10QSB 1 uiip.htm FORM 10-QSB—QUARTERLY OR TRANSITIONAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF



UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549


Form 10-QSB


(Mark One)

[X]

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006



[ ]

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT



For the transition period from _________to _________


Commission file number 0-17646



UNITED INVESTORS INCOME PROPERTIES

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)




   Missouri

43-1483942

(State or other jurisdiction of

   (I.R.S. Employer

 incorporation or organization)

  Identification No.)


55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)


(864) 239-1000

(Issuer's telephone number)


Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  X   No ___


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes __ No   X_   








PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION



ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




UNITED INVESTORS INCOME PROPERTIES


BALANCE SHEET

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except unit data)


March 31, 2006




Assets

  

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$   223

Receivables and deposits

 

     64

Other assets

 

    114

Investment properties:

  

Land

$ 1,021

 

Buildings and related personal property

  6,802

 
 

  7,823

 

Less accumulated depreciation

  (3,850)

  3,973

  

$ 4,374

Liabilities and Partners' (Deficiency) Capital

  

Liabilities

  

Accounts payable

 

$    29

Tenant security deposit liabilities

 

     18

Accrued property taxes

 

     22

Other liabilities

 

     16

Mortgage note payable

 

  1,900

   

Partners' (Deficiency) Capital

  

General partner

 $   (39)

 

Limited partners (61,063 units issued and

  

outstanding)

  2,428

  2,389

  

$ 4,374


See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements











UNITED INVESTORS INCOME PROPERTIES


STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per unit data)



 

Three Months Ended March 31,

 

2006

2005

  

(Restated)

Revenues:

  

Rental income

$   258

$   248

Other income

     26

     23

Total revenues

    284

    271

   

Expenses:

  

Operating

    160

    110

General and administrative

     27

     31

Depreciation

     70

     64

Interest

     36

     --

Property taxes

     22

     23

Total expenses

    315

    228

   

(Loss) income from continuing operations

     (31)

     43

Income from discontinued operations (Note A)

     --

     38

   

Net (loss) income

 $   (31)

$    81

   

Net (loss) income allocated to general partner

$    --

$     1

Net (loss) income allocated to limited partners

     (31)

     80

 

 $   (31)

$    81

Per limited partnership unit:

  

(Loss) income from continuing operations

 $ (0.51)

$  0.69

Income from discontinued operations

     --

   0.62

   

Net (loss) income

 $ (0.51)

$  1.31

   

Distributions per limited partnership unit

$    --

$  2.92


See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements











UNITED INVESTORS INCOME PROPERTIES


STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' (DEFICIENCY) CAPITAL

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except unit data)




 

Limited

  
 

Partnership

General

Limited

 
 

Units

Partner

Partners

Total

     

Original capital contributions

61,063

$   --

$15,266

$15,266

     

Partners' (deficiency) capital

    

at December 31, 2005

61,063

 $  (39)

$ 2,459

$ 2,420

     

Net loss for the three months

    

ended March 31, 2006

    --

    --

     (31)

     (31)

     

Partners' (deficiency) capital

    

at March 31, 2006

61,063

 $  (39)

$ 2,428

$ 2,389


See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements






UNITED INVESTORS INCOME PROPERTIES


STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)



 

Three Months Ended

 

March 31,

 

2006

2005

Cash flows from operating activities:

  

Net (loss) income

 $   (31)

$    81

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash

  

provided by operating activities:

  

Depreciation

     70

     99

Amortization of loan costs

     11

     --

Change in accounts:

  

Receivables and deposits

     (17)

     (17)

Other assets

      (8)

     11

Accounts payable

      4

     (10)

Tenant security deposit liabilities

     --

      (2)

Accrued property taxes

     22

      8

Other liabilities

     (31)

      5

Due to affiliates

     --

     16

Net cash provided by operating activities

     20

    191

   

Cash flows used in investing activities:

  

Property improvements and replacements

     (48)

     (38)

   

Cash flows from financing activities:

  

Payments on mortgage note payable

      (7)

     --

Distributions to partners

     --

    (180)

  Loan costs refunded (paid)

     10

     (10)

        Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

      3

    (190)

   

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

     (25)

     (37)

   

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

    248

    356

   

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$   223

$   319

   

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash information:

  

Property improvements and replacements included in

  

    accounts payable

$    4

$   --

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow activity:

  

Cash paid for interest

$   26

$   --


At December 31, 2005 approximately $13,000 of property improvements and replacements were included in accounts payable which are included in property improvements and replacements at March 31, 2006.


