XML 68 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
INVESTMENT IN THIRD PARTY
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Investments, All Other Investments [Abstract]  
INVESTMENT IN THIRD PARTY [Text Block]
INVESTMENT IN THIRD PARTY:

On October 22, 2010, the Company made a $7.0 million investment in preferred stock of a privately held company, SemiSouth Laboratories (“SemiSouth”). Also in October 2010, the Company paid $10.0 million as a prepaid royalty in exchange for the right to use SemiSouth's technology. The Company will amortize the royalty to cost of revenues based on the Company's sales of products incorporating the licensed technology. The Company classified its investment in SemiSouth, with a carrying value of $7.0 million and prepaid royalty of $10.0 million within Other Assets in the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2012. The Company does not expect to amortize the prepaid royalty in 2012.     

In February 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with SemiSouth to provide a lease line for the financing of capital equipment. Under the terms of the agreement, SemiSouth can borrow up to $8.6 million through January 2013, of which a total of $8.5 million had been funded as of June 30, 2012. Refer to Note 16, Lease Line to Third Party, for details. The Company included the lease line receivable and deposits on equipment in Other Assets and Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets in its consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2012.
The Company's 2010 agreement with SemiSouth provides, among other things, that the Company has the option to acquire SemiSouth in the future (“Call Option”) and that the Company may be obligated to acquire SemiSouth at a future date if SemiSouth achieves certain financial performance conditions (“Put Option”). The Put and Call Options terminate on the date that is approximately a month following delivery to the Company of SemiSouth's financial statements for the quarter ending December 31, 2013.

The Call Option can be exercised by the Company at a multiple of SemiSouth's annualized net operating profits after tax (“NOPAT”) (based on the average of this measure over a period of several months), as defined in the agreement. The multiple is intended to result in an acquisition price equal to the estimated fair value of SemiSouth. The minimum acquisition price would be $36 million, subject to certain adjustments. Pursuant to an amended agreement entered into in March 2012, the maximum purchase price shall not exceed $80.0 million.

The Put Option can only be exercised by SemiSouth once certain revenue and profit metrics have been reached.  At that time, SemiSouth could obligate the Company to acquire SemiSouth at a multiple of SemiSouth's NOPAT. The multiple is intended to result in an acquisition price equal to the estimated fair value of SemiSouth limited to a maximum of $80.0 million pursuant to the March 2012 amendment. In order to reach the revenue and profit metrics required to exercise the Put Option, SemiSouth would need to increase its quarterly revenue to approximately 17 times the level of revenues achieved in the second quarter of 2012.

The NOPAT multiple was determined to reflect fair value based on the Market Approach using Level 2 inputs that are derived principally from observable market data by comparing multiples for similar publicly traded companies. Due to the fact that the strike price of the Put Option is continually being adjusted to reflect the changes in the fair value of SemiSouth, the fair value of the Put Option was determined to be zero.

In July 2011, SemiSouth obtained $15 million of financing through the sale, and concurrent licensing back, of its intellectual property ("IP") with a financing company. In connection with this arrangement, the Company entered into a contingent purchase commitment with the financing company for SemiSouth's IP. The contingent purchase commitment requires the Company to purchase the IP previously owned by SemiSouth from its new owner for $15 million (plus reimbursement of certain expenses) under certain conditions generally relating to SemiSouth's failure to make certain payments or SemiSouth's insolvency. In this event, the agreement sets forth a process to be followed before the Company's purchase commitment matures. First, the agreement allows the Company to exercise its Call Option for a certain period of time and under certain conditions. If the Company does not initially exercise its Call Option, then SemiSouth can be sold to a third party during a period of time of up to approximately half a year (which period of time may be shortened by the new SemiSouth IP owner) or the Company could still exercise its Call Option. After that period of time elapses, the Company is obligated to purchase the SemiSouth IP for $15 million (plus reimbursement of certain expenses). The Company provided a $15 million letter of credit in August 2011 to the financing company to secure the contingent purchase commitment.

The Company entered into a contract in July 2011 with SemiSouth to act as a sales representative for SemiSouth. The sales representation agreement will allow the Company to earn a fee for its efforts in representing, promoting and soliciting orders for SemiSouth products. The contract can be terminated with or without cause by giving prior written notice to the other party.

In March 2012, the Company loaned SemiSouth $18.0 million, and in exchange the Company was issued a promissory note. In consideration for the loan the Company obtained an amendment to its 2010 agreement with SemiSouth to establish a maximum purchase price related to both the Company's option to acquire SemiSouth ("Purchase Option") and its potential obligation to acquire SemiSouth (as discussed above). The Company used Level 3 inputs in its fair-market valuation utilizing the income-approach valuation technique. The Company prepared a discounted cash flow analysis using the following unobservable inputs: weighted average cost of capital, long-term revenue growth, control premium, and discount for lack of marketability. The Company then used a Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of the Company's purchase option to be approximately $6.2 million. The Company's valuation technique derived inputs principally from market data (i.e., correlation values). The Company accounted for the $18.0 million promissory note in the Other Assets caption in its condensed consolidated balance sheet, net of the $6.2 million interest discount related to the Purchase Option, of which $0.9 million was amortized as of June 30, 2012. The interest discount will be amortized to interest income over the life of the promissory note. The amortization of the interest income and the stated interest rate on the promissory note reflect the approximate fair value of the effective interest rate. The Company also recorded the corresponding $6.2 million value of the Purchase Option in Other Assets in its condensed consolidated balance sheet. The following table reflects the Company's interest income related to its SemiSouth agreements (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,

 
Six Months Ended
June 30,

 
2012
2011
 
2012
2011
Interest income on note from SemiSouth
$
90

$

 
$
114

$

Non-cash interest income on note from SemiSouth
623


 
780


Interest income from SemiSouth lease line
83

21

 
164

60

Total interest income from SemiSouth
$
796

$
21

 
$
1,058

$
60


The Company's investment in SemiSouth is periodically reviewed for other-than-temporary declines in fair value by considering available evidence, including general market conditions, SemiSouth's financial condition, pricing in recent rounds of financing, earnings and cash flow forecasts, recent operational performance and any other readily available market data.  
 
The Company has determined that its investment in SemiSouth, in which the Company holds less than 20% equity interest, is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) in which the Company is not the primary beneficiary. The primary factors in the Company's assessment were; (i) SemiSouth's management team and board of directors were solely responsible for all business and financial decisions for SemiSouth and (ii) the Company does not have the ability to direct the activities that significantly impact the economic performance of SemiSouth. The Company accounts for its non-marketable investment in SemiSouth under the cost method.

The Company's maximum exposure to loss as a result of its interest in SemiSouth is limited to the aggregate of the carrying value of its equity investment, up to $8.6 million for the lease line agreement and $18.0 million for the loan to SemiSouth. There were no additional future funding commitments to SemiSouth as of June 30, 2012.