Exhibit 99.2

MBIA INSURANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011

and for the years ended

December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

MBIA INSURANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

	PAGE
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		1
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011		2
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010		3
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010		4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010		5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010		6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		7

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of MBIA Insurance Corporation:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MBIA Insurance Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, there is a significant risk that one counterparty could present substantial contractual claims for which the Company may not have sufficient resources to meet their contractual obligations that raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, NY

February 27, 2013

1

MBIA INSURANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands except share and per share amounts)

	December 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Assets
Investments:
Fixed-maturity securities held as available-for-sale, at fair value (amortized cost $708,068 and $1,110,605)	$	730,440	$	1,108,645
Investments carried at fair value		3,825		—
Short-term investments held as available-for-sale, at fair value (amortized cost $157,791 and $219,449)		158,610		219,526
Other investments (includes investments at fair value of $611 and $7,721)		28,139		35,546
Total investments		921,014		1,363,717
Cash and cash equivalents		396,788		136,361
Secured loan to Parent		—		300,000
Accrued investment income		7,085		12,501
Premiums receivable		1,228,381		1,359,568
Deferred acquisition costs		508,600		623,127
Prepaid reinsurance premiums		1,370,711		1,698,740
Insurance loss recoverable		3,648,025		3,045,987
Reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses		159,338		178,044
Property and equipment, at cost (less accumulated depreciation of $60,186 and $58,755)		1,633		2,510
Receivable for investments sold		65		15,820
Derivative assets		6,764		7,861
Current income taxes		7,071		—
Deferred income taxes, net		1,239,427		1,711,442
Other assets		19,744		23,495
Assets of consolidated variable interest entities:
Cash		176,342		160,123
Investments held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value of $2,674,336 and $2,469,285)		2,829,200		2,840,000
Fixed-maturity securities at fair value		1,734,774		2,884,265
Loans receivable at fair value		1,880,586		2,045,608
Loan repurchase commitments		1,086,040		1,076,765
Derivative assets		333		449,740
Total assets	$	17,221,921	$	19,935,674
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Liabilities:
Unearned premium revenue	$	2,507,839	$	2,953,389
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves		845,573		836,331
Reinsurance premiums payable		313,287		351,732
Long-term debt		2,604,063		2,082,655
Deferred fee revenue		409,458		514,139
Payable for investments purchased		—		34
Derivative liabilities		2,933,229		4,807,647
Current income taxes		—		26,060
Other liabilities		403,315		276,695
Liabilities of consolidated variable interest entities:
Variable interest entity notes (includes financial instruments carried at fair value of $3,675,182 and $4,786,570)		6,504,382		7,626,570
Derivative liabilities		161,745		824,819
Total liabilities		16,682,891		20,300,071
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 18)
Shareholders’ equity (deficit):
Series A non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, par value $1,000 per share, liquidation value $100,000 per share, authorized—4,000, issued and outstanding—2,759		27,598		27,598
Common stock, par value $220.80 per share; authorized, issued and outstanding—67,936 shares		15,000		15,000
Additional paid-in capital		981,735		985,835
Retained earnings (deficit)		(510,283)		(1,396,905)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax of $1,642 and $8,599		24,980		4,075
Total shareholders’ equity (deficit)		539,030		(364,397)
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity (deficit)	$	17,221,921	$	19,935,674

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

2

MBIA INSURANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2012		2011		2010
Revenues:
Premiums earned:
Scheduled premiums earned	$	182,375	$	228,667	$	248,610
Refunding premiums earned		13,237		31,777		19,721
Premiums earned (net of ceded premiums of $299,783, $254,920, and $261,564)		195,612		260,444		268,331
Net investment income		19,173		72,235		119,129
Fees and reimbursements		141,134		99,291		194,140
Change in fair value of insured derivatives:
Realized gains (losses) and other settlements on insured derivatives		(407,179)		(2,372,313)		(161,952)
Unrealized gains (losses) on insured derivatives		1,869,664		(314,095)		(700,273)
Net change in fair value of insured derivatives		1,462,485		(2,686,408)		(862,225)
Net gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value and foreign exchange		42,574		68,300		133,496
Investment losses related to other-than-temporary impairments:
Investment losses related to other-than-temporary impairments		(5,830)		(94,086)		—
Other-than-temporary impairments recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(37,086)		37,086		—
Net investment losses related to other-than-temporary impairments		(42,916)		(57,000)		—
Other net realized gains (losses)		1,175		937		28,609
Revenues of consolidated variable interest entities:
Net investment income		53,013		51,902		52,562
Net gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value and foreign exchange		7,677		160,335		350,901
Other net realized gains (losses)		—		(15,975)		(76,129)
Total revenues		1,879,927		(2,045,939)		208,814
Expenses:
Losses (recoveries) and loss adjustment		28,721		(84,212)		159,422
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs		112,150		133,764		145,937
Operating		129,310		132,971		127,462
Interest		237,456		138,277		135,952
Expenses of consolidated variable interest entities:
Operating		19,703		32,160		27,373
Interest		42,375		42,673		42,063
Total expenses		569,715		395,633		638,209
Income (loss) before income taxes		1,310,212		(2,441,572)		(429,395)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		423,590		(814,524)		(148,189)
Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates		—		—		336
Net income (loss)	$	886,622	$	(1,627,048)	$	(280,870)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

3

MBIA INSURANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(In thousands)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2012		2011		2010
Net income (loss)	$	886,622	$	(1,627,048)	$	(280,870)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period, net of tax of $13,184, $26,031 and $9,301		31,011		81,763		34,793
Less: Reclassification adjustments for (gains) losses included in net income (loss), net of tax of $7,913, $21,944 and $683		(14,695)		(40,754)		1,269
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net		16,316		41,009		36,062
Other-than-temporary impairments on available-for-sale securities:
Other-than-temporary impairments arising during the period, net of tax of $0, $12,980 and $0		—		(24,106)		—
Less: Reclassification adjustments for other-than-temporary impairments included in net income (loss), net of tax of $12,980, $0 and $0		24,106		—		—
Other-than-temporary impairments on available-for-sale securities, net		24,106		(24,106)		—
Foreign currency translation, net of tax of $2,660, $164 and $42,968		(19,517)		(31,105)		(144,846)
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		20,905		(14,202)		(108,784)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	907,527	$	(1,641,250)	$	(389,654)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

4

MBIA INSURANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

For The Years Ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

(In thousands except share amounts)

													Accumulated Total Other Comprehensive
									Additional Paid-in		Retained Earnings				Shareholders’
	Preferred Stock				Common Stock										Equity
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Capital		(Deficit)		Income (Loss)		(Deficit)
Balance, January 1, 2010		2,759	$	27,598		67,936	$	15,000	$	982,664	$	637,834	$	(90,061)	$	1,573,035
ASU 2009-17 transition adjustment
Consolidated variable interest entities, net of taxes of $23,592		—		—		—		—		—		(123,659)		131,781		8,122
Deconsolidated variable interest entities, net of tax of $1,756		—		—		—		—		—		(3,162)		85,341		82,179
Total ASU 2009-17 transition adjustment		—		—		—		—		—		(126,821)		217,122		90,301
Net income (loss)		—		—		—		—		—		(280,870)		—		(280,870)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		—		—		—		—		—		—		(108,784)		(108,784)
Capital contribution in connection with the sale of real estate		—		—		—		—		494		—		—		494
Share-based compensation, net of tax of $493		—		—		—		—		637		—		—		637
Balance, December 31, 2010		2,759	$	27,598		67,936	$	15,000	$	983,795	$	230,143	$	18,277	$	1,274,813
Net income (loss)		—		—		—		—		—		(1,627,048)		—		(1,627,048)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		—		—		—		—		—		—		(14,202)		(14,202)
Capital contribution in connection with the sale of investments		—		—		—		—		3,620		—		—		3,620
Share-based compensation, net of tax of $3,077		—		—		—		—		(1,580)		—		—		(1,580)
Balance, December 31, 2011		2,759	$	27,598		67,936	$	15,000	$	985,835	$	(1,396,905)	$	4,075	$	(364,397)
Net Income (loss)		—		—		—		—		—		886,622		—		886,622
Other comprehensive income (loss)		—		—		—		—		—		—		20,905		20,905
Share-based compensation, net of tax of $5,602		—		—		—		—		(4,100)		—		—		(4,100)
Balance, December 31, 2012		2,759	$	27,598		67,936	$	15,000	$	981,735	$	(510,283)	$	24,980	$	539,030

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

5

MBIA INSURANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2012		2011		2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Premiums, fees and reimbursements received	$	261,197	$	425,793	$	461,330
Investment income received		358,464		580,994		717,680
Insured derivative losses and commutations paid		(464,069)		(2,476,616)		(894,938)
Financial guarantee losses and loss adjustment expenses paid		(728,072)		(871,961)		(1,433,191)
Proceeds from reinsurance and recoveries		225,660		288,448		386,632
Operating and employee related expenses paid		(146,531)		(155,407)		(264,756)
Interest paid		(305,011)		(378,342)		(409,043)
Income taxes (paid) received		(8,261)		8,803		272,338
Net cash used by operating activities		(806,623)		(2,578,288)		(1,163,948)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of fixed-maturity securities		(517,179)		(863,245)		(600,672)
Purchase of controlling interest in an affiliate, net of cash received		—		—		(26,693)
Sale and redemption of fixed-maturity securities		1,297,334		1,618,650		1,468,150
Proceeds from paydowns on variable interest entity loans		276,479		290,760		860,303
Proceeds from paydowns on the secured loan to Parent		300,000		675,000		625,000
Sale of short-term investments, net		243,701		627,759		424,389
Sale (purchase) of other investments, net		8,403		(24,525)		354
Sale of an entity to an affiliate		—		147,079		—
Payments for derivative settlements		(81,124)		(287,788)		(232,473)
Consolidation/deconsolidation of variable interest entities, net		(50,901)		(432,288)		752,856
Capital expenditures		(555)		(968)		(1,997)
Disposal of fixed assets		—		447		66,393
Net cash provided by investing activities		1,476,158		1,750,881		3,335,610
Cash flows from financing activities:
Principal paydowns of variable interest entity notes		(835,889)		(1,112,318)		(1,488,589)
Proceeds from long-term debt		443,000		1,243,367		—
Repayment of long-term debt		—		—		(276,572)
Redemption of preferred shares		—		—		(26,010)
Dividends paid		—		—		(1,005)
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities		(392,889)		131,049		(1,792,176)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		276,646		(696,358)		379,486
Cash and cash equivalents—beginning of year		296,484		992,842		613,356
Cash and cash equivalents—end of year	$	573,130	$	296,484	$	992,842
Reconciliation of net income (loss) to net cash used by operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	886,622	$	(1,627,048)	$	(280,870)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used by operating activities:
Changes in:
Accrued investment income		5,416		8,692		(2,303)
Premiums receivable		152,309		209,536		268,225
Deferred acquisition costs		114,527		140,946		120,010
Unearned premium revenue		(469,191)		(524,409)		(534,550)
Prepaid reinsurance premiums		328,029		290,031		268,515
Reinsurance premiums payable		(38,445)		(38,017)		(46,747)
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves		9,242		(293,027)		(80,623)
Reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses		18,706		50,804		(52,975)
Insurance loss recoverable		(602,133)		(512,846)		(772,717)
Receivable from affiliates		(5,593)		137,612		(20,923)
Payable to reinsurers on recoverables		100,792		87,244		(3,958)
Accrued interest payable		103,370		—		—
Accounts receivable		53		30		585
Accrued expenses		36,038		(1,009)		(48,820)
Deferred fee revenue		(104,682)		(96,254)		(54,933)
Current income taxes		(33,132)		22,530		288,658
Amortization (accretion) of bond premiums (discounts), net		6,871		(16,365)		(29,892)
Depreciation		1,432		2,486		4,549
Other net realized (gains) losses		(1,175)		15,038		47,520
Investment losses on other-than-temporary impaired investments		42,916		57,000		—
Realized gains and other settlements on insured derivatives		—		—		(613,063)
Unrealized (gains) losses on insured derivatives		(1,869,664)		314,095		700,273
Net (gains) losses on financial instruments at fair value and foreign exchange		(50,251)		(228,636)		(484,397)
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)		448,474		(831,453)		(171,134)
Share-based compensation		1,501		1,497		1,130
Other operating		111,345		253,235		334,492
Total adjustments to net income (loss)		(1,693,245)		(951,240)		(883,078)
Net cash used by operating activities	$	(806,623)	$	(2,578,288)	$	(1,163,948)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

6

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1: Business Developments and Risks and Uncertainties

Summary

MBIA Insurance Corporation is a wholly-owned subsidiary of MBIA Inc. (the “Parent” or “MBIA”). The guarantees of MBIA Insurance Corporation and its subsidiaries (“MBIA Corp.”) insure structured finance and asset-backed obligations, privately issued bonds used for the financing of public purpose projects, which are primarily located outside of the United States (“U.S.”) and that include toll roads, bridges, airports, public transportation facilities, utilities and other types of infrastructure projects serving a substantial public purpose, and obligations of sovereign and sub-sovereign issuers. Structured finance and asset-backed securities (“ABS”) typically are securities repayable from expected cash flows generated by a specified pool of assets, such as residential and commercial mortgages, insurance policies, consumer loans, corporate loans and bonds, trade and export receivables, leases for equipment, aircraft and real property.

Business Developments

As a result of insured losses during the period from 2007 through December 31, 2012, MBIA Corp. has seen ratings downgrades, a near cessation of new insurance business and increasing liquidity pressure. MBIA Corp. has been unable to write meaningful amounts of new insurance business since 2008 and does not expect to write significant new insurance business prior to any upgrade of its credit ratings. As of December 31, 2012, MBIA Corp. was rated B with a negative outlook by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (“S&P”) and Caa2 with a developing outlook by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”).

During the year ended December 31, 2012, MBIA Corp. continued to seek to reduce both the absolute amount and the volatility of its obligations and potential future claim payments through the execution of commutations of insurance policies. The combination of the failure of certain mortgage originators to honor contractual obligations to repurchase ineligible mortgage loans from securitizations MBIA Corp. insured, commutation payments to reduce liabilities and claim payments has increased liquidity pressure on MBIA Corp. The failure of certain mortgage originators, primarily Bank of America, to repurchase ineligible mortgages from securitizations MBIA Corp. insured represents significant breaches of their contractual obligations. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, cash and liquid assets were $345 million and $534 million, respectively. Management believes MBIA Corp.’s current liquidity position is adequate to make expected future claim payments assuming its insured commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) exposures held by Bank of America/Merrill Lynch are commuted as part of a settlement of MBIA Corp.’s put-back claims against Bank of America. No assurance can be given as to whether such a settlement can be timely reached. In the absence of collecting a substantial amount of its put-back recoverables, and in light of the potential for substantial claims in the near-term on its insured CMBS exposure, the related liquidity stress to MBIA Corp. could result in it being placed in a rehabilitation or liquidation proceeding by the New York State Department of Financial Services (“NYSDFS”) (an “MBIA Corp. Proceeding”). Refer to the following “Risks and Uncertainties” section for a discussion of factors that could have an adverse effect on MBIA Corp.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, MBIA Corp. made $1.2 billion in gross claim payments, and commuted $13.4 billion of gross insured exposure, primarily comprising structured CMBS pools, commercial real estate (“CRE”) collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”), investment grade corporate CDOs, ABS CDOs, and subprime residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) transactions.

The reference herein to “ineligible” mortgage loans refers to those mortgage loans that MBIA Corp. believes failed to comply with the representations and warranties made by the sellers/servicers of the securitizations to which those mortgage loans were sold (including mortgage loans that failed to comply with the related underwriting criteria), based on MBIA Corp.’s assessment of such mortgage loans’ compliance with such representations and warranties, which included information provided by third-party review firms. The sellers/servicers have contractual obligations to cure, repurchase or replace such ineligible mortgage loans. These expected recoveries are generally referred to as “put-backs”, and are calculated based on MBIA Corp.’s assessment of a range of possible collection outcomes. MBIA Corp.’s assessment of the ineligibility of individual mortgage loans is being challenged by the sellers/servicers of the securitizations in litigation and there is no assurance that MBIA Corp.’s determinations will prevail.

7

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1: Business Developments and Risks and Uncertainties (continued)

Risks and Uncertainties

MBIA Corp.’s consolidated financial statements include estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. The outcome of certain significant risks and uncertainties could cause MBIA Corp. to revise its estimates and assumptions or could cause actual results to differ from MBIA Corp.’s estimates. While MBIA Corp. believes, subject to the qualifications described above, that it continues to have sufficient capital and liquidity to meet all of its expected obligations, if one or more possible adverse events were to occur, its statutory capital, financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected. Significant risks and uncertainties that could affect amounts reported in MBIA Corp.’s financial statements in future periods include, but are not limited to, the following:

• Management’s expected liquidity and capital forecast for MBIA Corp. for 2013 reflects adequate resources to pay expected claims. However, there is a significant risk to this forecast as MBIA Corp.’s forecast assumes a settlement with Bank of America including a commutation of insured CMBS exposure, as well as collection of a substantial portion of MBIA Corp.’s put-back recoverable recorded against Bank of America/Countrywide. Management believes that a timely settlement will occur because it believes a comprehensive settlement is in the best interests of MBIA Corp. and Bank of America. If, however, MBIA Corp. is not able to reach a comprehensive settlement with Bank of America and Bank of America’s subsidiary, Merrill Lynch, presents substantial claims on its policies covering CMBS pools, MBIA Corp. may have insufficient resources to cover Bank of America’s expected claims. While no claims have been made on these CMBS exposures to date, given the significant erosion of the deductible in some of the underlying insured credit default swaps (“CDS”), MBIA Corp. expects that Bank of America /Merrill Lynch will have the ability to make a claim in the near term. In addition, Bank of America/Merrill Lynch is also one of two remaining plaintiffs in the litigation challenging the establishment of National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation (“National”) (“Transformation Litigation”), and developments in this litigation may impact the amount MBIA Corp. ultimately collects in a comprehensive settlement. While management believes it is more likely than not that a settlement will be reached, which would alleviate its liquidity risk, there can be no assurance such a settlement will be reached on mutually acceptable terms. As a result of the risk that MBIA Corp. may not reach a settlement with Bank of America within a reasonable period of time, management has concluded that there is a significant risk of an MBIA Corp. Proceeding that raises substantial doubt about MBIA Corp.’s ability to continue as a going concern. MBIA Corp.’s financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. In the event of an MBIA Corp. Proceeding, MBIA Corp. may be subject to, among other things, the following:

• CDS counterparties may seek to terminate CDS contracts insured by MBIA Corp. and MBIA UK Insurance Limited (“MBIA UK”) and make market-based damage claims (irrespective of whether actual credit-related losses are expected under the underlying exposure), which claims could aggregate $7.0 billion or more;

• Medium-term notes (“MTNs”) issued by MBIA’s subsidiaries, MBIA Global Funding, LLC (“GFL”) and Meridian Funding Company, LLC (“Meridian”), which are insured by MBIA Corp., would accelerate. To the extent GFL failed to pay the accelerated amounts under the GFL MTNs or the collateral securing the Meridian MTNs was deemed insufficient to pay the accelerated amounts under the Meridian MTNs, the MTN holders would have policy claims against MBIA Corp. for scheduled payments of interest and principal;

• An MBIA Corp. Proceeding may result in a default under certain collateralized investment agreements of MBIA that are insured by MBIA Corp., and to the extent MBIA fails to pay the accelerated amounts under these investment agreements or the collateral securing these investment agreements is deemed insufficient to pay the accelerated amounts due, the holders of the investment agreements would have policy claims against MBIA Corp.;

• Payments under MBIA Corp. insurance policies could be suspended, delayed or reduced, in whole or in part;

8

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1: Business Developments and Risks and Uncertainties (continued)

• An acceleration of the surplus notes issued by MBIA Corp. and a possible reduction or further delay or suspension of the amounts due;

• MBIA Corp.’s ability to carry out tax planning strategies or to realize the benefit of its deferred tax asset could be materially impaired. This may cause it to record additional allowances against a portion or all of its deferred tax assets. Refer to “Note 11: Income Taxes” for information about MBIA Corp.’s deferred tax assets. In addition, MBIA Corp. is currently included in the consolidated tax return of MBIA Inc. An MBIA Corp. Proceeding could result in challenges to the tax sharing arrangement among the MBIA affiliates that might adversely affect management’s ability to manage taxes efficiently;

• Approval of the rehabilitator and the rehabilitation court (or liquidator and liquidation court, as the case may be) may be required for a variety of actions of importance to MBIA Corp. and its policyholders, including, without limitation, settlement of MBIA Corp.’s put-back litigation (including against Bank of America) and commutation of MBIA Corp.-insured exposures (including insured CMBS exposures held by Bank of America);

• The rehabilitator or liquidator would replace the Board of Directors of MBIA Corp. and take control of the operations and assets of MBIA Corp., which may result in changes to its strategies and management;

• MBIA Corp. would be subject to significant additional expenses arising from the appointment of the rehabilitator or liquidator, as receiver, and payment of the fees and expenses of the advisors to such rehabilitator or liquidator; and

• A default under and an acceleration of MBIA Corp.’s secured loan from National (the “National Secured Loan”).

• Incurred losses from insured RMBS have declined from their peaks. However, due to the large percentage of ineligible mortgage loans included within the MBIA Corp.-insured second-lien portfolio, performance remains difficult to predict and losses could ultimately be in excess of MBIA Corp.’s current estimated loss reserves. In addition, MBIA Corp.’s efforts to recover losses from second-lien RMBS originators, including but not limited to Bank of America, could be delayed, settled at amounts below its contractual claims or potentially settled at amounts below those recorded on its balance sheets prepared under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and statutory accounting principles (“U.S. STAT”). As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, MBIA Corp.’s estimated recoveries after income taxes calculated at the federal statutory rate of 35%, were $2.3 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively, which was 432% and negative 556% of MBIA Corp.’s GAAP consolidated total shareholders’ equity and deficit, respectively. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the related measures calculated under U.S. STAT were 162% and 89%, respectively, of the statutory capital of MBIA Corp. Statutory capital includes policyholders’ surplus and contingency reserves. Refer to “Note 6: Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves” for information about MBIA Corp.’s RMBS reserves and recoveries.

• Further economic stress might cause increases in MBIA Corp.’s loss estimates on its remaining exposure, particularly within its higher risk CMBS pool and ABS CDO exposures. As of December 31, 2012, MBIA Corp.’s CMBS pool gross par outstanding, including exposure held by Bank of America, and ABS CDO gross par outstanding was approximately $15.6 billion and $4.3 billion, respectively. MBIA Corp.’s primary strategy for managing its CMBS pool and ABS CDO exposures has been commutations. Consistent with this strategy, in the fourth quarter of 2012, MBIA Corp. agreed with a CDS counterparty on a commutation of certain potentially volatile policies insuring ABS CDO, structured CMBS pools and CRE CDO transactions. The agreement was subject to the approval by the NYSDFS of a request to draw on the National Secured Loan in order to finance the commutation, as well as the receipt by MBIA Corp. of confirmation from the NYSDFS of its non-disapproval of the commutation. MBIA Corp. requested the NYSDFS to confirm its non-disapproval of the commutation and for approval of a loan under the National Secured Loan or for approval of an alternative financing structure to finance the commutation. Subsequent to December 31, 2012, those requests were denied. MBIA Corp.’s ability to

9

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1: Business Developments and Risks and Uncertainties (continued)

commute insured transactions is limited by available liquidity, including the availability of intercompany loans under the National Secured Loan and the use of other available financing structures and liquidity, all of which could be subject to regulatory approval by the NYSDFS. There can be no assurance that MBIA Corp. will be able to fund further commutations by borrowing from National or otherwise. Refer to “Note 6: Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves” for information about MBIA Corp.’s estimate of losses on its exposures.

• As of December 31, 2012, MBIA Corp. was not in compliance with a requirement under New York Insurance Law (“NYIL”) to hold qualifying assets in an amount at least equal to its insurance liabilities. In order to be in compliance, MBIA Corp. has requested approval from the NYSDFS to release a portion of its contingency reserves. To date, such request remains outstanding. In addition, as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2012, MBIA Corp. exceeded its aggregate risk limits under NYIL. MBIA Corp. has filed a formal notification with the NYSDFS regarding the overage and submitted a plan to achieve compliance with its limits. While the NYSDFS has not taken action against MBIA Corp., the NYSDFS may restrict MBIA Corp. from making commutation or other payments or may take other remedial actions for failing to meet these requirements.

• In the event the economy and the markets to which MBIA Corp. is exposed do not improve, or decline, the unrealized losses on insured credit derivatives could increase, causing additional stress in MBIA Corp.’s reported financial results. In addition, volatility in the relationship between MBIA Corp.’s credit spreads and those on underlying collateral assets of insured credit derivatives can create significant unrealized gains and losses in MBIA Corp.’s reported results of operations. Refer to “Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments” for information about MBIA Corp.’s valuation of insured credit derivatives.

Key Lending Agreements with Affiliates

MBIA Corp. has entered into agreements with affiliates as follows:

National Secured Loan

In 2011, National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation provided the $1.1 billion secured loan to MBIA Insurance Corporation in order to enable MBIA Insurance Corporation to fund settlements and commutations of its insurance policies. This loan was approved by the NYSDFS as well as by the boards of directors of MBIA Inc., MBIA Insurance Corporation and National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation. The National Secured Loan has a fixed annual interest rate of 7% and a maturity date of December 2016. MBIA Insurance Corporation has the option to defer payments of interest when due by capitalizing interest amounts to the loan balance, subject to the collateral value exceeding certain thresholds. MBIA Insurance Corporation has elected to defer the interest payments due under the loan. MBIA Insurance Corporation’s obligation to repay the loan is secured by a pledge of collateral having an estimated value in excess of the notional amount of the loan as of December 31, 2012, which collateral comprised the following future receivables of MBIA Corp.: (i) its right to receive put-back recoveries related to ineligible mortgage loans included in its insured second-lien RMBS transactions; (ii) future recoveries on defaulted insured second-lien RMBS transactions resulting from expected excess spread generated by performing loans in such transactions; and (iii) future installment premiums. During the year ended December 31, 2012, MBIA Insurance Corporation borrowed an additional $443 million under the National Secured Loan with the approval of the NYSDFS at the same terms as the original loan to fund additional commutations of its insurance policies. As of December 31, 2012, the outstanding principal amount under this loan was $1.7 billion. MBIA Insurance Corporation may seek to borrow additional amounts under the loan in the future. Any such increase or other amendment to the terms of the loan would be subject to regulatory approval by the NYSDFS.

10

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1: Business Developments and Risks and Uncertainties (continued)

MBIA Corp. Secured Loan

MBIA Corp., as lender, maintained a master repurchase agreement with MBIA Inc. (“MBIA Corp. Secured Loan”) for the benefit of MBIA Inc.’s asset/liability products business, which totaled $2.0 billion at inception and was scheduled to mature in May 2012, as amended. This loan was repaid in May 2012 and there have been no further draws. During 2012, the average interest rate on the MBIA Corp. Secured Loan was 2.51% through the repayment in May 2012. Also in May 2012, the NYSDFS approved the maturity extension of the MBIA Corp. Secured Loan to May 2013 with a maximum outstanding amount of $450 million, subject to MBIA Corp. obtaining prior regulatory approval from the NYSDFS for any draws under the facility.

Structured Finance and International Insurance Business

The insurance policies issued by MBIA Corp. generally provide unconditional and irrevocable guarantees of the payments of the principal of, and interest or other amounts owing on, insured obligations when due or, in the event MBIA Corp. has the right at its discretion to accelerate insured obligations upon default or otherwise, upon MBIA Corp.’s acceleration. Certain investment agreement contracts written by MBIA Inc. are insured by MBIA Corp. If MBIA Inc. were to have insufficient assets to pay amounts due, MBIA Corp. would be called upon to make such payments under its insurance policies. MBIA Corp. also insures debt obligations of the following affiliates:

• MBIA Inc.;

• GFL;

• Meridian;

• LaCrosse Financial Products, LLC (“LaCrosse”), a wholly-owned affiliate, in which MBIA Corp. has written insurance policies guaranteeing the obligations under CDS, including termination payments that may become due in certain circumstances including the occurrence of certain insolvency or payment defaults under the CDS contracts.

MBIA Corp.’s guarantees insure structured finance and asset-backed obligations, privately issued bonds used for the financing of public purpose projects, which are primarily located outside of the U.S. and that include toll roads, bridges, airports, public transportation facilities, utilities and other types of infrastructure projects serving a substantial public purpose, and obligations of sovereign-related and sub-sovereign issuers. Structured finance and ABS typically are securities repayable from expected cash flows generated by a specified pool of assets, such as residential and commercial mortgages, insurance policies, consumer loans, corporate loans and bonds, trade and export receivables, leases for equipment, aircraft and real property. Since the beginning of the economic downturn in 2008, the collateral underlying many of MBIA Corp.’s insured structured finance transactions has experienced diminished value and financial stress. Although MBIA Corp.’s current reserves represent its estimate of expected losses based on all available information, there is a possibility such losses could increase significantly. A material increase in losses in MBIA Corp.’s structured finance insured portfolio could have a material adverse effect on its statutory capital, financial condition, cash flows, and results of operations.

MBIA Corp. owns MBIA UK, a financial guarantee insurance company licensed in the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) that issued financial guarantee insurance in the member countries of the European Economic Area and other regions outside the U.S. MBIA Corp. issued financial guarantee insurance in Mexico through MBIA México, S.A. de C.V.

In February 2009, after receiving the required regulatory approvals, MBIA Inc. established and capitalized National as a U.S. public finance-only financial guarantor, which was previously named MBIA Insurance Corp. of Illinois (“MBIA Illinois”) and previously owned by MBIA Insurance Corporation. In connection with the establishment of National, the stock of MBIA Illinois was transferred to a newly established intermediate holding

11

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1: Business Developments and Risks and Uncertainties (continued)

company, which is wholly owned by MBIA Inc. Additionally, National was further capitalized with approximately $2.1 billion from funds distributed by MBIA Insurance Corporation to MBIA Inc. as a dividend and return of capital, which MBIA Inc. contributed to National through the intermediate holding company.

