Financial Instruments

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Financial Instruments

Financial Instruments

Fair Value Measurement

The Company measures the fair value of its financial assets and liabilities based on assumptions used by market participants in pricing the asset or liability, which may include inherent risk, restrictions on the sale or use of an asset, or nonperformance risk, including the Company's nonperformance risk. The estimate of an exchange price is the price in an orderly transaction between market participants to sell the asset or transfer the liability ("exit price") in the principal market, or the most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market, for that asset or liability. The Company utilizes a number of valuation sources to determine the fair values of its financial assets and liabilities, including quoted market prices, third-party commercial pricing services, third party brokers and industry-standard, vendor-provided software that models the value based on market observable inputs and other internal modeling techniques based on projected cash flows.

The Company categorizes its financial instruments into a three-level hierarchy based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). If the inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the category level is based on the lowest priority level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument. Financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are categorized as follows:

• Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market. The Company defines an active market as a market in which transactions take place with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

• Level 2 - Quoted prices in markets that are not active or valuation techniques that require inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. Level 2 inputs include the following:

a) Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;

b) Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in non-active markets;

c) Inputs other than quoted market prices that are observable; and

d) Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data through correlation or other means.

• Level 3 - Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. These valuations, whether derived internally or obtained from a third party, use critical assumptions that are not widely available to estimate market participant expectations in valuing the asset or liability.

When available, the estimated fair value of securities is based on quoted prices in active markets that are readily and regularly obtainable. When quoted prices in active markets are not available, the determination of estimated fair value is based on market standard valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow methodologies, matrix pricing, or other similar techniques.

The following tables present the Company’s hierarchy for its assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Fixed maturities, including securities pledged:
U.S. Treasuries	$	1,000.2	$	53.3	$	—	$	1,053.5
U.S. government agencies and authorities	—		403.4		—		403.4
U.S. corporate, state and municipalities	—		9,529.2		151.6		9,680.8
Foreign	—		5,109.1		19.4		5,128.5
Residential mortgage-backed securities	—		2,251.2		6.0		2,257.2
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	—		891.9		—		891.9
Other asset-backed securities	—		426.3		30.1		456.4
Equity securities, available-for-sale	126.2		—		18.5		144.7
Derivatives:
Interest rate contracts	3.1		525.0		—		528.1
Foreign exchange contracts	—		2.7		—		2.7
Equity contracts	0.4		—		—		0.4
Credit contracts	—		1.1		—		1.1
Cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and short-term investments under securities loan agreement	1,192.0		0.2		—		1,192.2
Assets held in separate accounts	44,318.2		4,978.8		8.7		49,305.7
Total	$	46,640.1	$	24,172.2	$	234.3	$	71,046.6
Liabilities:
Product guarantees	$	—	$	—	$	133.0	$	133.0
Fixed indexed annuities	—		—		17.6		17.6
Derivatives:
Interest rate contracts	—		337.7		—		337.7
Foreign exchange contracts	—		23.6		—		23.6
Equity contracts	—		1.7		—		1.7
Credit contracts	—		—		—		—
Total	$	—	$	363.0	$	150.6	$	513.6

	2011
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Fixed maturities, including securities pledged:
U.S. Treasuries	$	1,180.3	$	51.3	$	—	$	1,231.6
U.S. government agencies and authorities	—		410.7		—		410.7
U.S. corporate, state and municipalities	—		8,883.5		129.1		9,012.6
Foreign	—		4,937.0		51.1		4,988.1
Residential mortgage-backed securities	—		2,206.1		41.0		2,247.1
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	—		911.3		—		911.3
Other asset-backed securities	—		411.1		27.7		438.8
Equity securities, available-for-sale	125.9		—		19.0		144.9
Derivatives:
Interest rate contracts	5.7		437.6		—		443.3
Foreign exchange contracts	—		0.7		—		0.7
Credit contracts	—		2.6		—		2.6
Cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and short-term investments under securities loan agreement	953.9		4.8		—		958.7
Assets held in separate accounts	40,556.8		4,722.3		16.1		45,295.2
Total	$	42,822.6	$	22,979.0	$	284.0	$	66,085.6
Liabilities:
Product guarantees	$	—	$	—	$	221.0	$	221.0
Fixed indexed annuities	—		—		16.3		16.3
Derivatives:
Interest rate contracts	—		306.4		—		306.4
Foreign exchange contracts	—		32.4		—		32.4
Credit contracts	—		8.6		12.7		21.3
Total	$	—	$	347.4	$	250.0	$	597.4

Transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.  The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers in and transfers out as of the beginning of the reporting period.

Valuation of Financial Assets and Liabilities

As described below, certain assets and liabilities are measured at estimated fair value on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. In addition, further disclosure of estimated fair values is included in this Financial Instruments footnote. The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The exit price and the transaction (or entry) price will be the same at initial recognition in many circumstances. However, in certain cases, the transaction price may not represent fair value. The fair value of a liability is based on the amount that would be paid to transfer a liability to a third-party with an equal credit standing. Fair value is required to be a market-based measurement which is determined based on a hypothetical transaction at the measurement date, from a market participant’s perspective. The Company considers three broad valuation techniques when a quoted price is unavailable: (i) the market approach, (ii) the income approach and (iii) the cost approach. The Company determines the most appropriate valuation technique to use, given the instrument being measured and the availability of sufficient inputs. The Company prioritizes the inputs to fair valuation techniques and allows for the use of unobservable inputs to the extent that observable inputs are not available.

