XML 41 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Goodwill And Other Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

On October 1, 2016, we completed the acquisition of HCB and acquired intangible assets of $1.6 million and recorded $4.8 million of preliminary goodwill. See Note 3 Acquisitions for additional information.

Goodwill and certain other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized into net income over an estimated life, but rather are tested at least annually for impairment.  Intangible assets determined to have definite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives and also are subject to impairment testing.

We first determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the goodwill impairment test.  The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent.  If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, we determine it is not more likely that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the impairment test is unnecessary.  However, if we conclude otherwise, then we perform an impairment test by calculating the fair value of the reporting unit and comparing the fair value with the carrying amount of the reporting unit.  Fair value is determined based on at least one of three various market valuation methodologies.  If the fair value equals or exceeds the book value, no write-down of recorded goodwill is necessary.  If the fair value is less than the book value, a charge may be required to write down the goodwill to the proper carrying value based upon additional analysis.Such additional analysis compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of the goodwill for the reporting unit.  The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as goodwill that is recognized in a business combination.

During 2016, we completed our annual impairment test for our reporting units and determined that no impairment charges were necessary as follows:

Community Banking – During third quarter 2016, we performed the Step 0 assessment of our goodwill of our community banking reporting unit and determined that it was not more likely than not that the fair value was less than its carrying value.  In performing the qualitative Step 0 assessments, we considered certain events and circumstances  such as macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, overall financial performance and cost factors when evaluating whether it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than its carrying amount. No indicators of impairment were noted as of September 30, 2016.
 
Insurance Services – During third quarter 2016, we performed the Step 0 assessment of our goodwill of our insurance services reporting unit.  We considered certain events and circumstances specific to the reporting unit, such as macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, overall financial performance and cost factors when evaluating whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of our insurance services reporting unit is less than its carrying value and deemed it necessary to perform the further 2-step impairment test.  We performed an internal valuation utilizing the income approach to determine the fair value of our insurance services reporting unit.  This methodology consisted of discounting the expected future cash flows of this unit based upon a forecast of its operations considering long-term key business drivers such as anticipated commission revenue growth.  The long term growth rate used in determining the terminal value was estimated at 2.5% and a discount rate of 10.0% was applied to the insurance services unit’s estimated future cash flows.  We did not fail this Step 1 test as of September 30, 2016, therefore Step 2 testing was not necessary.
 
In addition, at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had $2.66 million and $1.30 million in unamortized identifiable assets comprised of $1.56 million core deposit intangible and $1.10 million customer intangible at December 31, 2016 and $1.30 million customer intangible at December 31, 2015.

 
 
Goodwill Activity
Dollars in thousands
 
Community
Banking
 
Insurance
Services
 
Total
Balance, January 1, 2016
 
$
1,488

 
$
4,710

 
$
6,198

Acquired goodwill, net
 
4,791

 

 
4,791

Balance, December 31, 2016
 
$
6,279

 
$
4,710

 
$
10,989




 
 
Other Intangible Assets
 
 
December 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Dollars in thousands
 
Community
Banking
 
Insurance
Services
 
Total
 
Community
Banking
 
Insurances
Services
 
Total
Unidentifiable intangible assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross carrying amount
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
2,268

 
$

 
$
2,268

Less: accumulated amortization
 

 

 

 
2,268

 

 
2,268

Net carrying amount
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Identifiable intangible assets
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Gross carrying amount
 
$
1,610

 
$
3,000

 
$
4,610

 
$

 
$
3,000

 
$
3,000

Less: accumulated amortization
 
47

 
1,900

 
1,947

 

 
1,700

 
1,700

Net carrying amount
 
$
1,563

 
$
1,100

 
$
2,663

 
$

 
$
1,300

 
$
1,300



Amortization relative to our identifiable intangible assets is as follows:

 
 
Core Deposit
 
Customer
Dollars in thousands
 
Intangible
 
Intangible
Actual:
 
 
 
 
2014
 
$

 
$
250

2015
 

 
200

2016
 
47

 
200

Expected:
 
 
 
 
2017
 
186

 
200

2018
 
175

 
200

2019
 
163

 
200

2020
 
151

 
200

2021
 
139

 
200