In February 2009, MBIA Corp. entered into a quota share reinsurance agreement effective January 1, 2009 pursuant to which MBIA Insurance Corporation ceded all of its U.S. public finance exposure to National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation and into an assignment agreement under which MBIA Insurance Corporation assigned its rights and obligations with respect to the U.S. public finance business that MBIA Insurance Corporation assumed from Financial Guaranty Insurance Corporation (“FGIC”). The exposure transferred to National under the reinsurance and assignment agreements totaled $553.7 billion of net par outstanding. The reinsurance and assignment enables covered policyholders and certain ceding reinsurers to make claims for payment directly against National in accordance with the terms of those agreements.

To provide additional protection to its policyholders, National also issued second-to-pay policies for the benefit of the policyholders covered by the above reinsurance and assignment agreements. These second-to-pay policies, which are direct obligations of National, are held by a trustee and provide that if MBIA Insurance Corporation or FGIC, as applicable, do not pay valid claims of their policyholders; the policyholders will then be able to make claims directly against National.

MBIA Corp. is no longer insuring new credit derivative contracts except in transactions related to the reduction of existing derivative exposure. The structured finance market continues to recover from the global credit crisis with new issuance volume, though increasing, still well below historical averages. It is unclear how or when MBIA Corp. may be able to re-engage this market.

In 2010, the accounting guidance for the consolidation of variable interest entities (“VIEs”) was amended and MBIA Corp. was required to consolidate certain entities that are designed as VIEs where MBIA Corp. has contractual rights under insurance policies to direct the activities of the VIE when performance and other triggers were breached. MBIA Corp. does not believe there is any difference in the risks and profitability of financial guarantees provided to VIEs compared with other financial guarantees written by MBIA Corp.

Note 2: Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. As additional information becomes available or actual amounts become determinable, the recorded estimates are revised and reflected in operating results.

Certain amounts have been reclassified in prior years’ consolidated financial statements to conform to the current presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on total revenues, expenses, assets, liabilities or shareholders’ equity for all periods presented.

Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of MBIA Insurance Corporation, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and all other entities in which MBIA Corp. has a controlling financial interest. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. MBIA Corp. determines whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity by first evaluating whether an entity is a voting interest entity or a VIE.

12

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2: Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Voting interest entities are entities in which (i) the total equity investment at risk is sufficient to enable an entity to finance its activities independently and (ii) the equity holders have the obligation to absorb losses, the right to receive residual returns and the right to make decisions about the entity’s activities. Voting interest entities are consolidated when MBIA Corp. has a majority voting interest.

VIEs are entities that lack one or more of the characteristics of a voting interest entity. The consolidation of a VIE is required if an entity has a variable interest (such as an equity or debt investment, a beneficial interest, a guarantee, a written put option or a similar obligation) and that variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in the VIE. A controlling financial interest is present when an enterprise has both (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, and (b) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The enterprise with the controlling financial interest, known as the primary beneficiary, is required to consolidate the VIE. MBIA Corp. consolidates all VIEs in which it is the primary beneficiary. Refer to “Note 4: Variable Interest Entities” for additional information.

Statements of Cash Flows

Previously, MBIA Corp. reported its consolidated statements of cash flows using the indirect method. The indirect method uses accrual accounting information to present the cash flows from operations. Effective January 1, 2012, MBIA Corp. elected to present its consolidated statements of cash flows using the direct method. The direct method uses actual cash flow information from MBIA Corp.’s operations, rather than using accrual accounting values. Using either the direct or indirect method, total cash flows from operations are consistent. In addition, the presentation of cash flows from investing and financing activities using either the direct or indirect method are consistent. The change to the direct method for calculating and presenting cash flows from operations was implemented retroactively for all statements of cash flows presented herein. Use of the direct method requires a reconciliation of net income to cash flows from operations. This reconciliation is provided as a supplement directly beneath the statements of cash flows.

Investments

MBIA Corp. classifies its fixed-maturity investments as available-for-sale (“AFS”), held-to-maturity (“HTM”), or trading. AFS investments are reported in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of applicable deferred income taxes, reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) in shareholders’ equity. Bond discounts and premiums are accreted and amortized using the effective yield method over the remaining term of the securities. For MBS and ABS, discounts and premiums are amortized using the retrospective method. For pre-refunded bonds, the remaining term is determined based on the contractual refunding date. Investment income is recorded as earned. Realized gains and losses represent the difference between the amortized cost value and the sale proceeds. The first-in, first-out method is used to identify the investments sold and the resulting realized gains and losses are included as a separate component of revenues.

HTM investments consist mainly of debt securities for which MBIA Corp. has the ability and intent to hold such investments to maturity. These investments are reported in the consolidated balance sheets at amortized cost. Discounts and premiums are amortized using the effective yield method over the remaining term of the assets. Investment income, including interest income, is recorded as earned.

Short-term investments include all fixed-maturity securities with a remaining effective term to maturity of less than one year, commercial paper and money market securities.

Other investments include loan receivables due from an affiliate and MBIA Corp.’s investment in equity securities. The loan receivables bear no interest and are accounted for at the principal amount outstanding. Refer to “Note 17: Related Party Transactions” for more information on the loan receivables. MBIA Corp. records its share of the unrealized gains and losses on equity investments, net of applicable deferred income taxes, in AOCI in shareholders’ equity when it does not have a controlling financial interest in or exert significant influence over an entity (generally a voting interest of less than 20%).

13

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2: Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Fixed-Maturity Securities Held at Fair Value

Fixed-maturity securities at fair value include all fixed-maturity securities held by MBIA Corp. for which changes in fair values are reflected in earnings. These securities are those for which MBIA Corp. has elected the fair value option. Changes in fair value and realized gains and losses from the sale of these securities are reflected in earnings as part of “Net gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value and foreign exchange.” Any interest income is reflected in earnings as part of net investment income. Refer to “Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments” for additional disclosures related to securities for which MBIA Corp. has elected the fair value option.

MBIA Corp. elected, under the fair value option within accounting guidance for financial assets and liabilities, to record certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value. Specifically, MBIA Corp. has elected to apply the fair value option to all financial assets and liabilities of certain consolidated VIEs on a VIE-by-VIE basis.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairments on Investment Securities

MBIA Corp.’s consolidated statements of operations reflect the full impairment (the difference between a security’s amortized cost basis and fair value) on debt securities that MBIA Corp. intends to sell or would more likely than not be required to sell before the expected recovery of the amortized cost basis. For AFS and HTM debt securities that management has no intent to sell and believes that it is more likely than not such securities will not be required to be sold prior to recovery, only the credit loss component of the impairment is recognized in earnings. For AFS securities, the remaining fair value loss is recognized in AOCI, net of applicable deferred income taxes.

MBIA Corp.’s AFS and HTM securities for which the fair value is less than amortized cost are reviewed no less than quarterly in order to determine whether a credit loss exists. This evaluation includes both qualitative and quantitative considerations. In assessing whether a decline in value is related to a credit loss, MBIA Corp. considers several factors, including but not limited to (a) the magnitude and duration of the decline, (b) credit indicators and the reasons for the decline, such as general interest rate or credit spread movements, credit rating downgrades, issuer-specific changes in credit spreads, and the financial condition of the issuer, and (c) any guarantees associated with a security such as those provided by financial guarantee insurance companies. Credit loss expectations for ABS and CDOs are assessed using discounted cash flow modeling, and the recoverability of amortized cost for corporate obligations is generally assessed using issuer-specific credit analyses.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and demand deposits with banks with original maturities of less than 90 days.

Secured Loan to Parent

The secured loan to Parent is accounted for as a collateralized loan and is recorded at contract value plus accrued interest.

This transaction was entered into with a wholly owned subsidiary of MBIA Inc., in connection with the Parent’s collateralized municipal investment agreement activity. MBIA Insurance Corporation minimizes the credit risk that the Parent might be unable to fulfill its contractual obligations by monitoring the Parent’s credit exposure and collateral value and requiring additional collateral to be deposited with MBIA Insurance Corporation when deemed necessary.

Acquisition Costs

MBIA Corp. capitalizes and defers acquisition costs that are directly related to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business. Acquisition costs are costs to acquire an insurance contract which result directly from and is essential to the insurance contracts transaction and would not have been incurred by MBIA Corp. had the contract transaction not occurred.

14

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2: Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

For business produced directly by MBIA Corp., such costs include compensation of employees involved in underwriting and deferred issuance functions, certain rating agency fees, state premium taxes and certain other underwriting expenses, reduced by ceding commission income on premiums ceded to reinsurers. Acquisition costs also generally include ceding commissions paid by MBIA Corp. in connection with assuming business from other financial guarantors. In February 2009, ceding commission income on premiums ceded to National was related to all U.S. public finance exposure, including assumed FGIC business. Such ceding commission exceeded its carrying value of the deferred acquisition costs related to those businesses initially acquired by MBIA Corp., and accordingly, was reflected as deferred revenue. Deferred acquisition costs, net of ceding commissions received, related to non-derivative insured financial guarantee transactions are deferred and amortized over the period in which the related premiums are earned. Acquisition costs related to insured derivative transactions are expensed as incurred. See “Note 3: Recent Accounting Pronouncements” for a discussion on the adoption of the new accounting standard on acquisition costs.

Derivatives

MBIA Corp. has entered into derivative transactions as an additional form of financial guarantee insurance and for purposes of hedging risks associated with existing assets and liabilities. All derivative instruments are recognized at fair value on the balance sheets as either assets or liabilities depending on the rights or obligations under the contract. MBIA Corp. does not designate any derivatives as hedges.

Certain of MBIA Corp.’s financial guarantees that meet the definition of a derivative are subject to a financial guarantee scope exception, as defined by the accounting guidance for derivative instruments and hedging activities. This scope exception provides that these financial guarantee contracts are not subject to accounting guidance for derivative instruments and should be accounted for as financial guarantee insurance contracts only if:

• they provide for payments to be made solely to reimburse the guaranteed party for failure of the debtor to satisfy its required payment obligations under a non-derivative contract, either at pre-specified payment dates or accelerated payment dates, as a result of the occurrence of an event of default (as defined in the financial obligation covered by the guarantee contract) or notice of acceleration being made to the debtor by the creditor;

• payment under the financial guarantee contract is made only if the debtor’s obligation to make payments as a result of conditions as described above is past due; and

• the guaranteed party is, as a precondition in the contract (or in the back-to-back arrangement, if applicable) for receiving payment of any claim under the guarantee, exposed to the risk of nonpayment both at inception of the financial guarantee contract and throughout its term either through direct legal ownership of the guaranteed obligation or through a back-to-back arrangement with another party that is required by the back-to-back arrangement to maintain direct ownership of the guaranteed obligation.

Financial guarantee contracts which have any of the following would not qualify for the financial guarantee scope exception:

• payments are required based on changes in the creditworthiness of a referenced credit, rather than failure of that debtor to pay when due (i.e. default);

• the guaranteed party is not actually exposed to loss (that is, it neither owns the referenced asset nor is itself a guarantor of that asset) throughout the term of the contract; or

• the compensation to be paid under the contract could exceed the amount of loss actually incurred by the guaranteed party.

Approximately 88% of MBIA Corp.’s financial guarantee contracts qualify for the scope exception defined above and, therefore, are accounted for as financial guarantee insurance contracts. The remaining contracts do not meet the scope exception, primarily because the guaranteed party is not exposed to the risk of nonpayment both at inception of the financial guarantee contract and throughout its term.

15

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2: Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

These contracts are accounted for as derivatives and reported on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets as either assets or liabilities, depending on the rights or obligations under the contract, at fair value. MBIA Corp. refers to these contracts as insured CDS contracts. Insured CDS contracts are not designated as hedges and changes in the fair value are reflected in the consolidated statements of operations as unrealized gains (losses) on insured derivatives.

Refer to “Note 9: Derivative Instruments” for a further discussion of MBIA Corp.’s use of derivatives and their impact on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated financial statements and “Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments” for derivative valuation techniques and fair value disclosures.

Fair Value Measurements – Definition and Hierarchy

In determining fair value, MBIA Corp. uses various valuation approaches, including both market and income approaches. The accounting guidance for fair value measurement establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available and reliable. Observable inputs are those MBIA Corp. believes that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data. Unobservable inputs are those that reflect MBIA Corp.’s beliefs about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the observability and reliability of inputs as follows:

• Level 1—Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that MBIA Corp. has the ability to access. Since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market, valuation of these products does not entail any degree of judgment. Assets utilizing Level 1 inputs generally include U.S. Treasuries, foreign government bonds, money market securities, and certain corporate obligations that are highly liquid and actively traded.

• Level 2—Valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 assets include debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments, securities which are priced using observable inputs and derivative contracts whose values are determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. Assets and liabilities utilizing Level 2 inputs include: U.S. government and agency MBS; most over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives; corporate and municipal bonds and certain other MBS or ABS.

• Level 3—Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the overall fair value measurement. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. Assets and liabilities utilizing Level 3 inputs include certain MBS, ABS and CDO securities where observable pricing information was not able to be obtained for a significant portion of the underlying assets, OTC derivatives and certain insured derivatives that require significant management judgment and estimation in the valuation.

The level of activity in a market contributes to the determination of whether an input is observable. An active market is one in which transactions for an asset or liability occurs with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. In determining whether a market is active or inactive, MBIA Corp. considers the following traits to be indicative of an active market:

• transactions are frequent and observable;

• prices in the market are current;

• price quotes among dealers do not vary significantly over time; and

• sufficient information relevant to valuation is publicly available.

16

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2: Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

The availability of observable inputs can vary from product to product and period to period and is affected by a wide variety of factors, including, for example, the type of product, whether the product is new and not yet established in the marketplace, and other characteristics particular to the transaction. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by MBIA Corp. in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant rather than an entity-specific measure. Therefore, even when market assumptions are not readily available, MBIA Corp.’s own assumptions are set to reflect those that it believes market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. MBIA Corp. uses prices and inputs that are current as of the measurement date, including during periods of market dislocation. In periods of market dislocation, the observability of prices and inputs may be reduced for many instruments. This condition could cause an instrument to be reclassified from Level 1 to Level 2 or from Level 2 to Level 3. MBIA Corp. has also taken into account its own nonperformance risk and that of its counterparties when measuring fair value.

Refer to “Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments” for additional fair value disclosures.

Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses

MBIA Corp. recognizes loss reserves on a contract-by-contract basis when the present value of expected net cash outflows to be paid under the contract discounted using a risk-free rate as of the measurement date exceeds the unearned premium revenue. A loss reserve is subsequently remeasured each reporting period for expected increases or decreases due to changes in the likelihood of default and potential recoveries. Subsequent changes to the measurement of the loss reserves are recognized as claim expense in the period of change. Measurement and recognition of loss reserves are reported gross of any reinsurance. MBIA Corp. estimates the likelihood of possible claims payments and possible recoveries using probability-weighted expected cash flows based on information available as of the measurement date, including market information. Accretion of the discount on a loss reserve is included in loss expense.

MBIA Corp. recognizes potential recoveries on paid claims based on probability-weighted net cash inflows present valued at applicable risk-free rates as of the measurement date. Such amounts are reported within “Insurance loss recoverable” on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets. To the extent MBIA Corp. had recorded potential recoveries in its loss reserves previous to a claim payment; such recoveries are reclassified to “Insurance loss recoverable” upon payment of the related claim and remeasured each reporting period.

MBIA Corp.’s loss reserves, insurance loss recoverable, and accruals for loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) incurred are disclosed in “Note 6: Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves.”

Long-term Debt

Long-term debt consists of surplus notes and a secured loan from National. Long-term debt is carried at the principal amount borrowed, plus accrued interest and net of any unamortized discounts.

Financial Guarantee Insurance Premiums

Unearned Premium Revenue and Receivable for Future Premiums

MBIA Corp. recognizes a liability for unearned premium revenue at the inception of financial guarantee insurance and reinsurance contracts on a contract-by-contract basis. Unearned premium revenue recognized at inception of a contract is measured at the present value of the premium due.

17

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2: Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

For most financial guarantee insurance contracts, MBIA Corp. receives the entire premium due at the inception of the contract, and recognizes unearned premium revenue liability at that time. For certain other financial guarantee contracts, MBIA Corp. receives premiums in installments over the term of the contract. Unearned premium revenue and a receivable for future premiums is recognized at the inception of an installment contract, and measured at the present value of premiums expected to be collected over the contract period or expected period using a risk-free discount rate. The expected period is used in the present value determination of unearned premium revenue and receivable for future premiums for contracts where (a) the insured obligation is contractually prepayable, (b) prepayments are probable, (c) the amount and timing of prepayments are reasonably estimable, and (d) a homogenous pool of assets is the underlying collateral for the insured obligation. MBIA Corp. has determined that substantially all of its installment contracts meet the conditions required to be treated as expected period contracts. The receivable for future premiums is reduced as installment premiums are collected. MBIA Corp. reports the accretion of the discount on installment premiums receivable as premium revenue and discloses the amount recognized in “Note 5: Insurance Premiums.” MBIA Corp. assesses the receivable for future premiums for collectability each reporting period, adjusts the receivable for uncollectible amounts and recognizes any write-off as operating expense and discloses the amount recognized in “Note 5: Insurance Premiums.” As premium revenue is recognized, the unearned premium revenue liability is reduced.

Premium Revenue Recognition

MBIA Corp. recognizes and measures premium revenue over the period of the contract in proportion to the amount of insurance protection provided. Premium revenue is measured by applying a constant rate to the insured principal amount outstanding in a given period to recognize a proportionate share of the premium received or expected to be received on a financial guarantee insurance contract. A constant rate for each respective financial guarantee insurance contract is calculated as the ratio of (a) the present value of premium received or expected to be received over the period of the contract to (b) the sum of all insured principal amounts outstanding during each period over the term of the contract.

An issuer of an insured financial obligation may retire the obligation prior to its scheduled maturity through refinancing or legal defeasance in satisfaction of the obligation according to its indenture, which results in MBIA Corp.’s obligation being extinguished under the financial guarantee contract. MBIA Corp. recognizes any remaining unearned premium revenue on the insured obligation as refunding premiums earned in the period the contract is extinguished to the extent the unearned premium revenue has been collected.

Non-refundable commitment fees are considered insurance premiums and are initially recorded under unearned premium revenue in the consolidated balance sheets when received. Once the related financial guarantee insurance policy is issued, the commitment fees are recognized as premium written and earned using the constant rate method. If the commitment agreement expires before the related financial guarantee is issued, the non-refundable commitment fee is immediately recognized as premium written and earned at that time.

Fee and Reimbursement Revenue Recognition

MBIA Corp. collects insurance-related fees for services performed in connection with certain transactions. In addition, MBIA Corp. may be entitled to reimbursement of third-party insurance expenses that it incurs in connection with certain transactions. Depending upon the type of fee received and whether it is related to an insurance policy, the fee is either earned when it is received or deferred and earned over the life of the related transaction. Work, waiver and consent, termination, administrative and management fees are earned when the related services are completed and the fee is received. Structuring fees are earned on a straight-line basis over the life of the related insurance policy. Amounts received from reinsurers in excess of those which are contractually due to MBIA Corp. upon the termination of reinsurance agreements are recorded as fees and earned when received.

18

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2: Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Stock-Based Compensation

MBIA Corp. recognizes in earnings all stock-based payment transactions at the fair value of the stock-based compensation provided. Under the modified prospective transition method selected by MBIA Corp., all equity-based awards granted to employees and existing awards modified on or after January 1, 2003 are accounted for at fair value with compensation expense recorded in net income (loss). Refer to “Note 15: Employee Benefits” for a further discussion regarding the methodology utilized in recognizing employee stock compensation expense.

Foreign Currency Translation

Financial statement assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars generally using rates of exchange prevailing at the balance sheet date. Operating results are translated at average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. Unrealized gains or losses, net of deferred taxes, resulting from translation of the financial statements of a non-U.S. operation, when the functional currency is other than U.S. dollars, are included in AOCI in shareholders’ equity. Foreign currency remeasurement gains and losses resulting from transactions in non-functional currencies are recorded in current earnings. Exchange gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are recorded in current earnings.

Income Taxes

MBIA Corp. is included in the consolidated tax return of MBIA Inc. The tax provision for MBIA Corp. for financial reporting purposes is determined on a stand-alone basis. MBIA Corp. files its U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return as a member of the MBIA Inc. consolidated group and participates in a tax sharing agreement between MBIA Corp. and MBIA Inc. under which MBIA Corp. is allocated its share of consolidated tax liability or tax benefit as determined under the tax sharing agreement.

Deferred income taxes are recorded with respect to loss carryforwards and temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts in MBIA Corp.’s consolidated financial statements that will result in deductible or taxable amounts in future years when the reported amounts of assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Such temporary differences relate principally to premium revenue recognition, deferred acquisition costs, unrealized appreciation or depreciation of investments and derivatives, invested asset impairments and cancellation of indebtedness income. Valuation allowances are established to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that more likely than not will be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effect of changes in tax laws and rates in the period in which changes are approved by the relevant authority.

In establishing a liability for an unrecognized tax benefit (“UTB”), assumptions may be made in determining whether a tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the taxing authority and also in determining the ultimate amount that is likely to be realized. A tax position is recognized only when, based on management’s judgment regarding the application of income tax laws, it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination. The amount of tax benefit recognized is based on MBIA Corp.’s assessment of the largest amount of benefit that is more likely than not to be realized on ultimate settlement with the taxing authority. This measurement is based on many factors, including whether a tax dispute may be settled through negotiation with the taxing authority or is only subject to review in the courts. As new information becomes available, MBIA Corp. evaluates its tax positions, and adjusts its UTB, as appropriate. If the tax benefit ultimately realized differs from the amount previously recognized MBIA Corp. recognizes an adjustment of the UTB.

Refer to “Note 11: Income Taxes” for additional information about MBIA Corp.’s income taxes.

19

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 3: Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05)

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)—Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” This ASU amends the presentation of total comprehensive income and requires the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income to be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendment does not change what currently constitutes net income and other comprehensive income (loss). MBIA Corp. elected the two-statement approach that required the presentation of the components of net income and total net income in the statement of operations, and the presentation in a statement immediately following of the components of other comprehensive income, a total for other comprehensive income, and a total for comprehensive income. The new guidance was effective for MBIA Corp. beginning January 1, 2012. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12 “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)—Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05,” which defers certain aspects of ASU 2011-05 related to the presentation of reclassification adjustments. MBIA Corp. adopted this standard effective January 1, 2012. The standard only affected MBIA Corp.’s presentation of comprehensive income, and did not affect MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets, results of operations, or cash flows.

Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (ASU 2011-04)

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820)—Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.” This amendment results in a consistent definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. MBIA Corp. adopted this standard effective January 1, 2012. This standard only affected MBIA Corp.’s disclosures related to fair value; therefore, the adoption of this standard did not affect MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets, results of operations, or cash flows.

Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts (ASU 2010-26)

In October 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-26, “Financial Services—Insurance (Topic 944)—Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts.” This amendment specifies which costs incurred in the acquisition of new and renewal insurance contracts should be capitalized. MBIA Corp. adopted this standard on a prospective basis effective January 1, 2012. As MBIA Corp. is currently not writing any significant new business, the adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets, results of operations, or cash flows. The difference between the amount of acquisition costs capitalized during 2012 compared with the amount of acquisition costs that would have been capitalized during the period if MBIA Corp.’s previous policy had been applied during that period is not material because MBIA Corp. did not write any significant new insurance business during 2012.

Recent Accounting Developments

Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (ASU 2013-02)

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)—Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” that requires an entity to present information about the amounts reclassified out of AOCI by component and to present significant amounts reclassified out of AOCI by the respective line items of net income. The amendments will only affect MBIA Corp.’s disclosures and will not affect MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets, results of operations, or cash flows. This update is effective for interim and annual periods beginning January 1, 2013 and is applied on a prospective basis.

20

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 3: Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)

Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (ASU 2011-11)

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11, “Balance Sheet (Topic 210)—Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” ASU 2011-11 creates new disclosure requirements about the nature of MBIA Corp.’s rights of setoff and related arrangements associated with its financial instruments and derivative instruments. This amendment does not change the existing offsetting eligibility criteria or the permitted balance sheet presentation for those instruments that meet the eligibility criteria. The disclosure requirements are effective for MBIA Corp. beginning in the first quarter of 2013. In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-01, “Balance Sheet (Topic 210)—Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” ASU 2013-01 clarifies that ASU 2011-11 applies only to derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset in accordance with specific criteria contained in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification or subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement. These standards will only affect MBIA Corp.’s disclosures and will not affect MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets, results of operations, or cash flows.

Note 4: Variable Interest Entities

MBIA Corp. provides credit protection to issuers of obligations that may involve issuer-sponsored special purpose entities (“SPEs”). An SPE may be considered a VIE to the extent the SPE’s total equity at risk is not sufficient to permit the SPE to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or its equity investors lack any one of the following characteristics: (i) the power to direct the activities of the SPE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance or (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity or the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity. A holder of a variable interest or interests in a VIE is required to assess whether it has a controlling financial interest, and thus is required to consolidate the entity as primary beneficiary. An assessment of a controlling financial interest identifies the primary beneficiary as the variable interest holder that has both of the following characteristics: (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The primary beneficiary is required to consolidate the VIE. An ongoing reassessment of controlling financial interest is required to be performed based on any substantive changes in facts and circumstances involving the VIE and its variable interests.

MBIA Corp. evaluates issuer-sponsored SPEs initially to determine if an entity is a VIE, and is required to reconsider its initial determination if certain events occur. For all entities determined to be VIEs, MBIA Corp. performs an ongoing reassessment to determine whether its guarantee to provide credit protection on obligations issued by VIEs provides MBIA Corp. with a controlling financial interest. Based on its ongoing reassessment of controlling financial interest, MBIA Corp. determines whether a VIE is required to be consolidated or deconsolidated.

MBIA Corp. makes its determination for consolidation based on a qualitative assessment of the purpose and design of a VIE, the terms and characteristics of variable interests of an entity, and the risks a VIE is designed to create and pass through to holders of variable interests. MBIA Corp. generally provides credit protection on obligations issued by VIEs, and holds certain contractual rights according to the purpose and design of a VIE. MBIA Corp. may have the ability to direct certain activities of a VIE depending on facts and circumstances, including the occurrence of certain contingent events, and these activities may be considered the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. MBIA Corp. generally considers its guarantee of principal and interest payments of insured obligations, given nonperformance by a VIE, to be an obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. At the time MBIA Corp. determines it has the ability to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the economic performance of the entity based on facts and circumstances, MBIA Corp. is deemed to have a controlling financial interest in the VIE and is required to consolidate the entity as primary beneficiary. MBIA Corp. performs an ongoing reassessment of controlling financial interest that may result in consolidation or deconsolidation of any VIE.

21

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 4: Variable Interest Entities (continued)

Nonconsolidated VIEs

The following tables present the total assets of nonconsolidated VIEs in which MBIA Corp. holds a variable interest as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. The following tables also present MBIA Corp.’s maximum exposure to loss for nonconsolidated VIEs and carrying values of the assets and liabilities for its interests in these VIEs as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. MBIA Corp. has aggregated nonconsolidated VIEs based on the underlying credit exposure of the insured obligation. The nature of MBIA Corp.’s variable interests in nonconsolidated VIEs is related to financial guarantees, insured CDS contracts and any investments in obligations issued by nonconsolidated VIEs.

	December 31, 2012
					Carrying Value of Assets						Carrying Value of Liabilities
In millions	VIE Assets		Maximum Exposure to Loss		Investments(1)		Premiums Receivable(2)		Insurance Loss Recoverable(3)		Unearned Premium Revenue(4)		Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves(5)		Derivative Liabilities(6)
Insurance:
Global structured finance:
Collateralized debt obligations	$	16,925	$	10,873	$	—	$	62	$	5	$	55	$	37	$	74
Mortgage-backed residential		34,061		13,075		11		77		3,278		75		440		4
Mortgage-backed commercial		4,801		2,432		—		2		—		2		—		—
Consumer asset-backed		5,820		3,086		10		19		—		19		21		—
Corporate asset-backed		19,980		9,981		—		123		13		140		—		—
Total global structured finance		81,587		39,447		21		283		3,296		291		498		78
Global public finance		39,259		21,346		—		220		—		267		4		—
Total insurance	$	120,846	$	60,793	$	21	$	503	$	3,296	$	558	$	502	$	78

(1)—Reported within “Investments” on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets.

(2)—Reported within “Premiums receivable” on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets.

(3)—Reported within “Insurance loss recoverable” on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets.

(4)—Reported within “Unearned premium revenue” on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets.

(5)—Reported within “Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves” on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets.

(6)—Reported within “Derivative liabilities” on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets.

	December 31, 2011
					Carrying Value of Assets						Carrying Value of Liabilities
In millions	VIE Assets		Maximum Exposure to Loss		Investments(1)		Premiums Receivable(2)		Insurance Loss Recoverable(3)		Unearned Premium Revenue(4)		Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves(5)		Derivative Liabilities(6)
Insurance:
Global structured finance:
Collateralized debt obligations	$	26,507	$	15,466	$	42	$	67	$	—	$	58	$	3	$	113
Mortgage-backed residential		47,669		16,379		25		87		2,773		86		428		5
Mortgage-backed commercial		5,001		2,644		—		2		—		2		—		—
Consumer asset-backed		8,015		4,563		16		26		—		25		23		—
Corporate asset-backed		29,855		15,577		241		192		22		205		—		1
Total global structured finance		117,047		54,629		324		374		2,795		376		454		119
Global public finance		42,106		21,774		—		215		—		270		—		—
Total insurance	$	159,153	$	76,403	$	324	$	589	$	2,795	$	646	$	454	$	119

(1)—Reported within “Investments” on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets.

(2)—Reported within “Premiums receivable” on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets.

(3)—Reported within “Insurance loss recoverable” on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets.

(4)—Reported within “Unearned premium revenue” on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets.

(5)—Reported within “Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves” on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets.

(6)—Reported within “Derivative liabilities” on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets.

22

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 4: Variable Interest Entities (continued)

The maximum exposure to loss as a result of MBIA Corp.’s variable interests in VIEs is represented by insurance in force. Insurance in force is the maximum future payments of principal and interest, net of cessions to reinsurers, which may be required under commitments to make payments on insured obligations issued by nonconsolidated VIEs.

