Commitments and Contingencies	6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2022
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	16. Commitments and Contingencies Environmental Matters Due to the nature of our business, certain of our subsidiaries’ operations are subject to numerous existing and proposed laws and governmental regulations designed to protect the environment, particularly regarding plant wastes and emissions and solid waste disposal. Our consolidated environmental liabilities on an undiscounted basis were $25 million and $13 million as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively, primarily within our Energy segment, which are included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. We do not believe that environmental matters will have a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition. Energy A wholly-owned subsidiary of CVR Refining is party to proceedings pending before the United States District Court for the District of Kansas (“D. Kan.”) relating to claims by United States Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) on behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) and the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (“KDHE”) (a) alleging violations of the Clean Air Act and a 2012 Consent Decree (“CD”) between CVR Refining, the United States (on behalf of the EPA) and KDHE at its Coffeyville refinery primarily relating to flares and seeking stipulated penalties under the CD (the “Stipulated Claims”) and (b) alleging violations of the CAA, the Kansas State Implementation Plan, Kansas law, Part 63 of the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Petroleum Refineries Subparts CC and R (“NESHAP”) and CRRM’s permits relating to flares, heaters, and related matters and seeking civil penalties, injunctive and related relief under an amended complaint filed by the United States (on behalf of the EPA) and KDHE on February 17, 2022 (collectively, the “Statutory Claims”). On March 30, 2022, D. Kan. denied CVR Refining’s petition for judicial review of approximately $6.8 million in Stipulated Claims, which amount CVR Refining previously deposited into a commercial escrow account. CVR Refining is currently evaluating its response to this denial, including its appeal rights. The escrowed funds are legally restricted for use and are included within Prepaid expenses and other current assets on CVR Energy’s consolidated balance sheets. On March 21, 2022, CVR Refining filed with D. Kan. a Motion to Dismiss the Statutory Claims, which motion is currently pending before the court. As negotiations and proceedings relating to the Stipulated Claims and the Statutory Claims are ongoing, CVR Energy cannot at this time determine the outcome of these matters, including whether such outcome, or any subsequent enforcement or litigation relating thereto would have a material impact on our Energy segment’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. As of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, our Energy segment had environmental accruals of $24 million and $12 million, respectively, representing estimated costs for future remediation efforts at certain sites. Renewable Fuel Standards CVR Refining is subject to the Renewable Fuel Standard (“RFS”) implemented primarily by the EPA which requires refiners to either blend renewable fuels into their transportation fuels or purchase renewable fuel credits, known as RINs, in lieu of blending. CVR Refining is not able to blend the substantial majority of its transportation fuels and has to purchase RINs on the open market and may have to obtain waiver credits for cellulosic biofuels or other exemptions from the EPA, to the extent available, in order to comply with the RFS. Wholly owned subsidiaries of CVR Refining are or expect to be party to or have interest in various lawsuits relating to the RFS, including a lawsuit against the EPA for damages sustained by the EPA’s failure to timely issue small refinery exemptions (“SREs”) to its Wynnewood refinery. In April 2022, the EPA denied the SRE previously granted to certain small refineries for 2018, including Wynnewood, and also issued an alternate compliance ruling that would allow such small refineries to meet their compliance obligations without purchasing or redeeming additional RFS though is not requiring it to purchase or redeem additional RFS credits (the “Alternate Compliance Ruling”). In June 2022, Wynnewood filed petitions challenging the EPA’s improper denial of WRC’s 2018 SRE and the Alternate Compliance Ruling. In July and August 2022, Wynnewood filed petitions challenging the EPA’s improper denial of WRC’s SREs for the 2017 and 2019 to 2021 compliance periods and also intervened in an action filed by certain biofuels producers against the EPA relating to the Alternate Compliance Ruling. As these actions are in their earliest stages, we cannot currently estimate the outcome, impact or timing of resolution of these matters. However, while CVR Refining firmly believe the EPA’s actions are unlawful and intends to pursue all available legal remedies, if these matters are ultimately concluded in a manner adverse to CVR Refining, they could have a material effect on our Energy business’ financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. For the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, our Energy segment recognized an expense of $153 million and $173 million, respectively, for CVR Refining’s compliance with the RFS (based on our Energy segment’s revised 2020 and finalized 2021 and 2022 annual renewal volume obligation (“RVO”) and excluding the impacts of any exemptions or waivers to which our Energy segment may be entitled). For the six months ended June 30 2022 and 2021, such expenses were $259 million and $351 million, respectively. These recognized amounts are included in cost of goods sold in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and represent costs to comply with the RFS obligation through purchasing of RINs not otherwise reduced by blending of ethanol or biodiesel. At each reporting period, to the extent RINs purchased or generated through blending are less than the RFS obligation (excluding the impact of exemptions or waivers to which CVR Refining may be entitled), the remaining position is marked-to-market using RIN market prices at period end. As of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, CVR Refining’s RFS position was $708 million and $494 million, respectively, and is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Litigation From time to time, we and our subsidiaries are involved in various lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. We do not believe that such normal routine litigation will have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations. Energy Call Option Lawsuits – On July 20, 2022, CVR Energy and certain of its affiliates (the “Call Defendants”) who are parties to the consolidated lawsuits (collectively, the “Call Option Lawsuits”) pending before the