XML 85 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Risk and Uncertainties [Policy Text Block]
Risks and Uncertainties

The earnings of the Company depend primarily on the earnings of Republic.  The earnings of Republic are dependent primarily upon the level of net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on its interest-earning assets, such as loans and investments, and the interest paid on its interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. Accordingly, the Company’s results of operations are subject to risks and uncertainties surrounding Republic’s exposure to changes in the interest rate environment.

Prepayments on residential real estate mortgage and other fixed rate loans and mortgage-backed securities vary significantly and may cause significant fluctuations in interest margins.
Use of Estimates [Policy Text Block]
Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Significant estimates are made by management in determining the allowance for loan losses, carrying values of other real estate owned, assessment of other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”) of investment securities, fair value of financial instruments and the realization of deferred income tax assets. Consideration is given to a variety of factors in establishing these estimates.

In estimating the allowance for loan losses, management considers current economic conditions, diversification of the loan portfolio, delinquency statistics, results of internal loan reviews, borrowers’ perceived financial and managerial strengths, the adequacy of underlying collateral, if collateral dependent, or present value of future cash flows, and other relevant factors.  An estimate for the carrying value of other real estate owned is normally determined through appraisals which are updated on a regular basis or through agreements of sale that have been negotiated. Because the allowance for loan losses and carrying value of other real estate owned are dependent, to a great extent, on the general economy and other conditions that may be beyond the Company’s and Republic’s control, the estimates of the allowance for loan losses and the carrying values of other real estate owned could differ materially in the near term.
 
In estimating OTTI of investment securities, securities are evaluated on at least a quarterly basis and more frequently when market conditions warrant such an evaluation, to determine whether a decline in their value is other than temporary.  To determine whether a loss in value is other than temporary, management utilizes criteria such as the reasons underlying the decline, the magnitude and duration of the decline, the intent to hold the security and the likelihood of the Company not being required to sell the security prior to an anticipated recovery in the fair value.  The term “other than temporary” is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent, but indicates that the prospect for a near-term recovery of value is not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support a realizable value equal to or greater than the carrying value of investment.  Once a decline in value is determined to be other than temporary, the value of the security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized.
 
In evaluating the Company’s ability to recover deferred tax assets, management considers all available positive and negative evidence.   Management also makes assumptions on the amount of future taxable income, the reversal of temporary differences and the implementation of feasible and prudent tax planning strategies.  These assumptions require management to make judgments that are consistent with the plans and estimates used to manage the Company’s business.  As a result of cumulative losses in the years 2008 through 2011 and the uncertain nature of the current economic environment, the Company has decided to currently exclude future taxable income from its analysis on the ability to recover deferred tax assets and has recorded a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets.  An increase or decrease in the valuation allowance would result in an adjustment to income tax expense in the period and could have a significant impact on the Company’s future earnings.
Stock-Based Compensation [Policy Text Block]
Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has a Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (“Plan”), under which the Company may grant options, restricted stock or stock appreciation rights to the Company’s employees, directors, and certain consultants.  Under the terms of the Plan, 1.5 million shares of common stock, plus an annual increase equal to the number of shares needed to restore the maximum number of shares that may be available for grant under the Plan to 1.5 million shares, are available for such grants.  As of June 30, 2013, the only grants under the Plan have been option grants.  The Plan provides that the exercise price of each option granted equals the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of the grant.  Any option granted vests within one to five years and has a maximum term of ten years.
 
The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the estimated fair value of each stock option granted on the date of the grant.  A summary of the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model for 2013 and 2012 are as follows:

   
2013
   
2012
 
Dividend yield(1)
  0.0%   0.0%
Expected volatility(2)
 
54.88% to 55.08
%  
53.12% to 54.21
%
Risk-free interest rate(3)
 
1.28% to 2.02
%  
1.01% to 1.61
%
Expected life(4)
 
7.0 years
   
7.0 years
 
 
(1) A dividend yield of 0.0% is utilized because cash dividends have never been paid.
(2) Expected volatility is based on Bloomberg’s seven year volatility calculation for “FRBK” stock.
(3) The risk-free interest rate is based on the seven year Treasury bond.
(4) The expected life reflects a 3 to 4 year vesting period, the maximum ten year term and review of historical behavior.

During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, 109,787 options and 21,000 options vested, respectively.  Expense is recognized ratably over the period required to vest.  At June 30, 2013, the intrinsic value of the 1,200,280 options outstanding was $344,580, while the intrinsic value of the 288,717 exercisable (vested) options was $38,036. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, 83,500 options were forfeited with a weighted average grant date fair value of $289,015.

Information regarding stock based compensation for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 is set forth below:
   
2013
   
2012
 
Stock based compensation expense recognized
 $155,000   $192,000 
Number of unvested stock options
  911,563    845,600 
Fair value of unvested stock options
 $1,245,470   $1,562,250 
Amount remaining to be recognized as expense
 $687,636   $638,125 

The remaining amount of $687,636 will be recognized as expense through June 2017.
Earnings per Share [Policy Text Block]
Earnings per Share

Earnings per share (“EPS”) consist of two separate components: basic EPS and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for each period presented. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus dilutive common stock equivalents (“CSEs”). CSEs consist of dilutive stock options granted through the Company’s Plan and convertible securities related to the trust preferred securities issued in 2008.  In the diluted EPS computation, the after tax interest expense on the trust preferred securities issuance is added back to the net income. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the effect of CSEs (convertible securities related to the trust preferred securities only) and the related add back of after tax interest expense was considered anti-dilutive and therefore was not included in the EPS calculation.
 
The calculation of EPS for the three and six months ended June, 2013 and 2012 is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
 
   
Three Months Ended June 30,
   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2013
   
2012
   
2013
   
2012
 
Net income (basic and diluted)
 $1,011  $1,007  $2,003  $2,312 
                 
Weighted average shares outstanding
  25,973   25,973   25,973   25,973 
                 
Net income per share – basic
 $0.04  $0.04  $0.08  $0.09 
                 
Weighted average shares outstanding (including dilutive CSEs)
  26,103   25,996   26,062   25,988 
                 
Net income per share – diluted
 $0.04  $0.04  $0.08  $0.09 
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Recent Accounting Pronouncements

ASU 2013-02

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, “Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Comprehensive Income.” The amendments in this ASU are intended to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income by requiring an entity to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required to be reclassified in its entirety to net income.  For other amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required that provide additional detail about those amounts.  This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is reclassified to a balance sheet account instead of directly to income or expense in the same reporting period.  The ASU was effective for public entities for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012 and did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.