XML 62 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.2.0.727
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2015
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The changes to goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2015 were as follows (in thousands):
 
2015
Balance at January 1, 2015
$
452,669

Acquired from acquisitions
36,591

Increase from adjustments during the measurement period related to recent acquisitions
3,841

Goodwill impairment charge
(31,992
)
Foreign currency translation
(8,251
)
Balance at June 30, 2015
$
452,858


The Company assesses goodwill for impairment on an annual basis as of December 31, or at an interim date when events or changes in the business environment would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. The Company conducted the annual impairment test of goodwill for all reporting units as of December 31, 2014 and determined that no adjustment to the carrying value of goodwill for any reporting unit was necessary because the fair value of each of the reporting units exceeded that reporting unit's respective carrying value.

As disclosed in the Company's annual report on form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2014, the fair value of the Oil and Gas Field Services reporting unit did not significantly exceed its carrying amount. During the first quarter of 2015, the Company evaluated the reporting unit’s performance along with other business specific, and macroeconomic industry factors and concluded that no interim impairment test was necessary.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2015, certain events and changes in circumstances arose which led management of the Company to conclude that the fair value of the Oil and Gas Field Services reporting unit may be less than its carrying value and therefore an interim impairment test was conducted relative to goodwill recorded by the Oil and Gas Field Services reporting unit. The primary events and changes in circumstances which led to this conclusion were:    

The second quarter is the period of time where greater levels of communication with customers and the receipt of bids and proposals for project work takes place and provide management with more clarity into levels of activity and other economic and business indicators for the latter half of the fiscal year and into the first quarter of the following year. During the quarter ended June 30, 2015 it became apparent that oil and gas exploration and production activity would continue to be lower than historical periods and lower than previously anticipated by the Company. This was evidenced by reduced volume in bid and proposal requests from customers and communications indicating the reduction in customer budgets in these areas as well as lower than anticipated pricing for our services.

Market and industry reports which management looks to in projecting business conditions and establishing forecast information evidenced more pessimistic views in the near term. The continued depressed price of oil without any upward momentum since December 2014 as well as declining and expected continued decline in rig count for the remainder of 2015 have resulted in lower estimates of industry activity in the second half of 2015 and early 2016.

In recognition of lower than anticipated business results and less optimistic market indicators, management significantly lowered its 2015 forecasts relative to the Oil and Gas reporting unit.

In performing Step I of this interim goodwill impairment test, the estimated fair value of the Oil and Gas Field Services reporting unit was determined using an income approach based upon discounted cash flows and was compared to the reporting unit's carrying value as of June 30, 2015. Based on the results of that valuation, the carrying amount of the reporting unit, including $32.0 million of goodwill, exceeded its estimated fair value and as a result the Company performed Step II of the goodwill impairment test to determine the amount of goodwill impairment charge to be recorded.

Step II of the goodwill impairment test required the Company to perform a theoretical purchase price allocation for the reporting unit to determine the implied fair value of goodwill and to compare the implied fair value of goodwill to the recorded amount. The estimates of the fair values of intangible assets identified in performing this theoretical purchase price allocation and resulting implied fair value of goodwill required significant judgment. Based on the results of this goodwill impairment test the implied value of goodwill was $0 and as such the Company recognized a goodwill impairment charge equal to the recorded amount of goodwill or $32.0 million as of June 30, 2015.

The factors contributing to the $32.0 million goodwill impairment charge principally related to events and changes in circumstances discussed above which had negative impacts on the Company’s prospective financial information utilized in its discounted cash flow model prepared in connection with the interim impairment test. The currently projected lower levels of activity and pricing in the latter half of the year which became evident during the second quarter decreased the reporting unit’s anticipated future cash flows for 2015 as compared to those estimated previously. These factors have also provided evidence of a longer than expected overall recovery from current industry lows which negatively impacted the estimated levels of cash flows in future periods that are assumed in the cash flow models utilized in the interim impairment test. These factors adversely affected the estimated fair value of the reporting unit as of June 30, 2015 and ultimately led to the recognition of the goodwill impairment charge.

Significant judgments and unobservable inputs categorized as Level III in the fair value hierarchy are inherent in the impairment tests performed and include assumptions about the amount and timing of expected future cash flows, growth rates, and the determination of appropriate discount rates. The Company believes that the assumptions used in its annual and any interim date impairment tests are reasonable, but variations in any of the assumptions may result in different calculations of fair values and impairment charges.
The Company also performed an analysis to consider whether the reporting unit's carrying values of finite-lived intangible and other long lived assets may not be entirely recoverable. As of June 30, 2015 the Oil and Gas Field Services reporting unit had property, plant and equipment, net of $185.3 million, other intangible assets of $20.1 million consisting of: permits of $0.1 million, customer and supplier relationships of $10.7 million and other intangible assets of $9.3 million. Based on this analysis, sufficient undiscounted cash flows were available over those assets' remaining lives to demonstrate recoverability and thus no impairment exists.
Below is a summary of amortizable other intangible assets (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
 
Cost
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining Amortization
Period
(in years)
 
Cost
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining Amortization
Period
(in years)
Permits
$
163,036

 
$
59,430

 
$
103,606

 
19.1
 
$
156,692

 
$
55,318

 
$
101,374

 
19.0
Customer and supplier relationships
384,722

 
88,471

 
296,251

 
10.6
 
370,373

 
77,697

 
292,676

 
11.0
Other intangible assets
32,353

 
20,354

 
11,999

 
2.4
 
31,540

 
19,074

 
12,466

 
3.2
Total amortizable permits and other intangible assets
580,111

 
168,255

 
411,856

 
10.7
 
558,605

 
152,089

 
406,516

 
11.4
Trademarks and trade names
122,765

 

 
122,765

 
Indefinite
 
123,564

 

 
123,564

 
Indefinite
Total permits and other intangible assets
$
702,876

 
$
168,255

 
$
534,621

 

 
$
682,169

 
$
152,089

 
$
530,080

 


Amortization expense of permits and other intangible assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and was $8.8 million and $19.8 million, respectively. Amortization expense of permits and other intangible assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 was $8.9 million and $18.4 million, respectively.
Below is the expected future amortization of the net carrying amount of finite-lived intangible assets at June 30, 2015 (in thousands):
Years Ending December 31,
Expected Amortization
2015 (six months)
$
18,761

2016
37,120

2017
34,506

2018
31,440

2019
27,730

Thereafter
262,299

 
$
411,856