XML 50 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Fair Value Measurements 
Fair Value Measurements

Note 17—Fair Value Measurements

 

The Company follows the framework within the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires fair value to be determined based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. These requirements establish market or observable inputs as the preferred source of values. Assumptions based on hypothetical transactions are used in the absence of market inputs. The Company does not have any non-financial instruments accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis.

 

The valuation techniques required are based upon observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s market assumptions. These two types of inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:

 

Level 1     Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

 

Level 2                Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.

 

Level 3     Significant inputs to the valuation model are unobservable.

 

The Company believes that the assets or liabilities subject to such standards with fair value disclosure requirements are short-term investments, which are independently valued using market observable Level 1 inputs, and contingent consideration payments (Note 16), which were valued using the income approach and Level 3 unobservable inputs within the fair value hierarchy. The primary Level 3 inputs used to value the contingent consideration payments were probability weighted payout projections and discount rates. The Company’s Level 1 short-term investments consist primarily of certificates of deposit with original maturities of twelve months or less. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair values of short-term investments were $90,730 and $98,341, respectively.  As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair values of the contingent consideration payments were nil and $56,668, respectively. The impact of the credit risk related to these financial assets is immaterial.

 

The table below sets forth a summary of changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 items for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

 

Balance at December 31, 2010

 

$

56,668

 

Accretion of discount on contingent consideration liabilities

 

1,145

 

Payment of contingent acquisition related obligations

 

(40,000

)

Change in contingent acquisition related obligations

 

(17,813

)

Balance at September 30, 2011

 

$

 

 

The Company does not have any other significant financial or non-financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.