XML 81 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
(in thousands)
 
Grain
 
Plant Nutrient
 
Rail
 
Turf & Specialty
 
Total
Balance as of January 1, 2012
 
$
4,990

 
$
6,869

 
$

 
$
686

 
$
12,545

Acquisitions (a)
 
33,175

 
6,681

 

 
1,986

 
41,842

Balance as of December 31, 2012
 
38,165

 
13,550

 

 
2,672

 
54,387

Acquisitions
 

 

 
4,167

 

 
4,167

Balance as of December 31, 2013
 
38,165

 
13,550

 
4,167

 
2,672

 
58,554

Acquisitions
 
8,257

 
5,554

 

 

 
13,811

Balances of December 31, 2014
 
$
46,422

 
$
19,104

 
$
4,167

 
$
2,672

 
$
72,365

(a) The Grain acquisition balance has been revised to include the effect of the adjustments to the purchase price allocation in 2013. Discussed in Note 12. Business Acquisitions

Goodwill is tested annually for impairment as of December 31 or whenever events or circumstances change that would indicate that an impairment of goodwill may be present. There have been no goodwill impairment charges historically. In 2014, the Company performed a combination of quantitative and qualitative assessments of goodwill. In 2013 and 2012 the Company performed mainly qualitative goodwill impairment analyses.

The quantitative approach uses a two-step process. Step 1 compares the business enterprise value ("BEV") of each reporting unit with its carrying value. The BEV is computed based on estimated future cash flows, discounted at the weighted average cost of capital of a hypothetical third-party buyer. If the BEV is less than the carrying value for any reporting unit, then Step 2 must be performed. Step 2 compares the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of goodwill. Any excess of the carrying value of the goodwill over the implied fair value will be recorded as an impairment loss. The calculations of the BEV in Step 1 and the implied fair value of goodwill in Step 2 are based on significant unobservable inputs, such as price trends, customer demand, material costs, discount rates and asset replacement costs, and are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. For those reporting units for which the Company performed the quantitative assessment, no impairment existed.

In performing the qualitative assessment of goodwill, management considered the following relevant events and circumstances to determine if any reporting units were deemed to be at risk:

Macroeconomic conditions including, but not limited to deterioration in general economic conditions, limitation on accessing capital, or other developments in equity and credit markets;
Industry and market considerations such as a deterioration in the environment in which an entity operates, an increased competitive environment, a change in the market for an entity's products or services, or a regulatory or political development;
Cost factors such as increases in commodity prices, raw materials, labor, or other costs that have a negative effect on earnings and cash flows;
Overall financial performance such as negative or declining cash flows or a decline in actual or planned revenue or earnings compared with actual and projected results of relevant prior periods;
Other relevant entity-specific events such as changes in management, key personnel, strategy, or customers and;
Events affecting a reporting unit such as a change in the composition or carrying amount of its net assets, a more-likely-than-not expectation of selling or disposing all, or a portion, of a reporting unit, the testing for recoverability of a significant asset group within a reporting unit, or recognition of a goodwill impairment loss in the financial statements of a subsidiary that is a component of a reporting unit.

There is a certain degree of uncertainty associated with the key assumptions used. Potential events or changes in circumstances that could reasonably be expected to negatively affect the key assumptions include significant volatility in commodity prices or raw material prices and unanticipated changes in the economy or industries within which the businesses operate. When considering all factors in totality, management believes it is more likely than not that the fair value of goodwill exceeds its carrying amount, and as such, no further analysis was required for purposes of testing goodwill for impairment.
The Company's intangible assets are recorded in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are as follows:
(in thousands)
Original Cost
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net Book Value
December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
Intangible asset class
 
 
 
 
 
  Customer list
$
21,757

 
$
10,374

 
$
11,383

  Non-compete agreement
3,502

 
2,187

 
1,315

  Supply agreement
9,806

 
3,082

 
6,724

  Technology
2,100

 
1,225

 
875

  Trademarks and patents
3,218

 
876

 
2,342

  Lease intangible
5,985

 
4,422

 
1,563

  Other
1,904

 
1,695

 
209

 
$
48,272

 
$
23,861

 
$
24,411

December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
Intangible asset class
 
 
 
 
 
  Customer list
$
20,058

 
$
8,833

 
$
11,225

  Non-compete agreement
2,949

 
1,860

 
1,089

  Supply agreement
5,186

 
2,477

 
2,709

  Technology
2,100

 
805

 
1,295

  Trademarks and patents
2,357

 
641

 
1,716

  Lease intangible
4,939

 
3,866

 
1,073

  Other
1,904

 
1,528

 
376

 
$
39,493

 
$
20,010

 
$
19,483


 
Amortization expense for intangible assets was $5.0 million, $5.3 million and $4.8 million for 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Expected future annual amortization expense is as follows: 2015 -- $4.8 million; 2016 -- $3.9 million; 2017 -- $3.3 million; 2018 -- $3.2 million; and 2019 -- $2.6 million. In December 2014, the Company recorded an impairment of $1.5 million related to a customer list in the Grain Group.