SECURITIZATIONS AND VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

For additional information regarding Citi’s use of special purpose entities (SPEs) and variable interest entities (VIEs), see Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Citigroup’s involvement with consolidated and unconsolidated VIEs with which the Company holds significant variable interests or has continuing involvement through servicing a majority of the assets in a VIE is presented below:



	As of June 30, 2018
							Maximum exposure to loss in significant unconsolidated VIEs⁽¹⁾
							Funded exposures⁽²⁾				Unfunded exposures
In millions of dollars	Total involvement with SPE assets		Consolidated VIE/SPE assets		Significant unconsolidated VIE assets⁽³⁾		Debt investments		Equity investments		Funding commitments		Guarantees and derivatives		Total
Credit card securitizations	$	46,520	$	46,520	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Mortgage securitizations⁽⁴⁾
U.S. agency-sponsored	110,826		—		110,826		3,014		—		—		97		3,111
Non-agency-sponsored	22,812		1,724		21,088		422		—		—		1		423
Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)	18,548		18,548		—		—		—		—		—		—
Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)	16,687		—		16,687		5,148		—		—		9		5,157
Asset-based financing	64,970		627		64,343		19,360		568		7,249		—		27,177
Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)	7,671		2,158		5,513		—		—		3,752		—		3,752
Municipal investments	18,321		3		18,318		2,609		3,767		2,237		—		8,613
Client intermediation	667		442		225		124		—		—		6		130
Investment funds	1,836		581		1,255		8		7		7		2		24
Other	662		35		627		38		8		24		46		116
Total	$	309,520	$	70,638	$	238,882	$	30,723	$	4,350	$	13,269	$	161	$	48,503



	As of December 31, 2017
							Maximum exposure to loss in significant unconsolidated VIEs⁽¹⁾
							Funded exposures⁽²⁾				Unfunded exposures
In millions of dollars	Total involvement with SPE assets		Consolidated VIE/SPE assets		Significant unconsolidated VIE assets⁽³⁾		Debt investments		Equity investments		Funding commitments		Guarantees and derivatives		Total
Credit card securitizations	$	50,795	$	50,795	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Mortgage securitizations⁽⁴⁾
U.S. agency-sponsored	116,610		—		116,610		2,647		—		—		74		2,721
Non-agency-sponsored	22,251		2,035		20,216		330		—		—		1		331
Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)	19,282		19,282		—		—		—		—		—		—
Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)	20,588		—		20,588		5,956		—		—		9		5,965
Asset-based financing	60,472		633		59,839		19,478		583		5,878		—		25,939
Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)	6,925		2,166		4,759		138		—		3,035		—		3,173
Municipal investments	19,119		7		19,112		2,709		3,640		2,344		—		8,693
Client intermediation	958		824		134		32		—		—		9		41
Investment funds	1,892		616		1,276		14		7		13		—		34
Other	677		36		641		27		9		34		47		117
Total	$	319,569	$	76,394	$	243,175	$	31,331	$	4,239	$	11,304	$	140	$	47,014

(1) The definition of maximum exposure to loss is included in the text that follows this table.


(2)	Included on Citigroup’s June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 Consolidated Balance Sheet.


(3)	A significant unconsolidated VIE is an entity in which the Company has any variable interest or continuing involvement considered to be significant, regardless of the likelihood of loss.


(4)	Citigroup mortgage securitizations also include agency and non-agency (private-label) re-securitization activities. These SPEs are not consolidated. See “Re-securitizations” below for further discussion.

