UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended
or
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File No:
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
(State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. EIN)
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code:
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Issuer's classes of common equity as of the latest practicable date: Number of shares outstanding as of August 11, 2017:
DIAMONDHEAD CASINO CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART 1: | FINANCIAL INFORMATION | Page |
|
|
|
ITEM 1: | Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
| Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2017 |
|
| and December 31, 2016……………………………………………………………… | 1 |
|
|
|
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Loss for the Three Months Ended |
|
| June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016…………………..………......................................... | 2 |
|
|
|
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Loss for the Six Months Ended |
|
| June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016…………………..………......................................... | 3 |
|
|
|
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended |
|
| June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016…………………..………......................................... | 4 |
|
|
|
| Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements …………………………… | 5 |
|
|
|
ITEM 2: | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and |
|
| Financial Results…………………………………………………………………….. | 19 |
|
|
|
ITEM 3: | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk……………………… | 23 |
|
|
|
ITEM 4: | Controls and Procedures…………………………………………………………… | 23 |
|
|
|
PART II: | OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1: | Legal Proceedings…………………………………………………………………. | 24 |
|
|
|
ITEM 1A: | Risk Factors………………………………………………………………………… | 26 |
|
|
|
ITEM 2: | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds……………………… | 26 |
|
|
|
ITEM 3: | Default Upon Senior Securities……………………………………………………. | 26 |
|
|
|
ITEM 4: | Mine Safety Disclosures…………………………………………………………… | 27 |
|
|
|
ITEM 5: | Other Information…………………………………………………………………. | 27 |
|
|
|
ITEM 6: | Exhibits……………………………………………………………………………. | 27 |
|
|
|
| Signatures…………………………………………………………………………. | 29 |
i
DIAMONDHEAD CASINO CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
| June 30, |
| December 31, |
| |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash | $ | $ |
| ||
Other current assets |
|
|
| ||
Total current assets |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land held for development (Note 3) |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs (net of amortization of $ |
|
|
| ||
Other assets |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets | $ | $ |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible notes and line of credit payable (Note 5) | $ | $ |
| ||
Debenture payable (net of unamortized discount of $ |
|
|
| ||
Convertible debentures payable (net of unamortized discount of $ |
|
|
| ||
Derivative liability (Note 6) |
|
|
| ||
Short term notes and interest bearing advance (Note 7) |
|
| |
| |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses due related parties (Note 4) |
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses – other (Note 4) |
|
|
| ||
Total current liabilities |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable due related parties (Note 8) |
|
|
| ||
Notes payable due others (Note 8) |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 3 and 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ deficiency |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $ |
|
|
| ||
Common stock, $ |
|
|
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
| ||
Unearned ESOP shares |
| ( | ) | ( | ) |
Accumulated deficit |
| ( | ) | ( | ) |
Treasury stock, at cost, |
| ( | ) | ( | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders’ deficiency |
| ( | ) | ( | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficiency | $ | $ |
|
See the accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
DIAMONDHEAD CASINO CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF LOSS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
(UNAUDITED)
| 2017 |
|
| 2016 |
| |
COSTS AND EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative and general |
|
|
|
| ||
Amortization |
|
|
|
| ||
Other |
|
|
|
| ||
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt discount |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
Interest expense |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
Change in fair value of derivative liability |
|
|
| ( |
| |
Net proceeds from litigation settlement |
|
|
|
| ||
Reversal of previously accrued DOL penalties |
|
|
|
| ||
Total other income |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share, basic and fully diluted |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic and fully diluted |
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
DIAMONDHEAD CASINO CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF LOSS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
(UNAUDITED)
| 2017 |
| 2016 | |
COSTS AND EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
Administrative and general | $ | $ | ||
Amortization |
|
| ||
Other |
|
| ||
Total costs and expenses |
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt discount |
| ( |
| ( |
Interest expense |
| ( |
| ( |
Change in fair value of derivative liability |
|
| ( | |
Net proceeds from litigation settlement |
|
| ||
Reversal of previously accrued DOL penalties |
|
| ||
Other income |
|
| ||
Total other income (expense) |
|
| ( | |
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
| ( |
| ( |
|
|
|
|
|
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS |
| ( |
| ( |
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS | $ | ( | $ | ( |
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share, basic and fully diluted | $ | ( | $ | ( |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic and fully diluted |
|
|
See the accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
DIAMONDHEAD CASINO CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
(UNAUDITED)
| 2017 |
|
| 2016 |
| |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
| |
| |
Change in fair value of derivative liability |
| ( | ) |
| |
|
Amortization of debt discount |
|
|
|
| ||
Change in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
| ( | ) |
| ( | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
| |
| |
Net cash used in operating activities |
| ( | ) |
| ( | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long term note |
|
|
| |
| |
Proceeds from interest bearing advances from related parties |
| |
|
| |
|
Proceeds from non-interest bearing advances from related parties |
| |
|
| |
|
Proceeds from other interest bearing advances |
|
|
| |
| |
Proceeds from short term Notes |
|
|
| |
| |
Payment of non-interest bearing advances from related parties |
| |
|
| ( | ) |
Payment of short term note |
| ( | ) |
| ( | ) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash |
| ( | ) |
| |
|
Cash beginning of period |
|
|
| |
| |
Cash end of period | $ |
| $ | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest | $ |
| $ |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid preferred stock dividends included in accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ |
| $ |
|
See the accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
DIAMONDHEAD CASINO CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 1. Organization and Business
Diamondhead Casino Corporation and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) own a total of approximately
Note 2. Liquidity and Going Concern
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis that the Company is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has no operations and generates no operating revenues. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company incurred net losses applicable to common shareholders, exclusive of the recording of change in the fair value of derivatives, of $
The Company has had no operations since it ended its gambling cruise ship operations in 2000. Since that time, the Company has concentrated its efforts on the development of its Diamondhead, Mississippi Property. The development of the Diamondhead Property is dependent on obtaining the necessary capital, through equity and/or debt financing, unilaterally, or in conjunction with one or more partners, to master plan, design, obtain permits for, construct, staff, open, and operate a casino resort.