Delaware Court of Chancery (the “Chancery Court”) primarily alleging breach of contract, tortious interference and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and seeking monetary damages and attorneys’ fees, among other remedies, filed by purported former unitholders of CVR Refining on behalf of themselves and an alleged class of similarly situated unitholders relating to CVR Energy’s exercise of the call option (“Call Option”) under the CVR Refining Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership assigned to it by CVR Refining’s general partner, entered into a confidential, binding term sheet pursuant to which CVR Energy, the Call Defendants and plaintiffs are expected to execute a final agreement to settle the Call Option Lawsuits for $79 million, subject to approval by the Chancery Court and other conditions contained therein. If finalized, settlement of the Call Option Lawsuits is not currently expected to have any further impact on our Energy business’ financial position or results of operations beyond the $79 million recognized within Other current liabilities and Other (expense) income, net as of June 30, 2022 to reflect the estimated probable loss. The lawsuits relating to insurance coverage for the Call Option Lawsuits, one filed on January 27, 2021, in the 434^th Judicial District Court of Fort Bend County, Texas by the Call Defendants’ primary and excess insurers (the “Insurers”) seeking a declaratory judgment determining that they owe no indemnity coverage for the Call Option Lawsuits in relation to insurance policies that have coverage limits of $50 million, and another filed on January 30, 2022, in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware by the Call Defendants against the Insurers for anticipatory breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (the “Delaware Coverage Case”), remain pending, and pre-trial proceedings are in process. CVR Energy intends to vigorously pursue recovery of the $79 million it expects to pay in settlement of the Call Options Lawsuits and other damages allowed by law from its primary and excess insurers in the event the Chancery Court approves the settlement. As both lawsuits are in their early stages, CVR Energy cannot determine at this time the outcome of these lawsuits, including whether the outcome would have a material impact on our Energy business’ financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Other Matters Pension Obligations Mr. Icahn, through certain affiliates, owns 100% of Icahn Enterprises GP and approximately 86% of Icahn Enterprises’ outstanding depositary units as of June 30, 2022. Applicable pension and tax laws make each member of a “controlled group” of entities, generally defined as entities in which there is at least an 80% common ownership interest, jointly and severally liable for certain pension plan obligations of any member of the controlled group. These pension obligations include ongoing contributions to fund the plan, as well as liability for any unfunded liabilities that may exist at the time the plan is terminated. In addition, the failure to pay these pension obligations when due may result in the creation of liens in favor of the pension plan or the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the “PBGC”) against the assets of each member of the controlled group. As a result of the more than 80% ownership interest in us by Mr. Icahn’s affiliates, we and our subsidiaries are subject to the pension liabilities of entities in which Mr. Icahn has a direct or indirect ownership interest of at least 80%, which includes the liabilities of pension plans sponsored by Viskase and ACF Industries LLC (“ACF”), an affiliate of Mr. Icahn. All the minimum funding requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, for the Viskase and ACF plans have been met as of June 30, 2022. If the plans were voluntarily terminated, they would be underfunded by an aggregate of approximately $82 million as of June 30, 2022. These results are based on the most recent information provided by the plans’ actuaries. These liabilities could increase or decrease, depending on a number of factors, including future changes in benefits, investment returns, and the assumptions used to calculate the liability. As members of the controlled group, we would be liable for any failure of Viskase or ACF to make ongoing pension contributions or to pay the unfunded liabilities upon a termination of the Viskase or ACF pension plans. In addition, other entities now or in the future within the controlled group in which we are included may have pension plan obligations that are, or may become, underfunded and we would be liable for any failure of such entities to make ongoing pension contributions or to pay the unfunded liabilities upon termination of such plans. The current underfunded status of the pension plans of Viskase and ACF requires them to notify the PBGC of certain “reportable events,” such as if we cease to be a member of the Viskase or ACF controlled group, or if we make certain extraordinary dividends or stock redemptions. The obligation to report could cause us to seek to delay or reconsider the occurrence of such reportable events. Starfire Holding Corporation (“Starfire”), which is 99.6% owned by Mr. Icahn, has undertaken to indemnify us and our subsidiaries from losses resulting from any imposition of certain pension funding or termination liabilities that may be imposed on us and our subsidiaries or our assets as a result of being a member of the Icahn controlled group, including ACF. The Starfire indemnity provides, among other things, that so long as such contingent liabilities exist and could be imposed on us, Starfire will not make any distributions to its stockholders that would reduce its net worth to below $250 million. Nonetheless, Starfire may not be able to fund its indemnification obligations to us. Other The U.S. Attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York contacted Icahn Enterprises L.P. in September 2017 seeking production of information pertaining to our and Mr. Icahn’s activities relating to the Renewable Fuels Standard and Mr. Icahn’s former role as an advisor to the former President of the United States. We cooperated with the request and provided information in response to the subpoena. The U.S. Attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York contacted Icahn Enterprises L.P. in June 2018 seeking production of information pertaining to trading in Manitowoc Company, Inc. securities. We cooperated with the request and provided documents in response to the subpoena. The U.S. Attorney’s office has not made any claims or allegations against us or Mr. Icahn with respect to either of the foregoing inquiries. We believe that we maintain a strong compliance program and, while no assurances can be made, we do not believe these inquiries will have a material impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Commitments and Contingencies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2022

