N-CSR 1 edg146585.htm Evergreen Money Market Trust
OMB APPROVAL 

OMB Number: 3235-0570 

Expires: September 30, 2007 

Estimated average burden hours per response: 19.4 




UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act file number 811-08555

Evergreen Money Market Trust

_____________________________________________________________
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

     200 Berkeley Street Boston, Massachusetts 02116

_____________________________________________________________
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

     Michael H. Koonce, Esq. 200 Berkeley Street Boston, Massachusetts 02116

____________________________________________________________
(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (617) 210-3200

Date of fiscal year end: Registrant is making an annual filing for nine of its series, Evergreen California Municipal Money Market Fund, Evergreen Florida Municipal Money Market Fund, Evergreen Money Market Fund, Evergreen Municipal Money Market Fund, Evergreen New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund, Evergreen New York Municipal Money Market Fund, Evergreen Pennsylvania Municipal Money Market Fund, Evergreen Treasury Money Market Fund and Evergreen U.S.

Government Money Market Fund, for the year ended January 31, 2006. These nine series have a Janaury 31 fiscal year end.

Date of reporting period: January 31, 2006

Item 1 - Reports to Stockholders.


Evergreen California Municipal Money Market Fund



    table of contents 
1    LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS 
4    FUND AT A GLANCE 
6    ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES 
7    FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 
10    SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS 
15    STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES 
16    STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS 
17    STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS 
18    NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
23    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 
24    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
32    TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS 

This annual report must be preceded or accompanied by a prospectus of the Evergreen fund contained herein. The prospectus contains more complete information, including fees and expenses, and should be read carefully before investing or sending money.

The fund will file its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q will be available on the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, the fund’s Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800.SEC.0330.

A description of the fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures, as well as information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, is available by visiting our Web site at EvergreenInvestments.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov. The fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures are also available without charge, upon request, by calling 800.343.2898.

Mutual Funds:         
 NOT FDIC INSURED  MAY LOSE VALUE  NOT BANK GUARANTEED 

Evergreen InvestmentsSM is a service mark of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC.
Copyright 2006, Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC.

Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC is a subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation
and is an affiliate of Wachovia Corporation's other Broker Dealer subsidiaries.

Evergreen mutual funds are distributed by Evergreen Investment Services, Inc.
200 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS

March 2006


Dennis H. Ferro
President and Chief
Executive Officer

Dear Shareholder,

We are pleased to provide the annual report for the Evergreen California Municipal Money Market Fund, which covers the twelve-month period ended January 31, 2006.

The U.S. financial markets had to navigate through some choppy seas during the past twelve months. Uncertainty was prevalent as questions surfaced about the sustainability of economic growth, tighter monetary policy, surging oil prices, moderating profit growth, and an increase in inflation. Geopolitical tensions continued and the Gulf region suffered enormous damage from the hurricanes. Not surprisingly, each of these events combined at various times during the year to increase market volatility. Throughout these turbulent times, the portfolio management teams of Evergreen’s money market funds employed a variety of strategies to manage portfolios in a rising yield environment and enhance portfolio returns, in both the taxable and tax-advantaged markets.

Over the course of the investment period, economic reports frequently delivered confusing signals. While growth was expected to moderate as the expansion matured, the economy showed surprising strength, particularly in the third quarter, as Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) grew in excess of 4%, despite the hurricanes and the spike in inflation. The effects of higher energy prices and tighter monetary policy became evident in the last quarter of 2005 as initial readings for GDP growth barely exceeded 1%. The conflicting data was often subject to interpretation and the consequence for investors was a frequent bout of market volatility. While many debated whether or not

1


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS continued

the short-term volatility was an indication of pending weakness, Evergreen’s Investment Strategy Committee focused on the breadth of economic output, particularly personal consumption and capital investment. Though the rate of growth in each was moderating from unusually high levels, we believed it would lead to a more sustainable, and ultimately less inflationary, pace for the expansion. The fundamentals, though no longer great, were still pretty good in our view, and our portfolio teams based many of their investment decisions on these positive macro-economic trends.

Despite the mixed signals from the economy, the Federal Reserve (“Fed”) maintained its strategy of gradually raising short-term interest rates. Considering that monetary policy had been stimulative for most of the prior three years, central bankers were determined in their efforts to prevent alarming increases in inflation, raising their target for the federal funds rate by twenty-five basis points at every policy meeting over the past year. Yet long-term market interest rates continued to decline and the extent of the yield curve’s flattening had many on Wall Street debating its meaning. Given our forecast for more moderate levels of growth in consumption and investment supporting a sustainable expansion, we viewed the yield curve’s message as confidence in the Fed’s ability to prevent long-term inflation. In addition, higher oil prices would likely serve to dampen output and we believed the absence of significant wage pressures would enable the Fed to continue on with its less stimulative, rather than more restrictive, path for monetary policy.

In this environment, the portfolio managers of Evergreen’s money market funds attempted to focus on the aforementioned market fundamentals, as well as the timing of Fed meetings. Each increase in the Fed’s target for its benchmark rate would result in a “resetting” of rates at the short end of the yield curve, enabling the teams to pursue higher income potential. In addition, many of our analysts and portfolio managers used a variety of short-term securities to capture yield, in

2


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS continued

order to provide our investors with the stability and liquidity necessary to balance exposure within their diversified long-term portfolios.

We continue to recommend that investors maintain their diversified strategies, including exposure to money market funds, within their long-term portfolios.

Please visit our Web site, EvergreenInvestments.com, for more information about our funds and other investment products available to you. Thank you for your continued support of Evergreen Investments.

Sincerely,


Dennis H. Ferro

President and Chief Executive Officer
Evergreen Investment Company, Inc.

 

Special Notice to Shareholders:

Please visit our Web site at EvergreenInvestments.com for a statement from President and Chief Executive Officer, Dennis Ferro, addressing NASD actions involving Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. (EIS), Evergreen’s mutual fund distributor or statements from Dennis Ferro and Chairman of the Board of the Evergreen funds, Michael S. Scofield, addressing SEC actions involving the Evergreen funds.

3


FUND AT A GLANCE

as of January 31, 2006

 

MANAGEMENT TEAM

Investment Advisor:

• Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC

Portfolio Managers:

• Diane C. Beaver

• Ladson Hart

 

PERFORMANCE AND RETURNS*

Portfolio inception date: 9/24/2001

    Class A    Class S    Class I 
Class inception date    9/24/2001    9/24/2001    9/24/2001 

Nasdaq symbol    ECMXX    N/A    ECUXX 

Average annual return             

1-year    1.78%    1.56%    2.09% 

Since portfolio inception    0.93%    0.69%    1.26% 

7-day annualized yield    2.21%    1.98%    2.51% 

30-day annualized yield    2.20%    1.97%    2.50% 


* The yield quotation more closely reflects the current earnings of the fund than the total return quotation.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The performance quoted represents past performance and current performance may be lower or higher. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that investors’ shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month-end for Classes A or I, please go to EvergreenInvestments.com/fundperformance. Please call 1.800.343.2898 for the most recent month-end performance information for Class S. The performance of each class may vary based on differences in fees and expenses paid by the shareholders investing in each class. Performance includes the reinvestment of income dividends and capital gain distributions.

The fund incurs a 12b-1 fee of 0.30% for Class A and 0.60% for Class S. Class I does not pay a 12b-1 fee. The advisor is reimbursing a portion of the 12b-1 fee for Class S. Had the fee not been reimbursed, returns for Class S would have been lower. Returns reflect expense limits previously in effect for all classes, without which returns would have been lower.

An investment in a money market fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund.

4


FUND AT A GLANCE continued

7-DAY ANNUALIZED YIELD


Class I shares are only offered in the following manner: (1) to investment advisory clients of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC (or its advisory affiliates) when purchased by such advisor(s) on behalf of its clients, (2) through arrangements entered into on behalf of the Evergreen funds with certain financial services firms, (3) to certain institutional investors and (4) to persons who owned Class Y shares in registered name in an Evergreen fund on or before December 31, 1994 or who owned shares of any SouthTrust fund in registered name as of March 18, 2005 or shares of Vestaur Securities Fund as of May 20, 2005.

Class I shares are only available to institutional shareholders with a minimum of $1 million investment, which may be waived in certain situations.

Class S shares are sold through certain broker dealers and financial institutions which have selling agreements with the fund’s distributor.

The fund’s investment objective is nonfundamental and may be changed without a vote of the fund’s shareholders.

Funds that concentrate their investments in a single state may face increased risk of price fluctuation over less concentrated funds due to adverse developments within that state.

The fund’s yield will fluctuate and there can be no guarantee that the fund will achieve its objective or any particular tax-exempt yield. Income may be subject to federal alternative minimum tax as well as local income taxes.

Yields are based on net investment income for the stated periods and annualized.

All data is as of January 31, 2006, and subject to change.

5


ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES

The Example below is intended to describe the fees and expenses borne by shareholders and the impact of those costs on your investment.

Example

As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads), redemption fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) fees and other fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from August 1, 2005 to January 31, 2006.

The example illustrates your fund’s costs in two ways:

• Actual expenses

The section in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in these columns, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class, in the column entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

• Hypothetical example for comparison purposes

The section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees or exchange fees. Therefore, the section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

    Beginning    Ending         
    Account    Account     Expenses 
    Value    Value    Paid During 
    8/1/2005    1/31/2006     Period* 

Actual                 
Class A    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,010.11       $    4.76 
Class S    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,008.98       $    5.92 
Class I    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,011.66       $    3.25 
Hypothetical                 
(5% return                 
before expenses)                 
Class A    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,020.47       $    4.79 
Class S    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,019.31       $    5.96 
Class I    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,021.98       $    3.26 


* For each class of the Fund, expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of each class (0.94% for Class A, 1.17% for Class S and 0.64% for Class I), multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184 / 365 days.

6


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS A    2006    2005    2004    2003    20021 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00         $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Income from investment operations                         
Net investment income (loss)    0.02    0.01        0     0.01    0 

Distributions to shareholders from                         
Net investment income       (0.02)       (0.01)        02    (0.01)    02 

Net asset value, end of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00         1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Total return    1.78%    0.56%         0.40%     0.92%     0.40% 

Ratios and supplemental data                         
Net assets, end of period (thousands)    $30,405    $56,228       $87,673    $122,687    $117,217 
Ratios to average net assets                         
      Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
          but excluding expense reductions
 
  0.94%    0.94%         0.94%     0.88%    0.89%3 
      Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
          and expense reductions
 
  0.94%    0.96%         0.96%     0.96%    1.09%3 
      Net investment income (loss)    1.68%    0.53%         0.41%     0.88%    1.12%3 


1 For the period from September 24, 2001 (commencement of class operations), to January 31, 2002.

2 Amount represents less than $0.005 per share.

3 Annualized

See Notes to Financial Statements

7


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS S    2006    2005        2004    2003    20021 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00         $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Income from investment operations                         
Net investment income (loss)     0.02    0        0    0.01    0 

Distributions to shareholders from                         
Net investment income    (0.02)    02        02       (0.01)    02 

Net asset value, end of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00         $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Total return     1.56%    0.30%         0.19%    0.68%    0.29% 

Ratios and supplemental data                         
Net assets, end of period (thousands)    $191,144    $172,467       $25,427    $41,997    $41,972 
Ratios to average net assets                         
     Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
    but excluding expense reductions
 
   1.17%    1.16%         1.15%    1.11%    1.19%3 
    Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
       and expense reductions
 
   1.25%    1.23%         1.26%    1.26%    1.39%3 
      Net investment income (loss)     1.54%    0.53%         0.20%    0.65%    0.83%3 


1 For the period from September 24, 2001 (commencement of class operations), to January 31, 2002.

2 Amount represents less than $0.005 per share.

3 Annualized

See Notes to Financial Statements

8


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS I    2006    2005        2004    2003    20021 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00         $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $1.00 

Income from investment operations                         
Net investment income (loss)       0.02       0.01         0.01    0.01     0.01 

Distributions to shareholders from                         
Net investment income     (0.02)     (0.01)         (0.01)       (0.01)    (0.01) 

Net asset value, end of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00         $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $1.00 

Total return       2.09%       0.87%         0.70%    1.22%     0.59% 

Ratios and supplemental data                         
Net assets, end of period (thousands)    $1,531    $3,622       $11,447    $20,169    $ 168 
Ratios to average net assets                         
     Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
    but excluding expense reductions
 
     0.64%       0.65%         0.64%    0.58%     0.58%2 
     Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
    and expense reductions
 
     0.64%       0.67%         0.66%    0.66%     0.78%2 
      Net investment income (loss) 
     1.95%       0.74%         0.69%    0.99%     1.42%2 


1 For the period from September 24, 2001 (commencement of class operations), to January 31, 2002.

2 Annualized

See Notes to Financial Statements

9


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

 
MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS 99.6%             
EDUCATION 7.2%             
ABAG Fin. Auth. for Nonprofit Corp., California RB, The Thatcher Sch. Proj.,             
     3.02%, VRDN, (LOC: KeyCorp)    $ 8,000,000    $    8,000,000 
California CDA RB, Biola Univ., Ser. B, 4.47%, VRDN, (SPA: BNP Paribas SA)    2,745,000        2,745,000 
PFOTER, 3.12%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. & Insd. by MBIA)    5,285,000        5,285,000 

            16,030,000 

GENERAL OBLIGATION - LOCAL 2.1%             
Clovis, CA Unified Sch. Dist. GO:             
     3.08%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. & Insd. by FGIC)    3,320,000        3,320,000 
     3.10%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. & Insd. by FGIC)    1,330,000        1,330,000 

            4,650,000 

GENERAL OBLIGATION - STATE 10.7%             
California GO:             
     3.03%, VRDN, (Liq.: Morgan Stanley)    2,400,000        2,400,000 
     MSTR, 2.92%, VRDN, (SPA: JPMorgan Chase & Co. & Insd. by MBIA)    6,300,000        6,300,000 
     PFOTER:             
              2.98%, VRDN, (Liq.: Societe Generale & Insd. by MBIA)    1,625,000        1,625,000 
           3.07%, VRDN, (SPA: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    4,100,000        4,100,000 
California ROC, RR II-R-438Ce, 3.10%, VRDN, (Liq.: Citigroup Global Markets &             
     Insd. by CitiBank, NA)    9,370,000        9,370,000 

            23,795,000 

HOUSING 20.4%             
California CDA MHRB, Oakwood Apts. Proj., 3.47%, 06/15/2006, (Liq.: Merrill             
     Lynch & Co., Inc.)    2,000,000        2,000,000 
Class B Revenue Bond Cert. Trust, Ser. 2002-1, 3.47%, VRDN, (Liq.: American Intl.             
     Group, Inc.)    7,000,000        7,000,000 
FHLMC MHRB, Ser. M001, Class A, 3.12%, VRDN, (Insd. by FHLMC)    2,959,711        2,959,711 
New Mexico Mtge. Fin. Auth. SFHRB, 4.39%, VRDN, (Insd. by Trinity Plus             
     Funding Co.)    2,368,457        2,368,457 
PFOTER:             
     Class A, 2.40%, 02/02/2006, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    910,000        910,000 
     Class F, 3.05%, VRDN, (LOC: Lloyds TSB Group plc)    6,895,000        6,895,000 
San Jose, CA MHRB, PFOTER, 3.08%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    13,905,000        13,905,000 
Simi Valley, CA MHRB:             
     3.00%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    7,800,000        7,800,000 
     3.19%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    1,700,000        1,700,000 

            45,538,168 

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE 16.6%             
California CDA IDRB, Santos Proj., Ser. A, 3.19%, VRDN, (LOC: California Bank             
     & Trust)    3,120,000        3,120,000 
California CDA RB, Triple H Investors Proj., 3.14%, VRDN, (LOC: Union Bank of             
     California)    740,000        740,000 
California EDA RB, Killion Inds. Proj., 3.28%, VRDN, (LOC: Union Bank of California)    2,680,000        2,680,000 

See Notes to Financial Statements

10


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

        Principal         
        Amount        Value 

 
MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued                 
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE continued                 
California Infrastructure & Econ. Dev. Bank IDRB:                 
     Bonny Doon Winery, Inc. Proj., Ser. A, 3.08%, VRDN, (LOC: Comerica, Inc.)    $    3,000,000    $    3,000,000 
     G&G Specialty Foods Proj., 3.08%, VRDN, (LOC: Comerica, Inc.)        1,500,000        1,500,000 
     Haig Precision Manufacturing Corp., 3.22%, VRDN, (SPA: Bank of the West)        2,200,000        2,200,000 
     Surtec, Inc. Proj., Ser. A, 3.08%, VRDN, (LOC: Comerica, Inc.)        2,200,000        2,200,000 
Delaware EDA Solid Waste Disposal & Sewer Fac. RB, Ciba Specialty Chemical                 
     Corp. Proj., Ser. A, 3.29%, VRDN, (Gtd. by Ciba Specialty Chemical Corp.)        1,700,000        1,700,000 
Douglas Cnty., GA IDRB, Electrical Fiber Sys. Proj., 3.42%, VRDN, (LOC: Regions                 
     Finl. Corp.)        1,700,000        1,700,000 
Frankfort, IN EDRB, Gen. Seating of America Proj., 3.57%, VRDN, (LOC: Dai-Ichi                 
     Kangyo Bank, Ltd.)        1,275,000        1,275,000 
Glenn Cnty., CA IDA PCRB, Land O’Lakes, Inc. Proj., Ser. 1995, 3.15%, VRDN,                 
     (LOC: JPMorgan Chase & Co.)        1,900,000        1,900,000 
Los Angeles, CA IDA RB, Kairak, Inc. Proj., 3.03%, VRDN, (LOC: U.S. Bank)        1,480,000        1,480,000 
Riverside Cnty., CA IDA Empowerment Zone Fac. RB, 3.20%, VRDN, (LOC:                 
     California Bank & Trust)        6,500,000        6,500,000 
Riverside Cnty., CA IDRB, Triple H Processors Proj., 3.14%, VRDN, (LOC: Union                 
     Bank of California)        1,560,000        1,560,000 
Riverside Cnty., CA IDRRB, Advance Business Graphics:                 
     Ser. A, 3.10%, VRDN, (Gtd. by California State Teachers’ Retirement System)        1,450,000        1,450,000 
     Ser. B, 3.10%, VRDN, (Gtd. by California State Teachers’ Retirement System)        1,300,000        1,300,000 
South Bend, IN EDRB, Deluxe Sheet Metal, Inc. Proj., 3.17%, VRDN, (LOC: Standard                 
     Federal Bank)        1,500,000        1,500,000 
Westfield, IN IDRB, Standard Locknut Proj., 3.24%, VRDN, (Liq.: Wells Fargo & Co.)        1,230,000        1,230,000 

                37,035,000 

LEASE 2.0%                 
Midway, CA Sch. Dist. COP, Refinancing Proj., Ser. 2000, 3.10%, VRDN, (LOC:                 
     Union Bank of California)        4,485,000        4,485,000 

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 11.4%                 
California Pollution Ctl. Fin. Auth. Solid Waste Disposal RB:                 
     Carlos Echeverria & Sons Proj., 3.11%, VRDN, (LOC: KeyCorp)        3,500,000        3,500,000 
     Dairy & Poso Creek Proj., 3.11%, VRDN, (SPA: Bank of the West)        3,000,000        3,000,000 
     George & Jennifer Deboer Trust, 3.11%, VRDN, (LOC: Wells Fargo & Co.)        2,500,000        2,500,000 
     Heritage Dairy Proj., 3.11%, VRDN, (Liq.: Wells Fargo & Co.)        1,500,000        1,500,000 
     John B. & Ann M. Verwey Proj., 3.11%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America Corp.)        3,400,000        3,400,000 
     Milk Time Dairy Farms Proj., 3.11%, VRDN, (SPA: Bank of the West)        1,400,000        1,400,000 
Pennsylvania EDFA RRB, Wastewater Treatment, Sunoco, Inc. Proj., 3.14%, VRDN,                 
     (Gtd. by Sunoco, Inc.)        2,200,000        2,200,000 
Port Arthur, TX Navigation Dist. IDRB, Fina Oil & Chemical Co. Proj., 3.09%, VRDN,                 
     (Gtd. by Total SA)        3,600,000        3,600,000 
Puerto Rico, Med. & Env. Pollution Ctl. Facs. RB, Becton Dickinson & Co.,                 
     2.60%, 03/01/2006, (Gtd. by Becton Dickinson & Co.)        4,390,000        4,390,000 

                25,490,000 


See Notes to Financial Statements

11


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

 
MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
PORT AUTHORITY 1.9%             
Alameda Corridor Trans. Auth., California RB, 3.08%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch &             
     Co., Inc. & Insd. by AMBAC)    $ 4,120,000    $    4,120,000 

PUBLIC FACILITIES 2.9%             
San Diego, CA Pub. Facs. Fin. Auth. Lease RB, PFOTER:             
     3.07%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. & Insd. by MBIA)    2,000,000        2,000,000 
     3.07%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. & Insd. by AMBAC)    4,500,000        4,500,000 

            6,500,000 

RESOURCE RECOVERY 7.2%             
California Pollution Ctl. Fin. Auth. Solid Waste Disposal RB:             
     BLT Enterprises Proj., Ser. A, 3.08%, VRDN, (LOC: Union Bank of California)    7,280,000        7,280,000 
     Cedar Ave. Recycling Proj. A, 3.03%, VRDN, (Gtd. by California State Teachers’             
               Retirement System)    3,000,000        3,000,000 
     Napa Recycling & Waste, Ser. A, 3.08%, VRDN, (LOC: Union Bank of             
           California)    5,255,000        5,255,000 
     South Lake Refuse Co. Proj., Ser. A, 3.08%, VRDN, (LOC: Comerica, Inc.)    445,000        445,000 

            15,980,000 

SPECIAL TAX 4.2%             
California Econ. Recovery Putters, Ser. 452, 3.05%, VRDN, (LOC: JPMorgan Chase             
     & Co. & Insd. by MBIA)    1,490,000        1,490,000 
California Econ. Recovery RB, Ser. C-17, 2.90%, VRDN    4,900,000        4,900,000 
Puerto Rico Cmnwlth. Hwy. & Trans. Auth. RB, Ser. M, 3.05%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of             
     America Corp. & Insd. by FGIC)    3,000,000        3,000,000 

            9,390,000 

TOBACCO REVENUE 4.1%             
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., California, Ser. Z5, 3.08%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     Goldman Sachs & Insd. by FSA)    2,500,000        2,500,000 
Municipal Securities Trust Cert., Ser. 5001, Class A, 3.05%, VRDN, (LOC: Branch             
     Banking & Trust & Insd. by AMBAC)    6,550,000        6,550,000 

            9,050,000 

TRANSPORTATION 1.7%             
Foothill/Eastern Trans. Corridor Agcy., California Toll Road RB, 3.08%, VRDN, (Liq.:             
     Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    3,870,000        3,870,000 

UTILITY 2.0%             
Carlton, WI PCRB, Wisconsin Power & Light Co. Proj., 3.12%, VRDN, (Gtd. by             
     Wisconsin Power & Light Co.)    800,000        800,000 
Delaware EDA RB, Delmarva Power & Light Co. Proj., 3.10%, VRDN, (Gtd. by             
     Delmarva Power & Light Co.)    1,800,000        1,800,000 
Northern California Pub. Power Agcy. RB, MSTR, Ser. 35A, 2.99%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     JPMorgan Chase & Co. & Insd. by MBIA)    1,300,000        1,300,000 
Sheboygan, WI PCRB, Wisconsin Power & Light Proj., 3.15%, VRDN, (Gtd. by             
     Wisconsin Power & Light)    600,000        600,000 

            4,500,000 


See Notes to Financial Statements

12


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

        Principal         
        Amount        Value 

 
MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS  continued                 
WATER & SEWER 5.2%                 
Hanford, CA Sewer RB, Ser. A, 3.11%, VRDN, (Gtd. by California State Teachers’             
     Retirement System)        $ 1,065,000    $    1,065,000 
Houston, TX Water & Sewer Sys. RB, 3.10%, VRDN, (SPA: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.             
     & Insd. by FSA)        2,390,000        2,390,000 
Los Angeles, CA Wastewater Sys. RB, Ser. TT, 3.05%, VRDN, (LOC: Goldman Sachs             
     & Insd. by MBIA)        4,000,000        4,000,000 
Olcese, CA Water Dist. COP, Rio Bravo Water Delivery Proj., Ser. A, 3.65%,             
     VRDN, (SPA: Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp.) (cost $4,200,000)    4,200,000        4,200,000 

                11,655,000 

Total Investments (cost $222,088,168) 99.6%            222,088,168 
Other Assets and Liabilities  0.4%                991,563 

Net Assets 100.0%            $    223,079,731 


VRDN    Variable Rate Demand Note security which is payable on demand within seven calendar days after notice is given by the 
    Fund to the issuer or other parties not affiliated with the issuer. Interest rates are determined and reset by the issuer 
    daily, weekly, or monthly depending upon the terms of the security. Interest rates presented for these securities are 
    those in effect at January 31, 2006. 

Certain obligations held in the portfolio have credit enhancements or liquidity features that may, under certain circumstances, provide for repayment of principal and interest on the obligation upon demand date, interest rate reset date or final maturity. These enhancements include: letters of credit; liquidity guarantees; security purchase agreements; tender option purchase agreements; and third party insurance (i.e. AMBAC, FGIC and MBIA). Adjustable rate bonds and variable rate demand notes held in the portfolio may be considered derivative securities within the standards imposed by the Securities and Exchange Commission under Rule 2a-7 which were designed to minimize both credit and market risk.

Summary of Abbreviations 
AMBAC    American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp. 
CDA    Community Development Authority 
COP    Certificates of Participation 
EDA    Economic Development Authority 
EDFA    Economic Development Finance Authority 
EDRB    Economic Development Revenue Bond 
FGIC    Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. 
FHLMC    Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. 
FSA    Financial Security Assurance, Inc. 
GO    General Obligation 
IDA    Industrial Development Authority 
IDRB    Industrial Development Revenue Bond 
IDRRB    Industrial Development Refunding Revenue Bond 
LOC    Letter of Credit 
MBIA    Municipal Bond Investors Assurance Corp. 
MHRB    Multifamily Housing Revenue Bond 
MSTR    Municipal Securities Trust Receipt 
PCRB    Pollution Control Revenue Bond 
PFOTER    Putable Floating Option Tax Exempt Receipts 
RB    Revenue Bond 

See Notes to Financial Statements

13


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

Summary of Abbreviations (continued) 
ROC    Reset Option Certificate 
RRB    Refunding Revenue Bond 
SFHRB    Single Family Housing Revenue Bond 
SPA    Securities Purchase Agreement 

The following table shows the percent of total investments by geographic location as of January 31, 2006:

California    75.1% 
Delaware    4.7% 
Puerto Rico    3.3% 
New York    3.0% 
Texas    2.7% 
Indiana    1.8% 
New Mexico    1.1% 
Pennsylvania    1.0% 
Georgia    0.8% 
Wisconsin    0.6% 
Non-state specific    5.9% 

    100.0%
   

The following table shows the percent of total investments by credit quality as of January 31, 2006 (unaudited):

Tier 1    96.8% 
Tier 2    3.2% 

    100.0%
   

The following table shows the percent of total investments by maturity as of January 31, 2006 (unaudited):

1 day    1.9% 
2-7 days    95.2% 
8-60 days    2.0% 
121-240 days    0.9% 

    100.0%
   

See Notes to Financial Statements

14


STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

January 31, 2006

Assets         
Investments at amortized cost    $    222,088,168 
Cash        18,786 
Interest receivable        1,010,552 
Receivable from investment advisor        5,113 
Prepaid expenses and other assets        21,213 

   Total assets        223,143,832 

Liabilities         
Dividends payable        1,931 
Payable for Fund shares redeemed        28,803 
Due to related parties        630 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities        32,737 

   Total liabilities        64,101 

Net assets    $    223,079,731 

Net assets represented by         
Paid-in capital    $    223,074,388 
Undistributed net investment income        5,343 

Total net assets    $    223,079,731 

Net assets consists of         
   Class A    $    30,405,145 
   Class S        191,143,940 
   Class I        1,530,646 

Total net assets    $    223,079,731 

Shares outstanding (unlimited number of shares authorized)         
   Class A        30,436,864 
   Class S        191,156,123 
   Class I        1,528,914 

Net asset value per share         
   Class A    $    1.00 
   Class S    $    1.00 
   Class I    $    1.00 


See Notes to Financial Statements

15


STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Year Ended January 31, 2006

Investment income         
Interest    $    5,537,361 

Expenses         
Advisory fee        928,428 
Distribution Plan expenses         
   Class A        125,304 
   Class S        972,152 
Administrative services fee        123,790 
Transfer agent fees        97,404 
Trustees’ fees and expenses        2,834 
Printing and postage expenses        30,557 
Custodian and accounting fees        68,932 
Registration and filing fees        44,121 
Professional fees        20,069 
Other        4,404 

   Total expenses        2,417,995 
   Less: Expense reductions        (9,881) 
           Expense reimbursements        (125,713) 

   Net expenses        2,282,401 

Net investment income        3,254,960 

Net realized gains or losses on:         
   Securities        34,144 
   Credit default swap transactions        (2,300) 

Net realized gains on investments        31,844 

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations    $    3,286,804 


See Notes to Financial Statements

16


STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

    Year Ended January 31, 

    2006    2005 

Operations                 
Net investment income    $    3,254,960    $    904,168 
Net realized gains on investments        31,844        6,207 

Net increase in net assets resulting from                 
   operations        3,286,804        910,375 

Distributions to shareholders from                 
Net investment income                 
   Class A        (707,289)        (400,804) 
   Class S        (2,526,619)        (445,339) 
   Class I        (49,574)        (55,591) 

   Total distributions to shareholders        (3,283,482)        (901,734) 

    Shares        Shares     
Capital share transactions                 
Proceeds from shares sold                 
   Class A    164,241,920    164,241,920    320,057,777    320,057,777 
   Class S    884,059,621    884,059,621    477,003,742    477,003,742 
   Class I    27,234,849    27,234,849    60,247,677    60,247,677 

    1,075,536,390        857,309,196 

Net asset value of shares issued in                 
   reinvestment of distributions                 
   Class A    707,285    707,285    400,699    400,699 
   Class S    2,526,619    2,526,619    441,194    441,194 
   Class I    11,269    11,269    6,382    6,382 

        3,245,173        848,275 

Payment for shares redeemed                 
   Class A    (190,775,815)    (190,775,815)    (351,906,282)    (351,906,282) 
   Class S    (867,908,792)    (867,908,792)    (330,410,411)    (330,410,411) 
   Class I    (29,337,410)    (29,337,410)    (68,079,709)    (68,079,709) 

    (1,088,022,017)        (750,396,402) 

Net increase (decrease) in net assets                 
   resulting from capital share transactions        (9,240,454)        107,761,069 

Total increase (decrease) in net assets        (9,237,132)        107,769,710 
Net assets                 
Beginning of period        232,316,863        124,547,153 

End of period    $         223,079,731    $       232,316,863 

Undistributed net investment income    $    5,343    $    2,021 


See Notes to Financial Statements

17


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. ORGANIZATION

Evergreen California Municipal Money Market Fund (the “Fund”) is a non-diversified series of Evergreen Money Market Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on September 18, 1997. The Trust is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).

The Fund offers Class A, Class S and Institutional (“Class I”) shares. Class A, Class S and Class I shares are sold at net asset value without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge. Each class of shares, except Class I shares, pays an ongoing distribution fee.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported herein. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

a. Valuation of investments

As permitted under Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act, securities are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value.

b. Credit default swaps

The Fund may enter into credit default swaps. Credit default swaps involve an exchange of a fixed rate premium for protection against the loss in value of an underlying debt instrument in the event of default or bankruptcy. Under the terms of the swap, one party acts as a “guarantor” and receives a periodic stream of payments that is a fixed percentage applied to a notional principal amount over the term of the swap. In return, the party agrees to purchase the notional amount of the underlying instrument, at par, if a credit event occurs during the term of the swap. Periodic payments are recorded as realized gains or losses. The Fund may enter into credit default swaps as either the guarantor or the counterparty.

Payments received or made as a result of a credit event or termination of the contract are recognized as realized gains or losses. The Fund could be exposed to risks if the counterparty defaults on its obligation to perform, or if there are unfavorable changes in the fluctuation of interest rates or in the price of the underlying security.

c. Security transactions and investment income

Security transactions are recorded on trade date. Realized gains and losses are computed using the specific cost of the security sold. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.

d. Federal taxes

The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company and distribute all of its taxable and tax-exempt income, including any net capital gains (which have already been offset by available capital loss carryovers). Accordingly, no provision for federal taxes is required.

18


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

e. Distributions

Distributions to shareholders from net investment income are accrued daily and paid monthly. Distributions from net realized gains, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Such distributions are determined in conformity with income tax regulations, which may differ from generally accepted accounting principles.

Reclassifications have been made to the Fund’s components of net assets to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryovers, as applicable) under income tax regulations. The primary permanent differences causing such reclassifications are due to dividend redesignations. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the following amounts were reclassified:


Undistributed net investment income  $ 31,844
Accumulated net realized gains on investments    (31,844) 


f. Class allocations

Income, common expenses and realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated to the classes based on the relative net assets of each class. Distribution fees, if any, are calculated daily at the class level based on the appropriate net assets of each class and the specific expense rates applicable to each class.

3. ADVISORY FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC (“EIMC”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation (“Wachovia”), is the investment advisor to the Fund and is paid an annual fee starting at 0.45% and declining to 0.30% as average daily net assets increase.

From time to time, EIMC may voluntarily or contractually waive its fee and/or reimburse expenses in order to limit operating expenses. During the year ended January 31, 2006, EIMC reimbursed other expenses in the amount of $46 and Distribution Plan expenses (see Note 4) relating to Class S shares in the amount of $125,667.

Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. (“EIS”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia, is the administrator to the Fund. As administrator, EIS provides the Fund with facilities, equipment and personnel and is paid an annual rate determined by applying percentage rates to the aggregate average daily net assets of the Evergreen money market funds, starting at 0.06% and declining to 0.04% as the aggregate average daily net assets of the Evergreen money market funds increase.

Evergreen Service Company, LLC (“ESC”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia, is the transfer and dividend disbursing agent for the Fund. ESC receives account fees that vary based on the type of account held by the shareholders in the Fund.

4. DISTRIBUTION PLANS

EIS also serves as distributor of the Fund’s shares. The Fund has adopted Distribution Plans, as allowed by Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act, for each class of shares, except Class I. Under the

19


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

Distribution Plans, distribution fees are paid at an annual rate of 0.30% of the average daily net assets for Class A shares and 0.60% of the average daily net assets for Class S shares.

5. SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS

On January 31, 2006, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes for the Fund was the same as for financial reporting purposes.

6. INTERFUND LENDING

Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the SEC, the Fund may participate in an interfund lending program with certain funds in the Evergreen fund family. This program allows the Fund to borrow from other participating funds. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the Fund did not participate in the interfund lending program.

7. DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS

As of January 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis consisted of undistributed exempt-interest income in the amount of $5,343. Additionally, short-term capital gains are considered ordinary income for income tax purposes.

The tax character of distributions paid was as follows:

    Year Ended January 31, 

         2006    2005 

Ordinary Income    $    32,533    $ 6,553 
Exempt-Interest Income        3,249,324    892,805 
Long-term Capital Gain        1,625    2,376 


8. EXPENSE REDUCTIONS

Through expense offset arrangements with ESC and the Fund’s custodian, a portion of fund expenses has been reduced

9. DEFERRED TRUSTEES’ FEES

Each Trustee of the Fund may defer any or all compensation related to performance of their duties as Trustees. The Trustees’ deferred balances are allocated to deferral accounts, which are included in the accrued expenses for the Fund. The investment performance of the deferral accounts is based on the investment performance of certain Evergreen funds. Any gains earned or losses incurred in the deferral accounts are reported in the Fund’s Trustees’ fees and expenses. At the election of the Trustees, the deferral account will be paid either in one lump sum or in quarterly installments for up to ten years.

10. FINANCING AGREEMENT

The Fund and certain other Evergreen funds share in a $150 million unsecured revolving credit commitment for temporary and emergency purposes, including the funding of redemptions, as permitted by each participating fund’s borrowing restrictions. Borrowings under this facility bear

20


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

interest at 0.50% per annum above the Federal Funds rate. All of the participating funds are charged an annual commitment fee of 0.09% of the unused balance, which is allocated pro rata. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the Fund had no borrowings under this agreement.

11. CONCENTRATION OF RISK

The Fund invests a substantial portion of its assets in issuers of municipal debt securities located in a single state, therefore, it may be more affected by economic and political developments in that state or region than would be a comparable general tax-exempt mutual fund.

12. REGULATORY MATTERS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Since September 2003, governmental and self-regulatory authorities have instituted numerous ongoing investigations of various practices in the mutual fund industry, including investigations relating to revenue sharing, market-timing, late trading and record retention, among other things. The investigations cover investment advisors, distributors and transfer agents to mutual funds, as well as other firms. EIMC, EIS and ESC (collectively, “Evergreen”) have received subpoenas and other requests for documents and testimony relating to these investigations, are endeavoring to comply with those requests, and are cooperating with the investigations. Evergreen is continuing its own internal review of policies, practices, procedures and personnel, and is taking remedial action where appropriate.

In connection with one of these investigations, on July 28, 2004, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) informed Evergreen that the staff intends to recommend to the SEC that it institute an enforcement action against Evergreen. The SEC staff’s proposed allegations relate to (i) an arrangement pursuant to which a broker at one of EIMC’s affiliated broker-dealers had been authorized, apparently by an EIMC officer (no longer with EIMC), to engage in short-term trading, on behalf of a client, in Evergreen Mid Cap Growth Fund (formerly Evergreen Emerging Growth Fund and prior to that, known as Evergreen Small Company Growth Fund) during the period from December 2000 through April 2003, in excess of the limitations set forth in the fund’s prospectus, (ii) short-term trading from September 2001 through January 2003, by a former Evergreen portfolio manager, of Evergreen Precious Metals Fund, a fund he managed at the time, (iii) the sufficiency of systems for monitoring exchanges and enforcing exchange limitations as stated in the fund’s prospectuses, and (iv) the adequacy of e-mail retention practices. In connection with the activity in Evergreen Mid Cap Growth Fund, EIMC reimbursed the fund $378,905, plus an additional $25,242, representing what EIMC calculated at that time to be the client’s net gain and the fees earned by EIMC and the expenses incurred by this fund on the client’s account. In connection with the activity in Evergreen Precious Metals Fund, EIMC reimbursed the fund $70,878, plus an additional $3,075, representing what EIMC calculated at that time to be the portfolio manager’s net gain and the fees earned by EIMC and expenses incurred by the fund on the portfolio manager’s account. Evergreen is currently engaged in discussions with the staff of the SEC concerning its recommendation.

21


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

The staff of the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) had notified EIS that it has made a preliminary determination to recommend that disciplinary action be brought against EIS for certain violations of the NASD’s rules. The recommendation relates principally to allegations that EIS (i) arranged for fund portfolio trades to be directed to broker-dealers (including Wachovia Securities, LLC, an affiliate of EIS) that sold Evergreen fund shares during the period of January 2001 to December 2003 and (ii) provided non-cash compensation by sponsoring offsite meetings attended by Wachovia Securities, LLC brokers during that period. EIS is cooperating with the NASD staff in its review of these matters.

Any resolution of these matters with regulatory authorities may include, but not be limited to, sanctions, penalties or injunctions regarding Evergreen, restitution to mutual fund shareholders and/or other financial penalties and structural changes in the governance or management of Evergreen’s mutual fund business. Any penalties or restitution will be paid by Evergreen and not by the Evergreen funds.

In addition, the Evergreen funds and EIMC and certain of its affiliates are involved in various legal actions, including private litigation and class action lawsuits. EIMC does not expect that any of such legal actions currently pending or threatened will have a material adverse impact on the financial position or operations of any of the Evergreen funds or on EIMC’s ability to provide services to the Evergreen funds.

Although Evergreen believes that neither the foregoing investigations nor any pending or threatened legal actions will have a material adverse impact on the Evergreen funds, there can be no assurance that these matters and any publicity surrounding or resulting from them will not result in reduced sales or increased redemptions of Evergreen fund shares, which could increase Evergreen fund transaction costs or operating expenses, or have other adverse consequences on the Evergreen funds.

22


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Trustees and Shareholders
Evergreen Money Market Trust

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, of the Evergreen California Municipal Money Market Fund, a series of Evergreen Money Market Trust, as of January 31, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and finan-cial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of January 31, 2006 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, or by other appropriate auditing procedures where replies from brokers were not received. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Evergreen California Municipal Money Market Fund, as of January 31, 2006, the results of its operations, changes in its net assets and financial highlights for each of the years or periods described above in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Boston, Massachusetts
March 24, 2006

23


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited)

FEDERAL TAX DISTRIBUTIONS

Pursuant to Section 852 of the Internal Revenue Code, the Fund has designated aggregate capital gain distributions of $1,625 for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006.

For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, the percentage representing the portion of distributions from net investment income, which is exempt from federal income tax, other than alternative minimum tax and California state income tax is 98.96% .

24


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT
ADVISORY AGREEMENT

Each year, the Fund’s Board of Trustees is required to consider whether to continue in place the Fund’s investment advisory agreement. In September 2005, the Trustees, including a majority of the Trustees who are not interested persons (as that term is defined in the 1940 Act) of the Fund or of EIMC, approved the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement.

At the same time, the Trustees considered the continuation of the investment advisory agreements for all of the Evergreen funds, and the description below refers in many cases to the Trustees’ process and conclusions in connection with their consideration of this matter for all of the Evergreen funds. In all of its deliberations, the Board of Trustees and the disinterested Trustees were advised by independent counsel to the disinterested Trustees and counsel to the Evergreen funds.

The review process. The 1940 Act requires that the Board of Trustees request and evaluate, and that EIMC furnish, such information as may reasonably be necessary to evaluate the terms of the Fund’s advisory agreement. The review process began formally in spring 2005, when a committee of the Board (the “Committee”), working with EIMC management, determined generally the types of information the Board would review and set a timeline for the review process. In late spring, counsel to the disinterested Trustees sent to EIMC a formal request for information to be furnished to the Trustees. In addition, the independent data provider Lipper Inc. (“Lipper”) was engaged to provide fund-specific and industry-wide data to the Board containing information of a nature and in a format generally prescribed by the Committee.

The Trustees reviewed EIMC’s responses to the request for information, with the assistance of counsel for the disinterested Trustees and for the Evergreen funds and an independent industry consultant retained by the disinterested Trustees, and requested and received additional information following that review. The Committee met in person with the representatives of EIMC in early September 2005. At a meeting of the full Board of Trustees later in September 2005, the Committee reported the results of its discussions with EIMC, and the full Board met with representatives of EIMC, engaged in further review of the materials provided to them, and approved the continuation of each of the advisory and sub-advisory agreements.

The disinterested Trustees discussed the continuation of the Fund’s advisory agreement with representatives of EIMC and in multiple private sessions with legal counsel at which no personnel of EIMC were present. In considering the continuation of the agreement, the Trustees did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each Trustee attributed different weights to various factors. The Trustees evaluated information provided to them both in terms of the Evergreen mutual funds generally and with respect to the Fund specifically as they considered appropriate; although the Trustees considered the continuation of the agreement as part of the larger process of considering the continuation of the advisory contracts for all of the Evergreen funds, their determination to continue the advisory agreement for each of the Evergreen funds was ultimately made on a fund-by-fund basis.

25


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

This summary describes the most important, but not necessarily all, of the factors considered by the Board and the disinterested Trustees.

Information reviewed. The Board of Trustees and committees of the Board of Trustees meet periodically during the course of the year. At those meetings, the Board receives a wide variety of information regarding the services performed by EIMC, the investment performance of the Fund and the other Evergreen funds, and other aspects of the business and operations of the Evergreen funds. At those meetings, and in the process of considering the continuation of the agreements, the Trustees considered information regarding, for example, the Fund’s investment results; the portfolio management team for the Fund and the experience of the members of that team, and any recent changes in the membership of the team; portfolio trading practices; compliance by the Fund and EIMC with applicable laws and regulations and with the Fund’s and EIMC’s compliance policies and procedures; services provided by affiliates of EIMC to the Fund and shareholders of the Fund; and other information relating to the nature, extent, and quality of services provided by EIMC. The Trustees considered the rates at which the Fund pays investment advisory fees, the total expense ratio of the Fund, and the efforts generally by EIMC and its affil-iates as sponsors of the Fund. The data provided by Lipper showed the fees paid by the Fund and the Fund’s total expense ratio in comparison to other similar mutual funds, in addition to data regarding the investment performance by the Fund in comparison to other similar mutual funds. The Trustees were assisted by the independent industry consultant in reviewing the information presented to them.

The Board also considered that EIS serves as administrator to the Fund and receives a fee for its services as administrator. In their comparison of the advisory fee paid by the Fund with those paid by other mutual funds, the Board took into account administrative fees paid by the Fund and those other mutual funds. The Board considered that affiliates of EIMC serve as transfer agent and distributor to the Fund and receive fees from the Fund for those services, and received information regarding recent reductions in the transfer agency fees paid by the Fund. They considered other so-called “fall-out” benefits to EIMC and its affiliates due to their other relationships with the Evergreen funds, including, for example, soft-dollar services received by EIMC attributable to transactions entered into by EIMC for the benefit of the Evergreen funds and brokerage commissions received by Wachovia Securities LLC, an affiliate of EIMC, from transactions effected by it for the Evergreen funds.

The Board of Trustees also considered that certain of the money market funds managed by EIMC are offered in connection with cash sweep arrangements and similar services made available by affiliates of EIMC to their customers. The Trustees considered that EIMC and its affiliates benefit from the availability of those Evergreen funds and the distribution and shareholder services fees paid by those Evergreen funds.

Nature and quality of the services provided. The Trustees considered that EIMC and its affili-ates provide a comprehensive investment management service to the Fund. They noted that EIMC formulates and implements an investment program for the Fund. They noted that EIMC makes its personnel available to serve as officers of the Evergreen funds, and concluded that the

26


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

reporting and management functions provided by EIMC with respect to the Fund and the Evergreen funds overall were generally satisfactory. The Trustees considered the investment philosophy of the Fund’s portfolio management team, and considered the in-house research capabilities of EIMC and its affiliates, as well as other resources available to EIMC, including research services available to it from third parties. The Board considered the managerial and financial resources available to EIMC, and the commitment that the Wachovia organization has made to the Fund and the Evergreen funds generally. On the basis of these factors, they determined that the nature and scope of the services provided by EIMC were consistent with its duties under the investment advisory agreements and appropriate and consistent with the investment programs and best interests of the Fund.

The Trustees noted the commitment and resources EIMC and its affiliates have brought to the regulatory, compliance, accounting, tax and tax reporting, and shareholder servicing functions, and the number and quality of staff committed to those functions, which they concluded were appropriate and generally in line with EIMC’s responsibilities to the Fund and to the Evergreen funds generally. They noted that EIMC had enhanced a number of these functions in recent periods and continued to do so, in light of regulatory developments in the investment management and mutual fund industries generally and in light of regulatory matters involving EIMC and its affiliates. They concluded that those enhancements appeared generally appropriate, but considered that the enhancement process is an on-going one and determined to continue to monitor developments in these functions in coming periods for appropriateness and consistency with regulatory and industry developments. The Board and the disinterested Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the Fund’s advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by EIMC, including services provided by EIS under its administrative services agreement with the Fund.

Investment performance. The Trustees considered the investment performance of each of the Evergreen funds, both by comparison to other comparable mutual funds and to broad market indices. The Trustees emphasized that the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for an Evergreen fund should not be taken as any indication that the Trustees did not believe investment performance for any specific fund might not be improved, and they noted that they would continue to monitor closely the investment performance of the Evergreen funds going forward. Specifically with respect to the Fund, the Trustees noted that the Class A shares of the Fund performed in the third quintile (but above the median) over the recently completed one-year period and performed in the second quintile over the recently completed three-year period.

Advisory and administrative fees. The Trustees recognized that EIMC does not seek to provide the lowest cost investment advisory service, but to provide a high quality, full-service investment management product at a reasonable price. They also noted that EIMC has generally attempted to make its investment advisory fees consistent with industry norms. The Trustees noted that, from the materials presented, it appeared that the combination of investment advisory and administrative fees paid by the Fund to EIMC and EIS with respect to Class A shares was the highest of the fees paid by comparable funds (though not significantly above its nearest compa-

27


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

rable fund), although the Trustees concluded that the fees were not unreasonable in light of the Fund’s investment performance and the services provided by EIMC and EIS.

The Trustees noted that EIMC does not provide services to other clients using the same investment strategy as it uses in managing the Fund.

Economies of scale. The Trustees noted that economies of scale would likely be achieved by EIMC in managing the Evergreen funds as the funds grow. The Trustees noted that the Fund had implemented breakpoints in its advisory fee structure. The Trustees undertook to continue to review the appropriate levels of breakpoints in the future, but concluded that the breakpoints as implemented appeared to be a reasonable step toward the realization of economies of scale by the funds.

Profitability. The Trustees considered information provided to them regarding the profitability to the EIMC organization of the investment advisory, administration, and transfer agency fees paid to EIMC and its affiliates by each of the Evergreen funds. They considered that the information provided to them was necessarily estimated. They noted that the levels of profitability of the Evergreen funds to EIMC varied widely, depending on among other things the size and type of fund. They noted that all of the estimates provided to them were calculated on a pre-tax basis. They considered the profitability of the Evergreen funds in light of such factors as, for example, the information they had received regarding the relation of the fees paid by the Evergreen funds to those paid by other mutual funds, the investment performance of the Evergreen funds, and the amount of revenues involved. In light of these factors, the Trustees did not consider that the profitability of any of the Evergreen funds, individually or in the aggregate, was such as to prevent their approving the continuation of the agreements.

In connection with their review of the Fund’s investment advisory and administrative fees, the Trustees also considered the transfer agency fees paid by the Evergreen funds to an affiliate of EIMC. They reviewed information presented to them showing generally that the transfer agency fees charged to the Evergreen funds were generally consistent with industry norms, and that transfer agency fees for a number of Evergreen funds had recently declined, or were expected to in the near future.

28


This page left intentionally blank

29


This page left intentionally blank

30


This page left intentionally blank

31


TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS

TRUSTEES1

Charles A. Austin III    Investment Counselor, Anchor Capital Advisors, Inc. (investment advice); Director, The Andover 
Trustee    Companies (insurance); Trustee, Arthritis Foundation of New England; Former Director, The 
DOB: 10/23/1934    Francis Ouimet Society; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust; Former 
Term of office since: 1991    Investment Counselor, Appleton Partners, Inc. (investment advice); Former Director, Executive 
Other directorships: None   Vice President and Treasurer, State Street Research & Management Company (investment 
    advice) 

 
Shirley L. Fulton    Partner, Tin, Fulton, Greene & Owen, PLLC (law firm); Former Partner, Helms, Henderson & 
Trustee    Fulton, P.A. (law firm); Retired Senior Resident Superior Court Judge, 26th Judicial District, 
DOB: 1/10/1952    Charlotte, NC 
Term of office since: 2004     
Other directorships: None     

 
K. Dun Gifford    Chairman and President, Oldways Preservation and Exchange Trust (education); Trustee, 
Trustee    Treasurer and Chairman of the Finance Committee, Cambridge College; Former Trustee, Mentor 
DOB: 10/23/1938    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1974     
Other directorships: None     

 
Dr. Leroy Keith, Jr.    Partner, Stonington Partners, Inc. (private equity fund); Trustee, Phoenix Funds Family; Director, 
Trustee    Diversapack Co.; Director, Obagi Medical Products Co.; Former Director, Lincoln Educational 
DOB: 2/14/1939    Services; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1983     
Other directorships: Trustee, The     
Phoenix Group of Mutual Funds     

 
Gerald M. McDonnell    Manager of Commercial Operations, SMI Steel Co. – South Carolina (steel producer); Former 
Trustee    Sales and Marketing Manager, Nucor Steel Company; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash 
DOB: 7/14/1939    Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1988     
Other directorships: None     

 
William Walt Pettit    Vice President, Kellam & Pettit, P.A. (law firm); Director, Superior Packaging Corp.; Director, 
Trustee    National Kidney Foundation of North Carolina, Inc.; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash 
DOB: 8/26/1955    Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     

 
David M. Richardson    President, Richardson, Runden LLC (executive recruitment business development/consulting 
Trustee    company); Consultant, Kennedy Information, Inc. (executive recruitment information and 
DOB: 9/19/1941    research company); Consultant, AESC (The Association of Executive Search Consultants); 
Term of office since: 1982    Director, J&M Cumming Paper Co. (paper merchandising); Former Trustee, NDI Technologies, LLP 
Other directorships: None    (communications); Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 

 
Dr. Russell A. Salton III    President/CEO, AccessOne MedCard; Former Medical Director, Healthcare Resource Associates, 
Trustee    Inc.; Former Medical Director, U.S. Health Care/Aetna Health Services; Former Trustee, Mentor 
DOB: 6/2/1947    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     


32


TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS continued

Michael S. Scofield    Director and Chairman, Branded Media Corporation (multi-media branding company); Attorney, 
Trustee    Law Offices of Michael S. Scofield; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
DOB: 2/20/1943     
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     

 
Richard J. Shima    Independent Consultant; Trustee, Saint Joseph College (CT); Director, Hartford Hospital; Trustee, 
Trustee    Greater Hartford YMCA; Former Director, Trust Company of CT; Former Director, Enhance 
DOB: 8/11/1939    Financial Services, Inc.; Former Director, Old State House Association; Former Trustee, Mentor 
Term of office since: 1993    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Other directorships: None     

 
Richard K. Wagoner, CFA2    Member and Former President, North Carolina Securities Traders Association; Member, Financial 
Trustee    Analysts Society; Former Consultant to the Boards of Trustees of the Evergreen funds; Former 
DOB: 12/12/1937    Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1999     
Other directorships: None     

 
 
OFFICERS     
 
Dennis H. Ferro3    Principal occupations: President and Chief Executive Officer, Evergreen Investment Company, 
President    Inc. and Executive Vice President, Wachovia Bank, N.A.; former Chief Investment Officer, 
DOB: 6/20/1945    Evergreen Investment Company, Inc. 
Term of office since: 2003     

 
Jeremy DePalma4    Principal occupations: Vice President, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc.; Former Assistant Vice 
Treasurer    President, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. 
DOB: 2/5/1974     
Term of office since: 2005     

 
Michael H. Koonce4    Principal occupations: Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Evergreen Investment 
Secretary    Services, Inc.; Senior Vice President and Assistant General Counsel, Wachovia Corporation 
DOB: 4/20/1960     
Term of office since: 2000     

 
James Angelos4    Principal occupations: Chief Compliance Officer and Senior Vice President, Evergreen Funds; 
Chief Compliance Officer    Former Director of Compliance, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. 
DOB: 9/2/1947     
Term of office since: 2004     


1 Each Trustee serves until a successor is duly elected or qualified or until his/her death, resignation, retirement or removal from office. Each Trustee oversees 90 Evergreen funds. Correspondence for each Trustee may be sent to Evergreen Board of Trustees, P.O. Box 20083, Charlotte, NC 28202.

2 Mr. Wagoner is an “interested person” of the Fund because of his ownership of shares in Wachovia Corporation, the parent to the Fund’s investment advisor.

3 The address of the Officer is 401 S. Tryon Street, 20th Floor, Charlotte, NC 28288.

4 The address of the Officer is 200 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116.

Additional information about the Fund’s Board of Trustees and Officers can be found in the Statement of Additional Information (SAI) and is available upon request without charge by calling 800.343.2898.

33



565215 rv3 3/2006


Evergreen Florida Municipal Money Market Fund



    table of contents 
1    LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS 
4    FUND AT A GLANCE 
6    ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES 
7    FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 
10    SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS 
16    STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES 
17    STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS 
18    STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS 
19    NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
24    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 
25    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
32    TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS 

This annual report must be preceded or accompanied by a prospectus of the Evergreen fund contained herein. The prospectus contains more complete information, including fees and expenses, and should be read carefully before investing or sending money.

The fund will file its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q will be available on the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, the fund’s Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800.SEC.0330.

A description of the fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures, as well as information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, is available by visiting our Web site at EvergreenInvestments.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov. The fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures are also available without charge, upon request, by calling 800.343.2898.

Mutual Funds:         
NOT FDIC INSURED    MAY LOSE VALUE    NOT BANK GUARANTEED 

Evergreen InvestmentsSM is a service mark of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC.
Copyright 2006, Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC.

Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC is a subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation
and is an affiliate of Wachovia Corporation's other Broker Dealer subsidiaries.

Evergreen mutual funds are distributed by Evergreen Investment Services, Inc.
200 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS

March 2006


Dennis H. Ferro
President and Chief
Executive Officer

Dear Shareholder,

We are pleased to provide the annual report for the Evergreen Florida Municipal Money Market Fund, which covers the twelvemonth period ended January 31, 2006.

The U.S. financial markets had to navigate through some choppy seas during the past twelve months. Uncertainty was prevalent as questions surfaced about the sustainability of economic growth, tighter monetary policy, surging oil prices, moderating profit growth, and an increase in inflation. Geopolitical tensions continued and the Gulf region suffered enormous damage from the hurricanes. Not surprisingly, each of these events combined at various times during the year to increase market volatility. Throughout these turbulent times, the portfolio management teams of Evergreen’s money market funds employed a variety of strategies to manage portfolios in a rising yield environment and enhance portfolio returns, in both the taxable and tax-advantaged markets.

Over the course of the investment period, economic reports frequently delivered confusing signals. While growth was expected to moderate as the expansion matured, the economy showed surprising strength, particularly in the third quarter, as Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) grew in excess of 4%, despite the hurricanes and the spike in inflation. The effects of higher energy prices and tighter monetary policy became evident in the last quarter of 2005 as initial readings for GDP growth barely exceeded 1%. The conflicting data was often subject to interpretation and the consequence for investors was a frequent bout of market volatility. While many debated whether or not

1


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS continued

the short-term volatility was an indication of pending weakness, Evergreen’s Investment Strategy Committee focused on the breadth of economic output, particularly personal consumption and capital investment. Though the rate of growth in each was moderating from unusually high levels, we believed it would lead to a more sustainable, and ultimately less inflationary, pace for the expansion. The fundamentals, though no longer great, were still pretty good in our view, and our portfolio teams based many of their investment decisions on these positive macro-economic trends.

Despite the mixed signals from the economy, the Federal Reserve (“Fed”) maintained its strategy of gradually raising short-term interest rates. Considering that monetary policy had been stimulative for most of the prior three years, central bankers were determined in their efforts to prevent alarming increases in inflation, raising their target for the federal funds rate by twenty-five basis points at every policy meeting over the past year. Yet long-term market interest rates continued to decline and the extent of the yield curve’s flattening had many on Wall Street debating its meaning. Given our forecast for more moderate levels of growth in consumption and investment supporting a sustainable expansion, we viewed the yield curve’s message as confidence in the Fed’s ability to prevent long-term inflation. In addition, higher oil prices would likely serve to dampen output and we believed the absence of significant wage pressures would enable the Fed to continue on with its less stimulative, rather than more restrictive, path for monetary policy.

In this environment, the portfolio managers of Evergreen’s money market funds attempted to focus on the aforementioned market fundamentals, as well as the timing of Fed meetings. Each increase in the Fed’s target for its benchmark rate would result in a “resetting” of rates at the short end of the yield curve, enabling the teams to pursue higher income potential. In addition, many of our analysts and portfolio managers used a variety of short-term securities to capture yield, in

2


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS continued

order to provide our investors with the stability and liquidity necessary to balance exposure within their diversified long-term portfolios.

We continue to recommend that investors maintain their diversified strategies, including exposure to money market funds, within their long-term portfolios.

Please visit our Web site, EvergreenInvestments.com, for more information about our funds and other investment products available to you. Thank you for your continued support of Evergreen Investments.

Sincerely,


Dennis H. Ferro
President and Chief Executive Officer
Evergreen Investment Company, Inc.

 

Special Notice to Shareholders:

Please visit our Web site at EvergreenInvestments.com for a statement from President and Chief Executive Officer, Dennis Ferro, addressing NASD actions involving Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. (EIS), Evergreen’s mutual fund distributor or statements from Dennis Ferro and Chairman of the Board of the Evergreen funds, Michael S. Scofield, addressing SEC actions involving the Evergreen funds.

3


FUND AT A GLANCE

as of January 31, 2006

 

MANAGEMENT TEAM

Investment Advisor:

Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC

Portfolio Managers:

Mathew M. Kiselak

• James Randazzo

 

PERFORMANCE AND RETURNS*

Portfolio inception date: 10/26/1998

    Class A    Class S    Class I 
Class inception date    10/26/1998    6/30/2000    12/29/1998 

Nasdaq symbol    EFIXX    N/A    EFMXX 

Average annual return             

1-year    1.88%    1.58%    2.19% 

5-year    1.18%    0.88%    1.49% 

Since portfolio inception    1.75%    1.52%    2.05% 

7-day annualized yield    2.27%    1.97%    2.57% 

30-day annualized yield    2.27%    1.97%    2.57% 


* The yield quotation more closely reflects the current earnings of the fund than the total return quotation.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The performance quoted represents past performance and current performance may be lower or higher. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that investors’ shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month-end for Classes A or I, please go to EvergreenInvestments.com/fundperformance. Please call 1.800.343.2898 for the most recent month-end performance information for Class S. The performance of each class may vary based on differences in fees and expenses paid by the shareholders investing in each class. Performance includes the reinvestment of income dividends and capital gain distributions.

Historical performance shown for Classes S and I prior to their inception is based on the performance of Class A, the original class offered. The historical returns for Classes S and I have not been adjusted to reflect the effect of each class’ 12b-1 fee. These fees are 0.30% for Class A and 0.60% for Class S. Class I does not pay a 12b-1 fee. If these fees had been reflected, returns for Class S would have been lower while returns for Class I would have been higher.

The advisor is waiving a portion of its advisory fee. Had the fee not been waived, returns would have been lower. Returns reflect expense limits previously in effect for Class S, without which returns for Class S would have been lower.

An investment in a money market fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund.

4


FUND AT A GLANCE continued

7-DAY ANNUALIZED YIELD


Class I shares are only offered in the following manner: (1) to investment advisory clients of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC (or its advisory affiliates) when purchased by such advisor(s) on behalf of its clients, (2) through arrangements entered into on behalf of the Evergreen funds with certain financial services firms, (3) to certain institutional investors and (4) to persons who owned Class Y shares in registered name in an Evergreen fund on or before December 31, 1994 or who owned shares of any SouthTrust fund in registered name as of March 18, 2005 or shares of Vestaur Securities Fund as of May 20, 2005.

Class I shares are only available to institutional shareholders with a minimum of $1 million investment, which may be waived in certain situations.

Class S shares are sold through certain broker dealers and financial institutions which have selling agreements with the fund’s distributor.

The fund’s investment objective is nonfundamental and may be changed without a vote of the fund’s shareholders.

Funds that concentrate their investments in a single state may face increased risk of price fluctuation over less concentrated funds due to adverse developments within that state.

The fund’s yield will fluctuate and there can be no guarantee that the fund will achieve its objective or any particular tax-exempt yield. Income may be subject to federal alternative minimum tax as well as local income taxes.

Yields are based on net investment income for the stated periods and annualized.

All data is as of January 31, 2006, and subject to change.

5


ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES

The Example below is intended to describe the fees and expenses borne by shareholders and the impact of those costs on your investment.

Example

As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads), redemption fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) fees and other fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from August 1, 2005 to January 31, 2006.

The example illustrates your fund’s costs in two ways:

• Actual expenses

The section in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in these columns, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class, in the column entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

• Hypothetical example for comparison purposes

The section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees or exchange fees. Therefore, the section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

    Beginning    Ending     
    Account    Account    Expenses 
    Value    Value    Paid During 
    8/1/2005    1/31/2006    Period* 

Actual             
Class A    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,010.74    $ 4.11 
Class S    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,009.22    $ 5.62 
Class I    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,012.27    $ 2.59 
Hypothetical             
(5% return             
before expenses)             
Class A    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,021.12    $ 4.13 
Class S    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,019.61    $ 5.65 
Class I    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,022.63    $ 2.60 


* For each class of the Fund, expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of each class (0.81% for Class A, 1.11% for Class S and 0.51% for Class I), multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184 / 365 days.