The previous tables do not include:


•	certain venture capital investments made by some of the Company’s private equity subsidiaries, as the Company accounts for these investments in accordance with the Investment Company Audit Guide (codified in ASC 946);


•	certain investment funds for which the Company provides investment management services and personal estate trusts for which the Company provides administrative, trustee and/or investment management services;


•	certain VIEs structured by third parties in which the Company holds securities in inventory, as these investments are made on arm’s-length terms;


•	certain positions in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities held by the Company, which are classified as Trading account assets or Investments, in which the Company has no other involvement with the related securitization entity deemed to be significant (for more information on these positions, see Notes 12 and 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements);

•

certain representations and warranties exposures in legacy ICG-sponsored mortgage-backed and asset-backed securitizations in which the Company has no variable interest or continuing involvement as servicer. The outstanding balance of mortgage loans securitized during 2005 to 2008 in which the Company has no variable interest or continuing involvement as servicer was approximately $8 billion and $9 billion at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively;


•	certain representations and warranties exposures in Citigroup residential mortgage securitizations, where the original mortgage loan balances are no longer outstanding; and


•	VIEs such as trust preferred securities trusts used in connection with the Company’s funding activities. The Company does not have a variable interest in these trusts.

The asset balances for consolidated VIEs represent the carrying amounts of the assets consolidated by the Company. The carrying amount may represent the amortized cost or the current fair value of the assets depending on the legal form of the asset (e.g., loan or security) and the Company’s standard accounting policies for the asset type and line of business.

The asset balances for unconsolidated VIEs in which the Company has significant involvement represent the most current information available to the Company. In most cases, the asset balances represent an amortized cost basis without regard to impairments, unless fair value information is readily available to the Company.

The maximum funded exposure represents the balance sheet carrying amount of the Company’s investment in the VIE. It reflects the initial amount of cash invested in the VIE, adjusted for any accrued interest and cash principal payments received. The carrying amount may also be adjusted for increases or declines in fair value or any impairment in value recognized in earnings. The maximum exposure of unfunded positions represents the remaining undrawn committed amount, including liquidity and credit facilities provided by the Company or the notional amount of a derivative instrument considered to be a variable interest. In certain transactions, the Company has entered into derivative instruments or other arrangements that are not considered variable interests in the VIE (e.g., interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps or where the Company is the purchaser of credit protection under a credit default swap or total return swap where the Company pays the total return on certain assets to the SPE). Receivables under such arrangements are not included in the maximum exposure amounts.

Funding Commitments for Significant Unconsolidated VIEs—Liquidity Facilities and Loan Commitments

The following table presents the notional amount of liquidity facilities and loan commitments that are classified as funding commitments in the VIE tables above:



	June 30, 2018				December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars	Liquidity facilities		Loan/equity commitments		Liquidity facilities		Loan/equity commitments
Asset-based financing	$	—	$	7,249	$	—	$	5,878
Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)	3,752		—		3,035		—
Municipal investments	—		2,237		—		2,344
Investment funds	—		7		—		13
Other	—		24		—		34
Total funding commitments	$	3,752	$	9,517	$	3,035	$	8,269

Significant Interests in Unconsolidated VIEs—Balance Sheet Classification

The following table presents the carrying amounts and classification of significant variable interests in unconsolidated VIEs:



In billions of dollars	June 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
Cash	$	—	$	—
Trading account assets	8.0		8.5
Investments	4.6		4.4
Total loans, net of allowance	22.0		22.2
Other	0.5		0.5
Total assets	$	35.1	$	35.6

Credit Card Securitizations

Substantially all of the Company’s credit card securitization activity is through two trusts—Citibank Credit Card Master Trust (Master Trust) and Citibank Omni Master Trust (Omni Trust), with the substantial majority through the Master Trust. These trusts are consolidated entities.

The following table reflects amounts related to the Company’s securitized credit card receivables:



In billions of dollars	June 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
Ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables
Sold to investors via trust-issued securities	$	27.3	$	28.8
Retained by Citigroup as trust-issued securities	7.6		7.6
Retained by Citigroup via non-certificated interests	11.7		14.4
Total	$	46.6	$	50.8

The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to Citigroup’s credit card securitizations:



	Three Months Ended June 30,
In billions of dollars	2018			2017
Proceeds from new securitizations	$	1.1		$	5.1
Pay down of maturing notes	(2.6		)	(0.8		)



	Six Months Ended June 30,
In billions of dollars	2018			2017
Proceeds from new securitizations	$	3.9		$	7.6
Pay down of maturing notes	(5.4		)	(2.8		)

Master Trust Liabilities (at Par Value)

The weighted average maturity of the third-party term notes issued by the Master Trust was 2.8 years as of June 30, 2018 and 2.6 years as of December 31, 2017.



