XML 25 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Finance Receivables, Net
3 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Receivables [Abstract]  
Finance Receivables, Net

Note 4 – Finance Receivables, Net

Finance receivables, net consist of retail receivables and dealer financing, which includes accrued interest and deferred fees and costs, net of the allowance for credit losses and deferred income.  Finance receivables, net also includes securitized retail receivables, which represent retail receivables that have been sold for legal purposes to securitization trusts but continue to be included in our consolidated financial statements, as discussed further in Note 10 – Variable Interest Entities.  Cash flows from these securitized retail receivables are available only for the repayment of debt issued by these trusts and other obligations arising from the securitization transactions.  They are not available for payment of our other obligations or to satisfy claims of our other creditors.

Finance receivables, net consisted of the following:

 

 

 

June 30,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2018

 

Retail receivables

 

$

42,047

 

 

$

41,265

 

Securitized retail receivables

 

 

11,776

 

 

 

12,130

 

Dealer financing

 

 

17,860

 

 

 

17,420

 

 

 

 

71,683

 

 

 

70,815

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred origination (fees) and costs, net

 

 

629

 

 

 

630

 

Deferred income

 

 

(1,383

)

 

 

(1,335

)

Allowance for credit losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retail and securitized retail receivables

 

 

(313

)

 

 

(312

)

Dealer financing

 

 

(150

)

 

 

(151

)

Total allowance for credit losses

 

 

(463

)

 

 

(463

)

Finance receivables, net

 

$

70,466

 

 

$

69,647

 

Credit Quality Indicators

We are exposed to credit risk on our finance receivables.  Credit risk is the risk of loss arising from the failure of customers or dealers to meet the terms of their contracts with us or otherwise fail to perform as agreed.

Retail Loan Portfolio Segment

The retail loan portfolio segment consists of one class of finance receivables. While we use various credit quality metrics to develop our allowance for credit losses on the retail loan portfolio segment, we primarily utilize the aging of the individual accounts to monitor the credit quality of these finance receivables.  Based on our experience, the payment status of borrowers is the strongest indicator of the credit quality of the underlying receivables.  Payment status also impacts charge-offs.

Individual borrower accounts within the retail loan segment are segregated into aging categories based on the number of days outstanding.  The aging for each class of finance receivables is updated monthly.


Note 4 – Finance Receivables, Net (Continued)

Dealer Products Portfolio Segment

For the three classes of finance receivables within the dealer products portfolio segment (wholesale, real estate and working capital), all loans outstanding for an individual dealer or dealer group, which includes affiliated entities, are aggregated and evaluated collectively by dealer or dealer group.  This reflects the interconnected nature of financing provided to our individual dealer and dealer group customers, and their affiliated entities.

When assessing the credit quality of the finance receivables within the dealer products portfolio segment, we segregate the finance receivables account balances into four categories representing distinct credit quality indicators based on internal risk assessments.  The internal risk assessments for all finance receivables within the dealer products portfolio segment are updated on a monthly basis.

The four credit quality indicators are:

 

Performing – Account not classified as either Credit Watch, At Risk or Default

 

Credit Watch – Account designated for elevated attention

 

At Risk – Account where there is an increased likelihood that default may exist based on qualitative and quantitative factors

 

Default – Account is not currently meeting contractual obligations or we have temporarily waived certain contractual requirements

The tables below present each credit quality indicator by class of finance receivables:

 

 

 

Retail Loan

 

 

 

June 30,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2018

 

Aging of finance receivables:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

$

52,928

 

 

$

52,559

 

30-59 days past due

 

 

642

 

 

 

613

 

60-89 days past due

 

 

186

 

 

 

158

 

90 days or greater past due

 

 

67

 

 

 

65

 

Total

 

$

53,823

 

 

$

53,395

 

 

 

 

Wholesale

 

 

Real Estate

 

 

Working Capital

 

 

 

June 30,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

June 30,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

June 30,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2018

 

 

2018

 

 

2018

 

 

2018

 

 

2018

 

Credit quality indicators:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performing

 

$

9,769

 

 

$

9,451

 

 

$

4,019

 

 

$

4,070

 

 

$

2,140

 

 

$

2,118

 

Credit Watch

 

 

1,084

 

 

 

946

 

 

 

524

 

 

 

484

 

 

 

117

 

 

 

105

 

At Risk

 

 

106

 

 

 

75

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

33

 

Default

 

 

4

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

21

 

Total

 

$

10,963

 

 

$

10,513

 

 

$

4,588

 

 

$

4,630

 

 

$

2,309

 

 

$

2,277

 

 

 


Note 4 – Finance Receivables, Net (Continued)

Impaired Finance Receivables

The following table summarizes the information related to our impaired loans by class of finance receivables: 

 

 

 

Impaired

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individually Evaluated

 

 

 

Finance Receivables

 

 

Unpaid Principal Balance

 