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

16. Commitments and Contingencies

Environmental Matters

Due to the nature of our business, certain of our subsidiaries’ operations are subject to numerous existing and proposed laws and governmental regulations designed to protect the environment, particularly regarding plant wastes and emissions and solid waste disposal. Our consolidated environmental liabilities on an undiscounted basis were $25 million and $13 million as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively, primarily within our Energy segment, which are included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. We do not believe that environmental matters will have a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

Energy

A wholly-owned subsidiary of CVR Refining is party to proceedings pending before the United States District Court for the District of Kansas (“D. Kan.”) relating to claims by United States Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) on behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) and the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (“KDHE”) (a) alleging violations of the Clean Air Act and a 2012 Consent Decree (“CD”) between CVR Refining, the United States (on behalf of the EPA) and KDHE at its Coffeyville refinery primarily relating to flares and seeking stipulated penalties under the CD (the “Stipulated Claims”) and (b) alleging violations of the CAA, the Kansas State Implementation Plan, Kansas law, Part 63 of the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Petroleum Refineries Subparts CC and R (“NESHAP”) and CRRM’s permits relating to flares, heaters, and related matters and seeking civil penalties, injunctive and related relief under an amended complaint filed by the United States (on behalf of the EPA) and KDHE on February 17, 2022 (collectively, the “Statutory Claims”). On March 30, 2022, D. Kan. denied CVR Refining’s petition for judicial review of approximately $6.8 million in Stipulated Claims, which amount CVR Refining previously deposited into a commercial escrow account. CVR Refining is currently evaluating its response to this denial, including its appeal rights. The escrowed funds are legally restricted for use and are included within Prepaid expenses and other current assets on CVR Energy’s consolidated balance sheets. On March 21, 2022, CVR Refining filed with D. Kan. a Motion to Dismiss the Statutory Claims, which motion is currently pending before the court. As negotiations and proceedings relating to the Stipulated Claims and the Statutory Claims are ongoing, CVR Energy cannot at this time determine the outcome of these matters, including whether such outcome, or any subsequent enforcement or litigation relating thereto would have a material impact on our Energy segment’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

As of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, our Energy segment had environmental accruals of $24 million and $12 million, respectively, representing estimated costs for future remediation efforts at certain sites.

