XML 15 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2019
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  
Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition

The Company accounts for its revenues in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers, (“ASC 606”).

Wholesale revenues are recorded when a contract with the customer is agreed to by both parties and product has been transferred, which generally occurs at the point of shipment from the Company’s warehouse, and recorded at the transaction price based on the amount the Company expects to receive. Collection is probable as the majority of shipments occur to reputable credit worthy businesses and through factored relationships which guarantee payment. Estimated reductions to revenue for customer allowances are recorded based upon history as a percentage of sales and current outstanding chargebacks. The Company may allow for returns based upon pre-approval or in the case of damaged goods. Such returns are estimated based on historical experience and also specific claims filed by the customer. A refund liability is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses within the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Also, the Company records a return asset receivable in prepaid expenses and other current assets within the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The return asset receivable is evaluated for impairment each period.

Retail store revenue is recognized at the time the customer takes possession of the related merchandise. Revenue for ecommerce sales of products ordered through the Company’s retail internet sites are recognized at the point of shipment to the customer. Retail store revenue and ecommerce revenue exclude sales taxes collected from the customer.

Revenue from licensing arrangements is recognized based on actual sales when the Company expects royalties to exceed the minimum guarantee. For licensing arrangements in which the Company does not expect royalties to exceed the minimum guarantee, an estimate of the transaction price is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract. A contract asset is recorded for revenue recognized in advance of the contract payment terms, which is included in other assets within the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. Nonrefundable upfront fees are recorded as a contract liability and revenue is recognized straight-line over the term of the contract. Contract liabilities are included in other liabilities within the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Amounts related to shipping and handling that are billed to customers are considered to be activities to fulfill a promise to transfer the goods and are reflected in net sales, and the related costs are reflected in cost of goods sold within the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Concentration of Risk

Concentration of Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable and sold receivables, net. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents with various financial institutions, which is designed to limit exposure to any one institution. Periodic evaluations are performed of the relative credit rating of those financial institutions that are considered in the Company’s investment strategy. The vast majority of trade receivables from sales to customers are subsequently sold to a financial institution pursuant to a trade receivables securitization facility. The sale of trade receivables are made on a non-recourse basis; however, such sales are guaranteed through credit insurance purchased from an unrelated financial institution. When insured, the Company is not at risk if a customer fails to pay. For trade receivables not sold to a financial institution, the Company generally does not require collateral. As of September 30, 2019, the deferred purchase price of trade receivables sold pursuant to the RPA (as defined below) totaled $102.7 million. As of December 31, 2018, the deferred purchase price of trade receivables sold pursuant to the RPA totaled $59.3 million.  See “Note 4 – Accounts Receivables.”

The Company provides an allowance for estimated losses to be incurred in the collection of accounts receivable based upon the aging of outstanding balances, margin support and other dilution-related items. The net carrying value approximates the fair value for these assets. Such losses have historically been within management’s expectations. Uncollectible accounts are written off once collection efforts are deemed by management to have been exhausted.

Leases

Leases

In general, leases are evaluated and classified as either operating or finance leases. The Company has finance leases, however, finance leases are not material to the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets, condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss or condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

The assets related to the Company’s operating leases are included in operating lease ROU assets, and the current and long-term portions of liabilities related to the Company’s operating leases are included in current portion of operating lease liabilities and operating lease liabilities, respectively, on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2019. Operating lease assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at commencement date. As the Company cannot determine the implicit rate in its leases, the Company uses its estimated incremental borrowing rate based on information available at the date of the commencement of the lease in calculating the present value of its existing lease payments. The incremental borrowing rate is determined using the U.S. Treasury rate adjusted to account for the Company’s credit rating and the collateralized nature of operating leases. The operating lease asset also includes any lease payments made and unamortized lease incentives. The Company’s lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. Lease expense for minimum lease payments is recognized on a straight-line method over the term of the lease.