In the past, in order to raise capital to continue to pay on-going costs and expenses, the Company has borrowed funds, through Private Placements of convertible instruments and other means, which are more fully described in Notes 5, 6, 7 and 8 to these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company is past due with respect to payment of significant principal and interest on most of these instruments. The Company is also in arrears with respect to payment of franchise taxes due to the State of Delaware for the years 2015 and 2016. In addition, the Company has also been unable to pay various routine operating expenses. At June 30, 2017, the Company had current liabilities totaling $
The above conditions raise substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
5
Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and in conformity with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 8-03 of Regulation S-X and the related rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. However, we believe that the disclosures included in these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this document have been prepared on the same basis as the annual consolidated financial statements and, in our opinion, reflect all adjustments, which include normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation in accordance with GAAP and SEC regulations for interim financial statements. The results for the six months ended June 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that we will have for any subsequent period. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, attached as Exhibit 99.1 to our annual report on Form 10-K.
Principles of Consolidation
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Diamondhead Casino Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Land Held for Development
Land held for development is carried at cost. Costs directly related to site development, such as licenses, permitting, engineering, and other costs, are capitalized.
Land development costs, which have been capitalized, consist of the following at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
Land under development | $ |
Licenses | |
Engineering and costs associated with permitting | |
|
|
Total land held for development | $ |
6
Fair Value Measurements
The Company follows the provisions of ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements” for financial assets and liabilities. This standard defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures. The standard discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The standard utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Input other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.
Level 3: Unobservable input that reflects management’s own assumptions.
The table listed below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending net balances for the derivative liability measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
| June 30, |
| December 31, |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance | $ |
| $ |
|
|
|
|
Total unrealized (appreciation) depreciation | ( |
| |
|
|
|
|
Ending balance | $ |
| $ |
Sensitivity Analysis to Changes in Level 3 Assumptions
Significant inputs include the dates when required conditions are expected to be met under the conversion terms of the debentures, the underlying market cap due to borrowings and losses and discount for lack of marketability while the stock was delisted and reversed when the Company's stock became publicly listed again on or about October 26, 2015. In addition, use of different ranges of bond discount rates and changes in historical volatility rates would also result in a higher or lower fair value.
Current assets and current liabilities are financial instruments and management believes that their carrying amounts are reasonable estimates of their fair values due to their short term nature.
The convertible debentures and derivative liability approximate fair value based on Level 3 inputs, as further discussed in Note 7.
7
Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of longlived assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount of the assets to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows projected to be generated by the assets. If such assets are considered impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount the carrying value exceeds the fair value of such assets determined by appraisal, discounted cash flow projections, or other means. No impairment existed at June 30, 2017.
Net Loss per Common Share
Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Common shares outstanding consist of issued shares, including allocated and committed shares held by the ESOP trust, less shares held in treasury. The dilutive securities below do not include
The table below summarizes the components of potential dilutive securities at June 30, 2017 and 2016.
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
Description | 2017 |
| 2016 |
|
|
|
|
Convertible Preferred Stock |
| ||
Options to Purchase Common Shares |
| ||
Private Placement Warrants |
| ||
Convertible Promissory Notes |
| ||
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Note 4. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
The table below outlines the elements included in accounts payable and accrued expenses at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
| June 30, |
| December 31, |
| |
Description |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
|
Related Parties: |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued payroll due officers |
|
|
| ||
Accrued interest due officers and directors |
|
|
| ||
Accrued director fees |
|
|
| ||
Base rents due to the President |
|
|
| ||
Associated rental costs |
|
|
| ||
Other |
|
|
| ||
Total Related Parties |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Related Parties: |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
| ||
Accrued dividends |
|
|
| ||
Accrued fines and penalties |
|
|
| ||
Other accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
| ||
Total Non-related Parties |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
|
8
Note 5. Convertible Notes and Line of Credit
Line of Credit
On October 23, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with an unrelated third party for an unsecured Line of Credit up to a maximum of $
Convertible Notes
Pursuant to a Private Placement Memorandum dated March 1, 2010, the Company offered Units consisting of a two year unsecured, convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $
Pursuant to an additional Private Placement Memorandum dated October 25, 2010, the Company offered Units consisting of a two year unsecured, convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $
The Convertible Notes issued pursuant to the two Private Placements discussed above total $
The table below summarizes the Company’s debt arising from the above-described sources as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
| Principal |
|
|
| Amount | Amount Due | Amount Due |
Loan Facility | Owed | Related Parties | Others |
|
|
|
|
Line of Credit | $ | $ | $ |
|
|
|
|
Private Placements: |
|
|
|
March 1, 2010 | | | |
October 25, 2010 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Total Private Placements | | | |
|
|
|
|
Total | $ | $ | $ |
9
Note 6. Convertible Debentures and Derivative Liability
Pursuant to a Private Placement Memorandum dated February 14, 2014 (the "Private Placement"), the Company offered up to a maximum of $
On December 31, 2014, investors who had purchased $
On December 31, 2014, the Second Closing occurred when investors representing $
The Company did not meet the closing obligations for the Third Tranche Debentures as of June 30, 2015, as was required, pursuant to the terms of the Private Placement, as amended. Therefore, the remaining $850,000 being held in escrow for the purchase of the Third Tranche Debentures was returned to the investors in July 2015.
