EX-8.1 5 dp08540_ex0801.htm
 
Exhibit 8.1
 
DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL  
     

 
 
450 LEXINGTON AVENUE
NEW YORK, N.Y. 10017
212 450 4000
FAX 212 450 3800
Menlo Park
Washington, D.C.
London
Paris
Frankfurt
Madrid
Tokyo
Beijing
Hong Kong
     
 
February 15, 2008
  
 

Re:
BBVA International Preferred, S.A. Unipersonal Offer to Exchange
Series C $600,000,000 Fixed/Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Guaranteed Preferred Securities


BBVA International Preferred, S.A. Unipersonal
Plaza de San Nicolás, 4
48005 Bilbao
Spain

Ladies and Gentlemen:
 
We have acted as special United States counsel to BBVA International Preferred, S.A. Unipersonal, a sociedad anónima of the Kingdom of Spain (the “Company”), in connection with the Company’s offer (the “Exchange Offer”) to exchange its Series C $600,000,000 Fixed/Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Guaranteed Preferred Securities (the “Exchange Series C Preferred Securities”) for any and all of its outstanding Series C $600,000,000 Fixed/Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Guaranteed Preferred Securities (the “Restricted Series C Preferred Securities”).  The Exchange Series C Preferred Securities will be guaranteed by Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. (the “Guarantor”) in accordance with the provisions of the Amended and Restated Guarantee Agreement dated as of January 14, 2008, between the Company and the Guarantor.  This opinion is being furnished in accordance with the requirements of Item 601(b)(8) of Regulation S-K of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”).
 
We hereby confirm, as of the date hereof, our opinion set forth under the caption “Taxation ― U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” in the Prospectus dated February 15, 2008.
 
 
 
 2
 February 15, 2008
 
 
We are members of the Bar of the State of New York.  The foregoing opinion is based upon and limited to the United States federal tax laws as contained in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, Treasury regulations, administrative decisions and court decisions as of the date of this opinion.
 
We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form F-4.  The issuance of such consent does not concede that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Act.