XML 20 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Note 3 - Basis of Reporting and Significant Accounting Policies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2017
Notes to Financial Statements  
Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]
NOTE
3
BASIS OF REPORTING AND
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Applied Minerals, Inc. have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, they do
not
include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for
complete financial statements.
 
In the opinion of management, these interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all of the adjustments of a normal and recurring nature which are considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position of the Company and the results of its operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results of operations for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
are
not
necessarily indicative of the operating results for the entire year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related disclosures for the year ended
December 31, 2016,
included in the Annual Report of Applied Minerals, Inc. on Form
10
-K filed with the SEC on
March 31, 2017.
 
The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect the application of certain significant accounting policies as described below and elsewhere in these notes. As of
September 30, 2017,
the Company’s significant accounting policies and estimates remain unchanged from those detailed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10
-K for the year ended
December 31, 2016. 
 
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Applied Minerals, Inc. and its inactive subsidiary in northern Idaho.
 
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. In these condensed consolidated financial statements, the PIK Note derivative liability, stock compensation and
the assessment of the possible impairment of long-lived assets involve extensive reliance on management’s estimates. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Fair Value
ASC Topic
820,
Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures
, defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. This topic also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires classification based on observable and unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and an entity’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of
three
levels:
 
Level
1
– Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities;
 
Level
2
– Inputs other than level
one
inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable; and
 
Level
3
– Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions, which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions that a market participant would use.
 
Liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows:
 
   
Fair value measurement using inputs
   
Carrying amount
 
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
September
30,
2017
   
December 31,
2016
 
                                         
Financial instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Series 2023 PIK Note Derivative
  $
-0-
    $
-0-
    $
68,041
    $
68,041
    $
142,909
 
Series A PIK Note Derivative
  $
-0-
    $
-0-
    $
1,074,133
    $
1,074,133
    $
2,033,643
 
 
The following table summarizes the activity for financial instruments at fair value using Level
3
inputs:
 
Balance at December 31,
2016
  $
2,176,552
 
Additions related to the i
ssuance of PIK Notes
   
31,990
 
Net unrealized
gains included in net (loss)
   
(1,066,368
)
         
Balance at
September 30, 2017
  $
1,142,174
 
 
The recorded value of certain financial assets and liabilities, which consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, other current assets, and accounts payable and accrued expenses approximates the fair value at
September 30, 2017
and Decemb
er
31,
2016
based upon the short-term nature of the assets and liabilities. Based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for loans with similar terms, and the remaining short-term period outstanding, the carrying value of notes payable other than PIK Notes approximates fair value. Estimated fair value of the PIK Notes Payable approximate
$31,809,504
and
$23,361,553,
respectively, at
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016.
 
For the Company's PIK Note derivative liabilities, Level
3
fair value hierarchy was estimated using a Monte Carlo Model using the following assumptions:
 
Series 2023 PIK Note derivative liability
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
   
Using Inputs
 
   
September
30, 2017
   
December 31,
2016
 
                 
Market price and estimated fair value of stock
  $
0.04
    $
0.12
 
Exercise price
  $
1.14
    $
1.28
 
Term (years)
   
5.83
     
6.58
 
Dividend yield
  $
-0-
    $
-0-
 
Expected volatility
   
107.7
%    
86.2
%
Risk-free interest rate
   
2.02
%    
2.18
%
 
Series A PIK Note derivative liability
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
   
Using Inputs
 
   
September
30, 2017
   
December 31,
2016
 
                 
Market price and estimated fair value of stock
  $
0.04
    $
0.12
 
Exercise price
  $
0.66
    $
0.83
 
Term (years)
   
5.83
     
6.58
 
Dividend yield
  $
-0-
    $
-0-
 
Expected volatility
   
107.7
%    
86.2
%
Risk-free interest rate
   
2.02
%    
2.18
%
 
Per share data
 
Loss per share for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
2016,
respectively, is calculated based on
118,862,734
and
108,482,042
weighted average outstanding shares of common stock.
  Loss per share for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
2016,
respectively, is calculated based on
112,094,593
and
101,231,559
weighted average outstanding shares of common stock.
 
At
September 30, 2017
and
2016,
respectively, the Company had outst
anding options and warrants to purchase
31,898,352
and
25,314,940
shares of Company common stock, and had notes payable which were convertible into
52,075,593
and
38,676,232
shares, respectively, of the Company common stock,
none
of which were included in the diluted computation as their effect would be anti-dilutive.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
Recently Adopted
 
In
November 2015,
FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
2015
-
17,
Income Taxes (Topic
740
): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. Accounting Standards Update
2015
-
17
simplifies current guidance and requires companies to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent on the balance sheet. Accounting Standards Update
2015
-
17
can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively and is effective for periods beginning after
December 15, 2016,
with early adoption permitted. The new guidance which was adopted in the quarter ended
March 31, 2017
had
no
effect on its financial statements and related disclosures.
 
In
March 2016,
the FASB issued ASU
2016
-
09,
“Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”, which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions. Under this amended guidance, all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies will be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement in the period in which the awards vest or are exercised. In the statement of cash flows, excess tax benefits will be classified with other income tax cash flows in operating activities. The amended guidance also gives the option to make a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur and increases the threshold for awards that are partially settled in cash to qualify for equity classification. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2016,
with early adoption permitted. The new guidance which was adopted in the quarter ended
March 31, 2017
had
no
effect on the financial statements. In accordance with ASU
2016
-
09,
the Company has made the accounting policy election to continue to estimate forfeitures.
 
Not
Yet Adopted
 
In 
May 2014,
the FASB issued guidance on revenue recognition, which provides a single, comprehensive revenue recognition model for all contracts with customers and superseded most existing revenue recognition guidance. The main principle under this guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue at the amount it expects to be entitled to in exchange for the transfer of goods or services to customers. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
January 1, 2018.
The Company will adopt the new standard in the
first
quarter of
2018.
The cumulative effect of the initial adoption will be reflected as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the date of the application of the guidance.
The Company will finalize its assessment in the
fourth
quarter of
2017.
 
 
In
February 2016,
the FASB issued ASU
2016
-
02
(“Topic
842”
) new accounting guidance for leases, which supersedes previous lease guidance. Under this guidance, for all leases with terms in excess of
one
year, including operating leases, the Company will be required to recognize on its balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. The new guidance retains a distinction between finance leases and operating leases and the classification criteria is substantially similar to previous guidance. Additionally, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee have
not
significantly changed. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2018,
with early adoption permitted.
 The Company is currently evaluating the effect this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statement and disclosures.
 
In
June 2016,
the FASB issued ASU
2016
-
13,
“Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic
326
): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” which (i) significantly changes the impairment model for most financial assets that are measured at amortized cost and certain other instruments from an incurred loss model to an expected loss model; and (ii) provides for recording credit losses on available-for-sale (AFS) debt securities through an allowance account. The update also requires certain incremental disclosures. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2020,
including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the effect this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.