For purposes of determining the proper accounting treatment and valuation of the instruments, the Company applied the provisions set forth in ASC Topic 820, "Fair Value in Financial Instruments" and ASC Topic 815, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." Since the Notes issued have derivative features, the embedded derivatives should be bundled and valued as a single, compound embedded derivative, bifurcated from the debt host and treated as a liability. In addition, the valuation is required to be conducted for each reporting period the instrument is in existence.
10
The Company's stock was not trading from approximately September 4, 2014, when its stock registration was revoked, through approximately October 26, 2015, when its' stock began to trade again. The Company engaged an independent valuation expert to determine the fair value of its shares of common stock for each quarter beginning with the quarter ended September 30, 2014. For periods from September 30, 2014 through September 30, 2015, the fair value of the common stock was estimated by adjusting the most recent market price by changes in the underlying market cap due to changes in the value of net assets and applying a discount for lack of marketability inasmuch as the stock was not trading. After the stock began to trade again on or about October 26, 2015, the closing price of the stock was used in the valuation beginning with the quarter ending December 31, 2015 through this most recent valuation at June 30, 2017.
The estimated fair value for the derivative liability relating to each Debenture at the balance sheet dates is as follows:
June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |
|
|
|
Tranche 1 | $ | $ |
Tranche 2 | | |
|
|
|
Derivative Liability | $ | $ |
At the initial valuation date of each Tranche, a portion of the derivative liability was allocated to the Convertible Debentures as debt discount, with the remainder being recorded as other income/expense. At March 31, 2014, the initial valuation of the First Tranche Debentures, $
The interest payment on the Tranche 1 and Tranche 2 Debentures for the calendar year 2015, in the amount of $
On October 25, 2016, certain Debenture holders filed a Complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware for monies due and owing pursuant to the Tranche 1 and Tranche 2 Collateralized Convertible Senior Debentures issued on March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2014. The plaintiffs are seeking $1.4 million, plus interest from January 1, 2015, together with costs and fees. The Company was served with the Complaint on October 31, 2016. On November 21, 2016, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to failure to plead diversity. On February 21, 2017, the plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend their Complaint based upon declarations of citizenship previously filed with the court.
11
Note 7. Short Term Notes and Interest Bearing Advance
Short Term Note
In January 2017, the Company financed $
Bank Credit Facility
Wells Fargo Bank provided an unsecured credit facility of up to $
Interest Bearing Advance
On February 2, 2017, the Company borrowed $
The table below summarizes the short term notes and interest bearing advance at June 30, 2017.
|
| Balance Owing |
Description of Facility | Interest Rate | June 30,2017 |
|
|
|
Property Liability Insurance Financing | $ | |
|
|
|
Bank Credit Facility | | |
|
|
|
Interest Bearing Advance | | |
|
|
|
Total Short Term Notes and Interest Bearing Advance |
| $ 40,588 |
12
Note 8. Long Term Notes Payable
In the first four months of 2016, the Company received cash advances totaling $
In the third quarter of 2016, the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company loaned the Company an additional $
The principal due under the foregoing loans totals $
On June 9, 2017, the Company entered into a Promissory Note with an unrelated lender in exchange for proceeds in the amount of $
The table below summarizes the Company’s long term notes payable as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
| Principal Amount |
| Amount Due |
| Amount Due |
Loan Facility | Owed |
| Related Parties |
| Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 Year 8% secured note | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 Year 14% secured note | |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Due December 31, 2016 | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 Year 12.5% secured note | |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Due June 30, 2017 | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
13
Note 9. Related Party Transactions
As of June 30, 2017, the President of the Company is owed deferred salary in the amount of $
Effective September 1, 2011, the Company entered into a month-to-month lease with the President and then-Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, for office space in a furnished and fully equipped townhouse office building owned by the President in Alexandria, Virginia. The lease calls for monthly base rent in the amount of $
Directors of the Company are entitled to a director's fee of $
See Notes 8 and 11 for other related party transactions.
