UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number 0-16668

WSFS FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	22-2866913
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

WSFS Bank Center, 500 Delaware Avenue, Wilmington, Delaware	19801
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(302) 792-6000

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files),    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	x
Non-accelerated filer	¨  (Do not check if smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of November 2, 2012:

Common Stock, par value $.01 per share	8,735,520
(Title of Class)	(Shares Outstanding)

WSFS FINANCIAL CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

PART I. Financial Information

		Page
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011		1
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended September  30, 2012 and 2011		2
	Consolidated Statements of Condition as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011		3
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011		4
	Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011		5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		32
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		47
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		47
PART II. Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		47
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		47
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		47
Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities		48
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures		48
Item 5.	Other Information		48
Item 6.	Exhibits		48
Signatures			49
Exhibit 31.1	Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 31.2	Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32	Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 101.INS	Instance Document
Exhibit 101.SCH	Schema Document
Exhibit 101.CAL	Calculation Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.LAB	Labels Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.PRE	Presentation Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.DEF	Definition Linkbase Document

WSFS FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
	(Unaudited)
	(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	32,003	$	32,940	$	98,185	$	97,699
Interest on mortgage-backed securities		4,344		7,052		14,953		20,962
Interest and dividends on investment securities		158		99		335		396
Other interest income		9		—		27		—
		36,514		40,091		113,500		119,057
Interest expense:
Interest on deposits		3,237		4,619		10,652		14,876
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances		1,403		2,484		4,985		7,866
Interest on trust preferred borrowings		369		340		1,114		1,015
Interest on senior debt		353		—		353		—
Interest on other borrowings		259		468		895		1,679
		5,621		7,911		17,999		25,436
Net interest income		30,893		32,180		95,501		93,621
Provision for loan losses		3,751		6,558		28,379		21,048
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		27,142		25,622		67,122		72,573
Noninterest income:
Credit/debit card and ATM income		5,738		5,523		17,031		15,549
Deposit service charges		4,360		4,385		12,673		11,975
Fiduciary & investment management income		3,258		2,987		9,716		8,891
Securities gains, net		2,451		1,935		17,797		2,953
Bank owned life insurance income		1,126		197		1,447		1,795
Mortgage banking activities, net		914		257		1,882		1,035
Loan fee income		706		610		1,803		1,871
Other income		1,195		1,030		3,149		2,523
		19,748		16,924		65,498		46,592
Noninterest expenses:
Salaries, benefits and other compensation		16,942		15,337		49,840		44,566
Occupancy expense		3,235		3,171		9,697		8,944
Loan workout and OREO expenses		2,115		1,864		4,902		5,989
Equipment expense		1,701		1,666		5,403		5,195
Data processing and operations expenses		1,402		1,325		4,190		4,026
FDIC expenses		1,384		1,436		4,262		4,478
Professional Fees		671		1,267		2,917		3,974
Marketing Expense		379		1,597		1,976		3,446
Acquisition integration costs		—		—		—		780
Other operating expense		4,324		4,749		12,972		13,053
		32,153		32,412		96,159		94,451
Income before taxes		14,737		10,134		36,461		24,714
Income tax provision		4,758		3,348		12,708		8,199
Net income		9,979		6,786		23,753		16,515
Dividends on preferred stock and accretion of discount		693		692		2,077		2,077
Net income allocable to common stockholders	$	9,286	$	6,094	$	21,676	$	14,438
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	1.07	$	0.71	$	2.49	$	1.68
Diluted	$	1.06	$	0.70	$	2.47	$	1.66

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

1

WSFS FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
	(In Thousands)						(In Thousands)
Net Income	$	9,979		$	6,786		$	23,753		$	16,515
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gains on securities available for sale		15,341			10,592			27,605			12,370
Tax expense		(5,783	)		(4,054	)		(10,440	)		(4,734	)
Net of tax amount		9,558			6,538			17,165			7,636
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income		(2,451	)		(1,935	)		(17,797	)		(2,953	)
Tax expense		931			735			6,763			1,122
Net of tax amount		(1,520	)		(1,200	)		(11,034	)		(1,831	)
Total other comprehensive income		8,038			5,338			6,131			5,805
Total comprehensive income	$	18,017		$	12,124		$	29,884		$	22,320

2

WSFS FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION

	Sept. 30, 2012			Dec 31, 2011
	(Unaudited)
	(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	73,236		$	70,889
Cash in non-owned ATMs		373,577			397,119
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		287			9
Total cash and cash equivalents		447,100			468,017
Investment securities, available-for-sale		910,055			859,362
Investment securities, trading		12,590			12,432
Loans held-for-sale		20,905			10,185
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $45,598 at September 30, 2012 and $53,080 at December 31, 2011		2,656,161			2,702,589
Bank owned life insurance		62,818			63,392
Stock in Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, at cost		30,172			35,756
Assets acquired through foreclosure		6,996			11,695
Premises and equipment		37,107			35,964
Goodwill		28,146			28,146
Intangible assets		5,417			6,139
Accrued Interest receivable		10,292			11,743
Other assets		33,573			43,588
Total assets	$	4,261,332		$	4,289,008
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing demand	$	596,235		$	525,444
Interest-bearing demand		413,042			389,495
Money market		799,786			805,570
Savings		388,878			368,390
Time		353,749			412,027
Jumbo certificates of deposit – customer		345,855			346,568
Total customer deposits		2,897,545			2,847,494
Brokered deposits		262,259			287,810
Total deposits		3,159,804			3,135,304
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase		100,000			50,000
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		392,870			538,682
Trust preferred borrowings		67,011			67,011
Senior debt		55,000			—
Other borrowed funds		29,942			67,927
Accrued interest payable		6,335			1,910
Other liabilities		32,575			36,041
Total liabilities		3,843,537			3,896,875
Stockholders’ Equity:
Serial preferred stock $.01 par value, 7,500,000 shares authorized; issued 52,625 at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011	$	1		$	1
Common stock $.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized; issued 18,314,319 at September 30, 2012 and 18,258,714 at December 31, 2011		183			182
Capital in excess of par value		221,146			220,163
Accumulated other comprehensive income		17,333			11,202
Retained earnings		427,412			408,865
Treasury stock at cost, 9,580,569 shares at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011		(248,280	)		(248,280	)
Total stockholders’ equity		417,795			392,133
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	4,261,332		$	4,289,008

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

WSFS FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011
	(Unaudited)
	(In Thousands)
Operating activities:
Net Income	$	23,753		$	16,515
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		28,379			21,048
Depreciation, accretion and amortization		11,926			7,991
Decrease in accrued interest receivable		1,451			439
Decrease (increase) in other assets		8,726			(5,047	)
Origination of loans held-for-sale		(137,298	)		(69,659	)
Proceeds from sales of loans held-for-sale		142,535			77,844
Gain on mortgage banking activities, net		(1,882	)		(1,035	)
Security gains, net		(17,797	)		(2,953	)
Stock-based compensation expense		1,600			1,216
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements		(99	)		(587	)
Increase in accrued interest payable		4,425			5,216
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities		(3,432	)		11,884
Loss on sale of assets acquired through foreclosure and valuation adjustments, net		2,891			2,447
Increase in value of bank-owned life insurance		(1,447	)		(1,795	)
(Increase) decrease in capitalized interest, net		(478	)		1
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	63,253		$	63,525
Investing activities:
Maturities of investment securities		5,039			11,727
Sale of investment securities available for sale		616,254			216,261
Purchase of investment securities available-for-sale		(751,363	)		(415,277	)
Repayments of investment securities available-for-sale		101,729			130,184
Disbursements for reverse mortgages		(94	)		(396	)
Proceeds from loan disposition		31,307			—
Net increase in loans		(38,190	)		(118,138	)
Payment of bank-owned life insurance		2,021			2,885
Net decrease (increase) in stock of Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh		5,585			(102	)
Sales of assets acquired through foreclosure, net		11,789			9,088
Investment in premises and equipment, net		(5,747	)		(8,090	)
Net cash (used for) investing activities	$	(21,670	)	$	(171,858	)
Financing activities:
Net increase in demand and saving deposits		101,059			162,096
Net decrease in time deposits		(58,991	)		(14,975	)
Net decrease in brokered deposits		(25,717	)		(28,245	)
Receipts from FHLB advances		27,299,083			9,846,709
Repayments of FHLB advances		(27,444,895	)		(9,766,892	)
Receipts from federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreement to repurchase		14,135,000			3,103,525
Repayments of federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreement to repurchase		(14,085,000	)		(3,103,525	)
Repayment of unsecured debt		(30,000	)		—
Issuance of senior debt		52,691			—
Dividends paid		(5,115	)		(5,067	)
Issuance of common stock and exercise of common stock options		1,086			914
Repurchase of common stock warrants		(1,800	)		—
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements		99			587
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities	$	(62,500	)	$	195,127
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(20,917	)		86,794
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		468,017			376,759
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	447,100		$	463,553
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid for interest during the period	$	13,574		$	20,220
Cash paid for income taxes, net		8,379			336
Loans transferred to assets acquired through foreclosure		9,290			14,391
Other comprehensive income		6,131			5,805

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

WSFS FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012

(UNAUDITED)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Our Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of WSFS Financial Corporation (“the Company”, “our Company”, “we”, “our” or “us”), Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB (“WSFS Bank” or the “Bank”) and Montchanin Capital Management, Inc. (“Montchanin”). We also have one unconsolidated affiliate, WSFS Capital Trust III (“the Trust”). WSFS Bank has two fully-owned subsidiaries, WSFS Investment Group, Inc. (“WIG”) and Monarch Entity Services LLC (“Monarch”) and Montchanin has one wholly owned subsidiary, Cypress Capital Management, LLC (“Cypress”).

Founded in 1832, the Bank is one of the ten oldest banks continuously operating under the same name in the United States. We provide residential and commercial real estate, commercial and consumer lending services, as well as retail deposit and cash management services. In addition, we offer a variety of wealth management and trust services to personal and corporate customers through our Trust and Wealth Management division. Lending activities are funded primarily with customer deposits and borrowings. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insures our customers’ deposits to their legal maximums. We serve our customers primarily from our 51 offices located in Delaware (42), Pennsylvania (7), Virginia (1) and Nevada (1) and through our website at www.wsfsbank.com.

Amounts subject to significant estimates are items such as the allowance for loan losses and reserves for lending related commitments, goodwill, intangible assets, post-retirement benefit obligations, the fair value of financial instruments and other-than-temporary impairments (“OTTI”). Among other effects, changes to such estimates could result in future reserves for impairments of investment securities, goodwill and intangible assets and increases of allowances for loan losses and lending related commitments as well as increased post-retirement benefits expense.

Our accounting and reporting policies conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and prevailing practices within the banking industry for interim financial information and Rule 10-01 of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Regulation S-X. Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X does not require us to include all information and notes for complete financial statements and prevailing practices within the banking industry. Operating results for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future quarters or for the year ending December 31, 2012. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the SEC.

Whenever necessary, reclassifications have been made to prior period Consolidated Financial Statements to conform to the current period’s presentation. All significant intercompany transactions were eliminated in consolidation.

5

2. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table shows the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

	For the three months ended September 30,				For the nine months ended September 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
	(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Numerator:
Net income allocable to common stockholders	$	9,286	$	6,094	$	21,676	$	14,438
Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings per share - weighted average shares		8,712		8,605		8,702		8,594
Effect of dilutive employee stock options and warrants		83		96		77		124
Denominator for diluted earnings per share – adjusted weighted average shares and assumed exercise		8,795		8,701		8,779		8,718
Earnings per share:
Basic:
Net income allocable to common shareholders	$	1.07	$	0.71	$	2.49	$	1.68
Diluted:
Net income allocable to common shareholders	$	1.06	$	0.70	$	2.47	$	1.66
Outstanding common stock equivalents having no dilutive effect		338		537		361		538

3. INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The following tables detail the amortized cost and the estimated fair value of the Company’s investment securities held-to-maturity and securities available-for-sale (which include reverse mortgages):

	Amortized Cost			Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(In Thousands)
Available-for-sale securities:
September 30, 2012:
Reverse mortgages	$	(552	)	$	—	$	—		$	(552	)
U.S. Government and government sponsored enterprises (“GSE”)		50,747			308		(3	)		51,052
State and political subdivisions		3,120			29		(1	)		3,148
Collateralized Mortgage Obligation (“CMO”) (1)		247,991			7,462		(131	)		255,322
Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) Mortgage-Backed Securities (“MBS”)		446,296			15,193		(54	)		461,435
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) MBS		70,110			2,246		—			72,356
Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) MBS		63,757			3,537		—			67,294
	$	881,469		$	28,775	$	(189	)	$	910,055
December 31, 2011:
Reverse mortgages	$	(646	)	$	—	$	—		$	(646	)
GSE		38,776			262		(13	)		39,025
State and political subdivisions		4,159			39		(8	)		4,190
CMO (1)		323,980			6,933		(2,527	)		328,386
FNMA		320,019			9,379		(44	)		329,354
FHLMC		93,305			1,781		—			95,086
GNMA		60,991			3,033		(57	)		63,967
	$	840,584		$	21,427	$	(2,649	)	$	859,362
Trading securities
September 30, 2012:
CMO	$	12,590		$	—	$	—		$	12,590
December 31, 2011:
CMO	$	12,432		$	—	$	—		$	12,432

(1) Includes agency CMO and SASCO 2002 RM-1 Class O securities classified as available-for-sale

6

The scheduled maturities of investment securities available-for-sale at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were as follows:

	Available-for-Sale
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(In Thousands)
September 30, 2012
Within one year (1)	$	8,889	$	8,941
After one year but within five years		42,447		42,729
After five years but within ten years		273,536		282,968
After ten years		556,597		575,417
	$	881,469	$	910,055
December 31, 2011
Within one year (1)	$	7,916	$	7,966
After one year but within five years		32,225		32,465
After five years but within ten years		129,597		135,649
After ten years		670,846		683,282
	$	840,584	$	859,362

(1) Reverse mortgages do not have contractual maturities. We have included reverse mortgages in maturities within one year.