6


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS A    2006    2005    2004    2003    2002 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00        $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Income from investment operations                     
Net investment income (loss)         0.02         0.01    0         0.01         0.02 

Distributions to shareholders from                     
Net investment income       (0.02)       (0.01)    01       (0.01)       (0.02) 

Net asset value, end of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00       $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Total return         1.88%         0.62%     0.49%         0.89%         2.03% 

Ratios and supplemental data                     
Net assets, end of period (thousands)    $17,386    $18,368          $27,758    $30,804    $60,484 
Ratios to average net assets                     
   Expenses including waivers/reimbursements                    
        but excluding expense reductions         0.81%         0.82%     0.83%         0.87%         0.86% 
   Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements                    
        and expense reductions         0.83%         0.84%     0.83%         0.87%         0.86% 
   Net investment income (loss)         1.84%         0.61%     0.48%         0.79%         1.89% 


1 Amount represents less than $0.005 per share.

See Notes to Financial Statements

7


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS S    2006    2005    2004    2003    2002 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00       $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Income from investment operations                     
Net investment income (loss)           0.02    0    0           0.01           0.02 

Distributions to shareholders from                     
Net investment income         (0.02)    01    01         (0.01)         (0.02) 

Net asset value, end of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00        $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Total return           1.58%    0.32%     0.20%           0.59%           1.73% 

Ratios and supplemental data                     
Net assets, end of period (thousands)    $460,726    $442,868       $259,620    $242,800    $206,592 
Ratios to average net assets                     
   Expenses including waivers/reimbursements                    
      but excluding expense reductions           1.11%    1.11%     1.12%           1.17%           1.15% 
   Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements                    
      and expense reductions           1.13%    1.14%     1.14%           1.17%           1.15% 
   Net investment income (loss)           1.52%    0.37%     0.20%           0.52%           1.58% 


1 Amount represents less than $0.005 per share.

See Notes to Financial Statements

8


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS I1    2006    2005    2004    2003    2002 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00     $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $1.00 

Income from investment operations                     
Net investment income (loss)         0.02         0.01    0.01       0.01     0.02 

Distributions to shareholders from                     
Net investment income       (0.02)       (0.01)    (0.01)     (0.01)    (0.02) 

Net asset value, end of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00       $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $1.00 

Total return         2.19%         0.92%    0.79%       1.20%     2.34% 

Ratios and supplemental data                     
Net assets, end of period (thousands)    $32,778    $37,692         $6,699    $2,785    $ 260 
Ratios to average net assets                     
   Expenses including waivers/reimbursements                    
      but excluding expense reductions         0.51%         0.52%    0.56%       0.57%     0.51% 
   Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements                    
      and expense reductions         0.53%         0.54%    0.56%       0.57%     0.51% 
   Net investment income (loss)         2.16%         1.10%    0.78%       0.99%     2.20% 


1 Effective at the close of business on May 11, 2001, Class Y sh ares were renamed as Institutional shares (Class I).

See Notes to Financial Statements

9


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

 
COMMERCIAL PAPER 0.5%             
Special Tax 0.5%             
Hillsborough Cnty., FL Capital Impt. Program, Ser. A, 2.90%, 06/15/2006             
     (cost $2,500,000)    $ 2,500,000    $    2,500,000 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS 99.0%             
AIRPORT 10.7%             
Greater Orlando Aviation Auth. RB, Flight Safety Proj.:             
     Ser. A, 3.08%, VRDN, (Gtd. by Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.)    3,100,000        3,100,000 
     Ser. B, 3.08%, VRDN, (Gtd. by Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.)    3,000,000        3,000,000 
Hillsborough Cnty., FL Aviation Auth. RB:             
     Delta Airlines Proj., 3.05%, VRDN, (Liq.: GE Capital Corp.)    8,300,000        8,300,000 
     Ser. 1060, 3.09%, VRDN, (Liq.: Morgan Stanley)    3,600,000        3,600,000 
Miami-Dade Cnty., FL IDA Arpt. Facs. RB, Flight Safety Proj.:             
     Ser. A, 3.23%, VRDN, (Gtd. by Boeing Co.)    16,910,000        16,910,000 
     Ser. B, 3.23%, VRDN, (Gtd. by Boeing Co.)    19,030,000        19,030,000 
Miami-Dade Cnty., FL Intl. Arpt. Proj. MSTR, 3.05%, VRDN, (SPA: Societe             
     Generale)    900,000        900,000 

            54,840,000 

CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY 1.7%             
Bay Cnty., FL RB, Methodist Home for Aging, 3.29%, VRDN, (Insd. by FHLB)    7,885,000        7,885,000 
Orange Cnty., FL Hlth. Facs. Auth. RB, Hlth. Facs. Svcs., Inc. Proj., 2.97%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: SunTrust Banks, Inc.)    830,000        830,000 

            8,715,000 

EDUCATION 7.2%             
Brevard Cnty., FL Sch. Board COP, Ser. 638, 3.06%, VRDN, (LOC: JPMorgan             
     Chase & Co.)    2,490,000        2,490,000 
Florida Board of Ed. MSTR, Class A, 2.99%, VRDN, (SPA: AMBAC & Liq.: Bear             
     Stearns Cos.)    14,000,000        14,000,000 
Palm Beach Cnty., FL Edl. Facs. RB, Atlantic College Proj., 3.07%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     Bank of America Corp.)    9,400,000        9,400,000 
University of South Florida Research Foundation RB, Univ. Tech. Proj.:             
     Ser. A, 2.95%, VRDN, (LOC: SunTrust Banks, Inc.)    400,000        400,000 
     Ser. B, 3.07%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America Corp.)    1,200,000        1,200,000 
Volusia Cnty., FL Edl. Facs. Auth. RB:             
     PFOTER, 3.05%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    6,310,000        6,310,000 
     ROC, 3.07%, VRDN, (LOC: Citibank)    3,125,000        3,125,000 

            36,925,000 

GENERAL OBLIGATION - LOCAL 2.0%             
Miami-Dade Cnty., FL GO, ROC, 3.06%, VRDN, (LOC: Citibank)    7,580,000        7,580,000 
Wildgrass, CO GO, 3.60%, VRDN, (LOC: Compass Bank, Inc.)    2,500,000        2,500,000 

            10,080,000 


See Notes to Financial Statements

10


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

 
MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
GENERAL OBLIGATION - STATE 4.6%             
Florida Board of Ed. GO:             
     ROC, 3.06%, VRDN, (LOC: Citibank)    $ 7,200,000    $    7,200,000 
     Ser. 137, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: JPMorgan Chase & Co.)    11,880,000        11,880,000 
Florida Dept. of Trans. GO, ROC, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: Citigroup, Inc.)    1,490,000        1,490,000 
Texas GO TRAN, 4.50%, 08/31/2006    3,000,000        3,025,250 

            23,595,250 

HOSPITAL 11.2%             
Highlands Cnty., FL Hlth. Facs. Auth. RB, Adventist Hlth. Sys. Proj.:             
     Ser. A, 3.04%, VRDN, (LOC: SunTrust Banks, Inc.)    300,000        300,000 
     Ser. C, 3.07%, VRDN, (Gtd. by Adventist Hlth. Sys.)    8,500,000        8,500,000 
Highlands Cnty., FL Hlth. Facs. Auth. RRB, Adventist Hlth. Sys. Proj., Ser. B, 3.03%,             
     VRDN, (LOC: SunTrust Banks, Inc.)    5,100,000        5,100,000 
Houston Cnty., AL Hlth. Care Facs. RB, PFOTER, 3.35%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch             
     & Co., Inc.)    3,000,000        3,000,000 
Indianapolis, IN Hlth. Facs. Fin. Auth. RB, Ascension Hlth. Credit Group, Ser. A,             
     2.50%, 03/01/2006, (Gtd. by Ascension Hlth. Credit Group)    3,050,000        3,049,768 
Jacksonville, FL IDRB, Univ. of Florida Hlth. & Science Ctr., 3.08%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     Bank of America Corp.)    800,000        800,000 
Miami, FL Hlth. Facs. Auth. PFOTER, Mercy Hosp. Proj., 3.11%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     WestLB AG)    32,995,000        32,995,000 
St. Lucie Cnty., FL IDA, Savannah Hosp. Proj., 3.05%, VRDN, (LOC: Canadian             
     Imperial Bank)    3,545,000        3,545,000 

            57,289,768 

HOUSING 28.4%             
Alachua Cnty., FL HFA RB, Univ. Cove Apts. Proj., 3.02%, VRDN, (LOC: SunTrust             
     Banks, Inc.)    3,970,000        3,970,000 
Brevard Cnty., FL HFA MHRB:             
     PFOTER, 3.10%, VRDN, (Insd. by FHLMC)    3,340,000        3,340,000 
     Shore View Apts. Proj., 3.10%, VRDN, (LOC: Harris Trust & Savings)    2,200,000        2,200,000 
Brevard Cnty., FL SFHRB PFOTER, 3.11%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    9,700,000        9,700,000 
Broward Cnty., FL HFA RB, Ser. 2000-C, 3.24%, VRDN, (LOC: Citibank)    5,000        5,000 
Broward Cnty., FL MHRB, Cypress Grove Apt., Ser. B, 3.52%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Citibank)    4,270,000        4,270,000 
Class B Revenue Bond Cert. Trust:             
     3.46%, VRDN, (Liq.: American Intl. Group, Inc.)    1,095,000        1,095,000 
     Ser. 2003-1, 2.65%, VRDN, (Liq.: American Intl. Group, Inc.)    6,530,000        6,530,000 
Clipper Tax-Exempt Cert. Trust COP:             
     Ser. 1999-2, 3.22%, VRDN, (SPA: State Street Corp.)    196,013        196,013 
     Ser. 2000-1, 3.14%, VRDN, (SPA: State Street Corp.)    7,408,000        7,408,000 
Florida Hsg. Fin. Corp. MHRB:             
     3.11%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    7,890,000        7,890,000 
     Lake Shore Apts. Proj., 3.10%, VRDN, (Insd. by FNMA)    5,900,000        5,900,000 
     Lee Vista Apts. Proj., 3.05%, VRDN, (Insd. by FHLMC)    17,810,000        17,810,000 
     Lynn Lake Apts. Proj., Ser. B1, 3.08%, VRDN, (Insd. by FHLMC)    9,500,000        9,500,000 
     Maitland Apts. Proj., 3.05%, VRDN, (Insd. by FHLMC)    19,665,000        19,665,000 
     Northbridge Apts. Proj., 3.05%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America Corp.)    6,500,000        6,500,000 

See Notes to Financial Statements

11


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

 
MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
HOUSING continued             
Hillsborough Cnty., FL HFA MHRB ROC, 3.10%, VRDN, (Insd. by FNMA)    $ 3,380,000    $    3,380,000 
MMA Finl. MHRB, Ser. B, Class A, 3.08%, VRDN, (LOC: SunTrust Banks, Inc.)    8,970,000        8,970,000 
Oakland, CA MHRB PFOTER, 3.45%, VRDN, (LOC: Lloyds TSB Group plc)    5,000,000        5,000,000 
Orange Cnty., FL Hsg. Fin. Mtge. RB, Lee Vista Club Apts., Ser. A, 3.07%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: AmSouth Bank)    500,000        500,000 
Osceola Cnty., FL HFA RB, Arrow Ridge Apts., Ser. A, 3.05%, VRDN, (Insd. by             
     FNMA)    2,970,000        2,970,000 
PFOTER, Class B:             
     2.40%, VRDN, (Insd. by FHLMC)    1,925,000        1,925,000 
     2.85%, VRDN, (LOC: Lloyds TSB Group plc)    2,725,000        2,725,000 
Pinellas Cnty., FL HFA PFOTER:             
     3.11%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    255,000        255,000 
     3.11%, VRDN, (SPA: Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale)    6,140,000        6,140,000 
Pinellas Cnty., FL HFA SFHRB, 3.11%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    1,565,000        1,565,000 
Volusia Cnty., FL HFA RB, Sunrise Pointe Apts., Ser. A, 3.03%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank             
     of America Corp.)    5,700,000        5,700,000 

            145,109,013 

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE 8.3%             
Alachua Cnty., FL IDRB, Florida Rock Proj., 3.07%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America             
     Corp.)    1,000,000        1,000,000 
Colorado HFA EDRB, Corey Bldg. Proj., Ser. A, 3.17%, VRDN, (LOC: Wells Fargo             
     & Co.)    1,530,000        1,530,000 
Dade Cnty., FL IDA RB, Quipp, Inc. Proj., 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America             
     Corp.)    450,000        450,000 
Escambia Cnty., FL IDRB, Daw’s Manufacturing Co., Inc. Proj., 3.17%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Bank of America Corp.)    3,305,000        3,305,000 
Florida Dev. Fin. Corp. IDRB:             
     Enterprise Bldg. Proj.:             
           Ser. A-1, 3.13%, VRDN, (LOC: SunTrust Banks, Inc.)    970,000        970,000 
           Ser. A-2, 3.08%, VRDN, (LOC: SunTrust Banks, Inc.)    630,000        630,000 
     Enterprise Triple Crown Trailers, Ser. 2002-C1, 3.13%, VRDN, (LOC: SunTrust             
           Banks, Inc.)    1,150,000        1,150,000 
     Fort Walton Proj., Ser. A-4, 3.13%, VRDN, (LOC: SunTrust Banks, Inc.)    745,000        745,000 
     Novelty Crystal Proj., 3.08%, VRDN, (LOC: SunTrust Banks, Inc.)    1,100,000        1,100,000 
     Plastics Components Proj., 3.08%, VRDN, (LOC: SunTrust Banks, Inc.)    850,000        850,000 
     Suncoast Bakeries Proj., Ser. A-1, 3.08%, VRDN, (LOC: SunTrust Banks, Inc.)    570,000        570,000 
Jacksonville, FL EDA IDRB:             
     Crown Products Co. Proj., Ser. 1998, 3.08%, VRDN, (LOC: SunTrust Banks,             
           Inc.)    800,000        800,000 
     Hartley Press, Inc., Ser. A, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America Corp.)    2,600,000        2,600,000 
Massachusetts IFA IDRB, Portland Causeway Proj., 3.20%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     Sovereign Bancorp, Inc.)    600,000        600,000 
Miami-Dade Cnty., FL IDA RB:             
     Friends of Lubavitch Proj., 2.99%, VRDN, (LOC: Union Planters Bank)    7,500,000        7,500,000 
     Reflectone, Inc. Proj., 3.03%, VRDN, (LOC: Royal Bank of Canada)    11,000,000        11,000,000 

See Notes to Financial Statements

12


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

 
MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE continued             
Pasco Cnty., FL IDRB, PAC-MED, Inc. Proj., 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America             
     Corp.)    $ 1,500,000    $    1,500,000 
Polk Cnty., FL IDA RB:             
     Citrus World, Inc., 3.27%, VRDN, (LOC: SunTrust Banks, Inc.)    1,000,000        1,000,000 
     Sun Orchard Florida, Inc. Proj., 3.13%, VRDN, (LOC: U.S. Bancorp)    1,545,000        1,545,000 
Sheboygan, WI IDRB, Vortex Liquid Color Proj., 3.27%, VRDN, (LOC: Associated             
     Banc-Corp.)    1,580,000        1,580,000 
Volusia Cnty., FL IDA RB, Ideal Spot Properties Proj., Ser. A, 3.07%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     Bank of America Corp.)    2,165,000        2,165,000 

            42,590,000 

LEASE 1.7%             
Orange Cnty., FL Sch. Board COP, Ser. 2000-328, 3.07%, VRDN, (Liq.: Morgan             
     Stanley)    350,000        350,000 
St. Lucie Cnty., FL Sch. Board Variable Rate Cert., 3.05%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of             
     New York Co.)    8,488,000        8,488,000 

            8,838,000 

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 6.2%             
Miami Dade Cnty., FL TOC, Ser. Z-9, 3.10%, VRDN, (Gtd. by Goldman Sachs             
     Group, Inc. & Insd. by MBIA)    13,000,000        13,000,000 
Palm Beach Cnty., FL RB, Jewish Cmnty. Campus Corp., 3.05%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     Northern Trust Corp.)    5,840,000        5,840,000 
Puerto Rico Govt. Dev. Bank Credit Enhanced CR, 3.25%, VRDN    10,000,000        10,000,000 
Valdez, AK Marine Terminal RB, ConocoPhillips Proj., 3.00%, VRDN, (Gtd.             
     by ConocoPhillips)    3,000,000        3,000,000 

            31,840,000 

PUBLIC FACILITIES 2.9%             
Hillsborough Cnty., FL Sch. Board COP, Ser. 2000-E, 3.17%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of             
     America Corp.)    4,590,000        4,590,000 
Miami-Dade Cnty., FL Sch. Board COP:             
     3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: Citigroup, Inc. & Insd. by FGIC)    4,565,000        4,565,000 
     3.06%, VRDN, (LOC: JPMorgan Chase & Co. & Insd. by FGIC)    3,100,000        3,100,000 
Palm Beach Cnty., FL Sch. Board COP, 3.06%, VRDN, (LOC: Citibank)    2,710,000        2,710,000 

            14,965,000 

RESOURCE RECOVERY 1.4%             
Broward Cnty., FL Resource Recovery RRB, Wheellabrator South-A, 5.00%,             
     12/01/2006    4,000,000        4,053,741 
Montana Board Resource Recovery RB, Colstrip Energy, LP Proj., 2.45%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Dexia SA)    2,865,000        2,865,000 

            6,918,741 


See Notes to Financial Statements

13


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

 
MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
SPECIAL TAX 3.8%             
ABN AMRO Munitops COP, Ser. 2002-24, 3.04%, VRDN, (LOC: ABN AMRO Bank)    $ 600,000    $    600,000 
Boynton Beach, FL Cmnty. Redev. Agcy. RB, Ser. 657, 3.06%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     JPMorgan Chase & Co. & Insd. by AMBAC)    1,590,000        1,590,000 
Collier Cnty., FL Gas Tax RB:             
     ROC, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: Citigroup, Inc. & Insd. by AMBAC)    5,375,000        5,375,000 
     Ser. 1240, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: JPMorgan Chase & Co. & Insd. by AMBAC)    5,305,000        5,305,000 
Florida Board of Ed. Lottery COP, Eagle Trust Cert., Ser. 2001-0904, 3.06%,             
     VRDN, (LOC: Citibank)    2,600,000        2,600,000 
Palm Beach Cnty., FL Pub. Impt. PFOTER, 3.05%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co.)    3,660,000        3,660,000 

            19,130,000 

TRANSPORTATION 1.2%             
Lee Cnty., FL Trans. Facs. RB:             
     PFOTER, 3.05%, VRDN, (Liq.: Citigroup, Inc.)    2,200,000        2,200,000 
     ROC, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: Citigroup, Inc.)    3,990,000        3,990,000 

            6,190,000 

UTILITY 3.8%             
Port St. Lucie, FL Util. Sys. RRB, Ser. A, 3.00%, VRDN, (SPA: RBC Centura Banks,             
     Inc.)    14,200,000        14,200,000 
Reedy Creek, FL Impt. Dist. Util. RB, Ser. 986, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: Morgan             
     Stanley)    5,000,000        5,000,000 

            19,200,000 

WATER & SEWER 3.9%             
Bay Cnty., FL Water Sys. RB, PFOTER, Ser. PT-2776, 3.05%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill             
     Lynch & Co., Inc. & Insd. by AMBAC)    440,000        440,000 
Florida Util. Auth. RB, Ser. 327, 3.07%, VRDN, (Liq.: Morgan Stanley)    10,348,500        10,348,500 
Florida Water & Sewer Sys. RB, Ser. 805, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: JPMorgan Chase             
     & Co.)    5,470,000        5,470,000 
West Palm Beach, FL Util. Sys. RB, Ser. 972, 3.05%, VRDN, (Liq.: Morgan Stanley)    3,500,000        3,500,000 

            19,758,500 

Total Municipal Obligations (cost $505,984,272)            505,984,272 

Total Investments (cost $508,484,272) 99.5%            508,484,272 
Other Assets and Liabilities 0.5%            2,405,413 

Net Assets 100.0%        $    510,889,685 


VRDN Variable Rate Demand Note security which is payable on demand within seven calendar days after notice is given by the
           Fund to the issuer or other parties not affiliated with the issuer. Interest rates are determined and reset by the issuer daily,
            weekly, or monthly depending upon the terms of the security. Interest rates presented for these securities are those in effect
           at January 31, 2006.

Certain obligations held in the portfolio have credit enhancements or liquidity features that may, under certain circumstances, provide for repayment of principal and interest on the obligation upon demand date, interest rate reset date or final maturity. These enhancements include: letters of credit; liquidity guarantees; security purchase agreements; tender option purchase agreements, and third party insurance (i.e. AMBAC, FGIC and MBIA). Adjustable rate bonds and variable rate demand notes held in the portfolio may be considered derivative securities within the standards imposed by the Securities and Exchange Commission under Rule 2a-7 which were designed to minimize both credit and market risk.

See Notes to Financial Statements

14


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

Summary of Abbreviations 
AMBAC    American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp. 
COP    Certificates of Participation 
CR    Custodial Receipts 
EDA    Economic Development Authority 
EDRB    Economic Development Revenue Bond 
FGIC    Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. 
FHLB    Federal Home Loan Bank 
FHLMC    Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. 
FNMA    Federal National Mortgage Association 
GO    General Obligation 
HFA    Housing Finance Authority 
IDA    Industrial Development Authority 
IDRB    Industrial Development Revenue Bond 
IFA    Industrial Finance Agency 
LOC    Letter of Credit 
MBIA    Municipal Bond Investors Assurance Corp. 
MHRB    Multifamily Housing Revenue Bond 
MSTR    Municipal Securities Trust Receipt 
PFOTER    Putable Floating Option Tax Exempt Receipts 
RB    Revenue Bond 
ROC    Reset Option Certificate 
RRB    Refunding Revenue Bond 
SFHRB    Single Family Housing Revenue Bond 
SPA    Securities Purchase Agreement 
TOC    Tender Option Certificate 
TRAN    Tax Revenue Anticipation Note 

The following table shows the percent of total investments by geographic location as of January 31, 2006:

Florida    90.3% 
Puerto Rico    2.0% 
California    1.0% 
Colorado    0.8% 
Indiana    0.6% 
Texas    0.6% 
Alabama    0.6% 
Alaska    0.6% 
Montana    0.6% 
Wisconsin    0.3% 
Massachusetts    0.1% 
Non-state specific    2.5% 

    100.0%
   

The following table shows the percent of total investments by credit quality as of January 31, 2006 (unaudited):

Tier 1    99.9% 
Tier 2    0.1% 

    100.0%
   

The following table shows the percent of total investments by maturity as of January 31, 2006 (unaudited):

2-7 days    89.9% 
8-60 days    2.4% 
121-240 days    5.3% 
241+ days    2.4% 

    100.0%
   

See Notes to Financial Statements

15


STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

January 31, 2006

Assets         
Investments at amortized cost    $    508,484,272 
Cash        104,699 
Interest receivable        2,371,448 
Prepaid expenses and other assets        27,333 

   Total assets        510,987,752 

Liabilities         
Dividends payable        21,644 
Payable for Fund shares redeemed        898 
Advisory fee payable        5,296 
Distribution Plan expenses payable        7,703 
Due to other related parties        483 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities        62,043 

   Total liabilities        98,067 

Net assets    $    510,889,685 

Net assets represented by         
Paid-in capital    $    510,893,546 
Overdistributed net investment income        (3,861) 

Total net assets    $    510,889,685 

Net assets consists of         
   Class A    $    17,386,043 
   Class S        460,725,908 
   Class I        32,777,734 

Total net assets    $    510,889,685 

Shares outstanding (unlimited number of shares authorized)         
   Class A        17,390,120 
   Class S        460,722,604 
   Class I        32,780,720 

Net asset value per share         
   Class A    $    1.00 
   Class S    $    1.00 
   Class I    $    1.00 


See Notes to Financial Statements

16


STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Year Ended January 31, 2006

Investment income         
Interest    $    11,189,612 

Expenses         
Advisory fee        1,695,649 
Distribution Plan expenses         
   Class A        51,936 
   Class S        2,283,498 
Administrative services fee        254,976 
Transfer agent fees        39,732 
Trustees’ fees and expenses        6,012 
Printing and postage expenses        31,534 
Custodian and accounting fees        126,900 
Registration and filing fees        70,134 
Professional fees        21,885 
Other        14,722 

   Total expenses        4,596,978 
   Less: Expense reductions        (9,161) 
           Fee waivers and expense reimbursements        (85,090) 

   Net expenses        4,502,727 

Net investment income        6,686,885 

Net realized gains on investments        118,479 

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations    $    6,805,364 


See Notes to Financial Statements

17


STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

    Year Ended January 31, 

    2006    2005 

Operations                 
Net investment income    $    6,686,885    $    1,311,961 
Net realized gains or losses on                 
   investments        118,479        (968) 

Net increase in net assets resulting                 
   from operations        6,805,364        1,310,993 

Distributions to shareholders                 
from                 
Net investment income                 
   Class A        (323,050)        (141,930) 
   Class S        (5,904,883)        (1,053,341) 
   Class I        (595,520)        (115,127) 

   Total distributions to shareholders        (6,823,453)        (1,310,398) 

    Shares        Shares     
Capital share transactions                 
Proceeds from shares sold                 
   Class A    61,860,865    61,860,865    52,177,799    52,177,799 
   Class S    2,076,102,614    2,076,102,614    814,757,126    814,757,126 
   Class I    177,050,371    177,050,371    55,614,589    55,614,589 

        2,315,013,850        922,549,514 

Net asset value of shares issued in                 
   reinvestment of distributions                 
   Class A    223,503    223,503    110,803    110,803 
   Class S    2,529,511    2,529,511    139,361    139,361 
   Class I    357,923    357,923    6,212    6,212 

        3,110,937        256,376 

Payment for shares redeemed                 
   Class A    (63,068,215)    (63,068,215)    (61,677,958)    (61,677,958) 
   Class S    (2,060,759,236)    (2,060,759,236)    (631,647,547)    (631,647,547) 
   Class I    (182,317,784)    (182,317,784)    (24,629,703)    (24,629,703) 

        (2,306,145,235)        (717,955,208) 

Net increase in net assets resulting                 
   from capital share transactions        11,979,552        204,850,682 

Total increase in net assets        11,961,463        204,851,277 
Net assets                 
Beginning of period        498,928,222        294,076,945 

End of period    $    510,889,685    $    498,928,222 

Undistributed (overdistributed) net                 
   investment income    $    (3,861)    $    15,196 


See Notes to Financial Statements

18


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. ORGANIZATION

Evergreen Florida Municipal Money Market Fund (the “Fund”) is a non-diversified series of Evergreen Money Market Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on September 18, 1997. The Trust is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).

The Fund offers Class A, Class S and Institutional (“Class I”) shares. Class A, Class S and Class I shares are sold at net asset value without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge. Each class of shares, except Class I shares, pays an ongoing distribution fee.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported herein. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

a. Valuation of investments

As permitted under Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act, securities are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value.

b. Security transactions and investment income

Security transactions are recorded on trade date. Realized gains and losses are computed using the specific cost of the security sold. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.

c. Federal taxes

The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company and distribute all of its taxable and tax-exempt income, including any net capital gains (which have already been offset by available capital loss carryovers). Accordingly, no provision for federal taxes is required.

d. Distributions

Distributions to shareholders from net investment income are accrued daily and paid monthly. Distributions from net realized gains, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Such distributions are determined in conformity with income tax regulations, which may differ from generally accepted accounting principles.

Reclassifications have been made to the Fund’s components of net assets to reflect income and gains available for distribution under income tax regulations. The primary permanent differences causing such reclassifications are due to dividend redesignations. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the following amounts were reclassified:


Overdistributed net investment income    $    117,511 
Accumulated net realized gains on investments        (117,511) 


19


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

e. Class allocations

Income, common expenses and realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated to the classes based on the relative net assets of each class. Distribution fees, if any, are calculated daily at the class level based on the appropriate net assets of each class and the specific expense rates applicable to each class.

3. ADVISORY FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC (“EIMC”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation (“Wachovia”), is the investment advisor to the Fund and is paid an annual fee starting at 0.40% and declining to 0.30% as average daily net assets increase.

From time to time, EIMC may voluntarily or contractually waive its fee and/or reimburse expenses in order to limit operating expenses. During the year ended January 31, 2006, EIMC waived its advisory fee in the amount of $84,992 and reimbursed other expenses in the amount of $98.

Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. (“EIS”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia, is the administrator to the Fund. As administrator, EIS provides the Fund with facilities, equipment and personnel and is paid an annual rate determined by applying percentage rates to the aggregate average daily net assets of the Evergreen money market funds, starting at 0.06% and declining to 0.04% as the aggregate average daily net assets of the Evergreen money market funds increase.

Evergreen Service Company, LLC (“ESC”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia, is the transfer and dividend disbursing agent for the Fund. ESC receives account fees that vary based on the type of account held by the shareholders in the Fund.

4. DISTRIBUTION PLANS

EIS also serves as distributor of the Fund’s shares. The Fund has adopted Distribution Plans, as allowed by Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act, for each class of shares, except Class I. Under the Distribution Plans, distribution fees are paid at an annual rate of 0.30% of the average daily net assets for Class A shares and 0.60% of the average daily net assets for Class S shares.

5. SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS

On January 31, 2006, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes for the Fund was the same as for financial reporting purposes.

6. INTERFUND LENDING

Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the SEC, the Fund may participate in an interfund lending program with certain funds in the Evergreen fund family. This program allows the Fund to borrow from other participating funds. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the Fund did not participate in the interfund lending program.

20


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

7. DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS

As of January 31, 2006, the component of distributable earnings on a tax basis consisted of overdistributed exempt-interest income in the amount of $3,861. Additionally, short-term capital gains are considered ordinary income for income tax purposes.

The tax character of distributions paid was as follows:

    Year Ended January 31, 

         2006        2005 

Ordinary Income    $    110,401    $    0 
Exempt-Interest Income        6,696,573        1,310,398 
Long-term Capital Gain        16,479        0 


8. EXPENSE REDUCTIONS

Through expense offset arrangements with ESC and the Fund’s custodian, a portion of fund expenses has been reduced.

9. DEFERRED TRUSTEES’ FEES

Each Trustee of the Fund may defer any or all compensation related to performance of their duties as Trustees. The Trustees’ deferred balances are allocated to deferral accounts, which are included in the accrued expenses for the Fund. The investment performance of the deferral accounts is based on the investment performance of certain Evergreen funds. Any gains earned or losses incurred in the deferral accounts are reported in the Fund’s Trustees’ fees and expenses. At the election of the Trustees, the deferral account will be paid either in one lump sum or in quarterly installments for up to ten years.

10. FINANCING AGREEMENT

The Fund and certain other Evergreen funds share in a $150 million unsecured revolving credit commitment for temporary and emergency purposes, including the funding of redemptions, as permitted by each participating fund’s borrowing restrictions. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at 0.50% per annum above the Federal Funds rate. All of the participating funds are charged an annual commitment fee of 0.09% of the unused balance, which is allocated pro rata. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the Fund had no borrowings under this agreement.

11. CONCENTRATION OF RISK

The Fund invests a substantial portion of its assets in issuers of municipal debt securities located in a single state, therefore, it may be more affected by economic and political developments in that state or region than would be a comparable general tax-exempt mutual fund.

12. REGULATORY MATTERS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Since September 2003, governmental and self-regulatory authorities have instituted numerous ongoing investigations of various practices in the mutual fund industry, including investigations relating to revenue sharing, market-timing, late trading and record retention, among other things. The investigations cover investment advisors, distributors and transfer agents to mutual funds, as

21


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

well as other firms. EIMC, EIS and ESC (collectively, “Evergreen”) have received subpoenas and other requests for documents and testimony relating to these investigations, are endeavoring to comply with those requests, and are cooperating with the investigations. Evergreen is continuing its own internal review of policies, practices, procedures and personnel, and is taking remedial action where appropriate.

In connection with one of these investigations, on July 28, 2004, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) informed Evergreen that the staff intends to recommend to the SEC that it institute an enforcement action against Evergreen. The SEC staff’s proposed allegations relate to (i) an arrangement pursuant to which a broker at one of EIMC’s affiliated broker-dealers had been authorized, apparently by an EIMC officer (no longer with EIMC), to engage in short-term trading, on behalf of a client, in Evergreen Mid Cap Growth Fund (formerly Evergreen Emerging Growth Fund and prior to that, known as Evergreen Small Company Growth Fund) during the period from December 2000 through April 2003, in excess of the limitations set forth in the fund’s prospectus, (ii) short-term trading from September 2001 through January 2003, by a former Evergreen portfolio manager, of Evergreen Precious Metals Fund, a fund he managed at the time, (iii) the sufficiency of systems for monitoring exchanges and enforcing exchange limitations as stated in the fund’s prospectuses, and (iv) the adequacy of e-mail retention practices. In connection with the activity in Evergreen Mid Cap Growth Fund, EIMC reimbursed the fund $378,905, plus an additional $25,242, representing what EIMC calculated at that time to be the client’s net gain and the fees earned by EIMC and the expenses incurred by this fund on the client’s account. In connection with the activity in Evergreen Precious Metals Fund, EIMC reimbursed the fund $70,878, plus an additional $3,075, representing what EIMC calculated at that time to be the portfolio manager’s net gain and the fees earned by EIMC and expenses incurred by the fund on the portfolio manager’s account. Evergreen is currently engaged in discussions with the staff of the SEC concerning its recommendation.

The staff of the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) had notified EIS that it has made a preliminary determination to recommend that disciplinary action be brought against EIS for certain violations of the NASD’s rules. The recommendation relates principally to allegations that EIS (i) arranged for fund portfolio trades to be directed to broker-dealers (including Wachovia Securities, LLC, an affiliate of EIS) that sold Evergreen fund shares during the period of January 2001 to December 2003 and (ii) provided non-cash compensation by sponsoring offsite meetings attended by Wachovia Securities, LLC brokers during that period. EIS is cooperating with the NASD staff in its review of these matters.

Any resolution of these matters with regulatory authorities may include, but not be limited to, sanctions, penalties or injunctions regarding Evergreen, restitution to mutual fund shareholders and/or other financial penalties and structural changes in the governance or management of Evergreen’s mutual fund business. Any penalties or restitution will be paid by Evergreen and not by the Evergreen funds.

In addition, the Evergreen funds and EIMC and certain of its affiliates are involved in various legal actions, including private litigation and class action lawsuits. EIMC does not expect that any

22


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

of such legal actions currently pending or threatened will have a material adverse impact on the financial position or operations of any of the Evergreen funds or on EIMC’s ability to provide services to the Evergreen funds.

Although Evergreen believes that neither the foregoing investigations nor any pending or threatened legal actions will have a material adverse impact on the Evergreen funds, there can be no assurance that these matters and any publicity surrounding or resulting from them will not result in reduced sales or increased redemptions of Evergreen fund shares, which could increase Evergreen fund transaction costs or operating expenses, or have other adverse consequences on the Evergreen funds.

23


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Trustees and Shareholders
Evergreen Money Market Trust

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, of the Evergreen Florida Municipal Money Market Fund, a series of Evergreen Money Market Trust, as of January 31, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of January 31, 2006 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, or by other appropriate auditing procedures where replies from brokers were not received. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Evergreen Florida Municipal Money Market Fund, as of January 31, 2006, the results of its operations, changes in its net assets and financial highlights for each of the years described above in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Boston, Massachusetts
March 24, 2006

24


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited)

FEDERAL TAX DISTRIBUTIONS

Pursuant to Section 852 of the Internal Revenue Code, the Fund has designated aggregate capital gain distributions of $16,479 for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006.

For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, the percentage representing the portion of distributions from net investment income, which is exempt from federal income tax, other than alternative minimum tax and Florida state income tax is 98.20% .

25


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT

ADVISORY AGREEMENT

Each year, the Fund’s Board of Trustees is required to consider whether to continue in place the Fund’s investment advisory agreement. In September 2005, the Trustees, including a majority of the Trustees who are not interested persons (as that term is defined in the 1940 Act) of the Fund or of EIMC, approved the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement.

At the same time, the Trustees considered the continuation of the investment advisory agreements for all of the Evergreen funds, and the description below refers in many cases to the Trustees’ process and conclusions in connection with their consideration of this matter for all of the Evergreen funds. In all of its deliberations, the Board of Trustees and the disinterested Trustees were advised by independent counsel to the disinterested Trustees and counsel to the Evergreen funds.

The review process. The 1940 Act requires that the Board of Trustees request and evaluate, and that EIMC furnish, such information as may reasonably be necessary to evaluate the terms of the Fund’s advisory agreement. The review process began formally in spring 2005, when a committee of the Board (the “Committee”), working with EIMC management, determined generally the types of information the Board would review and set a timeline for the review process. In late spring, counsel to the disinterested Trustees sent to EIMC a formal request for information to be furnished to the Trustees. In addition, the independent data provider Lipper Inc. (“Lipper”) was engaged to provide fund-specific and industry-wide data to the Board containing information of a nature and in a format generally prescribed by the Committee.

The Trustees reviewed EIMC’s responses to the request for information, with the assistance of counsel for the disinterested Trustees and for the Evergreen funds and an independent industry consultant retained by the disinterested Trustees, and requested and received additional information following that review. The Committee met in person with the representatives of EIMC in early September 2005. At a meeting of the full Board of Trustees later in September 2005, the Committee reported the results of its discussions with EIMC, and the full Board met with representatives of EIMC, engaged in further review of the materials provided to them, and approved the continuation of each of the advisory and sub-advisory agreements.

The disinterested Trustees discussed the continuation of the Fund’s advisory agreement with representatives of EIMC and in multiple private sessions with legal counsel at which no personnel of EIMC were present. In considering the continuation of the agreement, the Trustees did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each Trustee attributed different weights to various factors. The Trustees evaluated information provided to them both in terms of the Evergreen mutual funds generally and with respect to the Fund specifically as they considered appropriate; although the Trustees considered the continuation of the agreement as part of the larger process of considering the continuation of the advisory contracts for all of the Evergreen funds, their determination to continue the advisory agreement for each of the Evergreen funds was ultimately made on a fund-by-fund basis.

26


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

This summary describes the most important, but not necessarily all, of the factors considered by the Board and the disinterested Trustees.

Information reviewed. The Board of Trustees and committees of the Board of Trustees meet periodically during the course of the year. At those meetings, the Board receives a wide variety of information regarding the services performed by EIMC, the investment performance of the Fund and the other Evergreen funds, and other aspects of the business and operations of the Evergreen funds. At those meetings, and in the process of considering the continuation of the agreements, the Trustees considered information regarding, for example, the Fund’s investment results; the portfolio management team for the Fund and the experience of the members of that team, and any recent changes in the membership of the team; portfolio trading practices; compliance by the Fund and EIMC with applicable laws and regulations and with the Fund’s and EIMC’s compliance policies and procedures; services provided by affiliates of EIMC to the Fund and shareholders of the Fund; and other information relating to the nature, extent, and quality of services provided by EIMC. The Trustees considered the rates at which the Fund pays investment advisory fees, the total expense ratio of the Fund, and the efforts generally by EIMC and its affil-iates as sponsors of the Fund. The data provided by Lipper showed the fees paid by the Fund and the Fund’s total expense ratio in comparison to other similar mutual funds, in addition to data regarding the investment performance by the Fund in comparison to other similar mutual funds. The Trustees were assisted by the independent industry consultant in reviewing the information presented to them.

The Board also considered that EIS serves as administrator to the Fund and receives a fee for its services as administrator. In their comparison of the advisory fee paid by the Fund with those paid by other mutual funds, the Board took into account administrative fees paid by the Fund and those other mutual funds. The Board considered that affiliates of EIMC serve as transfer agent and distributor to the Fund and receive fees from the Fund for those services, and received information regarding recent reductions in the transfer agency fees paid by the Fund. They considered other so-called “fall-out” benefits to EIMC and its affiliates due to their other relationships with the Evergreen funds, including, for example, soft-dollar services received by EIMC attributable to transactions entered into by EIMC for the benefit of the Evergreen funds and brokerage commissions received by Wachovia Securities LLC, an affiliate of EIMC, from transactions effected by it for the Evergreen funds.

The Board of Trustees also considered that certain of the money market funds managed by EIMC are offered in connection with cash sweep arrangements and similar services made available by affiliates of EIMC to their customers. The Trustees considered that EIMC and its affiliates benefit from the availability of those Evergreen funds and the distribution and shareholder services fees paid by those Evergreen funds.

Nature and quality of the services provided. The Trustees considered that EIMC and its affili-ates provide a comprehensive investment management service to the Fund. They noted that EIMC formulates and implements an investment program for the Fund. They noted that EIMC makes its personnel available to serve as officers of the Evergreen funds, and concluded that the

27


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

reporting and management functions provided by EIMC with respect to the Fund and the Evergreen funds overall were generally satisfactory. The Trustees considered the investment philosophy of the Fund’s portfolio management team, and considered the in-house research capabilities of EIMC and its affiliates, as well as other resources available to EIMC, including research services available to it from third parties. The Board considered the managerial and financial resources available to EIMC, and the commitment that the Wachovia organization has made to the Fund and the Evergreen funds generally. On the basis of these factors, they determined that the nature and scope of the services provided by EIMC were consistent with its duties under the investment advisory agreements and appropriate and consistent with the investment programs and best interests of the Fund.

The Trustees noted the commitment and resources EIMC and its affiliates have brought to the regulatory, compliance, accounting, tax and tax reporting, and shareholder servicing functions, and the number and quality of staff committed to those functions, which they concluded were appropriate and generally in line with EIMC’s responsibilities to the Fund and to the Evergreen funds generally. They noted that EIMC had enhanced a number of these functions in recent periods and continued to do so, in light of regulatory developments in the investment management and mutual fund industries generally and in light of regulatory matters involving EIMC and its affiliates. They concluded that those enhancements appeared generally appropriate, but considered that the enhancement process is an on-going one and determined to continue to monitor developments in these functions in coming periods for appropriateness and consistency with regulatory and industry developments. The Board and the disinterested Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the Fund’s advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by EIMC, including services provided by EIS under its administrative services agreement with the Fund.

Investment performance. The Trustees considered the investment performance of each of the Evergreen funds, both by comparison to other comparable mutual funds and to broad market indices. The Trustees emphasized that the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for an Evergreen fund should not be taken as any indication that the Trustees did not believe investment performance for any specific fund might not be improved, and they noted that they would continue to monitor closely the investment performance of the Evergreen funds going forward. Specifically with respect to the Fund, the Trustees noted that the Class A shares of the Fund performed in the second quintile over the recently completed one-year period and performed in the first quintile over recently completed three- and five-year periods.

Advisory and administrative fees. The Trustees recognized that EIMC does not seek to provide the lowest cost investment advisory service, but to provide a high quality, full-service investment management product at a reasonable price. They also noted that EIMC has generally attempted to make its investment advisory fees consistent with industry norms. The Trustees noted that, from the materials presented, it appeared that the combination of investment advisory and administrative fees paid by the Fund to EIMC and EIS with respect to Class A shares was slightly above the median of fees paid by comparable funds, although the Trustees concluded that the fees

28


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

were not unreasonable in light of the Fund’s investment performance and the services provided by EIMC and EIS.

The Trustees noted that EIMC does not provide services to other clients using the same investment strategy as it uses in managing the Fund.

Economies of scale. The Trustees noted that economies of scale would likely be achieved by EIMC in managing the Evergreen funds as the funds grow. The Trustees noted that the Fund had implemented breakpoints in its advisory fee structure. The Trustees undertook to continue to review the appropriate levels of breakpoints in the future, but concluded that the breakpoints as implemented appeared to be a reasonable step toward the realization of economies of scale by the funds.

Profitability. The Trustees considered information provided to them regarding the profitability to the EIMC organization of the investment advisory, administration, and transfer agency fees paid to EIMC and its affiliates by each of the Evergreen funds. They considered that the information provided to them was necessarily estimated. They noted that the levels of profitability of the Evergreen funds to EIMC varied widely, depending on among other things the size and type of fund. They noted that all of the estimates provided to them were calculated on a pre-tax basis. They considered the profitability of the Evergreen funds in light of such factors as, for example, the information they had received regarding the relation of the fees paid by the Evergreen funds to those paid by other mutual funds, the investment performance of the Evergreen funds, and the amount of revenues involved. In light of these factors, the Trustees did not consider that the profitability of any of the Evergreen funds, individually or in the aggregate, was such as to prevent their approving the continuation of the agreements.

In connection with their review of the Fund’s investment advisory and administrative fees, the Trustees also considered the transfer agency fees paid by the Evergreen funds to an affiliate of EIMC. They reviewed information presented to them showing generally that the transfer agency fees charged to the Evergreen funds were generally consistent with industry norms, and that transfer agency fees for a number of Evergreen funds had recently declined, or were expected to in the near future.

29


This page left intentionally blank

30


This page left intentionally blank

31


TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS

TRUSTEES1     
Charles A. Austin III    Investment Counselor, Anchor Capital Advisors, Inc. (investment advice); Director, The Andover 
Trustee    Companies (insurance); Trustee, Arthritis Foundation of New England; Former Director, The 
DOB: 10/23/1934    Francis Ouimet Society; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust; Former 
Term of office since: 1991    Investment Counselor, Appleton Partners, Inc. (investment advice); Former Director, Executive 
Other directorships: None    Vice President and Treasurer, State Street Research & Management Company (investment 
    advice) 

 
Shirley L. Fulton    Partner, Tin, Fulton, Greene & Owen, PLLC (law firm); Former Partner, Helms, Henderson & 
Trustee    Fulton, P.A. (law firm); Retired Senior Resident Superior Court Judge, 26th Judicial District, 
DOB: 1/10/1952    Charlotte, NC 
Term of office since: 2004     
Other directorships: None     

 
K. Dun Gifford    Chairman and President, Oldways Preservation and Exchange Trust (education); Trustee, 
Trustee    Treasurer and Chairman of the Finance Committee, Cambridge College; Former Trustee, Mentor 
DOB: 10/23/1938    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1974     
Other directorships: None     

 
Dr. Leroy Keith, Jr.    Partner, Stonington Partners, Inc. (private equity fund); Trustee, Phoenix Funds Family; Director, 
Trustee    Diversapack Co.; Director, Obagi Medical Products Co.; Former Director, Lincoln Educational 
DOB: 2/14/1939    Services; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1983     
Other directorships: Trustee, The     
Phoenix Group of Mutual Funds     

 
Gerald M. McDonnell    Manager of Commercial Operations, SMI Steel Co. – South Carolina (steel producer); Former 
Trustee    Sales and Marketing Manager, Nucor Steel Company; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash 
DOB: 7/14/1939    Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1988     
Other directorships: None     

 
William Walt Pettit    Vice President, Kellam & Pettit, P.A. (law firm); Director, Superior Packaging Corp.; Director, 
Trustee    National Kidney Foundation of North Carolina, Inc.; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash 
DOB: 8/26/1955    Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     

 
David M. Richardson    President, Richardson, Runden LLC (executive recruitment business development/consulting 
Trustee    company); Consultant, Kennedy Information, Inc. (executive recruitment information and 
DOB: 9/19/1941    research company); Consultant, AESC (The Association of Executive Search Consultants); 
Term of office since: 1982    Director, J&M Cumming Paper Co. (paper merchandising); Former Trustee, NDI Technologies, LLP 
Other directorships: None   (communications); Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 

 
Dr. Russell A. Salton III    President/CEO, AccessOne MedCard; Former Medical Director, Healthcare Resource Associates, 
Trustee    Inc.; Former Medical Director, U.S. Health Care/Aetna Health Services; Former Trustee, Mentor 
DOB: 6/2/1947    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     


32


TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS continued

Michael S. Scofield    Director and Chairman, Branded Media Corporation (multi-media branding company); Attorney, 
Trustee    Law Offices of Michael S. Scofield; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
DOB: 2/20/1943     
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     

 
Richard J. Shima    Independent Consultant; Trustee, Saint Joseph College (CT); Director, Hartford Hospital; Trustee, 
Trustee    Greater Hartford YMCA; Former Director, Trust Company of CT; Former Director, Enhance 
DOB: 8/11/1939    Financial Services, Inc.; Former Director, Old State House Association; Former Trustee, Mentor 
Term of office since: 1993    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Other directorships: None     

 
Richard K. Wagoner, CFA2    Member and Former President, North Carolina Securities Traders Association; Member, Financial 
Trustee    Analysts Society; Former Consultant to the Boards of Trustees of the Evergreen funds; Former 
DOB: 12/12/1937    Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1999     
Other directorships: None     

 
 
OFFICERS     
 
Dennis H. Ferro3    Principal occupations: President and Chief Executive Officer, Evergreen Investment Company, 
President    Inc. and Executive Vice President, Wachovia Bank, N.A.; former Chief Investment Officer, 
DOB: 6/20/1945    Evergreen Investment Company, Inc. 
Term of office since: 2003     

 
Jeremy DePalma4    Principal occupations: Vice President, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc.; Former Assistant Vice 
Treasurer    President, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. 
DOB: 2/5/1974     
Term of office since: 2005     

 
Michael H. Koonce4    Principal occupations: Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Evergreen Investment 
Secretary    Services, Inc.; Senior Vice President and Assistant General Counsel, Wachovia Corporation 
DOB: 4/20/1960     
Term of office since: 2000     

 
James Angelos4    Principal occupations: Chief Compliance Officer and Senior Vice President, Evergreen Funds; 
Chief Compliance Officer    Former Director of Compliance, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. 
DOB: 9/2/1947     
Term of office since: 2004     


1 Each Trustee serves until a successor is duly elected or qualified or until his/her death, resignation, retirement or removal from office. Each Trustee oversees 90 Evergreen funds. Correspondence for each Trustee may be sent to Evergreen Board of Trustees, P.O. Box 20083, Charlotte, NC 28202.

2 Mr. Wagoner is an “interested person” of the Fund because of his ownership of shares in Wachovia Corporation, the parent to the Fund’s investment advisor.

3 The address of the Officer is 401 S. Tryon Street, 20th Floor, Charlotte, NC 28288.

4 The address of the Officer is 200 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116.

Additional information about the Fund’s Board of Trustees and Officers can be found in the Statement of Additional Information (SAI) and is available upon request without charge by calling 800.343.2898.

33



565211 rv3 3/2006


Evergreen Money Market Fund



  table of contents
 
1      LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS
4      FUND AT A GLANCE
6      ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES
7      FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
13      SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
19      STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
20      STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
21      STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
22      NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
27      REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
28      ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
32      TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS

This annual report must be preceded or accompanied by a prospectus of the Evergreen fund contained herein. The prospectus contains more complete information, including fees and expenses, and should be read carefully before investing or sending money.

The fund will file its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q will be available on the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, the fund’s Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800.SEC.0330.

A description of the fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures, as well as information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, is available by visiting our Web site at EvergreenInvestments.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov. The fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures are also available without charge, upon request, by calling 800.343.2898.

Mutual Funds:

NOT FDIC INSURED    MAY LOSE VALUE    NOT BANK GUARANTEED 

Evergreen InvestmentsSM is a service mark of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC.
Copyright 2006, Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC.

Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC is a subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation
and is an affiliate of Wachovia Corporation's other Broker Dealer subsidiaries.

Evergreen mutual funds are distributed by Evergreen Investment Services, Inc.
200 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS

March 2006


Dennis H. Ferro
President and Chief
Executive Officer

Dear Shareholder,

We are pleased to provide the annual report for the Evergreen Money Market Fund, which covers the twelve-month period ended January 31, 2006.

The U.S. financial markets had to navigate through some choppy seas during the past twelve months. Uncertainty was prevalent as questions surfaced about the sustainability of economic growth, tighter monetary policy, surging oil prices, moderating profit growth, and an increase in inflation. Geopolitical tensions continued and the Gulf region suffered enormous damage from the hurricanes. Not surprisingly, each of these events combined at various times during the year to increase market volatility. Throughout these turbulent times, the portfolio management teams of Evergreen’s money market funds employed a variety of strategies to manage portfolios in a rising yield environment and enhance portfolio returns, in both the taxable and tax-advantaged markets.

Over the course of the investment period, economic reports frequently delivered confusing signals. While growth was expected to moderate as the expansion matured, the economy showed surprising strength, particularly in the third quarter, as Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) grew in excess of 4%, despite the hurricanes and the spike in inflation. The effects of higher energy prices and tighter monetary policy became evident in the last quarter of 2005 as initial readings for GDP growth barely exceeded 1%. The conflicting data was often subject to interpretation and the consequence for investors was a frequent bout of market volatility. While many debated whether or not

1


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS continued

the short-term volatility was an indication of pending weakness, Evergreen’s Investment Strategy Committee focused on the breadth of economic output, particularly personal consumption and capital investment. Though the rate of growth in each was moderating from unusually high levels, we believed it would lead to a more sustainable, and ultimately less inflationary, pace for the expansion. The fundamentals, though no longer great, were still pretty good in our view, and our portfolio teams based many of their investment decisions on these positive macro-economic trends.

Despite the mixed signals from the economy, the Federal Reserve (“Fed”) maintained its strategy of gradually raising short-term interest rates. Considering that monetary policy had been stimulative for most of the prior three years, central bankers were determined in their efforts to prevent alarming increases in inflation, raising their target for the federal funds rate by twenty-five basis points at every policy meeting over the past year. Yet long-term market interest rates continued to decline and the extent of the yield curve’s flattening had many on Wall Street debating its meaning. Given our forecast for more moderate levels of growth in consumption and investment supporting a sustainable expansion, we viewed the yield curve’s message as confidence in the Fed’s ability to prevent long-term inflation. In addition, higher oil prices would likely serve to dampen output and we believed the absence of significant wage pressures would enable the Fed to continue on with its less stimulative, rather than more restrictive, path for monetary policy.

In this environment, the portfolio managers of Evergreen’s money market funds attempted to focus on the aforementioned market fundamentals, as well as the timing of Fed meetings. Each increase in the Fed’s target for its benchmark rate would result in a “resetting” of rates at the short end of the yield curve, enabling the teams to pursue higher income potential. In addition, many of our analysts and portfolio managers used a variety of short-term securities to capture yield, in

2


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS continued

order to provide our investors with the stability and liquidity necessary to balance exposure within their diversified long-term portfolios.

We continue to recommend that investors maintain their diversified strategies, including exposure to money market funds, within their long-term portfolios.

Please visit our Web site, EvergreenInvestments.com, for more information about our funds and other investment products available to you. Thank you for your continued support of Evergreen Investments.

Sincerely,


Dennis H. Ferro
President and Chief Executive Officer
Evergreen Investment Company, Inc.

 

Special Notice to Shareholders:

Please visit our Web site at EvergreenInvestments.com for a statement from President and Chief Executive Officer, Dennis Ferro, addressing NASD actions involving Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. (EIS), Evergreen’s mutual fund distributor or statements from Dennis Ferro and Chairman of the Board of the Evergreen funds, Michael S. Scofield, addressing SEC actions involving the Evergreen funds.

3


FUND AT A GLANCE

as of January 31, 2006

 

MANAGEMENT TEAM

Investment Advisor:

• Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC

Portfolio Managers:

• J. Kellie Allen

• Bryan K. White, CFA

• Sheila Nye

 

PERFORMANCE AND RETURNS*

Portfolio inception date: 11/2/1987

    Class A    Class B    Class C    Class S    Class S1    Class I 
Class inception date    1/4/1995    1/26/1995    8/1/1997    6/30/2000    6/26/2001    11/2/1987 

Nasdaq symbol   EMAXX    EMBXX    EMCXX    N/A    N/A    EGMXX 

Average annual                         
return**                         

1-year with                         
sales charge    N/A    -3.16%    0.84%    N/A    N/A    N/A 

1-year w/o                         
sales charge    2.56%    1.84%    1.84%    2.25%    2.32%    2.86% 

5-year    1.57%    0.61%    1.00%    1.28%    1.50%    1.86% 

10-year    3.30%    2.65%    2.81%    3.27%    3.42%    3.60% 

Maximum sales    N/A    5.00%    1.00%    N/A    N/A    N/A 
charge        CDSC    CDSC             

7-day annualized                         
yield    3.64%    2.94%    2.94%    3.34%    3.34%    3.94% 

30-day annualized                         
yield    3.59%    2.89%    2.89%    3.28%    3.29%    3.88% 


* The yield quotation more closely reflects the current earnings of the fund than the total return quotation.

** Adjusted for maximum applicable sales charge, unless noted

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The performance quoted represents past performance and current performance may be lower or higher. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that investors’ shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month-end for Classes A, B, C or I, please go to EvergreenInvestments.com/fundperformance. Please call 1.800.343.2898 for the most recent month-end performance information for Classes S or S1. The performance of each class may vary based on differences in loads, fees and expenses paid by the shareholders investing in each class. Performance includes the reinvestment of income dividends and capital gain distributions.

Historical performance shown for Classes C, S and S1 prior to their inception is based on the performance of Class I, the original class offered. The historical returns for Classes C, S and S1 have not been adjusted to reflect the effect of each class’ 12b-1 fee. The fund incurs 12b-1 fees of 0.30% for Class A, 0.60% for Classes S and S1, and 1.00% for Classes B and C. Class I does not pay a 12b-1 fee. If these fees had been reflected, returns for Classes C, S and S1 would have been lower.

The advisor is reimbursing the fund for a portion of other expenses. Had expenses not been reimbursed, returns would have been lower. Returns reflect expense limits previously in effect for Class A, B, C, S, and S1 without which returns for Class A, B, C, S and S1 would have been lower.

An investment in a money market fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund.

4


FUND AT A GLANCE continued


Class I shares are only offered in the following manner: (1) to investment advisory clients of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC (or its advisory affiliates) when purchased by such advisor(s) on behalf of its clients, (2) through arrangements entered into on behalf of the Evergreen funds with certain financial services firms, (3) to certain institutional investors and (4) to persons who owned Class Y shares in registered name in an Evergreen fund on or before December 31, 1994 or who owned shares of any SouthTrust fund in registered name as of March 18, 2005 or shares of Vestaur Securities Fund as of May 20, 2005.

Class I shares are only available to institutional shareholders with a minimum of $1 million investment, which may be waived in certain situations.

Class S and S1 shares are sold through certain broker dealers and financial institutions which have selling agreements with the fund’s distributor.

The fund’s investment objective is nonfundamental and may be changed without a vote of the fund’s shareholders.

Yields are based on net investment income for the stated periods and annualized.

Foreign investments may contain more risk due to the inherent risks associated with changing political climates, foreign market instability and foreign currency fluctuations.

U.S. government guarantees apply only to certain securities held in the fund’s portfolio and not to the fund’s shares.

The yield will fluctuate and there can be no guarantee that the fund will achieve its objective.

All data is as of January 31, 2006, and subject to change.

5


ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES

The Example below is intended to describe the fees and expenses borne by shareholders and the impact of those costs on your investment.

Example

As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads), redemption fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) fees and other fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from August 1, 2005 to January 31, 2006.

The example illustrates your fund’s costs in two ways:

• Actual expenses

The section in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in these columns, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class, in the column entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

• Hypothetical example for comparison purposes

The section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees or exchange fees. Therefore, the section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

    Beginning    Ending     
    Account    Account    Expenses 
    Value    Value    Paid During 
    8/1/2005    1/31/2006    Period* 

Actual             
Class A    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,015.62    $ 4.27 
Class B    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,012.04    $ 7.81 
Class C    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,012.05    $ 7.81 
Class S    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,014.07    $ 5.79 
Class S1    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,014.17    $ 5.69 
Class I    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,017.13    $ 2.75 
Hypothetical             
(5% return             
before expenses)             
Class A    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,020.97    $ 4.28 
Class B    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,017.44    $ 7.83 
Class C    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,017.44    $ 7.83 
Class S    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,019.46    $ 5.80 
Class S1    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,019.56    $ 5.70 
Class I    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,022.48    $ 2.75 


* For each class of the Fund, expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of each class (0.84% for Class A, 1.54% for Class B, 1.54% for Class C, 1.14% for Class S, 1.12% for Class S1 and 0.54% for Class I), multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184 / 365 days.

6


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS A    2006    2005        2004   2003    2002 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00        $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Income from investment operations                         
Net investment income (loss)       0.03       0.01        0         0.01       0.03 

Distributions to shareholders from                         
Net investment income     (0.03)     (0.01)        01       (0.01)     (0.03) 

Net asset value, end of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00        $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Total return       2.56%       0.68%        0.32%         1.14%       3.20% 

Ratios and supplemental data                         
Net assets, end of period (millions)    $2,803    $3,027         $6,261    $10,628    $9,605 
Ratios to average net assets                         
   Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
        but excluding expense reductions
 
     0.89%       0.94%        0.93%         0.89%       0.88% 
   Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
        and expense reductions
 
     0.92%       1.00%        0.99%         0.91%       0.88% 
   Net investment income (loss)       2.52%       0.60%        0.33%         1.12%       2.42% 


1 Amount represents less than $0.005 per share.

See Notes to Financial Statements

7


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS B    2006    2005    2004    2003    2002 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Income from investment operations                     
Net investment income (loss)     0.02    0    0    0     0.02 

Distributions to shareholders from                     
Net investment income    (0.02)    01    01    01    (0.02) 

Net asset value, end of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Total return2     1.84%    0.21%    0.06%    0.44%     2.48% 

Ratios and supplemental data                     
Net assets, end of period (millions)    $ 33    $ 46    $ 70    $ 113    $ 92 
Ratios to average net assets                     
  Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
        but excluding expense reductions
 
   1.59%    1.38%    1.20%    1.59%     1.57% 
  Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
        and expense reductions
 
   1.62%    1.70%    1.69%    1.60%     1.57% 
  Net investment income (loss)     1.77%    0.18%    0.06%    0.41%     2.25% 


1 Amount represents less than $0.005 per share.

2 Excluding applicable sales charges

See Notes to Financial Statements

8


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS C    2006    2005    2004    2003    2002 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Income from investment operations                     
Net investment income (loss)     0.02    0    0    0     0.02 

Distributions to shareholders from                     
Net investment income    (0.02)    01    01    01    (0.02) 

Net asset value, end of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Total return2     1.84%    0.21%    0.06%    0.44%     2.48% 

Ratios and supplemental data                     
Net assets, end of period (millions)    $ 9    $ 16    $ 26    $ 23    $ 15 
Ratios to average net assets                     
   Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
        but excluding expense reductions
 
   1.59%    1.37%    1.17%    1.59%     1.57% 
   Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
        and expense reductions
 
   1.62%    1.71%    1.70%    1.60%     1.57% 
    Net investment income (loss)     1.70%    0.15%    0.06%    0.42%     2.24% 


1 Amount represents less than $0.005 per share.

2 Excluding applicable sales charges

See Notes to Financial Statements

9


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS S    2006    2005        2004   2003    2002 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00        $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Income from investment operations                         
Net investment income (loss)       0.02    0        0       0.01       0.03 

Distributions to shareholders from                         
Net investment income     (0.02)    01        01     (0.01)     (0.03) 

Net asset value, end of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00        $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Total return       2.25%    0.41%        0.09%       0.82%       2.89% 

Ratios and supplemental data                         
Net assets, end of period (millions)    $2,421    $2,477        $3,544    $7,302    $9,954 
Ratios to average net assets                         
  Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
        but excluding expense reductions
 
     1.19%    1.20%        1.17%       1.21%       1.16% 
  Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
        and expense reductions
 
     1.22%    1.30%        1.28%       1.21%       1.16% 
  Net investment income (loss)       2.22%    0.39%        0.10%       0.83%       2.89% 


1 Amount represents less than $0.005 per share.

See Notes to Financial Statements

10


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS S1    2006    2005        2004   2003    20021 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00        $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Income from investment operations                         
Net investment income (loss)       0.02       0.01        0       0.01       0.01 

Distributions to shareholders from                         
Net investment income (loss)     (0.02)     (0.01)        02     (0.01)     (0.01) 

Net asset value, end of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00        $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Total return       2.32%       0.52%        0.20%       1.18%       1.38% 

Ratios and supplemental data                         
Net assets, end of period (millions)    $2,133    $2,294         $1,057    $1,767    $1,300 
Ratios to average net assets                         
  Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
        but excluding expense reductions
 
     1.11%       1.09%        1.05%       0.85%       0.86%3 
  Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
        and expense reductions
 
     1.21%       1.27%        1.29%       1.21%       1.21%3 
  Net investment income (loss)       2.30%       0.75%        0.21%       1.16%       1.72%3 


1 For the period from June 26, 2001 (commencemen t of class operations), to January 31, 2002.

2 Amount represents less than $0.005 per share.

3 Annualized

See Notes to Financial Statements

11


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS I1    2006    2005      2004   2003    2002 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00        $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Income from investment operations                         
Net investment income (loss)       0.03       0.01        0.01       0.01       0.03 

Distributions to shareholders from                         
Net investment income     (0.03)     (0.01)        (0.01)     (0.01)     (0.03) 

Net asset value, end of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00        $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Total return       2.86%       0.97%        0.57%       1.42%       3.50% 

Ratios and supplemental data                         
Net assets, end of period (millions)    $1,190    $1,531               $1,659    $2,334    $2,685 
Ratios to average net assets                         
  Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
        but excluding expense reductions
 
     0.59%       0.65%        0.68%       0.61%       0.56% 
  Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
        and expense reductions
 
     0.62%       0.70%        0.69%       0.61%       0.56% 
  Net investment income (loss)       2.80%       0.94%        0.57%       1.41%       3.43% 


1 Effective at the close of business on May 11, 2001, Class Y shares were renamed as Institutional shares (Class I).

See Notes to Financial Statements

12


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES 0.9%             
Blue Heron Funding Corp., FRN, 4.56%, 02/27/2006 144A    $ 50,000,000    $    50,000,000 
Carlyle Loan Investment, Ltd., Ser. 2005-1A, Class 4, 4.52%, 02/15/2006             
     144A +    25,000,000        25,000,000 

           Total Asset-Backed Securities (cost $75,000,000)            75,000,000 

CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 7.7%             
Barclays Bank plc, 4.52%, 03/01/2006    50,000,000        49,998,361 
Compass Bank, 4.44%, 02/13/2006    50,000,000        50,000,000 
Credit Suisse First Boston Corp., 3.77%, 06/07/2006    50,000,000        50,000,000 
Deutsche Bank AG:             
     4.73%, 12/01/2006    80,000,000        80,000,000 
     4.80%, 10/26/2006    50,000,000        50,000,000 
First Tennessee Bank, 4.38%, 02/10/2006    50,000,000        50,000,000 
HBOS Treasury Services, 4.76%, 10/17/2006    40,000,000        40,001,464 
SunTrust Bank:             
     4.25%, 02/08/2006    80,000,000        80,000,000 
     4.50%, 02/27/2006    70,000,000        70,000,000 
     4.70%, 07/25/2006    25,000,000        25,000,000 
U.S. Trust Co. of New York, 4.49%, 02/13/2006    50,000,000        50,000,000 
Wells Fargo Bank, 4.50%, 02/24/2006    65,000,000        65,000,000 

           Total Certificates of Deposit (cost $659,999,825)            659,999,825 

COMMERCIAL PAPER 51.5%             
Asset-Backed 45.8%             
Amstel Funding Corp.:             
     4.24%, 02/13/2006    50,000,000        49,929,333 
     4.30%, 02/21/2006    50,000,000        49,880,556 
     4.32%, 02/28/2006    40,000,000        39,870,400 
     4.40%, 03/13/2006    49,766,000        49,522,700 
     4.42%, 05/17/2006    37,291,000        36,810,257 
     4.45%, 05/26/2006    50,000,000        49,295,417 
ASAP Funding, Ltd.:             
     4.33%, 02/01/2006    40,000,000        40,000,000 
     4.35%, 02/06/2006    50,000,000        49,969,792 
     4.36%, 02/07/2006    160,000,000        159,891,000 
Barton Capital Corp.:             
     4.35%, 02/06/2006    15,339,000        15,329,733 
     4.41%, 03/09/2006    27,667,000        27,544,989 
Bavaria Trust Corp.:             
     4.35%, 02/03/2006    100,000,000        99,975,889 
     4.40%, 02/02/2006    15,000,000        14,998,167 
     4.50%, 02/09/2006    44,300,000        44,267,175 
Belmont Funding, LLC, 4.35%, 02/06/2006    50,000,000        49,969,792 
Charta, LLC, 4.40%, 02/08/2006    58,000,000        57,950,378 
Check Point Charlie, Inc.:             
     4.24%, 02/08/2006    20,250,000        20,233,305 
     4.36%, 02/10/2006    43,000,000        42,953,130 
     4.63%, 07/24/2006    18,000,000        17,599,505 
Chesham Finance, LLC:             
     4.32%, 02/01/2006    50,000,000        50,000,000 
     4.33%, 02/03/2006    50,000,000        49,987,972 
     4.52%, 02/02/2006    100,000,000        99,992,624 
     4.56%, 02/02/2006    50,000,000        49,996,250 

See Notes to Financial Statements

13


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

COMMERCIAL PAPER continued             
Asset-Backed continued             
Compass Securitization, LLC, 4.33%, 02/06/2006    $ 60,000,000    $    59,963,917 
Concord Minutemen Capital Co., LLC:             
    4.39%, 02/02/2006   65,000,000        65,000,000 
    4.43%, 02/13/2006    92,400,000        92,400,000 
    4.44%, 04/05/2006    50,000,000        49,611,500 
    4.45%, 02/16/2006    70,000,000        69,870,208 
Crown Point Capital Co., 4.49%, 02/01/2006    125,062,000        125,062,000 
Deer Valley Funding, Ltd.:             
    4.50%, 02/03/2006    15,045,000        15,041,239 
    4.52%, 02/21/2006    50,000,000        49,874,445 
    4.54%, 02/21/2006    16,345,000        16,303,774 
Descartes Funding Trust, 4.12%, 11/15/2006    80,000,000        80,000,000 
Fairway Finance Corp., 4.34%, 02/13/2006    20,099,000        20,069,923 
Georgetown Funding Corp, LLC, 4.48%, 02/27/2006    50,000,000        49,838,222 
Giro Balanced Funding Corp.:             
    4.33%, 02/06/2006    100,000,000        99,939,861 
    4.40%, 02/13/2006    50,000,000        49,926,667 
Giro Multi-Funding Corp., 4.45%, 02/21/2006    30,000,000        29,925,833 
Grampian Funding, LLC, 4.42%, 05/02/2006    35,000,000        34,613,250 
Greyhawk Funding, LLC:             
    4.23%, 02/13/2006    50,000,000        49,929,500 
    4.38%, 02/21/2006    50,000,000        49,878,333 
    4.40%, 05/09/2006    25,000,000        24,703,611 
Lake Constance Funding:             
    3.84%, 02/02/2006    25,000,000        24,997,337 
    4.33%, 02/06/2006    57,000,000        56,965,721 
    4.42%, 02/02/2006    90,000,000        89,988,950 
Legacy Capital Corp.:             
    4.32%, 02/01/2006    55,353,000        55,353,000 
    4.40%, 03/16/2006    50,000,000        49,737,222 
    4.43%, 03/23/2006    27,804,000        27,632,928 
Lexington Parker Capital Corp., LLC:             
    4.42%, 03/21/2006    32,971,000        32,776,691 
    4.50%, 02/03/2006    30,892,000        30,884,277 
Lockhart Funding, LLC:             
    4.33%, 02/01/2006    79,646,000        79,646,000 
    4.41%, 03/16/2006    43,850,000        43,619,020 
    4.45%, 02/10/2006    24,611,000        24,583,620 
Mortgage Interest Network:             
    4.42%, 02/06/2006    90,000,000        89,944,750 
    4.44%, 03/01/2006    25,000,000        24,913,667 
Neptune Funding Corp., 4.47%, 04/06/2006    40,622,000        40,299,191 
Paradigm Funding, LLC:             
    4.32%, 02/06/2006    100,000,000        99,940,000 
    4.35%, 02/03/2006    21,342,000        21,336,842 
    4.42%, 02/15/2006    50,000,000        49,914,055 
Park Granada, LLC:             
    4.52%, 02/01/2006    91,006,000        91,006,000 
    4.60%, 07/18/2006    25,000,000        24,466,528 
Perry Global Funding, Ltd., 4.32%, 02/06/2006    73,577,000        73,532,854 

