Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2017
Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies	1. Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein are unaudited and have been prepared by Calgon Carbon Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). All intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in audited annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S.) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. Management of the Company believes that the disclosures included herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading when read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and the notes included therein for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the SEC by the Company in its Annual Report on Form 10-K. On September 21, 2017, the Company entered into a definitive merger agreement under which a subsidiary of the Japanese chemical manufacturer Kuraray Co., Ltd. (Kuraray) agreed to acquire the Company, by way of a reverse triangular merger (Pending Merger). Following the consummation of the Pending Merger, the Company would become a wholly owned subsidiary of Kuraray. Refer to Note 16 for additional information regarding the Pending Merger. On November 2, 2016, the Company completed the acquisition of the wood-based activated carbon, reactivation, and mineral-based filtration media business of CECA, a subsidiary of Arkema Group (New Business). With the complementary New Business located in Europe, the Company becomes an even more global and diverse industry leader in activated carbon, reactivation, and filtration media in the form of diatomaceous earth and perlites. Refer to Notes 13 and 15 for additional information regarding the acquisition. In management’s opinion, the condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are of a normal and recurring nature, and which are necessary for a fair presentation, in all material respects, of financial results for the interim periods presented. Operating results for the first nine months of 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017. There have been no developments to recently issued accounting standards from those disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC for the year ended December 31, 2016, except for the following. In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-11, “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory” which requires entities to measure most inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. This simplifies the current guidance under which an entity measures inventory at the lower of cost or market. Market in this context is defined as one of three different measures, one of which is net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The Company adopted this ASU on a prospective basis as of January 1, 2017, and it did not have an impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted the provisions of this ASU effective January 1, 2017 and it did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue (Topic 606): Revenue from Contracts with Customers” which outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services by applying five steps listed in the guidance. ASU 2014-09 also requires disclosure of both quantitative and qualitative information that enables users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, which defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)” which amends the principal-versus agent implementation guidance and illustrations in FASB’s new revenue standard ASU 2014-09. The new guidance includes indicators to assist an entity in determining whether it controls a specified good or service before it is transferred to the customers. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, “Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing” which amends certain aspects of the guidance in ASU 2014-09. For identifying performance obligations, the amendments include: immaterial promised goods and services, shipping and handling activities, and identifying when promises represent performance obligations. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients.” This clarifies the collectability assessment, sales tax presentation and the treatment of contract modifications and completed contracts at transition. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-11, “Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of Accounting Standards Update 2014-09” which rescinds certain SEC guidance upon adoption including those related to freight services in process and shipping and handling fees. All of the new guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company has completed its preliminary assessment of the impact of the new standard compared to the historical accounting policies on a representative sample of contracts. For the majority of the Company’s revenue which consists of product sales, the Company does not anticipate a material change to result from the adoption of the new standard. The Company recognizes revenue for some of its contracts on a percentage of completion basis, which represented approximately 6% of its consolidated net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The Company expects that for some of these contracts, the new guidance will instead require revenue to be recognized at a point in time due to the nature of the product, which in some cases has an alternative use to the Company. In 2017, these sales are reported in both the Activated Carbon and Advanced Water Purification reportable segments. The Company is in the process of reviewing additional contracts and documenting its conclusions with regard to the new accounting standard. The Company is continuing to assess the ultimate impact that the adoption of this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In addition, the Company is evaluating the changes that will be required in its internal controls as a result of the adoption of this new standard. The Company is planning to adopt the provisions of the ASU and its subsequent amendments using the modified retrospective transition method for existing transactions that will likely result in a cumulative effect adjustment as of January 1, 2018. In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost,” which requires that employers disclose components of their pension service cost in the same line item as other compensation costs related to relevant employees. The ASU also requires that other components of net benefit costs be presented separately from the service cost component within the income statement, and outside of income from operations. The provisions of this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those annual reporting periods. The Company will retrospectively adopt this ASU as of January 1, 2018 as required, which will result in a reclassification of components of net periodic pension cost other than service cost outside of income from operations on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

1. Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies

The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein are unaudited and have been prepared by Calgon Carbon Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). All intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in audited annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S.) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. Management of the Company believes that the disclosures included herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading when read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and the notes included therein for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the SEC by the Company in its Annual Report on Form 10-K.