The portfolio of available-for-sale mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) includes 164 securities with an amortized cost of $828.2 million comprised of all GSE securities. All securities were AAA-rated at the time of purchase. All securities were re-evaluated for OTTI at September 30, 2012. The result of this evaluation showed no OTTI for the third quarter of 2012.

At September 30, 2012, investment securities with market values aggregating $431.2 million were pledged as collateral for retail customer repurchase agreements, municipal deposits, and other obligations. From time to time, investment securities are also pledged as collateral for FHLB borrowings. There were no FHLB pledged investment securities at September 30, 2012.

7

During the first nine months of 2012, we sold $616.3 million of investment securities categorized as available-for-sale for net gains of $17.7 million. In the first nine months of 2011, proceeds from the sale of investment securities available-for-sale were $216.1 million and resulted in net gains of $3.0 million. A portion of these sales during 2012 were the result of the completion of the Asset Strategies undertaken during the second quarter and were mainly due to maintaining the capital and earnings neutrality of these efforts. These and additional sales were completed as part of our ongoing portfolio management aimed at minimizing credit risk and decreasing prepayment/premium risk due to faster prepayments caused by declining mortgage interest rates in this historically-low rate environment. Lastly, the sales during the third quarter of 2012 were also aimed at limiting extension risk, which decreased the weighted average duration of the MBS portfolio to 4.2 years at September 30, 2012, from 4.5 years at June 30, 2012. The cost basis of all investment securities sales are based on the specific identification method.

As of September 30, 2012, our investment securities portfolio had remaining unamortized premiums of $22.6 million. In addition, at September 30, 2012 we had $216,000 of unaccreted discounts related to our investment securities portfolio.

MBS have expected maturities that differ from their contractual maturities. These differences arise because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without a prepayment penalty.

At September 30, 2012, we owned investment securities totaling $17.1 million in which the amortized cost basis exceeded fair value. Total unrealized losses on those securities were $189,000 at September 30, 2012. The temporary impairment is the result of changes in market interest rates subsequent to the purchase of the securities. Our investment portfolio is reviewed each quarter for indications of impairment. This review includes analyzing the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been lower than the cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer and our intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in the market. We evaluate our intent and ability to hold securities based upon our investment strategy for the particular type of security and our cash flow needs, liquidity position, capital adequacy and interest rate risk position. In addition, we do not have the intent to sell, nor is it more likely-than-not we will be required to sell these securities before we are able to recover the amortized cost basis.

For these investment securities with unrealized losses, the table below shows our gross unrealized losses and fair value by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at September 30, 2012.

	Less than 12 months				12 months or longer				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
	(In Thousands)
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S Government and agencies	$	2,008	$	3	$	—	$	—	$	2,008	$	3
State and political subdivisions		—		—		125		1		125		1
CMO		10,694		131		—		—		10,694		131
FNMA		4,288		54		—		—		4,288		54
FHLMC		—		—		—		—		—		—
GNMA		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total temporarily impaired investments	$	16,990	$	188	$	125	$	1	$	17,115	$	189

8

For these investment securities with unrealized losses, the table below shows our gross unrealized losses and fair value by investment category and length of time that individual securities were in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2011.

	Less than 12 months				12 months or longer				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
	(In Thousands)
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S Government and agencies	$	5,047	$	13	$	—	$	—	$	5,047	$	13
State and political subdivisions		—		—		440		8		440		8
CMO		78,955		2,194		9,933		333		88,888		2,527
FNMA		6,959		44		—		—		6,959		44
FHLMC		—		—		—		—		—		—
GNMA		5,420		57		—		—		5,420		57
Total temporarily impaired investments	$	96,381	$	2,308	$	10,373	$	341	$	106,754	$	2,649

We own $12.5 million par value of SASCO RM-1 2002 class B securities which are classified as trading, of which, $1.5 million is interest paid in kind. We expect to recover all principal and interest due to seasoning and excess collateral. Based on FASB ASC 320, Investments – Debt and Equity Securities (“ASC 320”) when these securities were acquired they were classified as trading because it was our intent to sell them in the near term. We use the guidance under ASC 320 to provide a reasonable estimate of fair value. We estimated the value of these securities based on the pricing of BBB+ securities that have an active market through a technique which estimates the fair value of this asset using the income approach as of September 30, 2012.

During 2011, we purchased 100% of SASCO 2002-RM1 Class O certificates for $2.5 million. As of September 30, 2012, the market value of the SASCO 2002-RM1 O securities was determined in accordance with FASB ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurement (“ASC 820”), to be $6.1 million. These securities have been included in our CMO portfolio since their purchase.

4. ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES AND CREDIT QUALITY INFORMATION

Allowance for Loan Losses

We maintain an allowance for loan losses and charge losses to this allowance when such losses are realized. The determination of the allowance for loan losses requires significant judgment reflecting our best estimate of impairment related to specifically identified impaired loans as well as probable loan losses in the remaining loan portfolio. Our evaluation is based upon a continuing review of these portfolios.

We established our loan loss allowance in accordance with guidance provided in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin 102 (“SAB 102”). Its methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance consists of several key elements which include: specific allowances for identified problem loans; formula allowances for commercial and commercial real estate loans; and allowances for pooled homogenous loans.

Specific reserves are established for certain impaired loans in cases where we have identified significant conditions or circumstances related to a specific credit that indicates a loss is probable to occur.

The formula allowances for commercial, commercial real estate and construction loans are calculated by applying estimates of default and loss severity to outstanding loans based on the risk grade of loans. Default rates are determined through a past twelve quarter migration analysis. Loss severity is based on a three year historical analysis. As a result, changes in risk grades affect the amount of the formula allowance.

9

Pooled loans are usually smaller, not-individually-graded and homogenous in nature, such as consumer installment loans and residential mortgages. Loan loss allowances for pooled loans are first based on a five-year net charge-off history. The average loss allowance per homogenous pool is based on the product of average annual historical loss rate and the homogeneous pool balances. These separate risk pools are then assigned a reserve for losses based upon this historical loss information.

Qualitative and environmental adjustment factors are taken into consideration when determining the above reserve estimates. These adjustment factors are based upon our evaluation of various current conditions, including those listed below.

• General economic and business conditions affecting the Bank’s key lending areas,

• Credit quality trends,

• Recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio,

• Collateral values and loan-to-value ratios,

• Loan volumes and concentrations, including changes in mix,

• Seasoning of the loan portfolio,

• Specific industry conditions within portfolio segments,

• Bank regulatory examination results, and

• Other factors, including changes in quality of the loan origination, servicing and risk management processes.

Our loan officers and risk managers meet at least quarterly to discuss and review these conditions and risks associated with individual problem loans. In addition, various regulatory agencies and loan review consultants periodically review our loan ratings and allowance for loan losses.

During the first quarter of 2012, we made certain improvements to the method in which we determine the allowance for loan loss. These improvements include:

• Used a three year loss migration analysis to determine the probability of default

• Segregated the commercial loan segment to more specifically analyze the risks associated with business, owner-occupied CRE, investor CRE and Construction loan portfolios

• Improved the data used to determine qualitative adjustment factors

• Established a portion of the allowance for loan losses related to model and complexity risk

• Revised our loan risk rating system based on recommendations from industry experts

10

The following table provides the activity of the allowance for loan losses and loan balances for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012:

	Commercial			Owner Occupied Commercial			Commercial Mortgages			Construction			Residential			Consumer			Complexity Risk (1)			Total
	(In Thousands)
Three months ended September 30, 2012
Allowance for loan losses
Beginning balance	$	9,891		$	4,091		$	9,618		$	5,307		$	6,265		$	10,341		$	916		$	46,429
Charge-offs		(1,281	)		(926	)		(709	)		(676	)		(705	)		(2,573	)		—			(6,870	)
Recoveries		455			184			18			1,314			113			204			—			2,288
Provision		(127	)		(4	)		(2,281	)		(810	)		2,690			4,300			(17	)		3,751
Ending balance	$	8,938		$	3,345		$	6,646		$	5,135		$	8,363		$	12,272		$	899		$	45,598
Nine months ended September 30, 2012
Allowance for loan losses
Beginning balance	$	15,067		$	9,235		$	7,556		$	4,074		$	6,544		$	10,604		$	—		$	53,080
Charge-offs		(11,316	)		(3,614	)		(5,600	)		(10,680	)		(3,344	)		(5,494	)		—			(40,048	)
Recoveries		1,305			190			382			1,642			171			497			—			4,187
Provision		3,882			(2,466	)		4,308			10,099			4,992			6,665			899			28,379
Ending balance	$	8,938		$	3,345		$	6,646		$	5,135		$	8,363		$	12,272		$	899		$	45,598
Period-end allowance allocated to:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,244		$	222		$	90		$	94		$	1,199		$	24		$	—		$	2,873
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		7,694			3,123			6,556			5,041			7,164			12,248			899			42,725
Ending balance	$	8,938		$	3,345		$	6,646		$	5,135		$	8,363		$	12,272		$	899		$	45,598
Period-end loan balances evaluated for:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,579		$	13,324		$	5,875		$	2,620		$	18,072		$	6,694		$	—		$	50,164	(2)
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		694,626			737,670			598,681			111,557			232,270			276,791			—			2,651,595
Ending balance	$	698,205		$	750,994		$	604,556		$	114,177		$	250,342		$	283,485		$	—		$	2,701,759

(1) Represents the portion of the allowance for loan losses established to account for the inherent complexity and uncertainty of estimates.

(2) The difference between this amount and nonaccruing loans at September 30, 2012, represents accruing troubled debt restructured loans.

11

The following table provides the activity of the allowance for loan losses and loan balances for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011:

	Commercial			Commercial Mortgages			Construction			Residential			Consumer			Total
	(In Thousands)
Three months ended September 30, 2011
Allowance for loan losses
Beginning balance	$	25,236		$	12,330		$	5,831		$	3,707		$	9,144		$	56,248
Charge-offs		(1,431	)		(5,302	)		(1,107	)		(877	)		(1,248	)		(9,965	)
Recoveries		71			94			51			25			106			347
Provision		1,645			302			926			427			3,258			6,558
Ending balance	$	25,521		$	7,424		$	5,701		$	3,282		$	11,260		$	53,188
Nine months ended September 30, 2011
Allowance for loan losses
Beginning balance	$	26,480		$	10,564		$	10,019		$	4,028		$	9,248		$	60,339
Charge-offs		(7,641	)		(6,609	)		(8,179	)		(2,183	)		(5,472	)		(30,084	)
Recoveries		409			381			557			116			422			1,885
Provision		6,273			3,088			3,304			1,321			7,062			21,048
Ending balance	$	25,521		$	7,424		$	5,701		$	3,282		$	11,260		$	53,188
Period-end allowance allocated to:
Specific reserves(1)	$	1,810		$	1,604		$	3,005		$	808		$	120		$	7,347
General reserves(2)		23,711			5,820			2,696			2,474			11,140			45,841
Ending balance	$	25,521		$	7,424		$	5,701		$	3,282		$	11,260		$	53,188
Period-end loan balances evaluated for:
Specific reserves(1)	$	21,270		$	20,306		$	21,701		$	17,666		$	3,176		$	84,119	(3)
General reserves(2)		1,376,272			583,564			89,803			267,668			293,991			2,611,298
Ending balance	$	1,397,542		$	603,870		$	111,504		$	285,334		$	297,167		$	2,695,417

(1) Specific reserves represent loans individually evaluated for impairment.

(2) General reserves represent loans collectively evaluated for impairment.

(3) The difference between this amount and nonaccruing loans at September 30, 2011, represents accruing troubled debt restructured loans.

12

Non-Accrual and Past Due Loans

The following tables show our nonaccrual and past due loans at the dates indicated:

September 30, 2012 (In Thousands)	30–59 Days Past Due and Still Accruing			60–89 Days Past Due and Still Accruing			Greater Than 90 Days Past Due and Still Accruing			Total Past Due And Still Accruing			Accruing Current Balances			Nonaccrual Loans			Total Loans
Commercial	$	332		$	—		$	1,869		$	2,201		$	692,425		$	3,579		$	698,205
Owner occupied commercial (1)		—			—			—			—			737,670			13,324			750,994
Commercial mortgages		—			80			—			80			598,601			5,875			604,556
Construction		—			—			—			—			111,557			2,620			114,177
Residential		5,272			1,218			—			6,490			234,498			9,354			250,342
Consumer		1,788			147			—			1,935			276,362			5,188			283,485
Total	$	7,392		$	1,445		$	1,869		$	10,706		$	2,651,113		$	39,940		$	2,701,759
% of Total Loans		0.28	%		0.05	%		0.07	%		0.40	%		98.12	%		1.48	%		100	%

December 31, 2011 (In Thousands)	30–59 Days Past Due and Still Accruing			60–89 Days Past Due and Still Accruing			Greater Than 90 Days Past Due and Still Accruing			Total Past Due And Still Accruing			Accruing Current Balances			Nonaccrual Loans			Total Loans
Commercial	$	1,087		$	63		$	78		$	1,228		$	1,435,876		$	23,080		$	1,460,184
Commercial mortgages		479			243			—			722			605,764			15,814			622,300
Construction		3,727			—			—			3,727			80,074			22,124			105,925
Residential		5,501			1,238			887			7,626			258,820			9,057			275,503
Consumer		2,783			709			—			3,492			287,247			1,018			291,757
Total	$	13,577		$	2,253		$	965		$	16,795		$	2,667,781		$	71,093		$	2,755,669
% of Total Loans		0.49	%		0.08	%		0.04	%		0.61	%		96.81	%		2.58	%		100	%

(1) Prior to 2012, owner-occupied commercial loans were included in commercial loan balances.