The Company utilizes a number of valuation methodologies to determine the fair values of its financial assets and liabilities in conformity with the concepts of "exit price" and the fair value hierarchy as prescribed in ASC Topic 820. Valuations are obtained from third party commercial pricing services, brokers and industry-standard, vendor-provided software that models the value based on market observable inputs. The Company reviews the assumptions and inputs used by third party commercial pricing services for each reporting period in order to determine an appropriate fair value hierarchy level. The documentation and analysis obtained from the third party commercial pricing services are reviewed by the Company, including in-depth validation procedures confirming the observability of inputs. The valuations obtained from brokers and third party commercial pricing services are non-binding. The valuations are reviewed and validated monthly through the internal valuation committee price variance review, comparisons to internal pricing models, back testing to recent trades, or monitoring of trading volumes.

All valuation methods and assumptions are validated at least quarterly to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the fair values. There were no material changes to the valuation methods or assumptions used to determine fair values during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011.

The following valuation methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the reported values for the investments and derivatives described below:

Fixed maturities: The fair values for the actively traded marketable bonds are determined based upon the quoted market prices and are classified as Level 1 assets.  Assets in this category would primarily include certain U.S. Treasury securities.  The fair values for marketable bonds without an active market are obtained through several commercial pricing services which provide the estimated fair values.  These services incorporate a variety of market observable information in their valuation techniques, including benchmark yields, broker-dealer quotes, credit quality, issuer spreads, bids, offers and other reference data and are classified as Level 2 assets. This category includes U.S. and foreign corporate bonds, ABS, U.S. agency and government guaranteed securities, CMBS and all RMBS, including certain CMO and subprime RMBS assets. 

Generally, the Company does not obtain more than one vendor price from pricing services per instrument. The Company uses a hierarchy process in which prices are obtained from a primary vendor and, if that vendor is unable to provide the price, the next vendor in the hierarchy is contacted until a price is obtained or it is determined that a price cannot be obtained from a commercial pricing service. When a price cannot be obtained from a commercial pricing service, independent broker quotes are solicited.  Securities priced using independent broker quotes are classified as Level 3.

Broker quotes and prices obtained from pricing services are reviewed and validated monthly through an internal valuation committee price variance review, comparisons to internal pricing models, back testing to recent trades, or monitoring of trading volumes. As of June 30, 2012, $125.8 and $15.3 billion of a total of $19.9 billion in fixed maturities were valued using unadjusted broker quotes and unadjusted prices obtained from pricing services, respectively, and verified through the review process. The remaining balance in fixed maturities consisted primarily of privately placed bonds valued using a matrix-based pricing model.

All prices and broker quotes obtained go through the review process described above including valuations for which only one broker quote is obtained.  After review, for those instruments where the price is determined to be appropriate, the unadjusted price provided is used for financial statement valuation. If it is determined that the price is questionable, another price may be requested from a different vendor. The internal valuation committee then reviews all prices for the instrument again, along with information from the review, to determine which price best represents "exit price" for the instrument.

Fair values of privately placed bonds are primarily determined using a matrix-based pricing model and are classified as Level 2 assets.  The model considers the current level of risk-free interest rates, current corporate spreads, the credit quality of the issuer and cash flow characteristics of the security.  Also considered are factors such as the net worth of the borrower, the value of collateral, the capital structure of the borrower, the presence of guarantees and the Company’s evaluation of the borrower’s ability

to compete in its relevant market.  Using this data, the model generates estimated market values which the Company considers reflective of the fair value of each privately placed bond.

Equity securities, available-for-sale: Fair values of publicly traded equity securities are based upon quoted market price and are classified as Level 1 assets. Other equity securities, typically private equities or equity securities not traded on an exchange, are valued by other methods such as analytics or brokers and are classified as Level 3 assets.

Cash and cash equivalents, Short-term investments and Short-term investments under securities loan agreement: The carrying amounts for cash reflect the assets' fair value. The fair values for cash equivalents and most short-term investments are determined based on quoted market prices. These assets are classified as Level 1. Other short-term investments are valued and classified in the fair value hierarchy consistent with the policies described herein, depending on investment type.

Derivatives: Derivatives are carried at fair value, which is determined using the Company’s derivative accounting system in conjunction with observable key financial data from third party sources, such as yield curves, exchange rates, Standard & Poor’s 500 Index prices, London Interbank Offered Rates ("LIBOR") and Overnight Index Swap ("OIS") rates. For June 30, 2012, the Company began using OIS rather than LIBOR for valuations of collateralized interest rate derivatives, which are obtained from third-party sources. For those derivatives that are unable to be valued by the accounting system, the Company typically utilizes values established by third-party brokers. Counterparty credit risk is considered and incorporated in the Company’s valuation process through counterparty credit rating requirements and monitoring of overall exposure.  It is the Company’s policy to transact only with investment grade counterparties with a credit rating of A- or better. The Company’s nonperformance risk is also considered and incorporated in the Company’s valuation process. Valuations for the Company’s futures and interest rate forward contracts are based on unadjusted quoted prices from an active exchange and, therefore, are classified as Level 1. The Company also has certain credit default swaps and options that are priced using models that primarily use market observable inputs, but contain inputs that are not observable to market participants, which have been classified as Level 3.  However, all other derivative instruments are valued based on market observable inputs and are classified as Level 2.

The Company has entered into a number of options as hedges on its Fixed indexed annuities ("FIA") liabilities. The maximum exposure is the current value of the option. The payoff of these contracts depends on market conditions during the lifetime of the option. The fair value measurement of options is highly sensitive to implied equity and interest rate volatility and the market reflects a considerable variance in broker quotes. The Company uses a third-party vendor to determine the market value of these options.