Note 10. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company’s obligations under the Collateralized Convertible Senior Debentures are secured by a lien on the Company’s Mississippi property (the “Investors Lien”). On March 31, 2014, the Company issued $1 million of First Tranche Collateralized Convertible Senior Debentures and on December 31, 2014 the Company issued $
The Company has filed a second lien in the maximum amount of $
14
Litigation
College Health & Investment, L.P. v. Diamondhead Casino Corporation (Delaware Superior Court)(C.A. No. N15C-01-119-WCC)
On January 15, 2015, the plaintiff, a beneficial owner of in excess of
College Health & Investment, L.P. v. Diamondhead Casino Corporation (In the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (C.A. No. 10663-CB)
On February 13, 2015, the plaintiff, a beneficial owner of in excess of 5% of the common stock of the Company, filed a Verified Complaint Pursuant to 8 Del.C.§211(c), with a Verification signed by the plaintiff's General Partner, Samuel I. Burstyn, seeking an order compelling the Company to hold an annual meeting. The Company agreed to entry of an Order setting a new date for an annual meeting of June 8, 2015, a Record Date of April 24, 2015, and to clarify that there is no advance notice requirement for the submission of stockholder proposals at the Company's annual stockholders' meetings. The plaintiff sought costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees. On or about July 7, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a Motion for an Award of Attorneys' Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses in the total amount of $
15
College Health & Investment, L.P. v. Edson R. Arneault, Deborah A. Vitale, Gregory A. Harrison, Martin Blount and Benjamin Harrell(In the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware)(C.A. No. 10793-CB)
On March 14, 2015, the plaintiff, a beneficial owner in excess of 5% of the common stock of the Company, filed a Verified Complaint, with a Verification signed by the plaintiff's General Partner, Samuel I. Burstyn. In Count I, the plaintiff alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duty of disclosure. In Count II, the plaintiff alleges that defendants breached their fiduciary duties of loyalty and care. The plaintiff sought injunctive relief, but no monetary damages other than attorney’s fees. The defendants believe that plaintiff's claims are without merit and intend to vigorously defend this lawsuit. In addition, on or about July 30, 2015, the defendant directors filed Defendants' Answer and Verified Counterclaims for defamation, breach of fiduciary duty and aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty. On August 19, 2015, the plaintiff filed a Motion to Dismiss the Counterclaims. As noted above, on or about July 7, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a Motion for an Award of Attorneys' Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses in the total amount of $
In re Diamondhead Casino Corporation (United States Bankruptcy Court)(District of Delaware)(Case No. 15-11647- LSS)
On August 6, 2015, an Involuntary Petition was filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court by three promissory note holders under title 11, United States Code, requesting an order for relief under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. The three creditors listed combined claims of $150,000 in principal, plus interest due on certain promissory notes. On August 28, 2015, the Company filed a Motion to Dismiss the Involuntary Petition or, in the Alternative, to Convert the Case to
Chapter 11 (the "Motion to Dismiss"). The Company maintained that the Petition was filed in bad faith by supporters of the dissident slate which lost the proxy contest that was decided by the stockholders on June 8, 2015 and that it was filed in retaliation for the Company's refusal, following the stockholders' vote, to place several of the losing dissident's nominees on the Board of Directors. On September 11, 15 and 17, 2015, three additional promissory note holders filed Joinders to the Involuntary Petition listing additional combined claims of $
On September 17, 2015, six Petitioners, who were represented by the same attorneys, filed an Objection to the Company's Motion to Dismiss. On September 18, 2015, the six Petitioners filed an Emergency Motion for Entry of an Order Directing the Appointment of (I) an Interim Chapter 7 Trustee, or (II) alternatively, a Chapter 11 Trustee Should the Involuntary Case be converted (the "Emergency Motion"). The Court held an evidentiary hearing on the Emergency Motion in October 2015. On November 13, 2015, the Court denied the Petitioners' Emergency Motion as it related to the request for an interim Chapter 7 trustee. On January 15, 2016, the Court held an evidentiary hearing on the Company's Motion to Dismiss the Involuntary Petitions. The parties filed briefs in support of and in opposition to the motion.