Impaired Loans

The following tables provide an analysis of our impaired loans at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

September 30, 2012 (In Thousands)	Ending Loan Balances		Loans with No Specific Reserve (1)		Loans with Specific Reserve		Related Specific Reserve		Contractual Principal Balances		Average Loan Balances
Commercial	$	3,579	$	1,735	$	1,844	$	1,244	$	10,714	$	8,530
Owner-Occupied Commercial (2)		13,324		12,088		1,236		222		16,293		13,918
Commercial mortgages		5,875		5,243		632		90		9,316		15,394
Construction		2,620		2,121		499		94		19,245		25,446
Residential		18,072		15,126		2,946		1,199		19,919		18,502
Consumer		6,694		5,988		706		24		8,242		4,113
Total	$	50,164	$	42,301	$	7,863	$	2,873	$	83,729	$	85,903

13

December 31, 2011 (In Thousands)	Ending Loan Balances		Loans with No Specific Reserve (1)		Loans with Specific Reserve		Related Specific Reserve		Contractual Principal Balances		Average Loan Balances
Commercial	$	23,193	$	19,353	$	3,840	$	2,630	$	26,815	$	22,396
Commercial mortgages		15,814		13,602		2,212		295		21,278		16,237
Construction		22,124		14,166		7,958		723		34,862		27,323
Residential		16,227		9,649		6,578		964		19,312		17,480
Consumer		2,621		1,336		1,285		101		2,788		3,916
Total	$	79,979	$	58,106	$	21,873	$	4,713	$	105,055	$	87,352

(1) Reflects loan balances at their remaining book balance.

(2) Prior to 2012, owner-occupied commercial loans were included in commercial loan balances.

Interest income of $150,000 and $478,000 was recognized on impaired loans during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.

Credit Quality Indicators

Below is a description of each of our risk ratings for all commercial loans:

Pass. These borrowers presently show no current or potential problems and their loans are considered fully collectible.

Special Mention. Borrowers have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. Borrowers in this category may be experiencing adverse operating trends, e.g.: declining revenues or margins, high leverage, tight liquidity, or increasing inventory without increasing sales. These adverse trends can have a potential negative effect on the borrower’s repayment capacity. These assets are not adversely classified and do not expose the Bank to significant risk that would warrant a more severe rating. Borrowers in this category may also be experiencing significant management problems, pending litigation, or other structural credit weaknesses.

Substandard. Borrowers have well-defined weaknesses that require extensive oversight by management. Borrowers in this category may exhibit one or more of the following: inadequate debt service coverage, unprofitable operations, insufficient liquidity, high leverage, and weak or inadequate capitalization. Relationships in this category are not adequately protected by the sound financial worth and paying capacity of the obligor or the collateral pledged on the loan, if any. The distinct possibility exists that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful. Borrowers have well-defined weaknesses inherent in the Substandard category with the added characteristic that the possibility of loss is extremely high. Current circumstances in the credit relationship make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable. A doubtful asset has some pending event that may strengthen the asset that defers the loss classification. Such impending events include: perfecting liens on additional collateral, obtaining collateral valuations, an acquisition or liquidation preceding, proposed merger, or refinancing plan.

Loss. Borrowers are uncollectible or of such negligible value that continuance as a bankable asset is not supportable. This classification does not mean that the asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather that it is not practical to defer writing off this asset even though partial recovery may be recognized sometime in the future.

Residential and Consumer Loans

The residential and consumer loan portfolios are monitored on an ongoing basis using delinquency information and loan type as credit quality indicators. These credit quality indicators are assessed in the aggregate in these relatively homogeneous portfolios. Loans that are greater than 90 days past due are generally considered nonperforming and placed in nonaccrual status.

14

The following tables provide an analysis of problem loans as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

Commercial credit exposure credit risk profile by internally assigned risk rating (in thousands):

	Commercial				Owner-Occupied Commercial (1)				Commercial Mortgages				Construction				Total Commercial
	Sept. 30, 2012		Dec. 31, 2011		Sept. 30, 2012		Dec. 31, 2011		Sept. 30, 2012		Dec. 31, 2011		Sept. 30, 2012		Dec. 31, 2011		September 30, 2012					December 31, 2011
																	Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent
Risk Rating:
Special mention	$	14,758	$	85,848	$	29,413		—	$	30,722	$	50,044	$	429	$	9,747	$	75,322				$	145,639
Substandard:
Accrual		73,204		107,896		54,344		—		13,812		13,664		13,053		19,039		154,413					140,599
Nonaccrual		1,334		23,193		12,088		—		5,243		15,814		2,121		22,124		20,786					61,131
Doubtful/Nonaccrual		2,245		—		1,236		—		632		—		499		—		4,612					—
Total Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful		91,541		216,937		97,081		—		50,409		79,522		16,102		50,910		255,133		12	%		347,369		16	%
Pass		606,664		1,242,519		653,913		—		554,147		543,277		98,075		55,244		1,912,799		88			1,841,040		84
Total Commercial Loans	$	698,205	$	1,459,456	$	750,994		—	$	604,556	$	622,799	$	114,177	$	106,154	$	2,167,932		100	%	$	2,188,409		100	%

Consumer credit exposure credit risk profile based on payment activity (in thousands):

	Residential				Consumer				Total Residential and Consumer
	Sept. 30, 2012		Dec. 31, 2011		Sept. 30, 2012		Dec. 31, 2011		September 30, 2012					December 31, 2011
									Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent
Nonperforming (2)	$	18,072	$	16,227	$	6,694	$	2,621	$	24,766		5	%	$	18,848		3	%
Performing		232,270		259,276		276,791		289,136		509,061		95			548,412		97
Total	$	250,342	$	275,503	$	283,485	$	291,757	$	533,827		100	%	$	567,260		100	%

(1) Prior to 2012, owner-occupied commercial loans were included in commercial loan balances.

(2) Includes $10.2 million at September 30, 2012 and $8.9 million at December 31, 2011 of troubled debt restructured mortgages and home equity installment loans performing in accordance with modified terms and are accruing interest

15

Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDR)

The book balance of TDRs at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was $22.3 million and $27.7 million, respectively. The balances at September 30, 2012 include approximately $12.1 million in nonaccrual status and $10.2 million in accrual status compared to $18.8 million in nonaccrual status and $8.9 million of in accrual status at December 31, 2011. Approximately $1.2 million and $1.3 million in specific reserves have been established for these loans as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

During the nine months ending September 30, 2012, the terms of 104 loans were either modified or identified as troubled debt restructurings, of which 15 were related to commercial loans that were already placed on nonaccrual. Nonaccruing restructured loans remain in nonaccrual status until there has been a period of sustained repayment performance for a reasonable period, usually six months. The remaining 89 loans represented residential and consumer loans. Our concessions on restructured loans consisted mainly of forbearance agreements, reduction in interest rates or extensions of maturities. Principal balances are generally not forgiven by us when a loan is modified as a TDR.

The following table presents loans identified as TDRs during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012:

(In Thousands)	Three Months Ended Sept. 30, 2012		Nine Months Ended Sept. 30, 2012
Commercial	$	710	$	9,986
Construction		—		378
Residential		2,779		4,170
Consumer		2,165		2,312
Total	$	5,654	$	16,846

The TDRs described above increased the allowance for loan losses by $357,000 through allocation of a specific reserve, and resulted in charge offs of $8.1 million during the nine months ending September 30, 2012.

There was one residential TDR in the amount of $84,000 which defaulted (defined as past due 90 days) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 that was restructured within the last twelve months prior to September 30, 2012.

5. TAXES ON INCOME

We account for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”) (Formerly SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes and FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty In Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109). ASC 740 requires the recording of deferred income taxes that reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. We exercise significant judgment in the evaluation of the amount and timing of the recognition of the resulting tax assets and liabilities. The judgments and estimates required for the evaluation are updated based upon changes in business factors and the tax laws. If actual results differ from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating the amount and timing of tax recognized, there can be no assurance that additional expenses will not be required in future periods. No valuation allowance has been recorded on our deferred tax assets due to our history of prior earnings along with our expectations of future income. ASC 740 prescribes a minimum probability threshold that a tax position must meet before a financial statement benefit is recognized. We recognize, when applicable, interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes in the financial statements. Assessment of uncertain tax positions under ASC 740 requires careful consideration of the technical merits of a position based on our analysis of tax regulations and interpretations.

16

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were $3,000 and $88,000, respectively, all of which would affect our September 30, 2012 effective tax rate if recognized. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the total amount of accrued interest included in such unrecognized tax benefits were $3,000 and $15,000, respectively. Penalties of $6,000 were included in such unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2011, but none are included at September 30, 2012. We record interest and penalties on potential income tax deficiencies as income tax expense. Our Federal and state tax returns for the 2009 through 2011 tax years are subject to examination as of September 30, 2012. We were recently notified of the IRS intention to audit our 2010 tax return. There are currently no other income tax audits in process.

6. SEGMENT INFORMATION

Under the definition of FASB ASC 280, Segment Reporting (“ASC 280”) (Formerly SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information) we discuss our business in three segments. There is one segment for each of WSFS Bank, Cash Connect, (the ATM division of WSFS Bank), and Trust and Wealth Management. Trust and Wealth Management was reorganized during 2011 and is comprised of Montchanin, Christiana Trust, Monarch Entity Services LLC, Private Banking and WSFS Investment Group, Inc. in a single reportable segment because each has similar economic characteristics, products, customers and distribution methods. As required by ASC 280, all prior years’ information has been updated to reflect this presentation.

The WSFS Bank segment provides financial products to commercial and retail customers through its 51 offices located in Delaware (42), Pennsylvania (7) and Virginia (1) and Nevada (1). Retail and Commercial Banking, Commercial Real Estate Lending and other banking business units are operating departments of WSFS. These departments share the same regulator, the same market, many of the same customers and provide similar products and services through the general infrastructure of the Bank. Because of these and other reasons, these departments are not considered discrete segments and are appropriately aggregated within the WSFS Bank segment in accordance with ASC 280.

Cash Connect provides turnkey ATM services through strategic partnerships with several of the largest networks, manufacturers and service providers in the ATM industry. The balance sheet category “Cash in non-owned ATMs” includes cash from which fee income is earned through bailment arrangements with customers of Cash Connect.

The Trust and Wealth Management segment is comprised of Christiana Trust, Monarch Entity Services LLC, Montchanin, Private Banking and WSFS Investment Group, Inc. Christiana Trust was acquired in December 2010 and WSFS’ Trust and Wealth Management business was consolidated into Christiana Trust. Christiana Trust provides investment, fiduciary, and agency services from locations in Delaware and Nevada. These services are provided to individuals and families as well as corporations and institutions. Monarch Entity Services LLC provides commercial domicile services from locations in Delaware and Nevada. Montchanin has one consolidated wholly owned subsidiary, Cypress Capital Management, LLC (Cypress). Cypress is a Wilmington-based investment advisory firm serving high net-worth individuals and institutions. WSFS Investment Group, Inc. markets various third-party insurance products and securities and Private Banking specializes in meeting the needs of professionals and their practices, including deposit services and credit needs of existing and start-up practices.

