XML 39 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Tables)
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Schedule of Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis
At March 31, 2014 (in thousands):
Assets
Quoted Prices In
Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Balance at
March 31, 2014
Available-for-sale equity securities (1)
$
22,699

 
$
18,038

 
 
 
$
40,737

Available-for-sale debt securities (1)
$
9,361

 
 
 
 
 
$
9,361

Readily marketable inventory (2)
$
5,158

 
$
7,133

 
 
 
$
12,291

Derivative instruments (3)
$
874

 
$
1,426

 
 
 
$
2,300

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative instruments (3)
$
1,008

 
$
2,401

 
 
 
$
3,409


At December 31, 2013 (in thousands):
Assets
Quoted Prices In
Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Balance at
December 31,
2013
Available-for-sale equity securities (1)
$
26,177

 
$
15,231

 
 
 
$
41,408

Available-for-sale debt securities (1)
$
9,172

 
 
 
 
 
$
9,172

Readily marketable inventory (2)
$
2,396

 
$
5,292

 
 
 
$
7,688

  Derivative instruments (3)
$
346

 
$
2,108

 
 
 
$
2,454

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative instruments (3)
$
436

 
$
936

 
 
 
$
1,372


(1) Where there are quoted market prices that are readily available in an active market, securities are classified as Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 available-for-sale investments are valued using quoted market prices multiplied by the number of shares owned and debt securities are valued using a market quote in an active market. All Level 2 available-for-sale securities are one class because they all contain similar risks and are valued using market prices and include securities where the markets are not active, that is where there are few transactions, or the prices are not current or the prices vary considerably over time. Inputs include directly or indirectly observable inputs such as quoted prices. Level 3 available-for-sale securities would include securities where valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

(2) Readily marketable inventory comprises commodity inventories that are reported at fair value based on commodity exchange quotations. Canola seed inventories are valued based on the quoted market price multiplied by the quantity of inventory and are classified as Level 1. Canola oil and meal inventories are classified as Level 2 because the inputs are directly observable, such as the quoted market price of the corresponding soybean commodity.

(3) Included in this caption are three types of agricultural commodity derivative contracts: swaps, exchange traded futures, and forward commodity purchase and sale contracts. The exchange traded futures contracts are valued based on quoted prices in active markets multiplied by the number of contracts and are classified as Level 1. The swaps are classified as Level 2 because the inputs are directly observable, such as the quoted market prices for relevant commodity futures contracts. The swaps are valued based on the difference of the arithmetic average of the quoted market price of the relevant underlying multiplied by the notional quantities, and the arithmetic average of the prices specified in the instrument multiplied by the notional quantities.
Fair Value Measurements on a Non-Recurring Basis
Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 (in thousands):
Asset Description
Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 
Total Loss Recorded During the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
Real estate (1)
 
 
 
 
$
1,357

 
$
(2,865
)

(1) The Company had a non-recurring fair value measurement of real estate assets with a carrying value of $4.2 million that was written down to its estimated fair value of $1.4 million resulting in an impairment charge of $2.9 million, which was included in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2014. The impairment was recorded based on the estimated sales price the Company expects to receive upon the sale of this real estate. The impairment loss relates to a property which is not part of UCP’s results of operations nor is it included in UCP’s inventory of lots.

Year Ended December 31, 2013 (in thousands):
Asset Description
 
Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 
Total Gain
(Loss) Recorded During the Year Ended December 31, 2013
Intangible asset (exclusive right to use infrastructure and associated water credits) (1)
 
 
 
 
 
$
83,897

 
$
(993
)
Real estate (2)
 
 
 
 
 
$
3,674

 
$
(417
)
Investment in unconsolidated affiliate (3)
 
 
 
 
 
$
28,679

 
$
21,181


(1) The Company had a non-recurring fair value measurement for an intangible asset with a carrying amount of $84.9 million that was written down to its estimated fair value of $83.9 million resulting in an impairment charge of $993,000, which was included in earnings for December 31, 2013. The implied fair value was calculated using a discounted cash flow model that incorporated a wide range of assumptions including current asset pricing, price escalation, discount rates, absorption rates, timing of sales, and costs. Given the decline in market prices for similar assets, increases in interest rates, and extended timing of expected absorptions, the Company adjusted its assumptions and judgments in the model from original projections.