Product guarantees: The Company records reserves for Stabilizer and Managed custody guarantees ("MCG") contracts containing guaranteed credited rates in accordance with ASC 815.  The guarantee is treated as an embedded derivative or a stand-alone derivative (depending on the underlying product) and is required to be reported at fair value.  The fair value of the obligation is calculated based on the income approach as described in ASC 820.  The income associated with the contracts is projected using actuarial and capital market assumptions, including benefits and related contract charges, over the anticipated life of the related contracts.  The cash flow estimates are produced by using stochastic techniques under a variety of risk neutral scenarios and other market implied assumptions.  These derivatives are classified as Level 3 liabilities. Explicit risk margins in the actuarial assumptions underlying valuations are included, as well as an explicit recognition of all nonperformance risks as required by U.S. GAAP.  Nonperformance risk for product guarantees contains adjustments to the fair values of these contract liabilities related to the current credit standing of ING Verzekeringen N.V. ("ING Insurance") and the Company based on credit default swaps ("CDS") with similar term to maturity and priority of payment. The ING Insurance credit default spread is applied to the discount factors for product guarantees in the Company’s valuation model in order to incorporate credit risk into the fair values of these product guarantees.

The Company also records for its FIA contracts an embedded derivative liability for interest payments to contract holders above the minimum guaranteed interest rate, in accordance with U.S. GAAP for derivative instruments and hedging activities. The guarantee is treated as an embedded derivative and is required to be reported separately from the host contract. The fair value of the obligation is calculated based on actuarial and capital market assumptions related to the projected cash flows, including benefits and related contract charges, over the anticipated life of the related contracts. The cash flow estimates are produced by market implied assumptions. These derivatives are classified as Level 3 liabilities in the fair value hierarchy.

The estimated fair value of the Stabilizer and MCG contracts containing guaranteed credited rates is determined based on the present value of projected future claims, minus the present value of future guaranteed premiums. At inception of the contract, the Company projects a guaranteed premium to be equal to the present value of the projected future claims. The income associated with the contracts is projected using actuarial and capital market assumptions, including benefits and related contract charges, over the anticipated life of the related contracts.

The Company's valuation actuaries are responsible for the policies and procedures for valuing the embedded derivatives, reflecting the capital markets and actuarial valuation inputs and nonperformance risk in the estimate of the fair value of the embedded derivatives. The actuarial and capital market assumptions for each liability are approved by each product's Chief Risk Officer ("CRO"), including an independent annual review by the U.S. CRO. Models used to value the embedded derivatives must comply with the Company's actuarial model and governance policies.

Quarterly, an attribution analysis is performed to quantify changes in fair value measurements and a sensitivity analysis is used to analyze the changes. The changes in fair value measurements are also compared to corresponding movements in the hedge target to assess the validity of the attributions. The results of the attribution analysis are reviewed by the valuation actuaries, responsible CFOs, Controllers and CROs, the Company's appointed actuary and/or others as nominated by management.

Assets held in separate accounts: Assets held in separate accounts are reported at the quoted fair values of the underlying investments in the separate accounts.  The underlying investments include mutual funds, short-term investments and cash, the valuations of which are based upon a quoted market price and are included in Level 1.  Bond valuations are obtained from third party commercial pricing services and brokers and are classified in the fair value hierarchy consistent with the policies described above for Fixed maturities.

Level 3 Financial Instruments

The fair values of certain assets and liabilities are determined using prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement (i.e., Level 3 as defined by ASC Topic 820), including but not limited to liquidity spreads for investments within markets deemed not currently active. These valuations, whether derived internally or obtained from a third party, use critical assumptions that are not widely available to estimate market participant expectations in valuing the asset or liability. In addition, the Company has determined, for certain financial instruments, an active market is such a significant input to determine fair value that the presence of an inactive market may lead to classification in Level 3. In light of the methodologies employed to obtain the fair values of financial assets and liabilities classified as Level 3, additional information is presented below.

The following tables summarize the changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 assets and liabilities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
	Fair Value as of April 1			Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in:							Purchases			Issuances		Sales			Settlements			Transfers in to Level 3 (2)		Transfers out of Level 3 (2)			Fair Value as of June 30			Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings (3)
				Net income				OCI
Fixed maturities, including securities pledged:
U.S. corporate, state and municipalities	$	146.6		$	—			$	(4.0	)	$	6.8		$	—	$	—		$	(15.1	)	$	27.9	$	(10.6	)	$	151.6		$	—
Foreign	19.7			—				(0.3		)	—			—		—			—			—		—			19.4			—
Residential mortgage-backed securities	11.0			1.1				1.6			—			—		(6.0		)	—			—		(1.7		)	6.0			(0.1		)
Other asset-backed securities	28.7			0.2				(0.5		)	—			—		—			(0.5		)	2.2		—			30.1			0.2
Total fixed maturities, including securities pledged	206.0			1.3				(3.2		)	6.8			—		(6.0		)	(15.6		)	30.1		(12.3		)	207.1			0.1
Equity securities, available-for-sale	18.5			—				—			—			—		—			—			—		—			18.5			—
Derivatives, net	—			—				—			—			—		—			—			—		—			—			—
Product guarantees	(72.0		)	(59.8		)	(1)	—			(1.2		)	—		—			—			—		—			(133.0		)	—
Fixed Indexed Annuities	(17.9		)	0.3			(1)	—			—			—		—			—			—		—			(17.6		)	—
Separate Accounts (4)	23.1			—				—			—			—		(14.4		)	—			—		—			8.7			0.2
(1) All gains and losses on Level 3 are classified as realized gains (losses) for the purpose of this disclosure because it is impracticable to track realized and unrealized gains (losses) separately on a contract-by-contract basis. These amounts are included in Other net realized capital gains (losses) in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(2)  The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers in and transfers out as of the beginning of the reporting period.
(3)  For financial instruments still held as of June 30, amounts are included in Net investment income and Other net realized capital gains (losses) in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(4)  The investment income and realized gains (losses) and change in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss) for separate account assets are offset by an equal amount for separate account liabilities, which result in a net zero impact on net income (loss) for the Company.

