Agreement bears a reasonable relationship to the mix of services provided by Dreyfus, including the nature, extent and quality of such services and that a discussion of economies of scale is predicated on increasing assets and that, if a fund’s assets had been decreasing, the possibility that Dreyfus may have realized any economies of scale would be less. It also was noted that Dreyfus was not realizing a profit on the Fund’s operations. The Board also noted the Capital Support Agreement payment made during the prior 12-month period.

24

At the conclusion of these discussions, the Board agreed that it had been furnished with sufficient information to make an informed business decision with respect to continuation of the Management Agreement. Based on the discussions and considerations as described above, the Board made the following conclusions and determinations.

• The Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Dreyfus are adequate and appropriate.

• The Board was satisfied with the fund’s relative performance.

• The Board concluded that the fee paid by the fund to Dreyfus was reasonable in light of the services provided, comparative performance, expense and management fee information (including fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements), costs of the services provided and profits to be realized and benefits derived or to be derived by Dreyfus from its relationship with the fund.

• The Board determined that the economies of scale which may accrue to Dreyfus and its affiliates in connection with the management of the fund had been adequately considered by Dreyfus in connection with the management fee rate charged to the fund and that, to the extent in the future it were determined that material economies of scale had not been shared with the fund, the Board would seek to have those economies of scale shared with the fund.

The Board members considered these conclusions and determinations, along with information received on a routine and regular basis throughout the year, and, without any one factor being dispositive, the Board determined that re-approval of the Management Agreement was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.

The Fund  25 

BOARD MEMBERS INFORMATION (Unaudited)

26

Once elected all Board Members serve for an indefinite term, but achieve Emeritus status upon reaching age 80.The address of the Board Members and Officers is in c/o The Dreyfus Corporation, 200 Park Avenue, NewYork, NewYork 10166.Additional information about the Board Members is available in the fund’s Statement of Additional Information which can be obtained from Dreyfus free of charge by calling this toll free number: 1-800-554-4611.

Lucy Wilson Benson, Emeritus Board Member
Arthur A. Hartman, Emeritus Board Member

The Fund  27 

OFFICERS OF THE FUND (Unaudited)

BRADLEY J. SKAPYAK, President since
January 2010.

Chief Operating Officer and a director of the Manager since June 2009. From April 2003 to June 2009, Mr. Skapyak was the head of the Investment Accounting and Support Department of the Manager. He is an officer of 76 investment companies (comprised of 170 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 51 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since February 1988.

PHILLIP N. MAISANO, Executive Vice
President since July 2007.

Chief Investment Officer,Vice Chair and a director of the Manager, and an officer of 76 investment companies (comprised of 170 portfolios) managed by the Manager. Mr. Maisano also is an officer and/or Board member of certain other investment management subsidiaries of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, each of which is affiliate of the Manager. He is 63 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since November 2006. Prior to joining the Manager, Mr. Maisano served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of EACM Advisors, an affiliate of the Manager, since August 2004.

MICHAEL A. ROSENBERG, Vice President
and Secretary since August 2005.

Assistant General Counsel of BNY Mellon, and an officer of 77 investment companies (comprised of 195 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 50 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since October 1991.

KIESHA ASTWOOD, Vice President and
Assistant Secretary since January 2010.

Counsel of BNY Mellon, and an officer of 77 investment companies (comprised of 195 portfolios) managed by the Manager. She is 37 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since July 1995.

JAMES BITETTO, Vice President and
Assistant Secretary since August 2005.

Senior Counsel of BNY Mellon and Secretary of the Manager, and an officer of 77 investment companies (comprised of 195 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 44 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since December 1996.

JONI LACKS CHARATAN, Vice President
and Assistant Secretary since
August 2005.

Senior Counsel of BNY Mellon, and an officer of 77 investment companies (comprised of 195 portfolios) managed by the Manager. She is 54 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since October 1988.

JOSEPH M. CHIOFFI, Vice President and
Assistant Secretary since August 2005.

Senior Counsel of BNY Mellon, and an officer of 77 investment companies (comprised of 195 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 48 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since June 2000.

KATHLEEN DENICHOLAS, Vice President
and Assistant Secretary since
January 2010.

Senior Counsel of BNY Mellon, and an officer of 77 investment companies (comprised of 195 portfolios) managed by the Manager. She is 36 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since February 2001.