In billions of dollars	Jun. 30, 2018		Dec. 31, 2017
Term notes issued to third parties	$	26.3	$	27.8
Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates	5.7		5.7
Total Master Trust liabilities	$	32.0	$	33.5

Omni Trust Liabilities (at Par Value)

The weighted average maturity of the third-party term notes issued by the Omni Trust was 1.4 years as of June 30, 2018 and 1.9 years as of December 31, 2017.



In billions of dollars	Jun. 30, 2018		Dec. 31, 2017
Term notes issued to third parties	$	1.0	$	1.0
Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates	1.9		1.9
Total Omni Trust liabilities	$	2.9	$	2.9

Mortgage Securitizations

The following tables summarize selected cash flow information and retained interests related to Citigroup mortgage securitizations:



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2018				2017
In billions of dollars	U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages		Non-agency- sponsored mortgages		U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages		Non-agency- sponsored mortgages
Proceeds from new securitizations	$	7.7	$	2.8	$	7.3	$	1.4
Contractual servicing fees received	—		—		0.1		—



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2018				2017
In billions of dollars	U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages		Non-agency- sponsored mortgages		U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages		Non-agency- sponsored mortgages
Proceeds from new securitizations	$	15.8	$	6.1	$	14.5	$	2.8
Contractual servicing fees received	0.1		—		0.1		—

Gains recognized on the securitization of U.S. agency-sponsored mortgages were $7 million and $12 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, gains recognized on the securitization of non-agency sponsored mortgages were $17 million and $35 million, respectively.

Gains recognized on the securitization of U.S. agency-sponsored mortgages were $18 million and $47 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, gains recognized on the securitization of non-agency sponsored mortgages were $26 million and $46 million, respectively.



	June 30, 2018						December 31, 2017
			Non-agency-sponsored mortgages⁽¹⁾						Non-agency-sponsored mortgages⁽¹⁾
In millions of dollars	U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages		Senior interests		Subordinated interests		U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages		Senior interests		Subordinated interests
Carrying value of retained interests	$	2,152	$	277	$	109	$	1,634	$	214	$	139


(1)	Disclosure of non-agency-sponsored mortgages as senior and subordinated interests is indicative of the interests’ position in the capital structure of the securitization.

Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of retained interests at the date of sale or securitization of mortgage receivables were as follows:



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
			Non-agency-sponsored mortgages⁽¹⁾
	U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages		Senior interests		Subordinated interests
Discount rate	3.1% to 9.5%		1.6% to 4.2%		3.5	%
Weighted average discount rate	5.7	%	3.4	%	3.5	%
Constant prepayment rate	3.5% to 12.9%		8.0	%	8.0	%
Weighted average constant prepayment rate	8.0	%	8.0	%	8.0	%
Anticipated net credit losses⁽²⁾	NM		4.6	%	4.6	%
Weighted average anticipated net credit losses	NM		4.6	%	4.6	%
Weighted average life	5.0 to 18.9 years		3.4 to 9.9 years		3.4 years



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
			Non-agency-sponsored mortgages⁽¹⁾
	U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages		Senior interests		Subordinated interests
Discount rate	2.5% to 14.0%		2.0% to 3.3%		3.5% to 19.1%
Weighted average discount rate	7.6	%	2.7	%	4.3	%
Constant prepayment rate	6.5% to 16.1%		—		—
Weighted average constant prepayment rate	10.6	%	—		—
Anticipated net credit losses⁽²⁾	NM		—		69.0% to 69.1%
Weighted average anticipated net credit losses	NM		—		69.1	%
Weighted average life	4.9 to 14.5 years		4.9 to 10.0 years		8.6 to 10.0 years