16
On June 7, 2016, the Court entered an Order granting the Company's Motion to Dismiss the Involuntary Petitions. In its accompanying Opinion, the Court found, in part, that based on the totality of the circumstances, the Creditors' primary concern in filing the involuntary petition was to effect a change in management to benefit their investments as stockholders, which was not a proper purpose for filing an involuntary bankruptcy petition. On June 30, 2016, the Company filed a Motion for an Award of Fees and Expenses and Punitive Damages. On August 11, 2016, the Petitioning Creditors filed an Opposition to the Company's Motion for an Award of Fees and Expenses and Punitive Damages. On August 31, 2016, the Court entered an Order awarding judgment to the Company for attorneys’ fees and expenses against the Petitioners, jointly and severally, in the amount of $
Edson R. Arneault, Kathleen Devlin and James Devlin, J. Steven Emerson, Emerson Partners, J. Steven Emerson Roth IRA, Steven Rothstein, and Barry Stark and Irene Stark v. Diamondhead Casino Corporation (In the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (C.A. No. 1:16-cv-00989-UNA)
On October 25, 2016, the above-named Debenture holders filed a Complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware for monies due and owing pursuant to certain Collateralized Convertible Senior Debentures issued on March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2014. The plaintiffs are seeking $1.4 million, plus interest from January 1, 2015, together with costs and fees. The Company was served with the Complaint on October 31, 2016. On November 21, 2016, the Company filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to failure to plead diversity. On February 21, 2017, the plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend their complaint based upon declarations of citizenship previously filed with the court.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
The Company failed to file information returns required to be filed in connection with its Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) for the 2015 calendar year in a timely fashion. The filings were due to be filed with the Department of Labor by October 15, 2016. The Company did not have sufficient funds to pay professionals to audit its ESOP and/or prepare and file required documents and forms when due. Although these required filings normally do not result in any tax due to an agency of the government, the Company could be subject to penalties for failure to file these forms when due. The Company intends to bring its ESOP-required filings current and when current, will attempt to enroll in a voluntary compliance program with the Department of Labor and the Internal Revenue Service with respect to any penalties or fines incurred. However, there can be no assurance the Company will be able to enroll in any such program or obtain a reduction of the fines and penalties that may be due. The Company has accrued $
Note 11. Subsequent Events
On July 26, 2017, at the request of the Company, the current Chairman of the Board of Directors and a Vice President of the Company ("the Chairman"), paid all property taxes due, together with all interest due thereon, to Hancock County, Mississippi on an approximate 404-acre tract of land ("the Diamondhead Property"), owned by Mississippi Gaming Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The taxes had to be paid by July 31, 2017 to avoid a tax sale.
17
The taxes paid, together with interest due thereon, totaled $
The Chairman is one of the secured parties under that Land Deed of Trust recorded on September 26, 2014 in Hancock County, Mississippi, to secure Tranche I and Tranche II Debentures issued by the Company in 2014. Under paragraph 5 of the Land Deed of Trust, a secured party who advances sums for taxes due on the Diamondhead Property is secured by the same Land Deed of Trust, but only at that interest rate specified in the note representing the primary indebtedness, namely
The Chairman advanced the $
On July 24, 2017, the President of the Company, who is a Director of the Company, agreed to advance the Company up to $
18
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND FINANCIAL RESULTS
Forward Looking Statements
This section should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto, for the year ended December 31, 2016, attached as Exhibit 99.1 to our annual report filed on Form 10-K.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements and involves risks and uncertainties that could materially affect the Company’s future plans, business strategy, expected results of operations, liquidity, cash flows, and business prospects. These statements include, among other things, statements regarding our ability to implement our business plan and business strategy, our ability to obtain financing to sustain the Company, our ability to finance our future development and future operations, our ability to attract key personnel, and our ability to operate profitably in the future. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties, which could cause our actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. Any statements contained in this document that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. You can identify forward-looking statements as those that are not historical in nature, particularly those that use terminology such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “expects”, “anticipates”, “contemplates”, “estimates”, “believes”, "assumes", “intends”, “plans”, “projects”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these or similar terms. In evaluating these forward-looking statements, you should consider risks and uncertainties relating to various factors, including, but not limited to, financing, licensing, construction and development, competition, legal actions, federal, state, county and/or city government actions, general financing conditions, and general economic conditions.
The Company’s actual results may differ significantly from results projected in the forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or update forward-looking statements, except as required by law. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.
Throughout this report references to “we”, “our”, “us”, “Diamondhead Casino Corporation”, the “Company”, and similar terms refer to Diamondhead Casino Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.
The Company’s current priority is the development of a casino resort on its Property located in Diamondhead, Mississippi. The Company’s management, financial resources and assets will be devoted towards the development of this property. There can be no assurance that the property can be developed or, that if developed, that the project will be successful.
19
Liquidity
The Company has incurred continued losses over the years and certain conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company has no operations, generates no revenues and has been dependent on various financing arrangements to raise sufficient cash to satisfy the expenses it incurs. The Company is concentrating its efforts on the development of its Diamondhead, Mississippi Property. The development of the Diamondhead property is dependent on obtaining the necessary capital, through equity and/or debt financing, unilaterally, or in conjunction with one or more partners, to master plan, design, obtain permits for, construct, staff, open, and operate a casino resort. In the past, the Company has been able to sustain itself through various short term borrowing, however, at June 30, 2017, the Company’s cash on hand amounted to $6,955, while current liabilities totaled $9,113,892. Therefore, in order to sustain itself, it is imperative that the Company secure a source of funds to provide further working capital. There can be no assurance the Company will be able to obtain such funding.
