XML 22 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2020
Notes to Financial Statements  
Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]

Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Risks and Uncertainties

 

The earnings of the Company depend primarily on the earnings of Republic. The earnings of Republic are heavily dependent upon the level of net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on its interest-earning assets, such as loans and investments, and the interest paid on its interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. Accordingly, the Company’s results of operations are subject to risks and uncertainties surrounding Republic’s exposure to changes in the interest rate environment. Prepayments on residential real estate mortgage and other fixed rate loans and mortgage-backed securities vary significantly and may cause significant fluctuations in interest margins.

 

The coronavirus (“COVID-19”) outbreak and the public health response to contain it have resulted in unprecedented economic and financial market conditions during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 that did not exist at December 31, 2019. In response to these evolving conditions, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”) reduced the federal funds target range by 150 basis points to 0.00% to 0.25% in March 2020. The Federal Reserve has taken additional steps to bolster the economy by promoting liquidity in certain securities markets and providing funding sources for small and mid-sized businesses, as well as, state and local governments as they work through the cash flow stresses caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

The economic downturn that began in the U.S. as a result of the government-mandated business closures and stay-at-home orders is significantly impacting the labor market, consumer spending, business investment and profitability. As a result, the President signed into law the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”), which is the largest economic stimulus package in the nation’s history in an effort to lessen the impact of COVID-19 on consumers and businesses. Among other measures, the CARES Act authorized funding for the Small Business Administration’s (“SBA”) Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) to provide loans to small businesses to keep employees on their payroll and to make other eligible payments to sustain their operation in the near term. We obtained approval from the SBA for more than 5,100 loan applications which has resulted in $683 million in outstanding PPP loans at September 30, 2020. Almost all of these loans have a two year term, an interest rate of 1.00% and included an origination fee paid by the SBA between 1% and 5% of the loan balance. Gross origination fees of approximately $23 million were earned by Republic which will be amortized and reported as interest income over the life of the loans. After deduction of deferred costs and fees related to the PPP program, $15 million of net revenue has been deferred and will be recognized as income in future periods.

 

Mortgage Banking Activities and Mortgage Loans Held for Sale

 

Mortgage loans held for sale are originated and held until sold to permanent investors. Management elected to adopt the fair value option in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, and record loans held for sale at fair value.

 

Mortgage loans held for sale originated on or subsequent to the election of the fair value option, are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. The fair value is determined on a recurring basis by utilizing quoted prices from dealers in such securities. Changes in fair value are reflected in mortgage banking income in the statements of income. Direct loan origination costs are recognized when incurred and are included in non-interest expense in the statements of income.

 

Interest Rate Lock Commitments (“IRLCs”)

 

Mortgage loan commitments known as interest rate locks that relate to the origination of a mortgage that will be held for sale upon funding are considered derivative instruments under the derivatives and hedging accounting guidance FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. Loan commitments that are classified as derivatives are recognized at fair value on the balance sheet as other assets and other liabilities with changes in their fair values recorded as mortgage banking income and included in non-interest income in the statements of income. Outstanding IRLCs are subject to interest rate risk and related price risk during the period from the date of issuance through the date of loan funding, cancellation or expiration. Loan commitments generally range between 30 and 90 days; however, the borrower is not obligated to obtain the loan. Republic is subject to fallout risk related to IRLCs, which is realized if approved borrowers choose not to close on the loans within the terms of the IRLCs. Republic uses best efforts commitments to substantially eliminate these risks. The valuation of the IRLCs issued by Republic includes the value of the servicing released premium. Republic sells loans where the servicing is released, and the servicing released premium is included in the market price. See Note 12 Derivatives and Risk Management Activities for further detail of IRLCs.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Significant estimates are made by management in determining the allowance for loan losses, carrying values of other real estate owned, assessment of other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”) of investment securities, fair value of financial instruments, and the realization of deferred income tax assets. Consideration is given to a variety of factors in establishing these estimates.

 

In estimating the allowance for loan losses, management considers current economic conditions, past loss experience, diversification of the loan portfolio, delinquency statistics, results of internal loan reviews and regulatory examinations, borrowers’ perceived financial and managerial strengths, the adequacy of underlying collateral, if collateral dependent, or present value of future cash flows, and other relevant and qualitative risk factors. Subsequent to foreclosure, an estimate for the carrying value of other real estate owned is normally determined through valuations that are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value, less the cost to sell. Because the allowance for loan losses and carrying value of other real estate owned are dependent, to a great extent, on the general economy and other conditions that may be beyond the Company’s and Republic’s control, the estimates of the allowance for loan losses and the carrying values of other real estate owned could differ materially in the near term.