Consolidated VIEs

The carrying amounts of assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs were $7.7 billion and $6.7 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2012, and $9.5 billion and $8.5 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2011. The carrying amounts of assets and liabilities are presented separately in “Assets of consolidated variable interest entities” and “Liabilities of consolidated variable interest entities” on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets. Additional VIEs are consolidated or deconsolidated based on an ongoing reassessment of controlling financial interest, when events occur or circumstances arise, and whether the ability to exercise rights that constitute power to direct activities of any VIEs are present according to the design and characteristics of these entities. No additional VIEs were consolidated during the year ended December 31, 2012. Net realized losses related to the initial consolidation of additional VIEs were $16 million and $76 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. No gains or losses were recognized on the VIEs that were deconsolidated during the year ended December 31, 2012 and net realized gains related to the deconsolidation of VIEs were immaterial for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

Holders of insured obligations of issuer-sponsored VIEs related to MBIA Corp. do not have recourse to the general assets of MBIA Corp. In the event of nonpayment of an insured obligation issued by a consolidated VIE, MBIA Corp. is obligated to pay principal and interest, when due, on the respective insured obligation only. MBIA Corp.’s exposure to consolidated VIEs is limited to the credit protection provided on insured obligations and any additional variable interests held by MBIA Corp.

Note 5: Insurance Premiums

MBIA Corp. recognizes and measures premiums related to financial guarantee (non-derivative) insurance and reinsurance contracts in accordance with the accounting principles for financial guarantee insurance contracts.

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, MBIA Corp. reported premiums receivable of $1.2 billion and $1.4 billion, respectively, primarily related to installment policies for which premiums will be collected over the estimated term of the contracts. Premiums receivable for an installment policy is initially measured at the present value of premiums expected to be collected over the expected period or contract period of the policy using a risk-free discount rate. Premiums receivable for policies that use the expected period of risk due to expected prepayments are adjusted in subsequent measurement periods when prepayment assumptions change using the risk-free discount rate as of the remeasurement date. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the weighted average risk-free rate used to discount future installment premiums was 2.6% and 2.8%, respectively, and the weighted average expected collection term of the premiums receivable was 9.13 years.

MBIA Corp. evaluates whether any premiums receivable are uncollectible at each balance sheet date. If MBIA Corp. determines that premiums are uncollectible, it records a write-off of such amounts in current earnings. The majority of MBIA Corp.’s premiums receivable consists of the present values of future installment premiums that are not yet billed or due. Given that premiums due to MBIA Corp. typically have priority over most other payment obligations, MBIA Corp. determined that the amount of uncollectible premiums as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 was insignificant.

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, MBIA Corp. reported reinsurance premiums payable of $313 million and $352 million, respectively, which represents the portion of MBIA Corp.’s premiums receivable that is due to reinsurers. The reinsurance premiums payable is accreted and paid to reinsurers as premiums due to MBIA Corp. are accreted and collected.

23

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 5: Insurance Premiums (continued)

The following tables present a roll forward of MBIA Corp.’s premiums receivable for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:

In millions						Adjustments
Premiums Receivable as of December 31, 2011		Premium Payments Received		Premiums from New Business Written		Changes in Expected Term of Policies		Accretion of Premiums Receivable Discount		Other (1)		Premiums Receivable as of December  31, 2012		Reinsurance Premiums Payable as of December 31, 2012
$	1,360	$	(182)	$	5	$	(57)	$	32	$	70	$	1,228	$	313

(1)—Primarily consists of unrealized gains (losses) due to foreign currency exchange rates.

In millions						Adjustments
Premiums Receivable as of December 31, 2010		Premium Payments Received		Premiums from New Business Written		Changes in Expected Term of Policies		Accretion of Premiums Receivable Discount		Other (1)		Premiums Receivable as of December  31, 2011		Reinsurance Premiums Payable as of December 31, 2011
$	1,589	$	(212)	$	—	$	(76)	$	40	$	19	$	1,360	$	352

(1)—Primarily consists of unrealized gains (losses) due to foreign currency exchange rates.

The following table presents the undiscounted future amount of premiums expected to be collected and the period in which those collections are expected to occur:

In millions	Expected Collection of Premiums
Three months ended:
March 31, 2013	$	30
June 30, 2013		43
September 30, 2013		30
December 31, 2013		36
Twelve months ended:
December 31, 2014		125
December 31, 2015		117
December 31, 2016		109
December 31, 2017		99
Five years ended:
December 31, 2022		378
December 31, 2027		264
December 31, 2032 and thereafter		303
Total	$	1,534

24

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 5: Insurance Premiums (continued)

The following table presents the unearned premium revenue balance and future expected premium earnings as of and for the periods presented:

In millions	Unearned Premium Revenue						Accretion		Total Expected Future Premium Earnings
			Expected Future Premium Earnings
			Upfront		Installments
December 31, 2012	$	2,508
Three months ended:
March 31, 2013		2,443	$	33	$	32	$	7	$	72
June 30, 2013		2,379		33		31		7		71
September 30, 2013		2,318		31		30		7		68
December 31, 2013		2,257		31		30		7		68
Twelve months ended:
December 31, 2014		2,031		116		110		27		253
December 31, 2015		1,824		105		102		25		232
December 31, 2016		1,633		96		95		23		214
December 31, 2017		1,460		88		85		21		194
Five years ended:
December 31, 2022		799		339		322		82		743
December 31, 2027		393		201		205		50		456
December 31, 2032 and thereafter		—		186		207		52		445
Total			$	1,259	$	1,249	$	308	$	2,816

Note 6: Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves

Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Process

MBIA Corp.’s insured portfolio management division (“IPM”) monitors MBIA Corp.’s outstanding insured obligations with the objective of minimizing losses. IPM meets this objective by identifying issuers that, because of deterioration in credit quality or changes in the economic, regulatory or political environment, are at a heightened risk of defaulting on debt service of obligations insured by MBIA Corp. In such cases, IPM works with the issuer, trustee, bond counsel, servicer, underwriter and other interested parties in an attempt to alleviate or remedy the problem and avoid defaults on debt service payments. Once an obligation is insured, MBIA Corp. typically requires the issuer, servicer (if applicable) and the trustee to furnish periodic financial and asset-related information, including audited financial statements, to IPM for review. IPM also monitors publicly available information related to insured obligations. Potential problems uncovered through this review, such as poor financial results, low fund balances, covenant or trigger violations and trustee or servicer problems, or other events that could have an adverse impact on the insured obligation, could result in an immediate surveillance review and an evaluation of possible remedial actions. IPM also monitors and evaluates the impact on issuers of general economic conditions, current and proposed legislation and regulations, as well as state and municipal finances and budget developments.

Insured obligations are monitored periodically. The frequency and extent of such monitoring is based on the criteria and categories described below. Insured obligations that are judged to merit more frequent and extensive monitoring or remediation activities due to a deterioration in the underlying credit quality of the insured obligation or the occurrence of adverse events related to the underlying credit of the issuer are assigned to a surveillance category (“Caution List—Low,” “Caution List—Medium,” “Caution List—High” or “Classified List”) depending on the extent of credit deterioration or the nature of the adverse events. IPM monitors insured obligations assigned to a surveillance category more frequently and, if needed, develops a remediation plan to address any credit deterioration.

25

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 6: Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves (continued)

MBIA Corp. does not establish any case basis reserves for insured obligations that are assigned to “Caution List—Low,” “Caution List—Medium” or “Caution List—High.” In the event MBIA Corp. expects to pay a claim as determined by probability-weighted cash flow analysis with respect to an insured transaction, it places the insured transaction on its “Classified List” and establishes a case basis reserve. The following provides a description of each surveillance category:

“Caution List—Low”—Includes issuers where debt service protection is adequate under current and anticipated circumstances. However, debt service protection and other measures of credit support and stability may have declined since the transaction was underwritten and the issuer is less able to withstand further adverse events. Transactions in this category generally require more frequent monitoring than transactions that do not appear within a surveillance category. IPM subjects issuers in this category to heightened scrutiny.

“Caution List—Medium”—Includes issuers where debt service protection is adequate under current and anticipated circumstances, although adverse trends have developed and are more pronounced than for “Caution List—Low.” Issuers in this category may have breached one or more covenants or triggers. These issuers are more closely monitored by IPM but generally take remedial action on their own.

“Caution List—High”—Includes issuers where more proactive remedial action is needed but where no defaults on debt service payments are expected. Issuers in this category exhibit more significant weaknesses, such as low debt service coverage, reduced or insufficient collateral protection or inadequate liquidity, which could lead to debt service defaults in the future. Issuers in this category may have breached one or more covenants or triggers and have not taken conclusive remedial action. Therefore, IPM adopts a remediation plan and takes more proactive remedial actions.

“Classified List”—Includes all insured obligations where MBIA Corp. has paid a claim or where a claim payment is expected. It also includes insured obligations where a significant LAE payment has been made, or is expected to be made, to mitigate a claim payment. This may include property improvements, bond purchases and commutation payments. Generally, IPM is actively remediating these credits where possible, including restructurings through legal proceedings, usually with the assistance of specialist counsel and advisors.

In establishing case basis loss reserves, MBIA Corp. calculates the present value of probability-weighted estimated loss payments, net of estimated recoveries, using a discount rate equal to the risk-free rate applicable to the currency and the weighted average remaining life of the insurance contract as required by accounting principles for financial guarantee contracts. Yields on U.S. Treasury offerings are used to discount loss reserves denominated in U.S. dollars, which represent the majority of the loss reserves. Similarly, yields on foreign government offerings are used to discount loss reserves denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. If MBIA Corp. were to apply different discount rates, its case basis reserves may have been higher or lower than those established as of December 31, 2012. For example, a higher discount rate applied to expected future payments would have decreased the amount of a case basis reserve established by MBIA Corp. and a lower rate would have increased the amount of a reserve established by MBIA Corp. Similarly, a higher discount rate applied to the potential future recoveries would have decreased the amount of a loss recoverable established by MBIA Corp. and a lower rate would have increased the amount of a loss recoverable established by MBIA Corp.

As of December 31, 2012, the majority of MBIA Corp.’s case basis reserves and insurance loss recoveries recorded in accordance with GAAP were related to insured second-lien and first-lien RMBS transactions. These reserves and recoveries do not include estimates for policies insuring credit derivatives. Policies insuring credit derivative contracts are accounted for as derivatives and carried at fair value under GAAP. The fair values of insured derivative contracts are influenced by a variety of market and transaction-specific factors that may be unrelated to potential future claim payments under MBIA Corp.’s insurance policies. In the absence of credit impairments on insured derivative contracts or the early termination of such contracts at a loss, the cumulative unrealized losses recorded from fair valuing these contracts should reverse before or at the maturity of the contracts.

26

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 6: Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves (continued)

Notwithstanding the difference in accounting under GAAP for financial guarantee policies and MBIA Corp.’s insured derivatives, insured derivatives have similar terms, conditions, risks, and economic profiles to financial guarantee insurance policies, and, therefore, are evaluated by MBIA Corp. for loss (referred to as credit impairment herein) and LAE periodically in a manner similar to the way that loss and LAE reserves are estimated for financial guarantee insurance policies. Credit impairments represent actual payments and collections plus the present value of estimated expected future claim payments, net of recoveries. MBIA Insurance Corporation’s expected future claim payments for insured derivatives were discounted using a rate of 5.72%, the same rate it used to calculate its statutory loss reserves as of December 31, 2012. These credit impairments, calculated in accordance with U.S. STAT, differ from the fair values recorded in MBIA Corp.’s consolidated financial statements. MBIA Corp. considers its credit impairment estimates as critical information for investors as it provides information about loss payments MBIA Corp. expects to make on insured derivative contracts. As a result, the following loss and LAE process discussion includes information about loss and LAE activity recorded in accordance with GAAP for financial guarantee insurance policies and credit impairments estimated in accordance with U.S. STAT for insured derivative contracts. Refer to “Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments” included herein for additional information about MBIA Corp.’s insured credit derivative contracts.

RMBS Case Basis Reserves and Recoveries (Financial Guarantees)

MBIA Corp.’s RMBS reserves and recoveries relate to financial guarantee insurance policies. MBIA Corp. calculated RMBS case basis reserves as of December 31, 2012 for both second-lien and first-lien RMBS transactions using a process called the “Roll Rate Methodology.” The Roll Rate Methodology is a multi-step process using a database of loan level information, a proprietary internal cash flow model, and a commercially available model to estimate expected ultimate cumulative losses on insured bonds. “Roll Rate” is defined as the probability that current loans become delinquent and that loans in the delinquent pipeline are charged-off or liquidated. Generally, Roll Rates are calculated for the previous three months and averaged. The loss reserve estimates are based on a probability-weighted average of three scenarios of loan losses (base case, stress case, and an additional stress case).

In calculating ultimate cumulative losses for RMBS, MBIA Corp. estimates the amount of loans that are expected to be charged-off (deemed uncollectible by servicers of the transactions) or liquidated in the future. MBIA Corp. assumes that charged-off loans have zero recovery values.

Second-lien RMBS Reserves

MBIA Corp.’s second-lien RMBS case basis reserves as of December 31, 2012 relate to RMBS backed by home equity lines of credit (“HELOC”) and closed-end second mortgages (“CES”).

The Roll Rates for 30-59 day delinquent loans and 60-89 day delinquent loans are calculated on a transaction-specific basis. MBIA Corp. assumes that the Roll Rate for 90+ day delinquent loans, excluding foreclosures and Real Estate Owned (“REO”) is 95%. The Roll Rates are applied to the amounts in the respective delinquency buckets based on delinquencies as of November 30, 2012 to estimate future losses from loans that are delinquent as of the current reporting period.

Roll Rates for loans that are current as of November 30, 2012 (“Current Roll to Loss”) are also calculated on a transaction-specific basis. A proportion of loans reported current as of November 30, 2012 is assumed to become delinquent every month, at a Current Roll to Loss rate that persists at a high level for a time and subsequently starts to decline. A key assumption in the model is the period of time in which MBIA Corp. projects high levels of Current Roll to Loss to persist. In the base case, MBIA Corp. assumes that the Current Roll to Loss begins to decline immediately and continues to decline over the next six months to 25% of their levels as of November 30, 2012. In the stress case, the period of elevated delinquency and loss is extended by six months. In the additional stress case, MBIA Corp. assumes that the current trends in losses will remain through late 2013, after which time they will revert to the base case. For example, in the base case, as of November 30, 2012, if the amount of current loans which become 30-59 days delinquent is 10%, and recent performance suggests that 30% of those loans will be charged-off, the Current Roll to Loss for the transaction is 3%.

27

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 6: Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves (continued)

In the base case, it is then assumed that the Current Roll to Loss will reduce linearly to 25% of its original value over the next six months (i.e., 3% will linearly reduce to 0.75% over the six months from December 2012 to May 2013). After that six-month period, MBIA Corp. further reduces the Current Roll to Loss to 0% by early 2014 with the expectation that the performing seasoned loans will eventually result in loan performance reverting to historically low levels of default.

In addition, in MBIA Corp.’s loss reserve models for transactions secured by HELOCs, MBIA Corp. considers borrower draw and prepayment rates and factors that could affect the excess spread generated by current loans, which offsets losses and reduces payments. For HELOCs, the current three-month average draw rate is generally used to project future draws on the line. For HELOCs and transactions secured by fixed-rate CES, the three-month average conditional prepayment rate is generally used to start the projection for trends in voluntary principal prepayments. Projected cash flows are also based on an assumed constant basis spread between floating rate assets and floating rate insured debt obligations (the difference between Prime and London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) interest rates, minus any applicable fees). For all transactions, cash flow models consider allocations and other structural aspects of the transactions, including managed amortization periods, rapid amortization periods and claims against MBIA Corp.’s insurance policy consistent with such policy’s terms and conditions. In developing multiple loss scenarios, stress is applied by elongating the Current Roll to Loss rate for various periods, simulating a slower improvement in the transaction performance. The estimated net claims from the procedure above are then discounted using a risk-free rate to a net present value reflecting MBIA Corp.’s general obligation to pay claims over time and not on an accelerated basis. The above assumptions represent MBIA Corp.’s best estimates of how transactions will perform over time.

MBIA Corp. monitors portfolio performance on a monthly basis against projected performance, reviewing delinquencies, Roll Rates, and prepayment rates (including voluntary and involuntary). However, given the large percentage of mortgage loans that were not underwritten by the sellers/servicers in accordance with applicable underwriting guidelines, performance remains difficult to predict and losses may exceed expectations. In the event of a material deviation in actual performance from projected performance, MBIA Corp. would increase or decrease the case basis reserves accordingly. If actual performance were to remain at the peak levels MBIA Corp. is modeling for six months longer than in the probability-weighted outcome, the addition to MBIA Corp.’s second-lien RMBS case basis reserves before considering potential recoveries would be approximately $110 million.

Second-lien RMBS Recoveries

As of December 31, 2012, MBIA Corp. recorded estimated recoveries of $3.6 billion, gross of income taxes, related to second-lien RMBS put-back claims on ineligible mortgage loans, consisting of $2.5 billion included in “Insurance loss recoverable” and $1.1 billion included in “Loan repurchase commitments” presented under the heading “Assets of consolidated variable interest entities” on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, MBIA Corp.’s estimated recoveries after income taxes calculated at the federal statutory rate of 35%, were $2.3 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively, which was 432% and negative 556% of the consolidated total shareholders’ equity and deficit, respectively. The negative percentage as of December 31, 2011 was a result of shareholders’ deficit of $364 million recorded on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets. These estimated recoveries relate to MBIA Corp.’s put-back claims of ineligible mortgage loans, which have been disputed by the loan sellers/servicers and are currently subject to litigation initiated by MBIA Corp. to pursue recoveries. While MBIA Corp. believes that it will prevail in enforcing its contractual rights, there is uncertainty with respect to the ultimate outcome. Furthermore, there is a risk that sellers/servicers or other responsible parties might not be able to satisfy their put-back obligations. Such risks are contemplated in the scenarios MBIA Corp. utilizes to calculate recoveries.

MBIA Corp. assesses the financial abilities of the sellers/servicers using external credit ratings and other factors. The impact of such factors on cash flows related to expected recoveries is incorporated into MBIA Corp.’s probability-weighted scenarios. Accordingly, MBIA Corp. has not recognized any recoveries related to its IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. insured exposures and has subsequent to the ResCap bankruptcy filing reviewed the indicative scenarios and related probabilities assigned to each scenario to develop a distribution of possible outcomes.

28

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 6: Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves (continued)

MBIA Corp.’s expected recoveries may be discounted in the future based on additional reviews of the creditworthiness of other sellers/servicers.

As of December 31, 2011, MBIA Corp. utilized five probability-weighted scenarios primarily based on the percentage of incurred losses for all sellers/servicers where estimated recoveries of ineligible mortgage loans were recorded.

On May 14, 2012, ResCap, and its wholly-owned subsidiary companies, RFC and GMAC, each filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. MBIA Corp. believes that the claims against RFC and GMAC are stronger and better defined than most other unsecured creditor claims due to the following reasons:

• the direct contractual relationship between MBIA Corp., GMAC and RFC related to MBIA Corp.’s second-lien RMBS put-back claims on ineligible mortgage loans that were improperly included in the MBIA Corp.-insured transactions;

• MBIA Corp.’s legal claims against RFC and GMAC based on breach of contract and fraud have withstood motions to dismiss; and

• expert reports submitted in the RFC litigation which established a substantial breach rate in MBIA Corp.’s insured securitizations, and MBIA Corp.’s damages as a result thereof.

MBIA Corp. has now modeled scenario-based recoveries which are founded upon the strength of these claims as well as a range of estimated assets available to unsecured creditors of the ResCap companies. As of December 31, 2012, the auction of the servicing platform and specific loans of the ResCap bankruptcy estate have concluded. However, an actual distribution of proceeds will not occur until a plan detailing the distribution of assets has been approved by the bankruptcy court. Consequently, the outcomes utilized by MBIA Corp. continue to be based upon information that was available to MBIA Corp. as of the filing date.

As of December 31, 2012, MBIA Corp. continues to maintain the same probability-weighted scenarios for its non-GMAC and non-RFC exposures (non-ResCap exposures), which are primarily based on the percentage of incurred losses MBIA Corp. would collect. The non-ResCap recovery estimates incorporate five scenarios that include full recovery of its incurred losses and limited/reduced recoveries due to litigation delays and risks and/or potential financial distress of the sellers/servicers. Probabilities were assigned across these scenarios, with most of the probability weight on partial recovery scenarios. The sum of the probabilities assigned to all scenarios is 100%. Expected cash inflows from recoveries are discounted using the current risk-free discount rates associated with the underlying transaction’s cash flows, which ranged from 0.9% to 1.7%, depending upon the transaction’s expected average life, which ranged from 5.6 years to 10.2 years. However, based on MBIA Corp.’s assessment of the strength of its contract claims, MBIA Corp. believes it is entitled to collect and/or assert a claim for the full amount of its incurred losses on these transactions, which totaled $5.1 billion through December 31, 2012. MBIA Corp. is entitled to collect interest on amounts paid.

MBIA Corp.’s potential recoveries are typically based on either salvage rights, the rights conferred to MBIA Corp. through the transactional documents (inclusive of the insurance agreement), or subrogation rights embedded within financial guarantee insurance policies. The second-lien RMBS transactions with respect to which MBIA Corp. has estimated put-back recoveries provide MBIA Corp. with such rights. Expected salvage and subrogation recoveries, as well as recoveries from other remediation efforts, reduce MBIA Corp.’s claim liability. Once a claim payment has been made, the claim liability has been satisfied and MBIA Corp.’s right to recovery is no longer considered an offset to future expected claim payments, and is recorded as a salvage asset. The amount of recoveries recorded by MBIA Corp. is limited to paid claims plus the present value of projected future claim payments. As claim payments are made, the recorded amount of potential recoveries may exceed the remaining amount of the claim liability for a given policy.

To date, sellers/servicers have not substituted loans which MBIA Corp. has put-back, and the amount of loans repurchased has been insignificant. The unsatisfactory resolution of these put-backs led MBIA Corp. to initiate litigation against six of the sellers/servicers to enforce their obligations.

29

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 6: Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves (continued)

MBIA Corp. has alleged several causes of action in its complaints, including breach of contract, fraudulent inducement and indemnification. MBIA Corp.’s aggregate $3.6 billion of estimated potential recoveries do not include damages from causes of action other than breach of contract. Irrespective of amounts recorded in its financial statements, MBIA Corp. is seeking to recover and/or assert claims for the full amount of its incurred losses and other damages on these transactions. MBIA Corp. has not collected any material amounts of cash related to these recoveries. Additional information on the status of these litigations can be found in the “Recovery Litigation” discussion within “Note 18: Commitments and Contingencies.”

MBIA Corp. has initiated litigation against six sellers/servicers (most recent filing was January 11, 2013) related to loan put-backs. MBIA Corp. has received five decisions with regard to the respective defendants’ motions to dismiss MBIA Corp.’s claims. In each instance, the respective court denied the motion, allowing MBIA Corp. to proceed on, at minimum, its fraud and breach of contract claims. In December 2011, MBIA Corp. reached an agreement with one of the six sellers/servicers with whom it had initiated litigation and that litigation has been dismissed.

MBIA Corp.’s assessment of the recovery outlook for insured second-lien RMBS issues is principally based on the following factors:

1. the strength of MBIA Corp.’s existing contract claims related to ineligible mortgage loan substitution/repurchase obligations;

2. the settlement of Assured Guaranty’s and Syncora’s put-back related claims with Bank of America;

3. the improvement in the financial strength of certain sellers/servicers due to mergers and acquisitions and/or government assistance, which should facilitate the ability of these sellers/servicers and their successors to comply with required loan repurchase/substitution obligations. MBIA Corp. is not aware of any provisions that explicitly preclude or limit successors’ obligations to honor the obligations of original sellers/servicers. MBIA Corp.’s assessment of any credit risk associated with sellers/servicers (or their successors) is reflected in MBIA Corp.’s probability-weighted potential recovery scenarios;

4. evidence of ineligible mortgage loan repurchase/substitution by sellers/servicers for put-back requests made by other harmed parties; this factor is further enhanced by (i) Bank of America’s disclosure that it has resolved $8.0 billion of repurchase requests in the fourth quarter of 2010; (ii) the Fannie Mae settlements with Ally Bank announced on December 23, 2010 and with Bank of America (which also involved Freddie Mac) announced on December 31, 2010; (iii) the Bank of America $10.3 billion settlement with Fannie Mae announced on January 7, 2013. The settlement substantially resolves Countrywide repurchase related claims between Bank of America and Fannie Mae, and (iv) MBIA Corp.’s settlement agreements entered into on July 16, 2010 and December 13, 2011 respectively, between MBIA Corp. and sponsors of certain MBIA Corp.-insured mortgage loan securitizations in which MBIA Corp. received consideration in exchange for a release relating to its representation and warranty claims against the sponsors. These settlements resolved all of MBIA Corp.’s representation and warranty claims against the sponsors on mutually beneficial terms and in aggregate were slightly more than the recoveries previously recorded by MBIA Corp. related to these exposures;

5. Assured Guaranty’s favorable court ruling of $90 million (plus interest, fees and expenses) regarding Flagstar Bank’s pervasive breach of mortgage representations and warranties;

6. the defendants’ failure to win dismissals of MBIA Corp.’s put-back litigations discussed above, allowing MBIA Corp. to continue to pursue its contract and fraud claims;

7. Countrywide’s unsuccessful appeal of its failure to win dismissal of MBIA Corp.’s fraud claims in the Countrywide litigation, allowing MBIA Corp. to pursue its fraud claims;

8. MBIA Corp.’s successful motion in the Countrywide litigation allowing MBIA Corp. to present evidence of liability and damages through the introduction of statistically valid random samples of loans rather than on a loan-by-loan basis and subsequent decisions consistent with that ruling;

30

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 6: Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves (continued)

9. Bank of America’s failure to win dismissal of MBIA Corp.’s claims for successor liability in the Countrywide litigation, as well as the completion of discovery relating to MBIA Corp.’s successor liability claims against Bank of America;

10. MBIA Corp.’s successful motion regarding causation and the right to rescissory damages in the Countrywide litigation, which provides that MBIA Corp. is not required to establish a direct causal link between Countrywide’s misrepresentations and MBIA Corp.’s claims payments made pursuant to the insurance policies at issue, and that MBIA Corp. may seek damages equal to the amount that it has been and will be required to pay under the relevant policies, less premiums received;

11. Syncora’s and Assured Guaranty’s successful motions regarding causation in their Federal court put-back litigations with JP Morgan Chase and Flagstar Bank, respectively, which support the ruling on causation in MBIA Corp.’s litigation against Countrywide; and

12. other loan repurchase reserves and/or settlements which have been publicly disclosed by certain sellers/servicers.

MBIA Corp. continues to consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including the factors described above, in developing its assumptions on expected cash inflows, probability of potential recoveries (including the outcome of litigation) and recovery period. The estimated amount and likelihood of potential recoveries are expected to be revised and supplemented to the extent there are developments in the pending litigation, new litigation is initiated and/or changes to the financial condition of sellers/servicers occur. While MBIA Corp. believes it will be successful in realizing recoveries from contractual and other claims, the ultimate amounts recovered may be materially different from those recorded by MBIA Corp. given the inherent uncertainty of the manner of resolving the claims (e.g., litigation) and the assumptions used in the required estimation process for accounting purposes which are based, in part, on judgments and other information that are not easily corroborated by historical data or other relevant benchmarks.

All of MBIA Corp.’s policies insuring second-lien RMBS for which litigation has been initiated against sellers/servicers are in the form of financial guarantee insurance contracts. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, MBIA Corp. has not recorded a gain contingency with respect to pending litigation.

First-lien RMBS Reserves

MBIA Corp.’s first-lien RMBS case basis reserves as of December 31, 2012, which primarily relate to RMBS backed by alternative A-paper (“Alt-A”) and subprime mortgage loans were determined using the Roll Rate Methodology. MBIA Corp. assumes that the Roll Rate for loans in foreclosure, REO and bankruptcy are 90%, 90% and 75%, respectively. Roll Rates for current, 30-59 day delinquent loans, 60-89 day delinquent loans and 90+ day delinquent loans are calculated on a transaction-specific basis. The Current Roll to Loss rates stay at the November 30, 2012 level for two months before declining to 25% of this level over a 24-month period. Additionally, MBIA Corp. runs scenarios where the 90+ day roll rate to loss is set at 90%. The Roll Rates are applied to the amounts in the respective delinquency buckets based on delinquencies as of November 30, 2012 to estimate future losses from loans that are delinquent as of the current reporting period.

In calculating ultimate cumulative losses for first-lien RMBS, MBIA Corp. estimates the amount of loans that are expected to be liquidated through foreclosure or short sale. The time to liquidation for a defaulted loan is specific to the loan’s delinquency bucket with the latest three-month average loss severities generally used to start the projection for trends in loss severities at loan liquidation. The loss severities are reduced over time to account for reduction in the amount of foreclosure inventory, anticipated future increases in home prices, principal amortization of the loan and government foreclosure moratoriums.

ABS CDOs (Financial Guarantees and Insured Derivatives)

MBIA Corp.’s insured ABS CDOs are transactions that include a variety of collateral ranging from corporate bonds to structured finance assets (which includes but are not limited to RMBS related collateral, ABS CDOs, corporate CDOs and collateralized loan obligations).

31

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 6: Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves (continued)

These transactions were insured as either financial guarantee insurance policies or credit derivatives with the majority insured in the form of credit derivatives. Since the fourth quarter of 2007, MBIA Corp.’s insured par exposure within the ABS CDO portfolio has been substantially reduced through a combination of terminations and commutations. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2012, the insured par exposure of the ABS CDO financial guarantee insurance policies and credit derivatives portfolio has declined by approximately 88% of the insured amount as of December 31, 2007.

MBIA Corp.’s ABS CDOs originally benefited from two sources of credit enhancement. First, the subordination in the underlying securities collateralizing the transaction must be fully eroded and second, the subordination below the insured tranche in the CDO transaction must be fully eroded before the insured tranche is subject to a claim. MBIA Corp.’s payment obligations after a default vary by transaction and by insurance type.

The primary factor in estimating reserves on insured ABS CDO policies written as financial guarantee insurance policies and in estimating impairments on insured ABS CDO credit derivatives is the losses associated with the underlying collateral in the transactions. MBIA Corp.’s approach to establishing reserves or impairments in this portfolio employs a methodology which is similar to other structured finance asset classes insured by MBIA Corp. MBIA Corp. uses up to a total of four probability-weighted scenarios in order to estimate its reserves or impairments for ABS CDOs.