See Notes to Financial Statements

14


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

COMMERCIAL PAPER continued             
Asset-Backed continued             
Rhineland Funding Capital Corp.:             
    4.42%, 03/02/2006    $ 36,250,000    $    36,120,930 
    4.50%, 03/15/2006    45,750,000        45,530,812 
    4.52%, 03/28/2006    10,000,000        9,930,944 
Scaldis Capital, LLC, 4.50%, 02/27/2006    50,000,000        49,837,500 
Thames Asset Global Securitization, Inc., 4.43%, 02/21/2006    37,520,000        37,427,659 
Thornburg Mortgage Capital Resources, LLC:             
    4.42%, 02/13/2006    70,000,000        69,896,867 
    4.43%, 02/15/2006    50,000,000        49,913,861 
    4.51%, 03/20/2006    35,000,000        34,793,918 
    4.58%, 03/13/2006    40,000,000        39,796,444 
Three Pillars Funding Corp.:             
    4.34%, 02/06/2006    30,372,000        30,353,692 
    4.36%, 02/13/2006    38,814,000        38,757,590 
    4.43%, 02/17/2006    40,000,000        39,921,244 
    4.50%, 02/24/2006    50,000,000        49,856,250 
    4.51%, 02/01/2006    100,000,000        100,000,000 
Tulip Funding Corp., 4.53%, 02/24/2006    25,000,000        24,927,726 
Yorktown Capital, LLC, 4.32%, 02/06/2006    50,000,000        49,970,000 

            3,936,494,737 

Capital Markets 2.0%             
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.:             
    3.65%, 05/25/2006    60,000,000        59,313,149 
    4.50%, 02/27/2006    50,000,000        50,000,000 
    4.59%, 02/02/2006    60,000,000        60,000,000 

            169,313,149 

Consumer Finance 3.1%             
Ford Motor Credit Co.:             
    4.34%, 02/01/2006    40,000,000        40,000,000 
    4.35%, 02/07/2006    50,000,000        49,963,750 
    4.44%, 03/06/2006    125,000,000        124,491,250 
    4.48%, 03/10/2006    25,800,000        25,681,205 
    4.50%, 04/10/2006    25,000,000        24,787,500 

            264,923,705 

Diversified Financial Services 0.6%             
CC USA, Inc., 4.39%, 02/28/2007    50,000,000        49,835,375 

           Total Commercial Paper (cost $4,420,566,966)            4,420,566,966 

CORPORATE BONDS 27.4%             
Capital Markets 9.0%             
Bear Stearns Cos.:             
    4.66%, 02/02/2006    50,000,000        50,017,758 
    FRN, 4.45%, 02/06/2006    50,000,000        50,000,000 
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., FRN, 4.70%, 03/21/2006    40,000,000        40,011,559 
Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., FRN, 4.59%, 04/03/2006    35,000,000        35,011,050 
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., FRN, 4.64%, 02/13/2006    300,000,000        300,000,000 
Morgan Stanley, FRN:             
    4.375%, 02/03/2006    100,000,000        99,999,742 
    4.50%, 02/15/2006    200,000,000        200,000,000 

            775,040,109 


See Notes to Financial Statements

15


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

        Principal         
        Amount        Value 

CORPORATE BONDS  continued             
Commercial Banks  3.8%             
Bank of America Corp., FRN, 4.56%, 02/02/2006    $100,000,000    $    100,000,000 
First Tennessee Bank, 4.46%, 02/17/2006 144A    75,000,000        75,000,000 
Marshall & Ilsley Bank Corp., 5.18%, 12/15/2006    50,000,000        50,153,649 
WestLB AG, FRN, 4.43%, 02/10/2006 144A    100,000,000        99,985,056 

                325,138,705 

Consumer Finance  6.0%                
American Honda Finance Corp., 4.42%, 02/21/2006 144A    70,000,000        70,002,965 
BMW U.S. Capital Corp., LLC, FRN, 4.51%, 02/24/2006    40,000,000        40,000,000 
General Electric Capital Corp., FRN:             
     4.52%, 02/09/2006    100,000,000        100,000,000 
     4.57%, 02/17/2006    220,000,000        220,000,000 
Toyota Motor Credit Corp., FRN:             
     4.27%, 02/08/2006    50,000,000        50,003,877 
     4.56%, 02/02/2006    40,000,000        40,000,000 

                520,006,842 

Diversified Financial Services 6.4%             
CC USA, Inc., FRN:                 
     4.37%, 02/27/2006 144A    40,000,000        39,999,904 
     4.56%, 02/02/2006 144A    30,000,000        29,998,603 
     4.57%, 02/02/2006 144A    65,000,000        64,997,680 
Dorada Finance, Inc., FRN, 4.56%, 02/02/2006 144A    40,000,000        39,998,137 
Liberty Lighthouse U.S. Capital Corp.:             
     4.57%, 02/02/2006 144A    50,000,000        49,985,065 
     FRN, 4.49%, 02/27/2006 144A    35,000,000        34,998,331 
Sigma Finance, Inc.:                 
     3.87%, 07/03/2006 144A    75,000,000        75,000,000 
     4.00%, 08/02/2006 144A    50,000,000        50,000,000 
     4.86%, 02/12/2007 144A    50,000,000        50,000,000 
     FRN:                 
          4.31%, 09/28/2006 144A    50,000,000        50,000,000 
          4.61%, 04/13/2006 144A    62,000,000        62,003,305 

                546,981,025 

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure 0.6%             
McDonald’s Corp., FRN, 4.49%, 03/07/2006 144A    50,000,000        50,043,874 

Thrifts & Mortgage Finance 1.6%             
Countrywide Financial Corp., FRN:             
     4.50%, 03/06/2006    83,000,000        83,000,000 
     4.55%, 03/13/2006    59,000,000        59,000,000 

                142,000,000 

           Total Corporate Bonds (cost $2,359,210,555)            2,359,210,555 

FUNDING AGREEMENTS 6.0%             
Allstate Life Global Funding Agreement, 4.53%, 02/27/2006 +    35,000,000        35,000,000 
Jackson National Life Insurance Co., 4.61%, 04/03/2006 +    75,000,000        75,000,000 
Metropolitan Life Funding Agreement, 4.68%, 04/17/2006 +    75,000,000        75,000,000 
New York Life Funding Agreement, 4.63%, 03/01/2006 +    60,000,000        60,000,000 
Transamerica Occidental Funding Agreement:             
     4.61%, 02/01/2006 +    140,000,000        140,000,000 
     4.68%, 04/03/2006 +    135,000,000        135,000,000 

           Total Funding Agreements (cost $520,000,000)            520,000,000 


See Notes to Financial Statements

16


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

        Principal         
        Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS 0.6%                 
Industrial Development Revenue 0.1%                 
Warren Cnty., KY IDA RB, Stupp Brothers, Inc. Proj., FRN, Ser. B-1, 4.47%,            
     02/02/2006, (LOC: Bank of America Corp.)        $10,500,000    $    10,500,000 

Miscellaneous Revenue 0.5%                 
Detroit, MI Economic Dev. Corp. RB, Waterfront Recreation, FRN, Ser. B, 4.59%,            
     02/02/2006, (LOC: Bank of America Corp.)        41,830,000        41,830,000 

           Total Municipal Obligations (cost $52,330,000)            52,330,000 

U.S. GOVERNMENT & AGENCY OBLIGATIONS  2.9%             
FHLB, 4.50%, 11/03/2006        70,000,000        70,000,000 
FHLMC:                 
     1.875%, 02/15/2006        38,699,000        38,673,540 
     FRN, 2.50%, 04/19/2006        60,000,000        60,000,000 
FNMA, 3.15%, 02/06/2006        80,000,000        79,999,852 

           Total U.S. Government & Agency Obligations  (cost $248,673,392)            248,673,392 

YANKEE OBLIGATIONS-CORPORATE 2.9%                 
FINANCIALS 2.9%                 
Commercial Banks 2.3%                 
HBOS plc, FRN, 4.44%, 02/20/2006 144A        150,000,000        150,000,000 
Islandsbanki HF, FRN, 4.56%, 02/22/2006 144A        50,000,000        50,000,000 

                200,000,000 

Diversified Financial Services 0.6%                 
Irish Life & Permanent plc, 4.51%, 02/22/2006 144A        50,000,000        50,000,000 

           Total Yankee Obligations-Corporate (cost $250,000,000)            250,000,000 
 

        Shares        Value 

MUTUAL FUND SHARES 0.0%                 
Federated Prime Value Obligation Fund (cost $74,592)    74,592        74,592 
 

        Principal         
        Amount        Value 

REPURCHASE AGREEMENT 0.4%                 
Societe Generale, 4.33%, dated 1/31/2006, maturing 2/01/2006; maturity             
     value $32,567,435 (1) (cost $32,563,518)        $ 32,563,518        32,563,518 

Total Investments (cost $8,618,418,848) 100.3%            8,618,418,848 
Other Assets and Liabilities (0.3%)                (29,815,474) 

Net Assets 100.0%            $ 8,588,603,374 
           

+    Security is deemed illiquid and is valued using market quotations when readily available. 
144A    Security that may be sold to qualified institutional buyers under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. 
    This security has been determined to be liquid under guidelines established by the Board of Trustees, unless otherwise 
    noted. 
(1)    Collateralized by $33,157,000 U.S. Treasury Note, 1.825%, 1/15/2015, value including accrued interest is $33,215,313. 

See Notes to Financial Statements

17


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

Summary of Abbreviations 
FHLB    Federal Home Loan Bank 
FHLMC    Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. 
FNMA    Federal National Mortgage Association 
FRN    Floating Rate Note 
IDA    Industrial Development Authority 
LOC    Letter of Credit 
RB    Revenue Bond 

The following table shows the percent of total investments by credit quality as of January 31, 2006 (unaudited):

Tier 1    100% 


The following table shows the percent of total investments by maturity as of January 31, 2006 (unaudited):

1 day    8.7% 
2-7 days    25.1% 
8-60 days    49.0% 
61-120 days    8.9% 
121-240 days    3.4% 
241+ days    4.9% 

    100.0% 
   

See Notes to Financial Statements

18


STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

January 31, 2006

Assets         
Investments at amortized cost    $    8,618,418,848 
Cash        71,749 
Receivable for Fund shares sold        248,237 
Interest receivable        25,475,985 
Prepaid expenses and other assets        146,691 

   Total assets        8,644,361,510 

Liabilities         
Dividends payable        4,952,461 
Payable for securities purchased        39,796,444 
Payable for Fund shares redeemed        9,354,243 
Advisory fee payable        93,103 
Distribution Plan expenses payable        98,924 
Due to other related parties        18,819 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities        1,444,142 

   Total liabilities        55,758,136 

Net assets    $    8,588,603,374 

Net assets represented by         
Paid-in capital    $    8,593,481,173 
Undistributed net investment income        98,187 
Accumulated net realized losses on investments        (4,975,986) 

Total net assets    $    8,588,603,374 

Net assets consists of         
   Class A    $    2,803,363,613 
   Class B        32,730,166 
   Class C        8,825,599 
   Class S        2,420,567,321 
   Class S1        2,133,402,733 
   Class I        1,189,713,942 

Total net assets    $    8,588,603,374 

Shares outstanding (unlimited number of shares authorized)         
   Class A        2,804,606,093 
   Class B        32,753,784 
   Class C        8,828,626 
   Class S        2,423,583,736 
   Class S1        2,133,441,710 
   Class I        1,191,853,677 

Net asset value per share         
   Class A    $    1.00 
   Class B    $    1.00 
   Class C    $    1.00 
   Class S    $    1.00 
   Class S1    $    1.00 
   Class I    $    1.00 


See Notes to Financial Statements

19


STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Year Ended January 31, 2006

Investment income         
Interest    $    300,800,632 

Expenses         
Advisory fee        34,986,691 
Distribution Plan expenses         
   Class A        8,654,774 
   Class B        400,698 
   Class C        142,290 
   Class S        14,993,214 
   Class S1        12,659,035 
Administrative services fee        5,305,645 
Transfer agent fees        10,897,885 
Trustees’ fees and expenses        123,823 
Printing and postage expenses        617,999 
Custodian and accounting fees        2,093,234 
Registration and filing fees        82,464 
Professional fees        78,805 
Other        202,644 

   Total expenses        91,239,201 
   Less: Expense reductions        (138,604) 
           Fee waivers and expense reimbursements        (4,088,116) 

   Net expenses        87,012,481 

Net investment income        213,788,151 

Net realized losses on investments        (119,326) 

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations    $    213,668,825 


See Notes to Financial Statements

20


STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

    Year Ended January 31, 

    2006    2005 

Operations                 
Net investment income    $    213,788,151    $    61,014,689 
Net realized losses on investments        (119,326)        (19,886) 

Net increase in net assets resulting                 
   from operations        213,668,825        60,994,803 

Distributions to shareholders from                 
Net investment income                 
   Class A        (72,538,999)        (23,466,845) 
   Class B        (707,887)        (104,311) 
   Class C        (242,576)        (49,169) 
   Class S        (55,478,327)        (10,753,722) 
   Class S1        (48,489,076)        (10,623,068) 
   Class I        (36,306,902)        (16,014,983) 

   Total distributions to shareholders        (213,763,767)        (61,012,098) 

    Shares        Shares     
Capital share transactions                 
Proceeds from shares sold                 
   Class A    13,002,882,240    13,002,882,240    14,070,341,857    14,070,341,857 
   Class B    23,918,604    23,918,604    30,304,561    30,304,561 
   Class C    18,039,528    18,039,528    46,101,474    46,101,474 
   Class S    6,472,134,491    6,472,134,491    1,341,631,844    1,341,631,844 
   Class S1    13,908,320,152    13,908,320,152    7,927,586,237    7,927,586,237 
   Class I    5,321,160,505    5,321,160,505    6,365,129,123    6,365,129,123 

        38,746,455,520        29,781,095,096 

Net asset value of shares issued in                 
   reinvestment of distributions                 
   Class A    58,536,084    58,536,084    20,173,809    20,173,809 
   Class B    623,739    623,739    92,777    92,777 
   Class C    205,683    205,683    41,430    41,430 
   Class S    15,972,354    15,972,354    31    31 
   Class S1    48,489,076    48,489,076    10,403,291    10,403,291 
   Class I    2,960,989    2,960,989    1,088,586    1,088,586 

        126,787,925        31,799,924 

Automatic conversion of Class B                 
   shares to Class A shares                 
   Class A    6,596,936    6,596,936    7,007,280    7,007,280 
   Class B    (6,596,936)    (6,596,936)    (7,007,280)    (7,007,280) 

        0        0 

Payment for shares redeemed                 
   Class A    (13,291,474,713)    (13,291,474,713)    (17,331,368,841)    (17,331,368,841) 
   Class B    (30,928,537)    (30,928,537)    (47,471,221)    (47,471,221) 
   Class C    (25,504,024)    (25,504,024)    (56,547,203)    (56,547,203) 
   Class S    (6,544,009,774)    (6,544,009,774)    (2,409,555,060)    (2,409,555,060) 
   Class S1    (14,116,958,991)    (14,116,958,991)    (6,701,260,297)    (6,701,260,297) 
   Class I    (5,665,824,097)    (5,665,824,097)    (6,493,437,525)    (6,493,437,525) 

        (39,674,700,136)        (33,039,640,147) 

Net decrease in net assets resulting                 
   from capital share transactions        (801,456,691)        (3,226,745,127) 

Total decrease in net assets        (801,551,633)        (3,226,762,422) 
Net assets                 
Beginning of period        9,390,155,007        12,616,917,429 

End of period    $    8,588,603,374    $    9,390,155,007 

Undistributed net investment income    $    98,187    $    73,803 


See Notes to Financial Statements

21


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. ORGANIZATION

Evergreen Money Market Fund (the “Fund”) is a diversified series of Evergreen Money Market Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on September 18, 1997. The Trust is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).

The Fund offers Class A, Class B, Class C, Class S, Class S1 and Institutional (“Class I”) shares. Class A, Class S, Class S1 and Class I shares are sold at net asset value without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge. Class B shares are sold without a front-end sales charge but are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge that is payable upon redemption and decreases depending on how long the shares have been held. Class C shares are sold without a front-end sales charge but are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge that is payable upon redemption within one year. Class B and Class C shares are only available for subsequent purchases by existing shareholders and prospective shareholders making an exchange from Class B or Class C shares of another Evergreen fund. Each class of shares, except Class I shares, pays an ongoing distribution fee.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported herein. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

a. Valuation of investments

As permitted under Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act, securities are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value.

Investments in other mutual funds are valued at net asset value.

b. Repurchase agreements

Securities pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements are held by the custodian bank or in a segregated account in the Fund’s name until the agreements mature. Collateral for certain tri-party repurchase agreements is held at the counterparty’s custodian in a segregated account for the benefit of the Fund and the counterparty. Each agreement requires that the market value of the collateral be sufficient to cover payments of interest and principal. However, in the event of default or bankruptcy by the other party to the agreement, retention of the collateral may be subject to legal proceedings. The Fund will only enter into repurchase agreements with banks and other financial institutions, which are deemed by the investment advisor to be creditworthy pursuant to guidelines established by the Board of Trustees.

c. Security transactions and investment income

Security transactions are recorded on trade date. Realized gains and losses are computed using the specific cost of the security sold. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.

22


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

d. Federal taxes

The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company and distribute all of its taxable income, including any net capital gains (which have already been offset by available capital loss carryovers). Accordingly, no provision for federal taxes is required.

e. Distributions

Distributions to shareholders from net investment income are accrued daily and paid monthly. Distributions from net realized gains, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Such distributions are determined in conformity with income tax regulations, which may differ from generally accepted accounting principles.

Reclassifications have been made to the Fund’s components of net assets to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryovers, as applicable) under income tax regulations. The primary permanent differences causing such reclassifications are due to expiration of capital loss carryovers. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the following amounts were reclassified:


Paid-in capital  $  (381,247) 
Accumulated net realized losses on investments        381,247 


f. Class allocations

Income, common expenses and realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated to the classes based on the relative net assets of each class. Distribution fees, if any, are calculated daily at the class level based on the appropriate net assets of each class and the specific expense rates applicable to each class.

3. ADVISORY FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC (“EIMC”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation (“Wachovia”), is the investment advisor to the Fund and is paid an annual fee starting at 0.44% and declining to 0.39% as average daily net assets increase.

From time to time, EIMC may voluntarily or contractually waive its fee and/or reimburse expenses in order to limit operating expenses. During the year ended January 31, 2006, EIMC waived its advisory fee in the amount of $329,448 and reimbursed other expenses in the amount of $2,257,843. In addition, EIMC reimbursed Distribution Plan expenses (see Note 4) relating to Class S1 shares in the amount of $1,500,825.

Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. (“EIS”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia, is the administrator to the Fund. As administrator, EIS provides the Fund with facilities, equipment and personnel and is paid an annual rate determined by applying percentage rates to the aggregate average daily net assets of the Evergreen money market funds, starting at 0.06% and declining to 0.04% as the aggregate average daily net assets of the Evergreen money market funds increase.

23


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

Evergreen Service Company, LLC (“ESC”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia, is the transfer and dividend disbursing agent for the Fund. ESC receives account fees that vary based on the type of account held by the shareholders in the Fund. For the year ended January 31, 2006, the transfer agent fees were equivalent to an annual rate of 0.12% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.

4. DISTRIBUTION PLANS

EIS also serves as distributor of the Fund’s shares. The Fund has adopted Distribution Plans, as allowed by Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act, for each class of shares, except Class I. Under the Distribution Plans, distribution fees are paid at an annual rate of 0.30% of the average daily net assets for Class A shares, 0.60% of the average daily net assets for Class S and S1 shares and 1.00% of the average daily net assets for each of Class B and Class C shares.

For the year ended January 31, 2006, EIS received $232,389 and $4,008 in contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of Class B and Class C shares, respectively.

5. SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS

On January 31, 2006, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes for the Fund was the same as for financial reporting purposes.

As of January 31, 2006, the Fund had $4,968,423 in capital loss carryovers for federal income tax purposes expiring as follows:

Expiration

2007    2008    2009    2011    2012    2013    2014 

$200,609    $139,955    $4,353,228    $137,629    $5,353    $19,886    $111,763 


For income tax purposes, capital losses incurred after October 31 within the Fund’s fiscal year are deemed to arise on the first business day of the following fiscal year. As of January 31, 2006, the Fund incurred and will elect to defer post-October losses of $7,563.

6. INTERFUND LENDING

Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the SEC, the Fund may participate in an interfund lending program with certain funds in the Evergreen fund family. This program allows the Fund to borrow from other participating funds. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the Fund did not participate in the interfund lending program.

7. DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS

As of January 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis consisted of undistributed ordinary income in the amount of $98,187 and capital loss carryover and post-October loss in the amount of $4,975,986.

The tax character of distributions paid were $213,763,767 and $61,012,098 of ordinary income for the years ended January 31, 2006 and January 31, 2005, respectively.

24


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

8. EXPENSE REDUCTIONS

Through expense offset arrangements with ESC and the Fund’s custodian, a portion of fund expenses has been reduced.

9. DEFERRED TRUSTEES’ FEES

Each Trustee of the Fund may defer any or all compensation related to performance of their duties as Trustees. The Trustees’ deferred balances are allocated to deferral accounts, which are included in the accrued expenses for the Fund. The investment performance of the deferral accounts is based on the investment performance of certain Evergreen funds. Any gains earned or losses incurred in the deferral accounts are reported in the Fund’s Trustees’ fees and expenses. At the election of the Trustees, the deferral account will be paid either in one lump sum or in quarterly installments for up to ten years.

10. FINANCING AGREEMENT

The Fund and certain other Evergreen funds share in a $150 million unsecured revolving credit commitment for temporary and emergency purposes, including the funding of redemptions, as permitted by each participating fund’s borrowing restrictions. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at 0.50% per annum above the Federal Funds rate. All of the participating funds are charged an annual commitment fee of 0.09% of the unused balance, which is allocated pro rata. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the Fund had no borrowings under this agreement.

11. REGULATORY MATTERS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Since September 2003, governmental and self-regulatory authorities have instituted numerous ongoing investigations of various practices in the mutual fund industry, including investigations relating to revenue sharing, market-timing, late trading and record retention, among other things. The investigations cover investment advisors, distributors and transfer agents to mutual funds, as well as other firms. EIMC, EIS and ESC (collectively, “Evergreen”) have received subpoenas and other requests for documents and testimony relating to these investigations, are endeavoring to comply with those requests, and are cooperating with the investigations. Evergreen is continuing its own internal review of policies, practices, procedures and personnel, and is taking remedial action where appropriate.

In connection with one of these investigations, on July 28, 2004, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) informed Evergreen that the staff intends to recommend to the SEC that it institute an enforcement action against Evergreen. The SEC staff’s proposed allegations relate to (i) an arrangement pursuant to which a broker at one of EIMC’s affiliated broker-dealers had been authorized, apparently by an EIMC officer (no longer with EIMC), to engage in short-term trading, on behalf of a client, in Evergreen Mid Cap Growth Fund (formerly Evergreen Emerging Growth Fund and prior to that, known as Evergreen Small Company Growth Fund) during the period from December 2000 through April 2003, in excess of the limitations set forth in the fund’s prospectus, (ii) short-term trading from September 2001 through January 2003, by a former Evergreen portfolio manager, of Evergreen Precious Metals Fund, a fund he managed at the time, (iii) the sufficiency of systems for monitoring exchanges and enforcing exchange limi-

25


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

tations as stated in the fund’s prospectuses, and (iv) the adequacy of e-mail retention practices. In connection with the activity in Evergreen Mid Cap Growth Fund, EIMC reimbursed the fund $378,905, plus an additional $25,242, representing what EIMC calculated at that time to be the client’s net gain and the fees earned by EIMC and the expenses incurred by this fund on the client’s account. In connection with the activity in Evergreen Precious Metals Fund, EIMC reimbursed the fund $70,878, plus an additional $3,075, representing what EIMC calculated at that time to be the portfolio manager’s net gain and the fees earned by EIMC and expenses incurred by the fund on the portfolio manager’s account. Evergreen is currently engaged in discussions with the staff of the SEC concerning its recommendation.

The staff of the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) had notified EIS that it has made a preliminary determination to recommend that disciplinary action be brought against EIS for certain violations of the NASD’s rules. The recommendation relates principally to allegations that EIS (i) arranged for fund portfolio trades to be directed to broker-dealers (including Wachovia Securities, LLC, an affiliate of EIS) that sold Evergreen fund shares during the period of January 2001 to December 2003 and (ii) provided non-cash compensation by sponsoring offsite meetings attended by Wachovia Securities, LLC brokers during that period. EIS is cooperating with the NASD staff in its review of these matters.

Any resolution of these matters with regulatory authorities may include, but not be limited to, sanctions, penalties or injunctions regarding Evergreen, restitution to mutual fund shareholders and/or other financial penalties and structural changes in the governance or management of Evergreen’s mutual fund business. Any penalties or restitution will be paid by Evergreen and not by the Evergreen funds.

In addition, the Evergreen funds and EIMC and certain of its affiliates are involved in various legal actions, including private litigation and class action lawsuits. EIMC does not expect that any of such legal actions currently pending or threatened will have a material adverse impact on the financial position or operations of any of the Evergreen funds or on EIMC’s ability to provide services to the Evergreen funds.

Although Evergreen believes that neither the foregoing investigations nor any pending or threatened legal actions will have a material adverse impact on the Evergreen funds, there can be no assurance that these matters and any publicity surrounding or resulting from them will not result in reduced sales or increased redemptions of Evergreen fund shares, which could increase Evergreen fund transaction costs or operating expenses, or have other adverse consequences on the Evergreen funds.

26


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Trustees and Shareholders
Evergreen Money Market Trust

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, of the Evergreen Money Market Fund, a series of Evergreen Money Market Trust, as of January 31, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of January 31, 2006 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, or by other appropriate auditing procedures where replies from brokers were not received. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Evergreen Money Market Fund, as of January 31, 2006, the results of its operations, changes in its net assets and financial highlights for each of the years or periods described above in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.


Boston, Massachusetts
March 24, 2006

27


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited)

INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT
ADVISORY AGREEMENT

Each year, the Fund’s Board of Trustees is required to consider whether to continue in place the Fund’s investment advisory agreement. In September 2005, the Trustees, including a majority of the Trustees who are not interested persons (as that term is defined in the 1940 Act) of the Fund or of EIMC, approved the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement.

At the same time, the Trustees considered the continuation of the investment advisory agreements for all of the Evergreen funds, and the description below refers in many cases to the Trustees’ process and conclusions in connection with their consideration of this matter for all of the Evergreen funds. In all of its deliberations, the Board of Trustees and the disinterested Trustees were advised by independent counsel to the disinterested Trustees and counsel to the Evergreen funds.

The review process. The 1940 Act requires that the Board of Trustees request and evaluate, and that EIMC furnish, such information as may reasonably be necessary to evaluate the terms of the Fund’s advisory agreement. The review process began formally in spring 2005, when a committee of the Board (the “Committee”), working with EIMC management, determined generally the types of information the Board would review and set a timeline for the review process. In late spring, counsel to the disinterested Trustees sent to EIMC a formal request for information to be furnished to the Trustees. In addition, the independent data provider Lipper Inc. (“Lipper”) was engaged to provide fund-specific and industry-wide data to the Board containing information of a nature and in a format generally prescribed by the Committee.

The Trustees reviewed EIMC’s responses to the request for information, with the assistance of counsel for the disinterested Trustees and for the Evergreen funds and an independent industry consultant retained by the disinterested Trustees, and requested and received additional information following that review. The Committee met in person with the representatives of EIMC in early September 2005. At a meeting of the full Board of Trustees later in September 2005, the Committee reported the results of its discussions with EIMC, and the full Board met with representatives of EIMC, engaged in further review of the materials provided to them, and approved the continuation of each of the advisory and sub-advisory agreements.

The disinterested Trustees discussed the continuation of the Fund’s advisory agreement with representatives of EIMC and in multiple private sessions with legal counsel at which no personnel of EIMC were present. In considering the continuation of the agreement, the Trustees did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each Trustee attributed different weights to various factors. The Trustees evaluated information provided to them both in terms of the Evergreen mutual funds generally and with respect to the Fund specifically as they considered appropriate; although the Trustees considered the continuation of the agreement as part of the larger process of considering the continuation of the advisory contracts for all of the Evergreen funds, their determination to continue the advisory agreement for each of the Evergreen funds was ultimately made on a fund-by-fund basis.

28


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

This summary describes the most important, but not necessarily all, of the factors considered by the Board and the disinterested Trustees.

Information reviewed. The Board of Trustees and committees of the Board of Trustees meet periodically during the course of the year. At those meetings, the Board receives a wide variety of information regarding the services performed by EIMC, the investment performance of the Fund and the other Evergreen funds, and other aspects of the business and operations of the Evergreen funds. At those meetings, and in the process of considering the continuation of the agreements, the Trustees considered information regarding, for example, the Fund’s investment results; the portfolio management team for the Fund and the experience of the members of that team, and any recent changes in the membership of the team; portfolio trading practices; compliance by the Fund and EIMC with applicable laws and regulations and with the Fund’s and EIMC’s compliance policies and procedures; services provided by affiliates of EIMC to the Fund and shareholders of the Fund; and other information relating to the nature, extent, and quality of services provided by EIMC. The Trustees considered the rates at which the Fund pays investment advisory fees, the total expense ratio of the Fund, and the efforts generally by EIMC and its affiliates as sponsors of the Fund. The data provided by Lipper showed the fees paid by the Fund and the Fund’s total expense ratio in comparison to other similar mutual funds, in addition to data regarding the investment performance by the Fund in comparison to other similar mutual funds. The Trustees were assisted by the independent industry consultant in reviewing the information presented to them.

The Board also considered that EIS serves as administrator to the Fund and receives a fee for its services as administrator. In their comparison of the advisory fee paid by the Fund with those paid by other mutual funds, the Board took into account administrative fees paid by the Fund and those other mutual funds. The Board considered that affiliates of EIMC serve as transfer agent and distributor to the Fund and receive fees from the Fund for those services, and received information regarding recent reductions in the transfer agency fees paid by the Fund. They considered other so-called “fall-out” benefits to EIMC and its affiliates due to their other relationships with the Evergreen funds, including, for example, soft-dollar services received by EIMC attributable to transactions entered into by EIMC for the benefit of the Evergreen funds and brokerage commissions received by Wachovia Securities LLC, an affiliate of EIMC, from transactions effected by it for the Evergreen funds.

The Board of Trustees also considered that certain of the money market funds managed by EIMC are offered in connection with cash sweep arrangements and similar services made available by affiliates of EIMC to their customers. The Trustees considered that EIMC and its affiliates benefit from the availability of those Evergreen funds and the distribution and shareholder services fees paid by those Evergreen funds.

Nature and quality of the services provided. The Trustees considered that EIMC and its affili-ates provide a comprehensive investment management service to the Fund. They noted that EIMC formulates and implements an investment program for the Fund. They noted that EIMC makes its personnel available to serve as officers of the Evergreen funds, and concluded that the

29


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

reporting and management functions provided by EIMC with respect to the Fund and the Evergreen funds overall were generally satisfactory. The Trustees considered the investment philosophy of the Fund’s portfolio management team, and considered the in-house research capabilities of EIMC and its affiliates, as well as other resources available to EIMC, including research services available to it from third parties. The Board considered the managerial and financial resources available to EIMC, and the commitment that the Wachovia organization has made to the Fund and the Evergreen funds generally. On the basis of these factors, they determined that the nature and scope of the services provided by EIMC were consistent with its duties under the investment advisory agreements and appropriate and consistent with the investment programs and best interests of the Fund.

The Trustees noted the commitment and resources EIMC and its affiliates have brought to the regulatory, compliance, accounting, tax and tax reporting, and shareholder servicing functions, and the number and quality of staff committed to those functions, which they concluded were appropriate and generally in line with EIMC’s responsibilities to the Fund and to the Evergreen funds generally. They noted that EIMC had enhanced a number of these functions in recent periods and continued to do so, in light of regulatory developments in the investment management and mutual fund industries generally and in light of regulatory matters involving EIMC and its affiliates. They concluded that those enhancements appeared generally appropriate, but considered that the enhancement process is an on-going one and determined to continue to monitor developments in these functions in coming periods for appropriateness and consistency with regulatory and industry developments. The Board and the disinterested Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the Fund’s advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by EIMC, including services provided by EIS under its administrative services agreement with the Fund.

Investment performance. The Trustees considered the investment performance of each of the Evergreen funds, both by comparison to other comparable mutual funds and to broad market indices. The Trustees emphasized that the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for an Evergreen fund should not be taken as any indication that the Trustees did not believe investment performance for any specific fund might not be improved, and they noted that they would continue to monitor closely the investment performance of the Evergreen funds going forward. Specifically with respect to the Fund, the Trustees noted that the Class A shares of the Fund performed in the first quintile over recently completed one-, three-, and five-year periods.

Advisory and administrative fees. The Trustees recognized that EIMC does not seek to provide the lowest cost investment advisory service, but to provide a high quality, full-service investment management product at a reasonable price. They also noted that EIMC has generally attempted to make its investment advisory fees consistent with industry norms. The Trustees noted that, from the materials presented, it appeared that the combination of investment advisory and administrative fees paid by the Fund to EIMC and EIS with respect to Class A shares was higher than most (though not all) of the fees paid by comparable funds, although the Trustees concluded that the fees were not unreasonable in light of the Fund’s investment performance and the services provided by EIMC and EIS.

30


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

The Trustees noted that EIMC does not provide services to other clients using the same investment strategy as it uses in managing the Fund.

Economies of scale. The Trustees noted that economies of scale would likely be achieved by EIMC in managing the Evergreen funds as the funds grow. The Trustees noted that the Fund had implemented a breakpoint in its advisory fee structure. The Trustees undertook to continue to review the appropriate levels of breakpoints in the future, but concluded that the breakpoint as implemented appeared to be a reasonable step toward the realization of economies of scale by the funds.

Profitability. The Trustees considered information provided to them regarding the profitability to the EIMC organization of the investment advisory, administration, and transfer agency fees paid to EIMC and its affiliates by each of the Evergreen funds. They considered that the information provided to them was necessarily estimated. They noted that the levels of profitability of the Evergreen funds to EIMC varied widely, depending on among other things the size and type of fund. They noted that all of the estimates provided to them were calculated on a pre-tax basis. They considered the profitability of the Evergreen funds in light of such factors as, for example, the information they had received regarding the relation of the fees paid by the Evergreen funds to those paid by other mutual funds, the investment performance of the Evergreen funds, and the amount of revenues involved. In light of these factors, the Trustees did not consider that the profitability of any of the Evergreen funds, individually or in the aggregate, was such as to prevent their approving the continuation of the agreements.

In connection with their review of the Fund’s investment advisory and administrative fees, the Trustees also considered the transfer agency fees paid by the Evergreen funds to an affiliate of EIMC. They reviewed information presented to them showing generally that the transfer agency fees charged to the Evergreen funds were generally consistent with industry norms, and that transfer agency fees for a number of Evergreen funds had recently declined, or were expected to in the near future.

31


TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS

TRUSTEES1

Charles A. Austin III    Investment Counselor, Anchor Capital Advisors, Inc. (investment advice); Director, The Andover 
Trustee    Companies (insurance); Trustee, Arthritis Foundation of New England; Former Director, The 
DOB: 10/23/1934    Francis Ouimet Society; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust; Former 
Term of office since: 1991    Investment Counselor, Appleton Partners, Inc. (investment advice); Former Director, Executive 
Other directorships: None   Vice President and Treasurer, State Street Research & Management Company (investment 
    advice) 

Shirley L. Fulton    Partner, Tin, Fulton, Greene & Owen, PLLC (law firm); Former Partner, Helms, Henderson & 
Trustee    Fulton, P.A. (law firm); Retired Senior Resident Superior Court Judge, 26th Judicial District, 
DOB: 1/10/1952    Charlotte, NC 
Term of office since: 2004     
Other directorships: None     

K. Dun Gifford    Chairman and President, Oldways Preservation and Exchange Trust (education); Trustee, 
Trustee    Treasurer and Chairman of the Finance Committee, Cambridge College; Former Trustee, Mentor 
DOB: 10/23/1938    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1974     
Other directorships: None     

Dr. Leroy Keith, Jr.    Partner, Stonington Partners, Inc. (private equity fund); Trustee, Phoenix Funds Family; Director, 
Trustee    Diversapack Co.; Director, Obagi Medical Products Co.; Former Director, Lincoln Educational 
DOB: 2/14/1939    Services; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1983     
Other directorships: Trustee, The     
Phoenix Group of Mutual Funds     

Gerald M. McDonnell    Manager of Commercial Operations, SMI Steel Co. – South Carolina (steel producer); Former 
Trustee    Sales and Marketing Manager, Nucor Steel Company; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash 
DOB: 7/14/1939    Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1988     
Other directorships: None     

William Walt Pettit    Vice President, Kellam & Pettit, P.A. (law firm); Director, Superior Packaging Corp.; Director, 
Trustee    National Kidney Foundation of North Carolina, Inc.; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash 
DOB: 8/26/1955    Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     

David M. Richardson    President, Richardson, Runden LLC (executive recruitment business development/consulting 
Trustee    company); Consultant, Kennedy Information, Inc. (executive recruitment information and 
DOB: 9/19/1941    research company); Consultant, AESC (The Association of Executive Search Consultants); 
Term of office since: 1982    Director, J&M Cumming Paper Co. (paper merchandising); Former Trustee, NDI Technologies, LLP 
Other directorships: None    (communications); Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 

Dr. Russell A. Salton III    President/CEO, AccessOne MedCard; Former Medical Director, Healthcare Resource Associates, 
Trustee    Inc.; Former Medical Director, U.S. Health Care/Aetna Health Services; Former Trustee, Mentor 
DOB: 6/2/1947    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     


32


TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS continued

Michael S. Scofield    Director and Chairman, Branded Media Corporation (multi-media branding company); Attorney, 
Trustee    Law Offices of Michael S. Scofield; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
DOB: 2/20/1943     
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     

Richard J. Shima    Independent Consultant; Trustee, Saint Joseph College (CT); Director, Hartford Hospital; Trustee, 
Trustee    Greater Hartford YMCA; Former Director, Trust Company of CT; Former Director, Enhance 
DOB: 8/11/1939    Financial Services, Inc.; Former Director, Old State House Association; Former Trustee, Mentor 
Term of office since: 1993    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Other directorships: None     

Richard K. Wagoner, CFA2    Member and Former President, North Carolina Securities Traders Association; Member, Financial 
Trustee    Analysts Society; Former Consultant to the Boards of Trustees of the Evergreen funds; Former 
DOB: 12/12/1937    Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1999     
Other directorships: None     

OFFICERS     
Dennis H. Ferro3    Principal occupations: President and Chief Executive Officer, Evergreen Investment Company, 
President    Inc. and Executive Vice President, Wachovia Bank, N.A.; former Chief Investment Officer, 
DOB: 6/20/1945    Evergreen Investment Company, Inc. 
Term of office since: 2003     

Jeremy DePalma4    Principal occupations: Vice President, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc.; Former Assistant Vice 
Treasurer    President, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. 
DOB: 2/5/1974     
Term of office since: 2005     

Michael H. Koonce4    Principal occupations: Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Evergreen Investment 
Secretary    Services, Inc.; Senior Vice President and Assistant General Counsel, Wachovia Corporation 
DOB: 4/20/1960     
Term of office since: 2000     

James Angelos4    Principal occupations: Chief Compliance Officer and Senior Vice President, Evergreen Funds; 
Chief Compliance Officer    Former Director of Compliance, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. 
DOB: 9/2/1947     
Term of office since: 2004     


1 Each Trustee serves until a successor is duly elected or qualified or until his/her death, resignation, retirement or removal from office. Each Trustee oversees 90 Evergreen funds. Correspondence for each Trustee may be sent to Evergreen Board of Trustees, P.O. Box 20083, Charlotte, NC 28202.

2 Mr. Wagoner is an “interested person” of the Fund because of his ownership of shares in Wachovia Corporation, the parent to the Fund’s investment advisor.

3 The address of the Officer is 401 S. Tryon Street, 20th Floor, Charlotte, NC 28288.

4 The address of the Officer is 200 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116.

Additional information about the Fund’s Board of Trustees and Officers can be found in the Statement of Additional Information (SAI) and is available upon request without charge by calling 800.343.2898.

33



565209 rv3 3/2006


Evergreen Municipal Money Market Fund



    table of contents 
1    LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS 
4    FUND AT A GLANCE 
6    ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES 
7    FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 
11    SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS 
27    STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES 
28    STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS 
29    STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS 
30    NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
35    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 
36    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
44    TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS 

This annual report must be preceded or accompanied by a prospectus of the Evergreen fund contained herein. The prospectus contains more complete information, including fees and expenses, and should be read carefully before investing or sending money.

The fund will file its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q will be available on the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, the fund’s Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800.SEC.0330.

A description of the fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures, as well as information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, is available by visiting our Web site at EvergreenInvestments.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov. The fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures are also available without charge, upon request, by calling 800.343.2898.

Mutual Funds:         
 NOT FDIC INSURED    MAY LOSE VALUE    NOT BANK GUARANTEED 

Evergreen InvestmentsSM is a service mark of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC.
Copyright 2006, Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC.

Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC is a subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation
and is an affiliate of Wachovia Corporation's other Broker Dealer subsidiaries.

Evergreen mutual funds are distributed by Evergreen Investment Services, Inc.
200 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS

March 2006


Dennis H. Ferro

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Dear Shareholder,

We are pleased to provide the annual report for the Evergreen Municipal Money Market Fund, which covers the twelve-month period ended January 31, 2006.

The U.S. financial markets had to navigate through some choppy seas during the past twelve months. Uncertainty was prevalent as questions surfaced about the sustainability of economic growth, tighter monetary policy, surging oil prices, moderating profit growth, and an increase in inflation. Geopolitical tensions continued and the Gulf region suffered enormous damage from the hurricanes. Not surprisingly, each of these events combined at various times during the year to increase market volatility. Throughout these turbulent times, the portfolio management teams of Evergreen’s money market funds employed a variety of strategies to manage portfolios in a rising yield environment and enhance portfolio returns, in both the taxable and tax-advantaged markets.

Over the course of the investment period, economic reports frequently delivered confusing signals. While growth was expected to moderate as the expansion matured, the economy showed surprising strength, particularly in the third quarter, as Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) grew in excess of 4%, despite the hurricanes and the spike in inflation. The effects of higher energy prices and tighter monetary policy became evident in the last quarter of 2005 as initial readings for GDP growth barely exceeded 1%. The conflicting data was often subject to interpretation and the consequence for investors was a frequent bout of market volatility. While many debated whether or not

1


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS continued

the short-term volatility was an indication of pending weakness, Evergreen’s Investment Strategy Committee focused on the breadth of economic output, particularly personal consumption and capital investment. Though the rate of growth in each was moderating from unusually high levels, we believed it would lead to a more sustainable, and ultimately less inflationary, pace for the expansion. The fundamentals, though no longer great, were still pretty good in our view, and our portfolio teams based many of their investment decisions on these positive macro-economic trends.

Despite the mixed signals from the economy, the Federal Reserve (“Fed”) maintained its strategy of gradually raising short-term interest rates. Considering that monetary policy had been stimulative for most of the prior three years, central bankers were determined in their efforts to prevent alarming increases in inflation, raising their target for the federal funds rate by twenty-five basis points at every policy meeting over the past year. Yet long-term market interest rates continued to decline and the extent of the yield curve’s flattening had many on Wall Street debating its meaning. Given our forecast for more moderate levels of growth in consumption and investment supporting a sustainable expansion, we viewed the yield curve’s message as confidence in the Fed’s ability to prevent long-term inflation. In addition, higher oil prices would likely serve to dampen output and we believed the absence of significant wage pressures would enable the Fed to continue on with its less stimulative, rather than more restrictive, path for monetary policy.

In this environment, the portfolio managers of Evergreen’s money market funds attempted to focus on the aforementioned market fundamentals, as well as the timing of Fed meetings. Each increase in the Fed’s target for its benchmark rate would result in a “resetting” of rates at the short end of the yield curve, enabling the teams to pursue higher income potential. In addition, many of our analysts and portfolio managers used a variety of short-term securities to capture yield, in

2


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS continued

order to provide our investors with the stability and liquidity necessary to balance exposure within their diversified long-term portfolios.

We continue to recommend that investors maintain their diversified strategies, including exposure to money market funds, within their long-term portfolios.

Please visit our Web site, EvergreenInvestments.com, for more information about our funds and other investment products available to you. Thank you for your continued support of Evergreen Investments.

Sincerely,


Dennis H. Ferro

President and Chief Executive Officer
Evergreen Investment Company, Inc.

 

Special Notice to Shareholders:

Please visit our Web site at EvergreenInvestments.com for a statement from President and Chief Executive Officer, Dennis Ferro, addressing NASD actions involving Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. (EIS), Evergreen’s mutual fund distributor or statements from Dennis Ferro and Chairman of the Board of the Evergreen funds, Michael S. Scofield, addressing SEC actions involving the Evergreen funds.

3


FUND AT A GLANCE

as of January 31, 2006

 

MANAGEMENT TEAM

Investment Advisor:

• Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC

Portfolio Managers:

• Mathew M. Kiselak
• James Randazzo

 

PERFORMANCE AND RETURNS*

Portfolio inception date: 11/2/1988

    Class A    Class S    Class S1    Class I 
Class inception date    1/5/1995    6/30/2000    6/26/2001    11/2/1988 

Nasdaq symbol    EXAXX    N/A    N/A    EVTXX 

Average annual return                 

1-year    1.87%    1.57%    1.57%    2.18% 

5-year    1.23%    0.93%    1.00%    1.54% 

10-year    2.20%    2.17%    2.24%    2.51% 

7-day annualized yield    2.31%    2.01%    2.01%    2.61% 

30-day annualized yield    2.31%    2.01%    2.01%    2.61% 


*The yield quotation more closely reflects the current earnings of the fund than the total return quotation.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The performance quoted represents past performance and current performance may be lower or higher. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that investors’ shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month-end for Classes A or I, please go to EvergreenInvestments.com/fundperformance. Please call 1.800.343.2898 for the most recent month-end performance information for Classes S or S1. The performance of each class may vary based on differences in fees and expenses paid by the shareholders investing in each class. Performance includes the reinvestment of income dividends and capital gain distributions.

Historical performance shown for Classes S and S1 prior to their inception is based on the performance of Class I, the original class offered. The historical returns for Classes S and S1 have not been adjusted to reflect the effect of each class’ 12b-1 fee. The fund incurs 12b-1 fees of 0.30% for Class A and 0.60% for Classes S and S1. Class I does not pay a 12b-1 fee. If these fees had been reflected, returns for Classes S and S1 would have been lower.

The advisor is waiving a portion of its advisory fee. Had the fee not been waived, returns would have been lower. Returns reflect expense limits previously in effect for Class S and S1, without which returns for Class S and S1 would have been lower.

An investment in a money market fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund.

4


FUND AT A GLANCE continued

7-DAY ANNUALIZED YIELD


Class I shares are only offered in the following manner: (1) to investment advisory clients of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC (or its advisory affiliates) when purchased by such advisor(s) on behalf of its clients, (2) through arrangements entered into on behalf of the Evergreen funds with certain financial services firms, (3) to certain institutional investors and (4) to persons who owned Class Y shares in registered name in an Evergreen fund on or before December 31, 1994 or who owned shares of any SouthTrust fund in registered name as of March 18, 2005 or shares of Vestaur Securities Fund as of May 20, 2005.

Class I shares are only available to institutional shareholders with a minimum of $1 million investment, which may be waived in certain situations.

Class S and S1 shares are sold through certain broker dealers and financial institutions which have selling agreements with the fund’s distributor.

The fund’s investment objective is nonfundamental and may be changed without a vote of the fund’s shareholders.

The fund's yield will fluctuate and there can be no guarantee that the fund will achieve its objective or any particular tax-exempt yield. Income may be subject to federal alternative minimum tax as well as local income taxes.

Yields are based on net investment income for the stated periods and annualized. All data is as of January 31, 2006, and subject to change.

5


ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES

The Example below is intended to describe the fees and expenses borne by shareholders and the impact of those costs on your investment.

Example

As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads), redemption fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) fees and other fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from August 1, 2005 to January 31, 2006.

The example illustrates your fund’s costs in two ways:

• Actual expenses

The section in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in these columns, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class, in the column entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

• Hypothetical example for comparison purposes

The section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees or exchange fees. Therefore, the section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

    Beginning    Ending     
    Account    Account    Expenses 
    Value    Value    Paid During 
    8/1/2005    1/31/2006    Period* 

Actual             
Class A    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,010.69    $ 4.16 
Class S    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,009.18    $ 5.67 
Class S1    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,009.18    $ 5.67 
Class I    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,012.23    $ 2.64 
Hypothetical             
(5% return             
before expenses)             
Class A    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,021.07    $ 4.18 
Class S    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,019.56    $ 5.70 
Class S1    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,019.56    $ 5.70 
Class I    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,022.58    $ 2.65 


* For each class of the Fund, expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of each class (0.82% for Class A, 1.12% for Class S, 1.12% for Class S1 and 0.52% for Class I), multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184 / 365 days.

6


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS A    2006    2005     2004    2003    2002 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $ 1.00    $1.00 

Income from investment operations                     
Net investment income (loss)     0.02     0.01       0.01       0.01     0.02 

Distributions to shareholders from                     
Net investment income    (0.02)    (0.01)     (0.01)     (0.01)    (0.02) 

Net asset value, end of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $ 1.00    $1.00 

Total return     1.87%     0.68%       0.51%       0.95%     2.18% 

Ratios and supplemental data                     
Net assets, end of period (millions)    $ 482    $ 763    $ 958    $1,237    $ 953 
Ratios to average net assets                     
 Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
    but excluding expense reductions
   0.82%     0.83%       0.85%       0.86%     0.88% 
 Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
    and expense reductions
   0.86%     0.87%       0.86%       0.86%     0.88% 
  Net investment income (loss)     1.78%     0.65%       0.50%       0.89%     1.47% 


See Notes to Financial Statements

7


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS S    2006    2005     2004    2003    2002 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Income from investment operations                     
Net investment income (loss)     0.02    0    0     0.01     0.02 

Distributions to shareholders from                     
Net investment income    (0.02)    01    01    (0.01)    (0.02) 

Net asset value, end of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Total return     1.57%    0.38%    0.21%     0.65%     1.88% 

Ratios and supplemental data                     
Net assets, end of period (millions)    $ 315    $ 319    $ 463    $ 835    $ 638 
Ratios to average net assets                     
 Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
    but excluding expense reductions
   1.12%    1.13%    1.13%     1.16%     1.16% 
 Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
    and expense reductions
   1.16%    1.17%    1.15%     1.16%     1.16% 
  Net investment income (loss)     1.54%    0.34%    0.22%     0.60%     1.82% 


See Notes to Financial Statements

8


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS S1    2006    2005     2004    2003    20021 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Income from investment operations                     
Net investment income (loss)       0.02    0    0     0.01     0.01 

Distributions to shareholders from                     
Net investment income     (0.02)    02    02    (0.01)    (0.01) 

Net asset value, end of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Total return       1.57%    0.37%    0.22%     0.72%     0.77% 

Ratios and supplemental data                     
Net assets, end of period (millions)    $1,089    $1,344    $ 274    $ 369    $ 257 
Ratios to average net assets                     
 Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
   but excluding expense reductions
     1.12%    1.10%    1.12%     1.09%     1.10%3 
 Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
     and expense reductions
     1.16%    1.14%    1.15%     1.16%     1.20%3 
  Net investment income (loss)       1.53%    0.57%    0.22%     0.67%     0.96%3 


1 For the period from June 26, 2001 (commencemen t of class operations), to January 31, 2002.

2 Amount represents less than $0.005 per share.

3 Annualized

See Notes to Financial Statements

9


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS I1    2006    2005     2004    2003    2002 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Income from investment operations                     
Net investment income (loss)     0.02     0.01       0.01     0.01     0.02 

Distributions to shareholders from                     
Net investment income    (0.02)    (0.01)     (0.01)    (0.01)    (0.02) 

Net asset value, end of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Total return     2.18%     0.98%       0.81%     1.25%     2.49% 

Ratios and supplemental data                     
Net assets, end of period (millions)    $ 422    $ 492    $ 513    $ 561    $ 489 
Ratios to average net assets                     
 Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
   but excluding expense reductions
   0.52%     0.52%       0.55%     0.56%     0.56% 
 Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
    and expense reductions
   0.56%     0.56%       0.56%     0.56%     0.56% 
  Net investment income (loss)     2.12%     0.96%       0.80%     1.20%     2.46% 


1 Effective at the close of business on May 11, 2001, Class Y shares were renamed as Institutional shares (Class I).

See Notes to Financial Statements

10


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS 99.4%             
AIRPORT 2.6%             
Chicago, IL O’Hare Intl. Arpt. RB, PFOTER, 3.10%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co.,             
     Inc. & Insd. by XL Capital, Ltd.)    $ 675,000    $    675,000 
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX Intl. Arpt. RB, Ser. 1019, 3.09%, VRDN, (Liq.: JPMorgan             
     Chase & Co. & Insd. by FGIC)    2,035,000        2,035,000 
Denver, CO City and Cnty. Arpt. RB, Ser. 2004-104, 3.06%, VRDN, (LOC: BNP             
     Paribas SA & Insd. by MBIA)    5,530,000        5,530,000 
Hillsborough Cnty., FL Aviation Auth. RB, Ser. 930, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: JPMorgan             
     Chase & Co. & Insd. by AMBAC)    3,775,000        3,775,000 
Houston, TX Arpt. Sys. RB, Floating Rate Trust Cert., Ser. 404, 3.09%, VRDN, (Liq.:             
     Morgan Stanley & Insd. by FGIC)    1,100,000        1,100,000 
Kenton Cnty., KY Arpt. Board RB, Ser. F-2, 3.14%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America             
     Corp. & Insd. by MBIA)    2,910,000        2,910,000 
Metropolitan Washington, DC Arpt. Auth. RB, 3.25%, 10/13/2006, (LOC: Bank of             
     America)    15,300,000        15,300,000 
Metropolitan Washington, DC Arpt. MSTR, 3.27%, VRDN, (SPA: Societe Generale)    9,705,000        9,705,000 
Miami-Dade Cnty., FL IDA Arpt. Facs. RB, Flight Safety Proj.:             
     Ser. A, 3.23%, VRDN, (Gtd. by Boeing Co.)    3,300,000        3,300,000 
     Ser. B, 3.23%, VRDN, (Gtd. by Boeing Co.)    1,200,000        1,200,000 
Minneapolis & St. Paul, MN Metro. Arpt. RB, Ser. 928, 3.09%, VRDN, (Liq.:             
     JPMorgan Chase & Co. & Insd. by AMBAC)    3,990,000        3,990,000 
Philadelphia, PA Arpt. MSTR, 3.10%, VRDN, (SPA: Societe Generale & Insd. by             
     FGIC)    3,400,000        3,400,000 
Philadelphia, PA Arpt. RB, Ser. B, 2.98%, VRDN, (Liq.: JPMorgan Chase & Co. &             
     Insd. by AMBAC)    9,000,000        9,000,000 

            61,920,000 

EDUCATION 6.4%             
ABN AMRO Munitops Cert. Trust RB, Ser. 2004-10, 3.05%, VRDN, (Insd. by FSA)    1,000,000        1,000,000 
Adams Cnty., CO MTC, Sch. Dist. 12, Ser. 9008, 2.99%, VRDN, (Liq.: Bear Stearns             
     Cos. & Insd. by MBIA) 144A    10,010,000        10,010,000 
Alamo Heights, TX Independent Sch. Dist. GO, Ser. 980, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.:             
     JPMorgan Chase & Co.)    9,100,000        9,100,000 
Arlington, TX Independent Sch. Dist. RB, Ser. 347, 3.07%, VRDN, (Liq.: Morgan             
     Stanley)    2,245,000        2,245,000 
Carrollton, GA Payroll Dev. Auth. RB, Oak Mountain Academy, 3.28%, VRDN, (Gtd.             
     by Columbus B&T Co.)    1,930,000        1,930,000 
Chilton, WI Sch. Dist. GO, ROC, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: Citigroup Global Markets)    5,390,000        5,390,000 
Clark Cnty., NV MTC, Sch. Dist. Bldg., Ser. D, 3.08%, VRDN, (Insd. by MBIA)    5,910,000        5,910,000 
Colorado Edl. & Cultural Facs. Auth. RB:             
     Concordia Univ. of Irvine Proj., 2.89%, VRDN, (LOC: U.S. Bank)    3,000,000        3,000,000 
     Vail Mountain Sch. Proj., 3.10%, VRDN, (LOC: KeyCorp)    4,000,000        4,000,000 
De Soto, TX Independent Sch. Dist. GO, PFOTER, 3.10%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch             
     & Co., Inc.)    855,000        855,000 
Franklin Cnty., TN Hlth. & Ed. Facs. Board RB, St. Andrews Sewanee Sch. Proj.,             
     3.07%, VRDN, (LOC: AmSouth Bancorp)    1,685,000        1,685,000 

See Notes to Financial Statements

11


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
EDUCATION continued             
Lancaster, PA IDA RB, Student Lodging, Ser. A, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: Fulton Finl.             
     Corp.)    $ 3,610,000    $    3,610,000 
Los Angeles, CA Unified Sch. Dist. MSTR, 3.00%, VRDN, (Liq.: Societe Generale)    16,075,000        16,075,000 
Louisiana Local Govt. Env. Facs. & CDA RB, Univ. of Louisiana at Monroe Facs.,             
     Ser. C, 3.04%, VRDN, (LOC: Regions Bank)    10,000,000        10,000,000 
Lowndes Cnty., GA Dev. Auth. RB, Valwood Sch. Proj., 3.20%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     Columbus B&T Co.)    7,145,000        7,145,000 
Madison & Macoupin Cnty., IL GO, Cmnty. College Dist. No. 536, Ser. 1026, 3.06%,             
     VRDN, (Liq.: JPMorgan Chase & Co. & Insd. by FSA)    5,350,000        5,350,000 
Nebraska Elementary & Secondary Sch. Fin. Auth. Edl. Facs. RB, Lutheran Sch. Proj.,             
     2.89%, VRDN, (LOC: Fifth Third Bancorp)    5,160,000        5,160,000 
Oak Ridge, TN IDRB, Oak Ridge Univ. Proj., 3.05%, VRDN, (SPA: Allied Irish             
     Banks plc)    3,800,000        3,800,000 
Oklahoma City, OK IDA RB, Oklahoma Christian College, 3.30%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank             
     of America Corp.)    7,700,000        7,700,000 
Palm Beach Cnty., FL RRB, Benjamin Private Sch. Proj, 3.02%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of             
     America Corp.)    8,800,000        8,800,000 
Philadelphia, PA Sch. Dist. RB, Ser. 345, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: Morgan Stanley)    2,400,000        2,400,000 
Private Colleges and Univ. Auth., Georgia RB, Mercer Univ. Proj., 3.12%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Branch Banking & Trust)    11,795,000        11,795,000 
St. Joseph Cnty., IN Edl. Facs. RB, Holy Cross College Proj., 3.10%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     KeyCorp)    6,600,000        6,600,000 
Summit Cnty., OH RB, Western Academy Reserve, 3.00%, VRDN, (LOC: KeyCorp)    5,405,000        5,405,000 
Washington Hsg. Fin. Commission RB, Gonzaga Preparatory Sch., 3.07%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Bank of America Corp.)    2,400,000        2,400,000 
Will Cnty., IL Cmnty. Sch. Dist. GO, PFOTER, 3.10%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch &             
     Co., Inc.)    675,000        675,000 
Winnebago & Boone Cntys., IL Sch. Dist. TAN, 4.18%, 10/02/2006    5,250,000        5,270,483 

            147,310,483 

GENERAL OBLIGATION - LOCAL 7.4%             
ABN AMRO Munitops Cert. Trust,             
     3.07%, VRDN, (SPA: ABN AMRO Bank & Insd. by MBIA)    9,495,000        9,495,000 
     3.12%, VRDN, (Insd. by FSA)    7,325,000        7,325,000 
Chattanooga, TN GO, ROC, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: Citigroup, Inc. & Insd. by MBIA)    4,905,000        4,905,000 
Clipper Tax-Exempt Trust COP, 3.08%, VRDN, (SPA: State Street Corp.)    10,100,000        10,100,000 
Cook Cnty., IL GO, Ser. 559, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: JPMorgan Chase & Co.)    2,000,000        2,000,000 
District of Columbia GO, Ser. C, 2.96%, VRDN, (Insd. by FGIC)    9,445,000        9,445,000 
Harrison Cnty., MS GO, Bond Program, 3.12%, VRDN, (Insd. by AMBAC)    38,000,000        38,000,000 
Honolulu, HI City & Cnty. GO, PFOTER, 2.85%, 07/06/2006, (SPA: Merrill Lynch &             
     Co., Inc. & Insd. by MBIA)    4,995,000        4,995,000 
Metropolitan Govt. Nashville & Davidson Cnty., TN GO, ROC, 3.06%, VRDN,             
     (Insd. by MBIA)    3,985,000        3,985,000 
New York, NY GO, 3.09%, VRDN, (Liq.: Citigroup, Inc.)    70,000,000        70,000,000 
Shelby Cnty., TN GO, Pub. Impt. Sch., Ser. B, 3.03%, VRDN, (SPA: Landesbank             
     Hessen-Thuringen)    10,000,000        10,000,000 

            170,250,000 


See Notes to Financial Statements

12


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

        Principal         
        Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued                 
GENERAL OBLIGATION - STATE 4.5%                 
California GO, MSTR, 2.92%, VRDN, (SPA: JPMorgan Chase & Co. & Insd. by MBIA)    $    900,000    $    900,000 
Connecticut GO, PFOTER, 3.04%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)        1,600,000        1,600,000 
Florida Board of Ed. GO, ROC, 3.06%, VRDN, (LOC: Citibank)        16,200,000        16,200,000 
Florida Dept. of Trans. GO, ROC, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: Citigroup, Inc.)        3,960,000        3,960,000 
Texas GO TRAN, 4.50%, 08/31/2006        55,000,000        55,415,171 
Texas GO, Ser. 1016, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: JPMorgan Chase & Co.)        3,325,000        3,325,000 
Washington State GO:                 
     Eagle Class A, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: Citigroup, Inc. & Insd. by AMBAC)        20,000,000        20,000,000 
     ROC, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: Citigroup, Inc. & Insd. by AMBAC)        2,265,000        2,265,000 

                103,665,171 

HOSPITAL 7.8%                 
Allegheny Cnty., PA Hosp. Dev. Auth. RB, PFOTER, 3.10%, VRDN,                 
     (SPA: Landesbank Hessen)        8,965,000        8,965,000 
Birmingham, AL Spl. Care Facs. Fin. Auth. RB:                 
     Eye Foundation Hosp., Ser. A, 3.02%, VRDN, (LOC: Columbus B&T Co.)        17,835,000        17,835,000 
     Methodist Home for the Aging, 3.29%, VRDN, (LOC: Colonial BancGroup, Inc.)        6,000,000        6,000,000 
Columbus, GA Hosp. Auth. RB, St. Francis Hosp., 3.24%, VRDN, (Gtd. by Columbus                 
     B&T Co.)        9,145,000        9,145,000 
Eustis, FL Hlth. Facs. Auth. RB, Waterman Med. Ctr. Proj., 3.04%, VRDN, (LOC:                 
     SunTrust Banks, Inc.)        1,097,000        1,097,000 
Highlands Cnty., FL Hlth. Facs. Auth. RRB, Adventist Hlth. Sys. Proj., Ser. B, 3.03%,                 
     VRDN, (LOC: SunTrust Banks, Inc.)        2,100,000        2,100,000 
Houston Cnty., AL Hlth. Care Facs. RB, PFOTER, 3.35%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill                 
     Lynch & Co., Inc.)        7,195,000        7,195,000 
Indianapolis, IN Hlth. Facs. Fin. Auth. RB, Ascension Hlth. Credit Group, Ser. A,                 
     2.50%, 03/01/2006, (Gtd. by Ascension Hlth. Credit Group)        10,000,000        9,990,576 
Kentucky EDA Hosp. RB, St. Luke’s Hosp., PFOTER, 3.11%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch                 
     & Co., Inc.)        520,000        520,000 
Langhorne Manor Borough, PA Higher Ed. & Hlth. Auth. Retirement Cmnty. RRB,                 
     Wesley Enhanced Living, Ser. B, 2.93%, VRDN, (LOC: Citizens Bank)        1,000,000        1,000,000 
Lawrence Cnty., PA IDA RB, Villa Maria Proj., Ser. A, 3.05%, VRDN, (SPA: Allied Irish                 
     Banks plc)        5,321,000        5,321,000 
Leesburg, FL Hosp. RB, The Villages Regl. Hosp. Proj., 3.13%, VRDN, (SPA: Bank of                 
     Nova Scotia & Insd. by Radian Asset Assurance, Inc.)        12,000,000        12,000,000 
Lima, OH Hosp. RB, Lima Mem. Hosp. Proj., 3.10%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank One)        1,210,000        1,210,000 
Louisiana Pub. Facs. Auth. RB:                 
     Blood Ctr. Proj., 3.06%, VRDN, (LOC: Union Planters Bank)        3,775,000        3,775,000 
     Cenikor Foundation Proj., 3.09%, VRDN, (LOC: Union Planters Bank)        3,070,000        3,070,000 
Lowndes Cnty., GA Residential Care Facs. for the Elderly RB, South Georgia Hlth.                 
     Alliance Proj., 3.02%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America Corp.)        1,211,000        1,211,000 
Miami, FL Hlth. Facs. Auth. PFOTER, Mercy Hosp. Proj., 3.11%, VRDN, (LOC:                 
     WestLB AG)        2,000,000        2,000,000 
Miami-Dade Cnty., FL HFA RB, Ward Towers Assisted Living, 3.07%, VRDN, (LOC:                 
     Bank of America Corp.)        1,600,000        1,600,000 