In addition, a line of credit in the amount of $1,000,000 obtained in October 2008, was payable in November 2012. Also, convertible notes issued pursuant to two Private Placements offered in 2010, totaling $962,500 at June 30, 2017, had become payable beginning in March 2012 and extending at various dates through June 2013. As of the date of the filing of this report, none of the aforementioned debt obligations or the accrued interest thereon has been paid and, therefore, the Company is in default with respect to the repayment terms of the notes. Also, accrued interest on Tranche 1 and Tranche 2 Debentures issued in 2014, totaled $167,929, of which payment of $131,233 is delinquent. The Company is also in arrears with respect to payment of franchise taxes due to the State of Delaware for the years 2015 and 2016. In addition, the Company has also been unable to pay various routine operating expenses. At June 30, 2017, the Company had current liabilities totaling $9,113,892 and only $6,955 cash on hand. The above conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Financial Results and Analysis
During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company incurred net losses applicable to common stockholders, exclusive of the recording of change in the fair value of derivatives, of $680,843. However, the Company recorded a decrease in the fair value of the derivative liability in the amount of $445,802 which decreased the net loss applicable to common stockholders to $235,041 for the six months ended June 30, 2017. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company incurred net losses, exclusive of the recording of change in the fair value of derivatives, of $283,316. However, the Company recorded an increase in the fair value of the derivative liability in the amount of $190,100 which increased the net loss applicable to common stockholders to $473,416 for the six months ended June 30, 2016.
Administrative and general expenses incurred totaled $317,536 and $340,786 for the six months ending June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The table below depicts the major categories comprising these expenses:
20
|
| June 30, |
| June 30, | |||
DESCRIPTION |
| 2017 |
| 2016 | |||
Payroll and Related Taxes |
| $ | 150,000 |
| $ | 150,000 | |
Director Fees |
| 45,000 |
| 45,000 | |||
Professional Services |
| 57,090 |
| 45,240 | |||
Settlement Fee paid to Director |
| - |
| 15,000 | |||
Rents and Insurances |
| 36,265 |
| 34,908 | |||
Fines and Penalties |
| 9,050 |
| 24,432 | |||
All Other Expenses |
| 20,131 |
| 26,206 | |||
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total General and Administrative Expenses |
| $ | 317,536 |
| $ | 340,786 |
The increase in professional fees for the six months ended June 30, 2017 in the amount of $11,850 was due to legal fees and expenses associated with various on-going litigation.
Expense associated with fines and penalties decreased $15,382 from the prior year. The decrease is attributable to the Company successfully completing its previously delinquent filings for the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan for the years 2010 through 2014 during the second quarter of 2016.
Other Income and Expense
Interest expense incurred totaled $221,502 and $199,980 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, an increase of $21,522. The increase in 2017 is primarily attributable to the impact of accrued interest on unpaid wages which continue to accrue quarterly.
The results for the period ended June 30, 2016 benefited from the settlement of certain litigation in the second quarter of 2016, which resulted in net proceeds to the Company of $150,000. In addition, the Company filed previously delinquent filings associated with its Employee Stock Ownership Plan for the years ended December 31, 2010 through 2014 with the Department of Labor (“DOL”). In the absence of the filings, the Company could have been subjected to extensive penalties associated with those delinquencies and had accrued a provision for that possibility in prior financial statements. The Company believed it had complied with the DOL's Delinquent Filer Voluntary Compliance Program and, therefore, recaptured $240,050 of previously-accrued expense related to this matter in the second quarter of 2016.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Management Agreement
On June 19, 1993, two subsidiaries of the Company, Casino World Inc. and Mississippi Gaming Corporation, entered into a Management Agreement with Casinos Austria Maritime Corporation (“CAMC”). Subject to certain conditions, under the Management Agreement, CAMC would operate, on an exclusive basis, all of the Company’s proposed dockside gaming casinos in the State of Mississippi, including any operation fifty percent (50%) or more of which is owned by the Company or its affiliates. Unless terminated earlier pursuant to the provisions of the Agreement, the Agreement terminates five years from the first day of actual Mississippi gaming operations and provides for the payment of an annual operational term management fee of 1.2% of all gross gaming revenues between zero and $100,000,000; plus 0.75% of gross gaming revenue between $100,000,000 and $140,000,000; plus 0.5% of gross gaming revenue above $140,000,000; plus two percent of the net gaming revenue between zero and $25,000,000; plus three percent of the net gaming revenue above twenty-five million dollars $25,000,000. The Company believes this Agreement is no longer in effect. However, there can be no assurance that CAMC will not attempt to maintain otherwise which would lead to litigation.
21
There are no other off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues and expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources, that are material to our stockholders.
Critical Accounting Policies
Estimates
The preparation of unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company follows the provisions of ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements” for financial assets and liabilities. This standard defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures. The standard discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The standard utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Input other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.
Level 3: Unobservable input that reflects management’s own assumptions.
The table listed below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending net balances for the derivative liability measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |
|
|
|
Tranche 1 | $ 876,685 | $ 1,008,068 |
Tranche 2 | 707,802 | 1,022,221 |
|
|
|
Derivative Liability | $ 1,584,487 | $ 2,030,289 |
Sensitivity Analysis to Changes in Level 3 Assumptions
Significant inputs include the dates when required conditions are expected to be met under the conversion terms of the debentures, the underlying market cap due to borrowings and losses and discount for lack of marketability while the stock was delisted and reversed when the Company's stock became publicly listed again on or about October 26, 2015. In addition, use of different ranges of bond discount rates and changes in historical volatility rates would also result in a higher or lower fair value.
22
Current assets and current liabilities are financial instruments and management believes that their carrying amounts are reasonable estimates of their fair values due to their short term nature.
The convertible debentures and derivative liability approximate fair value based on Level 3 inputs.
Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of longlived assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount of the assets to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows projected to be generated by the assets. If such assets are considered impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount the carrying value exceeds the fair value of such assets determined by appraisal, discounted cash flow projections, or other means. No impairment existed at June 30, 2017.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
The Company currently is not subject to any trading or non-trading market risk-sensitive instruments. The note payable and the long-term debt listed on the Company’s balance sheet are at fixed interest rates and, therefore, are not market risk-sensitive.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
In connection with the preparation of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, who also serves as Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2017. Disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that the information that we are required to disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s Rules and Forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on the results of this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of June 30, 2017.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the quarter ended June 30, 2017 that are expected to materially affect, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
23
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
College Health & Investment, L.P. v. Diamondhead Casino Corporation (Delaware Superior Court)(C.A. No. N15C-01-119-WCC)
On January 15, 2015, the plaintiff, a beneficial owner of in excess of 5% of the common stock of the Company, filed suit for breach of a Promissory Note issued March 25, 2010, in the principle amount of $150,000, with interest payable at 12% per annum, with a maturity date of March 25, 2012. Plaintiff seeks payment of principle of $150,000, interest due through December 31, 2014 in the amount of $45,000, and interest due of 12% per annum from December 31, 2014 until entry of judgment. The Note, as well as the accrued interest thereon, are shown as current liabilities on the Company’s current balance sheet. On January 22, 2015, the defendant forwarded a Notice of Conversion to plaintiff, exercising the Borrower's right to convert the principal and any interest due on the Note into common stock. On February 11, 2015, the Company moved to dismiss the complaint as moot. The plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss alleging that the Note was convertible only prior to its maturity date. On July 2, 2015, the Court agreed with the Plaintiff and denied the Company's motion to dismiss. On July 16, 2015, the Company filed an Answer and Grounds of Defense. On August 18, 2015, the Company filed a Suggestion of Bankruptcy and Automatic Stay. The matter was stayed due to the below-referenced bankruptcy action (Case No. 15-11647) which has now concluded. On July 7, 2017, the Court notified counsel for the parties that if no proceedings were taken within the next thirty days, that this action would be dismissed by the Court for want of prosecution. On August 4, 2017, the plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgement.
College Health & Investment, L.P. v. Diamondhead Casino Corporation (In the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (C.A. No. 10663-CB)
On February 13, 2015, the plaintiff, a beneficial owner of in excess of 5% of the common stock of the Company, filed a Verified Complaint Pursuant to 8 Del.C.§211(c), with a Verification signed by the plaintiff's General Partner, Samuel I. Burstyn, seeking an order compelling the Company to hold an annual meeting. The Company agreed to entry of an Order setting a new date for an annual meeting of June 8, 2015, a Record Date of April 24, 2015, and to clarify that there is no advance notice requirement for the submission of stockholder proposals at the Company's annual stockholders' meetings. The plaintiff sought costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees. On or about July 7, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a Motion for an Award of Attorneys' Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses in the total amount of $150,000 for both this case and the following case. The Company filed an opposition to this motion. On August 18, 2015, the Company filed a Suggestion of Bankruptcy and Automatic Stay. The matter was stayed due to the below-referenced bankruptcy action (Case No. 15-11647) which has now concluded. No further activity has occurred in this case.
24
College Health & Investment, L.P. v. Edson R. Arneault, Deborah A. Vitale, Gregory A. Harrison, Martin Blount and Benjamin Harrell(In the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware)(C.A. No. 10793-CB)
On March 14, 2015, the plaintiff, a beneficial owner in excess of 5% of the common stock of the Company, filed a Verified Complaint, with a Verification signed by the plaintiff's General Partner, Samuel I. Burstyn. In Count I, the plaintiff alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duty of disclosure. In Count II, the plaintiff alleges that defendants breached their fiduciary duties of loyalty and care. The plaintiff sought injunctive relief, but no monetary damages other than attorney’s fees. The defendants believe that plaintiff's claims are without merit and intend to vigorously defend this lawsuit. In addition, on or about July 30, 2015, the defendant directors filed Defendants' Answer and Verified Counterclaims for defamation, breach of fiduciary duty and aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty.
On August 19, 2015, the plaintiff filed a Motion to Dismiss the Counterclaims. As noted above, on or about July 7, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a Motion for an Award of Attorneys' Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses in the total amount of $150,000 in this case and the above-referenced case. On or about August 26, 2015, the defendants filed an Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for an Award of Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses. On September 25, 2015, the parties entered into a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Staying Litigation pending the below-referenced bankruptcy action (Case No. 15-11647) which has now concluded. No further activity has occurred in this case.
