Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)	6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements
Description of Business and Basis of Presentation	he Company has developed and ultimately intends to commercialize its innovative PAD based products for the over-the-counter (“OTC”) and laboratory markets based on its patented technology platforms, and its genomic diagnostics, based on its patented PadKit® technology for the worldwide healthcare industry. These platforms include: inSync®, Unique™, PadKit®, and OEM branded OTC and laboratory testing products based on the Company’s core intellectual property related to its PAD technology. These products are intended for the treatment of hemorrhoids, minor vaginal infection, urinary incontinence, general catamenial uses and other medical needs. The Company’s efforts to commercialize its products are currently contingent on additional financing to execute its business and operating plan, which is currently focused on the commercialization of the Company’s PAD technology either directly or through a joint venture or other relationship intended to increase shareholder value. In the interim, the Company has executed a plan to substantially reduce expenses, including headcount, and to restructure and/or eliminate many of its outstanding liabilities. This plan was necessary in order for the Company to continue as a going concern. No assurances can be given that the Company will obtain financing, or otherwise successfully develop a business and operating plan or enter into an alternative relationship to commercialize the Company’s PAD technology. On June 20, 2012, the Company formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, QX Labs, Inc. (“QX”), and convey and transfer to QX all intellectual property and assets related to the Company’s diagnostic testing business ("Diagnostics Business"). The Diagnostic Business is based principally on the Company’s proprietary PadKit® technology, which the Company believes provides a patented platform technology for genomic diagnostics, including fetal genomics. Following the transfer of the Diagnostics Business to QX, the Company’s other business line will consist of its over-the-counter business, including the InSync feminine hygienic interlabial pad, the Unique pad for hemorrhoid application, and other treated miniforms (the “OTC Business”), as well as established and continuing licensing relationships related to the OTC Business. Management believes the creation of QX permits the Company to more efficiently explore different options to maximize the value of the Diagnostics Business and the OTC Business (collectively, the “Businesses”), with the objective of maximizing the value of the Businesses for the benefit of the Company and its stakeholders. The Company’s current focus is to develop a financing and operating plan to: (i) leverage its broad-based intellectual property (IP) and patent portfolio to develop new and innovative diagnostic products; (ii) commercialize its OTC Business and Diagnostics Business, either directly or through joint ventures, mergers or similar transactions intended to capitalize on commercial opportunities presented by each of the Businesses; (iii) contract manufacturing to third parties while maintaining control over the manufacturing process; and (iv) maximize the value of the Company’s investments in non-core assets. As a result of its current financial condition, however, the Company’s efforts in the short-term will be focused on obtaining financing necessary to maintain the Company as a going concern. Recent Developments Settlement of GUSA Note Receivable and Litigation. On May 24, 2013, the Company and Genomics USA, Inc. ("GUSA") settled the Company’s complaint filed against GUSA seeking to recover all amounts due the Company under the terms of a promissory note in the principal amount of $200,000 (the "GUSA Note"). The Complaint was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, and sought repayment of all amounts due under the terms of the GUSA Note, and accrued interest thereon, plus attorney's fees. The settlement agreement entered into by the parties provides for the payment to the Company of $200,000, of which $20,000 was paid on June 7, 2013, and $10,000 per month shall be paid on the 7^th day of each consecutive month thereafter for a total of 18 months. Issuance of Additional Promissory Notes. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company issued two additional promissory notes to two investors in the principal amounts of $2,000, and $25,000 (together, the “Notes”). As additional consideration for the purchase of the Notes, the Company issued an aggregate total of 27,000 warrants to purchase shares of FluoroPharma Medical, Inc. (“FPMI”) common stock, for $1.00 per share (“FPMI Warrants”), to the investors. The FPMI Warrants expire on February 15, 2019. The Notes accrue interest at the rate of 6% annually. The Notes were due and payable on June 30, 2013 (the “Maturity Date”), and are currently payable upon demand by the Note holders. The Notes are convertible at the option of the holder into shares of the Company's common stock at a conversion price equal to $0.10 per share. In addition, the holder may exchange the Notes for common stock in the event the Company consummates a qualified financing (the “Qualified Financing”), which is defined in the Notes as a financing resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of at least $500,000. While the Company intends to pay the Notes using proceeds from a Qualified Financing, such Qualified Financing may not occur prior to the date the holder of the Notes demands repayment. The Company presently intends to issue additional Promissory Notes to finance its current working capital needs. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to issue additional Promissory Notes.
Management Statement Regarding Going Concern	The Company currently is not generating revenue from operations. The Company has historically financed its operations primarily through issuances of equity and the proceeds from the issuance of promissory notes. In the past, the Company also provided for its cash needs by issuing common stock, options and warrants for certain operating costs, including consulting and professional fees, as well as divesting its minority equity interests and equity-linked investments. The Company’s history of operating losses, limited cash resources and the absence of an operating plan necessary to capitalize on the Company’s assets raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, absent a strengthening of our cash position. Management is currently pursuing various funding options, including seeking debt or equity financing, licensing opportunities and the sale of certain investment holdings, as well as a strategic, merger or other transaction to obtain additional funding to continue the development of, and to successfully commercialize, its products. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in its efforts. Should the Company be unable to obtain adequate financing or generate sufficient revenue in the future, the Company’s business, result of operations, liquidity and financial condition would be materially and adversely harmed, and the Company will be unable to continue as a going concern. There can be no assurance that, assuming the Company is able to strengthen its cash position, it will achieve sufficient revenue or profitable operations to continue as a going concern.