As of December 31, 2012, MBIA Corp. established loss and LAE reserves totaling $143 million related to ABS CDO financial guarantee insurance policies after the elimination of $236 million as a result of consolidating VIEs. For the year ended December 31, 2012, MBIA Corp. had a benefit of $21 million of losses and LAE recorded in earnings related to ABS CDO financial guarantee insurance policies after the elimination of a $24 million benefit as a result of consolidating VIEs. In the event of further deteriorating performance of the collateral referenced or held in ABS CDO transactions, the amount of losses estimated by MBIA Corp. could increase materially.

Credit Impairments Related to Structured CMBS Pools, CRE CDOs and CRE Loan Pools (Financial Guarantees and Insured Derivatives)

Most of the structured CMBS pools, CRE CDOs and CRE loan pools insured by MBIA Corp. are accounted for as insured credit derivatives and are carried at fair value in MBIA Corp.’s consolidated financial statements. Since MBIA Corp.’s insured credit derivatives have similar terms, conditions, risks, and economic profiles to its financial guarantee insurance policies, MBIA Corp. evaluates them for impairment in the same way that it estimates loss and LAE for its financial guarantee policies. The following discussion provides information about MBIA Corp.’s process for estimating credit impairments on these contracts using its statutory loss reserve methodology, determined as the present value of the probability-weighted potential future losses, net of estimated recoveries, across multiple scenarios, plus actual payments and collections.

MBIA Corp. has developed multiple scenarios to consider the range of potential outcomes in the CRE market and their impact on MBIA Corp. The approaches require substantial judgments about the future performance of the underlying loans, and include the following:

• The first approach considers the range of commutation agreements achieved and agreed to since 2010, which included 66 structured CMBS pools, CRE CDOs and CRE loan pool policies totaling $33.1 billion of gross insured exposure. MBIA Corp. considers the range of commutations achieved over the past several years with multiple counterparties. This approach results in an estimated price to commute the remaining policies with price estimates, based on this experience. It is customized by counterparty and is dependent on the level of dialogue with the counterparty and the credit quality and payment profile of the underlying exposure.

• The second approach considers current delinquency rates and uses current and projected net operating income (“NOI”) and capitalization rates (“Cap Rates”) to project losses under two scenarios. Loans are stratified by size with larger loans being valued utilizing lower Cap Rates than for smaller loans. These scenarios also assume that Cap Rates and NOIs remain flat for the near term and then begin to improve gradually.

32

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 6: Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves (continued)

Additionally, in these scenarios, any loan with a balance greater than $75 million with a debt service coverage ratio (“DSCR”) less than 1.0x or that was reported as being in any stage of delinquency, was reviewed individually so that performance and loss severity could be more accurately determined. Specific loan level assumptions for this large loan subset were then incorporated into these scenarios, as well as specific assumptions regarding certain smaller loans when there appeared to be a material change in the asset’s financial or delinquency performance over the preceding six months. As MBIA Corp. continues to increase the level of granularity in its individual loan assessments, it analyzes and adjusts assumptions for loans with certain mitigating attributes, such as no lifetime delinquency, recent appraisals indicating sufficient value and large capital reserve levels. These scenarios project different levels of additional defaults with respect to loans that are current. This approach makes use of the most recent financial statements available at the property level.

• The third approach stratifies loans into buckets based on delinquency status (including a “current” bucket) and utilizes recent Roll Rates actually experienced within each of the commercial mortgage-backed index (“CMBX”) series in order to formulate an assumption to predict future delinquencies. Ultimately, this generates losses over a projected time horizon based on the assumption that loss severities will begin to decline from the high levels seen over the past two years. MBIA Corp. further examines those loans referenced in the CMBX indices which were categorized as 90+ days delinquent or in the process of foreclosure and determines the average monthly balance of such loans which were cured. MBIA Corp. then applies the most recent rolling six-month average balance of all such cured loans to all underperforming loans in the 90+ day delinquent bucket or in the foreclosure process (and those projected to roll into late stage delinquency from the current and lesser stage levels of delinquency) and assumes all other loans are liquidated. MBIA Corp. reserves the right to exclude any aberrant data from this analysis and also assumes all loans in the REO category liquidate over the next twelve months.

• The fourth approach is based on a proprietary model developed by reviewing performance data on over 80,000 securitized CRE loans originated between 1992 and 2011. The time period covered during the performance review includes the years 2006 through 2011. MBIA Corp. believes that these five years represent an appropriate time period in which to conduct a performance review because they encompass a period of extreme stress in the economy and the CRE market.

Based on a review of the data, MBIA Corp. found property type and the DSCR to be the most significant determinants of a loan’s default probability, with other credit characteristics less influential. As a result, MBIA Corp. developed a model in which the loans were divided into 168 representative cohorts based on their DSCR and property type. For each of these cohorts, MBIA Corp. calculated the average annual probability of default, and then ran Monte Carlo simulations to estimate the timing of defaults. In addition, the model incorporated the following logic:

• NOI and Cap Rates were assumed to remain at current levels for loans in MBIA Corp.’s classified portfolio, resulting in no modifications or extensions under the model, other than as described in the next bullet point, to reflect the possibility that the U.S. economy and CRE market could experience no growth for the foreseeable future.

• Any valuation estimates obtained by special servicers since a loan’s origination as well as MBIA Corp.’s individual large loan level analysis for loans with balances greater than $75 million were incorporated as described in the second approach. However, in the fourth approach no adjustments were made for loans lower than $75 million regardless of any mitigating factors.

The loss severities projected by these scenarios vary widely, from moderate to substantial losses, with the majority of projected losses relating to a subset of transactions with a single counterparty. Actual losses will be a function of the proportion of loans in the pools that are foreclosed and liquidated and the loss severities associated with those liquidations. If the deductibles in MBIA Corp.’s insured transactions and underlying referenced CMBS transactions are fully eroded, additional property level losses upon foreclosures and liquidations could result in substantial losses for MBIA Corp. Since foreclosures and liquidations have only begun to take place during this economic cycle, particularly for larger properties, ultimate loss rates remain uncertain.

33

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 6: Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves (continued)

Whether CMBS collateral is included in a structured pool or in a CRE CDO, MBIA Corp. believes the modeling related to the underlying bond should be the same. However, adjustments may be needed for structural or legal reasons. MBIA Corp. assigns a wide range of probabilities to these scenarios, with lower severity scenarios being weighted more heavily than higher severity scenarios. This reflects the view that liquidations will continue to be mitigated by loan extensions and modifications, and that property values and NOIs have bottomed for many sectors and markets in the U.S. The weightings are customized to each counterparty. If macroeconomic stress were to increase or the U.S. goes into a recession, higher delinquencies, liquidations and/or higher severities of loss upon liquidation may result and MBIA Corp. may incur substantial additional losses. The foreclosure and REO pipelines are still relatively robust, with several restructurings and liquidations yet to occur, so the range of possible outcomes is wider than those for MBIA Corp.’s exposures to ABS CDOs and second-lien RMBS.

In the CRE CDO portfolio, transaction-specific structures require managers to report reduced enhancement according to certain guidelines which often include downgrades even when the bond is still performing. As a result, in addition to collateral defaults, reported enhancement has been reduced significantly in some CRE CDOs. Moreover, many of the CRE CDO positions are amortizing more quickly than originally expected as most or all interest proceeds that would have been allocated to more junior classes within the CDO have been diverted and redirected to pay down the senior most classes insured by MBIA Corp.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, MBIA Corp. incurred $46 million of losses and LAE recorded in earnings related to CRE CDO financial guarantee insurance policies. For the year ended December 31, 2012, additional credit impairments and LAE on structured CMBS pools, CRE CDOs and CRE loan pools were estimated to be $852 million as a result of additional delinquencies and loan level liquidations, as well as continued refinements of MBIA Corp.’s assessment of various commutation possibilities. The majority of the increase relates to a subset of transactions with a single counterparty. The cumulative credit impairments and LAE on structured CMBS pools, CRE CDOs and CRE loan pools were estimated to be $3.6 billion through December 31, 2012. Although the pace of increases in the delinquency rate has slowed and many loans are being modified, liquidations have taken place. Some loans were liquidated with minimal losses of 1% to 2%, others experienced near complete losses, and in some cases severities exceeded 100%. These liquidations have led to losses in the CMBS market, and in many cases, have resulted in reductions of enhancement to the individual CMBS bonds referenced by the insured structured CMBS pools. In certain insured transactions, these losses have resulted in deductible erosion. Bond level enhancement and pool level deductibles are structural features intended to mitigate losses to MBIA Corp. However, some of the transactions reference similar rated subordinate tranches of CMBS bonds. When there are broad-based declines in property performance, this leverage can result in rapid deterioration in pool performance.

Loss and LAE Activity

Financial Guarantee Insurance Losses (Non-Derivative)

MBIA Corp.’s financial guarantee insurance losses and LAE for the year ended December 31, 2012 are presented in the following table:

Losses and LAE
	Year Ended December 31, 2012
In millions	Second-lien RMBS		First-lien RMBS		Other(1)		Total
Losses and LAE related to actual and expected payments	$	220	$	147	$	91	$	458
Recoveries of actual and expected payments		(371)		1		(47)		(417)
Gross losses incurred		(151)		148		44		41
Reinsurance		—		(1)		(11)		(12)
Losses and LAE	$	(151)	$	147	$	33	$	29

(1)—Primarily financial guarantee CMBS.

34

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 6: Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves (continued)

The second-lien RMBS losses and LAE related to actual and expected payments included in the preceding table comprise net increases of previously established reserves. The second-lien RMBS recoveries of actual and expected payments comprise $454 million in recoveries resulting from ineligible mortgage loans included in insured exposures that are subject to contractual obligations by sellers/servicers to repurchase or replace such mortgages, offset by an $83 million reduction in excess spread. The first-lien losses and LAE primarily resulted from credit deterioration.

The following table provides information about the financial guarantees and related claim liability included in each of MBIA Corp.’s surveillance categories as of December 31, 2012:

	Surveillance Categories
$ in millions	Caution List Low		Caution List Medium		Caution List High		Classified List		Total
Number of policies		49		25		8		204		286
Number of issues(1)		27		15		8		135		185
Remaining weighted average contract period (in years)		8.2		4.0		6.0		9.5		8.6
Gross insured contractual payments outstanding:(2)
Principal	$	4,126	$	1,176	$	307	$	9,412	$	15,021
Interest		2,690		256		69		5,231		8,246
Total	$	6,816	$	1,432	$	376	$	14,643	$	23,267
Gross claim liability	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,569	$	1,569
Less:
Gross potential recoveries		—		—		—		4,090		4,090
Discount, net		—		—		—		233		233
Net claim liability (recoverable)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(2,754)	$	(2,754)
Unearned premium revenue	$	142	$	11	$	2	$	121	$	276

(1)—An “issue” represents the aggregate of financial guarantee policies that share the same revenue source for purposes of making debt service payments.

(2)—Represents contractual principal and interest payments due by the issuer of the obligations insured by MBIA Corp.

35

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 6: Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves (continued)

The following table provides information about the financial guarantees and related claim liability included in each of MBIA Corp.’s surveillance categories as of December 31, 2011:

	Surveillance Categories
$ in millions	Caution List Low		Caution List Medium		Caution List High		Classified List		Total
Number of policies		46		26		14		200		286
Number of issues(1)		28		16		11		130		185
Remaining weighted average contract period (in years)		8.0		5.5		6.0		9.6		8.7
Gross insured contractual payments outstanding:(2)
Principal	$	4,203	$	1,190	$	561	$	10,420	$	16,374
Interest		2,570		338		144		5,836		8,888
Total	$	6,773	$	1,528	$	705	$	16,256	$	25,262
Gross claim liability	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,812	$	1,812
Less:
Gross potential recoveries		—		—		—		3,813		3,813
Discount, net		—		—		—		177		177
Net claim liability (recoverable)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(2,178)	$	(2,178)
Unearned premium revenue	$	154	$	16	$	3	$	134	$	307

(1)—An “issue” represents the aggregate of financial guarantee policies that share the same revenue source for purposes of making debt service payments.

(2)—Represents contractual principal and interest payments due by the issuer of the obligations insured by MBIA Corp.

The gross claim liability as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 in the preceding tables represents MBIA Corp.’s estimate of undiscounted probability-weighted future claim payments, which principally relate to insured first-lien and second-lien RMBS transactions and U.S. public finance transactions. The gross potential recoveries represent MBIA Corp.’s estimate of undiscounted probability-weighted recoveries of actual claim payments and recoveries of estimated future claim payments, and principally relate to insured second-lien RMBS transactions. Both amounts reflect the elimination of claim liabilities and potential recoveries related to VIEs consolidated by MBIA Corp.

The following table presents the components of MBIA Corp.’s loss and LAE reserves and insurance loss recoverable as reported on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 for insured obligations within MBIA Corp.’s “Classified List.” The loss reserves (claim liability) and insurance claim loss recoverable included in the following table represent the present value of the probability-weighted future claim payments and recoveries reported in the preceding tables.

	As of December 31,
In millions	2012		2011
Loss reserves (claim liability)	$	786	$	781
LAE reserves		60		55
Loss and LAE reserves	$	846	$	836
Insurance claim loss recoverable	$	(3,610)	$	(3,032)
LAE insurance loss recoverable		(38)		(14)
Insurance loss recoverable	$	(3,648)	$	(3,046)
Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses	$	152	$	174
Reinsurance recoverable on LAE reserves		6		3
Reinsurance recoverable on paid losses		1		1
Reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses	$	159	$	178

36

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 6: Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves (continued)

As of December 31, 2012, loss and LAE reserves include $1.2 billion of reserves for expected future payments offset by expected recoveries of such future payments of $320 million. As of December 31, 2011, loss and LAE reserves included $1.4 billion of reserves for expected future payments offset by expected recoveries of such future payments of $562 million. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the insurance loss recoverable principally related to estimated recoveries of payments made by MBIA Corp. resulting from ineligible mortgage loans in certain insured second-lien residential mortgage loan securitizations that are subject to a contractual obligation by the sellers/servicers to repurchase or replace the ineligible mortgage loans and expected future recoveries on second-lien RMBS transactions resulting from expected excess spread generated by performing loans in such transactions. MBIA Corp. expects to be reimbursed for the majority of its potential recoveries related to ineligible mortgage loans by the second half of 2013.

Total paid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance and collections, for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $502 million, including $421 million related to insured second-lien RMBS transactions. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the increase in insurance loss recoverable related to paid losses totaled $602 million, and primarily related to insured second-lien RMBS transactions.

The following table presents MBIA Corp.’s second-lien RMBS exposure, gross undiscounted claim liability and potential recoveries for amounts excluding consolidated VIEs and amounts related to consolidated VIEs, as of December 31, 2012. All insured transactions reviewed with potential recoveries are included within the “Classified List.”

Second-lien RMBS Exposure			Outstanding				Gross Undiscounted
$ in billions	Issues		Gross Principal		Gross Interest		Claim Liability		Potential Recoveries
Excluding Consolidated VIEs:
Insured issues designated as “Classified List”		22	$	4.0	$	1.6	$	0.2	$	3.5
Insured issues reviewed with potential recoveries		15	$	3.7	$	1.5	$	0.2	$	3.4
Consolidated VIEs:
Insured issues designated as “Classified List”		12	$	2.2	$	0.8	$	0.1	$	1.4
Insured issues reviewed with potential recoveries		11	$	2.1	$	0.8	$	0.1	$	1.4

MBIA Corp. has performed reviews on 29 of the 34 total insured issues designated as “Classified List” and recorded potential recoveries on 26 of those 29 issues, primarily related to four issuers (Countrywide, RFC, GMAC and Credit Suisse). In addition, MBIA Corp. has received consideration on two transactions, including one Alt-A transaction, which have been excluded in the preceding table.

The following tables present changes in MBIA Corp.’s loss and LAE reserves for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. Changes in the loss and LAE reserves attributable to the accretion of the claim liability discount, changes in discount rates, changes in the timing and amounts of estimated payments and recoveries, changes in assumptions and changes in LAE reserves are recorded in “Losses (recoveries) and loss adjustment” expenses in MBIA Corp.’s consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the weighted average risk-free rate used to discount MBIA Corp.’s loss reserves (claim liability) was 1.38% and 1.53%, respectively. LAE reserves are expected to be settled within a one-year period and are not discounted.

In millions		Changes in Loss and LAE Reserves for the Year Ended December 31, 2012
Gross Loss and LAE Reserves as of December 31, 2011		Loss Payments for Cases with Reserves		Accretion of Claim Liability Discount		Changes in Discount Rates		Changes in Timing of Payments		Changes in Amount of Net Payments		Changes in Assumptions		Changes in Unearned Premium Revenue		Changes in LAE Reserves		Gross Loss and LAE Reserves as of December 31, 2012
$	836	$	(395)	$	11	$	(26)	$	52	$	46	$	316	$	1	$	5	$	846

The decrease in MBIA Corp.’s gross loss and LAE reserves reflected in the preceding table was primarily due to decreases in reserves related to loss payments on insured first-lien and second-lien RMBS issues outstanding as of December 31, 2011.

37

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 6: Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves (continued)

These decreases were offset by increases in changes in assumptions on insured first-lien and second-lien RMBS issues, changes in timing and amount of payments.

In millions		Changes in Loss and LAE Reserves for the Year Ended December 31, 2011
Gross Loss and LAE Reserves as of December 31, 2010		Loss Payments for Cases with Reserves		Accretion of Claim Liability Discount		Changes in Discount Rates		Changes in Timing of Payments		Changes in Amount of Net Payments		Changes in Assumptions		Changes in Unearned Premium Revenue		Changes in LAE Reserves		Gross Loss and LAE Reserves as of December 31, 2011
$	1,129	$	(523)	$	14	$	(20)	$	38	$	—	$	193	$	20	$	(15)	$	836

The decrease in MBIA Corp.’s gross loss and LAE reserves reflected in the preceding table was primarily due to a decrease in reserves related to loss payments on insured first-lien and second-lien RMBS issues. Offsetting these decreases were changes in assumptions due to additional defaults and charge-offs of ineligible mortgage loans on insured second-lien RMBS issues outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and changes in the timing of payments.

Current period changes in MBIA Corp.’s estimate of potential recoveries may be recorded as an insurance loss recoverable asset, netted against the gross loss and LAE reserve liability, or both. The following tables present changes in MBIA Corp.’s insurance loss recoverable and changes in recoveries on unpaid losses reported within MBIA Corp.’s claim liability for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. Changes in insurance loss recoverable attributable to the accretion of the discount on the recoverable, changes in discount rates, changes in the timing and amounts of estimated collections, changes in assumptions and changes in LAE recoveries are recorded in “Losses (recoveries) and loss adjustment” expenses in MBIA Corp.’s consolidated statements of operations.

	Gross Reserve as of December 31, 2011		Changes in Insurance Loss Recoverable and Recoveries on Unpaid Losses for the Year Ended December 31, 2012														Gross Reserve as of December 31, 2012
In millions			Collections for Cases with Recoveries		Accretion of Recoveries		Changes in Discount Rates		Changes in Timing  of Collections		Changes in Amount  of Collections		Changes in Assumptions		Changes in LAE Recoveries
Insurance loss recoverable	$	3,046	$	(13)	$	32	$	4	$	—	$	(145)	$	700	$	24	$	3,648
Recoveries on unpaid losses		562		—		7		13		—		—		(251)		(11)		320
Total	$	3,608	$	(13)	$	39	$	17	$	—	$	(145)	$	449	$	13	$	3,968

MBIA Corp.’s insurance loss recoverable increased during 2012 primarily due to changes in assumptions associated with issues outstanding as of December 31, 2011, which related to increases in excess spread and ineligible mortgage loans included in insured second-lien residential mortgage securitization exposures that are subject to contractual obligations by sellers/servicers to repurchase or replace such mortgages, partially offset by changes in the amount of collections. Recoveries on unpaid losses decreased primarily due to changes in assumptions as a result of a reduction of excess spread related to first-lien and second-lien RMBS transactions offset by changes in discount rates.

			Changes in Insurance Loss Recoverable and Recoveries on Unpaid Losses for the Year Ended December 31, 2011
In millions	Gross Reserve as of December 31, 2010		Collections for Cases with Recoveries		Accretion of Recoveries		Changes in Discount Rates		Changes in Timing of Collections		Changes in Amount of Collections		Changes in Assumptions		Changes in LAE Recoveries		Gross Reserve as of December 31, 2011
Insurance loss recoverable	$	2,531	$	(101)	$	57	$	49	$	—	$	(227)	$	723	$	14	$	3,046
Recoveries on unpaid losses		896		—		16		68		—		—		(416)		(2)		562
Total	$	3,427	$	(101)	$	73	$	117	$	—	$	(227)	$	307	$	12	$	3,608

MBIA Corp.’s insurance loss recoverable increased during 2011 primarily due to changes in assumptions associated with estimates of potential recoveries on issues outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and related to ineligible mortgage loans included in insured second-lien residential mortgage securitization exposures that are subject to contractual obligations by sellers/servicers to repurchase or replace such mortgages, partially offset by changes in the amount of collections.

38

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 6: Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves (continued)

Recoveries on unpaid losses decreased primarily due to changes in assumptions as a result of reduced expectations of future claim payments on U.S. public finance transactions, which resulted in a corresponding reduction in future expected recoveries. In addition, a reduction of excess spread related to first-lien and second-lien RMBS transactions reported in recoveries on unpaid losses was offset by an increase in excess spread on paid losses reported in insurance loss recoverable.

The following table presents MBIA Corp.’s total estimated recoveries from ineligible mortgage loans included in certain insured second-lien mortgage loan securitizations as of December 31, 2012. The total estimated recoveries from ineligible mortgage loans of $3.6 billion include $2.5 billion recorded as “Insurance loss recoverable” and $1.1 billion recorded as “Loan repurchase commitments” presented under the heading “Assets of consolidated variable interest entities” on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets.

In millions
Total Estimated Recoveries from Ineligible Mortgage Loans as of December 31, 2011		Accretion of Future Collections		Changes in Discount Rates		Recoveries (Collections)		Changes in Amount of Collections		Changes in Assumptions		Total Estimated Recoveries from Ineligible Mortgage Loans as of December 31, 2012
$	3,119	$	36	$	2	$	—	$	—	$	426	$	3,583

MBIA Corp.’s total estimated recoveries from ineligible mortgage loans in the preceding table increased primarily as a result of the probability-weighted scenarios as described within the preceding “Second-lien RMBS Recoveries” section.

The following table presents MBIA Corp.’s total estimated recoveries from ineligible mortgage loans included in certain insured second-lien mortgage loan securitizations as of December 31, 2011. The total estimated recoveries from ineligible mortgage loans of $3.1 billion include $2.0 billion recorded as “Insurance loss recoverable” and $1.1 billion recorded as “Loan repurchase commitments” presented under the heading “Assets of consolidated variable interest entities” on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets.

In millions
Total Estimated Recoveries from Ineligible Mortgage Loans as of December 31, 2010		Accretion of Future Collections		Changes in Discount Rates		Recoveries (Collections)		Changes in Amount of Collections		Changes in Assumptions		Total Estimated Recoveries from Ineligible Mortgage Loans as of December 31, 2011
$	2,517	$	65	$	35	$	(86)	$	29	$	559	$	3,119

MBIA Corp.’s total estimated recoveries from ineligible mortgage loans in the preceding table increased primarily as a result of the probability-weighted scenarios as described within the preceding “Second-lien RMBS Recoveries” section.

Remediation actions may involve, among other things, waivers or renegotiations of financial covenants or triggers, waivers of contractual provisions, the granting of consents, transfer of servicing, consideration of restructuring plans, acceleration, security or collateral enforcement, actions in bankruptcy or receivership, litigation and similar actions. The types of remedial actions pursued are based on the insured obligation’s risk type and the nature and scope of the event giving rise to the remediation. As part of any such remedial actions, MBIA Corp. seeks to improve its security position and to obtain concessions from the issuer of the insured obligation. From time to time, the issuer of an MBIA Corp.-insured obligation may, with the consent of MBIA Corp., restructure the insured obligation by extending the term, increasing or decreasing the par amount or decreasing the related interest rate, with MBIA Corp. insuring the restructured obligation.

39

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 6: Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves (continued)

Costs associated with remediating insured obligations assigned to MBIA Corp.’s “Caution List—Low,” “Caution List—Medium,” “Caution List—High” and “Classified List” are recorded as LAE. LAE is primarily recorded as part of MBIA Corp.’s provision for its loss reserves and included in “Losses (recoveries) and loss adjustment” on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated statements of operations. The following table presents the gross expenses related to remedial actions for insured obligations:

	Years Ended December 31,
In millions	2012		2011		2010
Loss adjustment expense incurred, gross	$	131	$	120	$	91

Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value Measurement

Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant. Therefore, even when market assumptions are not readily available, MBIA Corp.’s own assumptions are set to reflect those which it believes market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability at the measurement date. The fair value measurements of financial instruments held or issued by MBIA Corp. are determined through the use of observable market data when available. Market data is obtained from a variety of third-party sources, including dealer quotes. If dealer quotes are not available for an instrument that is infrequently traded, MBIA Corp. uses alternate valuation methods, including either dealer quotes for similar instruments or modeling using market data inputs. The use of alternate valuation methods generally requires considerable judgment in the application of estimates and assumptions, and changes to such estimates and assumptions may produce materially different fair values.

The accounting guidance for fair value measurement establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available and reliable. Observable inputs are those that MBIA Corp. believes that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on available market data. Unobservable inputs are those that reflect MBIA Corp.’s beliefs about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on the best information available. The fair value hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the observability and reliability of inputs, as follows:

• Level 1—Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that MBIA Corp. can access. Since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market, valuation of these products does not entail any degree of judgment.

• Level 2—Valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 assets include debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments, securities which are priced using observable inputs and derivative contracts whose values are determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.

• Level 3—Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the overall fair value measurement. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques where significant inputs are unobservable, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

The availability of observable inputs can vary from product to product and period to period and is affected by a wide variety of factors, including, for example, the type of product, whether the product is new and not yet established in the marketplace, and other characteristics particular to the product. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, MBIA Corp. assigns the level in the fair value hierarchy for which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls, based on the least observable input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

40

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

1. Financial Assets (excluding derivative assets)

Financial assets, excluding derivative assets, held by MBIA Corp. primarily consist of investments in debt securities. Substantially all of MBIA Corp.’s investments are priced by independent third parties, including pricing services and brokers. Typically MBIA Corp. receives one pricing service value or broker quote for each instrument, which represents a non-binding indication of value. MBIA Corp. reviews the assumptions, inputs and methodologies used by pricing services to obtain reasonable assurance that the prices used in its valuations reflect fair value. When MBIA Corp. believes a third-party quotation differs significantly from its internally developed expectation of fair value, whether higher or lower, MBIA Corp. reviews its data or assumptions with the provider. This review includes comparing significant assumptions such as prepayment speeds, default ratios, forward yield curves, credit spreads and other significant quantitative inputs to internal assumptions, and working with the price provider to reconcile the differences. The price provider may subsequently provide an updated price. In the event that the price provider does not update their price, and MBIA Corp. still does not agree with the price provided, MBIA Corp. will try to obtain a price from another third-party provider, such as a broker, or use an internally developed price which it believes represents the fair value of the investment. The fair values of investments for which internal prices were used were not significant to the aggregate fair value of MBIA Corp.’s investment portfolio as of December 31, 2012 or 2011. All challenges to third-party prices are reviewed by staff of MBIA Corp. with relevant expertise to ensure reasonableness of assumptions.

In addition to challenging pricing assumptions, MBIA Corp. obtains reports from the independent accountants for significant third-party pricing services attesting to the effectiveness of the controls over data provided to MBIA Corp. These reports are obtained annually and are reviewed by MBIA Corp. to ensure key controls are applied by the pricing services, and that appropriate user controls are in place at the third-party pricing services organization to ensure proper measurement of the fair values of its investments. In the event that any controls in these reports are deemed ineffective by independent accountants, MBIA Corp. will take the necessary actions to ensure that internal user controls are in place to mitigate the control risks. No deficiencies were noted for significant third-party pricing services used.

2. Derivative Assets and Liabilities

MBIA Corp.’s derivative liabilities are primarily insured credit derivatives that reference structured pools of cash securities and CDSs. MBIA Corp. generally insured the most senior liabilities of such transactions, and at the inception of transactions its exposure generally had more subordination than needed to achieve triple-A ratings from credit rating agencies. The types of collateral underlying its insured derivatives consist of cash securities and CDSs referencing primarily corporate, asset-backed, residential mortgage-backed, commercial mortgage-backed, CRE loans, and CDO securities.

MBIA Corp.’s insured credit derivative contracts are non-traded structured credit derivative transactions. Since insured derivatives are highly customized and there is generally no observable market for these derivatives, MBIA Corp. estimates their fair values in a hypothetical market based on internal and third-party models simulating what a similar company would charge to assume MBIA Corp.’s position in the transaction at the measurement date. This pricing would be based on the expected loss of the exposure. MBIA Corp. reviews its valuation model results on a quarterly basis to assess the appropriateness of the assumptions and results in light of current market activity and conditions. This review is performed by internal staff with relevant expertise. If live market spreads or securities prices are observable for similar transactions, those spreads are an integral part of the analysis. New insured transactions that resemble existing (previously insured) transactions, if any, would be considered, as well as negotiated settlements of existing transactions.

MBIA Corp. may from time to time make changes in its valuation techniques if the change results in a measurement that it believes is equally or more representative of fair value under current circumstances.

41

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

3. Internal Review Process

All significant financial assets and liabilities, including derivative assets and liabilities, are reviewed by committees created by MBIA Corp. to ensure compliance with MBIA Corp. policies and risk procedures in the development of fair values of financial assets and liabilities. These valuation committees review, among other things, key assumptions used for internally developed prices, significant changes in sources and uses of inputs, including changes in model approaches, and any adjustments from third-party inputs or prices to internally developed inputs or prices. The committees also review any significant impairment or improvements in fair values of the financial instruments from prior periods. From time to time, these committees will reach out to MBIA Corp. valuation experts to better understand key methods and assumptions used for the determination of fair value, including understanding significant changes in fair values. These committees are comprised of senior finance team members with the relevant experience in the financial instruments their committee is responsible for. Each quarter, these committees document their agreement with the fair values developed by management of MBIA Corp. as reported in the quarterly and annual financial statements.

Valuation Techniques

Valuation techniques for financial instruments measured at fair value and included in the tables that follow are described below.

Fixed-Maturity Securities (including short-term investments) Held as Available-For-Sale, Investments (including fixed-maturity securities) Carried at Fair Value, Other Investments, and Investments Held-to-Maturity, at Amortized Cost.