17

An operating segment is a component of an enterprise that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses, whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the enterprise’s chief operating decision makers to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance, and for which discrete financial information is available. We evaluate performance based on pretax ordinary income relative to resources used, and allocate resources based on these results. The accounting policies applicable to our segments are those that apply to our preparation of the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements. Segment information for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 follows:

For the three months ended September 30, 2012

	WSFS Bank		Cash Connect		Trust & Wealth Management		Total
	(In Thousands)
External customer revenues:
Interest income	$	34,475	$	—	$	2,039	$	36,514
Noninterest income		11,686		4,707		3,355		19,748
Total external customer revenues		46,161		4,707		5,394		56,262
Inter-segment revenues:
Interest income		944		—		1,358		2,302
Noninterest income		2,122		148		24		2,294
Total inter-segment revenues		3,066		148		1,382		4,596
Total revenue		49,227		4,855		6,776		60,858
External customer expenses:
Interest expense		5,377		—		244		5,621
Noninterest expenses		27,300		2,113		2,740		32,153
Provision for loan loss		2,997		—		754		3,751
Total external customer expenses		35,674		2,113		3,738		41,525
Inter-segment expenses
Interest expense		1,358		338		606		2,302
Noninterest expenses		172		586		1,536		2,294
Total inter-segment expenses		1,530		924		2,142		4,596
Total expenses		37,204		3,037		5,880		46,121
Income before taxes and extraordinary items	$	12,023	$	1,818	$	896	$	14,737
Provision for income taxes								4,758
Consolidated net income							$	9,979
Capital expenditures	$	1,289	$	311	$	3	$	1,603
As of September 30, 2012
Cash and cash equivalents	$	52,821	$	390,356	$	3,923	$	447,100
Other segment assets		3,622,291		1,976		189,965		3,814,232
Total segment assets	$	3,675,112	$	392,332	$	193,888	$	4,261,332

18

For the three months ended September 30, 2011

	WSFS Bank		Cash Connect		Trust & Wealth Management		Total
	(In Thousands)
External customer revenues:
Interest income	$	37,729	$	—	$	2,362	$	40,091
Noninterest income		9,389		4,235		3,300		16,924
Total external customer revenues		47,118		4,235		5,662		57,015
Inter-segment revenues:
Interest income		1,136		—		1,406		2,542
Noninterest income		1,793		202		21		2,016
Total inter-segment revenues		2,929		202		1,427		4,558
Total revenue		50,047		4,437		7,089		61,573
External customer expenses:
Interest expense		7,600		—		311		7,911
Noninterest expenses		27,524		2,187		2,701		32,412
Provision for loan loss		6,068		—		490		6,558
Total external customer expenses		41,192		2,187		3,502		46,881
Inter-segment expenses
Interest expense		1,406		349		787		2,542
Noninterest expenses		223		358		1,435		2,016
Total inter-segment expenses		1,629		707		2,222		4,558
Total expenses		42,821		2,894		5,724		51,439
Income before taxes and extraordinary items	$	7,226	$	1,543	$	1,365	$	10,134
Provision for income taxes								3,348
Consolidated net income							$	6,786
Capital expenditures	$	2,374	$	837	$	2	$	3,213
As of December 31, 2011
Cash and cash equivalents	$	48,107	$	416,949	$	2,961	$	468,017
Other segment assets		3,618,744		2,155		200,092		3,820,991
Total segment assets	$	3,666,851	$	419,104	$	203,053	$	4,289,008

19

For the nine months ended September 30, 2012

	WSFS Bank		Cash Connect		Trust & Wealth Management		Total
	(In Thousands)
External customer revenues:
Interest income	$	107,199	$	—	$	6,301	$	113,500
Noninterest income		42,238		13,254		10,006		65,498
Total external customer revenues		149,437		13,254		16,307		178,998
Inter-segment revenues:
Interest income		3,099		—		4,344		7,443
Noninterest income		6,368		568		79		7,015
Total inter-segment revenues		9,467		568		4,423		14,458
Total revenue		158,904		13,822		20,730		193,456
External customer expenses:
Interest expense		17,330		—		669		17,999
Noninterest expenses		81,267		6,628		8,264		96,159
Provision for loan loss		26,786		—		1,593		28,379
Total external customer expenses		125,383		6,628		10,526		142,537
Inter-segment expenses
Interest expense		4,344		1,008		2,091		7,443
Noninterest expenses		647		1,711		4,657		7,015
Total inter-segment expenses		4,991		2,719		6,748		14,458
Total expenses		130,374		9,347		17,274		156,995
Income before taxes and extraordinary items	$	28,530	$	4,475	$	3,456	$	36,461
Provision for income taxes								12,708
Consolidated net income							$	23,753
Capital expenditures	$	5,406	$	321	$	20	$	5,747
As of September 30, 2012
Cash and cash equivalents	$	52,821	$	390,356	$	3,923	$	447,100
Other segment assets		3,622,291		1,976		189,965		3,814,232
Total segment assets	$	3,675,112	$	392,332	$	193,888	$	4,261,332

20

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011

	WSFS Bank		Cash Connect		Trust & Wealth Management		Total
	(In Thousands)
External customer revenues:
Interest income	$	111,984	$	—	$	7,073	$	119,057
Noninterest income		25,275		11,484		9,833		46,592
Total external customer revenues		137,259		11,484		16,906		165,649
Inter-segment revenues:
Interest income		3,344		—		4,505		7,849
Noninterest income		5,610		524		93		6,227
Total inter-segment revenues		8,954		524		4,598		14,076
Total revenue		146,213		12,008		21,504		179,725
External customer expenses:
Interest expense		24,434		—		1,002		25,436
Noninterest expenses		79,866		5,824		8,761		94,451
Provision for loan loss		19,802		—		1,246		21,048
Total external customer expenses		124,102		5,824		11,009		140,935
Inter-segment expenses
Interest expense		4,505		913		2,431		7,849
Noninterest expenses		617		1,162		4,448		6,227
Total inter-segment expenses		5,122		2,075		6,879		14,076
Total expenses		129,224		7,899		17,888		155,011
Income before taxes and extraordinary items	$	16,989	$	4,109	$	3,616	$	24,714
Provision for income taxes								8,199
Consolidated net income							$	16,515
Capital expenditures	$	6,768	$	1,014	$	308	$	8,090
As of December 31, 2011
Cash and cash equivalents	$	48,107	$	416,949	$	2,961	$	468,017
Other segment assets		3,618,744		2,155		200,092		3,820,991
Total segment assets	$	3,666,851	$	419,104	$	203,053	$	4,289,008

21

7. FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES OF FINANCIAL ASSETS

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL ASSETS

ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the use of inputs used in valuation methodologies into the following three levels:

Level 1: Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices, unadjusted, for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. A quoted price in an active market provides the most reliable evidence of fair value and shall be used to measure fair value whenever available.

Level 2: Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or inputs to the valuation methodology that are derived principally from or can be corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3: Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using discounted cash flow methodologies, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below.

The table below presents the balances of assets measured at fair value as of September 30, 2012 (there are no material liabilities measured at fair value):

Description	Quoted Prices  in Active Markets for Identical Asset (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Total Fair Value
	(in Thousands)
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Available-for-sale securities:
Collateralized mortgage obligations	$	—	$	249,272	$	6,050		$	255,322
FNMA		—		461,435		—			461,435
FHLMC		—		72,356		—			72,356
GNMA		—		67,294		—			67,294
U.S. Government and agencies		—		51,052		—			51,052
State and political subdivisions		—		3,148		—			3,148
Reverse mortgages		—		—		(552	)		(552	)
Trading Securities		—		—		12,590			12,590
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis	$	—	$	904,557	$	18,088		$	922,645
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Other real estate owned	$	—	$	—	$	6,996		$	6,996
Impaired Loans		—		—		47,291			47,291
Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis	$	—	$	—	$	54,287		$	54,287

22

The table below presents the balances of assets measured at fair value as of December 31, 2011 (there are no material liabilities measured at fair value):

Description	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Asset (Level  1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Total Fair Value
	(in Thousands)
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Available-for-sale securities:
Collateralized mortgage obligations	$	—	$	324,450	$	3,936		$	328,386
FNMA		—		329,354		—			329,354
FHLMC		—		95,086		—			95,086
GNMA		—		63,967		—			63,967
U.S. Government and agencies		—		39,025		—			39,025
State and political subdivisions		—		4,190		—			4,190
Reverse mortgages		—		—		(646	)		(646	)
Trading Securities		—		—		12,432			12,432
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis	$	—	$	856,072	$	15,722		$	871,794
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Other real estate owned	$	—	$	11,695	$	—		$	11,695
Impaired Loans		—		74,562		—			74,562
Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis	$	—	$	86,257	$	—		$	86,257

Fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed models or obtained from third parties that primarily use, as inputs, observable market-based parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments may include unobservable parameters. Our valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While we believe our valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.

Available- for-sale securities. As of September 30, 2012, securities classified as available for sale are reported at fair value using both Level 2 and Level 3 inputs. Included in the Level 2 total are approximately $51.0 million in Federal Agency debentures, $850.4 million in Federal Agency MBS, and $3.1 million in municipal bonds. Agency and MBS securities are predominately AAA-rated. We believe this Level 2 designation is appropriate for these securities under ASC 820-10 as, with almost all fixed income securities, none are exchange traded, and all are priced by correlation to observed market data. For these securities we obtain fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, U.S. government and agency yield curves, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information, and the security’s terms and conditions, among other factors.

23

Included in the Level 3 total is a small equity traunche of a reverse mortgage security purchased on July 15, 2011. This security is Level 3 because there is no active market for this security and no observable inputs that reflect quoted prices for identical assets in active markets (Level 1) or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset through corroboration with observable market data (Level 2). In order to establish the fair value for a Level 3 asset a “mark-to-model” has been developed using the income approach described in ASC 820-10-35-32 and is similar to the methodology used to value our trading securities described below.

The amount of our investment in reverse mortgages represents the estimated value of future cash flows of the reverse mortgages at a rate deemed appropriate for these mortgages, based on the market rate for similar collateral. The projected cash flows depend on assumptions about life expectancy of the mortgagor and the future changes in collateral values. Due to the significant amount of management judgment and the unobservable input calculations, these reverse mortgages have been classified as Level 3.

Trading securities. The amount included in the trading securities category represents the fair value of a BBB-rated traunche of a reverse mortgage security. There has never been an active market for these securities. As such, we classify these trading securities as Level 3 under ASC 820-10. As prescribed by ASC 820-10 management used various observable and unobservable inputs to develop a range of likely fair value prices where this security would be exchanged in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The unobservable inputs reflect assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing this asset. Included in these inputs were the median of a selection of other BBB-rated securities as well as quoted market prices from higher rated traunches of this asset class. The unobservable inputs consist of prepayments, house price appreciation and interest rates. We have completed a sensitivity analysis at September 30, 2012, which showed any increase or decrease in these inputs would not have a significant impact on the fair value of these assets. As a result, the value assigned to this security is determined primarily through a discounted cash flow analysis. All of these assumptions require a significant degree of management judgment.

The changes in Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows:

	Trading Securities		Reverse Mortgages			Available- for-sale Securities			Total
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	12,432	$	(686	)	$	—		$	11,746
Total net (losses) income for the period included in net income		—		(137	)		265			128
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements, net		—		177			2,755			2,932
Mark-to-market adjustment		—		—			916			916
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	12,432	$	(646	)		3,936		$	15,722
Total net income (losses) for the period included in net income		33		(29	)		—			4
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements, net		—		45			—			45
Mark-to-market adjustment		—		—			(436	)		(436	)
Balance at March 31, 2012	$	12,465	$	(630	)	$	3,500		$	15,335
Total net losses for the period included in net income		—		(47	)		—			(47	)
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements, net		—		45			—			45
Mark-to-market adjustment		—		—			845			845
Balance at June 30, 2012	$	12,465	$	(632	)	$	4,345		$	16,178
Total net income for the period included in net income		—		35			—			35
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements, net		—		45			—			45
Mark-to-market adjustment		125		—			1,705			1,830
Balance at September 30, 2012	$	12,590	$	(552	)	$	6,050		$	18,088

24

Other real estate owned. Other real estate owned consists of loan collateral which has been repossessed through foreclosure or other measures. Initially, foreclosed assets are recorded as held for sale at the lower of the loan balance or fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are updated periodically and the assets may be marked down further, reflecting a new cost basis. The fair value of our real estate owned was estimated using Level 3 inputs based on appraisals obtained from third parties.

Impaired loans. We evaluate and value impaired loans at the time the loan is identified as impaired, and the fair values of such loans are estimated using Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy. The collateral for each loan has a unique appraisal and our discount of the value is based on the factors unique to each impaired loan. The significant unobservable input in determining the fair value is our subjective discount on appraisals of the collateral securing the loan, which range from 10% - 50%. Collateral may consist of real estate and/or business assets including equipment, inventory and accounts receivable. The value of these assets is determined based on appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers hired by us. Appraised and reported values may be discounted based on our historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of valuation, estimated costs to sell, and/or our expertise and knowledge of the client and the client’s business.

Impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a net amount of $47.3 million and $75.3 million at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The valuation allowance on impaired loans was $2.9 million as of September 30, 2012 and $4.7 million as of December 31, 2011.

Due to the continuing weakness in the real estate market, we now utilize a more significant level of unobservable inputs and, as such, have reclassified the hierarchical levels of both Other Real Estate Owned and Impaired Loans to Level 3 as of March 31, 2012.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The reported fair values of financial instruments are based on a variety of factors. In certain cases, fair values represent quoted market prices for identical or comparable instruments. In other cases, fair values have been estimated based on assumptions regarding the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows that are discounted to reflect current market rates and varying degrees of risk. Accordingly, fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instruments that could have been realized as of period-end or that will be realized in the future.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:

Cash and Short-Term Investments: For cash and short-term investments, including due from banks, federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreements to resell and interest-bearing deposits with other banks, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Investments and Mortgage-Backed Securities: Since quoted market prices are not available, fair value is estimated using quoted prices for similar securities, which we obtain from a third party vendor. We utilize one of the largest providers of securities pricing to the industry and we periodically assesses the inputs used by this vendor to price the various types of securities owned by us to validate the vendor’s methodology. The fair value of our investment in reverse mortgages is based on the net present value of estimated cash flows, which have been updated to reflect recent external appraisals of the underlying collateral. For additional discussion of our mortgage-backed securities-trading or our internally developed models, see Fair Value of Financial Assets, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Loans: Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type: commercial, commercial mortgages, construction, residential mortgages and consumer. For loans that reprice frequently, book value approximates fair value. The fair values of other types of loans are estimated by discounting expected cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with comparable credit ratings and for similar remaining maturities. The fair value of nonperforming loans is based on recent external appraisals of the underlying collateral. Estimated cash flows, discounted using a rate commensurate with current rates and the risk associated with the estimated cash flows, are utilized if appraisals are not available. This technique does not contemplate an exit price.

Bank-Owned Life Insurance: The estimated fair value approximates the book value for this investment.