Accounting for Share-Based Payments	Accounting for Share-Based Payments. The Company follows the provisions of ASC Topic 718, which establishes the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges equity securities for services and requires companies to expense the estimated fair value of these awards over the requisite service period. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model in determining fair value. Accordingly, compensation cost has been recognized using the fair value method and expected term accrual requirements as prescribed, which resulted in employee stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 of $30,000 and $30,000, respectively and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 of $27,000. The Company accounts for share-based payments granted to non-employees in accordance with ASC Topic 505, “Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees.” The Company determines the fair value of the stock-based payment as either the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. If the fair value of the equity instruments issued is used, it is measured using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of either (1) the date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached, or (2) the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete. In the case of modifications, the Black-Scholes model is used to value the warrant on the modification date by applying the revised assumptions. The difference between the fair value of the warrants prior to the modification and after the modification determines the incremental value. The Company has modified warrants in connection with the issuance of certain notes and note extensions. These modified warrants were originally issued in connection with previous private placement investments. In the case of debt issuances, the warrants were accounted for as original issuance discount based on their relative fair values. When modified in connection with a note issuance, the Company recognizes the incremental value as a part of the debt discount calculation, using its relative fair value in accordance with ASC Topic 470-20, “Debt with Conversion and Other Options.” When modified in connection with note extensions, the Company recognized the incremental value as prepaid interest, which is expensed over the term of the extension. The fair value of each share based payment is estimated on the measurement date using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions, which are determined at the beginning of each year and utilized in all calculations for that year: During 2012, the fair value of each share based payment is estimated on the measurement date using the Black-Scholes model using an average risk free interest rate of 3.08%, expected volatility of 261%, and a dividend yield of zero. During 2011, the fair value of each share based payment is estimated on the measurement date using the Black-Scholes model using a risk free interest rate of 3.22%, expected volatility of 300%, and a dividend yield of zero. Risk-Free Interest Rate. The interest rate used is based on the yield of a U.S. Treasury security as of the beginning of the year. Expected Volatility. The Company calculates the expected volatility based on historical volatility of monthly stock prices over a three year period. Dividend Yield. The Company has never paid cash dividends, and does not currently intend to pay cash dividends, and thus has assumed a 0% dividend yield. Expected Term. For options, the Company has no history of employee exercise patterns. Therefore, the Company uses the option term as the expected term. For warrants, the Company uses the actual term of the warrant. Pre-Vesting Forfeitures. Estimates of pre-vesting option forfeitures are based on Company experience. The Company will adjust its estimate of forfeitures over the requisite service period based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Changes in estimated forfeitures will be recognized through a cumulative catch-up adjustment in the period of change and will also impact the amount of compensation expense to be recognized in future periods. Black Scholes Option Pricing Model. During the second quarter of 2013, the Company has used an average risk-free interest rate of 3%, a dividend yield of 0%, and an average volatility of 261% to calculate the fair value of equity securities issued for services.
Earnings per Share	Earnings per Share. The Company computes net income (loss) per common share in accordance with ASC Topic 260. Net income (loss) per share is based upon the weighted average number of outstanding common shares and the dilutive effect of common share equivalents, such as options and warrants to purchase common stock, convertible preferred stock and convertible notes, if applicable, that are outstanding each year. Basic and diluted earnings per share were the same at the reporting dates of the accompanying financial statements, as including common stock equivalents in the calculation of diluted earnings per share would have been antidilutive. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had outstanding options exercisable for 304,500 shares of its common stock, warrants exercisable for 2,132,500 shares of its common stock, and preferred shares convertible into 20,416,228 shares of its common stock. The above options, warrants, and preferred shares were deemed to be antidilutive for the quarter ended June 30, 2013. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had outstanding options exercisable for 304,500 shares of its common stock, warrants exercisable for 6,529,873 shares of its common stock, and preferred shares convertible into 20,416,228 shares of its common stock. The above options, warrants, and preferred shares were deemed to be antidilutive for the six months ended June 30, 2012.
Fair value	Fair Value. The Company has adopted ASC Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures" for both financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The Company has not elected the fair value option for any of its assets or liabilities.
Reclassifications	Reclassifications. Certain reclassifications have been made in the presentation of the financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 to conform to the presentation of the financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013. These reclassifications had no effect on reported losses, total assets, or stockholders' equity as previously reported.
Use of Estimates	Use of Estimates. The accompanying financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and include certain estimates and assumptions, which affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Accordingly, actual results may differ from those estimates.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Description of Business and Basis of Presentation