In re Diamondhead Casino Corporation (United States Bankruptcy Court)(District of Delaware)(Case No. 15-11647-LSS)
On August 6, 2015, an Involuntary Petition was filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court by three promissory note holders under title 11, United States Code, requesting an order for relief under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. The three creditors listed combined claims of $150,000 in principal, plus interest due on certain promissory notes. On August 28, 2015, the Company filed a Motion to Dismiss the Involuntary Petition or, in the Alternative, to Convert the Case to Chapter 11 (the "Motion to Dismiss"). The Company maintained that the Petition was filed in bad faith by supporters of the dissident slate which lost the proxy contest that was decided by the stockholders on June 8, 2015 and that it was filed in retaliation for the Company's refusal, following the stockholders' vote, to place several of the losing dissident's nominees on the Board of Directors. On September 11, 15 and 17, 2015, three additional promissory note holders filed Joinders to the Involuntary Petition listing additional combined claims of $237,500 plus interest. The Company does not recognize one of the joining petitioners as a bona fide creditor of the Company. On September 17, 2015, the six Petitioners, who were represented by the same attorneys, filed an Objection to the Company's Motion to Dismiss. On September 18, 2015, the six Petitioners filed an Emergency Motion for Entry of an Order Directing the Appointment of (I) an Interim Chapter 7 Trustee, or (II) alternatively, a Chapter 11 Trustee Should the Involuntary Case be converted (the "Emergency Motion"). The Court held an evidentiary hearing on the Emergency Motion in October 2015. On November 13, 2015, the Court denied the Petitioners' Emergency Motion as it related to the request for an interim Chapter 7 trustee. On January 15, 2016, the Court held an evidentiary hearing on the Company's Motion to Dismiss the Involuntary Petitions. The parties filed briefs in support of and in opposition to the motion.
25
On June 7, 2016, the Court entered an Order granting the Company's Motion to Dismiss the Involuntary Petitions. In its accompanying Opinion, the Court found, in part, that based on the totality of the circumstances, the Creditors' primary concern in filing the involuntary petition was to effect a change in management to benefit their investments as stockholders, which was not a proper purpose for filing an involuntary bankruptcy petition. On June 30, 2016, the Company filed a Motion for an Award of Fees and Expenses and Punitive Damages. On August 11, 2016, the Petitioning Creditors filed an Opposition to the Company's Motion for an Award of Fees and Expenses and Punitive Damages. On August 31, 2016, the Court entered an Order awarding judgment to the Company for attorneys’ fees and expenses against the Petitioners, jointly and severally, in the amount of $54,886. On September 1, 2016, the Court filed an Amended Order in which it further stated that the amounts awarded were not subject to any setoff against amounts owed by the Company to the Petitioners. The Company has filed a collection action against the Petitioners to collect the attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in defending this action. In the first quarter of 2017, the Company collected $20,000 from one petitioner in connection with the collection action.
Edson R. Arneault, Kathleen Devlin and James Devlin, J. Steven Emerson, Emerson Partners, J. Steven Emerson Roth IRA, Steven Rothstein, and Barry Stark and Irene Stark v. Diamondhead Casino Corporation (In the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (C.A. No. 1:16-cv-00989-UNA)
On October 25, 2016, the above-named Debenture holders filed a Complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware for monies due and owing pursuant to certain Collateralized Convertible Senior Debentures issued on March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2014. The plaintiffs are seeking $1.4 million, plus interest from January 1, 2015, together with costs and fees. The Company was served with the Complaint on October 31, 2016. On November 21, 2016, the Company filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to failure to plead diversity. On February 21, 2017, the plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend their complaint based upon declarations of citizenship previously filed with the court.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
As a smaller reporting company, information under this item is not required to be presented.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Default Upon Senior Securities
The Company is in arrears on the payment of dividends due on its three series of preferred stock currently issued and outstanding. The Company has not paid dividends due in the first six months of 2017 in the amount of i) $15,000 on its Series S preferred stock; ii) $15,000 on its Series S-NR preferred stock; and iii) $20,800 on its Series S-PIK preferred stock. The table below summarizes total preferred stock dividends in arrears at June 30, 2017.
|
| Total Amount | |
Description |
| In Arrears | |
|
|
| |
Series S | $ | 180,000 | |
Series S-NR |
| 180,000 | |
Series S-PIK |
| 249,600 | |
|
|
| |
Total In Arrears | $ | 609,600 |
26
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not Applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2
Attached to this report is the certification of the Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and Rule15d-14.
27
Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2
Attached to this report is the certification of the Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer of the Company as required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document |
101.SHC | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
28
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.
DIAMONDHEAD CASINO CORPORATION
DATE: August 14, 2017 | /s/ DEBORAH A. VITALE |
| By: Deborah A. Vitale |
| Chief Executive Officer |
29
CERTIFICATIONS Exhibit 31.1
I, Deborah A. Vitale, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Diamondhead Casino Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. As the Issuer's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and I have:
(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 14, 2017
/s/ Deborah A. Vitale
Deborah A. Vitale
Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATIONS Exhibit 31.2
I, Deborah A Vitale, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Diamondhead Casino Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. As the issuer's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the issuer and I have:
(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 14, 2017
/s/ Deborah A. Vitale
Deborah A. Vitale
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diamondhead Casino Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Deborah A. Vitale, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
DATE: August 14, 2017 |
|
| /s/ DEBORAH A. VITALE |
| Deborah A. Vitale |
| Chief Executive Officer |
EHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diamondhead Casino Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Deborah A. Vitale, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
DATE: August 14, 2017 |
|
| /s/ DEBORAH A. VITALE |
| Deborah A. Vitale |
| Chief Financial Officer |