XML 44 R30.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.4
Fair Value Of Assets And Liabilities
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2020
Fair Value Of Assets And Liabilities [Abstract]  
Fair Value Of Assets And Liabilities 22.FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

There are three levels of inputs to fair value measurements:

Level 1 inputs are quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;

Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs.

Observable market data should be used when available.


ASSETS AND LIABILITIES MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A RECURRING BASIS

The following table presents for each of the fair-value hierarchy levels as defined in this footnote, those assets and liabilities which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2020 and 2019:

(in thousands)

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Fair Value

December 31, 2020

Securities available-for-sale:

US government agencies

$

-

$

68,098

$

-

$

68,098

States and political subdivisions

-

7,524

-

7,524

Mortgage-backed securities

-

86,774

-

86,774

Mortgage servicing rights

-

-

917

917

December 31, 2019

Securities available-for-sale:

US government agencies

$

-

$

28,155

$

-

$

28,155

States and political subdivisions

-

3,351

-

3,351

Mortgage-backed securities

-

96,416

-

96,416

Mortgage servicing rights

-

-

555

555

Securities available for sale

Fair values for available for sale securities are determined using independent pricing services and market-participating brokers. The Company utilizes a third-party for these pricing services. The third-party utilizes evaluated pricing models that vary by asset class and incorporate available trade, bid and other market information for structured securities, cash flow and, when available, loan performance data. Because many fixed income securities do not trade on a daily basis, the third-party service provider’s evaluated pricing applications apply information as applicable through processes, such as benchmarking of like securities, sector groupings, and matrix pricing, to prepare evaluations. In addition, our third-party pricing service provider uses model processes, such as the Option Adjusted Spread model, to assess interest rate impact and develop prepayment scenarios. The models and the process take into account market convention. For each asset class, a team of evaluators gathers information from market sources and integrates relevant credit information, perceived market movements and sector news into the evaluated pricing applications and models. The third-party, at times, may determine that it does not have sufficient verifiable information to value a particular security. In these cases the Company will utilize valuations from another pricing service.

On a quarterly basis the Company reviews changes, as submitted by our third-party pricing service provider, in the market value of its securities portfolio. Individual changes in valuations are reviewed for consistency with general interest rate movements and any known credit concerns for specific securities. Additionally, on a quarterly basis the Company has its entire securities portfolio priced by a second pricing service to determine consistency with another market evaluator. If, on the Company’s review or in comparing with another servicer, a material difference between pricing evaluations were to exist, the Company may submit an inquiry to our third-party pricing service provider regarding the data used to value a particular security. If the Company determines it has market information that would support a different valuation than our third-party service provider’s evaluation it can submit a challenge for a change to that security’s valuation. There were no material differences in valuations noted in 2020 or 2019.

Securities available for sale are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy as the valuation provided by the third-party provider uses observable market data.

Mortgage servicing rights

Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, the Company obtains the fair value of the MSRs using a third-party pricing provider. The provider determines the fair value by discounting projected net servicing cash flows of the remaining servicing portfolio. The valuation model used by the provider considers market loan prepayment predictions and other economic factors. The fair value of MSRs is mostly affected by changes in mortgage interest rates since rate changes cause the loan prepayment acceleration factors to increase or decrease. All assumptions are market driven. Mortgage servicing rights are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as the valuation is model driven and primarily based on unobservable inputs.


The following table summarizes the changes in fair value for items measured at fair value (Level 3) on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs during the years ended December 31:

(in thousands)

2020

2019

2018

Mortgage servicing rights - January 1

$

555 

$

609 

$

586 

Gains/(Losses) included in earnings

(381)

(178)

(22)

Additions from business combinations

639 

-

-

Additions from loan sales

104 

124 

45 

Mortgage servicing rights - December 31

$

917 

$

555 

$

609 

Quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of MSRs at the respective dates is as follows:

December 31, 2020

December 31, 2019

Servicing fees

0.25 

%

0.25 

%

Discount rate

9.04 

%

9.00 

%

Prepayment rate (CPR)

9.73 

%

8.21 

%

ASSETS AND LIABILITIES MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A NONRECURRING BASIS

The Company is required, on a nonrecurring basis, to adjust the carrying value of certain assets or provide valuation allowances related to certain assets using fair value measurements. The following table presents for each of the fair-value hierarchy levels as defined in this footnote, those assets and liabilities which are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at December 31, 2020 and 2019:

(in thousands)