Fixed-maturity securities (including short-term investments) held as available-for-sale, investments carried at fair value, other investments, and investments held-to-maturity, at amortized cost include investments in U.S. Treasury and government agencies, foreign governments, corporate obligations, mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities (including CMBS and CDOs), state and municipal bonds, equity securities (including perpetual preferred securities and money market mutual funds), and loans receivable with an affiliate.

These investments are generally valued based on recently executed transaction prices or quoted market prices. When quoted market prices are not available, fair value is generally determined using quoted prices of similar investments or a valuation model based on observable and unobservable inputs. Inputs vary depending on the type of investment. Observable inputs include contractual cash flows, interest rate yield curves, CDS spreads, prepayment and volatility scores, diversity scores, cross-currency basis index spreads, and credit spreads for structures similar to the financial instrument in terms of issuer, maturity and seniority. Unobservable inputs include cash flow projections and the value of any credit enhancement.

The fair value of the HTM investments is determined using discounted cash flow models. Key inputs include unobservable cash flows projected over the expected term of the investment discounted using observable interest rate yield curves of similar securities.

Investments based on quoted market prices of identical investments in active markets are classified as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Level 1 investments generally consist of U.S. Treasury and foreign government and agency investments. Quoted market prices of investments in less active markets, as well as investments which are valued based on other than quoted prices for which the inputs are observable, such as interest rate yield curves, are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Investments that contain significant inputs that are not observable are categorized as Level 3.

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Receivable for Investments Sold, Accrued Investment Income and Payable for Investments Purchased

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, receivable for investments sold, accrued investment income and payable for investments purchased approximate fair values due to the short-term nature and credit worthiness of these instruments.

42

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

Secured Loan to Parent

The fair value of the secured loan to Parent as of December 31, 2011 was determined based on the underlying securities pledged as collateral. The underlying securities were generally corporate bonds. The fair value of these corporate bonds was obtained using recently executed transactions or market price quotations where observable. When observable price quotations were not available, fair value was determined based on cash flow models with yield curves, bond or single name CDS spreads and diversity scores as key inputs. The secured loan was paid off in 2012.

Loans Receivable at Fair Value

Loans receivable at fair value are comprised of loans held by consolidated VIEs consisting of residential mortgage loans, commercial mortgage loans and other whole business loans. Fair values of residential mortgage loans are determined using quoted prices for MBS with similar characteristics and adjustments for the fair values of the financial guarantees provided by MBIA Corp. on the related MBS. Fair values of commercial mortgage loans and other whole business loans are valued based on quoted prices of similar collateralized MBS. Loans receivable at fair value are categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Loan Repurchase Commitments

Loan repurchase commitments are obligations owed by the sellers/servicers of mortgage loans to either MBIA Corp. as reimbursement of paid claims or to the RMBS trusts as defined in the transaction documents. Loan repurchase commitments are assets of the consolidated VIEs. This asset represents the rights of MBIA Corp. against the sellers/servicers for breaches of representations and warranties that the securitized residential mortgage loans sold to the trust to comply with stated underwriting guidelines and for the sellers/servicers to cure, replace, or repurchase mortgage loans. Fair value measurements of loan repurchase commitments represent the amounts owed by the sellers/servicers to either MBIA Corp. as reimbursement of paid claims or to the RMBS trusts as defined in the transaction documents. Loan repurchase commitments are not securities and no quoted prices or comparable market transaction information are observable or available. Loan repurchase commitments at fair value are categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Fair values of loan repurchase commitments are determined using discounted cash flow techniques based on inputs including:

• breach rates representing the rate at which the sellers/servicers failed to comply with stated representations and warranties;

• recovery rates representing the estimates of future cash flows for the asset, including estimates about possible variations in the amount of cash flows expected to be collected;

• expectations about possible variations in the timing of collections of the cash flows; and

• time value of money, represented by the rate on risk-free monetary assets.

Variable Interest Entity Notes

The fair values of VIE notes are determined based on recently executed transaction prices or quoted prices where observable. When position-specific quoted prices are not observable, fair values are based on quoted prices of similar securities. Fair values based on quoted prices of similar securities may be adjusted for factors unique to the securities, including any credit enhancement. When observable quoted prices are not available, fair value is determined based on discounted cash flow techniques of the underlying collateral using observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs include interest rate yield curves and bond spreads of similar securities. Unobservable inputs include the value of any credit enhancement. VIE notes are categorized in Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

Long-term Debt

Long-term debt consists of surplus notes and a secured loan from an affiliate. The fair value of the surplus notes is estimated based on quoted market prices for identical or similar securities.

43

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

The fair value of the secured loan is determined as the net present value of expected cash flows from the loan. The discount rate is the yield to maturity of a comparable corporate bond index. Long-term debt is categorized as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Insured Credit Derivatives

MBIA Corp. derivative contracts primarily consist of insured credit derivatives which cannot be legally traded and generally do not have observable market prices. MBIA Corp. determines the fair values of insured credit derivatives using valuation models. The fair valuation models are consistently applied from period to period, with refinements to the fair value estimation approach being applied as and when the information becomes available. Negotiated settlements are also considered when determining fair value to provide the best estimate of how another market participant would evaluate fair value.

Approximately 82% of the balance sheet fair value of insured credit derivatives as of December 31, 2012 was valued primarily based on the Binomial Expansion Technique (“BET”) Model. Approximately 18% of the balance sheet fair value of insured credit derivatives as of December 31, 2012 was valued primarily based on the internally developed Direct Price Model. An immaterial amount of insured credit derivatives were valued using the dual-default model. The valuation of insured derivatives includes the impact of its own credit standing. All of these derivatives are categorized as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as their fair value is derived using significant unobservable inputs.

A. Description of the BET Model

1. Valuation Model Overview

The BET Model estimates what a bond insurer would charge to guarantee a transaction at the measurement date, based on the market- implied default risk of the underlying collateral and the remaining structural protection in a deductible or subordination.

Inputs to the process of determining fair value for structured transactions using the BET Model include estimates of collateral loss, allocation of loss to separate tranches of the capital structure and calculation of the change in value.

• Estimates of aggregated collateral losses are calculated by reference to the following (described in further detail under “BET Model Inputs” below):

• credit spreads of underlying collateral based on actual spreads or spreads on similar collateral with similar ratings, or in some cases, are benchmarked; for collateral pools where the spread distribution is characterized by extremes, MBIA Corp. models each segment of the pool separately instead of using an overall pool average;

• diversity score of the collateral pool as an indication of correlation of collateral defaults; and

• recovery rate for all defaulted collateral.

• Allocation of losses to separate tranches of the capital structure according to priority of payments in a transaction.

• The inception-to-date unrealized gain or loss on a transaction is the difference between the original price of the risk (the original market-implied expected loss) and the current price of the risk based on the assumed market-implied expected losses derived from the model.

Additional structural assumptions of the BET Model are:

• Default probabilities are determined by three factors: credit spread, recovery rate after default and the time period under risk.

• Frequencies of defaults are modeled evenly over time.

44

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

• Collateral assets are generally considered on an average basis rather than being modeled on an individual basis.

• Collateral asset correlation is modeled using a diversity score, which is calculated based on industry or sector concentrations. Recovery rates are based on historical averages and updated based on market evidence.

2. Model Strengths and Weaknesses

The primary strengths of the BET model are:

• The model takes account of transaction structure and key drivers of fair value. Transaction structure includes par insured, weighted average life, level of deductible or subordination (if any) and composition of collateral.

• The model is a consistent approach to marking positions that minimizes the level of subjectivity. MBIA Corp. has also developed a hierarchy for usage of various market-based spread inputs that reduces the level of subjectivity, especially during periods of high illiquidity.

• The model uses market-based inputs including credit spreads for underlying reference collateral, recovery rates specific to the type and credit rating of referenced collateral, diversity score of the entire collateral pool, MBIA Corp.’s CDS and derivative recovery rate level.

The primary weaknesses of the BET Model are:

• As of December 31, 2012, some of the model inputs were either unobservable or derived from illiquid markets which might adversely impact the model’s reliability.

• The BET Model requires an input for collateral spreads. However, some securities are quoted only in price terms. For securities that trade substantially below par, the calculation of spreads from price to spread can be subjective.

• Results may be affected by using average spreads and a single diversity factor, rather than using specific spreads for each piece of underlying collateral and collateral-specific correlations.

3. BET Model Inputs

a. Credit spreads

The average spread of collateral is a key input as MBIA Corp. assumes credit spreads reflect the market’s assessment of default probability for each piece of collateral. Spreads are obtained from market data sources published by third parties (e.g., dealer spread tables for assets most closely resembling collateral within MBIA Corp.’s transactions) as well as collateral-specific spreads on the underlying reference obligations provided by trustees or market sources. Also, when these sources are not available, MBIA Corp. benchmarks spreads for collateral against market spreads or prices. This data is reviewed on an ongoing basis for reasonableness and applicability to MBIA Corp.’s derivative portfolio. MBIA Corp. also calculates spreads based on quoted prices and on internal assumptions about expected life when pricing information is available and spread information is not.

MBIA Corp. uses the spread hierarchy listed below in determining which source of spread information to use, with the rule being to use CDS spreads where available and cash security spreads as the next alternative.

Spread Hierarchy:

• Collateral-specific credit spreads when observable.

• Sector-specific spread tables by asset class and rating.

• Corporate spreads, including Bloomberg spread tables based on rating.

• Benchmark from most relevant market source when corporate spreads are not directly relevant.

45

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

There were some transactions where MBIA Corp. incorporated multiple levels within the hierarchy, including using actual collateral-specific credit spreads in combination with a calculated spread based on an assumed relationship. In those cases, MBIA Corp. classified the transaction as being benchmarked from the most relevant spread source even though the majority of the average spread was from actual collateral-specific spreads. As of December 31, 2012, sector-specific spreads were used in 9% of the transactions valued using the BET Model. Corporate spreads were used in 46% of the transactions and spreads benchmarked from the most relevant spread source were used for 45% of the transactions. The spread source can also be identified by whether or not it is based on collateral weighted average rating factor (“WARF”). No collateral-specific spreads are based on WARF, sector-specific and corporate spreads are based on WARF, and some benchmarked spreads are based on WARF. WARF-sourced and/or ratings-sourced credit spreads were used for 79% of the transactions.

Over time, the data inputs change as new sources become available, existing sources are discontinued or are no longer considered to be reliable or the most appropriate. It is always MBIA Corp.’s objective to use more observable spread hierarchies defined above. However, MBIA Corp. may on occasion move to less observable spread inputs due to the discontinuation of data sources or due to MBIA Corp. considering certain spread inputs no longer representative of market spreads.

b. Diversity scores

Diversity scores are a means of estimating the diversification in a portfolio. The diversity score estimates the number of uncorrelated assets that are assumed to have the same loss distribution as the actual portfolio of correlated assets. While diversity score is a required input into the BET model, due to current high levels of default within the collateral of the structures, diversity score does not have a significant impact on valuation.

c. Recovery rate

The recovery rate represents the percentage of par expected to be recovered after an asset defaults, indicating the severity of a potential loss. MBIA Corp. generally uses rating agency recovery assumptions which may be adjusted to account for differences between the characteristics and performance of the collateral used by the rating agencies and the actual collateral in MBIA Corp.-insured transactions. MBIA Corp. may also adjust rating agency assumptions based on the performance of the collateral manager and on empirical market data.

d. Nonperformance risk

MBIA Corp.’s valuation methodology for insured credit derivative liabilities incorporates MBIA Corp.’s own nonperformance risk. MBIA Corp. calculates the fair value by discounting the market value loss estimated through the BET Model at discount rates which include MBIA Corp.’s CDS spreads as of December 31, 2012. The CDS spreads assigned to each deal are based on the weighted average life of the deal. MBIA Corp. limits the nonperformance impact so that the derivative liability could not be lower than MBIA Corp.’s recovery derivative price multiplied by the unadjusted derivative liability.

B. Description of Direct Price Model

1. Valuation Model Overview

The Direct Price Model uses quoted market prices of financial assets correlated to the underlying collateral of the pool of assets backing the liabilities guaranteed by certain insured derivative liabilities. These quoted market prices are adjusted to reflect the unique characteristics of the liabilities of the entities backed by the correlated assets and unique terms of the insured derivative contracts.

46

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

2. Model Strengths and Weaknesses

The primary strengths of the Direct Price Model are:

• The model takes account of transaction structure and key drivers of market value. The transaction structure includes par insured, legal final maturity, level of deductible or subordination (if any) and composition of collateral.

• The model is a consistent approach to marking positions that minimizes the level of subjectivity. Model structure, inputs and operation are well documented by MBIA Corp.’s internal controls, creating a strong controls process in execution of the model.

• The model uses market inputs for each transaction with the most relevant being market prices for collateral, MBIA Corp.’s CDS and derivative recovery rate level and interest rates. Most of the market inputs are observable.

The primary weaknesses of the Direct Price Model are:

• There is no market in which to test and verify the fair values generated by MBIA Corp.’s model.

• The model does not take into account potential future volatility of collateral prices. When the market value of collateral is substantially lower than insured par and there is no or little subordination left in a transaction, which is the case for most of the transactions marked with this model, MBIA Corp. believes this assumption still allows a reasonable estimate of fair value.

3. Model Inputs

• Collateral prices

Fair value of collateral is based on quoted prices when available. When quoted prices are not available, a matrix pricing grid is used based on security type and rating to determine fair value of collateral, which applies an average based on securities with the same rating and security type categories.

• Interest rates

The present value of the market-implied potential losses was calculated assuming that MBIA Corp. deferred all principal losses to the legal final maturity. This was done through a cash flow model that calculated potential interest payments in each period and the potential principal loss at the legal final maturity. These cash flows were discounted using the LIBOR flat swap curve.

• Nonperformance risk

The methodology for calculating MBIA Corp.’s nonperformance risk is the same as used for the BET Model. Due to the current level of MBIA Corp. CDS spread rates and the long tenure of these transactions, the derivative recovery rate was used to estimate nonperformance risk for all transactions marked by this model.

Overall Model Results

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, MBIA Corp.’s net insured derivative liability was $2.9 billion and $4.8 billion, respectively, and was primarily related to the fair values of insured credit derivatives based on the results of the aforementioned pricing models. In the current environment the most significant driver of changes in fair value is nonperformance risk. In aggregate, the nonperformance calculation resulted in a pre-tax net insured derivative liability that was $4.4 billion and $5.7 billion lower than the net liability that would have been estimated if MBIA Corp. excluded nonperformance risk in its valuation as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Nonperformance risk is a fair value concept and does not contradict MBIA Corp.’s internal view, based on fundamental credit analysis of MBIA Corp.’s economic condition, that MBIA Corp. will be able to pay all claims when due.

47

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

Accrued Interest Expense

The fair value of the accrued interest expense on the 14% surplus notes due 2033 is determined based on the scheduled interest payments discounted by the market’s perception of the credit risk related to the repayment of the surplus notes. The credit risk related to the repayment of the surplus notes is based on recent trades of the surplus notes. The deferred interest payment will be due on the first business day on or after which MBIA Corp. obtains approval to make such payment.

The carrying amounts of accrued interest expense on all other long-term debt approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

Financial Guarantees

Gross Financial Guarantees—The fair value of gross financial guarantees is determined using discounted cash flow techniques based on inputs that include (i) assumptions of expected losses on financial guarantee policies where loss reserves have not been recognized, (ii) amount of losses expected on financial guarantee policies where loss reserves have been established, net of expected recoveries, (iii) the cost of capital reserves required to support the financial guarantee liability, (iv) operating expenses, and (v) discount rates. MBIA Corp.’s CDS spread and recovery rate are used as its discount rate.

The carrying value of MBIA Corp.’s gross financial guarantees consists of unearned premium revenue and loss and LAE reserves, net of the insurance loss recoverable as reported on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets.

Ceded Financial Guarantees—The fair value of ceded financial guarantees is determined by applying the percentage ceded to reinsurers to the related fair value of the gross financial guarantees. The carrying value of ceded financial guarantees consists of prepaid reinsurance premiums and reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses as reported on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets.

48

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

Significant Unobservable Inputs

The following table provides quantitative information regarding the significant unobservable inputs used by MBIA Corp. for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012. This table excludes inputs used to measure fair value that are not developed by MBIA Corp., such as broker prices and other third-party pricing service valuations.

In millions	Fair Value as of December 31, 2012		Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
Assets of consolidated VIEs:
Loans receivable at fair value	$	1,881	Quoted market prices adjusted for financial guarantees provided to VIE obligations	Impact of financial guarantee		0% - 14% (3%)
Loan repurchase commitments		1,086	Discounted cash flow	Recovery rates		10% - 75% (47%)
				Breach rates		66% - 94% (78%)
Liabilities of consolidated VIEs:
Variable interest entity notes		1,948	Quoted market prices of VIE assets adjusted for financial guarantees provided	Impact of financial guarantee		0% - 23% (6%)
Credit derivative liabilities, net:
CMBS		1,590	BET Model	Recovery rates		21% - 90% (51%)
				Nonperformance risk		19% - 59% (58%)
				Weighted average life (in years)		0.1 - 5.6 (4.4)
				CMBS spreads		1% - 23% (13%)
Multi-sector CDO		525	Direct Price Model	Nonperformance risk		59% - 59% (59%)
Other		806	BET Model	Recovery rates		42% - 75% (47%)
				Nonperformance risk		42% - 59% (58%)
				Weighted average life (in years)		0.1 - 19.6 (3.0)

Sensitivity of Significant Unobservable Inputs

The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of MBIA Corp.’s loans receivable at fair value of consolidated VIEs is the impact of the financial guarantee. The fair value of loans receivable is calculated by subtracting the value of the financial guarantee from the market value of VIE liabilities. The value of a financial guarantee is estimated by MBIA Corp. as the present value of expected cash payments under the policy. As expected cash payments provided by MBIA Corp. under the insurance policy increase, there is a lower expected cash flow on the underlying loans receivable of the VIE. This results in a lower fair value of the loans receivable in relation to the obligations of the VIE.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of MBIA Corp.’s loan repurchase commitments of consolidated VIEs are the recovery rates and the breach rates.

49

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

Recovery rates reflect the estimates of future cash flows reduced for litigation delays and risks and/or potential financial distress of the sellers/servicers. The estimated recoveries of the loan repurchase commitments may differ from the actual recoveries that may be received in the future. Breach rates represent the rate at which the mortgages fail to comply with stated representations and warranties of the sellers/servicers. Significant increases or decreases in the recovery rates and the breach rates would result in significantly higher or lower fair values of the loan repurchase commitments, respectively. Additionally, changes in the legal environment and the ability of the counterparties to pay would impact the recovery rate assumptions, which could significantly impact the fair value measurement. Any significant challenges by the counterparties to MBIA Corp.’s determination of breaches of representations and warranties could significantly adversely impact the fair value measurement. Recovery rates and breach rates are determined independently. Changes in one input will not necessarily have any impact on the other input.

The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of MBIA Corp.’s variable interest entity notes of consolidated VIEs is the impact of the financial guarantee. The fair value of VIE notes is calculated by adding the value of the financial guarantee to the market value of VIE assets. The value of a financial guarantee is estimated by MBIA Corp. as the present value of expected cash payments under the policy. As the value of the guarantee provided by MBIA Corp. to the obligations issued by the VIE increases, the credit support adds value to the liabilities of the VIE. This results in an increase in the fair value of the liabilities of the VIE.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of MBIA Corp.’s CMBS credit derivatives, which are valued using the BET Model, are CMBS spreads, recovery rates, nonperformance risk and weighted average life. The CMBS spread is an indicator of credit risk of the collateral securities. The recovery rate represents the percentage of notional expected to be recovered after an asset defaults, indicating the severity of a potential loss. The nonperformance risk is an assumption of MBIA Corp.’s own ability to pay and whether MBIA Corp. will have the necessary resources to pay the obligations as they come due. Weighted average life is based on MBIA Corp.’s estimate of when the principal of the underlying collateral of the CMBS structure will be repaid. A significant increase or decrease in CMBS spreads or weighted average life would result in an increase or decrease in the fair value of the derivative liabilities, respectively. Any significant increase or decrease in recovery rates or MBIA Corp.’s nonperformance risk would result in a decrease or increase in the fair value of the derivative liabilities, respectively. CMBS spreads, recovery rates, nonperformance risk and weighted average lives are determined independently. Changes in one input will not necessarily have any impact on the other inputs.

The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of MBIA Corp.’s multi-sector CDO credit derivatives, which are valued using the Direct Price Model, is nonperformance risk. The nonperformance risk is an assumption of MBIA Corp.’s own ability to pay and whether MBIA Corp. will have the necessary resources to pay the obligations as they come due. Any significant increase or decrease in MBIA Corp.’s nonperformance risk would result in a decrease or increase in the fair value of the derivative liabilities, respectively.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of MBIA Corp.’s other credit derivatives, which are valued using the BET Model, are recovery rates, nonperformance risk and weighted average life. The recovery rate represents the percentage of notional expected to be recovered after an asset defaults, indicating the severity of a potential loss. The nonperformance risk is an assumption of MBIA Corp.’s own ability to pay and whether MBIA Corp. will have the necessary resources to pay the obligations as they come due. Weighted average life is based on MBIA Corp.’s estimate of when the principal of the underlying collateral will be repaid. Any significant increase or decrease in weighted average life would result in an increase or decrease in the fair value of the derivative liabilities, respectively. Any significant increase or decrease in recovery rates or MBIA Corp.’s nonperformance risk would result in a decrease or increase in the fair value of the derivative liabilities, respectively. Recovery rates, nonperformance risk and weighted average lives are determined independently. Changes in one input will not necessarily have any impact on the other inputs.

50

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

The following tables present the fair value of MBIA Corp.’s assets (including short-term investments) and liabilities measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:

	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
In millions	Quoted Prices in Active Markets  for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Balance as of December 31, 2012
Assets:
Fixed-maturity investments:
U.S. Treasury and government agency	$	353	$	—	$	—		$	353
State and municipal bonds		—		7		—			7
Foreign governments		86		106		3	(1)		195
Corporate obligations		—		261		—			261
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential mortgage-backed agency		—		3		—			3
Residential mortgage-backed non-agency		—		29		3	(1)		32
Asset-backed securities:
Collateralized debt obligations		—		1		—			1
Other asset-backed		—		16		5	(1)		21
Total fixed-maturity investments		439		423		11			873
Money market securities		15		—		—			15
Equity securities		—		1		4	(1)		5
Cash and cash equivalents		397		—		—			397
Derivative assets:
Credit derivatives		—		7		—			7
Total derivative assets		—		7		—			7

(1)— Unobservable inputs are either not developed by MBIA Corp. or do not significantly impact the overall fair values of the aggregate financial assets and liabilities.

51

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
In millions	Quoted Prices in Active Markets  for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Balance as of December 31, 2012
Assets of consolidated VIEs:
Cash		176		—		—			176
Corporate obligations		—		58		56	(1)		114
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential mortgage-backed non-agency		—		787		6	(1)		793
Commercial mortgage-backed		—		409		7	(1)		416
Asset-backed securities:
Collateralized debt obligations		—		185		66	(1)		251
Other asset-backed		—		99		62	(1)		161
Loans receivable		—		—		1,881			1,881
Loan repurchase commitments		—		—		1,086			1,086
Derivative assets:
Total assets	$	1,027	$	1,969	$	3,179		$	6,175
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities:
Credit derivatives	$	—	$	12	$	2,921		$	2,933
Total derivative liabilities		—		12		2,921			2,933
Liabilities of consolidated VIEs:
Variable interest entity notes		—		1,727		1,948			3,675
Derivative liabilities:
Interest rate derivatives		—		141		—			141
Currency rate derivatives		—		—		21	(1)		21
Total derivative liabilities		—		141		21			162
Total liabilities	$	—	$	1,880	$	4,890		$	6,770

(1)— Unobservable inputs are either not developed by MBIA Corp. or do not significantly impact the overall fair values of the aggregate financial assets and liabilities.

52

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
In millions	Quoted Prices in Active Markets  for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance as of December 31, 2011
Assets:
Fixed-maturity investments:
U.S. Treasury and government agency	$	485	$	—	$	—	$	485
State and municipal bonds		—		22		—		22
Foreign governments		277		62		11		350
Corporate obligations		—		324		4		328
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential mortgage-backed agency		—		6		—		6
Residential mortgage-backed non-agency		—		41		7		48
Commercial mortgage-backed		—		1		—		1
Asset-backed securities:
Collateralized debt obligations		—		2		—		2
Other asset-backed		—		17		42		59
Total fixed-maturity investments		762		475		64		1,301
Money market securities		28		—		—		28
Equity securities		7		—		—		7
Cash and cash equivalents		136		—		—		136
Derivative assets:
Credit derivatives		—		8		—		8
Total derivative assets		—		8		—		8

53

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
In millions	Quoted Prices in Active Markets  for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Other Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance as of December 31, 2011
Assets of consolidated VIEs:
Cash		160		—		—		160
Corporate obligations		—		170		67		237
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential mortgage-backed agency		—		3		—		3
Residential mortgage-backed non-agency		—		1,344		21		1,365
Commercial mortgage-backed		—		559		22		581
Asset-backed securities:
Collateralized debt obligations		—		286		149		435
Other asset-backed		—		196		67		263
Loans receivable		—		—		2,046		2,046
Loan repurchase commitments		—		—		1,077		1,077
Derivative assets:
Credit derivatives		—		—		447		447
Interest rate derivatives		—		3		—		3
Total assets	$	1,093	$	3,044	$	3,960	$	8,097
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities:
Credit derivatives	$	—	$	18	$	4,790	$	4,808
Total derivative liabilities		—		18		4,790		4,808
Liabilities of consolidated VIEs:
Variable interest entity notes		—		1,865		2,922		4,787
Derivative liabilities:
Credit derivatives		—		—		527		527
Interest rate derivatives		—		281		—		281
Currency rate derivatives		—		—		17		17
Total derivative liabilities		—		281		544		825
Total liabilities	$	—	$	2,164	$	8,256	$	10,420

Level 3 Analysis

Level 3 assets at fair value, as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 represented approximately 51% and 49%, respectively, of total assets measured at fair value. Level 3 liabilities at fair value, as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, represented approximately 72% and 79%, respectively, of total liabilities measured at fair value.

54

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

The following tables present the fair values and carrying values of MBIA Corp.’s assets and liabilities that are disclosed at fair value but not reported at fair value on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:

	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
In millions	Quoted Prices in Active Markets  for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value Balance as of December 31, 2012		Carry Value Balance as of December  31, 2012
Assets:
Other investments	$	—	$	—	$	28	$	28	$	28
Accrued investment income		7		—		—		7		7
Assets of consolidated VIEs:
Investments held-to-maturity		—		—		2,675		2,675		2,829
Total assets	$	7	$	—	$	2,703	$	2,710	$	2,864
Liabilities:
Long-term debt	$	—	$	1,847	$	—	$	1,847	$	2,604
Accrued interest payable(1)		—		39		—		39		90
Liabilities of consolidated VIEs:
VIE notes		—		—		2,675		2,675		2,829
Total liabilities	$	—	$	1,886	$	2,675	$	4,561	$	5,523
Financial Guarantees:
Gross	$	—	$	—	$	(114)	$	(114)	$	(294)
Ceded		—		—		1,442		1,442		1,530

(1)—Reported within “Other liabilities” on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets.

	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
In millions	Quoted Prices in Active Markets  for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value Balance as of December 31, 2011		Carry Value Balance as of December 31, 2011
Assets:
Other investments	$	—	$	—	$	28	$	28	$	28
Secured loan to Parent		—		—		168		168		300
Accrued investment income		13		—		—		13		13
Receivable for investments sold		16		—		—		16		16
Assets of consolidated VIEs:
Investments held-to-maturity		—		—		2,469		2,469		2,840
Total assets	$	29	$	—	$	2,665	$	2,694	$	3,197
Liabilities:
Long-term debt	$	—	$	1,663	$	—	$	1,663	$	2,083
Accrued interest payable(1)		—		61		—		61		61
Liabilities of consolidated VIEs:
VIE notes		—		—		2,469		2,469		2,840
Total liabilities	$	—	$	1,724	$	2,469	$	4,193	$	4,984
Financial Guarantees:
Gross	$	—	$	—	$	786	$	786	$	744
Ceded		—		—		1,184		1,184		1,877

(1)—Reported within “Other liabilities” on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets.

55

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

The following tables present information about changes in Level 3 assets (including short-term investments) and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:

Changes in Level 3 Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis for the Year Ended December 31, 2012

In millions	Balance, Beginning of Year		Realized Gains / (Losses)		Unrealized Gains / (Losses) Included in Earnings		Unrealized Gains / (Losses) Included in OCI		Foreign Exchange Recognized in OCI or Earnings		Purchases		Issuances		Settlements		Sales		Transfers into Level 3(1)		Transfers out of Level 3(1)		Ending Balance		Change in Unrealized Gains (Losses) for the  Period Included in Earnings for Assets Still Held as of December 31, 2012
Assets:
Foreign governments	$	11	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1	$	21	$	—	$	(28)	$	(5)	$	3	$	—	$	3	$	—
Corporate obligations		4		—		—		—		(1)		8		—		(14)		(2)		13		(8)		—		—
Residential mortgage-backed non-agency		7		—		—		—		—		—		—		(2)		—		—		(2)		3		—
Other asset-backed		42		(31)		—		38		—		—		—		(3)		(41)		—		—		5		—
Equity securities		—		—		5		—		—		—		—		(1)		—		—		—		4		—
Assets of consolidated VIEs:
Corporate obligations		67		—		(19)		—		—		—		—		(4)		—		15		(3)		56		3
Residential mortgage-backed non-agency		21		—		6		—		—		—		—		(7)		(16)		6		(4)		6		3
Commercial mortgage-backed		22		—		4		—		—		—		—		(4)		(9)		5		(11)		7		1
Collateralized debt obligations		149		—		(25)		—		—		—		—		(2)		(73)		17		—		66		5
Other asset-backed		67		—		6		—		—		—		—		(10)		(35)		34		—		62		7
Loans receivable		2,046		—		114		—		—		—		—		(277)		(2)		—		—		1,881		114
Loan repurchase commitments		1,077		—		9		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		1,086		9
Total assets	$	3,513	$	(31)	$	100	$	38	$	—	$	29	$	—	$	(352)	$	(183)	$	93	$	(28)	$	3,179	$	142

In millions	Balance, Beginning of Year		Realized (Gains) / Losses		Unrealized (Gains) / Losses Included in Earnings		Unrealized (Gains) / Losses Included in OCI		Foreign Exchange Recognized in OCI or Earnings		Purchases		Issuances		Settlements		Sales		Transfers into Level 3(1)		Transfers out of Level 3(1)		Ending Balance		Change in Unrealized (Gains) Losses for the Period Included in Earnings for Assets Still Held as of December 31, 2012
Liabilities:
Credit derivatives, net	$	4,790	$	464	$	(1,869)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(464)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	2,921	$	(927)
Liabilities of consolidated VIEs:
VIE notes		2,922		—		448		—		—		—		—		(439)		(983)		—		—		1,948		409
Credit derivatives, net		80		—		2		—		—		—		—		—		(82)		—		—		—		—
Currency derivatives, net		17		—		4		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		21		4
Total liabilities	$	7,809	$	464	$	(1,415)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(903)	$	(1,065)	$	—	$	—	$	4,890	$	(514)

(1)—Transferred in and out at the end of the period.