Renewable Fuel Standards

CVR Refining is subject to the Renewable Fuel Standard (“RFS”) implemented primarily by the EPA which requires refiners to either blend renewable fuels into their transportation fuels or purchase renewable fuel credits, known as RINs, in lieu of blending. CVR Refining is not able to blend the substantial majority of its transportation fuels and has to purchase RINs on the open market and may have to obtain waiver credits for cellulosic biofuels or other exemptions from the EPA, to the extent available, in order to comply with the RFS. Wholly owned subsidiaries of CVR Refining are or expect to be party to or have interest in various lawsuits relating to the RFS, including a lawsuit against the EPA for damages sustained by the EPA’s failure to timely issue small refinery exemptions (“SREs”) to its Wynnewood refinery. In April 2022, the EPA denied the SRE previously granted to certain small refineries for 2018, including Wynnewood, and also issued an alternate compliance ruling that would allow such small refineries to meet their compliance obligations without purchasing or redeeming additional RFS though is not requiring it to purchase or redeem additional RFS credits (the “Alternate Compliance Ruling”). In June 2022, Wynnewood filed petitions challenging the EPA’s improper denial of WRC’s 2018 SRE and the Alternate Compliance Ruling. In July and August 2022, Wynnewood filed

petitions challenging the EPA’s improper denial of WRC’s SREs for the 2017 and 2019 to 2021 compliance periods and also intervened in an action filed by certain biofuels producers against the EPA relating to the Alternate Compliance Ruling. As these actions are in their earliest stages, we cannot currently estimate the outcome, impact or timing of resolution of these matters. However, while CVR Refining firmly believe the EPA’s actions are unlawful and intends to pursue all available legal remedies, if these matters are ultimately concluded in a manner adverse to CVR Refining, they could have a material effect on our Energy business’ financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

For the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, our Energy segment recognized an expense of $153 million and $173 million, respectively, for CVR Refining’s compliance with the RFS (based on our Energy segment’s revised 2020 and finalized 2021 and 2022 annual renewal volume obligation (“RVO”) and excluding the impacts of any exemptions or waivers to which our Energy segment may be entitled). For the six months ended June 30 2022 and 2021, such expenses were $259 million and $351 million, respectively. These recognized amounts are included in cost of goods sold in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and represent costs to comply with the RFS obligation through purchasing of RINs not otherwise reduced by blending of ethanol or biodiesel. At each reporting period, to the extent RINs purchased or generated through blending are less than the RFS obligation (excluding the impact of exemptions or waivers to which CVR Refining may be entitled), the remaining position is marked-to-market using RIN market prices at period end. As of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, CVR Refining’s RFS position was $708 million and $494 million, respectively, and is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Litigation

From time to time, we and our subsidiaries are involved in various lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. We do not believe that such normal routine litigation will have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Energy

Call Option Lawsuits – On July 20, 2022, CVR Energy and certain of its affiliates (the “Call Defendants”) who are parties to the consolidated lawsuits (collectively, the “Call Option Lawsuits”) pending before the Delaware Court of Chancery (the “Chancery Court”) primarily alleging breach of contract, tortious interference and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and seeking monetary damages and attorneys’ fees, among other remedies, filed by purported former unitholders of CVR Refining on behalf of themselves and an alleged class of similarly situated unitholders relating to CVR Energy’s exercise of the call option (“Call Option”) under the CVR Refining Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership assigned to it by CVR Refining’s general partner, entered into a confidential, binding term sheet pursuant to which CVR Energy, the Call Defendants and plaintiffs are expected to execute a final agreement to settle the Call Option Lawsuits for $79 million, subject to approval by the Chancery Court and other conditions contained therein. If finalized, settlement of the Call Option Lawsuits is not currently expected to have any further impact on our Energy business’ financial position or results of operations beyond the $79 million recognized within Other current liabilities and Other (expense) income, net as of June 30, 2022 to reflect the estimated probable loss.