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
			Non-agency-sponsored mortgages⁽¹⁾
	U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages		Senior interests		Subordinated interests
Discount rate	3.0% to 11.4%		1.6% to 4.5%		3.0% to 3.5%
Weighted average discount rate	6.0	%	3.4	%	3.2	%
Constant prepayment rate	3.5% to 16.0%		8.0% to 12.0%		8.0% to 12.0%
Weighted average constant prepayment rate	8.2	%	9.8	%	9.9	%
Anticipated net credit losses⁽²⁾	NM		2.0% to 6.7%		2.0% to 4.6%
Weighted average anticipated net credit losses	NM		4.9	%	3.3	%
Weighted average life	5.0 to 18.9 years		2.5 to 9.9 years		2.5 to 3.4 years



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
			Non-agency-sponsored mortgages⁽¹⁾
	U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages		Senior interests		Subordinated interests
Discount rate	2.4% to 19.9%		2.0% to 3.3%		3.5% to 19.1%
Weighted average discount rate	9.5	%	2.7	%	4.3	%
Constant prepayment rate	3.8% to 16.1%		—		—
Weighted average constant prepayment rate	9.1	%	—		—
Anticipated net credit losses⁽²⁾	NM		—		67.3% to 69.1%
Weighted average anticipated net credit losses	NM		—		68.5	%
Weighted average life	4.9 to 14.5 years		4.9 to 10.0 years		8.6 to 10.0 years


(1)	Disclosure of non-agency-sponsored mortgages as senior and subordinated interests is indicative of the interests’ position in the capital structure of the securitization.


(2)	Anticipated net credit losses represent estimated loss severity associated with defaulted mortgage loans underlying the mortgage securitizations disclosed above. Anticipated net credit losses, in this instance, do not represent total credit losses incurred to date, nor do they represent credit losses expected on retained interests in mortgage securitizations.


NM	Anticipated net credit losses are not meaningful due to U.S. agency guarantees.

The interests retained by the Company range from highly rated and/or senior in the capital structure to unrated and/or residual interests.

The key assumptions used to value retained interests, and the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions, are set forth in the tables below. The negative effect of each change is calculated independently, holding all other assumptions constant. Because the key assumptions may not be independent, the net effect of simultaneous adverse changes in the key assumptions may be less than the sum of the individual effects shown below.



	June 30, 2018
			Non-agency-sponsored mortgages⁽¹⁾
	U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages		Senior interests		Subordinated interests
Discount rate	2.4% to 48.6%		9.5	%	3.9% to 8.5%
Weighted average discount rate	5.7	%	9.5	%	7.2	%
Constant prepayment rate	3.3% to 21.2%		5.0	%	7.5% to 9.5%
Weighted average constant prepayment rate	9.2	%	5.0	%	8.5	%
Anticipated net credit losses⁽²⁾	NM		41.0	%	28.0% to 56.3%
Weighted average anticipated net credit losses	NM		41.0	%	41.1	%
Weighted average life	0.5 to 27.3 years		6.9 years		1.9 to 10.3 years



	December 31, 2017
			Non-agency-sponsored mortgages⁽¹⁾
	U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages		Senior interests		Subordinated interests
Discount rate	1.8% to 84.2%		5.8% to 100.0%		2.8% to 35.1%
Weighted average discount rate	7.1	%	5.8	%	9.0	%
Constant prepayment rate	6.9% to 27.8%		8.9% to 15.5%		8.6% to 13.1%
Weighted average constant prepayment rate	11.6	%	8.9	%	10.6	%
Anticipated net credit losses⁽²⁾	NM		0.4% to 46.9%		35.1% to 52.1%
Weighted average anticipated net credit losses	NM		46.9	%	44.9	%
Weighted average life	0.1 to 27.8 years		4.8 to 5.3 years		0.2 to 18.6 years


(1)	Disclosure of non-agency-sponsored mortgages as senior and subordinated interests is indicative of the interests’ position in the capital structure of the securitization.


(2)	Anticipated net credit losses represent estimated loss severity associated with defaulted mortgage loans underlying the mortgage securitizations disclosed above. Anticipated net credit losses, in this instance, do not represent total credit losses incurred to date, nor do they represent credit losses expected on retained interests in mortgage securitizations.


