Summary of Significant Accounting Principles (Policies)	9 Months Ended
Summary of Significant Accounting Principles (Policies)	Sep. 30, 2019
Summary of Significant Accounting Principles
Going Concern	Going Concern As of September 30, 2019, the Company has cumulative losses totaling $(6,818,368) and negative working capital of $107,887. The Company had a net income of $75,825 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019. Because of these conditions, the Company will require additional working capital to develop business operations. The Company intends to raise additional working capital through the continued licensing of its brand with its current and new operators. There are no assurances that the Company will be able to achieve the level of revenues adequate to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to support the Company’s working capital requirements. To the extent that funds generated from any future use of licensing are insufficient, the Company will have to raise additional working capital. No assurance can be given that additional financing will be available, or if available, will be on terms acceptable to the Company. If adequate working capital is not available, the Company may not continue its operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
Concentration of Credit Risk	Concentration of Credit Risk The Company earns royalty revenues from ten licensees. With regards to September 30, 2019, concentrations of sales from four licensees range from 10% to 30%, totaling 78%. There are receivables from two licensees ranging from 14% to 76%, totaling 90%. There are no sales from licensees that are considered related parties. There are no receivables from these licensees that are considered related parties. With regards to September 30, 2018, concentrations of sales from four licensees range from 11% to 24%, totaling 70%. There are receivables from three licensees ranging from 16% to 33% totaling 77%. %. There are no sales from licensees that are considered related parties. There are no receivables from these licensees that are considered related parties.
Principles of consolidation	Principles of consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary. Inter-company items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Cash and cash equivalents	Cash and cash equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid temporary cash investments, with a maturity of three months or less when purchased, to be cash equivalents. There are times when cash may exceed $250,000, the FDIC insured limit.
Income per Share	Income per Share Under ASC 260-10-45, “Earnings Per Share”, basic income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the income (loss) applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares assumed to be outstanding during the period of computation. Diluted income (loss) per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and, if dilutive, potential common shares outstanding during the period. Accordingly, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, is the same for purposes of computing both basic and diluted net income per share for such years. As of September 30, 2019, there are no outstanding stock equivalents.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments	Fair Value of Financial Instruments The carrying value of cash and accrued expenses, if applicable, approximate their fair values based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. The carrying amounts of debt were also estimated to approximate fair value. The Company utilizes the methods of fair value measurement as described in ASC 820 to value its financial assets and liabilities. As defined in ASC 820, fair value is based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels, which are described below: Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs. Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data. Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards Update	Recently Issued Accounting Standards Update Leases In March 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-01, Leases (Topic 842): Codification Improvements. ASU 2019-01 aligns the guidance for fair value of the underlying asset by lessors with existing guidance in Topic 842. The ASU requires that the fair value of the underlying asset at lease commencement is its cost reflecting in volume or trade discounts that may apply. However, if there has been a significant lapse of time between the date the asset was acquired and the lease commencement date, the definition of fair value as outlined in Topic 820 should be applied. In addition, the ASU exempts both lessees and lessors from having to provide certain interim disclosures in the fiscal year in which a company adopts the new leases standard. The update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. We are still evaluating the impact of this ASU on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. All new accounting pronouncements issued but not yet effective or adopted have been deemed not to be relevant to us, hence are not expected to have any impact once adopted.