See Notes to Financial Statements

13


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
HOSPITAL continued             
Michigan Hosp. Fin. Auth. RB, Holland Cmnty. Hosp., Ser. B, 3.04%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     Bank One)    $ 5,000,000    $    5,000,000 
Mobile, AL Second Med. Clinic RB, Bridge, Inc. Proj., 3.22%, VRDN, (LOC: Regions             
     Bank)    1,265,000        1,265,000 
Montgomery Cnty., OH Hlth. Care RB, Windows Home Proj., 3.10%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     KeyCorp)    3,290,000        3,290,000 
New Hampshire Higher Ed. & Hlth. Facs. RB, Ser. 2003-866, 3.05%, VRDN, (Liq.:             
     Morgan Stanley)    10,370,000        10,370,000 
Rhode Island Hlth. & Ed. Bldg. Corp. MTC, Lifespan Proj.:             
     Ser. 1999-69A, Class A, 3.15%, VRDN, (Liq.: Bear Stearns Cos.) 144A    29,240,000        29,240,000 
     Ser. 1999-69B, Class B, 3.15%, VRDN, (Liq.: Bear Stearns Cos.) 144A    29,225,000        29,225,000 
Salt Lake City, UT Hosp. MTC, Ser. 1999-69B, 3.15%, VRDN, (Liq.: Bear Stearns Cos.)    2,855,000        2,855,000 
South Central, PA Gen. Auth. RB, York Cnty. Cerebral Palsy Proj., 3.12%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Fulton Finl. Corp.)    1,645,000        1,645,000 
Steuben Cnty., NY IDA RB:             
     Civic Facs. Corning Hosp. Ctr. Proj., 3.00%, VRDN, (LOC: M&T Bank Corp.)    1,610,000        1,610,000 
     Civic Facs. Guthrie Corning Dev. Proj., 3.00%, VRDN, (LOC: M&T Bank Corp.)    2,645,000        2,645,000 

            181,179,576 

HOUSING 32.2%             
ABN AMRO Munitops Cert. Trust RB:             
     Ser. 2002-1, 3.18%, VRDN, (LOC: LaSalle Bank, NA) 144A    3,080,000        3,080,000 
     Ser. 2005-68, 3.10%, VRDN, (SPA: ABN AMRO Bank & Insd. by FGIC) 144A    17,085,000        17,085,000 
Alaska Hsg. Fin. Corp. RB, Ser. 1020, 3.09%, VRDN, (Liq.: JPMorgan Chase & Co.)    5,785,000        5,785,000 
Arlington Heights, IL MHRB, Dunton Tower Apts. Proj., 3.05%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     Marshall & Ilsley Corp.)    9,870,000        9,870,000 
Atlanta, GA Urban Residential Fin. Auth. RB, Buckhead Crossing, 3.12%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Columbus B&T Co.)    16,000,000        16,000,000 
Brevard Cnty., FL HFA MHRB, PFOTER, 3.10%, 09/28/2006, (Insd. by FHLMC)    8,000,000        8,000,000 
California Statewide CDA MHRB, 3.08%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    8,535,000        8,535,000 
Charter Mac Equity Issuer Trust, PFOTER, 3.13%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co.,             
     Inc.)    30,960,000        30,960,000 
Chattanooga, TN Hlth., Edl. & Hsg. Facs. RB, Alexian Court Proj., 3.25%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: First Tennessee Bank)    1,400,000        1,400,000 
Chicago, IL Hsg. Auth. Capital RB, PFOTER, Ser. 576, 3.07%, VRDN, (Liq.: Morgan             
     Stanley)    4,500,000        4,500,000 
Class B Revenue Bond Cert. Trust, Ser. 2001-2, 3.72%, VRDN, (Liq.: American             
         Intl. Group, Inc.)    16,300,000        16,300,000 
Clipper Tax-Exempt Cert. Trust COP:             
     Ser. 1999-2, 3.22%, VRDN, (SPA: State Street Corp.)    6,170,884        6,170,884 
     Ser. 1999-3, 3.22%, VRDN, (Liq.: State Street Corp. & Insd. by GNMA)    13,727,000        13,727,000 
     Ser. 1999-9, 3.14%, VRDN, (LOC: State Street Corp.)    5,470,000        5,470,000 
     Ser. 2000-1, 3.14%, VRDN, (SPA: State Street Corp.)    40,000        40,000 
     Ser. 2002-9, 3.22%, VRDN, (Liq.: State Street Corp. & Insd. by FNMA)    26,824,000        26,824,000 
     Ser. 2004-10, 3.22%, VRDN, (Liq.: State Street Corp. & Insd. by GNMA &             
               FNMA)    8,872,000        8,872,000 
     Ser. 2005-14, 3.22%, VRDN, (SPA: State Street Corp. & Insd. by GNMA)    4,591,000        4,591,000 

See Notes to Financial Statements

14


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
HOUSING continued             
Collin Cnty., TX Hsg. Fin. Corp. RB, Hsg. Huntington Apts. Proj., 3.12%, VRDN,             
     (Insd. by FHLMC)    $ 6,155,000    $    6,155,000 
Columbus, GA MHRB, Quail Ridge Proj., 3.11%, VRDN, (LOC: Columbus B&T Co.)    4,450,000        4,450,000 
De Kalb Cnty., GA Hsg. Auth. MHRB:             
     3.15%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    18,000,000        18,000,000 
     Post Walk Proj., 3.01%, VRDN, (Liq.: FNMA)    14,800,000        14,800,000 
Denton Cnty., TX Hsg. Fin. Corp. RB, 3.15%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    12,195,000        12,195,000 
Denver, CO City & Cnty. MHRRB, Regency Park Proj., Ser. B, 3.15%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     Commerzbank AG)    8,300,000        8,300,000 
District of Columbia HFA COP, Tyler House Trust, Ser. 1995-A, 3.17%, VRDN, (SPA:             
     Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale)    7,200,000        7,200,000 
District of Columbia HFA MHRB, Fort Lincoln Garden Proj., Ser. A, 3.18%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Crestar Bank)    2,725,000        2,725,000 
Escambia Cnty., FL HFA RB, Macon Trust 2002, Ser. B, 2.95%, 04/06/2006, (LOC:             
     Bank of America Corp. & Insd. by GNMA)    5,075,000        5,075,000 
FHLMC MHRB, Ser. M001, Class A, 3.12%, VRDN, (Insd. by FHLMC)    11,838,846        11,838,846 
Greystone Tax-Exempt COP, Cert. of Beneficial Ownership, Ser. 2002-1, 3.27%,             
     VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America Corp.)    5,860,000        5,860,000 
Hamilton Cnty., OH MHRB:             
     Forest Ridge Apt. Proj., 3.47%, VRDN, (Liq.: American Intl. Group, Inc.)    10,805,000        10,805,000 
     Pleasant Run Apt. Proj., 3.47%, VRDN, (Liq.: American Intl. Group, Inc.)    4,265,000        4,265,000 
Indianapolis, IN MHRB, Canal Square Proj., Ser. A, 3.07%, VRDN, (Insd. by FHLMC)    11,905,000        11,905,000 
Kansas Dev. Fin. Auth. MHRB, Trails Garden City Proj., 3.62%, VRDN, (Liq.: American             
     Intl. Group, Inc.)    8,145,000        8,145,000 
King Cnty., WA Hsg. Auth. RB, Auburn Courts Apts. Proj., 3.08%, VRDN, (LOC: U.S.             
     Bancorp)    8,075,000        8,075,000 
Macon Trust Pooled Cert.:             
     Ser. 1997, 3.22%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America Corp. & Insd. by FSA)    3,765,000        3,765,000 
     Ser. 1998A, 3.17%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America Corp. & Insd. by AMBAC)    2,171,000        2,171,000 
Macon-Bibb Cnty., GA Urban Dev. Auth. RRB, Hotel Investors Proj., 2.98%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: SunTrust Banks, Inc.)    273,000        273,000 
Massachusetts Dev. Fin. Agcy. RB:             
     Georgetown Vlg. Apts., Ser. A, 3.10%, VRDN, (Liq.: FNMA)    3,800,000        3,800,000 
     PFOTER, 3.13%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    10,000,000        10,000,000 
Metropolitan Govt. Nashville & Davidson Cnty., TN Hsg. Facs. MHRB, Meadow             
     Creek Apts. Proj., 3.25%, VRDN, (LOC: First Tennessee Bank)    5,000,000        5,000,000 
Metropolitan Govt. Nashville & Davidson Cnty., TN RRB, Hickory Trace Apts. Proj.,             
     3.12%, VRDN, (Liq.: FHLMC)    4,750,000        4,750,000 
Minneapolis, MN MHRB, Stone Arch Apts., 3.09%, VRDN, (Insd. by FHLB)    3,600,000        3,600,000 
Montgomery Cnty., MD Hsg. Opportunities Cmnty. MHRB, 3.12%, VRDN, (SPA:             
     Danske Bank)    20,000,000        20,000,000 
MuniMae Trust COP, Ser. 2002-1M, 3.06%, VRDN, (SPA: Bayerische Landesbanken             
     & Insd. by MBIA)    11,590,000        11,590,000 

See Notes to Financial Statements

15


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
HOUSING continued             
Nebraska Investment Fin. Auth. MHRB:             
     Apple Creek Associates Proj., 3.23%, VRDN, (LOC: Northern Trust Corp.)    $ 4,310,000    $    4,310,000 
     Bridgeport Apts. Proj., 3.47%, VRDN, (Liq.: American Intl. Group, Inc.)    8,615,000        8,615,000 
     Housing Amberwood Apts. Proj., 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America Corp.)    3,500,000        3,500,000 
New Mexico Mtge. Fin. Auth. SFHRB, 4.39%, VRDN, (Insd. by Trinity Plus             
     Funding Co.)    4,236,872        4,236,872 
New Orleans, LA Fin. Auth. SFHRB:             
     Ser. 1137, 3.17%, VRDN, (Liq.: Morgan Stanley)    22,785,000        22,785,000 
     Ser. 1185, 3.15%, VRDN, (Liq.: Morgan Stanley & Insd. by XL Capital, Ltd.)    7,000,000        7,000,000 
New York, NY Dorm. Auth. RB, PFOTER, 2.85%, 06/22/2006, (SPA: Merrill Lynch &             
     Co., Inc. & Insd. by AMBAC)    6,140,000        6,140,000 
Oakland, CA MHRB PFOTER, 3.45%, 11/09/2006, (LOC: Lloyds TSB Group plc)    25,000,000        25,000,000 
Ogden City, UT Hsg. Auth. MHRB, Madison Manor Browning Apts. Proj., 3.10%,             
     VRDN, (LOC: KeyCorp)    1,260,000        1,260,000 
Olathe, KS MHRB, Jefferson Place Apts. Proj., Ser. B, 3.39%, VRDN, (Insd. by             
     FHLMC)    2,485,000        2,485,000 
PFOTER:             
     Class A:             
           3.12%, VRDN, (Insd. by FHLMC)    17,315,000        17,315,000 
           3.17%, VRDN, (SPA: WestLB AG)    30,300,000        30,300,000 
     Class B:             
           2.40%, 02/02/2006, (Insd. by FHLMC)    11,540,000        11,540,000 
           2.85%, 07/06/2006, (LOC: Lloyds TSB Group plc)    51,095,000        51,095,000 
     Class C, 2.65%, 03/09/2006, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    3,635,000        3,635,000 
     Class D:             
           3.10%, 09/28/2006, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    22,590,000        22,590,000 
           3.12%, VRDN, (Insd. by FHLMC)    20,185,000        20,185,000 
     Class F, 3.12%, VRDN, (Insd. by FHLMC)    24,030,000        24,030,000 
     Class G, 2.65%, 03/09/2006, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    21,845,000        21,845,000 
     Class I, 2.65%, 03/09/2006, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    685,000        685,000 
Pinellas Cnty., FL HFA PFOTER, 3.11%, VRDN, (SPA: Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen             
     Girozentrale)    490,000        490,000 
Roaring Fork Muni. Products, LLC RB, Ser. 2001-14, Class A, 3.17%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     Bank of New York Co.)    7,380,000        7,380,000 
South Dakota Hsg. Auth. SFHRB, Homeownership Mtge., Ser. H, 4.50%, 12/15/06    12,550,000        12,661,289 
Texas Dept. of Hsg. & Cmnty. Affairs MHRB, PFOTER, 3.15%, VRDN, (SPA: Merrill             
     Lynch & Co., Inc.)    5,490,000        5,490,000 
Washington MHRB:             
     Eaglepointe Apts., Ser. A, 3.47%, VRDN, (Liq.: American Intl. Group, Inc.)    4,840,000        4,840,000 
     Winterhill Apts., Ser. A, 3.47%, VRDN, (Liq.: American Intl. Group, Inc.)    6,525,000        6,525,000 
Waukesha, WI HFA RB, Park Place Apts. Proj., 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: Marshall &             
     Isley Bank)    5,850,000        5,850,000 
Wisconsin Hsg. & Econ. Dev. Auth. Home Ownership SFHRB, Ser. A, 2.99%, VRDN,             
     (SPA: WestLB AG)    18,000,000        18,000,000 

            741,740,891 


See Notes to Financial Statements

16


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE 13.2%             
Alachua Cnty., FL IDRB, Florida Rock Proj., 3.07%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America             
     Corp.)    $ 3,000,000    $    3,000,000 
Allegheny Cnty., PA IDA RB, United Jewish Federation Proj., Ser. A, 3.05%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: PNC Finl. Svcs. Group, Inc.)    1,883,000        1,883,000 
Allendale Cnty., SC IDRB, King Seeley Thermos Proj., 3.07%, VRDN, (SPA: Royal             
     Bank of Scotland)    9,250,000        9,250,000 
Belgium, WI IDRB, Trimen Inds. Proj., 3.27%, VRDN, (LOC: Associated Banc-Corp.)    1,205,000        1,205,000 
Boone Cnty., KY Indl. Bldg. RB, Lyons Magnus East Proj., Ser. A, 3.09%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Bank of America Corp.)    1,120,000        1,120,000 
Botetourt Cnty., VA IDRB, Altec Inds. Proj., 3.17%, VRDN, (LOC: AmSouth Bancorp)    2,700,000        2,700,000 
Bristol, TN IDRB, Robinette Co. Proj., 3.29%, VRDN, (LOC: AmSouth Bancorp)    300,000        300,000 
Butler, WI IDRB, Western States Envelope Co. Proj., 3.05%, VRDN, (LOC: Marshall             
     & Ilsley Corp.)    1,585,000        1,585,000 
California EDA RB, Killion Inds. Proj., 3.28%, VRDN, (LOC: Union Bank of             
     California)    2,820,000        2,820,000 
Chesterfield Cnty., VA IDA RB, Allied Signal, Inc., 3.37%, VRDN, (Gtd. by Honeywell             
     Intl., Inc.)    3,000,000        3,000,000 
Clayton Cnty., GA IDA RB, Anasteel Supply Co. Proj., 3.13%, VRDN, (LOC: Branch             
     Banking & Trust)    3,000,000        3,000,000 
Cobb Cnty., GA IDRB, Standex Intl. Corp. Proj., 3.09%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of             
     America Corp.)    3,300,000        3,300,000 
Colorado EDRB, Super Vacuum Manufacturing Co. Proj., Class A, 3.22%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Wells Fargo & Co.)    1,925,000        1,925,000 
Colorado HFA IDRB, Worldwest, LLP Proj., 3.20%, VRDN, (LOC: Firstar Bank)    2,500,000        2,500,000 
Cumberland Cnty., TN IDRB, Delbar Products, Inc. Proj., 3.17%, VRDN, (LOC: PNC             
     Finl. Svcs. Group, Inc.)    3,550,000        3,550,000 
Dallas, TX Indl. Dev. Corp. RB, Crane Plumbing Proj., 2.90%, VRDN, (LOC: LaSalle             
     Bank)    4,150,000        4,150,000 
Demopolis, AL IDRB, Delaware Mesa Farms Proj., 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: Wells             
     Fargo & Co.)    5,600,000        5,600,000 
Devils Lake, ND IDRB, Noodles by Leonardo, 3.39%, VRDN, (LOC: U.S. Bancorp)    7,000,000        7,000,000 
Dodge City, KS IDRB, Farmland Natl. Beef Proj., 3.27%, VRDN, (LOC: U.S.             
     Bancorp)    1,000,000        1,000,000 
Dooly Cnty., GA IDA RB, Flint River Svcs. Proj., 3.34%, VRDN, (LOC: Columbus             
     B&T Co.)    7,930,000        7,930,000 
Douglas Cnty., NE IDRB, James Skinner Co. Proj., 3.24%, VRDN, (LOC: U.S. Bancorp)    2,045,000        2,045,000 
Elkhart Cnty., IN EDRB:             
     Adorn, Inc. Proj., 3.19%, VRDN, (LOC: Harris Trust & Savings Bank)    2,195,000        2,195,000 
     Four Season Hsg., Inc. Proj., 3.10%, VRDN, (LOC: KeyCorp)    2,000,000        2,000,000 
Eutaw, AL IDRB, South Fresh Aquaculture Proj., 3.23%, VRDN, (LOC: AmSouth             
     Bancorp)    4,770,000        4,770,000 
Franklin Cnty., IN EDRB, J&J Packaging Co. Proj., 3.17%, VRDN, (LOC: Fifth Third             
     Bancorp)    1,230,000        1,230,000 
Greenwood, IN EDA RB, Hutchinson Hayes Proj., 3.20%, VRDN, (LOC: Natl. City             
     Corp.)    1,180,000        1,180,000 

See Notes to Financial Statements

17


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE continued             
Gwinnett Cnty., GA IDRB, Price Co., Inc. Proj., 3.13%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America             
     Corp.)    $ 1,200,000    $    1,200,000 
Hackleberg, AL IDRB, River Birch Homes Proj., 3.32%, VRDN, (LOC: AmSouth             
     Bancorp)    820,000        820,000 
Haleyville, AL IDRB:             
     Charming Castle, LLC Proj., 3.32%, VRDN, (SPA: Canadian Imperial Bank)    538,000        538,000 
     Door Components, LLC Proj., 3.32%, VRDN, (SPA: Canadian Imperial Bank)    1,635,000        1,635,000 
Hamilton, AL IDRB, Quality Hsg. Proj., 3.42%, VRDN, (SPA: Canadian Imperial Bank)    910,000        910,000 
Hillsboro, TX Indl. Dev. Corp. IDRB, Lamraft, LP Proj., 3.32%, VRDN, (LOC: First             
     Comml. Bank)    1,129,000        1,129,000 
Howard Cnty., MD EDRB, Concrete Pipe & Products Proj., 3.18%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     Crestar Bank)    1,060,000        1,060,000 
Hull, WI IDRB, Welcome Dairy, Inc. Proj., 3.27%, VRDN, (LOC: Associated             
     Banc-Corp.)    1,615,000        1,615,000 
Huntsville, AL IDRB:             
     Brown Precision, Inc. Proj., 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: First Comml. Bank)    2,945,000        2,945,000 
     Wright-K Technology, Inc. Proj., 3.25%, VRDN, (LOC: Natl. City Corp.)    1,380,000        1,380,000 
Illinois Dev. Fin. Auth. IDRB, Cook Composites & Polymers Proj., 3.37%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: BNP Paribas SA)    1,495,000        1,495,000 
Illinois Dev. Fin. Auth. PCRB, 3.03%, VRDN, (LOC: Rabobank Neder)    6,300,000        6,300,000 
Indiana Dev. Fin. Auth. IDRB, Goodwill Inds. Central Proj., 3.10%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Bank One)    1,770,000        1,770,000 
Iowa Fin. Auth. IDRB, Interwest Proj., 3.47%, VRDN, (SPA: Bay Hypo-Und             
     Vereinsbank AG)    3,680,000        3,680,000 
Jackson, TN IDRB, Gen. Cable Corp. Proj., 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: JPMorgan Chase             
     & Co.)    9,000,000        9,000,000 
Jasper Cnty., MO IDA RB, Leggett & Platt, Inc., 3.13%, VRDN, (LOC: JPMorgan             
     Chase & Co.)    2,300,000        2,300,000 
Juab Cnty., UT IDRB, Intermountain Farmers Assn. Proj., 3.47%, VRDN, (SPA: Bay             
     Hypo-Und Vereinsbank AG)    2,200,000        2,200,000 
Kansas City, MO Land Clearance RB, Landmark Bank Proj., 3.26%, VRDN, (LOC: U.S.             
     Bancorp)    795,000        795,000 
Loudoun Cnty., VA IDA RB, Electronic Instrumentation, 3.07%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank             
     of America Corp.)    1,715,000        1,715,000 
Manitowoc Cnty., WI RB, Lake Michigan Private Inds. Proj., 3.19%, VRDN, (LOC: U.S.             
     Bancorp)    2,590,000        2,590,000 
Mankato, MN IDRB, Katolight Proj., 3.24%, VRDN, (LOC: U.S. Bancorp)    2,050,000        2,050,000 
Maricopa Cnty., AZ IDA RB, Young Elec. Sign Co. Proj., 3.17%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     KeyCorp)    2,885,000        2,885,000 
Massachusetts IFA IDRB:             
     Portland Causeway Proj., 3.20%, VRDN, (LOC: Sovereign Bancorp, Inc.)    2,000,000        2,000,000 
     Portland Causeway Realty Trust Co., Ser. 1988, 3.20%, VRDN, (LOC: Sovereign             
              Bancorp, Inc.)    700,000        700,000 

See Notes to Financial Statements

18


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE continued             
Miami-Dade Cnty., FL IDA RB:             
     Cigarette Racing Team Proj., 3.03%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America Corp.)    $ 2,600,000    $    2,600,000 
     Tarmac America Proj., 3.07%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America Corp.)    3,000,000        3,000,000 
Michigan Jobs Dev. Auth. PCRB, Mazda Motor Manufacturing USA Corp., 5.55%,             
     VRDN, (SPA: Sumitomo Bank, Ltd.)    6,000,000        6,000,000 
Michigan Strategic Fund, Ltd. Obl. RB:             
     Quantum Composites, Inc. Proj., 3.22%, VRDN, (LOC: Heller Finl., Inc.)    4,560,000        4,560,000 
     Wilden Adventures Proj., 3.19%, VRDN, (LOC: Comerica Bank)    3,930,000        3,930,000 
Minnesota Agriculture & EDRB, Como Partnership Proj., Ser. 1996, 3.24%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Firstbank Corp.)    1,560,000        1,560,000 
Missouri Dev. Fin. Board IDRB, Cook Composite Co. Proj., Ser. 1994, 3.37%, VRDN,             
     (SPA: Societe Generale)    3,390,000        3,390,000 
Mobile Cnty., AL IDRB, FGDI, LLC Proj., 3.47%, VRDN, (SPA: Bay Hypo-Und             
     Vereinsbank AG)    4,400,000        4,400,000 
Montgomery Cnty., OH Port Auth. Facs. RB, Sherman Dixie Proj., 3.24%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Amsouth Bank, NA)    3,500,000        3,500,000 
Moorhead, MN Solid Waste Disposal RB, American Crystal Sugar, 3.27%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Wells Fargo & Co.)    5,500,000        5,500,000 
New Hampshire Business Fin. Auth. EDRB, 41 Northwestern, LLC Proj., 3.22%,             
     VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America Corp.)    2,100,000        2,100,000 
New Lisbon, WI IDRB, Leer, LP Proj., 3.24%, VRDN, (LOC: U.S. Bancorp)    2,325,000        2,325,000 
Newton, WI IDRB, Stecker Machine Co., Inc. Proj., 3.14%, VRDN, (LOC: U.S.             
     Bancorp)    2,700,000        2,700,000 
Oklahoma Dev. Fin. Auth. RB, Indl. Dev. Tracker Marine Proj., 3.07%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     Bank of America Corp.)    2,250,000        2,250,000 
Olathe, KS IDRB, Insulite Proj., 3.27%, VRDN, (LOC: U.S. Bancorp)    1,975,000        1,975,000 
Onslow Cnty., NC Indl. Facs. PCRB, Mine Safety Appliances Co., 3.04%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: JPMorgan Chase & Co.)    4,000,000        4,000,000 
Oregon EDRB, Beef Northwest Feeders, Inc., 3.27%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of             
     America Corp.)    1,575,000        1,575,000 
Osceola Vlg., WI IDRB, Johnson Family, LP, 3.09%, VRDN, (LOC: U.S. Bancorp)    2,240,000        2,240,000 
Pilchuck, WA Dev. Pub. Corp. IDRB, Romac Inds., Inc., Ser. 1995, 3.23%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Bank of California)    2,600,000        2,600,000 
Pinal Cnty., AZ IDA RB, Solid Waste Disposal, Feenstra Investments, LLC Proj.,             
     3.27%, VRDN, (LOC: KeyCorp)    1,250,000        1,250,000 
Plymouth, WI IDRB, Wisconsin Plastics Products, 3.27%, VRDN, (LOC: Associated             
     Banc-Corp.)    1,300,000        1,300,000 
Portland, OR EDA RB, Broadway Proj., 3.05%, VRDN, (LOC: KeyCorp & Insd. by             
     AMBAC)    4,500,000        4,500,000 
Rockwall, TX Indl. Dev. Corp. IDRB, Columbia Extrusion Corp., 3.20%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: U.S. Bancorp)    1,700,000        1,700,000 
Savannah, GA EDRB, Georgia Kaolin, Inc., 3.07%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America             
     Corp.)    2,250,000        2,250,000 
Sheboygan, WI IDRB, Alaark Manufacturing Corp. Proj., 3.27%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     Associated Banc-Corp.)    1,935,000        1,935,000 

See Notes to Financial Statements

19


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE continued             
Skokie, IL EDRB, Skokie Fashion Square Proj., 3.43%, VRDN, (LOC: LaSalle Bank)    $ 1,850,000    $    1,850,000 
South Carolina Jobs EDA RB:             
     Compact Air Products, LLC, 3.17%, VRDN, (LOC: KeyCorp)    2,795,000        2,795,000 
     Ortec, Inc. Proj., Ser. B, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America Corp.)    2,400,000        2,400,000 
     Roller Bearing Co. Proj., Ser. 1994-A, 3.22%, VRDN, (Liq.: Heller Finl., Inc.)    7,700,000        7,700,000 
South Central, PA Gen. Auth. RB, 3.07%, VRDN, (SPA: RBC Centura Bank & Insd.             
     by AMBAC)    7,000,000        7,000,000 
South Dakota EDFA IDRB, Lomar Dev. Co. Proj., 3.24%, VRDN, (LOC: U.S. Bancorp)    2,100,000        2,100,000 
Springfield, MO IDA RB, SLH Investments, LLC Proj., 3.34%, VRDN, (LOC: U.S.             
     Bancorp)    1,445,000        1,445,000 
St. Charles Cnty., MO IDRB:             
     Craftsmen Inds. Proj., 3.33%, VRDN, (LOC: U.S. Bancorp)    5,460,000        5,460,000 
     Kuenz Heating & Sheet Metal, 3.34%, VRDN, (LOC: U.S. Bancorp)    2,295,000        2,295,000 
Summit Cnty., UT IDRB, Hornes’ Kimball Proj., Ser. 1985, 3.55%, VRDN, (LOC: U.S.             
     Bancorp)    900,000        900,000 
Sweetwater Cnty., WY Env. Impt. RB, Phosphates, Ltd. Co. Proj., 3.27%, VRDN, (SPA:             
     Rabobank Neder)    21,500,000        21,500,000 
Trumann, AR IDRB, Roach Manufacturing Corp. Proj., 3.27%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     Regions Bank)    4,000,000        4,000,000 
Tuscaloosa Cnty., AL IDRB, Nucor Corp. Proj., 3.03%, VRDN, (Gtd. by Nucor Corp.)    6,600,000        6,600,000 
Twin Falls, ID IDRB, Longview Fibre Co. Proj., 3.05%, VRDN, (SPA: Sumitomo             
     Bank, Ltd.)    4,500,000        4,500,000 
Vanderburgh Cnty., IN EDRB, Pyrotek, Inc. Proj., 3.17%, VRDN, (LOC: KeyCorp)    2,390,000        2,390,000 
Volusia Cnty., FL IDA RB, Ideal Spot Properties Proj., Ser. A, 3.07%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     Bank of America Corp.)    2,700,000        2,700,000 
Wabash, IN EDRB, Martin Yale Inds. Proj., 3.13%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank One)    2,700,000        2,700,000 
Washington Fin. Auth. RB, Smith Brothers Farms, Inc., 3.27%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of             
     America Corp.)    3,300,000        3,300,000 
Washtenaw Cnty., MI Econ. Dev. Corp. IDRB, David & Lisa Frame, LLC, 3.17%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: KeyCorp)    1,405,000        1,405,000 
West Virginia EDA IDRB, Coastal Lumber Products Proj.:             
     Ser. A, 3.28%, VRDN, (LOC: Crestar Bank)    1,945,000        1,945,000 
     Ser. B, 3.28%, VRDN, (LOC: Crestar Bank)    1,305,000        1,305,000 
Wilson Cnty., TN IDRB, Knight Leasing Co. Proj., 3.29%, VRDN, (LOC: AmSouth             
     Bancorp)    8,000,000        8,000,000 
Yakima Cnty., WA Pub. Corp. RB, Macro Plastics, Inc. Proj., 3.30%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     Bank of the West)    3,980,000        3,980,000 

            304,360,000 

LEASE 0.5%             
ABN AMRO Chicago Corp. Leasetops Master Trust, Ser. 1997-1, 3.30%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: LaSalle Bank NA)    2,238,352        2,238,352 
Goat Hill Properties, Washington Lease RB ROC, 3.06%, VRDN, (Insd. by MBIA)    1,335,000        1,335,000 
MBIA Capital Corp. Grantor Trust Lease PFOTER, 3.12%, VRDN, (SPA: Landesbank             
     Hessen)    3,635,000        3,635,000 

See Notes to Financial Statements

20


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
LEASE continued             
Orange Cnty., FL Sch. Board COP, Ser. 2000-328, 3.07%, VRDN, (Liq.: Morgan             
     Stanley)    $ 2,227,500    $    2,227,500 
Pitney Bowes Credit Corp. Leasetops RB, Ser. 2002-1, 3.22%, VRDN, (Gtd. by             
     Pitney Bowes Credit Corp. & Insd. by AMBAC)    2,604,153        2,604,153 

            12,040,005 

MANUFACTURING 0.8%             
Mount Jackson, VA IDA RB, Bowman Apple Products Proj., 3.03%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     SunTrust Banks, Inc.)    3,600,000        3,600,000 
Pinellas Cnty., FL IDA RB, Sure-Feed Engineering, Inc. Proj., 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     Bank of America Corp.)    2,500,000        2,500,000 
San Marcos, TX Indl. Dev. Corp. RB, Butler Manufacturing Co. Proj., 3.22%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Bank of America Corp.)    6,250,000        6,250,000 
Sylacauga, AL IDRB, Harrells Fertilizer, Inc., 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America             
     Corp.)    3,200,000        3,200,000 
Wisconsin Hsg. & EDRRB, Zero Zone, Inc. Proj., 3.03%, VRDN, (LOC: U.S. Bancorp)    3,420,000        3,420,000 

            18,970,000 

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 11.8%             
Cassia Cnty., ID IDRB, Oak Valley Land Corp. Proj., 3.27%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of             
     America Corp.)    3,500,000        3,500,000 
Clipper Tax-Exempt Trust COP, Ser. 2005-25, 3.06%, VRDN, (LOC: State Street Corp.             
     & Insd. by AMBAC)    44,270,000        44,270,000 
De Soto, TX IDA RRB, Solar Turbines Proj., 3.06%, VRDN, (Insd. by Merrill Lynch &             
     Co., Inc.)    7,050,000        7,050,000 
Las Vegas, NV EDRB, Andre Agassi Foundation Proj., 3.03%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of             
     New York)    15,705,000        15,705,000 
Louisiana Local Govt. Env. Facs. CDA RB, Honeywell Intl., Inc. Proj., 3.22%, VRDN,             
     (Gtd. by Honeywell Intl., Inc.)    4,000,000        4,000,000 
Magnolia, AR IDRB, American Fuel Cell Proj., 3.39%, VRDN, (SPA: Commerce de             
     France)    1,355,000        1,355,000 
Metropolitan Govt. Nashville & Davidson Cnty., TN RB, Commerce Street Ventures,             
     Ser. 2002-A, 3.22%, VRDN, (LOC: AmSouth Bancorp)    3,685,000        3,685,000 
Missouri, IL Bi-State Dev. Agcy. RB, Metro. Mass Trans. Proj., Ser. A, 3.00%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: JPMorgan Chase & Co.)    12,000,000        12,000,000 
Municipal Securities Pool Trust Receipts, 3.17%, VRDN, (SPA: Societe Generale &             
     Insd. by MBIA)    51,780,000        51,780,000 
Oklahoma Dev. Fin. Auth. RB, ConocoPhillips Proj., 3.45%, VRDN, (Gtd. by             
     ConocoPhillips)    6,000,000        6,000,000 
Peoria Cnty., IL Sewage Facs. RB, Caterpillar, Inc. Proj., 3.14%, VRDN    4,300,000        4,300,000 
PFOTER, Ser. A, 3.17%, VRDN, (SPA: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    1,590,000        1,590,000 
Port Arthur, TX Navigation Dist. Env. Facs. RB, Fina Oil & Chemical Co. Proj., 3.10%,             
     VRDN, (Gtd. by Motiva Enterprises, LLC)    10,635,000        10,635,000 
Port Corpus Christi, TX Solid Waste Disposal RB, Flint Hills Resources, Ser. A:             
     3.28%, VRDN, (Gtd. by Flint Resources)    9,000,000        9,000,000 
     3.34%, VRDN, (Gtd. by Flint Resources)    25,000,000        25,000,000 

See Notes to Financial Statements

21


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

        Principal         
        Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS  continued             
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE  continued             
Puerto Rico Govt. Dev. Bank Credit Enhanced CR, 3.25%, 07/24/2006 144A    $ 26,000,000    $    26,000,000 
Stephans Cnty., GA IDRB, Caterpillar, Inc. Proj., 3.22%, VRDN, (Gtd. by Caterpillar,             
     Inc.)        1,000,000        1,000,000 
Traill Cnty., ND Solid Waste Disposal RB, American Crystal Sugar:             
     Ser. A, 3.27%, VRDN, (LOC: Wells Fargo & Co.)    16,000,000        16,000,000 
     Ser. B, 3.27%, VRDN, (LOC: Wells Fargo & Co.)    1,000,000        1,000,000 
     Ser. C, 3.27%, VRDN, (LOC: Wells Fargo & Co.)    1,000,000        1,000,000 
Valdez, AK Marine Terminal RB, Conoco Phillips Co. Proj., 3.03%, 05/01/2006    4,600,000        4,600,000 
West Baton Rouge, LA IDRB, Dow Chemical Co. Proj., Ser. 1995, 3.09%, VRDN,             
     (Gtd. by Dow Chemical Co.)    20,300,000        20,300,000 
York Cnty., ME Fin. Auth. RB, Cmnty. Action Corp. Proj., 3.10%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     KeyCorp)        2,365,000        2,365,000 

                272,135,000 

PORT AUTHORITY 0.3%                 
Mississippi Dev. Bank Spl. Obl. RB, Harrison Cnty. Pub. Impt., 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     AmSouth Bancorp & Insd. by AMBAC)    6,990,000        6,990,000 

PUBLIC FACILITIES 0.8%                 
Memphis, TN City Fin. Corp. RB, Memphis Redbirds Foundation, 3.15%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: First Tennessee Bank)    12,245,000        12,245,000 
Puerto Rico Pub. Bldg. Auth. RB, 3.20%, VRDN, (Gtd. by Lloyds TSB Group plc)    6,250,000        6,250,000 
San Diego, CA Pub. Facs. Fin. Auth. Lease RB, PFOTER, 3.07%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill             
     Lynch & Co., Inc. & Insd. by AMBAC)    670,000        670,000 

                19,165,000 

RESOURCE RECOVERY 1.2%             
Broward Cnty., FL Resource Recovery RRB, Wheellabrator South-A, 5.00%,             
     12/01/2006        4,035,000        4,089,211 
Montana Board Resource Recovery RB, Colstrip Energy, LP Proj., 2.45%,             
     02/23/2006, (LOC: Dexia SA)    6,685,000        6,685,000 
Portage, IN EDRB, American Iron Oxide Co. Proj., Ser. B, 3.52%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank             
     One)        11,000,000        11,000,000 
Spencer Cnty., IN PCRB, American Iron Oxide Co. Proj., 3.52%, VRDN, (SPA: Bank of             
     Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd.)        5,000,000        5,000,000 

                26,774,211 

SPECIAL TAX 2.5%                 
ABN AMRO Munitops COP, Ser. 2002-24, 3.04%, VRDN, (LOC: ABN AMRO Bank)    1,300,000        1,300,000 
Central Puget Sound, WA Regl. Transit Auth. RB, ROC, 3.06%, VRDN, (Insd. by             
     AMBAC)        18,565,000        18,565,000 
Chicago, IL GO, Lakefront Millenium, Ser. 322, 3.07%, VRDN, (Liq.: Morgan Stanley)    2,225,000        2,225,000 
Chicago, IL Tax Increment RRB, Stockyards Indl. Comml. Redevelopment Proj.:             
     Ser. A, 3.05%, VRDN, (LOC: Northern Trust Co.)    8,170,000        8,170,000 
     Ser. B, 3.05%, VRDN, (LOC: Northern Trust Co.)    10,400,000        10,400,000 

See Notes to Financial Statements

22


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
SPECIAL TAX continued             
Collier Cnty., FL Gas Tax RB,             
     PFOTER, 3.05%, VRDN, (LOC: AMBAC & Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    $ 6,000,000    $    6,000,000 
     Ser. 1241, 3.06%, VRDN, (LOC: AMBAC & Liq.: JPMorgan Chase & Co.)    7,560,000        7,560,000 
Washington GO, Motor Vehicle Tax, Ser. 2002-B, 3.08%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of New         
     York Co. & Insd. by FSA) 144A    2,760,000        2,760,000 

            56,980,000 

TOBACCO REVENUE 1.5%             
Badger Tobacco Asset Security Corp. RB, PFOTER,             
     3.11%, VRDN, (LOC: Lloyds TSB Group plc)    3,715,000        3,715,000 
     3.14%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    4,220,000        4,220,000 
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement Fin. Corp. RB, PFOTER, 3.10%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill         
     Lynch & Co., Inc.)    23,100,000        23,100,000 
Tobacco Settlement Fin. Corp. of New York RB, PFOTER, 2.85%, VRDN, (SPA: Merrill             
     Lynch & Co., Inc. & Insd. by AMBAC)    3,700,000        3,700,000 

            34,735,000 

TRANSPORTATION 1.7%             
Central Puget Sound Washington Regl. Transit Auth. RB, PFOTER, Ser. 360, 3.06%,         
     VRDN, (Liq.: Morgan Stanley & Insd. by FGIC)    910,000        910,000 
E 470 Pub. Highway, Colorado Auth. RB, PFOTER, 3.10%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch         
     & Co., Inc.)    5,425,000        5,425,000 
Metropolitan Trans. Auth. of New York RB, Sub-Ser. A-3, 2.97%, VRDN, (SPA: Depfa         
     Bank plc)    27,780,000        27,780,000 
New Mexico Finl. Auth. Trans. RB, Ser. 435, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: JPMorgan Chase &         
     Co. & Insd. by MBIA)    5,430,000        5,430,000 

            39,545,000 

UTILITY 2.6%             
Carlton, WI PCRB, Wisconsin Power & Light Co. Proj., 3.12%, VRDN, (Gtd. by             
     Wisconsin Power & Light Co.)    8,300,000        8,300,000 
Carroll Cnty., KY Solid Waste Disposal Facs. RB, Kentucky Util. Co. Proj., 3.07%,             
     VRDN, (Gtd. by Kentucky Util. Co.)    8,700,000        8,700,000 
Coconino Cnty., AZ PCRB, Arizona Pub. Svc. Co. Proj., 3.27%, VRDN, (Gtd. by             
     Arizona Pub. Svc. Co.)    1,000,000        1,000,000 
Delaware EDA RB, Delmarva Power & Light Co. Proj., 3.10%, VRDN, (Gtd. by             
     Delmarva Power & Light Co.)    5,550,000        5,550,000 
Harris Cnty., TX Indl. Dev. Corp. RRB, Deer Park Refining, Ser. A, 3.01%, VRDN, (Gtd.         
     by Deer Park Refining)    15,000,000        15,000,000 
Reedy Creek, FL Impt. Dist. Util. RB, Ser. 986, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: Morgan Stanley)    700,000        700,000 
Richmond, VA IDA RB, Cogentrix of Richmond Proj., Ser. A, 3.00%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     BNP Paribas SA)    5,700,000        5,700,000 
Utah Intermountain Power Agcy. & Supply RB, Ser. E, 2.78%, 03/15/2006, (SPA:             
     Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale & Insd. by AMBAC)    14,100,000        14,100,000 

            59,050,000 


See Notes to Financial Statements

23


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
WATER & SEWER 1.6%             
ABN AMRO Munitops Cert. Trust RB, 3.07%, VRDN, (Insd. by FSA)    $ 9,995,000    $    9,995,000 
Bay Cnty., FL Water Sys. RB, PFOTER, Ser. PT-2776, 3.05%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill             
     Lynch & Co., Inc. & Insd. by AMBAC)    5,500,000        5,500,000 
Colorado River, Texas Muni. Water Dist. RB, Republic Waste Svcs., Inc. Proj., 3.12%,             
     VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America Corp.)    4,000,000        4,000,000 
Colorado Superior Metro. Dist. No. 1 RRB, Ser. A, 3.12%, VRDN, (SPA: BNP             
     Paribas SA)    2,870,000        2,870,000 
Florida Util. Auth. RB, Ser. 327, 3.07%, VRDN, (Liq.: Morgan Stanley)    500,000        500,000 
Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Auth. RB, Republic Waste Svcs., Inc. Proj., 3.12%,             
     VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America Corp.)    3,500,000        3,500,000 
Metropolitan Superior, Colorado Water Dist. 1 RB, 3.07%, VRDN, (SPA: BNP             
     Paribas SA)    2,000,000        2,000,000 
Niceville, FL Water & Sewer RB, Ser. B, 3.04%, VRDN, (LOC: Columbus B&T Co. &             
     Insd. by AMBAC)    1,420,000        1,420,000 
Olcese, CA Water Dist. COP, Rio Bravo Water Delivery Proj., Ser. A, 3.65%, VRDN,             
     (SPA: Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp.)    1,200,000        1,200,000 
Raleigh, NC Comb Enterprise Sys. RB, ROC, 3.06%, VRDN, (LOC: Citibank)    4,995,000        4,995,000 

            35,980,000 

Total Investments (cost $2,292,790,337) 99.4%            2,292,790,337 
Other Assets and Liabilities 0.6%            13,550,237 

Net Assets 100.0%        $    2,306,340,574 


144A    Security that may be sold to qualified institutional buyers under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. 
    This security has been determined to be liquid under guidelines established by the Board of Trustees, unless otherwise 
    noted. 
VRDN    Variable Rate Demand Note security which is payable on demand within seven calendar days after notice is given by the 
    Fund to the issuer or other parties not affiliated with the issuer. Interest rates are determined and reset by the issuer 
    daily, weekly, or monthly depending upon the terms of the security. Interest rates presented for these securities are 
    those in effect at January 31, 2006. 

Certain obligations held in the portfolio have credit enhancements or liquidity features that may, under certain circumstances, provide for repayment of principal and interest on the obligation upon demand date, interest rate reset date or final maturity. These enhancements include: letters of credit; liquidity guarantees; security purchase agreements; tender option purchase agreements; and third party insurance (i.e. AMBAC, FGIC and MBIA). Adjustable rate bonds and variable rate demand notes held in the portfolio may be considered derivative securities within the standards imposed by the Securities and Exchange Commission under Rule 2a-7 which were designed to minimize both credit and market risk.

See Notes to Financial Statements

24


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

Summary of Abbreviations         
AMBAC    American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp.      IDRB    Industrial Development Revenue Bond 
CDA    Community Development Authority    IFA    Industrial Finance Agency 
COP    Certificates of Participation    LOC    Letter of Credit 
CR    Custodial Receipts    MBIA    Municipal Bond Investors Assurance Corp. 
EDA    Economic Development Authority    MHRB    Multifamily Housing Revenue Bond 
EDFA    Economic Development Finance Authority    MHRRB    Multifamily Housing Refunding Revenue Bond 
EDRB    Economic Development Revenue Bond    MSTR    Municipal Securities Trust Receipt 
EDRRB    Economic Development Refunding Revenue Bond    MTC    Municipal Trust Certificates 
FGIC    Financial Guaranty Insurance Co.    PCRB    Pollution Control Revenue Bond 
FHLB    Federal Home Loan Bank    PFOTER    Putable Floating Option Tax Exempt Receipts 
FHLMC    Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.    RB    Revenue Bond 
FNMA    Federal National Mortgage Association    ROC    Reset Option Certificate 
FSA    Financial Security Assurance, Inc.    RRB    Refunding Revenue Bond 
GNMA    Government National Mortgage Association    SFHRB    Single Family Housing Revenue Bond 
GO    General Obligation    SPA    Securities Purchase Agreement 
HFA    Housing Finance Authority    TAN    Tax Anticipation Note 
IDA    Industrial Development Authority    TRAN    Tax Revenue Anticipation Note 

The following table shows the percent of total investments by geographic location as of January 31, 2006: 
Texas    8.5%      Michigan    0.9%   
New York    5.1%    Maryland    0.9%   
Florida    4.9%    Delaware    0.8%   
Georgia    4.8%    Puerto Rico    0.8%   
Illinois    3.6%    Oklahoma    0.7%   
Tennessee    3.6%    Massachusetts    0.7%   
Washington    3.4%    Hawaii    0.7%   
Louisiana    3.1%    Minnesota    0.7%   
New Jersey    2.9%    Virginia    0.7%   
Wisconsin    2.9%    Kansas    0.6%   
California    2.9%    Kentucky    0.6%   
Alabama    2.8%    South Dakota    0.6%   
Rhode Island    2.6%    New Hampshire    0.5%   
Indiana    2.5%    Alaska    0.5%   
Mississippi    2.0%    New Mexico    0.4%   
Pennsylvania    2.0%    North Carolina    0.4%   
Colorado    2.0%    Idaho    0.4%   
Missouri    1.4%    Oregon    0.3%   
District of Columbia    1.3%    Montana    0.3%   
South Carolina    1.3%    Arkansas    0.2%   
Ohio    1.2%    Arizona    0.2%   
North Dakota    1.1%    Iowa    0.2%   
Nebraska    1.0%    West Virginia    0.1%   
Wyoming    0.9%    Maine    0.1%   
Utah    0.9%    Connecticut    0.1%   
Nevada    0.9%    Non-state specific    18.0%   

 
            100.0%   

 

See Notes to Financial Statements

25


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

The following table shows the percent of total investments by credit quality as of January 31, 2006 (unaudited): 
Tier 1    97.5%   
Tier 2    2.3%   
NR    0.2%   

 
    100.0%   
   
 
 
The following table shows the percent of total investments by maturity as of January 31, 2006 (unaudited): 
1 day    0.1%   
2-7 days    85.3%   
8-60 days    2.5%   
61-120 days    0.7%   
121-240 days    8.4%   
241+ days    3.0%   

 
    100.0%   
   
 

See Notes to Financial Statements

26


STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

January 31, 2006

Assets         
Investments at amortized cost    $    2,292,790,337 
Cash        1,898,005 
Receivable for securities sold        1,452,813 
Receivable for Fund shares sold        136,759 
Interest receivable        11,187,338 
Prepaid expenses and other assets        26,267 

   Total assets        2,307,491,519 

Liabilities         
Dividends payable        669,465 
Payable for Fund shares redeemed        135,519 
Advisory fee payable        24,085 
Distribution Plan expenses payable        26,981 
Due to other related parties        6,307 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities        288,588 

   Total liabilities        1,150,945 

Net assets    $    2,306,340,574 

Net assets represented by         
Paid-in capital    $    2,306,442,641 
Overdistributed net investment income        (102,067) 

Total net assets    $    2,306,340,574 

Net assets consists of         
   Class A    $    481,634,757 
   Class S        314,647,602 
   Class S1        1,088,507,301 
   Class I        421,550,914 

Total net assets    $    2,306,340,574 

Shares outstanding (unlimited number of shares authorized)         
   Class A        481,757,637 
   Class S        314,558,962 
   Class S1        1,088,663,614 
   Class I        421,530,057 

Net asset value per share         
   Class A    $    1.00 
   Class S    $    1.00 
   Class S1    $    1.00 
   Class I    $    1.00 


See Notes to Financial Statements

27


STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Year Ended January 31, 2006

Investment income         
Interest    $    66,333,655 

Expenses         
Advisory fee        10,325,117 
Distribution Plan expenses         
   Class A        1,901,410 
   Class S        2,055,148 
   Class S1        6,670,834 
Administrative services fee        1,511,557 
Transfer agent fees        1,033,917 
Trustees’ fees and expenses        35,230 
Printing and postage expenses        130,368 
Custodian and accounting fees        756,756 
Registration and filing fees        106,459 
Professional fees        66,919 
Other        73,568 

   Total expenses        24,667,283 
   Less: Expense reductions        (60,672) 
           Fee waivers and expense reimbursements        (1,006,983) 

   Net expenses        23,599,628 

Net investment income        42,734,027 

Net realized gains or losses on:         
   Securities        281,327 
   Credit default swap transactions        (11,500) 

Net realized gains on investments        269,827 

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations    $    43,003,854 


See Notes to Financial Statements

28


STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

    Year Ended January 31, 

    2006    2005 

Operations                 
Net investment income    $    42,734,027    $    15,635,084 
Net realized gains on investments        269,827        57,193 

Net increase in net assets resulting                 
   from operations        43,003,854        15,692,277 

Distributions to shareholders from                 
Net investment income                 
   Class A        (11,399,034)        (5,478,348) 
   Class S        (5,347,087)        (1,375,127) 
   Class S1        (17,214,332)        (4,116,285) 
   Class I        (9,220,345)        (4,869,247) 

   Total distributions to shareholders        (43,180,798)        (15,839,007) 

    Shares        Shares     
Capital share transactions                 
Proceeds from shares sold                 
   Class A    3,021,007,675    3,021,007,675    3,546,559,440    3,546,559,440 
   Class S    1,132,445,681    1,132,445,681    390,196,929    390,196,929 
   Class S1    5,439,049,003    5,439,049,003    3,865,252,825    3,865,252,825 
   Class I    379,984,231    379,984,231    652,358,781    652,358,781 

        9,972,486,590        8,454,367,975 

Net asset value of shares issued in                 
   reinvestment of distributions                 
   Class A    10,003,479    10,003,479    4,939,115    4,939,115 
   Class S    1,588,125    1,588,125    0    0 
   Class S1    17,214,332    17,214,332    4,006,080    4,006,080 
   Class I    3,145,867    3,145,867    1,629,134    1,629,134 

        31,951,803        10,574,329 

Payment for shares redeemed                 
   Class A    (3,312,308,002)    (3,312,308,002)    (3,746,049,226)    (3,746,049,226) 
   Class S    (1,138,016,390)    (1,138,016,390)    (534,077,306)    (534,077,306) 
   Class S1    (5,711,719,961)    (5,711,719,961)    (2,799,584,789)    (2,799,584,789) 
   Class I    (453,282,007)    (453,282,007)    (675,686,405)    (675,686,405) 

        (10,615,326,360)        (7,755,397,726) 

Net increase (decrease) in net assets                 
   resulting from capital share                 
   transactions        (610,887,967)        709,544,578 

Total increase (decrease) in net assets        (611,064,911)        709,397,848 
Net assets                 
Beginning of period        2,917,405,485        2,208,007,637 

End of period    $    2,306,340,574    $    2,917,405,485 

Undistributed (overdistributed) net                 
   investment income    $    (102,067)    $    74,877 


See Notes to Financial Statements

29


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. ORGANIZATION

Evergreen Municipal Money Market Fund (the “Fund”) is a diversified series of Evergreen Money Market Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on September 18, 1997. The Trust is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).

The Fund offers Class A, Class S, Class S1 and Institutional (“Class I”) shares. Class A, Class S, Class S1 and Class I shares are sold at net asset value without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge. Each class of shares, except Class I shares, pays an ongoing distribution fee.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported herein. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

a. Valuation of investments

As permitted under Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act, securities are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value.

b. Credit default swaps

The Fund may enter into credit default swaps. Credit default swaps involve an exchange of a fixed rate premium for protection against the loss in value of an underlying debt instrument in the event of default or bankruptcy. Under the terms of the swap, one party acts as a “guarantor” and receives a periodic stream of payments that is a fixed percentage applied to a notional principal amount over the term of the swap. In return, the party agrees to purchase the notional amount of the underlying instrument, at par, if a credit event occurs during the term of the swap. Periodic payments are recorded as realized gains or losses. The Fund may enter into credit default swaps as either the guarantor or the counterparty.

Payments received or made as a result of a credit event or termination of the contract are recognized as realized gains or losses. The Fund could be exposed to risks if the counterparty defaults on its obligation to perform, or if there are unfavorable changes in the fluctuation of interest rates or in the price of the underlying security.

c. Security transactions and investment income

Security transactions are recorded on trade date. Realized gains and losses are computed using the specific cost of the security sold. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.

30


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

d. Federal taxes

The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company and distribute all of its taxable and tax-exempt income, including any net capital gains (which have already been offset by available capital loss carryovers). Accordingly, no provision for federal taxes is required.

e. Distributions

Distributions to shareholders from net investment income are accrued daily and paid monthly. Distributions from net realized gains, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Such distributions are determined in conformity with income tax regulations, which may differ from generally accepted accounting principles.

Reclassifications have been made to the Fund’s components of net assets to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryovers, as applicable) under income tax regulations. The primary permanent differences causing such reclassifications are due to dividend redesignations. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the following amounts were reclassified:


Overdistributed net investment income    $ 269,827 
Accumulated net realized gains on investments    (269,827) 


f. Class allocations

Income, common expenses and realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated to the classes based on the relative net assets of each class. Distribution fees, if any, are calculated daily at the class level based on the appropriate net assets of each class and the specific expense rates applicable to each class.

3. ADVISORY FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC (“EIMC”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation (“Wachovia”), is the investment advisor to the Fund and is paid an annual fee starting at 0.44% and declining to 0.39% as average daily net assets increase.

From time to time, EIMC may voluntarily or contractually waive its fee and/or reimburse expenses in order to limit operating expenses. During the year ended January 31, 2006, EIMC waived its advisory fee in the amount of $1,006,411 and reimbursed other expenses in the amount of $572.

Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. (“EIS”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia, is the administrator to the Fund. As administrator, EIS provides the Fund with facilities, equipment and personnel and is paid an annual rate determined by applying percentage rates to the aggregate average daily net assets of the Evergreen money market funds, starting at 0.06% and declining to 0.04% as the aggregate average daily net assets of the Evergreen money market funds increase.

31


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

Evergreen Service Company, LLC (“ESC”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia, is the transfer and dividend disbursing agent for the Fund. ESC receives account fees that vary based on the type of account held by the shareholders in the Fund.

4. DISTRIBUTION PLANS

EIS also serves as distributor of the Fund’s shares. The Fund has adopted Distribution Plans, as allowed by Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act, for each class of shares, except Class I. Under the Distribution Plans, distribution fees are paid at an annual rate of 0.30% of the average daily net assets for Class A shares and 0.60% of the average daily net assets for each of Class S and Class S1 shares.

5. SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS

On January 31, 2006, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes for the Fund was the same as for financial reporting purposes.

6. INTERFUND LENDING

Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the SEC, the Fund may participate in an interfund lending program with certain funds in the Evergreen fund family. This program allows the Fund to borrow from other participating funds. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the Fund did not participate in the interfund lending program.

7. DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS

As of January 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis consisted of overdistributed exempt-interest income in the amount of $102,067. Additionally, short-term capital gains are considered ordinary income for income tax purposes.

The tax character of distributions paid was as follows:

        Year Ended January 31, 

        2006        2005 

Ordinary Income    $    189,040    $    24,127 
Exempt-Interest Income        42,888,914        15,747,834 
Long-term Capital Gain        102,844        67,046 


8. EXPENSE REDUCTIONS

Through expense offset arrangements with ESC and the Fund’s custodian, a portion of fund expenses has been reduced.

9. DEFERRED TRUSTEES’ FEES

Each Trustee of the Fund may defer any or all compensation related to performance of their duties as Trustees. The Trustees’ deferred balances are allocated to deferral accounts, which are included in the accrued expenses for the Fund. The investment performance of the deferral accounts is based on the investment performance of certain Evergreen funds. Any gains earned or losses

32


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

incurred in the deferral accounts are reported in the Fund’s Trustees’ fees and expenses. At the election of the Trustees, the deferral account will be paid either in one lump sum or in quarterly installments for up to ten years.

10. FINANCING AGREEMENT

The Fund and certain other Evergreen funds share in a $150 million unsecured revolving credit commitment for temporary and emergency purposes, including the funding of redemptions, as permitted by each participating fund’s borrowing restrictions. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at 0.50% per annum above the Federal Funds rate. All of the participating funds are charged an annual commitment fee of 0.09% of the unused balance, which is allocated pro rata. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the Fund had no borrowings under this agreement.

11. REGULATORY MATTERS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Since September 2003, governmental and self-regulatory authorities have instituted numerous ongoing investigations of various practices in the mutual fund industry, including investigations relating to revenue sharing, market-timing, late trading and record retention, among other things. The investigations cover investment advisors, distributors and transfer agents to mutual funds, as well as other firms. EIMC, EIS and ESC (collectively, “Evergreen”) have received subpoenas and other requests for documents and testimony relating to these investigations, are endeavoring to comply with those requests, and are cooperating with the investigations. Evergreen is continuing its own internal review of policies, practices, procedures and personnel, and is taking remedial action where appropriate.

In connection with one of these investigations, on July 28, 2004, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) informed Evergreen that the staff intends to recommend to the SEC that it institute an enforcement action against Evergreen. The SEC staff’s proposed allegations relate to (i) an arrangement pursuant to which a broker at one of EIMC’s affiliated broker-dealers had been authorized, apparently by an EIMC officer (no longer with EIMC), to engage in short-term trading, on behalf of a client, in Evergreen Mid Cap Growth Fund (formerly Evergreen Emerging Growth Fund and prior to that, known as Evergreen Small Company Growth Fund) during the period from December 2000 through April 2003, in excess of the limitations set forth in the fund’s prospectus, (ii) short-term trading from September 2001 through January 2003, by a former Evergreen portfolio manager, of Evergreen Precious Metals Fund, a fund he managed at the time, (iii) the sufficiency of systems for monitoring exchanges and enforcing exchange limitations as stated in the fund’s prospectuses, and (iv) the adequacy of e-mail retention practices. In connection with the activity in Evergreen Mid Cap Growth Fund, EIMC reimbursed the fund $378,905, plus an additional $25,242, representing what EIMC calculated at that time to be the client’s net gain and the fees earned by EIMC and the expenses incurred by this fund on the client’s account. In connection with the activity in Evergreen Precious Metals Fund, EIMC reimbursed the fund $70,878, plus an additional

33


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

$3,075, representing what EIMC calculated at that time to be the portfolio manager’s net gain and the fees earned by EIMC and expenses incurred by the fund on the portfolio manager’s account. Evergreen is currently engaged in discussions with the staff of the SEC concerning its recommendation.

The staff of the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) had notified EIS that it has made a preliminary determination to recommend that disciplinary action be brought against EIS for certain violations of the NASD’s rules. The recommendation relates principally to allegations that EIS (i) arranged for fund portfolio trades to be directed to broker-dealers (including Wachovia Securities, LLC, an affiliate of EIS) that sold Evergreen fund shares during the period of January 2001 to December 2003 and (ii) provided non-cash compensation by sponsoring offsite meetings attended by Wachovia Securities, LLC brokers during that period. EIS is cooperating with the NASD staff in its review of these matters.

Any resolution of these matters with regulatory authorities may include, but not be limited to, sanctions, penalties or injunctions regarding Evergreen, restitution to mutual fund shareholders and/or other financial penalties and structural changes in the governance or management of Evergreen’s mutual fund business. Any penalties or restitution will be paid by Evergreen and not by the Evergreen funds.

In addition, the Evergreen funds and EIMC and certain of its affiliates are involved in various legal actions, including private litigation and class action lawsuits. EIMC does not expect that any of such legal actions currently pending or threatened will have a material adverse impact on the financial position or operations of any of the Evergreen funds or on EIMC’s ability to provide services to the Evergreen funds.

Although Evergreen believes that neither the foregoing investigations nor any pending or threatened legal actions will have a material adverse impact on the Evergreen funds, there can be no assurance that these matters and any publicity surrounding or resulting from them will not result in reduced sales or increased redemptions of Evergreen fund shares, which could increase Evergreen fund transaction costs or operating expenses, or have other adverse consequences on the Evergreen funds.

34


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Trustees and Shareholders
Evergreen Money Market Trust

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, of the Evergreen Municipal Money Market Fund, a series of Evergreen Money Market Trust, as of January 31, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of January 31, 2006 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, or by other appropriate auditing procedures where replies from brokers were not received. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Evergreen Municipal Money Market Fund, as of January 31, 2006, the results of its operations, changes in its net assets and financial highlights for each of the years or periods described above in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.


Boston, Massachusetts
March 24, 2006

35


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

FEDERAL TAX DISTRIBUTIONS

Pursuant to Section 852 of the Internal Revenue Code, the Fund has designated aggregate capital gain distributions of $102,844 for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006.

For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, the percentage representing the portion of distributions from net investment income, which is exempt from federal income tax, other than alternative minimum tax and state income tax is 99.32% .

36


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT

Each year, the Fund’s Board of Trustees is required to consider whether to continue in place the Fund’s investment advisory agreement. In September 2005, the Trustees, including a majority of the Trustees who are not interested persons (as that term is defined in the 1940 Act) of the Fund or of EIMC, approved the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement.

At the same time, the Trustees considered the continuation of the investment advisory agreements for all of the Evergreen funds, and the description below refers in many cases to the Trustees’ process and conclusions in connection with their consideration of this matter for all of the Evergreen funds. In all of its deliberations, the Board of Trustees and the disinterested Trustees were advised by independent counsel to the disinterested Trustees and counsel to the Evergreen funds.

The review process. The 1940 Act requires that the Board of Trustees request and evaluate, and that EIMC furnish, such information as may reasonably be necessary to evaluate the terms of the Fund’s advisory agreement. The review process began formally in spring 2005, when a committee of the Board (the “Committee”), working with EIMC management, determined generally the types of information the Board would review and set a timeline for the review process. In late spring, counsel to the disinterested Trustees sent to EIMC a formal request for information to be furnished to the Trustees. In addition, the independent data provider Lipper Inc. (“Lipper”) was engaged to provide fund-specific and industry-wide data to the Board containing information of a nature and in a format generally prescribed by the Committee.

The Trustees reviewed EIMC’s responses to the request for information, with the assistance of counsel for the disinterested Trustees and for the Evergreen funds and an independent industry consultant retained by the disinterested Trustees, and requested and received additional information following that review. The Committee met in person with the representatives of EIMC in early September 2005. At a meeting of the full Board of Trustees later in September 2005, the Committee reported the results of its discussions with EIMC, and the full Board met with representatives of EIMC, engaged in further review of the materials provided to them, and approved the continuation of each of the advisory and sub-advisory agreements.

The disinterested Trustees discussed the continuation of the Fund’s advisory agreement with representatives of EIMC and in multiple private sessions with legal counsel at which no personnel of EIMC were present. In considering the continuation of the agreement, the Trustees did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each Trustee attributed different weights to various factors. The Trustees evaluated information provided to them both in terms of the Evergreen mutual funds generally and with respect to the Fund specifically as they considered appropriate; although the Trustees considered the continuation of the agreement as part of the larger process of considering the continuation of the advisory contracts for all of the Evergreen funds, their determination to continue the advisory agreement for each of the Evergreen funds was ultimately made on a fund-by-fund basis.

37


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

This summary describes the most important, but not necessarily all, of the factors considered by the Board and the disinterested Trustees.

Information reviewed. The Board of Trustees and committees of the Board of Trustees meet periodically during the course of the year. At those meetings, the Board receives a wide variety of information regarding the services performed by EIMC, the investment performance of the Fund and the other Evergreen funds, and other aspects of the business and operations of the Evergreen funds. At those meetings, and in the process of considering the continuation of the agreements, the Trustees considered information regarding, for example, the Fund’s investment results; the portfolio management team for the Fund and the experience of the members of that team, and any recent changes in the membership of the team; portfolio trading practices; compliance by the Fund and EIMC with applicable laws and regulations and with the Fund’s and EIMC’s compliance policies and procedures; services provided by affiliates of EIMC to the Fund and shareholders of the Fund; and other information relating to the nature, extent, and quality of services provided by EIMC. The Trustees considered the rates at which the Fund pays investment advisory fees, the total expense ratio of the Fund, and the efforts generally by EIMC and its affil-iates as sponsors of the Fund. The data provided by Lipper showed the fees paid by the Fund and the Fund’s total expense ratio in comparison to other similar mutual funds, in addition to data regarding the investment performance by the Fund in comparison to other similar mutual funds. The Trustees were assisted by the independent industry consultant in reviewing the information presented to them.

The Board also considered that EIS serves as administrator to the Fund and receives a fee for its services as administrator. In their comparison of the advisory fee paid by the Fund with those paid by other mutual funds, the Board took into account administrative fees paid by the Fund and those other mutual funds. The Board considered that affiliates of EIMC serve as transfer agent and distributor to the Fund and receive fees from the Fund for those services, and received information regarding recent reductions in the transfer agency fees paid by the Fund. They considered other so-called “fall-out” benefits to EIMC and its affiliates due to their other relationships with the Evergreen funds, including, for example, soft-dollar services received by EIMC attributable to transactions entered into by EIMC for the benefit of the Evergreen funds and brokerage commissions received by Wachovia Securities LLC, an affiliate of EIMC, from transactions effected by it for the Evergreen funds.

The Board of Trustees also considered that certain of the money market funds managed by EIMC are offered in connection with cash sweep arrangements and similar services made available by affiliates of EIMC to their customers. The Trustees considered that EIMC and its affiliates benefit from the availability of those Evergreen funds and the distribution and shareholder services fees paid by those Evergreen funds.

Nature and quality of the services provided. The Trustees considered that EIMC and its affili-ates provide a comprehensive investment management service to the Fund. They noted that EIMC formulates and implements an investment program for the Fund. They noted that EIMC makes its personnel available to serve as officers of the Evergreen funds, and concluded that the

38


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

reporting and management functions provided by EIMC with respect to the Fund and the Evergreen funds overall were generally satisfactory. The Trustees considered the investment philosophy of the Fund’s portfolio management team, and considered the in-house research capabilities of EIMC and its affiliates, as well as other resources available to EIMC, including research services available to it from third parties. The Board considered the managerial and financial resources available to EIMC, and the commitment that the Wachovia organization has made to the Fund and the Evergreen funds generally. On the basis of these factors, they determined that the nature and scope of the services provided by EIMC were consistent with its duties under the investment advisory agreements and appropriate and consistent with the investment programs and best interests of the Fund.

The Trustees noted the commitment and resources EIMC and its affiliates have brought to the regulatory, compliance, accounting, tax and tax reporting, and shareholder servicing functions, and the number and quality of staff committed to those functions, which they concluded were appropriate and generally in line with EIMC’s responsibilities to the Fund and to the Evergreen funds generally. They noted that EIMC had enhanced a number of these functions in recent periods and continued to do so, in light of regulatory developments in the investment management and mutual fund industries generally and in light of regulatory matters involving EIMC and its affiliates. They concluded that those enhancements appeared generally appropriate, but considered that the enhancement process is an on-going one and determined to continue to monitor developments in these functions in coming periods for appropriateness and consistency with regulatory and industry developments. The Board and the disinterested Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the Fund’s advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by EIMC, including services provided by EIS under its administrative services agreement with the Fund.

Investment performance. The Trustees considered the investment performance of each of the Evergreen funds, both by comparison to other comparable mutual funds and to broad market indices. The Trustees emphasized that the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for an Evergreen fund should not be taken as any indication that the Trustees did not believe investment performance for any specific fund might not be improved, and they noted that they would continue to monitor closely the investment performance of the Evergreen funds going forward. Specifically with respect to the Fund, the Trustees noted that the Class A shares of the Fund performed in the second quintile over the recently completed one-year period and performed in the first quintile over recently completed three- and five-year periods.

