XML 21 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Note 3 - Basis of Reporting and Significant Accounting Policies
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2017
Notes to Financial Statements  
Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]
NOTE
3
BASIS OF REPORTING AND
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Applied Minerals, Inc. have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.
 
In the opinion of management, these interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all of the adjustments of a normal and recurring nature which are considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position of the Company and the results of its operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results of operations for the
three
months ended
March
31,
2017
are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the entire year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related disclosures for the year ended
December
31,
2016,
included in the Annual Report of Applied Minerals, Inc. on Form
10
-K filed with the SEC on
March
31,
2017.
 
The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect the application of certain significant accounting policies as described below and elsewhere in these notes. As of
March
31,
2017,
the Company’s significant accounting policies and estimates remain unchanged from those detailed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10
-K for the year ended
December
31,
2016.
 
 
Exploration-Stage Company
From
1997
through
2008,
the Company’s sole source of revenue and income was derived from its contract mining business through which it provided shaft sinking, underground mine development and mine labor services. At
December
31,
2008,
the Company discontinued its contract mining efforts due to economic conditions and the desire to concentrate its efforts on the commercialization of the halloysite clay deposit at the Dragon Mine. Effective
January
1,
2009,
the Company was, and still is, classified as an exploration company as the existence of proven or probable reserves have not been demonstrated and no significant revenue has been earned from the mine. Under the SEC’s Industry Guide
7,
a mining company is considered an exploration stage company until it has declared mineral reserves determined in accordance with the guide and staff interpretations thereof.
 
Fair Value
ASC Topic
820,
Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures
, defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. This topic also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires classification based on observable and unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and an entity’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of
three
levels:
 
Level
1
– Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities;
 
Level
2
– Inputs other than level
one
inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable; and
 
Level
3
– Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions, which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions that a market participant would use.
 
Liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows:
 
 
 
Fair value measurement using inputs
 
 
Carrying amount
 
 
 
Level 1
 
 
Level 2
 
 
Level 3
 
 
March 31,
2017
 
 
December 31,
2016
 
                                         
Financial instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Series 2023 PIK Note Derivative
  $
-0-
    $
-0-
    $
92,341
    $
92,341
    $
142,909
 
Series A PIK Note Derivative
  $
-0-
    $
-0-
    $
1,191,134
    $
1,191,134
    $
2,033,643
 
 
The following table summarizes the activity for financial instruments at fair value using Level
3
inputs:
 
Balance at December 31, 2016
  $
2,176,552
 
Issuance of additional Series 2023 Notes
   
2,647
 
Net unrealized gain included in operations
   
(895,724
)
         
Balance at March 31, 2017
  $
1,283,475
 
 
The recorded value of certain financial assets and liabilities, which consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, other current assets, and accounts payable and accrued expenses approximates the fair value at
March
31,
2017
and
December
31,
2016
based upon the short-term nature of the assets and liabilities. Based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for loans with similar terms, and the remaining short-term period outstanding, the carrying value of notes payable other than PIK Notes approximates fair value. Estimated fair value of the PIK Notes Payable approximate
$24,209,090
and
$23,
361,553,
respectively, at
March
31,
2017
and
December
31,
2016.
 
For the Company's PIK Note derivative liabilities, Level
3
fair value hierarchy was estimated using a Monte Carlo Model using the following assumptions:
 
Series 2023 PIK Note derivative liability
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
   
Using Inputs
 
   
March 31,
2017
   
December 31,
2016
 
                 
Market price and estimated fair value of stock
  $
0.08
    $
0.12
 
Exercise price
  $
1.28
    $
1.28
 
Term (years)
   
6.33
     
6.58
 
Dividend yield
  $
- 0 -
    $
- 0 -
 
Expected volatility
   
86.5
%
   
86.2
%
Risk-free interest rate
   
2.11
%
   
2.18
%
 
Series A PIK Note derivative liability
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
   
Using Inputs
 
   
March 31,
2017
   
December 31,
2016
 
                 
Market price and estimated fair value of stock
  $
0.08
    $
0.12
 
Exercise price
  $
0.83
    $
0.83
 
Term (years)
   
6.33
     
6.58
 
Dividend yield
  $
- 0 -
    $
- 0 -
 
Expected volatility
   
86.5
%
   
86.2
%
Risk-free interest rate
   
2.11
%
   
2.18
%
 
Revenue Recognition
Revenue includes sales of halloysite clay and iron oxide, and is recognized when title passes to the buyer and when collectability is reasonably assured. Title passes to the buyer based on terms of the sales contract. Product pricing is determined based on related contractual arrangements with the Company’s customers.
 
Per share data
Loss per share for the
three
months ended
March
31,
2017
and
2016,
respectively, is calculated based on
108,613,549
and
97,243,610
weighted average outstanding shares of common stock.
 