56

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

Changes in Level 3 Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis for the Year Ended December 31, 2011

In millions	Balance, Beginning of Year		Realized Gains / (Losses)		Unrealized Gains / (Losses) Included in Earnings		Unrealized Gains / (Losses) Included in OCI		Foreign Exchange Recognized in OCI or Earnings		Purchases		Issuances		Settlements		Sales		Transfers into Level 3(1)		Transfers out of Level 3(1)		Ending Balance		Change in Unrealized Gains (Losses) for the Period Included in Earnings for Assets Still Held as of December 31, 2011
Assets:
State and municipal bonds	$	15	$	1	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(15)	$	(1)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Foreign governments		11		—		—		—		(2)		13		—		(10)		(1)		7		(7)		11		—
Corporate obligations		4		(3)		—		1		5		2		—		(89)		(37)		178		(57)		4		—
Residential mortgage-backed non-agency		5		—		—		—		2		5		—		(1)		(4)		1		(1)		7		—
Commercial mortgage-backed		3		—		—		(1)		—		—		—		—		(1)		—		(1)		—		—
Collateralized debt obligations		13		1		—		(1)		2		—		—		(10)		(5)		1		(1)		—		—
Other asset-backed		70		(62)		—		24		—		—		—		13		(2)		5		(6)		42		—
Assets of consolidated VIEs:
Corporate obligations		80		—		(17)		—		—		—		—		(6)		—		17		(7)		67		(2)
Residential mortgage-backed non-agency		22		—		(3)		—		—		—		—		(5)		(6)		13		—		21		—
Commercial mortgage-backed		23		—		9		—		—		—		—		(2)		(13)		7		(2)		22		3
Collateralized debt obligations		189		—		(25)		—		—		—		—		(6)		(39)		41		(11)		149		5
Other asset-backed		81		—		(10)		—		—		—		—		(2)		(19)		19		(2)		67		(4)
Loans receivable		2,183		—		132		—		—		24		—		(291)		(2)		—		—		2,046		132
Loan repurchase commitments		835		—		230		—		—		—		12		—		—		—		—		1,077		230
Total assets	$	3,534	$	(63)	$	316	$	23	$	7	$	44	$	12	$	(424)	$	(130)	$	289	$	(95)	$	3,513	$	364

In millions	Balance, Beginning of Year		Realized (Gains) / Losses		Unrealized (Gains) / Losses Included in Earnings		Unrealized (Gains) / Losses Beginning OCI		Foreign Exchange Recognized in OCI or Earnings		Purchases		Issuances		Settlements		Sales		Transfers into Level 3(1)		Transfers out of Level 3(1)		Ending Balance		Change in Unrealized (Gains) Losses for the Period Included in Earnings for Assets Still Held as of December 31, 2011
Liabilities:
Credit derivatives, net	$	4,476	$	2,477	$	314	$	—	$	—	$	(8)	$	—	$	(2,477)	$	—	$	8	$	—	$	4,790	$	2,702
Liabilities of consolidated VIEs:
VIE notes		4,698		—		105		—		—		—		—		(554)		(1,327)		—		—		2,922		105
Credit derivatives, net		638		—		(153)		—		—		—		—		—		(405)		—		—		80		(80)
Currency derivatives, net		14		—		3		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		17		3
Total liabilities	$	9,826	$	2,477	$	269	$	—	$	—	$	(8)	$	—	$	(3,031)	$	(1,732)	$	8	$	—	$	7,809	$	2,730

(1)—Transferred in and out at the end of the period..

57

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

Transfers into and out of Level 3 were $93 million and $28 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2012. Transfers into and out of Level 2 were $28 million and $93 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2012. Transfers into Level 3 were principally related to other asset-backed securities, corporate obligations and CDOs where inputs, which are significant to their valuation, became unobservable. These inputs included spreads, prepayment speeds, default speeds, default severities, yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals, and market corroborated inputs. Transfers out of Level 3 were principally for CMBS, corporate obligations and residential mortgage-backed non-agency. There were no transfers into or out of Level 1.

Transfers into and out of Level 3 were $297 million and $95 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2011. Transfers into and out of Level 2 were $95 million and $297 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2011. Transfers into Level 3 were principally related to corporate obligations and collateralized debt obligations where inputs, which are significant to their valuation, became unobservable during the period. These inputs included spreads, prepayment speeds, default speeds, default severities, yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals, and market corroborated inputs. Transfers out of Level 3 were principally for corporate obligations, collateralized debt obligations and foreign governments. There were no transfers into or out of Level 1.

All Level 1, 2 and 3 designations are made at the end of each accounting period.

Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings relating to Level 3 assets and liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 are reported on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated statements of operations as follows:

	Year Ended December 31, 2012
							Consolidated VIEs
In millions	Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Insured Derivatives		Net Realized Gains (Losses)		Net Gains (Losses) on Financial Instruments at Fair Value and Foreign Exchange		Net Gains (Losses) on Financial Instruments at Fair Value and Foreign Exchange
Total gains (losses) included in earnings	$	1,869	$	(507)	$	17	$	(359)
Change in unrealized gains (losses) for the period included in earnings for assets and liabilities still held as of December 31, 2012	$	927	$	—	$	—	$	(271)

	Year Ended December 31, 2011
							Consolidated VIEs
In millions	Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Insured Derivatives		Net Realized Gains (Losses)		Net Gains (Losses) on Financial Instruments at Fair Value and Foreign Exchange		Net Gains (Losses) on Financial Instruments at Fair Value and Foreign Exchange
Total gains (losses) included in earnings	$	(314)	$	(2,540)	$	—	$	361
Change in unrealized gains (losses) for the period included in earnings for assets and liabilities still held as of December 31, 2011	$	(2,702)	$	—	$	—	$	336

58

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

	Year Ended December 31, 2010
							Consolidated VIEs
In millions	Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Insured Derivatives		Net Realized Gains (Losses)		Net Gains (Losses) on Financial Instruments at Fair Value and Foreign Exchange		Net Gains (Losses) on Financial Instruments at Fair Value and Foreign Exchange
Total gains (losses) included in earnings	$	(703)	$	(282)	$	(1)	$	(295)
Change in unrealized gains (losses) for the period included in earnings for assets and liabilities still held as of December 31, 2010	$	(1,431)	$	—	$	—	$	(349)

Fair Value Option

MBIA Corp. elected to record at fair value certain financial instruments of VIEs that have been consolidated in connection with the adoption of the accounting guidance for consolidation of VIEs, among others.

The following table presents the changes in fair value included in MBIA Corp.’s consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, for all financial instruments for which the fair value option was elected:

	Net Gains (Losses) on Financial Instruments at Fair Value and  Foreign Exchange
In millions	2012		2011		2010
Fixed-maturity securities held at fair value	$	(55)	$	(339)	$	374
Loans receivable at fair value:
Residential mortgage loans		(107)		(143)		295
Other loans		(56)		(19)		(26)
Loan repurchase commitments		9		242		336
Other assets		—		—		26
Long-term debt		107		562		(599)

The following table reflects the difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate remaining contractual principal balance outstanding as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, for loans and VIE notes for which the fair value option was elected:

	As of December 31, 2012						As of December 31, 2011
In millions	Contractual Principal Outstanding		Fair Value		Difference		Contractual Principal Outstanding		Fair Value		Difference
Loans receivable at fair value:
Residential mortgage loans	$	2,307	$	1,735	$	572	$	2,769	$	1,895	$	874
Residential mortgage loans (90 days or more past due)		244		54		190		259		—		259
Other loans		22		22		—		129		43		86
Other loans (90 days or more past due)		197		70		127		324		108		216
Total loans receivable at fair value	$	2,770	$	1,881	$	889	$	3,481	$	2,046	$	1,435
VIE notes	$	9,079	$	3,675	$	5,404	$	13,684	$	4,787	$	8,897

Substantially all gains and losses included in earnings during the periods ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 on loans receivable and VIE notes are attributable to credit risk. This is primarily due to the high rate of defaults on loans and the collateral supporting the VIE notes, resulting in depressed pricing of the financial instruments.

59

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 8: Investments

MBIA Corp’s investments, excluding those elected under the fair value option, include debt and equity securities classified as either AFS or HTM. Other invested assets designated as AFS are primarily comprised of money market funds.

The following tables present the amortized cost, fair value, corresponding gross unrealized gains/losses and other-than-temporary impairments (“OTTI”) for AFS and HTM investments in MBIA Corp.’s investment portfolios as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:

	December 31, 2012
In millions	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
AFS Investments
Fixed-maturity investments:
U.S. Treasury and government agency	$	352	$	1	$	—	$	353
State and municipal bonds		6		1		—		7
Foreign governments		183		13		—		196
Corporate obligations		254		7		—		261
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential mortgage-backed agency		2		—		—		2
Residential mortgage-backed non-agency		31		2		—		33
Commercial mortgage-backed		1		—		(1)		—
Asset-backed securities:
Collateralized debt obligations		1		—		—		1
Other asset-backed		20		1		—		21
Total fixed-maturity investments		850		25		(1)		874
Money market securities		15		—		—		15
Equity securities		1		—		—		1
Total AFS investments	$	866	$	25	$	(1)	$	890
HTM Investments
Assets of consolidated VIEs:
Corporate obligations	$	2,829	$	2	$	(157)	$	2,674
Total HTM investments	$	2,829	$	2	$	(157)	$	2,674

60

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 8: Investments (continued)

	December 31, 2011
In millions	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Other-Than- Temporary Impairments(1)
AFS Investments
Fixed-maturity investments:
U.S. Treasury and government agency	$	484	$	1	$	—	$	485	$	—
State and municipal bonds		20		2		—		22		—
Foreign governments		351		24		—		375		—
Corporate obligations		301		3		(1)		303		—
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential mortgage-backed agency		6		—		—		6		—
Residential mortgage-backed non-agency		41		8		(1)		48		—
Commercial mortgage-backed		2		—		(1)		1		—
Asset-backed securities:
Collateralized debt obligations		2		—		—		2		—
Other asset-backed		97		—		(38)		59		(37)
Total fixed-maturity investments		1,304		38		(41)		1,301		(37)
Money market securities		28		—		—		28		—
Equity securities		6		1		—		7		—
Total AFS investments	$	1,338	$	39	$	(41)	$	1,336	$	(37)
HTM Investments
Assets of consolidated VIEs:
Corporate obligations	$	2,840	$	—	$	(371)	$	2,469	$	—
Total HTM investments	$	2,840	$	—	$	(371)	$	2,469	$	—

(1)—Represents unrealized gains or losses on other than temporarily impaired securities recognized in AOCI, which includes the non-credit component of impairments, as well as all subsequent changes in fair value of such impaired securities reported in AOCI.

The following table presents the distribution by contractual maturity of AFS and HTM fixed-maturity securities at amortized cost and fair value as of December 31, 2012. Contractual maturity may differ from expected maturity as borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations.

	AFS Securities				HTM Securities
					Consolidated VIEs
In millions	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	139	$	139	$	—	$	—
Due after one year through five years		561		570		—		—
Due after five years through ten years		84		96		—		—
Due after ten years through fifteen years		—		—		—		—
Due after fifteen years		11		12		2,829		2,674
Mortgage-backed and asset-backed		55		57		—		—
Total fixed-maturity investments	$	850	$	874	$	2,829	$	2,674

61

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 8: Investments (continued)

Net unrealized gains (losses), including the portion of OTTI included in AOCI, reported within shareholders’ equity consisted of:

	As of December 31,
In millions	2012		2011
Gross unrealized gains	$	25	$	39
Gross unrealized losses		(1)		(41)
Foreign exchange		24		(9)
Total		48		(11)
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)		5		(13)
Unrealized gains (losses), net	$	43	$	2

Deposited Securities

The fair value of securities on deposit with various regulatory authorities was $5 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. These deposits are required to comply with state insurance laws.

Impaired Investments

The following tables present the gross unrealized losses related to AFS and HTM investments as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:

	December 31, 2012
	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or Longer				Total
In millions	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
AFS Investments
Fixed-maturity investments:
U.S. Treasury and government agency	$	151	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	151	$	—
State and municipal bonds		1		—		—		—		1		—
Foreign governments		11		—		1		—		12		—
Corporate obligations		8		—		4		—		12		—
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential mortgage-backed non-agency		2		—		6		—		8		—
Commercial mortgage-backed		—		—		—		(1)		—		(1)
Asset-backed securities:
Other asset-backed		—		—		10		—		10		—
Total fixed-maturity investments		173		—		21		(1)		194		(1)
Equity securities		1		—		—		—		1		—
Total AFS investments	$	174	$	—	$	21	$	(1)	$	195	$	(1)
HTM Investments
Assets of consolidated VIEs:
Corporate obligations	$	297	$	(19)	$	1,287	$	(138)	$	1,584	$	(157)
Total HTM investments	$	297	$	(19)	$	1,287	$	(138)	$	1,584	$	(157)

62

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 8: Investments (continued)

	December 31, 2011
	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or Longer				Total
In millions	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
AFS Investments
Fixed-maturity investments:
State and municipal bonds	$	1	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1	$	—
Foreign governments		20		—		—		—		20		—
Corporate obligations		90		(1)		10		—		100		(1)
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential mortgage-backed agency		1		—		—		—		1		—
Residential mortgage-backed non-agency		24		(1)		10		—		34		(1)
Commercial mortgage-backed		—		(1)		—		—		—		(1)
Asset-backed securities:
Other asset-backed		—		—		40		(38)		40		(38)
Total fixed-maturity investments		136		(3)		60		(38)		196		(41)
Total AFS investments	$	136	$	(3)	$	60	$	(38)	$	196	$	(41)
HTM Investments
Assets of consolidated VIEs:
Corporate obligations	$	284	$	(31)	$	2,185	$	(340)	$	2,469	$	(371)
Total HTM investments	$	284	$	(31)	$	2,185	$	(340)	$	2,469	$	(371)

With the weighting applied on the fair value of each security relative to the total fair value, the weighted average contractual maturity of securities in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 was 27 and 26 years, respectively. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, there were 36 and 43 securities, respectively, that were in an unrealized loss position for a continuous twelve-month period or longer, of which 6 and 14 securities, respectively, had fair values that were below book value by more than 5%.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairments

MBIA Corp. has evaluated on a security-by-security basis whether the unrealized losses in its investment portfolios were other-than-temporary considering duration and severity of unrealized losses, the circumstances that gave rise to the unrealized losses, and whether MBIA Corp. has the intent to sell the securities or more likely than not will be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery. Based on its evaluation, MBIA Corp. determined that the unrealized losses on the remaining securities were temporary in nature because its impairment analysis, including projected future cash flows, indicated that MBIA Corp. would be able to recover the amortized cost of impaired assets. MBIA Corp. also concluded that it does not have the intent to sell securities in an unrealized loss position and it is more likely than not that it will not have to sell these securities before recovery of their cost basis. In making this conclusion, MBIA Corp. examined the cash flow projections for its investment portfolios, the potential sources and uses of cash in its businesses, and the cash resources available to its business other than sales of securities. It also considered the existence of any risk management or other plans as of December 31, 2012 that would require the sale of impaired securities. On a quarterly basis, MBIA Corp. re-evaluates the unrealized losses in its investment portfolios to determine whether an impairment loss should be realized in current earnings. Impaired securities that MBIA Corp. intends to sell before the expected recovery of such securities’ fair values have been written down to their fair values.

Credit Loss Rollforward

The portion of certain OTTI losses on fixed-maturity securities that does not represent credit losses is recognized in AOCI. For these impairments, the net amount recognized in earnings represents the difference between the amortized cost of the security and the net present value of its projected future discounted cash flows prior to impairment. Any remaining difference between the fair value and amortized cost is recognized in AOCI.

63

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 8: Investments (continued)

The following table presents the amount of credit loss impairments recognized in earnings on fixed-maturity securities held by MBIA Corp. as of the dates indicated, for which a portion of the OTTI losses was recognized in AOCI, and the corresponding changes in such amounts. There were no OTTI losses for which a portion was recognized in AOCI for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2010.

In millions	Years Ended December 31,
Credit Losses Recognized in Earnings Related to OTTI	2012		2011		2010
Beginning balance	$	57	$	—	$	93
Accounting transition adjustment(1)		—		—		(93)
Additions for credit loss impairments recognized in the current period on securities not previously impaired		—		57		—
Reductions for credit loss impairments previously recognized on securities impaired to fair value during the period(2)		(57)		—		—
Ending balance	$	—	$	57	$	—

(1)— Reflects the adoption of the accounting principles for the consolidation of VIEs.

(2)— Represents circumstances where MBIA Corp. determined in the current period that it intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not that it will be required

For the year ended December 31, 2011, the credit loss recognized in earnings was related to one RMBS. There were no credit loss impairments in 2012 and 2010. The following table presents a summary of the significant inputs considered in determining the measurement of the credit loss on the security in which a portion of the impairment was included in AOCI:

Asset-backed Securities	Year Ended December 31, 2011
Expected size of losses(1)
Range(2)		47.07%
Weighted average(3)		47.07%
Current subordination levels(4)
Range(2)		n/a
Weighted average(3)		n/a
Prepayment speed (annual CPR)(5)
Range(2)		n/a
Weighted average(3)		n/a

(1)— Represents future expected credit losses on impaired assets expressed as a percentage of total outstanding balance.

(2)— Represents the range of inputs/assumptions based upon the individual securities within each category.

(3)— Calculated by weighting the relevant input/assumption for each individual security by outstanding notional of the security.

(4)— Represents current level of credit protection (subordination) for the securities, expressed as a percentage of the balance of the collateral group backing the bond.

(5)— Values represent high and low points of lifetime vectors of constant prepayment rates.

64

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 8: Investments (continued)

Realized Gains and Losses

Realized gains and losses in the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were primarily from the sales of AFS securities. The amount of gross realized gains and gross losses of AFS securities (primarily fixed-maturity securities) were as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
In millions	2012		2011		2010
Gross realized gains	$	35	$	88	$	8
Gross realized losses		(2)		(67)		(1)
Net(1)	$	33	$	21	$	7

(1)— These balances are included in the “Net gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value and foreign exchange” line items on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated statements of operations.

Note 9: Derivative Instruments

MBIA Corp. accounts for derivative instruments in accordance with the accounting principles for derivative and hedging activities, which requires that all such instruments be recorded on MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets at fair value. Refer to “Note 7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments” for the method used for determining the fair value of derivative instruments.

MBIA Corp. has entered into derivative instruments that it viewed as an extension of its core financial guarantee business but which do not qualify for the financial guarantee scope exception and, therefore, must be recorded at fair value in MBIA Corp.’s consolidated balance sheets. MBIA Corp. insures CDS contracts, primarily referencing corporate, asset-backed, residential mortgage-backed, commercial mortgage-backed, CRE loans, and CDO securities that MBIA Corp. intends to hold for the entire term of the contract absent a negotiated settlement with the counterparty.

Changes in the fair value of derivatives, excluding insured derivatives, are recorded each period in current earnings within “Net gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value and foreign exchange.” Changes in the fair value of insured derivatives are recorded each period in current earnings within “Net change in fair value of insured derivatives.” The net change in the fair value of MBIA Corp.’s insured derivatives has two primary components: (i) realized gains (losses) and other settlements on insured derivatives and (ii) unrealized gains (losses) on insured derivatives. “Realized gains (losses) and other settlements on insured derivatives” include (i) premiums received and receivable on sold CDS contracts, (ii) premiums paid and payable to reinsurers in respect to CDS contracts, (iii) net amounts received or paid on reinsurance commutations, (iv) losses paid and payable to CDS contract counterparties due to the occurrence of a credit event or settlement agreement, (v) losses recovered and recoverable on purchased CDS contracts due to the occurrence of a credit event or settlement agreement and (vi) fees relating to CDS contracts. The “Unrealized gains (losses) on insured derivatives” include all other changes in fair value of the insured derivative contracts.

Variable Interest Entities

VIEs consolidated by MBIA Corp. have entered into derivative instruments primarily consisting of interest rate swaps. Interest rate swaps are entered into to hedge the risks associated with fluctuations in interest rates or fair values of certain contracts.

65

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 9: Derivative Instruments (continued)

Credit Derivatives Sold

The following tables present information about credit derivatives sold by MBIA Corp. that were outstanding as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. Credit ratings represent the lower of underlying ratings assigned to the collateral by Moody’s, S&P or MBIA.

$ in millions	As of December 31, 2012
			Notional Value
Credit Derivatives Sold	Weighted Average Remaining Expected Maturity		AAA		AA		A		BBB		Below Investment Grade		Total Notional		Fair Value Asset (Liability)
Insured credit default swaps		5.1 Years	$	10,457	$	5,862	$	5,253	$	11,571	$	13,859	$	47,002	$	(2,858)
Insured swaps		20.8 Years		—		103		2,520		1,627		71		4,321		(7)
All others		1.8 Years		—		—		—		—		195		195		(68)
Total notional			$	10,457	$	5,965	$	7,773	$	13,198	$	14,125	$	51,518
Total fair value			$	(7)	$	(70)	$	(72)	$	(732)	$	(2,052)			$	(2,933)

$ in millions	As of December 31, 2011
			Notional Value
Credit Derivatives Sold	Weighted Average Remaining Expected Maturity		AAA		AA		A		BBB		Below Investment Grade		Total Notional		Fair Value Asset (Liability)
Insured credit default swaps		5.6 Years	$	15,475	$	12,065	$	6,336	$	14,042	$	17,639	$	65,557	$	(4,716)
Non-insured credit default swaps-VIE		3.6 Years		—		—		—		—		643		643		(527)
Insured swaps		20.6 Years		—		133		3,140		2,227		133		5,633		(9)
All others		2.8 Years		—		—		—		—		195		195		(91)
Total notional			$	15,475	$	12,198	$	9,476	$	16,269	$	18,610	$	72,028
Total fair value			$	(114)	$	(116)	$	(205)	$	(1,355)	$	(3,553)			$	(5,343)

Internal credit ratings assigned by MBIA on the underlying collateral are derived by MBIA Corp.’s surveillance group. In assigning an internal rating, current status reports from issuers and trustees, as well as publicly available transaction-specific information, are reviewed. Also, where appropriate, cash flow analyses and collateral valuations are considered. The maximum potential amount of future payments (undiscounted) on CDS contracts are estimated as the notional value plus any additional debt service costs, such as interest or other amounts owed on CDS contracts. The maximum amount of future payments that MBIA Corp. may be required to make under these guarantees is $50.9 billion. This amount is net of $392 million of insured derivatives ceded under reinsurance agreements in which MBIA Corp. economically hedges a portion of the credit and market risk associated with its insured derivatives and offsetting agreements with a counterparty. The maximum potential amount of future payments (undiscounted) on insured swaps are estimated as the notional value of such contracts.

MBIA Corp. may hold recourse provisions with third parties in derivative transactions through both reinsurance and subrogation rights. MBIA Corp.’s reinsurance arrangements provide that in the event MBIA Corp. pays a claim under a guarantee of a derivative contract, MBIA Corp. has the right to collect amounts from any reinsurers that have reinsured the guarantee on either a proportional or non-proportional basis, depending upon the underlying reinsurance agreement. MBIA Corp. may also have recourse through subrogation rights whereby if MBIA Corp. makes a claim payment, it is entitled to any rights of the insured counterparty, including the right to any assets held as collateral.

66

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 9: Derivative Instruments (continued)

Financial Statement Presentation

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, MBIA Corp. reported derivative assets of $7 million and $458 million, respectively, and derivative liabilities of $3.1 billion and $5.6 billion, respectively, which are shown separately on the consolidated balance sheets. The following table presents the total fair value of MBIA Corp.’s derivative assets and liabilities by instrument and balance sheet location as of December 31, 2012:

In millions			Derivative Assets			Derivative Liabilities
Derivative Instruments	Notional Amount Outstanding		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
Not designated as hedging instruments:
Insured credit default swaps	$	47,320	Derivative assets	$	—	Derivative liabilities	$	(2,858)
Insured swaps		7,890	Derivative assets		7	Derivative liabilities		(7)
Interest rate swaps-VIE		2,728	Derivative assets-VIE		—	Derivative liabilities-VIE		(141)
Cross currency swaps-VIE		110	Derivative assets-VIE		—	Derivative liabilities-VIE		(21)
All other		195	Derivative assets		—	Derivative liabilities		(68)
All other-VIE		280	Derivative assets-VIE		—	Derivative liabilities-VIE		—
Total derivatives	$	58,523		$	7		$	(3,095)

The following table presents the total fair value of MBIA Corp.’s derivative assets and liabilities by instrument and balance sheet location as of December 31, 2011:

In millions			Derivative Assets			Derivative Liabilities
Derivative Instruments	Notional Amount Outstanding		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
Not designated as hedging instruments:
Insured credit default swaps	$	66,851	Derivative assets	$	—	Derivative liabilities	$	(4,708)
Non-insured credit default swaps-VIE		1,272	Derivative assets-VIE		447	Derivative liabilities-VIE		(527)
Insured swaps		9,811	Derivative assets		8	Derivative liabilities		(9)
Interest rate swaps-VIE		4,878	Derivative assets-VIE		—	Derivative liabilities-VIE		(281)
Cross currency swaps-VIE		123	Derivative assets-VIE		—	Derivative liabilities-VIE		(17)
All other		195	Derivative assets		—	Derivative liabilities		(91)
All other-VIE		472	Derivative assets-VIE		3	Derivative liabilities-VIE		—
Total derivatives	$	83,602		$	458		$	(5,633)

67

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 9: Derivative Instruments (continued)

The following table shows the effect of derivative instruments on the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012:

In millions
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative	Net Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
Insured credit default swaps	Unrealized gains (losses) on insured derivatives	$	1,847
Insured credit default swaps	Realized gains (losses) and other settlements on insured derivatives		(407)
Non-insured credit default swaps-VIE	Net gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value and foreign exchange-VIE		(1)
Insured swaps	Unrealized gains (losses) on insured derivatives		1
Interest rate swaps-VIE	Net gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value and foreign exchange-VIE		55
Currency swaps-VIE	Net gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value and foreign exchange-VIE		(4)
All other	Unrealized gains (losses) on insured derivatives		22
All other-VIE	Net gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value and foreign exchange-VIE		(1)
Total		$	1,512

The following table shows the effect of derivative instruments on the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011:

In millions
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative	Net Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
Insured credit default swaps	Unrealized gains (losses) on insured derivatives	$	(261)
Insured credit default swaps	Realized gains (losses) and other settlements on insured derivatives		(2,372)
Non-insured credit default swaps-VIE	Net gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value and foreign exchange-VIE		153
Interest rate swaps-VIE	Net gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value and foreign exchange-VIE		52
Currency swaps-VIE	Net gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value and foreign exchange-VIE		(3)
All other	Unrealized gains (losses) on insured derivatives		(53)
All other-VIE	Net gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value and foreign exchange-VIE		(8)
Total		$	(2,492)

68

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 9: Derivative Instruments (continued)

The following table shows the effect of derivative instruments on the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2010:

In millions
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative	Net Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
Insured credit default swaps	Unrealized gains (losses) on insured derivatives	$	(691)
Insured credit default swaps	Realized gains (losses) and other settlements on insured derivatives		(162)
Non-insured credit default swaps-VIE	Net gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value and foreign exchange-VIE		48
Insured swaps	Unrealized gains (losses) on insured derivatives		2
Interest rate swaps-VIE	Net gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value and foreign exchange-VIE		5
All other	Unrealized gains (losses) on insured derivatives		(11)
All other	Net gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value and foreign exchange		(10)
All other-VIE	Net gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value and foreign exchange-VIE		(16)
Total		$	(835)

Note 10: Debt

Long-Term Debt

On January 16, 2008, MBIA Corp. issued $1.0 billion of 14% fixed-to-floating rate surplus notes due January 15, 2033. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the par amount outstanding was $953 million. The surplus notes have an initial interest rate of 14% until January 15, 2013 and thereafter have an interest rate of three-month LIBOR plus 11.26%. Interest and principal payments on the surplus notes are subject to prior approval by the Superintendent of the NYSDFS. A request for approval of the January 15, 2013, note interest payment was denied by the NYSDFS. MBIA Corp. provided notice to the Fiscal Agent that it has not made a scheduled interest payment. The deferred interest payment will become due on the first business day on or after which MBIA Corp. obtains approval to make such payment. No interest will accrue on the deferred interest. The surplus notes were callable at par at the option of MBIA Corp. on the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance, and are callable at par on January 15, 2018 and every fifth anniversary thereafter and are callable on any other date at par plus a make-whole amount, subject to prior approval by the Superintendent and other restrictions. The cash received from the issuance of surplus notes was used for general business purposes and the deferred debt issuance costs are being amortized over the term of the surplus notes. To date, MBIA Corp. has repurchased a total of $47 million par value outstanding of its surplus notes at a weighted average price of $77.08.

