-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, MKAFhpQJiCHl9wG2EZoUkrOr8DrvycH0pTXSkfbiiVcJSkWSLXv+SyBOLfh666XY qp9acmn+YAcIklVa/E14QQ== 0000891618-99-000892.txt : 19990312 0000891618-99-000892.hdr.sgml : 19990312 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000891618-99-000892 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K405 PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 8 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19981231 FILED AS OF DATE: 19990310 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: NOVELLUS SYSTEMS INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000836106 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SPECIAL INDUSTRY MACHINERY, NEC [3559] IRS NUMBER: 770024666 STATE OF INCORPORATION: CA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K405 SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-17157 FILM NUMBER: 99562340 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 3970 N FIRST ST CITY: SAN JOSE STATE: CA ZIP: 95134 BUSINESS PHONE: 4089439700 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 81 VISTA MONTANA STREET 2: 81 VISTA MONTANA CITY: SAN JOSE STATE: CA ZIP: 95134 10-K405 1 FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 1 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) (X) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _________ to _________ Commission File Number 0-17157 NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) CALIFORNIA 77-0024666 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation of organization) Identification No.) 4000 NORTH FIRST STREET SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95134 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (408) 943-9700 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Name of Each Exchange on Title of Each Class Which Registered None N/A Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock (Title of Class) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES X NO ---------- ---------- Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X] As of February 26, 1999 the aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $1,944,000,000 based on the average of the high and low prices of the Common Stock as reported on the NASDAQ National Market on such date. Shares of Common Stock held by officers, directors and holders of more than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock have been excluded from this calculation because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes. The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding on February 26, 1999 was 34,884,617. Part III of this Report on Form 10-K incorporates information by reference from the Registrant's Proxy Statement for its 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. 2 PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS Novellus Systems, Inc. ("Novellus" or "the Company") was incorporated in April 1984 as a California Corporation. The Company manufactures, markets and services advanced automated wafer fabrication systems for the deposition of thin films within the semiconductor equipment market. The Company is a leading supplier of high productivity deposition systems used in the fabrication of integrated circuits. Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) systems employ a chemical plasma to deposit all of the dielectric (insulating) layers and certain of the conductive metal layers on the surface of a semiconductor wafer. Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD) systems are used to deposit conductive metal layers by sputtering metallic atoms from the surface of a target source via high DC power. Electrofill systems are used for depositing copper conductive layers in a dual damascene design architecture using an Aqueous solution. The Company's strategy is to focus on major semiconductor manufacturers, and has sold one or more of its systems to each of the 20 largest semiconductor manufacturers in the world. INDUSTRY BACKGROUND The semiconductor industry has experienced significant growth over the past decade due to increased demand for personal computers and the internet; the expansion of the telecommunications industry (and especially wireless communications); the emergence of new applications such as consumer electronics products; and the increased semiconductor content in these electronics systems. Significant performance advantages and lower prices for integrated circuits have contributed to the growth and expansion of the semiconductor industry over time. The semiconductor market is cyclical by nature, however, characterized by short term periods of either under or oversupply for both memory and logic devices. When demand decreases, semiconductor manufacturers typically slow their purchasing of capital equipment; conversely, when demand increases, so does capital purchasing. The market downturn that started in late 1997 also saw the emergence of a new trend, driven by the increasingly rapid pace in which the size of the circuitry on the chip is decreasing. When chips decrease in size, circuits can operate more quickly. With size reduction, too, more chips can be produced on a given wafer size, and the yield per manufacturing machine goes up. So, with decreasing chip size more chips can be produced per machine, and there's a decreased need to build new manufacturing plants, in particular, for pure capacity expansion. New equipment featuring the latest technological advances, however, must often be purchased to manufacture the smaller-sized chips, and in many cases is retrofit into existing manufacturing facilities. The fabrication of integrated circuits requires a number of complex and repetitive processing steps, including deposition, photolithography and etch. Deposition is a process in which a film of either electrically insulating or electrically conductive material is deposited on the surface of a wafer. The three principal methods of this film deposition are CVD, which can be used to deposit both insulating and conductive films; PVD, which is used primarily for sputtering conductive metals onto the wafer surface; and electrofill, a process for depositing metal films via an electrically charged aqueous solution. In the CVD process, wafers are typically placed in a reaction chamber and a variety of pure and precisely metered gases are introduced while some form of energy is added to activate a chemical reaction on the wafer surface. The result of this reaction is the deposition of a film on the wafer. CVD processes are used to deposit all of the dielectric films in an integrated circuit. The dielectric layers in an integrated circuit include the initial interlayer, portions of the interconnect layers and the final passivation layer. CVD is also used for deposition of conductive metal layers, particularly those metals that are more difficult to deposit in smaller line width geometry devices through conventional PVD or other deposition technology. CVD technology is particularly effective for depositing blanket tungsten as a "plug" layer that connects one conductive metal layer to another in a multi-level integrated circuit. For such applications, tungsten is replacing aluminum, which has certain physical properties that reduce its efficacy for the smaller interconnect holes of devices with smaller line width geometries. PVD, also known as "sputtering," is a process whereby ions of an inert gas, typically argon, are electrically accelerated in a high vacuum toward a target of pure metal, such as aluminum, tantalum, or copper. Upon impact, the argon ions "sputter" off bits of the target material, which then deposits on the silicon wafer to form thin conductive films which "wire" the thousands of transistors in the computer chip together. PVD processes are used to provide conducting liner and barrier metal layers to prevent diffusion or reactions between metals such as tungsten and silicon regions, and to provide underlying foundations for the nucleation of other metal deposition layers. Aluminum PVD is also widely used at the present time as the primary wiring material in up to six or more layers of device interconnect. The Company believes, however, that PVD tantalum barrier and copper seed layers will play an important role in enabling the transition from aluminum to copper as the primary wiring material. Electrofilling is the process used to deposit copper wiring. Copper has lower resistance and capacitance values than aluminum, the present conductive metal used in integrated circuits. Because of this fact, copper has the potential to double the speed of an advanced microprocessor while reducing the number of metal layers required by as much as 50%. The electrofilling process, developed to deposit copper conductive lines, poses unique processing challenges. Due to the difficulties in etching copper, the metal is filled in a structure created within the circuit's insulating layers in a process called dual damascene: this is the reverse of the process used with aluminum, where the metal is deposited, etched to create lines and vias, and then filled with insulating layers between the metal lines. The most difficult task is filling copper into interconnect structures which can be less than 0.25 micron in width, with aspect ratios of up to 5:1. Electrofilling employs a liquid chemistry and electrolytic principles to deposit the copper wiring into the dielectric structure, a simple and cost-effective process that is also highly reliable. 2 3 Electrofill processes are used to produce the primary copper conductive layers in advanced integrated circuits (typically circuits smaller than 0.25 micron). The technology is believed by the Company to be extendible until at least the 0.13 micron design rule, and possibly down to 0.10 design rules; or in other words, approximately another 5 or 6 years given the current industry evolution. Advanced integrated circuit technology has created increased demand for more sophisticated semiconductor processing equipment. Today's complex semiconductor devices, such as 64 megabit DRAMs and 64-bit microprocessors, are being designed with line width geometries as small as 0.25 microns, with up to six layers of interconnect circuitry. The next generation of semiconductor devices, including 256 megabit DRAMs, will see line widths as small as 0.18 micron, and Novellus believes there will be widespread transition from aluminum to copper conductive lines for faster processing speeds. Each additional interconnect layer requires three separate layers of deposition, which include the initial metal layer, a non-conductive dielectric layer and then a "plug" metal film to fill patterned holes in the dielectric layer that connects the metal layers on either side of the dielectric. The Company believes that the greater complexity and number of interconnect layers in advanced integrated circuits will enable the markets for CVD aluminum and PVD aluminum to grow over the short term. Semiconductor manufacturers generally measure the cost performance of their production equipment in terms of "cost per wafer," which is determined by factoring in the fixed costs for acquisition and installation of the system, its variable operating costs and its net throughput rate. A system with higher throughput allows the semiconductor manufacturer to recover the purchase price of the system over a greater number of wafers and thereby reduce the cost of ownership of the system on a per wafer basis. Throughput is most accurately measured on a net or overall basis, which takes into account the processing speed of the system and any non-operational downtime for cleaning, maintenance or other repairs. Yield and film quality are also significant factors to the semiconductor manufacturer in selecting processing equipment. The increased costs of larger and more complex semiconductor wafers have made high yields extremely important to semiconductor manufacturers. To achieve higher yields and better film quality, deposition systems must be capable of repeating the original process on a consistent basis without a disqualifying level of defects. This characteristic, known in the industry as "repeatability," is extremely important in achieving commercially acceptable yields. Repeatability is more easily achieved in those systems that can operate at desired throughput rates without requiring the system to approach its critical tolerance limits. The continuing evolution of semiconductor devices to smaller line width geometries and more complex multi-level circuitry has significantly increased the cost and performance requirements of the capital equipment used to manufacture these devices. An advanced 200 mm wafer fabrication line can cost over $1 billion, representing a substantial increase over the costs of prior generation facilities. Increased capital depreciation costs will continue to become a much larger percentage of the aggregate production costs for semiconductor manufacturers relative to labor, materials and other variable manufacturing costs. As a result, there has been an increasing focus by the semiconductor industry on obtaining increased productivity and higher returns from its semiconductor manufacturing equipment, thereby reducing the effective cost of ownership of such systems. THE NOVELLUS SOLUTION Novellus focuses on advanced thin film deposition systems (CVD, PVD, and electrofill) that provide high film quality while attaining the high levels of productivity required to meet the semiconductor industry's need for high volume, low cost wafer production. The Company's multi-station continuous processing architecture enables its systems to address each of the following critical parameters of system performance: CVD Solutions Throughput, Cost per Wafer. In contrast to CVD systems which process only one wafer at a time in a chamber, the Company's multi-station continuous processing systems can process five, six, or even seven wafers at the same time in a chamber, leading to higher throughput levels. The design simplicity and automatic cleaning capabilities of the Company's systems further increase net throughput by reducing production downtime. Film Quality. With Novellus' unique sequential multi-station chamber design, each wafer receives a fraction of the desired film thickness at each of the five, six, or seven deposition stations in the process chamber. The "averaging" effect created by this design tends to reduce anomalies in film thickness and thereby improves film uniformity and quality. The Company's systems, for most films, can obtain within-wafer and wafer-to-wafer uniformity levels of +/- 1% of film thickness as measured at one standard deviation, which the Company believes is state-of-the-art for the industry. Process Repeatability. Because of the inherently higher throughput potential of continuous processing, the Company's systems are able to deposit materials at lower, more controlled rates than single wafer processing systems, which generally deposit at faster rates closer to the process performance limits to achieve production-level throughputs. Lower deposition rates avoid straining the system's process tolerance limits and thereby permit increased process control and repeatability. Metal PVD Solutions. Through the acquisition of Varian's Thin Film Systems division in 1997, Novellus has extended its capabilities in PVD, introducing the INOVA(TM) system in April of 1998. PVD, a critical technology in the production of advanced semiconductor logic and memory devices, enables Novellus to provide metal deposition solutions for both aluminum primary conductor as well as copper barrier/seed layers. Copper Electrofilling Solutions. Introduced in June 1998 after an extensive joint development program with IBM's Microelectronics Division, the SABRE(TM) copper electrofill tool is the industry's only production-proven machine for depositing copper conductive layers on sub-0.25 micron circuits. SABRE employs a patented wafer fixture to avoid backside contamination of the wafer from the plating bath; a unique bath cell design that ensures reproducibility of the copper fill; and a simple system architecture that ensures both high wafer throughput and system 3 4 availability. Coupled with the INOVA PVD system, Novellus is able to offer a complete copper solution for the deposition of advanced circuits. STRATEGY The Company's objective is to increase its market share in the worldwide Thin Film Deposition market and strengthen its position as a leading supplier of semiconductor processing equipment. The key elements of the Company's strategy are as follows: Emphasis on High Productivity Systems. Novellus focuses on providing high productivity thin film deposition systems to leading semiconductor companies. The Company addresses the needs of semiconductor manufacturers through either its multi-chamber or unique continuous processing architecture, which enables its systems to attain high levels of wafer throughput, yield and film quality. The architecture's simple design also provides the Company's systems with long up-time and smaller footprints. The Company intends to retain its focus on productivity by leveraging its multi-chamber and continuous processing architecture in product enhancements and new product offerings. Leadership in dielectric and metallization technologies. The Company's strategy is to provide a family of deposition systems which utilize advanced CVD, PVD, and electrofilling technologies to address leading-edge wafer processing needs. The Company's Concept One(TM) Dielectric offers dual frequency deposition technology to achieve results for a wide variety of films on wafers as large as eight inches and geometries as small as 0.35 micron. The Company's Concept One-W is used by manufacturers to connect multiple metal layers in advanced devices; the Company believes that it is currently the only system that provides full coverage tungsten deposition. The Company's Concept Two(TM) system is a modular CVD system designed to address the needs of wafer fabs that demand greater levels of wafer processing integration, higher volume production and increased factory automation. The Company is focusing its research and development efforts on additional Concept Two modules; advanced PVD and electrofilling technology; "gap fill" technology; low-k dielectric materials; and additional advanced technologies for the next generation of smaller geometry fabrication lines, as well as equipment to process 300mm wafers. The Company's first offering in the advanced "gap fill" technology market, SPEED(TM), was introduced in February 1996. Novellus further believes that the INOVA(TM) system will provide an advanced PVD system that can deliver tantalum barriers and copper seed layers for copper metallization, as well as Maxfill(TM) aluminum and Ti/Ti-nitride film quality with excellent particle performance. And finally, we believe the SABRE electrofill tool is emerging as the industry choice for the fill of copper vias and trenches using a dual damascene process. Focus On Major Semiconductor Manufacturers. The Company has sold one or more deposition systems to each of the 20 largest semiconductor manufacturers in the world. The Company's sales objective is to work closely with customers to secure purchase orders for multiple systems as these customers expand existing facilities; retrofit old facilities with new equipment; or build new fabs. The Company seeks to build customer loyalty and achieve a high level of repeat business by offering high reliability products, comprehensive field support and a responsive parts replacement and service program. Expansion Of Asian Market Presence. While Novellus derives a significant percentage of its net sales from the Asian marketplace, the Company believes that substantial additional growth potential exists in the region over the long term. While the present industry slowdown was exacerbated in large part by the Asian financial crisis, countries such as Japan, Taiwan, and Korea continue to represent a disproportionate share of the world's capacity for semiconductor manufacturing. The Asian countries are particularly dominant in the manufacturing of memory products, which at the end of 1998 appeared to be moving from an oversupply to an undersupply market situation, and which are enabling technologies for end use consumer applications such as the Internet. Currently, the Company's local presence in Asia includes sales and support offices throughout Japan (via the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, Nippon Novellus), and one each in Korea, Taiwan, China and Singapore. Novellus believes it is an important part of its current business strategy to aggressively build its presence in Asia to serve this strategically significant region. However, Asian countries, particularly Japan and Korea, continue to experience banking, currency and other difficulties that are contributing to economic slowdowns or recessions in those countries. The region does not appear to be responding quickly to significant efforts to stimulate its economies. As a result of the economic difficulties within certain Asian countries, the Company has increased sales subject to extended payment terms within this region. If Asian economies remain stagnant or continue to deteriorate, capital investment by Asian customers could decrease from current levels. Among other things, the decline in value of the Korean currency, together with difficulties obtaining credit, could result in a decline in the purchasing power of the Company's Korean customers. This in turn could result in cancellation or delay of orders for the Company's products from Korean customers, thus materially adversely affecting the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, if Japan's economy weakens further, investments by Japanese customers may be adversely affected and it is possible that economic recovery in other Pacific Rim countries could be delayed. Low Manufacturing Cost Structure. Novellus utilizes an outsourcing strategy for the manufacture of major subassemblies and performs system design, assembly and testing in-house. Novellus believes that outsourcing enables it to minimize its fixed costs and capital expenditures while also providing the flexibility to increase capacity as needed. This strategy also allows the Company to focus on product differentiation through system design and quality control. Through the use of third party manufacturing specialists, the Company ensures that its subsystems incorporate advanced technologies in robotics, gas panels and microcomputers. The Company works closely with its suppliers to achieve mutual cost reduction through joint design efforts. 4 5 PRODUCTS Since the introduction of its original Concept One Dielectric system in 1987, the Company has developed and now offers a family of processing systems for the dielectric and metal deposition markets. The Concept One Dielectric deposits a variety of insulating or "dielectric" films on wafers including Oxide, Nitride and TEOS. In 1990, the Company introduced a modified version of the Concept One-Dielectric, the Concept One-W, which also uses a CVD process to deposit blanket tungsten metal films on wafers primarily as the metal interconnect between conductor layers in the integrated circuit layers. In November 1991, the Company introduced the Concept Two, which is a modular, integrated production system capable of depositing both dielectric and conductive metal layers by combining one or more processing chambers around a common, automated robotic wafer handler. In February 1996, the Company introduced SPEED on the Concept Two platform, targeted at advanced inter-metal dielectric ("IMD") deposition. Following the acquisition of Varian's Thin Film Systems Division, the Company announced the introduction of its INOVA system, an advanced PVD system that delivers Maxfill aluminum and Ti/Ti-nitride film quality for aluminum barrier layer applications, as well as highly conformal tantalum barrier copper seed layers (barrier/seed) for copper conductive layers. Most recently, in June 1998 Novellus announced the SABRE copper Electrofill(TM) system for producing copper conductive layers. With the SABRE product announcement, Novellus can now provide its customers with the entire set of metals and dielectrics deposition processes required for 0.25 micron devices and below. CONCEPT ONE-DIELECTRIC The Concept One-Dielectric is shipped in two versions: the Concept One-150, which processes 100, 125, and 150 mm wafers (approximately 4, 5, and 6 inches in diameter), and the Concept One-200, which processes 125, 150 and 200 mm wafers (approximately 5, 6 and 8 inches in diameter, designed for advanced eight inch fabrication lines). The Concept One consists principally of two attached chambers and associated hardware and electronics. The first chamber of the system, called the "loadlock," isolates the process chamber from the outside environment. Depending on the model of the Concept One-Dielectric, the loadlock accepts up to 75 wafers sized from 100 to 200 mm, stored in cassette carriers. The operator inserts the cassettes of wafers in batches into the loadlock, and the pressure inside the loadlock is decreased to create a vacuum, which matches the constant pressure level of the process chamber. A robotic arm in the center of the loadlock, the wafer transport mechanism, transfers wafers one at a time from the cassettes to the process chamber and, upon completion of the deposition process, returns the finished wafers to the cassettes. The loadlock isolates the process chamber from the fabrication environment, permitting the process chamber to remain at constant temperature and pressure while wafers are transferred from the clean-room to the loadlock and from the loadlock to the process chamber. These stable process chamber conditions enhance film quality, process repeatability, and throughput. The loadlock design also reduces particulate contamination because the robotic arm is the only moving mechanism in the loadlock and because the wafer cassettes are isolated from the clean-room. The process chamber for the Concept One-Dielectric has six or eight stations, depending on the model. One station is used as a load/unload site and the remaining five, six, or seven stations are used for wafer deposition. Each deposition station employs a dedicated shower head which delivers gases and plasma energy to the wafer surface. In a six station process chamber, for example, each wafer moves through the system and stops at each of the five deposition stations to receive one-fifth of its preprogrammed film thickness. Some CVD products, called "single wafer" systems, process only one wafer at a time in a process chamber, while multistation continuous process systems, like the Concept One, can process numerous wafers at the same time. The continuous processing capabilities of a multistation system generally enable such systems to attain higher throughput while using a less critical, more repeatable process than would be required for a single wafer system at equivalent throughput levels. This multiple deposition design also results in greater film uniformity and improved film quality because small variations in deposition at any single station tend to be offset by deposition of the same film at other stations. After the entire batch of up to 75 wafers has been processed and returned to the cassettes, an automatic cleaning cycle in the process chamber removes residual deposition materials, which could otherwise cause particulate contamination in a subsequent deposition process. During this cleaning cycle, the loadlock automatically returns to atmospheric pressure, enabling the operator to remove the cassettes of finished wafers without impacting system throughput. The Concept One-Dielectric uses electrical radio frequency (RF) plasma energy to enhance thermal energy, enabling the system to process wafers at a relatively low temperature, and thus reducing the risk of heat damage to existing metal layers during processing. The system also suppresses hillock formation by limiting the time that the wafer is exposed to elevated temperatures prior to deposition. The wafer is heated for 10 seconds or less in advance of deposition in the Concept One-Dielectric, which the Company believes is one of the shortest preheat times of any CVD system. Stress related defects are addressed through the system by addition of a proprietary dual frequency, "stress control" option which the Company offers. The system's vacuum loadlock reduces the level of particles, thereby improving film quality by isolating the process chamber of the Concept One-Dielectric from temperature and pressure fluctuations. In addition, the automatic cleaning capability and relatively simple mechanical design of the system reduce particulate contaminants and thereby increase yields and film quality. In 1995, the Company introduced an extension to its Concept One-Dielectric system, the Concept One Maxus(TM). The Maxus extends the Company's performance in nitride passivation by enhancing the nitride deposition rate while retaining nitride film performance. It also enhances the gap fill capability of TEOS films by enabling fluorinated-TEOS (F-TEOS) processing for .35 micron gap fill. F-TEOS enables the customer to lower the dielectric constant to 3.7, an important capability in enhancing device performance. The Maxus is also available on the Concept Two platform. 5 6 CONCEPT ONE-W The Concept One-W was introduced in 1990 to address the tungsten CVD market. The Concept One-W deposits blanket tungsten metal films, which are increasingly used in advanced semiconductor devices to connect multiple metal layers in the integrated circuit. Like the Concept One-Dielectric, the Concept One-W uses a multistation sequential deposition design that achieves high throughput with desirable film properties for the entire range of film thickness. The Concept One-W also uses an approach patented by the Company to provide full-coverage front-side tungsten deposition while preventing deposition of tungsten on the backside of the wafer. This capability helps prevent the generation of damaging particles on the wafer and eliminates the need for time-consuming etching on the backside of the wafer to remove the film. During 1993, the Concept One-W successfully completed a 21 day, 24 hour-per-day wafer manufacturing trial at SEMATECH, a U.S. semiconductor industry consortium. The results of this extended manufacturing trial demonstrated that the Concept One-W achieved or surpassed all program goals, which included system availability, film uniformity, particulates and other film properties. In 1993, SEMATECH also announced that the Concept One-W was one group of U.S. manufactured semiconductor production tools capable of producing devices with 0.35 micron geometries. The success of the Concept One-W in these SEMATECH trials was a major milestone for the Company in attaining market acceptance for the Concept One-W with major U.S. semiconductor manufacturers and in enabling the Company to penetrate certain of these important accounts. CONCEPT TWO The Concept Two, introduced in November 1991, is a modular, integrated production system capable of depositing both dielectric and conductive metal layers by combining one or more processing chambers around a common, robotic wafer handler. The Concept Two enables the semiconductor manufacturer to increase production throughput and system capability as needed without equipment replacement by adding additional process modules through the Concept Two's modular configuration. The Concept Two was initially available with a tungsten process chamber and a PVD process module for deposition of certain metal layers. In late 1994, a dielectric process module became available for Concept Two systems. The Concept Two has been designed to be compatible with the modular equipment interface standard established by the Modular Equipment Standards Committee ("MESC"), sponsored by SEMATECH. The Concept Two in a typical configuration incorporates a central cassette module and wafer handler that interfaces with the clean-room, and includes multiple interfaces for process or transport modules. The cassette module, through its robotics, manages wafer movement between the various processing stations that can be included in a particular Concept Two configuration. Different cassette modules are available, depending on customer requirements. An optional isolation chamber is also available that is connected to the cassette module to connect high vacuum process chambers and other portions of the system. In 1993, the Company introduced the Concept Two-ALTUS(TM), which combines the modular architecture of the Concept Two system with an advanced tungsten CVD process chamber. The system features a dual loadlock cassette module with full factory automation capability to meet the high throughput requirements of high volume, automated eight inch wafer fabs. This dual loadlock cassette handler permits continuous operation of the process chamber with one loadlock, while a second loadlock is simultaneously being loaded or unloaded by the operator in the clean-room. Through its modular configuration, the Concept Two enables the semiconductor manufacturer to combine multistation modules for slower processes with single wafer modules for faster processes to balance the throughput of the overall system. A dielectric version of the Concept Two ALTUS(TM), the Concept Two SEQUEL(TM), was shipped in late 1994. This system brought the same level of factory automation and throughput to the dielectric market as the ALTUS did to the metals market. The Concept Two SEQUEL(TM) was initially shipped in a single chamber version targeted at thin dielectric films used in volume 200mm inter-metal dielectric production applications. In 1994, the Company introduced the Concept Two-Dual ALTUS tungsten deposition system. The Dual ALTUS features the production proven performance of Novellus' tungsten CVD chamber in a dual chamber configuration that delivers the throughput power to dramatically lower the cost of tungsten deposition. The Company believes that the Dual ALTUS is a solution in the industry for very high volume 200mm wafer fabs producing 0.35 micron semiconductor devices. Subsequent to 1994, the Company has continued to expand its Concept Two product offerings as follows: CONCEPT TWO DUAL SEQUEL This dual chamber version of the SEQUEL dielectric family is designed for high throughput deposition of thick films, such as layers before CMP (chemical mechanical polishing), and dual layer passivation films. The Dual SEQUEL employs two process chambers to provide the throughput power of twelve stations, resulting in dramatic improvements in productivity for these types of films. CONCEPT TWO SEQUEL-S AND ALTUS-S These enhanced versions of the SEQUEL and ALTUS systems offer improved throughput performance for both thick and thin dielectric films, while occupying 45% less space than previous versions. They also provide a range of improved maintainability features and design enhancements that reduce customer facilities costs. The two products are available in both single and dual chamber versions. 6 7 CONCEPT TWO PRISM(TM) The Prism(TM) MOCVD Ti-nitride system offers thin barrier solutions for high aspect ratio structures with barrier properties, conformality and film stability. This system is used to form a high quality, low cost barrier/adhesion layer prior to depositing tungsten. The Company began shipments of this system in 1996. CONCEPT TWO SPEED Introduced in February 1996, SPEED is the Company's advanced dielectric gap fill system, the semiconductor capital equipment industry's first high density plasma deposition solution capable of high-volume manufacturing. SPEED is targeted for advanced IMD deposition for 0.35 micron devices and below. The IMD market is currently the largest segment in dielectric CVD and is also currently the fastest growing. SPEED is offered either as a stand alone gap fill system or integrated with the Concept Two SEQUEL to provide a complete high-throughput, low-cost gap fill and chemical mechanical polishing gap layer solution for logic manufacturing. SPEED is a single wafer processing system, and uses a patented hemispherical source design and a proprietary electrostatic chuck to provide excellent fill, reproducibility, low damage and high throughput. In 1996 the Company received and shipped orders for multiple production SPEED systems and announced an enhanced version (SPEED-S) that occupies 40% less space, thus improving throughput densities for customers. ANTI REFLECTION LAYER In December 1996, the Company announced a new plasma enhanced anti-reflection layer ("ARL"). The ARL product achieves tighter levels of critical dimension control with in-line and Deep UV lithography in advanced semiconductor devices while reducing cost per wafer. Running on a Concept Two SEQUEL, the Company believes that the ARL offers competitive throughput and low cost of ownership for the industry. The Novellus ARL product is currently being used in production in customer manufacturing facilities. CONCEPT THREE (TM) In December 1997, the Company introduced its Concept Three family of chemical vapor deposition systems for dielectric and tungsten applications on 300mm wafers. The new Concept Three(TM) products are the C3-SPEED(TM), the C3-SEQUEL(TM), and the C-3 ALTUS(TM). Because the Concept Three systems are based on the production proven Novellus Concept Two products, the Company believes that they should offer minimal risk to its customers in making the transition from 200mm to 300mm volume chipmaking. INOVA (TM) SYSTEM Introduced in April 1998, the INOVA system is an advanced PVD system that delivers tantalum barrier and copper seed layers required prior to copper electrofilling, as well as Maxfill aluminum and Ti/Ti-nitride films for aluminum liner/barrier applications. The INOVA incorporates Novellus' uniquely-designed Hollow Cathode Magnetron ("HCM") technology, which the Company believes offers better target utilization, extended maintenance intervals, and lower cost of ownership in comparison with collimated and other ionized sputtering techniques. The INOVA is a multi-chamber single wafer processing system. SABRE The SABRE system, introduced in July 1998 after an extensive development program with IBM, is believed by the Company to be the most reliable and technologically advanced copper electrofilling system available on the market. SABRE has been proven to provide void-free copper fill of sub-0.15 micron trench features (at 9 or 10:1 aspect ratios) and 0.25 micron vias (at 5:1 aspect ratios). SABRE employs a proprietary electrofilling cell that eliminates the backside wafer contamination of copper, and features a unique plating cell design that ensures reproducibility of the copper fill, with a film uniformity of 3 sigma, [5% with a wafer. SABRE requires only two types of process modules to complete the electrofill process, for electrofilling (3 stations total) and the other for spin/rinse/dry (another 3 stations). The resulting simplicity of this design is key to the system's high reliability and manufacturing availability. 