XML 21 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.0.814
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Fair Value Measurements  
Fair Value Measurements

Note 2. Fair Value Measurements

 

As described in Note 1, the Partnership follows the provisions of FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. FASB ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and sets out a fair value hierarchy. The Partnership utilizes valuation techniques to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value are categorized within the fair value hierarchy based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their value. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). Inputs are broadly defined as assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

 

Level 1. Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

 

Level 2. Inputs other than quoted prices within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. A significant adjustment to a Level 2 input could result in the Level 2 measurement becoming a Level 3 measurement.

 

Level 3. Inputs that are unobservable for the asset or liability. The Partnership does not have any assets classified as Level 3.

 

The following section describes the valuation techniques used by the Partnership to measure different financial instruments at fair value and includes the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the financial instrument is categorized.

 

Fair value of exchange-traded futures contracts and options on futures contracts are based upon exchange settlement prices as of the last business day of the reporting period. These financial instruments are classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

The Partnership values forward contracts and options on forward contracts based on the average bid and ask price of quoted forward spot prices obtained as of the last business day of the reporting period. These financial instruments are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

The Partnership values bank deposits, which consist of interest bearing demand deposits and are included in cash and cash equivalents in the consolidated statements of financial condition, at face value plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value based on prevailing interest rates, and these financial instruments are classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

The Partnership values bank deposits, which consist of certificates of deposit and are included in securities owned in the consolidated statements of financial condition, at face value plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value based on prevailing interest rates, and these financial instruments are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

U.S. Government securities, U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise securities and commercial paper are stated at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value based on quoted market prices in an active market. The Partnership compares market prices quoted by dealers to the cost plus accrued interest to ensure a reasonable approximation of fair value. These securities are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

The Partnership values corporate bonds at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value. Corporate bonds purchased are of a high credit quality and have observable market price quotations. The fair value of corporate bonds is evaluated considering market prices of the issuer quoted by dealers. Corporate bonds are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

The investment in the total return swap is reported at fair value based on daily price reporting from the swap counterparty. The Partnership’s swap transaction is a two-party contract entered into primarily to exchange the returns earned or realized on particular pre-determined investments or instruments. The gross returns to be exchanged or swapped between parties are calculated with respect to a notional amount. The total return swap has inputs which are transparent and can generally be corroborated by market data and therefore is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

The following table presents the Partnership’s fair value hierarchy for those assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2015:

 

Assets

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Equity in brokers’ trading accounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Government securities

 

$

—

 

$

9,500,412

 

$

—

 

$

9,500,412

 

U.S. and foreign futures contracts

 

7,293,331

 

—

 

—

 

7,293,331

 

Forward currency contracts

 

—

 

(480,443

)

—

 

(480,443

)

Swap contracts

 

—

 

411,108

 

—

 

411,108

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bank deposits

 

3,077,861

 

—

 

—

 

3,077,861

 

Foreign commercial paper

 

—

 

6,163,239

 

—

 

6,163,239

 

U.S. Commercial paper

 

—

 

108,292,356

 

—

 

108,292,356

 

Securities owned

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign commercial paper

 

—

 

1,997,440

 

—

 

1,997,440

 

U.S. Commercial paper

 

—

 

12,160,986

 

—

 

12,160,986

 

U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises

 

—

 

68,918,070

 

—

 

68,918,070

 

U.S. Corporate bonds

 

—

 

12,130,799

 

—

 

12,130,799

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

10,371,192

 

$

219,093,967

 

$

—

 

$

229,465,159

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The gross presentation of the fair value of the Partnership’s derivatives by contract type is shown in Note 10. See the consolidated condensed schedule of investments for additional detail categorization.

 

The following table presents the Partnership’s fair value hierarchy for those assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2014:

 

Assets

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Equity in brokers’ trading accounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Government securities

 

$

—

 

$

12,395,634

 

$

—

 

$

12,395,634

 

U.S. and foreign futures contracts

 

11,549,467

 

—

 

—

 

11,549,467

 

Forward currency contracts

 

—

 

(181,222

)

—

 

(181,222

)

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bank deposits

 

6,163,896

 

—

 

—

 

6,163,896

 

Foreign commercial paper

 

—

 

18,301,948

 

—

 

18,301,948

 

U.S. commercial paper

 

—

 

136,220,051

 

—

 

136,220,051

 

Securities owned

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—

 

Foreign commercial paper

 

—

 

2,580,625

 

—

 

2,580,625

 

U.S. commercial paper

 

—

 

8,106,663

 

—

 

8,106,663

 

U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises

 

—

 

89,383,625

 

—

 

89,383,625

 

Foreign corporate bonds

 

—

 

1,553,227

 

—

 

1,553,227

 

U.S. corporate bonds

 

—

 

10,563,619

 

—

 

10,563,619

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

17,713,363

 

$

278,924,170

 

$

—

 

$

296,637,533

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The gross presentation of the fair value of the Partnership’s derivatives by contract type is shown in Note 10. See the consolidated condensed schedule of investments for additional detail categorization.

 

The Partnership assesses the level of the investments at each measurement date, and transfers between levels are recognized on the actual date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer in accordance with the Partnership’s accounting policy regarding the recognition of transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy. There were no significant transfers among Levels 1, 2 and 3 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and year ended December 31, 2014.