XML 50 R44.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements (Tables)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring Basis
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy in which those measurements fall, are as follows (in thousands):
 
 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
and Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Fair Value at
September 30, 2012
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investments in grantor trusts
$
16,480

 
 
 
 
 
$
16,480

Derivative instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
 
 
$
10,852

 
 
 
10,852

Total
$
16,480

 
$
10,852

 
$

 
$
27,332

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
 
 
$
827

 
 
 
$
827

Deferred compensation plan obligations
$
16,480

 
 
 
 
 
16,480

Total
$
16,480

 
$
827

 
$

 
$
17,307

 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
and Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Fair Value at
December 31, 2011
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investments in grantor trusts
$
14,693

 
 
 
 
 
$
14,693

Derivative instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
 
 
$
10,816

 
 
 
10,816

Total
$
14,693

 
$
10,816

 
$

 
$
25,509

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
 
 
$
674

 
 
 
$
674

Deferred compensation plan obligations
$
14,693

 
 
 
 
 
14,693

Total
$
14,693

 
$
674

 
$

 
$
15,367

Reconciliation Of Subordinate Tax Increment Revenue Bonds Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
A reconciliation of the outstanding balance of the subordinate tax increment revenue bonds using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) is as follows (in thousands):
 
 
Fair Value
Measurements
Using
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Outstanding, January 1, 2011
$
10,700

Settlement of recalled bonds (1)
(10,700
)
Outstanding, December 31, 2011
$

_______________
(1)
Settlement of recalled bonds represents the recall of previously issued subordinated tax increment revenue bonds that were available for sale and were replaced with held to maturity subordinated tax increment revenue bonds associated with the exchange transaction in April 2011.
Assets Measured On Nonrecurring Basis
Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at September 30, 2012, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy in which those measurements fall, are as follows (in thousands):
 
 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
and Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Fair Value
 
Total Gains
(Losses) (1)
Property (2)
 
 
 
 
$
13,906

 
$
13,906

 
$
(2,897
)
Property held for sale (3)
 
 
$
39,131

 
10,675

 
49,806

 
(4,801
)
Investment in real estate joint ventures
and partnerships (4)
 
 
24,231

 
 
 
24,231

 
(6,608
)
Total
$

 
$
63,362

 
$
24,581

 
$
87,943

 
$
(14,306
)
_______________
(1)
Total gains (losses) exclude impairments on disposed assets because they are no longer held by us.
(2)
In accordance with our policy of evaluating and recording impairments on the disposal of long-lived assets, property with a carrying amount of $16.8 million was written down to a fair value of $13.9 million, resulting in a loss of $2.9 million, which was included in earnings for the nine month period. Management’s estimate of the fair value of these properties was determined using Level 3 inputs. See the quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used for our Level 3 fair value measurements table below.
(3)
Property held for sale with a carrying amount of $53.8 million was written down to a fair value of $49.8 million less costs to sell of $0.8 million, resulting in a loss of $4.8 million, which was included in discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the nine month period. Management’s estimate of the fair value of these properties was determined using bona fide purchase offers for the Level 2 inputs, and see the quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used for our Level 3 fair value measurements table below.
(4)
Our net investment in real estate joint ventures and partnerships with a carrying amount of $30.8 million was written down to a fair value of $24.2 million, resulting in a loss of $6.6 million, which was included in earnings for the nine month period. Management’s estimate of the fair value of this investment was determined using the weighted average of the bona fide purchase offers received for the Level 2 inputs.

Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at December 31, 2011, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy in which those measurements fall, are as follows (in thousands):

 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
and Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Fair Value
 
Total Gains
(Losses) (1)
Property (2)
 
 
$
389

 
$
98,207

 
$
98,596

 
$
(36,907
)
Property held for sale (3)
 
 
43,657

 
1,500

 
45,157

 
(13,799
)
Investment in real estate joint ventures
and partnerships (4)
 
 
 
 
6,311

 
6,311

 
(1,752
)
Subordinate tax increment revenue bonds (5)
 
 
 