JANETTE E. FARRAGHER, Vice President
and Assistant Secretary since
August 2005.

Assistant General Counsel of BNY Mellon, and an officer of 77 investment companies (comprised of 195 portfolios) managed by the Manager. She is 47 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since February 1984.

28

JOHN B. HAMMALIAN, Vice President and
Assistant Secretary since August 2005.

Managing Counsel of BNY Mellon, and an officer of 77 investment companies (comprised of 195 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 47 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since February 1991.

M. CRISTINA MEISER, Vice President and
Assistant Secretary since January 2010.

Senior Counsel of BNY Mellon, and an officer of 77 investment companies (comprised of 195 portfolios) managed by the Manager. She is 40 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since August 2001.

ROBERT R. MULLERY, Vice President and
Assistant Secretary since August 2005.

Managing Counsel of BNY Mellon, and an officer of 77 investment companies (comprised of 195 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 58 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since May 1986.

JEFF PRUSNOFSKY, Vice President and
Assistant Secretary since August 2005.

Managing Counsel of BNY Mellon, and an officer of 77 investment companies (comprised of 195 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 45 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since October 1990.

JAMES WINDELS, Treasurer since
November 2001.

Director – Mutual Fund Accounting of the Manager, and an officer of 77 investment companies (comprised of 195 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 52 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since April 1985.

RICHARD CASSARO, Assistant Treasurer
since January 2008.

Senior Accounting Manager – Money Market and Municipal Bond Funds of the Manager, and an officer of 77 investment companies (comprised of 195 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 51 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since September 1982.

GAVIN C. REILLY, Assistant Treasurer
since December 2005.

Tax Manager of the Investment Accounting and Support Department of the Manager, and an officer of 77 investment companies (comprised of 195 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 42 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since April 1991.

ROBERT ROBOL, Assistant Treasurer
since March 2003.

Senior Accounting Manager – Fixed Income Funds of the Manager, and an officer of 77 investment companies (comprised of 195 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 46 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since October 1988.

ROBERT SALVIOLO, Assistant Treasurer
since July 2007.

Senior Accounting Manager – Equity Funds of the Manager, and an officer of 77 investment companies (comprised of 195 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 43 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since June 1989.

The Fund  29 

OFFICERS OF THE FUND (Unaudited) (continued)

ROBERT SVAGNA, Assistant Treasurer
since August 2005.

Senior Accounting Manager – Equity Funds of the Manager, and an officer of 77 investment companies (comprised of 195 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 43 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since November 1990.

JOSEPH W. CONNOLLY, Chief Compliance
Officer since October 2004.

Chief Compliance Officer of the Manager and The Dreyfus Family of Funds (77 investment companies, comprised of 195 portfolios). From November 2001 through March 2004, Mr. Connolly was first Vice-President, Mutual Fund Servicing for Mellon Global Securities Services. In that capacity, Mr. Connolly was responsible for managing Mellon’s Custody, Fund Accounting and Fund Administration services to third-party mutual fund clients. He is 53 years old and has served in various capacities with the Manager since 1980, including manager of the firm’s Fund Accounting Department from 1997 through October 2001.

NATALIA GRIBAS, Anti-Money Laundering
Compliance Officer since July 2010.

Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer of the Distributor, and the Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer of 73 investment companies (comprised of 191 portfolios) managed by the Manager. She is 40 years old and has been an employee of the Distributor since September 2008.

30

NOTES

For More Information

Telephone 1-800-645-6561

Mail The Dreyfus Family of Funds, 144 Glenn Curtiss Boulevard, Uniondale, NY 11556-0144 E-mail Send your request to info@dreyfus.com Internet Information can be viewed online or downloaded at: http://www.dreyfus.com

The fund will disclose daily, on www.dreyfus.com, the fund’s complete schedule of holdings as of the end of the previous business day.  The schedule of holdings will remain on the website until the fund files its Form N-Q or Form N-CSR for the period that includes the date of the posted holdings.

The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund's Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.

Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-645-6561.

Item 2.                        Code of Ethics.

The Registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Registrant's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions.  There have been no amendments to, or waivers in connection with, the Code of Ethics during the period covered by this Report.

Item 3.                        Audit Committee Financial Expert.