See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements









UNITED INVESTORS INCOME PROPERTIES


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)



Note A – Basis of Presentation


The accompanying unaudited financial statements of United Investors Income Properties (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-QSB and Item 310(b) of Regulation S-B.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of United Investors Real Estate, Inc. (the “General Partner” or “UIRE”), a Delaware corporation and a subsidiary of Apartment Investment and Management Company (“AIMCO”), a publicly traded real estate investment trust, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  Operating results for the three month period ended March 31, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.


In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the accompanying statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 has been restated as of January 1, 2005 to reflect the operations of Meadow Wood Apartments, which sold July 22, 2005, as income from discontinued operations. Included in income from discontinued operations are revenues of approximately $158,000.


Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2005 balances to conform to the 2006 presentation.


Recent Accounting Pronouncement


In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 154 “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, which replaces APB Opinion No. 20 and SFAS No. 3, and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. This statement is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Partnership adopted SFAS No. 154 effective January 1, 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 154 did not have a material effect on the Partnership’s financial condition or results of operations.


Note B - Transactions with Affiliated Parties


The Partnership has no employees and depends on the General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership activities.  The Partnership Agreement provides for payments to affiliates for services and for reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.


Affiliates of the General Partner receive 5% of gross receipts from all of the Partnership's properties as compensation for providing property management services. The Partnership paid to such affiliates approximately $14,000 and $21,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, which is included in operating expenses and income from discontinued operations.


An affiliate of the General Partner charged the Partnership reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $9,000 and $20,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expenses.


For acting as real estate broker in connection with the 1999 sale of Peachtree Corners Medical Building, the General Partner earned a real estate commission of approximately $21,000. However, this amount is not payable until the limited partners receive an amount equal to their adjusted capital investment and a cumulative distribution equal to an 8% annual return from the last additional closing date or, if greater, a 6% cumulative annual return from their date of admission to the Partnership. At December 31, 2005, the limited partners had not received their return.  During the year ended December 31, 2005, the General Partner determined that the limited partners would not receive both their adjusted capital investment and applicable return with future property sales or financings.  Therefore, the General Partner reversed the real estate commission previously accrued associated with the 1999 sale of Peachtree Corners Medical Building.


The Partnership insures its properties up to certain limits through coverage provided by AIMCO, which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to workers compensation, property casualty, general liability and vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its properties above the AIMCO limits through insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the General Partner. During the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates approximately $19,000 for hazard insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration.  Additional charges will be incurred by the Partnership during 2006 as other insurance policies renew later in the year. The Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates approximately $25,000 for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration during the year ended December 31, 2005.


Note C - Contingencies


AIMCO Properties L.P. and NHP Management Company, both affiliates of the General Partner, are defendants in a lawsuit alleging that they willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) by failing to pay maintenance workers overtime for all hours worked in excess of forty per week. The complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, attempts to bring a collective action under the FLSA and seeks to certify state subclasses in California, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs contend that AIMCO Properties L.P. and NHP Management Company failed to compensate maintenance workers for time that they were required to be "on-call". Additionally, the complaint alleges AIMCO Properties L.P. and NHP Management Company failed to comply with the FLSA in compensating maintenance workers for time that they worked in excess of 40 hours in a week.   In June 2005 the Court conditionally certified the collective action on both the on-call and overtime issues, which allows the plaintiffs to provide notice of the collective action to all non-exempt maintenance workers from August 7, 2000 through the present.  Notices have been sent out to all current and former hourly maintenance workers. Although 1,049 individuals opted-in to the class the defendants will be challenging the eligibility and timeliness of some. Defendants will have the opportunity to move to decertify the collective action with briefing that commences in August.  Because the court denied plaintiffs’ motion to certify state subclasses, on September 26, 2005, the plaintiffs filed a class action with the same allegations in the Superior Court of California (Contra Costa County), and on November 5, 2005 in Montgomery County Maryland Circuit Court.  The California case has been stayed, while discovery in the Maryland case proceeds. Although the outcome of any litigation is uncertain, AIMCO Properties, L.P. does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Similarly, the General Partner does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s financial condition or results of operations.