7 8 MARKETING, SALES AND SERVICE Novellus markets its products worldwide to manufacturers of semiconductors, including both captive fabrication lines (which produce semiconductors primarily for internal consumption) and merchant semiconductor manufacturers (which produce semiconductors primarily for sales to third party customers). In North America, the Company sells products primarily through a direct sales force. The Company's U.S. sales and support offices are located in Boston; Orlando; Austin; Dallas; Phoenix; Hopewell Junction, New York; Williston, Vermont; Bethlehem, Pennsylvania; Manassas, Virginia; and Beaverton, Oregon. In Europe, the Company's products are predominantly sold through a wholly owned subsidiary, Novellus Systems, Ltd., which has sales and support facilities outside London, England, and in Scotland. The Company also has sales and services support offices in The Netherlands, France, Germany, Spain, Ireland and Israel. In Asia, the Company sells its products through wholly owned subsidiaries in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and China. The Company's Japanese subsidiary maintains its headquarters near Tokyo and six sales offices throughout Japan. The ability to provide prompt and effective field support is critical to the Company's sales efforts, due to the substantial operational and financial commitments made by customers that purchase a deposition system. The Company's strategy of supporting its installed base through both its customer support and research and development groups has served to encourage use of the Company's systems in production applications and has accelerated penetration of certain key accounts. The Company believes that its marketing efforts are enhanced by the technical expertise of its research and development personnel who provide customer process support and participate in a number of industry forums, such as conferences and publications. The Company believes that its ability to service its customers is enhanced by the design simplicity of its systems. The Company generally warrants its products against defects in design, materials, and workmanship. In 1992, the Company became the first semiconductor equipment manufacturer to extend its warranty to 24 months from shipment and in 1993 also included the cost of all consumable parts in the system and preventative maintenance parts under warranty. The Company offers maintenance contracts as an additional service to its customers. For the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1998, there were no customers who accounted for more than 10% of the Company's net sales. The Company terminated its contract with Seki Technotron in June 1998. For the year ended December 31, 1996, one customer, Seki Technotron (a distributor in Japan), accounted for 12% of the Company's net sales. Export sales for the year ended December 31, 1998 were approximately $262.3 million, or 51% of net sales. Export sales for the year ended December 31, 1997 were approximately $250.1 million, or 47% of net sales. For the year ended December 31, 1996, export sales (including sales made by the Company's Japanese subsidiary) were approximately $295.2 million or 64% of net sales. Historically, the Company has sold a significant proportion of its systems in any particular period to a limited number of customers. Sales to the Company's ten largest customers in 1998, 1997 and 1996 accounted for 57%, 48%, and 59% of net sales, respectively. The Company expects that sales of its products to relatively few customers will continue to account for a high percentage of its net sales in the foreseeable future. None of the Company's customers has entered into a long-term agreement requiring it to purchase the Company's products. The Company believes that sales to certain of its customers will decrease in the near future as those customers complete current purchasing requirements for new or expanded fabrication facilities. Although the composition of the group comprising the Company's largest customers has varied from year to year, the loss of a significant customer or any reduction in orders from any significant customer, including reductions due to customer departures from recent buying patterns, market, economic or competitive conditions in the semiconductor industry or in the industries that manufacture products utilizing integrated circuits, could adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, sales of the Company's systems depend in significant part upon the decision of a prospective customer to increase manufacturing capacity or to expand current manufacturing capacity, both of which typically involve a significant capital commitment. The Company has from time to time experienced delays in finalizing system sales following initial system qualification. Due to these and other factors, the Company's systems typically have a lengthy sales cycle during which the Company may expend substantial funds and management effort. BACKLOG As of December 31, 1998, the Company's backlog was $108.4 million, as compared to a backlog of $223.9 million at December 31, 1997. The Company includes in its backlog only those customer orders for which it has accepted purchase orders and assigned shipment dates within twelve months. All orders are subject to cancellation or rescheduling by customers with limited or no penalties. Because of orders received in the same quarter in which a system is shipped, possible changes in system delivery schedules, cancellations of orders and delays in systems shipments, the Company's backlog at any particular date is not necessarily a reliable indicator of actual sales for any succeeding period. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT The semiconductor manufacturing industry is subject to rapid technological change and new product introductions and enhancements. The Company's ability to remain competitive in this market will depend in part upon its ability to develop new and enhanced systems and to introduce these systems at competitive prices and on a timely and cost-effective basis. Accordingly, the Company devotes a significant portion of its personnel and financial resources to research and development programs and seeks to maintain close relationships with its customers to remain responsive to their product needs. 8 9 The Company's current research and development efforts are directed at development of new systems and processes and improving existing system capabilities. The Company is focusing its research and development efforts on additional Concept Two modules, advanced PVD systems, advanced gap fill technology, primary conductor metals, low-K dielectric materials and additional advanced technologies for the next generation of smaller geometry fabrication lines, as well as equipment to process 300mm wafers. Expenditures for research and development during 1998, 1997 and 1996 were $106.5 million, $89.8 million, and $53.9 million, respectively, or approximately 21%, 17%, and 12% of net sales, respectively. The amount and percentage of sales in 1997 for research and development exclude the in-process research and development charge related to the acquisition of Varian's Thin Film Systems business (TFS). The Company expects in future years that research and development expenditures will continue to represent a substantial percentage of net sales. The success of the Company in developing, introducing and selling new and enhanced systems depends upon a variety of factors, including product selection, timely and efficient completion of product design and development, timely and efficient implementation of manufacturing and assembly processes, product performance in the field and effective sales and marketing. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in selecting, developing, manufacturing and marketing new products or in enhancing its existing products. As is typical in the semiconductor capital equipment market, the Company has experienced delays from time to time in the introduction of, and certain technical and manufacturing difficulties with, certain of its systems and enhancements and may experience delays and technical and manufacturing difficulties in future introductions or volume production of new systems or enhancements. The Company's inability to complete the development or meet the technical specifications of any of its new systems or enhancements or to manufacture and ship these systems or enhancements in volume in a timely manner would materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the Company may incur substantial unanticipated costs to ensure the functionality and reliability of its future product introductions early in the product's life cycle. If new products have reliability or quality problems, reduced orders or higher manufacturing costs, delays in collecting accounts receivable and additional service and warranty expense may result. Any of such events could materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. MANUFACTURING The Company's manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembling and testing components and subassemblies which are acquired from third party vendors and then integrated into a finished system by the Company. The Company utilizes an outsourcing strategy for the manufacture of major subassemblies and performs system design, assembly and testing in-house. Novellus believes that outsourcing enables it to minimize its fixed costs and capital expenditures while also providing the flexibility to increase production capacity. This strategy also allows the Company to focus on product differentiation through system design and quality control. Through the use of manufacturing specialists, the Company believes that its subsystems incorporate advanced technologies in robotics, gas panels and microcomputers. The Company works closely with its suppliers on achieving mutual cost reduction through joint design efforts. The Company manufactures its system units in clean-room environments which are similar to the clean rooms used by semiconductor manufacturers for wafer fabrication. This procedure is intended to reduce the amount of particulates and other contaminants in the final assembled system, which in turn improves yield and reduces the level of contaminants at the customer level. Following assembly, the completed system is packaged in a plastic shrink wrap to maintain clean-room standards during shipment. The Company uses numerous suppliers to supply parts, components and subassemblies (collectively, "parts") for the manufacture and support of its products. Although the Company makes reasonable efforts to ensure that parts are available from multiple suppliers, this is not always possible; accordingly, certain key parts are obtained from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers. These suppliers are, in some cases, thinly capitalized, independent companies that generate significant portions of their business from the Company and/or a small group of other companies in the semiconductor industry. Although the Company seeks to reduce its dependence on these limited source suppliers, disruption or termination of certain of these sources could occur and such disruptions could have at least a temporary adverse effect on the Company's operations. Moreover, a prolonged inability to obtain certain components could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations and could result in damage to customer relationships. COMPETITION Significant competitive factors in the semiconductor equipment market include system performance and flexibility, cost, the size of each manufacturer's installed customer base, capability for customer support and breadth of product line. The Company believes that it competes favorably in the deposition equipment marketplace primarily on the basis of system performance and flexibility, cost and customer support capability. In addition, the Company believes that the acquisition of TFS and its 1998 announcements of a copper primary conductor product will allow the Company to develop and compete successfully in the PVD and copper electrofill areas of the market, respectively. However, the semiconductor equipment industry is highly competitive and characterized by increasingly rapid technological changes. The Company faces substantial competition in the market in which it competes from both established competitors and potential new entrants. In the CVD and PVD areas of the market, the Company's principal competitor is Applied Materials, Inc., which is a major supplier of CVD and PVD systems and has established a substantial base of CVD, PVD and other equipment in large semiconductor manufacturers. In the copper electrofill area of the market, the Company's principal competitors are Semitool (which has a large installed base of R&D tools) and EEJA, a Japanese company with ties to the chemistry supplier Enthone-OMI. Certain of the Company's competitors have greater financial, marketing, technical or other resources, broader product lines, greater customer service capabilities and larger and more established sales organizations and customer bases than the Company. The Company may also face future competition from new market entrants from other overseas and domestic sources. 9 10 The Company expects its competitors to continue to improve the design and performance of their products. There can be no assurance that the Company's competitors will not develop enhancements to or future generations of competitive products that will offer price or performance features. In addition, a substantial investment is required by customers to install and integrate capital equipment into a semiconductor production line. As a result, once a semiconductor manufacturer has selected a particular vendor's capital equipment, the Company believes that the manufacturer will be generally reliant upon that equipment for the specific production line application. Accordingly, the Company may experience difficulty in selling a product line to a particular customer for a significant period of time if that customer selects a competitor's product. Increased competitive pressure could lead to lower prices for the Company's products, thereby materially adversely affecting the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to compete successfully in the future. PATENTS AND PROPRIETARY RIGHTS The Company intends to continue to pursue the legal protection of its technology primarily through patent and trade secret protection. The Company currently holds over 100 patents, some with pending foreign counterparts, and intends to file additional patent applications as appropriate. There can be no assurance that patents will be issued from any of these pending applications or that any claims allowed from existing or pending patents will be sufficiently broad to protect the Company's technology. While the Company intends to protect its intellectual property rights vigorously, there can be no assurance that any patents held by the Company will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, or that the rights granted thereunder will provide competitive advantages to the Company (see Item 3 "Legal Proceedings"). The Company also relies on trade secrets and proprietary technology that it seeks to protect, in part, through confidentiality agreements with employees, consultants and other parties. There can be no assurance that these agreements will not be breached, that the Company will have adequate remedies for any breach, or that the Company's trade secrets will not otherwise become known to or independently developed by others. There has also been substantial litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights in semiconductor related industries. The Company is currently involved in such litigation (see Item 3 "Legal Proceedings"), and, although, except as set forth in Item 3 "Legal Proceedings," it is not aware of any claim of infringement by its products of any patent or proprietary rights of others, it could become involved in additional litigation in the future. Although the Company does not believe the outcome of the current litigation will have a material impact on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations, no assurances can be given that this litigation or future litigation will not have such an impact. In addition to the current litigation, the Company's operations, including the further commercialization of the Company's products, could provoke additional claims of infringement from third parties. In the future, litigation may be necessary to enforce patents issued to the Company, to protect trade secrets or know-how owned by the Company or to defend the Company against claimed infringement of the rights of others and to determine the scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others. Any such litigation could result in substantial cost and diversion of effort by the Company, which by itself could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and operating results. Further, adverse determinations in such litigation could result in the Company's loss of proprietary rights, subject the Company to significant liabilities to third parties, require the Company to seek licenses from third parties or prevent the Company from manufacturing or selling its products, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. EMPLOYEES At December 31, 1998, the Company had 1,524 full time and temporary employees. The success of the Company's future operations depends in large part on the Company's ability to recruit and retain engineers and technicians, as well as marketing, sales, service and other key personnel, who in each case are in great demand. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in retaining or recruiting key personnel. None of the Company's employees is represented by a labor union and the Company has never experienced a work stoppage, slowdown, or strike. The Company currently considers its employee relations to be good. The Company's success depends to a significant extent upon a limited number of key employees and other members of senior management of the Company. The loss of the service of one or more of these key employees could have a material adverse effect on the Company. Although the Company has recently experienced significant growth in net sales, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to continue to maintain or increase the level of net sales in future periods. This growth has placed, and is expected to continue to place, a significant strain on the Company's management and operations. The success of the Company's future operations depends in large part on the Company's ability to recruit and retain engineers and technicians, as well as marketing, sales, service and other key personnel, who in each case are in great demand. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in retaining or recruiting key personnel. The Company's inability to effectively manage growth, should it occur, or to attract and retain the personnel it requires, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations. OTHER CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS See Part II, Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. 10 11 ITEM 2. PROPERTIES The Company's operations are conducted primarily in eight buildings in the North San Jose, California area and one building in Wilsonville, Oregon. The San Jose buildings are leased by the Company and consist of 558,613 square feet. The leases expire in 2002 and provide for an extension to 2005. The buildings house two Manufacturing operations, a Research and Development facility, various Administrative and Customer Support offices, a Customer Demonstration Lab, Corporate Headquarters, and a new state of the art Applications and Customer Demonstration Lab. The Wilsonville, Oregon building is a leased facility and consists of 26,900 square feet of Manufacturing, Research and Development, and Customer Support space. The Wilsonville lease expires in August 2001 and provides for a 5 year option to renew the lease. Additionally, the Company subleases four buildings on and adjacent to the Novellus campus, consisting of 270,000 square feet, to third party users on leases expiring 2001 and 2002. The former Western Regional Sales office in North San Jose was consolidated into a Novellus building and the office is subleased to Microsoft through the remaining term. The Company is currently developing the parcel of land leased from Stanford University which formerly housed the Thin Films Systems (TFS) business Novellus acquired in June 1997. The new 129,700 square foot building is leased to a tenant and rent is expected to commence in November 1999. The Company also controls 6.4 acres of vacant land adjacent to its Metals Manufacturing operation in North San Jose that is being held for future expansion needs. The Company also operates a facility near Tokyo, Japan which serves as Nippon Novellus Headquarters, Sales Office, Service, Technology and Customer Demonstration center. The facility near Tokyo is operated under a five year lease expiring in 2001. In addition, the Company maintains six sales offices throughout Japan. The Company leases various smaller facilities worldwide which are used as sales and customer service centers. The Company currently believes that its current properties will be sufficient to meet the Company's requirements for the foreseeable future. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS Applied Materials, Inc. vs. Varian Associates Inc. (Case No. C-97-20523 RMW) and Novellus Systems, Inc. v. Applied Materials, Inc. (Case No. C-97-20551 RMW). On July 7, 1997, prior to the consummation of the purchase of the Thin Film Systems Business ("TFS") of Varian Associates ("Varian"), Applied Materials, Inc. ("Applied") filed a complaint (the "Applied Complaint") against Varian in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California San Jose Division, Civil Action No. C-97-20523 RMW, alleging, among other things, infringement by Varian (including the making, using, selling and/or offering for sale of certain products and systems made by TFS) of United States Patent Nos. 5,171,412, 5,186,718, 5,496,455 and 5,540,821 (the "Applied Patents"), which patents are owned by Applied. Immediately after consummation of the TFS purchase, the Company filed a complaint (the "Company Complaint") against Applied in the same Court, Civil Action No. C-97-20551 RMW, alleging infringement by Applied (including the making, using, selling and/or offering for sale of certain products and systems) of United States Patent Nos. 5,314,597, 5,330,628, and 5,635,036 (the "Company Patents"), which patents the Company acquired from Varian in the TFS purchase. In the Company Complaint, the Company also alleged that it is entitled to declarations from Applied that the Company does not infringe the Applied Patents and/or that the Applied Patents are invalid and/or unenforceable. Applied has filed counterclaims alleging that the Company infringes the Applied Patents. Also after consummation of the TFS purchase, but some time after the Company filed the Company Complaint, Applied amended the Applied Complaint to add the Company as a defendant. The Company has requested that the Court dismiss the Company as a defendant in Applied's lawsuit against Varian. The Court has not yet required the Company to file an answer to the Applied Complaint. In addition to a request for a permanent injunction against further infringement, the Applied Complaint and Applied's counterclaims to the Company Complaint include requests for damages for alleged prior infringement and treble damages for alleged "willful" infringement. In connection with the consummation of the TFS purchase, Varian agreed, under certain circumstances, to reimburse the Company for certain of its legal and other expenses in connection with the defense and prosecution of this litigation, and to indemnify the Company for a portion of any losses incurred by the Company arising from this litigation (including losses resulting from a permanent injunction). The Company and Varian believe that there are meritorious defenses to Applied's allegations, including among other things, that the Company's operations (including TFS products and systems) do not infringe the Applied Patents and/or that the Applied Patents are invalid and/or unenforceable. However, the resolution of intellectual property disputes is often fact intensive and, therefore, inherently uncertain. Although the Company believes that the ultimate outcome of the dispute with Applied will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business or results of operations (taking into account both the defenses available to the Company and Varian's reimbursement and indemnity obligations), there can be no assurances that Applied will not ultimately prevail in this dispute and that, in such an event, Varian's reimbursement and indemnity obligations will not be 11 12 sufficient to fully reimburse the Company for its losses. If Applied were to prevail in this dispute, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business or results of operations. The Company Complaint against Applied also includes requests for damages for prior infringement and treble damages for "willful" infringement, in addition to a request for a permanent injunction for further infringement. Although the Company believes that it will prevail against Applied, there can be no assurances that the Company will prevail in its litigation against Applied. If Applied were to prevail against the Company Complaint, it will unlikely, but could, have a material adverse effect on the Company's business or results of operations. Semitool, Inc. v. Novellus Systems, Inc. (Case No. C-98-3089 DLJ) On August 10, 1998, Semitool sued the Company for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Semitool alleges that the Company's SABRE(TM) copper deposition system infringes two Semitool patents, U.S. Patent No. 5,222,310, issued June 29, 1993, entitled "Single Wafer Processor with a Frame," and U.S. Patent No. 5,377,708, issued January 3, 1995, entitled "Multi-Station Semiconductor Processor with Volatilization." Semitool seeks an injunction against the Company's manufacture and sale of SABRE(TM) systems, and seeks damages for past infringement. Semitool also seeks trebled damages for alleged willful infringement. Semitool also seeks its attorneys' fees and COSTS, and interest on any judgement. The Company believes that there are meritorious defenses to Semitool's allegations, including among other things that the Company's operations (including SABRE(TM) products and systems) do not infringe the Semitool Patents and/or that the Semitool Patents are invalid and/or unenforceable. But the resolution of intellectual property disputes is often fact intensive and, like most other litigation matters, inherently uncertain. Although the Company believes that the ultimate outcome of the dispute with Semitool will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business or results of operations (taking into account the defenses available to the Company), there can be no assurances that Semitool will not ultimately prevail in this dispute. If Semitool were to prevail in this dispute, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business or results of operations. Other Litigation In addition, in the normal course of business the Company from time to time receives inquiries with regard to possible other patent infringements. The Company believes it is unlikely that the outcome of the patent infringement inquiries will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations. There has been substantial litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights in semiconductor-related industries. Although the Company is not aware of any infringement by its products of any patents or proprietary rights of others except as claimed by Applied and Semitool, further commercialization of the Company's products could provoke claims of infringement from third parties. In the future, litigation may be necessary to enforce patents issued to the Company, to protect trade secrets or know-how owned by the Company or to defend the Company against claimed infringement of the rights of others and to determine the scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others. Any such litigation could result in substantial cost and diversion of effort by the Company, which by itself could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and operating results. Further, adverse determinations in such litigation could result in the Company's loss of proprietary rights, subject the Company to significant liabilities to third parties, require the Company to seek licenses from third parties or prevent the Company from manufacturing or selling its products, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS Not applicable. 12 13 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS STOCK INFORMATION(1) Novellus' common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market and is quoted on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol "NVLS". The following table sets forth the high and low closing prices as reported by the NASDAQ National Market for the periods indicated:
1998 HIGH LOW --------------------------------------------------- First Quarter $ 49 3/8 $ 29 13/16 Second Quarter 49 7/16 31 1/4 Third Quarter 43 1/16 23 11/16 Fourth Quarter 57 15/16 21 15/16 1997 HIGH LOW --------------------------------------------------- First Quarter $ 45 1/4 $ 27 3/4 Second Quarter 43 9/16 24 1/8 Third Quarter 63 44 Fourth Quarter 64 11/16 29 7/8
(1) Stock prices have been restated to reflect the Company's two-for-one stock split, effective October 1997. The Company has not paid cash dividends on its common stock since inception, and its Board of Directors presently plans to reinvest the Company's earnings in its business. Accordingly, it is anticipated that no cash dividends will be paid to holders of common stock in the foreseeable future. Additionally, certain covenants set forth in the Company's bank lines of credit and senior credit facility prohibit the Company's ability to pay dividends. As of December 31, 1998, there were 656 holders of record of the Company's common stock. ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA Selected Consolidated Financial Data [in thousands, except per share data]:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA: Net sales $ 518,778 $ 534,004 $ 461,736 $ 373,732 $ 224,679 Gross profit 280,865 290,438 264,574 216,147 128,453 Net income (loss) 52,828 (95,658)(1) 94,029 82,543 44,932 Basic earnings (loss) per share(2) $ 1.55 $ (2.88) $ 2.92 $ 2.52 $ 1.45 Diluted earnings (loss) per share(2) $ 1.51 $ (2.88)(3) $ 2.85 $ 2.41 $ 1.36 Shares used in basic per share calculations(2) 34,035 33,257 32,156 32,712 31,090 Shares used in diluted per share calculations(2) 34,987 33,257(3) 33,018 34,274 32,990 DECEMBER 31, 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS DATA: Cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments $ 130,818 $ 98,089 $ 176,668 $ 149,799 $ 136,539 Working capital 287,621 223,710 287,818 226,257 183,581 Total assets 551,939 493,300 459,787 364,688 265,000 Long-term obligations 65,000 65,000 -- -- -- Shareholders' equity 375,465 301,001 373,636 272,782 214,214 Cash dividends per share -- -- -- -- --
(1) The Company's reported loss of $95.7 million or $2.88 per share for the year ended December 31, 1997 includes pre-tax one-time charges totaling $235.2 million, consisting of $133.5 million in connection with the acquisition of TFS, a write-off of $17.7 million in connection with outstanding accounts receivable from Submicron Technology, Inc. and charges totaling $84.0 million in connection with the May 4, 1997 settlement of the TEOS patent litigation. (2) The earnings (loss) per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the Company's two-for-one stock split, effective October 1997. 13 14 (3) Excludes common stock equivalents as they are antidilutive to the loss per share for the year. ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Net Sales Net sales were $518.8 million, $534.0 million, and $461.7 million in 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively. The decrease of approximately 3% from 1997 to 1998 reflects the slowdown in capital spending by semiconductor equipment manufacturers during 1998, particularly for capacity purchases. The increase of approximately 16% from 1996 to 1997 was the result of the acquisition of the Thin Film Systems business ("TFS") from Varian Associates in June of 1997, combined with continued strong sales of Chemical Vapor Deposition ("CVD") equipment. The Company's CVD equipment showed strong sales primarily as a result of increasing demand for its Concept Two SPEED system, an advanced dielectric gap fill system released in February 1996. In addition, the Company's other Concept Two products continued to show strong demand, offset by the decline in demand for the Company's Concept One products. International sales were approximately 51% of net sales in 1998, an increase from 47% in 1997. The increase is the result of higher demand in Europe and Korea offset by lower demand in Japan and the Pacific Rim countries. International sales were approximately 47% of net sales in 1997, a decrease from 64% in 1996. The decrease in 1997 versus 1996 is the result of strong demand for the Company's products in the U.S. partially offsetting lower demand in Japan. During the year, the Company terminated a distribution agreement with its Japanese distributor, Seki Technotron. The termination agreement provided for an orderly transition from Seki Technotron to Nippon Novellus. The Company expects international sales to continue to represent a significant portion of its overall net sales. The Company's international sales are primarily made directly to its customers. Gross Profit Gross profit was $280.9 million, $290.4 million, and $264.6 million in 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively. The absolute dollar decrease from 1997 to 1998 was due to lower net sales. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit was approximately 54% in 1998 and 1997, and 57% in 1996. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales from 1997 to 1998 remained consistent due to continued shipment of older Physical Vapor Deposition ("PVD") systems which have lower margins than the Company's CVD systems as well as lower absorption of fixed overhead costs resulting from decreased shipment volume offset by cost reduction efforts. The decrease in gross profit as a percentage of net sales from 1996 to 1997 was due to the shipment of older PVD systems which have lower margins than the Company's CVD systems, combined with the change in mix from the Company's higher margin Concept One products to the Company's Concept Two products. The Company anticipates that it will experience competitive pricing pressures in the future which will be offset by cost reduction programs and increasing sales volumes which could result in near term gross margins that approximate levels experienced in 1998. Research and Development Research and development expenses were $106.5 million, $89.8 million (excluding a one-time charge for in-process research and development of $119.2 million), and $53.9 million, in 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively. The increases reflect the Company's increasing commitment to the development of new products, including additional Concept Two modules, advanced PVD systems, advanced "gap fill" technology, primary conductor metals, low K dielectric materials and additional advanced technologies for the next generation of smaller geometry fabrication lines, as well as equipment to process 300mm wafers. As a percentage of net sales, expenses were approximately 21%, 17%, (excluding the one-time charge of $119.2 million relating to in-process research and development), and 12% in 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively. The Company plans to continue to invest in new products and increase research and development spending in absolute dollars. Selling, General, and Administrative Selling, general, and administrative expenses were $95.4 million, $89.5 million, and $74.4 million in 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general, and administrative expenses were approximately 18%, 17%, and 16% in 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively. The increase as a percentage of net sales and in absolute dollars from 1997 to 1998 is related to the impact of a full year of selling, general and administrative expenses associated with the PVD product line. The increase as a percentage of net sales and in absolute dollars from 1996 to 1997 is related to incremental expenses associated with selling and supporting the acquired PVD product line. The Company expects its selling, general and administrative expenses to approximate the levels experienced in 1998. Gross profit, research and development expenses, and selling, general, and administrative expenses were affected throughout the periods indicated by charges to expense for the Company's profit sharing and bonus programs. Amounts charged to expense for these programs in 1998, 1997, and 1996 were $5.5 million, $8.0 million, and $10.2 million, respectively. Acquisition of Thin Film Systems In connection with the acquisition of Thin Film Systems from Varian Associates, the Company recorded pre-tax charges of $133.5 million during 1997. These charges included $119.2 million for in-process research and development and $14.2 million attributed to restructuring charges, relating primarily to write-offs of duplicative assets and facilities at the Company. As of December 31, 1998, all of the restructuring charges had been incurred and the Company had made approximately $2.6 million of cash payments, primarily related to lease payments. 14 15 To determine the value of the acquired in-process research and development technology, the Company considered, among other factors, the stage of development of each project, the time and resources needed to complete each project, expected income, target markets and associated risks. Associated risks include the inherent difficulties and uncertainties in completing each project and thereby achieving technological feasibility, and the risks related to the viability of potential changes in future target markets. Due to the absence of a completed working model at which point functions, features and technical performance requirements can be demonstrated as of the date of the acquisition, the Company concluded that the in-process technology had no alternate future use after considering potential future usage in different products, resale, and internal usage. A discount rate of 35% was applied in the valuation of in-process technology. The analysis resulted in a valuation of $119.2 million. Therefore, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the $119.2 million was expensed. Other Charges In the quarter ended June 28, 1997, the Company recorded one-time charges of $84.0 million and $17.7 million related to the settlement of the TEOS patent litigation and a customer account write-off, respectively. Net Interest Income Net interest income was $1.1 million, $2.9 million, and $8.4 million, in 1998, 1997, and 1996 respectively. The decrease from 1997 to 1998 was due to lower average cash and short-term investment balances and a full year's interest expense associated with the Company's $65.0 million debt which was incurred in order to complete the acquisition of TFS. The decrease from 1996 to 1997 was due to lower cash balances as a result of the payment of $80.0 million to Applied Materials for the settlement of the TEOS patent litigation in May 1997 and the acquisition of TFS, financed through the use of $80.5 million of existing cash, and long-term borrowings of $65.0 million. Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes The provision for income taxes reflects an effective tax rate of 34% in 1998, (21%) in 1997, and 35% in 1996. The lower effective tax rate in 1997 is primarily due to the in-process research and development charge, which was not fully tax benefited. At December 31, 1998, the Company has recognized a deferred tax asset of $49.3 million, after a valuation allowance of $16.9 million. The Company believes that it is more likely than not that this asset will be realized by an offset against the recognized deferred tax liability of $11.1 million and future taxable income. Net Income (Loss) Net income for the year ended December 31, 1998 was $52.8 million or $1.55 and $1.51 per basic and diluted shares, respectively, compared with a net (loss) for the year ended December 31, 1997 of $(95.7) million or $(2.88) per basic and diluted shares. The net loss recorded in 1997 is attributable to the TFS acquisition and other charges described above. Without giving effect to these charges the Company's operating income for the year ended December 31, 1997 would have approximated $75.3 million or $2.26 and $2.17 per basic and diluted shares, respectively. Net (loss) for the year ended December 31, 1997 was $(95.7) million or ($2.88) per basic and diluted shares, compared with net income of $94.0 million or $2.92 and $2.85 per basic and diluted shares, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 1996. The change to a net loss in 1997 from net income in 1996, is attributable to the TFS acquisition and other charges described above. Without giving effect to these charges the Company's operating income for the year ended December 31, 1997, would have approximated $75.3 million, or $2.26 and $2.17 per basic and diluted shares, respectively. The number of shares used in the per share calculations for the year ended December 31, 1998 was 34.0 and 35.0 million shares, respectively for the basic and diluted income per share calculations, compared with 33.3 million for both the basic and diluted income per share calculations for the year ended December 31, 1996. Shares used for year ended December 31, 1997 exclude common stock equivalents as they are antidilutive. Repurchase of Common Stock During 1998, 1997 and 1996, the Company repurchased 9,000, 6,000 and 172,000 shares of common stock, respectively. These share repurchases had no material impact on earnings (loss) per share amounts in each period. Foreign Currency Accounting The local currency is the functional currency for all foreign operations. Accordingly, translation gains or losses related to the foreign subsidiaries are included as a component of shareholders' equity. Foreign Exchange Contracts The Company conducts its business in various foreign currencies. The Company enters into forward foreign exchange contracts primarily to hedge against the short-term impact of foreign currency fluctuations of intercompany accounts payable denominated in U.S. dollars recorded by the Japanese subsidiary. The Company also enters into forward foreign exchange contracts to buy and sell foreign currencies as economic hedges of the parent's intercompany balances denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar. In 1998, these hedging contracts were denominated primarily in the Japanese Yen. The maturities of all the forward foreign exchange contracts are generally short-term in nature. As the impact of movements in currency exchange rates on forward foreign exchange contracts offsets the related impact on the underlying items being hedged, the Company believes these financial instruments do not subject the Company to speculative risk that would otherwise result from changes in currency exchange rates. Net foreign currency gains and losses have not been material. 15 16 Other Issues Effective January 1998, the Company adopted SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income." SFAS No. 130 established standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in a full set of general purpose financial statements. Adoption of SFAS No. 130 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1998, the Company adopted SFAS No. 131, "Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information". SFAS changes the way companies report selected segment information in annual financial statements and also requires those companies to report selected segment information in interim financial reports to shareholders. The Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 131 for the year ended December 31, 1998. Adoption of SFAS No. 131 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In June 1998, the FASB released SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities". SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS No. 133 requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and measure those instruments at fair value. The Statement is effective for all fiscal quarters of fiscal years beginning after June 15, 1999. The Company is still in the process of assessing the impact of SFAS No. 133 on its financial statements. CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS The statements contained in this Report on Form 10-K that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of section 27A of the Securities Act of 1993 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including, without limitation, statements regarding the Company's expectations, objectives, anticipations, plans, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future. Forward looking statements include, without limitation, the discussion of the Company's strategy to focus on major semiconductor manufacturers, under the heading "Item 1, Business;" the statements regarding (a) the Company's belief that PVD, tantalum barrier and copper seed layers may play an important role in replacing aluminum with copper as the primary wiring material, (b) the Company's belief that electrofill process technology will be extendible to at least the 0.13 micron design rule, and possibly down to 0.10 design words; or, in other words, approximately another 5 or 6 years given the current industry evolution; (c) Novellus' belief that there will be widespread transition from aluminum to copper conductive lines for faster processing speeds, and (d) the Company's belief regarding the greater complexity and number of interconnect layers in advanced integrated circuits, (e) the effect of the evolution of semiconductor devices to smaller line width geometries and more complex multi-level circuitry on the cost and performance requirements of capital equipment used to manufacture these devices, under the heading "Item 1, Business - Industry Background;" the Company's beliefs regarding Throughput, Cost per Wafer and Film Quality, the Company's belief that within-wafer and wafer-to-wafer uniformity levels of +/- 1% of film thickness as measured at one standard deviation are state-of-the-art for the industry, under the heading "Item 1, Business - The Novellus Solution;" the discussion of the Company's strategies under the heading "Item 1, Business - Strategy;" the Company's belief that the 10-second heating period in advance of deposition in the Concept One - Dielectric is one of the shortest preheat times of any CVD system, under the heading "Item 1, Business - Products - Concept One-Dielectric;" the Company's belief that the Dual ALTUS offers a solution in the industry for very high volume 200 mm wafer fabs producing 0.35 micron semiconductor devices, under the heading "Item 1, Business - Products - Concept Two;" the Company's belief that ARL offers competitive throughput and low cost of ownership for the industry, under the heading "Item 1, Business - Products Anti Reflection Layer," the Company's belief that the Concept Three family of systems should offer minimal risks to its customers in making the transition from 200 mm to 300 mm volume chipmaking, under the heading "Item 1, Business - Products - Concept Three;" the Company's belief that HCM technology offers better target utilization, extended maintenance intervals, and lower cost of ownership in comparison with collimated and other ionized sputtering techniques, under the heading "Item 1, Business - Products - Inova System;" the Company's belief that the SABRE system is the most reliable and technologically advanced electrofilling system available on the market, under the heading "Item 1, Business - Products - SABRE." Forward looking statements also include (a) the Company's belief that its marketing efforts are enhanced by the technical expertise of its research and development personnel, (b) belief that its service to its customers is enhanced by the design simplicity of its systems, and (c) the expectation that sales of its products to relatively few customers will continue to account for a high percentage of its net sales in the foreseeable future, under the heading "Item 1, Business - Marketing, Sales and Service"; the Company's expectation that research and development expenditures will continue to represent a substantial percentage of sales, under the heading "Item 1, Business - Research and Development"; the Company's belief as to its favorable competitiveness in the deposition equipment marketplace and the Company's belief that the acquisition of TFS and its 1998 announcement of a copper primary conductor product will allow the Company to develop and compete successfully in the PVD and copper electrofill areas of market, under the heading "Item 1, Business - Competition"; the Company's belief that its current properties will be sufficient to meet the Company's requirements for the foreseeable future, under heading "Item 2, Properties"; the Company's belief that there are meritorious defenses in the Applied and Semitool litigations, and the Company's beliefs with respect to the outcomes of the Applied Materials and Semitool litigations and current patent infringement inquiries, under the heading "Item 3, Legal Proceedings"; the Company's strategies, beliefs, plans, expectations, anticipations and hopes with respect to Net Sales, Gross Profit, Research and Development, Selling, General and Administrative, Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes, and Foreign Exchange Contracts set forth under "Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"; the Company's belief that there is not a significant risk of nonperformance by counterparties on its foreign exchange contracts used in hedging activities, under "Items 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -Cautionary Statements - Concentration of Credit Risk" and "Items 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 1 Business and Nature of Operations - Concentration of Credit Risk;" the Company's estimates that its year 2000 compliance expense will be approximately $1.7 million, the Company's requirement as to the availability of the year 2000 compatible release of the Company's internal information system from the vendor, the Company's belief that the year 2000 issue is not going to be a significant issue as it pertains to its vendors, and the Company's expectation that its year 2000 conversion project will be completed on a timely basis, under the heading "Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Cautionary Statements - Year 2000"; and the Company's expectations and beliefs with respect to its current cash position, cash generated through operations and its expectations with respect to the return from investments in property and equipment and the sufficiency of funds from operations, existing cash balances and borrowing capacity, under the heading "Item 7, Liquidity and Capital Resources"; and the Company's expectation that any 16 17 adjustment to the Thin Film Systems purchase price, as a result of arbitration, would not have a material effect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations, under the heading "Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data -- Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 2 "Acquisition of Thin Film Systems Business of Varian Associates." All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to the Company on the date hereof, and the Company assumes no obligation to update any such forward looking statements. It is important to note that the Company's actual results could differ materially from those included in such forward looking statements. Among the factors that cause actual results to differ materially are the factors detailed in the following discussion on "Other Cautionary Statements." The reader should also consult the cautionary statements and risk factors listed from time to time in the Company's Reports on Forms 10-Q, 8-K, 10-K and Annual Reports to Shareholders. These additional risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those described herein and include the following: DRAM Overcapacity and Demand Shifts in the PC Industry. The semiconductor industry is characterized by excess production capacity for DRAM devices, which has caused semiconductor manufacturers to decrease capital spending. In the PC market, a shift in demand from more expensive, high-performance products to lower-priced products (sub-$1,000 PCs) has resulted in reduced profitability for semiconductor manufacturers. Therefore, during fiscal 1998, many of the Company's customers delayed or decreased their purchases of the Company's products. Continued DRAM overcapacity and strengthening demand for sub-$1,000 PCs could cause further delays or decreased demand for the Company's products. Concentration of Credit Risk. The Company uses financial instruments that potentially subject it to concentrations of credit risk. Such instruments include cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, and financial instruments used in hedging activities. The Company invests its cash in cash deposits, money market funds, commercial paper, certificates of deposit, readily marketable debt securities, or medium term notes. The Company places its investments with high-credit-quality financial institutions and limits the credit exposure from any one financial institution or instrument. To date, the Company has not experienced material losses on these investments. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers' financial condition and generally requires no collateral. The Company has an exposure to nonperformance by counterparties on the foreign exchange contracts used in hedging activities. These counterparties are large international financial institutions and to date, no such counterparty has failed to meet its financial obligations to the Company. The Company does not believe there is a significant risk of nonperformance by these counterparties because the Company continuously monitors its positions and the credit ratings of such counterparties and the amount of contracts it enters into with any one party. However, there can be no assurance that there will be no significant nonperformance by these counterparties and that this would not materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations. International Operations. Export sales accounted for approximately 51%, 47%, and 64% of net sales in 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively. The Company anticipates that export sales will account for a significant portion of net sales in the foreseeable future. As a result, a significant portion of the Company's sales will be subject to certain risks, including tariffs and other barriers, difficulties in staffing and managing foreign subsidiary operations, difficulties in managing distributors, potentially adverse tax consequences and the possibility of difficulty in accounts receivable collection. The Company is also subject to the risks associated with the imposition of legislation and regulations relating to the import or export of semiconductor products. The Company cannot predict whether quotas, duties, taxes, or other charges or restrictions will be implemented by the United States or any other country upon the importation or exportation of the Company's products in the future. There can be no assurance that any of these factors or the adoption of restrictive policies will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations. Moreover, each region in the global semiconductor equipment market exhibits unique characteristics that can cause capital equipment investment patterns to vary significantly from period to period. Although international markets provide the Company with significant growth opportunities, periodic economic downturns, trade balance issues, political instability and fluctuations in interest and foreign currency exchange rates are all risks that could materially and adversely affect global products and service demand, and, therefore, the Company's business operations and financial condition. Asian countries, particularly Japan and Korea, continue to experience banking, currency and other difficulties that are contributing to economic slowdowns or recessions in those countries. The region does not appear to be responding quickly to significant efforts to stimulate its economies. As a result of the economic difficulties within certain Asian countries, the Company has increased sales subject to extended payment terms within this region. If Asian economies remain stagnant or continue to deteriorate, capital investment by Asian customers could decrease from current levels. Among other things, the decline in value of the Korean currency, together with difficulties obtaining credit, could result in a decline in the purchasing power of the Company's Korean customers. This in turn could result in the cancellation or delay of orders for the Company's products from Korean customers, thus materially adversely affecting the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, if Japan's economy weakens further, investments by Japanese customers may be adversely affected and it is possible that economic recovery in other Pacific Rim countries could be delayed. In addition to the concerns described above, sales of systems shipped by the Company's Japanese subsidiary are denominated in Japanese Yen. The Company sells the systems to its Japanese subsidiary in U.S. Dollars. It then enters into forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge against the short-term impact of foreign currency fluctuations of intercompany accounts payable denominated in U.S. Dollars recorded by the Japanese subsidiary in order to manage this exposure, however, there can be no assurance that future changes in the Japanese Yen will not have a material effect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations. 17 18 Market Risk. The Company's business depends predominantly on capital expenditures of semiconductor manufacturers, which in turn depends on the current and anticipated market demand for integrated circuits and products utilizing integrated circuits. The semiconductor industry has historically been very cyclical and has experienced periodic downturns, which have had a material adverse effect on the semiconductor industry's demand for semiconductor processing equipment, including equipment manufactured and marketed by the Company. During periods of reduced and declining demand, the Company must be able to quickly and effectively align its cost structure with prevailing market conditions, and motivate and retain key employees. During periods of rapid growth, the Company must be able to acquire and/or develop sufficient manufacturing capacity to meet customer demand, and hire and assimilate a sufficient number of qualified people. No assurance can be given that the Company's net sales and operating results will not be adversely affected if downturns or slowdowns in the rate of capital investment in the semiconductor industry occur in the future. Possible Volatility of Stock Price. The stock price of the Company's Common Stock may be subject to wide fluctuations and possible rapid increases or declines in a short time period. These fluctuations may be due to factors specific to the Company such as variations in quarterly operating results or changes in analysts' earnings estimates, or to factors relating to the semiconductor industry or to the securities markets in general, which, in recent years, have experienced significant price fluctuations. These fluctuations often have been unrelated to the operating performance of the specific companies whose stocks are traded. Shareholders should be willing to incur the risk of such fluctuations. Sales of substantial amounts of Common Stock in the public market after any offering of the Company's Securities could adversely affect the market price of the outstanding Common Stock. Variability of Quarterly Operating Results. The Company has experienced and expects to continue to experience significant fluctuations in its quarterly operating results. During each quarter, the Company customarily sells a relatively small number of systems that typically sell for prices in excess of $1 million. The Company's backlog at the beginning of each quarter does not necessarily include all system sales needed to achieve expected net sales for that quarter. Consequently, the Company will often be dependent on obtaining orders for shipment in the same quarter that the order is received. Because the Company builds its systems according to forecast, the absence of significant backlog for an extended period of time could hinder the Company's ability to plan production and inventory levels, which could adversely affect operating results. The Company's net sales and operating results could also be adversely affected for a particular quarter if an anticipated order for even a few systems is not received in time to permit shipment during that quarter. Moreover, customers may reschedule or cancel shipments, with, in the case of cancellations, little or no penalties, and production difficulties could delay shipments. A delay in a shipment in any quarter, due, for example, to an unanticipated shipment rescheduling, to cancellations by customers or to unexpected manufacturing difficulties experienced by the Company, may cause net sales in such quarter to fall significantly below the Company's expectations and may thus materially adversely affect the Company's operating results for such quarter. The timing of new product announcements and releases by the Company may also contribute to fluctuations in quarterly operating results, particularly in cases where new product offerings cause customers to defer ordering products from the Company's existing product lines. The Company's results of operations also could be affected by new product announcements and releases by the Company's competitors, the volume, mix and timing of orders received during a period, availability and pricing of key components, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, and conditions in the semiconductor equipment industry. The Company's operating results also fluctuate based on gross profit realized on system sales. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales may vary based on a variety of factors, including the mix and average selling prices of products sold and costs to manufacture upgrades and customize systems. Because the Company's operating expenses are based on anticipated net sales levels, and a high percentage of those expenses are relatively fixed, a variation in the timing of recognition of net sales and the level of gross profit from a single transaction can cause material variations in operating results from quarter to quarter. Year 2000. The Company is aware of the issues associated with the operation of information technology ("IT") and non-information technology ("Non-IT") systems as the millennium (year 2000) approaches. The "Year 2000" problem is pervasive and complex, with the possibility to affect many IT and Non-IT systems, as the result of the rollover of the two digit year value from "99" to "00". The concern is whether such systems will properly recognize data sensitive information when the year changes to 2000. Systems that do not properly recognize such information could generate erroneous data or fail. In addition to the Company's own systems, the Company relies, directly and indirectly, on external systems of its customers, suppliers, creditors, financial organizations, utilities providers and governmental entities, both domestic and internationally (collectively, "Third Parties"). Consequently, the Company could be affected through disruptions in the operations of the Third Parties with which the Company interacts. Furthermore, the purchasing frequency and volume of customers or potential customers may be affected by Year 2000 issues as companies expend significant resources to make their current systems Year 2000 compliant. The Company is utilizing both internal and external resources to address (a) the Company's state of readiness (including the readiness of Third Parties, with which the Company interacts) with respect to the Year 2000 problem, (b) the costs to the Company to address Year 2000 issues related to internal IT and Non-IT systems, which, if uncorrected, could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition or results of operations of the Company, (c) the known risks related to the consequences of any failure to correct any Year 2000 problems identified by the Company, and (d) what contingency plans, if any, should be adopted by the Company should any identified Year 2000 problems not be corrected. 18 19 State of Readiness. The following discussion broadly addresses the Company's efforts to identify and address the Company's and applicable Third Parties' Year 2000 problems with respect to (a) the Company's products, (b) the Company's information technology systems, including facilities and infrastructure, and (c) the Company's suppliers. However, it would be impractical for the Company to attempt to address all Year 2000 problems of Third Parties that have been or may in the future be identified. Specifically, Year 2000 problems have been or may in the future be identified with respect to the IT and Non-IT systems of Third Parties having widespread national and international interactions with persons and entities generally (for example, certain IT and Non-IT systems of governmental agencies, utilities and telecommunications, information and financial networks) that, if uncorrected, could have a material adverse impact on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations. Notwithstanding anything set forth below, the Company is not in a position to address any such Year 2000 problems. (a) The Company's products. The Company has completed a Year 2000 compliance evaluation of all of its products utilizing testing guidelines prepared by Sematech, a consortium of suppliers to the worldwide semiconductor manufacturers that assists its members with strategic marketing opportunities. It is the Company's plan to comply with Sematech's guidelines for Year 2000 compliance. The Company's new products are designed to be Year 2000 compliant. However, some of the Company's older products will require upgrades for Year 2000 compliance. At this time, software upgrades have been or will be provided to all Novellus customers products free of charge. Any hardware needed to achieve Year 2000 compliance on out of warranty systems will need to be purchased from Novellus. However, notwithstanding such efforts, any failure of the Company's products to perform, including system malfunctions due to the onset of Year 2000, could result in claims against the Company, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations or financial condition. Moreover, the Company's customers could choose to convert to other Year 2000 compliant products in order to avoid such malfunctions, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations. In June of 1997, the Company acquired the Thin Films Systems division of Varian Associates, Inc. (TFS). During the Company's evaluation of Year 2000 readiness for its products, it was determined that some of the TFS products acquired from Varian Associates, Inc. are not, and will not be Year 2000 compliant prior to December 31, 1999. The Company is taking measures to inform its applicable customers of that fact. The Company currently anticipates that the failure of such products to be Year 2000 compliant will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations or financial condition. (b) Information technology systems including facilities and infrastructure. The Company currently uses standard mass-market vendor supplied software on its desktop systems and laptops. These standard software applications limit the number of information technology vendors that Novellus must work with to ensure Year 2000 readiness. Many of these vendors are still implementing their Year 2000 compliance programs. Novellus maintains maintenance contracts with all information technology vendors and will implement the Year 2000 compliant versions of hardware and/or software as required when those solutions become available. Novellus will be Year 2000 compliant with all of the business applications in April of 1999. Novellus also uses a third party service provider to provide electronic exchange of data (EDI). The vendor software is Year 2000 compliant, therefore, we do not believe we face any significant EDI Year 2000 issues. The Company's hardware for workstations, servers, and network routers will be Year 2000 compliant by Q2 1999. As of December 31, 1998, approximately 95% of the Company's hardware and software applications were Year 2000 compliant. However, no assurance can be provided that all such programs will be implemented in a timely manner or that the failure to so implement such programs will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations or financial condition. The Company is in the process of assessing its Year 2000 risk with respect to building automation systems, electronic security systems, utility and water systems. Formal queries to landlords, local fire departments, water and utility providers for the Company's domestic and international locations will be sent by March 1999. As of December 31, 1998, approximately 80% of the Company's facilities and infrastructure were Year 2000 compliant. (c) Suppliers. Novellus has contacted those suppliers that could have a material adverse impact on Novellus' ability to provide uninterrupted service to its customers should the IT or Non-IT systems of such suppliers have uncorrected Year 2000 problems. By the end of December 1998, 90% of these suppliers had documentation with respect to their Year 2000 readiness on file with Novellus. The remaining 10% are being contacted to complete the Sematech Year 2000 Readiness Supplier Questionnaire or to document their Year 2000 compliance status as is appropriate for their business. However, such documentation does not assure Year 2000 compliance of the IT and Non-IT systems used by such suppliers, but instead provides only a description of their relevant systems and the status of efforts, if any, by such suppliers to make such systems Year 2000 compliant. Accordingly, no assurance can be provided that (a) the IT and Non-IT systems of Company suppliers (including those suppliers who have provided documentation to the Company regarding their Year 2000 compliance) will be Year 2000 compliant, (b) that such documentation accurately and fully reflects the Year 2000 compliance status of such suppliers' systems, or (c) that the failure by any such suppliers' systems to be Year 2000 compliant will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations or financial condition. 19 20 Costs to Address Year 2000 Issues. The Company currently expects to incur total software, hardware and systems-related costs of approximately $1.7 million in connection with remediations of Year 2000 compliance issues. Of the estimated total costs, approximately $1.4 million has been incurred to date. There can be no assurance that the cost estimates associated with the Company's Year 2000 issues will prove to be accurate or that the actual costs will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations or financial condition. Known Risks. The Company currently anticipates that any identified Year 2000 problem affecting its own systems or that of its significant customers, suppliers, creditors, financial organizations and utilities providers will be either corrected by December 31, 1999 or will not have a material adverse affect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations. Moreover, the Company is working to minimize any disruption to the business of its vendors and suppliers due to Year 2000 problems that may have a material adverse affect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of its operations. However, notwithstanding the Company's efforts to identify and correct such Year 2000 problems, there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in addressing the year 2000 problems as they pertain to its products and its internal systems, and that the failure to do so would not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, notwithstanding such efforts, there can be no assurance that the systems of Third Parties with which the Company interacts will not suffer from Year 2000 problems, or that such problems would not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations. In particular, Year 2000 problems that have been or may in the future be identified with respect to the IT and Non-IT systems of Third Parties having widespread national and international interactions with persons and entities generally (for example, certain IT and Non-IT Systems of governmental agencies, utilities and information and financial networks) could have a material adverse impact on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations. Contingency Plans. The Company currently is in the process of reviewing its Year 2000 compliance plans to determine what contingency plans, if any, are appropriate. The Company does not currently have any contingency plans. The Company anticipates completing such review and preparing contingency plans, if appropriate, by September 1999. There can be no assurance that such measures will prevent the occurrence of Year 2000 problems, which could have a material adverse effect upon the Company's business, results of operations or financial condition. Euro Conversion. On January 1, 1999, several member countries of the European Union established fixed conversion rates between their existing sovereign currencies and adopted the Euro as their new common legal currency. As of that date, the Euro traded on currency exchanges and the legacy currencies remain legal tender in the participating countries for a transition period between January 1, 1999 and January 1, 2002. During the transition period, noncash payments can be made in the Euro, and parties can elect to pay for goods and services and transact business using either the Euro or legacy currency. Between January 1, 1999 and January 1, 2002 the participating countries will introduce Euro notes and coins and withdraw all legacy currencies so that they will no longer be available. The Euro conversion may affect cross-border competition by creating cross-border transparency. The Company is assessing its pricing/marketing strategy in order to insure that it remains competitive in a broader European market. The Company is also assessing its information technology systems to allow for transactions to take place in both legacy currencies and the Euro and the eventual elimination of the legacy currencies, and reviewing whether certain existing contracts will be need to be modified. The Company's currency risk and risk management for operations in participating countries may be reduced as the legacy currencies are converted to the Euro. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES The Company has historically financed its operating and capital resource requirements through cash flows from operations, sales of equity securities, and borrowings. The Company's primary source of funds at December 31,1998 consisted of $130.8 million of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. This amount represents an increase of $32.7 million from the December 31, 1997 balance of $98.1 million. During the second quarter of 1997, the Company entered into a five year $125 million Senior Credit Facility structured as an unsecured revolving credit line. The borrowings, at the option of the Company, bear interest at either a base rate plus a margin or LIBOR plus a margin for interest periods of one to six months. As of December 31, 1998, total borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility were $65 million with a weighted average interest rate of approximately 6.5%. The Senior Credit Facility requires the Company to be in compliance with certain financial covenants. At December 31, 1998, the Company was in compliance with these financial covenants. The Senior Credit Facility currently restricts the Company from paying dividends. In addition, at December 31, 1998, there was $14.0 million available under bank lines of credit that expire at various dates through June 2002. At December 31, 1998 approximately $13.0 million was outstanding under these bank lines of credit which bear interest at the banks' prime lending rates or offshore reference rates. The weighted average interest rates at December 31, 1998 for borrowings under the bank lines of credit was 1.52%. Net cash provided by operating activities during the year ended December 31, 1998 was $56.1 million. This amount consisted primarily of net income of $52.8 million, non-cash depreciation and amortization charges of $23.8 million, a decrease of $13.2 million in deferred income taxes, and a decrease of $12.9 million in inventories partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable of $39.4 million and a decrease in accrued warranty of $12.0 million. 20 21 Net cash used in investing activities was $57.2 million during the year ended December 31, 1998. During this period, the Company had capital expenditures of $36.1 million. These cash outflows also consisted of purchases of approximately $10.3 million, net, of available-for-sale securities. The Company expects investment in property and equipment for the fiscal year 1999 to approximate $32.0 million. The Company intends to finance these investments from existing cash balances and cash flows from operations. During the year ended December 31, 1998, net cash provided by financing activities was $23.0 million, due primarily to proceeds of $22.0 million from common stock option exercises. On February 24, 1999, the Company sold 3,860,000 shares of Common Stock at $67.50 per share. The Company granted the underwriter a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 579,000 shares of common stock to cover overallotments, if any. The net proceeds to the Company, not including the overallotment option, totaled approximately $255.3 million. The Company believes that its current cash position, cash generated through operations and equity offerings, and available borrowings will be sufficient to meet the Company's needs through the next twelve months. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Interest Rate Risk. The Company's exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the Company's investment portfolio and long-term debt obligations. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments in its investment portfolio. The Company places its investments with high credit quality issuers and, by policy, limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. The Company mitigates default risk by investing in only the safest and highest credit quality securities and by monitoring the credit rating of investment issuers. The portfolio includes only marketable securities with active secondary or resale markets to ensure portfolio liquidity. The Company has no cash flow exposure due to rate changes for cash equivalents and short-term investments, as all of these investments are at fixed interest rates. The Company's short-term borrowing is at a fixed interest rate. Long-term debt is at variable interest rates. The short-term borrowing is used by the Company's Japanese subsidiary for general corporate purposes including capital expenditures and working capital needs. The long-term debt was incurred in connection with the Company's acquisition of TFS. The table below presents principal amounts and related weighted average interest rates by year of maturity for the Company's investment portfolio and debt obligations.