Advisory and administrative fees. The Trustees recognized that EIMC does not seek to provide the lowest cost investment advisory service, but to provide a high quality, full-service investment management product at a reasonable price. They also noted that EIMC has generally attempted to make its investment advisory fees consistent with industry norms. The Trustees noted that, from the materials presented, it appeared that the combination of investment advisory and administrative fees paid by the Fund to EIMC and EIS with respect to Class A shares was higher than most (though not all) of the fees paid by comparable funds, although the Trustees concluded

39


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

that the fees were not unreasonable in light of the Fund’s investment performance and the services provided by EIMC and EIS.

The Trustees noted that EIMC does not provide services to other clients using the same investment strategy as it uses in managing the Fund.

Economies of scale. The Trustees noted that economies of scale would likely be achieved by EIMC in managing the Evergreen funds as the funds grow. The Trustees noted that the Fund had implemented a breakpoint in its advisory fee structure. The Trustees undertook to continue to review the appropriate levels of breakpoints in the future, but concluded that the breakpoint as implemented appeared to be a reasonable step toward the realization of economies of scale by the funds.

Profitability. The Trustees considered information provided to them regarding the profitability to the EIMC organization of the investment advisory, administration, and transfer agency fees paid to EIMC and its affiliates by each of the Evergreen funds. They considered that the information provided to them was necessarily estimated. They noted that the levels of profitability of the Evergreen funds to EIMC varied widely, depending on among other things the size and type of fund. They noted that all of the estimates provided to them were calculated on a pre-tax basis. They considered the profitability of the Evergreen funds in light of such factors as, for example, the information they had received regarding the relation of the fees paid by the Evergreen funds to those paid by other mutual funds, the investment performance of the Evergreen funds, and the amount of revenues involved. In light of these factors, the Trustees did not consider that the profitability of any of the Evergreen funds, individually or in the aggregate, was such as to prevent their approving the continuation of the agreements.

In connection with their review of the Fund’s investment advisory and administrative fees, the Trustees also considered the transfer agency fees paid by the Evergreen funds to an affiliate of EIMC. They reviewed information presented to them showing generally that the transfer agency fees charged to the Evergreen funds were generally consistent with industry norms, and that transfer agency fees for a number of Evergreen funds had recently declined, or were expected to in the near future.

40


This page left intentionally blank

41


This page left intentionally blank

42


This page left intentionally blank

43


TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS 

TRUSTEES1     
Charles A. Austin III    Investment Counselor, Anchor Capital Advisors, Inc. (investment advice); Director, The Andover 
Trustee    Companies (insurance); Trustee, Arthritis Foundation of New England; Former Director, The 
DOB: 10/23/1934    Francis Ouimet Society; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust; Former 
Term of office since: 1991    Investment Counselor, Appleton Partners, Inc. (investment advice); Former Director, Executive 
    Vice President and Treasurer, State Street Research & Management Company (investment 
Other directorships: None    advice) 

Shirley L. Fulton    Partner, Tin, Fulton, Greene & Owen, PLLC (law firm); Former Partner, Helms, Henderson & 
Trustee    Fulton, P.A. (law firm); Retired Senior Resident Superior Court Judge, 26th Judicial District, 
DOB: 1/10/1952    Charlotte, NC 
Term of office since: 2004     
Other directorships: None     

K. Dun Gifford    Chairman and President, Oldways Preservation and Exchange Trust (education); Trustee, 
Trustee    Treasurer and Chairman of the Finance Committee, Cambridge College; Former Trustee, Mentor 
DOB: 10/23/1938    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1974     
Other directorships: None     

Dr. Leroy Keith, Jr.    Partner, Stonington Partners, Inc. (private equity fund); Trustee, Phoenix Funds Family; Director, 
Trustee    Diversapack Co.; Director, Obagi Medical Products Co.; Former Director, Lincoln Educational 
DOB: 2/14/1939    Services; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1983     
Other directorships: Trustee, The     
Phoenix Group of Mutual Funds     

Gerald M. McDonnell    Manager of Commercial Operations, SMI Steel Co. – South Carolina (steel producer); Former 
Trustee    Sales and Marketing Manager, Nucor Steel Company; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash 
DOB: 7/14/1939    Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1988     
Other directorships: None     

William Walt Pettit    Vice President, Kellam & Pettit, P.A. (law firm); Director, Superior Packaging Corp.; Director, 
Trustee    National Kidney Foundation of North Carolina, Inc.; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash 
DOB: 8/26/1955    Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     

David M. Richardson    President, Richardson, Runden LLC (executive recruitment business development/consulting 
Trustee    company); Consultant, Kennedy Information, Inc. (executive recruitment information and 
DOB: 9/19/1941    research company); Consultant, AESC (The Association of Executive Search Consultants); 
Term of office since: 1982    Director, J&M Cumming Paper Co. (paper merchandising); Former Trustee, NDI Technologies, LLP 
    (communications); Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Other directorships: None     

Dr. Russell A. Salton III    President/CEO, AccessOne MedCard; Former Medical Director, Healthcare Resource Associates, 
Trustee    Inc.; Former Medical Director, U.S. Health Care/Aetna Health Services; Former Trustee, Mentor 
DOB: 6/2/1947    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     

     
44     


TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS continued 

Michael S. Scofield    Director and Chairman, Branded Media Corporation (multi-media branding company); Attorney, 
Trustee    Law Offices of Michael S. Scofield; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
DOB: 2/20/1943     
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     

Richard J. Shima    Independent Consultant; Trustee, Saint Joseph College (CT); Director, Hartford Hospital; Trustee, 
Trustee    Greater Hartford YMCA; Former Director, Trust Company of CT; Former Director, Enhance 
DOB: 8/11/1939    Financial Services, Inc.; Former Director, Old State House Association; Former Trustee, Mentor 
Term of office since: 1993    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Other directorships: None     

Richard K. Wagoner, CFA2    Member and Former President, North Carolina Securities Traders Association; Member, Financial 
Trustee    Analysts Society; Former Consultant to the Boards of Trustees of the Evergreen funds; Former 
DOB: 12/12/1937    Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1999     
Other directorships: None     

OFFICERS     
Dennis H. Ferro3    Principal occupations: President and Chief Executive Officer, Evergreen Investment Company, 
President    Inc. and Executive Vice President, Wachovia Bank, N.A.; former Chief Investment Officer, 
DOB: 6/20/1945    Evergreen Investment Company, Inc. 
Term of office since: 2003     

Jeremy DePalma4    Principal occupations: Vice President, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc.; Former Assistant Vice 
Treasurer    President, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. 
DOB: 2/5/1974     
Term of office since: 2005     

Michael H. Koonce4    Principal occupations: Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Evergreen Investment 
Secretary    Services, Inc.; Senior Vice President and Assistant General Counsel, Wachovia Corporation 
DOB: 4/20/1960     
Term of office since: 2000     

James Angelos4    Principal occupations: Chief Compliance Officer and Senior Vice President, Evergreen Funds; 
Chief Compliance Officer    Former Director of Compliance, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. 
DOB: 9/2/1947     
Term of office since: 2004     


1 Each Trustee serves until a successor is duly elected or qualified or until his/her death, resignation, retirement or removal from office. Each Trustee oversees 90 Evergreen funds. Correspondence for each Trustee may be sent to Evergreen Board of Trustees, P.O. Box 20083, Charlotte, NC 28202.

2 Mr. Wagoner is an “interested person” of the Fund because of his ownership of shares in Wachovia Corporation, the parent to the Fund’s investment advisor.

3 The address of the Officer is 401 S. Tryon Street, 20th Floor, Charlotte, NC 28288.

4 The address of the Officer is 200 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116.

Additional information about the Fund’s Board of Trustees and Officers can be found in the Statement of Additional Information (SAI) and is available upon request without charge by calling 800.343.2898.

45



565210 rv3 3/2006


Evergreen New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund



    table of contents 
1    LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS 
4    FUND AT A GLANCE 
6    ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES 
7    FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 
10    SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS 
14    STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES 
15    STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS 
16    STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS 
17    NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
22    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 
23    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
28    TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS 

This annual report must be preceded or accompanied by a prospectus of the Evergreen fund contained herein. The prospectus contains more complete information, including fees and expenses, and should be read carefully before investing or sending money.

The fund will file its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q will be available on the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, the fund’s Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800.SEC.0330.

A description of the fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures, as well as information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, is available by visiting our Web site at EvergreenInvestments.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov. The fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures are also available without charge, upon request, by calling 800.343.2898.

Mutual Funds:         
 NOT FDIC INSURED    MAY LOSE VALUE    NOT BANK GUARANTEED 

Evergreen InvestmentsSM is a service mark of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC.
Copyright 2006, Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC.

Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC is a subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation
and is an affiliate of Wachovia Corporation's other Broker Dealer subsidiaries.

Evergreen mutual funds are distributed by Evergreen Investment Services, Inc.
200 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS

March 2006


Dennis H. Ferro

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Dear Shareholder,

We are pleased to provide the annual report for the Evergreen New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund, which covers the twelve-month period ended January 31, 2006.

The U.S. financial markets had to navigate through some choppy seas during the past twelve months. Uncertainty was prevalent as questions surfaced about the sustainability of economic growth, tighter monetary policy, surging oil prices, moderating profit growth, and an increase in inflation. Geopolitical tensions continued and the Gulf region suffered enormous damage from the hurricanes. Not surprisingly, each of these events combined at various times during the year to increase market volatility. Throughout these turbulent times, the portfolio management teams of Evergreen’s money market funds employed a variety of strategies to manage portfolios in a rising yield environment and enhance portfolio returns, in both the taxable and tax-advantaged markets.

Over the course of the investment period, economic reports frequently delivered confusing signals. While growth was expected to moderate as the expansion matured, the economy showed surprising strength, particularly in the third quarter, as Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) grew in excess of 4%, despite the hurricanes and the spike in inflation. The effects of higher energy prices and tighter monetary policy became evident in the last quarter of 2005 as initial readings for GDP growth barely exceeded 1%. The conflicting data was often subject to interpretation and the consequence for investors was a frequent bout of market volatility. While many debated whether or not

1


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS continued

the short-term volatility was an indication of pending weakness, Evergreen’s Investment Strategy Committee focused on the breadth of economic output, particularly personal consumption and capital investment. Though the rate of growth in each was moderating from unusually high levels, we believed it would lead to a more sustainable, and ultimately less inflationary, pace for the expansion. The fundamentals, though no longer great, were still pretty good in our view, and our portfolio teams based many of their investment decisions on these positive macro-economic trends.

Despite the mixed signals from the economy, the Federal Reserve (“Fed”) maintained its strategy of gradually raising short-term interest rates. Considering that monetary policy had been stimulative for most of the prior three years, central bankers were determined in their efforts to prevent alarming increases in inflation, raising their target for the federal funds rate by twenty-five basis points at every policy meeting over the past year. Yet long-term market interest rates continued to decline and the extent of the yield curve’s flattening had many on Wall Street debating its meaning. Given our forecast for more moderate levels of growth in consumption and investment supporting a sustainable expansion, we viewed the yield curve’s message as confidence in the Fed’s ability to prevent long-term inflation. In addition, higher oil prices would likely serve to dampen output and we believed the absence of significant wage pressures would enable the Fed to continue on with its less stimulative, rather than more restrictive, path for monetary policy.

In this environment, the portfolio managers of Evergreen’s money market funds attempted to focus on the aforementioned market fundamentals, as well as the timing of Fed meetings. Each increase in the Fed’s target for its benchmark rate would result in a “resetting” of rates at the short end of the yield curve, enabling the teams to pursue higher income potential. In addition, many of our analysts and portfolio managers used a variety of short-term securities to capture yield, in

2


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS continued

order to provide our investors with the stability and liquidity necessary to balance exposure within their diversified long-term portfolios.

We continue to recommend that investors maintain their diversified strategies, including exposure to money market funds, within their long-term portfolios.

Please visit our Web site, EvergreenInvestments.com, for more information about our funds and other investment products available to you. Thank you for your continued support of Evergreen Investments.

Sincerely,


Dennis H. Ferro

President and Chief Executive Officer
Evergreen Investment Company, Inc.

 

Special Notice to Shareholders:

Please visit our Web site at EvergreenInvestments.com for a statement from President and Chief Executive Officer, Dennis Ferro, addressing NASD actions involving Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. (EIS), Evergreen’s mutual fund distributor or statements from Dennis Ferro and Chairman of the Board of the Evergreen funds, Michael S. Scofield, addressing SEC actions involving the Evergreen funds.

3


FUND AT A GLANCE

as of January 31, 2006

 

MANAGEMENT TEAM

Investment Advisor:

• Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC

Portfolio Managers:

• Diane C. Beaver
• Ladson Hart

 

PERFORMANCE AND RETURNS*

Portfolio inception date: 10/26/1998

    Class A    Class S    Class I 
Class inception date    10/26/1998    6/30/2000    4/5/1999 

Nasdaq symbol    ENJXX    N/A    EJMXX 

Average annual return             

1-year    1.83%    1.54%    2.13% 

5-year    1.20%    0.90%    1.50% 

Since portfolio inception    1.75%    1.52%    2.03% 

7-day annualized yield    2.32%    2.01%    2.61% 

30-day annualized yield    2.30%    1.99%    2.59% 


* The yield quotation more closely reflects the current earnings of the fund than the total return quotation.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The performance quoted represents past performance and current performance may be lower or higher. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that investors’ shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month-end for Classes A or I, please go to EvergreenInvestments.com/fundperformance. Please call 1.800.343.2898 for the most recent month-end performance information for Class S. The performance of each class may vary based on differences in fees and expenses paid by the shareholders investing in each class. Performance includes the reinvestment of income dividends and capital gain distributions.

Historical performance shown for Classes S and I prior to their inception is based on the performance of Class A, the original class offered. The historical returns for Classes S and I have not been adjusted to reflect the effect of each class’ 12b-1 fee. These fees are 0.30% for Class A and 0.60% for Class S. Class I does not pay a 12b-1 fee. If these fees had been reflected, returns for Class S would have been lower while returns for Class I would have been higher.

Returns reflect expense limits previously in effect, without which returns would have been lower.

An investment in a money market fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund.

4


FUND AT A GLANCE continued

7-DAY ANNUALIZED YIELD


Class I shares are only offered in the following manner: (1) to investment advisory clients of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC (or its advisory affiliates) when purchased by such advisor(s) on behalf of its clients, (2) through arrangements entered into on behalf of the Evergreen funds with certain financial services firms, (3) to certain institutional investors and (4) to persons who owned Class Y shares in registered name in an Evergreen fund on or before December 31, 1994 or who owned shares of any SouthTrust fund in registered name as of March 18, 2005 or shares of Vestaur Securities Fund as of May 20, 2005.

Class I shares are only available to institutional shareholders with a minimum of $1 million investment, which may be waived in certain situations.

Class S shares are sold through certain broker dealers and financial institutions which have selling agreements with the fund’s distributor.

The fund’s investment objective is nonfundamental and may be changed without a vote of the fund’s shareholders.

Funds that concentrate their investments in a single state may face increased risk of price fluctuation over less concentrated funds due to adverse developments within that state.

The fund’s yield will fluctuate and there can be no guarantee that the fund will achieve its objective or any particular tax-exempt yield. Income may be subject to federal alternative minimum tax as well as local income taxes.

Yields are based on net investment income for the stated periods and annualized.

All data is as of January 31, 2006, and subject to change.

5


ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES

The Example below is intended to describe the fees and expenses borne by shareholders and the impact of those costs on your investment.

Example

As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads), redemption fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) fees and other fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from August 1, 2005 to January 31, 2006.

The example illustrates your fund’s costs in two ways:

• Actual expenses

The section in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in these columns, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class, in the column entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

• Hypothetical example for comparison purposes

The section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees or exchange fees. Therefore, the section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

    Beginning    Ending     
    Account    Account    Expenses 
    Value    Value    Paid During 
    8/1/2005    1/31/2006    Period* 

Actual             
Class A    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,010.40    $ 4.51 
Class S    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,008.88    $ 5.97 
Class I    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,011.90    $ 2.99 
Hypothetical             
(5% return             
before expenses)             
Class A    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,020.72    $ 4.53 
Class S    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,019.26    $ 6.01 
Class I    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,022.23    $ 3.01 


* For each class of the Fund, expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of each class (0.89% for Class A, 1.18% for Class S and 0.59% for Class I), multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184 / 365 days.

6


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS A    2006    2005     2004    2003    2002 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Income from investment operations                     
Net investment income (loss)     0.02     0.01       0.01     0.01     0.02 

Distributions to shareholders from                     
Net investment income    (0.02)    (0.01)     (0.01)    (0.01)    (0.02) 

Net asset value, end of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Total return     1.83%     0.65%       0.53%     0.90%     2.11% 

Ratios and supplemental data                     
Net assets, end of period (millions)    $ 20    $ 23    $ 30    $ 42    $ 37 
Ratios to average net assets                     
 Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
    but excluding expense reductions
   0.88%     0.89%       0.87%     0.86%     0.85% 
 Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
    and expense reductions
   0.88%     0.90%       0.88%     0.86%     0.85% 
  Net investment income (loss)     1.78%     0.62%       0.49%     0.81%     2.01% 


See Notes to Financial Statements

7


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS S    2006    2005     2004    2003    2002 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Income from investment operations                     
Net investment income (loss)     0.02    0    0     0.01     0.02 

Distributions to shareholders from                     
Net investment income    (0.02)    01    01    (0.01)    (0.02) 

Net asset value, end of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Total return     1.54%    0.35%    0.24%     0.60%     1.81% 

Ratios and supplemental data                     
Net assets, end of period (millions)    $ 162    $ 171    $ 66    $ 108    $ 136 
Ratios to average net assets                     
 Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
    but excluding expense reductions
   1.17%    1.16%    1.16%     1.16%     1.15% 
 Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
    and expense reductions
   1.18%    1.17%    1.18%     1.16%     1.15% 
  Net investment income (loss)     1.51%    0.48%    0.19%     0.51%     1.71% 


1 Amount represents less than $0.005 per share.

See Notes to Financial Statements

8


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS I1    2006    2005     2004    2003    2002 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Income from investment operations                     
Net investment income (loss)     0.02     0.01       0.01     0.01     0.02 

Distributions to shareholders from                     
Net investment income    (0.02)    (0.01)     (0.01)    (0.01)    (0.02) 

Net asset value, end of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Total return     2.13%     0.95%       0.83%     1.21%     2.42% 

Ratios and supplemental data                     
Net assets, end of period (millions)    $ 10    $ 5    $ 22    $ 21    $ 6 
Ratios to average net assets                     
 Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
    but excluding expense reductions
   0.58%     0.59%       0.57%     0.56%     0.55% 
 Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
    and expense reductions
   0.58%     0.60%       0.58%     0.56%     0.55% 
  Net investment income (loss)     2.19%     0.89%       0.73%     1.04%     2.32% 


1 Effective at the close of business on May 11, 2001, Class Y shares were renamed as Institutional shares (Class I).

See Notes to Financial Statements

9


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS 99.5%             
CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY 3.0%             
New Jersey EDA RRB, Crane’s Mill Proj., Ser. B, 3.03%, VRDN, (LOC: UniCredito             
     Italiano SpA & Insd. by Sovereign Bank)    $ 3,060,000    $    3,060,000 
New Jersey Hlth. Care Facs. Fin. Auth. RB, Wiley Mission Proj., 3.02%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Commerce Bancorp, Inc.)    2,700,000        2,700,000 

            5,760,000 

EDUCATION 8.1%             
California CDA RB, Biola Univ., Ser. B, 4.47%, VRDN, (SPA: BNP Paribas SA)    1,925,000        1,925,000 
New Jersey EDA RB, Princeton Day Sch. Proj., 2.97%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank             
     of New York)    5,000,000        5,000,000 
New Jersey Edl. Facs. Auth. RB, Princeton Univ. Proj., 3.05%, VRDN, (Gtd. by             
     Princeton Univ.)    2,650,000        2,650,000 
New Jersey Edl. Facs. Auth. ROC, 3.07%, VRDN, (Liq.: Citigroup, Inc.)    5,920,000        5,920,000 

            15,495,000 

GENERAL OBLIGATION - LOCAL 5.5%             
Camden., NJ BAN, 4.50%, 11/27/2006    8,314,285        8,385,381 
Cumberland Cnty., NJ Impt. Auth. BAN, 3.85%, 12/12/2006    2,200,000        2,201,272 

            10,586,653 

GENERAL OBLIGATION - STATE 6.3%             
New Jersey GO:             
     3.05%, VRDN, (Liq.: Dexia Credit Local & Insd. by FGIC)    5,900,000        5,900,000 
     Ser. 1995-D, 3.02%, VRDN, (LOC: Chase Manhattan Bank)    6,130,000        6,130,000 

            12,030,000 

HOSPITAL 12.9%             
Camden Cnty., NJ Impt. Auth. Hlth. Care Redev. RB, The Cooper Hlth. Sys. Proj.,             
     Ser. B, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: Commerce Bancorp, Inc.)    13,000,000        13,000,000 
New Jersey Hlth. Care Facs. Fin. Auth. RB:             
     PFOTER, 3.05%, VRDN, (SPA: Svenska Handelsbank & Insd. by AMBAC)    6,420,000        6,420,000 
     St. Mary’s Hosp. Ser. A4, 3.03%, VRDN, (LOC: Valley National Bancorp, Inc.)    2,600,000        2,600,000 
New Jersey Hlth. Care Facs. RRB, Ser. 1163, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: Morgan             
     Stanley & Insd. by Radian Group, Inc.)    2,840,000        2,840,000 

            24,860,000 

HOUSING 10.5%             
Class B Revenue Bond Cert. Trust, Ser. 2001-1, 3.47%, VRDN, (Liq.: American             
     Intl. Group, Inc.)    2,600,000        2,600,000 
Memphis, TN Hlth. Edl. & Hsg. Fac. MHRB, Aspenwood Square Apts. Proj.,             
     3.12%, VRDN, (Insd. by Columbus Bank & Trust Co.)    4,040,000        4,040,000 
New Jersey Hsg. & Mtge. Fin. Agcy. SFHRB, Ser. Q, 3.02%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     Dexia Credit Local)    5,000,000        5,000,000 
New Mexico Fin. Auth. SFHRB, 4.39%, VRDN, (Insd. by Trinity Plus Funding Co.)    912,305        912,305 
Newark, NJ Hsg. Auth. MHRB, 3.15%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    2,860,000        2,860,000 
PFOTER:             
     Class F, 3.05%, VRDN, (LOC: Lloyds TSB Group plc)    3,000,000        3,000,000 
     Class I, 2.65%, 03/09/2006, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    1,815,000        1,815,000 

            20,227,305 


See Notes to Financial Statements

10


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE 7.5%             
Delaware EDA Solid Waste Disposal & Sewer Fac. RB, Ciba Specialty Chemical             
     Corp. Proj., Ser. A, 3.29%, VRDN, (Gtd. by Ciba Specialty Chemical Corp.)    $ 1,500,000    $    1,500,000 
Frankfort, IN EDRB, Gen. Seating of America Proj., 3.57%, VRDN, (LOC: Dai-Ichi             
     Kangyo Bank, Ltd.)    1,355,000        1,355,000 
Logan City, UT IDRB, Scientific Tech, Inc., 3.32%, VRDN, (LOC: Bank of the West)    1,700,000        1,700,000 
New Jersey EDA RB:             
     East Meadow Corp. Proj., Ser. 1986-B, 4.20%, VRDN, (Gtd. by UFJ             
           Bank, Ltd.)    3,545,000        3,545,000 
     El Dorado Terminals Proj., Ser. B, 2.88%, VRDN, (LOC: SunTrust Banks, Inc.)    700,000        700,000 
     Hoben Investors Proj., 3.18%, VRDN, (LOC: Valley National Bancorp, Inc.)    1,645,000        1,645,000 
New Jersey EDA RRB, Dieter Weissenrieder, Ser. A, 3.14%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Washington Mutual, Inc.)    2,215,000        2,215,000 
Plymouth, MN IDRB, Nu Aire, Inc. Proj., Ser. A, 3.24%, VRDN, (LOC: Wells             
     Fargo & Co.)    1,760,000        1,760,000 

            14,420,000 

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 14.7%             
Clipper Tax-Exempt Trust COP, Ser. 2005-25, 3.06%, VRDN, (LOC: State Street             
     Corp. & Insd. by AMBAC)    3,852,000        3,852,000 
New Jersey EDA RB:             
     3.05%, VRDN, (SPA: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.& Insd. by FSA)    3,500,000        3,500,000 
     Bayonne Impt. Proj.:             
           Ser. A, 2.88%, VRDN, (LOC: SunTrust Banks, Inc.)    1,325,000        1,325,000 
           Ser. B, 2.88%, VRDN, (LOC: SunTrust Banks, Inc.)    650,000        650,000 
           Ser. C, 2.88%, VRDN, (LOC: SunTrust Banks, Inc.)    6,230,000        6,230,000 
New Jersey Env. Infrastructure RB, MSTR, 3.02%, VRDN, (Liq.: JPMorgan             
     Chase & Co.)    9,135,000        9,135,000 
Pennsylvania EDFA RRB, Wastewater Treatment, Sunoco, Inc. Proj., 3.14%,             
     VRDN, (Gtd. by Sunoco, Inc.)    2,000,000        2,000,000 
West Baton Rouge, LA IDRB, Dow Chemical Co. Proj.:             
     Ser. 1995, 3.09%, VRDN, (Gtd. by Dow Chemical Co.)    400,000        400,000 
     Ser. A, 3.09%, VRDN, (Gtd. by Dow Chemical Co.)    1,150,000        1,150,000 

            28,242,000 

SALES TAX 0.9%             
Garden State Preservation Trust RB, Open Space & Farmland Proj., Ser. RR,             
     3.05%, VRDN, (Liq.: Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. & Insd. by FSA)    1,700,000        1,700,000 

SPECIAL TAX 10.1%             
Denver, CO Urban Renewal Auth. Tax Increment RRB, Ser. A, 3.28%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Zions Bancorp)    3,000,000        3,000,000 
New Jersey EDA RB:             
     3.05%, VRDN, (Liq.: Radian Group, Inc.)    6,345,000        6,345,000 
     3.06%, VRDN, (Insd. by MBIA)    10,000,000        10,000,000 

            19,345,000 


See Notes to Financial Statements

11


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
TOBACCO REVENUE 9.1%             
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement Fin. Corp. RB, PFOTER:             
     3.08%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    $ 5,910,000    $    5,910,000 
     3.10%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    6,900,000        6,900,000 
     3.11%, VRDN, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    4,600,000        4,600,000 

            17,410,000 

TRANSPORTATION 9.4%             
New Jersey Trans. Auth. RB:             
     3.05%, VRDN, (Insd. by FGIC)    270,000        270,000 
     MTC, Ser. 2001-1, 3.52%, VRDN, (Liq.: Commerzbank AG)    12,745,000        12,745,000 
New Jersey Turnpike Auth. RB:             
     2.95%, VRDN, (Insd. by FSA & Dexia Credit Local)    2,270,000        2,270,000 
     3.05%, VRDN, (Insd. by FGIC & Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    2,300,000        2,300,000 
New York Thruway Auth. RB, MSTR, 2.98%, VRDN, (SPA: Societe Generale)    500,000        500,000 

            18,085,000 

UTILITY 1.5%             
Carlton, WI PCRB, Wisconsin Power & Light Co. Proj., 3.12%, VRDN, (Gtd. by             
     Wisconsin Power & Light Co.)    1,200,000        1,200,000 
Delaware EDA RB, Delmarva Power & Light Co. Proj., 3.10%, VRDN, (Gtd. by             
     Delmarva Power & Light Co.)    1,600,000        1,600,000 

            2,800,000 

Total Investments (cost $190,960,958) 99.5%            190,960,958 
Other Assets and Liabilities 0.5%            964,229 

Net Assets 100.0%        $    191,925,187 


VRDN    Variable Rate Demand Note security which is payable on demand within seven calendar days after notice is given by the 
    Fund to the issuer or other parties not affiliated with the issuer. Interest rates are determined and reset by the issuer 
    daily, weekly, or monthly depending upon the terms of the security. Interest rates presented for these securities are 
    those in effect at January 31, 2006. 

Certain obligations held in the portfolio have credit enhancements or liquidity features that may, under certain circumstances, provide for repayment of principal and interest on the obligation upon demand date, interest rate reset date or final maturity. These enhancements include: letters of credit, liquidity guarantees; security purchase agreements; lender option purchase agreements, and third party insurance (i.e. AMBAC, FGIC and MBIA). Adjustable rate bonds and variable rate demand notes held in the portfolio may be considered derivative securities within the standards imposed by the Securities and Exchange Commission under Rule 2a-7 which were designed to minimize both credit and market risk.

See Notes to Financial Statements

12


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

Summary of Abbreviations         
AMBAC    American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp.        MBIA    Municipal Bond Investors Assurance Corp. 
BAN    Bond Anticipation Note    MHRB    Multifamily Housing Revenue Bond 
CDA    Community Development Authority    MSTR    Municipal Securities Trust Receipt 
COP    Certificates of Participation    MTC    Municipal Trust Certificates 
EDA    Economic Development Authority    PCRB    Pollution Control Revenue Bond 
EDFA    Economic Development Finance Authority    PFOTER    Putable Floating Option Tax Exempt Receipts 
EDRB    Economic Development Revenue Bond    RB    Revenue Bond 
FGIC    Financial Guaranty Insurance Co.    ROC    Reset Option Certificate 
FSA    Financial Security Assurance, Inc.    RRB    Refunding Revenue Bond 
GO    General Obligation    SFHRB    Single Family Housing Revenue Bond 
IDRB    Industrial Development Revenue Bond    SPA    Securities Purchase Agreement 
LOC    Letter of Credit         


The following table shows the percent of total investments by geographic location as of January 31, 2006: 
New Jersey    84.0%   
California    2.4%   
Tennessee    2.1%   
Colorado    1.6%   
Delaware    1.6%   
Pennsylvania    1.0%   
Minnesota    0.9%   
Utah    0.9%   
Louisiana    0.8%   
Indiana    0.7%   
Wisconsin    0.6%   
New Mexico    0.5%   
New York    0.3%   
Non-state specific    2.6%   

 
    100.0%   
   
 
 
The following table shows the percent of total investments by credit quality as of January 31, 2006 (unaudited): 
Tier 1    89.2%   
Tier 2    10.8%   

 
    100.0%   
   
 
 
The following table shows the percent of total investments by maturity as of January 31, 2006 (unaudited): 
2-7 days    93.5%   
8-60 days    1.0%   
241+ days    5.5%   

 
    100.0%   
   
 

See Notes to Financial Statements

13


STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

January 31, 2006

Assets         
Investments at amortized cost    $    190,960,958 
Cash        30,542 
Receivable for Fund shares sold        124 
Interest receivable        985,500 
Prepaid expenses and other assets        19,026 

      Total assets        191,996,150 

Liabilities         
Dividends payable        22,757 
Payable for Fund shares redeemed        81 
Advisory fee payable        2,152 
Distribution Plan expenses payable        2,827 
Due to other related parties        661 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities        42,485 

      Total liabilities        70,963 

Net assets    $    191,925,187 

Net assets represented by         
Paid-in capital    $    191,911,642 
Undistributed net investment income        13,545 

Total net assets    $    191,925,187 

Net assets consists of         
Class A    $    20,021,705 
Class S        162,227,175 
Class I        9,676,307 

Total net assets    $    191,925,187 

Shares outstanding (unlimited number of shares authorized)         
Class A        19,998,590 
Class S        162,228,830 
Class I        9,684,222 

Net asset value per share         
Class A    $    1.00 
Class S    $    1.00 
Class I    $    1.00 


See Notes to Financial Statements

14


STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Year Ended January 31, 2006

Investment income         
Interest    $    5,139,045 

Expenses         
Advisory fee        786,741 
Distribution Plan expenses         
   Class A        60,632 
   Class S        971,866 
Administrative services fee        115,133 
Transfer agent fees        46,048 
Trustees’ fees and expenses        2,891 
Printing and postage expenses        21,866 
Custodian and accounting fees        63,434 
Registration and filing fees        42,081 
Professional fees        18,838 
Other        20,092 

   Total expenses        2,149,622 
   Less: Expense reductions        (10,473) 
           Expense reimbursements        (18,214) 

Net expenses        2,120,935 

Net investment income        3,018,110 

Net realized gains on investments        15,255 

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations    $    3,033,365 


See Notes to Financial Statements

15


STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

    Year Ended January 31, 

    2006    2005 

Operations                 
Net investment income    $    3,018,110    $    782,232 
Net realized gains on investments        15,255        35,100 

Net increase in net assets resulting                 
   from operations        3,033,365        817,332 

Distributions to shareholders from                 
Net investment income                 
   Class A        (360,889)        (158,044) 
   Class S        (2,461,149)        (530,839) 
   Class I        (213,065)        (121,042) 

   Total distributions to shareholders        (3,035,103)        (809,925) 

    Shares        Shares     
Capital share transactions                 
Proceeds from shares sold                 
   Class A    70,847,480    70,847,480    55,590,727    55,590,727 
   Class S    710,772,494    710,772,494    434,505,828    434,505,828 
   Class I    106,361,929    106,361,929    75,520,508    75,520,508 

        887,981,903        565,617,063 

Net asset value of shares issued in                 
   reinvestment of distributions                 
   Class A    266,357    266,357    115,039    115,039 
   Class S    1,801,404    1,801,404    327,982    327,982 
   Class I    60,936    60,936    29,742    29,742 

        2,128,697        472,763 

Payment for shares redeemed                 
   Class A    (74,376,790)    (74,376,790)    (62,263,181)    (62,263,181) 
   Class S    (721,750,737)    (721,750,737)    (329,796,830)    (329,796,830) 
   Class I    (101,751,886)    (101,751,886)    (92,695,830)    (92,695,830) 

        (897,879,413)        (484,755,841) 

Net increase (decrease) in net assets                 
   resulting from capital share transactions        (7,768,813)        81,333,985 

Total increase (decrease) in net assets        (7,770,551)        81,341,392 
Net assets                 
Beginning of period        199,695,738        118,354,346 

End of period    $ 191,925,187    $ 199,695,738 

Undistributed net investment income    $    13,545    $    15,283 


See Notes to Financial Statements

16


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. ORGANIZATION

Evergreen New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund (the “Fund”) is a non-diversified series of Evergreen Money Market Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on September 18, 1997. The Trust is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).

The Fund offers Class A, Class S and Institutional (“Class I”) shares. Class A, Class S and Class I shares are sold at net asset value without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge. Each class of shares, except Class I shares, pays an ongoing distribution fee.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported herein. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

a. Valuation of investments

As permitted under Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act, securities are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value.

b. Security transactions and investment income

Security transactions are recorded on trade date. Realized gains and losses are computed using the specific cost of the security sold. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.

c. Federal taxes

The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company and distribute all of its taxable and tax-exempt income, including any net capital gains (which have already been offset by available capital loss carryovers). Accordingly, no provision for federal taxes is required.

d. Distributions

Distributions to shareholders from net investment income are accrued daily and paid monthly. Distributions from net realized gains, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Such distributions are determined in conformity with income tax regulations, which may differ from generally accepted accounting principles.

Reclassifications have been made to the Fund’s components of net assets to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryovers, as applicable) under income tax regulations. The primary permanent differences causing such reclassifications are due to dividend redesignation. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the following amounts were reclassified:


Undistributed net investment income    $ 15,255 
Accumulated net realized gains on investments    (15,255) 


17


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

e. Class allocations

Income, common expenses and realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated to the classes based on the relative net assets of each class. Distribution fees, if any, are calculated daily at the class level based on the appropriate net assets of each class and the specific expense rates applicable to each class.

3. ADVISORY FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC (“EIMC”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation (“Wachovia”), is the investment advisor to the Fund and is paid an annual fee starting at 0.41% and declining to 0.30% as average daily net assets increase.

From time to time, EIMC may voluntarily or contractually waive its fee and/or reimburse expenses in order to limit operating expenses. During the year ended January 31, 2006, EIMC reimbursed other expenses in the amount of $39 and Distribution Plan expenses (see Note 4) relating to Class S shares in the amount of $18,175.

Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. (“EIS”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia, is the administrator to the Fund. As administrator, EIS provides the Fund with facilities, equipment and personnel and is paid an annual rate determined by applying percentage rates to the aggregate average daily net assets of the Evergreen money market funds, starting at 0.06% and declining to 0.04% as the aggregate average daily net assets of the Evergreen money market funds increase.

Evergreen Service Company, LLC (“ESC”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia, is the transfer and dividend disbursing agent for the Fund. ESC receives account fees that vary based on the type of account held by the shareholders in the Fund.

4. DISTRIBUTION PLANS

EIS also serves as distributor of the Fund’s shares. The Fund has adopted Distribution Plans, as allowed by Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act, for each class of shares, except Class I. Under the Distribution Plans, distribution fees are paid at an annual rate of 0.30% of the average daily net assets for Class A shares and 0.60% of the average daily net assets for Class S shares.

5. SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS

On January 31, 2006, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes for the Fund was the same as for financial reporting purposes.

6. INTERFUND LENDING

Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the SEC, the Fund may participate in an interfund lending program with certain funds in the Evergreen fund family. This program allows the Fund to borrow from other participating funds. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the Fund did not participate in the interfund lending program.

18


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

7. DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS

As of January 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis consisted of undistributed exempt-interest income in the amount of $13,545. Additionally, short-term capital gains are considered ordinary income for income tax purposes.

The tax character of distributions paid was as follows:

    Year Ended January 31, 

    2006    2005 

Ordinary Income    $ 22,007    $ 25,440 
Exempt-Interest Income    3,013,096    774,825 
Long-term Capital Gain    0    9,660 


8. EXPENSE REDUCTIONS

Through expense offset arrangements with ESC and the Fund’s custodian, a portion of fund expenses has been reduced.

9. DEFERRED TRUSTEES’ FEES

Each Trustee of the Fund may defer any or all compensation related to performance of their duties as Trustees. The Trustees’ deferred balances are allocated to deferral accounts, which are included in the accrued expenses for the Fund. The investment performance of the deferral accounts is based on the investment performance of certain Evergreen funds. Any gains earned or losses incurred in the deferral accounts are reported in the Fund’s Trustees’ fees and expenses. At the election of the Trustees, the deferral account will be paid either in one lump sum or in quarterly installments for up to ten years.

10. FINANCING AGREEMENT

The Fund and certain other Evergreen funds share in a $150 million unsecured revolving credit commitment for temporary and emergency purposes, including the funding of redemptions, as permitted by each participating fund’s borrowing restrictions. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at 0.50% per annum above the Federal Funds rate. All of the participating funds are charged an annual commitment fee of 0.09% of the unused balance, which is allocated pro rata. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the Fund had no borrowings under this agreement.

11. CONCENTRATION OF RISK

The Fund invests a substantial portion of its assets in issuers of municipal debt securities located in a single state, therefore, it may be more affected by economic and political developments in that state or region than would be a comparable general tax-exempt mutual fund.

12. REGULATORY MATTERS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Since September 2003, governmental and self-regulatory authorities have instituted numerous ongoing investigations of various practices in the mutual fund industry, including investigations relating to revenue sharing, market-timing, late trading and record retention, among other things. The investigations cover investment advisors, distributors and transfer agents to mutual funds, as

19


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

well as other firms. EIMC, EIS and ESC (collectively, “Evergreen”) have received subpoenas and other requests for documents and testimony relating to these investigations, are endeavoring to comply with those requests, and are cooperating with the investigations. Evergreen is continuing its own internal review of policies, practices, procedures and personnel, and is taking remedial action where appropriate.

In connection with one of these investigations, on July 28, 2004, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) informed Evergreen that the staff intends to recommend to the SEC that it institute an enforcement action against Evergreen. The SEC staff’s proposed allegations relate to (i) an arrangement pursuant to which a broker at one of EIMC’s affiliated broker-dealers had been authorized, apparently by an EIMC officer (no longer with EIMC), to engage in short-term trading, on behalf of a client, in Evergreen Mid Cap Growth Fund (formerly Evergreen Emerging Growth Fund and prior to that, known as Evergreen Small Company Growth Fund) during the period from December 2000 through April 2003, in excess of the limitations set forth in the fund’s prospectus, (ii) short-term trading from September 2001 through January 2003, by a former Evergreen portfolio manager, of Evergreen Precious Metals Fund, a fund he managed at the time, (iii) the sufficiency of systems for monitoring exchanges and enforcing exchange limitations as stated in the fund’s prospectuses, and (iv) the adequacy of e-mail retention practices. In connection with the activity in Evergreen Mid Cap Growth Fund, EIMC reimbursed the fund $378,905, plus an additional $25,242, representing what EIMC calculated at that time to be the client’s net gain and the fees earned by EIMC and the expenses incurred by this fund on the client’s account. In connection with the activity in Evergreen Precious Metals Fund, EIMC reimbursed the fund $70,878, plus an additional $3,075, representing what EIMC calculated at that time to be the portfolio manager’s net gain and the fees earned by EIMC and expenses incurred by the fund on the portfolio manager’s account. Evergreen is currently engaged in discussions with the staff of the SEC concerning its recommendation.

The staff of the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) had notified EIS that it has made a preliminary determination to recommend that disciplinary action be brought against EIS for certain violations of the NASD’s rules. The recommendation relates principally to allegations that EIS (i) arranged for fund portfolio trades to be directed to broker-dealers (including Wachovia Securities, LLC, an affiliate of EIS) that sold Evergreen fund shares during the period of January 2001 to December 2003 and (ii) provided non-cash compensation by sponsoring offsite meetings attended by Wachovia Securities, LLC brokers during that period. EIS is cooperating with the NASD staff in its review of these matters.

Any resolution of these matters with regulatory authorities may include, but not be limited to, sanctions, penalties or injunctions regarding Evergreen, restitution to mutual fund shareholders and/or other financial penalties and structural changes in the governance or management of Evergreen’s mutual fund business. Any penalties or restitution will be paid by Evergreen and not by the Evergreen funds.

20


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

In addition, the Evergreen funds and EIMC and certain of its affiliates are involved in various legal actions, including private litigation and class action lawsuits. EIMC does not expect that any of such legal actions currently pending or threatened will have a material adverse impact on the financial position or operations of any of the Evergreen funds or on EIMC’s ability to provide services to the Evergreen funds.

Although Evergreen believes that neither the foregoing investigations nor any pending or threatened legal actions will have a material adverse impact on the Evergreen funds, there can be no assurance that these matters and any publicity surrounding or resulting from them will not result in reduced sales or increased redemptions of Evergreen fund shares, which could increase Evergreen fund transaction costs or operating expenses, or have other adverse consequences on the Evergreen funds.

21


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Trustees and Shareholders
Evergreen Money Market Trust

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, of the Evergreen New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund a series of Evergreen Money Market Trust, as of January 31, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and finan-cial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of January 31, 2006 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, or by other appropriate auditing procedures where replies from brokers were not received. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Evergreen New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund, as of January 31, 2006, the results of its operations, changes in its net assets and financial highlights for each of the years or periods described above in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.


Boston, Massachusetts
March 24, 2006

22


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited)

FEDERAL TAX DISTRIBUTIONS

For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, the percentage representing the portion of distributions from net investment income, which is exempt from federal income tax, other than alternative minimum tax and state income tax is 99.28% .

23


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT

Each year, the Fund’s Board of Trustees is required to consider whether to continue in place the Fund’s investment advisory agreement. In September 2005, the Trustees, including a majority of the Trustees who are not interested persons (as that term is defined in the 1940 Act) of the Fund or of EIMC, approved the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement.

At the same time, the Trustees considered the continuation of the investment advisory agreements for all of the Evergreen funds, and the description below refers in many cases to the Trustees’ process and conclusions in connection with their consideration of this matter for all of the Evergreen funds. In all of its deliberations, the Board of Trustees and the disinterested Trustees were advised by independent counsel to the disinterested Trustees and counsel to the Evergreen funds.

The review process. The 1940 Act requires that the Board of Trustees request and evaluate, and that EIMC furnish, such information as may reasonably be necessary to evaluate the terms of the Fund’s advisory agreement. The review process began formally in spring 2005, when a committee of the Board (the “Committee”), working with EIMC management, determined generally the types of information the Board would review and set a timeline for the review process. In late spring, counsel to the disinterested Trustees sent to EIMC a formal request for information to be furnished to the Trustees. In addition, the independent data provider Lipper Inc. (“Lipper”) was engaged to provide fund-specific and industry-wide data to the Board containing information of a nature and in a format generally prescribed by the Committee.

The Trustees reviewed EIMC’s responses to the request for information, with the assistance of counsel for the disinterested Trustees and for the Evergreen funds and an independent industry consultant retained by the disinterested Trustees, and requested and received additional information following that review. The Committee met in person with the representatives of EIMC in early September 2005. At a meeting of the full Board of Trustees later in September 2005, the Committee reported the results of its discussions with EIMC, and the full Board met with representatives of EIMC, engaged in further review of the materials provided to them, and approved the continuation of each of the advisory and sub-advisory agreements.

The disinterested Trustees discussed the continuation of the Fund’s advisory agreement with representatives of EIMC and in multiple private sessions with legal counsel at which no personnel of EIMC were present. In considering the continuation of the agreement, the Trustees did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each Trustee attributed different weights to various factors. The Trustees evaluated information provided to them both in terms of the Evergreen mutual funds generally and with respect to the Fund specifically as they considered appropriate; although the Trustees considered the continuation of the agreement as part of the larger process of considering the continuation of the advisory contracts for all of the Evergreen funds, their determination to continue the advisory agreement for each of the Evergreen funds was ultimately made on a fund-by-fund basis.

24


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

This summary describes the most important, but not necessarily all, of the factors considered by the Board and the disinterested Trustees.

Information reviewed. The Board of Trustees and committees of the Board of Trustees meet periodically during the course of the year. At those meetings, the Board receives a wide variety of information regarding the services performed by EIMC, the investment performance of the Fund and the other Evergreen funds, and other aspects of the business and operations of the Evergreen funds. At those meetings, and in the process of considering the continuation of the agreements, the Trustees considered information regarding, for example, the Fund’s investment results; the portfolio management team for the Fund and the experience of the members of that team, and any recent changes in the membership of the team; portfolio trading practices; compliance by the Fund and EIMC with applicable laws and regulations and with the Fund’s and EIMC’s compliance policies and procedures; services provided by affiliates of EIMC to the Fund and shareholders of the Fund; and other information relating to the nature, extent, and quality of services provided by EIMC. The Trustees considered the rates at which the Fund pays investment advisory fees, the total expense ratio of the Fund, and the efforts generally by EIMC and its affil-iates as sponsors of the Fund. The data provided by Lipper showed the fees paid by the Fund and the Fund’s total expense ratio in comparison to other similar mutual funds, in addition to data regarding the investment performance by the Fund in comparison to other similar mutual funds. The Trustees were assisted by the independent industry consultant in reviewing the information presented to them.

The Board also considered that EIS serves as administrator to the Fund and receives a fee for its services as administrator. In their comparison of the advisory fee paid by the Fund with those paid by other mutual funds, the Board took into account administrative fees paid by the Fund and those other mutual funds. The Board considered that affiliates of EIMC serve as transfer agent and distributor to the Fund and receive fees from the Fund for those services, and received information regarding recent reductions in the transfer agency fees paid by the Fund. They considered other so-called “fall-out” benefits to EIMC and its affiliates due to their other relationships with the Evergreen funds, including, for example, soft-dollar services received by EIMC attributable to transactions entered into by EIMC for the benefit of the Evergreen funds and brokerage commissions received by Wachovia Securities LLC, an affiliate of EIMC, from transactions effected by it for the Evergreen funds.

The Board of Trustees also considered that certain of the money market funds managed by EIMC are offered in connection with cash sweep arrangements and similar services made available by affiliates of EIMC to their customers. The Trustees considered that EIMC and its affiliates benefit from the availability of those Evergreen funds and the distribution and shareholder services fees paid by those Evergreen funds.

Nature and quality of the services provided. The Trustees considered that EIMC and its affili-ates provide a comprehensive investment management service to the Fund. They noted that EIMC formulates and implements an investment program for the Fund. They noted that EIMC makes its personnel available to serve as officers of the Evergreen funds, and concluded that the

25


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

reporting and management functions provided by EIMC with respect to the Fund and the Evergreen funds overall were generally satisfactory. The Trustees considered the investment philosophy of the Fund’s portfolio management team, and considered the in-house research capabilities of EIMC and its affiliates, as well as other resources available to EIMC, including research services available to it from third parties. The Board considered the managerial and financial resources available to EIMC, and the commitment that the Wachovia organization has made to the Fund and the Evergreen funds generally. On the basis of these factors, they determined that the nature and scope of the services provided by EIMC were consistent with its duties under the investment advisory agreements and appropriate and consistent with the investment programs and best interests of the Fund.

The Trustees noted the commitment and resources EIMC and its affiliates have brought to the regulatory, compliance, accounting, tax and tax reporting, and shareholder servicing functions, and the number and quality of staff committed to those functions, which they concluded were appropriate and generally in line with EIMC’s responsibilities to the Fund and to the Evergreen funds generally. They noted that EIMC had enhanced a number of these functions in recent periods and continued to do so, in light of regulatory developments in the investment management and mutual fund industries generally and in light of regulatory matters involving EIMC and its affiliates. They concluded that those enhancements appeared generally appropriate, but considered that the enhancement process is an on-going one and determined to continue to monitor developments in these functions in coming periods for appropriateness and consistency with regulatory and industry developments. The Board and the disinterested Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the Fund’s advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by EIMC, including services provided by EIS under its administrative services agreement with the Fund.

Investment performance. The Trustees considered the investment performance of each of the Evergreen funds, both by comparison to other comparable mutual funds and to broad market indices. The Trustees emphasized that the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for an Evergreen fund should not be taken as any indication that the Trustees did not believe investment performance for any specific fund might not be improved, and they noted that they would continue to monitor closely the investment performance of the Evergreen funds going forward. Specifically with respect to the Fund, the Trustees noted that the Class A shares of the Fund performed favorably against its relatively limited peer group over recently completed one-, three-, and five-year periods.

Advisory and administrative fees. The Trustees recognized that EIMC does not seek to provide the lowest cost investment advisory service, but to provide a high quality, full-service investment management product at a reasonable price. They also noted that EIMC has generally attempted to make its investment advisory fees consistent with industry norms. The Trustees noted that, from the materials presented, it appeared that the combination of investment advisory and administrative fees paid by the Fund to EIMC and EIS with respect to Class A shares was higher than the fees paid by comparable funds, although the Trustees concluded that the fees were not

26


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

unreasonable in light of the Fund’s investment performance and the services provided by EIMC and EIS.

The Trustees noted that EIMC does not provide services to other clients using the same investment strategy as it uses in managing the Fund.

Economies of scale. The Trustees noted that economies of scale would likely be achieved by EIMC in managing the Evergreen funds as the funds grow. The Trustees noted that the Fund had implemented breakpoints in its advisory fee structure. The Trustees undertook to continue to review the appropriate levels of breakpoints in the future, but concluded that the breakpoints as implemented appeared to be a reasonable step toward the realization of economies of scale by the funds.

Profitability. The Trustees considered information provided to them regarding the profitability to the EIMC organization of the investment advisory, administration, and transfer agency fees paid to EIMC and its affiliates by each of the Evergreen funds. They considered that the information provided to them was necessarily estimated. They noted that the levels of profitability of the Evergreen funds to EIMC varied widely, depending on among other things the size and type of fund. They noted that all of the estimates provided to them were calculated on a pre-tax basis. They considered the profitability of the Evergreen funds in light of such factors as, for example, the information they had received regarding the relation of the fees paid by the Evergreen funds to those paid by other mutual funds, the investment performance of the Evergreen funds, and the amount of revenues involved. In light of these factors, the Trustees did not consider that the profitability of any of the Evergreen funds, individually or in the aggregate, was such as to prevent their approving the continuation of the agreements.

In connection with their review of the Fund’s investment advisory and administrative fees, the Trustees also considered the transfer agency fees paid by the Evergreen funds to an affiliate of EIMC. They reviewed information presented to them showing generally that the transfer agency fees charged to the Evergreen funds were generally consistent with industry norms, and that transfer agency fees for a number of Evergreen funds had recently declined, or were expected to in the near future.

27


TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS

TRUSTEES1

Charles A. Austin III    Investment Counselor, Anchor Capital Advisors, Inc. (investment advice); Director, The Andover 
Trustee    Companies (insurance); Trustee, Arthritis Foundation of New England; Former Director, The 
DOB: 10/23/1934    Francis Ouimet Society; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust; Former 
Term of office since: 1991    Investment Counselor, Appleton Partners, Inc. (investment advice); Former Director, Executive 
    Vice President and Treasurer, State Street Research & Management Company (investment 
Other directorships: None    advice) 

Shirley L. Fulton    Partner, Tin, Fulton, Greene & Owen, PLLC (law firm); Former Partner, Helms, Henderson & 
Trustee    Fulton, P.A. (law firm); Retired Senior Resident Superior Court Judge, 26th Judicial District, 
DOB: 1/10/1952    Charlotte, NC 
Term of office since: 2004     
Other directorships: None     

K. Dun Gifford    Chairman and President, Oldways Preservation and Exchange Trust (education); Trustee, 
Trustee    Treasurer and Chairman of the Finance Committee, Cambridge College; Former Trustee, Mentor 
DOB: 10/23/1938    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1974     
Other directorships: None     

Dr. Leroy Keith, Jr.    Partner, Stonington Partners, Inc. (private equity fund); Trustee, Phoenix Funds Family; Director, 
Trustee    Diversapack Co.; Director, Obagi Medical Products Co.; Former Director, Lincoln Educational 
DOB: 2/14/1939    Services; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1983     
Other directorships: Trustee, The     
Phoenix Group of Mutual Funds     

Gerald M. McDonnell    Manager of Commercial Operations, SMI Steel Co. – South Carolina (steel producer); Former 
Trustee    Sales and Marketing Manager, Nucor Steel Company; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash 
DOB: 7/14/1939    Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1988     
Other directorships: None     

William Walt Pettit    Vice President, Kellam & Pettit, P.A. (law firm); Director, Superior Packaging Corp.; Director, 
Trustee    National Kidney Foundation of North Carolina, Inc.; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash 
DOB: 8/26/1955    Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     

David M. Richardson    President, Richardson, Runden LLC (executive recruitment business development/consulting 
Trustee    company); Consultant, Kennedy Information, Inc. (executive recruitment information and 
DOB: 9/19/1941    research company); Consultant, AESC (The Association of Executive Search Consultants); 
Term of office since: 1982    Director, J&M Cumming Paper Co. (paper merchandising); Former Trustee, NDI Technologies, LLP 
    (communications); Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Other directorships: None     

Dr. Russell A. Salton III    President/CEO, AccessOne MedCard; Former Medical Director, Healthcare Resource Associates, 
Trustee    Inc.; Former Medical Director, U.S. Health Care/Aetna Health Services; Former Trustee, Mentor 
DOB: 6/2/1947    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     


28


TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS continued

Michael S. Scofield    Director and Chairman, Branded Media Corporation (multi-media branding company); Attorney, 
Trustee    Law Offices of Michael S. Scofield; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
DOB: 2/20/1943     
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     

Richard J. Shima    Independent Consultant; Trustee, Saint Joseph College (CT); Director, Hartford Hospital; Trustee, 
Trustee    Greater Hartford YMCA; Former Director, Trust Company of CT; Former Director, Enhance 
DOB: 8/11/1939    Financial Services, Inc.; Former Director, Old State House Association; Former Trustee, Mentor 
Term of office since: 1993    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Other directorships: None     

Richard K. Wagoner, CFA2    Member and Former President, North Carolina Securities Traders Association; Member, Financial 
Trustee    Analysts Society; Former Consultant to the Boards of Trustees of the Evergreen funds; Former 
DOB: 12/12/1937    Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1999     
Other directorships: None     

OFFICERS     
Dennis H. Ferro3    Principal occupations: President and Chief Executive Officer, Evergreen Investment Company, 
President    Inc. and Executive Vice President, Wachovia Bank, N.A.; former Chief Investment Officer, 
DOB: 6/20/1945    Evergreen Investment Company, Inc. 
Term of office since: 2003     

Jeremy DePalma4    Principal occupations: Vice President, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc.; Former Assistant Vice 
Treasurer    President, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. 
DOB: 2/5/1974     
Term of office since: 2005     

Michael H. Koonce4    Principal occupations: Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Evergreen Investment 
Secretary    Services, Inc.; Senior Vice President and Assistant General Counsel, Wachovia Corporation 
DOB: 4/20/1960     
Term of office since: 2000     

James Angelos4    Principal occupations: Chief Compliance Officer and Senior Vice President, Evergreen Funds; 
Chief Compliance Officer    Former Director of Compliance, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. 
DOB: 9/2/1947     
Term of office since: 2004     


1 Each Trustee serves until a successor is duly elected or qualified or until his/her death, resignation, retirement or removal from office. Each Trustee oversees 90 Evergreen funds. Correspondence for each Trustee may be sent to Evergreen Board of Trustees, P.O. Box 20083, Charlotte, NC 28202.

2 Mr. Wagoner is an “interested person” of the Fund because of his ownership of shares in Wachovia Corporation, the parent to the Fund’s investment advisor.

3 The address of the Officer is 401 S. Tryon Street, 20th Floor, Charlotte, NC 28288.

4 The address of the Officer is 200 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116.

Additional information about the Fund’s Board of Trustees and Officers can be found in the Statement of Additional Information (SAI) and is available upon request without charge by calling 800.343.2898.

29



565213 rv3 3/2006


Evergreen New York Municipal Money Market Fund



    table of contents 
1    LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS 
4    FUND AT A GLANCE 
6    ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES 
7    FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 
10    SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS 
15    STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES 
16    STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS 
17    STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS 
18    NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
23    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 
24    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
28    TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS 

This annual report must be preceded or accompanied by a prospectus of the Evergreen fund contained herein. The prospectus contains more complete information, including fees and expenses, and should be read carefully before investing or sending money.

The fund will file its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q will be available on the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, the fund’s Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800.SEC.0330.

A description of the fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures, as well as information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, is available by visiting our Web site at EvergreenInvestments.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov. The fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures are also available without charge, upon request, by calling 800.343.2898.

Mutual Funds:         
 NOT FDIC INSURED    MAY LOSE VALUE    NOT BANK GUARANTEED 

Evergreen InvestmentsSM is a service mark of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC.
Copyright 2006, Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC.

Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC is a subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation
and is an affiliate of Wachovia Corporation's other Broker Dealer subsidiaries.

Evergreen mutual funds are distributed by Evergreen Investment Services, Inc.
200 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS

March 2006


Dennis H. Ferro

President and Chief Executive Officer

Dear Shareholder,

We are pleased to provide the annual report for the Evergreen New York Municipal Money Market Fund, which covers the twelve-month period ended January 31, 2006.

The U.S. financial markets had to navigate through some choppy seas during the past twelve months. Uncertainty was prevalent as questions surfaced about the sustainability of economic growth, tighter monetary policy, surging oil prices, moderating profit growth, and an increase in inflation. Geopolitical tensions continued and the Gulf region suffered enormous damage from the hurricanes. Not surprisingly, each of these events combined at various times during the year to increase market volatility. Throughout these turbulent times, the portfolio management teams of Evergreen’s money market funds employed a variety of strategies to manage portfolios in a rising yield environment and enhance portfolio returns, in both the taxable and tax-advantaged markets.

Over the course of the investment period, economic reports frequently delivered confusing signals. While growth was expected to moderate as the expansion matured, the economy showed surprising strength, particularly in the third quarter, as Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) grew in excess of 4%, despite the hurricanes and the spike in inflation. The effects of higher energy prices and tighter monetary policy became evident in the last quarter of 2005 as initial readings for GDP growth barely exceeded 1%. The conflicting data was often subject to interpretation and the consequence for investors was a frequent bout of market volatility. While many debated whether or not

1


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS continued

the short-term volatility was an indication of pending weakness, Evergreen’s Investment Strategy Committee focused on the breadth of economic output, particularly personal consumption and capital investment. Though the rate of growth in each was moderating from unusually high levels, we believed it would lead to a more sustainable, and ultimately less inflationary, pace for the expansion. The fundamentals, though no longer great, were still pretty good in our view, and our portfolio teams based many of their investment decisions on these positive macro-economic trends.

Despite the mixed signals from the economy, the Federal Reserve (“Fed”) maintained its strategy of gradually raising short-term interest rates. Considering that monetary policy had been stimulative for most of the prior three years, central bankers were determined in their efforts to prevent alarming increases in inflation, raising their target for the federal funds rate by twenty-five basis points at every policy meeting over the past year. Yet long-term market interest rates continued to decline and the extent of the yield curve’s flattening had many on Wall Street debating its meaning. Given our forecast for more moderate levels of growth in consumption and investment supporting a sustainable expansion, we viewed the yield curve’s message as confidence in the Fed’s ability to prevent long-term inflation. In addition, higher oil prices would likely serve to dampen output and we believed the absence of significant wage pressures would enable the Fed to continue on with its less stimulative, rather than more restrictive, path for monetary policy.

In this environment, the portfolio managers of Evergreen’s money market funds attempted to focus on the aforementioned market fundamentals, as well as the timing of Fed meetings. Each increase in the Fed’s target for its benchmark rate would result in a “resetting” of rates at the short end of the yield curve, enabling the teams to pursue higher income potential. In addition, many of our analysts and portfolio managers used a variety of short-term securities to capture yield, in

2


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS continued

order to provide our investors with the stability and liquidity necessary to balance exposure within their diversified long-term portfolios.

We continue to recommend that investors maintain their diversified strategies, including exposure to money market funds, within their long-term portfolios.

Please visit our Web site, EvergreenInvestments.com, for more information about our funds and other investment products available to you. Thank you for your continued support of Evergreen Investments.

Sincerely,


Dennis H. Ferro

President and Chief Executive Officer
Evergreen Investment Company, Inc.

 

Special Notice to Shareholders:

Please visit our Web site at EvergreenInvestments.com for a statement from President and Chief Executive Officer, Dennis Ferro, addressing NASD actions involving Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. (EIS), Evergreen’s mutual fund distributor or statements from Dennis Ferro and Chairman of the Board of the Evergreen funds, Michael S. Scofield, addressing SEC actions involving the Evergreen funds.

3


FUND AT A GLANCE

as of January 31, 2006

 

MANAGEMENT TEAM

Investment Advisor:

• Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC

Portfolio Managers:

• Diane C. Beaver
• Ladson Hart

 

PERFORMANCE AND RETURNS*

Portfolio inception date: 9/24/2001 
    Class A    Class S    Class I 
Class inception date    9/24/2001    9/24/2001    9/24/2001 

Nasdaq symbol    ENYXX    N/A    ENIXX 

Average annual return             

1-year    1.84%    1.54%    2.15% 

Since portfolio inception    0.93%    0.63%    1.23% 

7-day annualized yield    2.25%    1.95%    2.54% 

30-day annualized yield    2.23%    1.93%    2.53% 


* The yield quotation more closely reflects the current earnings of the fund than the total return quotation.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The performance quoted represents past performance and current performance may be lower or higher. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that investors’ shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month-end for Classes A or I, please go to EvergreenInvestments.com/fundperformance. Please call 1.800.343.2898 for the most recent month-end performance information for Class S. The performance of each class may vary based on differences in fees and expenses paid by the shareholders investing in each class. Performance includes the reinvestment of income dividends and capital gain distributions.

The fund incurs a 12b-1 fee of 0.30% for Class A and 0.60% for Class S. Class I does not pay a 12b-1 fee. Returns reflect expense limits previously in effect, without which returns would have been lower.

An investment in a money market fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund.

4


FUND AT A GLANCE continued


Class I shares are only offered in the following manner: (1) to investment advisory clients of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC (or its advisory affiliates) when purchased by such advisor(s) on behalf of its clients, (2) through arrangements entered into on behalf of the Evergreen funds with certain financial services firms, (3) to certain institutional investors and (4) to persons who owned Class Y shares in registered name in an Evergreen fund on or before December 31, 1994 or who owned shares of any SouthTrust fund in registered name as of March 18, 2005 or shares of Vestaur Securities Fund as of May 20, 2005.

Class I shares are only available to institutional shareholders with a minimum of $1 million investment, which may be waived in certain situations.

Class S shares are sold through certain broker dealers and financial institutions which have selling agreements with the fund’s distributor.

The fund’s investment objective is nonfundamental and may be changed without a vote of the fund’s shareholders.

Funds that concentrate their investments in a single state may face increased risk of price fluctuation over less concentrated funds due to adverse developments within that state.

The fund’s yield will fluctuate and there can be no guarantee that the fund will achieve its objective or any particular tax-exempt yield. Income may be subject to federal alternative minimum tax as well as local income taxes.

Yields are based on net investment income for the stated periods and annualized.

All data is as of January 31, 2006, and subject to change.

5


ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES

The Example below is intended to describe the fees and expenses borne by shareholders and the impact of those costs on your investment.

Example

As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads), redemption fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) fees and other fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from August 1, 2005 to January 31, 2006.

The example illustrates your fund’s costs in two ways:

• Actual expenses

The section in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in these columns, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class, in the column entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

• Hypothetical example for comparison purposes

The section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees or exchange fees. Therefore, the section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

    Beginning    Ending         
    Account    Account    Expenses 
    Value    Value    Paid During 
    8/1/2005    1/31/2006     Period* 

Actual                 
Class A    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,010.51       $    4.41 
Class S    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,008.98       $    5.87 
Class I    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,012.02       $    2.89 
Hypothetical                 
(5% return                 
before expenses)                 
Class A    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,020.82       $    4.43 
Class S    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,019.36       $    5.90 
Class I    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,022.33       $    2.91 


*      For each class of the Fund, expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of each class
(0.87% for Class A, 1.16% for Class S and 0.57% for Class I), multiplied by the average account
value over the period, multiplied by 184 / 365 days.