he Company has developed and ultimately intends to commercialize its innovative PAD based products for the over-the-counter (“OTC”) and laboratory markets based on its patented technology platforms, and its genomic diagnostics, based on its patented PadKit® technology for the worldwide healthcare industry. These platforms include: inSync®, Unique™, PadKit®, and OEM branded OTC and laboratory testing products based on the Company’s core intellectual property related to its PAD technology. These products are intended for the treatment of hemorrhoids, minor vaginal infection, urinary incontinence, general catamenial uses and other medical needs.

The Company’s efforts to commercialize its products are currently contingent on additional financing to execute its business and operating plan, which is currently focused on the commercialization of the Company’s PAD technology either directly or through a joint venture or other relationship intended to increase shareholder value. In the interim, the Company has executed a plan to substantially reduce expenses, including headcount, and to restructure and/or eliminate many of its outstanding liabilities. This plan was necessary in order for the Company to continue as a going concern. No assurances can be given that the Company will obtain financing, or otherwise successfully develop a business and operating plan or enter into an alternative relationship to commercialize the Company’s PAD technology.

On June 20, 2012, the Company formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, QX Labs, Inc. (“QX”), and convey and transfer to QX all intellectual property and assets related to the Company’s diagnostic testing business ("Diagnostics Business"). The Diagnostic Business is based principally on the Company’s proprietary PadKit® technology, which the Company believes provides a patented platform technology for genomic diagnostics, including fetal genomics. Following the transfer of the Diagnostics Business to QX, the Company’s other business line will consist of its over-the-counter business, including the InSync feminine hygienic interlabial pad, the Unique pad for hemorrhoid application, and other treated miniforms (the “OTC Business”), as well as established and continuing licensing relationships related to the OTC Business. Management believes the creation of QX permits the Company to more efficiently explore different options to maximize the value of the Diagnostics Business and the OTC Business (collectively, the “Businesses”), with the objective of maximizing the value of the Businesses for the benefit of the Company and its stakeholders.

The Company’s current focus is to develop a financing and operating plan to: (i) leverage its broad-based intellectual property (IP) and patent portfolio to develop new and innovative diagnostic products; (ii) commercialize its OTC Business and Diagnostics Business, either directly or through joint ventures, mergers or similar transactions intended to capitalize on commercial opportunities presented by each of the Businesses; (iii) contract manufacturing to third parties while maintaining control over the manufacturing process; and (iv) maximize the value of the Company’s investments in non-core assets. As a result of its current financial condition, however, the Company’s efforts in the short-term will be focused on obtaining financing necessary to maintain the Company as a going concern.