FAIR VALUE DECEMBER 31, IN THOUSANDS 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 THEREAFTER TOTAL 1998 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assets Cash equivalents $ 81,224 -- -- -- -- -- $ 81,224 $81,224 Average interest rate 4.42% -- -- -- -- -- 4.42% Short-term investments $ 49,594 -- -- -- -- -- $ 49,594 $49,594 Average interest rate 5.50% -- -- -- -- -- 5.50% Total investment securitie $ 130,818 -- -- -- -- -- $ 130,818 $130,818 Average interest rate 4.83% -- -- -- -- -- 4.83% Short-term borrowing $ 12,986 -- -- -- -- -- $ 12,986 $12,986 Average interest rate 1.52% -- -- -- -- -- 1.52% Long-term debt Variable rate -- -- -- $ 65,000 -- -- $ 65,000 $65,000 Average interest rate -- -- -- 6.51% -- -- 6.51% Total debt $ 12,986 -- -- $ 65,000 -- -- $ 77,986 $77,986 Average interest rate 1.52% -- -- 6.51% -- -- 5.68%
The Company has lease agreements on several properties. The agreements are for five years with interest rates that approximate the London Interbank Offering Rate (LIBOR). At current interest rates, the annual lease payments total approximately $12.7 million. 21 22 Foreign Currency Risk. The Company transacts business in various foreign countries. Its primary foreign currency cash flows are in countries in Asia and Europe. During 1998 and 1997, the Company employed a foreign currency hedging program utilizing foreign currency forward exchange contracts and certain foreign currency denominated balance sheet positions. Under this program, increases or decreases in currency commitments and balance sheet positions, as translated into U.S. dollars, are primarily offset by realized gains and losses on the hedging instruments. The goal of the hedging program is to economically guarantee or lock in exchange rates on the Company's foreign currency cash outflows and to minimize the impact to the Company of foreign currency fluctuations. The Company does not use foreign currency forward exchange contracts for speculative or trading purposes. Under the hedging program, all foreign currency contracts are marked-to-market and realized and unrealized gains and losses are included as a component of other income and expense. The following table provides information as of December 31, 1998 about the Company's derivative financial instruments, which are comprised of foreign currency forward exchange contracts. The information is provided in U.S. dollar equivalent amounts, as presented in the Company's financial statements. The table presents the notional amounts (at the contract exchange rates), the weighted average contractual foreign currency exchange rates, and the estimated fair value of those contracts.
DECEMBER 31, 1998 NOTIONAL AVERAGE ESTIMATED IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR AVERAGE CONTRACT RATE AMOUNT CONTRACT RATE FAIR VALUE - ---------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- Foreign currency forward exchange contracts: Japanese yen $24,014 117.09 $(954) British pound $(1,086) 1.69 $ (15) French franc $ 152 5.63 $ (1) Irish punt $ (49) 1.50 -- Germany mark $ 382 1.66 -- Dutch guilder $ 185 1.89 $ (2) Singapore dollar $ 132 1.65 -- Taiwan dollar $(2,320) 32.32 $ 11 --------------------------------------- $21,410 $(961)
The statements contained in this Report on Form 10-K that are not purely historical in nature are "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including without limitation, statements regarding the Company's estimations, anticipations, determinations, commitments, expectations, plans, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future. These forward looking statements involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, domestic and international economic conditions, product demand and industry capacity, competitive products and pricing, manufacturing efficiencies, new product development, ability to enforce patents, the availability of raw materials and critical manufacturing equipment, new plant startups, the regulatory and trade environment, and other risks indicated in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Actual results may differ materially. Novellus assumes no obligation to update this information. For more details, please refer to other SEC filings, including the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarter Reports on Form 10-Q and Reports on Form 8-K. 22 23 NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 1997 1996 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Net sales $ 518,778 $ 534,004 $ 461,736 Cost of sales 237,913 243,566 197,162 ------------------------------------------- Gross profit 280,865 290,438 264,574 Operating expenses: Research and development 106,510 89,830 53,902 Selling, general and administrative 95,407 89,474 74,419 In-process research and development -- 119,246 -- Restructuring and other costs -- 14,243 -- Litigation settlement and other related -- 84,021 -- legal costs Bad debt write-off -- 17,700 -- ------------------------------------------- Total operating expenses 201,917 414,514 128,321 ------------------------------------------- Operating income (loss) 78,948 (124,076) 136,253 Interest: Income 5,968 5,684 8,884 Expense (4,869) (2,741) (477) ------------------------------------------- Net interest income 1,099 2,943 8,407 ------------------------------------------- Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for 80,047 (121,133) 144,660 income taxes Provision (benefit) for income taxes 27,219 (25,475) 50,631 ------------------------------------------- Net income (loss) $ 52,828 $ (95,658) $ 94,029 =========================================== Basic earnings (loss) per share $ 1.55 $ (2.88) $ 2.92 =========================================== Diluted earnings (loss) per share $ 1.51 $ (2.88) $ 2.85 =========================================== Shares used in basic per share calculations 34,035 33,257 32,156 =========================================== Shares used in diluted per share calculations 34,987 33,257 33,018 ===========================================
See accompanying notes. 23 24 NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (IN THOUSANDS)
DECEMBER 31, 1998 1997 - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 81,224 $ 59,265 Short-term investments 49,594 38,824 Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,135 in 1998 and $3,547 in 1997 173,364 133,925 Inventories 69,223 82,133 Deferred taxes 21,003 22,241 Prepaid and other current assets 4,687 14,621 --------------------------- Total current assets 399,095 351,009 Property and equipment: Machinery and equipment 113,268 83,972 Furniture and fixtures 8,295 6,456 Leasehold improvements 52,237 47,294 --------------------------- 173,800 137,722 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 68,221 44,382 --------------------------- 105,579 93,340 Long-term deferred taxes 17,516 29,498 Other assets 29,749 19,453 --------------------------- Total assets $ 551,939 $ 493,300 =========================== LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable $ 30,966 $ 22,865 Accrued payroll and related expenses 13,138 20,632 Accrued warranty 25,872 37,836 Other accrued liabilities 23,720 34,314 Income taxes payable 4,792 -- Current obligations under lines of credit 12,986 11,652 --------------------------- Total current liabilities 111,474 127,299 Long-term debt 65,000 65,000 Commitments and contingencies Shareholders' equity: Preferred stock, no par value; Authorized shares - 20,000 Issued and outstanding shares - none -- -- Common stock, no par value; Authorized shares - 80,000 Issued and outstanding shares - 34,499 in 1998 and 33,719 in 1997 176,140 154,167 Retained earnings 201,581 149,061 Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (2,256) (2,227) --------------------------- Total shareholders' equity 375,465 301,001 --------------------------- Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $ 551,939 $ 493,300 ===========================
See accompanying notes. 24 25 NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (IN THOUSANDS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 1997 1996 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net income (loss) $ 52,828 ($ 95,658) $ 94,029 Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 23,839 18,288 11,332 In-process research and development -- 119,246 -- Restructuring and other costs -- 12,043 -- Bad debt write-off -- 17,700 -- Deferred income taxes 13,220 (37,226) 1,767 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable (39,439) (17,899) (7,867) Inventories 12,895 (5,232) (18,669) Prepaid and other current assets 9,934 4,067 (4,413) Accounts payable 8,101 (11,294) (6,819) Accrued payroll and related expenses (7,494) 993 1,626 Accrued warranty (11,964) 5,551 3,305 Other accrued liabilities (10,594) 12,068 430 Income taxes payable 4,792 -- (7,447) ------------------------------------------- Total adjustments 3,290 118,305 (26,755) ------------------------------------------- Net cash provided by operating activities 56,118 22,647 67,274 ------------------------------------------- INVESTING ACTIVITIES Purchases of available-for-sale securities (67,457) (125,663) (387,709) Proceeds from the sale and maturity of 56,687 197,745 366,488 available-for-sale securities Purchase of the net assets of the Thin Film Systems business of Varian Associates, Inc. -- (148,325) -- Capital expenditures (36,092) (36,153) (35,285) (Increase) decrease in other assets (10,296) 2,208 (15,540) ------------------------------------------- Net cash used in investing activities (57,158) (110,188) (72,046) ------------------------------------------- FINANCING ACTIVITIES Proceeds (payments) from lines of credit, net 1,334 (1,501) 5,784 Borrowings under long-term debt -- 65,000 -- Common stock issued 22,016 17,817 7,880 Common stock repurchased (351) (272) (3,244) ------------------------------------------- Net cash provided by financing activities 22,999 81,044 10,420 ------------------------------------------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash 21,959 (6,497) 5,648 equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period 59,265 65,762 60,114 ------------------------------------------- Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period $ 81,224 $ 59,265 $ 65,762 =========================================== Supplemental disclosures: Cash paid during the year for: Interest $ 4,876 $ 2,741 $ 477 Income taxes $ 4,693 $ 393 $ 57,611 Other non-cash changes: Income tax benefits from employee stock plans $ 4,728 $ 7,624 $ 3,034
See accompanying notes. 25 26 NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (IN THOUSANDS)
ACCUMULATED OTHER TOTAL COMMON STOCK RETAINED COMPREHENSIVE SHAREHOLDERS' SHARES AMOUNT EARNINGS INCOME (LOSS) EQUITY ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at January 1, 1996 31,884 $ 118,423 $ 153,595 $ 764 $ 272,782 Exercise of stock options 670 5,619 -- -- 5,619 Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan 128 2,261 -- -- 2,261 Income tax benefits realized from activity in employee stock plans -- 3,034 -- -- 3,034 Net income -- -- 94,029 -- 94,029 Cumulative translation adjustment -- -- -- (845) (845) --------- Comprehensive income -- -- -- -- 93,184 --------- Common stock repurchased (172) (586) (2,658) -- (3,244) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1996 32,510 128,751 244,966 (81) 373,636 Exercise of stock options 1,070 14,956 -- -- 14,956 Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan 145 2,861 -- -- 2,861 Income tax benefits realized from activity in employee stock plans -- 7,624 -- -- 7,624 Net loss -- -- (95,658) -- (95,658) Cumulative translation adjustment -- -- -- (2,146) (2,146) --------- Comprehensive loss -- -- -- -- (97,804) --------- Common stock repurchased (6) (25) (247) -- (272) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1997 33,719 154,167 149,061 (2,227) 301,001 Exercise of stock options 618 12,617 -- -- 12,617 Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan 171 4,671 -- -- 4,671 Income tax benefits realized from activity in employee stock plans -- 4,728 -- -- 4,728 Net income -- -- 52,828 -- 52,828 Cumulative translation adjustment -- -- -- (29) (29) --------- Comprehensive income -- -- -- -- 52,799 --------- Common stock repurchased (9) (43) (308) -- (351) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1998 34,499 $ 176,140 $ 201,581 $(2,256) $ 375,465 =======================================================================
See accompanying notes. 26 27 NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1998 NOTE 1 BUSINESS AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS Nature of Operations Novellus Systems, Inc. (the Company) is a leading manufacturer of high productivity deposition systems (CVD, PVD, and electrofill) used in the fabrication of integrated circuits. CVD systems employ a chemical plasma to deposit all of the dielectric (insulating) layers and certain of the conductive metal layers on the surface of a semiconductor wafer. PVD systems are used to deposit conductive metal layers by sputtering metallic atoms from the surface of a target source via high DC power. Electrofill systems are used for depositing copper conductive layers in a dual damascene design architecture using a plating bath solution. The overall growth in the semiconductor industry and the increasing number of layers used in complex integrated circuits have led to demand for advanced deposition equipment. The Company's products are able to provide simultaneous solutions to productivity and wafer quality problems facing the worldwide semiconductor manufacturing industry. Basis of Presentation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries after elimination of all significant intercompany accounts and transactions. Certain prior year amounts in the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto have been reclassified to conform to the 1998 presentation. Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results inevitably will differ from those estimates and such differences may be material to the financial statements. Revenue Recognition Net sales consist of system and spare part sales as well as revenues from maintenance and service contracts. Revenue related to system and spare part sales is recognized on shipment. Revenue related to maintenance and service contracts is recognized ratably over the duration of the contracts. Unearned maintenance and service contract revenue is immaterial and included in accrued liabilities. Warranty and Installation The Company generally warrants its systems for a period of up to 24 months from shipment for material and labor to repair and service the system. A provision for the estimated cost of installation and warranty is recorded upon shipment. Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with insignificant interest rate risk and maturities of ninety days or less to be cash equivalents. Short-Term Investments The Company classifies its marketable debt securities as available-for-sale in accordance with the provisions of the Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities." Securities classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair market value with the related unrealized gains and losses included in retained earnings. Realized gains and losses and declines in value of securities judged to be other than temporary are included in interest income or expense. Interest on all securities is included in interest income. Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. Inventories consisted of the following at December 31 (in thousands):
1998 1997 ----------------------- Purchased and spare parts $50,591 $45,556 Work-in-process 13,005 30,326 Finished goods 5,627 6,251 ----------------------- $69,223 $82,133 ========== ============
27 28 NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1998 Property and Equipment Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are provided mainly on the straight-line method over the following useful lives: Machinery and equipment 3-5 years Furniture and fixtures 3-5 years Leasehold improvements Shorter of useful life or remaining lease term Foreign Currency Accounting The local currency is the functional currency for all foreign operations. Accordingly, translation gains or losses related to the foreign subsidiaries' financial statements are included as a component of shareholders' equity. Forward Foreign Exchange Contracts The Company enters into forward foreign exchange contracts primarily to hedge against the short-term impact of foreign currency fluctuations of intercompany accounts payable denominated in U.S. Dollars recorded by its Japanese subsidiary. The Company also enters into forward foreign exchange contracts to buy and sell foreign currencies as economic hedges of the parent's intercompany balances denominated in a currency other than the U.S. Dollar. In 1997 and 1998, these hedging contracts were denominated primarily in the Japanese Yen. The maturities of all the forward foreign exchange contracts are generally short-term in nature. Because the impact of movements in currency exchange rates on forward foreign exchange contracts offsets the related impact on the underlying items being hedged, these financial instruments do not subject the Company to speculative risk that would otherwise result from changes in currency exchange rates. All foreign currency contracts are marked-to-market and realized and unrealized gains and losses are included as a component of other income and expense. Net foreign currency gains and losses have not been material. Stock Split On September 22, 1997 the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved a two-for-one split of Novellus' common stock. Each shareholder of record as of the close of business on September 29, 1997 received one additional share of common stock for every share held. All prior period common stock and applicable share and per share amounts have been restated to reflect the two-for-one split, effective October, 1997. Earnings (Loss) Per Share In 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 128 "Earnings per Share". SFAS No. 128 replaced the calculation of primary and fully diluted earnings per share with basic and diluted earnings per share. Unlike primary earnings per share, basic earnings per share excludes any dilutive effects of options, warrants and convertible securities. Diluted earnings per share is very similar to the previously reported fully diluted earnings per share. Earnings per share amounts for all periods presented have been restated to conform to SFAS No. 128. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
1998 1997 1996 ------------------------------------- Numerator: Net income (loss) $52,828 $(95,658) $94,029 Denominator: Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per share - weighted-average shares outstanding 34,035 33,257 32,156 Employee stock options 952 -- 862 ------------------------------------- Denominator for diluted earnings (loss) per share - adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding 34,987 33,257 33,018 ------------------------------------- Basic earnings (loss) per share $ 1.55 $ (2.88) $ 2.92 Diluted earnings (loss) per share $ 1.51 $ (2.88) $ 2.85 =====================================
Options to purchase 824,000 and 1,918,000 shares of common stock at weighted-average prices of $44.21 and $29.73 per share were outstanding during 1998 and 1996, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted net income per common share because the options' exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect would be antidilutive. Options were outstanding during 1997, but were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per common share because the effect in years with a net loss would be antidilutive. 28 29 NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1998 Advertising Expenses The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expenses for 1998, 1997, and 1996 were $6,065,000, $3,233,000 and $3,259,000, respectively. Concentration of Credit Risk The Company uses financial instruments that potentially subject it to concentrations of credit risk. Such instruments include cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, and financial instruments used in hedging activities. The Company invests its cash in cash deposits, money market funds, commercial paper, certificates of deposit, readily marketable debt securities, or medium term notes. The Company places its investments with high-credit-quality financial institutions and limits the credit exposure from any one financial institution or instrument. To date, the Company has not experienced material losses on these investments. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers' financial condition and generally requires no collateral. As a result of the economic difficulties within certain Asian countries, the Company has increased sales subject to extended payment terms within this region. The Company has an exposure to nonperformance by counterparties on the foreign exchange contracts used in hedging activities. These counterparties are large international financial institutions and to date, no such counterparty has failed to meet its financial obligations to the Company. The Company does not believe there is a significant risk of nonperformance by these counterparties because the Company continuously monitors its positions and the credit ratings of such counterparties and the amount of contracts it enters into with any one party. However, there can be no assurance that there will be no significant nonperformance by these counterparties and that this would not materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations. Comprehensive Income (Loss) As of January 1, 1998, the Company adopted the Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 130 (SFAS 130), "Reporting Comprehensive Income." SFAS 130 establishes new rules for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components; however adoption of this Statement had no impact on the Company's net income or shareholders' equity. SFAS 130 requires unrealized gains or losses on the Company's available-for-sale securities and foreign currency translation adjustments to be included in other comprehensive income. Prior to adoption, unrealized gains or losses related to foreign currency translation adjustments were reported as a separate component of shareholders' equity. The following are the components of comprehensive income (loss), (in thousands):
Years Ended Dec. 31, Dec. 31, Dec. 31, 1998 1997 1996 ---------------------------------------- Net income (loss) $ 52,828 $(95,658) $ 94,029 Foreign currency translation adjustment (29) (2,146) (845) ---------------------------------------- Comprehensive income (loss) $ 52,799 $(97,804) $ 93,184 ======================================== The component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of related tax is as follows: Foreign currency translation adjustment $ (2,256) $ (2,227) $ (81) ========================================
Employee Stock Plans Effective January 1, 1996, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation". In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Company accounts for stock-based employee compensation arrangements under the intrinsic value method prescribed by the Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and will provide pro forma disclosures of net income (loss) and earning (loss) per share as if the fair value method prescribed by SFAS No. 123 had been applied in measuring employee compensation expense. See Note 9, Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Effective January 1, 1998, the Company adopted SFAS No. 131, "Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information". SFAS changes the way companies report selected segment information in annual financial statements and also requires those companies to report selected segment information in interim financial reports to shareholders. The Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 131 for the year ended December 31, 1998. Adoption of SFAS No. 131 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In June 1998, the FASB released SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities". SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS No. 133 requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and measure those instruments at fair value. The Statement is effective for all fiscal quarters of fiscal years beginning after June 15, 1999. The Company is still in the process of assessing the impact of SFAS No. 133 on its financial statements. 29 30 NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1998 NOTE 2 ACQUISITION OF THE THIN FILM SYSTEMS BUSINESS OF VARIAN ASSOCIATES In June 1997, the Company completed the acquisition of the Thin Film Systems business ("TFS") of Varian Associates, Inc. ("Varian"). TFS manufactures and markets equipment for physical vapor deposition ("PVD"), a critical technology in the production of advanced semiconductor logic and memory devices. The acquisition has been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, and accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of TFS subsequent to the acquisition date. The currently estimated total purchase price of $148.3 million consisted of a cash payment of $145.5 million to Varian and $2.8 million of related acquisition expenses. The purchase price is dependent on the results of the audit of the TFS pre-acquisition financial statements. The Company has disputed the results of the audit of the pre-acquisition financial statements and in accordance with the purchase agreement, has demanded arbitration in order to resolve the disputes over the purchase price of TFS. Adjustments to the estimated purchase price, if any, could ultimately be determined through arbitration. The Company expects that any adjustment to the purchase price, as a result of such arbitration, would not have a material effect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations. Acquired assets and liabilities were recorded at their estimated fair values at the date of the acquisition. The aggregate purchase price, plus related acquisition expenses, have been allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired based on independent valuations. Amounts allocated to in-process research and development of approximately $119.2 million were written-off at the acquisition date, representing an estimated value (using risk-adjusted cash flows, discounted at 35%) of development programs that have not yet reached technological feasibility. Amounts allocated to developed technology, $11.7 million, and workforce in place, $1.0 million, are being amortized on a straight line basis over periods of seven and three years, respectively. As a result of the acquisition of TFS the Company recorded restructuring and other costs of $14.2 million comprised primarily of write-offs of duplicative assets and the cost of exiting certain facilities. All of these actions were completed in the year ended December 31, 1998. As of December 31, 1998, the Company had made $2.6 million of cash payments relating primarily to lease payments. The components of the restructuring and other costs are summarized as follows (in thousands):
Total Restructuring Balance at and Other Spending/ December 31, Costs Charges 1998 --------------------------------------- Duplicative machinery and equipment $ 9,039 $ 9,039 $0 Lease commitments and leasehold improvements $ 3,143 $ 3,143 $0 Other exiting costs $ 2,061 $ 2,061 $0 --------------------------------------- $14,243 $14,243 $0 =======================================
The following unaudited pro forma summary presents the consolidated results of operations of the Company as if the acquisition of TFS had occurred at the beginning of fiscal 1996 and does not purport to be indicative of what would have occurred had the acquisition been made as of the beginning of fiscal 1996 or of results which may occur in the future (in thousands, except per share data).