6


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS A    2006    2005    2004    2003    20021 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00        $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Income from investment operations                         
Net investment income (loss)         0.02         0.01        0    0.01    0 

Distributions to shareholders from                         
Net investment income       (0.02)       (0.01)        02    (0.01)    02 

Net asset value, end of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00        $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Total return         1.84%         0.58%         0.46%    0.82%         0.33% 

Ratios and supplemental data                         
Net assets, end of period (thousands)    $40,856    $78,542        $82,110   $101,114    $94,200 
Ratios to average net assets                         
     Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
         but excluding expense reductions
 
       0.86%         0.87%         0.91%    0.88%    0.88%3 
     Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
         and expense reductions
 
       0.87%         0.91%         0.93%    0.93%    0.99%3 
     Net investment income (loss)         1.71%         0.58%         0.39%    0.79%    0.92%3 


1      For the period from September 24, 2001 (commencement of class operations), to January 31, 2002.
2      Amount represents less than $0.005 per share.
3      Annualized

See Notes to Financial Statements

7


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS S    2006    2005    2004    2003    20021 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00        $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Income from investment operations                         
Net investment income (loss)           0.02    0        0         0.01    0 

Distributions to shareholders from                         
Net investment income         (0.02)    02        02       (0.01)    02 

Net asset value, end of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00        $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Total return           1.54%    0.30%         0.19%         0.52%         0.22% 

Ratios and supplemental data                         
Net assets, end of period (thousands)    $245,347    $289,872        $25,407   $35,817    $24,092 
Ratios to average net assets                         
     Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
         but excluding expense reductions
 
         1.16%    1.11%         1.18%         1.18%    1.18%3 
     Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
         and expense reductions
 
         1.17%    1.15%         1.23%         1.23%    1.29%3 
     Net investment income (loss)           1.46%    0.54%         0.13%         0.49%    0.54%3 


1      For the period from September 24, 2001 (commencement of class operations), to January 31, 2002.
2      Amount represents less than $0.005 per share.
3      Annualized

See Notes to Financial Statements

8


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS I    2006    2005    2004    2003    20021 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00        $ 1.00    $1.00    $ 1.00 

Income from investment operations                         
Net investment income (loss)         0.02       0.01        0     0.01    0 

Distributions to shareholders from                         
Net investment income       (0.02)     (0.01)        02    (0.01)    02 

Net asset value, end of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00        $ 1.00    $1.00    $ 1.00 

Total return         2.15%       0.89%        0.76%     1.12%       0.44% 

Ratios and supplemental data                         
Net assets, end of period (thousands)    $11,915    $3,420        $2,200   $ 676    $3,710 
Ratios to average net assets                         
     Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
         but excluding expense reductions
 
       0.57%       0.56%        0.59%     0.57%    0.59%3 
     Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
         and expense reductions
 
       0.58%       0.60%        0.61%     0.62%    0.70%3 
     Net investment income (loss)         2.26%       0.92%        0.65%     1.08%    1.15%3 


1      For the period from September 24, 2001 (commencement of class operations), to January 31, 2002.
2      Amount represents less than $0.005 per share.
3      Annualized

See Notes to Financial Statements

9


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS 99.5%             
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 0.7%             
Seneca Cnty., NY IDA RB, KidsPeace Natl. Centers Proj., 3.10%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: KeyCorp)    $ 2,095,000    $    2,095,000 

EDUCATION 2.4%             
New York Dorm. Auth. RB, Mount St. Mary’s College, 3.07%, VRDN,             
     (SPA: Citizens Banking Corp.)    7,300,000        7,300,000 

GENERAL OBLIGATION - LOCAL 7.1%             
New York, NY GO:             
     3.08%, VRDN, (Liq.: Dexia SA)    4,255,000        4,255,000 
     PFOTER:             
          Ser. 356, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: JPMorgan Chase & Co.)    3,000,000        3,000,000 
          Ser. 601, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: JPMorgan Chase & Co.)    5,265,000        5,265,000 
          Ser. 603, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: JPMorgan Chase & Co.)    5,215,000        5,215,000 
New York, NY Putters GO, Ser. 1236, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: JPMorgan Chase & Co.)    3,300,000        3,300,000 

            21,035,000 

HOSPITAL 6.1%             
Albany, NY Indl. Dev. Agcy. Civic Facs. RB, Albany Med. Ctr. Hosp. Proj.,             
     Ser. A, 3.05%, VRDN, (LOC: KeyCorp)    5,000,000        5,000,000 
Herkimer Cnty., NY Indl. Dev. Agcy. Civic Facs. RB, Templeton Foundation             
     Proj., 3.10%, VRDN, (LOC: KeyCorp)    750,000        750,000 
Lancaster Township, NY IDA RB, Greenfield Manor Proj., 3.06%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: M&T Bank Corp.)    4,500,000        4,500,000 
New Jersey Hlth. Care Facs. Fin. Auth. RB, PFOTER, 3.07%, VRDN,             
     (SPA: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. & Insd. by AMBAC)    700,000        700,000 
New York Dorm. Auth. RB, Mental Hlth. Svcs. Facs., Ser. 340, 3.05%, VRDN,             
     (Liq.: Morgan Stanley & Insd. by MBIA)    3,982,500        3,982,500 
Otsego Cnty., NY Indl. Dev. Agcy. RB, Templeton Foundation Proj., Ser. A, 3.10%,             
     VRDN, (LOC: KeyCorp)    3,270,000        3,270,000 

            18,202,500 

HOUSING 29.2%             
Albany, NY Hsg. Auth. Private Account RB, Historic Bleecker Terrace, 3.25%,             
     VRDN, (LOC: KeyCorp)    768,500        768,500 
Class B Revenue Bond Cert. Trust, Ser. 2001-1, 3.47%, VRDN,             
     (Liq.: American Intl. Group, Inc.)    6,700,000        6,700,000 
MMA Finl. MHRB, Ser. A, Class A, 3.08%, VRDN, (Liq.: SunTrust Banks, Inc.)    7,200,000        7,200,000 
Nassau Cnty., NY Indl. Dev. Agcy. PFOTER, 3.12%, VRDN,             
     (SPA: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    32,500,000        32,500,000 
New Mexico Mtge. Fin. Auth. SFHRB, 4.39%, VRDN,             
     (Insd. by Trinity Plus Funding Co.)    2,301,657        2,301,657 
New York Hsg. Fin. Agcy. RB, 350 West 43rd Street, Ser. A, 2.98%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Landesbank Hessen)    3,100,000        3,100,000 

See Notes to Financial Statements

10


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
HOUSING continued             
New York, NY Hsg. Dev. Corp. MHRB:             
     Connecticut Landing Avenue Apts., Ser. A, 2.99%, VRDN, (LOC: KeyCorp)    $ 7,000,000    $    7,000,000 
     Louis Boulevard Apts., Ser. A, 2.99%, VRDN, (LOC: KeyCorp)    5,000,000        5,000,000 
     Renaissance Ct., Ser. A, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: FHLMC)    3,300,000        3,300,000 
     West 61st Apts., Ser. A, 2.99%, VRDN, (LOC: HSBC Bank USA)    10,000,000        10,000,000 
Newburgh, NY Indl. Dev. Agcy., MHRB, 3.15%, VRDN,             
     (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    3,210,000        3,210,000 
PFOTER, Class C, 2.65%, 03/09/2006, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    2,735,000        2,735,000 
Sherburne Cnty., MN Hsg. & Redev. Auth. RB, Apperts, Inc. Proj., 3.42%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: LaSalle Bank Corp.)    3,270,000        3,270,000 

            87,085,157 

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE 8.6%             
California EDA IDRB, Plating Works, Inc. Proj., 3.28%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Union Bank of California)    2,390,000        2,390,000 
Chenango Cnty., NY IDA RB, Baillie Lumber, Ser. A, 3.25%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Citizens Banking Corp.)    3,351,000        3,351,000 
Frankfort, IN EDRB, Gen. Seating of America Proj., 3.57%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Dai-Ichi Kangyo Bank, Ltd.)    875,000        875,000 
Islip, NY Indl. Dev. Agcy. RB, Radiation Dynamics Proj., Ser. A, 3.07%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Bank of New York Co.)    6,000,000        6,000,000 
New York, NY IDA RB, Contractors Sheet Metal, Inc., 3.11%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Citibank)    1,680,000        1,680,000 
Oswego Cnty., NY IDRB, Crysteel Manufacturing, Inc. Proj., Ser. A, 3.17%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: U.S. Bancorp)    3,440,000        3,440,000 
Plymouth, MN IDRB, NuAire, Inc., Proj., Ser. B, 3.24%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Wells Fargo & Co.)    780,000        780,000 
Rockland Cnty., NY Indl. Dev. Agcy. RB, Var-Mic Tech. Proj., Ser. A, 3.30%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Bank of America Corp.)    1,000,000        1,000,000 
Sparks, NV EDRB, Rix Inds. Proj., 3.24%, VRDN, (LOC: Wells Fargo & Co.)    1,720,000        1,720,000 
Ulster Cnty., NY Indl. Dev. Agcy. RB:             
     SunWize Technologies, Ser. A, 3.20%, VRDN, (LOC: HSBC Bank USA)    1,800,000        1,800,000 
     Zumtobel Staff Proj., Ser. A, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: Creditanstalt Bank)    1,500,000        1,500,000 
Yakima Cnty., WA Pub. Corp. RB, Longview Fibre Co. Proj., 3.15%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Bank of America Corp.)    1,240,000        1,240,000 

            25,776,000 

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 5.2%             
Delaware EDA Solid Waste Disposal & Sewer Fac. RB, Ciba Specialty Chemical Corp.             
     Proj., Ser. A, 3.29%, VRDN, (Gtd. by Ciba Specialty Chemical Corp.)    2,450,000        2,450,000 
New York, NY Indl. Dev. Agcy. RB, Casa Proj., 3.10%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: JPMorgan Chase & Co.)    1,000,000        1,000,000 
Pennsylvania EDFA RRB, Wastewater Treatment, Sunoco, Inc. Proj., 3.14%, VRDN,             
     (Gtd. by Sunoco, Inc.)    3,000,000        3,000,000 
Port Arthur, TX Navigation Dist. IDRB, Fina Oil & Chemical Co. Proj., 3.09%, VRDN,             
     (Gtd. by Total SA)    3,600,000        3,600,000 

See Notes to Financial Statements

11


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

        Principal         
        Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS  continued                
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE  continued                
Puerto Rico Med. & Env. Pollution Ctl. Facs. RB, Becton Dickinson & Co., 2.60%,             
     03/01/2006, (Gtd. by Becton Dickinson & Co.)    $ 2,100,000    $    2,100,000 
West Baton Rouge, LA IDRB, Dow Chemical Co. Proj., Ser. 1995, 3.09%, VRDN,             
     (Gtd. by Dow Chemical Co.)        3,500,000        3,500,000 

                15,650,000 

SPECIAL TAX 5.0%                 
Metropolitan Trans. Auth. of New York RB, Dedicated Tax Fund, Class A, 3.06%,             
     VRDN, (LOC: Citibank)        6,000,000        6,000,000 
New York Urban Dev. Corp. RB, Facs. & Equip., Sub-Ser. A-3, 3.02%, VRDN,             
     (SPA: CIFG Services, Inc.)        3,600,000        3,600,000 
New York Urban Dev. Corp. PFOTER, RB, 3.05%, VRDN    2,500,000        2,500,000 
New York, NY TFA RB, Ser. 362, 3.05%, VRDN, (Liq.: Morgan Stanley)    2,667,500        2,667,500 

                14,767,500 

TOBACCO REVENUE 7.5%                 
Erie Cnty., NY Tobacco Asset Securization Corp. RB, 3.10%, VRDN,             
     (SPA: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    11,085,000        11,085,000 
New York Tobacco Trust RB, PFOTER, 3.10%, VRDN, (LOC: WestLB AG)    3,900,000        3,900,000 
Rockland, NY Tobacco Asset Securization Corp. RB, 3.10%, VRDN,             
     (SPA: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    2,000,000        2,000,000 
Tobacco Settlement Fin. Corp. of New York RB, PFOTER, 3.05%, VRDN,             
     (SPA: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    1,075,000        1,075,000 
Westchester, NY Tobacco Asset Securization Corp. RB, 3.10%, VRDN,             
     (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.)    4,170,000        4,170,000 

                22,230,000 

TRANSPORTATION 10.4%                 
Metropolitan Trans. Auth. of New York RB, Class A, 3.06%, VRDN, (LOC: Citibank)    4,000,000        4,000,000 
Municipal Securities Trust Cert.:                 
     Ser. 2000-109, Class A, 2.92%, VRDN, (Liq.: Bear Stearns Cos.)    7,000,000        7,000,000 
     Ser. 7000, Class A, 3.00%, VRDN, (LOC: Bear Stearns Cos.)    4,995,000        4,995,000 
New York Thruway Auth. Gen. RB:             
     2.95%, VRDN, (Liq.: Societe Generale)    2,000,000        2,000,000 
     3.08%, VRDN, (Liq.: Morgan Stanley)    1,042,500        1,042,500 
     MSTR, 2.98%, VRDN, (SPA: Societe Generale)    11,900,000        11,900,000 

                30,937,500 

UTILITY 2.9%                 
Carlton, WI PCRB, Wisconsin Power & Light Co. Proj., 3.12%, VRDN,             
     (Gtd. by Wisconsin Power & Light Co.)    1,000,000        1,000,000 
Delaware EDA RB, Delmarva Power & Light Co. Proj., 3.10%, VRDN,             
     (Gtd. by Delmarva Power & Light Co.)    2,800,000        2,800,000 
Monroe Cnty., NY Indl. Dev. Agcy. RB, Electric Navigation Inds., 3.00%,             
     07/01/2006, (Gtd. by Emerson Electric Co.)    4,970,000        4,970,000 

                8,770,000 


See Notes to Financial Statements

12


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

            Principal     
            Amount    Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
WATER & SEWER 14.4%             
New York Env. Facs., ROC RB, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: Citibank)    $ 5,225,000   $ 5,225,000 
New York, NY Muni. Water Fin. Auth. RB:             
     3.01%, VRDN, (SPA: Dexia Credit Local)        5,000,000    5,000,000 
     Class A, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: Citibank)        26,180,000    26,180,000 
     PFOTER, Ser. 621, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: JPMorgan Chase & Co.)    4,980,000    4,980,000 
Olcese, CA Water Dist. COP, Rio Bravo Water Delivery Proj.,         
     Ser. A, 3.65%, VRDN, (SPA: Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp.)    1,500,000    1,500,000 

                42,885,000 
 
Total Investments (cost $296,733,657)  99.5%           296,733,657 
Other Assets and Liabilities 0.5%            1,384,142 
 
Net Assets 100.0%          $ 298,117,799 
 


VRDN    Variable Rate Demand Note security which is payable on demand within seven calendar days after notice is given by the 
    Fund to the issuer or other parties not affiliated with the issuer. Interest rates are determined and reset by the issuer 
    daily, weekly, or monthly depending upon the terms of the security.  Interest rates presented for these securities are 
    those in effect at January 31, 2006. 
 
Certain obligations held in the portfolio have credit enhancements or liquidity features that may, under certain circumstances, 
provide for repayment of principal and interest on the obligation upon demand date, interest rate reset date or final maturity. 
These enhancements include: letters of credit; liquidity guarantees; security purchase agreements; tender option purchase 
agreements; and third party insurance (i.e. AMBAC, FGIC and MBIA). Adjustable rate bonds and variable rate demand notes 
held in the portfolio may be considered derivative securities within the standards imposed by the Securities and Exchange 
Commission under Rule 2a-7 which were designed to minimize both credit and market risk. 


Summary of Abbreviations 
AMBAC    American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp.      MBIA    Municipal Bond Investors Assurance Corp. 
COP    Certificates of Participation    MHRB    Multifamily Housing Revenue Bond 
EDA    Economic Development Authority    MSTR    Municipal Securities Trust Receipt 
EDFA    Economic Development Finance Authority    PCRB    Pollution Control Revenue Bond 
EDRB    Economic Development Revenue Bond    PFOTER    Putable Floating Option Tax Exempt Receipts 
FHLMC    Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.    RB    Revenue Bond 
GO    General Obligation    ROC    Reset Option Certificate 
IDA    Industrial Development Authority    RRB    Refunding Revenue Bond 
IDRB    Industrial Development Revenue Bond    SFHRB    Single Family Housing Revenue Bond 
LOC    Letter of Credit    SPA    Securities Purchase Agreement 
        TFA    Transitional Finance Authority 

See Notes to Financial Statements

13


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

The following table shows the percent of total investments by geographic location as of January 31, 2006:

New York    83.2% 
California    3.6% 
Florida    2.4% 
Delaware    1.8% 
Minnesota    1.4% 
Louisiana    1.2% 
Texas    1.2% 
Pennsylvania    1.0% 
New Mexico    0.8% 
Puerto Rico    0.7% 
Nevada    0.6% 
Washington    0.4% 
Indiana    0.3% 
Wisconsin    0.3% 
New Jersey    0.2% 
Non-state specific    0.9% 

    100.0% 
   

The following table shows the percent of total investments by credit quality as of January 31, 2006 (unaudited):

Tier 1    95.7% 
Tier 2    4.3% 

    100.0% 
   

The following table shows the percent of total investments by maturity as of January 31, 2006 (unaudited):

1 day    0.5% 
2-7 days    96.2% 
8-60 days    1.6% 
121-240 days    1.7% 

    100.0% 
   

See Notes to Financial Statements

14


STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

January 31, 2006

Assets         
Investments at amortized cost    $    296,733,657 
Cash        81,201 
Interest receivable        1,373,651 
Prepaid expenses and other assets        20,650 

   Total assets        298,209,159 

Liabilities         
Dividends payable        30,458 
Advisory fee payable        3,260 
Distribution Plan expenses payable        4,359 
Due to other related parties        1,951 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities        51,332 

   Total liabilities        91,360 

Net assets    $    298,117,799 

Net assets represented by         
Paid-in capital    $    297,872,492 
Undistributed net investment income        245,307 

Total net assets    $    298,117,799 

Net assets consists of         
   Class A    $    40,855,676 
   Class S        245,346,895 
   Class I        11,915,228 

Total net assets    $    298,117,799 

Shares outstanding (unlimited number of shares authorized)         
   Class A        40,799,539 
   Class S        245,170,715 
   Class I        11,915,320 

Net asset value per share         
   Class A    $    1.00 
   Class S    $    1.00 
   Class I    $    1.00 


See Notes to Financial Statements

15


STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Year Ended January 31, 2006

Investment income         
Interest    $    8,689,161 

Expenses         
Advisory fee        1,328,682 
Distribution Plan expenses         
   Class A        171,955 
   Class S        1,575,522 
Administrative services fee        199,302 
Transfer agent fees        110,822 
Trustees’ fees and expenses        4,840 
Printing and postage expenses        27,244 
Custodian and accounting fees        103,039 
Registration and filing fees        56,187 
Professional fees        24,743 
Other        30,627 

   Total expenses        3,632,963 
   Less: Expense reductions        (10,131) 
          Fee waivers and expense reimbursements        (25,476) 

   Net expenses        3,597,356 

Net investment income        5,091,805 

Net realized gains or losses on:         
   Securities        176,860 
   Credit default swap transactions        (1,150) 

Net realized gains on investments        175,710 

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations    $    5,267,515 


See Notes to Financial Statements

16


STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

    Year Ended January 31, 

    2006      2005

Operations                 
Net investment income        $ 5,091,805    $    1,320,195 
Net realized gains on investments        175,710        218,143 

Net increase in net assets resulting                 
   from operations        5,267,515        1,538,338 

Distributions to shareholders from                 
Net investment income                 
   Class A        (999,320)        (481,315) 
   Class S        (3,958,050)        (774,376) 
   Class I        (286,879)        (66,822) 

   Total distributions to shareholders        (5,244,249)        (1,322,513) 

    Shares        Shares     
Capital share transactions                 
Proceeds from shares sold                 
   Class A    208,251,409    208,251,409    258,967,530    258,967,530 
   Class S    1,006,020,073    1,006,020,073    679,284,557    679,284,557 
   Class I    79,807,433    79,807,433    74,753,514    74,753,514 

        1,294,078,915    1,013,005,601 

Net asset value of shares issued                 
   in reinvestment of distributions                 
   Class A    959,593    959,593    473,936    473,936 
   Class S    3,850,539    3,850,539    743,861    743,861 
   Class I    36,546    36,546    5,515    5,515 

        4,846,678        1,223,312 

Payment for shares redeemed                 
   Class A    (246,911,027)    (246,911,027)    (263,054,928)    (263,054,928) 
   Class S    (1,054,411,685)    (1,054,411,685)    (415,729,120)    (415,729,120) 
   Class I    (71,342,190)    (71,342,190)    (73,544,759)    (73,544,759) 

        (1,372,664,902)        (752,328,807) 

Net increase (decrease) in net assets                 
   resulting from capital share transactions        (73,739,309)        261,900,106 

Total increase (decrease) in net assets        (73,716,043)        262,115,931 
Net assets                 
Beginning of period        371,833,842        109,717,911 

End of period        $ 298,117,799    $ 371,833,842 

Undistributed net investment income        $ 245,307    $    222,041 


See Notes to Financial Statements

17


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. ORGANIZATION

Evergreen New York Municipal Money Market Fund (the “Fund”) is a non-diversified series of Evergreen Money Market Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on September 18, 1997. The Trust is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).

The Fund offers Class A, Class S and Institutional (“Class I”) shares. Class A, Class S and Class I shares are sold at net asset value without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge. Each class of shares, except Class I shares, pays an ongoing distribution fee.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported herein. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

a. Valuation of investments

As permitted under Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act, securities are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value.

b. Credit default swaps

The Fund may enter into credit default swaps. Credit default swaps involve an exchange of a fixed rate premium for protection against the loss in value of an underlying debt instrument in the event of default or bankruptcy. Under the terms of the swap, one party acts as a “guarantor” and receives a periodic stream of payments that is a fixed percentage applied to a notional principal amount over the term of the swap. In return, the party agrees to purchase the notional amount of the underlying instrument, at par, if a credit event occurs during the term of the swap. Periodic payments are recorded as realized gains or losses. The Fund may enter into credit default swaps as either the guarantor or the counterparty.

Payments received or made as a result of a credit event or termination of the contract are recognized as realized gains or losses. The Fund could be exposed to risks if the counterparty defaults on its obligation to perform, or if there are unfavorable changes in the fluctuation of interest rates or in the price of the underlying security.

c. Security transactions and investment income

Security transactions are recorded on trade date. Realized gains and losses are computed using the specific cost of the security sold. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.

d. Federal taxes

The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company and distribute all of its taxable and tax-exempt income, including any net capital gains (which have already been offset by available capital loss carryovers). Accordingly, no provision for federal taxes is required.

18


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

e. Distributions

Distributions to shareholders from net investment income are accrued daily and paid monthly. Distributions from net realized gains, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Such distributions are determined in conformity with income tax regulations, which may differ from generally accepted accounting principles.

Reclassifications have been made to the Fund’s components of net assets to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryovers, as applicable) under income tax regulations. The primary permanent differences causing such reclassifications are due to dividend redesignation. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the following amounts were reclassified:


Undistributed net investment income  $ 175,710 
Accumulated net realized gains on investments    (175,710) 


f. Class allocations

Income, common expenses and realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated to the classes based on the relative net assets of each class. Distribution fees, if any, are calculated daily at the class level based on the appropriate net assets of each class and the specific expense rates applicable to each class.

3. ADVISORY FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC (“EIMC”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation (“Wachovia”), is the investment advisor to the Fund and is paid an annual fee starting at 0.40% and declining to 0.30% as average daily net assets increase.

From time to time, EIMC may voluntarily or contractually waive its fee and/or reimburse expenses in order to limit operating expenses. During the year ended January 31, 2006, EIMC waived its advisory fee in the amount of $25,403 and reimbursed other expenses in the amount of $73.

Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. (“EIS”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia, is the administrator to the Fund. As administrator, EIS provides the Fund with facilities, equipment and personnel and is paid an annual rate determined by applying percentage rates to the aggregate average daily net assets of the Evergreen money market funds, starting at 0.06% and declining to 0.04% as the aggregate average daily net assets of the Evergreen money market funds increase.

Evergreen Service Company, LLC (“ESC”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia, is the transfer and dividend disbursing agent for the Fund. ESC receives account fees that vary based on the type of account held by the shareholders in the Fund.

4. DISTRIBUTION PLANS

EIS also serves as distributor of the Fund’s shares. The Fund has adopted Distribution Plans, as allowed by Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act, for each class of shares, except Class I. Under the Dis-

19


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

tribution Plans, distribution fees are paid at an annual rate of 0.30% of the average daily net assets for Class A shares and 0.60% of the average daily net assets for Class S shares.

5. SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS

On January 31, 2006, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes for the Fund was the same as for financial reporting purposes.

6. INTERFUND LENDING

Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the SEC, the Fund may participate in an interfund lending program with certain funds in the Evergreen fund family. This program allows the Fund to borrow from other participating funds. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the Fund did not participate in the interfund lending program.

7. DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS

As of January 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis consisted of undistributed exempt-interest income in the amount of $245,307. Additionally, short-term capital gains are considered ordinary income for income tax purposes.

The tax character of distributions paid was as follows:

    Year Ended January 31, 

     2006  2005 

Ordinary Income    $   35,344     $ 43,170 
Exempt-Interest Income        5,066,841    1,102,326 
Long-term Capital Gain        142,064    177,017 


8. EXPENSE REDUCTIONS

Through expense offset arrangements with ESC and the Fund’s custodian, a portion of fund expenses has been reduced.

9. DEFERRED TRUSTEES’ FEES

Each Trustee of the Fund may defer any or all compensation related to performance of their duties as Trustees. The Trustees’ deferred balances are allocated to deferral accounts, which are included in the accrued expenses for the Fund. The investment performance of the deferral accounts is based on the investment performance of certain Evergreen funds. Any gains earned or losses incurred in the deferral accounts are reported in the Fund’s Trustees’ fees and expenses. At the election of the Trustees, the deferral account will be paid either in one lump sum or in quarterly installments for up to ten years.

10. FINANCING AGREEMENT

The Fund and certain other Evergreen funds share in a $150 million unsecured revolving credit commitment for temporary and emergency purposes, including the funding of redemptions, as permitted by each participating fund’s borrowing restrictions. Borrowings under this facility bear

20


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

interest at 0.50% per annum above the Federal Funds rate. All of the participating funds are charged an annual commitment fee of 0.09% of the unused balance, which is allocated pro rata. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the Fund had no borrowings under this agreement.

11. CONCENTRATION OF RISK

The Fund invests a substantial portion of its assets in issuers of municipal debt securities located in a single state, therefore, it may be more affected by economic and political developments in that state or region than would be a comparable general tax-exempt mutual fund.

12. REGULATORY MATTERS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Since September 2003, governmental and self-regulatory authorities have instituted numerous ongoing investigations of various practices in the mutual fund industry, including investigations relating to revenue sharing, market-timing, late trading and record retention, among other things. The investigations cover investment advisors, distributors and transfer agents to mutual funds, as well as other firms. EIMC, EIS and ESC (collectively, “Evergreen”) have received subpoenas and other requests for documents and testimony relating to these investigations, are endeavoring to comply with those requests, and are cooperating with the investigations. Evergreen is continuing its own internal review of policies, practices, procedures and personnel, and is taking remedial action where appropriate.

In connection with one of these investigations, on July 28, 2004, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) informed Evergreen that the staff intends to recommend to the SEC that it institute an enforcement action against Evergreen. The SEC staff’s proposed allegations relate to (i) an arrangement pursuant to which a broker at one of EIMC’s affiliated broker-dealers had been authorized, apparently by an EIMC officer (no longer with EIMC), to engage in short-term trading, on behalf of a client, in Evergreen Mid Cap Growth Fund (formerly Evergreen Emerging Growth Fund and prior to that, known as Evergreen Small Company Growth Fund) during the period from December 2000 through April 2003, in excess of the limitations set forth in the fund’s prospectus, (ii) short-term trading from September 2001 through January 2003, by a former Evergreen portfolio manager, of Evergreen Precious Metals Fund, a fund he managed at the time, (iii) the sufficiency of systems for monitoring exchanges and enforcing exchange limitations as stated in the fund’s prospectuses, and (iv) the adequacy of e-mail retention practices. In connection with the activity in Evergreen Mid Cap Growth Fund, EIMC reimbursed the fund $378,905, plus an additional $25,242, representing what EIMC calculated at that time to be the client’s net gain and the fees earned by EIMC and the expenses incurred by this fund on the client’s account. In connection with the activity in Evergreen Precious Metals Fund, EIMC reimbursed the fund $70,878, plus an additional $3,075, representing what EIMC calculated at that time to be the portfolio manager’s net gain and the fees earned by EIMC and expenses incurred by the fund on the portfolio manager’s account. Evergreen is currently engaged in discussions with the staff of the SEC concerning its recommendation.

21


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

The staff of the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) had notified EIS that it has made a preliminary determination to recommend that disciplinary action be brought against EIS for certain violations of the NASD’s rules. The recommendation relates principally to allegations that EIS (i) arranged for fund portfolio trades to be directed to broker-dealers (including Wachovia Securities, LLC, an affiliate of EIS) that sold Evergreen fund shares during the period of January 2001 to December 2003 and (ii) provided non-cash compensation by sponsoring offsite meetings attended by Wachovia Securities, LLC brokers during that period. EIS is cooperating with the NASD staff in its review of these matters.

Any resolution of these matters with regulatory authorities may include, but not be limited to, sanctions, penalties or injunctions regarding Evergreen, restitution to mutual fund shareholders and/or other financial penalties and structural changes in the governance or management of Evergreen’s mutual fund business. Any penalties or restitution will be paid by Evergreen and not by the Evergreen funds.

In addition, the Evergreen funds and EIMC and certain of its affiliates are involved in various legal actions, including private litigation and class action lawsuits. EIMC does not expect that any of such legal actions currently pending or threatened will have a material adverse impact on the financial position or operations of any of the Evergreen funds or on EIMC’s ability to provide services to the Evergreen funds.

Although Evergreen believes that neither the foregoing investigations nor any pending or threatened legal actions will have a material adverse impact on the Evergreen funds, there can be no assurance that these matters and any publicity surrounding or resulting from them will not result in reduced sales or increased redemptions of Evergreen fund shares, which could increase Evergreen fund transaction costs or operating expenses, or have other adverse consequences on the Evergreen funds.

22


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Trustees and Shareholders
Evergreen Money Market Trust

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, of the Evergreen New York Municipal Money Market Fund, a series of Evergreen Money Market Trust, as of January 31, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and finan-cial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of January 31, 2006 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, or by other appropriate auditing procedures where replies from brokers were not received. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Evergreen New York Municipal Money Market Fund, as of January 31, 2006, the results of its operations, changes in its net assets and financial highlights for each of the years or periods described above in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.


Boston, Massachusetts
March 24, 2006

23


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited)

FEDERAL TAX DISTRIBUTIONS

Pursuant to Section 852 of the Internal Revenue Code, the Fund has designated aggregate capital gain distributions of $142,064 for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006.

For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, the percentage representing the portion of distributions from net investment income, which is exempt from federal income tax, other than alternative minimum tax and New York State income tax is 96.60% .

INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT

Each year, the Fund’s Board of Trustees is required to consider whether to continue in place the Fund’s investment advisory agreement. In September 2005, the Trustees, including a majority of the Trustees who are not interested persons (as that term is defined in the 1940 Act) of the Fund or of EIMC, approved the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement.

At the same time, the Trustees considered the continuation of the investment advisory agreements for all of the Evergreen funds, and the description below refers in many cases to the Trustees’ process and conclusions in connection with their consideration of this matter for all of the Evergreen funds. In all of its deliberations, the Board of Trustees and the disinterested Trustees were advised by independent counsel to the disinterested Trustees and counsel to the Evergreen funds.

The review process. The 1940 Act requires that the Board of Trustees request and evaluate, and that EIMC furnish, such information as may reasonably be necessary to evaluate the terms of the Fund’s advisory agreement. The review process began formally in spring 2005, when a committee of the Board (the “Committee”), working with EIMC management, determined generally the types of information the Board would review and set a timeline for the review process. In late spring, counsel to the disinterested Trustees sent to EIMC a formal request for information to be furnished to the Trustees. In addition, the independent data provider Lipper Inc. (“Lipper”) was engaged to provide fund-specific and industry-wide data to the Board containing information of a nature and in a format generally prescribed by the Committee.

The Trustees reviewed EIMC’s responses to the request for information, with the assistance of counsel for the disinterested Trustees and for the Evergreen funds and an independent industry consultant retained by the disinterested Trustees, and requested and received additional information following that review. The Committee met in person with the representatives of EIMC in early September 2005. At a meeting of the full Board of Trustees later in September 2005, the Committee reported the results of its discussions with EIMC, and the full Board met with representatives of EIMC, engaged in further review of the materials provided to them, and approved the continuation of each of the advisory and sub-advisory agreements.

The disinterested Trustees discussed the continuation of the Fund’s advisory agreement with representatives of EIMC and in multiple private sessions with legal counsel at which no personnel of EIMC were present. In considering the continuation of the agreement, the Trustees did not

24


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each Trustee attributed different weights to various factors. The Trustees evaluated information provided to them both in terms of the Evergreen mutual funds generally and with respect to the Fund specifically as they considered appropriate; although the Trustees considered the continuation of the agreement as part of the larger process of considering the continuation of the advisory contracts for all of the Evergreen funds, their determination to continue the advisory agreement for each of the Evergreen funds was ultimately made on a fund-by-fund basis.

This summary describes the most important, but not necessarily all, of the factors considered by the Board and the disinterested Trustees.

Information reviewed. The Board of Trustees and committees of the Board of Trustees meet periodically during the course of the year. At those meetings, the Board receives a wide variety of information regarding the services performed by EIMC, the investment performance of the Fund and the other Evergreen funds, and other aspects of the business and operations of the Evergreen funds. At those meetings, and in the process of considering the continuation of the agreements, the Trustees considered information regarding, for example, the Fund’s investment results; the portfolio management team for the Fund and the experience of the members of that team, and any recent changes in the membership of the team; portfolio trading practices; compliance by the Fund and EIMC with applicable laws and regulations and with the Fund’s and EIMC’s compliance policies and procedures; services provided by affiliates of EIMC to the Fund and shareholders of the Fund; and other information relating to the nature, extent, and quality of services provided by EIMC. The Trustees considered the rates at which the Fund pays investment advisory fees, the total expense ratio of the Fund, and the efforts generally by EIMC and its affil-iates as sponsors of the Fund. The data provided by Lipper showed the fees paid by the Fund and the Fund’s total expense ratio in comparison to other similar mutual funds, in addition to data regarding the investment performance by the Fund in comparison to other similar mutual funds. The Trustees were assisted by the independent industry consultant in reviewing the information presented to them.

The Board also considered that EIS serves as administrator to the Fund and receives a fee for its services as administrator. In their comparison of the advisory fee paid by the Fund with those paid by other mutual funds, the Board took into account administrative fees paid by the Fund and those other mutual funds. The Board considered that affiliates of EIMC serve as transfer agent and distributor to the Fund and receive fees from the Fund for those services, and received information regarding recent reductions in the transfer agency fees paid by the Fund. They considered other so-called “fall-out” benefits to EIMC and its affiliates due to their other relationships with the Evergreen funds, including, for example, soft-dollar services received by EIMC attributable to transactions entered into by EIMC for the benefit of the Evergreen funds and brokerage commissions received by Wachovia Securities LLC, an affiliate of EIMC, from transactions effected by it for the Evergreen funds.

The Board of Trustees also considered that certain of the money market funds managed by EIMC are offered in connection with cash sweep arrangements and similar services made available by

25


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

affiliates of EIMC to their customers. The Trustees considered that EIMC and its affiliates benefit from the availability of those Evergreen funds and the distribution and shareholder services fees paid by those Evergreen funds.

Nature and quality of the services provided. The Trustees considered that EIMC and its affil-iates provide a comprehensive investment management service to the Fund. They noted that EIMC formulates and implements an investment program for the Fund. They noted that EIMC makes its personnel available to serve as officers of the Evergreen funds, and concluded that the reporting and management functions provided by EIMC with respect to the Fund and the Evergreen funds overall were generally satisfactory. The Trustees considered the investment philosophy of the Fund’s portfolio management team, and considered the in-house research capabilities of EIMC and its affiliates, as well as other resources available to EIMC, including research services available to it from third parties. The Board considered the managerial and financial resources available to EIMC, and the commitment that the Wachovia organization has made to the Fund and the Evergreen funds generally. On the basis of these factors, they determined that the nature and scope of the services provided by EIMC were consistent with its duties under the investment advisory agreements and appropriate and consistent with the investment programs and best interests of the Fund.

The Trustees noted the commitment and resources EIMC and its affiliates have brought to the regulatory, compliance, accounting, tax and tax reporting, and shareholder servicing functions, and the number and quality of staff committed to those functions, which they concluded were appropriate and generally in line with EIMC’s responsibilities to the Fund and to the Evergreen funds generally. They noted that EIMC had enhanced a number of these functions in recent periods and continued to do so, in light of regulatory developments in the investment management and mutual fund industries generally and in light of regulatory matters involving EIMC and its affiliates. They concluded that those enhancements appeared generally appropriate, but considered that the enhancement process is an on-going one and determined to continue to monitor developments in these functions in coming periods for appropriateness and consistency with regulatory and industry developments. The Board and the disinterested Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the Fund’s advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by EIMC, including services provided by EIS under its administrative services agreement with the Fund.

Investment performance. The Trustees considered the investment performance of each of the Evergreen funds, both by comparison to other comparable mutual funds and to broad market indices. The Trustees emphasized that the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for an Evergreen fund should not be taken as any indication that the Trustees did not believe investment performance for any specific fund might not be improved, and they noted that they would continue to monitor closely the investment performance of the Evergreen funds going forward. Specifically with respect to the Fund, the Trustees noted that the Class A shares of the Fund performed in the third quintile (but above the median) over the recently completed one-year period and performed in the second quintile over the recently completed three-year period.

26


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

Advisory and administrative fees. The Trustees recognized that EIMC does not seek to provide the lowest cost investment advisory service, but to provide a high quality, full-service investment management product at a reasonable price. They also noted that EIMC has generally attempted to make its investment advisory fees consistent with industry norms. The Trustees noted that, from the materials presented, it appeared that the combination of investment advisory and administrative fees paid by the Fund to EIMC and EIS with respect to Class A shares was above the median of fees paid by comparable funds, although the Trustees concluded that the fees were not unreasonable in light of the Fund’s investment performance and the services provided by EIMC and EIS.

The Trustees noted that EIMC does not provide services to other clients using the same investment strategy as it uses in managing the Fund.

Economies of scale. The Trustees noted that economies of scale would likely be achieved by EIMC in managing the Evergreen funds as the funds grow. The Trustees noted that the Fund had implemented breakpoints in its advisory fee structure. The Trustees undertook to continue to review the appropriate levels of breakpoints in the future, but concluded that the breakpoints as implemented appeared to be a reasonable step toward the realization of economies of scale by the funds.

Profitability. The Trustees considered information provided to them regarding the profitability to the EIMC organization of the investment advisory, administration, and transfer agency fees paid to EIMC and its affiliates by each of the Evergreen funds. They considered that the information provided to them was necessarily estimated. They noted that the levels of profitability of the Evergreen funds to EIMC varied widely, depending on among other things the size and type of fund. They noted that all of the estimates provided to them were calculated on a pre-tax basis. They considered the profitability of the Evergreen funds in light of such factors as, for example, the information they had received regarding the relation of the fees paid by the Evergreen funds to those paid by other mutual funds, the investment performance of the Evergreen funds, and the amount of revenues involved. In light of these factors, the Trustees did not consider that the profitability of any of the Evergreen funds, individually or in the aggregate, was such as to prevent their approving the continuation of the agreements.

In connection with their review of the Fund’s investment advisory and administrative fees, the Trustees also considered the transfer agency fees paid by the Evergreen funds to an affiliate of EIMC. They reviewed information presented to them showing generally that the transfer agency fees charged to the Evergreen funds were generally consistent with industry norms, and that transfer agency fees for a number of Evergreen funds had recently declined, or were expected to in the near future.

27


TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS

TRUSTEES1     
Charles A. Austin III    Investment Counselor, Anchor Capital Advisors, Inc. (investment advice); Director, The Andover 
Trustee    Companies (insurance); Trustee, Arthritis Foundation of New England; Former Director, The 
DOB: 10/23/1934    Francis Ouimet Society; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust; Former 
Term of office since: 1991    Investment Counselor, Appleton Partners, Inc. (investment advice); Former Director, Executive 
Other directorships: None   Vice President and Treasurer, State Street Research & Management Company (investment 
    advice) 

Shirley L. Fulton    Partner, Tin, Fulton, Greene & Owen, PLLC (law firm); Former Partner, Helms, Henderson & 
Trustee    Fulton, P.A. (law firm); Retired Senior Resident Superior Court Judge, 26th Judicial District, 
DOB: 1/10/1952    Charlotte, NC 
Term of office since: 2004     
Other directorships: None     

K. Dun Gifford    Chairman and President, Oldways Preservation and Exchange Trust (education); Trustee, 
Trustee    Treasurer and Chairman of the Finance Committee, Cambridge College; Former Trustee, Mentor 
DOB: 10/23/1938    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1974     
Other directorships: None     

Dr. Leroy Keith, Jr.    Partner, Stonington Partners, Inc. (private equity fund); Trustee, Phoenix Funds Family; Director, 
Trustee    Diversapack Co.; Director, Obagi Medical Products Co.; Former Director, Lincoln Educational 
DOB: 2/14/1939    Services; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1983     
Other directorships: Trustee, The     
Phoenix Group of Mutual Funds     

Gerald M. McDonnell    Manager of Commercial Operations, SMI Steel Co. – South Carolina (steel producer); Former 
Trustee    Sales and Marketing Manager, Nucor Steel Company; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash 
DOB: 7/14/1939    Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1988     
Other directorships: None     

William Walt Pettit    Vice President, Kellam & Pettit, P.A. (law firm); Director, Superior Packaging Corp.; Director, 
Trustee    National Kidney Foundation of North Carolina, Inc.; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash 
DOB: 8/26/1955    Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     

David M. Richardson    President, Richardson, Runden LLC (executive recruitment business development/consulting 
Trustee    company); Consultant, Kennedy Information, Inc. (executive recruitment information and 
DOB: 9/19/1941    research company); Consultant, AESC (The Association of Executive Search Consultants); 
Term of office since: 1982    Director, J&M Cumming Paper Co. (paper merchandising); Former Trustee, NDI Technologies, LLP 
Other directorships: None   (communications); Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 

Dr. Russell A. Salton III    President/CEO, AccessOne MedCard; Former Medical Director, Healthcare Resource Associates, 
Trustee    Inc.; Former Medical Director, U.S. Health Care/Aetna Health Services; Former Trustee, Mentor 
DOB: 6/2/1947    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     


28


TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS continued

Michael S. Scofield    Director and Chairman, Branded Media Corporation (multi-media branding company); Attorney, 
Trustee    Law Offices of Michael S. Scofield; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
DOB: 2/20/1943     
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     

Richard J. Shima    Independent Consultant; Trustee, Saint Joseph College (CT); Director, Hartford Hospital; Trustee, 
Trustee    Greater Hartford YMCA; Former Director, Trust Company of CT; Former Director, Enhance 
DOB: 8/11/1939    Financial Services, Inc.; Former Director, Old State House Association; Former Trustee, Mentor 
Term of office since: 1993    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Other directorships: None     

Richard K. Wagoner, CFA2    Member and Former President, North Carolina Securities Traders Association; Member, Financial 
Trustee    Analysts Society; Former Consultant to the Boards of Trustees of the Evergreen funds; Former 
DOB: 12/12/1937    Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1999     
Other directorships: None     

OFFICERS     
Dennis H. Ferro3    Principal occupations: President and Chief Executive Officer, Evergreen Investment Company, 
President    Inc. and Executive Vice President, Wachovia Bank, N.A.; former Chief Investment Officer, 
DOB: 6/20/1945    Evergreen Investment Company, Inc. 
Term of office since: 2003     

Jeremy DePalma4    Principal occupations: Vice President, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc.; Former Assistant Vice 
Treasurer    President, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. 
DOB: 2/5/1974     
Term of office since: 2005     

Michael H. Koonce4    Principal occupations: Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Evergreen Investment 
Secretary    Services, Inc.; Senior Vice President and Assistant General Counsel, Wachovia Corporation 
DOB: 4/20/1960     
Term of office since: 2000     

James Angelos4    Principal occupations: Chief Compliance Officer and Senior Vice President, Evergreen Funds; 
Chief Compliance Officer    Former Director of Compliance, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. 
DOB: 9/2/1947     
Term of office since: 2004     


1    Each Trustee serves until a successor is duly elected or qualified or until his/her death, resignation, retirement or removal from office. 
    Each Trustee oversees 90 Evergreen funds. Correspondence for each Trustee may be sent to Evergreen Board of Trustees, 
    P.O. Box 20083, Charlotte, NC 28202. 
2    Mr. Wagoner is an “interested person” of the Fund because of his ownership of shares in Wachovia Corporation, the parent to the 
    Fund’s investment advisor. 
3    The address of the Officer is 401 S. Tryon Street, 20th Floor, Charlotte, NC 28288. 
4    The address of the Officer is 200 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116. 
Additional information about the Fund’s Board of Trustees and Officers can be found in the Statement of Additional Information (SAI) and 
is available upon request without charge by calling 800.343.2898. 

29



565216 rv3    3/2006


Evergreen Pennsylvania Municipal Money Market Fund



    table of contents 
1    LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS 
4    FUND AT A GLANCE 
6    ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES 
7    FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 
10    SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS 
16    STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES 
17    STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS 
18    STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS 
19    NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
24    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 
25    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
32    TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS 

This annual report must be preceded or accompanied by a prospectus of the Evergreen fund contained herein. The prospectus contains more complete information, including fees and expenses, and should be read carefully before investing or sending money.

The fund will file its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q will be available on the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, the fund’s Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800.SEC.0330.

A description of the fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures, as well as information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, is available by visiting our Web site at EvergreenInvestments.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov. The fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures are also available without charge, upon request, by calling 800.343.2898.

Mutual Funds:         
NOT FDIC INSURED    MAY LOSE VALUE    NOT BANK GUARANTEED 

Evergreen InvestmentsSM is a service mark of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC.
Copyright 2006, Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC.

Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC is a subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation
and is an affiliate of Wachovia Corporation's other Broker Dealer subsidiaries.

Evergreen mutual funds are distributed by Evergreen Investment Services, Inc.
200 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS

March 2006


Dennis H. Ferro
President and Chief
Executive Officer

Dear Shareholder,

We are pleased to provide the annual report for the Evergreen Pennsylvania Municipal Money Market Fund, which covers the twelve-month period ended January 31, 2006.

The U.S. financial markets had to navigate through some choppy seas during the past twelve months. Uncertainty was prevalent as questions surfaced about the sustainability of economic growth, tighter monetary policy, surging oil prices, moderating profit growth, and an increase in inflation. Geopolitical tensions continued and the Gulf region suffered enormous damage from the hurricanes. Not surprisingly, each of these events combined at various times during the year to increase market volatility. Throughout these turbulent times, the portfolio management teams of Evergreen’s money market funds employed a variety of strategies to manage portfolios in a rising yield environment and enhance portfolio returns, in both the taxable and tax-advantaged markets.

Over the course of the investment period, economic reports frequently delivered confusing signals. While growth was expected to moderate as the expansion matured, the economy showed surprising strength, particularly in the third quarter, as Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) grew in excess of 4%, despite the hurricanes and the spike in inflation. The effects of higher energy prices and tighter monetary policy became evident in the last quarter of 2005 as initial readings for GDP growth barely exceeded 1%. The conflicting data was often subject to interpretation and the consequence for investors was a frequent bout of market volatility. While many debated whether or not

1


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS continued

the short-term volatility was an indication of pending weakness, Evergreen’s Investment Strategy Committee focused on the breadth of economic output, particularly personal consumption and capital investment. Though the rate of growth in each was moderating from unusually high levels, we believed it would lead to a more sustainable, and ultimately less inflationary, pace for the expansion. The fundamentals, though no longer great, were still pretty good in our view, and our portfolio teams based many of their investment decisions on these positive macro-economic trends.

Despite the mixed signals from the economy, the Federal Reserve (“Fed”) maintained its strategy of gradually raising short-term interest rates. Considering that monetary policy had been stimulative for most of the prior three years, central bankers were determined in their efforts to prevent alarming increases in inflation, raising their target for the federal funds rate by twenty-five basis points at every policy meeting over the past year. Yet long-term market interest rates continued to decline and the extent of the yield curve’s flattening had many on Wall Street debating its meaning. Given our forecast for more moderate levels of growth in consumption and investment supporting a sustainable expansion, we viewed the yield curve’s message as confidence in the Fed’s ability to prevent long-term inflation. In addition, higher oil prices would likely serve to dampen output and we believed the absence of significant wage pressures would enable the Fed to continue on with its less stimulative, rather than more restrictive, path for monetary policy.

In this environment, the portfolio managers of Evergreen’s money market funds attempted to focus on the aforementioned market fundamentals, as well as the timing of Fed meetings. Each increase in the Fed’s target for its benchmark rate would result in a “resetting” of rates at the short end of the yield curve, enabling the teams to pursue higher income potential. In addition, many of our analysts and portfolio managers used a variety of short-term securities to capture yield, in

2


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS continued

order to provide our investors with the stability and liquidity necessary to balance exposure within their diversified long-term portfolios.

We continue to recommend that investors maintain their diversified strategies, including exposure to money market funds, within their long-term portfolios.

Please visit our Web site, EvergreenInvestments.com, for more information about our funds and other investment products available to you. Thank you for your continued support of Evergreen Investments.

Sincerely,


Dennis H. Ferro
President and Chief Executive Officer
Evergreen Investment Company, Inc.

 

Special Notice to Shareholders:

Please visit our Web site at EvergreenInvestments.com for a statement from President and Chief Executive Officer, Dennis Ferro, addressing NASD actions involving Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. (EIS), Evergreen’s mutual fund distributor or statements from Dennis Ferro and Chairman of the Board of the Evergreen funds, Michael S. Scofield, addressing SEC actions involving the Evergreen funds.

3


FUND AT A GLANCE

as of January 31, 2006

 

MANAGEMENT TEAM

Investment Advisor:

Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC

Portfolio Managers:

Diane C. Beaver

Ladson Hart

 

PERFORMANCE AND RETURNS*

Portfolio inception date: 8/15/1991

    Class A    Class S    Class I 
Class inception date    8/22/1995    6/30/2000    8/15/1991 

Nasdaq symbol    EPPXX    N/A    EPAXX 

Average annual return             

1-year    1.92%    1.62%    2.23% 

5-year    1.30%    0.95%    1.56% 

10-year    2.21%    2.05%    2.39% 

7-day annualized yield    2.36%    2.06%    2.66% 

30-day annualized yield    2.36%    2.06%    2.66% 


* The yield quotation more closely reflects the current earnings of the fund than the total return quotation.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The performance quoted represents past performance and current performance may be lower or higher. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that investors’ shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month-end for Classes A or I, please go to EvergreenInvestments.com/fundperformance. Please call 1.800.343.2898 for the most recent month-end performance information for Class S. The performance of each class may vary based on differences in fees and expenses paid by the shareholders investing in each class. Performance includes the reinvestment of income dividends and capital gain distributions.

Historical performance shown for Class S prior to its inception is based on the performance of Class I, the original class offered. The historical returns for Class S have not been adjusted to reflect the effect of its 12b-1 fee. The fund incurs 12b-1 fees of 0.30% for Class A and 0.60% for Class S. Class I does not pay a 12b-1 fee. If these fees had been reflected, returns for Class S would have been lower.

Returns reflect expense limits previously in effect, without which returns would have been lower.

An investment in a money market fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund.

4


FUND AT A GLANCE continued

7-DAY ANNUALIZED YIELD


Class I shares are only offered in the following manner: (1) to investment advisory clients of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC (or its advisory affiliates) when purchased by such advisor(s) on behalf of its clients, (2) through arrangements entered into on behalf of the Evergreen funds with certain financial services firms, (3) to certain institutional investors and (4) to persons who owned Class Y shares in registered name in an Evergreen fund on or before December 31, 1994 or who owned shares of any SouthTrust fund in registered name as of March 18, 2005 or shares of Vestaur Securities Fund as of May 20, 2005.

Class I shares are only available to institutional shareholders with a minimum of $1 million investment, which may be waived in certain situations.

Class S shares are sold through certain broker dealers and financial institutions which have selling agreements with the fund’s distributor.

The fund’s investment objective is nonfundamental and may be changed without a vote of the fund’s shareholders.

Funds that concentrate their investments in a single state may face increased risk of price fluctuation over less concentrated funds due to adverse developments within that state.

The fund’s yield will fluctuate and there can be no guarantee that the fund will achieve its objective or any particular tax-exempt yield. Income may be subject to federal alternative minimum tax as well as local income taxes.

Yields are based on net investment income for the stated periods and annualized.

All data is as of January 31, 2006, and subject to change.

5


ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES

The Example below is intended to describe the fees and expenses borne by shareholders and the impact of those costs on your investment.

Example

As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads), redemption fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) fees and other fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from August 1, 2005 to January 31, 2006.

The example illustrates your fund’s costs in two ways:

• Actual expenses

The section in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in these columns, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class, in the column entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

• Hypothetical example for comparison purposes

The section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees or exchange fees. Therefore, the section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

    Beginning    Ending     
    Account    Account    Expenses 
    Value    Value    Paid During 
    8/1/2005    1/31/2006    Period* 

Actual             
Class A    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,010.83    $ 4.26 
Class S    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,009.30    $ 5.77 
Class I    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,012.35    $ 2.74 
Hypothetical             
(5% return             
before expenses)             
Class A    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,020.97    $ 4.28 
Class S    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,019.46    $ 5.80 
Class I    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,022.48    $ 2.75 


* For each class of the Fund, expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of each class (0.84% 
 for Class A, 1.14% for Class S and 0.54% for Class I), multiplied by the average account value over the 
 period, multiplied by 184 / 365 days. 


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS A    2006    2005    2004    2003    2002 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Income from investment operations                     
Net investment income (loss)     0.02     0.01    0.01     0.01     0.02 

Distributions to shareholders from                     
Net investment income    (0.02)    (0.01)     (0.01)    (0.01)    (0.02) 

Net asset value, end of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Total return     1.92%     0.71%     0.52%     1.10%     2.27% 

Ratios and supplemental data                     
Net assets, end of period (millions)    $ 37    $ 26    $ 32    $ 31    $ 28 
Ratios to average net assets                     
  Expenses including waivers/reimbursements                    
    but excluding expense reductions     0.83%     0.81%    0.81%     0.66%     0.64% 
  Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements                    
    and expense reductions     0.83%     0.84%     0.81%     0.77%     0.78% 
  Net investment income (loss)     1.94%     0.70%    0.53%     1.03%     2.17% 


See Notes to Financial Statements

7


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS S    2006    2005        2004    2003    2002 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Income from investment operations                     
Net investment income (loss)     0.02    0    0     0.01     0.02 

Distributions to shareholders from                     
Net investment income    (0.02)    01    01    (0.01)    (0.02) 

Net asset value, end of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Total return     1.62%    0.41%    0.23%     0.69%     1.82% 

Ratios and supplemental data                     
Net assets, end of period (millions)    $ 109    $ 62    $ 71    $ 137    $ 155 
Ratios to average net assets                     
  Expenses including waivers/reimbursements                    
    but excluding expense reductions     1.13%    1.11%    1.11%     1.07%     1.08% 
  Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements                    
    and expense reductions     1.13%    1.14%    1.12%     1.07%     1.08% 
  Net investment income (loss)     1.63%    0.41%    0.23%     0.62%     1.79% 


1 Amount represents less than $0.005 per share. 

See Notes to Financial Statements

8


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS I1    2006    2005      2004    2003    2002 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Income from investment operations                     
Net investment income (loss)     0.02     0.01     0.01     0.01     0.02 

Distributions to shareholders from                     
Net investment income    (0.02)    (0.01)     (0.01)    (0.01)    (0.02) 

Net asset value, end of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Total return     2.23%     1.01%      0.83%     1.29%     2.43% 

Ratios and supplemental data                     
Net assets, end of period (millions)    $ 75    $ 66    $ 76    $ 66    $ 80 
Ratios to average net assets                     
  Expenses including waivers/reimbursements                    
    but excluding expense reductions     0.53%     0.51%         0.51%     0.47%     0.48% 
  Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements                    
    and expense reductions     0.53%     0.54%        0.51%     0.47%     0.48% 
  Net investment income (loss)     2.18%     0.98%      0.81%     1.23%     2.31% 


1 Effective at the close of business on May 11, 2001, Class Y shares were renamed as Institutional shares (Class I). 

See Notes to Financial Statements

9


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS 99.7%             
AIRPORT 3.4%             
Philadelphia, PA Arpt. IDA RB, Macon Trust, Ser. 1998 P-1, 3.17%, VRDN, (SPA:             
     Bank of America Corp. & Insd. by FGIC)    $ 2,000,000    $    2,000,000 
Philadelphia, PA Arpt. MSTR, 3.10%, VRDN, (SPA: Societe Generale & Insd.             
     by FGIC)    1,200,000        1,200,000 
Springfield, IL Arpt. Auth. RB, Allied-Signal, Inc. Proj., 3.18%, VRDN, (Gtd. by             
     Honeywell Intl., Inc.)    4,375,000        4,375,000 

            7,575,000 

CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY 4.4%             
Lancaster Cnty., PA Hosp. Auth. RB, Brethren Vlg. Retirement Cmnty., 3.07%,             
     VRDN, (LOC: Fulton Finl. Corp.)    5,250,000        5,250,000 
Langhorne Manor Borough, PA Higher Ed. & Hlth. Auth. Retirement Cmnty. RRB,             
     Wesley Enhanced Living, Ser. A, 2.93%, VRDN, (SPA: Citizens Banking Corp. &             
     Insd. by Radian Group, Inc.)    1,600,000        1,600,000 
Montgomery Cnty., PA IDA RB, ACTS Retirement-Life Communities, Inc., 2.94%,             
     VRDN, (SPA: LaSalle Bank Corp. & Insd. by Radian Group, Inc.)    2,930,000        2,930,000 

            9,780,000 

EDUCATION 13.9%             
ABN AMRO Munitops Cert. Trust, Ser. 2003-14, 3.05%, VRDN, (SPA: ABN AMRO             
     Bank & Insd. by FGIC)    8,400,000        8,400,000 
Allegheny Cnty., PA IDA RB, Pressley Ridge Sch. Proj., Ser. 2002, 3.10%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: National City Corp.)    2,625,000        2,625,000 
Latrobe, PA IDA RB, Greensburg Diocese, 3.05%, VRDN, (LOC: Allied Irish             
     Banks plc)    1,350,000        1,350,000 
Philadelphia, PA Sch. Dist. RB, Ser. 345, 3.06%, VRDN, (Liq.: Morgan Stanley)    440,000        440,000 
Washington Cnty., PA Auth. RRB, Univ. of Pennsylvania, 3.00%, VRDN, (Gtd. by             
     University of Pennsylvania)    18,000,000        18,000,000 

            30,815,000 

GENERAL OBLIGATION - LOCAL 5.2%             
Lampeter Strasburg Sch. Dist. PA GO, 3.02%, VRDN, (Insd. by FSA & SPA: Royal             
     Bank of Canada)    11,500,000        11,500,000 

GENERAL OBLIGATION - STATE 0.6%             
Pennsylvania GO MSTR, 3.02%, VRDN, (LOC: JPMorgan Chase & Co.)    1,345,000        1,345,000 

HOSPITAL 7.8%             
Lancaster Cnty., PA Hosp. Auth. RB, Lancaster Gen. Hosp. Proj., 3.12%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Fulton Finl. Corp.)    2,000,000        2,000,000 
Lancaster, PA Muni. Auth. RB, Ephrata Cmnty. Hosp. Proj., 3.12%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Fulton Bank)    2,000,000        2,000,000 
Langhorne Manor Borough, PA Higher Ed. & Hlth. Auth. Retirement Cmnty. RRB,             
     Wesley Enhanced Living, Ser. B, 2.93%, VRDN, (LOC: Citizens Bank)    500,000        500,000 
Pennsylvania Higher Edl. Facs. & Hosp. Auth. PFOTER, 3.08%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     Lloyd’s Bank)    12,775,000        12,775,000 

            17,275,000 


See Notes to Financial Statements

10


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
HOUSING 9.7%             
Class B Revenue Bond Cert. Trust, Ser. 2001-1, 3.47%, VRDN, (Liq.: American Intl.             
     Group, Inc.)    $ 2,648,000    $    2,648,000 
Lancaster, PA IDA RB, Davco Family Proj., Class A, 3.22%, VRDN, (LOC: Fulton             
     Finl. Corp.)    1,405,000        1,405,000 
New Mexico Mtge. Fin. Auth. SFHRB, 4.39%, VRDN, (Insd. by Trinity Plus             
     Funding Co.)    1,368,457        1,368,457 
Pennsylvania HFA, Single Family Mtge., Ser 86C, 2.98%, VRDN, (Gtd. by             
     Depfa USA)    3,300,000        3,300,000 
PFOTER:             
     Class F, 3.05%, VRDN, (LOC: Lloyds TSB Group plc)    4,385,000        4,385,000 
     Class I, 2.65%, 03/09/2006, (Liq.: Merrill Lynch & Co.)    1,415,000        1,415,000 
Simi Valley, CA MHRB, 3.00%, VRDN, (Liq. by Merrill Lynch & Co.)    6,995,000        6,995,000 

            21,516,457 

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE 26.4%             
Allegheny Cnty., PA IDA RRB, Mine Safety Appliances Co. Proj., Ser. 1991, 3.04%,             
     VRDN, (LOC: JPMorgan Chase & Co.)    1,000,000        1,000,000 
Blair Cnty., PA IDA RB, Demand-CCK, Inc. Proj., 3.22%, VRDN, (LOC: Fulton             
     Finl. Corp.)    2,100,000        2,100,000 
Butler Cnty., PA IDRB, Mine Safety Appliances Co.:             
     Ser. 1992-A, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: JPMorgan Chase & Co.)    3,000,000        3,000,000 
     Ser. 1992-B, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: JPMorgan Chase & Co.)    1,000,000        1,000,000 
Butler Cnty., PA IDRRB, Mine Safety Appliances Co., Ser. 1991, 3.04%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: JPMorgan Chase & Co.)    1,000,000        1,000,000 
Chester Cnty., PA IDRB, KAC III Realty Corp. Proj., Ser. A, 3.17%, VRDN, (LOC: PNC             
     Finl. Svcs. Group, Inc.)    2,000,000        2,000,000 
Cumberland Cnty., PA IDA RB, Lane Enterprises, Inc. Proj., 3.17%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     PNC Finl. Svcs. Group, Inc.)    2,360,000        2,360,000 
Delaware EDA Solid Waste Disposal & Sewer Fac. RB, Ciba Specialty Chemical Corp.             
     Proj., Ser. A, 3.29%, VRDN, (Gtd. by Ciba Specialty Chemical Corp.)    2,100,000        2,100,000 
East Hempfield, PA IDA RB, BGT Realty Proj., 3.17%, VRDN, (LOC: Fulton             
     Finl. Corp.)    2,700,000        2,700,000 
Franconia Township, PA IDA RB, Asher’s Chocolates Proj., Ser. A, 3.27%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Mellon Bank)    3,000,000        3,000,000 
Hatfield Township, PA IDA Exempt Facs. RB, Hatfield Quality Meats Proj., 3.07%,             
     VRDN, (LOC: Bank of America Corp.)    1,500,000        1,500,000 
Lancaster, PA IDA RB:             
     Purple Cow Partners, LLC Proj., 3.10%, VRDN, (LOC: First Tennessee Bank)    2,500,000        2,500,000 
     RIS Paper Co. Proj., 3.17%, VRDN, (LOC: PNC Finl. Svcs. Group, Inc.)    1,565,000        1,565,000 
Montgomery Cnty., PA IDA RB, Vari Corp. Proj., Ser. C, 3.27%, VRDN, (LOC: M&T             
     Bank Corp.)    720,000        720,000 
Pennsylvania EDFA RB:             
     Computer Components Proj., Ser. G-3, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: PNC Finl. Svcs.             
          Group, Inc.)    600,000        600,000 
     Del Grosso Foods, Inc. Proj., Ser. G-6, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: PNC Finl. Svcs.             
          Group, Inc.)    850,000        850,000 

See Notes to Financial Statements

11


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE continued             
Pennsylvania EDFA RB:             
     Donald Bernstein Proj.:             
           Ser. 2000-H3, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: PNC Finl. Svcs. Group, Inc.)    $ 1,000,000    $    1,000,000 
           Ser. C-5, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: PNC Finl. Svcs. Group, Inc.)    2,400,000        2,400,000 
     EPT Associates Proj., Ser. B-5, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: PNC Finl. Svcs. Group, Inc.)    900,000        900,000 
     First Street Partners Proj., Ser. H-4, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: PNC Finl. Svcs.             
           Group, Inc.)    1,200,000        1,200,000 
     Fitzpatrick Container Corp., Ser. A-1, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: PNC Finl. Svcs.             
           Group, Inc.)    3,000,000        3,000,000 
     Ganflec Corp. Proj., Ser. E, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: PNC Finl. Svcs. Group, Inc.)    1,800,000        1,800,000 
     Hamill Manufacturing Co. Proj., Ser. H-6, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: PNC Finl. Svcs.             
           Group, Inc.)    800,000        800,000 
     Johnston Welding & Fabric, Ser. B-1, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: PNC Finl. Svcs.             
           Group, Inc.)    800,000        800,000 
     Moosic Realty Partners, LP Proj., Ser. A-1, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: PNC Finl. Svcs.             
           Group, Inc.)    800,000        800,000 
     O’Neill Family, LLC, Ser. B-8, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: PNC Finl. Svcs. Group, Inc.)    2,000,000        2,000,000 
     Sage Properties, LLC Proj., Ser. G-12, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: PNC Finl. Svcs.             
           Group, Inc.)    600,000        600,000 
     Savicor Associates, LP, Ser. H-10, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: PNC Finl. Svcs.             
           Group, Inc.)    1,100,000        1,100,000 
     Ser. 2001-B1, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: PNC Finl. Svcs. Group, Inc.)    1,000,000        1,000,000 
     Ser. 2001-B2, 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: PNC Finl. Svcs. Group, Inc.)    900,000        900,000 
Philadelphia, PA IDRB:             
     1100 Walnut Associates Proj., 3.25%, VRDN, (LOC: PNC Finl. Svcs. Group, Inc.)    1,600,000        1,600,000 
     Allied Corp. Proj., 3.25%, 11/01/2006, (Gtd. by Honeywell Intl., Inc.)    980,000        980,000 
Philadelphia, PA Indl. Dev. PCRB, Allied Corp. Proj., VRDN, 3.25%, (Gtd. by             
     Honeywell Intl., Inc.)    1,010,000        1,010,000 
Washington Cnty., PA IDRB, Engineered Products, Inc. Proj., Ser. A, 3.12%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Citizens Banking Corp.)    640,000        640,000 
Weld Cnty., CO RB, Mak Group Proj., 3.24%, VRDN, (LOC: Wells Fargo & Co.)    985,000        985,000 
Westfield, IN EDRB, Standard Locknut, Inc. Proj., 3.24%, VRDN, (LOC: Wells             
     Fargo & Co.)    1,095,000        1,095,000 
Westmoreland Cnty., PA IDA RB, White Consolidated Inds., Inc. Proj., 3.69%,             
     06/01/2006, (SPA: Bank of Nova Scotia)    5,875,000        5,875,000 

            58,480,000 

LEASE 0.7%             
Midway, CA Sch. Dist. COP, Refinancing Proj., Ser. 2000, 3.10%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     Union Bank of California)    1,455,000        1,455,000 

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 5.4%             
Lancaster, PA IDA RB, Student Lodging, Inc. Proj., 3.12%, VRDN, (LOC: Fulton Finl.             
     Corp.)    2,500,000        2,500,000 
New Jersey EDA RB, Bayonne Impt. Proj., Ser. B, 2.88%, VRDN, (LOC: SunTrust             
     Banks, Inc.)    1,000,000        1,000,000 
Pennsylvania EDFA IDRB, Babcock & Wilcox Co., Ser. A-2, 3.27%, VRDN, (LOC: PNC             
     Finl. Svcs. Group, Inc.)    4,500,000        4,500,000 

See Notes to Financial Statements

12


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

        Principal         
        Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE continued             
Pennsylvania EDFA RRB, Wastewater Treatment, Sunoco, Inc. Proj., 3.14%, VRDN,             
     (Gtd. by Sunoco, Inc.)        $ 1,300,000    $    1,300,000 
Pennsylvania Higher Edl. Facs. Auth. RB, Honeysuckle Student Holding, Ser. A,             
     3.04%, VRDN, (LOC: Allied Irish Banks plc)    1,085,000        1,085,000 
West Baton Rouge, LA IDRB, Dow Chemical Co. Proj., Ser. 1995, 3.09%, VRDN,             
     (Gtd. by Dow Chemical Co.)        1,600,000        1,600,000 

                11,985,000 

PORT AUTHORITY 0.9%                 
Pennsylvania EDFA RB, Port of Pittsburgh Commission, Ser. G-10, 3.12%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: PNC Finl. Svcs. Group, Inc.)    2,000,000        2,000,000 

RESOURCE RECOVERY 5.2%             
Schuylkill Cnty., PA IDA RRB, Northeastern Power Co., Ser. 1997A, 3.00%, VRDN,             
     (Gtd. by Dexia SA)        800,000        800,000 
Washington Cnty., PA IDRB, Solid Waste Disposal, American Iron Oxide Co. Proj.,             
     3.52%, VRDN, (Liq.: Bank of Tokyo)    10,700,000        10,700,000 

                11,500,000 

SPECIAL TAX 2.0%                 
Denver, CO Urban Renewal Auth. Tax Increment RRB, Ser. A, 3.28%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Zions Bancorp)        835,000        835,000 
Pennsylvania Intergovernmental Coop. Auth. Spl. Tax ROC, Ser. 99-7, 3.06%,             
     VRDN, (LOC: Citigroup, Inc. & Insd. by FGIC)    675,000        675,000 
Puerto Rico Cmnwlth. Infrastructure Fin. Auth. TOC, Ser. Z6, 3.10%, VRDN, (Liq.:             
     Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. & Insd. by FGIC)    2,975,000        2,975,000 

                4,485,000 

TOBACCO REVENUE 0.5%                 
Tobacco Settlement Fin. Corp. of New York RB, PFOTER, 3.05%, VRDN, (SPA: Merrill             
     Lynch & Co., Inc.)        1,100,000        1,100,000 

TRANSPORTATION 0.7%                 
New York Thruway Auth. RB, MSTR, 2.98%, VRDN, (SPA: Societe Generale)    1,400,000        1,400,000 

UTILITY 4.4%                 
Carlton, WI PCRB, Wisconsin Power & Light Co. Proj., 3.12%, VRDN, (Gtd. by             
     Wisconsin Power & Light Co.)    1,800,000        1,800,000 
Delaware EDA RB, Delmarva Power & Light Co. Proj., 3.10%, VRDN, (Gtd. by             
     Delmarva Power & Light Co.)    2,000,000        2,000,000 
Lehigh Cnty., PA IDA PCRB, 3.05%, VRDN, (Insd. by FGIC & Liq: Merrill Lynch &             
     Co.)        5,000,000        5,000,000 
Lehigh Cnty., PA IDA RB, Allegheny Electric Corp., Inc. Proj., 3.20%, VRDN, (LOC:             
     Rabobank Nederland)        755,000        755,000 
Sweetwater Cnty., WY Env. Impt. RB, Pacificorp Proj., Ser. 1995, 3.04%, VRDN,             
     (LOC: Barclays plc)        200,000        200,000 

                9,755,000 


See Notes to Financial Statements

13


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS continued             
WATER & SEWER 8.5%             
Olcese, CA Water Dist. COP, Rio Bravo Water Delivery Proj., Ser. A, 3.65%,             
     VRDN, (SPA: Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp.) (cost $2,000,000)    $ 2,000,000    $    2,000,000 
Philadelphia, PA Water & Wastewater Facs. RB:             
     MTC, Ser. 1999-1, 3.52%, VRDN, (LOC: Commerzbank AG & Insd. by             
          AMBAC)    15,495,000        15,495,000 
     PFOTER, 3.05%, VRDN, (SPA: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. & Insd. by FSA)    300,000        300,000 
Pittsburgh, PA Water & Sewer Auth. RB, Ser. 346, 3.07%, VRDN, (Liq.: Morgan             
     Stanley)    995,000        995,000 

            18,790,000 

Total Investments (cost $220,756,457) 99.7%            220,756,457 
Other Assets and Liabilities 0.3%            725,797 

Net Assets 100.0%        $    221,482,254 


VRDN   Variable Rate Demand Note security which is payable on demand within seven calendar days after notice is given by the 
           Fund to the issuer or other parties not affiliated with the issuer. Interest rates are determined and reset by the issuer 
           daily, weekly, or monthly depending upon the terms of the security. Interest rates presented for these securities are 
           those in effect at January 31, 2006. 
 