The Registrant's Board has determined thatJoseph S. DiMartino, a member of the Audit Committee of the Board, is an audit committee financial expert as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC").   Joseph S. DiMartino is "independent" as defined by the SEC for purposes of audit committee financial expert determinations.

Item 4.                        Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

(a)  Audit Fees.  The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years (the "Reporting Periods") for professional services rendered by the Registrant's principal accountant (the "Auditor") for the audit of the Registrant's annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by the Auditor in connection with the statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the Reporting Periods, were $44,344, in 2009 and $44,344 in 2010.

(b)  Audit-Related Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for assurance and related services by the Auditor that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the Registrant's financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item 4 were $5,272         in 2009 and $5,382 in 2010. These services consisted of one or more of the following: (i) agreed upon procedures related to compliance with Internal Revenue Code section 817(h), (ii) security counts required by Rule 17f-2 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (iii) advisory services as to the accounting or disclosure treatment of Registrant transactions or events and (iv) adviso ry services to the accounting or disclosure treatment of the actual or potential impact to the Registrant of final or proposed rules, standards or interpretations by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Accounting Standards Boards or other regulatory or standard-setting bodies.

The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for non-audit assurance and related services by the Auditor to the Registrant's investment adviser (not including any sub-investment adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant ("Service Affiliates"), that were reasonably related to the performance of the annual audit of the Service Affiliate, which required pre-approval by the Audit Committee were $0 in 2009 and $0 in 2010.

(c)  Tax Fees.  The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for professional services rendered by the Auditor for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning ("Tax Services") were $3,517 in 2009 and $3,537 in 2010. These services consisted of: (i) review or preparation of U.S. federal, state, local and excise tax returns; (ii) U.S. federal, state and local tax planning, advice and assistance regarding statutory, regulatory or administrative developments; (iii) tax advice regarding tax qual ification matters and/or treatment of various financial instruments held or proposed to be acquired or held. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for Tax Services by the Auditor to Service Affiliates, which required pre-approval by the Audit Committee were $0 in 2009 and $0 in 2010. 

(d)  All Other Fees.  The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for products and services provided by the Auditor, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Item, were $201 in 2009 and $187 in 2010 [These services consisted of a review of the Registrant's anti-money laundering program].

-3-

SSL-DOCS2 70128344v15

The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for Non-Audit Services by the Auditor to Service Affiliates, other than the services reported in paragraphs (b) through (c) of this Item, which required pre-approval by the Audit Committee, were  $0 in 2009 and $0 in 2010. 

(e)(1) Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures. The Registrant's Audit Committee has established policies and procedures (the "Policy") for pre-approval (within specified fee limits) of the Auditor's engagements for non-audit services to the Registrant and Service Affiliates without specific case-by-case consideration. The pre-approved services in the Policy can include pre-approved audit services, pre-approved audit-related services, pre-approved tax services and pre-approved all other services.  Pre-approval considerations include whether the proposed services are compatible with maintaining the Auditor's independence.  Pre-approvals pursuant to the Policy are considered annually.

(e)(2) Note: None of the services described in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this Item 4 were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

(f) None of the hours expended on the principal accountant's engagement to audit the registrant's financial statements for the most recent fiscal year were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal account's full-time, permanent employees.

Non-Audit Fees. The aggregate non-audit fees billed by the Auditor for services rendered to the Registrant, and rendered to Service Affiliates, for the Reporting Periods were  $25,383,429 in 2009 and $31,544,905 in 2010. 

Auditor Independence. The Registrant's Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to Service Affiliates, which were not pre-approved (not requiring pre-approval), is compatible with maintaining the Auditor's independence.

Item 5.                        Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.

                        Not applicable.  [CLOSED-END FUNDS ONLY]

Item 6.                        Investments.

(a)Not applicable.

Item 7.            Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management            Investment Companies.

                        Not applicable.  [CLOSED-END FUNDS ONLY]

Item 8.                        Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.  [CLOSED-END FUNDS ONLY, beginning with reports for periods ended on and after December 31, 2005]

Item 9.                        Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and             Affiliated Purchasers.

Not applicable.  [CLOSED-END FUNDS ONLY]

-4-

SSL-DOCS2 70128344v15

Item 10.          Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

There have been no material changes to the procedures applicable to Item 10.

Item 11.          Controls and Procedures.