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
	Fair Value as of January 1			Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in:							Purchases			Issuances		Sales			Settlements			Transfers in to Level 3 (2)		Transfers out of Level 3 (2)			Fair Value as of June 30			Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings (3)
				Net income				OCI
Fixed maturities, including securities pledged:
U.S. corporate, state and municipalities	$	129.1		$	(0.2	)		$	(3.2	)	$	7.2		$	—	$	—		$	(6.0	)	$	28.3	$	(3.6	)	$	151.6		$	(0.2	)
Foreign	51.1			0.9				(1.2		)	—			—		(5.7		)	—			—		(25.7		)	19.4			—
Residential mortgage-backed securities	41.0			0.8				1.8			—			—		(6.0		)	—			—		(31.6		)	6.0			(0.4		)
Other asset-backed securities	27.7			0.4				0.5			—			—		—			(1.1		)	2.6		—			30.1			0.4
Total fixed maturities, including securities pledged	248.9			1.9				(2.1		)	7.2			—		(11.7		)	(7.1		)	30.9		(60.9		)	207.1			(0.2		)
Equity securities, available-for-sale	19.0			—				(0.1		)	0.7			—		(1.1		)	—			—		—			18.5			—
Derivatives, net	(12.7		)	(1.7		)		—			—			—		—			14.4			—		—			—			—
Product guarantees	(221.0		)	90.8			(1)	—			(2.8		)	—		—			—			—		—			(133.0		)	—
Fixed Indexed Annuities	(16.3		)	(1.3		)	(1)	—			—			—		—			—			—		—			(17.6		)	—
Separate Accounts(4)	16.1			0.3				—			1.1			—		(9.0		)	—			0.2		—			8.7			0.6
(1) All gains and losses on Level 3 are classified as realized gains (losses) for the purpose of this disclosure because it is impracticable to track realized and unrealized gains (losses) separately on a contract-by-contract basis. These amounts are included in Other net realized capital gains (losses) in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(2) The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers in and transfers out as of the beginning of the reporting period.
(3) For financial instruments still held as of June 30, amounts are included in Net investment income and Other net realized capital gains (losses) in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(4) The investment income and realized gains (losses) and change in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss) for separate account assets are offset by an equal amount for separate account liabilities, which result in a net zero impact on net income (loss) for the Company.

The following tables summarize the changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 assets and liabilities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 (As revised)
	Fair Value as of April 1			Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in:							Purchases and issuances			Sales and Settlements			Transfers in to Level 3 (2)		Transfers out of Level 3 (2)			Fair Value as of June 30			Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings (3)
				Net income				OCI
Fixed maturities, including securities pledged:
U.S. corporate, state and municipalities	$	13.9		$	(0.1	)		$	4.5		$	—		$	(11.6	)	$	126.8	$	—		$	133.5		$	—
Foreign	7.6			—				(0.2		)	2.2			—			22.3		(7.0		)	24.9			—
Residential mortgage-backed securities	119.9			(0.2		)		(0.4		)	—			(0.3		)	—		(106.7		)	12.3			(0.2		)
Other asset-backed securities	52.0			0.1				(0.3		)	—			(1.0		)	—		(1.7		)	49.1			0.2
Total fixed maturities, including securities pledged	193.4			(0.2		)		3.6			2.2			(12.9		)	149.1		(115.4		)	219.8			—
Equity securities, available-for-sale	29.8			0.1				0.1			1.7			(1.3		)	—		(8.7		)	21.7			—
Derivatives, net	(11.4		)	1.7				—			—			—			—		—			(9.7		)	1.7
Product guarantees	2.0			(3.2		)	(1)	—			(1.3		)	—			—		—			(2.5		)	—
Fixed Indexed Annuities	(8.4		)	(3.4		)	(1)	—			—			—			—		—			(11.8		)	—
Separate Accounts (4)	20.1			0.4				—			0.1			(2.0		)	—		(5.1		)	13.5			0.6
(1) All gains and losses on Level 3 are classified as realized gains (losses) for the purpose of this disclosure because it is impracticable to track realized and unrealized gains (losses) separately on a contract-by-contract basis. These amounts are included in Other net realized capital gains (losses) in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(2) The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers in and transfers out as of the beginning of the reporting period.
(3) For financial instruments still held as of June 30, amounts are included in Net investment income and Other net realized capital gains (losses) in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(4) The investment income and realized gains (losses) and change in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss) for separate account assets are offset by an equal amount for separate account liabilities, which result in a net zero impact on net income (loss) for the Company.

