-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, A1bfU4A5OhgUVwG34Yu4TMXZfClfDfQuvDt8q7rB/V9ltmfTIebtYKwpiz57TruK INvMw8Vlq70+RcIti+dAZQ== 0000811716-99-000001.txt : 19990317 0000811716-99-000001.hdr.sgml : 19990317 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000811716-99-000001 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 13 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19990102 FILED AS OF DATE: 19990316 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS INC /OR/ CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000811716 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: ELECTRONIC COMPUTERS [3571] IRS NUMBER: 930826369 STATE OF INCORPORATION: OR FISCAL YEAR END: 1228 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-15627 FILM NUMBER: 99565551 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 15450 SW KOLL PKWY STREET 2: ED02-803 CITY: BEAVERTON STATE: OR ZIP: 97006-6063 BUSINESS PHONE: 5036265700 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 15450 SW KOLL PKWY STREET 2: ED02 -803 CITY: BEAVERTON STATE: OR ZIP: 97006-6063 10-K 1 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 [X] Annual report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended January 2, 1999 or [ ] Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from ______________ to ______________. Commission file number: 0-15627 SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Oregon 93-0826369 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) incorporation or organization) 15450 S.W. Koll Parkway, Beaverton, Oregon 97006-6063 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) Registrant's telephone number, including are code: (503) 626-5700 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered ______________________ ______________________ Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $.01 par value Rights to purchase Preferred Stock (Title of Class) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No_____ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Aggregate market value of Common Stock held by nonaffiliates of the Registrant at March 1, 1999, based on the closing price on such date on the NASDAQ National Market System: $408,419,373. Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 1, 1999: 43,608,297. Documents Incorporated by Reference Part of Form 10-K into Document which incorporated 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders Parts II and IV Proxy Statement for 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders Part III TABLE OF CONTENTS Item of Form 10-K Page PART I Item 1. Business 3 Item 2. Properties 15 Item 3. Legal Proceedings 16 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 16 Item 4(a). Executive Officers of the Registrant 16 PART II Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and 17 Related Stockholder Matters Item 6. Selected Financial Data 17 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial 17 Condition and Results of Operations Item 7(a). Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures of Market Risk 17 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 17 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants 17 on Accounting and Financial Disclosure PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant 18 Item 11. Executive Compensation 18 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and 18 Management Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 18 PART IV Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports 19 on Form 8-K SIGNATURES 27 PART I Item 1. Business. Sequent Computer Systems, Inc. ("Sequent" or "the Company") is a leading provider of Intel Corporation ("Intel") -based high-end, scalable, data center systems and solutions for large organizations. Sequent pioneered the development of large-scale, Intel-based symmetric multiprocessing ("SMP") systems in the 1980s and early 1990s and, in 1996, was first to market with large, cache coherent non-uniform memory access ("CC-NUMA") systems built with Intel Pentium Pro processors. In October 1998, Sequent launched its second-generation NUMA-Q(TM) 2000 data center servers, incorporating Intel's Pentium II Xeon processors and designed to scale from 4 to 64 processors in a single system with a single instance of DYNIX/ptx?, Sequent's scalable UNIX operating system. In December 1998, the Company introduced a Xeon-based version of NUMACenter(TM), its mixed mode computing environment enabling rapid deployment, lower cost and central management of large-scale, mission critical Windows NT Server applications with a large, back-end UNIX database server. In January 1999, Sequent announced NUMA-Q 1000, a new line of midrange servers that scale from 4 to 8 Xeon Processors, run UNIX or Windows NT, and deliver price/performance equivalent to midrange RISC-based (Reduced Instruction Set Computing) UNIX servers. Sequent's NUMA-Q 2000 products are used primarily as database servers for large commercial applications: custom on-line transaction processing ("OLTP"); packaged business (financial, manufacturing and human resources) solutions, also called enterprise resource planning ("ERP") solutions; and customer relationship management ("CRM"), a broad solution set that includes back office decision support systems ("DSS") and data warehouses supporting front-office marketing, sales and service applications. The Company's NUMACenter framework is designed to optimize mixed mode environments where application servers running Windows NT are supported by a large UNIX database server. The Company's NUMA-Q 1000 systems are designed, priced and marketed as development systems and application servers. Currently, the Company's products run Sequent's DYNIX/ptx UNIX operating systems and Microsoft Corporation's ("Microsoft") Windows NT. In October 1998, International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM") announced "Project Monterey," a cooperative program with Sequent and Santa Cruz Operation ("SCO") to develop a standard version of IBM's AIX UNIX operating system for Intel's 64-bit (IA-64) processor architecture, code- named "Merced." Sequent plans to introduce Merced-based systems running Project Monterey UNIX shortly after Merced is generally available, which is expected to be in the second half of 2000. Meanwhile, the Company has announced plans to align its DYNIX/ptx operating system with SCO UnixWare and incorporate features of IBM's AIX UNIX operating system. Rebranded as UnixWare ptx Edition, this enhanced 32-bit operating system will support selected IBM software and provide a high-end path to IA-64 UNIX being developed by IBM under Project Monterey. The target date for general availability of UnixWare ptx Edition is expected to be the fourth quarter of 1999. Sequent sells its products and services worldwide through its direct sales force, through distributors and, increasingly, through arrangements with systems integrators ("SIs"). Sequent's direct sales efforts are focused on large organizations with the goal of establishing and maintaining long-term "major account" relationships. The Company's SI partners, such as Arthur Andersen Business Consultants ("AABC") and Electronic Data Systems Corporation ("EDS") generally have greater access than Sequent to the Company's target accounts and afford opportunities for the Company to gain access to those accounts by partnering with them to sell complete solutions. For several years, Sequent has partnered with South African SI PQA (formerly "Persetel") to sell Sequent products in South Africa. In January 1999, Sequent announced that it signed a strategic partnership agreement with Comparex Holdings Limited ("Comparex"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of PQA. The partnership agreement allows Comparex to take responsibility for Sequent's sales activities in Austria, Belgium, Germany, The Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and Switzerland. Sequent's operations in the United Kingdom and France, which represent the majority of its European business, are not included in the partnership agreement. Comparex will work with Sequent to market the Company's products and services in the regions included under the agreement. Since the early 1990s, Sequent has enhanced its competitive position by providing consulting and professional services to help large organizations identify complex IT problems and develop solutions that combine its products with those of its hardware, software and solutions partners. The Company's high-end professional services capability has enabled Sequent to shift the focus of its business from selling systems to offering solutions that combine systems and services. Sequent's solution- oriented expertise is geared to offerings in three basic categories: custom OLTP; ERP solutions; and large DSS/data warehousing applications. Over the past five years, the knowledge and expertise of Sequent's professional services organization have become key differentiators for the Company, enabling Sequent to participate in a growing number of projects where the sale of large systems follows or accompanies the sale of significant professional services contracts. For existing customers, Sequent provides a broad array of 24-hour data center services designed to ensure the smooth operation and high availability of their solutions. These include system support services, environmental services, management support services and business protection services. The Company was incorporated in Delaware in January 1983 and was reincorporated in Oregon in December 1988. Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Report on Form 10-K to the "Company" or "Sequent" refer to the prior Delaware corporation, the current Oregon corporation and its subsidiaries. The Company's principal executive offices are located at 15450 S.W. Koll Parkway, Beaverton, Oregon 97006, and its telephone number at that location is (503) 626-5700. Market Overview The proliferation of new technology, data and information is rapidly changing the face of business. Within the past few years, standard ERP applications from software vendors such as Baan Company ("Baan"), Oracle Corporation ("Oracle"), PeopleSoft, Inc. ("PeopleSoft") and SAP have transformed the data center, replacing custom OLTP applications and enabling large organizations to capture large volumes of data about their businesses. With the rapid expansion of the World-Wide Web, growing numbers of organizations have established electronic links with customers, partners and suppliers, giving them access to vast amounts of new data. These changes have driven demand for sophisticated DSS and data warehousing applications that allow organizations to analyze that data and convert it into information that will give them a competitive advantage. As a result, DSS/data warehousing has become one of the fastest growing segments of the high-end, open systems computing market. With the knowledge made possible by the ability to access and analyze all aspects of their business, organizations have increasingly shifted their focus from what they produce to what customers buy. In today's commodity-based markets, companies are discovering that what a customer does or does not buy often has less to do with the products or services themselves than with the relationship they have established--or failed to establish--with the customer. Growing awareness of this fact has given rise to a new business strategy called CRM. The goal of CRM is to assemble all of an organization's information about its customers and leverage that knowledge base during each customer interaction to keep them as customers and, whenever possible, sell them new products or services. The overall growth of data center solutions (OLTP, ERP, DSS/DW and CRM) is driving demand for servers, including application servers that run the application software and database servers that manage the huge amounts of data used by the application. Business Strategy Sequent's goal is to become the leading provider of Intel-based UNIX and Windows NT solutions for the data center. The Company's business strategy is designed to leverage its own resources (leading edge technology and data center knowledge and expertise) and those of its business and technology partners to achieve that goal. Since 1983, Sequent has pioneered the development of scalable computer architectures for large database applications. With its NUMA architecture, the Company continues to lead the industry in this area. Since 1987, Sequent has been the leading provider of large-scale Intel-based systems and has worked closely with Intel to ensure that its own product roadmap is aligned with Intel's. As the volume leader in microprocessors, Intel is the preferred architecture for application development, and Intel's share of the server market is projected to grow significantly over the next several years. The Company currently enjoys a close working relationship with Intel and expects that relationship to continue. Sequent's DYNIX/ptx operating system has long been recognized as one of the industry's most scalable UNIX operating systems. In the server marketplace, however, volume attracts application software suppliers and the Company's focus on low-volume, high-complexity projects has limited the number of applications ported to DYNIX/ptx to date. To address this issue, Sequent designed its NUMA architecture to run both DYNIX/ptx and Microsoft Windows NT, giving Sequent customers access to the broad range of applications being developed for Microsoft's enterprise operating system. To compensate for the scalability limitations of Windows NT, the Company developed NUMACenter, a hardware and software environment that allows customers to run Windows NT applications with a scalable, back-end UNIX database and single-point monitoring of all resources. Recently, the Company also entered into agreements with IBM and SCO that will enhance and eventually replace DYNIX/ptx with versions of the UNIX operating system that are more broadly supported by third-party software vendors. During 1999, the company intends to make DYNIX/ptx binary compatible with SCO UnixWare, enhanced with features from IBM's AIX operating system, and rebranded as UnixWare ptx Edition. Simultaneously, the Company is collaborating with IBM to develop a 64-bit version of AIX optimized for NUMA and Intel's IA- 64 processor architecture. Intel and IBM are contributing significant resources to fund the migration of third-party software to the new operating system. In the late 1980s Sequent established close working relationships with Oracle, Informix Corporation ("Informix") and other vendors of relational database software, acquiring substantial database knowledge and expertise that continue to distinguish the Company from its competitors. Sequent is currently building relationships with Microsoft and IBM that the Company believes will distinguish it as a provider of solutions based on SQL Server and the DB2 Universal Database. Although the number of applications ported to DYNIX/ptx has been limited, the major ERP applications have been available on Sequent platforms, and the Company has distinguished itself in the deployment and support of some of the largest--and in some cases the largest-- implementations of Baan, PeopleSoft and Oracle Applications software in the world. The Company's NUMACenter offering has also distinguished Sequent as a leading provider of mixed-mode (UNIX & Windows NT) SAP solutions, one of only two mixed-mode providers authorized by SAP. As industry spending on ERP applications has slowed, Sequent has focused its knowledge of large database applications and architecture on the growing market for CRM applications supported by large DSS/data warehousing implementations. During the past three years, the Company has established a strong track record in DSS/data warehousing, winning first- place "Best Practices" awards from the Data Warehousing Institute for three consecutive years and earning the institute's top "Leadership Award" in 1998. In December 1998, Sequent announced a strategic alliance with industry leader Siebel Systems, Inc. ("Siebel") to deliver Siebel's integrated family of front-office (sales, marketing and customer service) products on NUMACenter. CRM, including back-office DSS/data warehousing, will be a major focus for the Company in 1999. Since 1992, the Company's success in the data center has stemmed increasingly from its ability to provide high-end consulting services geared toward the design and implementation of large database applications. The Company plans to continue investing in the growth and development of its service organizations as an integral part of its data center strategy. Because Sequent competes directly with much larger companies, a key part of the Company's strategy is to sell its products and services through cooperative relationships with SIs who have broad market presence globally or in specific geographic regions. The Company currently has strategic relationships with AABC, EDS and PQA/Comparex (Europe and South Africa), and is working with certain other integrators to establish additional marketing opportunities. Products Complex data center applications that serve a broad spectrum of end users--employees, partners, customers--require round-the-clock access, good response times and flexibility for future growth. In computing requirements, this translates to reliability, high availability, high performance and scalability. With the move by many companies toward "virtual data centers" that extend their computing environments beyond the perimeters of their own organizations, the number of users and the volume of data associated with business-critical applications continues to grow exponentially. As a result, scalable servers, large enterprise storage systems and systems management solutions have become necessities. Sequent has historically provided large-scale, business-critical computing to meet these types of requirements. The Company's current products based on its NUMA architecture were designed for data-center- class computing environments, whether they reside in today's equivalent of The Glass House or span a virtual enterprise. NUMA Architecture. Sequent's NUMA technology is based on a four-way SMP Intel baseboard with NUMA features and enhancements added by Sequent to improve its performance and reliability as a component or building block for large, scalable servers. In systems with more than 8 processors, these components, called "quads", are connected with a device called IQ-Link(TM). Developed by Sequent in cooperation with Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation, IQ-Link is a proprietary, high-performance interconnect that uses a gallium arsenide data pump to transfer data between quads at the rate of one gigabyte per second. IQ-Link has the ability to monitor the Intel processor bus on a specific quad and respond to requests for data contained in memory on a different quad, either by accessing the data from memory on the other quad or by directing the request to data stored in its on-board cache (hence the term, "non- uniform" memory access). Because latency (the time it takes to retrieve data from memory on another quad) slows system performance, IQ-Link uses special algorithms to minimize latency by maximizing the "cache hit rate," i.e., the number of times requested data is available in its on-board cache. IQ-Link also ensures the accuracy of data in its cache (cache coherency) by updating its cache whenever data in the original memory location is changed. Based on standard Intel building blocks and other industry-standard components, Sequent's scalable NUMA architecture enables the Company to leverage advances in open systems technology--including processor enhancements, storage technology, communications and user-interface enhancements--and incorporate these advances in its product offerings quickly and inexpensively. This aspect of the NUMA architecture directly benefits customers by enabling them to upgrade their installed Sequent systems without altering source programs, retraining users or replacing hardware and software not directly affected by the upgrade. Platforms. Sequent manufactures and sells two server lines under its trademark NUMA-Q brand: high-end NUMA-Q 2000 and mid-range NUMA-Q 1000. NUMA-Q 2000 is scalable from 4 to 64 processors and runs Sequent's DYNIX/ptx UNIX operating system. The second-generation NUMA-Q 2000 with Intel Pentium II Xeon processors was introduced in October 1998 and immediately achieved record setting benchmark numbers in the Transaction Performance Processing Council's TPC-C and TPC-D benchmarks. The TPC-C benchmark test, which measures OLTP performance, used a 64-processor system and showed near-linear scalability with another NUMA-Q 2000 benchmark run with 32 processors. The TPC-D benchmark test, which measures DSS performance, was run at the one terabyte scale and set new performance and price/performance records at the time it was run. NUMA-Q 1000 is a 4- or 8- processor server that can run either UNIX or Windows NT. Designed for price/performance in the midrange, NUMA-Q 1000 uses a DL2 (direct link) interconnect that is specially developed for a two-quad system. The system delivers performance comparable to that of a four or eight-processor NUMA-Q 2000 system at a price equivalent to the most aggressively priced midrange UNIX products from Sequent's competitors. NUMA-Q 1000 also enables operating system flexibility by allowing bi-directional migration between UNIX and Windows NT. In addition to the products the Company manufactures, Sequent OEMs a midrange Windows NT server from NCR Corporation ("NCR"). Sold under the brand name NTX 2000, it is a commodity Windows NT server in a pedestal configuration. Sequent intends to OEM NCR's rackmounted system beginning in the first half of 1999. Sequent also offers a multi-tiered, mixed operating system framework called NUMACenter. NUMACenter is an application deployment platform that meets the needs of many of today's applications by providing a two-tiered system with industry-standard servers running Windows NT on the application tier and NUMA-Q 2000 quads running UNIX on the database tier. The framework is integrated using Sequent's new ADAM (Advanced Detection Availability Manager) hardware, which provides the ability to monitor and control critical baseline functions of all NUMACenter devices. Each release of NUMACenter is designed to ensure flexibility and minimize risk in the deployment of large enterprise applications by eliminating the need for customers to choose between UNIX and Windows NT. Operating System Software DYNIX/ptx. DYNIX/ptx, Sequent's data-center-hardened version of the UNIX operating system, runs on Sequent's NUMACenter, NUMA-Q 2000 and NUMA- Q 1000 systems. DYNIX/ptx has several leading edge data center capabilities. Application Region Manager(TM) enables users to partition systems into application regions, thus enabling workload management and server consolidation. Multipath/multiport delivers mainframe-level functionality at the UNIX operating system level by providing up to eight active paths from a NUMA-Q system to a storage device. Data is accessible through all paths, enabling high availability of NUMA-Q servers even if one or more paths fail. Project Monterey. In an effort to increase the number of software packages available on its platforms, Sequent has joined IBM, Intel and SCO in Project Monterey, an IBM initiative to develop an industry standard 64- bit UNIX for Intel's IA-64 (Merced) microprocessor. Based on IBM's AIX operating system, the new IA-64 UNIX is scheduled for delivery on Merced in the second half of 2000. Several other companies, including Acer Inc., CETIA, Groupe Bull, ICL, Motorola, Inc. and Unisys Corporation, have already signed up with IBM as OEM partners of the new operating system. As a development partner, Sequent will contribute its NUMA technology expertise and Intel experience in data center implementations to the project. As part of Project Monterey, the Company also plans to align DYNIX/ptx with SCO's 32-bit UnixWare and incorporate AIX features that will enable customers to run selected IBM software, including the DB2/Universal Database, on its 32-bit NUMA platforms. Rebranded as UnixWare ptx Edition, this new 32-bit operating system will provide Sequent customers with a low-risk path to IA-64 UNIX. Following the launch of Merced and IA-64 UNIX, Sequent plans to continue supporting UnixWare ptx Edition to leverage Intel's 32-bit processor roadmap. Windows NT. Sequent has been a strong proponent of Microsoft Windows NT since it was first introduced in 1993. Since then, Windows NT has become the platform of choice for thousands of enterprise applications. However, current versions lack the scalability to support large data center applications. Sequent is working with Microsoft on Windows NT scalability and other data center capabilities for Sequent servers. In 1998, the Company opened an engineering center in Bellevue, Washington, dedicated to Windows NT development. In addition, Sequent developed NUMACenter specifically to provide a flexible, low-risk data center platform that enables users to run Windows NT applications in a mixed environment that includes a large UNIX database. The Company has also designed its mid-range NUMA-Q 1000 server to run either UNIX or Windows NT. FLEX-ES. Sequent offers Fundamental Software Inc.'s FLEX-ES software, a UNIX application running under DYNIX/ptx that allows the mounting and execution of all S/390 and S/370 operating systems, data, and applications without modification. This software enables organizations