XML 34 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block]
a.
Accounting Methods
 
LKA’s financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting. LKA has elected a calendar year-end.
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block]
b.
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share
 
LKA presents both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period including convertible debt, stock options, and warrants, using the treasury stock method, and convertible debt instrument, using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. LKA had net losses as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, so the diluted EPS excluded all 600,000 dilutive potential shares in the diluted EPS because the effect would be anti-dilutive.
Mine Exploration Costs, Policy [Policy Text Block]
c.
Mine Exploration Costs
 
Mine exploration costs are capitalized and amortized by the units of production method over estimated total recoverable proven and probable reserves. Amortization of mineral rights is provided by the units of production method over estimated total recoverable proven and probable reserves.
Costs related to locating and evaluating mineral and ore deposits, as well as determining the economic mineability of such deposits, are expensed as incurred. All costs related to mine exploration and expense were expensed due to there being no proven and probable reserves.
Asset Retirement Obligations, Policy [Policy Text Block]
d.
Asset Retirement Obligations
 
LKA recognizes legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets at fair value at the time the obligations are incurred. Upon initial recognition of a liability, the costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset (see Note 3).
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block]
e.
Income Taxes
 
LKA files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and the state of Colorado. LKA’s policy is to recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses.
 
Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
 
Net deferred tax assets consist of the following components as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:
 
   
2015
   
2014
 
Deferred tax assets:
               
Net operating loss carry forward
  $ 1,596,014     $ 1,295,892  
Accrued expenses
    30,857       29,739  
Valuation allowance
    (1,626,871 )     (1,325,631 )
Net deferred tax asset
  $ -     $ -  
 
The federal income tax provision differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 34% to pretax income from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 due to the following:
 
   
2015
   
2014
 
Pre-tax book income (loss)
  $ (303,547 )   $ (192,787 )
Meals and entertainment
    646       1,193  
Common stock, options and warrants issued for services and debt discount
    -       62,421  
Related party accruals
    1,119       (59,465 )
Accretion
    1,661       1,544  
Valuation allowance
    300,121       187,094  
Federal Income Tax
  $ -     $ -  
 
LKA had net operating losses of approximately $4,694,159 that expire in years through 2025. Due to the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, net operating loss carryforwards for Federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations. Should a change in ownership occur, net operating loss carryforwards may be limited as to use in future years. In accordance with the statute of limitations for federal tax returns, the Company’s federal tax returns for the years 2011 through 2014 are subject to examination.
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block]
f.
Cash Equivalents
 
LKA considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Receivables, Policy [Policy Text Block]
g.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
 
Accounts receivable are amounts due on gold sales, are unsecured and are carried at their estimated collectible amounts. Credit is generally extended on a short-term basis; thus accounts receivable do not bear interest. Accounts receivable are periodically evaluated for collectability based on past credit history with clients. Provisions for losses on accounts receivable are determined on the basis of loss experience, known and inherent risk in the account balance and current economic conditions.
Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block]
h.
Principles of Consolidation
 
The consolidated financial statements include those of LKA Gold, Inc., a Delaware corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary LKA International, Inc., a Nevada corporation. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block]
i.
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block]
j.
Revenue Recognition Policy
 
The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, goods have been delivered and title has transferred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue is generated through the sale of gold-bearing vein material and is recognized upon acceptance of this material by the smelter, or other ore processors. During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, LKA recognized $170,549 and $906,400 from the delivery of gold-bearing material from the Golden Wonder mine, respectively.
 
During 2015 and 2014 100% and 26% of revenue recognized was from one source, Klondex Mines, Ltd. in Reno, Nevada (Klondex). During 2014, $478,295, or 53% of revenue recognized was from TCB International, Inc. in Phoenix, Arizona, while $195,351, or 21% of revenue recognized was from Echo Bay Minerals Company in Republic, Washington. Precious metal sales receivables were $995 and $203,645 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively and were due from Klondex.
Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block]
k.
Stock-Based Compensation
 
LKA records stock-based compensation using the fair value method. Equity instruments issued to employees and the cost of the services received as consideration are accounted for in accordance with ASC 718 “Stock Compensation” and are measured and recognized based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued. All transactions with non-employees in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for in accordance with ASC 515 “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees”, based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block]
l.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments  
 
ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements” (ASC 820) and ASC 825, “Financial Instruments” (ASC 825)
,
requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. It establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument's categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. It prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:
 
Level 1 -
Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
 
Level 2 -
Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.
 
Level 3
- Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
 
The carrying values of cash, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximate fair value. Pursuant to ASC 820 and 825, the fair value of cash is determined based on "Level 1" inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The recorded values of all other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations.
 
The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the Company's financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2015:
 
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
 
Liabilities
                               
Derivative financial instruments
  $ -     $ -     $ 256,278     $ 256,278  
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]
m.
New Accounting Pronouncements
 
LKA has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that may impact its financial statements. During the fourth quarter of 2015, LKA adopted FASB Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-03 “Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30)”, which was issued April 2015 and adopted by the Company for the year ended December 31, 2015. In accordance with ASU 2015-03, LKA presents debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability.
 
The Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.
Reclassification, Policy [Policy Text Block]
n.
Reclassification of Prior Period Balances
 
Certain amounts in prior periods have been reclassified to conform with the report classifications of the year ended December 31, 2015, with no effect on previously reported net income or stockholder’s equity.
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block]
o.
Long Lived Assets
 
Periodically the Company assesses potential impairment of its long-lived assets, which include property, equipment and acquired intangible assets, in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment.”
The Company recognizes impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying values. An impairment loss would be recognized in the amount by which the recorded value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset, measured by the quoted market price of an asset or an estimate based on the best information available in the circumstances. There were no such losses recognized during 2015 or 2014.
Debt Issuance Costs, Policy [Policy Text Block]
p.
Debt Issuance Costs
 
The Company accounts for debt issuance costs in accordance with the provisions of ASU 2015-03, presenting debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability.
Derivatives, Policy [Policy Text Block]
q.
Accounting for Derivative Instruments
 
LKA accounts for derivative instruments in accordance with ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (ASC 815) and all derivative instruments are reflected as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet.
 
LKA uses estimates of fair value to value its derivative instruments. Fair value is defined as the price to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing and able market participants. In general, LKA's policy in estimating fair values is to first look at observable market prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets, where available. When these are not available, other inputs are used to model fair value such as prices of similar instruments, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, default rates and credit spreads (including for LKA's liabilities), relying first on observable data from active markets. Additional adjustments may be made for factors including liquidity, credit, bid/offer spreads, etc., depending on current market conditions. Transaction costs are not included in the determination of fair value. When possible, LKA seeks to validate the model's output to market transactions. Depending on the availability of observable inputs and prices, different valuation models could produce materially different fair value estimates. The values presented may not represent future fair values and may not be realizable. LKA categorizes its fair value estimates in accordance with ASC 820 based on the hierarchical framework associated with the three levels of price transparency utilized in measuring financial instruments at fair value as discussed above. Changes in fair value are recognized in the period incurred as either gains or losses.