(a)        The Registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded, based on their evaluation of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in the reports that it files or submits on Form N-CSR is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b)        There were no changes to the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Item 12.          Exhibits.

(a)(1)   Code of ethics referred to in Item 2.

(a)(2)   Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

(a)(3)   Not applicable.

(b)        Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

-5-

SSL-DOCS2 70128344v15

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dreyfus Worldwide Dollar Money Market Fund, Inc.

By:       /s/ Bradley J. Skapyak

            Bradley J. Skapyak,

            President

Date:    December 23, 2010

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By:      /s/ Bradley J. Skapyak

            Bradley J. Skapyak,

            President

Date:    December 23, 2010

By:       /s/ James Windels

            James Windels,

            Treasurer

Date:    December 23, 2010

EXHIBIT INDEX

(a)(1)   Code of ethics referred to in Item 2.

(a)(2)   Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.  (EX-99.CERT)

(b)        Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.  (EX-99.906CERT)

-6-

SSL-DOCS2 70128344v15

EX-99.COD ETH

THE DREYFUS FAMILY OF FUNDS

CODE OF ETHICS FOR PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE

AND SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS

1.Covered Officers/Purpose of the Code

This code of ethics (the "Code") for the investment companies within the complex (each, a "Fund") applies to each Fund's Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer or Controller, or other persons performing similar functions, each of whom is listed on Exhibit A(the "Covered Officers"), for the purpose of promoting:

·honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

·full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Fund files with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") and in other public communications made by the Fund;

·compliance with applicable laws and governmental rules and regulations;

·the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code; and

·accountability for adherence to the Code.

Each Covered Officer should adhere to a high standard of business ethics and should be sensitive to situations that may give rise to actual as well as apparent conflicts of interest.

2.Covered Officers Should Handle Ethically Actual and Apparent Conflicts of Interest

Overview.  A "conflict of interest" occurs when a Covered Officer's private interest interferes with the interests of, or his service to, the Fund.  For example, a conflict of interest would arise if a Covered Officer, or a member of his family, receives improper personal benefits as a result of his position with the Fund.

Certain conflicts of interest arise out of the relationships between Covered Officers and the Fund and already are subject to conflict of interest provisions in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act"), and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Advisers Act").  For example, Covered Officers may not individually engage in certain transactions (such as the purchase or sale of securities or other property) with the Fund because of their status as "affiliated persons" of the Fund.  The compliance programs and procedures of the Fund and the Fund's investment adviser (the "Adviser") are designed to prevent, or identify and correct, violations of these provisions.  The Code does not, and is not intended to, repeat or replace these programs and procedures, and the circumstances they cover fall outside of the parameters of the Code.

Although typically not presenting an opportunity for improper personal benefit, conflicts arise from, or as a result of, the contractual relationship between the Fund and the Adviser of which the Covered Officers are also officers or employees.  As a result, the Code recognizes that the Covered Officers, in the ordinary course of their duties (whether formally for the Fund or for the Adviser, or for both), will be involved in establishing policies and implementing decisions that will have different effects on the Adviser and the Fund.  The participation of the Covered Officers in such activities is inherent in the contractual relationship between the Fund and the Adviser and is consistent with the performance by the Covered Officers of their duties as officers of the Fund and, if addressed in conformity with the provisions of the Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act, will be deemed to have been handled ethically.  In addition, it is recognized by the Fund's Board that the Covered Officers also may be officers or employees of one or more other investment companies covered by this or other codes of ethics.

Other conflicts of interest are covered by the Code, even if such conflicts of interest are not subject to provisions in the Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act.  Covered Officers should keep in mind that the Code cannot enumerate every possible scenario.  The overarching principle of the Code is that the personal interest of a Covered Officer should not be placed improperly before the interest of the Fund.

Each Covered Officer must:

·not use his personal influence or personal relationships improperly to influence investment decisions or financial reporting by the Fund whereby the Covered Officer would benefit personally to the detriment of the Fund;

·not cause the Fund to take action, or fail to take action, for the individual personal benefit of the Covered Officer rather than the benefit of the Fund; and

·not retaliate against any employee or Covered Officer for reports of potential violations that are made in good faith.