(2) The Company had a non-recurring fair value measurement of real estate assets with a carrying value of $4.1 million that was written down to its estimated fair value of $3.7 million resulting in an impairment charge of $417,000, which was included in earnings for December 31, 2013. The impairment was recorded based on the estimated sales price the Company expects to receive upon the sale of this real estate. The impairment loss relates to a property which is not part of UCP’s results of operations nor is it included in UCP’s inventory of lots.

(3) The Company had a non-recurring fair value measurement as a result of the merger transaction between Spigit, Inc. (“Spigit”) and Mindjet. The transaction resulted in the deconsolidation of Spigit, and the recording of the Company’s common and preferred stock investment in Mindjet at fair value, on the date of the transaction. The transaction resulted in a gain of approximately $21.2 million before income taxes. The fair value of the investment in Mindjet was based on analysis of the financial and operational aspects of the company, including consideration of a discounted cash flow analysis which incorporated a contemporary forecast of the merged Mindjet/Spigit entity going forward.  Also considered was a guideline public company analysis which compared business enterprise value-to-revenue ratios for comparable public companies to current revenue metrics for the company.  Determination of the business enterprise value based on the foregoing was then considered in an analysis of the distribution of equity value to the various classes of equity held by PICO in order to reflect differences in value due to differing liquidation, dividend and voting rights. The fair value approach relied primarily on Level 3 unobservable inputs, whereby expected future cash flows were discounted using a rate that includes assumptions regarding an entity’s average cost of debt and equity, incorporated expected future cash flows based on internal business plans, and applied certain assumptions about risk and uncertainties. The estimates were based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which by nature are uncertain and unpredictable.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of the Company’s financial instruments which are not carried at fair value at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (in thousands):

 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Estimated
Fair Value
Financial assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates held at cost
$
19,380

 
$
19,380

 
$
19,380

 
$
19,380

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt
$
135,536

 
$
144,968

 
$
136,767

 
$
145,924

Notional Amounts of Open Derivative Positions
The following tables summarize the notional amount of open derivative positions at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
 
March 31, 2014
 
Exchange Traded
 
Non-Exchange Traded
 
 
 
(Short)(1)
 
Long(1)
 
(Short)(1)
 
Long(1)
 
Unit of Measure
Futures
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Agricultural Commodities
(54,855
)
 
31,708

 
 
 
 
 
Tons
Natural Gas
 
 
400,000

 
 
 
 
 
MMBtus(2)
Forwards
 
 
 
 
(117,801
)
 
72,900

 
Tons
Swaps
 
 
 
 
 
 
15,000

 
Tons

 
December 31, 2013
 
Exchange Traded
 
Non-Exchange Traded
 
 
 
(Short)(1)
 
Long(1)
 
(Short)(1)
 
Long(1)
 
Unit of Measure
Futures
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Agricultural Commodities
(23,038
)
 
34,380

 
 
 
 
 
Tons
Natural Gas
 
 
460,000

 
 
 
 
 
MMBtus(2)
Forwards
 
 
 
 
(132,428
)
 
30,367

 
Tons
Swaps

 
 
 
 
 
75,000

 
Tons

(1) Exchange and non-exchange traded futures, forwards, and swaps are presented on a gross (short) and long position basis.
(2) Million Metric British Thermal Units.

Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income or Loss
The table below summarizes the effect of derivative instruments on the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income or loss (in thousands):
 
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives
 
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
Location
 
2014
 
2013
Futures
Cost of canola oil and meal sold
 
$
(1,054
)
 
$
(2,171
)
Forwards
Cost of canola oil and meal sold
 
1,474

 
(814
)
Swaps
Cost of canola oil and meal sold
 
3,675

 
367

 
 
 
$
4,095

 
$
(2,618
)