 

In estimating OTTI of investment securities, securities are evaluated on at least a quarterly basis and more frequently when market conditions warrant such an evaluation, to determine whether a decline in their value is other-than-temporary. To determine whether a loss in value is other-than-temporary, management utilizes criteria such as the reasons underlying the decline, the magnitude and duration of the decline, the intent to hold the security and the likelihood of the Company not being required to sell the security prior to an anticipated recovery in the fair value. The term “other-than-temporary” is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent, but indicates that the prospects for a near-term recovery of value is not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support a realizable value equal to or greater than the carrying value of the investment. Once a decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the portion of the decline related to credit impairment is charged to earnings.

 

In evaluating the Company’s ability to recover deferred tax assets, management considers all available positive and negative evidence, including the past operating results and forecasts of future taxable income. In determining future taxable income, management makes assumptions for the amount of taxable income, the reversal of temporary differences and the implementation of feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. These assumptions require management to make judgments about the future taxable income and are consistent with the plans and estimates used to manage the business. A material reduction in estimated future taxable income may require management to record a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets. An increase in the valuation allowance would result in additional income tax expense in the period and could have a significant impact on future earnings.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company has a Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (“the 2005 Plan”), under which the Company granted options, restricted stock or stock appreciation rights to the Company’s employees, directors, and certain consultants. The 2005 Plan became effective on November 14, 1995, and was amended and approved at the Company’s 2005 annual meeting of shareholders. Under the terms of the 2005 Plan, 1.5 million shares of common stock, plus an annual increase equal to the number of shares needed to restore the maximum number of shares that could be available for grant under the 2005 Plan to 1.5 million shares, were available for such grants. As of September 30, 2020, the only grants under the 2005 Plan were option grants. The 2005 Plan provided that the exercise price of each option granted equaled the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of the grant. Options granted pursuant to the 2005 Plan vest within one to four years and have a maximum term of 10 years. The 2005 Plan terminated on November 14, 2015 in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the Plan agreement.

 

On April 29, 2014 the Company’s shareholders approved the 2014 Republic First Bancorp, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”), under which the Company may grant options, restricted stock, stock units, or stock appreciation rights to the Company’s employees, directors, independent contractors, and consultants. Under the terms of the 2014 Plan, 2.6 million shares of common stock, plus an annual adjustment to be no less than 10% of the outstanding shares or such lower number as the Board of Directors may determine, are available for such grants. Compensation cost for all option awards is calculated and recognized over the vesting period of the option awards. If the service conditions are not met, the Company reverses previously recorded compensation expense upon forfeiture. The Company’s accounting policy election is to recognize forfeitures as they occur. At September 30, 2020, the maximum number of common shares issuable under the 2014 Plan was 6.4 million shares. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, 1,248,100 options were granted under the 2014 Plan with a fair value of $1,084,888.

 

The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the estimated fair value of each stock option granted on the date of the grant. A summary of the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model for 2020 and 2019 are as follows:

 

  

2020

  

2019

 

Dividend yield(1)

  0.0%    0.0%  

Expected volatility(2)

  28.61%    28.81%  

Risk-free interest rate(3)

 0.36%to1.22%  1.42% to2.78% 

Expected life(4) (in years)

  6.25%    6.25%  

Assumed forfeiture rate(5)

  5.0%    4.0%  

 

(1) A dividend yield of 0.0% is utilized because cash dividends have never been paid.

(2) The expected volatility was based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock price as adjusted for certain historical periods of extraordinary volatility in order to estimate expected volatility.

(3) The risk-free interest rate is based on the five to seven year Treasury bond.

(4) The expected life reflects an 8 month to 4 year vesting period, the maximum ten year term and review of historical behavior.

(5) Forfeiture rate is determined through forfeited and expired options as a percentage of options granted over the current three year period.

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, 907,790 shares and 842,898 shares vested, respectively. Expense is recognized ratably over the period required to vest. At September 30, 2020, the intrinsic value of the 5,993,700 options outstanding was $11,000, while the intrinsic value of the 3,384,500 exercisable (vested) options was $11,000. At September 30, 2019, the intrinsic value of the 5,007,725 options outstanding was $780,000, while the intrinsic value of the 2,645,960 exercisable (vested) options was $753,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, 13,000 options were exercised resulting in cash receipts of $33,000 and 220,875 options were forfeited with a weighted average grant date fair value of $419,999. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, 53,550 options were exercised resulting in cash receipts of $261,000 and 142,875 options were forfeited with a weighted average grant date fair value of $381,811.