25

Stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh: The fair value of FHLB stock is assumed to be equal to its cost. We carry FHLB stock at cost, or par value, and evaluate FHLB stock for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability of par value rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. As part of the impairment assessment of FHLB stock, management considers, among other things, (i) the significance and length of time of any declines in net assets of the FHLB compared to its capital stock, (ii) commitments by the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulations and the level of such payments in relation to its operating performance and (iii) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on FHLB. The FHLB has access to the U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprise Credit Facility, a secured lending facility that serves as a liquidity backstop, substantially reducing the likelihood that the FHLB would need to sell securities to raise liquidity and, thereby, cause the realization of large economic losses. On August 8, 2011, Standard & Poors (“S&P”) downgraded the FHLB from AAA to AA+, similar to their downgrade of the U.S. sovereign rating. The reduction in the FHLB credit rating was due to the belief, by S&P, that the FHLB system is certain to receive U.S. government support, if necessary, resulting from the important role the FHLB system plays as primary liquidity providers to U.S. mortgage and housing-market participants. Despite the downgrade, the FHLB continues to have a very high degree of government support and was in compliance with all regulatory capital requirements as of September 30, 2012. As a result, we have determined there was no OTTI related to our FHLB stock investment as of September 30, 2012.

Demand Deposits, Savings Deposits and Time Deposits: The fair value of demand deposits and savings deposits is determined by projecting future cash flows using an estimated economic life based on account characteristics. The resulting cash flow is discounted using rates available on alternative funding sources. The fair value of time deposits is estimated using the rate and maturity characteristics of the deposits to estimate their cash flow. The cash flow is discounted at rates for similar term wholesale funding.

Borrowed Funds: Rates currently available to us for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate fair value of existing debt.

Off-Balance Sheet Instruments: The fair value of off-balance sheet instruments, including commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit, is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements with comparable remaining terms and reflects the present creditworthiness of the counterparties.

The book value and estimated fair value of our financial instruments are as follows:

	Fair Value	September 30, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Measurement	Book Value		Fair Value		Book Value		Fair Value
(In Thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	Level 1	$	447,100	$	447,100	$	468,017	$	468,017
Investment securities	See Footnote 7		922,645		922,645		871,794		871,794
Loans held for sale	Level 3		20,905		20,905		10,185		10,185
Loans, net	Level 3		2,656,161		2,677,467		2,702,589		2,721,804
Stock in Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh	Level 2		30,171		30,171		35,756		35,756
Accrued interest receivable	Level 2		10,292		10,292		11,743		11,743
Financial liabilities:
Deposits	Level 2		3,159,804		3,079,661		3,135,304		3,087,464
Borrowed funds	Level 2		644,823		650,389		723,620		731,522
Standby letters of credit	Level 3		257		257		322		322
Accrued interest payable	Level 2		6,335		6,335		1,910		1,910

The estimated fair value of our off-balance sheet financial instruments is as follows:

	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
(In Thousands)
Off-balance sheet instruments:
Commitments to extend credit	$	5,123	$	4,445

26

8. INDEMNIFICATIONS AND GUARANTEES

Secondary Market Loan Sales. We generally do not sell loans with recourse except to the extent arising from standard loan sale contract provisions covering violations of representations and warranties and, under certain circumstances first payment defaults by borrowers. These are customary repurchase provisions in the secondary market for conforming mortgage loan sales. These indemnifications may include our repurchase of the loans. Repurchases and losses are rare, and no provision is made for the losses at the time of sale. During the third quarter of 2012, we had no repurchases under these indemnifications.

We typically sell fixed-rate, conforming first mortgage loans (including reverse mortgages) in the secondary market as part of our ongoing asset/liability management program. Loans held-for-sale are carried at the lower of cost or market of the aggregate, or in some cases, individual loans. Gains and losses on sales of loans are recognized at the date of the sale.

Swap Guarantees. We entered into agreements with three unrelated financial institutions whereby those financial institutions entered into interest rate derivative contracts (interest rate swap transactions) with customers referred to them by us. By the terms of the agreements, those financial institutions have recourse to us for any exposure created under each swap transaction in the event the customer defaults on the swap agreement and the agreement is in a paying position to the third-party financial institution. This is a customary arrangement that allows smaller financial institutions like us to provide access to interest rate swap transactions for our customers without creating the swap ourselves.

At September 30, 2012 there were 91 variable-rate swap transactions between the third party financial institutions and our customers, compared to 79 at December 31, 2011. The initial notional amount aggregated approximately $379.1 million at September 30, 2012 compared with $318.1 million at December 31, 2011. At September 30, 2012 maturities ranged from approximately 1 month to 13 years. The aggregate market value of these swaps to the customers was a liability of $41.1 million at September 30, 2012 and $32.8 million at December 31, 2011.

9. ASSOCIATE (EMPLOYEE) BENEFIT PLANS

Postretirement Benefits

We share certain costs of providing health and life insurance benefits to retired Associates (and their eligible dependents). Substantially all Associates may become eligible for these benefits if they reach normal retirement age while working for us.

We account for our obligations under the provisions of FASB ASC 715, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (“ASC 715”) (Formerly SFAS No. 106, Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions). ASC 715 requires that the costs of these benefits be recognized over an Associate’s active working career. Disclosures are in accordance with ASC 715.

The following disclosures of the net periodic benefit cost components of postretirement benefits were measured at January 1, 2012 and 2011:

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
(In Thousands)
Service cost	$	72	$	52	$	216	$	156
Interest cost		44		41		131		125
Amortization of transition obligation		15		15		45		45
Net loss recognition		17		8		51		24
Net periodic benefit cost	$	148	$	116	$	443	$	350

27

10. STOCK AND COMMON STOCK WARRANTS

In August 2010, we completed an underwritten public offering of 1,370,000 shares of common stock. The offering was priced at $36.50 per share, a slight premium to the prior day’s closing price, and raised $47.1 million net of $2.9 million of costs.

On September 24, 2009 we completed a private placement of stock to Peninsula Investment Partners, L.P. (Peninsula), pursuant to which we issued and sold 862,069 shares of common stock for a total purchase price of $25.0 million, and a 10-year warrant to purchase 129,310 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $29.00 per share. The warrant is immediately exercisable. During 2011 all shares were distributed on a pro-rata basis to the fund holders of Peninsula with the warrants being transferred to Peninsula’s managing partner.

Total proceeds of $25.0 million were allocated, based on the relative fair value of common stock and common stock warrants, to common stock for $23.5 million and common stock warrants for $1.5 million on September 24, 2009.

On January 23, 2009, we entered into a purchase agreement with the U.S. Treasury (“Treasury”) pursuant to which we issued and sold 52,625 shares of our fixed-rate cumulative perpetual preferred stock for a total purchase price of $52.6 million, and a 10-year warrant to purchase 175,105 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $45.08 per share. On March 28, 2012, the Treasury held a public auction where it sold all 52,625 shares, which represented the Treasury’s entire preferred stock holding in WSFS. Under the terms of the agreement, WSFS will continue to pay a five percent dividend annually for each of the first five years of the investment and a nine percent dividend thereafter until the shares are redeemed. The cumulative dividend for the preferred stock is accrued for and payable on February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15 of each year. We have declared and paid $2.0 million of cash dividends on the preferred stock during the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Total proceeds of $52.6 million were allocated, based on the relative fair value of the preferred stock and common stock warrants, to preferred stock for $51.9 million and common stock warrants for $693,000 respectively, on January 23, 2009. The preferred stock discount is being accreted, on an effective yield method, over five years. We have accreted $104,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. At September 30, 2012 there was approximately $185,000 of discount on preferred stock remaining.

On September 12, 2012 we entered into a letter agreement with the U.S. Treasury pursuant to which the Company repurchased the warrant for $1.8 million.

11. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLES

In accordance with FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations, and FASB ASC 350, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other, all assets and liabilities acquired in purchase acquisitions, including goodwill, indefinite-lived intangibles and other intangibles are recorded at fair value. We consider our accounting policies related to goodwill and other intangible assets to be critical because the assumptions and judgment used in determining the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in past acquisitions are subjective and complex. As a result, changes in these assumptions and judgment could have a significant impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

The fair value of acquired assets and liabilities, including the resulting goodwill, was based either on quoted market prices or provided by other third-party sources, when available. When third-party information was not available we made good-faith estimates primarily through the use of internal cash flow modeling techniques. The assumptions used in the cash flow modeling are subjective and susceptible to significant changes.

Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are tested for impairment at least annually and charged to results of operations in periods in which the recorded value is more than the estimated fair value. Intangible assets that have finite useful lives are amortized over their useful lives and are periodically evaluated for impairment. Goodwill totaled $28.1 million at both September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The majority of our goodwill, or $23.0 million, is in the WSFS Bank reporting unit and is the result of a branch acquisition in 2008 and the acquisition of Christiana Bank & Trust (“CB&T”) during 2010. The remaining $5.1 million is in the Trust and Wealth Management reporting unit and is mainly the result of the acquisition of CB&T.

28

When required, the goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process. The first test is done by comparing the reporting unit’s aggregate fair value to its carrying value. Absent other indicators of impairment, if the aggregate fair value exceeds the carrying value, goodwill is not considered impaired and no additional analysis is necessary. If the carrying value of the reporting unit were to exceed the aggregate fair value, a second test would be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. To measure any impairment loss, the implied fair value would be determined in the same manner as if the reporting unit were being acquired in a business combination. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the recorded goodwill an impairment charge would be recorded for the difference.

During 2011, ASU 2011-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), was issued. Under the Update, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. Therefore, before the first step of the existing guidance, the entity has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that the fair value of goodwill is less than carrying value. The qualitative assessment includes adverse events or circumstances identified that could negatively affect the reporting units’ fair value as well as positive and mitigating events. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step process is unnecessary. The entity has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment step for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to the first step of the existing two-step process. The entity can resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. We adopted the Update for the quarter ended December 31, 2011.

Based on the results of the annual impairment test it was determined that no goodwill impairment charges were required for the year ended December 31, 2011. Our next annual impairment test will be conducted during the quarter ending December 31, 2012. For the quarter ended September 30, 2012, we determined no triggering events had occurred and, therefore, did not conduct an interim impairment test of goodwill. Even though there was no goodwill impairment at September 30, 2012, declines in the value of our stock price or additional adverse changes in the operating environment of the financial services industry may result in a future impairment charge.

FASB ASC 350, also requires that an acquired intangible asset be separately recognized if the benefit of the intangible asset is obtained through contractual or other legal rights, or if the asset can be sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged, regardless of the acquirer’s intent to do so.

The following table summarizes other intangible assets:

	Gross Intangible Assets		Accumulated Amortization			Net Intangible Assets
	(In Thousands)
September 30, 2012
Core deposits	$	4,370	$	(1,863	)	$	2,507
Other		4,885		(1,975	)		2,910
Total other intangible assets	$	9,255	$	(3,838	)	$	5,417
December 31, 2011
Core deposits	$	4,370	$	(1,393	)	$	2,977
Other		4,865		(1,703	)		3,162
Total other intangible assets	$	9,235	$	(3,096	)	$	6,139

Core deposit intangible assets are amortized over their expected lives using the present value of the benefit of the core deposits and straight-line methods of amortization. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we recognized amortization expense on other intangible assets of $742,000.

29

The following presents the estimated amortization expense of intangibles:

(In Thousands)	Amortization of Intangibles
Remaining in 2012	$	370
2013		916
2014		758
2015		711
2016		465
Thereafter		2,197
Total	$	5,417

30

12. LEGAL AND OTHER PROCEEDINGS

In September 2012, we received a “30-day letter” from the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) on behalf of a trust for which the Bank (as successor to Christiana Bank & Trust (“CB&T”)) serves as trustee. A “30 day letter” is a notice sent by the IRS to a taxpayer giving the taxpayer thirty days to appeal IRS findings. The IRS letter received by the Bank informed the trust of a proposed adjustment to an income tax return filed in 2007 for the 2006 tax year, a period prior to the Bank’s acquisition of CB&T. The IRS has agreed to extend the time that the trust has to respond to the IRS letter to November 30, 2012. The letter informs the trust of a proposed adjustment in income tax of $8.0 million plus interest and penalties in the range of $6.0 million to $10.0 million. We understand the IRS has submitted a similar letter to the grantor of the trust. To date, the IRS has not made any claim against the Bank.

Since receiving this letter the Bank has been working with the IRS and our counsel to understand the circumstances relating to the proposed adjustment, interest and penalties and the context in which the transactions relating to the proposed adjustment occurred. We believe the Bank acted properly in its role as trustee. Further, based on the facts currently known to us, we believe any dispute or settlement is between the IRS and the grantor and we believe that if the IRS were to assert a claim against the Bank, the claim would have no merit. The trust intends to communicate this position to the IRS in its response.

There were no material changes or additions to other significant pending legal or other proceedings involving us other than those arising out of routine operations. Management does not anticipate that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of such other proceedings will have a material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

31

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

GENERAL

WSFS Financial Corporation is parent to Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB (“WSFS Bank” or the “Bank”), one of the ten oldest banks continuously operating under the same name in the United States. A permanent fixture in the community, WSFS has been in operation for more than 180 years. In addition to its focus on stellar customer service, the Bank has continued to fuel growth and remain a leader in our community. We are a relationship-focused, locally-managed, community banking institution that has grown to become the largest thrift holding company in the State of Delaware, one of the top commercial lenders in the state, the third largest bank in terms of Delaware deposits. We state our mission simply: We Stand for Service and Strengthening Our Communities.

Our core banking business is commercial lending funded by customer-generated deposits. We have built a $2.2 billion commercial loan portfolio by recruiting the best seasoned commercial lenders in our markets and offering a high level of service and flexibility typically associated with a community bank. We fund this business primarily with deposits generated through commercial relationships and retail deposits. We service our customers primarily from our 51 offices located in Delaware (42), Pennsylvania (7), Virginia (1) and Nevada (1). We also offer a broad variety of consumer loan products, retail securities and insurance brokerage through our retail branches.