In December 2011, MBIA Insurance Corporation entered into a secured loan with an affiliate, National, who provided the $1.1 billion National Secured Loan to MBIA Insurance Corporation in order to enable MBIA Insurance Corporation to fund settlements and commutations of its insurance policies. This loan was approved by the NYSDFS as well as by the boards of directors of MBIA Inc., MBIA Insurance Corporation and National. The National Secured Loan has a fixed annual interest rate of 7% and a maturity date of December 2016. MBIA Insurance Corporation has the option to defer payments of interest when due by capitalizing interest amounts to the loan balance, subject to the collateral value exceeding certain thresholds. MBIA Insurance Corporation has elected to defer the interest payments due under the loan. MBIA Insurance Corporation’s obligation to repay the loan is secured by a pledge of collateral having an estimated value in excess of the notional amount of the loan as of December 31, 2012, which collateral comprised the following future receivables of MBIA Insurance Corporation: (i) its right to receive put-back recoveries related to ineligible mortgage loans included in its insured second-lien RMBS transactions; (ii) future recoveries on defaulted insured second-lien RMBS transactions

69

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 10: Debt (continued)

resulting from expected excess spread generated by performing loans in such transactions; and (iii) future installment premiums. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, MBIA Insurance Corporation borrowed an additional $443 million under the National Secured Loan with the approval of the NYSDFS at the same terms as the original loan to fund additional commutations of its insurance policies. As of December 31, 2012, the outstanding principal amount under this loan was $1.7 billion. MBIA Insurance Corporation may seek to borrow additional amounts under the loan in the future. Any such increase or other amendment to the terms of the loan would be subject to regulatory approval by the NYSDFS.

The aggregate maturity of long-term debt obligations, excluding accrued interest, as of December 31, 2012 for each of the next five years and thereafter commencing in 2013 was:

In millions	2013		2014		2015		2016		2017		Thereafter		Total
14% Surplus Notes due 2033(1)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	953	$	953
Secured Loan due 2016		—		—		—		1,651		—		—		1,651
Total debt obligations due	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,651	$	—	$	953	$	2,604

(1)— Callable on January 15, 2018 and every fifth anniversary thereafter at 100.00.

Debt of Consolidated Variable Interest Entities

Variable Interest Entity Notes

Variable interest entity notes are variable interest rate debt instruments denominated in U.S. dollars issued by consolidated VIEs. Variable interest entity notes are collateralized by assets held by the consolidated VIEs, and are non-recourse to the general credit of MBIA Corp. As of December 31, 2012, variable interest entity notes consisting of debt instruments issued by issuer-sponsored consolidated VIEs totaled $6.5 billion. Variable interest entity notes of issuer-sponsored consolidated VIEs by maturity are as follows:

In millions	Principal  Amount(1)
Maturity date:
2013	$	341
2014		281
2015		428
2016		426
2017		466
Thereafter		4,562
Total	$	6,504

(1)— Includes $3.7 billion of VIE notes accounted for at fair value as of December 31, 2012.

70

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 11: Income Taxes

The provision (benefit) for income taxes on income and shareholders’ equity consisted of:

	Years Ended December 31,
In millions	2012		2011		2010
Current taxes:
Federal	$	(19)	$	1	$	23
Foreign		(6)		15		—
Deferred taxes:
Federal		444		(813)		(186)
Foreign		5		(18)		15
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		424		(815)		(148)
Income taxes charged (credited) to shareholders’ equity related to:
Total adjustments due to the adoption of new accounting standards		—		—		(59)
Change in unrealized gains and losses on investments		18		(9)		(9)
Change in foreign currency translation		(3)		—		(43)
Exercise of stock options and vested restricted stock		6		3		(1)
Total income taxes charged (credited) to shareholders’ equity		21		(6)		(112)
Total effect of income taxes	$	445	$	(821)	$	(260)

A reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% to MBIA Corp.’s effective income tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 is presented in the following table:

	Years ended December 31,
	2012		2011		2010
Federal income tax computed at the statutory rate		35.0%		35.0%		35.0%
Increase (reduction) in taxes resulting from:
Tax-exempt interest		0.0%		0.0%		0.4%
Valuation allowance		0.0%		(1.5)%		2.5%
Foreign taxes		(1.6)%		0.0%		0.0%
Out-of-period adjustment		(1.1)%		0.0%		0.0%
Other		0.0%		(0.1)%		(3.4)%
Effective tax rate		32.3%		33.4%		34.5%

Deferred Tax Asset, Net of Valuation Allowance

MBIA Corp. recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

71

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 11: Income Taxes (continued)

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 are presented in the following table:

	As of December 31,
In millions	2012		2011
Deferred tax liabilities:
Unearned premium revenue	$	204	$	64
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves		—		31
Deferred acquisition costs		174		41
Investments in VIEs		—		154
Total gross deferred tax liabilities		378		290
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards		244		161
Capital loss carryforward and other-than-temporary impairments		60		53
Net unrealized losses on insured derivatives		902		1,684
Net deferred taxes on VIEs		44		73
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves		108		—
Other		313		83
Total gross deferred tax assets		1,671		2,054
Valuation allowance		54		53
Net deferred tax asset	$	1,239	$	1,711

MBIA Corp. establishes a valuation allowance against its deferred tax asset when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. All evidence, both positive and negative, needs to be identified and considered in making the determination. Future realization of the existing deferred tax asset ultimately depends, in part, on the existence of sufficient taxable income of appropriate character (for example, ordinary income versus capital gains) within the carryforward period available under the tax law.

As of December 31, 2012, MBIA Corp. reported a net deferred tax asset of $1.2 billion. The $1.2 billion deferred tax asset is net of a $54 million valuation allowance. As of December 31, 2012, MBIA Corp. had a valuation allowance against a portion of the deferred tax asset related to capital loss carry forwards and losses from asset impairments as these losses are considered capital losses, have a five-year carryforward period, and once recognized, can only offset capital gain income.

MBIA Corp. has concluded that it is more likely than not that its net deferred tax asset will be realized. MBIA Corp. relied on MBIA Inc.’s tax sharing agreement and the Parent’s assurance that it intended for no net operating loss generated by MBIA Corp., to the extent used in consolidation, to expire without compensation. In 2012, the determination of doubt as to MBIA Corp’s ability to continue as a going concern does not impact this conclusion.

Out-of-Period Adjustment

During the fourth quarter of 2012, MBIA Corp. completed a balance sheet focused analysis to enhance efficiency and accuracy with its deferred income tax balances, and as a result, identified errors to the current and deferred income tax balances. MBIA Corp. evaluated the materiality of these errors in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99, “Materiality”, and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements”, and concluded that these errors, individually and in the aggregate, were immaterial to the year ended December 31, 2012 and all prior periods to which these errors relate. Accordingly, MBIA Corp. recorded the impact of these adjustments in its consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 by decreasing the “Deferred income taxes, net” by $8 million, decreasing “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” by $6 million, increasing “Current income taxes” by $17 million and increasing “Net income (loss)” by $15 million. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, this adjustment would have increased “Net income (loss)” by $16 million and decreased “Net income (loss)” by $22 million, respectively.

72

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 11: Income Taxes (continued)

Treatment of Undistributed Earnings of Certain Foreign Subsidiaries—“Accounting for Income Taxes—Special Areas”

No U.S. deferred income taxes have been provided on the differences in the book and tax basis in MBIA Corp.’s carrying value of MBIA UK and other entities because of MBIA Corp.’s practice and intent to permanently reinvest these earnings. The cumulative amounts of such differences were $139 million, $15 million and $3 million as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The estimated tax liability with respect to this difference was $17 million as of December 31, 2012.

Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes

It is MBIA Corp.’s policy to record and disclose any change in UTB and related interest and/or penalties to income tax in the consolidated statements of operations.

In millions
Unrecognized tax benefit as of January 1, 2010	$	6
Reduction of UTB as a result of the applicable statute of limitation		(5)
Unrecognized tax benefit as of December 31, 2010		1
Unrecognized tax benefit as of December 31, 2011		1
Decrease in the UTB related to settlements with taxing authorities		(1)
Unrecognized tax benefit as of December 31, 2012	$	—

For the year ended December 31, 2012, the total amount of UTB decreased as a result of settling the 2004-2009 Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) examination. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the amounts related to interest and penalties included in the consolidated balance sheets were not material.

MBIA Corp.’s major tax jurisdictions include the U.S. and the U.K. MBIA and its U.S. subsidiaries file a U.S. consolidated federal income tax return. The IRS has concluded its field work with respect to the examination of tax years 2004 through 2009 and on January 12, 2012, the Joint Committee on Taxation notified MBIA that the results of the IRS field examination were reviewed and accepted.

The U.K. tax authorities are currently auditing tax years 2005 through 2011. On February 5, 2013 Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs notified MBIA Corp. of their request for a meeting to discuss the progress of the enquiry.

As of December 31, 2012, MBIA Corp. had a cumulative net operating loss carryforward of $685 million, which will expire in tax year 2031 and a capital loss carryforward at $161 million, which will expire in tax year 2017.

Tax Sharing Arrangement

MBIA Corp. files its U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return as a member of the MBIA Inc. consolidated group and participates in a tax sharing agreement between MBIA Corp. and MBIA Inc. under which MBIA Corp. is allocated its share of consolidated tax liability or tax benefit as determined on a standalone basis under the tax sharing agreement.

As of December 31, 2012, MBIA Corp. has not made tax payments under this tax sharing agreement for 2012 and 2011. If tax payments had been made, all funds would be placed in escrow by MBIA Inc. and would remain in escrow until the expiration of a two-year carryback period which would allow MBIA Corp. to carryback a separate company tax loss and recover all or a portion of the escrowed funds.

As of December 31, 2012, MBIA Corp. has not received any payment with respect to tax losses contributed to the consolidated group. MBIA Corp. will receive benefits of its losses as it is able to earn out those losses in the future. However, it is MBIA Inc.’s intention not to allow any loss generated by MBIA Corp., to the extent used in consolidation, to expire without compensation.

73

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 12: Insurance in Force

MBIA Corp. guarantees the payment of principal of, and interest or other amounts owing on, municipal, asset-backed, mortgage-backed and other non-municipal securities. Additionally, MBIA Corp. has insured CDS primarily on pools of collateral, which it previously considered part of its core financial guarantee business. The pools of collateral are made up of corporate obligations, but also include commercial and residential mortgage-backed securities-related assets. MBIA Corp.’s insurance in force represents the aggregate amount of the insured principal of, and interest or other amounts owing on insured obligations. MBIA Corp.’s ultimate exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the issuer of the insured obligation is represented by the insurance in force in the tables that follow.

The financial guarantees issued by MBIA Corp. provide unconditional and irrevocable guarantees of the payment of the principal, and interest or other amounts owing on, insured obligations when due. The obligations are generally not subject to acceleration, except that MBIA Corp. may have the right, at its discretion, to accelerate insured obligations upon default or otherwise. Certain guaranteed investment contracts written by MBIA Inc. and guaranteed by MBIA Corp. are terminable based upon the credit ratings downgrades of MBIA Corp., and if MBIA Inc. were to have insufficient assets to pay the termination payments, MBIA Corp.’s insurance coverage would be drawn on to make such payments. These amounts have been excluded in the tables that follow.

The creditworthiness of each insured obligation is evaluated prior to the issuance of insurance, and each insured obligation must comply with MBIA Corp.’s underwriting guidelines. Further, the payments to be made by the issuer on the bonds or notes may be backed by a pledge of revenues, reserve funds, letters of credit, investment contracts or collateral in the form of mortgages or other assets. The right to such funds or collateral would typically become MBIA Corp.’s upon the payment of a claim by MBIA Corp.

MBIA Corp. maintains underwriting guidelines based on those aspects of credit quality that it deems important for each category of obligation considered for insurance.

In February 2009, MBIA Corp. entered into a quota share reinsurance agreement effective January 1, 2009 pursuant to which MBIA Corp. ceded all of its U.S. public finance exposure to National. The reinsurance enables covered policyholders and certain ceding reinsurers to make claims for payment directly against National in accordance with the terms of the cut-through provisions of the reinsurance agreement. As of December 31, 2012, the aggregate amount of insurance in force ceded by MBIA Corp. to National under the above reinsurance agreement was $351.5 billion. As a result of the cut-through provision of the above reinsurance agreement, amounts related to U.S. public finance have been excluded from the following tables and disclosures.

74

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 12: Insurance in Force (continued)

As of December 31, 2012, insurance in force, which represents principal and interest or other amounts owing on insured obligations, had an expected maturity range of 1 to 45 years. The distribution of insurance in force by geographic location, excluding $3.4 billion and $4.4 billion relating to transactions guaranteed by MBIA Corp. on behalf of various investment management services affiliated companies as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, is presented in the following table:

	As of December 31,
In billions	2012				2011
Geographic Location	Insurance in Force		% of Insurance in Force		Insurance in Force		% of Insurance in Force
United States	$	73.4		49.5%	$	95.8		52.2%
United Kingdom		26.7		18.0%		26.2		14.3%
Australia		8.0		5.4%		8.8		4.8%
Chile		4.2		2.8%		4.2		2.3%
Canada		2.9		2.0%		3.2		1.7%
Mexico		2.7		1.8%		2.7		1.5%
France		2.5		1.7%		3.3		1.8%
Germany		2.4		1.6%		3.0		1.6%
Spain		1.5		1.0%		1.5		0.8%
Portugal		0.7		0.5%		0.9		0.5%
Subtotal		125.0		84.3%		149.6		81.5%
Internationally diversified		18.9		12.8%		28.9		15.8%
Other country specific		4.3		2.9%		5.0		2.7%
Total	$	148.2		100.0%	$	183.5		100.0%

75

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 12: Insurance in Force (continued)

The insurance in force by bond type, excluding $3.4 billion and $4.4 billion relating to transactions guaranteed by MBIA Corp. on behalf of various investment management services affiliated companies as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, is presented in the following table:

	As of December 31,
In billions	2012					2011
			% of					% of
	Insurance		Insurance			Insurance		Insurance
Bond type	in Force		in Force			in Force		in Force
Global public finance—non-United States:
International utilities	$	16.2		11.0	%	$	16.2		8.8	%
Sovereign-related and sub-sovereign(1)		18.4		12.4	%		18.6		10.1	%
Transportation		14.2		9.6	%		15.0		8.2	%
Local governments(2)		0.5		0.3	%		0.5		0.3	%
Health care		0.1		0.0	%		0.1		0.1	%
Tax-backed		0.2		0.1	%		0.2		0.1	%
Total non-United States		49.6		33.4	%		50.6		27.6	%
Global structured finance:
Collateralized debt obligations(3)		57.6		38.9	%		78.7		42.9	%
Mortgage-backed residential		17.1		11.5	%		21.1		11.5	%
Mortgage-backed commercial		3.8		2.5	%		4.4		2.4	%
Consumer asset-backed:
Auto loans		—		0.0	%		0.7		0.4	%
Student loans		1.2		0.8	%		1.7		0.9	%
Manufactured housing		2.0		1.3	%		2.2		1.2	%
Other consumer asset-backed		0.1		0.1	%		0.2		0.1	%
Corporate asset-backed:
Operating assets:
Aircraft portfolio lease securitizations		2.5		1.7	%		3.2		1.8	%
Secured airline equipment securitization (EETC)		2.4		1.7	%		3.2		1.7	%
Other operating assets		0.5		0.4	%		0.7		0.4	%
Structured insurance securitizations		6.1		4.1	%		7.5		4.1	%
Franchise assets		0.9		0.6	%		1.3		0.7	%
Intellectual property		—		0.0	%		1.9		1.0	%
Future flow		0.2		0.2	%		0.4		0.2	%
Other corporate asset-backed		4.2		2.8	%		5.7		3.1	%
Total global structured finance		98.6		66.6	%		132.9		72.4	%
Total	$	148.2		100.0	%	$	183.5		100.0	%

(1)— Includes regions, departments or their equivalent in each jurisdiction as well as sovereign-owned entities that are supported by a sovereign state, region or department.

(2)— Includes municipal-owned entities backed by sponsoring local government.

(3)— Includes transactions (represented by structured pools of primarily investment grade corporate credit risks or CRE assets) that do not include typical CDO structuring characteristics, such as tranched credit risk, cash flow waterfalls, or interest and over-collateralization coverage tests.

MBIA Corp. has entered into certain guarantees of derivative contracts, included in the preceding tables, which are accounted for as derivative instruments. MBIA Corp. generally guarantees the timely payment of principal and interest related to these derivatives upon the occurrence of a credit event with respect to a referenced obligation. The maximum amount of future payments that MBIA Corp. may be required to make under these guarantees is $51.7 billion. MBIA Corp.’s guarantees of derivative contracts have a legal maximum maturity range of 1 to 70 years. A small number of insured credit derivative contracts have long-dated maturities, which comprise the longest maturity dates of the underlying collateral. However, the expected maturities of such contracts are much shorter due

76

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 12: Insurance in Force (continued)

to amortization and prepayments in the underlying collateral pools. The fair values of these guarantees as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets as derivative assets and liabilities, representing gross gains and losses, of $7 million and $2.9 billion, and $8 million and $4.8 billion, respectively.

Investment agreement contracts and medium-term notes issued by MBIA Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries are insured by MBIA Corp. and are not included in the previous tables. If MBIA Inc. or these subsidiaries were to have insufficient assets to pay amounts due, MBIA Corp. would be called upon to make such payments under its insurance policies. As of December 31, 2012, the maximum amount of future payments that MBIA Corp. could be required to make under these guarantees is $3.4 billion. These guarantees, which have a maximum maturity range of 1 to 33 years, were entered into on an arm’s length basis. MBIA Corp. has both direct recourse provisions and subrogation rights in these transactions. If MBIA Corp. is required to make a payment under any of these affiliate guarantees, it would have the right to seek reimbursement from such affiliate and to liquidate any collateral to recover amounts paid under the guarantee.

Ceded Exposure

Reinsurance enables MBIA Corp. to cede exposure for purposes of syndicating risk and increasing its capacity to write new business while complying with its single risk and credit guidelines. When a reinsurer is downgraded by one or more of the rating agencies, less capital credit is given to MBIA Corp. under rating agency models and the overall value of the reinsurance to MBIA Corp. is reduced. MBIA Corp. generally retains the right to reassume the business ceded to reinsurers under certain circumstances, including a reinsurer’s rating downgrade below specified thresholds. As of December 31, 2012, MBIA Corp.’s use of reinsurance was immaterial to the insurance operations and MBIA Corp. expects that it will continue to be immaterial in the future.

MBIA Corp. requires certain unauthorized reinsurers to maintain bank letters of credit or establish trust accounts to cover liabilities ceded to such reinsurers under reinsurance contracts. As of December 31, 2012, the total amount available under these letters of credit and trust arrangements was $8 million. MBIA Corp. remains liable on a primary basis for all reinsured risk, and although MBIA Corp. believes that its reinsurers remain capable of meeting their obligations, there can be no assurance of such in the future.

As of December 31, 2012, the aggregate amount of insured par outstanding ceded by MBIA Corp. to third-party reinsurers under reinsurance agreements was $3.4 billion, compared with $4.3 billion as of December 31, 2011. The aggregate amount of insurance in force ceded by MBIA Corp. to third-party reinsurers under reinsurance agreements was $6.0 billion and $7.5 billion as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The following table presents information about MBIA Corp.’s reinsurance agreements as of December 31, 2012.

In millions
Reinsurers	Standard & Poor’s Rating (Status)	Moody’s Rating (Status)	Ceded Par Outstanding		Letters of Credit/Trust Accounts		Reinsurance Recoverable(1)
Assured Guaranty Corp.	AA- (Stable Outlook)	Aa3 (Ratings Under Review)	$	2,437	$	—	$	14
Assured Guaranty Re Ltd.	AA- (Stable Outlook)	A1 (Ratings Under Review)		506		5		—
Overseas Private Investment Corp.	AA+ (Negative Outlook)	Aaa (Negative Outlook)		353		—		—
Export Development Canada	AAA (Stable Outlook)	Aaa (Stable Outlook)		59		1		—
Others	A+ or above	A2 or above		65		2		—
Total			$	3,420	$	8	$	14

(1)— Total reinsurance recoverable of $14 million comprised recoverables on paid and unpaid losses of $1 million and $13 million, respectively.

77

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 12: Insurance in Force (continued)

Since December 2007 through December 31, 2012, several of MBIA Corp.’s other financial guarantee reinsurers, including Assured Guaranty Corp., Assured Guaranty Re Ltd., and Old Republic Insurance Co. have had their credit ratings either downgraded or put on negative watch by one or more of the major rating agencies. Subsequent to December 31, 2012, Moody’s downgraded the credit ratings of Assured Guaranty Corp. and Assured Guaranty Re Ltd. to A3 with a stable outlook and Baa1 with a stable outlook, respectively. Although there was no material impact on MBIA Corp. from any of these rating agency actions relating to these reinsurers, a further deterioration in the financial condition of one or more of these reinsurers could require the establishment of reserves against any receivables due from the reinsurers.

Premium Summary

The components of financial guarantee net premiums earned, including premiums assumed from and ceded to other companies, are presented in the following tables:

	Years ended December 31,
In millions	2012		2011		2010
Net premiums earned:
Direct	$	494	$	513	$	528
Assumed		2		2		2
Gross		496		515		530
Ceded		(300)		(255)		(262)
Net	$	196	$	260	$	268

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, recoveries received on claims for financial guarantee policies under reinsurance contracts totaled $131 million, $155 million and $123 million, respectively. Ceding commissions from reinsurance, before deferrals and net of returned ceding commissions, were revenue of $7 million and expense of $25 million and revenue of $32 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Note 13: Insurance Regulations and Dividends

MBIA Corp. is subject to insurance regulations and supervision of the State of New York (their state of incorporation) and all U.S. and non-U.S. jurisdictions in which it is licensed to conduct insurance business. The extent of insurance regulation and supervision varies by jurisdiction, but New York and most other jurisdictions have laws and regulations prescribing minimum standards of solvency and business conduct, which must be maintained by insurance companies. Among other things, these laws prescribe permitted classes and concentrations of investments and limit both the aggregate and individual securities risks that MBIA Corp. may insure on a net basis based on the type of obligations insured. In addition, some insurance laws and regulations require the approval or filing of policy forms and rates. MBIA Corp. is required to file detailed annual financial statements with the NYSDFS and similar supervisory agencies in other jurisdictions in which it is licensed. The operations and accounts of MBIA Corp. are subject to examination by regulatory agencies at regular intervals.

The NYIL regulates the payment of dividends by financial guarantee insurance companies and provides that such companies may not declare or distribute dividends except out of statutory earned surplus. Under the NYIL, the sum of (i) the amount of dividends declared or distributed during the preceding 12-month period and (ii) the dividend to be declared may not exceed the lesser of (a) 10% of policyholders’ surplus, as reported in the latest statutory financial statements and (b) 100% of adjusted net investment income for such 12-month period (the net investment income for such 12-month period plus the excess, if any, of net investment income over dividends declared or distributed during the two-year period preceding such 12-month period), unless the Superintendent of the NYSDFS approves a greater dividend distribution based upon a finding that the insurer will retain sufficient surplus to support its obligations.

In 2012, MBIA Corp. did not declare or pay any dividends to MBIA Inc. or the holders of its preferred stock. MBIA Corp. is currently unable to pay dividends, including those related to its preferred stock, as a result of its earned

78

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 13: Insurance Regulations and Dividends (continued)

surplus deficit as of December 31, 2012 and is not expected to have any statutory capacity to pay any dividends in the near term. In connection with MBIA Corp. obtaining approval from the NYSDFS to release excessive contingency reserves as of September 30, 2011, December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012, as described below, MBIA Corp. agreed that it would not pay any dividends without prior approval from the NYSDFS.

As a result of the establishment of National and the reinsurance of the MBIA Corp. and FGIC portfolios by National, MBIA Corp. exceeded, as of the closing date, certain single and aggregate risk limits under the NYIL. MBIA Corp. obtained waivers from the NYSDFS of such limits. In connection with the waivers, MBIA Corp. submitted a plan to the NYSDFS to achieve compliance with the applicable regulatory limits. Under the plan, MBIA Corp. agreed not to write new financial guarantee insurance for certain issuers, and in certain categories of business, until they were in compliance with their single and aggregate risk limits and agreed to take commercially reasonable steps, including considering reinsurance, the addition of capital and other risk mitigation strategies, in order to comply with the regulatory single risk limits. As a condition to granting the waiver, the NYSDFS required that, in addition to complying with these plans, upon written notice from the NYSDFS, MBIA Corp. as applicable, would cease writing new financial guarantee insurance if it were not in compliance with the risk limitation requirements by December 31, 2009. To date, no such notice has been received from the NYSDFS.

As of December 31, 2012, MBIA Corp. exceeded its aggregate risk limits under the NYIL by $56 million. MBIA Corp. notified the NYSDFS of the overage and submitted a plan to achieve compliance with the limits in accordance with the NYIL. If MBIA Corp. is not in compliance with its aggregate risk limits, the NYSDFS may prevent MBIA Corp. from transacting any new financial guarantee insurance business until it no longer exceeds the limitations. During 2011, MBIA Corp. was in compliance with its aggregate risk limits. In 2012 and 2011, MBIA Corp. reported additional overages to the NYSDFS with respect to its single risk limits due to changes in its statutory capital.

Under the NYIL, MBIA Corp. is also required to establish a contingency reserve to provide protection to policyholders in the event of extreme losses in adverse economic events. The amount of the reserve is based on the percentage of principal insured or premiums earned, depending on the type of obligation (net of collateral, reinsurance, refunding, refinancing and certain insured securities). Under the NYIL, MBIA Corp. is required to invest its minimum surplus and contingency reserves, and 50% of its loss reserves and unearned premium reserves, in certain qualifying assets. Reductions in the contingency reserve may be recognized based on excess reserves and under certain stipulated conditions, subject to the approval of the Superintendent of the NYSDFS.

As of December 31, 2012, MBIA Corp. had a deficit of $140 million of qualifying assets required to support its contingency reserves. The deficit was caused by the failure of certain mortgage originators, particularly Bank of America, to honor their contractual obligations to repurchase ineligible mortgage loans from securitizations MBIA Corp. insured thus requiring it to sell liquid assets in order to make claim payments. The deficit is expected to grow as additional commutation and claim payments are made in the future until the defaulted put-backs are collected. MBIA Corp. has reported the deficit to the NYSDFS as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2012. MBIA Insurance Corporation has requested approval from the NYSDFS to release $140 million of contingency reserves as of December 31, 2012, but to date has not received approval.

Note 14: Statutory Accounting Practices

The financial statements have been prepared on a GAAP basis, which differs in certain respects from the statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the insurance regulatory authorities of MBIA Corp. Statutory accounting practices differ from GAAP in the following respects:

• Upfront premiums are earned on a U.S. STAT basis proportionate to the scheduled periodic maturity of principal and payment of interest (“debt service”) to the original total principal and interest insured. Additionally, under U.S. STAT, installment premiums are earned on a straight-line basis over each installment period generally one year or less. Under GAAP, MBIA Corp. recognizes and measures premium revenue over the period of the contract in proportion to the amount of insurance protection

79

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 14: Statutory Accounting Practices (continued)

provided. Upfront and installment premium revenue is measured by applying a constant rate to the insured principal amount outstanding in a given period to recognize a proportionate share of the premium received or expected to be received on a financial guarantee insurance contract. Additionally, under GAAP, installment premiums receivable are recorded at the present value of the premiums due or expected to be collected over the period of the insurance contract using a discount rate which reflects the risk-free rate at the inception of the contract;

• acquisition costs are charged to operations as incurred rather than deferred and amortized as the related premiums are earned;

• fixed-maturity investments are generally reported at amortized cost rather than fair value;

• surplus notes are recorded as a component of policyholders surplus, while under GAAP, surplus notes are treated as a long-term debt obligation;

• a contingency reserve is computed on the basis of statutory requirements, and is not permitted under GAAP;

• reserves for losses and LAE for financial guarantee and insured derivatives are established at present value for specific insured issues that are identified as currently or likely to be in default net of insurance loss recoverables. Incurred losses and LAE are discounted by applying a discount rate equal to the yield-to-maturity of MBIA Corp.’s fixed-income portfolio, excluding cash and cash equivalents and other investments not intended to defease long-term liabilities. Under GAAP, a claim liability (loss reserve) is recognized for financial guarantees on a contract-by-contract basis when the present value of expected net cash outflows to be paid under the contract using a risk-free rate as of the measurement date exceeds the unearned premium revenue and are shown gross of insurance loss recoverables on paid losses which are reported as an asset;

• guarantees of derivatives are not recorded at fair value, while under GAAP, guarantees that do not qualify for the financial guarantee scope exception under accounting principles for derivative instruments and hedging activities are recorded at fair value;

• changes in net deferred income taxes are recognized as a separate component of gains and losses in surplus. Under GAAP, changes in MBIA Corp.’s net deferred income tax balances are either recognized as a component of net income or other comprehensive income depending on how the underlying pre-tax impact is reflected;

• VIEs are not consolidated by the primary beneficiary under statutory requirements; and

• certain assets designated as “non-admitted assets” are charged directly against surplus but are reflected as assets under GAAP.

The net loss for MBIA Corp. determined in accordance with statutory accounting practices for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $843 million, $477 million, and $434 million, respectively. Statutory policyholders’ surplus of MBIA Corp. determined in accordance with statutory accounting practices as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $965 million and $1.6 billion, respectively. In order to maintain its New York State financial guarantee insurance license, MBIA Corp. is required to maintain a minimum of $65 million of policyholders’ surplus.

80

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 14: Statutory Accounting Practices (continued)

The following is a reconciliation of the consolidated shareholders’ equity of MBIA Corp., presented on a GAAP basis, to the statutory policyholders’ surplus of MBIA Corp. and its subsidiaries:

	As of December 31,
In millions	2012		2011
MBIA Corp’s GAAP shareholders’ equity	$	539	$	(364)
Premium revenue recognition (financial guarantee)		(239)		(226)
Deferral of acquisition costs, net of ceding commission		(106)		(116)
Investments, including unrealized gains (losses)		(459)		(439)
Surplus notes		953		953
Contingency reserve		(493)		(706)
Loss reserves		(1,138)		(903)
Income tax liabilities, net		(1,182)		(1,645)
Derivative assets and liabilities		2,932		4,810
VIE assets and liabilities, net		109		209
Non-admitted assets and other items		49		24
Statutory policyholders’ surplus	$	965	$	1,597

The statutory financial statements of MBIA Corp. are presented on the basis of accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual in its entirety subject to any conflicts with state regulations, or where the state statutes or regulations are silent.

Note 15: Employee Benefits

MBIA Corp. participates in MBIA Inc.’s pension plan, which covers substantially all employees. The pension plan is a qualified non-contributory defined contribution pension plan to which MBIA Corp. contributes 10% of each eligible employee’s annual compensation. Annual compensation for determining such contributions consists of base salary, bonus and commissions, as applicable. Pension benefits vest over a five-year period with 20% vested after two years, 60% vested after three years, 80% vested after four years and 100% vested after five years. MBIA Corp. funds the annual pension contribution by the following February of each applicable year. Pension expense related to the qualified pension plan for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $1 million in each year, respectively.

