XML 46 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Earnings Per Share ("EPS")
6 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2013
Earnings Per Share ("EPS")  
Earnings Per Share ("EPS")

7.                                      Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)

 

Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, less unvested restricted stock for the period.  Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares for the period.  Potential common shares include the weighted-average dilutive effects of outstanding stock options and unvested restricted stock using the treasury stock method.

 

The following table sets forth the number of weighted-average shares used to compute basic and diluted EPS:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31,
2013

 

April 1,
2012

 

March 31,
2013

 

April 1,
2012

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Tetra Tech

 

$

24,820

 

$

22,284

 

$

51,043

 

$

44,894

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding – basic

 

64,551

 

63,072

 

64,376

 

62,846

 

Effect of dilutive stock options and unvested restricted stock

 

921

 

745

 

832

 

651

 

Weighted-average common stock outstanding – diluted

 

65,472

 

63,817

 

65,208

 

63,497

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share attributable to Tetra Tech:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.38

 

$

0.35

 

$

0.79

 

$

0.71

 

Diluted

 

$

0.38

 

$

0.35

 

$

0.78

 

$

0.71

 

 

For the three and six months ended March 31, 2013, 0.4 million and 0.6 million options were excluded from the calculation of dilutive potential common shares, respectively, compared to 2.4 million and 3.0 million options for the same periods last year. These options were not included in the computation of dilutive potential common shares because the assumed proceeds per share exceeded the average market price per share for that period.  Therefore, their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.