Basis of Presentation

9 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

Basis of Presentation [Abstract]

Basis of Presentation

(1) Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of BMC Software, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, we, us, our or BMC). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. These financial statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments necessary to fairly present our financial position and results of operations as of and for the periods presented herein. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period’s financial statements to conform to the current period’s presentation.

Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. Our results reflect the seasonality of our business and generally tend to be stronger in the third and fourth quarters of our fiscal year, as compared to the first and second quarters of our fiscal year; however, general economic conditions also have an impact on our business and financial results. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our annual audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the SEC on Form 10-K.

Adjustments Recorded in Current Period

During the quarter ended December 31, 2011, we corrected the accounting for the foreign currency impacts of certain intangible assets and related deferred taxes associated with a fiscal 2000 business combination. The correction of these errors had the effect in the current quarter of decreasing intangible asset amortization expense by $4.5 million, increasing the provision for income taxes by $3.2 million and increasing the foreign currency translation adjustment (a component of other comprehensive income) by $29.2 million, resulting in increases to net earnings and comprehensive income of $1.3 million and $30.5 million, respectively.

We do not consider the impact of these corrections, which relate to financial statement periods dating back to fiscal 2000 (errors impacting net earnings primarily related to fiscal 2003 and prior periods), to be material to any prior fiscal year presented in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 or to the current fiscal year.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2010 and in September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued updated guidance relating to the annual goodwill impairment test. This new guidance incorporates additional qualitative assessments at two discrete points in the goodwill impairment evaluation. First, entities are now permitted to perform an initial qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that goodwill is impaired in order to determine the need to perform the previously required two-step impairment test. This new guidance has been early adopted by us and will be applied for our fiscal 2012 annual goodwill impairment test. Additionally, as part of step one of the two-step impairment test, entities are required to perform a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that goodwill is impaired in situations where reporting units have a carrying value that is zero or negative. If the qualitative evaluation determines that it is more likely than not that goodwill is impaired, step two of the goodwill impairment test is required to be performed to determine the amount of impairment, if any. This guidance is effective for us beginning with our fiscal 2012 goodwill impairment test. Neither set of guidance is expected to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In October 2009, the FASB issued new revenue recognition guidance for arrangements that include both software and non-software related deliverables. This guidance requires entities to allocate the overall consideration to each deliverable by using a best estimate of the selling price of individual deliverables in the arrangement in the absence of vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) or other third party evidence of the selling price. Additionally, the guidance modifies the manner in which the transaction consideration is allocated across the separately identified deliverables by no longer permitting the residual method of allocating arrangement consideration. The new guidance was effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and did not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.