 

The Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding litigation matters involving it or its investment properties that are not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.


Environmental


Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a property. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of the hazardous substances. The presence of, or the failure to manage or remedy properly, hazardous substances may adversely affect occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by such agencies in connection therewith, the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of removal, remediation or disposal of hazardous substances through a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances is potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of its properties, the Partnership could potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs associated with its properties.  


Mold


The Partnership is aware of lawsuits against owners and managers of multifamily properties asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of mold, some of which have resulted in substantial monetary judgments or settlements.  The Partnership has only limited insurance coverage for property damage loss claims arising from the presence of mold and for personal injury claims related to mold exposure.  Affiliates of the General Partner have implemented a national policy and procedures to prevent or eliminate mold from its properties and the General Partner believes that these measures will minimize the effects that mold could have on residents.  To date, the Partnership has not incurred any material costs or liabilities relating to claims of mold exposure or to abate mold conditions.  Because the law regarding mold is unsettled and subject to change the General Partner can make no assurance that liabilities resulting from the presence of or exposure to mold will not have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s financial condition or results of operations.


ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION


The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance and the effect of government regulations. Actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a variety of risks and factors including, without limitation: national and local economic conditions; the terms of governmental regulations that affect the Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment in which the Registrant operates; financing risks, including the risk that cash flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and the general economic climate in local markets and competition for tenants in such markets; litigation, including costs associated with prosecuting and defending claims and any adverse outcomes, and possible environmental liabilities. Readers should carefully review the Registrant’s financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the risk factors described in the documents the Registrant files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


The Partnership's investment properties consist of two apartment complexes. The following table sets forth the average occupancy of the properties for each of the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005:


 

Average Occupancy

Property

2006

2005

   

Bronson Place Apartments (1)

89%

84%

Mountlake Terrace, Washington

  

Defoors Crossing Apartments

94%

95%

Atlanta, Georgia

  


(1)

The General Partner attributes the increase in average occupancy at Bronson Place Apartments to a more stable tenant base and an improvement in market conditions.


The Partnership’s financial results depend upon a number of factors including the ability to attract and maintain tenants at the investment properties, interest rates on mortgage loans, costs incurred to operate the investment properties, general economic conditions and weather. As part of the ongoing business plan of the Partnership, the General Partner monitors the rental market environment of its investment properties to assess the feasibility of increasing rents, maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and protecting the Partnership from increases in expenses. As part of this plan, the General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from the burden of inflation-related increases in expenses by increasing rents and maintaining a high overall occupancy level. However, the General Partner may use rental concessions and rental rate reductions to offset softening market conditions, accordingly, there is no guarantee that the General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan. Further, a number of factors which are outside the control of the Partnership such as the local economic climate and weather can adversely or positively affect the Partnership’s financial results.


Results of Operations


The Partnership had a net loss of approximately $31,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to net income of approximately $81,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005.  The increase in net loss for the three month period is due to an increase in total expenses and a decrease in income from discontinued operations partially offset by an increase in total revenues.  In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, the statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 has been restated as of January 1, 2005, to reflect the operations of Meadow Woods Apartments as income from discontinued operations due to the sale of the property in July 2005. Included in income from discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 are revenues of approximately $158,000.


Excluding the income from discontinued operations, the Partnership’s loss from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006 was approximately $31,000 compared to income from continuing operations of approximately $43,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005.  The increase in loss from continuing operations is due to an increase in total expenses partially offset by an increase in total revenues.


Total revenues increased due to an increase in rental income.  Rental income increased due to increased occupancy at Bronson Place Apartments and increased average rental rates at both investment properties.  Other income remained relatively constant for the comparable period.


