XML 21 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Tables)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Schedule of Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis
At June 30, 2013 (in thousands):
Assets
Quoted Prices In
Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Balance at
June 30, 2013
Available-for-sale equity securities (1)
$
14,816

 
$
24,701

 
 
 
$
39,517

Available-for-sale debt securities (1)
$
7,045

 
 
 
 
 
$
7,045

Readily marketable inventory (2)
$
3,520

 
$
3,879

 
 
 
$
7,399

Derivative instruments (3)
$
679

 
$
2,085

 
 
 
$
2,764

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative instruments (3)
$
1,184

 
$
528

 
 
 
$
1,712


At December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
Assets
Quoted Prices In
Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Balance at
December 31,
2012
Available-for-sale equity securities (1)
$
27,977

 
$
12,461

 
 
 
$
40,438

Available-for-sale debt securities (1)
$
8,026

 
 
 
 
 
$
8,026

Readily marketable inventory (2)
$
3,152

 
$
3,773

 
 
 
$
6,925

  Derivative instruments (3)
$
96

 
$
2,257

 
 
 
$
2,353

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative instrument (3)
$
459

 
$
104

 
 
 
$
563


(1) Where there are quoted market prices that are readily available in an active market, securities are classified as Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 available-for-sale investments are valued using quoted market prices multiplied by the number of shares owned and debt securities are valued using a market quote in an active market. All Level 2 available-for-sale securities are one class because they all contain similar risks and are valued using market prices and include securities where the markets are not active, that is where there are few transactions, or the prices are not current or the prices vary considerably over time. Inputs include directly or indirectly observable inputs such as quoted prices. Level 3 available-for-sale securities would include securities where valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

(2) Readily marketable inventory are commodity inventories that are reported at fair value based on commodity exchange quotations. Canola seed inventories are valued based on the quoted market price multiplied by the quantity of inventory and are classified as Level 1. Canola oil and meal inventories are classified as Level 2 because the inputs are directly observable, such as the quoted market price of the corresponding soybean commodity.

(3) Included in this caption are three types of agricultural commodity derivative contracts: swaps, exchange traded futures, and forward commodity purchase and sale contracts. The exchange traded futures contracts are valued based on quoted prices in active markets multiplied by the number of contracts and are classified as Level 1. The swaps are classified as Level 2 because the inputs are directly observable, such as the quoted market prices for relevant commodity futures contracts. The swaps are valued based on the difference of the arithmetic average of the quoted market price of the relevant underlying multiplied by the notional quantities, and the arithmetic average of the prices specified in the instrument multiplied by the notional quantities.

Forward commodity purchase and sale contracts classified as derivatives are valued using quantitative models that require the use of multiple inputs including quoted market prices and various other assumptions including time value. These contracts are categorized as Level 2 and are valued based on the difference between the quoted market price and the price in the contract multiplied by the undelivered notional quantity deliverable under the contract.

Non-Financial Fair Value Measurements:

The following table sets forth the Company’s non-financial assets that were measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis for the six months ended June 30, 2013, by level within the fair value hierarchy. There were no such measurements during the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 (in thousands):
Asset Description
Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 
Total Loss
Intangible asset (exclusive right to use infrastructure and associated water credits) (1)
 
 
 
 
$
83,897

 
$
993

Real estate (2)
 
 
 
 
$
3,674

 
$
417


(1) As of June 30, 2013, the Company had a non-recurring fair value measurement for an intangible asset with a carrying amount of $84.9 million that was written down to its estimated fair value of $83.9 million resulting in an impairment charge of $993,000, which was included in earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013. The implied fair value was calculated using a discounted cash flow model that incorporated a wide range of assumptions including current asset pricing, price escalation, discount rates, absorption rates, timing of sales, and costs. Given the decline in market prices for similar assets, increases in interest rates, and extended timing of expected absorptions, the Company adjusted its assumptions and judgments in the model from prior projections for the Fish Springs water credits and pipeline rights and Carson Lyon water assets.

(2) As of June 30, 2013, the Company had a non-recurring fair value measurement of real estate assets with a carrying value of $4.1 million that was written down to its estimated fair value of $3.7 million resulting in an impairment charge of $417,000, which was included in earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013. The impairment was recorded based on the estimated sales price the Company expects to receive upon the sale of this real estate.

Fair Value Measurements on a Non-Recurring Basis
The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 (in thousands):
Asset Description
Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 
Total Loss
Intangible asset (exclusive right to use infrastructure and associated water credits) (1)
 
 
 
 
$
83,897

 
$
993

Real estate (2)
 
 
 
 
$
3,674

 
$
417


(1) As of June 30, 2013, the Company had a non-recurring fair value measurement for an intangible asset with a carrying amount of $84.9 million that was written down to its estimated fair value of $83.9 million resulting in an impairment charge of $993,000, which was included in earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013. The implied fair value was calculated using a discounted cash flow model that incorporated a wide range of assumptions including current asset pricing, price escalation, discount rates, absorption rates, timing of sales, and costs. Given the decline in market prices for similar assets, increases in interest rates, and extended timing of expected absorptions, the Company adjusted its assumptions and judgments in the model from prior projections for the Fish Springs water credits and pipeline rights and Carson Lyon water assets.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of the Company’s financial instruments which are not carried at fair value at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements are classified include measurements using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1), quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active (Level 2), and significant valuation assumptions that are not readily observable in the market (Level 3). As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and receivable approximated their carrying values because of the short-term nature of these assets or liabilities. The estimated fair value of the Company's debt is based on cash flow models discounted at the then-current interest rates and an estimate of the then-current spread above those rates at which the Company could borrow, which are level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy. The estimated fair value of the Company’s other investments, which is an investment in preferred stock of a private company, cannot be reasonably estimated.

 (In thousands)
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Estimated
Fair Value
Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt
$
150,447

 
$
160,793

 
$
141,008

 
$
137,024

Notional Amounts of Open Derivative Positions
The table below summarizes the notional amount of open derivative positions.
 
June 30, 2013
 
Exchange Traded
 
Non-Exchange Traded
 
 
 
(Short)(1)
 
Long(1)
 
(Short)(1)
 
Long(1)
 
Unit of Measure
Futures
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Agricultural Commodities
(33,444
)
 
42,050

 
 
 
 
 
Tons
Natural Gas
 
 
120,000

 
 
 
 
 
MMBtus
Forwards
 
 
 
 
(89,011
)
 
42,670

 
Tons
Swaps
 
 
 
 
 
 
33,500

 
Tons

(1) Exchange and non-exchange traded futures, forwards, and swaps are presented on a gross (short) and long position basis.

Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income or Loss
The table below summarizes the effect of derivative instruments on the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income or loss (in thousands).
 
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
 June 30,
 
Location
 
2013
 
2012
Futures(1)
Cost of canola oil and meal sold
 
$
3,134

 
$
784

Forwards(1)
Cost of canola oil and meal sold
 
280

 
(1,263
)
Swaps(1)
Cost of canola oil and meal sold
 
431

 
(5,711
)
 
 
 
$
3,845

 
$
(6,190
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Futures(2)
Operating and other costs
 

 
$
(708
)
Forwards(2)
Operating and other costs
 

 
707

Swaps(2)
Operating and other costs
 

 
1,884

 
 
 
$

 
$
1,883


(1) Represents the activity post-completion of the Company’s canola processing plant.

(2) Represents the activity pre-completion of the Company’s canola processing plant.