NM	Anticipated net credit losses are not meaningful due to U.S. agency guarantees.



	June 30, 2018
				Non-agency-sponsored mortgages
In millions of dollars	U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages			Senior interests		Subordinated interests
Discount rates
Adverse change of 10%	$	(61	)	$	—	$	(1	)
Adverse change of 20%	(119		)	—		(2		)
Constant prepayment rate
Adverse change of 10%	(34		)	—		(1		)
Adverse change of 20%	(68		)	—		(1		)
Anticipated net credit losses
Adverse change of 10%	NM			—		—
Adverse change of 20%	NM			—		—



	December 31, 2017
				Non-agency-sponsored mortgages
In millions of dollars	U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages			Senior interests			Subordinated interests
Discount rates
Adverse change of 10%	$	(44	)	$	(2	)	$	(3	)
Adverse change of 20%	(85		)	(4		)	(5		)
Constant prepayment rate
Adverse change of 10%	(41		)	(1		)	(1		)
Adverse change of 20%	(84		)	(1		)	(2		)
Anticipated net credit losses
Adverse change of 10%	NM			(3		)	—
Adverse change of 20%	NM			(7		)	—


NM	Anticipated net credit losses are not meaningful due to U.S. agency guarantees.

Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSRs)

The fair value of Citi’s capitalized MSRs was $596 million and $560 million at June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The MSRs correspond to principal loan balances of $63 billion and $71 billion as of June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The following tables summarize the changes in capitalized MSRs:



	Three Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2018			2017
Balance, as of March 31	$	587		$	567
Originations	15			21
Changes in fair value of MSRs due to changes in inputs and assumptions	11			(11		)
Other changes⁽¹⁾	(16		)	(17		)
Sale of MSRs	(1		)	—
Balance, as of June 30	$	596		$	560



	Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2018			2017
Balance, beginning of year	$	558		$	1,564
Originations	32			56
Changes in fair value of MSRs due to changes in inputs and assumptions	57			56
Other changes⁽¹⁾	(33		)	(70		)
Sale of MSRs⁽²⁾	(18		)	(1,046		)
Balance, as of June 30	$	596		$	560


(1)	Represents changes due to customer payments and passage of time.


(2)	See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information on the exit of the U.S. mortgage servicing operations and sale of MSRs in 2017.

The Company receives fees during the course of servicing previously securitized mortgages. The amounts of these fees were as follows:



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2018		2017		2018		2017
Servicing fees	$	43	$	65	$	89	$	171
Late fees	1		3		2		6
Ancillary fees	3		4		6		8
Total MSR fees	$	47	$	72	$	97	$	185

In the Consolidated Statement of Income these fees are primarily classified as Commissions and fees, and changes in MSR fair values are classified as Other revenue.

Re-securitizations

The Company engages in re-securitization transactions in which debt securities are transferred to a VIE in exchange for new beneficial interests. Citi did not transfer non-agency (private-label) securities to re-securitization entities during the quarters ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. These securities are backed by either residential or commercial mortgages and are often structured on behalf of clients.

As of June 30, 2018, the fair value of Citi-retained interests in private-label re-securitization transactions structured by Citi totaled approximately $90 million (all related to re-securitization transactions executed prior to 2016), which has been recorded in Trading account assets. Of this amount, approximately $33 million was related to senior beneficial interests and approximately $57 million was related to subordinated beneficial interests. As of December 31, 2017, the fair value of Citi-retained interests in private-label re-securitization transactions structured by Citi totaled approximately $79 million (all related to re-securitization transactions executed prior to 2016). Of this amount, substantially all was related to subordinated beneficial interests. The original par value of private-label re-securitization transactions in which Citi holds a retained interest as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 was approximately $548 million and $887 million, respectively.

The Company also re-securitizes U.S. government-agency guaranteed mortgage-backed (agency) securities. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, Citi transferred agency securities with a fair value of approximately $6.6 billion and $13.6 billion, respectively, to re-securitization entities compared to approximately $5.6 billion and $10.1 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.