to re-host mainframe systems and applications off older hardware that is not Year 2000 compliant and onto Sequent's UNIX servers. Communications Products Sequent systems support communications products that allow NUMA-Q 2000 systems to interconnect with other systems in multi-vendor system environments. These products include hardware that connects to wide and local area networks (WANs and LANs) and software that supports industry standard protocols. In addition to supporting open systems protocols such as TCP/IP, Open Systems Interconnections (OSI) and X.25, Sequent products can communicate directly with IBM systems via Systems Network Architecture (SNA). Sequent's NUMA-Q 2000 systems employ several high speed communications connections, including 100 Megabit-per-second Ethernet, CDDI (a copper wire version of FDDI), ATM and high speed Synchronous E1/T1, which offer an order of magnitude increase to the bandwidth of previous offerings. Product Development Sequent's research and development programs are focused on advancing hardware and software technologies that strengthen the Company's core product and service offerings. Sequent devotes substantial resources to ensure that its evolving technology roadmap is aligned with the technology direction of industry-leading vendors, such as IBM, Intel and Microsoft. Sequent engages in cooperative technology programs with these and other industry leaders, contributing Sequent's knowledge and expertise to the development of their products to optimize their performance with Sequent's own products. The Company is committed to making continued substantial investments in research and development activities to maintain and enhance its competitive position in a market characterized by rapid technological advances. Strategic Relationships with Leading Vendors Intel, IBM and Microsoft. Sequent maintains strategic relationships with Intel for the development of the processor technology used in its NUMA architecture and with IBM for the development of operating system software designed to run on future Intel-based products. Since 1987, the Company's close working relationship with Intel has enabled it to leverage Intel's research and development investment in the design of its own technology and to influence certain design features in successive generations of Intel microprocessors to optimize the performance of those components in the Company's systems. During the fourth quarter of 1998, IBM selected Sequent as a co-developer in its Project Monterey initiative to develop an AIX-based version of UNIX for Intel's IA-64 (Merced) architecture. Sequent's relationship with Microsoft is built around cooperative work on the scalability and other data center attributes of Windows NT, a strategically important component of the Company's technology roadmap. Fibre Channel and Storage Subsystems. In 1997, Sequent was the first server vendor to support fibre channel switched fabric technology in a Storage Area Network (SAN) configuration. This SAN utilizes Sequent's multipath/multiport technology within DYNIX/ptx, Brocade Communication Systems, Inc.'s fibre channel switch and storage devices such as disk subsystems and tape libraries. Storage subsystems are supplied by leading storage vendors including EMC Corporation, Data General Corporation's ("Data General") CLARiiON division, Hitachi Data Systems and Storage Technology Corporation. Sequent works closely with these vendors to deliver optimal performance of the combined products to customers. Systems Management Software Products. Sequent is implementing a standards-based systems management program that offers customers both flexibility and ease of integration. Consolidation around systems management frameworks has led to the emergence of three de facto industry standard frameworks: Computer Associates Unicenter TNG, Tivoli TME 10 and Hewlett-Packard Company's ("Hewlett-Packard") OpenView. Sequent has relationships with all leading framework providers, offering native support for each partner's agent technology and providing a broad range of integrated products that address specific management disciplines. Every NUMACenter framework ships with FacetCorp's FacetWin software which allows users of Windows to access and use UNIX network resources transparently. Relational Database Management System (RDBMS) Software. Sequent has strategic development and marketing relationships with major providers of RDBMS software, including Oracle, Informix and Microsoft. The Company works closely with these partners to optimize the performance and scalability of their products for large OLTP and DSS/data warehousing applications. Sequent cooperates with these partners in development programs, joint marketing programs and team sales efforts. The Company has from time to time entered into agreements with various vendors that provide for prepayment of future licenses and royalties based on sales of software. Enterprise Resource Planning Applications Software. Sequent maintains strategic relationships with key providers of packaged ERP applications and development tools for custom client/server applications. Packaged client/ server applications provide a standard pre-engineered solution for a common set of functional business problems. Packaged ERP applications offer the potential to trim the total cost of a solution, reduce the time required for implementation and lower overall project risk. Sequent maintains strategic relationships with several vendors of ERP applications, including Oracle, PeopleSoft, SAP and Baan. Decision Support System (DSS) Software and Tools. Sequent maintains strategic relationships with the leading providers of OLAP (on-line analytical processing), database, query and reporting, campaign management, segmentation and modeling tools and applications. These applications and tools support the decision-making process through analysis of information stored in relational databases. Packaged DSS applications provide a standard solution that supports the decision-making process by allowing organizations to organize data from a variety of sources and analyze it to measure the impact of business decisions and strategy. Well-designed DSS applications use a data warehouse infrastructure that ensures cost-effective deployment and a single view of data across the enterprise. Sequent maintains a number of strategic relationships with software partners providing DSS products, including Microstrategy, Prime Response, Exchange Applications, Unica, SAS and Siebel. In addition, Sequent has an interest in DP Applications ("DPA"), a packaged data warehouse application company. DPA specializes in turnkey data warehouses running in concert with packaged ERP systems, specifically Oracle financials, PeopleSoft financials and HR and SAP. Sales, Marketing and Service Applications. Sequent is aligned with the key providers of packaged enterprise sales, marketing and service applications. Combined with large back-office DSS/data warehousing solutions, these applications deliver a cross-enterprise solution for improved customer relationship management. Integrated sales, marketing and service applications reduce the total cost of a solution and the time required for implementation and leverage a single customer database for more targeted sales and service. Sequent maintains strategic relationships with Siebel and Point Information Systems. A large implementation of Sequent's NUMACenter framework also provides the Unix and Windows NT hardware infrastructure for SiebelNet, a new application outsourcing service from Siebel aimed at helping organizations accelerate the deployment of their sales, marketing and customer service applications and reduce and manage overall costs. Professional Services During the past six years, Sequent has strengthened its ability to compete at the high end of the open systems market by building a professional services organization with broad-based knowledge of open systems and specific knowledge and expertise in the design, development and implementation of large-scale database applications. Working directly with customers or together with SIs, the Company's professional services consultants help organizations diagnose their information technology problems and design solutions that leverage the best open systems technology and are aligned with the customer's business strategy. Sequent offers a wide range of professional services designed to support the customer through every phase of a project, from advance planning and architectural services to technology deployment and ongoing systems support. Professional services include: IT architecture and transition planning; CRM solutions, including call center and DSS/data warehousing design and implementation; implementation of ERP applications (such as Oracle Financials & Manufacturing, Baan and PeopleSoft applications); and enterprise infrastructure design and systems administration. In addition, Sequent offers customers education and training programs. Sequent's consulting and professional services capability has enabled Sequent to transform itself from a systems vendor into a provider of solution-oriented offerings. Professional services add significant value to the Company's partnerships with SIs and are a key factor in Sequent's ability to win new major accounts and compete successfully for large projects. Having professional services personnel on site in customer accounts also enables the Company to build customer relationships that result in a better understanding of the organization's IT needs and frequently lead to follow-on projects. Customer Services Sequent's customer service organization offers customers an industry- leading portfolio of data center support services that, when customized to customers' business and IT requirements, create total service solutions for business-critical computing. These solutions were designed around a set of necessary core components: system support services, environmental services, management support services and business protection services. System Support Services. System support services form the cornerstone of Sequent's customer services and provide a high level of traditional hardware, software and network support. These support services are available in a scalable range, which provides customers with the flexibility to choose levels of support based upon their need for risk management and system availability. In addition, hardware maintenance is offered for many third-party peripheral products connected to Sequent systems. System support services can address support needs for installations ranging from a single system to an entire data center. Environmental Services. Environmental services provide the first step in keeping systems on-line and users productive by making sure that data centers and office spaces are properly prepared to support sensitive electronic equipment. Sequent's environmental services range from power audits and reviews to uninterruptible power systems, and even planning, designing and building a computer room. Sequent delivers cost-effective solutions that optimize the reliability of a customer's IT infrastructure and help minimize the risks associated with environmental incidents. Management Support Services. Management support services provide the foundation for ensuring maximum productivity. This flexible set of services helps customers manage disparate information technology processes and more effectively manage the day-to-day aspects of their IT operations. The services offered include help desk/call management, vendor management, remote system administration and flexible levels of account management. These services can be used to augment current resources or as a total service solution to support customer's IT operations. Business Protection Services. Business protection services provide critical components for keeping customers operational in the event of any unexpected outage or disaster. Sequent's business protection services are designed to help plan and implement processes for protecting a customer's business investment. The solutions include business continuity planning, disaster recovery services, security assessments, backup data verification and system replacement services. As Sequent believes that the quality and reliability of its computer systems are essential to customer satisfaction, high system uptime is a built-in advantage of Sequent's architecture. The Company maintains round-the-clock technical consultation as well as remote log-in capability for diagnosing customer hardware and software problems. In the event a hardware malfunction occurs, systems are equipped with diagnostic tools that allow the Company's service engineers to identify, diagnose and repair a failed component from remote locations. In some cases, in-field hardware service is contracted to third-party suppliers who rely on Sequent for customer interface and diagnostic support. Sequent has consistently been rated among the best providers of customer service in independent customer surveys. Sales and Distribution Sequent sells its products and services worldwide through its own direct sales force and through SIs. In several countries in Europe, Asia-Pacific and elsewhere, the Company also relies on distributors with open systems expertise and a strong market presence. The Company's direct sales force is made up of sales teams, generally consisting of a major account executive ("MAE") and a systems analyst ("SA"). MAEs have primary responsibility for managing the team's accounts; SAs provide technical support during the sales cycle. The sales teams work closely with the Company's professional services organization to identify opportunities to leverage the Company's consulting and professional services capability in their accounts. Sequent has cooperative relationships with a number of SIs to sell its products and services into accounts where the Company does not have a strong market presence. In the fourth quarter of 1998, the Company entered into a relationship with Siebel to deliver CRM solutions that integrate Siebel's front-office solutions with large back-office decision support solutions running on Sequent platforms. The Company has a similar relationship with AABC and Oracle to develop and sell SolutionNOW, a set of rapid deployment packages for Oracle financials and manufacturing applications on Sequent platforms. For the past three years, Sequent has worked closely with EDS on a growing number of data center projects and outsourcing opportunities. In January 1999, the Company transferred management of its internal IT infrastructure and operations to EDS, laying the groundwork for future joint marketing and sales efforts. In January 1999, the Company signed an agreement with Comparex, the parent company of SI PQA and Comparex International, one of Europe's fastest growing independent integrators. The Company has had a successful working relationship with PQA in South Africa for many years and intends to apply the same selling model in those regions of Europe where it has been slow to replicate the success of its direct sales force in France and the United Kingdom. As of March 15, 1999, the Company has 56 sales offices worldwide, including 28 in North America, 15 in Europe and 13 in Asia Pacific. Competition The computer industry is intensely competitive and characterized by rapid technological advances resulting in frequent new product introductions and correspondingly frequent improvements in performance and functionality. Competitive factors related specifically to Sequent's business include product quality and reliability, professional services and customer support capability, price/performance and scalability, compatibility with a customer's existing IT infrastructure, availability of applications software and company size and reputation. Within the commercial segment of the computing market, Sequent competes against IBM, Hewlett-Packard, Sun Microsystems, Inc. ("Sun"), Compaq Computer Corporation and others whose size, reputation, installed base, technical expertise, marketing strength, distribution channels and financial resources make them formidable competitors. Most of these companies also have large professional services organizations and alliances with many of the same hardware and software vendors with whom Sequent has strategic relationships. Sequent believes that the completeness of its technology roadmap, the performance and scalability of its products, the character and strength of its strategic relationships, and the caliber and scope of its consulting and professional services represent key differentiating factors that will enable it to compete successfully with these companies in the market for data center solutions. Patents and Licenses The Company has fourteen U.S., one German, and three United Kingdom patents either issued or allowed. The Company has twenty additional U.S. patent applications pending and one foreign application covering technology incorporated into its products. The Company believes that the rapid pace of technological change in the computer industry makes patent protection less significant than factors such as its continued focus and efforts in research and product development, its technical expertise and the management ability of its personnel. The Company has from time to time been made aware of others in the industry who assert exclusive rights to certain technologies, copyrights or trademarks, usually in the form of an offer to license certain rights for a fee or royalties. The Company's policy is to evaluate such claims on a case-by-case basis. The Company may seek to enter into licensing agreements with companies having or asserting rights to technologies if the Company concludes that such licensing arrangements are necessary or desirable. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain such licenses or, if obtained, that such licenses will be on favorable terms. Employees At January 2, 1999, the Company employed 2,646 employees of whom 216 were employed as major account executives, 1,601 in sales support, marketing and service, 423 in product development, 219 in manufacturing and 187 in administrative and support services. The Company's continued success will depend in part on its ability to attract and retain highly skilled and motivated personnel who are in great demand throughout the industry. None of the Company's employees are represented by a labor union. Sequent believes that its employee relations are excellent and believes that its stock incentive plans, its challenging work environment and the opportunities for advancement within the Company are key factors to its ability to attract and retain qualified personnel. Trademarks Sequent(R), Symmetry(R), WinServer(R), Balance(R), DYNIX(R), DYNIX/ptx(R), PTX(R)and ptx/ADMIN(R) are registered trademarks and NUMA-Q(TM), NUMACenter(TM), IQ-Link(TM), NTX2000(TM), Decision Advantage(TM), Contact Advantage(TM), Application Advantage(TM) and Application Region Manager(TM) are trademarks of Sequent Computer Systems, Inc. This Report on Form 10-K also refers to trademarks held by other corporations. Factors That May Affect Future Results Information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that is not historical information, including information regarding product development schedules and anticipated benefits from new products and from the Project Monterey relationship with IBM constitutes forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Additional forward-looking statements may be made by the Company from time to time. The following factors are among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements should be considered in light of these factors. The Company's forward-looking statements apply only as of the date made. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release the results of any revision to these forward-looking statements which may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Fluctuations in Quarterly Results. The Company's results of operations have fluctuated significantly from period to period, including on a quarterly basis. A significant portion of the Company's products are shipped in the quarter in which the orders are received. Order backlog as of any quarter-end is normally shipped within the first few weeks of the succeeding quarter. As a result, order backlog as of the end of February for both 1999 and 1998 was relatively small. As is the case with many high technology companies, a disproportionately large percentage of a quarter's total sales occur in the last month and weeks and days of such quarter. The Company's quarterly sales and operating results, therefore, depend in large part on the volume and timing of orders received during the quarter, which are difficult to forecast. Accordingly, the Company may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected revenue shortfall. As a result, any significant shortfall in demand for the Company's products and services in relation to the Company's expectations could have an immediate material adverse effect on the Company's business, operating results and financial condition. Further, as the Company's sales to major accounts continue to increase, the Company expects that a limited number of large sales may account for a more significant portion of revenue in some quarters, creating greater exposure to possible fluctuations in revenue. In addition, larger orders typically involve substantially longer selling cycles, which makes quarterly forecasts of sales more difficult. The Company may experience significant fluctuations in future quarterly operating results that may be caused by many factors, including demand for the Company's products, introduction or enhancement of products by the Company or its competitors, market acceptance of new products, the timing of sales to large accounts, pricing pressures, the mix of products sold and the mix between product and service revenue, lengthy sales cycles, capital spending levels by customers, shipment interruptions due to quality problems and general economic conditions. Because of all of the foregoing factors, it is possible that in some future quarters the Company's operating results will be below the expectations of securities analysts or investors. In such event, the market price of the Company's Common Stock could be materially adversely affected. Competition. The computer business is intensely competitive. The Company competes with a number of companies that have considerably greater financial, marketing, technical and operating resources. The Company competes with, among others, Hewlett-Packard, Digital, IBM and Sun, which have large installed customer bases in many of the markets addressed by the Company. All of these companies offer products that compete with Sequent's products. Silicon Graphics, Inc. and Data General have already introduced products based on CC-NUMA technology and other companies are believed to be developing products based on CC-NUMA technology. Most also have large professional services organizations and alliances with many hardware and software vendors with which Sequent has strategic relationships. No assurances can be given that the Company will have the financial resources, marketing, distribution and service organizations, technical capabilities or depth of key personnel necessary to compete successfully in the future. Product Development. The computer industry is subject to rapid and significant technological change and frequent introductions of new competitive products. To remain competitive, the Company will be required to continue to invest substantially in research and development, enhance its existing products, introduce new competitive products and maintain price/performance advantages in its selected markets. New product development may be delayed or unsuccessful due to technical difficulties encountered or resource constraints. There can be no assurance that it will be able to respond adequately to unexpected technological changes in its markets or that future products will be completed on schedule or will be successful. Strategic Relationships. The Company has developed strategic relationships with leading hardware and software providers and is engaged in joint research and product development and marketing arrangements with these companies. The Company's ability to enhance its existing NUMA-Q products and develop new products is significantly dependent on maintaining and strengthening the Company's relationships with leading providers, particularly Intel, Microsoft, Oracle and IBM. Many of these hardware and software vendors also have significant development and marketing relationships with the Company's competitors. In addition, the Company's relationships with systems integrators, including EDS and AABC and Comparex, are increasingly important to the Company's business strategy. The Company plans to continue its strategy of developing technology and marketing relationships with these and other leading hardware and software vendors and systems integrators. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in its ongoing strategic relationships or that the Company will be able to find additional suitable business relationships as it develops new products. Any failure to continue or expand such relationships could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, operating results and financial condition. There can be no assurance that the Company's strategic partners, most of which have significantly greater financial and marketing resources than the Company, will not develop and market products in competition with the Company in the future, discontinue their relationships with the Company or form or strengthen arrangements with the Company's competitors. Software Development and OEM Relationship with IBM Corporation. The Company has joined IBM, Intel and SCO in Project Monterey, an IBM initiative to develop an industry standard 64-bit UNIX for Intel's IA-64 (Merced) microprocessor. Several other companies, including Acer Inc., CETIA, Groupe Bull, ICL, Motorola, Inc. and Unysis Corporation, have already signed up with IBM as OEM partners of the new operating system. There can be no assurance, however, that the software development will be timely and successful or that the companies mentioned above will successfully OEM the product. Supply of Components. Certain components used by the Company, including Intel microprocessors, custom VLSI gate arrays and intelligent high-speed data switches (IQ-Link), are only available from single sources. The Company attempts to reduce the risk of supply interruption through greater inventory positions in sole-source components. Other components, such as memory chips, have occasionally been in short supply throughout the industry. Failure to obtain sole-source or other parts and components in adequate quantities on a timely basis could increase costs or delay shipments and have an adverse effect on the Company's revenues and net income. The adverse effect of a supplier's failure to meet Sequent's requirements may be intensified by the fact that a large portion of orders are received, and the products shipped, at the end of a quarter. Capitalization of Software Development Costs. The Company has made and continues to make significant investments in software development. The amount of expenditures that qualify for capitalization under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 86 "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed" may vary from period to period as software projects progress through the development life-cycle. These variations could impact the Company's operating results in any given period. Unamortized software development costs were approximately $72.5 million at January 2, 1999. If technological developments or other factors were to jeopardize the realizability of such assets, the Company could be required to write off all or a substantial portion of such capitalized values, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations for the period in which the write-off occurs. Year 2000 Compliance. The Year 2000 Issue is the result of computer programs being written using two digits rather than four to define the applicable year. Any of the Company's software programs and microcircuitry that have date-sensitive features may recognize a date using "00" as the year 1900 rather than the year 2000. This could result in a system failure or miscalculations causing disruptions of operations. The Year 2000 Issue affects the Company's internal systems as well as any of the Company's products that include date-sensitive software. The Company is executing a company-wide Year 2000 Readiness Program for the Company's products, on-going operations, mission-critical information systems and key suppliers. Both internal and external resources are being employed to identify, correct, or reprogram, and test the systems for Year 2000 compliance. The total cost of the project is currently estimated to be approximately $10 million and is being funded through operating cash flows. The Company is expensing all costs associated with identification and resulting changes to these systems, but does not expect the amounts to have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations. There can be no assurance, however, that the systems or products of other companies on which the Company's systems also rely will be timely converted or that any such failure to convert by a vendor, customer or another company would not have an adverse effect on the Company's systems. Additionally, we cannot completely ensure that the Company's software products do not contain undetected problems associated with Year 2000 compliance. Such problems, should they occur, may result in adverse effects on future operating results. Uncertain Protection of Intellectual Property. The Company's success and ability to compete is dependent in part upon its internally developed technology. While the Company relies on patent, trademark, trade secret and copyright law to protect its technology, the Company believes that factors such as the technological and creative skills of its personnel, new product developments, frequent product enhancements, name recognition and reliable product maintenance are more essential to establishing and maintaining a technology leadership position. There can be no assurance that others will not develop technologies that are similar or superior to the Company's technology. The Company generally enters into confidentiality or license agreements with its employees, consultants and vendors and generally seeks to control access to and distribution of its proprietary information. Despite these precautions, it may be possible for a third party to copy or otherwise obtain and use the Company's products or technology without authorization, or to develop similar technology independently. There can be no assurance that the steps taken by the Company will prevent misappropriation of its technology or that such confidentiality and license agreements will be enforceable. Periodically, the Company has received, and may receive in the future, notices of claims of infringement of other parties' proprietary rights. Although the Company does not believe that its products infringe the proprietary rights of any third parties, there can be no assurance that infringement or invalidity claims (or claims for indemnification resulting from infringement claims) will not be asserted or prosecuted against the Company or that any such assertions or prosecutions (including the costs of litigation) will not materially adversely affect the Company's business, operating results and financial condition. If any claims or actions are asserted against the Company, the Company may seek to license a third party's intellectual property rights. There can be no assurance, however, that under such circumstances, a license would be available on reasonable terms or at all. Availability of Key Personnel; Expansion of Sales Force. The Company's continued growth depends upon its ability to attract, integrate and retain qualified management, technical and sales and support personnel for its operations. Competition for sales personnel is intense, and the Company may find it difficult to attract such personnel in a timely and efficient manner or to retain and integrate such personnel. This competition could adversely affect the Company's ability to expand and manage its sales force to sell its NUMA-Q products and professional services to large accounts and to develop marketing relationships with large SIs. Manufacturing Risks. The Company's products are designed and manufactured for high reliability. If flaws in design, production, assembly or testing occur on the part of Sequent or its suppliers, Sequent may experience a rate of failure in its products that results in substantial repair or replacement costs and potential damage to its reputation. There can be no assurance that Sequent's efforts to monitor, develop and implement appropriate test and manufacturing processes for its products will be sufficient to permit Sequent to avoid a rate of failure in its products that results in substantial delays in shipment, significant repair or replacement costs and potential damage to Sequent's reputation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on Sequent's business, operating results and financial condition. International Operations. The Company derived 52% of its total revenues from foreign customers in the year ended January 2, 1999, a substantial portion of which was denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. Most of the Company's international sales are in Europe. International operations are subject to various risks, including exposure to currency fluctuations, the greater difficulty of administering business abroad and the need to comply with a wide variety of international and United States export laws and regulatory requirements. Volatility of Stock Prices. There has been a history of significant volatility in the market prices of the Common Stock of electronics companies, including that of the Company, and it is likely that the market price of the Company's Common Stock will continue to be subject to significant fluctuations. Factors such as the timing and market acceptance of new product introductions by the Company, the introduction of new products by the Company's competitors, variations in quarterly operating results, changes in securities analysts' recommendations regarding the Company's Common Stock, developments in the electronics industry and general economic conditions may have a significant impact on the market price of the Company's Common Stock. In addition, the equity markets in recent years have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market prices of technology companies and that have often been unrelated to the operating performance of such companies. Item 2. Properties. The Company's headquarters and its product development and manufacturing operations are located in facilities totaling approximately 670,000 square feet in Beaverton, Oregon, 10 miles west of Portland. The Company occupies these facilities under leases which expire from 1999 to 2006. On the expiration dates of these leases, the Company generally has the option of purchasing the leased facilities at fair market value or renewing the leases for an additional five years. In addition, the Company owns 31 acres of undeveloped land in Beaverton held in anticipation of future facility growth requirements. The Company also leases for sales, marketing and customer support offices in locations throughout the United States, Europe, Canada and Asia Pacific. The Company anticipates that it will continue to expand its corporate and field facilities as business growth warrants. Item 3. Legal Proceedings. There are no material pending legal proceedings involving the Company. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. Not applicable. Item 4(a). Executive Officers of the Registrant. Executive Officers of the Company as of March 15, 1999 are as follows: Name Age Position Karl C. Powell, Jr. 55 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Director John McAdam 48 President and Chief Operating Officer, Director Robert S. Gregg 45 Sr. Vice President of Finance and Legal and Chief Financial Officer Barbara L. Gaffney 49 Sr. Vice President of Business Programs Mr. Powell, a co-founder of the Company, is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and has been a director since 1983. Mr. Powell has served as the Company's sole Chief Executive Officer or shared the Office of the Chief Executive with the co-founder of the Company since the Company's inception. From 1974 to 1983, Mr. Powell was employed by Intel Corporation, where his most recent position was General Manager for Microprocessor Operations. Mr. Powell served on the National Board of Directors of the American Electronics Association from 1985 to 1986. He holds a B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from the US Merchant Marine Academy. Mr. McAdam joined the Company in August 1989 as U.K. Sales Director. He became U.K. General Manager in January 1991, Vice President and General Manager of European Operations in October 1992, and Senior Vice President of European and Asian Operations in January 1994. He was promoted to President and Chief Operating Officer in February 1995, and was elected to the Board of Directors in November 1995. Prior to joining the Company Mr. McAdam was employed for 10 years by Data General U.K. Ltd., serving most recently as Regional Manager, Public Sector, Finance and Government Market. Mr. McAdam holds a B.Sc. first class honors degree in Computer Sciences from Glasgow University. Mr. Gregg joined the Company in 1983 as its Controller. He became Director of Finance in 1984 and Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer in March 1986. He was promoted to Senior Vice President of Finance and Legal and Chief Financial Officer in February 1995. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Gregg spent eight years at the public accounting firm of Price Waterhouse LLP. Mr. Gregg holds a B.S. degree in business and accounting from the University of Oregon. Ms. Gaffney joined the Company in 1983 as Vice President of Human Resources. She then took on the role of Vice President of Quality in 1992 and in 1996 she was promoted to Senior Vice President of Customer Services and Quality. Early in 1999, she was promoted to Senior Vice President of Business Programs. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Gaffney spent eleven years with Intel Corporation in various Human Resources management positions in both California and Oregon. Ms. Gaffney holds a B.S. degree from the University of Santa Clara. She is also a member of the Malcolm Baldridge National Quality Award (MBNQA) Board of Examiners. PART II Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters. The information required by this item is included under "Market Information (unaudited)" in the Company's 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 6. Selected Financial Data. Information with respect to selected financial data is included under "Selected Financial Data" in the Company's 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Information with respect to management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is included under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Company's 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 7(a). Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Information with respect to quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk is included under "Derivatives and Other Financial Instruments" under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Company's 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. Information with respect to selected quarterly financial data is included under "Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)" in the Company's 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference. The other information required by this item is included under "Consolidated Financial Statements" and "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" as listed in item 14 of this report and in the Company's 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders which is incorporated herein by reference. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. Not applicable. PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant. Information with respect to directors of the Company will be included under "Election of Directors" in the Company's Proxy Statement for its 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference. Information with respect to executive officers of the Company is included under Item 4(a) of Part I of this Report. Item 11. Executive Compensation. Information with respect to executive compensation will be included under "Summary Compensation Table", "Stock Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year", "Stock Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year End Option Values" and under "Executive Compensation," and "Certain Transactions" in the Company's Proxy Statement for its 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. Information with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management will be included under "Voting Securities and Principal Shareholders" and "Election of Directors" in the Company's Proxy Statement for its 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions. Information with respect to transactions with management will be included under "Certain Transactions" in the Company's Proxy Statement for its 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference. PART IV Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K. (a)(1) Financial Statements. The following financial statements are included in the Company's 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders: Sequent Computer Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries: Consolidated Statements of Operations - Fiscal Years Ended January 2, 1999, January 3, 1998 and December 28, 1996 Consolidated Balance Sheets - January 2, 1999 and January 3, 1998 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity - Fiscal Years Ended January 2, 1999, January 3, 1998 and December 28, 1996 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Fiscal Years Ended January 2, 1999, January 3, 1998 and December 28, 1996 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Report of Independent Accountants (a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules. The following schedule and report of independent accountants are filed herewith: Page in this report on Form 10-K Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts F-1 Report of Independent Accountants on Financial Statement Schedules F-2 All other schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable or is presented in the financial statements or related notes thereto. (a)(3) Exhibits. Exhibit Number Description 3.1 Articles of Incorporation, as amended, and Articles of Merger of Sequent Computer Systems, Inc. (the "Company"). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4A to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File no. 33-63972).) 3.2 Bylaws, as amended, of the Company. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4B to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File no. 33-39315).) 4.1 Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, the Company agrees to furnish any other long term debt agreements to the Commission upon request. 10.1A Amended and Restated Lease Agreement between KC Woodside and the Company, as amended, dated May 8, 1987 ("First Building Lease"), and related agreements. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 19.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 1987 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1B Second Amendment to First Building Lease, dated July 28, 1988. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3B to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 1989 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1C Third Amendment to First Building Lease, dated July 28, 1989. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3C to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 1989 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1D Fourth Amendment to First Building Lease, dated September 20, 1991. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1D to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 1991 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1E Fifth Amendment to First Building Lease, dated December 2, 1992. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1E to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 2, 1993 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1F Sixth Amendment to First Building Lease, dated April 5, 1993. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1F to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 1994 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1G Seventh Amendment to First Building Lease, dated September 30, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1G to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 1998 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1H Eighth Amendment to First Building Lease, dated March 26, 1998. 10.1I Lease Agreement between KC Woodside and the Company, dated May 8, 1987 ("Second Building Lease"). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 19.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 1987 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1J First Amendment to Second Building Lease, dated July 28, 1988. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3E to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 1989 (File no. 0-15627).) Exhibit Number Description 10.1K Second Amendment to Second Building Lease, dated September 13, 1991. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1G to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 1991 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1L Third Amendment to Second Building Lease, dated December 2, 1992. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1L to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 2, 1993 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1M Fourth Amendment to Second Building Lease, dated April 5, 1993. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1K to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 1994 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1N Fifth Amendment to Second Building Lease, dated September 30, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1M to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 1998 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1O Sixth Amendment to Second Building Lease, dated March 26, 1998. 10.1P Seventh Amendment to Second Building Lease, dated April 2, 1998. 10.1Q Lease Agreement, dated July 28, 1988 between KC Woodside and the Company ("Third Building Lease"). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3F to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 1989 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1R First Amendment to Third Building Lease, dated July 28, 1989. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3G to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 1989 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1S Second Amendment to Third Building Lease, dated September 13, 1991. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1J to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 1991 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1T Third Amendment to Third Building Lease, dated December 2, 1992. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1M to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 2, 1993 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1U Fourth Amendment to Third Building Lease, dated April 5, 1993. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1P to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 1994 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1V Fifth Amendment to Third Building Lease, dated September 30, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1S to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 1998 (File no. 0-15627). 10.1W Sixth Amendment to Third Building Lease, dated March 26, 1998. 10.1X Lease Agreement, dated July 28, 1989 between KC Woodside and the Company ("Fourth Building Lease"). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3H to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 1989 (File no. 0-15627).) Exhibit Number Description 10.1Y First Amendment to Fourth Building Lease, dated September 13, 1991. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1P to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 1991 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1Z Second Amendment to Fourth Building Lease, dated August 13, 1992. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1P to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 2, 1993 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1aa Third Amendment to Fourth Building Lease, dated December 2, 1992. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1Q to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 2, 1993 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1bb Fourth Amendment to Fourth Building Lease, dated April 5, 1993. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1U to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 1, 1994 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1cc Fifth Amendment to Fourth Building Lease, dated September 30, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1Y to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 1998 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1dd Sixth Amendment to Fourth Building Lease, dated March 26, 1998. 10.1ee Triple Net Lease, dated July 9, 1990 between KC Woodside and the Company ("Fifth Building Lease"). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 19 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 1990 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1ff First Amendment to Fifth Building Lease, dated April 29, 1991. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1N to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 1991 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1gg Second Amendment to Fifth Building Lease, dated April 29, 1991. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1O to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 1991 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1hh Third Amendment to Fifth Building Lease, dated June 10, 1991. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1P to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 1991 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1ii Fourth Amendment to the Fifth Building Lease, dated July 3, 1991. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1Q to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 1991 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1jj Fifth Amendment to Fifth Building Lease, dated September 13, 1991. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1R to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 1991 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1kk Sixth Amendment to Fifth Building Lease, dated December 2, 1992. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1X to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 2, 1993 (File no. 0-15627).) Exhibit Number Description 10.1ll Seventh Amendment to Fifth Building Lease, dated April 5, 1993. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1cc to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 1, 1994 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1mm Eighth Amendment to Fifth Building Lease, dated March 26, 1998. 10.1nn Lease Agreement between KC Woodside and the Company, dated June 10, 1991 (Umpqua). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1Y to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 2, 1993 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1oo First Amendment to Lease, dated March 26, 1998 (Umpqua). 10.1pp Lease Agreement between KC Woodside and the Company, dated June 10, 1991 (Charles). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1Z to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 2, 1993 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1qq First Amendment to Lease, dated October 31, 1991 (Charles). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1aa to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 2, 1993 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1rr Second Amendment to Lease, dated May 6, 1992 (Charles). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1bb to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 2, 1993 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1ss Third Amendment to Lease, dated January 8, 1993 (Charles). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1cc to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 2, 1993 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1tt Fourth Amendment to Lease, dated July 21, 1995 (Charles). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1dd to the Company's Annual Report on 10-K for fiscal year ended January 2, 1993 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1uu Fifth Amendment to Lease, dated March 26, 1998 (Charles). 10.1vv Lease Agreement between KC Woodside and the Company, dated June 10, 1991 (South Platte). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1dd to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 2, 1993 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1ww First Amendment to Lease, dated July 21, 1995 (South Platte). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1ee to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 2, 1993 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1xx Second Amendment to Lease, dated March 1, 1997 (South Platte). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1rr to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 3, 1998 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1yy Third Amendment to Lease, dated March 26, 1998 (South Platte). 10.1zz Lease Agreement between KC Woodside and the Company, dated January 15, 1996 (Guadalupe) as amended February 1, 1996 and October 1, 1996. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1pp to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 18, 1996 (File no. 0-15627).) Exhibit Number Description 10.1aaa First Amendment to Lease, dated May 12, 1992 (Guadalupe). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1ff to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 2, 1993 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1bbb Second Amendment to Lease, dated July 21, 1995 (Guadalupe). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.gg to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 2, 1993 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1ccc Third Amendment to Lease, dated March 26, 1998 (Guadalupe). 10.1ddd Business Park Lease between KC Woodside and the Company, dated June 10, 1991 (Hillsborough). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1gg to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 2, 1993 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.1eee First Amendment to Lease, dated March 26, 1998 (Hillsborough). 10.2 Master Software License Agreement between Unix System Laboratories, Inc. (formerly owned by American Telephone & Telegraph Company) and the Company, dated effective as of April 18, 1985. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 2, 1993 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.2A Sublicensing Agreement between Unix Systems Laboratories, Inc. and the Company, dated January 28, 1986, as amended June 22, 1987 and August 10, 1987. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2A to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 2, 1993 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.2B Substitution Agreement between Unix System Laboratories, Inc. and the Company, dated January 28, 1986. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2B to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 2, 1993 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.2C Amendment dated November 13, 1992 to Master Software License Agreement and Sublicensing Agreement with Unix System Laboratories, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2C to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 3, 1998 (File no. 0-15627).) 10.2D License Agreement, dated July 15, 1983 between The Regents of University of California and the Company, as amended July 2, 1986. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2C to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 2, 1993 (File no. 0-15627).) +10.3 Distributorship Agreement between the Company and Oracle Corporation, dated March 31, 1987, as amended on December 29, 1988, August 30, 1989, May 28, 1990, May 31, 1991 and June 30, 1991. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 2, 1993 (File no. 0-15627).) *10.4 Aircraft Lease Agreement between the Company and CP Transportation, Inc., dated October 1, 1996. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4A to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 28, 1996 (File no. 0-15627).) *10.5 Sequent Computer Systems, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan and Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, adopted March 20, 1984, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File no. 33-33444).) Exhibit Number Description *10.6 Sequent Computer Systems, Inc. 1987 Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File no. 33-33444).) *10.7 Sequent Computer Systems, Inc. 1987 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File no. 33-33444).) *10.8 Sequent Computer Systems, Inc. 1989 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company's Proxy Statement for its 1994 Annual Meeting of Shareholders). *10.9 Sequent Computer Systems, Inc. 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company's Proxy Statement dated March 23, 1995). *10.10 Sequent Computer Systems, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company's Proxy Statement dated March 27, 1997). *10.12 DP Applications, Inc. Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement, dated December 2, 1996. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 28, 1996 (File no. 0-15627).) *10.13 DP Applications, Inc. and the Robert W. Wilmot and Mary J. Wilmot, trustees of the Wilmot Living Trust, Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement, dated November 17, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 3, 1998 (File no. 0-15627).) 11 Statement regarding computation of earnings per share. 13 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders (portions not incorporated by reference are not deemed filed). 21 Subsidiaries. 23 Consent of Independent Public Accountants. 24 Powers of Attorney. 27 Financial Data Schedule. ________________________ + Confidential treatment for portions of this contract has been previously requested of the Commission. * Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 14(a)(3) of this Report. (b) Reports on Form 8-K. No reports on Form 8-K were filed by the Company during the last quarter of fiscal 1998. SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Sequent Computer Systems, Inc. Date: March 15, 1999 /s/ Robert S. Gregg Robert S. Gregg Sr. Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 15, 1999. Signature Title /s/ Karl C. Powell, Jr. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Karl C. Powell, Jr.) and Director (Principal Executive Officer) /s/ John McAdam President and Chief Operating Officer (John McAdam) and Director /s/ Robert S. Gregg Sr. Vice President of Finance and Legal (Robert S. Gregg) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) FRANK C. GILL * (Frank C. Gill) Director LARRY R. LEVITAN * (Larry R. Levitan) Director MICHAEL S. SCOTT MORTON * (Michael S. Scott Morton) Director MARTY STEIN * (Marty Stein) Director ROBERT W. WILMOT * (Robert W. Wilmot) Director By: /s/ Robert S. Gregg * Robert S. Gregg, Attorney-in-fact SCHEDULE II SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS (In thousands)
Additions Additions Balance at Charged to Charged to Write-offs Balance at Beginning of Costs and Other Accts. Net of End of Period Expenses Describe (1) Recoveries Period Year ended Dec. 28, 1996 Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 2,816 $ 317 $ (315) $ 12 $ 2,806 Accumulated amortization capitalized software $ 58,308 $ 19,984 $ 0 $ 39,846 $ 38,446 Year ended Jan. 3, 1998 Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 2,806 $ 2,694 $ (8) $ 2,371 $ 3,121 Accumulated amortization capitalized software $ 38,446 $ 27,570 $ 0 $ 0 $ 66,016 Year ended Jan. 2, 1999 Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 3,121 $ 3,161 $ (134) $ 2,279 $ 3,869 Accumulated amortization capitalized software $ 66,016 $ 31,365 $ 0 $ 30,584 $ 66,797
(1) Foreign currency translation adjustment REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES To the Board of Directors of Sequent Computer Systems, Inc. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our report dated January 28, 1999 appearing in the 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders of Sequent Computer Systems, Inc. (which report and consolidated financial statements are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) also included an audit of the Financial Statement Schedule listed in Item 14(a)(2) of this Form 10-K. In our opinion, this Financial Statement Schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP Portland, Oregon January 28, 1999 EXHIBIT 11 SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES STATEMENT SHOWING CALCULATION OF THE BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Income (Loss) Shares Per-Share (Numerator) (Denominator) Amount Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal 1998 1997 1996 1998 1997 1996 1998 1997 1996 Basic EPS Income (loss) available to common shareholders $ (52,519) $ 38,687 $ 7,771 43,561 37,899 33,641 $ (1.21) $ 1.02 $ 0.23 Effect of Dilutive Securities Stock options 2,653 723 Employee stock purchase plan 156 55 Debentures, if dilutive 116 144 Diluted EPS Income (loss) available to common shareholders + assumed conversions $ (52,519) $ 38,803 $ 7,771 43,561 40,852 34,419 $ (1.21) $ 0.95 $ 0.23
EXHIBIT 13 SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Fiscal Year Ended Jan. 2, Jan. 3, Dec. 28, Dec. 30, Dec. 31, 1999 1998 1996 1995 1994 OPERATIONS DATA Total revenue $ 784,156 $ 833,886 $ 595,362 $ 540,345 $ 450,823 Income (loss) before income taxes $ (76,071) $ 50,512 $ 10,676 $ 47,327 $ 38,800 Net income (loss) $ (52,519) $ 38,687 $ 7,771 $ 35,073 $ 33,134 Net income (loss) per share - basic $ (1.21) $ 1.02 $ .23 $ 1.09 $ 1.08 Net income (loss) per share - diluted $ (1.21) $ .95 $ .23 $ 1.04 $ 1.03 BALANCE SHEET DATA Working capital $ 324,674 $ 404,066 $ 191,810 $ 214,749 $ 168,468 Total assets $ 796,115 $ 886,677 $ 603,627 $ 503,923 $ 435,977 Long-term obligations $ 7,480 $ 9,910 $ 16,503 $ 9,106 $ 10,341 Shareholders' equity $ 552,854 $ 600,784 $ 374,809 $ 353,188 $ 291,195
SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The Company reported a net loss of $52.5 million in 1998 on a total revenue volume of $784.2 million. The Company's results in 1998 were significantly impacted by a pretax net restructuring charge of $61.4 million ($62.9 million was recorded in the second quarter of 1998 and was reduced by third and fourth quarter estimate revisions of $1.5 million). Since the restructure, the Company has focused on revamping its business strategy and broadening its product line while continuing its cost reduction efforts. Revenue: (dollars in millions) Fiscal Year Ended January 2, % January 3, % December 28, 1999 change 1998 change 1996 Total Revenue $ 784.2 (6%) $ 833.9 40% $ 595.4 Product $ 509.9 (15%) $ 600.5 45% $ 414.5 Professional Service 97.4 29% 75.7 34% 56.5 Customer Service 176.9 12% 157.7 27% 124.4 US $ 372.6 (17%) $ 449.4 66% $ 270.6 United Kingdom 300.9 12% 268.8 31% 205.5 Other International 110.7 (4%) 115.7 (3%) 119.3 Net Income (Loss) $ (52.5) $ 38.7 $ 7.8 Product: Product revenue was significantly impacted by a substantial decrease in product sales to the Company's largest domestic customer during the third quarter of 1998. Also adversely impacting the Company's product revenue in 1998 was the transition from its Pentium Pro-based NUMA-Q products to its new Pentium II Xeon-based NUMA-Q product line. The Company did not begin shipment of its new product line until late in the third quarter of 1998. In contrast, revenues in 1997 were up 40% over 1996. The decrease in total revenue from 1997 to 1998 was due to a substantial decline in product revenue of approximately 15%. Contributing to the substantial increase in 1997 revenues was a significant increase in product revenue generated from sales of the Company's NUMA-Q 2000 systems which were new to the marketplace in 1997 and which represented approximately 68% of the Company's system sales for that year. Service: The Company's service organizations continue to represent an increased percentage of total revenue, approximately 35% in 1998 compared to 28% and 30% in 1997 and 1996, respectively. Revenue increases from professional services were approximately 29% and 34% in 1998 and 1997, respectively. Customer service revenue increased approximately 12% and 27% in 1998 and 1997, respectively. Continued growth in the number and size of new projects, with both new and existing customers, contributed to the overall increases in revenue within the Company's professional service organization. Customer service revenue continues to increase from growth in the number of systems under maintenance contracts. Foreign revenue has continued to increase, primarily from increased volume in the Company's European operations, specifically in the United Kingdom. The following table sets forth certain operating data as a percentage of total revenue:
Fiscal Year Ended January 2, January 3, December 28, 1999 1998 1996 Revenue: Product 65% 72% 70% Service 35 28 30 Total revenue 100 100 100 Cost of product and service 65 58 57 Gross profit 35 42 43 Operating expenses: Research and development 9 8 9 Selling, general and administrative 28 28 32 Restructuring charges 8 - - Total operating expenses 45 36 41 Operating income (loss) (10) 6 2 Interest income (expense), net 1 - - Other expense, net (1) - - Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes (10) 6 2 Provision for (benefit from) income taxes (3) 1 1 Net income (loss) (7)% 5% 1%
GROSS MARGINS Fiscal Year Ended January 2, January 3, December 28, 1999 1998 1996 Product 39% 49% 52% Service 28% 26% 23% The factors influencing gross margins in a given period generally include overall pricing trends in our products' markets, unit volumes (which affect economies of scale), product configuration mix, the impact of existing product lifecycles, changes in component and manufacturing costs and the mix between product and service revenue. Product: During 1998, product margins continued to be negatively impacted by competitive pricing pressures and the impact of the product transition during the latter part of 1998. The Company's Pentium Pro-based product line was nearing the end of its product life cycle, which resulted in heavier discounting of the products sold during 1998. The Company's new Pentium II Xeon-based NUMA-Q products were announced to the marketplace near the end of the third quarter; however, formal introduction and shipment of the products did not begin until the fourth quarter of 1998. Product margins were also impacted by certain non-recurring charges for inventory obsolescence provisions made during the second quarter of 1998. Additionally, an increased product mix of third-party products, which generally yield lower margins than the Company's products, contributed to the overall decline in product margins in both 1998 and 1997. Service: Partially offsetting decreases in product margins were slight increases in service margins which were primarily realized from the Company's professional service organization. Sequent has enhanced its focus on the business strategy within this segment of the Company which has resulted in significant improvementsin the profitability of this organization, particularly in 1998. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Fiscal Year Ended (dollars in millions) January 2, % January 3, % December 28, 1999 change 1998 change 1996 Research and development expense $74.8 14% $65.4 22% $53.7 As a percentage of total revenue 10% 8% 9% Software costs capitalized $40.2 17% $34.2 -- $34.2
Research and development expense continued to increase in amount. During 1998 and 1997, the Company made substantial investments in the development of its new NUMA-Q product lines. Specifically, significant investments were made in the hardware and software development of its new Pentium II Xeon-based NUMA-Q product and in the technology of the Company's first generation NUMACenter which allows running Unix and Windows NT applications on a single system. Both of these new products were formally introduced into the marketplace during the latter part of 1998. SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
(dollars in millions) Fiscal Year Ended January 2, % January 3, % December 28, 1999 change 1998 change 1996 Selling, general and administrative $215.3 (8%) $234.0 22% $191.1 As a percentage of total revenue 27% 28% 32%
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased both in amount and as a percentage of revenue in 1998 over 1997. Savings were realized primarily from the effects of aggressive cost reduction measures implemented during 1998 and as a result of the Company's restructure which took place in the second quarter of 1998. The overall decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses resulted primarily from reductions in payroll, employee training and travel expenses. While these dollar decreases approximated 8%, the impact of these expenses as a percentage of revenue was tempered due to the decline in total revenue in 1998 over 1997. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in 1997 over 1996 was primarily due to the increased activity associated with the overall sales volume generated that year. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES During the second quarter of 1998, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $62.9 million in connection with management's decision to accelerate changes in its business model to leverage the strength of its technology roadmap and market position. The restructuring charge was reduced during the third and fourth quarters by estimate revisions totalling $1.5 million. The majority of these revisions were adjustments to prepaid software licenses and facilities. As part of the restructuring process, which was substantially completed during the second quarter of 1998, the Company reorganized its operations to revise the focus of its business strategy and broaden its line of Intel-based servers. As part of the restructuring efforts, the Company expanded its product offerings, including its new Xeon-based NUMA product and also NUMACenter, both of which were formally introduced into the marketplace in the latter part of 1998. The restructuring charges of $62.9 million included employee termination and other related costs ($7.2 million); facilities and office space costs ($13.7 million); write-offs of non-strategic assets, principally prepaid software licenses ($27.2 million), capital assets ($7.9 million), capitalized software ($2.5 million), goodwill ($2.5 million), and other assets, principally prepaid expenses ($1.9 million). The employee termination costs resulted from the elimination of 265 positions worldwide. The employee groups impacted by the eliminations encompassed all functions within the Company. All termination costs pertaining to the eliminated positions are included as restructuring costs in the accompanying Statements of Operations. Approximately 74% of the employee termination costs accrued during the second quarter of 1998 were paid as of January 2, 1999. Approximately 24% of the accrued costs were written off by the Company during 1998 and the remainder will be paid in 1999. Facilities costs represent expenses associated with excess office space and related fixed costs for the Company's headquarter and field office locations. The amount written off was determined using an analysis of individual specific lease terms, estimated sub-lease income to be realized and office headcount for unutilized facilities. The majority of capital asset write-offs represent retirements of hardware and software no longer being used for customer demonstrations and showcases due to the strategic product shift associated with the restructure. The method of determining fair value of costs written off was the net book value recorded at the time of the restructuring. Remaining cash outlays expected from the restructuring consist of $16 million relating to ongoing facilities costs and $500,000 relating to employee termination and prepaid software licenses. It is anticipated that the restructuring actions taken in the second quarter will yield operating cost reductions of approximately $25 million during 1999. The following table presents a summary of the restructuring charges recorded during 1998 and the resulting net balance sheet amounts recorded as of January 2, 1999. The balance of accrued restructuring costs of $16.5 million at January 2, 1999 is included in Accounts Payable and Other in the accompanying balance sheet.
(dollars in millions) Second Third Restructuring Quarter Write-offs/ Balance at Quarter Write-offs/ Balance at Costs Expenditures Adjustments July 4, 1998 Expenditures Adjustments October 3, 1998 Employee termination and related costs $ 7.2 $ (2.5) $ (0.3) $ 4.4 $ (2.5) $ (0.2) $ 1.7 Prepaid software licenses 27.2 - (24.9) 2.3 - (0.6) 1.7 Facilities 13.7 (0.1) - 13.6 (0.7) 0.1 13.0 Capital assets 7.9 - (7.9) - - 0.1 0.1 Capitalized software 2.5 - (2.5) - - - - Goodwill 2.5 - (2.5) - - - - Other assets 1.9 - (1.9) - - - - $ 62.9 $ (2.6) $ (40.0) $ 20.3 $ (3.2) $ (0.6) $ 16.5
Fourth Quarter Write-offs/ Balance at Expenditures Adjustments January 2, 1999 Employee termination and related costs $ (0.3) $ (1.2) $ 0.2 Prepaid software licenses - (1.4) 0.3 Facilities (0.7) 3.7 16.0 Capital assets - (0.1) - Capitalized software - - - Goodwill (0.1) 0.1 - Other assets - - - $ (1.1) $ 1.1 $ 16.5
