LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND CONTINGENCIES	6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2025
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND CONTINGENCIES	13. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND CONTINGENCIES: From time to time in the ordinary course of business, the Company becomes involved in lawsuits, or customers and distributors may make claims against the Company. In accordance with ASC 450-10, Contingencies, the Company makes a provision for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. On December 18, 2019, CogniPower LLC (“CogniPower”) filed a complaint against a customer of the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware for infringement of two patents; the Company thereafter intervened and sought a declaration of non-infringement with respect to use of the Company’s products. The case was then stayed until February 26, 2024, when the Delaware Court then set a schedule for the remainder of the case, with further proceedings in the coming months and a trial scheduled in August 2025. On January 16, 2025, CogniPower filed a follow-on complaint against the same customer asserting the same two patents in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, but no schedule has been set for the follow-on case. The Company believes it has strong claims and defenses with respect to all of CogniPower’s asserted patents and intends to vigorously defend itself against CogniPower’s claims against the Company’s technology, with appeals to follow if necessary. Currently, the Company is not able to estimate a loss or a range of loss for the ongoing litigations disclosed above. Adverse determinations in litigation could result in monetary losses, the loss of proprietary rights, subject the Company to significant liabilities, require the Company to seek licenses from third parties or prevent the Company from licensing the technology, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and operating results. On May 11, 2022, a former employee of the Company filed a first amended complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara alleging several violations of the Fair Employment and Housing Act. The complaint named the Company and one of its vice presidents and alleged, among other things, that the former employee was discriminated against and harassed based on age and disability, was retaliated against, and was wrongfully terminated in violation of public policy. Two of the plaintiff’s claims were dismissed with prejudice in response to the Company’s demurrer motions. Prior to trial, the plaintiff dismissed with prejudice the claims against the Company’s vice president and the claim of wrongful termination in violation of public policy. In June 2025, the remaining claims in the matter were tried before a jury. The jury reached a verdict and ruled in favor of the Company on the claims of age and disability discrimination and harassment based on age. The jury ruled in favor of the plaintiff and against the Company on the claims of harassment based on disability and retaliation and awarded compensatory damages of $3.2 million and punitive damages of $6.0 million. In the quarter ending June 30, 2025, the Company recognized a charge in the amount of $9.2 million in other operating expenses on the condensed consolidated statements of income. The Company strongly disagrees with those portions of the jury’s verdicts against the Company and plans to file post-trial motions asking the Court for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, including reversing the award of damages, and in the alternative for a new trial. The Company plans further appeals if they are necessary after rulings on post-trial motions. The Company is unable to predict the outcome of any further proceedings with certainty, and there can be no assurance that the Company will prevail in the above-mentioned litigations. These litigations, whether or not determined in the Company’s favor or settled, will be costly and will divert the efforts and attention of the Company’s management and technical personnel from normal business operations, potentially causing a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition and operating results.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND CONTINGENCIES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2025

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure

13. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND CONTINGENCIES:

From time to time in the ordinary course of business, the Company becomes involved in lawsuits, or customers and distributors may make claims against the Company. In accordance with ASC 450-10, Contingencies, the Company makes a provision for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.

On December 18, 2019, CogniPower LLC (“CogniPower”) filed a complaint against a customer of the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware for infringement of two patents; the Company thereafter intervened and sought a declaration of non-infringement with respect to use of the Company’s products. The case was then stayed until February 26, 2024, when the Delaware Court then set a schedule for the remainder of the case, with further proceedings in the coming months and a trial scheduled in August 2025. On January 16, 2025, CogniPower filed a follow-on complaint against the same customer asserting the same two patents in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, but no schedule has been set for the follow-on case. The Company believes it has strong claims and defenses with respect to all of CogniPower’s asserted patents and intends to vigorously defend itself against CogniPower’s claims against the Company’s technology, with appeals to follow if necessary.

Currently, the Company is not able to estimate a loss or a range of loss for the ongoing litigations disclosed above. Adverse determinations in litigation could result in monetary losses, the loss of proprietary rights, subject the Company to significant liabilities, require the Company to seek licenses from third parties or prevent the Company from licensing the technology, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and operating results.

On May 11, 2022, a former employee of the Company filed a first amended complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara alleging several violations of the Fair Employment and Housing Act. The complaint named the Company and one of its vice presidents and alleged, among other things, that the former employee was discriminated against and harassed based on age and disability, was retaliated against, and was wrongfully terminated in

violation of public policy. Two of the plaintiff’s claims were dismissed with prejudice in response to the Company’s demurrer motions. Prior to trial, the plaintiff dismissed with prejudice the claims against the Company’s vice president and the claim of wrongful termination in violation of public policy. In June 2025, the remaining claims in the matter were tried before a jury. The jury reached a verdict and ruled in favor of the Company on the claims of age and disability discrimination and harassment based on age. The jury ruled in favor of the plaintiff and against the Company on the claims of harassment based on disability and retaliation and awarded compensatory damages of $3.2 million and punitive damages of $6.0 million. In the quarter ending June 30, 2025, the Company recognized a charge in the amount of $9.2 million in other operating expenses on the condensed consolidated statements of income. The Company strongly disagrees with those portions of the jury’s verdicts against the Company and plans to file post-trial motions asking the Court for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, including reversing the award of damages, and in the alternative for a new trial. The Company plans further appeals if they are necessary after rulings on post-trial motions.

The Company is unable to predict the outcome of any further proceedings with certainty, and there can be no assurance that the Company will prevail in the above-mentioned litigations. These litigations, whether or not determined in the Company’s favor or settled, will be costly and will divert the efforts and attention of the Company’s management and technical personnel from normal business operations, potentially causing a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition and operating results.