As of June 30, 2018, the fair value of Citi-retained interests in agency re-securitization transactions structured by Citi totaled approximately $2.5 billion (including $1.2 billion related to re-securitization transactions executed in 2018) compared to $2.1 billion as of December 31, 2017 (including $854 million related to re-securitization transactions executed in 2017), which is recorded in Trading account assets. The original fair value of agency re-securitization transactions in which Citi holds a retained interest as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 was approximately $64.2 billion and $68.3 billion, respectively.

As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company did not consolidate any private-label or agency re-securitization entities.

Citi-Administered Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Conduits

At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the commercial paper conduits administered by Citi had approximately $18.5 billion and $19.3 billion of purchased assets outstanding, respectively, and had incremental funding commitments with clients of approximately $15.8 billion and $14.5 billion, respectively.

Substantially all of the funding of the conduits is in the form of short-term commercial paper. At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the weighted average remaining lives of the commercial paper issued by the conduits were approximately 47 and 51 days, respectively.

The primary credit enhancement provided to the conduit investors is in the form of transaction-specific credit enhancements described above. In addition to the transaction-specific credit enhancements, the conduits, other than the government guaranteed loan conduit, have obtained a letter of credit from the Company, which is equal to at least 8% to 10% of the conduit’s assets with a minimum of $200 million. The letters of credit provided by the Company to the conduits total approximately $1.7 billion as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. The net result across multi-seller conduits administered by the Company is that, in the event defaulted assets exceed the transaction-specific credit enhancements described above, any losses in each conduit are allocated first to the Company and then the commercial paper investors.

At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company owned $6.5 billion and $9.3 billion, respectively, of the commercial paper issued by its administered conduits. The Company's investments were not driven by market illiquidity and the Company is not obligated under any agreement to purchase the commercial paper issued by the conduits.

Collateralized Loan Obligations

The following tables summarize selected cash flow information and retained interests related to Citigroup CLOs:

Citi held no retained interests in CLOs purchased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.

Asset-Based Financing

The primary types of Citi’s asset-based financings, total assets of the unconsolidated VIEs with significant involvement, and Citi’s maximum exposure to loss are shown below. For Citi to realize the maximum loss, the VIE (borrower) would have to default with no recovery from the assets held by the VIE.



	June 30, 2018
In millions of dollars	Total unconsolidated VIE assets		Maximum exposure to unconsolidated VIEs
Type
Commercial and other real estate	$	15,795	$	5,177
Corporate loans	8,567		6,748
Hedge funds and equities	469		55
Airplanes, ships and other assets	39,512		15,197
Total	$	64,343	$	27,177



	December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars	Total unconsolidated VIE assets		Maximum exposure to unconsolidated VIEs
Type
Commercial and other real estate	$	15,370	$	5,445
Corporate loans	4,725		3,587
Hedge funds and equities	542		58
Airplanes, ships and other assets	39,202		16,849
Total	$	59,839	$	25,939

Municipal Securities Tender Option Bond (TOB) Trusts

At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, none of the municipal bonds owned by non-customer TOB trusts were subject to a credit guarantee provided by the Company.

At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, liquidity agreements provided with respect to customer TOB trusts totaled $3.8 billion and $3.2 billion, respectively, of which $1.9 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively, were offset by reimbursement agreements. For the remaining exposure related to TOB transactions, where the residual owned by the customer was at least 25% of the bond value at the inception of the transaction, no reimbursement agreement was executed.

The Company also provides other liquidity agreements or letters of credit to customer-sponsored municipal investment funds, which are not variable interest entities, and municipality-related issuers that totaled $6.3 billion and $6.1 billion as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. These liquidity agreements and letters of credit are offset by reimbursement agreements with various term-out provisions.

Client Intermediation

The proceeds from new securitizations related to the Company’s client intermediation transactions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 totaled approximately $0.3 billion and $0.5 billion, respectively, compared to $0.2 billion and $0.7 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.

Three Months Ended June 30,

In billions of dollars

Proceeds from new securitizations