INTEREST AND OTHER, NET (dollars in millions) Fiscal Year Ended January 2, % January 3, % December 28, 1999 change 1998 change 1996 Interest income $ 9.2 80% $ 5.1 70% $ 3.0 Interest expense $ 4.1 (33%) $ 6.1 91% $ 3.2 Other expense, net $ 3.4 48% $ 2.3 15% $ 2.0 Interest income is primarily generated from invested cash and cash equivalents and restricted deposits held at foreign and domestic banks. The significant increase in interest income in 1998 and 1997 is the result of investment of cash received from the Company's stock offering in August of 1997 and, in 1998, from investment of cash proceeds generated from improved collection of accounts receivable during the year. Interest expense includes costs related to foreign currency hedging loans, interim short-term borrowings and capital lease obligations and, in 1997 and 1996, convertible debentures. The decrease in interest expense in 1998 over 1997 is attributed to the decline in the use of the Company's line of credit and hedge loans during 1998. In 1997, the Company increased the use of its domestic line of credit for investments in its NUMA-Q and next- generation product lines, which resulted in an increase in interest expense. Other expense consists of discounts on the sale of accounts receivable and net realized and unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses. The increases in 1998 and 1997 are primarily from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and from increased activity in factoring the Company's accounts receivable, specifically in 1998. INCOME TAXES The Company recorded a $23.6 million benefit from income taxes in 1998 on a net loss before tax of $76.1 million. The difference between the statutory rate and the effective tax rate is principally due to a valuation allowance established for the potential expiration of certain tax attributes carried forward from prior years, offset by the benefit from the research tax credit and the Company's Foreign Sales Corporation. The 1998 effective tax rate benefit of 31.0% compares to an effective tax rate of 23.4% in 1997 and 27.2% in 1996. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Working capital was $324.7 million at January 2, 1999 compared to $404.1 million at January 3, 1998. The Company's current ratio at January 2, 1999 and January 3, 1998 was 2.4:1 and 2.5:1, respectively. Cash and cash equivalents increased $59.6 million during 1998. The Company's cash and cash equivalents were primarily impacted by the $107 million net decrease in accounts receivable. During 1998, the Company focused resources on collection efforts and credit terms, substantially decreasing the number and size of outstanding accounts. Offsetting the impact of the net decrease in accounts receivable were investing activities of $58.6 million and financing activities of $40.1 million. The Company has a $40 million receivable sales facility with a group of banks. At January 2, 1999, accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet is net of $24 million received by the Company under this agreement to sell its domestic accounts receivable. Additionally, the Company entered into two transactions to factor certain foreign receivables, without recourse, at an average rate of 6.6%. As of January 2, 1999, $10 million relating to these transactions was netted against accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The Company maintains an $80 million revolving line of credit agreement. The line is unsecured and extends through April 1, 2001. The line contains certain financial covenants and prohibits the Company from paying dividends without the lenders' consent. At January 2, 1999, there was no outstanding balance under the line of credit. The Company maintains a short-term borrowing agreement with a foreign bank to cover foreign currency exposures. Maximum borrowings allowed under the foreign bank agreement were $85.1 million, of which $28.3 million was outstanding at January 2, 1999 (based on currency exchange rates on such date). The Company also maintains a miscellaneous borrowing arrangement with a foreign bank. At January 2, 1999, $1.6 million was outstanding under this agreement. Management expects that its current available cash balances and funds generated from operations will provide adequate resources to meet the Company's anticipated operational cash requirements for at least the next twelve months. IMPACT OF THE YEAR 2000 ISSUE The Year 2000 Issue is the result of computer programs being written using two digits rather than four to define the applicable year. Any of the Company's software programs and microcircuitry that have date- sensitive features may recognize a date using "00" as the year 1900 rather than the year 2000. This could result in a system failure or miscalculations causing disruptions of operations. The Year 2000 Issue affects the Company's internal systems as well as any of the Company's products that include date-sensitive software. Sequent is executing a company-wide Year 2000 Readiness Program (Program) for the Company's products, on-going operations (operations), mission-critical information systems (IS), and key suppliers (suppliers). The Program's goal was to identify and conduct remediation of critical century date change issues by the end of 1998. Ongoing remediation, testing, and contingency planning are expected to continue throughout 1999. The Year 2000 Readiness Program is organized into six major phases: 1) exposure inventory, 2) risk assessment, 3) prioritization, 4) remediation (either by repair or replacement), 5) contingency planning, and 6) testing/verification. These stages have been largely completed for the Company's standard products and are in progress for ongoing operational issues as well as critical suppliers. The Program organization consists of a Steering Committee made up of Company executives, a Year 2000 taskforce representing each of the Company's major departments, and a Year 2000 Project Management Office. In addition, several Focus Teams have been set up to deal with cross-functional issues related to customers, partners, and suppliers. Operational program work is being done by each of the Company's departments with oversight by the Year 2000 Program Office. Operational program work includes the Company's critical business computer applications, data, and infrastructure. Mission-critical third party service and equipment suppliers are being contacted via written inquiry, as well as direct discussion, to understand and mitigate potential risks. The current status of the Company's Year 2000 Readiness Program is as follows: The Company's current line of hardware products, which are designed and manufactured to the Company's specifications, are Year 2000 ready if utilized with the appropriate version of the operating system software. The Company cannot ensure that its software products do not contain undetected problems associated with Year 2000 compliance. Such problems, should they occur, may result in material adverse effects on future operating results. Of the Company's eight Operations remediation programs, five have completed the remediation phase and three are still in process. Among the latter, remediation status ranges from 40% to 90% complete. Identified business critical exposures are expected to be resolved by the second quarter of 1999. The Company's Supplier readiness program is managed through its Strategic Sourcing group. Of those suppliers identified as business critical, all have remediation plans in place and completion is planned on or before end of the second quarter of 1999. The Company's Information Systems group is remediating both critical IS applications and IT infrastructure. Of the identified enterprise level business critical applications, over 90% have now been remediated. All IS-managed applications, regardless of business criticality, will be remediated, replaced or retired, worldwide. Remediation of the Company's worldwide IT infrastructure (networks, servers & PCs) is 90% complete. Any other IT exposures, such as workgroup level software applications, are being identified and dealt with as part of individual department Y2K programs. The total cost of the Program is currently estimated to be approximately $10 million and is being funded through operating cash flows. The Company is expensing costs associated with identification and resulting changes to these systems, but does not expect the amounts to have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations. These costs are not incremental as the Company's internal IS development resources were re-directed solely to the Year 2000 remediation effort in 1998. As of January 2, 1999, the total amount expended on the Program was approximately $6 million, with the majority of the costs representing hardware and labor expenditures. The Company has classified potential worst case scenarios as either 1) Year 2000 related failures in internal business critical information system applications or 2) the development of service or product supply difficulties by business critical suppliers. These circumstances are not considered probable, but have been reviewed as part of the Company's due diligence efforts. For Year 2000 type failures in internal applications (scenario 1), business critical applications have been identified, assessed as to possible business impact of their failure and are being repaired, upgraded or replaced based on the severity of potential impact. For each of these applications, a business continuity contingency plan is expected to be in place by the end of the first half of 1999. For service and product supplier type failures, an inventory has been completed and the business critical suppliers have been identified. A variety of risk reduction strategies have commenced, including but not limited to, developing possible alternative suppliers, acquiring safety stock and establishing enhanced testing programs and process audits. For the identified business critical suppliers, the Company expects to establish a contingency plan by mid 1999. There can be no assurance, however, that the systems or products of other companies on which the Company's systems also rely will be converted timely or that any such failure to convert by a vendor, customer or another company would not have an adverse effect on the Company's systems or results of operations. EURO CONVERSION The European Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) and a new currency, the "Euro", went into effect in Europe on January 1, 1999. This is a significant and critical element in the European Union's (EU) plan to blend the economies of the EU's member states into one integrated market, with unrestricted and unencumbered trade and commerce across borders. Eleven European countries (the "participating countries") of the fifteen member EU countries will initially participate (Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain). Other member states (Denmark, Greece, the United Kingdom and Sweden) may join in the years to come. The Euro will trade on currency exchanges and the legacy currencies will remain legal tender for a transition period between January 1, 1999 and January 1, 2002. During the transition period, public and private companies may pay for goods and services using either the Euro or the participating country's legacy currency. The Company is currently determining the necessary modifications to its internal systems to accommodate Euro-denominated transactions and is assessing the business implications of the conversion to the Euro, including long-term competitive implications and the effect of market risk with respect to financial instruments. The Company does not believe the financial impact of these matters, if any, will be material to its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. However, the Company will continue to assess the impact of Euro conversion issues as the applicable accounting, tax, legal and regulatory guidance evolves. DERIVATIVE AND OTHER FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS Risk Management Strategy In the normal course of business, Sequent enters into various financial instruments, including derivative financial instruments, for purposes other than trading. Derivative financial instruments are not entered into for speculative purposes. These instruments primarily consist of accounts receivable, short term investments, short-term debt, forward exchange contracts and option contracts which are used to reduce Sequent's exposure to currency exchange rates. At inception, foreign exchange contracts are designated as hedges of firmly committed or forecasted transactions. These transactions are generally expected to be completed in less than one year. The forward contracts and options generally mature within twelve months. The majority of Sequent's foreign exchange forward contracts are to exchange Japanese Yen, Australian Dollars and New Zealand Dollars. The option contracts are no-cost collars and exchange British Pounds. Exposure to credit risk is managed through credit approvals and monitoring procedures, and management believes that the reserves for losses are adequate. The counterparties to these financial instruments are substantial and creditworthy corporations, state agencies and multinational commercial banks. In management's opinion the risk of counterparty nonperformance associated with these instruments is not considered to be significant. Interest Rate Risk The Company routinely invests in short-term financial instruments within the parameters of its investment policy with maturities of less than three months. The instruments pay a fixed rate of return. These instruments are subject to overall market interest rate sensitivity upon maturity. As part of the Company's foreign currency hedging activities, the Company maintains short-term loans with a multinational commercial bank. These loans are for durations ranging from fifteen days to three months and carry a fixed interest rate. Upon maturity, these instruments are subject to overall market interest rate sensitivity. The Company also maintains two long-term leases with variable interest rates based on LIBOR (London Inter Bank Offer Rate). The table below illustrates the effect on lease payments of a +/-10% change in the underlying base rate: 1999 Forecast Rental Payments Base Rate $1,957K Base Rate plus 10% $2,072K Base Rate less 10% $1,748K Foreign Exchange Risk The table below presents foreign exchange contracts, options and debt at January 2, 1999 and January 3, 1998 (in thousands). The notional amounts represent agreed upon amounts on which calculations of dollars to be exchanged are based, and are an indication of the extent of Sequent's involvement in such instruments. They do not represent amounts exchanged by the parties and, therefore, are not a measure of the instruments. Contract Carrying Amount Fair Value (in thousands) Amount Asset Liability Asset Liability 1998 FX Forward Contracts $ 8,086 $ - $ - $ 8,086 $ 8,086 FX Options (net) 129,100 - - 135 123 Debt 28,244 - 28,244 - 28,244 1997 FX Forward Contracts $ 14,636 $ - $ - $ 14,781 $14,781 Debt 68,791 - 68,791 - 68,791 Fair values of financial instruments represent estimates of possible value that may not be realized in the future. EUROPEAN SALES OPERATIONS In January 1999, the Company announced that it signed a strategic partnership agreement with Comparex, one of Europe's leading suppliers of complete solutions for IT infrastructures. The partnership allows Comparex to take responsibility for Sequent's sales activities in Austria, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and Switzerland. The Company's operations in the United Kingdom and France geographies, which represent the majority of the Company's European business, are not included in the partnership agreement. The majority of the Company's personnel in the countries included under the agreement will become employees of Comparex and the remainder will stay with Sequent to manage and support the relationship with Comparex, continuing to provide specialist skills and expertise. The agreement also provides for the sale of certain assets to Comparex at recorded book value. Management anticipates that the new relationship with Comparex will positively impact both revenues and operating income in 1999 and 2000 in these geographies. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS The Chairman's Letter, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations and "Products," "Services," and "Solutions" contain information regarding the Company's expectations or goals as to: the market for the Company's products; development and release of new products; anticipated benefits from the new arrangements with IBM and Comparex; estimated costs to achieve Year 2000 compliance; growth, profitability and backlog improvements and increase in shareholder value; and expense reductions. These statements are forward- looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Factors that could adversely affect the market for the Company's products include, but are not limited to, business conditions and growth in the electronics industry and general economies, both domestic and international, and lower than expected capital expenditure levels by customers. Factors that could cause new product development to be delayed or not successful include, but are not limited to, technological difficulties encountered in product development and resource constraints. Factors that could adversely affect the anticipated benefits from the IBM relationship include, but are not limited to, the failure to develop and sell in significant quantities the products to be covered by the relationship. Anticipated benefits from the arrangement with Comparex could be adversely affected if Comparex does not sell Sequent products at the expected levels. Factors that could adversely affect the estimated costs to achieve Year 2000 compliance are set forth above under "Impact of the Year 2000 Issue." Factors that could adversely affect the Company's growth, profitability, shareholder value, backlog and expense levels include, but are not limited to, the failure to timely complete product development and release new products; lower than expected customer acceptance of NUMA-Q 1000, NUMA-Q 2000 and NUMACenter and future products; significant fluctuations in quarterly operating results; lower than expected customer orders; delays in receipt of orders or cancellation of orders; competitive factors, including increased competition, new product offerings by competitors and price pressures; the discontinuance of relationships with the Company's strategic partners; the unavailability of third party parts and supplies at reasonable prices; changes in product mix and the mix between product and service revenue; and product shipment interruptions due to manufacturing problems. The Company's forward- looking statements apply only as of the date made. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release the result of any revision to these forward-looking statements which may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (In thousands, except per share amounts) Fiscal Year Ended Jan. 2, Jan. 3, Dec. 28, 1999 1998 1996 Revenue: Product $ 509,830 $ 600,496 $ 414,418 Service 274,326 233,390 180,944 Total revenue 784,156 833,886 595,362 Costs and expenses: Cost of products sold 311,705 309,016 197,702 Cost of service revenue 198,793 171,595 139,983 Research and development 74,808 65,414 53,733 Selling, general and administrative 215,336 234,037 191,069 Restructuring charges (Note 11) 61,372 - - Total costs and expenses 862,014 780,062 582,487 Operating income (loss) (77,858) 53,824 12,875 Interest income 9,202 5,096 3,007 Interest expense (4,059) (6,086) (3,187) Other expense, net (3,356) (2,322) (2,019) Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes (76,071) 50,512 10,676 Provision for (benefit from) income taxes (23,552) 11,825 2,905 Net income (loss) $ (52,519) $ 38,687 $ 7,771 Net income (loss) per share - basic (Note 1) $ (1.21) $ 1.02 $ 0.23 Net income (loss) per share - diluted (Note 1) $ (1.21) $ 0.95 $ 0.23 The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In thousands, except per share amounts) Jan. 2, 1999 Jan. 3, 1998 ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 192,876 $ 133,299 Restricted deposits 28,280 68,791 Receivables, net 221,611 328,884 Inventories 86,333 112,228 Prepaid royalties and other 23,282 28,147 Total current assets 552,382 671,349 Property and equipment, net 133,831 134,728 Capitalized software costs, net 72,469 66,244 Other assets, net 37,433 14,356 Total assets $ 796,115 $ 886,677 LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Notes payable $ 29,908 $ 69,893 Accounts payable and other 124,099 128,157 Accrued payroll 19,070 22,843 Unearned revenue 47,446 40,946 Income taxes payable 4,865 3,134 Current obligations under capital leases 2,320 2,310 Total current liabilities 227,708 267,283 Other accrued expenses 8,073 8,700 Long-term obligations under capital leases 7,480 9,910 Total liabilities 243,261 285,893 Commitments and contingencies (Notes 5, 6, 10 and 12) Shareholders' equity: Common stock, $.01 par value, 100,000 shares authorized, 43,471 and 42,962 shares outstanding 435 430 Paid-in capital 511,169 508,858 Retained earnings 46,883 99,402 Accumulated other comprehensive income: Foreign currency translation adjustment (5,633) (7,906) Total shareholders' equity 552,854 600,784 Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $ 796,115 $ 886,677 The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (In thousands)
Foreign currency Total annual Common Stock Paid-in Retained translation comprehensive Shares Amount capital earnings adjustment Total income Balance, December 30, 1995 33,221 $ 332 $ 304,343 $ 52,945 $ (4,432) $ 353,188 $ Common shares issued 967 10 9,622 - - 9,632 Tax benefit of option exercises - - 175 - - 175 Warrants issued - - 1,176 - - 1,176 Net income - - - 7,771 - 7,771 7,771 Foreign currency translation adjustment - - - - 2,868 2,868 2,868 Rounding - - - (1) - (1) Balances, December 28, 1996 34,188 342 315,316 60,715 (1,564) 374,809 $ 10,639 Common shares issued 8,198 82 181,580 - - 181,662 Tax benefit of option exercises - - 3,021 - - 3,021 Conversion of debentures 576 6 8,941 - - 8,947 Net income - - - 38,687 - 38,687 38,687 Foreign currency translation adjustment - - - - (6,342) (6,342) (6,342) Balances, January 3, 1998 42,962 430 508,858 99,402 (7,906) 600,784 $ 32,345 Common shares issued 2,243 22 21,165 - - 21,187 Common shares repurchased (1,734) (17) (19,466) - - (19,483) Tax benefit of option exercises - - 612 - - 612 Net loss - - - (52,519) - (52,519) (52,519) Foreign currency translation adjustment - - - - 2,273 2,273 2,273 Balances, January 2, 1999 43,471 $435 $ 511,169 $ 46,883 $ (5,633) $ 552,854 $(50,246)
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In thousands)
Fiscal Year Ended Jan 2, 1999 Jan. 3, 1998 Dec. 28, 1996 Cash flow from operating activities: Net income (loss) $ (52,519) $ 38,687 $ 7,771 Reconciliation of net income (loss) to net cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities- Depreciation and amortization 88,374 83,649 65,534 Restructuring charges not affecting cash 55,950 -- -- Deferred income taxes (25,405) (535) 800 Changes in assets and liabilities- Receivables, net 107,273 (119,132) (31,430 Inventories 25,895 (37,737) (13,638) Prepaid royalties and other (11,755) 2,430 (17,113) Accounts payable and other (11,280) 40,683 31,282 Accrued payroll (5,433) (2,010) 13,130 Unearned revenue 6,500 10,159 9,321 Income taxes payable 1,731 117 (1,964) Other, net (22,339) 7,418 455 Net cash provided by operating activities 156,992 23,729 64,148 Cash flow from investing activities: Restricted deposits 40,511 (24,136) (5,013) Purchases of property and equipment, net (58,860) (58,698) (80,617) Capitalized software costs (40,217) (34,247) (34,170) Other assets, net -- -- (15,600) Net cash used for investing activities (58,566) (117,081) (135,400) Cash flow from financing activities: Notes payable, net (39,985) 9,968 18,779 Proceeds (payments) under capital lease obligations (2,410) (2,509) 14,662 Long-term debt payments -- (133) -- Stock issuance proceeds, net 21,799 184,683 10,983 Stock repurchases (19,483) -- -- Net cash (used) provided by financing activities (40,079) 192,009 44,424 Effect of exchange rate changes on cash 1,230 (3,337) 2,868 Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 59,577 95,320 (23,960) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 133,299 37,979 61,939 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 192,876 $ 133,299 $ 37,979