The lawsuits relating to insurance coverage for the Call Option Lawsuits, one filed on January 27, 2021, in the 434^th Judicial District Court of Fort Bend County, Texas by the Call Defendants’ primary and excess insurers (the “Insurers”) seeking a declaratory judgment determining that they owe no indemnity coverage for the Call Option Lawsuits in relation to insurance policies that have coverage limits of $50 million, and another filed on January 30, 2022, in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware by the Call Defendants against the Insurers for anticipatory breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (the “Delaware Coverage Case”), remain pending, and pre-trial proceedings are in process. CVR Energy intends to vigorously pursue recovery of the $79 million it expects to pay in settlement of the Call Options Lawsuits and other damages allowed by law from its primary and excess insurers in the event the Chancery Court approves the settlement. As both lawsuits are in their early stages, CVR Energy cannot

determine at this time the outcome of these lawsuits, including whether the outcome would have a material impact on our Energy business’ financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Other Matters

Pension Obligations

Mr. Icahn, through certain affiliates, owns 100% of Icahn Enterprises GP and approximately 86% of Icahn Enterprises’ outstanding depositary units as of June 30, 2022. Applicable pension and tax laws make each member of a “controlled group” of entities, generally defined as entities in which there is at least an 80% common ownership interest, jointly and severally liable for certain pension plan obligations of any member of the controlled group. These pension obligations include ongoing contributions to fund the plan, as well as liability for any unfunded liabilities that may exist at the time the plan is terminated. In addition, the failure to pay these pension obligations when due may result in the creation of liens in favor of the pension plan or the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the “PBGC”) against the assets of each member of the controlled group.

As a result of the more than 80% ownership interest in us by Mr. Icahn’s affiliates, we and our subsidiaries are subject to the pension liabilities of entities in which Mr. Icahn has a direct or indirect ownership interest of at least 80%, which includes the liabilities of pension plans sponsored by Viskase and ACF Industries LLC (“ACF”), an affiliate of Mr. Icahn. All the minimum funding requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, for the Viskase and ACF plans have been met as of June 30, 2022. If the plans were voluntarily terminated, they would be underfunded by an aggregate of approximately $82 million as of June 30, 2022. These results are based on the most recent information provided by the plans’ actuaries. These liabilities could increase or decrease, depending on a number of factors, including future changes in benefits, investment returns, and the assumptions used to calculate the liability. As members of the controlled group, we would be liable for any failure of Viskase or ACF to make ongoing pension contributions or to pay the unfunded liabilities upon a termination of the Viskase or ACF pension plans. In addition, other entities now or in the future within the controlled group in which we are included may have pension plan obligations that are, or may become, underfunded and we would be liable for any failure of such entities to make ongoing pension contributions or to pay the unfunded liabilities upon termination of such plans.

The current underfunded status of the pension plans of Viskase and ACF requires them to notify the PBGC of certain “reportable events,” such as if we cease to be a member of the Viskase or ACF controlled group, or if we make certain extraordinary dividends or stock redemptions. The obligation to report could cause us to seek to delay or reconsider the occurrence of such reportable events.

Starfire Holding Corporation (“Starfire”), which is 99.6% owned by Mr. Icahn, has undertaken to indemnify us and our subsidiaries from losses resulting from any imposition of certain pension funding or termination liabilities that may be imposed on us and our subsidiaries or our assets as a result of being a member of the Icahn controlled group, including ACF. The Starfire indemnity provides, among other things, that so long as such contingent liabilities exist and could be imposed on us, Starfire will not make any distributions to its stockholders that would reduce its net worth to below $250 million. Nonetheless, Starfire may not be able to fund its indemnification obligations to us.

Other

The U.S. Attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York contacted Icahn Enterprises L.P. in September 2017 seeking production of information pertaining to our and Mr. Icahn’s activities relating to the Renewable Fuels Standard and Mr. Icahn’s former role as an advisor to the former President of the United States. We cooperated with the request and provided information in response to the subpoena. The U.S. Attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York contacted Icahn Enterprises L.P. in June 2018 seeking production of information pertaining to trading in Manitowoc Company, Inc. securities. We cooperated with the request and provided documents in response to

the subpoena. The U.S. Attorney’s office has not made any claims or allegations against us or Mr. Icahn with respect to either of the foregoing inquiries. We believe that we maintain a strong compliance program and, while no assurances can be made, we do not believe these inquiries will have a material impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.