Total expenses increased due to increases in operating, depreciation and interest expense partially offset by a decrease in general and administrative expenses. Property tax expense remained relatively constant for the comparable period. Operating expense increased due to increases in property expense and maintenance expense partially offset by a decrease in advertising expense. Property expense increased due to increased salary and related benefits primarily at Defoors Crossing Apartments.  Maintenance expense increased due to increased contract services at Bronson Place Apartments.  Advertising expense decreased primarily due to decreased periodical advertising at Defoors Crossing Apartments. Depreciation expense increased due to assets placed into service within the last twelve months that are currently being depreciated at both properties. Interest expense increased due to the financing of the mortgage encumbering Bronson Place Apartments during October 2005.


General and administrative expense decreased primarily due a decrease in management reimbursements, due to the sale of one of the Partnership’s investment properties in July 2005, partially offset by an increase in audit expense.  The management reimbursements are paid to the General Partner as allowed under the Partnership Agreement. Also included in general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 are costs associated with the quarterly and annual communications with investors and regulatory agencies.


Liquidity and Capital Resources


At March 31, 2006, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $223,000 compared to approximately $319,000 at March 31, 2005. Cash and cash equivalents decreased by approximately $25,000 since December 31, 2005, due to approximately $48,000 of cash used in investing activities, which was partially offset by approximately $20,000 of cash provided by operating activities and approximately $3,000 of cash provided by financing activities. Cash used in investing activities consisted of property improvements and replacements.  Cash provided by financing activities consisted of a refund of loan costs previously paid related to the financing of Bronson Place Apartments during October 2005 partially offset by principal payments made on the mortgage encumbering Bronson Place Apartments. The Partnership invests its working capital reserves in interest bearing accounts.


The sufficiency of existing liquid assets to meet future liquidity and capital expenditure requirements is directly related to the level of capital expenditures required at the properties to adequately maintain the physical assets and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal, state and local legal and regulatory requirements. The General Partner monitors developments in the area of legal and regulatory compliance.  For example, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates or suggests additional compliance measures with regard to governance, disclosure, audit and other areas. In light of these changes, the Partnership expects that it will incur higher expenses related to compliance. Capital improvements planned for each of the Partnership's properties are detailed below.


Bronson Place Apartments


During the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Partnership completed approximately $30,000 of capital improvements at Bronson Place Apartments consisting primarily of floor covering and appliance replacements, structural upgrades and plumbing fixtures. These improvements were funded from operating cash flow.  The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property. While the Partnership has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, certain routine expenditures are anticipated during the remainder of 2006. Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as the anticipated cash flow generated by the property.


DeFoors Crossing Apartments


During the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Partnership completed approximately $9,000 of capital improvements at DeFoors Crossing Apartments consisting primarily of floor covering and appliance replacements and office computers. These improvements were funded from operating cash flow. The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property. While the Partnership has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, certain routine expenditures are anticipated during the remainder of 2006. Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as the anticipated cash flow generated by the property.


The additional capital expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from operations or from Partnership reserves. To the extent that capital improvements are completed, the Partnership's distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.


The Partnership’s assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term needs (exclusive of capital improvements) of the Partnership.  On October 21, 2005, the Partnership obtained financing for Bronson Place Apartments with a mortgage loan in the principal amount of approximately $1,912,000. The outstanding balance at March 31, 2006 was approximately $1,900,000. The loan was financed under a permanent credit facility (“Permanent Credit Facility”) with Fannie Mae.  The Permanent Credit Facility has a maturity of September 16, 2007, with one five-year extension option. The Permanent Credit Facility includes properties in other partnerships that are affiliated with the general partner of the Partnership. The Permanent Credit Facility creates separate loans for each property.  The loans under the Permanent Credit Facility are not cross-collateralized or cross-defaulted with the other property loans. The loan encumbering Bronson Place Apartments has a variable interest rate of the Fannie Mae discounted mortgage-backed security index plus 85 basis points. The rate was 5.585% at March 31, 2006 and resets monthly. Monthly principal payments are required based on a 30-year amortization schedule using the interest rate in effect during the first month that the mortgage encumbering Bronson Place Apartments was financed under the Permanent Credit Facility. The loan is prepayable without penalty.  As a condition of making the new mortgage, the lender required an affiliate of the Partnership to guarantee the obligations and liabilities of the Partnership with respect to the new mortgage.


