XML 33 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS [Abstract]  
Schedule of New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting Principles [Table Text Block]
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:


In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force), which amends ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition: Multiple-Element Arrangements. ASU No. 2009-13 addresses how to determine whether an arrangement involving multiple deliverables contains more than one unit of accounting and how to allocate consideration to each unit of accounting in the arrangement.  This ASU replaces all references to fair value as the measurement criteria with the term selling price and establishes a hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable.  ASU No. 2009-13 also eliminates the use of the residual value method for determining the allocation of arrangement consideration.  Additionally, ASU No. 2009-13 requires expanded disclosures.  This ASU became effective for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after the fiscal year 2010.  Earlier application was permitted with required transition disclosures based on the period of adoption.  The Company has adopted this standard and there is no effect of this standard on the consolidated financial statements at this time.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-17, Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition, which establishes a revenue recognition model for contingent consideration that is payable upon the achievement of an uncertain future event, referred to as a milestone. The scope of the ASU is limited to research or development arrangements and requires an entity to record the milestone payment in its entirety in the period received if the milestone meets all the necessary criteria to be considered substantive. However, entities would not be precluded from making an accounting policy election to apply another appropriate accounting policy that results in the deferral of some portion of the arrangement consideration. The ASU was effective for fiscal years (and interim periods within those fiscal years) beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company has adopted this standard and there is no effect of this standard on the consolidated financial statements at this time.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in US GAAP and IFRSs, (ASU 2011-04), which amends ASC 820. This update clarifies the existing guidance and amends the wording used to describe many of the requirements in US GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. This update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with prospective application required. This update will not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05). This update requires entities to present items of net income and other comprehensive income either in one continuous statement, referred to as the statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate, but consecutive, statements of net income and other comprehensive income. This update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with retrospective applications required.