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Sequent Computer Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries ("Sequent" or the "Company") was incorporated in January 1983. Sequent is a leading provider of scalable, Intel-based, UNIX and Windows NT solutions for the data center. Sequent designs, manufactures and markets systems based on Cache Coherent Non-Uniform Memory Access (CC-NUMA) architecture and used primarily as application and database servers for large commercial applications. These applications include: OLTP, packaged business (financial, manufacturing and human resources) solutions, also called ERP; and CRM, a broad solution set that includes back office DSS and data warehouses supporting front-office marketing, sales and service applications. Sequent provides consulting and professional services to help large organizations identify complex information technology (IT) problems and develop solutions that combine its products with those of its hardware, software and solutions partners. The Company's customer service organization offers an industry-leading portfolio of data center support services that, when customized to customers' business and IT requirements, create total service solutions for business-critical computing. Principles of Consolidation. The Company's fiscal year is generally based on a 52-week year (53 weeks in Fiscal 1997) ending the Saturday closest to December 31. The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of Sequent Computer Systems, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and profits have been eliminated. Cash and Cash Equivalents. The Company considers short-term investments which are highly liquid, readily convertible into cash and have original maturities of less than three months to be cash equivalents. Revenue Recognition and Receivables. Revenue from product sales is generally recognized upon shipment; however, depending upon contract terms, revenue recognition may be deferred until customer acceptance or clarification of funding. Revenue is recognized as earned on the straight-line basis over the term of customer service/maintenance contracts, and on either the percentage-of-completion or milestone achievement basis for professional service contracts. Receivables are shown net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3.9 million at January 2, 1999 and $3.1 million at January 3, 1998. The Company has an agreement with a group of banks to sell, without recourse, undivided ownership interests in a revolving pool consisting of substantially all of the Company's domestic accounts receivable for a maximum of $40 million. The agreement expires April 1, 2001. At January 2, 1999 and January 3, 1998, accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets is net of $24 million and $20 million, respectively, received by the Company under this agreement. Additionally, the Company entered into two transactions to factor certain foreign receivables, without recourse, at an average rate of 6.6%. As of January 2, 1999, $10 million relating to these transactions was netted against accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The Company had no single customer that represented greater than 10% of total revenue in 1998 or 1996. Approximately 19% of the Company's revenue in 1997 was from one customer. International sales represented approximately 53% of the Company's total revenue in 1998, 46% in 1997 and 55% in 1996. Inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Costs are determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method and include material, labor and manufacturing overhead. Prepaid Licenses and Royalties. The Company has entered into agreements with various vendors who provide for prepayment for future licenses and/or royalties related to sales of certain software. Prepaid amounts are realized upon receipt of reverse royalties from the vendors generated from software sales by the Company. Included in prepaid licenses and other assets as of January 3, 1998 were prepaid licenses acquired from a single vendor totaling $25.3 million. As of January 2, 1999, the majority of these licenses have been written off as part of the Company's 1998 restructuring. Property and Equipment. Property and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated over their estimated useful lives, ranging from three to five years, on the straight-line method. Leasehold improvements and equipment held under capital leases are amortized on the straight-line basis over the shorter of the asset life or lease term. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Research and Development. Software development costs for certain projects are capitalized from the time technological feasibility is established to the time the resulting software product is first shipped. Capitalized software costs are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value and are shown net of accumulated amortization of $66.8 million at January 2, 1999 and $66 million at January 3, 1998. Amortization, generally based on a three-year straight-line basis, was $31.4 million in 1998, $27.6 million in 1997 and $20 million in 1996. All other research and development costs are expensed as incurred. In 1998 and 1996, the Company removed from its balance sheet capitalized software costs which had an original cost of $26 million and $40 million, respectively, and were fully amortized. In addition, the Company wrote off capitalized software with a net book value of approximately $2.5 million as part of the restructuring in the second quarter of 1998. This did not affect the realizable value of the Company's remaining software products. Additionally, the Company maintains strategic relationships with industry-leading manufacturers of components, systems and software. In 1998 and 1997, the Company did not enter into any material joint development agreements with vendors that involve ownership interests to be retained in developed technology, nor has it entered into any agreements that involve revenue sharing arrangements or any funding responsibilities. Amounts related to joint development relationships included in the Company's research and development costs and expenses for 1998 were insignificant. Income Taxes. The Company's general practice is to reinvest the earnings of its foreign subsidiaries in those operations, unless it would be advantageous to the Company to repatriate the foreign subsidiaries' retained earnings. Foreign Currency Translation. The financial statements and transactions of the Company's foreign subsidiaries are maintained in their functional currencies and translated into U.S. dollars for purposes of consolidation. Translation adjustments are accumulated as a separate component of shareholders' equity. Gains and losses resulting from transactions denominated in a currency other than an entity's functional currency are included in other net expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Net losses aggregating $1.2 million, $1.6 million and $0.8 million for 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively, were realized from such transactions. Hedging of Foreign Currency Transactions. A substantial portion of the Company's business is conducted overseas through its foreign subsidiaries, primarily in Europe. This exposes the Company to risks associated with foreign currency rate fluctuations which can impact the Company's revenue and net income. To mitigate this risk the Company enters into foreign currency transactions with foreign and domestic banks on a continuing basis in amounts and timing consistent with the underlying currency exposure so that gains and losses on these transactions offset gains and losses on the underlying exposure. The Company does not engage in any speculative trading activity. See related discussion in Note 4. In addition to the arrangements described in Note 4, at January 2, 1999, the Company also has forward contracts denominated in Japanese Yen, Australian Dollars and New Zealand Dollars with a contract amount of approximately $2.2 million, $4.1 million and $1.9 million, respectively. These forward contracts are used to hedge certain intercompany payables. Gains and losses on such contracts have not been significant to date. The Company also has range forward option contracts denominated in British Pounds with a contract amount of approximately $129.1 million. These option contracts are used to hedge the cost of goods sold for the Company's United Kingdom operations. There have been no gains or losses on these contracts to date. Per Share Information. Basic earnings per share is calculated based on income available to common shareholders and the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reported period. Diluted earnings per share includes additional dilution from the effect of potential common stock issuances, such as stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options and warrants outstanding and the conversion of debt. The following table is a reconciliation of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations: (in thousands, except per share amounts)
Income (Loss) Shares Per-Share (Numerator) (Denominator) Amount Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal 1998 1997 1996 1998 1997 1996 1998 1997 1996 Basic EPS Income (loss) available to common shareholders $(52,519) $ 38,687 $ 7,771 43,561 37,899 33,641 $(1.21) $1.02 $0.23 Effect of Dilutive Securities Stock options 2,653 723 Employee stock purchase plan 156 55 Debentures, if dilutive 116 144 Diluted EPS Income (loss) available to common shareholders + assumed conversions $(52,519) $ 38,803 $ 7,771 43,561 40,852 34,419 $(1.21) $0.95 $0.23
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Total cash expenditures for income taxes were $5.2 million, $3.7 million and $5.9 million during 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. Interest paid does not differ materially from interest expense. Non-cash investing and financing activities include the following: 1997 - $9.1 million ($8.9 million, net of related expenses) of Convertible Debentures were converted into 576,000 shares of common stock. Management Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Significant estimates and judgments made by management of the Company include matters such as collectibility of accounts receivable, realizability of inventory and recoverability of capitalized software, prepaid royalties and deferred tax assets. Reclassifications. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to fiscal 1998 presentation. These changes had no impact on previously reported results of operations or shareholders' equity. New Accounting Pronouncements. During the first quarter of the year ended January 2, 1999, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income (FAS 130) as issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). Comprehensive income is defined by FAS 130 as the changes in equity of a business enterprise during a period that result from transactions and other economic events and circumstances from non-shareholder sources. It includes all changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investments by shareholders. Consequently, the Company has reported its Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment, as required by FAS 130, as comprehensive income in the appropriate consolidated financial statements presented herein. In March 1998, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use (SOP 98-1). This Statement provides authoritative guidance on when internal-use software costs should be capitalized and when these costs should be expensed as incurred. The Company adopted SOP 98-1 in 1998. During the year ended January 2, 1999, the Company capitalized $9.9 million of such costs in accordance with this guidance. In 1998, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information (FAS 131). This Statement supersedes FAS 14, Financial Reporting for Segments of a Business Enterprise, replacing the "industry segment" approach with the "management" approach. The management approach designates the internal organization that is used by management for making operating decisions and assessing performance as the source for the Company's reportable segments. This Statement also requires disclosures about products and services, geographic areas and major customers. The adoption of FAS 131 did not affect results of operations or financial position but did affect the disclosure of segment information (see Footnote 9 on "Segment Reporting"). In June 1998, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (FAS 133). This Statement establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives), and for hedging activities. It requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in current earnings or other comprehensive income, depending on whether a derivative is designated as part of a hedge transaction and, if it is, the type of hedge transaction. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 1999 (January 1, 2000 for the Company). The Company is currently assessing the impact that the adoption of FAS 133 will have on its consolidated financial statements. 2. INVENTORIES (in thousands) January 2, January 3, 1999 1998 Raw materials $ 14,996 $ 16,375 Work-in-progress 1,403 3,155 Finished goods 69,934 92,698 $ 86,333 $ 112,228 Finished goods inventory includes evaluation systems aggregating $25.8 million and $53.7 million as of January 2, 1999 and January 3, 1998, respectively. Such systems are located at potential customer sites for demonstration. 3. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT (in thousands) January 2, January 3, 1999 1998 Land $ 6,307 $ 5,037 Operational equipment 230,449 209,372 Furniture and office equipment 86,069 89,569 Leasehold improvements 27,498 22,889 350,323 326,867 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (216,492) (192,139) $ 133,831 $ 134,728 Depreciation and amortization of intangibles charged to expense totaled $56.9 million in 1998, $55.2 million in 1997 and $44.9 million in 1996. 4. NOTES PAYABLE The Company has an unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks which provides short-term borrowings up to $80 million. The line of credit agreement contains financial covenants, including covenants relating to net worth, ratio of liabilities to net worth and limitations on net operating losses, and prohibits the Company from paying dividends without the group of banks' consent. Individual borrowings on the credit line have maturities of three months or less. The line of credit agreement extends through April 1, 2001. There were no borrowings outstanding under the line of credit at January 2, 1999 or January 3, 1998. The Company has a short-term borrowing agreement with a foreign bank as a hedge to cover certain foreign currency exposures. Borrowings under the agreement are denominated in various foreign currencies with terms of fourteen days to three months. Proceeds from the borrowings are converted into U.S. dollars and placed in a term deposit account with the foreign bank. The deposits, which are classified as restricted deposits in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, are pledged to the foreign bank so long as borrowings under the agreement are outstanding. During July 1998, the Company re-negotiated the agreement to renew automatically on an annual basis, unless specifically cancelled. The foreign bank, without cause, can terminate the agreement at any time. At January 2, 1999, maximum borrowings allowed under the agreement were $85.1 million. Amounts outstanding were $28.3 million and $68.8 million at January 2, 1999 and January 3, 1998, respectively. The maximum borrowing limit is denominated in specified foreign currencies and fluctuates with the change in foreign exchange rates. The average interest rate on these borrowings at January 2, 1999 was 4.7%. In addition to the above borrowing agreements, the Company has entered into certain other miscellaneous borrowing arrangements with a foreign bank. Amounts outstanding were $1.6 million and $1.1 million at January 2, 1999 and January 3, 1998, respectively. The interest rate on these borrowings was 1.725% at January 2, 1999. 5. OBLIGATIONS UNDER CAPITAL LEASES The Company leases certain equipment under five-year capital leases. These lease terms require maintenance of certain financial ratios and generally include a fair market value purchase option at the end of the lease. These leased assets are pledged as security for capital lease obligations. In addition, the Company entered into a sales-leaseback transaction in September 1996 under which certain operating equipment with a net book value of $12.2 million was sold for $15.3 million and then leased back under a capital lease. The related lease terms stipulate monthly payments ranging from $274,000 to $341,000 over the five-year lease term beginning September 1996 at an annual interest rate of 7.4%. The resulting gain of $3.1 million has been recorded under "Other Accrued Expenses" and is being amortized in proportion to the related equipment depreciation over three years. The terms of the lease include an asset buy-back provision at the end of the lease for the then fair market value of the assets at the Company's option. Future minimum lease payments are as follows: (in thousands) 1999 $ 4,029 2000 4,107 2001 2,702 2002 -- 2003 -- Total minimum lease payments 10,838 Less amount representing interest (1,038) Present value of minimum lease payments $ 9,800 6. OPERATING LEASE COMMITMENTS The Company entered into two operating lease transactions during fiscal years 1997 and 1998 for certain buildings on the Beaverton campus. These two lease transactions involve a newly constructed facility to be completed and occupied during 1999 as well as three buildings previously occupied by the Company under operating leases. According to the terms of the agreements, the buildings were purchased by a third party from the previous lessor and then leased back to the Company. Both leases give the Company the option to extend the lease terms for one-year periods or purchase the buildings at the end of the lease term at fair market value. In addition, both leases provide Sequent the option to terminate the lease in order to purchase the buildings at any time. The first operating lease transaction was entered into on September 4, 1997 under a five-year agreement ending August 1, 2002 for the construction, sale and lease of a new building. Interest on the construction of the building is capitalized into the financing instrument throughout construction until completion. The lease payments commence upon completion and occupation of the building, currently estimated at August, 1999. The cost of the property to be financed is estimated to be $17.5 million. Lease payments are due monthly at a rate of 25 basis points above LIBOR. Future payments included in the table below are calculated through August 1, 2002 with an assumed weighted average interest rate of 6% for 1999 and 6.5% for 2000 through 2002, resulting in monthly payments ranging from $87,500 to $96,250. Actual operating lease payments are variable based on LIBOR and will fluctuate with actual market rates. On April 5, 1998, the Company entered into a second operating lease transaction to lease three currently occupied buildings based on a total cost of $25 million with lease terms extending through April 1, 2003. The resulting operating lease payments are payable monthly at interest rates ranging from 25 to 200 basis points above LIBOR. At January 2, 1999, the effective rates ranged from 5.80% to 7.55%. Total operating lease expenses for the year ended January 2, 1999 were $1.1 million. Future payments included in the table below are calculated through April 1, 2003 with an assumed weighted average interest rate of 6% for 1999 and 6.5% for 2000 through 2003. The resulting monthly payments range from $102,239 to $135,850 over the lease term. Future operating lease payments are variable based on LIBOR and will fluctuate with actual market rates. Future minimum lease payments under operating leases which include office space, equipment and manufacturing facilities are as follows: (in thousands) 1999 $ 20,686 2000 17,231 2001 13,547 2002 9,050 2003 and thereafter 13,554 $ 74,068 Total rent expense for operating leases was $20.0 million, $19.1 million and $17.4 million in 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. 7. INCOME TAXES The Company recorded a $23.6 million benefit for income taxes in 1998 on a net loss before tax of $76.1 million. The difference between the statutory rate and the effective tax rate is principally due to a valuation allowance for the potential expiration of certain tax attributes carried forward from prior years offset by the benefit from the research tax credit and the Company's Foreign Sales Corporation. The 1998 effective tax rate benefit of 31.0% compares to effective tax rate expense of 23.4% in 1997 and 27.2% in 1996. Pre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations for the last three fiscal years was taxed under the following jurisdictions: (in thousands) Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal 1998 1997 1996 Domestic ($88,822) $39,603 $5,593 Foreign 12,751 10,909 5,083 Total ($76,071) $50,512 $10,676 The provision (benefit) for income taxes was as follows: Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal 1998 1997 1996 Current: Federal ($3,899) $6,808 $ 789 Foreign 5,602 4,441 3,109 State 150 449 164 1,853 11,698 4,062 Deferred: Federal (25,582) 317 (900) Foreign 177 (211) (257) State -- 21 -- (25,405) 127 (1,157) Total provision (benefit) ($23,552) $11,825 $2,905 Deferred tax liabilities (assets) are recorded within Accounts Payable and Other and Other Assets, respectively in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. They are comprised of the following components: (in thousands) Fiscal Fiscal 1998 1997 Capitalized software $ 29,145 $ 25,119 Other 1,649 2,217 Gross deferred tax liabilities 30,794 27,336 Net operating loss carryforwards: Domestic (47,646) (18,921) Foreign (4,522) (4,897) Credit carryforwards (22,433) (18,626) Expenses not currently deductible (7,346) (6,741) Depreciation (2,442) (1,779) Revenue currently taxable (2,008) (2,008) Inventory basis differences (4,750) (2,499) Restructuring costs (9,982) -- Gross deferred tax assets (101,129) (55,471) Deferred tax asset valuation allowance 43,921 27,126 Net deferred tax asset ($ 26,414) ($ 1,009) The provision for income taxes differs from the amount of income taxes determined by applying the U.S. statutory federal tax rate to income (loss) from continuing operations due to the following: Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal 1998 1997 1996 Statutory federal tax rate (35.0)% 35.0% 35.0% State taxes, net of federal benefit (4.2) 4.2 4.2 Tax provision (benefit) from Foreign Sales Corporation (2.2) (4.8) (6.8) R&D Credit (4.3) (4.6) - Tax provision on foreign earnings 1.7 0.3 (0.9) Realized benefit from net operating losses - (2.2) (1.3) Deferred tax asset valuation allowance 10.2 - - Other, net 2.8 (4.5) (3.0) (31.0)% 23.4% 27.2% The deferred tax asset valuation allowance in fiscal years 1996 - 1998 is attributed to U.S. federal, state and foreign deferred tax assets. Management believes sufficient uncertainty exists with regard to the realizability of such assets that a valuation allowance of $43.9 million has been provided at January 2, 1999. When and if these reserved deferred tax assets are ultimately realized, $22.6 million will reduce the Company's federal and state tax provision and $21.3 million will be credited to paid-in capital (related to stock option deductions). In accordance with FAS 109, the valuation allowance is allocated pro-rata to federal, state, and foreign current and non-current deferred tax assets. The Company has net operating losses carried forward both domestically and in certain foreign jurisdictions. The domestic net operating losses expire from 2006 to 2018. Certain foreign net operating losses expire in 2002 through 2004 while others have no expiration date. The Company has accumulated unused research and experimentation credits of $11.2 million for income tax purposes. These credits expire from 1999-2013. The Company also has Alternative Minimum Tax Credits (AMT) which may be carried forward indefinitely and certain state tax credits which expire from 1999-2003. The Company may realize tax benefits as a result of the exercise of certain employee stock options. For financial reporting purposes, any reduction in income tax obligations as a result of these tax benefits is credited to paid-in capital. During 1998, 1997 and 1996, $612,000, $3.0 million and $175,000 of benefits were credited to paid-in capital, respectively, with a related reduction in current taxes payable. An income tax provision has not been recorded for U.S. or additional foreign taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries as the undistributed earnings have been and will continue to be reinvested in operations outside the United States. 8. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Common Stock. During 1998, the Company announced a plan to repurchase up to 4,000,000 shares of its outstanding common stock. As of January 2, 1999, 1,733,500 shares were actually repurchased. In 1997, the Company sold approximately 5.7 million shares of common stock in an equity offering. Net proceeds to the Company, after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses, were approximately $148.5 million. Also in 1997, $9.1 million ($8.9 million, net of related expenses) of Convertible Debentures was converted into 576,000 shares of common stock. Stock Compensation Plans. At January 2, 1999, the Company had the following stock-based compensation plans: Stock Option Plans At January 2, 1999, the Company had options outstanding to employees and non-employees under the following Stock Option Plans: 1984 Employee Stock Option Plan and 1984 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (the "1984 Plans"), the 1987 Employee Stock Option Plan and 1987 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (the "1987 Plans"), the 1989 Stock Incentive Plan (the "1989 Plan"), the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, the 1996 Stock Option Plan and the 1997 Stock Option Plan. Options granted after May 18, 1995 were made under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan and the 1996 and 1997 Stock Option Plans. As of January 2, 1999, the Company has reserved a total of 19,830,606 shares of common stock for issuance under these plans, of which 10,440,336 shares were outstanding at January 2, 1999. Employee options vest over varying time periods, generally ranging from one to four years, as long as, in the case of employees, the optionee remains employed by Sequent. Option prices generally have been at 85% or greater of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Options generally expire ten years from the date of the grant. Employee Stock Purchase Plan In September 1987, Sequent established an Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Under the plan, Sequent is authorized to grant rights to purchase up to 8,700,000 shares of common stock in a series of eighteen-month offerings. At January 2, 1999, there were 1,825,698 shares available for future purchase. Substantially all employees are eligible to receive rights under the plan. The purchase price is the lesser of 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of commencement of the offering or on the date of purchase. During 1998, 1997 and 1996, Sequent issued 1,870,876, 1,127,428 and 682,864 shares under the plan, respectively. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123. During 1995, the FASB issued FAS 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, which defines a fair value based method of accounting for an employee stock option or similar equity instrument and encourages all entities to adopt that method of accounting for all of their employee stock compensation plans. However, it also allows an entity to continue to measure compensation cost related to stock options issued to employees under these plans using the method of accounting prescribed by the Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB 25), Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Entities electing to remain with the accounting in APB 25 must make pro forma disclosures of net income and earnings per share, as if the fair value based method of accounting defined in this Statement has been applied. The Company has elected to continue to account for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in APB 25 and related Interpretations. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized in the consolidated statements of operations for its stock- based compensation plans other than for performance-based awards. Had compensation cost for the other stock-based compensation plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under these plans consistent with the method of FAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, the Company's net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below: (in thousands, except per share amounts) Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal 1998 1997 1996 Net income (loss): As reported $ (52,519) $ 38,687 $ 7,771 Pro forma (71,000) 28,981 (709) Net income (loss) per share - basic: As reported $ (1.21) $ 1.02 $ 0.23 Pro forma (1.63) 0.76 (0.02) Net income (loss) per share - diluted: As reported $ (1.21) $ 0.95 $ 0.23 Pro forma (1.63) 0.73 (0.02) The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted- average assumptions used for grants in 1998, 1997 and 1996: Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal 1998 1997 1996 Risk-free interest rate 4.84% 6.15% 6.05% Expected dividend yield -- -- -- Expected lives 3 years 3 years 3 years Expected volatility 81% 56% 50% The fair value of the employees' purchase rights was estimated using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions for 1998, 1997 and 1996: Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal 1998 1997 1996 Risk-free interest rate 5.08% 5.74% 5.58% Expected dividend yield -- -- -- Expected lives 1 year 1 year 1 year Expected volatility 81% 56% 50% The weighted-average per share fair value of those purchase rights granted in 1998, 1997 and 1996 was $11.33, $15.20 and $13.15, respectively. A summary of the status of the Company's stock option plans as of January 2, 1999, January 3, 1998 and December 28, 1996, and changes during the years ending on those dates is presented below: (in thousands, except per share amounts)
Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal 1998 1997 1996 Weighted-Average Weighted-Average Weighted-Average Shares per share Shares per share Shares per share under option Exercise Price under option Exercise Price under option Exercise Price Outstanding at beginning of year 8,276 $14.77 6,909 $12.27 5,068 $14.26 Granted: Price = Fair Value 2,562 13.02 2,812 18.39 3,353 12.60 Price < Fair Value 802 12.51 829 18.14 1,196 11.12 Price > Fair Value 2,604 13.00 -- -- -- -- Exercised (274) 11.21 (1,209) 12.01 (196) 8.53 Forfeited (3,530) 16.82 (1,065) 13.83 (2,512) 16.55 Outstanding at end of year 10,440 13.12 8,276 14.77 6,909 12.27 Options exercisable at year-end 3,721 2,370 1,446 Weighted-average per share fair value of options granted during the year $4.82 $ 8.35 $ 3.69
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at January 2, 1999:
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE Weighted- Number Weighted-Average Weighted-Average Number Average Range of Outstanding Remaining per share Exercisable per share Exercise Prices at 1/2/99 Contractual Life Exercise Price at 1/2/99 Exercise Price $0 - $ 9.00 1,507,229 8.6 years $ 8.68 197,882 $ 8.73 $9.09 - $11.25 1,631,244 7.4 years 10.44 953,892 10.62 $11.26 - $12.31 938,168 5.1 years 11.99 536,625 12.11 $12.33 - $13.00 2,652,942 8.3 years 12.98 133,853 12.68 $13.07 - $14.88 1,623,345 6.0 years 13.99 1,066,432 13.98 $14.93 - $21.38 2,020,170 8.1 years 18.33 817,759 18.84 $21.41 - $24.81 67,238 7.4 years 21.88 14,700 22.42 $0.00 - $24.81 10,440,336 7.5 years $ 13.12 3,721,143 $ 13.62
9. SEGMENT REPORTING In 1998, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information (FAS 131). This Statement supersedes FAS 14, Financial Reporting for Segments of a Business Enterprise, replacing the "industry segment" approach with the "management" approach. The management approach designates the internal organization that is used by management for making operating decisions and assessing performance as the source for the Company's reportable segments. The Company has determined that its reportable segments are those that are based on the Company's primary basis of organization and method of internal reporting - (1) Product, (2) Customer Services (CS), (3) Professional Services (PS) and (4) Research and Development (R&D). The Company is organized primarily on the basis of products and services. Its product segment offers large scalable computer systems, which are marketed to organizations spanning diverse industries. Customer Services offers customers a wide range of support services, including system, environmental, business protection and management. The Company's Professional Services segment offers services designed to support the customer through every phase of a project, from planning and architecture to technology deployment and ongoing consulting and support. Research and Development has been considered a reportable segment because its activities are an integral component of the Company's business and its operations are material to consolidated financial results. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies." The Company's management evaluates the performance of its segments and allocates resources to them based on revenue and margin. There are no intersegment revenues. Asset information by reportable segment is not reported, since the Company does not produce such information internally. Capitalized software amortization is not included in research and development expenses as it is included in cost of products sold which is used for evaluating the Company's product segment margin. The tables below present information about reported segments for the three years ended January 2, 1999, January 3, 1998 and December 28, 1996 and include a reconciliation of segment activity to consolidated net income before the provision for income taxes. Fiscal year ended January 2, 1999:
Product PS CS R&D Consolidated Revenue $ 509,830 $ 97,422 $ 176,904 $ 784,156 Cost of products sold 311,705 311,705 Cost of service revenue 92,065 106,728 198,793 Gross margin 198,125 5,357 70,176 273,658 R&D expenses 74,808 74,808 Selling, general & administrative 215,336 Restructuring charges 61,372 Operating loss (77,858) Interest income 9,202 Interest expense (4,059) Other expense, net (3,356) Loss before benefit from income taxes $ (76,071)
Fiscal year ended January 3, 1998:
Product PS CS R&D Consolidated Revenue $ 600,496 $ 75,695 $ 157,695 $ 833,886 Cost of products sold 309,016 309,016 Cost of service revenue 77,246 94,349 171,595 Gross margin 291,480 (1,551) 63,346 353,275 R&D expenses 65,414 65,414 Selling, general & administrative 234,037 Operating income 53,824 Interest income 5,096 Interest expense (6,086) Other expense, net (2,322) Income before provision for income taxes $ 50,512
Fiscal year ended December 28, 1996:
Product PS CS R&D Consolidated Revenue $ 414,418 $ 56,488 $ 124,456 $ 595,362 Cost of products sold 197,702 197,702 Cost of service revenue 62,824 77,159 139,983 Gross margin 216,716 (6,336) 47,297 257,677 R&D expenses 53,733 53,733 Selling, general & administrative 191,069 Operating income 12,875 Interest income 3,007 Interest expense (3,187) Other expense, net (2,019) Income before provision for $ 10,676 income taxes
Information concerning principal geographic areas is as follows: Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal 1998 1997 1996 Revenue from external customers: United States $ 372,627 $ 449,355 $ 270,571 United Kingdom 300,851 268,832 205,481 Other foreign 94,725 93,656 98,358 Export 15,953 22,043 20,952 Total $ 784,156 $ 833,886 $ 595,362 Identifiable assets: United States $ 594,715 $ 682,470 $ 440,145 United Kingdom 123,346 144,019 100,476 Other foreign 78,054 60,188 63,006 Total $ 796,115 $ 886,677 $ 603,627 Revenues are attributed to geographic areas based on the location of the identifiable assets producing the revenues. Foreign revenue is that which is produced by identifiable assets located in foreign countries while export revenue is that which is generated by identifiable assets located in the United States. Intercompany sales between geographic areas, primarily from the United States to Europe, were $157.5 million during 1998, $195.5 million during 1997 and $155.7 million during 1996. 10. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of the fair value of certain financial instruments. Cash and cash equivalents, restricted deposits, receivables, notes payable, accounts payable and other, and current obligations under capital leases are reflected in the consolidated financial statements at book value, which approximates fair value, because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. The fair value of long-term obligations under capital leases was estimated by discounting the future cash flows using market interest rates and does not differ significantly from the amount reflected in the consolidated financial statements. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information about the financial instrument. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates. 11. RESTRUCTURING During the second quarter of 1998, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $62.9 million in connection with management's decision to accelerate changes in its business model to leverage the strength of its technology roadmap and market position. The restructuring charge was reduced during the third and fourth quarters by estimate revisions totalling $1.5 million. The majority of these revisions were adjustments to prepaid software licenses and facilities. As part of the restructuring process, which was substantially completed during the second quarter of 1998, the Company reorganized its operations to revise the focus of its business strategy and broaden its line of Intel-based servers. As part of the restructuring efforts, the Company expanded its product offerings, including its new Xeon-based NUMA product and also NUMACenter, both of which were formally introduced into the marketplace in the latter part of 1998. The restructuring charges of $62.9 million included employee termination and other related costs ($7.2 million); facilities and office space costs ($13.7 million); write-offs of non-strategic assets, principally prepaid software licenses ($27.2 million), capital assets ($7.9 million), capitalized software ($2.5 million), goodwill ($2.5 million), and other assets, principally prepaid expenses ($1.9 million). The employee termination costs resulted from the elimination of 265 positions worldwide. The employee groups impacted by the eliminations encompassed all functions within the Company. All termination costs pertaining to the eliminated positions are included as restructuring costs in the accompanying Statements of Operations. Approximately 74% of the employee termination costs accrued during the second quarter of 1998 were paid as of January 2, 1999. Approximately 24% of the accrued costs were written off by the Company during 1998 and the remainder will be paid in 1999. Facilities costs represent expenses associated with excess office space and related fixed costs for the Company's headquarter and field office locations. The amount written off was determined using an analysis of individual specific lease terms, estimated sub-lease income to be realized and office headcount for unutilized facilities. The majority of capital asset write-offs represent retirements of hardware and software no longer being used for customer demonstrations and showcases due to the strategic product shift associated with the restructure. The method of determining fair value of costs written off was the net book value recorded at the time of the restructuring. The following table presents a summary of the restructuring charges recorded during 1998 and the resulting net balance sheet amounts recorded as of January 2, 1999. The balance of accrued restructuring costs of $16.5 million at January 2, 1999 is included in Accounts Payable and Other in the accompanying balance sheet.
(dollars in millions) Second Third Restructuring Quarter Write-offs/ Balance at Quarter Write-offs/ Balance at Costs Expenditures Adjustments July 4, 1998 Expenditures Adjustments October 3, 1998 Employee termination and related costs $ 7.2 $ (2.5) $ (0.3) $ 4.4 $ (2.5) $ (0.2) $ 1.7 Prepaid software licenses 27.2 - (24.9) 2.3 - (0.6) 1.7 Facilities 13.7 (0.1) - 13.6 (0.7) 0.1 13.0 Capital assets 7.9 - (7.9) - - 0.1 0.1 Capitalized software 2.5 - (2.5) - - - - Goodwill 2.5 - (2.5) - - - - Other assets 1.9 - (1.9) - - - - $ 62.9 $ (2.6) $ (40.0) $ 20.3 $ (3.2) $ (0.6) $ 16.5
Fourth Quarter Write-offs/ Balance at Expenditures Adjustments January 2, 1999 Employee termination and related costs $ (0.3) $ (1.2) $ 0.2 Prepaid software licenses - (1.4) 0.3 Facilities (0.7) 3.7 16.0 Capital assets - (0.1) - Capitalized software - - - Goodwill (0.1) 0.1 - Other assets - - - $ (1.1) $ 1.1 $ 16.5
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES On January 11, 1999, the Company announced that it selected EDS to be its North American information technology (IT) provider. Under the terms of the agreement, EDS will manage all IT infrastructure and operations support for Sequent's North American facilities, serving more than 1,800 users. The Company has also appointed EDS to manage a full spectrum of IT customer support services, including data center, applications, network and desktop infrastructure management. The majority of Sequent's IT employees will become employees of EDS. Under the 10-year agreement, which is effective January 1, 1999, Sequent is committed to purchase services from EDS for approximately $13 million per year. Management anticipates that with the services provided by EDS, its IT operations will be optimized and will result in reductions in future operating expenses. Lawsuits arise during the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, none of the pending lawsuits will result in a significant impact on the consolidated results of operations or financial position. REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Sequent Computer Systems, Inc. In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, of shareholders' equity and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Sequent Computer Systems, Inc. and its subsidiaries at January 2, 1999 and January 3, 1998, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 2, 1999, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for the opinion expressed above. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP Portland, Oregon January 28, 1999 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (unaudited) (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Basic Diluted Total Gross Net Earnings (Loss) Earnings (Loss Revenue Profit Income (Loss) Per Share Per Share Fiscal 1998 First quarter $ 183,068 $ 72,826 $ 4,022 $ 0.09 $ 0.09 Second quarter 185,677 54,977 (58,752) (1.34) (1.34) Third quarter 201,398 67,882 38 0.00 0.00 Fourth quarter 214,013 77,973 2,173 0.05 0.05 Year $ 784,156 $ 273,658 $(52,519) $(1.21)* $(1.21)* Fiscal 1997 First quarter $ 157,374 $ 68,120 $ 708 $ 0.02 $ 0.02 Second quarter 210,653 89,865 8,597 0.25 0.23 Third quarter 207,320 87,026 10,298 0.26 0.24 Fourth quarter 258,539 108,264 19,084 0.45 0.42 Year $ 833,886 $ 353,275 $ 38,687 $ 1.02* $ 0.95* Fiscal 1996 First quarter $ 120,745 $ 51,481 $ 598 $ 0.02 $ 0.02 Second quarter 142,587 61,203 3,306 0.10 0.10 Third quarter 148,785 66,132 1,355 0.04 0.04 Fourth quarter 183,245 78,861 2,512 0.07 0.07 Year $ 595,362 $ 257,677 $ 7,771 $ 0.23 $ 0.23
* The sum of quarterly earnings per share does not equal annual earnings per share as a result of the computation of quarterly versus annual average shares outstanding. MARKET INFORMATION (unaudited) Sequent's Common Stock has been traded on the NASDAQ National Market System since April 1987 under the symbol SQNT. The following table sets forth, for the fiscal quarters indicated, the high and low sales prices for the common stock as reported on the NASDAQ National Market System. High Low 1998: First quarter $ 22.00 $ 16.00 Second quarter $ 19.81 $ 11.88 Third quarter $ 12.19 $ 6.44 Fourth quarter $ 12.88 $ 5.75 1997: First quarter $ 20.00 $ 14.50 Second quarter $ 21.63 $ 14.38 Third quarter $ 30.63 $ 20.88 Fourth quarter $ 26.88 $ 19.50 1996: First quarter $ 14.88 $ 10.31 Second quarter $ 14.88 $ 11.88 Third quarter $ 13.88 $ 10.88 Fourth quarter $ 18.25 $ 12.50 At January 2, 1999, there were approximately 861 shareholders of record of the Company's common stock and 43.5 million shares outstanding. The Company has never paid cash dividends on its common stock. The Company intends to retain earnings for use in its business and, therefore, does not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, the Company's bank line of credit agreement prohibits payment of dividends without the lenders' consent. EXHIBIT 21 SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. - SUBSIDIARIES ENTERPRISE FINANCE COMPANY (Oregon) SEQUENT EXPORT, INC. (Barbados) DP APPLICATIONS, INC. (Oregon) CANADA: SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS (CANADA) LIMITED EUROPE: SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS LIMITED (United Kingdom) SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS A.B. (Sweden) SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS GmbH (Germany) SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, S.A. (France) SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, B.V. (Netherlands) SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, spol. s r.o. (Czech Republic) OPEN TOOL INTERNATIONAL, B.V. (Netherlands) SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS S. r. I. (Italy) SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS CJSC (Russia) JAPAN: SEQUENT COMPUTERS JAPAN CO., LTD ASIA: SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS (N.Z.) LIMITED (New Zealand) SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS AUSTRALIA PTY. LIMITED SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS ASIA LIMITED (Hong Kong) SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS (SINGAPORE) PTE. LIMITED SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS KOREA LIMITED EXHIBIT 23 Consent of Independent Accountants We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-16428, 33-16463, 33-33338, 33-36836, 33-39315, 33-39657, 33-40941, 33-40942, 33-63972, 33-63974, 33-59147, 33-59611, 333-53571 and 333-53573) of Sequent Computer Systems, Inc. of our report dated January 28, 1999 appearing in the Annual Report to Shareholders which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP Portland, Oregon March 12, 1999
EX-10 2 EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE THIS EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE is made as of March 26, 1998 between PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation and EQUITY FC, LTD., an Iowa corporation (collectively, "Lessor"), and SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation ("Lessee"). RECITALS A. Lessor and Lessee are parties to that certain Lease Agreement dated May 8, 1987 (the "Lease Agreement") and the following documents (the "Amendments"), which amend such Lease Agreement (the Lease Agreement and all such Amendments are herein collectively referred to as the "Lease"): 1. First Amendment dated December 29, 1987; 2. Second Amendment dated July 28, 1988; 3. Third Amendment dated July 28, 1989; 4. Fourth Amendment dated September 20, 1991; 5. Fifth Amendment dated December 2, 1992; 6. Sixth Amendment dated April 5, 1993; and 7. Seventh Amendment dated September 30, 1997 B. Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment have the meanings set forth in the Lease. C. Lessor and Lessee desire to amend the Lease as set forth herein. AGREEMENT 1. LEASE REVISIONS. 1.1 Closing Costs and Title Insurance. The following is added after the last sentence of Section 6.4.3 of the Lease and is hereby made a part of Section 6.4.3: "If available from Escrow Agent and if requested by Lessor, Escrow Agent shall issue to Lessor at its expense a "simultaneous issue" seller's policy of title insurance." 1.2 Conveyance. The following shall be added after the last sentence of Section 6.4.4 of the Lease and is hereby made a part of Section 6.4.4: "At Lessee's request, Lessor shall convey title to the Property to an institutional lender or trustee providing synthetic lease financing or other institutional financing to Lessee in connection with its acquisition of the Property; provided, however, use of such designee will not affect (or operate as a release of) Lessee's obligations or liability under the Lease, including the Option to Purchase provisions of the Lease." 1.3 Lease Termination. The following is added as a new Section 6.4.7 to the Lease: "6.4.7 Termination of Lease. This Lease shall automatically terminate effective upon the Closing of the sale of the Property from Lessor to Lessee pursuant to this Section 6; provided, however, the Survival Provisions of Section 51 shall apply in connection with any such termination. If requested by Lessee, Lessor shall enter into a lease termination agreement with Lessee to evidence the agreement of the parties in this Section 6.4.7, and Lessee shall have the right to record such lease termination agreement in the records of Washington County, Oregon at any time following the recording of the statutory special warranty deed referenced in Section 6.4.4." 1.4 Skybridge. Lessor and Lessee acknowledge that Lessee has exercised its option to purchase the Section Building (as defined in Section 47.3.4 of the Lease) which includes the skybridge connecting the Premises to the improvements which are the subject of the Second Lease. And that upon closing of such purchase Lessor shall not be responsible for any obligations of Lessor under the Lease with respect to such skybridge that accrue after the closing of such purchase. In connection with the closing of such purchase, Lessor, Lessee and, if applicable, Lessee's designee shall enter into a skybridge easement agreement with respect to such skybridge in form and content mutually agreeable to Lessor and Lessee. 1.5 Traffic Signal. The following is added as a new Section 52 to the Lease: "52 Traffic Signal. Lessor and Lessee agree that the cost to install a traffic signal (the "Signal") at the intersection of Koll Parkway, Walker Road and SW 150th Avenue shall be treated as a Special Common Area Assessment pursuant to the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions dated March 12, 1986, as amended by First Amendment thereto dated October 28, 1996 and Section Amendment thereto dated March 13, 1998 (collectively, the "Declaration"), which Declaration encumbers the Property and other property. Once the Signal has been installed and is operational (the "Signal Completion Date"), Lessor shall furnish to Lessee a statement in commercially reasonable detail showing the portion of the cost to install such Signal (the "Signal Cost") that is allocated to the Property as a Special Common Area Assessment pursuant to the Declaration and, upon request from Lessee, shall furnish copies of invoices received and paid by Lessor in connection with the installation of the Signal. Lessee agrees to reimburse Lessor for the portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property, provided, however, that, except as provided herein, Lessee shall not be required to pay such cost in a lump sum, but rather such cost, together with a financing charge of ten percent (10%) per annum, shall be amortized over an estimated useful life of ten (10) years and Lessee shall reimburse Lessor for such cost by paying Lessor in equal monthly installments beginning on the first day of the second calendar month following the Signal Completion Date (or on the first day of the next calendar month if the Signal Completion Date is the first day of a calendar month) and on the first day of each month thereafter during the remaining term of this Lease that portion of such cost attributable to the month preceding such payment based on such amortization plan. If the Signal Completion Date is a day other than the first day of a calendar month, then on the first day of the calendar month following the Signal Completion Date, Lessee shall pay to Lessor interest at the rate provided herein from the Signal Completion Date through the last day of the month in which the Signal Completion Date occurs. In the alternative, Lessee shall have the right to prepay all or any portion of the outstanding balance of such cost at any time without any prepayment charge. If Lessee purchases the Property pursuant to the Option to Purchase in this Lease and the Signal has been installed and is operational, upon the closing of such purchase Lessee shall pay to Lessor the outstanding balance of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property. If Lessee does not purchase the Property pursuant to the Option to Purchase in this Lease and this Lease expires or otherwise terminates, the (i) Lessee shall pay to Lessor within ten (10) days of such expiration or termination that portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property that is attributable to the period commencing with the first day of the month in which this Lease expires or otherwise terminates, and (ii) Lessee's obligation to reimburse Lessor for the remaining balance of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property shall cease upon such expiration or termination of this Lease, provided, however, that if this Lease terminates due to the default of Lessee, Lessor may recover from Lessee the unpaid portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property, if any, in addition to other amounts allowed under Section 20.2 of this Lease. Nothing herein shall be deemed an agreement by Lessee that the cost of any other traffic signal(s) installed near the Property in the future should be passed through to Lessee under this Lease." 