The Partnership distributed the following amounts during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands, except per unit data):


 

Three Months

Per Limited

Three Months

Per Limited

 

Ended

Partnership

Ended

Partnership

 

March 31, 2006

Unit

March 31, 2005

Unit

     

Operations

$   --

$   --

$  180

$ 2.92


Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of net cash generated from operations, property sales and/or financings. The Partnership's cash available for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. There can be no assurance, that the Partnership will generate sufficient funds from operations after capital improvements to permit any distributions to its partners during the remainder of 2006 or subsequent periods.


Other


In addition to its indirect ownership of the sole general partner of the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned 24,498 limited partnership units (the "Units") in the Partnership representing 40.12% of the outstanding Units at March 31, 2006. A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 40.12% of the outstanding Units at March 31, 2006, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to influence all such voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the General Partner, as general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates


The financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States which require the Partnership to make estimates and assumptions. The Partnership believes that of its significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets


Investment properties are recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation, unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable.  If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a property may not be recoverable, the Partnership will make an assessment of its recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to the Partnership’s estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest charges, of the property.   If the carrying amount exceeds the aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, the Partnership would recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the property.


Real property investments are subject to varying degrees of risk.  Several factors may adversely affect the economic performance and value of the Partnership’s investment properties.  These factors include, but are not limited to, general economic climate; competition from other apartment communities and other housing options; local conditions, such as loss of jobs or an increase in the supply of apartments that might adversely affect apartment occupancy or rental rates; changes in governmental regulations and the related cost of compliance; increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes) due to inflation and other factors, which may not be offset by increased rents; and changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of rent control laws or other laws regulating multi-family housing.  Any adverse changes in these factors could cause impairment of the Partnership’s assets.

 

 

Revenue Recognition


The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.  The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or in response to heavy competition from other similar complexes in the area.  Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.  The Partnership evaluates all accounts receivable from residents and establishes an allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than 30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.  


ITEM 3.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


(a)

Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Partnership’s management, with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.


(b)

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.


PART II - OTHER INFORMATION



ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS


AIMCO Properties L.P. and NHP Management Company, both affiliates of the General Partner, are defendants in a lawsuit alleging that they willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) by failing to pay maintenance workers overtime for all hours worked in excess of forty per week. The complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, attempts to bring a collective action under the FLSA and seeks to certify state subclasses in California, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs contend that AIMCO Properties L.P. and NHP Management Company failed to compensate maintenance workers for time that they were required to be "on-call". Additionally, the complaint alleges AIMCO Properties L.P. and NHP Management Company failed to comply with the FLSA in compensating maintenance workers for time that they worked in excess of 40 hours in a week.   In June 2005 the Court conditionally certified the collective action on both the on-call and overtime issues, which allows the plaintiffs to provide notice of the collective action to all non-exempt maintenance workers from August 7, 2000 through the present.  Notices have been sent out to all current and former hourly maintenance workers. Although 1,049 individuals opted-in to the class the defendants will be challenging the eligibility and timeliness of some. Defendants will have the opportunity to move to decertify the collective action with briefing that commences in August.  Because the court denied plaintiffs’ motion to certify state subclasses, on September 26, 2005, the plaintiffs filed a class action with the same allegations in the Superior Court of California (Contra Costa County), and on November 5, 2005 in Montgomery County Maryland Circuit Court.  The California case has been stayed, while discovery in the Maryland case proceeds. Although the outcome of any litigation is uncertain, AIMCO Properties, L.P. does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Similarly, the General Partner does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s financial condition or results of operations.


ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION


None.


ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS


See Exhibit Index.









SIGNATURES




In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.




 

UNITED INVESTORS INCOME PROPERTIES

  
 

By:   United Investors Real Estate, Inc.

 

      Its General Partner

  
 

By:   /s/Martha L. Long

 

      Martha L. Long

 

      Senior Vice President

  
 

By:   /s/Stephen B. Waters

 

      Stephen B. Waters

 

      Vice President

  
 

Date: May 12, 2006













UNITED INVESTORS INCOME PROPERTIES

 

INDEX TO EXHIBITS


Exhibit


 1

Form of Dealer Manager Agreement between the General Partner and the Dealer Manager, including Form of Soliciting Broker Agreement; incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to Partnership's Amendment to Registration Statement (File No. 33-20350) previously filed on May 2, 1988.