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 (As revised)
	Fair Value as of January 1			Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in:							Purchases and issuances			Sales and Settlements			Transfers in to Level 3 (2)		Transfers out of Level 3 (2)			Fair Value as of June 30			Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings (3)
				Net income				OCI
Fixed maturities, including securities pledged:
U.S. corporate, state and municipalities	$	11.2		$	—			$	3.2		$	13.9		$	(15.5	)	$	120.7	$	—		$	133.5		$	0.1
Foreign	11.4			0.9				(1.0		)	2.3			(5.2		)	22.3		(5.8		)	24.9			—
Residential mortgage-backed securities	254.7			(0.7		)		—			3.0			(0.8		)	—		(243.9		)	12.3			(1.7		)
Other asset-backed securities	247.7			(1.7		)		3.7			—			(1.4		)	1.5		(200.7		)	49.1			(3.5		)
Total fixed maturities, including securities pledged	525.0			(1.5		)		5.9			19.2			(22.9		)	144.5		(450.4		)	219.8			(5.1		)
Equity securities, available-for-sale	27.7			0.2				0.1			4.0			(1.3		)	—		(9.0		)	21.7			—
Derivatives, net	(13.6		)	4.0				—			—			(0.1		)	—		—			(9.7		)	3.9
Product guarantees	(3.0		)	3.1			(1)	—			(2.6		)	—			—		—			(2.5		)	—
Fixed Indexed Annuities	(5.6		)	(6.2		)	(1)	—			—			—			—		—			(11.8		)	—
Separate Accounts (4)	22.3			0.5				—			0.1			(2.7		)	—		(6.7		)	13.5			0.7
(1) All gains and losses on Level 3 are classified as realized gains (losses) for the purpose of this disclosure because it is impracticable to track realized and unrealized gains (losses) separately on a contract-by-contract basis. These amounts are included in Other net realized capital gains (losses) in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(2) The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers in and transfers out as of the beginning of the reporting period.
(3) For financial instruments still held as of June 30, amounts are included in Net investment income and Other net realized capital gains (losses) in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(4) The investment income and realized gains (losses) and change in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss) for separate account assets are offset by an equal amount for separate account liabilities, which result in a net zero impact on net income (loss) for the Company.

The transfers out of Level 3 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 in fixed maturities, including securities pledged, were primarily due to the Company's determination that the market for subprime RMBS securities had become active in the first quarter 2011 and to an increased utilization of vendor valuations for certain CMO assets, as opposed to the previous use of broker quotes in the second quarter of 2011. While the valuation methodology for subprime RMBS securities has not changed, the Company has concluded that the frequency of transactions in the market for subprime RMBS securities represent regularly occurring market transactions and therefore are now classified as Level 2.

The remaining transfers in and out of Level 3 for fixed maturities, equity securities and separate accounts during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were due to the variation in inputs relied upon for valuation each quarter. Securities that are primarily valued using independent broker quotes when prices are not available from one of the commercial pricing services are reflected as transfers into Level 3, as these securities are generally less liquid with very limited trading activity or where less transparency exists corroborating the inputs to the valuation methodologies. When securities are valued using more widely available information, the securities are transferred out of Level 3 and into Level 1 or 2, as appropriate.

Significant Unobservable Inputs

Quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the Company's Level 3 fair value measurements of its Annuity product guarantees is presented in the following sections and table.

The Company's Level 3 fair value measurements of its fixed maturities, equity securities available-for-sale, and equity and credit derivative contracts are primarily based on broker quotes for which the quantitative detail of the unobservable inputs is neither provided nor reasonably corroborated, thus negating the ability to perform a sensitivity analysis.  

Significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements of FIAs include nonperformance risk and lapses. Such inputs are monitored quarterly.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Stabilizer embedded derivatives and MCG derivative containing guaranteed credit rates are interest rate implied volatility, lapses, nonperformance risk and policyholder deposits. Such inputs are monitored quarterly.

Following is a description of selected inputs:

Interest Rate Volatility: A term-structure model is used to approximate implied volatility for the swap rates for the Stabilizer and MCG contracts. Where no implied volatility is readily available in the market, an alternative approach is applied based only on historical volatility.

Nonperformance Risk: The valuation actuaries obtain the CDS spreads of ING Insurance with similar term to maturity and priority of payment from an external source for use in the estimate of the fair value embedded derivatives.

Actuarial Assumptions: Management regularly reviews actuarial assumptions, which are based on the Company's experience and periodically reviewed against industry standards. Industry standards and Company experience may be limited on certain products.

The following table presents the unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements for product guarantees as of June 30, 2012:

	Range(1)
Unobservable Input	FIA	Stabilizer / MCG
Interest rate implied volatility	-	0% to 4%
Nonperformance risk	0.25% to 3.50%	0.25% to 3.50%
Actuarial Assumptions:
Lapses	0% to 10%	0% to 55%
Policyholder deposits(2)	-	0% to 15%
(1)The range of reasonable assumptions that management has used in its fair value calculations.
(2) Measured as a percentage of assets under management or assets under administration.

