XML 58 R83.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Business Combinations, Acquisitions, and Deconsolidations (Details) Deconsolidation of Spigit and Investment in Mindjet (USD $)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Dec. 31, 2013
Dec. 31, 2012
Sep. 10, 2013
Noncontrolling Interest [Line Items]        
Gain on deconsolidation $ (1,078,000)us-gaap_DeconsolidationGainOrLossAmount [1] $ 21,181,000us-gaap_DeconsolidationGainOrLossAmount [1]    
Provision (benefit) for federal, foreign, and state income taxes (3,514,000)us-gaap_IncomeTaxExpenseBenefit 3,197,000us-gaap_IncomeTaxExpenseBenefit (1,069,000)us-gaap_IncomeTaxExpenseBenefit  
Carrying Value (55,671,000)us-gaap_Investments (78,657,000)us-gaap_Investments    
Mindjet        
Noncontrolling Interest [Line Items]        
Fair value of total investment in Mindjet       28,679,000pico_EquityMethodandCostMethodInvestments
/ dei_LegalEntityAxis
= pico_MindjetMember
Carrying Value   25,900,000us-gaap_Investments
/ dei_LegalEntityAxis
= pico_MindjetMember
   
Restricted Stock | Mindjet        
Noncontrolling Interest [Line Items]        
Stock-based compensation expense   2,200,000us-gaap_AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense
/ us-gaap_AwardTypeAxis
= us-gaap_RestrictedStockMember
/ dei_LegalEntityAxis
= pico_MindjetMember
   
Spigit        
Noncontrolling Interest [Line Items]        
Provision (benefit) for federal, foreign, and state income taxes $ 2,800,000us-gaap_IncomeTaxExpenseBenefit
/ us-gaap_BusinessAcquisitionAxis
= pico_SpigitMember
$ 4,100,000us-gaap_IncomeTaxExpenseBenefit
/ us-gaap_BusinessAcquisitionAxis
= pico_SpigitMember
   
[1] The Company had a non-recurring fair value measurement as a result of the merger transaction between Spigit and Mindjet. The fair value of the investment in Mindjet was based on analysis of the financial and operational aspects of the company, including consideration of a discounted cash flow analysis which incorporated a contemporary forecast of the merged Mindjet/Spigit entity going forward. Also considered was a guideline public company analysis which compared business enterprise value-to-revenue ratios for comparable public companies to current revenue metrics for the company. Determination of the business enterprise value based on the foregoing was then considered in an analysis of the distribution of equity value to the various classes of equity held by PICO in order to reflect differences in value due to differing liquidation, dividend and voting rights. The fair value approach relied primarily on Level 3 unobservable inputs, whereby expected future cash flows were discounted using a rate that includes assumptions regarding an entity’s average cost of debt and equity, incorporated expected future cash flows based on internal business plans, and applied certain assumptions about risk and uncertainties. The estimates were based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which by nature are uncertain and unpredictable.