We have two consolidated subsidiaries, WSFS Bank and Montchanin Capital Management, Inc. (“Montchanin”) and one unconsolidated affiliate, WSFS Capital Trust III (“the Trust”).

WSFS Bank has two wholly owned subsidiaries, WSFS Investment Group, Inc. and Monarch Entity Services, LLC (“Monarch”). WSFS Investment Group, Inc., markets various third-party investment and insurance products, such as single-premium annuities, whole life policies and securities primarily through the Bank’s retail banking system and directly to the public. Monarch provides commercial domicile services which include employees, directors, sublease of office facilities and registered agent services in Delaware and Nevada.

Our Cash Connect division is a premier provider of ATM Vault Cash and related services in the United States. Cash Connect manages nearly $437 million in vault cash in nearly 13,000 ATMs nationwide and also provides online reporting and ATM cash management, predictive cash ordering, armored carrier management, ATM processing and equipment sales. Cash Connect also operates over 430 ATMs for WSFS Bank, which has, by far, the largest branded ATM network in Delaware.

We offer trust and wealth management services through Christiana Trust, Cypress Capital Management, LLC (Cypress), WSFS Investment Group brokerage and our Private Banking group. The Christiana Trust division provides investment, fiduciary, agency and commercial domicile services from locations in Delaware and Nevada and has over $15 billion in assets under administration. These services are provided to individuals and families as well as corporations and institutions. The Christiana Trust division of WSFS Bank provides these services to customers locally, nationally and internationally making use of the advantages of its branch facilities in Delaware and Nevada. Cypress is an investment advisory firm that manages over $600 million of portfolios for individuals, trusts, retirement plans and endowments. WSFS Investment Group, Inc. markets various third-party insurance products and securities through the Bank’s retail banking system.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and exhibits thereto, contains estimates, predictions, opinions, projections and other statements that may be interpreted as “forward-looking statements” as that phrase is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements include, without limitation, references to our financial goals, management’s plans and objectives for future operations, financial and business trends, business prospects, and management’s outlook or expectations for earnings, revenues, expenses, capital levels, liquidity levels, asset quality or other future financial or business performance, strategies or expectations. Such forward-looking statements are based on various assumptions (some of which may be beyond the Company’s control) and are subject to risks and uncertainties (which change over time) and other factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those related to the economic environment, particularly in the market areas in

32

which we operate, including an increase in unemployment levels; the volatility of the financial and securities markets, including changes with respect to the market value of financial assets; changes in market interest rates may increase funding costs and reduce earning asset yields thus reducing margins, changes in government regulation affecting financial institutions, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the rules being issued in accordance with this statute and potential expenses and elevated capital levels associated therewith; possible additional loan losses, impairment of the collectability of loans; possible changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies, laws and regulations and other activities of governments, agencies, and similar organizations, may have an adverse effect on business; possible regulations issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau or other regulators which might adversely impact our business model or products and services; possible stresses in the real estate markets, including possible continued deterioration in property values; our ability to expand into new markets and to maintain profit margins in the face of competitive pressures; our ability to effectively manage credit risk, interest rate risk market risk, operational risk, legal risk, liquidity risk, reputational risk, and regulatory and compliance risk; the effects of increased competition from both banks and non-banks; the effects of geopolitical instability and risks such as terrorist attacks; the effects of weather and natural disasters such as floods, droughts, wind, tornados and hurricanes, and the effects of man-made disasters; possible changes in the speed of loan prepayments by our customers and loan origination or sales volumes; possible acceleration of prepayments of mortgage-backed securities due to low interest rates, and the related acceleration of premium amortization on those securities; and the costs associated with resolving any problem loans, litigation and other risks and uncertainties, discussed in documents filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time. Forward looking statements are as of the date they are made, and the Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations are based on the Consolidated Financial Statements, which are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these Consolidated Financial Statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. We regularly evaluate these estimates and assumptions including those related to the allowance for loan losses, deferred taxes, fair value measurements, goodwill and other intangible assets. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other factors and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These form the basis for making judgments on the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Although our current estimates contemplate current economic conditions and how we expect them to change in the future, for the remainder of 2012, it is reasonably possible that actual conditions may be worse than anticipated in those estimates, which could materially affect our results of operations and financial condition. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The following are critical accounting policies that involve more significant judgments and estimates. See further discussion of these critical accounting policies in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Allowance for Loan Losses

We maintain allowances for loan losses and charge losses to these allowances when realized. We consider the determination of the allowance for loan losses to be critical because it requires significant judgment reflecting our best estimate of impairment related to specifically evaluated impaired loans as well as the inherent risk of loss for those in the remaining loan portfolio. Our evaluation is based upon a continuing review of the portfolio, with consideration given to evaluations resulting from examinations performed by regulatory authorities.

Deferred Taxes

We account for income taxes in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), which requires the recording of deferred income taxes that reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. We consider our accounting policies on deferred taxes to be critical because we regularly assess the need for valuation allowances on deferred income tax assets that may result from, among other things, limitations imposed by Internal Revenue Code and uncertainties, including the timing of settlement and realization of these differences. No valuation allowance is required as of September 30, 2012.

33

Fair Value Measurements

We adopted FASB ASC 820-10 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. We consider our accounting policies related to fair value measurements to be critical because they are important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results, and they require our subjective and complex judgment as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. See Note 7, Fair Value Disclosures of Financial Assets to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

In accordance with FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations, and FASB ASC 350, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other, all assets and liabilities acquired in purchase acquisitions, including goodwill, indefinite-lived intangibles and other intangibles are recorded at fair value. We consider our accounting policies related to goodwill and other intangible assets to be critical because the assumptions or judgment used in determining the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in past acquisitions are subjective and complex. As a result, changes in these assumptions or judgment could have a significant impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

For additional information regarding our goodwill and other intangible assets, see Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

FINANCIAL CONDITION, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

Financial Condition

Our total assets decreased $27.7 million, or less than 1%, to $4.3 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Included in this decrease was a $46.4 million, or 2%, decrease in net loans resulting from our second quarter 2012 Asset Strategies efforts, and a $20.9 million, or 4%, decrease in cash and cash equivalents mainly due to the seasonal decrease in cash in non-owned ATMs and the use of cash from other institutions in Cash Connect’s ATM Vault Cash business. Partially offsetting these decreases, investment securities increased $50.7 million, or 6%, and loans held-for-sale increased by $10.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Total liabilities decreased $53.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 to $3.8 billion. This decrease was primarily the result of decreased Federal Home Loan Bank advances of $145.8 million, or 27%, as a result of net repayments. Partially offsetting these decreases was a $50.0 million increase in federal funds purchased and a $50.1 million increase in total customer deposits. Deposit growth included a $70.8 million increase in noninterest-bearing demand accounts, a $23.5 million increase in interest bearing demand accounts and a $20.5 million increase in savings accounts. These core deposit account increases were partially offset the purposeful decreases of $58.3 million in high-cost, non-core customer time accounts and a $25.6 million decrease in brokered CDs.

Capital Resources

Stockholders’ equity increased $25.7 million between December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2012. This increase was mainly due to net income of $23.8 million combined with an increase of $6.1 million in the value of our available-for-sale securities portfolio. Partially offsetting these increases was the payment of common and preferred dividends of $5.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Book value per common share was $47.84 at September 30, 2012 an increase of $2.65 from $45.19 reported at December 31, 2011. Tangible common book value per common share (a non-GAAP measurement) was $37.99 at September 30, 2012, an increase of $2.79, or 8% from $35.20 reported at December 31, 2011.

34

Below is a table comparing the Bank’s consolidated capital position to the minimum regulatory requirements as of September 30, 2012:

	Consolidated Bank Capital					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					To be Well-Capitalized Under  Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
			% of					% of					% of
(Dollars in Thousands)	Amount		Assets			Amount		Assets			Amount		Assets
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)	$	458,242		14.28	%	$	256,771		8.00	%	$	320,964		10.00	%
Core Capital (to Adjusted Total Assets)		418,043		9.91			168,779		4.00			210,974		5.00
Tangible Capital (to Tangible Assets)		418,043		9.91			63,292		1.50			N/A		N/A
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)		418,043		13.02			128,386		4.00			192,578		6.00

Under guidelines issued by banking regulators, savings institutions such as the Bank must maintain certain capital levels in order to be considered adequately capitalized. The thresholds for being considered adequately capitalized are outlined in the table above. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory actions and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on our bank’s financial statements.

At September 30, 2012, the Bank was in compliance with regulatory capital requirements and was considered a “well-capitalized” institution. The Bank’s core capital ratio of 9.91%, Tier 1 capital ratio of 13.02% and total risk based capital ratio of 14.28%, all remain substantially in excess of “well-capitalized” regulatory benchmarks, the highest regulatory capital rating. In addition, and not included in Bank capital, the holding company held $61.2 million in cash to support dividends, acquisitions, strategic growth plans.

Liquidity

We manage our liquidity and funding needs through our treasury function and our Asset/Liability Committee. We have a policy that separately addresses liquidity, and management monitors our adherence to policy limits. Also, liquidity risk management is a primary area of examination by the banking regulators.

As a financial institution, the Bank has ready access to several sources to fund growth and meet its liquidity needs. Among these are: net income, retail deposit generation, loan repayments, borrowing from the FHLB, repurchase agreements, access to the Federal Reserve Discount Window, and access to the brokered deposit market as well as other wholesale funding avenues. In addition, we have a large portfolio of high-quality, liquid investments, primarily short-duration mortgage-backed securities and government sponsored enterprises (“GSE”) notes that provide a near-continuous source of cash flow to meet current cash needs, or can be sold to meet larger discrete needs for cash. Management believes these sources are sufficient to maintain required and prudent levels of liquidity.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, cash and cash equivalents decreased $20.9 million to $447.1 million. This decrease was primarily a result of the following: cash used for $145.8 million for net repayments of FHLB advances; $38.2 million increase in net loans; $28.3 million net increase in investment securities available for sale and a $30.0 million repayment of unsecured bank debt. Offsetting these decreases in cash were: $63.3 million increase in cash provided by operating activities; $53.1 million increase from the issuance of senior notes during the third quarter of 2012; $50.0 million increase in cash provided through an increase in federal funds purchased; $42.1 million net increase in deposits and $11.8 million increase from the sales of assets acquired through foreclosure.

35

NONPERFORMING ASSETS

The following table shows our nonperforming assets and past due loans at the dates indicated. Nonperforming assets include nonaccruing loans, nonperforming real estate, assets acquired through foreclosure and restructured mortgage and home equity consumer debt. Nonaccruing loans are those on which the accrual of interest has ceased. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status immediately if, in the opinion of management, collection is doubtful, or when principal or interest is past due 90 days or more and the value of the collateral is insufficient to cover principal and interest. Interest accrued but not collected at the date a loan is placed on nonaccrual status is reversed and charged against interest income. In addition, the amortization of net deferred loan fees is suspended when a loan is placed on nonaccrual status. Subsequent cash receipts are applied either to the outstanding principal balance or recorded as interest income, depending on management’s assessment of the ultimate collectability of principal and interest. Past due loans are loans contractually past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest payments but which remain on accrual status because they are considered well secured and in the process of collection.

	September 30,			December 31,
	2012			2011
	(In Thousands)
Nonaccruing loans:
Commercial	$	3,579		$	23,080
Owner-occupied commercial (1)		13,324			—
Consumer		5,188			1,018
Commercial mortgage		5,875			15,814
Residential mortgage		9,354			9,057
Construction		2,620			22,124
Total nonaccruing loans		39,940			71,093
Assets acquired through foreclosure		6,996			11,695
Troubled debt restructuring (accruing)		10,189			8,887
Total nonperforming assets	$	57,125		$	91,675
Past due loans (2):
Residential mortgages		—			887
Commercial and commercial mortgage		1,869			78
Total past due loans	$	1,869		$	965
Ratios:
Allowance for loan losses to total loans (3)		1.69	%		1.92	%
Nonperforming assets to total assets		1.34	%		2.14	%
Nonaccruing loans to total loans (3)		1.48	%		2.58	%
Loan loss allowance to nonaccruing loans		114.17	%		74.66	%
Loan loss allowance to total nonperforming assets		79.82	%		57.9	%

⁽¹⁾ Prior to 2012, owner-occupied loans were included in commercial loan balances.

⁽²⁾ Past due loans are accruing loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest. These loans are well secured and in the process of collection.

⁽³⁾ Total loans exclude loans held for sale.

36

Nonperforming assets decreased $34.6 million between December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2012. As a result, non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets decreased from 2.14% at December 31, 2011 to 1.34% at September 30, 2012. This significant reduction was mainly due to the successful efforts of our “Asset Strategies” during the second quarter of 2012. In addition, during the third quarter a total of $8.0 million was collected or paid down through additional note sales and ongoing asset management activities. Lastly, as the result of recent OCC guidance, during the third quarter of 2012, $4.7 million of loans were reclassified from performing loans to nonaccrual status (consisting of $2.5 million of residential mortgages and $2.2 million of consumer loans). For additional information on this reclass, see the “Allowance for Loan Losses” section of this Management Discussion and Analysis.

The following table summarizes the changes in nonperforming assets during the period indicated:

	For the nine			For the year
	months ended			ended
	September 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
	(In Thousands)
Beginning balance	$	91,675		$	92,898
Additions		55,321			89,842
Collections		(40,559	)		(40,695	)
Collections from loan dispositions		(14,305	)		—
Transfers to accrual		(552	)		(8,474	)
Charge-offs / write-downs, net		(34,455	)		(41,896	)
Ending balance	$	57,125		$	91,675

The timely identification of problem loans is a key element in our strategy to manage our loan portfolio. Timely identification enables us to take appropriate action and, accordingly, minimize losses. An asset review system established to monitor the asset quality of our loans and investments in real estate portfolios facilitates the identification of problem assets. In general, this system utilizes guidelines established by federal regulation.