Sensitivity Analysis

Generally, the following will cause an increase (decrease) in the FIA embedded derivative fair value liability:

• A decrease (increase) in nonperformance risk

• A decrease (increase) in lapses

Generally, the following will cause an increase (decrease) in the derivative and embedded derivative fair value liabilities related to Stabilizer and MCG:

• An increase (decrease) in interest rate volatility

• A decrease (increase) in the nonperformance risk

• An increase (decrease) in lapses

• A decrease (increase) in policyholder deposits

Other Financial Instruments

The carrying values and estimated fair values of certain of the Company’s financial instruments were as follows as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	2012				2011
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Assets:
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, including securities pledged	$	19,283.9	$	19,283.9	$	18,728.3	$	18,728.3
Fixed maturities, at fair value using the fair value option	587.8		587.8		511.9		511.9
Equity securities, available-for-sale	144.7		144.7		144.9		144.9
Mortgage loans on real estate	2,709.8		2,796.3		2,373.5		2,423.1
Loan-Dutch State obligation	379.1		382.6		417.0		421.9
Policy loans	240.5		240.5		245.9		245.9
Limited partnerships/corporations	380.7		380.7		510.6		510.6
Cash and cash equivalents, Short-term investments and Short-term investments under securities loan agreement	1,192.2		1,192.2		958.7		958.7
Derivatives	532.3		532.3		446.6		446.6
Notes receivable from affiliates	175.0		172.6		175.0		165.2
Assets held in separate accounts	49,305.7		49,305.7		45,295.2		45,295.2
Liabilities:
Investment contract liabilities:
With a fixed maturity	1,117.6		1,297.4		1,222.4		1,369.1
Without a fixed maturity	18,907.0		24,420.6		18,410.4		21,739.8
Product guarantees	133.0		133.0		221.0		221.0
Fixed Indexed Annuities	17.6		17.6		16.3		16.3
Derivatives	363.0		363.0		360.0		360.0

The following disclosures are made in accordance with the requirements of ASC Topic 825 which requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument.

ASC Topic 825 excludes certain financial instruments, including insurance contracts and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements.  Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Company.

The following valuation methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of the following financial instruments which are not carried at fair value on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and therefore not categorized in the fair value hierarchy:

Limited partnerships/corporations: The fair value for these investments, primarily private equities and hedge funds, is estimated based on the Net Asset Value as provided by the investee and are classified as Level 3.

Mortgage loans on real estate: The fair values for mortgage loans on real estate are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses and rates currently being offered in the marketplace for similar loans to borrowers with similar credit ratings. Loans with similar characteristics are aggregated for purposes of the calculations. Mortgage loans on real estate are classified as Level 3.

Loan - Dutch State obligation: The fair value of the Dutch State loan obligation is estimated utilizing discounted cash flows from the Dutch Strip Yield Curve and is classified as Level 2.

Policy loans: The fair value of policy loans is equal to the carrying, or cash surrender, value of the loans.  Policy loans are fully collateralized by the account value of the associated insurance contracts and are classified as Level 2.

Investment contract liabilities:

With a fixed maturity: Fair value is estimated by discounting cash flows, including associated expenses for maintaining the contracts, at rates, which are risk-free rates plus an adjustment for nonperformance risk. These liabilities are classified as Level 2.

Without a fixed maturity: Fair value is estimated as the mean present value of stochastically modeled cash flows associated with the contract liabilities relevant to both the contract holder and to the Company, taking into account assumptions about policyholder behavior. The stochastic valuation scenario set is consistent with current market parameters and discount is taken using stochastically evolving risk-free rates in the scenarios plus an adjustment for nonperformance risk. Margins for non-financial risks associated with the contract liabilities are also included. These liabilities are classified as Level 3.

Notes receivable from affiliates: Estimated fair value of the Company’s notes receivable from affiliates is based upon discounted future cash flows using a discount rate approximating the current market rate and classified as Level 2.

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on available market information and judgments about various financial instruments, such as estimates of timing and amounts of future cash flows. Such estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument, nor do they consider the tax impact of the realization of unrealized capital gains (losses). In many cases, the fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets, nor can the disclosed value be realized in immediate settlement of the instruments. In evaluating the Company’s management of interest rate, price and liquidity risks, the fair values of all assets and liabilities should be taken into consideration, not only those presented above.

Mortgage Loans on Real Estate

The Company’s mortgage loans on real estate are summarized as follows as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	2012			2011
Total commercial mortgage loans	$	2,711.5		$	2,374.8
Collective valuation allowance	(1.7		)	(1.3		)
Total net commercial mortgage loans	$	2,709.8		$	2,373.5

As of June 30, 2012, all commercial mortgage loans are held-for-investment. The Company diversifies its commercial mortgage loan portfolio by geographic region and property type to reduce concentration risk.  The Company manages risk when originating commercial mortgage loans by generally lending only up to 75% of the estimated fair value of the underlying real estate.  Subsequently, the Company continuously evaluates all mortgage loans based on relevant current information including an appraisal of loan-specific credit quality, property characteristics and market trends. Loan performance is monitored on a loan-specific basis through the review of submitted appraisals, operating statements, rent revenues and annual inspection reports, among other items. This review ensures properties are performing at a consistent and acceptable level to secure the debt.

The Company has established a collective valuation allowance for probable incurred, but not specifically identified, losses related to factors inherent in the lending process. The collective valuation allowance is determined based on historical loss rates as adjusted by current economic information for all loans that are not determined to have an individually-assessed loss. 

The changes in the collective valuation allowance were as follows for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011.

	2012		2011
Collective valuation allowance for losses, beginning of period	$	1.3	$	1.3
Addition to / (release of) allowance for losses	0.4		—
Collective valuation allowance for losses, end of period	$	1.7	$	1.3

The commercial mortgage loan portfolio is the recorded investment, prior to collective valuation allowances, by the indicated loan-to-value ratio and debt service coverage ratio, as reflected in the following tables as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	2012(1)		2011(1)
Loan-to-Value Ratio:
0% - 50%	$	536.2	$	552.4
50% - 60%	781.2		771.5
60% - 70%	1,255.4		908.2
70% - 80%	122.0		125.2
80% - 90%	16.7		17.5
Total commercial mortgage loans	$	2,711.5	$	2,374.8
(1)  Balances do not include allowance for mortgage loan credit losses.

