9.Reinsurance

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is involved in both the assumption and cession of reinsurance with non-affiliated companies. The following table provides details of the reinsurance recoverables balance as of December 31:

	2014		2013
Ceded future policyholder benefits and expenses	$	1,797,057	$	1,560,436
Ceded unearned premium	25,389		17,792
Ceded claims and benefits payable	319,790		247,777
Ceded paid losses	11,972		11,375
Total	$	2,154,208	$	1,837,380

A key credit quality indicator for reinsurance recoverables is the A.M. Best financial strength ratings of the reinsurer. The A.M. Best ratings are an independent opinion of a reinsurer’s ability to meet ongoing obligations to policyholders. The A.M. Best ratings for new reinsurance agreements where there is material credit exposure are reviewed at the time of execution. The A.M. Best ratings for existing reinsurance agreements are reviewed on a periodic basis, at least annually. The following table provides the reinsurance recoverable as of December 31, 2014 grouped by A.M. Best rating:

A. M. Best ratings of reinsurer	Ceded future policyholder benefits and expense		Ceded unearned premiums		Ceded claims and benefits payable		Ceded paid losses		Total
A++ or A+	$	1,158,636	$	25,217	$	295,587	$	239	$	1,479,679
A or A-	601,782		37		16,696		26		618,541
B++ or B+	36,315		135		244		0		36,694
Not rated	324		0		7,263		11,707		19,294
Reinsurance recoverable	$	1,797,057	$	25,389	$	319,790	$	11,972	$	2,154,208

A.M. Best ratings for The Hartford and John Hancock Life Insurance Company (“John Hancock”), a subsidiary of Manulife Financial Corporation, the reinsurers with the largest reinsurance recoverable balances, are A- and A+, respectively. A.M. Best currently maintains a stable outlook on the financial strength ratings of John Hancock and The Hartford. The total amount of recoverable for these two reinsurers is $2,045,518 as of December 31, 2014. Most of the assets backing reserves relating to reinsurance recoverables from these two counterparties are held in trust.

The effect of reinsurance on premiums earned and benefits incurred was as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2014									2013									2012
	Long Duration			Short Duration			Total			Long Duration			Short Duration			Total			Long Duration			Short Duration			Total

Direct earned premiums	$	202,992		$	839,786		$	1,042,778		$	207,159		$	823,576		$	1,030,735		$	212,727		$	827,048		$	1,039,775
Premiums assumed	8,400			149,549			157,949			9,709			140,971			150,680			11,983			146,130			158,113
Premiums ceded	(151,491		)	(13,769		)	(165,260		)	(164,698		)	(15,086		)	(179,784		)	(175,042		)	(14,860		)	(189,902		)
Net earned premiums	$	59,901		$	975,566		$	1,035,467		$	52,170		$	949,461		$	1,001,631		$	49,668		$	958,318		$	1,007,986

Direct policyholder benefits	$	661,461		$	542,796		$	1,204,257		$	369,169		$	548,631		$	917,800		$	344,022		$	535,016		$	879,038
Policyholder benefits assumed	21,922			145,597			167,519			23,556			138,485			162,041			24,519			133,285			157,804
Policyholder benefits ceded	(616,370		)	(9,305		)	(625,675		)	(325,982		)	(8,612		)	(334,594		)	(297,768		)	(7,212		)	(304,980		)
Net policyholder benefits	$	67,013		$	679,088		$	746,101		$	66,743		$	678,504		$	745,247		$	70,773		$	661,089		$	731,862

The Company had $810,419 and $843,181, respectively, of invested assets held in trusts or by custodians as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, for the benefit of others related to certain reinsurance arrangements.

The Company utilizes ceded reinsurance primarily for loss protection and capital management and business dispositions.

Loss Protection and Capital Management

As part of the Company’s overall risk and capacity management strategy, the Company purchases reinsurance for certain risks underwritten by the Company, including significant individual risks. Under indemnity reinsurance transactions in which the Company is the ceding insurer, the Company remains liable for policy claims if the assuming company fails to meet its obligations. To mitigate this risk, the Company has control procedures to evaluate the financial condition of reinsurers and to monitor the concentration of credit risk. The selection of reinsurance companies is based on criteria related to solvency and reliability and, to a lesser degree, diversification.

Business Divestitures

The Company has used reinsurance to exit certain businesses.

In 2005, the Parent signed an agreement with Forethought Life Insurance Company whereby the Company agreed to discontinue writing new preneed insurance policies in the United States via independent funeral homes and funeral homes other than those owned and operated by Service Corporation International for a period of ten years.

In 2001, the Parent entered into a reinsurance agreement with The Hartford for the sale of the FFG division. In 2000, the Company divested its LTC operations to John Hancock. Assets supporting liabilities ceded relating to these businesses are mainly held in trusts and the separate accounts relating to FFG are still reflected in the Company’s balance sheet. If the reinsurers became insolvent, we would be exposed to the risk that the assets in the trusts and/or the separate accounts would be insufficient to support the liabilities that would revert back to us. The reinsurance recoverable from The Hartford was $575,625 and $585,108 as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The reinsurance recoverable from John Hancock was $1,469,893 and $1,143,731 as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

The reinsurance agreement associated with the FFG sale also stipulates that The Hartford contribute funds to increase the value of the separate account assets relating to Modified Guaranteed Annuity business sold if such value declines below the value of the associated liabilities. If The Hartford fails to fulfill these obligations, the Company will be obligated to make these payments.

In addition, the Company would be responsible for administering this business in the event of reinsurer insolvency. We do not currently have the administrative systems and capabilities to process this business. Accordingly, we would need to obtain those capabilities in the event of an insolvency of one or more of the reinsurers of these businesses. We might be forced to obtain such capabilities on unfavorable terms with a resulting material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

As of December 31, 2014, we were not aware of any regulatory actions taken with respect to the solvency of the insurance subsidiaries of The Hartford or John Hancock that reinsure the FFG and LTC businesses, and the Company has not been obligated to fulfill any of such reinsurers’ obligations.

John Hancock and The Hartford have paid their obligations when due and there have been no disputes.