Recent Developments

Settlement of GUSA Note Receivable and Litigation. On May 24, 2013, the Company and Genomics USA, Inc. ("GUSA") settled the Company’s complaint filed against GUSA seeking to recover all amounts due the Company under the terms of a promissory note in the principal amount of $200,000 (the "GUSA Note"). The Complaint was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, and sought repayment of all amounts due under the terms of the GUSA Note, and accrued interest thereon, plus attorney's fees. The settlement agreement entered into by the parties provides for the payment to the Company of $200,000, of which $20,000 was paid on June 7, 2013, and $10,000 per month shall be paid on the 7^th day of each consecutive month thereafter for a total of 18 months.

Issuance of Additional Promissory Notes. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company issued two additional promissory notes to two investors in the principal amounts of $2,000, and $25,000 (together, the “Notes”). As additional consideration for the purchase of the Notes, the Company issued an aggregate total of 27,000 warrants to purchase shares of FluoroPharma Medical, Inc. (“FPMI”) common stock, for $1.00 per share (“FPMI Warrants”), to the investors. The FPMI Warrants expire on February 15, 2019.

The Notes accrue interest at the rate of 6% annually. The Notes were due and payable on June 30, 2013 (the “Maturity Date”), and are currently payable upon demand by the Note holders. The Notes are convertible at the option of the holder into shares of the Company's common stock at a conversion price equal to $0.10 per share. In addition, the holder may exchange the Notes for common stock in the event the Company consummates a qualified financing (the “Qualified Financing”), which is defined in the Notes as a financing resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of at least $500,000. While the Company intends to pay the Notes using proceeds from a Qualified Financing, such Qualified Financing may not occur prior to the date the holder of the Notes demands repayment.

The Company presently intends to issue additional Promissory Notes to finance its current working capital needs. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to issue additional Promissory Notes.

Management Statement Regarding Going Concern

The Company currently is not generating revenue from operations. The Company has historically financed its operations primarily through issuances of equity and the proceeds from the issuance of promissory notes. In the past, the Company also provided for its cash needs by issuing common stock, options and warrants for certain operating costs, including consulting and professional fees, as well as divesting its minority equity interests and equity-linked investments.

The Company’s history of operating losses, limited cash resources and the absence of an operating plan necessary to capitalize on the Company’s assets raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, absent a strengthening of our cash position. Management is currently pursuing various funding options, including seeking debt or equity financing, licensing opportunities and the sale of certain investment holdings, as well as a strategic, merger or other transaction to obtain additional funding to continue the development of, and to successfully commercialize, its products. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in its efforts. Should the Company be unable to obtain adequate financing or generate sufficient revenue in the future, the Company’s business, result of operations, liquidity and financial condition would be materially and adversely harmed, and the Company will be unable to continue as a going concern.

There can be no assurance that, assuming the Company is able to strengthen its cash position, it will achieve sufficient revenue or profitable operations to continue as a going concern.

Accounting for Share-Based Payments

Accounting for Share-Based Payments. The Company follows the provisions of ASC Topic 718, which establishes the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges equity securities for services and requires companies to expense the estimated fair value of these awards over the requisite service period. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model in determining fair value. Accordingly, compensation cost has been recognized using the fair value method and expected term accrual requirements as prescribed, which resulted in employee stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 of $30,000 and $30,000, respectively and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 of $27,000.

The Company accounts for share-based payments granted to non-employees in accordance with ASC Topic 505, “Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees.” The Company determines the fair value of the stock-based payment as either the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. If the fair value of the equity instruments issued is used, it is measured using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of either (1) the date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached, or (2) the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete.

In the case of modifications, the Black-Scholes model is used to value the warrant on the modification date by applying the revised assumptions. The difference between the fair value of the warrants prior to the modification and after the modification determines the incremental value. The Company has modified warrants in connection with the issuance of certain notes and note extensions. These modified warrants were originally issued in connection with previous private placement investments. In the case of debt issuances, the warrants were accounted for as original issuance discount based on their relative fair values. When modified in connection with a note issuance, the Company recognizes the incremental value as a part of the debt discount calculation, using its relative fair value in accordance with ASC Topic 470-20, “Debt with Conversion and Other Options.” When modified in connection with note extensions, the Company recognized the incremental value as prepaid interest, which is expensed over the term of the extension.