Financial Accounting Standards Recently Adopted and Recently Issued Financial Accounting Standards

Financial Accounting Standards Recently Adopted

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASC Topic 842, Leases (“ASC 842”), a new standard related to leases to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring the recognition of right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet. Most prominent among the changes in the standard is the recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating. Under the standard, disclosures are required to meet the objective of enabling users of financial statements to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases.

The Company adopted ASC 842 as of January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective approach. The Company elected the ‘comparatives under ASC 840 option’ as a transitional practical expedient, which allows the Company to initially apply the new lease requirements at the effective date and recognize a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. It also allows the Company to report comparative periods in the financial statements under previous GAAP under ASC 840, Leases (“ASC 840”). There was no cumulative-effect adjustment recorded in connection with our adoption of ASC 842. The Company also elected the ‘package of practical expedients’ permitted under the transition guidance, which allowed the Company to (i) carry forward the historical lease classification, (ii) forgo reassessment of whether any expired or existing contracts contain leases, and (iii) forgo reassessment of whether any previously unamortized initial direct costs continue to meet the definition of initial direct costs under ASC 842. However, any initial direct costs after the effective date will be included within the ROU asset under ASC 842. The Company did not elect the ‘hindsight’ practical expedient to reassess the lease term for existing leases.

For the accounting policy practical expedients, the Company elected not to recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities for short-term leases which have a lease term of 12 months or less and do not include an option to purchase the underlying asset that the Company is reasonably certain to exercise. Additionally, the Company elected the non-separation of lease and non-lease components, and as a result, the Company does not need to account for lease components (e.g., fixed payments including rent) separately from the non-lease components (e.g., common-area maintenance costs) for all leases.

The adoption of ASC 842 resulted in the recognition of ROU assets of $214.0 million with corresponding lease liabilities of $220.7 million. As a result of adopting the standard, $6.7 million of pre-existing liabilities for deferred rent, unfavorable leases and various lease incentives were reclassified as a component of the ROU assets.

There was no adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings upon adoption of ASC 842 given the nature of the impacts and the other transition practical expedients elected by the Company. Adoption of ASC 842 impacted the Company’s results on January 1, 2019, as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjustments due

 

 

 

    

December 31, 2018

    

to ASC 842

    

January 1, 2019

Operating lease ROU assets  (1) (2) (4)

 

$

 —

 

$

214,000

 

$

214,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current portion of operating lease liabilities (3)

 

$

 —

 

$

20,883

 

$

20,883

Accounts payable and accrued expenses (1)

 

 

525,863

 

 

(367)

 

 

525,496

Operating lease liabilities (3)

 

 

 —

 

 

199,857

 

 

199,857

Other non-current liabilities (4)

 

 

6,581

 

 

(6,373)

 

 

208

Total

 

$

532,444

 

$

214,000

 

$

746,444


(1)

Represents the reclassification of deferred rent, unfavorable leases and lease incentives to operating lease ROU assets.

(2)

Represents capitalization of operating lease assets.

(3)

Represents recognition of operating lease liabilities.

(4)

Represents reclassification of deferred rent, unfavorable leases and lease incentives to operating lease ROU assets.

The standard did not materially impact the Company’s consolidated net earnings and had no material impact on the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows. For further information regarding leases, see “Note 10Leases.”


Recently Issued Financial Accounting Standards

In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses — Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, an accounting standards update that introduces a new model for recognizing credit losses on financial instruments based on an estimate of current expected credit losses. This includes accounts receivable, trade receivables, loans, held-to-maturity debt securities, net investments in leases and certain off-balance sheet credit exposures.  The guidance also modifies the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022 and interim periods within that reporting period.  The Company is currently assessing the potential effects this update may have on its condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairments by eliminating step two from the goodwill impairment test. Under this guidance, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, an impairment charge shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. This standard is effective beginning in the first quarter of 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the new guidance.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. This new guidance removes certain disclosure requirements related to the fair value hierarchy, modifies existing disclosure requirements related to measurement uncertainty and adds new disclosure requirements. The new disclosure requirements include disclosing the changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. This new guidance is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted. Certain disclosures in the new guidance will need to be applied on a retrospective basis and others on a prospective basis. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the new guidance.