Summary of Significant Accounting Principles (Policies)	9 Months Ended
Summary of Significant Accounting Principles (Policies)	Sep. 30, 2018
Summary of Significant Accounting Principles
Going Concern	Going Concern As of September 30, 2018, the Company has cumulative losses totaling $(6,862,199) and negative working capital of $151,257. The Company had a net loss of $(638,801) for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. Because of these conditions, the Company will require additional working capital to develop business operations. The Company intends to raise additional working capital through the continued licensing of its brand with its current and new operators. There are no assurances that the Company will be able to achieve the level of revenues adequate to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to support the Company’s working capital requirements. To the extent that funds generated from any future use of licensing are insufficient, the Company will have to raise additional working capital. No assurance can be given that additional financing will be available, or if available, will be on terms acceptable to the Company. If adequate working capital is not available, the Company may not continue its operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
Concentration of Credit Risk	Concentration of Credit Risk The Company earns royalty revenues and to a lesser extent initiation fees from 12 licensees. With regards to September 30, 2018, concentrations of sales from 4 licensees range from 11% to 24%, totaling 70%. There are receivables from 3 licensees ranging from 16% to 33%, totaling 77%. Included in these amounts as of September 30, 2018 are sales from 1 licensee considered a related party. There are no receivables from these licensees that are considered related parties. With regards to September 30, 2017, concentrations of sales from 3 licensees range from 12% to 18%, totaling 47%. There are receivables from 4 licensees ranging from 19% to 26%, totaling 87%. There are no sales from licensees considered a related party. There are receivables from these 3 licensees that are considered related parties of 19%, 23% and 26%, most of which has been reserved.
Principles of consolidation	Principles of consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary. Inter-company items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Cash and cash equivalents	Cash and cash equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid temporary cash investments, with a maturity of three months or less when purchased, to be cash equivalents. There are times when cash may exceed $250,000, the FDIC insured limit.
Income per Share	Income per Share Under ASC 260-10-45, “Earnings Per Share”, basic income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the income (loss) applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares assumed to be outstanding during the period of computation. Diluted income (loss) per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and, if dilutive, potential common shares outstanding during the period. Accordingly, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, is the same for purposes of computing both basic and diluted net income per share for such years. As of September 30, 2018, there are no outstanding stock equivalents.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments	Fair Value of Financial Instruments The carrying value of cash and accrued expenses, if applicable, approximate their fair values based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. The carrying amounts of debt were also estimated to approximate fair value. The Company utilizes the methods of fair value measurement as described in ASC 820 to value its financial assets and liabilities. As defined in ASC 820, fair value is based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels, which are described below: Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs. Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data. Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards Update	Recently Issued Accounting Standards Update
New accounting standards not yet adopted	Revenue Recognition In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an Accounting Standards Update (ASU) “ASU 2016 – 01 Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” intended to improve the recognition and measurement of financial instruments. The ASU affects public and private companies, not-for-profit organizations, and employee benefit plans that hold financial assets or owe financial liabilities. The new guidance makes targeted improvements to existing GAAP by requiring equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. Requiring public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes. Requiring separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (that is, securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements. Eliminating the requirement to disclose the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost for organizations that are not public business entities. Eliminating the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet, and requiring a reporting organization to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk (also referred to as “own credit”) when the organization has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. The ASU on recognition and measurement went into effect for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Upon review of the provisions of this ASU it has been determined there is no material effect on the Company's results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. All new accounting pronouncements issued but not yet effective or adopted have been deemed not to be relevant to us, hence are not expected to have any impact once adopted.