XML 52 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
3 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2016
Business Combinations [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Note  12.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The FASB defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous markets for the asset and liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company estimates fair value of its financial instruments utilizing an established three-level hierarchy in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date as follows:

 

 

 

 

Level 1 –

Valuation is based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

 

 

 

Level 2 –

Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, or other inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instruments.

 

 

 

Level 3 –

Valuation is based upon other unobservable inputs that are significant to the fair value measurements.

The classification of fair value measurements within the hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the measurement. At September 30, 2016, the Company had foreign currency forward contracts recorded at fair value. The fair values of these instruments were measured using valuations based upon quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets (Level 2) and are valued by reference to similar financial instruments, adjusted for credit risk, restrictions and other terms specific to the contracts. Foreign currency gain related to these contracts was immaterial for the three months ended September 30, 2016. The Company also had a contingent earnout arrangement related to the acquisition of EpiWorks recorded at fair value. The EpiWorks earnout arrangement provides up to a maximum of $6.0 million of additional cash payments based upon EpiWorks achieving certain agreed upon financial and operational targets for capacity, wafer output and gross margin, which if earned would be payable for the achievement of each specific annual target over the next three years. The fair value of the contingent earnout arrangement was measured using valuations based upon other unobservable inputs that are significant to the fair value measurement (Level 3).  

The following table provides a summary by level of the fair value of financial instruments that are measured on a recurring basis for the periods presented ($000):

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2016 Using:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices in

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Active Markets

 

 

Other

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

for Identical

 

 

Observable

 

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

Inputs

 

 

Inputs

 

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

(Level 1)

 

 

(Level 2)

 

 

(Level 3)

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency forward contracts

 

$

163

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

163

 

 

$

-

 

Contingent earnout arrangement

 

$

4,410

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

4,410

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2016 Using:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices in

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Active Markets

 

 

Other

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

for Identical

 

 

Observable

 

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

Inputs

 

 

Inputs

 

 

 

June 30, 2016

 

 

(Level 1)

 

 

(Level 2)

 

 

(Level 3)

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency forward contracts

 

$

511

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

511

 

 

$

-

 

Contingent earnout arrangement

 

$

4,352

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

4,352

 

The Company’s policy is to report transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy at fair values as of the beginning of the period in which the transfers occur. There were no transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the three months ended September 30, 2016.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending fair value measurements of the Company’s level 3 contingent earnout arrangement related to the acquisition of EpiWorks ($000):

 

 

Significant

 

 

Unobservable Inputs

 

 

(Level 3)

 

Balance at July 1, 2016

$

4,352

 

Payments

 

-

 

Changes in fair value

 

58

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at September 30, 2016

$

4,410

 

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents are considered Level 1 among the fair value hierarchy and approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of those instruments. The Company’s borrowings are considered Level 2 among the fair value hierarchy and are variable interest rates and accordingly their carrying amounts approximate fair value.