On September 21, 2017, the Company entered into a definitive merger agreement under which a subsidiary of the Japanese chemical manufacturer Kuraray Co., Ltd. (Kuraray) agreed to acquire the Company, by way of a reverse triangular merger (Pending Merger). Following the consummation of the Pending Merger, the Company would become a wholly owned subsidiary of Kuraray. Refer to Note 16 for additional information regarding the Pending Merger.

On November 2, 2016, the Company completed the acquisition of the wood-based activated carbon, reactivation, and mineral-based filtration media business of CECA, a subsidiary of Arkema Group (New Business). With the complementary New Business located in Europe, the Company becomes an even more global and diverse industry leader in activated carbon, reactivation, and filtration media in the form of diatomaceous earth and perlites. Refer to Notes 13 and 15 for additional information regarding the acquisition.

In management’s opinion, the condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are of a normal and recurring nature, and which are necessary for a fair presentation, in all material respects, of financial results for the interim periods presented. Operating results for the first nine months of 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017.

There have been no developments to recently issued accounting standards from those disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC for the year ended December 31, 2016, except for the following.

In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-11, “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory” which requires entities to measure most inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. This simplifies the current guidance under which an entity measures inventory at the lower of cost or market. Market in this context is defined as one of three different measures, one of which is net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The Company adopted this ASU on a prospective basis as of January 1, 2017, and it did not have an impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted the provisions of this ASU effective January 1, 2017 and it did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue (Topic 606): Revenue from Contracts with Customers” which outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services by applying five steps listed in the guidance. ASU 2014-09 also requires disclosure of both quantitative and qualitative information that enables users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, which defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)” which amends the principal-versus agent implementation guidance and illustrations in FASB’s new revenue standard ASU 2014-09. The new guidance includes indicators to assist an entity in determining whether it controls a specified good or service before it is transferred to the customers. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, “Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing” which amends certain aspects of the guidance in ASU 2014-09. For identifying performance obligations, the amendments include: immaterial promised goods and services, shipping and handling activities, and identifying when promises represent performance obligations. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients.” This clarifies the collectability assessment, sales tax presentation and the treatment of contract modifications and completed contracts at transition. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-11, “Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of Accounting Standards Update 2014-09” which rescinds certain SEC guidance upon adoption including those related to freight services in process and shipping and handling fees. All of the new guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company has completed its preliminary assessment of the impact of the new standard compared to the historical accounting policies on a representative sample of contracts. For the majority of the Company’s revenue which consists of product sales, the Company does not anticipate a material change to result from the adoption of the new standard. The Company recognizes revenue for some of its contracts on a percentage of completion basis, which represented approximately 6% of its consolidated net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The Company expects that for some of these contracts, the new guidance will instead require revenue to be recognized at a point in time due to the nature of the product, which in some cases has an alternative use to the Company. In 2017, these sales are reported in both the Activated Carbon and Advanced Water Purification reportable segments. The Company is in the process of reviewing additional contracts and documenting its conclusions with regard to the new accounting standard. The Company is continuing to assess the ultimate impact that the adoption of this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In addition, the Company is evaluating the changes that will be required in its internal controls as a result of the adoption of this new standard. The Company is planning to adopt the provisions of the ASU and its subsequent amendments using the modified retrospective transition method for existing transactions that will likely result in a cumulative effect adjustment as of January 1, 2018.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost,” which requires that employers disclose components of their pension service cost in the same line item as other compensation costs related to relevant employees. The ASU also requires that other components of net benefit costs be presented separately from the service cost component within the income statement, and outside of income from operations. The provisions of this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those annual reporting periods. The Company will retrospectively adopt this ASU as of January 1, 2018 as required, which will result in a reclassification of components of net periodic pension cost other than service cost outside of income from operations on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.