XML 21 R7.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Significant Accounting Policies
9 Months Ended
Apr. 02, 2017
Significant Accounting Policies  
Significant Accounting Policies

NOTE 2 – Significant Accounting Policies

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.  Due to the inherent uncertainties in making estimates, actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences may be material to the consolidated financial statements.

 

Non-Controlling Interests

 

During the first quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company purchased approximately 1.9% of the outstanding non-controlling membership interests of Tekna Seal LLC.  On September 30, 2016, the Company sold Tekna Seal LLC, which included 95.7% owned by the Company and 4.3% held by minority stakeholders (see Note 3, Discontinued Operations, for more information).  Effective October 3, 2016, the Company purchased 3.8% of the outstanding non-controlling membership interests of FloMet LLC, increasing the Company’s ownership to 100%.  As a result of these transactions, there is no non-controlling interest on the consolidated balance sheet as of April 2, 2017.  The Company has recognized the carrying value of the non-controlling interests as a component of stockholders’ equity for the applicable periods presented. 

 

In connection with the purchase of the outstanding non-controlling membership interests of FloMet LLC, we entered into a Consent and Agreement with the seller that provides that if there is any sale of FloMet LLC within three years from October 3, 2016, and if such sale price is higher than the sale of the interests by the Seller, the Seller shall receive a proportionate gross-up payment reflecting such higher price.

 

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

For each of the quarters ended April 2, 2017 and March 27, 2016, there were no material differences between net income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss).

 

Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in the Current Period

 

In November 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.  This update requires an entity to classify deferred tax assets and liabilities as non-current within a classified statement of financial position.  ASU 2015-17 is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2016, but early adoption is permitted.  This update may be applied either prospectively to all deferred tax liabilities and assets or retrospectively to all periods presented.  The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-17 on a prospective basis as of July 1, 2016; therefore, the prior period was not retrospectively adjusted.  The adoption of ASU 2015-17 did not have an impact on our consolidated results of operations or cash flows.

 

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs to ASC Topic 835, Interest - Imputation of Interest (“ASU 2015-03”).  ASU 2015-03 requires an entity to present debt issuance costs in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset.  Amortization of debt issuance costs will continue to be reported as interest expense.  ASU 2015-03 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2015.

 

The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-03 on July 1, 2016, which required retroactive application and represented a change in accounting principle.  The deferred financing costs of approximately $1.3 million associated with a portion of our outstanding debt, which were previously included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and other assets on the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2016, are reflected as a reduction to the carrying liability of the Company’s outstanding debt.  As a result of this change in accounting principle, the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2016 was adjusted as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30, 2016

 

 

Previously

 

Effect of Adoption of

 

 

 

    

Reported

    

Accounting Principle

    

As Adjusted

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

$

4,378

 

$

(429)

 

$

3,949

Other assets

 

$

948

 

$

(920)

 

$

28

Total assets

 

$

121,798

 

$

(1,349)

 

$

120,449

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bank borrowings, current portion of long-term debt

 

$

15,909

 

$

(261)

 

$

15,648

Long-term debt, net of current portion

 

$

37,857

 

$

(1,088)

 

$

36,769

Total liabilities

 

$

77,255

 

$

(1,349)

 

$

75,906

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases: Topic 842 (“ASU 2016-02”), to supersede nearly all existing lease guidance under GAAP.  ASU 2016-02 requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet by lessees for those leases currently classified as operating leases.  ASU 2016-02 also requires qualitative disclosures along with specific quantitative disclosures and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early application is permitted.  Entities are required to apply the amendments at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach.  The Company is evaluating the requirements of this guidance and has not yet determined the impact of the adoption on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Topic 606 (“ASU 2014-09”), to supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP.  The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services.  ASU 2014-09 defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, it is possible more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than required under existing GAAP including identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation.  In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14 which defers the effective date for one year beyond the originally specified effective date.  ASU 2014-09 is effective in the Company’s first quarter of fiscal 2019 and may transition to the standard using either the full retrospective approach or retrospectively with a cumulative effect of initially applying the amendments recognized at the date of initial application.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact of its pending adoption of ASU 2014-09 on its consolidated financial statements.