INTEREST SENSITIVITY

The matching of maturities or repricing periods of interest rate-sensitive assets and liabilities to promote a favorable interest rate spread and mitigate exposure to fluctuations in interest rates is our primary tool for achieving our asset/liability management strategies. We regularly review our interest-rate sensitivity and adjust the sensitivity within acceptable tolerance ranges established by the Board of Directors. At September 30, 2012, interest-earning assets exceeded interest-bearing liabilities that mature or reprice within one year (interest-sensitive gap) by $133.3 million. Our interest-sensitive assets as a percentage of interest-sensitive liabilities within the one-year window increased from 102.8% at December 31, 2011, to 106.2% at September 30, 2012. Likewise, the one-year interest-sensitive gap as a percentage of total assets changed to 3.13% at September 30, 2012 from 1.54% at June 30, 2012. The change in sensitivity since December 31, 2011 reflects our continuing effort to effectively manage interest rate risk and positions us to improve our net interest margin in a rising rate environment.

Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and rates. Our market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk inherent in our lending, investing, and funding activities. To that end, we actively monitor and manage our interest rate risk exposure. One measure, required to be performed by Federal regulation, measures the impact of an immediate change in interest rates in 100 basis point increments on the net portfolio value ratio. The economic value of equity ratio is defined as the economic value of the estimated cash flows from assets and liabilities as a percentage of economic value of cash flows from total assets.

37

The table below shows the estimated impact of immediate changes in interest rates on our net interest margin and net portfolio value ratio at the specified levels at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
% Change in Interest Rate (Basis Points)	% Change in Net Interest Margin (1)	Economic Value of Equity (2)	% Change in Net Interest Margin (1)	Economic Value of Equity (2)
+300	8%	12.38%	6%	11.17%
+200	3%	12.52%	3%	11.30%
+100	-2%	12.34%	-2%	11.21%
—	0%	12.03%	0%	10.97%
-100	0%	11.23%	1%	10.19%
-200(3)	NMF	NMF	NMF	NMF
-300(3)	NMF	NMF	NMF	NMF

(1) The percentage difference between net interest margin in a stable interest rate environment and net interest margin as projected under the various rate change environments.

(2) The economic value of equity ratio in a stable interest rate environment and the economic value of equity ratio as projected under the various rate change environments.

(3) Sensitivity indicated by a decrease of 200 or 300 basis points is not deemed meaningful at September 30, 2012 given the low absolute level of interest rates at that time.

We also engage in other business activities that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For example, mortgage banking revenues and expenses can fluctuate with changing interest rates. In addition, our Cash Connect’s ATM Vault Cash program generates bailment income that can also fluctuate with changes in interest rates. These fluctuations are difficult to model and estimate.

COMPARISON OF THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012

Results of Operations

During the third quarter of 2012, we recorded net income of $10.0 million, or $1.06 per diluted common share which was an increase of $3.2 million compared to the third quarter 2011. Results for the quarter were positively impacted by lower credit costs of $2.5 million from the third quarter 2011, reflecting the improved credit quality of our loan portfolio. Additionally, noninterest income increased $2.8 million due to franchise growth across all segments when compared to the third quarter 2011. Also impacting net income was lower noninterest expenses of $259,000 from the same period a year ago. Partially offsetting these gains, net interest margin decreased 22 basis points from 3.63% in the third quarter 2011 to 3.41% in the third quarter 2012 due to our second quarter 2012 Asset Strategies initiatives, our issuance of senior notes from the third quarter of 2012, and the continued low, flat interest rate environment.

Net income for the first nine months of 2012 was $23.8 million, or $2.47 per diluted common share; an increase of $7.3 million from the same period in 2011. Earnings for the first nine months of 2012 were impacted by growth in noninterest income of $18.9 million, which included $13.3 million of securities gains from the second quarter Asset Strategies. The remaining increase in noninterest income reflects continued growth across all segments of the franchise. In addition, interest income increased by $1.9 million to $95.5 million during 2012, also reflecting the growth of the franchise and our proactive interest rate management efforts. Offsetting these increases was a $6.2 million increase in credit costs, which also included the impact of our second quarter Assets Strategies. In addition, noninterest expenses increased by $1.8 million during the year, mainly due to the final stages of our retail branch expansion plan and the relocation of our operations center over the past twelve months.

38

Net Interest Income

The following tables provide information concerning the balances, yields and rates on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities during the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2012								2011
	Average					Yield/			Average					Yield/
(Dollars In Thousands)	Balance			Interest		Rate (1)			Balance			Interest		Rate (1)
Assets:
Interest-earning assets:
Loans (2) (3):
Commercial real estate loans	$	718,046		$	8,803		4.90	%	$	731,527		$	8,556		4.68	%
Residential real estate loans (6)		276,681			2,980		4.31			293,800			3,454		4.70
Commercial loans		1,435,514			16,848		4.61			1,368,703			17,193		4.99
Consumer loans		283,704			3,372		4.73			296,709			3,737		5.00
Total loans		2,713,945			32,003		4.73			2,690,739			32,940		4.94
Mortgage-backed securities (4)		829,930			4,344		2.09			801,446			7,052		3.52
Investment securities (4) (5)		53,392			158		1.27			43,959			99		0.90
Other interest-earning assets		31,187			9		0.11			37,830			—		—
Total interest-earning assets		3,628,454			36,514		4.03			3,573,974			40,091		4.52
Allowance for loan losses		(46,808	)							(57,125	)
Cash and due from banks		70,366								65,997
Cash in non-owned ATMs		362,332								378,651
Bank-owned life insurance		63,315								63,463
Other noninterest-earning assets		118,330								119,888
Total assets	$	4,195,989							$	4,144,848
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits:
Interest-bearing demand	$	404,185		$	53		0.05	%	$	324,367		$	75		0.09	%
Money market		759,944			431		0.23			731,979			720		0.39
Savings		390,275			83		0.08			375,243			386		0.41
Customer time deposits		716,676			2,365		1.31			757,975			3,237		1.69
Total interest-bearing customer deposits		2,271,080			2,932		0.51			2,189,564			4,418		0.80
Brokered certificates of deposit		283,345			305		0.43			209,629			201		0.38
Total interest-bearing deposits		2,554,425			3,237		0.50			2,399,193			4,619		0.76
FHLB of Pittsburgh advances		389,745			1,403		1.41			610,253			2,484		1.59
Trust preferred borrowings		67,011			369		2.15			67,011			340		1.99
Senior debt		20,924			353		6.60			—			—		—
Other borrowed funds		129,293			259		0.80			142,725			468		1.31
Total interest-bearing liabilities		3,161,398			5,621		0.71			3,219,182			7,911		0.98
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		590,133								516,257
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities		33,757								26,001
Stockholders’ equity		410,701								383,408
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	4,195,989							$	4,144,848
Excess of interest-earning assets over interest-bearing liabilities	$	467,056							$	354,792
Net interest and dividend income				$	30,893							$	32,180
Interest rate spread							3.32	%							3.54	%
Net interest margin							3.41	%							3.63	%

(1) Weighted average yields have been computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a 35% effective tax rate.

(2) Nonperforming loans are included in average balance computations.

(3) Balances are reflected net of unearned income.

(4) Includes securities available-for-sale.

(5) Includes reverse mortgages.

(6) Includes loans held for sale arising during the normal course of business.

39

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012								2011
	Average					Yield/			Average					Yield/
(Dollars In Thousands)	Balance			Interest		Rate (1)			Balance			Interest		Rate (1)
Assets:
Interest-earning assets:
Loans (2) (3):
Commercial real estate loans	$	729,599		$	26,717		4.88	%	$	749,318		$	26,434		4.70	%
Residential real estate loans (6)		276,400			9,211		4.44			303,371			11,009		4.84
Commercial loans		1,459,698			51,891		4.73			1,311,390			48,855		4.99
Consumer loans		285,701			10,244		4.79			302,732			11,401		5.04
Loans held for sale (7)		7,113			122		2.29			—			—		—
Total loans		2,758,511			98,185		4.76			2,666,811			97,699		4.93
Mortgage-backed securities (4)		817,253			14,953		2.44			749,961			20,962		3.73
Investment securities (4) (5)		50,152			335		0.99			43,164			396		1.22
Other interest-earning assets		33,208			27		0.11			36,990			—		—
Total interest-earning assets		3,659,124			113,500		4.16			3,496,926			119,057		4.57
Allowance for loan losses		(49,140	)							(58,435	)
Cash and due from banks		90,969								62,869
Cash in non-owned ATMs		363,497								342,345
Bank-owned life insurance		63,465								64,221
Other noninterest-earning assets		123,228								120,583
Total assets	$	4,251,143							$	4,028,509
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits:
Interest-bearing demand	$	395,081		$	157		0.05	%	$	316,712		$	301		0.13	%
Money market		754,942			1,357		0.24			712,404			2,293		0.43
Savings		388,894			361		0.12			348,967			1,215		0.47
Retail time deposits		739,073			7,886		1.43			769,528			10,491		1.82
Total interest-bearing retail deposits		2,277,990			9,761		0.57			2,147,611			14,300		0.89
Brokered certificates of deposit		283,169			891		0.42			190,395			576		0.40
Total interest-bearing deposits		2,561,159			10,652		0.56			2,338,006			14,876		0.85
FHLB of Pittsburgh advances		466,266			4,985		1.40			558,807			7,866		1.86
Trust preferred borrowings		67,011			1,114		2.18			67,011			1,015		2.00
Senior debt		7,026			353		6.60			—			—		—
Other borrowed funds		136,282			895		0.88			158,822			1,679		1.41
Total interest-bearing liabilities		3,237,744			17,999		0.74			3,122,646			25,436		1.09
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		574,708								506,316
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities		33,922								22,744
Stockholders’ equity		404,769								376,803
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	4,251,143							$	4,028,509
Excess of interest-earning assets over interest-bearing liabilities	$	421,380							$	374,280
Net interest income				$	95,501							$	93,621
Interest rate spread							3.42	%							3.48	%
Net interest margin							3.49	%							3.60	%

(1) Weighted average yields have been computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a 35% effective tax rate.

(2) Nonperforming loans are included in average balance computations.

(3) Balances are reflected net of unearned income.

(4) Includes securities available-for-sale.

(5) Includes reverse mortgages.

(6) Includes loans held for sale arising from the normal course of business.

(7) Includes loans held for sale in conjunction with asset disposition strategies.

Net interest income for the third quarter 2012 declined $1.3 million, or 4%, when compared to the third quarter 2011. The decrease in net interest income reflects a decline in yields in our mortgage-backed securities portfolio due to the impact of our second quarter 2012 Assets Strategies efforts, and the ongoing impact of the historically low interest rate environment. In addition, the increase in borrowing costs was mainly due to the issuance of $55.0 million of 6.25% senior notes during the third quarter of 2012. Offsetting these decreases was our continued proactive rate management as evidenced by our 29 basis point decrease in retail funding costs, while we had only a 21 basis point decrease in overall loan yield during the same period.

40

The net interest margin for the third quarter 2012 was 3.41%, a 22 basis point decrease when compared to 3.63% for the third quarter 2011. The decrease reflects the impact of our Assets Strategies efforts during the second quarter 2012, the issuance of $55 million of 6.25% senior notes during the third quarter 2012 and the impact of the historically low, flat interest rate environment, particularly on our securities yields and loan pricing.

Net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $95.5 million compared to $93.6 million for the same period in 2011. This increase reflects the favorable impact of the growth in our franchise and proactive interest rate management in both customer and wholesale funding costs. However, the net interest margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was 3.49%, down 11 basis points from the same period in 2011. Similar to the quarterly discussion above this decrease was mainly due to: decreased MBS portfolio yields over the prior year as a result of our Asset Strategies efforts, our $55.0 million senior note issuance; and the continued historically low interest rate environment.

Allowance for Loan Losses

We maintain allowances for loan losses and charge losses to these allowances when such losses are identified. The determination of the allowance for loan losses requires significant judgment reflecting our best estimate of probable loan losses related to specifically identified impaired loans as well as probable loan losses in the remaining loan portfolio. Our evaluation is based upon a continuing review of these portfolios.

We established our loan loss allowance in accordance with guidance provided in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin 102 (“SAB 102”). Its methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance consists of several key elements which include: specific allowances for identified problem loans; formula allowances for commercial and commercial real estate loans; and allowances for pooled homogenous loans.

Specific reserves are established for certain impaired loans in cases where we have identified significant conditions or circumstances related to a specific credit that indicates that a loss is probable to occur.

The formula allowances for commercial, commercial real estate and construction loans are calculated by applying estimates of default and loss severity to outstanding loans based on the risk grade of loans. Default rates are determined through a past twelve quarter migration analysis. Loss severity is based on a three year historical analysis. As a result, changes in risk grades affect the amount of the formula allowance.

Pooled loans are usually smaller, not-individually-graded and homogenous in nature, such as consumer installment loans and residential mortgages. Loan loss allowances for pooled loans are first based on a five-year net charge-off history. The average loss allowance per homogenous pool is based on the product of average annual historical loss rate and the homogeneous pool balances. These separate risk pools are then assigned a reserve for losses based upon this historical loss information.