 

Allowance

 

 

 

June 30,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

June 30,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

June 30,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2018

 

 

2018

 

 

2018

 

 

2018

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired account balances individually evaluated for impairment with an allowance:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wholesale

 

$

111

 

 

$

107

 

 

$

111

 

 

$

107

 

 

$

10

 

 

$

14

 

Real estate

 

 

54

 

 

 

86

 

 

 

54

 

 

 

86

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

5

 

Working capital

 

 

52

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

51

 

Total

 

$

217

 

 

$

248

 

 

$

217

 

 

$

248

 

 

$

62

 

 

$

70

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired account balances individually evaluated for impairment without an allowance:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wholesale

 

$

103

 

 

$

83

 

 

$

103

 

 

$

83

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

 

141

 

 

 

142

 

 

 

141

 

 

 

142

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Working capital

 

 

21

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

265

 

 

$

247

 

 

$

265

 

 

$

247

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired account balances aggregated and evaluated for impairment:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retail loan

 

$

225

 

 

$

222

 

 

$

223

 

 

$

220

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total impaired account balances:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retail loan

 

$

225

 

 

$

222

 

 

$

223

 

 

$

220

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wholesale

 

 

214

 

 

 

190

 

 

 

214

 

 

 

190

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

 

195

 

 

 

228

 

 

 

195

 

 

 

228

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Working capital

 

 

73

 

 

 

77

 

 

 

73

 

 

 

77

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

707

 

 

$

717

 

 

$

705

 

 

$

715

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of June 30, 2018 and March 31, 2018, the impaired finance receivables balance for accounts in the dealer products portfolio segment that were on nonaccrual status was $208 million and $249 million, respectively, and there were no charge-offs against the allowance for credit losses for these finance receivables.  Therefore, the impaired finance receivables balance is equal to the unpaid principal balance.  As of June 30, 2018 and March 31, 2018, impaired finance receivables in the retail portfolio segment recorded at the fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs were not significant and therefore excluded from the table above.  Refer to Note 6 – Allowance for Credit Losses for details related to the retail loan portfolio segment’s impaired account balances which are aggregated and evaluated for impairment when determining the allowance for credit losses.

Note 4 – Finance Receivables, Net (Continued)

The following table summarizes the average impaired loans by class of finance receivables as of the balance sheet date:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired account balances individually evaluated

  for impairment with an allowance:

Wholesale

 

$

109

 

 

$

109

 

 

Real estate

 

 

70

 

 

 

94

 

 

Working capital

 

 

53

 

 

 

39

 

 

Total

 

$

232

 

 

$

242

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired account balances individually evaluated

  for impairment without an allowance:

Wholesale

 

$

93

 

 

$

134

 

 

Real estate

 

 

141

 

 

 

100

 

 

Working capital

 

 

22

 

 

 

-

 

 

Total

 

$

256

 

 

$

234

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired account balances aggregated and evaluated for impairment:

Retail loan

 

$

224

 

 

$

222

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total impaired account balances:

Retail loan

 

$

224

 

 

$

222

 

 

Wholesale

 

 

202

 

 

 

243

 

 

Real estate

 

 

211

 

 

 

194

 

 

Working capital

 

 

75

 

 

 

39

 

 

Total

 

$

712

 

 

$

698

 

 

 

The primary source of interest income recognized on the loans in the table above is from performing troubled debt restructurings.  Interest income on impaired finance receivables and interest income recognized using a cash-basis method of accounting during the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were not significant.

Note 4 – Finance Receivables, Net (Continued)

Troubled Debt Restructuring

For accounts not under bankruptcy protection, the amount of finance receivables modified as a troubled debt restructuring during the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was not significant for each class of finance receivables.  Troubled debt restructurings for non-bankrupt accounts within the retail loan class of finance receivables are comprised exclusively of contract term extensions that reduce the monthly payment due from the customer.  For the three classes of finance receivables within the dealer products portfolio segment, troubled debt restructurings include contract term extensions, interest rate adjustments, waivers of loan covenants, or any combination of the three.  Troubled debt restructurings of accounts not under bankruptcy protection did not include forgiveness of principal or interest rate adjustments during the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.

We consider finance receivables under bankruptcy protection within the retail loan class to be troubled debt restructurings as of the date we receive notice of a customer filing for bankruptcy protection, regardless of the ultimate outcome of the bankruptcy proceedings.  The bankruptcy court may impose modifications as part of the proceedings, including interest rate adjustments and forgiveness of principal.  For the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the financial impact of troubled debt restructurings related to finance receivables under bankruptcy protection was not significant to our Consolidated Statements of Income and Consolidated Balance Sheets. 

Payment Defaults

Finance receivables modified as troubled debt restructurings for which there was a subsequent payment default during the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, and for which the modification occurred within twelve months of the payment default, were not significant for all classes of such receivables.