At
March
31,
2017
and
2016,
respectively, the Company had outstanding options and warrants to purchase
25,022,102
and
19,230,012
shares of the Company’s common stock, respectively, and had notes payable which were convertible into
40,677,826
and
33,639,466
shares of the Company’s common stock, respectively, none of which were included in the diluted computation as their effect would be anti-dilutive.
 
Environmental Matters
Expenditures for ongoing compliance with environmental regulations that relate to current operations are expensed or capitalized as appropriate.  Expenditures resulting from the remediation of existing conditions caused by past operations that do not contribute to future revenue generations are expensed.  Liabilities are recognized when environmental assessments indicate that remediation efforts are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated.
 
Estimates of such liabilities are based upon currently available facts, existing technology and presently enacted laws and regulations taking into consideration the likely effects of inflation and other societal and economic factors, and include estimates of associated legal costs.  These amounts also reflect prior experience in remediating contaminated sites, other companies’ clean-up experience and data released by The Environmental Protection Agency or other organizations.  Such estimates are by their nature imprecise and can be expected to be revised over time because of changes in government regulations, operations, technology and inflation.  Recoveries are evaluated separately from the liability and, when recovery is assured, the Company records and reports an asset separately from the associated liability.
 
Based upon management’s current assessment of its environmental responsibilities, it does
not
believe that any reclamation or remediation liability exists at
March
31,
2017.
 
Comparative information
 
We have reclassified certain prior year information to conform with the current year’s presentation.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
Recently Adopted
 
In
November
2015,
FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
2015
-
17,
Income Taxes (Topic
740):
Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. Accounting Standards Update
2015
-
17
simplifies current guidance and requires companies to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent on the balance sheet. Accounting Standards Update
2015
-
17
can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively and is effective for periods beginning after
December
15,
2016,
with early adoption permitted. The new guidance which was adopted in the quarter ended
March
31,
2017
had no effect on its financial statements and related disclosures.
 
In
March
2016,
the FASB issued ASU
2016
-
09,
“Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”, which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions. Under this amended guidance, all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies will be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement in the period in which the awards vest or are exercised. In the statement of cash flows, excess tax benefits will be classified with other income tax cash flows in operating activities. The amended guidance also gives the option to make a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur and increases the threshold for awards that are partially settled in cash to qualify for equity classification. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December
15,
2016,
with early adoption permitted. The new guidance which was adopted in eh quarter ended
March
31,
2017
had no effect on the financial statements. In accordance with ASU
2016
-
09,
the Company has made the accounting policy election to continue to estimate forfeitures.
 
Not Yet Adopted
 
In
May
2014,
the FASB issued new accounting guidance, Accounting Standards Update No.
2014
-
09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers, on revenue recognition. The new standard provides for a single
five
-step model to be applied to all revenue contracts with customers as well as requires additional financial statement disclosures that will enable users to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows relating to customer contracts. Companies have an option to use either a retrospective approach or cumulative effect adjustment approach to implement the standard. Accounting Standards Update No.
2014
-
09
is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after
December
15,
2017,
including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted, but not before the original effective date of the standard. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on our consolidated financial statements.
 
 
In
February
2016,
the FASB issued ASU
2016
-
02
(“Topic
842”)
new accounting guidance for leases, which supersedes previous lease guidance. Under this guidance, for all leases with terms in excess of
one
year, including operating leases, the Company will be required to recognize on its balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. The new guidance retains a distinction between finance leases and operating leases and the classification criteria is substantially similar to previous guidance. Additionally, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee have not significantly changed. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December
15,
2018,
with early adoption permitted. 
 
In
June
2016,
the FASB issued ASU
2016
-
13,
“Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic
326):
Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial
Instruments,” which (i) significantly changes the impairment model for most financial assets that are measured at amortized cost and certain other instruments from an incurred loss model to an expected loss model; and (ii) provides for recording credit losses on available-for-sale (AFS) debt securities through an allowance account. The update also requires certain incremental disclosures. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after
December
15,
2020,
including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the effect this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
 
In
August
2016,
FASB issued ASU
2016
-
15,
“Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments,” amended guidance which clarifies how certain cash receipts and cash payments should be presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The new guidance is intended to reduce the existing diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after
December
15,
2017,
with early adoption permitted.
 
In
January
2017,
the FASB issued ASU
2017
-
01,
“Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business,” which clarifies the definition of a business and assists entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. Under this guidance, when substantially all of the fair value of gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single asset (or group of similar assets), the assets acquired would not represent a business. In addition, in order to be considered a business, an acquisition would have to include at a minimum an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create an output. The amended guidance also narrows the definition of outputs by more closely aligning it with how outputs are described in FASB guidance for revenue recognition. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after
December
15,
2017,
with early adoption permitted.