 

Information regarding stock based compensation for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 is set forth below:

 

  

2020

  

2019

 

Stock based compensation expense recognized

 $1,538,000  $2,005,000 

Number of unvested stock options

  2,609,200   2,361,765 

Fair value of unvested stock options

 $4,915,841  $6,095,468 

Amount remaining to be recognized as expense

 $3,121,499  $4,183,148 

 

The remaining unrecognized expense amount of $3,121,499 will be recognized ratably as expense through September 2024.

 

Earnings per Share

 

Earnings per share (“EPS”) consists of two separate components: basic EPS and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for each period presented. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus dilutive common stock equivalents (“CSEs”). CSEs consist of dilutive stock options granted through the Company’s stock option plans and convertible preferred stock for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. CSEs consist of dilutive stock options granted through the Company’s stock option plans for the nine months September 30, 2019.

 

The calculation of EPS for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

  

Three Months Ended

September 30,

  

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2020

  

2019

 
                 

Net income (loss) - basic and diluted

 $(966) $(1,822) $953  $(1,015)
                 

Weighted average shares outstanding

  58,853   58,843   58,851   58,830 

Net income per share – basic

 $(0.02) $(0.03) $0.02  $(0.02)

Weighted average shares outstanding (including dilutive CSEs)

  58,853   58,843   60,751   58,830 

Net income per share – diluted

 $(0.02) $(0.03) $0.02  $(0.02)

 

The following is a summary of securities that could potentially dilute basic earnings per common share in future periods. These securities were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented.

 

(in thousands)

 

Three Months Ended

September 30,

  

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2020

  

2019

 
                 

Anti-dilutive securities

                
                 

Share based compensation awards

  5,994   5,008   5,945   5,008 

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

ASU 2016-02

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases. From the Company’s perspective, the new standard establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases are classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement for lessees. From the landlord perspective, the new standard requires a lessor to classify leases as either sales-type, finance or operating. A lease is treated as a sale if it transfers all of the risks and rewards, as well as control of the underlying asset, to the lessee. If risks and rewards are conveyed without the transfer of control, the lease is treated as a financing. If the lessor doesn’t convey risks and rewards or control, an operating lease results. The new standard was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  

 

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, which provided lessees the option to apply the new leasing standard to all open leases as of the adoption date. Prior to this ASU issuance, a modified retrospective transition approach was required.

 

In December 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-20, Leases (Topic 842): Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors, which provided lessors a policy election to not evaluate whether certain sales taxes and other similar taxes are lessor costs or lessee costs. Additionally, the update requires certain lessors to exclude from variable payments lessor costs paid by lessees directly to third parties.

 

The Company adopted this ASU on January 1, 2019. The Company recognized an ROU asset of $34.2 million and total operating lease liability obligations of $35.1 million at January 1, 2019. Capital ratios remained in compliance with the regulatory definition of well capitalized. There were no material changes to the recognition of operating lease expense in the consolidated statements of income. The Company adopted certain practical expedients available under the new guidance, which did not require it to (1) reassess whether any expired or existing contracts contain leases, (2) reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases, (3) reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases, and (4) evaluate whether certain sales taxes and other similar taxes are lessor costs. The Company elected the use-of-hindsight practical expedient. Additionally, the Company elected to apply the new lease guidance at the adoption date, rather than at the beginning of the earliest period presented.

 

ASU 2016-13

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The ASU requires an organization to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. Many of the loss estimation techniques applied today will still be permitted, although the inputs to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. Additionally, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. The Company has evaluated the impact of this ASU, continuing its implementation efforts and reviewing the loss modeling requirements consistent with lifetime expected loss estimates. Calculations of expected losses under the new guidance were run parallel to the calculations under existing guidance to assess and evaluate the potential impact to the Company’s financial statements.  The new model includes different assumptions used in calculating credit losses, such as estimating losses over the estimated life of a financial asset and considers expected future changes in macroeconomic conditions. The Company expects an initial increase to the allowance for loan losses above the amount recorded on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2019. This one-time increase will be recorded, net of tax, as an adjustment to retained earnings effective January 1, 2020. This increase is expected to be an immaterial amount. When adopted this ASU may result in an increase to the Company's allowance for loan losses which will depend upon the nature and characteristics of the Company's loan portfolio at the adoption date, as well as the macroeconomic conditions and forecasts at that date. The Company has elected to defer the adoption of this ASU as permitted by Section 4014 of the CARES Act, which provides that financial institutions are not required to comply with the ASU during the period beginning on March 27, 2020 until the earlier of (i) the date on which the national emergency concerning the COVID-19 outbreak declared under the National Emergencies Relief Act terminates or (ii) December 31, 2020.