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Fair Value

December 31, 2020

Collateral dependent impaired loans

$

-

$

-

$

7,496 

$

7,496 

December 31, 2019

Collateral dependent impaired loans

$

-

$

-

$

15,735 

$

15,735 

Impaired loans

Collateral dependent loans carried at fair value have been partially charged-off or receive specific allocations of the allowance for credit losses. The Company evaluates and values collateral dependent impaired loans at the time the loan is identified as impaired, and the fair values of such loans are estimated using Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy. Each loan’s collateral value has a unique appraisal and management’s discount of the value is based on factors unique to each impaired loan. The significant unobservable input in determining the fair value is management’s subjective discount on appraisals of the collateral securing the loan, which ranges from 10%-50%. Fair value is estimated based on the value of the collateral securing these loans. Collateral may consist of real estate and/or business assets including equipment, inventory and/or accounts receivable and the value of these assets is determined based on appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers hired by the Company. Appraised and reported values may be discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of valuation, estimated costs to sell, and/or management’s expertise and knowledge of the client and the client’s business.

The Company has an appraisal policy in which appraisals are obtained upon a commercial loan being downgraded on the Company’s internal loan rating scale to a special mention or a substandard depending on the amount of the loan, the type of loan and the type of collateral.  All impaired commercial loans are graded substandard or worse on the internal loan rating scale.  For consumer loans, the Company obtains appraisals when a loan becomes 90 days past due or is determined to be impaired, whichever occurs first.  Subsequent to the downgrade or reaching 90 days past due, if the loan remains outstanding and impaired for at least one year more, management may require another follow-up appraisal.  Between receipts of updated appraisals, if necessary, management may perform an internal valuation based on any known changing conditions in the marketplace such as sales of similar properties, a change in the condition of the collateral, or feedback from local appraisers.  Collateral dependent impaired loans had a gross value of $8.8 million, with an allowance for loan loss of $1.3 million, at December 31, 2020 compared with $16.0 million and $0.3 million, respectively, at December 31, 2019.


At December 31, 2020 and 2019, the estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments, including those that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or nonrecurring basis, were as follows:

December 31, 2020

December 31, 2019

Carrying

Fair

Carrying

Fair

Amount

Value

Amount

Value

(in thousands)

(in thousands)

Financial assets:

Level 1:

Cash and cash equivalents

$

97,604 

$

97,604 

$

38,857 

$

38,857 

Level 2:

Available for sale securities

162,396 

162,396 

127,922 

127,922 

FHLB and FRB stock

5,793 

5,793 

3,544 

3,544 

Level 3:

Held to maturity securities

4,204 

4,271 

2,386 

2,392 

Loans, net

1,673,379 

1,720,878 

1,211,356 

1,222,386 

Mortgage servicing rights

917 

917 

555 

555 

Financial liabilities:

Level 1:

Demand deposits

$

436,157 

$

436,157 

$

263,717 

$

263,717 

NOW deposits

230,751 

230,751 

140,654 

140,654 

Savings deposits

825,947 

825,947 

587,142 

587,142 

Level 2:

Securities sold under agreement to

repurchase

4,093 

4,093 

2,425 

2,425 

Other borrowed funds

44,698 

45,547 

10,000 

9,997 

Subordinated debt

30,872 

31,394 

11,330 

11,330 

Level 3:

Time deposits

278,554 

280,059 

275,927 

277,051 

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value.

FHLB and FRB stock

The carrying value of FHLB and FRB stock, which are non-marketable equity investments, approximates fair value.

Deposits

The fair value of demand deposits, NOW accounts, muni-vest accounts and regular savings accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of time deposits is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Borrowed Funds and Securities Sold Under Agreement to Repurchase

The fair value of securities sold under agreement to repurchase approximates its carrying value. The fair value of other borrowed funds was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Subordinated Debt

Subordinated debt consists of subordinated notes and trust preferred capital securities. There is no active market for the Company’s trust preferred capital securities and there have been no issuances of similar instruments in recent years.  The Company looked at a market bond index to estimate a discount margin to value the debentures.  The discount margin was very similar to the spread to LIBOR established at the issuance of the debentures.  As a result, the Company determined that the fair value of the adjustable-rate debentures approximates their face amount. The Company utilizes active markets with similar assets to determine the fair value of the subordinated notes.

Pension Plan Assets

Refer to Note 13 to these Consolidated Financial Statements, “Employee Benefits and Deferred Compensation Plans” for the fair value analysis of the Pension Plan assets.