1997 1996 ------------------------ Net sales $584,453 $666,403 Income before provision for income taxes(1) $ 3,345 $158,481 Net income(1) $ 2,208 $103,013 Basic earnings per share(1) $ 0.07 $ 3.20 Diluted earnings per share(1) $ 0.06 $ 3.12
(1) Amounts exclude the $119.2 million relating to the in-process research and development charge and the $14.2 million restructuring costs recorded in the second quarter of 1997, as a result of the acquisition. The effects of the TFS acquisition on the 1997 consolidated statement of cash flows were as follows (in thousands):
Working capital acquired $ (2,117) Property, plant and equipment 18,498 Intangible assets 12,698 In-process research and development 119,246 --------- Total purchase price $ 148,325 =========
30 31 NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1998 NOTE 3 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk As part of the Company's asset and liability management, the Company enters into various types of transactions that involve financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk. The Company enters into foreign forward exchange contracts in order to manage foreign exchange risk. The notional amounts, carrying amounts, and estimated fair values of the Company's foreign forward exchange contracts are as follows at December 31 (in thousands):
1998 1997 ------- ----- ----- ------- ----- ------ NOTIONAL CARRYING ESTIMATED NOTIONAL CARRYING ESTIMATED AMOUNT AMOUNT FAIR VALUE AMOUNT AMOUNT FAIR VALUE --------------------------------------------------------------- Sell foreign currency, $21,410 $(166) $(961) $31,522 $(239) $1,124 primarily yen
The fair value of the Company's foreign forward exchange contracts are calculated based upon the related foreign exchange rate at the end of December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively. Available-for-Sale Securities The Company currently invests in only high quality, short-term investments which it classifies as available-for-sale. As such, there were no significant differences between amortized cost and estimated fair value at December 31, 1998 and 1997. Additionally, because investments are short-term and are generally allowed to mature, realized gains and losses for both years have been minimal. All investments held at December 31, 1998 are due in less than one year. The following table presents the estimated fair value of the Company's investments by balance sheet classification at December 31 (in thousands):
1998 1997 ----------------------- Institutional money market funds $ 36,373 $35,868 Commercial paper 44,851 23,397 ----------------------- Amounts included in cash and cash equivalents 81,224 59,265 ----------------------- Commercial paper 11,129 34,320 Certificates of deposits 2,499 4,504 Auction rate preferred stock 3,200 -- Corporate securities 29,763 -- U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government Agencies 3,003 -- ----------------------- Amounts included in short-term investments 49,594 38,824 Total available-for-sale securities $130,818 $98,089 =======================
Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments The carrying and estimated fair values of the Company's other financial instruments were as follows at December 31 (in thousands):
1998 1997 ------------------------------------------------ Carrying Estimated Carrying Estimated Value Fair Value Value Fair Value ------------------------------------------------ Cash and cash equivalents $81,224 $81,224 $59,265 $59,265 Current obligations under lines of credit $12,986 $12,986 $11,652 $11,652 Long-term debt $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000
The fair values of the Company's short-term investments are based on quoted market prices as of December 31, 1998 and 1997. The fair value of the Company's obligations under lines of credit and long-term debt are based on current rates offered to the Company for similar debt instruments of the same remaining maturities. NOTE 4 LINES OF CREDIT The Company has lines of credit with three banks under which the Company can borrow up to $14.0 million at the banks' prime rates (1% to 7.75% at December 31, 1998), which expire at various dates through June 2002. The lines restrict payment of cash dividends on the Company's common stock. A portion of this facility ($13.0 million at December 31, 1998) are available to the Company's Japanese subsidiary, Nippon Novellus Systems K.K. Borrowings by the subsidiary are at the banks' offshore reference rate. At December 31, 1998 and 1997, there were borrowings by the Japanese subsidiary under lines of credit of $13.0 million and $11.7 million respectively, at annual weighted average interest rates of 1.52% and 1.02%, respectively. All borrowings under the line of credit were by Nippon Novellus. 31 32 NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1998 NOTE 5 LONG TERM DEBT In June 1997, the Company entered into a five year, $125 million, Senior Credit Facility structured as an unsecured revolving credit line. Borrowings at the option of the Company, bear interest at either a base rate plus a margin or the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus a margin for interest periods of one to six months. As of December 31, 1998, total borrowings under the senior credit facility were $65 million. The weighted average interest rate at December 31, 1998 was approximately 6.5%. The Senior Credit Facility requires the Company maintain compliance with certain financial covenants. At December 31, 1998, the Company was in compliance with these financial covenants. The Senior Credit Facility currently prohibits the Company from paying dividends on its common stock. NOTE 6 LITIGATION Applied Litigation On May 4, 1997, the Company entered into a comprehensive global settlement of all of its ongoing legal disputes, to that date, with Applied Materials, Inc. ("Applied"). The Company recorded an expense of $84.0 million relating to the settlement, consisting of a cash payment of $80.0 million to Applied and $4.0 million related to legal costs associated with the settlement. On July 7, 1997, prior to the consummation of the purchase of TFS from Varian, Applied filed a complaint (the "Applied Complaint") against Varian in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California San Jose Division, Civil Action No. C-97-20523 RMW, alleging, among other things, infringement by Varian (including the making, using, selling and/or offering for sale of certain products and systems made by TFS) of United States Patent Nos. 5,171,412, 5,186,718, 5,496,455 and 5,540,821 (the "Applied Patents"), which patents are owned by Applied. Immediately after consummation of the TFS purchase, the Company filed a complaint (the "Company Complaint") against Applied in the same Court, Civil Action No. C-97-20551 RMW, alleging infringement by Applied (including the making, using, selling and/or offering for sale of certain products and systems) of United States Patent Nos. 5,314,597, 5,330,628, and 5,635,036 (the "Company Patents"), which patents the Company acquired from Varian in the TFS purchase. In the Company Complaint, the Company also alleged that it is entitled to declarations from Applied that the Company does not infringe the Applied Patents and/or that the Applied Patents are invalid and/or unenforceable. Applied has filed counterclaims alleging that the Company infringes the Applied Patents. Also after consummation of the TFS purchase, but some time after the Company filed the Company Complaint, Applied amended the Applied Complaint to add the Company as a defendant. The Company has requested that the Court dismiss the Company as a defendant in Applied's lawsuit against Varian. The Court has not yet required the Company to file an answer to the Applied Complaint. In addition to a request for a permanent injunction against further infringement, the Applied Complaint and Applied's counterclaims to the Company Complaint include requests for damages for alleged prior infringement and treble damages for alleged "willful" infringement. In connection with the consummation of the TFS purchase, Varian agreed, under certain circumstances, to reimburse the Company for certain of its legal and other expenses in connection with the defense and prosecution of this litigation, and to indemnify the Company for a portion of any losses incurred by the Company arising from this litigation (including losses resulting from a permanent injunction). The Company and Varian believe that there are meritorious defenses to Applied's allegations, including among other things, that the Company's operations (including TFS products and systems) do not infringe the Applied Patents and/or that the Applied Patents are invalid and/or unenforceable. However, the resolution of intellectual property disputes is often fact intensive and, therefore, inherently uncertain. Although the Company believes that the ultimate outcome of the dispute with Applied will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business or results of operations (taking into account both the defenses available to the Company and Varian's reimbursement and indemnity obligations), there can be no assurances that Applied will not ultimately prevail in this dispute and that, in such an event, Varian's reimbursement and indemnity obligations will not be sufficient to fully reimburse the Company for its losses. If Applied were to prevail in this dispute, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business or results of operations. The Company Complaint against Applied also includes requests for damages for prior infringement and treble damages for "willful" infringement, in addition to a request for a permanent injunction for further infringement. Although the Company believes that it will prevail against Applied, there can be no assurances that the Company will prevail in its litigation against Applied. If Applied were to prevail against the Company Complaint, it will unlikely, but could, have a material adverse effect on the Company's business or results of operations. Semitool Litigation On August 10, 1998, Semitool sued the Company for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Semitool alleges that the Company's SABRE(TM) copper deposition system infringes two Semitool patents, U.S. Patent No. 5,222,310, issued June 29, 1993, entitled "Single Wafer Processor with a Frame," and U.S. Patent No. 5,377,708, issued January 3, 1995, entitled "Multi-Station Semiconductor Processor with Volatilization." Semitool seeks an injunction against the Company's manufacture and sale of SABRE(TM) systems, and seeks damages for past infringement. Semitool also seeks trebled damages for alleged willful infringement. Semitool also seeks its attorneys' fees and COSTS, and interest on any judgement. 32 33 NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1998 The Company believes that there are meritorious defenses to Semitool's allegations, including among other things, that the Company's operations (including SABRE(TM) products and systems) do not infringe the Semitool Patents and/or that the Semitool Patents are invalid and/or unenforceable. But the resolution of intellectual property disputes is often fact intensive and, like most other litigation matters, inherently uncertain. Although the Company believes that the ultimate outcome of the dispute with Semitool will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business or results of operations (taking into account the defenses available to the Company), there can be no assurances that Semitool will not ultimately prevail in this dispute. If Semitool were to prevail in this dispute, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business or results of operations. Other Matters In addition, in the normal course of business, the Company from time to time receives inquiries with regard to possible other patent infringements. The Company believes it is unlikely that the outcome of the patent infringement inquiries will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations. There has been substantial litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights in semiconductor-related industries. Although the Company is not aware of any infringement by its products of any patents or proprietary rights of others except as claimed by Applied and Semitool, further commercialization of the Company's products could provoke claims of infringement from third parties. In the future, litigation may be necessary to enforce patents issued to the Company, to protect trade secrets or know-how owned by the Company or to defend the Company against claimed infringement of the rights of others and to determine the scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others. Any such litigation could result in substantial cost and diversion of effort by the Company, which by itself could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and operating results. Further, adverse determinations in such litigation could result in the Company's loss of proprietary rights, subject the Company to significant liabilities to third parties, require the Company to seek licenses from third parties or prevent the Company from manufacturing or selling its products, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations. NOTE 7 BAD DEBT WRITE-OFF In June 1997, the Company determined that due to the financial difficulties facing one of its customers an outstanding accounts receivable balance was at risk for collection. Accordingly, the Company recorded a write-off of $17.7 million, representing the outstanding accounts receivable balance and other related expenses for the repossession of its equipment. See Note 12, Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. NOTE 8 COMMITMENTS The Company leases its facilities under operating leases, that expire through 2002. As of December 31, 1998, the minimum annual rental commitments are as follows (in thousands): 1999 $ 15,892 2000 14,840 2001 13,763 2002 226,416 2003 1,898 Beyond 40 -------- 272,849 Less future sublease income (80,174) -------- $ 192,675 ========
Rent expense was approximately $12.8 million, $7.2 million, and $4.1 million for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively, net of sublease income of $2.1 million, $1.5 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively. The Company has lease agreements on twelve properties and 6.4 acres of undeveloped land. The agreements are for five years each with the option to extend for an additional two years at an interest rate that approximates LIBOR. At current interest rates, the annual lease payments total approximately $12.7 million. During the terms of the leases, the Company may elect to purchase the properties for an amount that approximates the lessor's cost of the property and any current rent due and payable. The guaranteed residual amount under the lease agreements is approximately $204.5 million. These leases contain certain restrictive financial covenants. The Company was in compliance with these covenants at December 31, 1998. 33 34 NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1998 NOTE 9 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS Employee Stock Option Plans The Company grants options to employees under the 1984 and 1992 Stock Option Plans ("the Plans"). Under the Plans, options to purchase up to 16.2 million shares of the Company's common stock may be granted at not less than fair market value. Options generally vest ratably over a four year period on the anniversary date of the grant or as determined by the Board of Directors. Stock options expire ten years after date of grant. At December 31, 1998, approximately 869,000 shares were reserved for future issuance under the Employee Stock Option Plans and options to purchase 1.7 million shares were exercisable at a weighted average exercise price of $28.84. The Company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." Accordingly, no expense has been recognized for options granted to employees under the Plans. Had compensation expense for the Company's plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for awards made subsequent to December 15, 1995 consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Company's net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share data):
1998 1997 1996 -------- ---------- -------- Net income (loss) as reported $ 52,828 $ (95,658) $ 94,029 Pro forma net income (loss) $ 38,196 $ (107,940) $ 86,791 Basic earnings (loss) per share as reported $ 1.55 $ (2.88) $ 2.92 Diluted earnings (loss) per share as reported $ 1.51 $ (2.88) $ 2.85 Pro forma basic earnings (loss) per share $ 1.12 $ (3.25) $ 2.70 Pro forma diluted earnings (loss) per share $ 1.09 $ (3.25) $ 2.63
In calculating pro forma compensation, the fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for grants made in 1998, 1997 and 1996:
1998 1997 1996 --------- --------- --------- Dividend yield None None None Expected volatility 0.63 0.61 0.56 Risk free interest rate 5.14% 5.92% 5.98% Expected lives 3.2 years 3.0 years 2.9 years
The weighted average fair value of options granted during the year were $19.31, $16.91 and $10.73 for 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. The pro forma net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share listed above include expense related to the Company's Employee Stock Purchase Plans. The effects on pro forma disclosures of applying SFAS 123 are not likely to be representative of the effects on pro forma disclosures of future years. Because SFAS 123 is applicable only to options granted subsequent to December 31, 1995, the pro forma effect will not be fully reflected until 1999. The fair value of issuance's under the employee stock purchase plans is estimated on the issuance date using the Black-Scholes model with the following weighted average assumptions for issuance's made in 1998, 1997 and 1996:
1998 1997 1996 --------- --------- --------- Dividend yield None None None Expected volatility 0.74 0.51 0.60 Risk free interest rate 5.5% 5.5% 5.8% Expected lives 1/2 year 1/2 year 1/2 year
The weighted average fair value of purchase rights granted during the year were $12.51, $7.05 and $6.91 for 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. 34 35 NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1998 Information with respect to stock option activity is as follows: (in thousands, except per share data)
Weighted Average Authorized Outstanding Price per Share Exercise Price -------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1995 301 4,079 $ 0.20 -- $41.63 $ 19.42 Additional authorization 1,360 -- -- Options granted (1,770) 1,770 $ 18.19 -- $30.13 $ 26.19 Options exercised -- (652) $ 4.19 -- $28.63 $ 7.78 Options canceled 384 (470) $ 0.20 -- $41.63 $ 24.71 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1996 275 4,727 $ 4.19 -- $41.63 $ 23.06 Additional authorization 1,320 -- -- Options granted (1,478) 1,478 $ 26.63 -- $58.88 $ 38.30 Options exercised -- (1,070) $ 4.19 -- $41.63 $ 13.97 Options canceled 506 (506) $ 4.19 -- $58.88 $ 30.31 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1997 623 4,629 $ 7.00 -- $58.88 $ 29.24 Additional authorization 1,100 -- -- Options granted (1,259) 1,259 $ 23.69 -- $49.25 $ 42.21 Options exercised -- (618) $ 22.88 -- $59.00 $ 20.53 Options canceled 405 (405) $ 16.00 -- $58.88 $ 33.36 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1998 869 4,865 $ 8.63 -- $58.88 $ 33.36
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 1998 (share information in thousands):
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable - -------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- Options Weighted Options Outstanding at Average Remaining Weighted Exercisable at Weighted Range of December 31, Contractual Life Average December 31, Average Exercise Prices 1998 (years) Exercise Price 1998 Exercise Price - -------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- $ 8.63 - $24.75 856 7.19 $20.32 358 $17.50 $24.91 - $27.88 895 6.86 $26.81 461 $26.33 $28.25 - $31.09 817 7.54 $30.07 424 $30.05 $32.13 - $37.13 821 8.64 $33.88 216 $33.50 $37.50 - $48.75 688 7.86 $42.00 235 $41.43 $49.25 - $58.88 788 9.80 $50.29 26 $57.26 - -------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- $ 8.63 - $58.88 4,865 7.95 $33.36 1,720 $28.84 - -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------
Employee Stock Purchase Plans In December 1988 and May 1992, the Company adopted qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plans under Sections 421 and 423 of the Internal Revenue Code and reserved 400,000 and 300,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the plans, respectively. In April 1998, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Purchase Plan increasing the number of shares available for issuance thereunder from 700,000 shares to 950,000 shares. Under the two plans, qualified employees are entitled to purchase shares at 85% of the fair market value on specified dates. There were approximately 168,000, 145,000, and 128,000 shares issued under the two plans in 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively. At December 31, 1998, approximately 185,000 shares were reserved for future issuance under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Common Stock Repurchase Program In October 1992 and January 1996, the Company announced it would repurchase 1,400,000 and 2,000,000 shares, respectively, of common stock for issuance in future Company employee benefit and compensation plans and other requirements. During 1997, the Company repurchased 6,000 shares under the program, and had purchased a total of 1,568,000 shares as of December 31, 1997. During 1998, the Company repurchased 9,000 shares under the program, and had purchased a total of 1,577,000 shares as of December 31, 1998. Employee Savings and Retirement Plan The Company maintains a 401(k) retirement savings plan for its full-time employees. Participants in the plan may contribute up to 20% of their annual salary, limited by the maximum dollar amount allowed by the Internal Revenue Code. Profit Sharing and Bonus Programs The Company has profit sharing and bonus programs that distribute cash based on the performance of the Company and its employees, including the executive officers. Charges to operations under these programs were $5.5 million, $8.0 million, and $10.2 million in 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively. 35 36 NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1998 NOTE 10 TAXES ON INCOME (LOSS) Significant components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes attributable to operations are as follows (in thousands):
1998 1997 1996 --------------------------------------- State Current $ 1,794 $ -- $ 6,145 Deferred 452 (5,248) 222 --------------------------------------- 2,246 (5,248) 6,367 Federal Current 4,715 3,376 38,701 Deferred 13,175 (31,978) 1,545 --------------------------------------- 17,890 (28,602) 40,246 Foreign Current 2,355 751 984 Income tax benefits attributable to employee stock plan activity allocated to shareholders' equity 4,728 7,624 3,034 --------------------------------------- Total provision (benefit) for income taxes $ 27,219 ($25,475) $50,631 =======================================
Pre-tax income (loss) from foreign operations was $4.4 million, $2.2 million, and $(2.1) million in 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows at December 31 (in thousands):
1998 1997 -------------------------- Deferred tax assets: Financial valuation accounts $ 4,525 $ 5,377 Expenses not currently deductible 18,741 26,774 Other 8,369 7,173 Capitalized In-Process R&D 34,575 39,606 -------------------------- Subtotal 66,210 78,930 Valuation allowance (16,924) (20,024) -------------------------- Total deferred tax assets 49,286 58,906 -------------------------- Deferred tax liabilities: Fixed assets (11,175) (7,167) -------------------------- Total net deferred tax assets $ 38,111 $ 51,739 ==========================
The provision (benefit) for income taxes differs from the provision (benefit) calculated by applying the federal statutory tax rate to income (loss) before taxes because of the following (in thousands):
1998 1997 1996 ---------------------------------------- Expected provision (benefit) at 35% $ 28,016 $(42,397) $ 50,631 State taxes, net of federal benefit 1,460 (2,924) 4,200 Research and development credits (1,530) (665) (500) Foreign sales corporation benefit (430) (365) (4,300) Unbenefitted in-process R&D -- 19,477 -- Valuation allowance increase/(decrease) (3,100) -- -- Other 2,803 1,399 600 ---------------------------------------- $ 27,219 $(25,475) $ 50,631 ========================================
36 37 NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1998 NOTE 11 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION REPORTING AND MAJOR CUSTOMERS The Company operates in one segment as it manufactures, markets and services advanced automated wafer fabrication systems for the deposition of thin films within the semiconductor equipment market. The Company is a supplier of high productivity deposition systems used in the fabrication of integrated circuits. All products and services are marketed within the geographic regions in which the Company operates. The Company's current product offerings qualify for aggregation under SFAS 131 as its products are manufactured and distributed in the same manner, have similar long-term gross margins and are sold to the same customer base. The following is a summary of operations in geographic areas (in thousands):
NORTH AMERICA EUROPE PACIFIC RIM ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED --------------------------------------------------------------- 1998 Sales to unaffiliated customers $ 468,204 $ 2,063 $ 48,511 $ -- $ 518,778 Transfers between geographic locations 12,301 5,962 11,137 (29,400) -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Total net sales $ 480,505 $ 8,025 $ 59,648 $ (29,400) $ 518,778 Operating income (loss) $ 78,598 $ (971) $ 6,770 $ -- $ 84,397 =============================================================== Long-lived assets $ 107,629 $ 232 $ 8,503 $ -- $ 116,364 All other identifiable assets 383,210 2,162 50,203 -- 435,575 =============================================================== Total assets $ 490,839 $ 2,394 $ 58,706 $ -- $ 551,939 =============================================================== 1997 Sales to unaffiliated customers $ 480,388 $ 5,908 $ 47,708 $ -- $ 534,004 Transfers between geographic locations 33,347 2,908 11,094 (47,349) -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Total net sales 513,735 8,816 58,802 (47,349) 534,004 Operating income (loss) $(126,044) $ 885 $ 1,083 $ -- $(124,076) =============================================================== Long-lived assets $ 96,471 $ 184 $ 9,360 $ -- $ 106,015 All other identifiable assets 333,099 5,798 48,388 -- 387,285 =============================================================== Total assets $ 429,570 $ 5,982 $ 57,748 $ -- $ 493,300 =============================================================== 1996 Sales to unaffiliated customers $ 387,396 $ 4,336 $ 70,004 $ -- $ 461,736 Transfers between geographic locations 59,771 2,377 9,438 (71,586) -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Total net sales 447,167 6,713 79,442 (71,586) 461,736 Operating income (loss) $ 137,887 $ 203 $ (1,837) $ -- $ 136,253 ========= ======= ======== ========== ========= Long-lived assets $ 59,100 $ 121 $ 9,009 $ -- $ 68,230 All other identifiable assets 348,372 1,380 41,805 -- 391,557 ========= ======= ======== ========== ========= Total assets $ 407,472 $ 1,501 $ 50,814 $ -- $ 459,787 ========= ======= ======== ========== =========
Revenue in each geographic area is recognized upon shipment from the locations within a designated geographic region. Transfers and commission arrangements between geographic areas are at prices sufficient to recover a reasonable profit. No customers exceeded 10% of net sales in 1998 or 1997. In 1996, sales to one customer (a distributor) was approximately 12% of net sales. Export sales were 51% of net sales in 1998, 47% of net sales in 1997, and 64% of net sales in 1996. NOTE 12 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS At December 31, 1998 the Company had outstanding notes receivable from one of its officers, totaling $1.5 million. The notes incur interest at 6.0% per year, compounded semi-annually, and is repayable in July 2000. This amount represents the highest amount owing from the officer during the year. During 1997 and 1996, the President of Submicron Technology, Inc. (Submicron), which was one of the Company's customers, was also a member of the Company's Board of Directors. For the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, the Company sold $5.4 million and $20.2 million of CVD systems to Submicron, respectively. Management believes these transactions were under terms no less favorable to the Company than those arranged with other parties. There were no transactions with Submicron in 1998. Trade receivables from Submicron at December 31, 1996 were $10.2 million. 37 38 NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1998 During the second quarter of 1997, the Company recorded a bad debt write-off of $17.7 million, representing the outstanding accounts receivable balance and other related expenses, (see Note 7, Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements). NOTE 13 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED--IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
1998 QUARTER ENDED MAR 28 JUNE 27 SEPT 26 DEC 31 ---------- --------- -------- -------- Net sales $163,214 $ 142,844 $106,704 $106,016 Gross profit $ 89,931 $ 78,566 $ 56,082 $ 56,286 Gross profit as a % of sales 55% 55% 53% 53% Operating income $ 31,711 $ 24,031 $ 11,212 $ 11,994 Net income $ 20,950 $ 16,115 $ 7,623 $ 8,140 Basic earnings per share(2) $ 0.62 $ 0.47 $ 0.22 $ 0.24 Diluted earnings per share(2) $ 0.60 $ 0.46 $ 0.22 $ 0.23 Shares used in basic per share calculations(2) 33,816 33,932 34,095 34,298 Shares used in diluted per share calculations(2) 34,857 35,047 34,659 35,384 1997 QUARTER ENDED MAR 29 JUNE 28 SEPT 27 DEC 31 ---------- --------- -------- -------- Net sales $101,628 $ 114,466 $155,080 $162,830 Gross profit $ 55,896 $ 62,956 $ 82,192 $ 89,394 Gross profit as a % of sales 55% 55% 53% 55% Operating income (loss) $ 21,523 $(210,504)(1) $ 31,002 $ 33,903 Net income (loss) $ 15,613 $(153,739)(1) $ 20,079 $ 22,389 Basic earnings (loss) per share(2) $ 0.48 $ (4.66) $ 0.60 $ 0.66 Diluted earnings (loss) per share(2) $ 0.46 $ (4.66)(3) $ 0.57 $ 0.64 Shares used in basic per share calculations(2) 32,760 33,020 33,546 33,700 Shares used in diluted per share calculations(2) 34,274 33,020 35,276 34,984
(1) The Company's reported loss of $153.7 million or $4.66 per share for the quarter ended June 28, 1997 includes pre-tax one-time charges totaling $235.2 million, consisting of $133.5 million in connection with the acquisition of TFS, a write-off of $17.7 million in connection with outstanding accounts receivable from Submicron Technology, Inc. and charges totaling $84.0 million in connection with the May 4, 1997 settlement of the TEOS patent litigation. (2) The earnings (loss) per share amounts and shares used have been adjusted to reflect the Company's the two-for-one stock split, effective October 1997. (3) Excludes common stock equivalents as they are antidilutive to the loss per share for the quarter. NOTE 14 SUBSEQUENT EVENT (UNAUDITED) On February 24, 1999, the Company sold 3,860,000 shares of Common Stock at $67.50 per share. The Company granted the underwriter a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 579,000 shares of common stock to cover overallotments, if any. The net proceeds to the Company, not including the overallotment option totaled approximately $255.3 million. 38 39 REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS The Shareholders and Board of Directors Novellus Systems, Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Novellus Systems, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 14(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Novellus Systems, Inc. at December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP San Jose, California January 18, 1999 39 40 ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE Not applicable PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT The information required by this item is included under "Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors," "Other Information - Executive Officers" and "Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act" in the Company's Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with its 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The information required by this item is included under "Other Information - Executive Compensation" in the Company's Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with its 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT The information required by this item is included under "Other Information - Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" in the Company's Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with its 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS The information required by this item is included under "Other Information - Certain Transactions" in the Company's Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with its 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference. PART IV ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) The following documents are filed as part of this Report: (1) Financial Statements and Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors Consolidated Statements of Operations - Years Ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 23 Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 1998 and 1997 24 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Years Ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 25 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity - Years Ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 26 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 27 Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors 39 (2) Financial Statement Schedules The following financial statement schedule is included herein: Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts 43 All other schedules are omitted because they are not required or the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto. (3) Exhibits (numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K)
40 41 3.1(5) Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Registrant. 3.1.1 Amendment to the Restated Articles of Incorporation of Registrant 3.2 Form of Bylaws of Registrant as amended 10.1(7) Asset Purchase Agreement by and between Varian Associates, Inc. and the Company dated May 7, 1997. 10.2(7) First Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement by and between Varian Associates, Inc. and the Company dated June 20, 1997. 10.3(7) Assignment and Assumption of Lessee's Interest in Lease (Units 8 and 9, Palo Alto) and Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions on Leasehold Interests (Units 1-12 Palo Alto) by and between Varian Associates, Inc. and the Company dated May 7, 1997. 10.4(7) Sublease (Portion of Unit 9, Palo Alto) by and between Varian Associates, Inc. and the Company dated May 7, 1997. 10.6(7) Environmental Agreement by and between Varian Associates, Inc. and the Company dated May 7, 1997. 10.7(7) Cross License Agreement by and between Varian Associates, Inc. and the Company dated May 7, 1997. 10.8(7) Parts Supply Agreement by and between Varian Associates, Inc. and the Company dated May 7, 1997. 10.9(8) Settlement Agreement by and between Applied Materials, Inc. and the Company dated May 7, 1997. Confidential treatment has been granted with respect to portions of this Exhibit. 10.10(8) Credit Agreement by and among ABN AMRO Bank, N.V., as agent, the lenders named therein, and the Company dated May 7, 1997. 10.11(8) Participation Agreement by and among Lease Plan North America, Inc. the Company and ABN AMRO Bank, N.V., as agent for the participations named therein, dated June 9, 1997. 10.11.1(9) Letter Amendment, dated June 20, 1997, to the Participation Agreement by and among Lease Plan North America, Inc., the Company and ABN AMRO Bank, N.V., as agent for the participants named therein, dated June 9, 1997. 10.11.2(9) Amendment no. 1, dated August 28, 1997, to the Participation Agreement by and among Lease Plan North America, Inc., the Company and ABN AMRO Bank, N.V., as agent for the participants named therein, dated June 9, 1997. 10.11.3(9) Amendment no. 2, dated September 26, 1997, to the Participation Agreement by and among Lease Plan North America, Inc., the Company and ABN AMRO Bank, N.V., as agent for the participants named therein, dated June 9, 1997. 10.12(9) Amendment no. 1, dated August 28, 1997, to the Facility 2 Lease Agreement, Construction Deed of Trust With Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by and between Lease Plan North America, Inc. and the Company dated June 9, 1997. 10.13(9) Amendment no. 2, dated September 26, 1997, to the Facility 2 Lease Agreement, Construction Deed of Trust With Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by and between Lease Plan North America, Inc. and the Company dated June 9, 1997. 10.13(9) Amendment no. 1, dated September 26, 1997, to the Facility 1 Lease Agreement, Deed of Trust With Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by and between Lease Plan North America, Inc. and the Company dated June 9, 1997. 10.14(9) Participation Agreement by and among Lease Plan USA, Inc., the Company and ABN AMRO Bank, N.V., as agent for the participants named therein, dated October 15, 1997. 10.15(9) Facility 1 Lease Agreement, Deed of Trust With Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by and between Lease Plan USA, Inc. and the Company dated October 15, 1997. 10.16(9) Facility 2 Lease Agreement, Construction Deed of Trust With Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by and between Lease Plan USA, Inc. and the Company dated October 15, 1997. 10.17(3) Distribution Agreement dated April 1, 1991 between Registrant and Seki Technotron Corporation. 41 42 SCHEDULE II NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS (IN THOUSANDS)
BALANCE AT BALANCE AT BEGINNING CHARGED TO END DESCRIPTION OF PERIOD EXPENSE DEDUCTIONS OF PERIOD ----------------------------------------------------- Year Ended December 31, 1996 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $2,196 $ 581 $ -- $2,777 Year Ended December 31, 1997 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts 2,777 16,370 15,600(1) 3,547 Year Ended December 31, 1998 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $3,547 $ 452 $ 864 $3,135
(1) $15.6 million write-off of the outstanding account from Submicron, total charge $17.7 million, see Note 7, Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 43 43 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in San Jose, California on the 8th day of March, 1998. NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. By: /s/Robert H. Smith -------------------------- Robert H. Smith EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION, PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER AND SECRETARY By: /s/J. Michael Dodson -------------------------- J. Michael Dodson VICE PRESIDENT AND CORPORATE CONTROLLER (PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER) POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Richard S. Hill and Robert H. Smith, and each of them, his attorneys-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
SIGNATURE CAPACITY DATE - ------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- -------------- /s/Richard S. Hill Chairman of the Board of Directors March 5, 1999 - ------------------------------- President and Chief Executive Officer Richard S. Hill /s/Robert H. Smith Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration, March 5, 1999 - ------------------------------- Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) Robert H. Smith /s/D. James Guzy Director March 5, 1999 - ------------------------------- D. James Guzy /s/Tom Long Director March 5, 1999 - ------------------------------- Tom Long /s/Glen Possley Director March 5, 1999 - ------------------------------- Glen Possley /s/J. David Lister Director March 5, 1999 - ------------------------------- J. David Lister /s/William R. Spivey Director March 5, 1999 - ------------------------------- William R. Spivey
44 44 INDEX TO EXHIBITS Exhibit Number Description - ------ ----------- 3.1(5) Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Registrant. 3.1.1 Amendment to the Restated Articles of Incorporation of Registrant 3.2 Form of Bylaws of Registrant as amended 10.1(7) Asset Purchase Agreement by and between Varian Associates, Inc. and the Company dated May 7, 1997. 10.2(7) First Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement by and between Varian Associates, Inc. and the Company dated June 20, 1997. 10.3(7) Assignment and Assumption of Lessee's Interest in Lease (Units 8 and 9, Palo Alto) and Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions on Leasehold Interests (Units 1-12 Palo Alto) by and between Varian Associates, Inc. and the Company dated May 7, 1997. 10.4(7) Sublease (Portion of Unit 9, Palo Alto) by and between Varian Associates, Inc. and the Company dated May 7, 1997. 10.6(7) Environmental Agreement by and between Varian Associates, Inc. and the Company dated May 7, 1997. 10.7(7) Cross License Agreement by and between Varian Associates, Inc. and the Company dated May 7, 1997. 10.8(7) Parts Supply Agreement by and between Varian Associates, Inc. and the Company dated May 7, 1997. 10.9(8) Settlement Agreement by and between Applied Materials, Inc. and the Company dated May 7, 1997. Confidential treatment has been granted with respect to portions of this Exhibit. 10.10(8) Credit Agreement by and among ABN AMRO Bank, N.V., as agent, the lenders named therein, and the Company dated May 7, 1997. 10.11(8) Participation Agreement by and among Lease Plan North America, Inc. the Company and ABN AMRO Bank, N.V., as agent for the participations named therein, dated June 9, 1997. 10.11.1(9) Letter Amendment, dated June 20, 1997, to the Participation Agreement by and among Lease Plan North America, Inc., the Company and ABN AMRO Bank, N.V., as agent for the participants named therein, dated June 9, 1997. 10.11.2(9) Amendment no. 1, dated August 28, 1997, to the Participation Agreement by and among Lease Plan North America, Inc., the Company and ABN AMRO Bank, N.V., as agent for the participants named therein, dated June 9, 1997. 10.11.3(9) Amendment no. 2, dated September 26, 1997, to the Participation Agreement by and among Lease Plan North America, Inc., the Company and ABN AMRO Bank, N.V., as agent for the participants named therein, dated June 9, 1997. 10.12(9) Amendment no. 1, dated August 28, 1997, to the Facility 2 Lease Agreement, Construction Deed of Trust With Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by and between Lease Plan North America, Inc. and the Company dated June 9, 1997. 10.13(9) Amendment no. 2, dated September 26, 1997, to the Facility 2 Lease Agreement, Construction Deed of Trust With Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by and between Lease Plan North America, Inc. and the Company dated June 9, 1997. 10.13(9) Amendment no. 1, dated September 26, 1997, to the Facility 1 Lease Agreement, Deed of Trust With Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by and between Lease Plan North America, Inc. and the Company dated June 9, 1997. 10.14(9) Participation Agreement by and among Lease Plan USA, Inc., the Company and ABN AMRO Bank, N.V., as agent for the participants named therein, dated October 15, 1997. 10.15(9) Facility 1 Lease Agreement, Deed of Trust With Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by and between Lease Plan USA, Inc. and the Company dated October 15, 1997. 10.16(9) Facility 2 Lease Agreement, Construction Deed of Trust With Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by and between Lease Plan USA, Inc. and the Company dated October 15, 1997. 10.17(3) Distribution Agreement dated April 1, 1991 between Registrant and Seki Technotron Corporation. 45 10.19.1 Seki Technotron Corporation Termination Agreement dated July 22, 1998 *10.20(3) Registrant's Amended and Restated 1984 Stock Option Plan, together with forms of agreements thereunder *10.21(5) Registrant's 1992 Stock Option Plan, together with forms of agreements thereunder *10.22(4) Registrant's 1992 Employee Stock Purchase Plan *10.23(1) Form of Agent Indemnification Agreement and amendment thereto *10.24(2) Employment Agreement dated June 1, 1989 between Registrant and Evert van de Ven *10.25(4) Employment Agreement dated as of June 15, 1992 between the Registrant and Peter Hanley *10.26(5) Offer Letter Agreement dated November 1, 1993 between Registrant and Richard S. Hill *10.27 Employment Agreement dated October 1, 1998 between Registrant and Richard S. Hill 22.1 Subsidiaries of Registrant 23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors 24.1 Power of Attorney (see page 39) 27.1 Financial Data Schedule - --------------- (1) Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 33-23011, which was declared effective August 11, 1988. (2) Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with Registrant's Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 1990. (3) Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with Registrant's Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 1992. (4) Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with Registrant's Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 26, 1993. (5) Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with Registrant's Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 18, 1994. (6) Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with Registrant's Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 1996. (7) Incorporated by reference to the Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 7, 1997. (8) Incorporated by reference to the Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 11, 1997. (9) Incorporated by reference to the Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 10, 1997. (b) Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Company on February 26, 1999, with respect to the underwriting agreement between the Company and Hambrecht & Quist, LLC relating to the public offering by the Company of 3,860,000 shares of its Common Stock (plus an underwriters over-allotment option of up to 579,000 additional shares). * Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements.