 1.1

Amendment to Dealer Manager Agreement; incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Partnership's Registration Statement previously filed on March 21, 1989.


 4.1

Form of Subscription Agreement; incorporated by reference as part of the Prospectus of Partnership contained in Partnership's Amendment to Registration Statement previously filed on May 2, 1988.


 4.2

Form of Agreement of Limited Partnership of Partnership; incorporated by reference as part of the Prospectus of Partnership contained in Partnership's Amendment to Registration Statement previously filed on May 2, 1988.


 4.3

Tenth Amendment to Agreement of Limited Partnership of Partnership; incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q previously filed on May 15, 1989.


4.4

Certificate of Limited Partnership (Exhibit 3 to Partnership's Form 8-K filed on April 29, 1991, is incorporated herein by reference).


4.5

Amendment to Agreement of Limited Partnership effective March 28, 2005; incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Partnership’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 13, 2005.


10.2

Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated June 22, 1988, between United Investors Real Estate, Inc., as nominee for United Investors Income Properties, as purchaser, and Nilsen/Bay Ridge Development, Inc. and MBIV Development, as seller, relating to Bronson Place Apartments; incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q previously filed on August 11, 1988.


10.3

Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated October 20, 1988, between United Investors Real Estate, Inc., as purchaser, and Defoors Crossing Associates, Ltd., as seller, relating to Defoors Crossing Apartments, and amendments thereto; incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Post-Effective Amendment No.1 to Partnership's Registration Statement previously filed on February 1, 1989.


10.8

Stock Purchase Agreement dated December 4, 1992, showing the purchase of 100% of the outstanding stock of United Investors Real Estate, Inc. by MAE GP Corporation; incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Partnership's Current Report on Form 8-K previously filed on December 31, 1992.


10.9

Purchase and Sale Contract between United Investors Income Properties, a Missouri limited partnership, as Seller, and The Meadow Wood Investors, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, as Purchaser, effective May 10, 2005; incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Partnership’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed on May 13, 2005.


10.10

Amendment of Purchase and Sale Contract between United Investors Income Properties, a Missouri limited partnership, as Seller, and The Meadow Wood Investors, LLC, a Oregon limited liability company, as Purchaser, effective June 2, 2005 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 1, 2005.


10.11

Second Amendment of Purchase and Sale Contract between United Investors Income Properties, a Missouri limited partnership, as Seller, and The Meadow Wood Investors, LLC, a Oregon limited liability company, as Purchaser, effective June 30, 2005 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 1, 2005.


10.12

Multifamily Note dated October 21, 2005 between United Investors Income Properties, a Missouri Limited Partnership and GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation. (1)


10.13

Guaranty dated October 21, 2005 by AIMCO Properties, L.P. for the benefit of GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation. (1)


10.14

Replacement Reserve and Security Agreement dated October 21, 2005 between United Investors Income Properties, a Missouri Limited Partnership and GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation. (1)


10.15

Assignment of Security Instrument dated October 21, 2005 between GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation and Fannie Mae. (1)


10.16

Multifamily Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents and Security Agreement dated October 21, 2005 between United Investors Income Properties, a Missouri Limited Partnership and GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation. (1)


10.17

Indemnification Agreement dated October 21, 2005 between United Investors Income Properties, a Missouri Limited Partnership and AIMCO Properties, L.P. in favor of GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation. (1)


31.1

Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


31.2

Certification of equivalent of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


32.1

Certification of the equivalent of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


(1)

Incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 21, 2005, as filed October 27, 2005.



Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Martha L. Long, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of United Investors Income Properties;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:


(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and


5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 12, 2006

/s/Martha L. Long

Martha L. Long

Senior Vice President of United Investors Real Estate, Inc., equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership









Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of United Investors Income Properties;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:


(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and


5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 12, 2006

/s/Stephen B. Waters

Stephen B. Waters

Vice President of United Investors Real Estate, Inc., equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership









Exhibit 32.1



Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of United Investors Income Properties (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:


(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



 

      /s/Martha L. Long

 

Name: Martha L. Long

 

Date: May 12, 2006

  
 

      /s/Stephen B. Waters

 

Name: Stephen B. Waters

 

Date: May 12, 2006



This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.