	2012(1)		2011(1)
Debt Service Coverage Ratio:
Greater than 1.5x	$	1,956.6	$	1,600.1
1.25x - 1.5x	397.5		408.1
1.0x - 1.25x	280.9		286.7
Less than 1.0x	76.5		79.9
Mortgages secured by loans on land or construction loans	—		—
Total commercial mortgage loans	$	2,711.5	$	2,374.8
(1)  Balances do not include allowance for mortgage loan credit losses.

Substantially all of the commercial mortgages are classified as performing. The Company defines delinquent commercial mortgage loans consistent with industry practice as 60 days past due. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, all mortgage loans in the Company’s portfolio were current with respect to principal and interest.  The Company’s policy is to recognize interest income until a loan becomes 90 days delinquent or foreclosure proceedings are commenced, at which point interest accrual is discontinued. Interest accrual is not resumed until past due payments are brought current.

All commercial mortgages are evaluated for the purpose of quantifying the level of risk.  Those loans with higher risk are placed on a watch list and are closely monitored for collateral deficiency or other credit events that may lead to a potential loss of principal or interest.  If the value of any mortgage loan is determined to be impaired (i.e., when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect on all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement), the carrying value of the mortgage loan is reduced to either the present value of expected cash flows from the loan, discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or fair value of the collateral.

The carrying values and unpaid principal balances (prior to any charge-off) of impaired commercial mortgage loans were as follows as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	2012		2011
	Carrying Value		Carrying Value
Impaired loans without valuation allowances	$	5.7	$	5.8
Unpaid principal balance of impaired loans	$	7.2	$	7.3

The following is information regarding impaired loans, restructured loans, loans 90 days or more past due and loans in the process of foreclosure for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011
Impaired loans, average investment during the period	$	5.8	$	9.4
Interest income recognized on impaired loans, on an accrual basis	0.1		0.2
Interest income recognized on impaired loans, on a cash basis	0.1		0.2
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011
Impaired loans, average investment during the period	$	5.8	$	9.4
Interest income recognized on impaired loans, on an accrual basis	0.2		0.3
Interest income recognized on impaired loans, on a cash basis	0.2		0.3

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, there were no Restructured loans, Interest income recognized on restructured loans, Loans 90 days or more past due, interest no longer accruing, at amortized cost, Loans in foreclosure, at amortized cost and Unpaid principal balance of loans 90 days or more past due, interest no longer accruing.

Troubled Debt Restructuring

The Company invests in high quality, well performing portfolios of commercial mortgage loans and private placements. Under certain circumstances, modifications to these contracts are granted. Each modification is evaluated as to whether a troubled debt restructuring has occurred. A modification is a troubled debt restructure when the borrower is in financial difficulty and the creditor makes concessions. Generally, the types of concessions may include reducing the face amount or maturity amount of the debt as originally stated, reducing the contractual interest rate, extending the maturity date at an interest rate lower than current market interest rates and/or reducing accrued interest. The Company considers the amount, timing and extent of the concession granted in determining any impairment or changes in the specific valuation allowance recorded in connection with the troubled debt restructuring. A valuation allowance may have been recorded prior to the quarter when the loan is modified in a troubled debt restructuring. Accordingly, the carrying value (net of the specific valuation allowance) before and after modification through a troubled debt restructuring may not change significantly, or may increase if the expected recovery is higher than the pre-modification recovery assessment.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company had no mortgage loans or private placement modified in a troubled debt restructuring with a subsequent payment default.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company enters into the following derivatives:

Interest rate caps: The Company uses interest rate cap contracts to hedge the interest rate exposure arising from duration mismatches between assets and liabilities. Interest rate caps are also used to hedge interest rate exposure if rates rise above a specified level. Such increases in rates will require the Company to incur additional expenses. The future payout from the interest rate caps fund this increased exposure. The Company pays an upfront premium to purchase these caps. The company utilizes these contracts in non-qualifying hedging relationships.

Interest rate swaps: Interest rate swaps are used by the Company primarily to reduce market risks from changes in interest rates and to alter interest rate exposure arising from mismatches between assets and/or liabilities. Interest rate swaps are also used to hedge the interest rate risk associated with the value of assets it owns or in an anticipation of acquiring them. Using interest rate swaps, the Company agrees with another party to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed rate and floating rate interest payments, calculated by reference to an agreed upon notional principal amount. These transactions are entered into pursuant to master agreements that provide for a single net payment to be made to/from the counterparty at each due date. The Company utilizes these contracts in qualifying hedging relationships as well as non-qualifying hedging relationships.

Foreign exchange swaps: The Company uses foreign exchange or currency swaps to reduce the risk of change in the value, yield or cash flows associated with certain foreign denominated invested assets. Foreign exchange swaps represent contracts that require the exchange of foreign currency cash flows against U.S. dollar cash flows at regular periods, typically quarterly or semi-annually. The Company utilizes these contracts in non-qualifying hedging relationships.

Credit default swaps: Credit default swaps are used to reduce credit loss exposure with respect to certain assets that the Company owns, or to assume credit exposure on certain assets that the Company does not own. Payments are made to or received from the counterparty at specified intervals. In the event of a default on the underlying credit exposure, the Company will either receive a payment (purchased credit protection) or will be required to make a payment (sold credit protection) equal to the par minus recovery value of the swap contract. The Company utilizes these contracts in non-qualifying hedging relationships.