 
26,723

 
26,723

 
(18,737
)
Total
$

 
$
44,046

 
$
132,741

 
$
176,787

 
$
(71,195
)
_______________
(1)
Total gains (losses) are reflected throughout 2011 and exclude impairments on disposed assets because they are no longer held by us.
(2)
In accordance with our policy of evaluating and recording impairments on the disposal of long-lived assets, property with a carrying amount of $135.5 million was written down to a fair value of $98.6 million, resulting in a loss of $36.9 million, which was included in earnings for the twelve month period. Management’s estimate of the fair value of these properties was determined using the expected sales price of an executed agreement for the Level 2 input and using third party broker valuations, bona fide purchase offers, cash flow models and discount rates ranging from 8% to 13% for the Level 3 inputs.
(3)
Property held for sale with a carrying amount of $57.0 million was written down to a fair value of $45.2 million less costs to sell of $2.0 million, resulting in a loss of $13.8 million, which was included in discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the twelve month period. Management’s estimate of the fair value of these properties was determined using the expected sales price of executed agreements for the Level 2 inputs and a cash flow model using a discount rate of 10% for the Level 3 input.
(4)
Our net investment in real estate joint ventures and partnerships with a carrying amount of $8.1 million was written down to a fair value of $6.3 million, resulting in a loss of $1.8 million, which was included in earnings for the twelve month period. Management’s estimate of the fair value of these investments was determined using the life and other terms of the investment, our partner’s financial condition, cash flow models and capitalization rates ranging from 7% to 9% for the Level 3 inputs.
(5)
A net credit loss on the exchange of bonds of $18.7 million was recognized upon the recall and replacement of our investment in tax increment revenue bonds by the Agency in April 2011. The exchange transaction resulted in us receiving approximately $16.5 million in cash proceeds and $57.7 million in new subordinated bonds replacing the face value of our $51.3 million of senior bonds and $22.4 million of subordinate bonds, which had been previously written down to a fair value of $10.7 million. The carrying value of the $57.7 million subordinated bonds received in the exchange were written down to their fair value of $26.7 million, of which a loss of $11.7 million was previously recognized in December 2010. The net credit loss resulted as management did not expect to recover the par value of the bonds based upon changes in terms of the bonds and future sales tax revenue projections of the development project through their maturity. Management’s estimates of the fair value of these investments were determined using third-party sales revenue projections, future growth rates ranging from 1% to 4% and inflation rates ranging from 1% to 2% for the Level 3 inputs.
Schedule Of Fair Value Of Notes Receivable From Real Estate Joint Ventures And Partnerships
Schedule of the fair value of our notes is as follows (in thousands):
 
 
September 30,
2012
 
December 31,
2011
Carrying value
$
90,385

 
$
149,204

Fair value, using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
93,257

 
153,532

Schedule Of Fair Value Of Tax Increment Revenue Bonds
Schedule of the fair value of our tax increment revenue bonds is as follows (in thousands):
 
 
September 30,
2012
 
December 31,
2011
Carrying value
$
26,505

 
$
26,505

Fair value, using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
26,505

 
26,505

Reconciliation Of The Credit Loss Recognized On Tax Increment Revenue Bonds
A reconciliation of the credit loss recognized on our tax increment revenue bonds at September 30, 2012 is as follows (in thousands):
 
 
Credit Loss 
Recognized
Beginning balance, January 1, 2011
$
11,717

Additions
19,305

Ending balance, December 31, 2011
31,022

Additions

Ending Balance, September 30, 2012
$
31,022

Schedule Of Fair Value Of Debt
Schedule of the fair value of our debt is as follows (in thousands):
 
September 30,
2012
 
December 31,
2011
Fixed-rate debt:
 
 
 
Carrying value
$
1,831,791

 
$
2,014,834

Fair value, using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
1,967,343

 
2,054,670

Variable-rate debt:
 
 
 
Carrying value
$
395,628

 
$
517,003

Fair value, using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
409,952

 
531,353

Quantitative Infromation About Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
The quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used for our Level 3 fair value measurements as of September 30, 2012 reported in the above tables, is as follows:
Description
 
Fair Value at
September 30, 2012
 
Valuation Technique
 
Unobservable Inputs
 
Range
 
 
 
 
Minimum
Maximum
Property
 
$
13,906

 
Broker valuation estimate
 
Indicative bid (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bona fide purchase offers
 
Contract price (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discounted cash flows
 
Discount rate
 
 
10.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capitalization rate
 
9.3
%
9.5
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Holding period (years)
 
 
1

 
 
 
 
 
 
Expected future inflation rate (2)
 
 
3.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Market rent growth rate (2)
 
 
3.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Expense growth rate (2)
 
 
3.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Vacancy rate (2)
 
 
5.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Renewal rate (2)
 
 
75.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Average market rent rate (2)
 
 
$
10.52

 
 
 
 
 
 
Average leasing cost per
square foot (2)
 
 
$
16.50

Property held for sale
 
10,675

 
Broker valuation estimate
 
Indicative bid (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bona fide purchase offers
 
Contract price (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discounted cash flows
 
Discount rate
 
 
9.8
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capitalization rate
 
 
10.5
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Holding period (years)
 
 
1

Notes receivable from real
estate joint ventures and
partnerships
 
93,257

 
Discounted cash flows
 
Discount rate
 
 
3.2
%
Tax increment revenue bonds
 
26,505

 
Discounted cash flows
 
Discount rate
 
 
7.5
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Expected future growth rate
 
1.0
%
4.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Expected future inflation rate
 
1.0
%
2.0
%
Fixed-rate debt
 
1,967,343

 
Discounted cash flows
 
Discount rate
 
1.2
%
6.0
%
Variable-rate debt
 
409,952

 
Discounted cash flows
 
Discount rate
 
1.4
%
5.0
%
_______________
(1)
These fair values were developed by third parties, subject to our corroboration for reasonableness.
(2)
Only applies to one property valuation.