EX-3.1.1 2 AMENDMENT TO RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION 1 Exhibit 3.1.1 CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. (A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION) The undersigned Richard S. Hill and Robert H. Smith certify that: 1. They are the Chief Executive Officer and Secretary, respectively, of NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC., a California corporation (the "Corporation"). 2. The first paragraph of Article III of the Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation is amended to read as follows: "This corporation is authorized to issue two classes of shares of stock to be designated respectively "Preferred" and "Common". The total number of Preferred shares authorized is 10,000,000 and the total number of Common shares authorized is 80,000,000. Upon the amendment of this Article III as herein set forth, each outstanding share of Common Stock of this corporation is split up and converted into two (2) shares of Common Stock." 3. The foregoing amendment of the Restated Articles of Incorporation was duly approved by the Board of Directors on September 19, 1997. 4. The foregoing amendment of Restated Articles of Incorporation is to effect a two-for-one stock split and a proportionate increase is authorized in the authorized number of shares of Common Stock. The Corporation has only one class of shares outstanding, Common Stock. Pursuant to Section 902 (C) of the California Corporations Code shareholder approval is not required for this action. 5. The foregoing amendment of the Restated Articles of Incorporation of Novellus Systems, Inc. shall become effective at the close of business on September 29, 1997. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this certificate on September 26, 1997. /s/Richard S. Hill ----------------------------------------------------- Richard S. Hill Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer /s/Robert H. Smith ----------------------------------------------------- Robert H. Smith Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary 2 Each of the undersigned further declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the matters set forth in this certificate are true and correct of our own knowledge. Executed on this 26th day of September, 1997, at San Jose, California. /s/Richard S. Hill ----------------------------------------------------- Richard S. Hill Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer /s/Robert H. Smith ----------------------------------------------------- Robert H. Smith Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary EX-3.2 3 FORM OF BYLAWS 1 EXHIBIT 3.2 AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. (a California corporation) ARTICLE I OFFICES Section 1.1. Principal Office. The principal office for the transaction of the business of the corporation shall be located at 4000 North First, San Jose, California 95134. The Board of Directors is hereby granted full power and authority to change said principal office to another location within or without the State of California. Section 1.2. Other Offices. One or more branch or other subordinate offices may at any time be fixed and located by the Board of Directors at such place or places within or without the State of California as it deems appropriate. ARTICLE II DIRECTORS Section 2.1. Exercise of Corporate Powers. Except as otherwise provided by the Articles of Incorporation of the corporation or by the laws of the State of California now or hereafter in force, the business and affairs of the corporation shall be managed and all corporate powers shall be exercised by or under the direction of the Board of Directors. The Board may delegate the management of the day-to-day operation of the business of the corporation as permitted by law provided that the business and affairs of the corporation shall be managed and all corporate powers shall be exercised under the ultimate direction of the Board. Section 2.2. Number. The number of directors of the corporation shall not be less than six (6) nor more than eleven (11) until changed by amendment of the Articles of Incorporation or by a Bylaw amending this Section 2.2 duly adopted by the vote or written consent of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares. The exact number of directors may be fixed from time to time, within the limits specified in the Articles of Incorporation or in this Section 2.2, by (i) a bylaw or amendment thereof duly adopted by the vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote represented at a duly held meeting at which a quorum is present, or by the written consent of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote, or by the Board of Directors, or (ii) resolution of the Board of Directors. Section 2.3. Need Not Be Shareholders. The directors of the corporation need not be shareholders of the corporation. 1 2 Section 2.4. Compensation. Directors shall receive such compensation for their services as directors and such reimbursement for their expenses of attendance at meetings as may be determined from time to time by resolution of the Board, Nothing herein contained shall be construed to preclude any director from serving the corporation in any other capacity and receiving compensation therefor. Section 2.5. Election and Term of Office. At each annual meeting of shareholders, directors shall be elected to hold office until the next annual meeting, provided that if for any reason said annual meeting or an adjournment thereof is not held or the directors are not elected thereat, then the directors may be elected at any special meeting of the shareholders called and held for that purpose. The term of office of the directors shall begin immediately after their election and shall continue until the expiration of the term for which elected and until their respective successors have been elected and qualified. No person may be elected or run for reelection to the Board of Directors after having attained the age of 70 years. Section 2.6. Vacancies. A vacancy or vacancies in the Board of Directors shall exist when any authorized position of director is not then filled by a duly elected director, whether caused by death, resignation, removal, change in the authorized number of directors (by the Board or the shareholders) or otherwise. The Board of Directors may declare vacant the office of a director who has been declared of unsound mind by an order of court or convicted of a felony. A vacancy created by the removal of a director may be filled only by the approval of the shareholders. Except for a vacancy created by the removal of a director, vacancies on the Board may be filled by a majority of the directors then in office, whether or not less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director. The shareholders may elect a director at any time to fill any vacancy not filled by the directors, but any such election by written consent other than to fill a vacancy created by removal requires the consent of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote. Any director may resign effective upon giving written notice to the Chairman of the Board, the President, the Secretary, or the Board of Directors of the corporation, unless the notice specifies a later time for the effectiveness of such resignation. If the resignation is effective at a future time, a successor may be elected to take office when the resignation becomes effective. Section 2.7. Removal. 2.7.1. General Rule. Any and all of the directors may be removed without cause if such removal is approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at an election of directors, except as set forth in subsections 2.7.2 and 2.7.3. 2.7.2. Supermajority Vote Required, No director may be removed (unless the entire Board is removed) when the votes cast against removal, or not consenting in writing to such removal, would be sufficient to elect such director if voted cumulatively at an election at which the same total number of votes were cast (or, if such action is taken by written consent, all shares entitled to vote were voted) and the entire number of directors authorized at the time of the director's most recent election were then being elected; 2.7.3. Class Vote. When by the provisions of the Articles the holders of the shares of any class or series, voting as a class or series, are entitled to elect one or more directors, any director so elected may be removed only by the applicable vote of the holders of the shares of that class or series. 2.7.4. Effect of Reduction of Size of Board. Any reduction of the authorized number of directors does not remove any director prior to the expiration of such director's term of office. 2 3 Section 2.8. Meetings of Directors. 2.8.1. Place of Meetings. Unless otherwise specified in the notice thereof, meetings (whether regular, special or adjourned) of the Board of Directors of the corporation shall be held at the principal office of the corporation for the transaction of business, as specified in accordance with Section 1.1 hereof, which is hereby designated as an office for such purpose in accordance with the laws of the State of California, or at any other place within or without the State which has been designated from time to time by resolution of the Board or by written consent of all members of the Board. 2.8.2. Regular Meetings. Regular meetings of the Board of Directors, of which no notice need be given except as required by the laws of the State of California, shall be held after the adjournment of each annual meeting of the shareholders (which meeting shall be designated the Regular Annual Meeting) and at such other times as may be designated from time to time by resolution of the Board of Directors, Such regular meetings shall be held at the principal office of the corporation for the transaction of business as specified in accordance with Section 1.1 hereof or at any other place within or without the State of California which has been designated from time to time by resolution of the Board or by written consent of all members of the Board, unless notice of the place thereof be given in the same manner as for special meetings. 2.8.3. Special Meetings. Special meetings of the Board of Directors may be called at any time by the Chairman of the Board, the President, any Vice President, the Secretary, or any two or more of the directors. 2.8.4. Notice of Meetings. Except in the case of regular meetings, notice of which has been dispensed with, all meetings of the Board of Directors shall be held upon four (4) days' notice by mail or forty-eight (48) hours' notice delivered personally or by telephone, telegraph, or other electronic or wireless means. If the address of a director is not shown on the records and is not readily ascertainable, notice shall be addressed to him at the city or place in which the meetings of the directors are regularly held. Except as set forth in subsection 2.8.6 below, notice of the time and place of holding an adjourned meeting need not be given to absent directors if the time and place be fixed at the meeting adjourned. 2.8.5. Quorum. A majority of the authorized number of directors constitutes a quorum of the Board for the transaction of business. Every act or decision done or made by a majority of the directors present at a meeting duly held at which a quorum is present shall be regarded as the act of the Board of Directors except as otherwise provided by law. A meeting at which a quorum is initially present may continue to transact business notwithstanding the withdrawal of directors, if any action taken is approved by at least a majority of the required quorum for such meeting. 2.8.6. Adjourned Meetings. A majority of the directors present, whether or not a quorum is present, may adjourn any meeting to another time and place. If the meeting is adjourned for more than 24 hours, notice of any adjournment to another time or place shall be given prior to the time of the adjourned meeting to the directors who were not present at the time of the adjournment. 3 4 2.8.7. Waiver of Notice and Consent. Notice of a meeting need not be given to any director who signs a waiver of notice or a consent to holding the meeting or an approval of the minutes thereof, whether before or after the meeting, or who attends the meeting without protesting, prior thereto or at its commencement, the lack of notice to such director. All such waivers, consents, and approvals shall be filed with the corporate records or made a part of the minutes of the meeting. 2.8.8. Action Without a Meeting. Any action required or permitted to be taken by the Board may be taken without a meeting, if all members of the Board shall individually or collectively consent in writing to such action. Such written consent or consents shall be filed with the minutes of the proceedings of the Board. Such action by written consent shall have the same force and effect as a unanimous vote of such directors. 2.8.9. Conference Telephone Meetings. Members of the Board may participate in a meeting through use of conference telephone or similar communications equipment, so long as all members participating in such meeting can hear one another. Participation in a meeting pursuant to this Section constitutes presence in person at such meeting. 2.8.10.Meetings of Committees. The provisions of this Section apply also to committees of the Board and action by such committees, with such changes in points of detail as may be necessary, ARTICLE III OFFICERS Section 3.1. Election and Qualifications. The officers of the corporation shall consist of a President, one or more Vice Presidents, a Secretary, and a Chief Financial Officer who shall be chosen by the Board of Directors and such other officers, including a Chairman of the Board, as the Board of Directors shall deem expedient, who shall be chosen in such manner and hold their offices for such terms as the Board of Directors may prescribe. Any two or more of such offices may be held by the same person. Any Vice President, Assistant Treasurer, or Assistant Secretary may exercise any of the powers of the President, the Chief Financial Officer, or the Secretary, respectively, as directed by the Board of Directors, and shall perform such other duties as are imposed upon such officer by the Bylaws or the Board of Directors. Section 3.2. Term of Office and Compensation. The term of office and salary of each of said officers and the manner and time of the payment of such salaries shall be fixed and determined by the Board of Directors and may be altered by said Board from time to time at its pleasure, subject to the rights, if any, of said officers under any contract of employment. Section 3.3. Removal and Vacancies. Any officer of the corporation may be removed at the pleasure of the Board of Directors at any meeting or at the pleasure of any officer who may be granted such power by a resolution of the Board of Directors. Any officer may resign at any time upon written notice to the corporation without prejudice to the rights, if any, of the corporation under any contract to which the officer is a party. If any vacancy occurs in any office of the corporation, the Board of Directors may elect a successor to fill such vacancy for the remainder of the unexpired term and until a successor is duly chosen and qualified. 4 5 ARTICLE IV CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD The Chairman of the Board of Directors, if there be one, shall have the power to preside at all meetings of the Board of Directors, and to call meetings of the shareholders and of the Board of Directors to be held within the limitations prescribed by law or by these Bylaws, at such times and at such places as the Chairman of the Board shall deem proper. The Chairman of the Board shall have such other powers and shall be subject to such other duties as the Board of Directors may from time to time prescribe. ARTICLE V PRESIDENT Section 5.1. Powers and Duties. The powers and duties of the President are: (a) To act as the chief executive officer of the corporation and, subject to the control of the Board of Directors, to have general supervision, direction, and control of the business and affairs of the corporation. (b) To preside at all meetings of the shareholders and, in the absence of the Chairman of the Board, or if there be none, at all meetings of the Board of Directors. (c) To call meetings of the shareholders and also of the Board of Directors to be held, subject to the limitations prescribed by law or by these Bylaws, at such times and at such places as the President shall deem proper, (d) Subject to the direction of the Board of Directors, to have general charge of the property of the corporation and to supervise and control all officers, agents, and employees of the corporation. Section 5.2. President Pro Tem. If neither the Chairman of the Board, the President, nor any Vice President is present at any meeting of the Board of Directors, a President pro tem may be chosen to preside and act at such meeting. If neither the President nor any Vice President is present at any meeting of the shareholders, a President pro tem may be chosen to preside at such meeting. ARTICLE VI VICE PRESIDENT In case of the absence, disability, or death of the President, the Vice President, or one of the Vice Presidents, shall exercise all the powers and perform all the duties of the President. If there is more than one Vice President, the order in which the Vice Presidents shall succeed to the powers and duties of the President shall be fixed by the Board of Directors. The Vice President or Vice Presidents shall have such other powers and perform such other duties as may be granted or prescribed by the Board of Directors. 5 6 ARTICLE VII SECRETARY The powers and duties of the Secretary are: (a) To keep a book of minutes at the principal office of the corporation, or such other place as the Board of Directors may order, of all meetings of its directors and shareholders with the time and place of holding, whether regular or special, and, if special, how authorized, the notice thereof given, the names of those present at directors' meetings, the number of shares present or represented at shareholders' meetings, and the proceedings thereof. (b) To keep the seal of the corporation and to affix the same to all instruments which may require it. (c) To keep or cause to be kept at the principal office of the corporation, or at the office of the transfer agent or agents, a share register, or duplicate share registers, showing the names of the shareholders and their addresses, the number and classes of shares held by each, the number and date of certificates issued for shares, and the number and date of cancellation of every certificate surrendered for cancellation. (d) To keep a supply of certificates for shares of the corporation, to fill in all certificates issued, and to make a proper record of each such issuance; provided, that so long as the corporation shall have one or more duly appointed and acting transfer agent of the shares, or any class or series of shares, of the corporation, such duties with respect to such shares shall be performed by such transfer agent or transfer agents, (e) To transfer upon the share books of the corporation any and all shares of the corporation; provided, that so long as the corporation shall have one or more duly appointed and acting transfer agent of the shares, or any class or series of shares, of the corporation, such duties with respect to such shares shall be performed by such transfer agent or transfer agents, and the method of transfer of each certificate shall be subject to the reasonable regulations of the transfer agent to which the certificate is presented for transfer, and also, if the corporation then has one or more duly appointed and acting registrars, to the reasonable regulations of the registrar to which the new certificate is presented for registration; and provided, further, that no certificate for shares of stock shall be issued or delivered or, if issued or delivered, shall have any validity whatsoever until and unless it has been signed or authenticated in the manner provided in Section 11.2 hereof. (f) To make service and publication of all notices that may be necessary or proper, and without command or direction from anyone. In case of the absence, disability, refusal, or neglect of the Secretary to make service or publication of any notices, then such notices may be served and/or published by the President, a Vice President, any person 6 7 thereunto authorized by either of them, the Board of Directors, or the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the corporation. (g) Generally to do and perform all such duties as pertain to the office of Secretary and as may be required by the Board of Directors, ARTICLE VIII CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER The powers and duties of the Chief Financial Officer are: (a) To supervise and control the keeping and maintaining of adequate and correct accounts of the corporation's properties and business transactions, including accounts of its assets, liabilities, receipts, disbursements, gains,, losses, capital, retained earnings, and shares. The books of account shall at all reasonable times be open to inspection by any director, (b) To have the custody of all funds, securities evidences of indebtedness, and other valuable documents of the corporation, and, at the Chief Financial Officer's discretion, to cause any or all thereof to be deposited for the account of the corporation with such depositary as may be designated from time to time by the Board of Directors, (c) To receive or cause to be received, and to give or cause to be given, receipts and acquittances for moneys paid in for the account of the corporation. (d) To disburse, or cause to be disbursed, all funds of the corporation as may be directed by the Board of Directors, taking proper vouchers for such disbursements. (e) To render to the President and the Board of Directors, whenever they may require, accounts of all transactions and of the financial condition of the corporation. (f) Generally to do and perform all such duties as pertain to the office of Chief Financial Officer and as may be required by the Board of Directors, ARTICLE IX COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD Section 9.1. Appointment and Procedure. The Board of Directors may, by resolution adopted by a majority of the authorized number of directors, designate one or more committees, each consisting of at least two or more directors, to serve at the pleasure of the Board. The Board may designate one or more directors as alternate members of any committee, who may replace any absent member at any meeting of the committee. The appointment of members or alternate members of a committee requires the vote of a majority of the authorized number of directors. 7 8 Section 9.2. Powers. Any committee appointed by the Board of Directors, to the extent provided in the resolution of the Board or in these Bylaws, shall have all the authority of the Board except with respect to: (a) the approval of any action which requires the approval or vote of the shareholders; (b) the filling of vacancies on the Board or on any committee; (c) the fixing of compensation of the directors for serving on the Board or on any committee; (d) the amendment or repeal of Bylaws or the adoption of new Bylaws; (e) the amendment or repeal of any resolution of the Board which by its express terms is not so amendable or repealable; (f) a distribution as defined at Section 166 of the California Corporations Code, except at a rate or in a periodic amount or within a price range set forth in the Articles of Incorporation or determined by the Board; (g) the appointment of other committees of the Board or the members thereof. Section 9.3. Executive Committee. In the event that the Board of Directors appoints an Executive Committee, such Executive Committee, in all cases in which specific directions to the contrary shall not have been given by the Board of Directors, shall have and may exercise, during the intervals between the meetings of the Board of Directors, all the powers and authority of the Board of Directors in the management of the business and affairs of the corporation (except as provided in Section 9.2 hereof) in such manner as the Executive Committee may deem best for the interests of the corporation. ARTICLE X MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS Section 10.1. Place of Meetings. Meetings (whether regular, special, or adjourned) of shareholders of the corporation shall be held at the principal office for the transaction of business as specified in accordance with Section 1.1 hereof, or any place within or without the State which may be designated by written consent of all the shareholders entitled to vote thereat, or which may be designated by the Board of Directors. Section 10.2. Time of Annual Meetings. The annual meeting of the shareholders shall be held at the hour of 10:00 o'clock in the morning on the last day in March in each year, if not a legal holiday, and if a legal holiday, then on the next succeeding business day not a legal holiday, or such other time or date within fifteen months of the date of incorporation or the date of the last annual meeting of shareholders (whichever is later) as may be set by the Board of Directors. 8 9 Section 10.3. Special Meetings. Special meetings of the shareholders may be called by the Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Board, the President, or the holders of shares entitled to cast not less than 10% of the vote at the meeting. Section 10.4. Notice of Meetings. Whenever shareholders are required or permitted to take any action at a meeting, a written notice of the meeting shall be given not less than 10 (or, if sent by third-class mail, 30) nor more than 60 days before the day of the meeting to each shareholder entitled to vote thereat. Such notice shall state the place, date, and hour of the meeting and (a) in the case of a special meeting, the general nature of the business to be transacted, and no other business may be transacted, or (b) in the case of the annual meeting, those matters which the Board, at the time of the mailing of the notice, intends to present for action by the shareholders. The notice of any meeting at which directors are to be elected shall include the names of nominees intended at the time of the notice to be presented by the Board of Directors for election. Subject to the provisions of Section 10.8 hereof any matter properly brought before an annual meeting may be presented at the meeting for such action. To be properly brought before an annual meeting, business must be specified in the notice of meeting (or any supplement thereto) given by or at the direction of the Board of Directors, otherwise properly brought before the meeting by or at the direction of the Board of Directors or otherwise properly brought before the meeting by a shareholder. In addition to any other applicable requirements, for business to be properly brought before an annual meeting by a shareholder, the shareholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the secretary of the corporation. To be timely, a shareholder's notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the corporation, not less than 45 days nor more than 75 days prior to the date on which the corporation first mailed its proxy materials for the previous year's annual meeting of shareholders (or the date on which the corporation mails its proxy materials for the current year if during the prior year the corporation did not hold an annual meeting or if the date of the annual meeting was changed more than 30 days from the prior year). A shareholder's notice to the secretary shall set forth as to each matter the shareholder proposes to bring before the annual meeting (i) a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the annual meeting and the reasons for conducting such business at the annual meeting, (ii) the name and record address of the shareholder proposing such business, (iii) the class and number of shares of the corporation which are beneficially owned by the shareholder, and (iv) any material interest of the shareholder in such business. Notwithstanding anything in the Bylaws to the contrary, no business shall be conducted at the annual meeting except in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Section 10.4, provided, however, that nothing in this Section 10.4 shall be deemed to preclude discussion by any shareholder of any business properly brought before the annual meeting in accordance with said procedure. The chairman of an annual meeting shall, if the facts warrant, determine and declare to the meeting that business was not properly brought before the meeting in accordance with the provisions of this Section 10.4, and if he should so determine he shall so declare to the meeting, and any such business not properly brought before the meeting shall not be transacted. Nothing in this Section 10.4 shall affect the right of a shareholder to request inclusion of a proposal in the corporation's proxy statement to the extent that such right is provided by an applicable rule of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Section 10.5. Delivery of Notice. Notice of a shareholders' meeting or the furnishing of any report shall be given either personally or by first-class mail, or, if the corporation has outstanding 9 10 shares held of record by 500 or more persons on the record date for the shareholder's meeting, notice may be sent third-class mail, or other means of written communication, addressed to the shareholder at the address of such shareholder appearing on the books of the corporation or given by the shareholder to the corporation for the purpose of notice; or if no such address appears or is given, at the place where the principal executive office of the corporation is located or by publication at least once in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the principal executive office is located. The notice or report shall be deemed to have been given at the time when delivered personally or deposited in the mail or sent by other means of written communication. A verified statement of mailing of any notice or report in accordance with the provisions of this Section, executed by the secretary, assistant secretary, or any transfer agent, shall be prima facie evidence of the giving of the notice or report, If any notice or report addressed to the shareholders at the address of such shareholder appearing on the books of the corporation is returned to the corporation by United States Postal Service marked to indicate that the United States Postal Service is unable to deliver the notice or report to the shareholder at such address, all future notices or reports shall be deemed to have been duly given without further mailing if the same shall be available for the shareholder upon written demand of the shareholder at the principal executive office of the corporation for a period of one year from the date of the giving of the notice to all other shareholders. Section 10.6. Adjourned Meetings. When a shareholders' meeting is adjourned to another time or place, unless these Bylaws otherwise require, notice need not be given of the adjourned meeting if the time and place thereof is announced at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken. At the adjourned meeting the corporation may transact any business which might have been transacted at the original meeting. If the adjournment is for more than 45 days or if after the adjournment a new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting, a notice of the adjourned meeting shall be given to each shareholder of record entitled to vote at the meeting, Section 10.7. Consent to Shareholders' Meeting. The transactions of any meeting shareholders, however called and noticed, and wherever held, are as valid as though had at a meeting duly held after regular call and notice, if a quorum is present either in person or by proxy, and if, either before or after the meeting, each of the persons entitled to vote not present in person or by proxy signs a written waiver of notice or consent to the holding of the meeting or an approval of the minutes thereof. All such waivers, consents, and approvals shall be filed with the corporate records or made a part of the minutes of the meeting. Attendance of a person at a meeting shall constitute a waiver of notice of such meeting, except when the person objects, at the beginning of the meeting, to the transaction of any business because the meeting is not lawfully called or convened and except that attendance at a meeting is not a waiver of any right to object to the consideration of matters required by the California General Corporation Law to be included in the notice but not so included in the notice if such objection is expressly made at the meeting, Neither the business to be transacted at nor the purpose of any regular or special meeting of shareholders need be specified in any written notice, consent to the holding of the meeting or approval of the minutes thereof, unless otherwise provided in the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws, except as provided in Section 10.8. Section 10.8. Notice of Business to be Transacted in Certain Cases. Any shareholder approval at a meeting, other than unanimous approval by those entitled to vote, on any of the matters listed below shall be valid only if the general nature of the proposal so approved was stated in the notice of meeting or in any written waiver of notice: 10 11 (a) a proposal to approve a contract or other transaction between a corporation and one or more of its directors, or between a corporation and any corporation, firm, or association in which one or more director has a material financial interest; (b) a proposal to amend the Articles of Incorporation; (c) a proposal regarding a reorganization, mergers or consolidation involving the corporation; (d) a proposal to wind up and dissolve the corporation; (e) a proposal to adopt a plan of distribution of the shares, obligations, or securities of any other corporation, domestic or foreign, or assets other than money which is not in accordance with the liquidation rights of any preferred shares as specified in the Articles of Incorporation. Section 10.9. Quorum; Vote Required. 10.9.1. Quorum Required. The presence in person or by proxy of the persons entitled to vote a majority of the voting shares at any meeting shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. If a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented and voting at a duly held meeting at which a quorum is present (which shares voting affirmatively also constitute at least a majority of the required quorum) shall be the act of the shareholders, unless the vote of a greater number or voting by classes is required by law, the Articles of Incorporation, or these Bylaws, and except as provided in subsection 10.9.2. 10.9.2. Continuation of Business Despite Lack of Quorum. The shareholders present at a duly called or held meeting at which a quorum is present may continue to transact business until adjournment notwithstanding the withdrawal of the number of enough shareholders to leave less than a quorum, if any action taken (other than adjournment) is approved by at least a majority of the shares required to constitute a quorum. 10.9.3. No Votes Without Quorum. In the absence of a quorum, any meeting of shareholders may be adjourned from time to time by the vote of a majority of the shares represented either in person or by proxy, but no other business may be transacted, except as provided in subsection 10.9.2. Section 10.10. Actions Without Meeting. 10.10.1. Majority Consent. Any action which may be taken at any annual or special meeting of shareholders may be taken without a meeting and without prior notices if a consent in writing, setting forth the action so taken, shall be signed by the holders of outstanding shares having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted; provided that, subject to the provisions of Section 2.6, directors may not be elected by written consent except by unanimous written consent of all shares entitled to vote for the election of directors. 