Certain obligations held in the portfolio have credit enhancements or liquidity features that may, under certain circumstances, 
provide for repayment of principal and interest on the obligation upon demand date, interest rate reset date or final maturity. 
These enhancements include: letters of credit; liquidity guarantees; security purchase agreements; tender option purchase 
agreements; and third party insurance (i.e. AMBAC, FGIC and MBIA). Adjustable rate bonds and variable rate demand notes held 
in the portfolio may be considered derivative securities within the standards imposed by the Securities and Exchange 
Commission under Rule 2a-7 which were designed to minimize both credit and market risk. 

Summary of Abbreviations 
AMBAC    American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp. 
COP    Certificates of Participation 
EDA    Economic Development Authority 
EDFA    Economic Development Finance Authority 
EDRB    Economic Development Revenue Bond 
FGIC    Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. 
FSA    Financial Security Assurance, Inc. 
GO    General Obligation 
HFA    Housing Finance Authority 
IDA    Industrial Development Authority 
IDRB    Industrial Development Revenue Bond 
IDRRB    Industrial Development Refunding Revenue Bond 
LOC   Letter of Credit
MHRB    Multifamily Housing Revenue Bond 
MSTR    Municipal Securities Trust Receipt 
MTC    Municipal Trust Certificates 
PCRB    Pollution Control Revenue Bond 
PFOTER    Putable Floating Option Tax Exempt Receipts 
RB    Revenue Bond 
ROC    Reset Option Certificate 
RRB    Refunding Revenue Bond 
SFHRB    Single Family Housing Revenue Bond 
SPA    Securities Purchase Agreement 
TOC    Tender Option Certificate 

See Notes to Financial Statements

14


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

The following table shows the percent of total investments by geographic location as of January 31, 2006:

Pennsylvania    81.1% 
California    5.9% 
Illinois    2.0% 
Delaware    1.9% 
Puerto Rico    1.3% 
New York    1.2% 
Colorado    0.8% 
Wisconsin    0.8% 
Louisiana    0.7% 
New Mexico    0.6% 
Indiana    0.5% 
New Jersey    0.5% 
Wyoming    0.1% 
Non-state specific    2.6% 

    100.0%
   

The following table shows the percent of total investments by credit quality as of January 31, 2006 (unaudited):

Tier 1    89.0% 
Tier 2    11.0% 

    100.0%
   

The following table shows the percent of total investments by maturity as of January 31, 2006 (unaudited):

1 day    0.9% 
2-7 days    94.9% 
8-60 days    0.6% 
121-240 days    2.7% 
241+ days    0.9% 

    100.0%
   

See Notes to Financial Statements

15


STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

January 31, 2006

Assets         
Investments at amortized cost    $    220,756,457 
Receivable for Fund shares sold        10,753 
Interest receivable        872,650 
Prepaid expenses and other assets        17,252 

   Total assets        221,657,112 

Liabilities         
Dividends payable        97,573 
Payable for Fund shares redeemed        1,740 
Due to custodian bank        31,278 
Advisory fee payable        2,182 
Distribution Plan expenses payable        2,097 
Due to other related parties        639 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities        39,349 

   Total liabilities        174,858 

Net assets    $    221,482,254 

Net assets represented by         
Paid-in capital    $    221,482,143 
Undistributed net investment income        111 

Total net assets    $    221,482,254 

Net assets consists of         
   Class A    $    37,424,284 
   Class S        109,062,451 
   Class I        74,995,519 

Total net assets    $    221,482,254 

Shares outstanding (unlimited number of shares authorized)         
   Class A        37,419,395 
   Class S        109,060,989 
   Class I        75,003,494 

Net asset value per share         
   Class A    $    1.00 
   Class S    $    1.00 
   Class I    $    1.00 


See Notes to Financial Statements

16


STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Year Ended January 31, 2006

Investment income         
Interest    $    4,987,109 

Expenses         
Advisory fee        655,042 
Distribution Plan expenses         
   Class A        85,107 
   Class S        592,563 
Administrative services fee        109,174 
Transfer agent fees        34,218 
Trustees’ fees and expenses        2,911 
Printing and postage expenses        24,052 
Custodian and accounting fees        60,149 
Registration and filing fees        53,471 
Professional fees        19,688 
Other        7,902 

   Total expenses        1,644,277 
   Less: Expense reductions        (11,749) 
           Expense reimbursements        (30) 

   Net expenses        1,632,498 

Net investment income        3,354,611 

Net realized gains or losses on:         
   Securities        9,960 
   Credit default swap transactions        (1,150) 

Net realized gains on investments        8,810 

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations    $    3,363,421 


See Notes to Financial Statements

17


STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

    Year Ended January 31, 

    2006    2005 

Operations                 
Net investment income    $    3,354,611    $    1,080,831 
Net realized gains or losses on                 
   investments        8,810        (1,670) 

Net increase in net assets resulting from                 
   operations        3,363,421        1,079,161 

Distributions to shareholders from                 
Net investment income                 
   Class A        (550,826)        (181,501) 
   Class S        (1,615,468)        (246,584) 
   Class I        (1,196,830)        (651,358) 

   Total distributions to shareholders        (3,363,124)        (1,079,443) 

    Shares        Shares     
Capital share transactions                 
Proceeds from shares sold                 
   Class A    76,072,008    76,072,008    57,153,608    57,153,608 
   Class S    629,194,940    629,194,940    113,012,818    113,012,818 
   Class I    152,641,744    152,641,744    139,238,696    139,238,696 

        857,908,692        309,405,122 

Net asset value of shares issued in                 
   reinvestment of distributions                 
   Class A    547,505    547,505    179,212    179,212 
   Class S    805,432    805,432    10,992    10,992 
   Class I    176,421    176,421    82,379    82,379 

        1,529,358        272,583 

Payment for shares redeemed                 
   Class A    (65,145,326)    (65,145,326)    (63,040,243)    (63,040,243) 
   Class S    (583,203,878)    (583,203,878)    (121,656,122)    (121,656,122) 
   Class I    (143,610,257)    (143,610,257)    (149,397,002)    (149,397,002) 

        (791,959,461)        (334,093,367) 

Net increase (decrease) in net assets                 
   resulting from capital share                 
   transactions        67,478,589        (24,415,662) 

Total increase (decrease) in net assets        67,478,886        (24,415,944) 
Net assets                 
Beginning of period        154,003,368        178,419,312 

End of period    $ 221,482,254    $ 154,003,368 

Undistributed net investment income        $              111        $              334 


See Notes to Financial Statements

18


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. ORGANIZATION

Evergreen Pennsylvania Municipal Money Market Fund (the “Fund”) is a non-diversified series of Evergreen Money Market Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on September 18, 1997. The Trust is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).

The Fund offers Class A, Class S and Institutional (“Class I”) shares. Class A, Class S and Class I shares are sold at net asset value without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge. Each class of shares, except Class I shares, pays an ongoing distribution fee.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported herein. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

a. Valuation of investments

As permitted under Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act, securities are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value.

b. Credit default swaps

The Fund may enter into credit default swaps. Credit default swaps involve an exchange of a fixed rate premium for protection against the loss in value of an underlying debt instrument in the event of default or bankruptcy. Under the terms of the swap, one party acts as a “guarantor” and receives a periodic stream of payments that is a fixed percentage applied to a notional principal amount over the term of the swap. In return, the party agrees to purchase the notional amount of the underlying instrument, at par, if a credit event occurs during the term of the swap. Periodic payments are recorded as realized gains or losses. The Fund may enter into credit default swaps as either the guarantor or the counterparty.

Payments received or made as a result of a credit event or termination of the contract are recognized as realized gains or losses. The Fund could be exposed to risks if the counterparty defaults on its obligation to perform, or if there are unfavorable changes in the fluctuation of interest rates or in the price of the underlying security.

c. Security transactions and investment income

Security transactions are recorded on trade date. Realized gains and losses are computed using the specific cost of the security sold. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.

d. Federal taxes

The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company and distribute all of its taxable and tax-exempt income, including any net capital gains (which have already been offset by available capital loss carryovers). Accordingly, no provision for federal taxes is required.

19


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

e. Distributions

Distributions to shareholders from net investment income are accrued daily and paid monthly. Distributions from net realized gains, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Such distributions are determined in conformity with income tax regulations, which may differ from generally accepted accounting principles.

Reclassifications have been made to the Fund’s components of net assets to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryovers, as applicable) under income tax regulations. The primary permanent differences causing such reclassifications are due to dividend redesignation. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the following amounts were reclassified:


Undistributed net investment income    $ 8,290 
Accumulated net realized gains on investments    (8,290) 


f. Class allocations

Income, common expenses and realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated to the classes based on the relative net assets of each class. Distribution fees, if any, are calculated daily at the class level based on the appropriate net assets of each class and the specific expense rates applicable to each class.

3. ADVISORY FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC (“EIMC”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation (“Wachovia”), is the investment advisor to the Fund and is paid an annual fee starting at 0.36% and declining to 0.24% as average daily net assets increase.

From time to time, EIMC may voluntarily or contractually waive its fee and/or reimburse expenses in order to limit operating expenses. During the year ended January 31, 2006, EIMC reimbursed other expenses in the amount of $30.

Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. (“EIS”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia, is the administrator to the Fund. As administrator, EIS provides the Fund with facilities, equipment and personnel and is paid an annual rate determined by applying percentage rates to the aggregate average daily net assets of the Evergreen money market funds, starting at 0.06% and declining to 0.04% as the aggregate average daily net assets of the Evergreen money market funds increase.

Evergreen Service Company, LLC (“ESC”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia, is the transfer and dividend disbursing agent for the Fund. ESC receives account fees that vary based on the type of account held by the shareholders in the Fund.

4. DISTRIBUTION PLANS

EIS also serves as distributor of the Fund’s shares. The Fund has adopted Distribution Plans, as allowed by Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act, for each class of shares, except Class I. Under the Distribution Plans, distribution fees are paid at an annual rate of 0.30% of the average daily net assets for Class A shares and 0.60% of the average daily net assets for Class S shares.

20


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

5. SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS

On January 31, 2006, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes for the Fund was the same as for financial reporting purposes.

6. INTERFUND LENDING

Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the SEC, the Fund may participate in an interfund lending program with certain funds in the Evergreen fund family. This program allows the Fund to borrow from other participating funds. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the Fund did not participate in the interfund lending program.

7. DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS

As of January 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis consisted of undistributed exempt-interest income in the amount of $111.

The tax character of distributions paid was as follows:

    Year Ended January 31, 

    2006    2005 

Ordinary Income    $    1,333    $    0 
Exempt-Interest Income        3,352,351        1,079,443 
Long-term Capital Gain        9,440        0 


8. EXPENSE REDUCTIONS

Through expense offset arrangements with ESC and the Fund’s custodian, a portion of fund expenses has been reduced.

9. DEFERRED TRUSTEES’ FEES

Each Trustee of the Fund may defer any or all compensation related to performance of their duties as Trustees. The Trustees’ deferred balances are allocated to deferral accounts, which are included in the accrued expenses for the Fund. The investment performance of the deferral accounts is based on the investment performance of certain Evergreen funds. Any gains earned or losses incurred in the deferral accounts are reported in the Fund’s Trustees’ fees and expenses. At the election of the Trustees, the deferral account will be paid either in one lump sum or in quarterly installments for up to ten years.

10. FINANCING AGREEMENT

The Fund and certain other Evergreen funds share in a $150 million unsecured revolving credit commitment for temporary and emergency purposes, including the funding of redemptions, as permitted by each participating fund’s borrowing restrictions. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at 0.50% per annum above the Federal Funds rate. All of the participating funds are charged an annual commitment fee of 0.09% of the unused balance, which is allocated pro rata. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the Fund had no borrowings under this agreement.

21


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

11. CONCENTRATION OF RISK

The Fund invests a substantial portion of its assets in issuers of municipal debt securities located in a single state, therefore, it may be more affected by economic and political developments in that state or region than would be a comparable general tax-exempt mutual fund.

12. REGULATORY MATTERS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Since September 2003, governmental and self-regulatory authorities have instituted numerous ongoing investigations of various practices in the mutual fund industry, including investigations relating to revenue sharing, market-timing, late trading and record retention, among other things. The investigations cover investment advisors, distributors and transfer agents to mutual funds, as well as other firms. EIMC, EIS and ESC (collectively, “Evergreen”) have received subpoenas and other requests for documents and testimony relating to these investigations, are endeavoring to comply with those requests, and are cooperating with the investigations. Evergreen is continuing its own internal review of policies, practices, procedures and personnel, and is taking remedial action where appropriate.

In connection with one of these investigations, on July 28, 2004, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) informed Evergreen that the staff intends to recommend to the SEC that it institute an enforcement action against Evergreen. The SEC staff’s proposed allegations relate to (i) an arrangement pursuant to which a broker at one of EIMC’s affiliated broker-dealers had been authorized, apparently by an EIMC officer (no longer with EIMC), to engage in short-term trading, on behalf of a client, in Evergreen Mid Cap Growth Fund (formerly Evergreen Emerging Growth Fund and prior to that, known as Evergreen Small Company Growth Fund) during the period from December 2000 through April 2003, in excess of the limitations set forth in the fund’s prospectus, (ii) short-term trading from September 2001 through January 2003, by a former Evergreen portfolio manager, of Evergreen Precious Metals Fund, a fund he managed at the time, (iii) the sufficiency of systems for monitoring exchanges and enforcing exchange limitations as stated in the fund’s prospectuses, and (iv) the adequacy of e-mail retention practices. In connection with the activity in Evergreen Mid Cap Growth Fund, EIMC reimbursed the fund $378,905, plus an additional $25,242, representing what EIMC calculated at that time to be the client’s net gain and the fees earned by EIMC and the expenses incurred by this fund on the client’s account. In connection with the activity in Evergreen Precious Metals Fund, EIMC reimbursed the fund $70,878, plus an additional $3,075, representing what EIMC calculated at that time to be the portfolio manager’s net gain and the fees earned by EIMC and expenses incurred by the fund on the portfolio manager’s account. Evergreen is currently engaged in discussions with the staff of the SEC concerning its recommendation.

The staff of the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) had notified EIS that it has made a preliminary determination to recommend that disciplinary action be brought against EIS for certain violations of the NASD’s rules. The recommendation relates principally to allegations that EIS (i) arranged for fund portfolio trades to be directed to broker-dealers (including Wachovia Securities, LLC, an affiliate of EIS) that sold Evergreen fund shares during the period

22


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

of January 2001 to December 2003 and (ii) provided non-cash compensation by sponsoring offsite meetings attended by Wachovia Securities, LLC brokers during that period. EIS is cooperating with the NASD staff in its review of these matters.

Any resolution of these matters with regulatory authorities may include, but not be limited to, sanctions, penalties or injunctions regarding Evergreen, restitution to mutual fund shareholders and/or other financial penalties and structural changes in the governance or management of Evergreen’s mutual fund business. Any penalties or restitution will be paid by Evergreen and not by the Evergreen funds.

In addition, the Evergreen funds and EIMC and certain of its affiliates are involved in various legal actions, including private litigation and class action lawsuits. EIMC does not expect that any of such legal actions currently pending or threatened will have a material adverse impact on the financial position or operations of any of the Evergreen funds or on EIMC’s ability to provide services to the Evergreen funds.

Although Evergreen believes that neither the foregoing investigations nor any pending or threatened legal actions will have a material adverse impact on the Evergreen funds, there can be no assurance that these matters and any publicity surrounding or resulting from them will not result in reduced sales or increased redemptions of Evergreen fund shares, which could increase Evergreen fund transaction costs or operating expenses, or have other adverse consequences on the Evergreen funds.

23


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Trustees and Shareholders
Evergreen Money Market Trust

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, of the Evergreen Pennsylvania Municipal Money Market Fund, a series of Evergreen Money Market Trust, as of January 31, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of January 31, 2006 by correspondence with the custodian. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Evergreen Pennsylvania Municipal Money Market Fund, as of January 31, 2006, the results of its operations, changes in its net assets and financial highlights for each of the years described above in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Boston, Massachusetts
March 24, 2006

24


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited)

FEDERAL TAX DISTRIBUTIONS

Pursuant to Section 852 of the Internal Revenue Code, the Fund has designated aggregate capital gain distributions of $9,440 for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006.

For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, the percentage representing the portion of distributions from net investment income, which is exempt from federal income tax, other than alternative minimum tax and Pennsylvania state income tax is 99.68% .

25


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT
ADVISORY AGREEMENT

Each year, the Fund’s Board of Trustees is required to consider whether to continue in place the Fund’s investment advisory agreement. In September 2005, the Trustees, including a majority of the Trustees who are not interested persons (as that term is defined in the 1940 Act) of the Fund or of EIMC, approved the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement.

At the same time, the Trustees considered the continuation of the investment advisory agreements for all of the Evergreen funds, and the description below refers in many cases to the Trustees’ process and conclusions in connection with their consideration of this matter for all of the Evergreen funds. In all of its deliberations, the Board of Trustees and the disinterested Trustees were advised by independent counsel to the disinterested Trustees and counsel to the Evergreen funds.

The review process. The 1940 Act requires that the Board of Trustees request and evaluate, and that EIMC furnish, such information as may reasonably be necessary to evaluate the terms of the Fund’s advisory agreement. The review process began formally in spring 2005, when a committee of the Board (the “Committee”), working with EIMC management, determined generally the types of information the Board would review and set a timeline for the review process. In late spring, counsel to the disinterested Trustees sent to EIMC a formal request for information to be furnished to the Trustees. In addition, the independent data provider Lipper Inc. (“Lipper”) was engaged to provide fund-specific and industry-wide data to the Board containing information of a nature and in a format generally prescribed by the Committee.

The Trustees reviewed EIMC’s responses to the request for information, with the assistance of counsel for the disinterested Trustees and for the Evergreen funds and an independent industry consultant retained by the disinterested Trustees, and requested and received additional information following that review. The Committee met in person with the representatives of EIMC in early September 2005. At a meeting of the full Board of Trustees later in September 2005, the Committee reported the results of its discussions with EIMC, and the full Board met with representatives of EIMC, engaged in further review of the materials provided to them, and approved the continuation of each of the advisory and sub-advisory agreements.

The disinterested Trustees discussed the continuation of the Fund’s advisory agreement with representatives of EIMC and in multiple private sessions with legal counsel at which no personnel of EIMC were present. In considering the continuation of the agreement, the Trustees did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each Trustee attributed different weights to various factors. The Trustees evaluated information provided to them both in terms of the Evergreen mutual funds generally and with respect to the Fund specifically as they considered appropriate; although the Trustees considered the continuation of the agreement as part of the larger process of considering the continuation of the advisory contracts for all of the Evergreen funds, their determination to continue the advisory agreement for each of the Evergreen funds was ultimately made on a fund-by-fund basis.

26


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

This summary describes the most important, but not necessarily all, of the factors considered by the Board and the disinterested Trustees.

Information reviewed. The Board of Trustees and committees of the Board of Trustees meet periodically during the course of the year. At those meetings, the Board receives a wide variety of information regarding the services performed by EIMC, the investment performance of the Fund and the other Evergreen funds, and other aspects of the business and operations of the Evergreen funds. At those meetings, and in the process of considering the continuation of the agreements, the Trustees considered information regarding, for example, the Fund’s investment results; the portfolio management team for the Fund and the experience of the members of that team, and any recent changes in the membership of the team; portfolio trading practices; compliance by the Fund and EIMC with applicable laws and regulations and with the Fund’s and EIMC’s compliance policies and procedures; services provided by affiliates of EIMC to the Fund and shareholders of the Fund; and other information relating to the nature, extent, and quality of services provided by EIMC. The Trustees considered the rates at which the Fund pays investment advisory fees, the total expense ratio of the Fund, and the efforts generally by EIMC and its affil-iates as sponsors of the Fund. The data provided by Lipper showed the fees paid by the Fund and the Fund’s total expense ratio in comparison to other similar mutual funds, in addition to data regarding the investment performance by the Fund in comparison to other similar mutual funds. The Trustees were assisted by the independent industry consultant in reviewing the information presented to them.

The Board also considered that EIS serves as administrator to the Fund and receives a fee for its services as administrator. In their comparison of the advisory fee paid by the Fund with those paid by other mutual funds, the Board took into account administrative fees paid by the Fund and those other mutual funds. The Board considered that affiliates of EIMC serve as transfer agent and distributor to the Fund and receive fees from the Fund for those services, and received information regarding recent reductions in the transfer agency fees paid by the Fund. They considered other so-called “fall-out” benefits to EIMC and its affiliates due to their other relationships with the Evergreen funds, including, for example, soft-dollar services received by EIMC attributable to transactions entered into by EIMC for the benefit of the Evergreen funds and brokerage commissions received by Wachovia Securities LLC, an affiliate of EIMC, from transactions effected by it for the Evergreen funds.

The Board of Trustees also considered that certain of the money market funds managed by EIMC are offered in connection with cash sweep arrangements and similar services made available by affiliates of EIMC to their customers. The Trustees considered that EIMC and its affiliates benefit from the availability of those Evergreen funds and the distribution and shareholder services fees paid by those Evergreen funds.

Nature and quality of the services provided. The Trustees considered that EIMC and its affiliates provide a comprehensive investment management service to the Fund. They noted that EIMC formulates and implements an investment program for the Fund. They noted that EIMC makes its personnel available to serve as officers of the Evergreen funds, and concluded that the

27


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

reporting and management functions provided by EIMC with respect to the Fund and the Evergreen funds overall were generally satisfactory. The Trustees considered the investment philosophy of the Fund’s portfolio management team, and considered the in-house research capabilities of EIMC and its affiliates, as well as other resources available to EIMC, including research services available to it from third parties. The Board considered the managerial and financial resources available to EIMC, and the commitment that the Wachovia organization has made to the Fund and the Evergreen funds generally. On the basis of these factors, they determined that the nature and scope of the services provided by EIMC were consistent with its duties under the investment advisory agreements and appropriate and consistent with the investment programs and best interests of the Fund.

The Trustees noted the commitment and resources EIMC and its affiliates have brought to the regulatory, compliance, accounting, tax and tax reporting, and shareholder servicing functions, and the number and quality of staff committed to those functions, which they concluded were appropriate and generally in line with EIMC’s responsibilities to the Fund and to the Evergreen funds generally. They noted that EIMC had enhanced a number of these functions in recent periods and continued to do so, in light of regulatory developments in the investment management and mutual fund industries generally and in light of regulatory matters involving EIMC and its affiliates. They concluded that those enhancements appeared generally appropriate, but considered that the enhancement process is an on-going one and determined to continue to monitor developments in these functions in coming periods for appropriateness and consistency with regulatory and industry developments. The Board and the disinterested Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the Fund’s advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by EIMC, including services provided by EIS under its administrative services agreement with the Fund.

Investment performance. The Trustees considered the investment performance of each of the Evergreen funds, both by comparison to other comparable mutual funds and to broad market indices. The Trustees emphasized that the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for an Evergreen fund should not be taken as any indication that the Trustees did not believe investment performance for any specific fund might not be improved, and they noted that they would continue to monitor closely the investment performance of the Evergreen funds going forward. Specifically with respect to the Fund, the Trustees noted that the Class A shares of the Fund performed in the first quintile over recently completed one-, three-, and five-year periods.

Advisory and administrative fees. The Trustees recognized that EIMC does not seek to provide the lowest cost investment advisory service, but to provide a high quality, full-service investment management product at a reasonable price. They also noted that EIMC has generally attempted to make its investment advisory fees consistent with industry norms. The Trustees noted that, from the materials presented, it appeared that the combination of investment advisory and administrative fees paid by the Fund to EIMC and EIS with respect to Class A shares was at the median of fees paid by comparable funds.

28


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

The Trustees noted that EIMC does not provide services to other clients using the same investment strategy as it uses in managing the Fund.

Economies of scale. The Trustees noted that economies of scale would likely be achieved by EIMC in managing the Evergreen funds as the funds grow. The Trustees noted that the Fund had implemented breakpoints in its advisory fee structure. The Trustees undertook to continue to review the appropriate levels of breakpoints in the future, but concluded that the breakpoints as implemented appeared to be a reasonable step toward the realization of economies of scale by the funds.

Profitability. The Trustees considered information provided to them regarding the profitability to the EIMC organization of the investment advisory, administration, and transfer agency fees paid to EIMC and its affiliates by each of the Evergreen funds. They considered that the information provided to them was necessarily estimated. They noted that the levels of profitability of the Evergreen funds to EIMC varied widely, depending on among other things the size and type of fund. They noted that all of the estimates provided to them were calculated on a pre-tax basis. They considered the profitability of the Evergreen funds in light of such factors as, for example, the information they had received regarding the relation of the fees paid by the Evergreen funds to those paid by other mutual funds, the investment performance of the Evergreen funds, and the amount of revenues involved. In light of these factors, the Trustees did not consider that the profitability of any of the Evergreen funds, individually or in the aggregate, was such as to prevent their approving the continuation of the agreements.

In connection with their review of the Fund’s investment advisory and administrative fees, the Trustees also considered the transfer agency fees paid by the Evergreen funds to an affiliate of EIMC. They reviewed information presented to them showing generally that the transfer agency fees charged to the Evergreen funds were generally consistent with industry norms, and that transfer agency fees for a number of Evergreen funds had recently declined, or were expected to in the near future.

29


This page left intentionally blank

30


This page left intentionally blank

31


TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS

TRUSTEES1

Charles A. Austin III    Investment Counselor, Anchor Capital Advisors, Inc. (investment advice); Director, The Andover 
Trustee    Companies (insurance); Trustee, Arthritis Foundation of New England; Former Director, The 
DOB: 10/23/1934    Francis Ouimet Society; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust; Former 
Term of office since: 1991    Investment Counselor, Appleton Partners, Inc. (investment advice); Former Director, Executive 
Other directorships: None    Vice President and Treasurer, State Street Research & Management Company (investment 
    advice) 

Shirley L. Fulton    Partner, Tin, Fulton, Greene & Owen, PLLC (law firm); Former Partner, Helms, Henderson & 
Trustee    Fulton, P.A. (law firm); Retired Senior Resident Superior Court Judge, 26th Judicial District, 
DOB: 1/10/1952    Charlotte, NC 
Term of office since: 2004     
Other directorships: None     

K. Dun Gifford    Chairman and President, Oldways Preservation and Exchange Trust (education); Trustee, 
Trustee    Treasurer and Chairman of the Finance Committee, Cambridge College; Former Trustee, Mentor 
DOB: 10/23/1938    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1974     
Other directorships: None     

Dr. Leroy Keith, Jr.    Partner, Stonington Partners, Inc. (private equity fund); Trustee, Phoenix Funds Family; Director, 
Trustee    Diversapack Co.; Director, Obagi Medical Products Co.; Former Director, Lincoln Educational 
DOB: 2/14/1939    Services; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1983     
Other directorships: Trustee, The     
Phoenix Group of Mutual Funds     

Gerald M. McDonnell    Manager of Commercial Operations, SMI Steel Co. – South Carolina (steel producer); Former 
Trustee    Sales and Marketing Manager, Nucor Steel Company; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash 
DOB: 7/14/1939    Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1988     
Other directorships: None     

William Walt Pettit    Vice President, Kellam & Pettit, P.A. (law firm); Director, Superior Packaging Corp.; Director, 
Trustee    National Kidney Foundation of North Carolina, Inc.; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash 
DOB: 8/26/1955    Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     

David M. Richardson    President, Richardson, Runden LLC (executive recruitment business development/consulting 
Trustee    company); Consultant, Kennedy Information, Inc. (executive recruitment information and 
DOB: 9/19/1941    research company); Consultant, AESC (The Association of Executive Search Consultants); 
Term of office since: 1982    Director, J&M Cumming Paper Co. (paper merchandising); Former Trustee, NDI Technologies, LLP 
Other directorships: None   (communications); Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 

Dr. Russell A. Salton III    President/CEO, AccessOne MedCard; Former Medical Director, Healthcare Resource Associates, 
Trustee    Inc.; Former Medical Director, U.S. Health Care/Aetna Health Services; Former Trustee, Mentor 
DOB: 6/2/1947    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     


32


TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS continued

Michael S. Scofield    Director and Chairman, Branded Media Corporation (multi-media branding company); Attorney, 
Trustee    Law Offices of Michael S. Scofield; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
DOB: 2/20/1943     
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     

Richard J. Shima    Independent Consultant; Trustee, Saint Joseph College (CT); Director, Hartford Hospital; Trustee, 
Trustee    Greater Hartford YMCA; Former Director, Trust Company of CT; Former Director, Enhance 
DOB: 8/11/1939    Financial Services, Inc.; Former Director, Old State House Association; Former Trustee, Mentor 
Term of office since: 1993    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Other directorships: None     

Richard K. Wagoner, CFA2    Member and Former President, North Carolina Securities Traders Association; Member, Financial 
Trustee    Analysts Society; Former Consultant to the Boards of Trustees of the Evergreen funds; Former 
DOB: 12/12/1937    Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1999     
Other directorships: None     

OFFICERS     
Dennis H. Ferro3    Principal occupations: President and Chief Executive Officer, Evergreen Investment Company, 
President    Inc. and Executive Vice President, Wachovia Bank, N.A.; former Chief Investment Officer, 
DOB: 6/20/1945    Evergreen Investment Company, Inc. 
Term of office since: 2003     

Jeremy DePalma4    Principal occupations: Vice President, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc.; Former Assistant Vice 
Treasurer    President, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. 
DOB: 2/5/1974     
Term of office since: 2005     

Michael H. Koonce4    Principal occupations: Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Evergreen Investment 
Secretary    Services, Inc.; Senior Vice President and Assistant General Counsel, Wachovia Corporation 
DOB: 4/20/1960     
Term of office since: 2000     

James Angelos4    Principal occupations: Chief Compliance Officer and Senior Vice President, Evergreen Funds; 
Chief Compliance Officer    Former Director of Compliance, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. 
DOB: 9/2/1947     
Term of office since: 2004     


1    Each Trustee serves until a successor is duly elected or qualified or until his/her death, resignation, retirement or removal from office. 
    Each Trustee oversees 90 Evergreen funds. Correspondence for each Trustee may be sent to Evergreen Board of Trustees, 
    P.O. Box 20083, Charlotte, NC 28202. 
2    Mr. Wagoner is an “interested person” of the Fund because of his ownership of shares in Wachovia Corporation, the parent to the 
    Fund’s investment advisor. 
3    The address of the Officer is 401 S. Tryon Street, 20th Floor, Charlotte, NC 28288. 
4    The address of the Officer is 200 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116. 
Additional information about the Fund’s Board of Trustees and Officers can be found in the Statement of Additional Information (SAI) and 
is available upon request without charge by calling 800.343.2898. 

33


565212 rv3 3/2006


Evergreen Treasury Money Market Fund



    table of contents 
1    LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS 
4    FUND AT A GLANCE 
6    ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES 
7    FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 
10    SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS 
13    STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES 
14    STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS 
15    STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS 
16    NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
21    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 
22    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
28    TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS 

This annual report must be preceded or accompanied by a prospectus of the Evergreen fund contained herein. The prospectus contains more complete information, including fees and expenses, and should be read carefully before investing or sending money.

The fund will file its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q will be available on the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, the fund’s Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800.SEC.0330.

A description of the fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures, as well as information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, is available by visiting our Web site at EvergreenInvestments.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov. The fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures are also available without charge, upon request, by calling 800.343.2898.

Mutual Funds:         
 NOT FDIC INSURED  MAY LOSE VALUE   NOT BANK GUARANTEED 

Evergreen InvestmentsSM is a service mark of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC.
Copyright 2006, Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC.

Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC is a subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation
and is an affiliate of Wachovia Corporation's other Broker Dealer subsidiaries.

Evergreen mutual funds are distributed by Evergreen Investment Services, Inc.
200 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS

March 2006


Dennis H. Ferro
President and Chief
Executive Officer

 

Dear Shareholder,

We are pleased to provide the annual report for the Evergreen Treasury Money Market Fund, which covers the twelve-month period ended January 31, 2006.

The U.S. financial markets had to navigate through some choppy seas during the past twelve months. Uncertainty was prevalent as questions surfaced about the sustainability of economic growth, tighter monetary policy, surging oil prices, moderating profit growth, and an increase in inflation. Geopolitical tensions continued and the Gulf region suffered enormous damage from the hurricanes. Not surprisingly, each of these events combined at various times during the year to increase market volatility. Throughout these turbulent times, the portfolio management teams of Evergreen’s money market funds employed a variety of strategies to manage portfolios in a rising yield environment and enhance portfolio returns, in both the taxable and tax-advantaged markets.

Over the course of the investment period, economic reports frequently delivered confusing signals. While growth was expected to moderate as the expansion matured, the economy showed surprising strength, particularly in the third quarter, as Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) grew in excess of 4%, despite the hurricanes and the spike in inflation. The effects of higher energy prices and tighter monetary policy became evident in the last quarter of 2005 as initial readings for GDP growth barely exceeded 1%. The conflicting data was often subject to interpretation and the consequence for investors was a frequent bout of market volatility. While many debated whether or not

1


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS continued

the short-term volatility was an indication of pending weakness, Evergreen’s Investment Strategy Committee focused on the breadth of economic output, particularly personal consumption and capital investment. Though the rate of growth in each was moderating from unusually high levels, we believed it would lead to a more sustainable, and ultimately less inflationary, pace for the expansion. The fundamentals, though no longer great, were still pretty good in our view, and our portfolio teams based many of their investment decisions on these positive macro-economic trends.

Despite the mixed signals from the economy, the Federal Reserve (“Fed”) maintained its strategy of gradually raising short-term interest rates. Considering that monetary policy had been stimulative for most of the prior three years, central bankers were determined in their efforts to prevent alarming increases in inflation, raising their target for the federal funds rate by twenty-five basis points at every policy meeting over the past year. Yet long-term market interest rates continued to decline and the extent of the yield curve’s flattening had many on Wall Street debating its meaning. Given our forecast for more moderate levels of growth in consumption and investment supporting a sustainable expansion, we viewed the yield curve’s message as confidence in the Fed’s ability to prevent long-term inflation. In addition, higher oil prices would likely serve to dampen output and we believed the absence of significant wage pressures would enable the Fed to continue on with its less stimulative, rather than more restrictive, path for monetary policy.

In this environment, the portfolio managers of Evergreen’s money market funds attempted to focus on the aforementioned market fundamentals, as well as the timing of Fed meetings. Each increase in the Fed’s target for its benchmark rate would result in a “resetting” of rates at the short end of the yield curve, enabling the teams to pursue higher income potential. In addition, many of our analysts and portfolio managers used a variety of short-term securities to capture yield, in

2


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS continued

order to provide our investors with the stability and liquidity necessary to balance exposure within their diversified long-term portfolios.

We continue to recommend that investors maintain their diversified strategies, including exposure to money market funds, within their long-term portfolios.

Please visit our Web site, EvergreenInvestments.com, for more information about our funds and other investment products available to you. Thank you for your continued support of Evergreen Investments.

Sincerely,


Dennis H. Ferro
President and Chief Executive Officer
Evergreen Investment Company, Inc.

 

Special Notice to Shareholders:

Please visit our Web site at EvergreenInvestments.com for a statement from President and Chief Executive Officer, Dennis Ferro, addressing NASD actions involving Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. (EIS), Evergreen’s mutual fund distributor or statements from Dennis Ferro and Chairman of the Board of the Evergreen funds, Michael S. Scofield, addressing SEC actions involving the Evergreen funds.

3


FUND AT A GLANCE

as of January 31, 2006

 

MANAGEMENT TEAM

Investment Advisor:

• Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC

Portfolio Managers:

• J. Kellie Allen

• Bryan K. White, CFA

• Sheila Nye

 

PERFORMANCE AND RETURNS*             
Portfolio inception date: 3/6/1991             
    Class A    Class S    Class I 
Class inception date    3/6/1991    6/30/2000    3/6/1991 

Nasdaq symbol    ETAXX    N/A    ETYXX 

Average annual return             

1-year    2.58%    2.28%    2.89% 

5-year    1.56%    1.27%    1.87% 

10-year    3.21%    3.05%    3.52% 

7-day annualized yield    3.52%    3.22%    3.82% 

30-day annualized yield    3.41%    3.11%    3.71% 


* The yield quotation more closely reflects the current earnings of the fund than the total return quotation.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The performance quoted represents past performance and current performance may be lower or higher. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that investors’ shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month-end for Classes A or I, please go to EvergreenInvestments.com/fundperformance. Please call 1.800.343.2898 for the most recent month-end performance information for Class S. The performance of each class may vary based on differences in fees and expenses paid by the shareholders investing in each class. Performance includes the reinvestment of income dividends and capital gain distributions.

Historical performance shown for Class S prior to its inception is based on the performance of Class A, one of the original classes offered along with Class I. The historical returns for Class S have not been adjusted to reflect the effect of each class’ 12b-1 fee. These fees are 0.30% for Class A and 0.60% for Class S. Class I does not pay a 12b-1 fee. If these fees had been reflected, returns for Class S would have been lower. Returns reflect expense limits previously in effect, without which returns would have been lower.

An investment in a money market fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund.

4


FUND AT A GLANCE continued

 

7-DAY ANNUALIZED YIELD


Class I shares are only offered in the following manner: (1) to investment advisory clients of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC (or its advisory affiliates) when purchased by such advisor(s) on behalf of its clients, (2) through arrangements entered into on behalf of the Evergreen funds with certain financial services firms, (3) to certain institutional investors and (4) to persons who owned Class Y shares in registered name in an Evergreen fund on or before December 31, 1994 or who owned shares of any SouthTrust fund in registered name as of March 18, 2005 or shares of Vestaur Securities Fund as of May 20, 2005.

Class I shares are only available to institutional shareholders with a minimum of $1 million investment, which may be waived in certain situations.

Class S shares are sold through certain broker dealers and financial institutions which have selling agreements with the fund’s distributor.

The fund’s investment objective is nonfundamental and may be changed without a vote of the fund’s shareholders.

Yields are based on net investment income for the stated periods and annualized.

U.S. government guarantees apply only to certain securities held in the fund’s portfolio and not to the fund’s shares.

The yield will fluctuate and there can be no guarantee that the fund will achieve its objective.

All data is as of January 31, 2006, and subject to change.

5


ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES

The Example below is intended to describe the fees and expenses borne by shareholders and the impact of those costs on your investment.

Example

As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads), redemption fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) fees and other fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from August 1, 2005 to January 31, 2006.

The example illustrates your fund’s costs in two ways:

• Actual expenses

The section in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in these columns, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class, in the column entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

• Hypothetical example for comparison purposes

The section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees or exchange fees. Therefore, the section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

    Beginning    Ending     
    Account    Account     Expenses 
    Value    Value    Paid During 
    8/1/2005    1/31/2006     Period* 

Actual             
Class A    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,015.47    $ 3.71 
Class S    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,013.95    $ 5.23 
Class I    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,017.01    $ 2.19 
Hypothetical             
(5% return             
before expenses)             
Class A    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,021.53    $ 3.72 
Class S    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,020.01    $ 5.24 
Class I    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,023.04    $ 2.19 


* For each class of the Fund, expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of each class (0.73% for Class A, 1.03% for Class S and 0.43% for Class I), multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184 / 365 days.

6


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS A    2006    2005    2004    2003    2002 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Income from investment operations                     
Net investment income (loss)     0.03     0.01    0     0.01     0.03 

Distributions to shareholders from                     
Net investment income    (0.03)    (0.01)    01    (0.01)    (0.03) 

Net asset value, end of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00 

Total return     2.58%     0.73%    0.38%     1.14%     3.00% 

Ratios and supplemental data                     
Net assets, end of period (millions)    $ 482    $ 478    $ 525    $ 773    $ 752 
Ratios to average net assets                     
     Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
        but excluding expense reductions
 
   0.72%     0.73%    0.75%     0.73%     0.70% 
     Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
        and expense reductions
 
   0.72%     0.73%    0.75%     0.73%     0.70% 
    Net investment income (loss)     2.57%     0.72%    0.38%     1.13%     2.98% 


1 Amount represents less than $0.005 per share.

See Notes to Financial Statements

7


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS S    2006    2005    2004    2003    2002 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Income from investment operations                     
Net investment income (loss)     0.02    0    0       0.01       0.03 

Distributions to shareholders from                     
Net investment income    (0.02)    01    01     (0.01)     (0.03) 

Net asset value, end of period    $1.00    $1.00    $1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Total return     2.28%    0.44%    0.11%       0.84%       2.70% 

Ratios and supplemental data                     
Net assets, end of period (millions)    $ 922    $ 761    $ 856    $1,484    $1,826 
Ratios to average net assets                     
     Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
        but excluding expense reductions
 
   1.02%    1.01%    1.02%       1.03%       1.00% 
     Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
        and expense reductions
 
   1.02%    1.02%    1.05%       1.03%       1.00% 
     Net investment income (loss) 
   2.26%    0.43%    0.12%       0.85%       2.71% 


1 Amount represents less than $ 0.005 per share.

See Notes to Financial Statements

8


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(For a share outstanding throughout each period)

    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS I1    2006    2005    2004    2003    2002 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $  1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Income from investment operations                         
Net investment income (loss)       0.03       0.01        0.01       0.01       0.03 

Distributions to shareholders from                         
Net investment income     (0.03)     (0.01)        (0.01)     (0.01)     (0.03) 

Net asset value, end of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $  1.00  $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Total return       2.89%       1.03%        0.68%       1.44%       3.31% 

Ratios and supplemental data                         
Net assets, end of period (millions)    $1,306    $1,145    $1,652    $1,201    $1,005 
Ratios to average net assets                         
     Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
        but excluding expense reductions
 
     0.42%       0.43%        0.45%       0.43%       0.40% 
     Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
        and expense reductions
 
     0.42%       0.43%        0.45%       0.43%       0.40% 
     Net investment income (loss) 
     2.87%       0.97%        0.66%       1.42%       3.21% 


1 Effective at the close of business on May 11, 2001, Class Y shares were renamed as Institutional shares (Class I).

See Notes to Financial Statements

9


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

January 31, 2006

    Principal         
    Amount        Value 

 
U.S. TREASURY OBLIGATIONS 16.7%             
U.S. Treasury Notes:             
     1.50%, 03/31/2006    $ 65,000,000    $    64,806,698 
     1.625%, 02/28/2006    60,000,000        59,940,564 
     2.25%, 04/30/2006    50,000,000        49,866,951 
     2.50%, 05/31/2006 - 10/31/2006    220,000,000        218,375,670 
     2.75%, 06/30/2006 - 07/31/2006    60,000,000        59,754,712 

           Total U.S. Treasury Obligations (cost $452,744,595)            452,744,595 

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS * 83.4%             
ABN AMRO, Inc., Avg. rate of 4.38%, dated 1/30/2006, maturing 2/6/2006;             
     maturity value $80,068,156 (1) **    80,000,000        80,000,000 
Bank of America Corp., Avg. rate of 4.38%, dated 1/30/2006, maturing             
     2/6/2006; maturity value $150,127,875 (2) **    150,000,000        150,000,000 
Barclays plc, 4.37%, dated 1/31/2006, maturing 2/1/2006; maturity value             
     $450,054,625 (3)    450,000,000        450,000,000 
Citigroup, Inc., Avg. rate of 4.43%, dated 1/30/2006, maturing 2/6/2006;             
     maturity value $100,086,056 (4) **    100,000,000        100,000,000 
Credit Suisse First Boston, LLC, Avg. rate of 4.39%, dated 1/30/2006, maturing             
     2/6/2006; maturity value $150,128,167 (5) **    150,000,000        150,000,000 
Deutsche Bank AG:             
     Avg. rate of 4.39%, dated 1/30/2006, maturing 2/6/2006; maturity value             
           $150,127,917 (6) **    150,000,000        150,000,000 
     Avg. rate of 4.45%, dated 1/30/2006, maturing 2/6/2006; maturity value             
           $100,086,500 (6) **    100,000,000        100,000,000 
Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., Avg. rate of 4.38%, dated 1/30/2006, maturing             
     2/6/2006; maturity value $80,068,111 (7) **    80,000,000        80,000,000 
HSBC Holdings plc, Avg. rate of 4.39%, dated 1/30/2006, maturing 2/6/2006;             
     maturity value $150,128,083 (8) **    150,000,000        150,000,000 
Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., Avg. rate of 4.38%, dated 1/30/2006, maturing             
     2/6/2006; maturity value $150,127,750 (9) **    150,000,000        150,000,000 
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 4.37%, dated 1/31/2006, maturing 2/1/2006; maturity             
     value $130,015,781 (10)    130,000,000        130,000,000 
Morgan Stanley, Avg. rate of 4.38%, dated 1/30/2006, maturing 2/6/2006;             
     maturity value $150,127,708 (11) **    150,000,000        150,000,000 
RBC Dain Rauscher Corp., Avg. rate of 4.39%, dated 1/30/2006, maturing             
     2/6/2006; maturity value $80,068,244 (12) **    80,000,000        80,000,000 
Societe Generale:             
     4.33%, dated 1/31/2006, maturing 2/1/2006; maturity value             
           $119,543,576 (13)    119,529,199        119,529,199 
     4.37%, dated 1/31/2006, maturing 2/1/2006; maturity value             
           $20,002,428 (14)    20,000,000        20,000,000 
UBS AG:             
     4.37%, dated 1/31/2006, maturing 2/1/2006; maturity value             
           $100,012,139 (15)    100,000,000        100,000,000 
     4.43%, dated 1/31/2006, maturing 2/1/2006; maturity value             
           $100,012,306 (16)    100,000,000        100,000,000 

           Total Repurchase Agreements (cost $2,259,529,199)            2,259,529,199 


See Notes to Financial Statements

10


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

            Value 

Total Investments (cost $2,712,273,794)  100.1%    $    2,712,273,794 
Other Assets and Liabilities (0.1%)            (2,666,531) 

Net Assets 100.0%        $    2,709,607,263 


*    Collateralized by: 
    (1)    $83,022,000 U.S. Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 6/22/2006, value is $81,600,663. 
    (2)    $130,427,000 TIPS, 2.375%, 1/15/2025, value including accrued interest is $143,278,461; $9,729,000 U.S. 
        Treasury Note, 2.375%, 8/15/2006, value including accrued interest is $9,721,868. 
    (3)    $62,843,000 U.S. Treasury Notes, 3.00% to 3.875%, 12/31/2006 to 5/15/2010, value including accrued interest is 
        $61,861,802; $248,557,000 U.S. Treasury Bonds, 6.375% to 10.625%, 8/15/2015 to 8/15/2027, value including 
        accrued interest is $345,539,497; $52,731,000 U.S. Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 7/27/2006, value is $51,600,975. 
    (4)    $1,348,931,796 GNMA, 4.00% to 9.00%, 5/15/2013 to 11/15/2037, value including accrued interest is 
        $102,000,000. 
    (5)    $120,214,000 TIPS, 3.625% to 3.875%, 1/15/2008 to 1/15/2009, value including accrued interest is 
        $153,000,636. 
    (6)    $119,872,000 TIPS, 3.625% to 4.25%, 1/15/2008 to 1/15/2010, value including accrued interest is 
        $152,782,367; $132,938,509 GNMA, 5.00% to 5.50%, 10/15/2034, value including accrued interest is 
        $102,218,379. This collateral was allocated on a pro-rata split such that sufficient collateral was applied to the 
        respective repurchase agreements. 
    (7)    $81,657,000 U.S. Treasury Notes, 3.625% to 4.125%, 1/15/2010 to 8/15/2010, value including accrued interest is 
        $81,600,764. 
    (8)    $298,013,080 U.S. Treasury STRIPS, 0.00%, 2/15/2014 to 8/15/2028, value is $153,001,544. 
    (9)    $321,460,349 U.S. Treasury STRIPS, 0.00%, 8/15/2009 to 11/15/2026, value is $153,003,245. 
    (10)    $132,955,000 U.S. Treasury Note, 4.375%, 1/31/2008, value including accrued interest is $132,601,343. 
    (11)    $252,027,000 U.S. Treasury STRIPS, 0.00%, 11/15/2016, value is $153,000,551. 
    (12)    $56,817,000 U.S. Treasury Bonds, 7.125% to 8.50%, 2/15/2020 to 2/15/2023, value including accrued interest is 
        $80,000,615. 
    (13)    $109,000,000 TIPS, 1.875%, 7/15/2013, value including accrued interest is $116,429,528; $5,480,000 U.S. 
        Treasury Note, 4.25%, 10/15/2010, value including accrued interest is $5,490,685. 
    (14)    $20,333,000 U.S. Treasury Note, 3.75%, 3/31/2007, value including accrued interest is $20,400,744. 
    (15)    $97,320,000 TIPS, 2.00%, 7/15/2014, value including accrued interest is $102,001,335. 
    (16)    $394,207,580 GNMA, 3.50% to 13.00%, 4/15/2006 to 1/15/2036, value including accrued interest is 
        $102,000,145. 
**    Variable rate repurchase agreement with rates which reset daily. The rate shown represents an average of the daily 
    rates over the term of the agreement. 
 
Summary of Abbreviations 
GNMA    Government National Mortgage Association 
STRIPS    Separately Traded Registered Interest and Principal Securities 
TIPS    Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities 

See Notes to Financial Statements

11


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

The following table shows the percent of total investments by credit quality as of January 31, 2006 (unaudited):

Tier 1    100.0%
   

The following table shows the percent of total investments by maturity as of January 31, 2006 (unaudited):

1 day    33.9% 
2-7 days    49.4% 
8-60 days    4.6% 
61-120 days    5.3% 
121-240 days    2.2% 
241+ days    4.6% 

    100.0%
   

See Notes to Financial Statements

12


STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

January 31, 2006

Assets         
Investments in securities    $    452,744,595 
Investments in repurchase agreements        2,259,529,199 

Investments at amortized cost        2,712,273,794 
Receivable for Fund shares sold        19,061 
Interest receivable        2,920,843 
Prepaid expenses and other assets        15,489 

   Total assets        2,715,229,187 

Liabilities         
Dividends payable        5,058,762 
Payable for Fund shares redeemed        4,885 
Advisory fee payable        23,006 
Distribution Plan expenses payable        19,094 
Due to other related parties        17,406 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities        498,771 

   Total liabilities        5,621,924 

Net assets    $    2,709,607,263 

Net assets represented by         
Paid-in capital    $    2,710,817,646 
Undistributed net investment income        21,679 
Accumulated net realized losses on investments        (1,232,062) 

Total net assets    $    2,709,607,263 

Net assets consists of         
   Class A    $    481,983,167 
   Class S        922,054,940 
   Class I        1,305,569,156 

Total net assets    $    2,709,607,263 

Shares outstanding (unlimited number of shares authorized)         
   Class A        482,411,817 
   Class S        922,448,373 
   Class I        1,306,208,213 

Net asset value per share         
   Class A    $    1.00 
   Class S    $    1.00 
   Class I    $    1.00 


See Notes to Financial Statements

13


STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Year Ended January 31, 2006

Investment income         
Interest    $    90,834,918 

Expenses         
Advisory fee        8,553,779 
Distribution Plan expenses         
   Class A        1,422,732 
   Class S        4,784,929 
Administrative services fee        1,655,570 
Transfer agent fees        599,020 
Trustees’ fees and expenses        38,603 
Printing and postage expenses        115,436 
Custodian and accounting fees        584,799 
Registration and filing fees        31,781 
Professional fees        63,076 
Other        57,045 

   Total expenses        17,906,770 
   Less: Expense reductions        (42,624) 
           Expense reimbursements        (468) 

   Net expenses        17,863,678 

Net investment income        72,971,240 

Net realized losses on investments        (620,577) 

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations    $    72,350,663 


See Notes to Financial Statements

14


STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

    Year Ended January 31, 

    2006    2005 

Operations                 
Net investment income    $    72,971,240    $    21,976,565 
Net realized losses on investments        (620,577)        (595,192) 

Net increase in net assets resulting                 
   from operations        72,350,663        21,381,373 

Distributions to shareholders                 
from                 
Net investment income                 
   Class A        (12,185,086)        (3,500,482) 
   Class S        (18,034,613)        (3,240,261) 
   Class I        (42,751,198)        (15,233,318) 

   Total distributions to shareholders        (72,970,897)        (21,974,061) 

    Shares        Shares     
Capital share transactions                 
Proceeds from shares sold                 
   Class A    1,679,129,745    1,679,129,745    1,625,808,053    1,625,808,053 
   Class S    3,409,482,607    3,409,482,607    799,421,821    799,421,821 
   Class I    4,908,210,033    4,908,210,033    4,614,933,419    4,614,933,419 

        9,996,822,385        7,040,163,293 

Net asset value of shares issued in                 
   reinvestment of distributions                 
   Class A    2,144,356    2,144,356    713,402    713,402 
   Class S    6,870,748    6,870,748    162,150    162,150 
   Class I    990,054    990,054    430,134    430,134 

        10,005,158        1,305,686 

Payment for shares redeemed                 
   Class A    (1,676,937,500)    (1,676,937,500)    (1,673,560,172)    (1,673,560,172) 
   Class S    (3,255,430,778)    (3,255,430,778)    (893,750,355)    (893,750,355) 
   Class I    (5,668,346,715)    (5,668,346,715)    (5,122,154,149)    (5,122,154,149) 

        (10,600,714,993)        (7,689,464,676) 

Net asset value of shares issued in                 
   acquisition                 
   Class I    919,887,413    919,870,981    0    0 

Net increase (decrease) in net assets                 
   resulting from capital share                 
   transactions        325,983,531        (647,995,697) 

Total increase (decrease) in net assets        325,363,297        (648,588,385) 
Net assets                 
Beginning of period        2,384,243,966        3,032,832,351 

End of period    $    2,709,607,263    $    2,384,243,966 

Undistributed net investment income    $    21,679    $    21,336 


See Notes to Financial Statements

15


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. ORGANIZATION

Evergreen Treasury Money Market Fund (the “Fund”) is a diversified series of Evergreen Money Market Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on September 18, 1997. The Trust is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).

The Fund offers Class A, Class S and Institutional (“Class I”) shares at net asset value without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge. Each class of shares, except Class I shares, pays an ongoing distribution fee.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported herein. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

a. Valuation of investments

As permitted under Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act, securities are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value.

b. Repurchase agreements

Securities pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements are held by the custodian bank or in a segregated account in the Fund’s name until the agreements mature. Collateral for certain tri-party repurchase agreements is held at the counterparty’s custodian in a segregated account for the benefit of the Fund and the counterparty. Each agreement requires that the market value of the collateral be sufficient to cover payments of interest and principal. However, in the event of default or bankruptcy by the other party to the agreement, retention of the collateral may be subject to legal proceedings. The Fund will only enter into repurchase agreements with banks and other financial institutions, which are deemed by the investment advisor to be creditworthy pursuant to guidelines established by the Board of Trustees.

c. Security transactions and investment income

Security transactions are recorded on trade date. Realized gains and losses are computed using the specific cost of the security sold. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.

d. Federal taxes

The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company and distribute all of its taxable income, including any net capital gains (which have already been offset by available capital loss carryovers). Accordingly, no provision for federal taxes is required.

e. Distributions

Distributions to shareholders from net investment income are accrued daily and paid monthly. Distributions from net realized gains, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Such distribu-

16


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

tions are determined in conformity with income tax regulations, which may differ from generally accepted accounting principles.

Reclassifications have been made to the Fund’s components of net assets to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryovers, as applicable) under income tax regulations. The primary permanent differences causing such reclassifications are due to certain capital loss carryovers assumed as a result of acquisitions. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the following amounts were reclassified:


Paid-in capital    $   16,293
Accumulated net realized losses on investments        (16,293) 


f. Class allocations

Income, common expenses and realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated to the classes based on the relative net assets of each class. Distribution fees, if any, are calculated daily at the class level based on the appropriate net assets of each class and the specific expense rates applicable to each class.

3. ADVISORY FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC (“EIMC”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation (“Wachovia”), is the investment advisor to the Fund and is paid an annual fee starting at 0.31% and declining to 0.15% as average daily net assets increase. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Fund paid EIMC an annual fee of 0.31% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.

From time to time, EIMC may voluntarily or contractually waive its fee and/or reimburse expenses in order to limit operating expenses. During the year ended January 31, 2006, EIMC reimbursed other expenses in the amount of $468.

Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. (“EIS”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia, is the administrator to the Fund. As administrator, EIS provides the Fund with facilities, equipment and personnel and is paid an annual rate determined by applying percentage rates to the aggregate average daily net assets of the Evergreen money market funds, starting at 0.06% and declining to 0.04% as the aggregate average daily net assets of the Evergreen money market funds increase.

Evergreen Service Company, LLC (“ESC”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia, is the transfer and dividend disbursing agent for the Fund. ESC receives account fees that vary based on the type of account held by the shareholders in the Fund.

4. DISTRIBUTION PLANS

EIS also serves as distributor of the Fund’s shares. The Fund has adopted Distribution Plans, as allowed by Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act, for each class of shares, except Class I. Under the Distribution Plans, distribution fees are paid at an annual rate of 0.30% of the average daily net assets for Class A shares and 0.60% of the average daily net assets for Class S shares.

17


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

5. ACQUISITION

Effective at the close of business on March 18, 2005, the Fund acquired the net assets of SouthTrust U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund in a tax-free exchange for Class I shares of the Fund. Shares were issued to Class I shares of SouthTrust U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund at an exchange ratio of 1.00 for Class I shares of the Fund. The aggregate net assets of the Fund and SouthTrust U.S. Treasury Money Market Fund immediately prior to the acquisition were $2,045,789,998 and $919,870,981, respectively. The aggregate net assets of the Fund immediately after the acquisition were $2,965,660,979.

6. SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS

On January 31, 2006, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes for the Fund was the same as for financial reporting purposes.

As of January 31, 2006, the Fund had $1,232,062 in capital loss carryovers for federal income tax purposes with $16,293 expiring in 2013 and $1,215,769 expiring in 2014.

7. INTERFUND LENDING

Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the SEC, the Fund may participate in an interfund lending program with certain funds in the Evergreen fund family. This program allows the Fund to borrow from other participating funds. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the Fund did not participate in the interfund lending program.

8. DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS

As of January 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis consisted of undistributed ordinary income in the amount of $21,679 and capital loss carryovers in the amount of $1,232,062.

The tax character of distributions paid were $72,970,897 and $21,974,061 of ordinary income for the years ended January 31, 2006 and January 31, 2005, respectively.

9. EXPENSE REDUCTIONS

Through expense offset arrangements with ESC and the Fund’s custodian, a portion of fund expenses has been reduced.

10. DEFERRED TRUSTEES’ FEES

Each Trustee of the Fund may defer any or all compensation related to performance of their duties as Trustees. The Trustees’ deferred balances are allocated to deferral accounts, which are included in the accrued expenses for the Fund. The investment performance of the deferral accounts is based on the investment performance of certain Evergreen funds. Any gains earned or losses incurred in the deferral accounts are reported in the Fund’s Trustees’ fees and expenses. At the election of the Trustees, the deferral account will be paid either in one lump sum or in quarterly installments for up to ten years.

18


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

11. FINANCING AGREEMENT

The Fund and certain other Evergreen funds share in a $150 million unsecured revolving credit commitment for temporary and emergency purposes, including the funding of redemptions, as permitted by each participating fund’s borrowing restrictions. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at 0.50% per annum above the Federal Funds rate. All of the participating funds are charged an annual commitment fee of 0.09% of the unused balance, which is allocated pro rata. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the Fund had no borrowings under this agreement.

12. REGULATORY MATTERS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Since September 2003, governmental and self-regulatory authorities have instituted numerous ongoing investigations of various practices in the mutual fund industry, including investigations relating to revenue sharing, market-timing, late trading and record retention, among other things. The investigations cover investment advisors, distributors and transfer agents to mutual funds, as well as other firms. EIMC, EIS and ESC (collectively, “Evergreen”) have received subpoenas and other requests for documents and testimony relating to these investigations, are endeavoring to comply with those requests, and are cooperating with the investigations. Evergreen is continuing its own internal review of policies, practices, procedures and personnel, and is taking remedial action where appropriate.

In connection with one of these investigations, on July 28, 2004, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) informed Evergreen that the staff intends to recommend to the SEC that it institute an enforcement action against Evergreen. The SEC staff’s proposed allegations relate to (i) an arrangement pursuant to which a broker at one of EIMC’s affiliated broker-dealers had been authorized, apparently by an EIMC officer (no longer with EIMC), to engage in short-term trading, on behalf of a client, in Evergreen Mid Cap Growth Fund (formerly Evergreen Emerging Growth Fund and prior to that, known as Evergreen Small Company Growth Fund) during the period from December 2000 through April 2003, in excess of the limitations set forth in the fund’s prospectus, (ii) short-term trading from September 2001 through January 2003, by a former Evergreen portfolio manager, of Evergreen Precious Metals Fund, a fund he managed at the time, (iii) the sufficiency of systems for monitoring exchanges and enforcing exchange limitations as stated in the fund’s prospectuses, and (iv) the adequacy of e-mail retention practices. In connection with the activity in Evergreen Mid Cap Growth Fund, EIMC reimbursed the fund $378,905, plus an additional $25,242, representing what EIMC calculated at that time to be the client’s net gain and the fees earned by EIMC and the expenses incurred by this fund on the client’s account. In connection with the activity in Evergreen Precious Metals Fund, EIMC reimbursed the fund $70,878, plus an additional $3,075, representing what EIMC calculated at that time to be the portfolio manager’s net gain and the fees earned by EIMC and expenses incurred by the fund on the portfolio manager’s account. Evergreen is currently engaged in discussions with the staff of the SEC concerning its recommendation.

The staff of the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) had notified EIS that it has made a preliminary determination to recommend that disciplinary action be brought against EIS

19


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

for certain violations of the NASD’s rules. The recommendation relates principally to allegations that EIS (i) arranged for fund portfolio trades to be directed to broker-dealers (including Wachovia Securities, LLC, an affiliate of EIS) that sold Evergreen fund shares during the period of January 2001 to December 2003 and (ii) provided non-cash compensation by sponsoring offsite meetings attended by Wachovia Securities, LLC brokers during that period. EIS is cooperating with the NASD staff in its review of these matters.

Any resolution of these matters with regulatory authorities may include, but not be limited to, sanctions, penalties or injunctions regarding Evergreen, restitution to mutual fund shareholders and/or other financial penalties and structural changes in the governance or management of Evergreen’s mutual fund business. Any penalties or restitution will be paid by Evergreen and not by the Evergreen funds.

In addition, the Evergreen funds and EIMC and certain of its affiliates are involved in various legal actions, including private litigation and class action lawsuits. EIMC does not expect that any of such legal actions currently pending or threatened will have a material adverse impact on the financial position or operations of any of the Evergreen funds or on EIMC’s ability to provide services to the Evergreen funds.

Although Evergreen believes that neither the foregoing investigations nor any pending or threatened legal actions will have a material adverse impact on the Evergreen funds, there can be no assurance that these matters and any publicity surrounding or resulting from them will not result in reduced sales or increased redemptions of Evergreen fund shares, which could increase Evergreen fund transaction costs or operating expenses, or have other adverse consequences on the Evergreen funds.

20


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Trustees and Shareholders
Evergreen Money Market Trust

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, of the Evergreen Treasury Money Market Fund, a series of Evergreen Money Market Trust, as of January 31, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of January 31, 2006 by correspondence with the custodian. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Evergreen Treasury Money Market Fund, as of January 31, 2006, the results of its operations, changes in its net assets and financial highlights for each of the years described above in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.


Boston, Massachusetts
March 24, 2006

21


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited)

INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT
ADVISORY AGREEMENT

Each year, the Fund’s Board of Trustees is required to consider whether to continue in place the Fund’s investment advisory agreement. In September 2005, the Trustees, including a majority of the Trustees who are not interested persons (as that term is defined in the 1940 Act) of the Fund or of EIMC, approved the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement.