MBIA Inc. also maintains a qualified profit sharing/401(k) plan in which MBIA Corp. participates. The plan is a voluntary contributory plan that allows eligible employees to defer compensation for federal income tax purposes under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Employees may contribute, through payroll deductions, up to 25% of eligible compensation. MBIA Corp. matches employee contributions up to the first 5% of such compensation. The 401(k) matching contributions are made in the form of cash, whereby participants may direct the MBIA Inc. match to an investment of their choice. MBIA Corp.’s contributions vest over a five-year period with 20% vested after two years, 60% vested after three years, 80% vested after four years and 100% vested after five years. Generally, a participating employee is entitled to distributions from the plan upon termination of employment, retirement, death or disability. Participants who qualify for distribution may receive a single lump sum, transfer the assets to another qualified plan or individual retirement account, or receive a series of specified installment payments. Profit sharing/401(k) expense related to the qualified profit sharing/401(k) plan for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $154 thousand, $947 thousand and $587 thousand, respectively.

In addition to the above two plans, MBIA Corp. also participates in MBIA Inc.’s non-qualified deferred compensation plan. Contributions to the above qualified plans that exceed limitations established by federal regulations are then contributed to the non-qualified deferred compensation plan. The non-qualified pension expense for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $476 thousand, $678 thousand and $482 thousand, respectively. The non-qualified profit sharing/401(k) expense for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $284 thousand, $157 thousand and $123 thousand, respectively.

81

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 15: Employee Benefits (continued)

MBIA Corp. participates in the MBIA Inc. 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”), as amended on May 7, 2009 and May 1, 2012. The Omnibus Plan may grant any type of an award including stock options, performance shares, performance units, restricted stock, restricted stock units and dividend equivalents. Following the effective date of the Omnibus Plan, no new options or awards were granted under any of the prior plans authorized by the MBIA Inc. shareholders.

The stock option component of the Omnibus Plan enables key employees to acquire shares of MBIA Inc. common stock. The stock option grants, which may be awarded every year, provide the right to purchase shares of MBIA Inc. common stock at the fair value of the stock on the date of grant. Options granted will either be Incentive Stock Options (“ISOs”), where they qualify under Section 422(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, or Non-Qualified Stock Options (“NQSOs”). ISOs and NQSOs are granted at a price not less than 100% of the fair value, defined as the closing price on the grant date, of MBIA Inc. common stock. Options are exercisable as specified at the time of grant depending on the level of the recipient (generally four or five years) and expire either seven or ten years from the date of grant (or shorter if specified or following termination of employment).

Under the restricted stock component of the Omnibus Plan, certain employees are granted restricted shares of MBIA Inc.’s common stock. These awards have a restriction period lasting three, four or five years depending on the type of award, after which time the awards fully vest. During the vesting period these shares may not be sold. Restricted stock may be granted to all employees.

In accordance with the accounting guidance for share-based payments, MBIA Inc. expenses the fair value of employee stock options and other forms of stock-based compensation. In addition, the guidance classifies share-based payment awards as either liability awards, which are remeasured at fair value at each balance sheet date, or equity awards, which are measured on the grant date and not subsequently remeasured. Generally, awards with cash-based settlement repurchase features or that are settled at a fixed dollar amount are classified as liability awards, and changes in fair value will be reported in earnings. Awards with net-settlement features or that permit a cashless exercise with third-party brokers are classified as equity awards and changes in fair value are not reported in earnings. MBIA Inc.’s long-term incentive plans include features which result in both liability and equity awards. For liability awards, MBIA Inc. remeasures these awards at each balance sheet date. In addition, the guidance requires the use of a forfeiture estimate. MBIA Inc. uses historical employee termination information to estimate the forfeiture rate applied to current stock-based awards.

MBIA Inc. maintains voluntary retirement benefits, which provide certain benefits to eligible employees of MBIA Corp. upon retirement. A description of these benefits is included in MBIA Inc.’s proxy statement. One of the components of the retirement program for those employees that are retirement eligible is to continue to vest all performance-based stock options and restricted share awards beyond the retirement date in accordance with the original vesting terms and to immediately vest all outstanding time-based stock options and restricted share grants. The accounting guidance for share-based payment requires compensation costs for those employees to be recognized from the date of grant through the retirement eligible date, unless there is a risk of forfeiture, in which case the compensation cost is recognized in accordance with the original vesting schedule. Accelerated expense, if any, relating to this retirement benefit for both stock option awards and restricted stock awards has been included in the disclosed compensation expense amounts.

In accordance with the accounting guidance for share-based payments, MBIA Inc. valued all stock options granted using an option-pricing model. The value is recognized as an expense over the period in which the options vest. MBIA Corp.’s proportionate share of compensation cost for employee stock options for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 totaled $2 million, $1 million and $1 million, respectively. MBIA Corp.’s proportionate share of compensation costs for restricted stock awards was $5 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

During 2011 and 2010, MBIA Corp. granted deferred cash-based long-term incentive awards. No new grants were awarded during 2012. These grants have a vesting period of either three or five years, after which time the award fully vests. Payment is generally contingent upon the employee’s continuous employment with MBIA Corp.

82

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 15: Employee Benefits (continued)

through the payment date. The deferred cash awards are granted to employees from the vice-president level up. Compensation expense related to the deferred cash awards was $2 million, $3 million and $2 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Note 16: Preferred Stock

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, MBIA Corp. had 2,759 shares of the preferred stock issued and outstanding. The carrying value of the preferred stock was $28 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011.

In accordance with MBIA Corp.’s fixed-rate election, the dividend rate on the preferred stock was determined using a fixed-rate equivalent of LIBOR plus 200 basis points. Each share of preferred stock has a par value of $1,000 with a liquidation preference of $100,000. The holders of the preferred stock are not entitled to any voting rights as shareholders of MBIA Corp. and their consent is not required for taking any corporate action. Subject to certain requirements, the preferred stock may be redeemed, in whole or in part, at the option of MBIA Corp. at any time or from time to time for cash at a redemption price equal to the liquidation preference per share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon at the date of redemption for the then current dividend period and any previously accumulated dividends payable without interest on such unpaid dividends. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, there were no dividends declared on the preferred stock. Payment of dividends on MBIA Corp.’s preferred stock is subject to the same restrictions that apply to dividends on common stock under New York State insurance law. The terms of the preferred stock provide that if MBIA Corp. fails to pay dividends in full on the preferred stock for 18 consecutive months, the authorized number of members of the MBIA Corp. board of directors will automatically be increased by two and the holders of the preferred stock will be entitled to fill the vacancies so created at a special meeting of the preferred stockholders of MBIA Corp. Due to its nonpayment of dividends on the preferred stock for 18 consecutive months, MBIA Corp. held a meeting of preferred stockholders on August 12, 2011 to elect the two new directors. The meeting was adjourned because a quorum was not present. MBIA Corp. is currently unable to pay dividends, including dividends on its preferred stock, due to earned surplus deficits per its statutory financial statement filing as of December 31, 2012 and 2011.

Note 17: Related Party Transactions

Related parties are defined as the following:

• Affiliates of MBIA Corp.: An affiliate is a party that directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by or is under common control with MBIA Corp. Control is defined as having, either directly or indirectly, the power to direct the management and operating policies of a company through ownership, by contract or otherwise.

• Entities for which investments are accounted for using the equity method by MBIA Corp.

• Trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit sharing trusts, that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management.

• Principal owners of MBIA Corp. defined as owners of record or known beneficial owners of more than 10% of the voting interests of MBIA Corp.

• Management of MBIA Corp. which includes persons who are responsible for achieving the objectives of MBIA Corp. and who have the authority to establish policies and make decisions by which those objectives are to be pursued. Management normally includes members of the Board of Directors, the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Vice President in charge of principal business functions and other persons who perform similar policymaking functions.

• Members of the immediate families of principal owners of MBIA Corp. and its management. This includes family members whom a principal owner or a member of management might control or influence or by whom they may be controlled or influenced because of the family relationship.

• Other parties with which MBIA Corp. may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

83

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 17: Related Party Transactions (continued)

• Other parties that can significantly influence the management or policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to the extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

Since 1989, MBIA Corp. has executed five surety bonds to guarantee the payment obligations of the members of the Municipal Bond Insurance Association (the “Association”), a voluntary unincorporated association of insurers writing municipal bond and note insurance as agents for the member insurance companies that had their S&P claims-paying rating downgraded from AAA on their previously issued Association policies. In the event that the Association does not meet their policy payment obligations, MBIA Corp. will pay the required amounts directly to the paying agent. The aggregate outstanding exposure on these surety bonds as of December 31, 2012 was $340 million.

MBIA Corp.’s investment portfolio is managed by Cutwater Investor Services Corp. (“Cutwater-ISC”) for domestic investments and by Cutwater Asset Management UK Limited (“Cutwater AM-UK”) for international investments, both wholly-owned subsidiaries of MBIA Inc., which provide fixed-income investment management services for MBIA Inc. and its affiliates, as well as third-party institutional clients. Prior to January 2011, Cutwater Asset Management Corp. (“Cutwater-AMC”) managed MBIA Corp.’s investment portfolio, which was assigned to Cutwater-ISC in January 2011. In 2012, 2011 and 2010, Cutwater-ISC, Cutwater-AMC and Cutwater AM-UK charged fees of $5 million, $7 million and $9 million to MBIA Corp., respectively, based on the performance of its investment portfolio.

MBIA Corp. insures outstanding investment agreement liabilities for MBIA Investment Management, which provides customized investment agreements for bond proceeds and other public funds, as well as for funds which are invested as part of asset-backed or structured product issuance. MBIA Corp. also insures assets and/or liabilities of MBIA-administered conduits that are consolidated in the financial statements of MBIA Inc. and subsidiaries. Refer to “Note 12: Insurance in Force” for further details on insured exposure relating to transactions guaranteed by MBIA Corp.

The MBIA Corp. Secured Loan was fully repaid in May 2012 and the outstanding balance as of December 31, 2011 was $300 million. The interest income relating to this agreement was $3 million, $14 million, and $30 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

In December 2011, MBIA Insurance Corporation entered into a secured loan agreement with National under which MBIA Insurance Corporation borrowed $1.1 billion at a fixed annual interest rate of 7% and with a maturity date of December 2016. During 2012, MBIA Insurance Corporation borrowed an additional $443 million under the National Secured Loan with the approval of the NYSDFS at the same terms as the original loan to fund additional commutations of its insurance policies. MBIA Insurance Corporation has the option to defer payments of interest when due by capitalizing interest amounts to the loan balance, subject to certain thresholds. MBIA Insurance Corporation has elected to defer the interest payments due under the loan. Interest expense attributable to this agreement totaled approximately $103 million and $4 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the amount outstanding under this secured loan was $1.7 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively.

MBIA Corp. provides credit support and issues financial guarantee policies on credit derivative instruments entered into by LaCrosse, an entity previously consolidated by MBIA Corp. under the criteria for variable interest entities. LaCrosse became an affiliate of MBIA Corp. during the fourth quarter of 2009. The outstanding notional amount of insured CDS contracts entered into by LaCrosse was $47.5 billion and $67.0 billion as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively and the gross outstanding notional amount of insured CDS contracts entered into by LaCrosse ceded to other reinsurers was zero as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. During 2012, 2011 and 2010 premiums from LaCrosse for payments received from the counterparties under the insured CDS contracts amounted to $53 million, $98 million, and $124 million, respectively.

84

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 17: Related Party Transactions (continued)

Optinuity Alliance Resources (“Optinuity”), created in the first quarter of 2010, provides support services such as management, legal, accounting, treasury and information technology, among others, to MBIA Inc. and other subsidiaries on a fee-for-service basis including MBIA Corp. The services fees charged to MBIA Corp. by Optinuity were $36 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 and $37 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

MBIA Infrastructure LP Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of MBIA UK, established in the second quarter of 2011, serves as the limited partner to TIF Infrastructure LP, an affiliated limited partnership. MBIA Infrastructure LP Limited has issued four interest free partner loans to TIF Infrastructure LP during 2011. The loans have termination dates ranging from February 2032 to February 2038. The partner loans have been issued to enable TIF Infrastructure LP to invest in a range of European infrastructure projects. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the amount of loans outstanding was $27 million.

During 2011, MBIA Inc. repurchased 111 shares of the outstanding preferred stock of MBIA Corp. at a weighted average purchase price of $20,200 per share or 20.2% of the face value. Preferred shares of 1,315 of MBIA Corp. remained outstanding with a carrying value of $12 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011.

Included in other liabilities were $10 million and $16 million of net payable from MBIA Inc. and other subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and 2011.

MBIA Corp. had no loans outstanding to any executive officers or directors during 2012 and 2011.

Note 18: Commitments and Contingencies

In the normal course of operating its business, MBIA Corp. may be involved in various legal proceedings. Additionally, MBIA may be involved in various legal proceedings that directly or indirectly impact MBIA Corp.

MBIA has received subpoenas or informal inquiries from a variety of regulators, regarding a variety of subjects. MBIA has cooperated fully with each of these regulators and has or is in the process of satisfying all such requests. MBIA may receive additional inquiries from these or other regulators and expects to provide additional information to such regulators regarding their inquiries in the future.

Recovery Litigation

On September 30, 2008, MBIA Corp. commenced an action in New York State Supreme Court, New York County, against Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Countrywide Securities Corp. and Countrywide Financial Corp. (collectively, “Countrywide”). An amended complaint, adding Bank of America as successor to Countrywide’s liabilities, and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP as defendants was filed on August 24, 2009. The amended complaint alleges that Countrywide fraudulently induced MBIA Corp. to provide financial guarantee insurance on securitizations of HELOCs and closed-end second-liens by misrepresenting the true risk profile of the underlying collateral and Countrywide’s adherence to its strict underwriting standards and guidelines. The complaint also alleges that Countrywide breached its representations and warranties and its contractual obligations, including its obligation to cure or repurchase ineligible loans as well as its obligation to service the loans in accordance with industry standards. Expert discovery was completed as of September 20, 2012. On September 19, 2012, MBIA Corp. and Countrywide filed respective motions for summary judgment regarding Countrywide’s primary liability and argument was heard on December 12 and 13, 2012. On September 28, 2012, MBIA Corp. and Bank of America filed motions for summary judgment regarding Bank of America’s successor liability and argument was heard on January 9 and 10, 2013. Oral argument with respect to the trial court’s partial summary judgment decision regarding proof of causation is scheduled for March 12, 2013 before the Appellate Division, First Department.

85

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 18: Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

On July 10, 2009, MBIA Corp. commenced an action in Los Angeles Superior Court against Bank of America Corporation, Countrywide Financial Corporation, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Countrywide Securities Corporation, Angelo Mozilo, David Sambol, Eric Sieracki, Ranjit Kripalani, Jennifer Sandefur, Stanford Kurland, Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., UBS Securities, LLC, and various Countrywide-affiliated Trusts. The complaint alleges that Countrywide made numerous misrepresentations and omissions of material fact in connection with its sale of certain RMBS, including that the underlying collateral consisting of mortgage loans had been originated in strict compliance with its underwriting standards and guidelines. MBIA Corp. commenced this action as subrogee of the purchasers of the RMBS, who incurred severe losses that have been passed on to MBIA Corp. as the insurer of the income streams on these securities. On June 21, 2010, MBIA Corp. filed its second amended complaint. The court has allowed limited discovery to proceed while otherwise staying the case pending further developments in the New York Countrywide action described in the prior paragraph.

On October 15, 2008, MBIA Corp. commenced an action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against RFC. On December 5, 2008, a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice was filed in the Southern District of New York and the complaint was re-filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County. The complaint alleges that RFC fraudulently induced MBIA Corp. to provide financial guarantee policies with respect to five RFC closed-end second-lien and HELOC securitizations, and that RFC breached its contractual representations and warranties, as well as its obligation to repurchase ineligible loans, among other claims. The case is currently stayed as a result of the Chapter 11 filing of ResCap on May 14, 2012 in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.

On April 1, 2010, MBIA Corp. commenced an action in New York State Supreme Court, New York County, against GMAC. The complaint alleges fraud and negligent misrepresentation on the part of GMAC in connection with the procurement of financial guarantee insurance on three RMBS transactions, breach of GMAC’s representations and warranties and its contractual obligation to cure or repurchase ineligible loans and breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing. The case is currently stayed as a result of the Chapter 11 filing of ResCap on May 14, 2012 in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.

On December 14, 2009, MBIA Corp. commenced an action in New York State Supreme Court, New York County, against Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc., and Select Portfolio Servicing Inc. (collectively, “Credit Suisse”). The complaint seeks damages for fraud and breach of contractual obligations in connection with the procurement of financial guarantee insurance on the Home Equity Mortgage Trust Series 2007-2 securitization. On January 30, 2013, MBIA Corp. filed its amended complaint. The amended complaint alleges, among other claims, that Credit Suisse falsely represented: (i) the attributes of the securitized loans; (ii) that the loans complied with the governing underwriting guidelines; and (iii) that Credit Suisse had conducted extensive due diligence on and quality control reviews of the securitized loans to ensure compliance with the underwriting guidelines. The complaint further alleges that the defendants breached their contractual obligations to cure or repurchase loans found to be in breach of the representations and warranties applicable thereto and denied MBIA Corp. the requisite access to all records and documents regarding the securitized loans. Defendants’ response to the amended complaint is due March 8, 2013.

On September 14, 2012, MBIA Insurance Corporation filed a complaint alleging fraud against J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (f/k/a Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.) relating to Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.’s role as lead securities underwriter on the GMAC Mortgage Corporation Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-HE4. On November 26, 2012, the defendant filed its answer.

On September 17, 2012, MBIA Insurance Corporation filed a complaint in Minnesota state court for aiding and abetting fraud and breach of contract against certain Ally Bank companies relating to seven MBIA-insured mortgage-backed securitizations sponsored by RFC and GMAC during 2006-2007. The defendants removed to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota on October 5, 2012, and filed a notice of motion to dismiss on October 12, 2012. A hearing on the defendants’ motion to dismiss is scheduled for April 25, 2013.

86

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 18: Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

On January 11, 2013, MBIA Insurance Corporation commenced a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Flagstar ABS, LLC, Flagstar Bank, FSB, and Flagstar Capital Markets Corporation (collectively, “Flagstar”) alleging breach of contract in connection with the Flagstar 2006-1 and 2007-1 second-lien RMBS transactions (the “Flagstar Transactions”). Specifically, the complaint alleges that Flagstar breached the repurchase protocol and breached various representations and warranties relating to the nature of the loans included in the securitizations and contained within the insurance agreements entered into in connection with the Flagstar Transactions. Defendants’ response to the complaint is due February 28, 2013.

On October 14, 2008, June 17, 2009 and August 25, 2009, MBIA Corp. submitted proofs of claim to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) with respect to the resolution of IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. for both pre- and post-receivership amounts owed to MBIA Corp. as a result of IndyMac’s contractual breaches and fraud in connection with financial guarantee insurance issued by MBIA Corp. on securitizations of HELOCs. The proofs of claim were subsequently denied by the FDIC. MBIA Corp. has appealed the FDIC’s denial of its proofs of claim via a complaint, filed on May 29, 2009, against IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. and the FDIC, as receiver, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and alleges that IndyMac fraudulently induced MBIA Corp. to provide financial guarantee insurance on securitizations of HELOCS by breaching contractual representations and warranties as well as negligently and fraudulently misrepresenting the nature of the loans in the securitization pools and IndyMac’s adherence to its strict underwriting standards and guidelines. On October 6, 2011, the court issued a ruling granting the FDIC’s motion to dismiss, which MBIA Corp. appealed. Oral argument was heard on November 14, 2012 and a decision is pending.

On September 22, 2009, MBIA Corp. commenced an action in Los Angeles Superior Court against IndyMac ABS, Inc., Home Equity Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Trust, Series 2006-H4, Home Equity Mortgage Loans Asset-Backed Trust, Series INDS 2007-I, Home Equity Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Trust, Series INDS 2007-2, Credit Suisse Securities (USA), L.L.C., UBS Securities, LLC, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Michael Perry, Scott Keys, Jill Jacobson, and Kevin Callan. The Complaint alleges that IndyMac Bank made numerous misrepresentations and omissions of material fact in connection with its sale of certain RMBS, including that the underlying collateral consisting of mortgage loans had been originated in strict compliance with its underwriting standards and guidelines. MBIA Corp. commenced this action as subrogee of the purchasers of the RMBS, who incurred severe losses that have been passed on to MBIA Corp. as the insurer of the income streams on these securities. On October 19, 2009, MBIA Corp. dismissed IndyMac ABS, Inc. from the action without prejudice. On October 23, 2009, defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. On November 30, 2009, the IndyMac trusts were consensually dismissed from the litigation. On August 3, 2010, the court denied defendants Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in its entirety. Effective January 30, 2012, the case has been reassigned to Judge Kenneth Freeman.

Transformation Litigation

On May 13, 2009, a complaint was filed in the New York State Supreme Court against MBIA, MBIA Corp. and National, entitled ABN AMRO Bank N.V. et al. v. MBIA Inc. et al. The plaintiffs, a group of domestic and international financial institutions, purport to be acting as holders of insurance policies issued by MBIA Corp. directly or indirectly guaranteeing the repayment of structured finance products. The complaint alleges that certain of the terms of the transactions entered into by MBIA, which were approved by the New York State Department of Insurance, constituted fraudulent conveyances and a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing under New York law. The complaint seeks a judgment (a) ordering the defendants to unwind the transactions, (b) declaring that the transactions constituted a fraudulent conveyance, (c) declaring that MBIA and National are jointly and severally liable for the insurance policies issued by MBIA Corp., and (d) ordering damages in an unspecified amount. On February 17, 2010, the court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss. Sixteen of the original eighteen plaintiffs have dismissed their claims, several of which dismissals were related to the commutation of certain of their MBIA-insured exposures.

On June 15, 2009, the same group of eighteen domestic and international financial institutions who filed the above described plenary action in New York State Supreme Court filed a proceeding pursuant to Article 78 of New York’s Civil Practice Law & Rules in New York State Supreme Court, entitled ABN AMRO Bank N.V. et al. v. Eric Dinallo, in his capacity as Superintendent of the New York State Insurance Department, the New York State

87

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 18: Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

Insurance Department, MBIA Inc. et al. The petition seeks a judgment (a) declaring void and to annul the approval letter of the Superintendent of the Department of Insurance, (b) to recover dividends paid in connection with the Transactions, and (c) declaring that the approval letter does not extinguish plaintiffs’ direct claims against MBIA in the plenary action described above. MBIA and the New York State Insurance Department filed their answering papers to the Article 78 Petition on November 24, 2009 and argued that based on the record and facts, approval of Transformation and its constituent transactions was neither arbitrary nor capricious nor in violation of NYIL. The Article 78 hearing concluded on June 7, 2012. A decision is pending. Sixteen of the original eighteen plaintiffs have dismissed their claims, several of which dismissals were related to the commutation of certain of their MBIA-insured exposures.

On September 10, 2012, CQS ABS Master Fund Ltd., CQS Select ABS Master Fund Ltd., and CQS ABS Alpha Master Fund Ltd. as holders of MBIA-insured residential mortgage-backed bonds filed suit against MBIA Inc., MBIA Insurance Corporation and National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. The complaint alleges that certain of the terms of the transactions entered into by MBIA Insurance Corporation, which were approved by the New York State Department of Insurance, constituted fraudulent conveyances under §§ 273, 274, 276 and 279(c) of New York Debtor and Creditor Law and a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing under New York common law. On October 19, 2012, MBIA filed its answer.

On November 9, 2012, certain holders of MBIA Corp.’s perpetual preferred shares filed a complaint in New York State Supreme Court, New York County titled Broadbill Partners LP et al. v. MBIA Inc. et al. alleging harm in connection with (i) MBIA Corp.’s exercise of put options in or around November 2008 pursuant to put option agreements with certain custodial trusts (i.e., North Castle Custodial Trusts I through North Castle Custodial Trust VIII), (ii) MBIA’s February 2009 Transformation and (iii) the August 2011 meeting of preferred stockholders to elect directors. Plaintiffs allege twenty-one causes of action including breach of contract, unjust enrichment, constructive and resulting trust, recession, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, declaratory relief, fraud, intentional interference with contract, violations of NYIL and New York Debtor and Creditor Law, and joint and several liability. On January 15, 2013, MBIA filed its motion to dismiss.

On October 22, 2010, a similar group of domestic and international financial institutions who filed the above described Article 78 proceeding and related plenary action in New York State Supreme Court filed an additional proceeding pursuant to Article 78 of New York’s Civil Practice Law & Rules in New York State Supreme Court, entitled Barclays Bank PLC et. al. v. James Wrynn, in his capacity as Superintendent of the New York State Insurance Department, the New York State Insurance Department, MBIA Inc. et al. This petition challenges the New York State Insurance Department’s June 22, 2010 approval of National’s restatement of earned surplus. The proceeding is currently stayed through April 19, 2013.

Corporate Litigation

On December 13, 2012, Bank of America filed a complaint against MBIA Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Indenture Trustee in New York State Supreme Court, County of Westchester, alleging MBIA’s consent solicitation completed on November 26, 2012, resulting in amendments to the indentures governing five series of MBIA Inc.’s notes, tortiously interfered with Bank of America’s November 13, 2012 tender offer to buy all of MBIA Inc.’s 5.7% senior notes due 2034. On January 8, 2013, MBIA filed a motion to transfer venue to New York State Supreme Court, New York County and the briefing was completed on January 31, 2013. On February 19, 2013, Bank of America filed an amended complaint.

On February 7, 2013, MBIA filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief against Bank of America Corp. and Blue Ridge Investments, L.L.C. in New York State Supreme Court, County of Westchester. The complaint seeks, among other things, a declaration that amendments to indentures and/or the issuance of supplemental indentures governing five series of MBIA Inc.’s notes that resulted from MBIA’s consent solicitation completed on November 26, 2012, were valid and properly effectuated and did not give rise to an event of default under the Senior Indenture dated as of November 24, 2004 between MBIA Inc. and the Bank of New York, as Trustee.

88

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 18: Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

On July 23, 2008, the City of Los Angeles filed a complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, against a number of financial guarantee insurers, including MBIA. At the same time and subsequently, additional complaints against MBIA and nearly all of the same co-defendants were filed by various municipal entities and quasi-municipal entities, mostly in California. These cases are part of a coordination proceeding in Superior Court, San Francisco County, before Judge Richard A. Kramer, referred to as the Ambac Bond Insurance Cases, which name as defendants MBIA, Ambac Assurance Corp., Syncora Guarantee, Inc. f/k/a XL Capital Assurance Inc., Financial Security Assurance, Inc., Assured Guaranty Corp., Financial Guaranty Insurance Company, and CIFG Assurance North America, Inc., Fitch Inc., Fitch Ratings, Ltd., Fitch Group, Inc., Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., and Standard & Poor’s Corporation.

In August 2011, the plaintiffs filed amended versions of their respective complaints. The claims allege participation by all the defendants in a conspiracy in violation of California’s antitrust laws to maintain a dual credit rating scale that misstated the credit default risk of municipal bond issuers and not-for-profit issuers and thus created market demand for bond insurance. The plaintiffs also allege that the individual bond insurers participated in risky financial transactions in other lines of business that damaged each bond insurer’s financial condition (thereby undermining the value of each of their guaranties), and each failed adequately to disclose the impact of those transactions on their financial condition. In addition to the statutory antitrust claim, plaintiffs assert common law claims of breach of contract and fraud against MBIA Corp. and the other monoline defendants. The non-municipal plaintiffs also allege a California unfair competition cause of action. On May 1, 2012, the court ruled in favor of the monoline defendants on their special motion to strike pursuant to California’s Anti-SLAPP statute. A hearing on the motion is scheduled for March 12, 2013.

On July 23, 2008, the City of Los Angeles filed a separate complaint in the Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, naming as defendants MBIA and other financial institutions, and alleging fraud and violations of California’s antitrust laws through bid-rigging in the sale of guaranteed investment contracts and what plaintiffs call “municipal derivatives” to municipal bond issuers. The case was removed to federal court and transferred by order dated November 26, 2008, to the Southern District of New York for inclusion in the multidistrict litigation In re Municipal Derivatives Antitrust Litigation, M.D.L. No. 1950. Complaints making the same allegations against MBIA and nearly all of the same co-defendants were then, or subsequently, filed by municipal entities and quasi-municipal entities, mostly in California, and three not-for-profit retirement community operators. These cases have all been added to the multidistrict litigation. The plaintiffs in all of the cases assert federal and either California or New York state antitrust claims. As of May 31, 2011, MBIA has answered all of the existing complaints.

On March 12, 2010, the City of Phoenix, Arizona filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona against MBIA Corp., Ambac Assurance Corp. and Financial Guaranty Insurance Company relating to insurance premiums charged on municipal bonds issued by the City of Phoenix between 2004 and 2007. The plaintiff’s complaint alleges pricing discrimination under Arizona insurance law and unjust enrichment.

On April 5, 2010, Tri-City Healthcare District, a California public healthcare legislative district, filed a complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, against MBIA, MBIA Corp., National, certain MBIA employees (collectively for this paragraph, “MBIA”) and various financial institutions and law firms. Tri-City subsequently filed five amended complaints. The Fifth Amended Complaint, filed on March 7, 2012, purports to state seven causes of action against MBIA for, among other things, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of contract and violation of the Business and Professions Code arising from Tri-City Healthcare District’s investment in auction rate securities. MBIA filed its answer to the remaining causes of action on November 26, 2012.

MBIA and MBIA Corp. are defending against the aforementioned actions in which they are a defendant and expect ultimately to prevail on the merits. There is no assurance, however, that they will prevail in these actions. Adverse rulings in these actions could have a material adverse effect on MBIA Corp.’s ability to implement its strategy and on its business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. At this stage of the litigation, there has not been a determination as to the amount, if any, of damages. Accordingly, MBIA Corp. is not able to estimate any amount of loss or range of loss.

89

MBIA Insurance Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 18: Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

There are no other material lawsuits pending or, to the knowledge of MBIA Corp., threatened, to which MBIA Corp. or any of its subsidiaries is a party.

Note 19: Subsequent Events

Refer to “Note 18: Commitments and Contingencies” for information about legal proceedings that developed after December 31, 2012.

90