11 12 10.10.2. Notice to Nonconsenting Shareholders. Unless the consents of all shareholders entitled to vote have been solicited in writing, (a) notice of any shareholder approval on matters described in subsections (a), (c), or (e) of section 10.8 or respecting indemnification of agents of the corporation without a meeting by less than unanimous written consent shall be given at least ten (10) days before the consummation of the action authorized by such approval, and (b) prompt notice shall be given of the taking of any other corporate action approved by shareholders without a meeting by less than unanimous written consent, to those shareholders entitled to vote but who have not consented in writing; the provisions of Section 10.5 shall apply to such notice. Section 10.11. Revocation of Consent. Any shareholder giving a written consent, or the shareholder's proxy-holders, or a transferee of the shares or a personal representative of the shareholder or their respective proxy-holders, may revoke the consent by a writing received by the corporation prior to the time that written consents of the number of shares required to authorize the proposed action have been filed with the secretary of the corporation, but may not do so thereafter. Such revocation is effective upon its receipt by the secretary of the corporation. Section 10.12. Voting Rights. Except as provided in Section 10.14, in the Articles of Incorporation, or in any statute relating to the election of directors or to other particular matters, each outstanding share, regardless of class, shall be entitled to one vote on each matter submitted to a vote of shareholders. Any holder of shares entitled to vote on any matter may vote part of the shares in favor of the proposal and refrain from voting the remaining shares or vote them against the proposal, other than elections to office, but, if the shareholder fails to specify the number of shares such shareholder is voting affirmatively, it will be conclusively presumed that the shareholder's approving vote is with respect to all shares such shareholder is entitled to vote. Section 10.13. Determination of Holders of Record. 10.13.1. Record Date. In order that the corporation may determine the shareholders entitled to notice of any meeting, to vote, to receive payment of any dividend or other distribution or allotment of any rights, or to exercise any rights in respect of any other lawful action, the Board of Directors may fix, in advance, a record date, which shall not be more than 60 nor less than 10 days prior to the date of such meeting nor more than 60 days prior to any other action. 10.13.2. Absence of Determination By Board. In the absence of any record date set by the Board of Directors pursuant to subsection 10.13.1 above, then: (a) The record date for determining shareholders entitled to notice of or to vote at a meeting of shareholders shall be at the close of business on the business day next preceding the day on which notice is given or, if notice is waived, at the close of business on the business day next preceding the day on which the meeting is held, (b) The record date for determining shareholders entitled to give consent to corporate action in writing without a meeting, when no prior action by the Board has been taken, shall be the day on which the first written consent is given. 12 13 (c) The record date for determining share holders for any other purpose shall be at the close of business on the day on which the Board adopts the resolution relating thereto, or the 60th day prior to the date of such other action, whichever is later. 10.13.3. Adjournments. A determination of shareholders of record entitled to notice of or to a vote at a meeting of shareholders shall apply to any adjournment of the meeting unless the Board fixes a new record date for the adjourned meeting, but the Board shall fix a new record date if the meeting is adjourned for more than 45 days from the date set for the original meeting. 10.13.4. Effect of Post Record Date Transfers. Shareholders at the close of business on the record date are entitled to notice and to vote or to receive the dividend, distribution, or allotment of rights or to exercise the rights, as the case may be, notwithstanding any transfer of any shares on the books of the corporation after the record date, except as otherwise provided in the Articles, these Bylaws, agreement, or applicable law. Section 10.14. Elections for Directors. 10.14.0 Right to Cumulate. Every shareholder complying with subsection 10.14.2 and normally entitled to vote at any election of directors may cumulate such shareholder's votes and give one candidate a number of votes equal to the number of directors to be elected multiplied by the number of votes to which the shareholder's shares are entitled, or distribute the shareholder's votes on the same principle among as many candidates as the shareholder thinks fit. 10.14.2. Procedure for Cumulating Votes, No shareholder shall be entitled to cumulate votes (i.e., cast for any candidate a number of votes greater than the number of the votes which such shareholder normally is entitled to cast) unless such candidate or candidates' names have been placed in nomination prior to the voting and the shareholder has given written notice to the chairman of the meeting at the meeting prior to the voting of the shareholder's intention to cumulate the shareholder's votes. If any one shareholder has given such notice, all shareholders may cumulate their votes for candidates in nomination. 10.14.3. Directors Elected. In any election of directors, the candidates receiving the highest number of affirmative votes of the shares entitled to be voted for them up to the number of directors to elected by such shares are elected; votes against directors and votes withheld shall have no effect. 10.14.4. Ballot Optional. Elections for directors need not be by ballot unless a shareholder demands election by ballot at the meeting and before the voting begins. Section 10.15. Proxies. 10.15.1. Proxies Authorized. Every person entitled to vote shares may authorize another person or persons to act by proxy with respect to such shares, Any proxy purporting to be executed in accordance with the provisions of the General Corporation Law of the State of California shall be presumptively valid. 13 14 10.15.2. Term of Proxy. No proxy shall be valid after the expiration of 11 months from the date thereof unless otherwise provided in the proxy. Every proxy continues in full force and effect until revoked by the person executing it prior to the vote pursuant thereto, except as otherwise provided in this Section. Such revocation may be effected by a writing delivered to the corporation stating that the proxy is revoked or by a subsequent proxy executed by the person executing the prior proxy and presented to the meeting, or as to any meeting by attendance at such meeting and voting in person by the person executing the proxy. The dates contained on the forms of proxy presumptively determine the order of execution, regardless of the postmark dates on the envelopes in which they are mailed. 10.15.3. Death of Proxy Maker. A proxy is not revoked by the death or incapacity of the maker unless, before the vote is counted, written notice of such death or incapacity is received by the corporation. Section 10.16. Inspectors of Election. 10.16.1. Appointment. In advance of any meeting of shareholders, the Board may appoint inspectors of election to act at the meeting and any adjournment thereof. If inspectors of election are not so appointed, or if any persons so appointed fail to appear or refuse to act, the chairman of any meeting of shareholders may, and on the request of any shareholder or a shareholder's proxy shall, appoint inspectors of election (or persons to replace those who so fail or refuse) at the meeting. The number of inspectors shall be either one or three. If appointed at a meeting on the request of one or more shareholders or proxies, the majority of shares represented in person or by proxy shall determine whether one or three inspectors are to be appointed, 10.16.2. Duties. The inspectors of election shall determine the number of shares outstanding and the voting power of each, the shares represented at the meeting, the existence of a quorum, the authenticity, validity, and effect of proxies, receive votes, ballots, or consents, hear and determine all challenges and questions in any way arising in connection with the right to vote, count, and tabulate all votes and consents, determine when the polls shall close, determine the result, and do such acts as may be proper to conduct the election or vote with fairness to all shareholders. 10.16.3. Good Faith; Acts. The inspectors of election shall perform their duties impartially, in good faith, to the best of their ability, and as expeditiously as is practical. If there are three inspectors of election, the decision, act, or certificate of a majority is effective in all respects as the decision, act, or certificate of all. Any report or certificate made by the inspectors of election is prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein. ARTICLE XI SUNDRY PROVISIONS Section 11.1. Shares Held by the Corporation. Shares in other corporations standing in the name of this corporation may be voted or represented and all rights incident thereto may be exercised on behalf of this corporation by the President or by any other officer of this corporation authorized so to do by resolution of the Board of Directors. 14 15 Section 11.2. Certificates of Stock. There shall be issued to each holder of fully paid shares of the capital stock of the corporation a certificate or certificates for such shares. Every holder of shares in the corporation shall be entitled to have a certificate signed in the name of the corporation by the Chairman or Vice Chairman of the Board, the President, or a Vice President and by the Chief Financial Officer, an Assistant Treasurer, the Secretary, or any Assistant Secretary, certifying the number of shares and the class or series of shares owned by the shareholder. Any or all of the signatures on the certificates may be facsimile. In case any officer, transfer agent, or registrar who has signed or whose facsimile signature has been placed upon a certificate shall have ceased to be such officer, transfer agent, or registrar before such certificate is issued, it may be issued by the corporation with the same effect as if such person were an officer, transfer agent, or registrar at the date of issue. Section 11.3. Lost Certificates. The corporation may issue a new share certificate or a new certificate for any other security in the place of any certificate theretofore issued by it, alleged to have been lost, stolen, or destroyed, and the corporation may require the owner of the lost, stolen, or destroyed certificate or the owner's legal representative to give the corporation a bond (or other adequate security) sufficient to indemnify it against any claim that may be made against it (including any expense or liability) on account of the alleged loss, theft, or destruction of any such certificate or the issuance of such new certificate. The Board of Directors may adopt such other provisions and restrictions with reference to lost certificates, not inconsistent with applicable law, as it shall in its discretion deem appropriate. Section 11.4. Certification and Inspection of Bylaws. The corporation shall keep at its principal executive office in this state, or if its principal executive office is not in this state at its principal business office in this state, the original or a copy of these Bylaws as amended to date, which shall be open to inspection by the shareholders at all reasonable times during office hours. If the principal executive office of the corporation is outside this state and the corporation has no principal business office in this state, it shall upon the written request of any shareholder furnish to such shareholder a copy of the Bylaws as amended to date. Section 11.5. Notices. Any reference in these Bylaws to the time a notice is given or sent means, unless otherwise expressly provided, the time a written notice by mail is deposited in the United States mails, postage prepaid; or the time any other written notice is personally delivered to the recipient or is delivered to a common carrier for transmission, or actually transmitted by the person giving the notice by electronic means, to the recipient; or the time any oral notice is communicated, in person or by telephone or wireless, to the recipient or to a person at the office of the recipient who the person giving the notice has reason to believe will promptly communicate it to the recipient. Section 11.6. Reports to Shareholders, Except as may otherwise be required by law, the rendition of an annual report to the shareholders is waived so long as there are less than 100 holders of record of the shares of the corporation (determined as provided in Section 605 of the California General Corporation Law), At such time or times, if any, that the corporation has 100 or more holders of record of its shares, the Board of Directors shall cause an annual report to be sent to the shareholders not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year or within such shorter time period as may be required by applicable law, and such annual report shall contain such information and be accompanied by such other documents as may be required by applicable law, Section 11.7. Indemnification of Directors, Officers, and Employees. 11.7.1. "Agent." For the purposes of this Section, "agent" means any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or other agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the 15 16 request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee, or agent of another foreign or domestic corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise, or was a director, officer, employee, or agent of a foreign or domestic corporation which was a predecessor corporation of the corporation, or of another enterprise at the request of such predecessor corporation; "proceeding" means any threatened, pending, or completed action or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative; and "expenses" includes without limitation attorneys' fees and any expenses of establishing a right to indemnification under subsection 11.7.4 or paragraph (c) of subsection 11.7.5. 11.7.2. Indemnification For Third Party Claims. Subject to the specific determination required by subsection 11.7.5, the corporation shall indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any proceeding (other than an action by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor) by reason of the fact that such person is or was an agent of the corporation, against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements, and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with such proceeding if such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the corporation and, in the case of a criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe the conduct of such person was unlawful. The termination of any proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contenders or its equivalent shall not, of itself, create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith or in a manner which the person reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the corporation or that the person had reasonable cause to believe that the person's conduct was unlawful. 11.7.3. Indemnification For Claims By the Corporation. Subject to the specific determination required by subsection 11.7.5, the corporation shall indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending, or completed action by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that such person is or was an agent of the corporation, against expenses actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with the defense or settlement of such action if such person acted in good faith, in a manner such person believed to be in the best interests of the corporation, and with such care, including reasonable inquiry, as an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. No indemnification shall be made under this subsection 11.7.3: (a) In respect of any claim, issue, or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation in the performance of such person's duty to the corporation, unless and only to the extent that the court in which such proceeding is or was pending shall determine upon application that, in view of all the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for the expenses which such court shall determine; (b) Of amounts paid in settling or otherwise disposing of a threatened or pending action, with or without court approval; or (c) Of expenses incurred in defending a threatened or pending action which is settled or otherwise disposed of without court approval. 11.7.4. Indemnification For Successful Defense. To the extent that an agent of a corporation has been successful on the merits in defense of any proceeding referred to in subsection 11.7.2 or 11.7.3 or in defense of any claim, issue, or matter therein, the agent shall be indemnified against expenses actually and reasonably incurred by the agent in connection therewith. 16 17 11.7.5. Determination Required to Permit Indemnification. Except as provided in subsection 11.7.4, any indemnification under this Section shall be made by the corporation only if authorized in the specific case, upon a determination that indemnification of the agent is proper in the circumstances because the agent has met the applicable standard of conduct set forth in subsection 11.7.2 or 11.7.3, by: (a) A majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who are not parties to such proceeding; (b) Approval of the shareholders, with the shares owned by the person to be indemnified not being entitled to vote thereon; or (c) The court in which such proceeding is or was pending upon application made by the corporation or the agent or the attorney or other person rendering services in connection with the defense, whether or not such application by the agent, attorney, or other person is opposed by the corporation. 11.7.6. Advances of Expenses. Expenses incurred in defending any proceeding may be advanced by the corporation prior to the final disposition of such proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the agent to repay such amount unless it shall be determined ultimately that the agent is entitled to be indemnified as authorized in this Section. 11.7.7. Prohibition of Nonconforming Arrangements. No provision made by the corporation to indemnify its or its subsidiary's directors or officers for the defense of any proceeding, whether contained in a resolution of shareholders or directors, an agreement, or otherwise, shall be valid unless consistent with this Section, Nothing contained in this Section shall affect any right to indemnification to which persons other than such directors and officers may be entitled by contract or otherwise. 11.7.8. Prohibitions on Indemnification, No indemnification or advance shall be made under this Section, except as provided in subsection 11.7.4 or paragraph (c) of subsection 11.7.5, in any circumstance where it appears: (a) That it would be inconsistent with a provision of the Articles, Bylaws, a resolution of the shareholders, or an agreement in effect at the time of the accrual of the alleged cause of action asserted in the proceeding in which the expenses were incurred or other amounts were paid, which prohibits or otherwise limits indemnification; or (b) That it would be inconsistent with any condition expressly imposed by a court in approving a settlement. 11.7.9. Insurance. The corporation shall have the power to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any agent of the corporation against any liability asserted against or incurred by the agent in such capacity or arising out of the agent's status as such whether or not the corporation would have the power to indemnify the agent against such liability under the provisions of this Section. 17 18 11.7.10. Application of Other Laws, Nothing in this Section shall restrict the power of the corporation to indemnify its agents under any provision of law from time to time applicable to the corporation, nor shall anything in this Section authorize the corporation to indemnify its agents in situations prohibited by law. Section 11.8. Loans to Officers. The Board may approve loans of money or property to, and guaranties of the obligations of, officers of the corporation, and may adopt employee benefit plans authorizing such loans and guaranties to officers of the corporation, without the approval of the shareholders of the corporation, provided that: (a) the corporation has outstanding shares held of record by more than 100 persons; (b) the vote of any interested director or directors is not counted; and (c) the Board determines that such loan, guaranty, or plan may reasonably be expected to benefit the corporation. ARTICLE XII CONSTRUCTION OF BYLAWS WITH REFERENCE TO PROVISIONS OF LAW Section 12.1. Definitions. Unless defined otherwise in these Bylaws or unless the context otherwise requires, terms used herein shall have the same meaning, if any, ascribed thereto in the California General Corporation Law, as amended from time to time. Section 12.2. Bylaw Provisions Additional and Supplemental to Provisions of Law. All restrictions, limitations, requirements, and other provisions of these Bylaws shall be construed, insofar as possible, as supplemental and additional to all provisions of law applicable to the subject matter thereof and shall be fully complied with in addition to the said provisions of law unless such compliance shall be illegal. Section 12.3. Bylaw Provisions Contrary to or Inconsistent with Provisions of Law. Any article, section, subsection, paragraph, subparagraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of these Bylaws which upon being construed in the manner provided in Section 12.2 hereof shall be contrary to or inconsistent with any applicable provision of law shall not apply so long as said provision of law shall remain in effect, but such result shall not affect the validity or applicability of any other portions of these Bylaws, it being hereby declared that these Bylaws would have been adopted and each article, section, subsection, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more articles, sections, subsections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases is or are illegal. ARTICLE XIII ADOPTION, AMENDMENT, OR REPEAL OF BYLAWS Section 13.1. By Shareholders. Bylaws may be adopted, amended, or repealed by the approval of the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of the corporation entitled to vote. 18 19 Section 13.2. By the Board of Directors. Subject to the right of shareholders to adopt, amend, or repeal Bylaws, Bylaws other than a Bylaw or amendment thereof changing the authorized number of directors or any provision of this Article XIII may be adopted, amended, or repealed by the Board of Directors. A Bylaw adopted by the shareholders may restrict or eliminate the power of the Board of Directors to adopt, amend, or repeal any or all Bylaws. 19 EX-10.19.1 4 SEKI TECHNOTRON CORPORATION TERMINATION AGMT. 1 EXHIBIT 10.19.1 TERMINATION AGREEMENT THIS TERMINATION AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is entered into as of July 1, 1998, by and between Novellus Systems, Inc., a California corporation ("Manufacturer"), and Seki Technotron Corporation ("Distributor"). RECITALS A. Manufacturer and Distributor entered into that certain Distribution Agreement dated January 1, 1996 (the "Distribution Agreement"), pursuant to which Distributor agreed to distribute certain products of Manufacturer, upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Distribution Agreement. All capitalized terms used herein, but not defined, shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Distribution Agreement. B. Pursuant to the Distribution Agreement, the term thereof is not scheduled to expire prior to December 31, 1999. However, Distributor has requested Manufacturer to agree to terminate the Distribution Agreement effective July 1, 1998, and to transition the customer support obligations to Manufacturer as set forth below. C. Manufacturer has agreed to Distributor's request, conditioned on, among other things, Distributor's execution and delivery of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Manufacturer and Distributor hereby agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Termination of Distribution Agreement. (a) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Distribution Agreement, the Distribution Agreement shall terminate effective July 1, 1998 (the "Termination Date"), and, except solely as provided herein, neither party shall have any further rights, interests, liabilities, responsibilities or obligations thereunder from and after the Termination Date. Except as provided in Sections 1(b), 2 and 3 below, the Distribution Agreement shall continue in full force and effect, unmodified hereby, until the Termination Date. (b) Notwithstanding Section 3.02 of the Distribution Agreement, no later than the Termination Date, Distributor shall pay to Manufacturer (i) all amounts owed by Distributor to Manufacturer pursuant to Section 3.01 of the Distribution Agreement for all Products purchased by Distributor on or prior to the Termination Date, and (ii) all 1 2 other amounts owed by Distributor to Manufacturer pursuant to the Distribution Agreement. (c) On the Termination Date, Distributor shall immediately deliver to Manufacturer all books, records, computer disks, manuals, logs, notes, factory automation interface software, drawings, designs, intangible property (including, without limitation, all trade secrets, know-how, proprietary rights and processes and other intellectual property and all documents, computer discs or other media relating to such intellectual property), accounts, and other documents, data and information, of whatever nature, (i) created or maintained by Distributor and relating to the Products (including the sale or servicing thereof), or (ii) provided by Manufacturer to Distributor, except to the extent such items have previously been delivered by Distributor to Manufacturer pursuant to Section 2(a) below. Without limiting any other provision of this Agreement, effective on the Termination Date, Distributor shall have no further right to retain or use any of the foregoing items, all of which are acknowledged and agreed to be Manufacturer's sole property. 2. Transfer of Service Obligations. (a) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Distribution Agreement, all Product repair and service rights and obligations of Distributor under the Distribution Agreement with respect to Products sold to and installed for Fujitsu, as of the date hereof, terminated effective May 1, 1998 (the "Fujitsu Service Transfer Date"), and, from and after such date, Distributor shall have no further obligation or right to perform such services, all of which obligations and rights shall be assumed by Manufacturer effective as of such date. Distributor represents and warrants that it has transferred to Manufacturer all customer service accounts and other books and records related to Product servicing maintained by Distributor with respect to Products sold to Fujitsu by Distributor. (b) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Distribution Agreement, all Product repair and service rights and obligations of Distributor under the Distribution Agreement (other than all such rights and obligations described in Section 2(a) above) shall terminate effective July 1, 1998 (the "General Service Transfer Date"), and, from and after such date, Distributor shall have no further obligation or right to perform such services, all of which obligations and rights shall be assumed by Manufacturer effective as of such date. Prior to the General Service Transfer Date, Distributor shall transfer to Manufacturer all customer service accounts and other books and records related to Product servicing maintained by Distributor (other than all such accounts books and records previously transferred pursuant to Section 2(a) above). (c) The parties hereby agree that the aggregate outstanding warranty and service obligations of Distributor being transferred to and assumed by Manufacturer are valued at 216 million Japanese Yen, which amount shall be payable to Manufacturer by Distributor on the date hereof (the "Warranty and Service Obligation"). 2 3 3. Backlog. (a) Notwithstanding Section 13.02 of the Distribution Agreement or any other provision therein to the contrary, no commission, fee or other payment shall be made by Manufacturer with respect to Distributor's backlog as of the Termination Date, except as follows: (i) Manufacturer shall pay to Distributor a sales commission of 5% of the Net Invoice Price (as hereinafter defined), if, as and when received by Manufacturer, for each sale originated by Distributor and in Distributor's backlog, provided that, as of the Termination Date, Manufacturer has received a hard copy acceptable purchase order (or a customer-issued, signed and priced acceptable letter of intent) for such sale and has recorded such sale on its books (the receipt of such a purchase order or such a letter of intent and the recordation of the applicable sale on Manufacturer's books, "Booked"), provided that Manufacturer receives payment in full for such Product no later than twelve (12) months after the applicable Product is installed at the customer's site; and (ii) with respect to the sale of each of the Products specified on Schedule 3 attached hereto to the customers specified on Schedule 3, Manufacturer shall pay to Distributor a sales commission equal to the percentage of the Net Invoice Price received by Manufacturer for such Product (if, as and when received by Manufacturer) calculated in accordance with Schedule 3, provided that Manufacturer shall have no obligation to pay any commission to Distributor pursuant to this clause (ii) with respect to (x) any such sale that is not Booked on or prior to December 31, 1998, and (y) any sale that is Booked on or prior to December 31, 1998, but with respect to which Manufacturer does not receive full payment from the applicable customer on or prior to the date that is twelve (12) months after the date the applicable Product is installed at the customer's site. All commissions payable by Manufacturer pursuant to this Section 3(a) shall be payable, if at all, within thirty (30) days after the date on which Manufacturer receives full payment for the Product sale in question. For the purposes hereof, the term "Net Invoice Price" shall mean the total invoice price of the applicable item minus (1) applicable customs duties, (2) transportation costs, and (3) value added taxes. (b) Distributor shall (i) during the remainder of 1998, provide Manufacturer with reasonable sales support, consistent with the amount of commissions anticipated to be received by Distributor pursuant to Section 3(a) above, for Manufacturer to sell Products to Distributor's existing Products customer base, and (ii) without limiting Section 6 below, not take any action, or permit to be taken any action within Distributor's reasonable control, the effect of which harms or impairs or could reasonably harm or impair Manufacturer's marketing or sales activities in the Territory. Without limiting the generality of clause (i) above, during the period from the Termination Date through and including December 31, 1998, Distributor shall cause, at no cost to Manufacturer (except solely for expense reimbursements to the extent provided herein), M. Furuyama, Distributor's employee, to provide sales and marketing assistance to Manufacturer in the Territory, as and when requested by Manufacturer, provided that M. Furuyama's obligation shall be limited to such assistance full time (x) two (2) days per week during each week commencing with the week in which the Termination Date occurs through and including the week in which September 26, 1998 occurs, and (y) one day per week during each week thereafter through and including the week in which December 31, 1998 3 4 occurs; provided that, in the event that M. Furuyama or Distributor has a conflicting obligation regarding M. Furuyama's availability, Distributor retains the right to allocate M. Furuyama's services solely at Distributor's discretion after August 31, 1998. In that event, Distributor will promptly provide Manufacturer with a schedule of M. Furuyama's availability. Manufacturer will reimburse Distributor reasonable travel and actual expenses incurred by M. Furuyama as a result of providing such sales and marketing assistance to Manufacturer. Manufacturer acknowledges that Distributor does not represent or warrant that the Services provided will be useful or effective in achieving Manufacturer's goal. If Distributor materially breaches any of its covenants pursuant to this Section 3(b), then, without limiting any other rights of Manufacturer, under this Agreement, at law or in equity, Manufacturer's obligations under Sections 3(a) and 4 shall immediately terminate and be of no further force or effect. (c) Until March 31, 2001, Distributor will have the right to engage, at its own expense, an independent auditor reasonably acceptable to Manufacturer to examine Manufacturer's records to verify (i) the amounts of commissions payable to Distributor pursuant to Section 3(a) above, and (ii) the amount of any sums payable to Distributor pursuant to Section 4 below. Such audits may be conducted no more frequently than once in any fiscal year, and shall be performed during Manufacturer's normal business hours on not less than three (3) days prior written notice once. Any overpayments or underpayments revealed by any such audit shall be paid, without interest, by the party responsible therefor within thirty (30) days after receipt of such audit by such party. 4. Spare Parts Inventory; Demonstration Unit. On the Termination Date, Manufacturer shall purchase all Distributors inventory of spare parts for Products, all of which inventory is listed on Schedule 4 attached hereto, for an aggregate purchase price of 216 million Japanese Yen (together with reasonable out-of-pocket transportation costs incurred to transport such parts to Manufacturer's facility), which purchase price shall be offset against the Warranty and Service Obligation. 5. Facility Lease. Effective on the Termination Date, Distributor shall assign to Manufacturer the lease pursuant to which Distributor occupies and uses its field service office in Wakamatsu, Japan, provided that, if its consent is required by the terms of such leases or other agreements, the lessor under such lease consents to such assignment. Distributor shall use its reasonable commercial efforts to obtain any such consent and Manufacturer shall reasonably cooperate with such efforts. Manufacturer shall assume all obligations under such lease accruing from facts or circumstances first occurring from and after the date of such assignment (including, without limitation, all rent accrued and payable with respect to periods from and after the date of such assignment). Provided that such assignment occurs, Manufacturer shall promptly reimburse Distributor for all rent, taxes and insurance premiums paid by Distributor under such lease for all periods from and after the Termination Date. To the extent that Manufacturer makes use of such premises prior to the Termination Date, the parties shall agree on an equitable reimbursement amount for Manufacturer's use of such facilities. Distributor and Manufacturer agree to execute any documents necessary to facilitate such transfer. Manufacturer further agrees, to the extent the lease requires that Distributor remain liable 4 5 while Manufacturer utilizes such premises, Manufacturer shall defend, indemnify and hold Distributor harmless from and against any liability, claim, suit, costs or damages (including reasonable attorneys' fees) arising out of Manufacturer's occupation of the premises or Manufacturer's acts or omissions therein. 