Qualitative and environmental adjustment factors are taken into consideration when determining above reserve estimates. These adjustment factors are based upon our evaluation of various current conditions, including those listed below.

• General economic and business conditions affecting the Bank’s key lending areas,

• Credit quality trends,

• Recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio,

• Collateral values and loan-to-value ratios,

• Loan volumes and concentrations, including changes in mix,

• Seasoning of the loan portfolio,

• Specific industry conditions within portfolio segments,

• Bank regulatory examination results, and

• Other factors, including changes in quality of the loan origination, servicing and risk management processes.

41

Our loan officers and risk managers meet at least quarterly to discuss and review these conditions and risks associated with individual problem loans. In addition, various regulatory agencies and loan review consultants periodically review our loan ratings and allowance for loan losses.

During the first quarter of 2012, we made certain improvements to the method in which we determine the allowance for loan loss. These improvements include:

• Used a three year loss migration analysis to determine the probability of default

• Segregated the commercial loan segment to more specifically analyze the risks associated with business, owner-occupied CRE, investor CRE and Construction loan portfolios

• Improved the data used to determine qualitative adjustment factors

• Established a portion of the allowance for loan losses related to model and complexity risk

• Revised our loan risk rating system based on recommendations from industry experts

As a result of recent guidance provided by the OCC, during the third quarter of 2012 $4.7 million of loans were identified as troubled debt restructurings because the borrower’s obligation to us has been discharged in bankruptcy and the borrower has not reaffirmed the debt. These loans were reclassified from performing loans to nonaccrual status and consisted of $2.5 million of residential mortgages and $2.2 million of consumer loans. Net loan charge-offs of $1.3 million were recognized. As of September 30, 2012, less than 4% of the loans within this category were 30 days or more past due and 88% of these loans have been making payments for at least the past 12 consecutive months. Based on this performance, we expect to recover a significant amount of these losses over time as principal payments are received.

During the third quarter of 2012, the provision for loan losses was also impacted by a higher level of estimated losses related to consumer loans [using updated historical data as adjusted for the current periods charge-offs and trends]. The third quarter adjustment was consistent with adjustments made in the prior year and resulted in an increase from the estimate previously used.

The provision for loan losses was $3.8 million in the quarter ending September 30, 2012 compared to $6.6 million in the same quarter of 2011. Total credit costs (including the provision for loan losses, loan workout expense, OREO expense and other credit reserves) decreased to $5.9 million from $8.4 in the third quarter of 2011, reflecting the improved credit quality of our loan portfolio.

42

The table below represents a summary of the changes in the allowance for loan losses during the periods indicated.

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Beginning balance	$	53,080		$	60,339
Provision for loan losses		28,379			21,048
Charge-offs:
Residential real estate (1)		3,343			2,183
Commercial real estate		5,600			6,609
Construction		10,680			8,179
Commercial		11,920			7,641
Owner-occupied commercial (2)		3,012			—
Overdrafts		813			613
Consumer (1)		4,680			4,859
Total charge-offs		40,048			30,084
Recoveries:
Residential real estate		171			116
Commercial real estate		382			381
Construction		1,642			557
Commercial		1,482			409
Owner-occupied commercial (2)		13			—
Overdrafts		297			267
Consumer		200			155
Total recoveries		4,187			1,885
Net charge-offs		35,861			28,199
Ending balance	$	45,598		$	53,188
Net charge-offs to average gross loans outstanding, net of unearned income (3)		1.75	%		1.41	%

(1) Recent regulatory guidance regarding loans discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy resulted in charge-offs of $1.0 million in consumer loans and $316K in residential real estate for the nine months ending September 30, 2012.

(2) Prior to 2012, owner-occupied loans were included in commercial loan balances.

(3) Ratios for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 annualized.

43

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income increased $2.8 million to $19.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 from $16.9 million in the third quarter of 2011. Excluding the effect of net securities gains in both periods and the unanticipated BOLI income during the third quarter of 2012, noninterest income increased by $1.3 million, or 9%. Mortgage banking and loan fee income increased $753,000, or 87%. Fiduciary and investment management income increased $271,000, or 9%, reflecting growth in the trust and wealth management segment, and credit/ debit card and ATM fees increased by $215,000, or 4%, reflecting growth in Cash Connect (our ATM division).

For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 noninterest income increased $18.9 million to $65.5 million compared to the same period in 2011. Excluding the effect of net securities gains in both periods and the unanticipated BOLI income in both years, noninterest income increased by $4.2 million, or 10%. Similar to the quarterly comparison, the increase in fee income was largely due to continued growth across all of our segments. The increase includes $1.5 million, or 10%, in credit/ debit card and ATM fees, $825,000, or 9%, increase in fiduciary and investment management income and $779,000 or 27%, increase in mortgage banking and loan fee income.

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expenses decreased $260,000, or 1%, to $32.2 million in the third quarter of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. Excluding our “Right Here” advertising campaign ($961,000) in the third quarter of 2011, expenses increased $701,000 or only 2% over the same period in 2011. This increase reflects the higher expenses associated with the prior years’ retail branch expansion plan, including the opening and renovation of four branches and the relocation of our operations center in the second half of 2011 and increased compensation related costs related to our improved performance in 2012 and changes in the timing of the awards. These increases were largely mitigated by our expense management efforts over the last year.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, noninterest expense increased $1.7 million, or 2%, to $96.2 million compared to the same period in 2011. Similar to the quarterly comparison, contributing to the increase were expenses associated with strategic investments, including the opening and renovation of four branches and the relocation of our operations center in the second half of 2011 and completed in early 2012 and added compensation costs related to our improved performance in 2012.

Income Taxes

We and our subsidiaries file a consolidated Federal income tax return and separate state income tax returns. Income taxes are accounted for in accordance with ASC 740, which requires the recording of deferred income taxes for tax consequences of temporary differences. We recorded an income tax expense of $4.8 million and $12.7 million during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, compared to an income tax expense of $3.3 million and $8.2 million for the same periods in 2011.

The third quarter 2012 included the recognition of tax benefits related to $1.0 million of tax-free income from life insurance proceeds received from our BOLI investment. The second quarter 2011 included $1.2 million of similar tax-free BOLI income. The third quarter 2011 included tax benefits of $376,000 resulting primarily from a decrease in our income tax reserve due to the expiration of the statute of limitations on certain items. Our effective tax rate was 32.3% and 34.9% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, compared to 33.0% and 33.2% during the same periods in 2011. Excluding the tax-free BOLI proceeds and statute of limitations related benefit, our effective tax rates were 34.7% and 35.8% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to 36.7% and 36.3% during the same periods in 2011.

The effective tax rate reflects the recognition of certain tax benefits in the financial statements including those benefits from tax-exempt interest income (including a 50% interest income exclusion on a loan to an Employee Stock Ownership Plan), federal low-income housing tax credits, and BOLI income. These tax benefits are offset by the tax effect of stock-based compensation expense related to incentive stock options and a provision for state income tax expense.

We frequently analyze our projections of taxable income and make adjustments to our provision for income taxes accordingly.

44

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In April 2011, the FASB issued an update (“ASU” No. 2011-02, A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring) which clarifies when creditors should classify loan modifications as troubled debt restructurings. The new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and applies retrospectively to restructurings occurring on or after January 1, 2011. A provision in Update 2011-02 also ends the FASB’s deferral of the additional disclosures about troubled debt restructurings as required by Update 2010-20. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In April 2011, the FASB issued an update (“ASU” No. 2011-03, Reconsideration of Effective Control in Repurchase Agreements) which removes from the assessment of effective control the criterion related to the transferor’s ability to repurchase or redeem financial assets on substantially agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee. In addition, this guidance also eliminates the requirement to demonstrate that a transferor possesses adequate collateral to fund substantially all the cost of purchasing replacement financial assets. The new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011, and applies prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions occurring on or after the effective date. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued an update (“ASU” No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS) to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements between U.S. and International accounting principles. While the overall guidance is consistent with U.S. GAAP, the amendment includes additional fair value disclosure requirements. The amendments in the guidance are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements; however, the adoption did have an impact on our fair value disclosures.

In June 2011, the FASB issued an update (“ASU” No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income) to eliminate the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholder’s equity. The amendment requires that comprehensive income be presented in either a single continuous statement or in two separate consecutive statements. This amendment is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements; however, the adoption did have an impact on our presentation of comprehensive income.

In September 2011, the FASB issued an update (“ASU” No. 2011-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)—Testing Goodwill for Impairment) to give entities the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to perform the first step of the two-step impairment test by calculating the fair value of the reporting unit and comparing the fair value with the carrying amount of the reporting unit. This amendment is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In December 2011, the FASB issued an update (“ASU” No. 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 350)—Offsetting) to address balance sheet offsetting. An entity is required to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements so that users of the financial statements can understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. Entities are required to disclose both gross information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting agreement. The instruments and transactions include derivatives, sale and repurchase agreements and reverse sale and repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending arrangements. This amendment is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our financial statements.

45

In December 2011, the FASB issued an update (“ASU” No. 2011-12, Presentation of Comprehensive Income: Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05) which under ASU 2011-05 defers the effective date pertaining to reclassification adjustments out of other accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). Concerns were raised that reclassifications of items out of AOCI would be costly for preparers and may add unnecessary complexity to financial statements. All other requirements in ASU 2011-05 are not affected by this Update. This amendment is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In July 2012, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2012-02, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment) which permits entities to perform an optional qualitative assessment for determining whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. The guidance is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. We are evaluating the impact of ASU 2012-02; however, we do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our financial statements.

RECENT LEGISLATION

On July 21, 2010, the President signed the Dodd-Frank Act into law. This legislation makes extensive changes to the laws regulating financial services firms and requires significant rule-making. In addition, the legislation mandates multiple studies, which could result in additional legislative or regulatory action. While the full effects of the legislation on us cannot yet be determined, this legislation was opposed by the American Bankers Association and is generally perceived as negatively impacting the banking industry. This legislation may result in higher compliance and other costs, reduced revenues and higher capital and liquidity requirements, among other things, which could adversely affect our business. There are many parts of the Dodd-Frank Act that have yet to be determined and implemented however, as a direct result of the Act, the following rulings have been adopted or will be adopted in the coming years:

• On August 10, 2010 the Board of Directors of the FDIC adopted a final ruling permanently increasing the standard maximum deposit insurance amount from $100,000 to $250,000, which became effective on July 22, 2010.

• During January of 2011, an implementation plan for the phase out of the Office of Thrift Supervision (“the OTS”), was announced by the joint agencies, and it merged into the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The provisions of the plan included a transition from the quarterly Thrift Financial Report, to the Call Report, which began with the March 2012 reporting period.

• On February 7, 2011, the Federal Reserve approved a final ruling the changes the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) assessment from domestic deposits to average assets minus tangible equity. The changes went into effect during the second quarter of 2011. It is the intent of the FDIC that banks with over $10 billion in assets pay a larger share of the assessments into the DIF.

• In June 2011, the Federal Reserve adopted the “Durbin Amendment” in which debit interchange fees would be capped at 21 cents plus 5 basis points of the transaction, with the possibility of an additional cent if the issuer implements certain fraud-prevention standards. This rule directly affects banks with $10 billion or more in assets.

• On July 21, 2011, the Federal Reserve repealed Federal prohibitions on the payment of interest on demand deposits.

• On July 21, 2011, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) was created to centralize responsibility for consumer financial protection. The bureau has been given the responsibility for implementing, examining and enforcing compliance with Federal consumer protection laws.

In June 2012, the Federal Reserve Board, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation approved three proposals that would amend the existing capital adequacy requirements of banks and bank holding companies. The three proposals would, among other things, implement the Basel III capital standards, as well as the Basel II standardized approach for almost all banking organizations in the United States including us. The Basel III proposal would increase the minimum levels of required capital, narrow the definition of capital, and places greater emphasis on common equity. The Basel II standardized proposal would modify the risk weights for various asset classes. We are still in the process of assessing the impacts of these complex proposals.

46

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Incorporated herein by reference from Item 2, of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Based on their evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)), our principal executive officer and the principal financial officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q such disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. During the quarter under report, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Incorporated herein by reference to Note 12 – Legal and Other Proceedings to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our management does not believe there have been any material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed under Item 1A. of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table represents information with respect to repurchases of common stock made by us during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. These shares were delivered to us by employees as payment for taxes on the vesting of restricted stock or exercise of stock options.

2012	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicity Announced  Plans or Programs		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July		3,562	$	39.84		—		—
August		—		—		—		—
September		712		39.84		—		—
Total (1)		4,274	$	39.84		—		—

(1) The shares repurchased were not part of a publicly announced repurchase plan or program. These shares were owned and tendered by employees as payment for taxes on vesting of restricted stock or exercise of stock options. There were no treasury shares repurchased during the quarter ended September 30, 2012.

47

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

Not applicable

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable

Item 5. Other Information

Not applicable

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibit 31.1 – Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(b) Exhibit 31.2 – Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(c) Exhibit 32 – Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(d) Exhibit 101.INS – XBRL Instance Document*

(e) Exhibit 101.SCH – XBRL Schema Document*

(f) Exhibit 101.CAL – XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document*

(g) Exhibit 101.LAB – XBRL Labels Linkbase Document*

(h) Exhibit 101.PRE – XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document*

(i) Exhibit 101.DEF – XBRL Definition Linkbase Document*

* Pursuant to Regulation 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are otherwise not subject to liability.

48

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	WSFS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Date: November 9, 2012	/s/ Mark A. Turner
	Mark A. Turner
	President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 9, 2012	/s/ Stephen A. Fowle
	Stephen A. Fowle
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

49