Forwards: The Company uses forward contracts to hedge certain invested assets against movement in interest rates, particularly mortgage rates. The Company uses To Be Announced ("TBA") securities as an economic hedge against rate movements. Forward contracts are utilized in non-qualifying hedging relationships.

Futures: The Company uses futures contracts as a hedge against an increase in certain equity indices. Such increases may result in increased payments to the holders of fixed index annuity contracts. The Company enters into exchange traded futures with regulated futures commissions that are members of the exchange. The Company also posts initial and variation margin with the exchange on a daily basis. The Company utilizes exchange-traded futures in non-qualifying hedging relationships.

Swaptions: A swaption is an option to enter into a swap with a forward starting effective date. The Company uses swaptions to hedge the interest rate exposure associated with the minimum crediting rate and book value guarantees embedded in the retirement products that the Company offers. Increases in interest rates will generate losses on assets that are backing such liabilities. In certain instances, the Company locks in the economic impact of existing purchased swaptions by entering into offsetting written swaptions. The Company pays a premium when it purchases the swaption. The Company utilizes these contracts in non-qualifying hedging relationships.

Managed Custody Guarantees: The Company issued certain credited rate guarantees on externally managed variable bond funds that represent stand alone derivatives. The market value is partially determined by, among other things, levels of or changes in interest rates, prepayment rates and credit ratings/spreads.

Embedded derivatives: The Company invested in certain fixed maturity instruments and has issued certain annuity products, that contain embedded derivatives whose fair value is at least partially determined by levels of or changes in domestic and/or foreign interest rates (short term or long-term), exchange rates, prepayment rates, equity markets, or credit ratings/spreads. Embedded derivatives within fixed maturities are included with the host contract on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, and changes in fair value are recorded in Other net realized capital gains (losses) in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Embedded derivatives within annuity products are included in Future policy benefits and claims reserves on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, and changes in the fair value of the embedded derivatives are recorded in Other net realized capital gains (losses) in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The notional amounts and fair values of derivatives were as follows as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	2012						2011
	Notional Amount		Asset Fair Value		Liability Fair Value		Notional Amount		Asset Fair Value		Liability Fair Value
Derivatives: Qualifying for hedge accounting
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate contracts	$	1,000.0	$	214.0	$	—	$	1,000.0	$	173.9	$	—
Derivatives: Non-Qualifying for hedge accounting
Interest rate contracts	15,364.5		314.1		337.7		17,555.1		269.4		306.4
Foreign exchange contracts	213.4		2.7		23.6		213.4		0.7		32.4
Equity contracts	13.9		0.4		—		—		—		—
Credit contracts	362.7		1.1		1.7		548.4		2.6		21.3
Managed custody guarantees	N/A		—		—		N/A		—		1.0
Embedded derivatives:
Within fixed maturity investments	N/A		58.9		—		N/A		59.2		—
Within annuity products	N/A		—		150.6		N/A		—		236.3
Total			$	591.2	$	513.6			$	505.8	$	597.4
N/A - Not Applicable

Net realized gains (losses) on derivatives were as follows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Derivatives: Qualifying for hedge accounting(1)
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate contracts	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Fair value hedges:
Interest rate contracts	—			—			—			—
Derivatives: Non-Qualifying for hedge accounting
Interest rate contracts	28.9			(23.3		)	6.0			(29.4		)
Foreign exchange contracts	12.5			(8.7		)	12.9			(16.9		)
Equity contracts	(0.5		)	0.1			1.1			0.4
Credit contracts	(1.6		)	1.2			6.2			6.0
Managed custody guarantees	—			0.5			1.1			0.5
Embedded derivatives:
Within fixed maturity investments	4.6			5.7			(0.2		)	(1.6		)
Within annuity products	(59.5		)	(7.1		)	88.4			(3.6		)
Total	$	(15.6	)	$	(31.6	)	$	115.5		$	(44.6	)
(1)  Changes in value for effective fair value hedges are recorded in Other net realized capital gains (losses). Changes in fair value upon disposal for effective cash flow hedges are recorded in Other net realized capital gains (losses) in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Credit Default Swaps

The Company has entered into various credit default swaps. When credit default swaps are sold, the Company assumes credit exposure to certain assets that it does not own. Credit default swaps may also be purchased to reduce credit exposure in the Company’s portfolio. Credit default swaps involve a transfer of credit risk from one party to another in exchange for periodic payments. These instruments are typically written for a maturity period of five years and do not contain recourse provisions, which would enable the seller to recover from third parties. The Company has International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ("ISDA") agreements with each counterparty with which it conducts business and tracks the collateral positions for each counterparty. To the extent cash collateral is received, it is included in Payables under securities loan agreement, including collateral held, on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and is reinvested in short-term investments. Collateral held is used in accordance with the Credit Support Annex ("CSA") to satisfy any obligations. Investment grade bonds owned by the Company are the source of noncash collateral posted, which is reported in Securities pledged on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. In the event of a default on the underlying credit exposure, the Company will either receive an additional payment (purchased credit protection) or will be required to make an additional payment (sold credit protection) equal to par minus recovery value of the swap contract. As of June 30, 2012, the fair value of credit default swaps of $1.1 and $1.7 was included in Derivatives assets and Derivatives liabilities, respectively, on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2011, the fair value of credit default swaps of $2.6 and $21.3 was included in Derivatives assets and Derivatives liabilities, respectively, on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the maximum potential future exposure to the Company on the sale of credit protection under credit default swaps was $339.0 and $518.3, respectively.