At the same time, the Trustees considered the continuation of the investment advisory agreements for all of the Evergreen funds, and the description below refers in many cases to the Trustees’ process and conclusions in connection with their consideration of this matter for all of the Evergreen funds. In all of its deliberations, the Board of Trustees and the disinterested Trustees were advised by independent counsel to the disinterested Trustees and counsel to the Evergreen funds.

The review process. The 1940 Act requires that the Board of Trustees request and evaluate, and that EIMC furnish, such information as may reasonably be necessary to evaluate the terms of the Fund’s advisory agreement. The review process began formally in spring 2005, when a committee of the Board (the “Committee”), working with EIMC management, determined generally the types of information the Board would review and set a timeline for the review process. In late spring, counsel to the disinterested Trustees sent to EIMC a formal request for information to be furnished to the Trustees. In addition, the independent data provider Lipper Inc. (“Lipper”) was engaged to provide fund-specific and industry-wide data to the Board containing information of a nature and in a format generally prescribed by the Committee.

The Trustees reviewed EIMC’s responses to the request for information, with the assistance of counsel for the disinterested Trustees and for the Evergreen funds and an independent industry consultant retained by the disinterested Trustees, and requested and received additional information following that review. The Committee met in person with the representatives of EIMC in early September 2005. At a meeting of the full Board of Trustees later in September 2005, the Committee reported the results of its discussions with EIMC, and the full Board met with representatives of EIMC, engaged in further review of the materials provided to them, and approved the continuation of each of the advisory and sub-advisory agreements.

The disinterested Trustees discussed the continuation of the Fund’s advisory agreement with representatives of EIMC and in multiple private sessions with legal counsel at which no personnel of EIMC were present. In considering the continuation of the agreement, the Trustees did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each Trustee attributed different weights to various factors. The Trustees evaluated information provided to them both in terms of the Evergreen mutual funds generally and with respect to the Fund specifically as they considered appropriate; although the Trustees considered the continuation of the agreement as part of the larger process of considering the continuation of the advisory contracts for all of the Evergreen funds, their determination to continue the advisory agreement for each of the Evergreen funds was ultimately made on a fund-by-fund basis.

22


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

This summary describes the most important, but not necessarily all, of the factors considered by the Board and the disinterested Trustees.

Information reviewed. The Board of Trustees and committees of the Board of Trustees meet periodically during the course of the year. At those meetings, the Board receives a wide variety of information regarding the services performed by EIMC, the investment performance of the Fund and the other Evergreen funds, and other aspects of the business and operations of the Evergreen funds. At those meetings, and in the process of considering the continuation of the agreements, the Trustees considered information regarding, for example, the Fund’s investment results; the portfolio management team for the Fund and the experience of the members of that team, and any recent changes in the membership of the team; portfolio trading practices; compliance by the Fund and EIMC with applicable laws and regulations and with the Fund’s and EIMC’s compliance policies and procedures; services provided by affiliates of EIMC to the Fund and shareholders of the Fund; and other information relating to the nature, extent, and quality of services provided by EIMC. The Trustees considered the rates at which the Fund pays investment advisory fees, the total expense ratio of the Fund, and the efforts generally by EIMC and its affil-iates as sponsors of the Fund. The data provided by Lipper showed the fees paid by the Fund and the Fund’s total expense ratio in comparison to other similar mutual funds, in addition to data regarding the investment performance by the Fund in comparison to other similar mutual funds. The Trustees were assisted by the independent industry consultant in reviewing the information presented to them.

The Board also considered that EIS serves as administrator to the Fund and receives a fee for its services as administrator. In their comparison of the advisory fee paid by the Fund with those paid by other mutual funds, the Board took into account administrative fees paid by the Fund and those other mutual funds. The Board considered that affiliates of EIMC serve as transfer agent and distributor to the Fund and receive fees from the Fund for those services, and received information regarding recent reductions in the transfer agency fees paid by the Fund. They considered other so-called “fall-out” benefits to EIMC and its affiliates due to their other relationships with the Evergreen funds, including, for example, soft-dollar services received by EIMC attributable to transactions entered into by EIMC for the benefit of the Evergreen funds and brokerage commissions received by Wachovia Securities LLC, an affiliate of EIMC, from transactions effected by it for the Evergreen funds.

The Board of Trustees also considered that certain of the money market funds managed by EIMC are offered in connection with cash sweep arrangements and similar services made available by affiliates of EIMC to their customers. The Trustees considered that EIMC and its affiliates benefit from the availability of those Evergreen funds and the distribution and shareholder services fees paid by those Evergreen funds.

Nature and quality of the services provided. The Trustees considered that EIMC and its affiliates provide a comprehensive investment management service to the Fund. They noted that EIMC formulates and implements an investment program for the Fund. They noted that EIMC makes its personnel available to serve as officers of the Evergreen funds, and concluded that the

23


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

reporting and management functions provided by EIMC with respect to the Fund and the Evergreen funds overall were generally satisfactory. The Trustees considered the investment philosophy of the Fund’s portfolio management team, and considered the in-house research capabilities of EIMC and its affiliates, as well as other resources available to EIMC, including research services available to it from third parties. The Board considered the managerial and financial resources available to EIMC, and the commitment that the Wachovia organization has made to the Fund and the Evergreen funds generally. On the basis of these factors, they determined that the nature and scope of the services provided by EIMC were consistent with its duties under the investment advisory agreements and appropriate and consistent with the investment programs and best interests of the Fund.

The Trustees noted the commitment and resources EIMC and its affiliates have brought to the regulatory, compliance, accounting, tax and tax reporting, and shareholder servicing functions, and the number and quality of staff committed to those functions, which they concluded were appropriate and generally in line with EIMC’s responsibilities to the Fund and to the Evergreen funds generally. They noted that EIMC had enhanced a number of these functions in recent periods and continued to do so, in light of regulatory developments in the investment management and mutual fund industries generally and in light of regulatory matters involving EIMC and its affiliates. They concluded that those enhancements appeared generally appropriate, but considered that the enhancement process is an on-going one and determined to continue to monitor developments in these functions in coming periods for appropriateness and consistency with regulatory and industry developments. The Board and the disinterested Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the Fund’s advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by EIMC, including services provided by EIS under its administrative services agreement with the Fund.

Investment performance. The Trustees considered the investment performance of each of the Evergreen funds, both by comparison to other comparable mutual funds and to broad market indices. The Trustees emphasized that the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for an Evergreen fund should not be taken as any indication that the Trustees did not believe investment performance for any specific fund might not be improved, and they noted that they would continue to monitor closely the investment performance of the Evergreen funds going forward. Specifically with respect to the Fund, the Trustees noted that the Class A shares of the Fund performed in the first quintile over recently completed one- and five-year periods and performed in the second quintile over the recently completed three-year period.

Advisory and administrative fees. The Trustees recognized that EIMC does not seek to provide the lowest cost investment advisory service, but to provide a high quality, full-service investment management product at a reasonable price. They also noted that EIMC has generally attempted to make its investment advisory fees consistent with industry norms. The Trustees noted that, from the materials presented, it appeared that the combination of investment advisory and administrative fees paid by the Fund to EIMC and EIS with respect to Class A shares was higher than most of the fees paid by comparable funds, although the Trustees concluded that the fees

24


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

were not unreasonable in light of the Fund’s investment performance and the services provided by EIMC and EIS.

The Trustees noted that EIMC does not provide services to other clients using the same investment strategy as it uses in managing the Fund.

Economies of scale. The Trustees noted that economies of scale would likely be achieved by EIMC in managing the Evergreen funds as the funds grow. The Trustees noted that the Fund had implemented breakpoints in its advisory fee structure. The Trustees undertook to continue to review the appropriate levels of breakpoints in the future, but concluded that the breakpoints as implemented appeared to be a reasonable step toward the realization of economies of scale by the funds.

Profitability. The Trustees considered information provided to them regarding the profitability to the EIMC organization of the investment advisory, administration, and transfer agency fees paid to EIMC and its affiliates by each of the Evergreen funds. They considered that the information provided to them was necessarily estimated. They noted that the levels of profitability of the Evergreen funds to EIMC varied widely, depending on among other things the size and type of fund. They noted that all of the estimates provided to them were calculated on a pre-tax basis. They considered the profitability of the Evergreen funds in light of such factors as, for example, the information they had received regarding the relation of the fees paid by the Evergreen funds to those paid by other mutual funds, the investment performance of the Evergreen funds, and the amount of revenues involved. In light of these factors, the Trustees did not consider that the profitability of any of the Evergreen funds, individually or in the aggregate, was such as to prevent their approving the continuation of the agreements.

In connection with their review of the Fund’s investment advisory and administrative fees, the Trustees also considered the transfer agency fees paid by the Evergreen funds to an affiliate of EIMC. They reviewed information presented to them showing generally that the transfer agency fees charged to the Evergreen funds were generally consistent with industry norms, and that transfer agency fees for a number of Evergreen funds had recently declined, or were expected to in the near future.

25


This page left intentionally blank

26


This page left intentionally blank

27


TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS

TRUSTEES1

Charles A. Austin III    Investment Counselor, Anchor Capital Advisors, Inc. (investment advice); Director, The Andover 
Trustee    Companies (insurance); Trustee, Arthritis Foundation of New England; Former Director, The 
DOB: 10/23/1934    Francis Ouimet Society; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust; Former 
Term of office since: 1991    Investment Counselor, Appleton Partners, Inc. (investment advice); Former Director, Executive 
Other directorships: None   Vice President and Treasurer, State Street Research & Management Company (investment 
    advice) 

 
Shirley L. Fulton    Partner, Tin, Fulton, Greene & Owen, PLLC (law firm); Former Partner, Helms, Henderson & 
Trustee    Fulton, P.A. (law firm); Retired Senior Resident Superior Court Judge, 26th Judicial District, 
DOB: 1/10/1952    Charlotte, NC 
Term of office since: 2004     
Other directorships: None     

 
K. Dun Gifford    Chairman and President, Oldways Preservation and Exchange Trust (education); Trustee, 
Trustee    Treasurer and Chairman of the Finance Committee, Cambridge College; Former Trustee, Mentor 
DOB: 10/23/1938    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1974     
Other directorships: None     

 
Dr. Leroy Keith, Jr.    Partner, Stonington Partners, Inc. (private equity fund); Trustee, Phoenix Funds Family; Director, 
Trustee    Diversapack Co.; Director, Obagi Medical Products Co.; Former Director, Lincoln Educational 
DOB: 2/14/1939    Services; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1983     
Other directorships: Trustee, The     
Phoenix Group of Mutual Funds     

 
Gerald M. McDonnell    Manager of Commercial Operations, SMI Steel Co. – South Carolina (steel producer); Former 
Trustee    Sales and Marketing Manager, Nucor Steel Company; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash 
DOB: 7/14/1939    Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1988     
Other directorships: None     

 
William Walt Pettit    Vice President, Kellam & Pettit, P.A. (law firm); Director, Superior Packaging Corp.; Director, 
Trustee    National Kidney Foundation of North Carolina, Inc.; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash 
DOB: 8/26/1955    Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     

 
David M. Richardson    President, Richardson, Runden LLC (executive recruitment business development/consulting 
Trustee    company); Consultant, Kennedy Information, Inc. (executive recruitment information and 
DOB: 9/19/1941    research company); Consultant, AESC (The Association of Executive Search Consultants); 
Term of office since: 1982    Director, J&M Cumming Paper Co. (paper merchandising); Former Trustee, NDI Technologies, LLP 
Other directorships: None   (communications); Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 

 
Dr. Russell A. Salton III    President/CEO, AccessOne MedCard; Former Medical Director, Healthcare Resource Associates, 
Trustee    Inc.; Former Medical Director, U.S. Health Care/Aetna Health Services; Former Trustee, Mentor 
DOB: 6/2/1947    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     


28


TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS continued

Michael S. Scofield    Director and Chairman, Branded Media Corporation (multi-media branding company); Attorney, 
Trustee    Law Offices of Michael S. Scofield; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
DOB: 2/20/1943     
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None     

 
Richard J. Shima    Independent Consultant; Trustee, Saint Joseph College (CT); Director, Hartford Hospital; Trustee, 
Trustee    Greater Hartford YMCA; Former Director, Trust Company of CT; Former Director, Enhance 
DOB: 8/11/1939    Financial Services, Inc.; Former Director, Old State House Association; Former Trustee, Mentor 
Term of office since: 1993    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Other directorships: None     

 
Richard K. Wagoner, CFA2    Member and Former President, North Carolina Securities Traders Association; Member, Financial 
Trustee    Analysts Society; Former Consultant to the Boards of Trustees of the Evergreen funds; Former 
DOB: 12/12/1937    Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1999     
Other directorships: None     

 
 
OFFICERS     
 
Dennis H. Ferro3    Principal occupations: President and Chief Executive Officer, Evergreen Investment Company, 
President    Inc. and Executive Vice President, Wachovia Bank, N.A.; former Chief Investment Officer, 
DOB: 6/20/1945    Evergreen Investment Company, Inc. 
Term of office since: 2003     


 
Jeremy DePalma4    Principal occupations: Vice President, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc.; Former Assistant Vice 
Treasurer    President, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. 
DOB: 2/5/1974     
Term of office since: 2005     


 
Michael H. Koonce4    Principal occupations: Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Evergreen Investment 
Secretary    Services, Inc.; Senior Vice President and Assistant General Counsel, Wachovia Corporation 
DOB: 4/20/1960     
Term of office since: 2000     


 
James Angelos4    Principal occupations: Chief Compliance Officer and Senior Vice President, Evergreen Funds; 
Chief Compliance Officer    Former Director of Compliance, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. 
DOB: 9/2/1947     
Term of office since: 2004     


1 Each Trustee serves until a successor is duly elected or qualified or until his/her death, resignation, retirement or removal from office. Each Trustee oversees 90 Evergreen funds. Correspondence for each Trustee may be sent to Evergreen Board of Trustees, P.O. Box 20083, Charlotte, NC 28202.

2 Mr. Wagoner is an “interested person” of the Fund because of his ownership of shares in Wachovia Corporation, the parent to the Fund’s investment advisor.

3 The address of the Officer is 401 S. Tryon Street, 20th Floor, Charlotte, NC 28288.

4 The address of the Officer is 200 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116.

Additional information about the Fund’s Board of Trustees and Officers can be found in the Statement of Additional Information (SAI) and is available upon request without charge by calling 800.343.2898.

29


565214 RV3 3/2006


Evergreen U.S. Government Money Market Fund



    table of contents 
1    LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS 
4    FUND AT A GLANCE 
6    ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES 
7    FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 
9    SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS 
11    STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES 
12    STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS 
13    STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS 
14    NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
19    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 
20    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
24    TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS 

This annual report must be preceded or accompanied by a prospectus of the Evergreen fund contained herein. The prospectus contains more complete information, including fees and expenses, and should be read carefully before investing or sending money.

The fund will file its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q will be available on the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, the fund’s Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800.SEC.0330.

A description of the fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures, as well as information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, is available by visiting our Web site at EvergreenInvestments.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov. The fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures are also available without charge, upon request, by calling 800.343.2898.

Mutual Funds:

NOT FDIC INSURED  MAY LOSE VALUE  NOT BANK GUARANTEED 

Evergreen InvestmentsSM is a service mark of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC.
Copyright 2006, Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC.

Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC is a subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation
and is an affiliate of Wachovia Corporation's other Broker Dealer subsidiaries.

Evergreen mutual funds are distributed by Evergreen Investment Services, Inc.
200 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116


Dennis H. Ferro
President and Chief
Executive Officer

LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS

March 2006

Dear Shareholder,

We are pleased to provide the annual report for the Evergreen U.S. Government Money Market Fund, which covers the twelve-month period ended January 31, 2006.

The U.S. financial markets had to navigate through some choppy seas during the past twelve months. Uncertainty was prevalent as questions surfaced about the sustainability of economic growth, tighter monetary policy, surging oil prices, moderating profit growth, and an increase in inflation. Geopolitical tensions continued and the Gulf region suffered enormous damage from the hurricanes. Not surprisingly, each of these events combined at various times during the year to increase market volatility. Throughout these turbulent times, the portfolio management teams of Evergreen’s money market funds employed a variety of strategies to manage portfolios in a rising yield environment and enhance portfolio returns, in both the taxable and tax-advantaged markets.

Over the course of the investment period, economic reports frequently delivered confusing signals. While growth was expected to moderate as the expansion matured, the economy showed surprising strength, particularly in the third quarter, as Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) grew in excess of 4%, despite the hurricanes and the spike in inflation. The effects of higher energy prices and tighter monetary policy became evident in the last quarter of 2005 as initial readings for GDP growth barely exceeded 1%. The conflicting data was often subject to interpretation and the consequence for investors was a frequent bout of market volatility. While many debated whether or not

1


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS continued

the short-term volatility was an indication of pending weakness, Evergreen’s Investment Strategy Committee focused on the breadth of economic output, particularly personal consumption and capital investment. Though the rate of growth in each was moderating from unusually high levels, we believed it would lead to a more sustainable, and ultimately less inflationary, pace for the expansion. The fundamentals, though no longer great, were still pretty good in our view, and our portfolio teams based many of their investment decisions on these positive macro-economic trends.

Despite the mixed signals from the economy, the Federal Reserve (“Fed”) maintained its strategy of gradually raising short-term interest rates. Considering that monetary policy had been stimulative for most of the prior three years, central bankers were determined in their efforts to prevent alarming increases in inflation, raising their target for the federal funds rate by twenty-five basis points at every policy meeting over the past year. Yet long-term market interest rates continued to decline and the extent of the yield curve’s flattening had many on Wall Street debating its meaning. Given our forecast for more moderate levels of growth in consumption and investment supporting a sustainable expansion, we viewed the yield curve’s message as confidence in the Fed’s ability to prevent long-term inflation. In addition, higher oil prices would likely serve to dampen output and we believed the absence of significant wage pressures would enable the Fed to continue on with its less stimulative, rather than more restrictive, path for monetary policy.

In this environment, the portfolio managers of Evergreen’s money market funds attempted to focus on the aforementioned market fundamentals, as well as the timing of Fed meetings. Each increase in the Fed’s target for its benchmark rate would result in a “resetting” of rates at the short end of the yield curve, enabling the teams to pursue higher income potential. In addition, many of our analysts and portfolio managers used a variety of short-term securities to capture yield, in

2


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS continued

order to provide our investors with the stability and liquidity necessary to balance exposure within their diversified long-term portfolios.

We continue to recommend that investors maintain their diversified strategies, including exposure to money market funds, within their long-term portfolios.

Please visit our Web site, EvergreenInvestments.com, for more information about our funds and other investment products available to you. Thank you for your continued support of Evergreen Investments.

Sincerely,


Dennis H. Ferro
President and Chief Executive Officer
Evergreen Investment Company, Inc.

 

Special Notice to Shareholders:

Please visit our Web site at EvergreenInvestments.com for a statement from President and Chief Executive Officer, Dennis Ferro, addressing NASD actions involving Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. (EIS), Evergreen’s mutual fund distributor or statements from Dennis Ferro and Chairman of the Board of the Evergreen funds, Michael S. Scofield, addressing SEC actions involving the Evergreen funds.

3


FUND AT A GLANCE

as of January 31, 2006

 

MANAGEMENT TEAM

Investment Advisor:

• Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC

Portfolio Managers:

• J. Kellie Allen

• Bryan K. White, CFA

• Sheila Nye

 

PERFORMANCE AND RETURNS*

Portfolio inception date: 6/26/2001

    Class A    Class S1 
Class inception date    6/26/2001    6/26/2001 

Nasdaq symbol    EGAXX    N/A 

Average annual return 

1-year    2.61%    2.30% 

Since portfolio inception    1.28%    1.11% 

7-day annualized yield    3.72%    3.41% 

30-day annualized yield    3.66%    3.35% 


* The yield quotation more closely reflects the current earnings of the fund than the total return quotation.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The performance quoted represents past performance and current performance may be lower or higher. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month-end for Class A, please go to EvergreenInvestments.com/fundperformance. Please call 1.800.343.2898 for the most recent month-end performance information for Class S1. The performance of each class may vary based on differences in fees and expenses paid by the shareholders investing in each class. Performance includes the reinvestment of income dividends and capital gain distributions.

The fund incurs a 12b-1 fee of 0.30% for Class A and 0.60% for Class S1.

The advisor is waiving a portion of its advisory fee and reimbursing the fund for a portion of other expenses. Had the fees and expenses not been waived or reimbursed, returns would have been lower. Returns reflect expense limits previously in effect for Classes A and S1 without which returns for Classes A and S1 would have been lower.

An investment in a money market fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund.

4


FUND AT A GLANCE continued

7-DAY ANNUALIZED YIELD


Class S1 shares are sold through certain broker dealers and financial institutions which have selling agreements with the fund’s distributor.

The fund’s investment objective is nonfundamental and may be changed without a vote of the fund’s shareholders.

Yields are based on net investment income for the stated periods and annualized.

U.S. government guarantees apply only to certain securities held in the fund’s portfolio and not to the fund’s shares.

The yield will fluctuate and there can be no guarantee that the fund will achieve its objective.

All data is as of January 31, 2006, and subject to change.

5


ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES

The Example below is intended to describe the fees and expenses borne by shareholders and the impact of those costs on your investment.

Example

As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads), redemption fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) fees and other fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from August 1, 2005 to January 31, 2006.

The example illustrates your fund’s costs in two ways:

• Actual expenses

The section in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in these columns, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class, in the column entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

• Hypothetical example for comparison purposes

The section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees or exchange fees. Therefore, the section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

    Beginning    Ending     
  Account    Account    Expenses 
  Value    Value    Paid During 
  8/1/2005    1/31/2006    Period* 

Actual 
Class A    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,016.18    $ 3.46 
Class S1    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,014.63    $ 4.98 
Hypothetical     
(5% return   
before expenses)   
Class A    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,021.78    $ 3.47 
Class S1    $ 1,000.00    $ 1,020.27    $ 4.99 


* For each class of the Fund, expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of each class (0.68% for Class A and 0.98% for Class S1), multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184 / 365 days.

6


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 

(For a share outstanding throughout each period) 
    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS A    2006    2005    2004    2003    20021 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $   1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Income from investment operations 
Net investment income (loss)     0.03     0.01    0    0.01    0.01 

Distributions to shareholders from 
Net investment income    (0.03)    (0.01)    02       (0.01)       (0.01) 

Net asset value, end of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00    $   1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Total return     2.61%     0.68%     0.26%    1.01%    1.33% 

Ratios and supplemental data 
Net assets, end of period (thousands)    $644,783    $901,382    $2,115,472    $3,979,856    $3,774,155 
Ratios to average net assets 
      Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
but excluding expense reductions
   0.74%     0.88%     0.93%    0.88%    0.88%3 
      Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
and expense reductions
   0.98%     1.08%     1.05%    1.04%    1.05%3 
      Net investment income (loss)     2.50%     0.57%     0.27%    1.00%    1.57%3 


1 For the period from June 26, 2001 (commencement of class operations), to January 31, 2002.
2 Amount represents less than $0.005 per share.
3 Annualized
See Notes to Financial Statements

7


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 

(For a share outstanding throughout each period) 
    Year Ended January 31, 

CLASS S1    2006    2005    2004    2003    20021 

Net asset value, beginning of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00     $   1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Income from investment operations 
Net investment income (loss)     0.02    0    0     0.01     0.01 

Distributions to shareholders from 
Net investment income    (0.02)    02    02    (0.01)    (0.01) 

Net asset value, end of period    $ 1.00    $ 1.00     $   1.00    $ 1.00    $ 1.00 

Total return     2.30%    0.45%     0.15%     0.99%     1.24% 
 
Ratios and supplemental data 
Net assets, end of period (thousands)    $372,904    $351,433     $266,596    $431,731    $390,392 
Ratios to average net assets 
       Expenses including waivers/reimbursements
but excluding expense reductions
   1.03%    1.10%     1.04%     0.90%     0.90%3 
       Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements
      and expense reductions
   1.27%    1.32%     1.35%     1.34%     1.37%3 
      Net investment income (loss)     2.34%    0.61%     0.16%     0.97%     1.56%3 


1 For the period from June 26, 2001 (commencemen t of class operations), to January 31, 2002.
2 Amount represents less than $0.005 per share.
3 Annualized
See Notes to Financial Statements

8


SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS 

January 31, 2006        Principal         
        Amount        Value 

U.S. GOVERNMENT & AGENCY OBLIGATIONS  52.9% 
FAMC: 
     4.28%, 03/31/2006    $ 20,000,000    $  19,862,089 
     4.78%, 11/30/2006 +    5,000,000        4,811,250 
     5.30%, 04/24/2006    5,000,000        5,008,743 
FFCB, FRN: 
     4.50%, 02/02/2006    65,000,000        64,991,257 
     4.51%, 02/02/2006    35,000,000        34,995,481 
FHLB: 
     2.375%, 02/15/2006    40,000,000        39,969,274 
     3.50%, 04/25/2006 – 08/15/2006    12,135,000        12,098,764 
     3.75%, 09/28/2006    4,750,000        4,723,057 
     4.75%, 12/29/2006    10,000,000        9,996,450 
     FRN: 
           4.40%, 04/05/2006    25,000,000        24,988,480 
           4.49%, 02/02/2006    50,000,000        49,993,646 
FHLMC: 
     1.875%, 02/15/2006    5,000,000        4,996,639 
     2.00%, 02/27/2006    20,000,000        19,965,018 
     2.75%, 08/15/2006    44,889,000        44,450,797 
     3.00%, 09/07/2006 – 09/29/2006    32,690,000        32,394,793 
     4.00%, 08/11/2006    12,895,000        12,893,011 
     4.55%, 05/30/2006 +    20,000,000        19,712,539 
     4.80%, 02/12/2007    15,000,000        14,999,275 
FNMA: 
     2.25%, 02/28/2006    20,000,000        19,968,122 
     2.50%, 06/15/2006    20,000,000        19,912,871 
     3.01%, 06/02/2006    15,000,000        14,963,963 
     4.30%, 06/30/2006 +    4,031,000        3,962,429 
     4.49%, 04/03/2006 +    10,255,000        10,178,891 
     4.60%, 05/01/2006 +    10,000,000        9,888,997 
     5.50%, 02/15/2006    38,884,000        38,901,752 

           Total U.S. Government & Agency Obligations 
                                 (cost $538,627,588)
      538,627,588 

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS* 47.7% 
Bank of America Corp., 4.44%, dated 1/31/2006, maturing 2/1/2006;     
     maturity value $200,024,667(1)    200,000,000        200,000,000 
Barclays plc, 4.37%, dated 1/31/2006, maturing 2/1/2006;     
     maturity value $40,241,472(2)    40,236,588        40,236,588 
Deutsche Bank AG, 4.42%, dated 1/31/2006, maturing 2/1/2006;     
     maturity value $200,024,556(3)    200,000,000        200,000,000 
Societe Generale, 4.37%, dated 1/31/2006, maturing 2/1/2006;     
     maturity value $45,005,463(4)    45,000,000        45,000,000 

           Total Repurchase Agreements (cost $485,236,588)        485,236,588 

Total Investments (cost $1,023,864,176) 100.6%        1,023,864,176 
Other Assets and Liabilities (0.6%)        (6,177,531) 

Net Assets 100.0%    $ 1,017,686,645 


See Notes to Financial Statements
9

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued

January 31, 2006

+    Zero coupon bond. The rate shown represents the yield to maturity at date of purchase. 
*    Collateralized by: 
    (1)    $204,457,000 FHLMC, 0.00% to 3.75%, 3/3/2006 to 3/15/2007, value including accrued interest is 
        $204,000,933. 
    (2)    $56,448,326 STRIPS, 0.00%, 2/15/2013, value is $41,041,320. 
    (3)    $117,675,000 FNMA, 0.00% to 3.50%, 3/13/2006 to 1/28/2008, value including accrued interest is 
        $116,870,570; $77,750,000 FHLB, 2.75%, 3/14/2006, value including accrued interest is $75,405,470; 
        $11,525,000 FHLMC, 4.79%, 8/4/2010, value including accrued interest is $11,724,392.  
    (4)    $32,554,000 U.S. Treasury Bond, 0.875% to 6.625%, 4/15/2010 to 4/15/2028, value including accrued 
        interest is $45,901,161. 

Summary of Abbreviations 
FAMC    Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corp. 
FFCB    Federal Farm Credit Bank 
FHLB    Federal Home Loan Bank 
FHLMC    Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. 
FNMA    Federal National Mortgage Association 
FRN    Floating Rate Note 
STRIPS    Separately Traded Registered Interest and Principal Securities 

The following table shows the percent of total investments by credit quality as of January 31, 2006 (unaudited):
Tier 1    100.0% 
   

The following table shows the percent of total investments by maturity as of January 31, 2006 (unaudited):
1 day    47.4% 
2 – 7 days    14.6% 
8 – 60 days    14.0% 
61 – 120 days    7.4% 
121 – 240 days    12.2% 
241 + days    4.4% 

    100.0% 
   

See Notes to Financial Statements
10

STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES 

January 31, 2006 

Assets 
Investments in securities    $  538,627,588 
Investments in repurchase agreements        485,236,588 

Investments at amortized cost        1,023,864,176 
Receivable for Fund shares sold        47,111 
Interest receivable        4,356,951 
Prepaid expenses and other assets        6,538 

   Total assets        1,028,274,776 

Liabilities 
Payable for securities purchased        9,888,997 
Payable for Fund shares redeemed        463,604 
Advisory fee payable        8,453 
Distribution Plan expenses payable        11,403 
Due to other related parties        14,398 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities        201,276 

   Total liabilities        10,588,131 

Net assets    $  1,017,686,645 

Net assets represented by 
Paid-in capital    $  1,017,903,467 
Undistributed net investment income        72,148 
Accumulated net realized losses on investments        (288,970) 

Total net assets    $  1,017,686,645 

Net assets consists of 
   Class A    $  644,782,501 
   Class S1        372,904,144 

Total net assets    $  1,017,686,645 

Shares outstanding (unlimited number of shares authorized) 
   Class A        644,933,089 
   Class S1        372,970,377 

Net asset value per share 
   Class A    $  1.00 
   Class S1    $  1.00 


See Notes to Financial Statements
11

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS 

Year Ended January 31, 2006 

Investment income         
Interest    $  34,686,238 

Expenses 
Advisory fee        3,920,343 
Distribution Plan expenses 
   Class A        2,177,718 
   Class B #        1,211 
   Class C #        877 
   Class S1        1,988,829 
Administrative services fee        634,554 
Transfer agent fees        2,108,292 
Trustees’ fees and expenses        15,188 
Printing and postage expenses        109,864 
Custodian and accounting fees        254,210 
Registration and filing fees        63,971 
Professional fees        44,405 
Other        27,090 

   Total expenses        11,346,552 
   Less: Expense reductions        (15,367) 
           Fee waivers and expense reimbursements        (2,540,559) 

   Net expenses        8,790,626 

Net investment income        25,895,612 

Net realized losses on investments        (164,808) 

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations    $  25,730,804 


# Effective at the close of business on March 7, 2005, Class B and Class C shares of the Fund were liquidated.

See Notes to Financial Statements
12


STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS 

    Year Ended January 31, 

    2006 (a)    2005 

Operations 
Net investment income    $  25,895,612    $  8,319,961 
Net realized losses on investments    (164,808)    (116,883) 

Net increase in net assets resulting     
   from operations    25,730,804    8,203,078 

Distributions to shareholders from     
Net investment income     
   Class A    (18,154,269)    (6,767,789) 
   Class B    (1,233)    (2,922) 
   Class C    (892)    (3,556) 
   Class S1    (7,750,612)    (1,554,256) 
   Class I    (63)    (313) 

   Total distributions to shareholders    (25,907,069)    (8,328,836) 

    Shares        Shares     
Capital share transactions 
Proceeds from shares sold 
   Class A    6,235,967,144    6,235,967,144    6,579,249,473    6,579,249,473 
   Class B    0    0    1,453,445    1,453,445 
   Class C    0    0    1,274,278    1,274,278 
   Class S1    2,410,433,676    2,410,433,676    1,443,066,563    1,443,066,563 

        8,646,400,820        8,025,043,759 

Net asset value of shares issued in     
   reinvestment of distributions   
   Class A    18,160,684    18,160,684    6,749,789    6,749,789 
   Class B    935    935    2,810    2,810 
   Class C    363    363    2,323    2,323 
   Class S1    7,750,610    7,750,610    1,529,608    1,529,608 
   Class I    51    51    313    313 

        25,912,643        8,284,843 

Automatic conversion of Class B     
   shares to Class A shares   
   Class A    0    0    6,076    6,076 
   Class B    0    0    (6,076)    (6,076) 

        0        0 

Payment for shares redeemed 
   Class A    (6,510,600,656)    (6,510,600,656)    (7,799,982,107)    (7,799,982,107) 
   Class B    (1,316,936)    (1,316,936)    (358,570)    (358,570) 
   Class C    (1,094,172)    (1,094,172)    (2,318,202)    (2,318,202) 
   Class S1    (2,396,663,404)    (2,396,663,404)    (1,359,746,877)    (1,359,746,877) 
   Class I    (32,322)    (32,322)    (1,134)    (1,134) 

        (8,909,707,490)        (9,162,406,890) 

Net decrease in net assets resulting     
   from capital share transactions        (237,394,027)        (1,129,078,288) 

Total decrease in net assets        (237,570,292)        (1,129,204,046) 
Net assets 
Beginning of period        1,255,256,937        2,384,460,983 

End of period    $  1,017,686,645    $  1,255,256,937 

Undistributed net investment income    $  72,148    $  83,605 


(a) Effective at the close of business on March 7, 2005, Class B, Class C and Class I shares of the Fund were liquidated.

See Notes to Financial Statements
13


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. ORGANIZATION

Evergreen U.S. Government Money Market Fund (the “Fund”) is a diversified series of Evergreen Money Market Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on September 18, 1997. The Trust is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).

The Fund offers Class A and Class S1 shares. Class A and Class S1 shares are sold at net asset value without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge. Each class of shares pays an ongoing distribution fee.

Effective at the close of business on March 7, 2005, Class B, Class C and Class I shares of the Fund were liquidated. Shareholders of Class B, Class C and Class I received the corresponding class of shares of Evergreen Money Market Fund.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported herein. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

a. Valuation of investments

As permitted under Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act, securities are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value.

b. Repurchase agreements

Securities pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements are held by the custodian bank or in a segregated account in the Fund’s name until the agreements mature. Collateral for certain tri-party repurchase agreements is held at the counterparty’s custodian in a segregated account for the benefit of the Fund and the counterparty. Each agreement requires that the market value of the collateral be sufficient to cover payments of interest and principal. However, in the event of default or bankruptcy by the other party to the agreement, retention of the collateral may be subject to legal proceedings. The Fund will only enter into repurchase agreements with banks and other financial institutions, which are deemed by the investment advisor to be creditworthy pursuant to guidelines established by the Board of Trustees.

c. Security transactions and investment income

Security transactions are recorded on trade date. Realized gains and losses are computed using the specific cost of the security sold. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.

d. Federal taxes

The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company and distribute all of its taxable income, including any net capital gains (which have already been offset by available capital loss carryovers). Accordingly, no provision for federal taxes is required.

14


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

e. Distributions

Distributions to shareholders from net investment income are accrued daily and paid monthly. Distributions from net realized gains, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Such distributions are determined in conformity with income tax regulations, which may differ from generally accepted accounting principles.

f. Class allocations

Income, common expenses and realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated to the classes based on the relative net assets of each class. Distribution fees, if any, are calculated daily at the class level based on the appropriate net assets of each class and the specific expense rates applicable to each class.

3. ADVISORY FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC (“EIMC”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation (“Wachovia”), is the investment advisor to the Fund and is paid an annual fee starting at 0.40% and declining to 0.30% as average daily net assets increase.

From time to time, EIMC may voluntarily or contractually waive its fee and/or reimburse expenses in order to limit operating expenses. During the year ended January 31, 2006, EIMC waived its advisory fee in the amount of $740,313 and reimbursed other expenses in the amount of $1,800,246.

Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. (“EIS”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia, is the administrator to the Fund. As administrator, EIS provides the Fund with facilities, equipment and personnel and is paid an annual rate determined by applying percentage rates to the aggregate average daily net assets of the Evergreen money market funds, starting at 0.06% and declining to 0.04% as the aggregate average daily net assets of the Evergreen money market funds increase.

Evergreen Service Company, LLC (“ESC”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia, is the transfer and dividend disbursing agent for the Fund. ESC receives account fees that vary based on the type of account held by the shareholders in the Fund. For the year ended January 31, 2006 the transfer agent fees were equivalent to an annual rate of 0.20% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.

4. DISTRIBUTION PLANS

The Fund has adopted Distribution Plans, as allowed by Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act, for each class of shares. Under the Distribution Plans, distribution fees are paid at an annual rate of 0.30% of the average daily net assets for Class A shares and 0.60% of the average daily net assets for Class S1 shares.

5. SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS

On January 31, 2006, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes for the Fund was the same as for financial reporting purposes.

15


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

As of January 31, 2006, the Fund had $251,626 in capital loss carryovers for federal income tax purposes with $7,279 expiring in 2012, $116,744 expiring in 2013 and $127,603 expiring in 2014.

For income tax purposes, capital losses incurred after October 31 within the Fund’s fiscal year are deemed to arise on the first business day of the following fiscal year. As of January 31, 2006 the Fund incurred and will elect to defer post-October capital losses of $37,344.

6. INTERFUND LENDING

Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the SEC, the Fund may participate in an interfund lending program with certain funds in the Evergreen fund family. This program allows the Fund to borrow from other participating funds. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the Fund did not participate in the interfund lending program.

7. DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS

As of January 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis consisted of undistributed ordinary income in the amount of $72,148 and capital loss carryover and post-October loss in the amount of $288,970.

The tax character of distributions paid was as follows:

    Year Ended January 31, 

    2006    2005 

Ordinary Income    $25,907,069    $ 8,328,836 


8. EXPENSE REDUCTIONS

Through expense offset arrangements with ESC and the Fund’s custodian, a portion of fund expenses has been reduced.

9. DEFERRED TRUSTEES’ FEES

Each Trustee of the Fund may defer any or all compensation related to performance of their duties as Trustees. The Trustees’ deferred balances are allocated to deferral accounts, which are included in the accrued expenses for the Fund. The investment performance of the deferral accounts is based on the investment performance of certain Evergreen funds. Any gains earned or losses incurred in the deferral accounts are reported in the Fund’s Trustees’ fees and expenses. At the election of the Trustees, the deferral account will be paid either in one lump sum or in quarterly installments for up to ten years.

10. FINANCING AGREEMENT

The Fund and certain other Evergreen funds share in a $150 million unsecured revolving credit commitment for temporary and emergency purposes, including the funding of redemptions, as permitted by each participating fund’s borrowing restrictions. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at 0.50% per annum above the Federal Funds rate. All of the participating funds are

16


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

charged an annual commitment fee of 0.09% of the unused balance, which is allocated pro rata. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the Fund had no borrowings under this agreement.

11. REGULATORY MATTERS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Since September 2003, governmental and self-regulatory authorities have instituted numerous ongoing investigations of various practices in the mutual fund industry, including investigations relating to revenue sharing, market-timing, late trading and record retention, among other things. The investigations cover investment advisors, distributors and transfer agents to mutual funds, as well as other firms. EIMC, EIS and ESC (collectively, “Evergreen”) have received subpoenas and other requests for documents and testimony relating to these investigations, are endeavoring to comply with those requests, and are cooperating with the investigations. Evergreen is continuing its own internal review of policies, practices, procedures and personnel, and is taking remedial action where appropriate.

In connection with one of these investigations, on July 28, 2004, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) informed Evergreen that the staff intends to recommend to the SEC that it institute an enforcement action against Evergreen. The SEC staff’s proposed allegations relate to (i) an arrangement pursuant to which a broker at one of EIMC’s affiliated broker-dealers had been authorized, apparently by an EIMC officer (no longer with EIMC), to engage in short-term trading, on behalf of a client, in Evergreen Mid Cap Growth Fund (formerly Evergreen Emerging Growth Fund and prior to that, known as Evergreen Small Company Growth Fund) during the period from December 2000 through April 2003, in excess of the limitations set forth in the fund’s prospectus, (ii) short-term trading from September 2001 through January 2003, by a former Evergreen portfolio manager, of Evergreen Precious Metals Fund, a fund he managed at the time, (iii) the sufficiency of systems for monitoring exchanges and enforcing exchange limitations as stated in the fund’s prospectuses, and (iv) the adequacy of e-mail retention practices. In connection with the activity in Evergreen Mid Cap Growth Fund, EIMC reimbursed the fund $378,905, plus an additional $25,242, representing what EIMC calculated at that time to be the client’s net gain and the fees earned by EIMC and the expenses incurred by this fund on the client’s account. In connection with the activity in Evergreen Precious Metals Fund, EIMC reimbursed the fund $70,878, plus an additional $3,075, representing what EIMC calculated at that time to be the portfolio manager’s net gain and the fees earned by EIMC and expenses incurred by the fund on the portfolio manager’s account. Evergreen is currently engaged in discussions with the staff of the SEC concerning its recommendation.

The staff of the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) had notified EIS that it has made a preliminary determination to recommend that disciplinary action be brought against EIS for certain violations of the NASD’s rules. The recommendation relates principally to allegations that EIS (i) arranged for fund portfolio trades to be directed to broker-dealers (including Wachovia Securities, LLC, an affiliate of EIS) that sold Evergreen fund shares during the period of January 2001 to December 2003 and (ii) provided non-cash compensation by sponsoring

17


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued

offsite meetings attended by Wachovia Securities, LLC brokers during that period. EIS is cooperating with the NASD staff in its review of these matters.

Any resolution of these matters with regulatory authorities may include, but not be limited to, sanctions, penalties or injunctions regarding Evergreen, restitution to mutual fund shareholders and/or other financial penalties and structural changes in the governance or management of Evergreen’s mutual fund business. Any penalties or restitution will be paid by Evergreen and not by the Evergreen funds.

In addition, the Evergreen funds and EIMC and certain of its affiliates are involved in various legal actions, including private litigation and class action lawsuits. EIMC does not expect that any of such legal actions currently pending or threatened will have a material adverse impact on the financial position or operations of any of the Evergreen funds or on EIMC’s ability to provide services to the Evergreen funds.

Although Evergreen believes that neither the foregoing investigations nor any pending or threatened legal actions will have a material adverse impact on the Evergreen funds, there can be no assurance that these matters and any publicity surrounding or resulting from them will not result in reduced sales or increased redemptions of Evergreen fund shares, which could increase Evergreen fund transaction costs or operating expenses, or have other adverse consequences on the Evergreen funds.

18


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Trustees and Shareholders
Evergreen Money Market Trust

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, of the Evergreen U.S. Government Money Market Fund, a series of Evergreen Money Market Trust, as of January 31, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of January 31, 2006 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, or by other appropriate auditing procedures where replies from brokers were not received. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Evergreen U.S. Government Money Market Fund, as of January 31, 2006, the results of its operations, changes in its net assets and financial highlights for each of the years or periods described above in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.


Boston, Massachusetts
March 24, 2006

19


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited)

INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT
ADVISORY AGREEMENT

Each year, the Fund’s Board of Trustees is required to consider whether to continue in place the Fund’s investment advisory agreement. In September 2005, the Trustees, including a majority of the Trustees who are not interested persons (as that term is defined in the 1940 Act) of the Fund or of EIMC, approved the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement.

At the same time, the Trustees considered the continuation of the investment advisory agreements for all of the Evergreen funds, and the description below refers in many cases to the Trustees’ process and conclusions in connection with their consideration of this matter for all of the Evergreen funds. In all of its deliberations, the Board of Trustees and the disinterested Trustees were advised by independent counsel to the disinterested Trustees and counsel to the Evergreen funds.

The review process. The 1940 Act requires that the Board of Trustees request and evaluate, and that EIMC furnish, such information as may reasonably be necessary to evaluate the terms of the Fund’s advisory agreement. The review process began formally in spring 2005, when a committee of the Board (the “Committee”), working with EIMC management, determined generally the types of information the Board would review and set a timeline for the review process. In late spring, counsel to the disinterested Trustees sent to EIMC a formal request for information to be furnished to the Trustees. In addition, the independent data provider Lipper Inc. (“Lipper”) was engaged to provide fund-specific and industry-wide data to the Board containing information of a nature and in a format generally prescribed by the Committee.

The Trustees reviewed EIMC’s responses to the request for information, with the assistance of counsel for the disinterested Trustees and for the Evergreen funds and an independent industry consultant retained by the disinterested Trustees, and requested and received additional information following that review. The Committee met in person with the representatives of EIMC in early September 2005. At a meeting of the full Board of Trustees later in September 2005, the Committee reported the results of its discussions with EIMC, and the full Board met with representatives of EIMC, engaged in further review of the materials provided to them, and approved the continuation of each of the advisory and sub-advisory agreements.

The disinterested Trustees discussed the continuation of the Fund’s advisory agreement with representatives of EIMC and in multiple private sessions with legal counsel at which no personnel of EIMC were present. In considering the continuation of the agreement, the Trustees did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each Trustee attributed different weights to various factors. The Trustees evaluated information provided to them both in terms of the Evergreen mutual funds generally and with respect to the Fund specifically as they considered appropriate; although the Trustees considered the continuation of the agreement as part of the larger process of considering the continuation of the advisory contracts for all of the Evergreen funds, their determination to continue the advisory agreement for each of the Evergreen funds was ultimately made on a fund-by-fund basis.

20


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

This summary describes the most important, but not necessarily all, of the factors considered by the Board and the disinterested Trustees.

Information reviewed. The Board of Trustees and committees of the Board of Trustees meet periodically during the course of the year. At those meetings, the Board receives a wide variety of information regarding the services performed by EIMC, the investment performance of the Fund and the other Evergreen funds, and other aspects of the business and operations of the Evergreen funds. At those meetings, and in the process of considering the continuation of the agreements, the Trustees considered information regarding, for example, the Fund’s investment results; the portfolio management team for the Fund and the experience of the members of that team, and any recent changes in the membership of the team; portfolio trading practices; compliance by the Fund and EIMC with applicable laws and regulations and with the Fund’s and EIMC’s compliance policies and procedures; services provided by affiliates of EIMC to the Fund and shareholders of the Fund; and other information relating to the nature, extent, and quality of services provided by EIMC. The Trustees considered the rates at which the Fund pays investment advisory fees, the total expense ratio of the Fund, and the efforts generally by EIMC and its affil-iates as sponsors of the Fund. The data provided by Lipper showed the fees paid by the Fund and the Fund’s total expense ratio in comparison to other similar mutual funds, in addition to data regarding the investment performance by the Fund in comparison to other similar mutual funds. The Trustees were assisted by the independent industry consultant in reviewing the information presented to them.

The Board also considered that EIS serves as administrator to the Fund and receives a fee for its services as administrator. In their comparison of the advisory fee paid by the Fund with those paid by other mutual funds, the Board took into account administrative fees paid by the Fund and those other mutual funds. The Board considered that affiliates of EIMC serve as transfer agent and distributor to the Fund and receive fees from the Fund for those services, and received information regarding recent reductions in the transfer agency fees paid by the Fund. They considered other so-called “fall-out” benefits to EIMC and its affiliates due to their other relationships with the Evergreen funds, including, for example, soft-dollar services received by EIMC attributable to transactions entered into by EIMC for the benefit of the Evergreen funds and brokerage commissions received by Wachovia Securities LLC, an affiliate of EIMC, from transactions effected by it for the Evergreen funds.

The Board of Trustees also considered that certain of the money market funds managed by EIMC are offered in connection with cash sweep arrangements and similar services made available by affiliates of EIMC to their customers. The Trustees considered that EIMC and its affiliates benefit from the availability of those Evergreen funds and the distribution and shareholder services fees paid by those Evergreen funds.

Nature and quality of the services provided. The Trustees considered that EIMC and its affiliates provide a comprehensive investment management service to the Fund. They noted that EIMC formulates and implements an investment program for the Fund. They noted that EIMC makes its personnel available to serve as officers of the Evergreen funds, and concluded that the

21


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

reporting and management functions provided by EIMC with respect to the Fund and the Evergreen funds overall were generally satisfactory. The Trustees considered the investment philosophy of the Fund’s portfolio management team, and considered the in-house research capabilities of EIMC and its affiliates, as well as other resources available to EIMC, including research services available to it from third parties. The Board considered the managerial and financial resources available to EIMC, and the commitment that the Wachovia organization has made to the Fund and the Evergreen funds generally. On the basis of these factors, they determined that the nature and scope of the services provided by EIMC were consistent with its duties under the investment advisory agreements and appropriate and consistent with the investment programs and best interests of the Fund.

The Trustees noted the commitment and resources EIMC and its affiliates have brought to the regulatory, compliance, accounting, tax and tax reporting, and shareholder servicing functions, and the number and quality of staff committed to those functions, which they concluded were appropriate and generally in line with EIMC’s responsibilities to the Fund and to the Evergreen funds generally. They noted that EIMC had enhanced a number of these functions in recent periods and continued to do so, in light of regulatory developments in the investment management and mutual fund industries generally and in light of regulatory matters involving EIMC and its affiliates. They concluded that those enhancements appeared generally appropriate, but considered that the enhancement process is an on-going one and determined to continue to monitor developments in these functions in coming periods for appropriateness and consistency with regulatory and industry developments. The Board and the disinterested Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the Fund’s advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by EIMC, including services provided by EIS under its administrative services agreement with the Fund.

Investment performance. The Trustees considered the investment performance of each of the Evergreen funds, both by comparison to other comparable mutual funds and to broad market indices. The Trustees emphasized that the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for an Evergreen fund should not be taken as any indication that the Trustees did not believe investment performance for any specific fund might not be improved, and they noted that they would continue to monitor closely the investment performance of the Evergreen funds going forward. Specifically with respect to the Fund, the Trustees noted that the Class A shares of the Fund performed in the third quintile over recently completed one- and three-year periods (and above the median for the one-year period).

Advisory and administrative fees. The Trustees recognized that EIMC does not seek to provide the lowest cost investment advisory service, but to provide a high quality, full-service investment management product at a reasonable price. They also noted that EIMC has generally attempted to make its investment advisory fees consistent with industry norms. The Trustees noted that, from the materials presented, it appeared that the combination of investment advisory and administrative fees paid by the Fund to EIMC and EIS with respect to Class A shares was higher than most of the fees paid by comparable funds, although the Trustees concluded that the fees

22


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued

were not unreasonable in light of the Fund’s investment performance and the services provided by EIMC and EIS.

The Trustees noted that EIMC does not provide services to other clients using the same investment strategy as it uses in managing the Fund.

Economies of scale. The Trustees noted that economies of scale would likely be achieved by EIMC in managing the Evergreen funds as the funds grow. The Trustees noted that the Fund had implemented breakpoints in its advisory fee structure. The Trustees undertook to continue to review the appropriate levels of breakpoints in the future, but concluded that the breakpoints as implemented appeared to be a reasonable step toward the realization of economies of scale by the funds.

Profitability. The Trustees considered information provided to them regarding the profitability to the EIMC organization of the investment advisory, administration, and transfer agency fees paid to EIMC and its affiliates by each of the Evergreen funds. They considered that the information provided to them was necessarily estimated. They noted that the levels of profitability of the Evergreen funds to EIMC varied widely, depending on among other things the size and type of fund. They noted that all of the estimates provided to them were calculated on a pre-tax basis. They considered the profitability of the Evergreen funds in light of such factors as, for example, the information they had received regarding the relation of the fees paid by the Evergreen funds to those paid by other mutual funds, the investment performance of the Evergreen funds, and the amount of revenues involved. In light of these factors, the Trustees did not consider that the profitability of any of the Evergreen funds, individually or in the aggregate, was such as to prevent their approving the continuation of the agreements.

In connection with their review of the Fund’s investment advisory and administrative fees, the Trustees also considered the transfer agency fees paid by the Evergreen funds to an affiliate of EIMC. They reviewed information presented to them showing generally that the transfer agency fees charged to the Evergreen funds were generally consistent with industry norms, and that transfer agency fees for a number of Evergreen funds had recently declined, or were expected to in the near future.

23


TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS 

TRUSTEES1 
Charles A. Austin III    Investment Counselor, Anchor Capital Advisors, Inc. (investment advice); Director, The Andover 
Trustee    Companies (insurance); Trustee, Arthritis Foundation of New England; Former Director, The 
DOB: 10/23/1934    Francis Ouimet Society; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust; Former 
Term of office since: 1991    Investment Counselor, Appleton Partners, Inc. (investment advice); Former Director, Executive 
Other directorships: None   Vice President and Treasurer, State Street Research & Management Company (investment 
    advice) 

Shirley L. Fulton    Partner, Tin, Fulton, Greene & Owen, PLLC (law firm); Former Partner, Helms, Henderson & 
Trustee    Fulton, P.A. (law firm); Retired Senior Resident Superior Court Judge, 26th Judicial District, 
DOB: 1/10/1952    Charlotte, NC 
Term of office since: 2004     
Other directorships: None   

K. Dun Gifford    Chairman and President, Oldways Preservation and Exchange Trust (education); Trustee, 
Trustee    Treasurer and Chairman of the Finance Committee, Cambridge College; Former Trustee, Mentor 
DOB: 10/23/1938    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1974     
Other directorships: None   

Dr. Leroy Keith, Jr.    Partner, Stonington Partners, Inc. (private equity fund); Trustee, Phoenix Funds Family; Director, 
Trustee    Diversapack Co.; Director, Obagi Medical Products Co.; Former Director, Lincoln Educational 
DOB: 2/14/1939    Services; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1983     
Other directorships: Trustee, The   
Phoenix Group of Mutual Funds   

Gerald M. McDonnell    Manager of Commercial Operations, SMI Steel Co. – South Carolina (steel producer); Former 
Trustee    Sales and Marketing Manager, Nucor Steel Company; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash 
DOB: 7/14/1939    Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1988     
Other directorships: None   

William Walt Pettit    Vice President, Kellam & Pettit, P.A. (law firm); Director, Superior Packaging Corp.; Director, 
Trustee    National Kidney Foundation of North Carolina, Inc.; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash 
DOB: 8/26/1955    Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None   

David M. Richardson    President, Richardson, Runden LLC (executive recruitment business development/consulting 
Trustee    company); Consultant, Kennedy Information, Inc. (executive recruitment information and 
DOB: 9/19/1941    research company); Consultant, AESC (The Association of Executive Search Consultants); 
Term of office since: 1982    Director, J&M Cumming Paper Co. (paper merchandising); Former Trustee, NDI Technologies, LLP 
Other directorships: None   (communications); Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 

Dr. Russell A. Salton III    President/CEO, AccessOne MedCard; Former Medical Director, Healthcare Resource Associates, 
Trustee    Inc.; Former Medical Director, U.S. Health Care/Aetna Health Services; Former Trustee, Mentor 
DOB: 6/2/1947    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1984     
Other directorships: None   


24


TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS continued 

Michael S. Scofield    Director and Chairman, Branded Media Corporation (multi-media branding company); Attorney, 
Trustee    Law Offices of Michael S. Scofield; Former Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
DOB: 2/20/1943     
Term of office since: 1984   
Other directorships: None   

Richard J. Shima    Independent Consultant; Trustee, Saint Joseph College (CT); Director, Hartford Hospital; Trustee, 
Trustee    Greater Hartford YMCA; Former Director, Trust Company of CT; Former Director, Enhance 
DOB: 8/11/1939    Financial Services, Inc.; Former Director, Old State House Association; Former Trustee, Mentor 
Term of office since: 1993    Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Other directorships: None     

Richard K. Wagoner, CFA2    Member and Former President, North Carolina Securities Traders Association; Member, Financial 
Trustee    Analysts Society; Former Consultant to the Boards of Trustees of the Evergreen funds; Former 
DOB: 12/12/1937    Trustee, Mentor Funds and Cash Resource Trust 
Term of office since: 1999     
Other directorships: None   

OFFICERS 
Dennis H. Ferro3    Principal occupations: President and Chief Executive Officer, Evergreen Investment Company, 
President    Inc. and Executive Vice President, Wachovia Bank, N.A.; former Chief Investment Officer, 
DOB: 6/20/1945    Evergreen Investment Company, Inc. 
Term of office since: 2003     

Jeremy DePalma4    Principal occupations: Vice President, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc.; Former Assistant Vice 
Treasurer    President, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. 
DOB: 2/5/1974     
Term of office since: 2005   

Michael H. Koonce4    Principal occupations: Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Evergreen Investment 
Secretary    Services, Inc.; Senior Vice President and Assistant General Counsel, Wachovia Corporation 
DOB: 4/20/1960     
Term of office since: 2000   

James Angelos4    Principal occupations: Chief Compliance Officer and Senior Vice President, Evergreen Funds; 
Chief Compliance Officer    Former Director of Compliance, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. 
DOB: 9/2/1947     
Term of office since: 2004   


1 Each Trustee serves until a successor is duly elected or qualified or until his/her death, resignation, retirement or removal from office. 
   Each Trustee oversees 90 Evergreen funds. Correspondence for each Trustee may be sent to Evergreen Board of Trustees, 
   P.O. Box 20083, Charlotte, NC 28202. 
2 Mr. Wagoner is an “interested person” of the Fund because of his ownership of shares in Wachovia Corporation, the parent to the 
   Fund’s investment advisor. 
3 The address of the Officer is 401 S. Tryon Street, 20th Floor, Charlotte, NC 28288. 
4 The address of the Officer is 200 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116. 

Additional information about the Fund’s Board of Trustees and Officers can be found in the Statement of Additional Information (SAI) and is available upon request without charge by calling 800.343.2898.

25



565217 rv3 3/2006

 




Item 2 - Code of Ethics

(a) The Registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer.

(b) During the period covered by this report, there were no amendments to the provisions of the code of ethics adopted in 2.(a) above.

(c) During the period covered by this report, there were no implicit or explicit waivers to the provisions of the code of ethics adopted in 2.(a) above.

Item 3 - Audit Committee Financial Expert

Charles A. Austin III and K. Dun Gifford have been determined by the Registrant's Board of Trustees to be audit committee financial experts within the meaning of Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. These financial experts are independent of management.

Items 4 – Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The following table represents fees for professional audit services rendered by KPMG LLP, for the audits of each of the nine series of the Registrant’s annual financial statements for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2006 and January 31, 2005, and fees billed for other services rendered by KPMG LLP.

    2006    2005 
Audit fees    $189,507    $176,795 
Audit -related fees (1)    4,800    0 

     Audit and audit-related fees    194,307    176,795 
Tax fees (2)    3,375    0 
All other fees    0    0 

     Total fees    $197,682    $176,795 


(1) Audit-related fees consists principally of fees for merger related activities. (2) Tax fees consists of fees for tax consultation, tax compliance and tax review.

Evergreen Funds
Evergreen Income Advantage Fund
Evergreen Managed Income Fund
Evergreen Utilities and High Income Fund
Evergreen International Balanced Income Fund

Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy

I. Statement of Principles

Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”), the Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees/Directors is responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of the independent auditor. As part of this responsibility, the Audit Committee is required to pre-approve the audit and non-audit services performed by the independent auditor in order to assure that they do not impair the auditor’s independence from the Funds. To implement these provisions of the Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) has issued rules specifying the types of services that an independent auditor may not provide to its audit client, as well as the audit committee’s administration of the engagement of the independent auditor. Accordingly, the Audit Committee has adopted, and the Board of Trustees/Directors has ratified, the Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre Approval Policy (the “Policy”), which sets forth the procedures and the conditions pursuant to which services proposed to be performed by the independent auditor may be pre-approved.

The SEC’s rules establish two different approaches to pre-approving services, which the SEC considers to be equally valid. Proposed services either: may be pre-approved without consideration of specific case-by-case services by the Audit Committee (“general pre-approval”); or require the specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee (“specified pre-approval”). The Audit Committee believes that the combination of these two approaches in this Policy will result in an effective and efficient procedure to pre-approve services performed by the independent auditor. As set forth in this Policy, unless a type of service has received general pre-approval, it will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee if it is to be provided by the independent auditor. Any proposed services exceeding pre-approved cost levels or budgeted amounts will also require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.

For both types of pre-approval, the Audit Committee will consider whether such services are consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence. The Audit Committee will also consider whether the independent auditor is best positioned to provide the most effective and efficient service, for reasons such as its familiarity with the Funds’ business people, culture, accounting systems, risk profile and other factors, and whether the service might enhance the Funds’ ability to manage or control risk or improve audit quality. All such factors will be considered as a whole, and no one factor should necessarily be determinative.

The Audit Committee is also mindful of the relationship between fees for audit and non-audit services in deciding whether to pre-approve any such services and may determine, for each fiscal year, the ratio between the total amount of fees for Audit, Audit-related and Tax services and the total amount of fees for certain permissible non-audit services classified as All Other services.

The term of any general pre-approval is 12 months from the date of pre-approval, unless the Audit Committee considers a different period and states otherwise. The Audit Committee will annually review and pre-approve the services that may be provided by the independent auditor without obtaining specific pre-approval from the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee will add or subtract to the list of general pre-approved services from time to time, based on subsequent determinations.

The purpose of this Policy is to set forth the procedures by which the Audit Committee intends to fulfill its responsibilities. It does not delegate the Audit Committee’s responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the independent auditor to management.

The independent auditor has reviewed this Policy and believes that implementation of the policy will not adversely affect the auditor’s independence.

II. Delegation

As provided in the Act and the SEC’s rules, the Audit Committee may delegate either type of pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member to whom such authority is delegated must report, for informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions of the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

III. Audit Services

The annual Audit services engagement terms and fees will be subject to the specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee. Audit services include the annual financial statement audit and other procedures required to be performed by the independent auditor to be able to form an opinion on the Funds’ financial statements. These other procedures include information systems and procedural reviews and testing performed in order to understand and place reliance on the systems of internal control, and consultations relating to the audit. Audit services also include the attestation engagement for the independent auditor’s report on management’s report on internal controls for financial reporting. The Audit Committee will monitor the Audit services engagement as necessary, but no less than on a quarterly basis, and will also approve, if necessary, any changes in terms, conditions and fees resulting from changes in audit scope, Fund service providers or other items.

In addition to the annual Audit services engagement approved by the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee may grant general pre-approval to other Audit services, which are those services that only the independent auditor reasonably can provide. Other Audit services may include services associated with SEC registration statements, periodic reports and other documents filed with the SEC or other documents issued in connection with mergers or acquisitions.

IV. Audit-related Services

Audit-related services are assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Funds’ financial statements or that are traditionally performed by the independent auditor. Because the Audit Committee believes that the provision of Audit-related services does not impair the independence of the auditor and is consistent with SEC’s rules on auditor independence, the Audit Committee may grant general pre-approval to Audit-related services. Audit-related services include, among others, due diligence services pertaining to potential business acquisitions/dispositions; accounting consultations related to accounting, financial reporting or disclosure matters not classified as “Audit services”; assistance with understanding and implementing new accounting and financial reporting guidance from rulemaking authorities; agreed-upon or expanded audit procedures related to accounting records required to respond to or comply with financial, accounting or regulatory reporting matters; and assistance with internal control reporting requirements.

V. Tax Services

The Audit Committee believes that the independent auditor can provide Tax services to the Funds such as tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice without impairing the auditor’s independence, and the SEC has stated that the independent auditor may provide such services. Hence, the Audit Committee believes it may grant general pre-approval to those Tax services that have historically been provided by the auditor, that the Audit Committee has reviewed and believes would not impair the independence of the auditor, and that are consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence. The Audit Committee will not permit the retention of the independent auditor in connection with a transaction initially recommended by the independent auditor, the sole business purpose of which may be tax avoidance and the tax treatment of which may not be supported in the Internal Revenue Code and related regulations. The Audit Committee will consult with the Director of Fund Administration, the Vice President of Tax Services or outside counsel to determine that the tax planning and reporting positions are consistent with this policy.

All Tax services involving large and complex transactions must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee, including: tax services proposed to be provide by the independent auditor to any executive officer or director of the Funds, in his or her individual capacity, where such services are paid for by the Funds or the investment advisor.

VI. All Other Services

The Audit Committee believes, based on the SEC’s rules prohibiting the independent auditor from providing specific non-audit services, that other types of non-audit services are permitted. Accordingly, the Audit Committee believes it may grant general pre-approval to those permissible non-audit services classified as All Other services that it believes are routine and recurring services, would not impair the independence of the auditor and are consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence.

The SEC’s rules and relevant guidance should be consulted to determine the precise definitions of the SEC’s prohibited non-audit services and the applicability of exceptions to certain of the prohibitions.

VII. Pre-Approval Fee Levels or Budgeted Amounts

Pre-approval fee levels or budgeted amounts for all services to be provided by the independent auditor will be established annually by the Audit Committee. Any proposed services exceeding these levels or amounts will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is mindful of the overall relationship of fees for audit and non-audit services in determining whether to pre-approve any such services. For each fiscal year, the Audit Committee may determine to ratio between the total amount of fees for Audit, Audit-related and Tax services, and the total amount of fees for services classified as All Other services.

VIII. Procedures

All requests or applications for services to be provided by the independent auditor that do not require specific approval by the Audit Committee will be submitted to the Director of Fund Administration or Assistant Director of Fund Administration and must include a detailed description of the services to be rendered. The Director/Assistant Director of Fund Administration will determine whether such services are included within the list of services that have received the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee will be informed on a quarterly basis (or more frequent if requested by the audit committee) of any such services rendered by the independent auditor.

Request or applications to provide services that require specific approval by the Audit Committee will be submitted to the Audit Committee by both the independent auditor and the Director/Assistant Director of Fund Administration, and must include a joint statement as to whether, in their view, the request or application is consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence.

The Audit Committee has designated the Chief Compliance Officer to monitor the performance of all services provided by the independent auditor and to determine whether such services are in compliance with this policy. The Chief Compliance Officer will report to the Audit Committee on a periodic basis on the results of its monitoring. Both the Chief Compliance Officer and management will immediately report to the chairman of the Audit Committee any breach of this policy that comes to the attention of the Chief Compliance Officer or any member of management.

The Audit Committee will also review the internal auditor’s annual internal audit plan to determine that the plan provides for the monitoring of the independent auditor’s services.

IX. Additional Requirements

The Audit Committee has determined to take additional measures on an annual basis to meet its responsibility to oversee the work of the independent auditor and to assure the auditor’s independence from the Funds, such as reviewing a formal written statement from the independent auditor delineating all relationships between the independent auditor and the Funds, the Funds’ investment advisor and related parties of the investment advisor, consistent with Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, and discussing with the independent auditor its methods and procedures for ensuring independence.

Items 5 – Audit Committee of Listed Registrants

Not applicable.

Item 6 – Schedule of Investments

Please see schedule of investments contained in the Report to Stockholders included under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.

Item 7 – Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 8 – Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 9 – Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.

Not applicable.

Item 10 – Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Registrant’s board of trustees that have been implemented since the Registrant last provided disclosure in response to the requirements of this Item.

Item 11 - Controls and Procedures

(a) The Registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) within 90 days of this filing and have concluded that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of that date, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported timely.

(b) There has been no changes in the Registrant's internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting .

Item 12 - Exhibits

File the exhibits listed below as part of this Form. Letter or number the exhibits in the sequence indicated.

(a) Any code of ethics, or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the Registrant intends to satisfy the Item 2 requirements through filing of an exhibit.

(b)(1) Separate certifications for the Registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached as EX99.CERT.

(b)(2) Separate certifications for the Registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached as EX99.906CERT. The certifications furnished pursuant to this paragraph are not deemed to be "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certifications are not deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates them by reference.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Evergreen Money Market Trust

By: _______________________
Dennis H. Ferro,
Principal Executive Officer

Date: March 31, 2006

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By: _______________________
Dennis H. Ferro,
Principal Executive Officer

Date: March 31, 2006

By: ________________________
Jeremy DePalma
Principal Financial Officer

Date: March 31, 2006