The fair value of each share based payment is estimated on the measurement date using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions, which are determined at the beginning of each year and utilized in all calculations for that year:

During 2012, the fair value of each share based payment is estimated on the measurement date using the Black-Scholes model using an average risk free interest rate of 3.08%, expected volatility of 261%, and a dividend yield of zero. During 2011, the fair value of each share based payment is estimated on the measurement date using the Black-Scholes model using a risk free interest rate of 3.22%, expected volatility of 300%, and a dividend yield of zero.

Risk-Free Interest Rate. The interest rate used is based on the yield of a U.S. Treasury security as of the beginning of the year.

Expected Volatility. The Company calculates the expected volatility based on historical volatility of monthly stock prices over a three year period.

Dividend Yield. The Company has never paid cash dividends, and does not currently intend to pay cash dividends, and thus has assumed a 0% dividend yield.

Expected Term. For options, the Company has no history of employee exercise patterns. Therefore, the Company uses the option term as the expected term. For warrants, the Company uses the actual term of the warrant.

Pre-Vesting Forfeitures. Estimates of pre-vesting option forfeitures are based on Company experience. The Company will adjust its estimate of forfeitures over the requisite service period based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Changes in estimated forfeitures will be recognized through a cumulative catch-up adjustment in the period of change and will also impact the amount of compensation expense to be recognized in future periods.

Black Scholes Option Pricing Model. During the second quarter of 2013, the Company has used an average risk-free interest rate of 3%, a dividend yield of 0%, and an average volatility of 261% to calculate the fair value of equity securities issued for services.

Earnings per Share

Earnings per Share. The Company computes net income (loss) per common share in accordance with ASC Topic 260. Net income (loss) per share is based upon the weighted average number of outstanding common shares and the dilutive effect of common share equivalents, such as options and warrants to purchase common stock, convertible preferred stock and convertible notes, if applicable, that are outstanding each year. Basic and diluted earnings per share were the same at the reporting dates of the accompanying financial statements, as including common stock equivalents in the calculation of diluted earnings per share would have been antidilutive.

As of June 30, 2013, the Company had outstanding options exercisable for 304,500 shares of its common stock, warrants exercisable for 2,132,500 shares of its common stock, and preferred shares convertible into 20,416,228 shares of its common stock. The above options, warrants, and preferred shares were deemed to be antidilutive for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.

As of June 30, 2012, the Company had outstanding options exercisable for 304,500 shares of its common stock, warrants exercisable for 6,529,873 shares of its common stock, and preferred shares convertible into 20,416,228 shares of its common stock. The above options, warrants, and preferred shares were deemed to be antidilutive for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Fair value

Fair Value. The Company has adopted ASC Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures" for both financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The Company has not elected the fair value option for any of its assets or liabilities.

Reclassifications

Reclassifications. Certain reclassifications have been made in the presentation of the financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 to conform to the presentation of the financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013. These reclassifications had no effect on reported losses, total assets, or stockholders' equity as previously reported.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates. The accompanying financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and include certain estimates and assumptions, which affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Accordingly, actual results may differ from those estimates.

- Definition

Disclosure of accounting policy for computing basic and diluted earnings or loss per share for each class of common stock and participating security. Addresses all significant policy factors, including any antidilutive items that have been excluded from the computation and takes into account stock dividends, splits and reverse splits that occur after the balance sheet date of the latest reporting period but before the issuance of the financial statements.

+ References+ Details

- Definition

Disclosure of accounting policy for stock option and stock incentive plans. This disclosure may include (1) the types of stock option or incentive plans sponsored by the entity (2) the groups that participate in (or are covered by) each plan (3) significant plan provisions and (4) how stock compensation is measured, and the methodologies and significant assumptions used to determine that measurement.

+ References+ Details

- Definition

Disclosure of accounting policy for the use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

+ References+ Details