3.Disclosure and Compliance

·Each Covered Officer should familiarize himself with the disclosure requirements generally applicable to the Fund within his area of responsibility;

·each Covered Officer should not knowingly misrepresent, or cause others to misrepresent, facts about the Fund to others, whether within or outside the Fund, including to the Fund's Board members and auditors, and to governmental regulators and self-regulatory organizations;

·each Covered Officer should, to the extent appropriate within his area of responsibility, consult with other officers and employees of the Fund and the Adviser with the goal of promoting full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in the reports and documents the Fund files with, or submits to, the SEC and in other public communications made by the Fund; and

·it is the responsibility of each Covered Officer to promote compliance with the standards and restrictions imposed by applicable laws, rules and regulations.

-2-

SSL-DOCS2 70116469v3

4.Reporting and Accountability

Each Covered Officer must:

·upon adoption of the Code (or thereafter, as applicable, upon becoming a Covered Officer), affirm in writing to the Board that he has received, read, and understands the Code;

·annually thereafter affirm to the Board that he has complied with the requirements of the Code; and

·notify the Adviser's General Counsel (the "General Counsel") promptly if he knows of any violation of the Code.  Failure to do so is itself a violation of the Code.

The General Counsel is responsible for applying the Code to specific situations in which questions are presented under it and has the authority to interpret the Code in any particular situation.  However, waivers sought by any Covered Officer will be considered by the Fund's Board.

The Fund will follow these procedures in investigating and enforcing the Code:

·the General Counsel will take all appropriate action to investigate any potential violations reported to him;

·if, after such investigation, the General Counsel believes that no violation has occurred, the General Counsel is not required to take any further action;

·any matter that the General Counsel believes is a violation will be reported to the Board;

·if the Board concurs that a violation has occurred, it will consider appropriate action, which may include: review of, and appropriate modifications to, applicable policies and procedures; notification to appropriate personnel of the Adviser or its board; or dismissal of the Covered Officer;

·the Board will be responsible for granting waivers, as appropriate; and

·any waivers of or amendments to the Code, to the extent required, will be disclosed as provided by SEC rules.

5.Other Policies and Procedures

The Code shall be the sole code of ethics adopted by the Fund for purposes of Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules and forms applicable to registered investment companies thereunder.  The Fund's, its principal underwriter's and the Adviser's codes of ethics under Rule 17j-1 under the Investment Company Act and the Adviser's additional policies and procedures, including its Code of Conduct, are separate requirements applying to the Covered Officers and others, and are not part of the Code.

-3-

SSL-DOCS2 70116469v3

6.Amendments

The Code may not be amended except in written form, which is specifically approved or ratified by a majority vote of the Fund's Board, including a majority of independent Board members.

7.Confidentiality

All reports and records prepared or maintained pursuant to the Code will be considered confidential and shall be maintained and protected accordingly.  Except as otherwise required by law or the Code, such matters shall not be disclosed to anyone other than the appropriate Funds and their counsel, the appropriate Boards (or Committees) and their counsel and the Adviser.

8.Internal Use

The Code is intended solely for the internal use by the Fund and does not constitute an admission, by or on behalf of the Fund, as to any fact, circumstance, or legal conclusion.

                                                                                                Dated as of:  July 1, 2003

-4-

SSL-DOCS2 70116469v3

Exhibit A

Persons Covered by the Code of Ethics

Bradley Skapyak	President	(Principal Executive Officer)
James Windels	Treasurer	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Revised as of January 1, 2010

-5-

SSL-DOCS2 70116469v3

EX-99.CERT

[EX-99.CERT]—Exhibit  (a)(2)

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Bradley J. Skapyak, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Dreyfus Worldwide Dollar Money Market Fund, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

By:       /s/ Bradley J. Skapyak

            Bradley J. Skapyak ,

            President

Date:    December 23, 2010

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, James Windels, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Dreyfus Worldwide Dollar Money market Fund, Inc;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

By:       /s/ James Windels

            James Windels,

            Treasurer

Date:     December 23, 2010

EX-99.906CERT

[EX-99.906CERT]

Exhibit (b)

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

            In connection with this report on Form N-CSR for the Registrant as furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)        the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable; and

            (2)        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

By:       /s/ Bradley J. Skapyak

Bradley J. Skapyak,

            President

Date:    December 23, 2010

By:       /s/ James Windels

             James Windels,

             Treasurer

Date:    December 23, 2010

This certificate is furnished pursuant to the requirements of Form N-CSR and shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

-1-