6. Release. In consideration of Manufacturer's agreement to terminate the Distribution Agreement prior to its scheduled expiration, Distributor hereby irrevocably and forever releases Manufacturer (and its subsidiaries and affiliates) from any and all claims, costs, liabilities, losses, damages, responsibilities, obligations and expenses, liquidated or unliquidated, fixed or contingent, foreseeable or unforeseeable, with respect to the Distribution Agreement, or arising from or due to the performance (or failure of performance) by Manufacturer or its subsidiaries of any provision of the Distribution Agreement, accruing with respect to facts and circumstances first occurring prior to the date hereof. With the exception of any costs, losses, expenses, damages or liabilities incurred by Manufacturer due to or arising as a result of (a) modifications made to Products by or on behalf of Distributor, including, without limitation, CIM interface software made by, or under contract to Distributor, or (b) commitments made, or obligations incurred, by Distributor to customers which are outside of Manufacturer's standard terms and conditions, Manufacturer hereby irrevocably and forever releases Distributor (and its subsidiaries and affiliates) from any and all claims, costs, liabilities, losses, damages, responsibilities, obligations and expenses, liquidated or unliquidated, fixed or contingent, foreseeable or unforeseeable, with respect to the Distribution Agreement, or arising from or due to the performance (or failure of performance) by Distributor or its subsidiaries of any provision of the Distribution Agreement, accruing with respect to facts and circumstances first occurring prior to the date hereof. 7. Noncompete; Confidentiality. (a) Prior to January 1, 2000, Distributor shall not, without the prior written consent of Manufacturer (which consent Manufacturer may grant or withhold in its sole discretion), (i) manufacture, sell, supply, distribute, service, repair, upgrade or otherwise use, handle or deal with, in any manner, products in Japan (or spare parts or components of products, other than such spare parts or components manufactured by or on behalf of Manufacturer or its subsidiaries or affiliates) which, in Manufacturer's reasonable judgment, are similar to or competitive with any products of the Manufacturer or its subsidiaries or affiliates, or (ii) agree to do any of the foregoing. For the purposes of this paragraph, prohibited products include all Products, including CVD equipment and processes, PVD equipment and processed, and copper electroplating equipment and processes. Without limiting the foregoing, if, at any time prior to such date, Distributor takes any of the actions described in clauses (i) or (ii) above, then, without limiting any remedies available to Manufacturer, under this Agreement, at law or in equity, for a breach by Distributor of its obligations pursuant to the preceding sentence, Manufacturer's obligations pursuant to Section 3(a) shall immediately terminate and be of no further force or effect. 5 6 (b) At all times from and after the Termination Date, Distributor shall hold in strict confidence and not use or disclose to others, any technical, business or financial information or data, manufacturing technique, process, trade secret, know-how or other intellectual property or proprietary rights of Manufacturer or its subsidiaries or affiliates, whether or not any of such items have been identified as confidential by Manufacturer. 8. Notices. All notices and other communications in connection with this Agreement shall be delivered in the form, in the manner and to the addresses set forth in Section 22 of the Distribution Agreement. 9. Survival of Provisions; Incorporation by Reference. The following provisions of the Distribution Agreement shall survive the termination thereof on the Termination Date and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference: Section 3.03 (Currency); Section 6 (Warranty) (other than the last sentence of the first paragraph of such Section and the last paragraph of such Section); Section 9 (Intellectual Property); Section 10 (Relationship of Parties); Section 16 (Export-Import Laws); Section 17 (Limitation on Liability); Section 18 (Governing Law); Section 19 (Arbitration); Section 20 (Severability of Provisions); Section 21 (Waiver of Compliance). Section 7 (Products Liability) is also hereby incorporated herein by this reference, provided that, Manufacturer's obligations under such Section shall continue until the date that is ten (10) years after the Termination Date. All references in such incorporated provisions to the term "Agreement" shall mean this Agreement. 10. Entire Agreement; Assignment This Agreement and, solely to the extent provided herein, the Distribution Agreement, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the matters discussed herein, and supercedes and replaces all prior oral or written agreements, negotiations, discussions or understandings. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of the Distribution Agreement (including any provision thereof incorporated herein by reference pursuant to Section 9 above), the provisions of this Agreement shall control. This Agreement may not be assigned by Distributor (by operation of law or otherwise). 11. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which, taken together, constitute one and the same document. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. MANUFACTURER: NOVELLUS SYSTEM, INC. By: ------------------------------------- Name: ------------------------------------- Title: ------------------------------------- 6 7 DISTRIBUTOR: SEKI TECHNOTRON CORPORATION By: ------------------------------------- Name: ----------------------------------- Title: ---------------------------------- 7 8 SCHEDULE 3
COMPANY PRODUCT PRICE - ------- ------- ----- Hamahoto Photonics C-150 $1,210,000 FASL D-Altus $2,300,000 Fujitsu Mie Low K $2,875,000 Fujitsu Mie Ta(2)O(5) $2,200,000 Fujitsu Mie Speed M $1,100,000 Fujitsu Mie Speed/Seq $3,100,000 Fujitsu Mie D-Speed $2,800,000 Fujitsu Mie D-Speed $2,800,000 Fujitsu Mie D-Speed $2,800,000 Fujitsu Mie Sequel $1,704,000 Fujitsu Mie Sequel $1,704,000 Fujitsu Mie D-Altus $2,954,000 Fujitsu Mie D-Altus $2,954,000 Fujitsu Wakamatsu Speed M $1,100,000 Fujitsu Iwate C1-W $1,600,000 MEC Kyoto Speed $1,800,000 MEC Tonami D-Sequel $2,600,000 MEC Tonami D-Speed $3,022,000 MEC Tonami D-Speed $3,022,000 MEC Tonami D-Speed $3,022,000 MEC Tonami C3-DSP/Seq $4,400,000 MEC Tonami C3-Altus $2,400,000 MEC Tonami C3-DSP/Seq $4,400,000 MEC Tonami C3-Altus $2,400,000 MEC Tonami C3-Sequel $2,400,000 MEC Tonami C3-Sequel $2,400,000 MEC Tonami C3-Sequel $2,400,000 MEC Uozu C-150 $1,200,000 Rohm Kyoto C-150 $1,200,000 Rohm Apollo C1-200 $1,500,000 Rohm Apollo C1-200 $1,500,000 Rohm Apollo C1-W $1,500,000 Toko C1-150 $1,600,000 Yamaha D-Sequel $2,700,000 Yamaha D-Altus $2,600,000 Yamaha Speed $1,600,000
Commission Formula* 5% for sales Booked on or before June 26, 1998 (Novellus 2nd Quarter) 4% for sales Booked on or before September 26, 1998 (Novellus 3rd Quarter) 2% for sales Booked on or before December 31, 1998 (Novellus 4th Quarter) *The applicable commission shall be reduced by 10% for each 1% decrease in the price of the applicable Product below 90% of the price listed in column 3 above with respect to that Product. 8
EX-10.27 5 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT DATED OCTOBER 1, 1998 1 EXHIBIT 10.27 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT This Employment Agreement ("Agreement"), entered into effective October 1, 1998, is between Novellus Systems, Inc., a California corporation (the "Company"), and Richard Hill ("Executive") (collectively, "the parties"). RECITALS 1. Executive has been employed by the Company and is currently serving as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. 2. The Company desires to continue to employ Executive and to assure itself of the continued services of Executive for the term of this Agreement, and Executive desires to be employed by the Company for such period, upon the following terms and conditions. AGREEMENT ACCORDINGLY, the parties agree as follows: 1. PERIOD OF EMPLOYMENT a. BASIC TERM. The Company shall continue to employ Executive to render services to the Company in the position and with the duties and responsibilities described in Section 2 from the date of this Agreement through December 31, 2001 (the "Term Date"), unless Executive's employment is terminated sooner in accordance with Section 4 below. 2. POSITION, DUTIES, RESPONSIBILITIES a. POSITION: Executive is employed by the Company to render services to the Company in the position of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and shall perform all services appropriate to that position, as well as such other services as may reasonably be assigned by the Company. Executive shall devote his best efforts and full-time attention to the performance of his duties. Executive shall report to the Board of Directors of the Company. b. OTHER ACTIVITIES. Except upon the prior written consent of the Company, Executive will not (i) accept any other employment, or (ii) engage, directly or indirectly, in any other business activity (whether or not pursued for pecuniary advantage) that is or may be in conflict with, or that might place Executive in a conflicting position to that of, the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, while the Company does not request Executive's service on the boards of directors of other corporations, the Company does not, in principle, object to such service where Executive would have no conflict of interest with duties owed to the Company. c. PROPRIETARY INFORMATION. "Proprietary Information" is all information and any idea in whatever form, tangible or intangible, pertaining in any manner to the business of the Company, or any Affiliate, or its employees, clients, consultants, or business associates, 1 2 which was produced by any employee of the Company, or any Affiliate, in the course of his or her employment or otherwise produced or acquired by or on behalf of the Company, or any Affiliate. All Proprietary Information not generally known outside of the Company's organization, and all Proprietary Information so known only through improper means, shall be deemed "Confidential Information." Without limiting the foregoing definition, Proprietary and Confidential Information shall include, but not be limited to: (i) formulas, teaching and development techniques, processes, trade secrets, computer programs, electronic codes, inventions, improvements, and research projects; (ii) information about costs, profits, markets, sales, and lists of customers or clients; (iii) business, marketing, and strategic plans; and (iv) employee personnel files and compensation information. Executive should consult any Company procedures instituted to identify and protect certain types of Confidential Information, which are considered by the Company to be safeguards in addition to the protection provided by this Agreement. Nothing contained in those procedures or in this Agreement is intended to limit the effect of the other. d. GENERAL RESTRICTIONS ON USE. During the Period of Employment, Executive shall use Proprietary Information, and shall disclose Confidential Information, only for the benefit of the Company and as is necessary to carry out his responsibilities under this Agreement. Following termination, Executive shall neither, directly or indirectly, use any Proprietary Information nor disclose any Confidential Information, except as expressly and specifically authorized in writing by the Company. The publication of any Proprietary Information through literature or speeches must be approved in advance in writing by the Company. 3. COMPENSATION. In consideration of the services to be rendered under this Agreement, Executive shall be entitled to the following: a. The Company shall continue to pay Executive at an initial base annual salary equivalent to Executive's current annual base rate of pay of $382,885.00, payable bi-weekly. Payment of Executive's current base rate of pay is subject to a temporary fifteen percent (15%) reduction, pursuant to the Company's management's decision to temporarily reduce the annual base salaries of all of its officers. At such time when the Company's management decides to restore the annual base salaries of its officers to their prior base rate of pay or higher, the Company shall adjust Executive's base annual salary to $525,000.00. Thereafter, Executive's salary will be reviewed from time to time in accordance with Company's established procedures for adjusting salaries for similarly situated employees. Executive shall also be eligible to participate in the Company's executive bonus plan, as already established by the Company, and as may be amended from time to time in the Company's sole discretion. b. Executive shall be eligible to participate in the Company's benefit plans, and to receive perquisites of employment, as established by the Company, and as may be amended from time to time in the Company's sole discretion at least equal to those provided to other Company officers. 2 3 c. The Company shall pay any interest accrued to date and shall, through December 31, 1999, pay any additional interest on the two relocation loans made by the Company to Executive in June and July 1997, as evidenced by the two promissory notes. d. The Company shall pay the monthly dues, fees, and assessments for Executive's membership in a golf club, to be selected by Executive. Company shall also reimburse Executive in accordance with Company guidelines and procedures for golf club expenses associated with the normal course of conduct with customers. e. The Company shall have the right to deduct or withhold from the compensation due to Executive hereunder any and all sums required for federal income and social security taxes and all state or local taxes now applicable or that may be enacted and become applicable in the future. 4. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT a. TERMINATION BY DEATH. Executive's employment shall terminate automatically upon the death of Executive. Company shall pay to Executive's beneficiaries or estate, as appropriate, any compensation then due and owing, and shall continue to pay Executive's salary and benefits, bi-weekly, through the second full month after Executive's death. As of the date of death, all stock options available to Executive through the Term Date shall, in accordance with the terms of the Company's stock option plan and Executive's stock option agreements, be exercisable by the appropriate representative beneficiary of Executive's estate. Thereafter, all obligations of Company under this Agreement shall cease. Nothing in this Section shall affect any entitlement of Executive's heirs to the benefits of any life insurance plan or other applicable benefits. b. TERMINATION BY DISABILITY. If, in the sole opinion of the Company, Executive shall be prevented from properly performing his duties hereunder by reason of any physical or mental incapacity for a period of more than one hundred eighty (180) days in the aggregate in any twelve-month period, then, to the extent permitted by law, Company may relieve Executive of his duties. Company shall pay to Executive all compensation to which Executive is entitled up through the last day of the month in which the 180th day of incapacity occurs, and thereafter, the Company shall continue to employ Executive at 66 2/3% of his base annual salary at the time of disability and shall include Executive in the Company's health insurance benefit plans beginning on the 181st day of his disability, such payment of salary and inclusion in Company health insurance benefits to continue until Executive reaches age 65. Any long term disability insurance payments received by Executive shall be credited to the Company's obligation for such disability payments. The Executive's rights to exercise stock options shall be in accordance with the terms of the Company's stock option plan and Executive's stock option agreements. Nothing in this Section shall affect Executive's rights under any disability plan in which he is a participant. Executive agrees that he shall, on or about the first and second anniversary dates of this agreement, undergo at the Company's expense a complete medical examination. 3 4 c. TERMINATION BY COMPANY NOT FOR CAUSE. At any time, Employer may terminate the Period of Employment Not For Cause for any reason by providing Executive ten (10) days' advance written notice, provided that Executive shall, in addition to all compensation due and owing through the last day actually worked, receive the following: (i) The greater of a severance payment equal to two years of the Executive's then current base salary, or his base salary through the Term Date per paragraph 1(a) above. The severance payment will be made in the form of salary continuation for two years (the "Severance Period"), payable on the Company's normal payroll schedule. (ii) During the Severance Period, Executive will continue to receive annual bonus payments equal to 150 percent of his then current base annual salary, payable in any year in which any bonus payments are made by the Company to any other employees. During the Severance Period, Executive's annual bonus payments, if any, shall be payable when the Company makes annual bonus payments to any other similarly situated employees. (iii) Payment of the Executive's share of health insurance premiums throughout the Severance Period and for a period of eighteen (18) months thereafter. Thereafter, the Company shall use reasonable efforts to cause health insurance benefits to be made available to Executive and his dependents under the Company's group health insurance plans for as long as permitted under such plans. (iv) Executive's stock options shall continue to vest during the Severance Period. Executive shall not be required to exercise such options until three (3) years following the end of the Severance Period during which three (3) year period he shall serve as a consultant to the Company on terms agreeable to the Executive and the Company. (v) Executive's obligation to repay the Company for the relocation loans made by the Company to Executive in June and July 1997, evidenced by two promissory notes, shall not become payable until the end of the Severance Period. In the event that Executive's employment is terminated following a change of control, the Company shall pay interest on and shall not require repayment of the principal of the Executive's two relocation loans until the date two years following the end of the Severance Period. (vi) The amount of any payment provided for in this Section 4.c. shall not be reduced, offset or subject to recovery by the Company by reason of any compensation earned by Executive as the result of employment by another employer during the Severance Period so long as Executive does not violate the provisions of Section 5.d. below. (vii) The severance benefits described in this Section 4.c. shall be conditioned upon Executive's continued observance of the obligations described in Section 5.d. throughout the Severance Period. Should Executive engage in or pursue any of the activities described in Section 5.d. at any time during the Severance Period, all severance benefits described in this Section 4.c. shall cease and the two promissory notes described in Section 4.c(v) shall become immediately due and payable in full. 4 5 d. TERMINATION BY COMPANY FOR CAUSE. At any time, and without prior notice, the Company may terminate Executive's employment For Cause (as defined below). The Company shall pay Executive all compensation then due and owing; thereafter, all of the Company's obligations under this Agreement shall cease. Termination for "Cause" shall mean termination of Executive's employment because of Executive's (i) involvement in fraud, misappropriation or embezzlement related to the business or property of the company; (ii) conviction for, or guilty plea to, a felony; (iii) willful material breach of this Agreement; (iv) willful and continued failure to substantially perform his duties under this Agreement, provided, however, that if such Cause is reasonably curable, the company shall not terminate Executive's employment hereunder unless the Company first gives notice of its intention to terminate and the grounds of such termination, and the Executive has not within ninety (90) days following receipt of this notice, cured such Cause. e. BY EXECUTIVE NOT FOR CAUSE. At any time, Executive may terminate the Period of Employment for any reason, with or without cause, by providing Employer thirty (30) days' advance written notice. Employer shall have the option, in its complete discretion, to make termination of the Period of Employment effective at any time prior to the end of such notice period, provided Employer pays Executive all compensation due and owing through the last day actually worked, plus an amount equal to the base salary Executive would have earned through the balance of the above notice period; thereafter, all of Employer's obligations under this Agreement shall cease. f. BY EXECUTIVE FOR GOOD REASON. Executive may terminate, without liability, the Period of Employment for Good Reason (as defined below), provided Executive gives Employer ninety (90) days' advance written notice of the reason for termination and his intent to terminate this Agreement. During this period, Employer shall have an opportunity to correct the condition constituting Good Reason. If the condition is remedied within this period, Executive's notice to terminate shall be rescinded automatically; if not remedied, termination of the Period of Employment shall become effective upon expiration of the above notice period. In this event, Employer shall pay Executive all compensation due and owing through the last day actually worked including any accrued but unused vacation. Employer shall also have the option, in its complete discretion, to make termination effective at any time prior to the end of the notice period, provided that Employer pays Executive all compensation due and owing through the balance of the notice period (not to exceed ninety (90) days). Executive shall be entitled to exercise his right to terminate this Agreement for Good Reason only if he gives the required notice not more than ninety (90) days after the occurrence of the event that is the basis for the Good Reason. If Executive terminates the Period of Employment for Good Reason pursuant to the provisions of this Section 4.f., Executive shall receive the severance benefits described in and pursuant to the terms of subparagraphs 4.c.(i)-(vii) above. Termination shall be for "Good Reason" if Executive voluntarily resigns following: (i) a change in Executive's position with employer which materially reduces Executive's level of responsibility; (ii) a relocation of Executive's principal place of employment by more than fifty (50) miles, provided and only if such change, reduction or relocation is effected by the Employer 5 6 without Executive's consent; (iii) a reduction in base compensation; or (iv) a reduction in bonus payments not permitted by this Employment Agreement. 5. TERMINATION OBLIGATIONS a. RETURN OF COMPANY'S PROPERTY Executive hereby acknowledges and agrees that all personal property, including, without limitation, all books, manuals, records, reports, notes, contracts, lists, blueprints, and other documents, or materials, or copies thereof, and equipment furnished to or prepared by Executive in the course of or incident to Executive's employment, belong to Company and shall be promptly returned to Company upon termination of Executive's employment. b. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES SURVIVE TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT. The representations and warranties contained herein, except Executive's obligations under Section 2(b), shall survive termination of Executive's employment and expiration of this Agreement. c. COOPERATION IN PENDING WORK. Following any termination of Executive's employment, Executive shall fully cooperate with Company in all matters relating to the winding up of pending work on behalf of Company and the orderly transfer of work to other employees of Company. Executive shall also cooperate in the defense of any action brought by any third party against Company that relates in any way to Executive's acts or omissions while employed by Company. d. NONCOMPETITION. Executive acknowledges and agrees that during his employment with the Company, he has had access to confidential information and the activities forbidden by this subsection would necessarily involve the improper use and disclosure of this confidential information. To forestall this use or disclosure, Executive agrees that during the Severance Period described in Section 4.c., Executive shall not, directly or indirectly, (i) divert or attempt to divert from the Company (or any Affiliate) any business of any kind in which it is engaged; (ii) employ or recommend for employment any person employed by the Company (of any Affiliate); or (iii) engage in any business activity that is competitive with the Company (of any Affiliate) in any state where the Company conducts its business, unless Executive can prove that any of the above actions was done without the use of confidential information. In addition to the above restrictions on noncompetitive activity, and regardless of whether any use of confidential information is involved, Executive agrees that during the Severance Period Executive shall not, directly or indirectly, (i) solicit any customer of the Company (or any Affiliate) known to Executive (while he was employed by the Company) to have been a customer with respect to products or services competitive with products or services offered by the Company; or (ii) solicit for employment any person employed by the Company (or any Affiliate). 6. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION Company and Executive mutually agree that any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, or any other dispute between the parties, shall be 6 7 submitted to mediation before a mutually agreeable mediator, which cost is to be borne by the Company. In the event mediation is unsuccessful in resolving the claim or controversy, such claim or controversy shall be resolved by arbitration. The claims covered by this Agreement ("Arbitrable Claims") include, but are not limited to, claims for wages or other compensation due; claims for breach of any contract (including this Agreement) or covenant (express or implied); tort claims; claims for discrimination (including, but not limited to, race, sex, religion, national origin, age, marital status, medical condition, or disability); claims for benefits (except where an employee benefit or pension plan specifies that its claims procedure shall culminate in an arbitration procedure different from this one), and claims for violation of any federal, state, or other law, statute, regulation, or ordinance, except claims excluded in the following paragraph. The parties hereby waive any rights they may have to trial by jury in regard to Arbitrable Claims. Claims Executive may have for Workers' Compensation or unemployment compensation benefits are not covered by this Agreement. Also not covered is either party's right to obtain provisional remedies or interim relief from a court of competent jurisdiction. Arbitration under this Agreement shall be the exclusive remedy for all Arbitrable Claims. Company and Executive agree that arbitration shall be held in or near Santa Clara County, California, and shall be in accordance with the then current Employment Dispute Resolution Rules of the American Arbitration Association, before an arbitrator licensed to practice law in the State of California. The arbitrator shall have authority to award or grant both legal, equitable, and declaratory relief. Such arbitration shall be final and binding on the parties. The Federal Arbitration Act shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this section pertaining to Alternative Dispute Resolution. This Agreement to mediate and arbitrate survives termination of Executive's employment. 7. NOTICES All notices or other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be made in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if delivered by hand or mailed, postage prepaid, by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, and addressed to the Company: Novellus Systems, Inc. 3970 North First Street San Jose, CA 95134 Attn: Corporate Secretary with a copy to: Morrison & Foerster LLP 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018 Attn: William D. Sherman, Esq. 7 8 and to Executive at: Mr. Richard Hill 187 Heather Atherton, CA 94047 with a copy to: Miller, Nash, Wiener, Hager & Carlsen LLP 4400 Two Union Square 601 Union Street Seattle, WA 98101-2322 Attn: John L. West, Esq. Executive and the Company shall be obligated to notify the other party of any change in address. Notice of change of address shall be effective only when made in accordance with this Section. 8. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement is intended to be the final, complete, and exclusive statement of the terms of Executive's employment by The Company. Except for any stock option agreements and any other agreements evidencing a loan or trust from the Company to Executive (including but not limited to the two loan agreements between Executive and the Company dated July 1, 1997 and July 31, 1997, and the agreement evidencing the creation of a trust for the benefit of Executive dated May 26, 1994, this Agreement supersedes all other prior and contemporaneous agreements and statements pertaining in any manner to the employment of Executive and it may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior or contemporaneous statements or agreements. To the extent that the practices, policies, or procedures of Company, now or in the future, apply to Executive and are inconsistent with the terms of this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall control. 9. AMENDMENTS, WAIVERS This Agreement may not be modified, amended, or terminated except by an instrument in writing, signed by Executive and by a duly authorized representative of Company other than Executive. No failure to exercise and no delay in exercising any right, remedy, or power under this Agreement shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any right, remedy, or power under this Agreement preclude any other or further exercise thereof, or the exercise of any other right, remedy, or power provided herein or by law or in equity. 10. ASSIGNMENT; SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS Executive agrees that he will not assign, sell, transfer, delegate or otherwise dispose of, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, or by operation of law, any rights or obligations under this Agreement, nor shall Executive's rights be subject to encumbrance or the claims of creditors. 8 9 Any purported assignment, transfer, or delegation shall be null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent the consolidation of the Company with, or its merger into, any other corporation, or the sale by the Company of all or substantially all of its properties or assets, or the assignment by the Company of this Agreement and the performance of its obligations hereunder to any successor in interest. In the event of a change in ownership or control of the Company, the terms of this Agreement will remain in effect and shall be binding upon any successor in interest. Notwithstanding and subject to the foregoing, this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors, and permitted assigns, and shall not benefit any person or entity other than those enumerated above. 11. SEVERABILITY; ENFORCEMENT If any provision of this Agreement, or the application thereof to any person, place, or circumstance, shall be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, unenforceable, or void, the remainder of this Agreement and such provisions as applied to other persons, places, and circumstances shall remain in full force and effect. 12. GOVERNING LAW The validity, interpretation, enforceability, and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the law of the State of California. 13. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PARTIES The parties acknowledge (a) that they have consulted with or have had the opportunity to consult with independent counsel of their own choice concerning this Agreement, and (b) that they have read and understand the Agreement, are fully aware of its legal effect, and have entered into it freely based on their own judgment and not on any representations or promises other than those contained in this Agreement. 9 10 14. DATE OF AGREEMENT The parties have duly executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. ---------------------------------------- Richard Hill NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. By: ------------------------------------- Robert H. Smith Executive Vice President 10 EX-22.1 6 SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT 1 Exhibit 22.1 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES Novellus Systems, Ltd. Nippon Novellus Systems, KK Unit 1EB, Bishops Weald House, K5P Bldg., R&D C-10F, Albion Way, 3-2-1 Sakado, Takatsu-Ku, Kawasaki-shi Horsham, West Sussex Kanagawa-ken 213, Japan RH12 1AH, England T 81.44.850.1777 T 44.1403.265550 F 81.44.850.1778 F 44.1403.266554 Novellus Systems, BV Novellus Systems Korea Dillenburgstraat 5 B 2F DaeWoo Engineering Bldg., 9-3 SuNae-Dong, 5652 AM Eindhoven BunDang-Ku, SungNam City, KyungKi-Do 463-020 Korea The Netherlands T 82.342.738.1114 T 31.40.291.8010 F 82.342.714.9921 F 31.40.257.3590 Novellus Systems GmbH Novellus Systems Taiwan Koenigsbruecker Strasse 150 B, 5F-1, No. 295, Sec. 2 D - 01099 Dresden, Kwang Fu Road Germany Hsin-Chu City, Taiwan 30801 R.O.C. T 49.351.89252.10 T 886.35.730550 F 49.351.89252.20 F 886.35.730553 Novellus Systems Ireland Ltd Novellus Systems Semiconductor IR4-1-10, Equipment Shanghai Co., Ltd Collinstown Industrial Park, 603-611 No. 300 Leixlip Tian-Lin Bldg., Tain-Lin Road Co. Kildare., Ireland Shanghai 200233, China T 353.1.606.5247 T 86.21.6485.3889 F 353.1.606.5180 F 86.21.6485.1282 Novellus Systems Israel Ltd Novellus Singapore Pte Ltd. Asia House, 4 Weizmann Street 101 Thomson Road 64239 Tel-Aviv #21-01/02 United Square Israel Singapore 307591 T 65.353.9288 F 65.353.6833 Novellus Systems SARL Parc de la Julienne, Bat. D, 1 er etage, 91830 Le Coudray - Montceaux France T 33.1.64.93.7070 F 33.1.64.93.8787 Novellus Systems Spain Avenida Diagonal, 482 Barcelona 08006 Spain
EX-23.1 7 CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP. 1 Exhibit 23.1 CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-48037) and the related Prospectus and Registrations Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-11825, 33-88156, 33-51056, 33-36787, 33-25897, 33-62807, 333-35487, 333-65567) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1992 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Amended and Restated 1984 Stock Option Plan, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the Amended and Restated 1992 Stock Option Plan, and in the related prospectuses of our report dated January 18, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Novellus Systems, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998. /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP San Jose, California March 3, 1999 EX-27.1 8 FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
5 12-MOS DEC-31-1998 JAN-01-1998 DEC-31-1998 81,224 49,594 176,499 3,135 69,223 399,095 173,800 68,221 551,939 111,474 65,000 0 0 176,140 199,325 551,939 518,778 518,778 237,913 237,913 201,917 0 1,099 80,047 27,219 52,828 0 0 0 58,828 1.55 1.51
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----