ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

We maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level considered adequate to provide for estimated probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is comprised of three distinct reserve components: (1) specific reserves related to loans individually evaluated, (2) quantitative reserves related to loans collectively evaluated, and (3) qualitative reserves related to loans collectively evaluated. A summary of the methodology we employ on a quarterly basis with respect to each of these components in order to evaluate the overall adequacy of our allowance for loan losses is as follows:

Specific Reserve for Loans Individually Evaluated

First, we identify loan relationships having aggregate balances in excess of $500,000 and that may also have credit weaknesses. Such loan relationships are identified primarily through our analysis of internal loan evaluations, past due loan reports, and loans adversely classified by regulatory authorities. Each loan so identified is then individually evaluated to determine whether it is impaired – that is, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms of the underlying loan agreement. Substantially all of our impaired loans historically have been collateral dependent, meaning repayment of the loan is expected or is considered to be provided solely from the sale of the loan’s underlying collateral. For such loans, we measure impairment based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral, which is generally determined utilizing current appraisals. A specific reserve is established in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the recorded investment in each impaired loan over the fair value of its underlying collateral, less estimated costs to sell. Our policy is to re-evaluate the fair value of collateral dependent loans at least every twelve months unless there is a known deterioration in the collateral’s value, in which case a new appraisal is obtained. Beginning in 2014, for purposes of loans that have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring and not internally graded as substandard, doubtful, or loss ("performing TDRs") we began measuring impairment using the discounted cash flows method. Under this method, a specific reserve is established in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the recorded investment in each impaired loan over its discounted cash flows.

Quantitative Reserve for Loans Collectively Evaluated

Second, we stratify the loan portfolio into the following eleven loan pools: land and land development, construction, commercial, commercial real estate -- owner-occupied, commercial real estate -- non-owner occupied, conventional residential mortgage, jumbo residential mortgage, home equity, mortgage warehouse lines, consumer, and other. Quantitative reserves relative to each loan pool are established as follows: for all loan segments detailed above an allocation equaling 100% of the respective pool’s average 12 month historical net loan charge-off rate (determined based upon the most recent twelve quarters) is applied to the aggregate recorded investment in the pool of loans.

Qualitative Reserve for Loans Collectively Evaluated

Third, we consider the necessity to adjust our average historical net loan charge-off rates relative to each of the above eleven loan pools for potential risks factors that could result in actual losses deviating from prior loss experience. For example, if we observe a significant increase in delinquencies within the conventional mortgage loan pool above historical trends, an additional allocation to the average historical loan charge-off rate is applied. Such qualitative risk factors considered are: (1) levels of and trends in delinquencies and impaired loans, (2) levels of and trends in charge-offs and recoveries, (3)trends in volume and term of loans, (4) effects of any changes in risk selection and underwriting standards, and other changes in lending policies, procedures, and practice, (5) experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff, (6) national and local economic trends and conditions, (7) industry conditions, and (8) effects of changes in credit concentrations.

An analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the six month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, and for the year ended December 31, 2015 is as follows:



	Six Months Ended June 30,				Year Ended December 31,
Dollars in thousands	2016		2015		2015
Balance, beginning of year	$	11,472	$	11,167	$	11,167
Losses:
Commercial	260		77		77
Commercial real estate
Owner occupied	166		269		559
Non-owner occupied	121		—		178
Construction and development
Land and land development	—		434		457
Construction	—		—		—
Residential real estate
Non-jumbo	118		284		417
Jumbo	—		—		208
Home equity	10		76		76
Mortgage warehouse lines	—		—		—
Consumer	57		48		69
Other	92		56		110
Total	824		1,244		2,151
Recoveries:
Commercial	62		4		10
Commercial real estate
Owner occupied	17		5		290
Non-owner occupied	6		4		13
Construction and development
Land and land development	12		322		456
Construction	—		—		—
Real estate - mortgage
Non-jumbo	48		63		107
Jumbo	6		96		96
Home equity	2		2		3
Mortgage warehouse lines	—		—		—
Consumer	34		68		105
Other	42		35		126
Total	229		599		1,206
Net losses	595		645		945
Provision for loan losses	500		750		1,250
Balance, end of period	$	11,377	$	11,272	$	11,472

Activity in the allowance for loan losses by loan class during the first six months of 2016 is as follows:



	Construction & Land Development							Commercial Real Estate					Residential Real Estate
Dollars in thousands	Land & Land Develop- ment			Construc- tion		Commer- cial		Owner Occupied		Non- Owner Occupied			Non- jumbo		Jumbo			Home Equity		Mortgage Warehouse Lines		Con- sumer		Other		Total
Allowance for loan losses
Beginning balance	$	2,852		$	15	$	780	$	1,589	$	2,977		$	1,253	$	1,593		$	253	$	—	$	60	$	100	$	11,472
Charge-offs	—			—		260		166		121			118		—			10		—		57		92		824
Recoveries	12			—		62		17		6			48		6			2		—		34		42		229
Provision	(1,251		)	62		476		512		(31		)	1,018		(834		)	365		—		165		18		500
Ending balance	$	1,613		$	77	$	1,058	$	1,952	$	2,831		$	2,201	$	765		$	610	$	—	$	202	$	68	$	11,377

Allowance related to:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	141		$	—	$	19	$	13	$	144		$	179	$	28		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	524
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment	1,472			77		1,039		1,939		2,687			2,022		737			610		—		202		68		10,853
Total	$	1,613		$	77	$	1,058	$	1,952	$	2,831		$	2,201	$	765		$	610	$	—	$	202	$	68	$	11,377

Loans
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	8,518		$	—	$	817	$	8,187	$	12,329		$	6,212	$	4,575		$	709	$	—	$	53	$	—	$	41,400
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment	57,184			8,506		100,704		182,347		335,770			219,707		47,530			75,195		80,282		19,467		10,008		$	1,136,700
Total	$	65,702		$	8,506	$	101,521	$	190,534	$	348,099		$	225,919	$	52,105		$	75,904	$	80,282	$	19,520	$	10,008	$	1,178,100