1.6 Monument Sign. Notwithstanding that the monument sign used by Lessee in connection with its use of the Premises is located within an area designated as common area under the Declaration, during the term of this Lease the expense of maintaining the sign shall not be treated as a common area expense, but rather shall be the responsibility of Lessee. Upon termination of this Lease, the expense of maintaining the sign shall be treated as a common area expense under the Declaration unless the sign is used exclusively by the owner of the Premises or any new tenant of such owner, in which case such expense shall be the responsibility of such owner or such tenant. 2. STATUS OF LEASE. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Lease remains in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and affirmed. 3. COUNTERPARTS. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously or in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Amendment. 4. FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION. Facsimile transmission of any signed original document, and retransmission of any signed facsimile transmission, shall be the same as delivery of an original. At the request of either party, the parties shall confirm facsimile trasmitted signatures by signing an original document. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Eighth Amendment to Lease has been executed as of the date set forth above. LESSOR: PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation By: /s/ MICHAEL S. DUFFY Name: MICHAEL S. DUFFY Title: VICE PRESIDENT By: /s/ GREGORY C. HAUSER Name: GREGORY C. HAUSER Title: VICE PRESIDENT EQUITY FC, LTD., an Iowa corporation By: /s/ L.S. VALENTINE Name: L.S. VALENTINE Title: COUNSEL By: /s/ RONALD B. FRANKLIN Name: RONALD B. FRANKLIN Title: VICE PRESIDENT LESSEE: SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation By: /s/ ROBERT B. WITT Name: ROBERT B. WITT Title: VICE PRESIDENT & CIO EX-10.1 3 SIXTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE THIS SIXTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE is made as of March 26, 1998 between PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation, and EQUITY FC, LTD., an Iowa corporation, (collectively, "Lessor"), and SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC, an Oregon corporation ("Lessee"). RECITALS A. Lessor and Lessee are parties to that certain Lease Agreement dated May 8, 1987 (the "Lease Agreement") and the following documents (the "Amendments"), which amend such Lease Agreement (the Lease Agreement and all such Amendments are herein collectively referred to as the "Lease"): 1. Letter dated January 12, 1988; 2. Addendum to Triple Net Lease of 1987 (an undated copy of which is attached as Exhibit A) (referred to in past lease amendments as an amended memorandum of lease); 3. First Amendment dated July 28, 1988; 4. Second Amendment dated September 13, 1991; 5. Third Amendment dated December 2, 1992; 6. Fourth Amendment dated April 5, 1993; and 7. Fifth Amendment dated September 30, 1997. B. Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment have the meanings set forth in the Lease. C. Lessor and Lessee desire to amend the Lease as set forth herein. AGREEMENT 1. Lease Revisions 1.1 Delays in Closing. Section 6.4.2 of the Lease is hereby deleted and the following is inserted in its place: "6.4.2 Delays in Closing. The Closing shall occur on April1, 1998. Lessee shall have no right to close the purchase of the Property absent simultaneously closing the purchase of (I) the land and improvements covered by the third building lease between Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company and Petula Associates, Ltd., together as lessor, and Lessee, as lessee, dated July 28, 1998, as amended by amendments dated July 28, 1989, September 13, 1991, December 2, 1992, April 5, 1993, September 30, 1997 and of even date with this Amendment (collectively, the "Third Lease") and (ii) the land and improvements covered by the fourth building lease between Lessor and Lessee dated July 28, 1989, as amended by amendments dated September 13, 1991, August 13, 1992, December 2, 1992, April 5, 1993, September 30, 1997 and of even date with this Amendment (collectively, the "Fourth Lease"). Any failure by Lessee to close the purchase of the land and improvements covered by the Third Lease and Fourth Lease on April 1, 1998 shall be deemed a rescission of the exercise of the Option to Purchase the Property pursuant to Section 6." "In the event the Closing does not occur on April 1, 1998, then (I) Lessor shall continue to lease to Lessee and Lessee shall continue to lease from Lessor the Premises at the rental and upon all of the terms and conditions set forth in this Lease until the Closing occurs as provided herein or until the expiration or termination of this Lease, whichever occurs first, and (ii) if the Closing does not occur on April 1, 1998 for any reason attributable to Lessee, Lessee shall have an additional fifteen (15-) day period during which Lessee shall exert best efforts to close the purchase of the Property. If the closing does not occur within such fifteen- (15-) day period for any reason attributable to Lessee, the Option to Purchase shall terminate, Lessor shall not have any obligation to convey the Property to Lessee and Lessor shall have all remedies available to Lessor under Section 6.9 of the Lease. If the delay in Closing is attributable to Lessor or to a third party not in relationship with Lessee, then the fifteen- (15-) day period shall be extended, on the same terms until a Closing can be accomplished and Lessee shall have all remedies available to it under this Lease." 1.2 Closing Costs and Title Insurance. The following is added after the last sentence of Section 6.4.3 of the Lease and is hereby made a part of Section 6.4.3: "If available from Escrow Agent and if requested by Lessor, Escrow Agent shall issue to Lessor at its expense a 'simultaneous issue' seller's policy of title insurance. 1.3 Conveyance. Section 6.4.4 of the Lease is hereby deleted and the following is inserted in its place: "The Property and the skybridge (described in Section 47.3.4) shall be conveyed by Lessor to Lessee by Statutory Special Warranty Deed, subject to the Permitted Exceptions. The trust deeds in favor of Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company listed as exceptions 50, 51 and 52 in the 6th Supplemental Preliminary Title Report dated March 18, 1998, Title Number W186736H issued by Transnation Title Insurance Company shall not be Permitted Exceptions as to the conveyance of the Property or the skybridge but shall be permitted exceptions as to the appurtenant rights acquired by Lessee under a separate skybridge easement agreement to be entered into between Lessor, Lessee and, if applicable, Lessee's designee. The conveyance shall allow Lessee and its successors to continue to enjoy rights and obligations with respect to the common areas (as set forth in the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions then encumbering the Property) after the Closing, equivalent to those prevailing before the Closing, provided Lessee and its successors pay all common area assessments and abide by all Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions in force from time to time with respect to such common areas. At Lessee's request, Lessor shall convey title to the Property to an institutional lender or trustee providing synthetic lease financing or other institutional financing to Lessee in connection with its acquisition of the Property; provided, however, use of such designee will not affect (or operate as a release of) Lessee's obligations or liability under the Lease, including the Option to Purchase provisions of the Lease." 1.4 Lease Termination. The following is added as a new Section 6.4.7 to the Lease: "6.4.7 Termination of Lease. This Lease shall automatically terminate effective upon the Closing of the sale of the Property from Lessor to Lessee pursuant to this Section 6; provided, however, the Survival Provision of Section 50 shall apply in connection with any such termination. If requested by Lessee, Lessor shall enter into a lease termination agreement with Lessee to evidence the agreement of the parties in this Section 6.4.7, an Lessee shall have the right to record such lease termination agreement in the records of Washington County, Oregon at any time following the recording of the statutory special warranty deed referenced in Section 6.4.4." 1.5 Traffic Signal. The following is added as a new Section 51 to the Lease: "51 Traffic Signal. Lessor and Lessee agree that the cost to install a traffic signal (the "Signal") at the intersection of Koll Parkway, Walker Road and SW 150th Avenue shall be treated as a Special Common Area Assessment pursuant to the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions dated March 12, 1986, as amended by First Amendment thereto dated October 28, 1996 and Second Amendment thereto dated March 13, 1998 (collectively, the "Declaration"), which Declaration encumbers the Property and other property. Once the Signal has been installed and is operational (the "Signal Completion Date"), Lessor shall furnish to Lessee a statement in commercially reasonable detail showing the portion of the cost to install such Signal (the "Signal Cost") that is allocated to the Property as a Special Common Area Assessment pursuant to the Declaration, and, upon request from Lessee, shall furnish copies of invoices received and paid by Lessor in connection with the installation of the Signal. Lessee agrees to reimburse Lessor for the portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property, provided, however, that, except as provided herein, Lessee shall not be required to pay such cost in a lump sum, but rather such cost, together with a financing charge of ten percent (10%) per annum, shall be amortized over an estimated useful life of ten (10) years and Lessee shall reimburse Lessor for such cost by paying Lessor in equal monthly installments beginning on the first day of the second calendar month following the Signal Completion Date (or on the first day of the next calendar month if the Signal Completion Date is the first day of a calendar month) and on the first day of each month thereafter during the remaining term of this Lease that portion of such cost attributable to the month preceding such payment based on such amortization plan. If the Signal Completion Date is a day other than the first day of a calendar month, then on the first day of the calendar month following the Signal Completion Date, Lessee shall pay to Lessor interest at the rate provided herein from the Signal Completion Date through the last day of the month in which the Signal Completion Date occurs. In the alternative, Lessee shall have the right to prepay all or any portion of the outstanding balance of such cost at any time without any prepayment charge. If Lessee purchases the Property pursuant to the Option to Purchase in this Lease and the Signal has been installed and is operational, upon the Closing of such purchase Lessee shall pay to Lessor the outstanding balance of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property. If Lessee does not purchase the Property pursuant to the Option to Purchase in this Lease and this Lease expires or otherwise terminates, then (I) Lessee shall pay to Lessor within ten (10) days of such expiration or termination that portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property that is attributable to the period commencing with the first day of the month in which this Lease expires or otherwise terminates through the date the Lease expires or otherwise terminates, and (ii) Lessee's obligation to reimburse Lessor for the remaining balance of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property shall cease upon such expiration or termination of this Lease with respect to any portion of the Signal Cost that is attributable to any period from and after the expiration or termination of this Lease, provided, however, that if this Lease terminates due to the default of Lessee, Lessor may recover from Lessee the unpaid portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property, if any, in addition to other amounts allowed under Section 20.2 of this Lease. Nothing herein shall be deemed an agreement by Lessee that the cost of any other traffic signal()s) installed near the Property in the future should be passed through to Lessee under this Lease." 1.6 The following is added at the end of Section 6.8.1.2 of the Lease and is made a part of such Section: "No rescission notice given by Lessee to Lessor pursuant to this Section 6.8.1.2 will be valid unless Lessee simultaneously gives to Lessor a rescission notice to rescind its exercise of the Option to Purchase under the Third Lease and the Fourth Lease." 1.7 The last sentence of Section 6.9 of the Lease is hereby deleted and the following is inserted in its place: "In such event, Lessor shall accept the payment of costs under Section 6.8.2 above as liquidated damages and as its sole remedy for such a failure of Lessee to Close, and Lessor shall continue to lease to Lessee and Lessee shall continue to lease from Lessor the Premises for the term, at the rental, and upon all of the terms and conditions set forth in this Lease, except that the Option to Purchase in Section 6 shall terminate and Lessor shall not have any obligation to convey the Property to Lessee." 1.8 Lessor and Lessee agree that all amounts referenced in the Addendum to Triple Net Lease attached as Exhibit A have been paid in full. 2. STATUS OF LEASE. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Lease remains in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and affirmed. 3. COUNTERPARTS. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously or in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Amendment. 4. FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION. Facsimile transmission of and signed original document, and retransmission of any signed facsimile transmission, shall be the same as delivery of an original. At the request of either party, the parties shall confirm facsimile transmitted signatures by signing an original document. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Sixth Amendment to Lease has been executed as of the date set forth above. LESSOR: PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation By: /s/ Michael S. Duffy Name: Michael S. Duffy Title: Vice President By: /s/ Gregory C. Hauser Name: Gregory C. Hauser Title: Vice President EQUITY FC, LTD., an Iowa corporation By: /s/ L. S. Valentine Name: L. S Valentine Title: Counsel By: /s/ Ronald B. Franklin Name: Ronald B. Franklin Title: Vice President LESSEE: SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., An Oregon corporation By: /s/ Robert B. Witt Name: Robert B. Witt Title: Vice President & CIO EXHIBIT A ADDENDUM TO TRIPLE NET LEASE THIS ADDENDUM is made and entered into this ___ day of __________________, 1987 by and between KOLL WOODSIDE ASSOCIATES, a California general partnership, and PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation, tenants-in-common, doing business as KC WOODSIDE, a joint venture (herein collectively "LESSOR"), and SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation (herein "LESSEE"). RECITALS A. This Addendum relates to that certain Triple Net Lease dated May 8, 1987 by and between Lessor and Lessee (herein the "Lease"). The capitalized, defined terms used in the Lease shall have the same meanings when used herein. B. The parties desire to add the following material to the Lease and to amend the Lease as follows. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, and good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Adjustment to Basic Rent. The parties acknowledge that the Cost of reusable Tenant Improvements has now exceeded $1,722,072.00, being the total amount of the reusable Tenant Improvements allowance described in Sections 3.6.1 and 3.6.2 of the Lease. The parties have agreed, pursuant to Section 3.6.2 of the Lease, that the first $156,552.00 of the excess Cost of reusable Tenant Improvements over the basic reusable Tenant Improvements allowance of $1,565,520.00 is payable from LESSEE to LESSOR by means of adjustment to the Basic Rent for Period 1 set forth in Section 4.1 of the Lease, such adjustment being contemplated by Section 3.6.3 of the Lease. The total adjustment is $1,565.52 per month, meaning that the Basic Rent for Period 1 shall be increased from $47,356.98 to $48,922.50. 2. Cash Payments. The parties further agree that the Cost of reusable Tenant Improvements over and above the Cost reflected in the increase of Basic Rent for Period 1 as set forth in Section 1 above, together with the cost of non-reusable Tenant Improvement, is the sum of $177,482.88. Pursuant to the terms of the Lease, such excess amount is payable, in cash, by LESSEE to LESSOR. The parties agree that such amount shall be paid in two equal installments of $88,741.44 each, the first such installment to be due and payable on October 30, 1987, and the second such installment to be due and payable on November 30, 1987. 3. Status of Lease. Except as expressly supplemented and amended hereby, the Lease remains in full force and effect and the same is hereby ratified and confirmed. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, LESSOR and LESSEE have executed this Addendum as of the day and year first above written. LESSOR: LESSEE: KOLL WOODSIDE ASSOCIATES, SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. a California general partnership a Delaware corporation By: The Koll Company, a By: California Corporation, Its: a general partner of Koll Woodside Associates By: Its: Division President PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation By: Its: By: Its: As Tenants-in-Common doing business as KC WOODSIDE, a joint venture EX-10.2 4 SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE THIS SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE is made as of April 2, 1998 between PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation and EQUITY FC, LTD., an Iowa corporation (collectively, "Lessor"), and SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation ("Lessee"). RECITALS A. Lessor and Lessee are parties to that certain Lease Agreement dated May 8, 1987 (the "Lease Agreement") and the following documents (the "Amendments"), which amend such Lease Agreement (the Lease Agreement and all such Amendments are herein collectively referred to as the "Lease"): 1. Letter dated January 12, 1988; 2. Addendum to Triple Net Lease of 1987 (an undated copy of which is attached as Exhibit A to the Sixth Amendment referenced below) (referred to in the Fifth Amendment referenced below as an amended memorandum of lease); 3. First Amendment dated July 28, 1988; 4. Second Amendment dated September 13, 1991; 5. Third Amendment dated December 2, 1992; 6. Fourth Amendment dated April 5, 1993; 7. Fifth Amendment dated September 30, 1997; and 8. Sixth Amendment dated March 26, 1998. B. Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment have the meanings set forth in the Lease. C. Lessor and Lessee desire to amend the Lease as set forth herein. AGREEMENT 1. LEASE REVISIONS. 1.1 Section 1.8 of the Sixth Amendment to Lease provides that Lessor and Lessee agree that all amounts referenced in the Addendum to Triple Net Lease (the "Addendum") attached as Exhibit A to the Sixth Amendment have been paid in full. Lessor and Lessee now wish to acknowledge that as of the date of this Amendment they have been unable to determine whether one of the installments referenced in the Addendum in the amount of $88,741.44 was paid. Lessor and Lessee reserve all rights and defenses they may have with respect to the payment of such amount. Nothing in this Amendment shall be construed as an acknowledgment by Lessee that any amounts remain due and owing or construed as extending the statute of limitations with respect to such payment. 2. STATUS OF LEASE. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Lease remains in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and affirmed. 3. COUNTERPARTS. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously or in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Amendment. 4. FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION. Facsimile transmission of any signed original document, and retransmission of any signed facsimile transmission, shall be the same as delivery of an original. At the request of either party, the parties shall confirm facsimile transmitted signatures by signing an original document. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Eighth Amendment to Lease has been executed as of the date set forth above. LESSOR: PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation By: /s/ MICHAEL S. DUFFY Name: MICHAEL S. DUFFY Title: VICE PRESIDENT By: /s/ GREGORY C. HAUSER Name: GREGORY C. HAUSER Title: VICE PRESIDENT EQUITY FC, LTD., an Iowa corporation By: /s/ L.S. VALENTINE Name: L.S. VALENTINE Title: COUNSEL By: /s/ RONALD B. FRANKLIN Name: RONALD B. FRANKLIN Title: VICE PRESIDENT LESSEE: SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation By: /s/ DANIEL C. WOO Name: DANIEL C. WOO Title: TREASURER EX-10.3 5 SIXTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE THIS SIXTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE is made as of March 26, 1998 between PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Iowa corporation, and PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation, and EQUITY FC, LTD., an Iowa corporation, (collectively, "Lessor"), and SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation ("Lessee"). RECITALS A. Lessor and Lessee are parties to that certain Lease Agreement dated July 28, 1988 (the "Lease Agreement") and the following documents (the "Amendments"), which amend such Lease Agreement (the Lease Agreement and all such Amendments are herein collectively referred to as the "Lease"): 1. First Amendment dated July 28, 1989; 2. Second Amendment dated September 13, 1991; 3. Third Amendment dated December 2, 1992; 4. Fourth Amendment dated April 5, 1993; and 5. Fifth Amendment dated September 30, 1997. B. Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment have the meanings set forth in the Lease. C. Lessor and Lessee desire to amend the Lease as set forth herein. AGREEMENT 1. Lease Revisions 1.1 Delays in Closing. Section 6.4.2 of the Lease is hereby deleted and the following is inserted in its place: "6.4.2 Delays in Closing. The Closing shall occur on April1, 1998. Lessee shall have no right to close the purchase of the Property absent simultaneously closing the purchase of (I) the land and improvements covered by the second building lease between Petula Associates, Ltd. and Koll Woodside Associates, tenants-in-common, doing business as KC Woodside ("Woodside"), as lessor, and Lessee, as lessee, dated May 8, 1987, as amended by letter dated January 12, 1988, Addendum of 1987 (undated) and amendments dated July 28, 1988, September 13, 1991, December 2, 1992, April 5, 1993, September 30, 1997 and of even date with this Amendment (collectively, the "Second Lease") and (ii) the land and improvements covered by the fourth building lease between Woodside, as lessor, and Lessee dated July 28, 1989, as amended by amendments dated September 13, 1991, August 13, 1992, December 2, 1992, April 5, 1993, September 30, 1997 and of even date with this Amendment (collectively, the "Fourth Lease"). Any failure by Lessee to close the purchase of the land and improvements covered by the second Lease and Fourth Lease on April 1, 1998 shall be deemed a rescission of the exercise of the Option to Purchase the Property pursuant to Section 6." "In the event the Closing does not occur on April 1, 1998, then (I) Lessor shall continue to lease to Lessee and Lessee shall continue to lease from Lessor the Premises at the rental and upon all of the terms and conditions set forth in this Lease until the Closing occurs as provided herein or until the expiration or termination of this Lease, whichever occurs first, and (ii) if the Closing does not occur on April 1, 1998 for any reason attributable to Lessee, Lessee shall have an additional fifteen (15-) day period during which Lessee shall exert best efforts to close the purchase of the Property. If the closing does not occur within such fifteen- (15-) day period for any reason attributable to Lessee, the Option to Purchase shall terminate, Lessor shall not have any obligation to convey the Property to Lessee and Lessor shall have all remedies available to Lessor under Section 6.9 of the Lease. If the delay in Closing is attributable to Lessor or to a third party not in relationship with Lessee, then the fifteen- (15-) day period shall be extended, on the same terms until a Closing can be accomplished and Lessee shall have all remedies available to it under this Lease." 1.2 Closing Costs and Title Insurance. The following is added after the last sentence of Section 6.4.3 of the Lease and is hereby made a part of Section 6.4.3: "If available from Escrow Agent and if requested by Lessor, Escrow Agent shall issue to Lessor at its expense a 'simultaneous issue' seller's policy of title insurance. 1.3 Conveyance. The following shall be added after the last sentence of Section 6.4.4 of the Lease and is hereby made a part of Section 6.4.4: "At Lessee's request, Lessor shall convey title to the Property to an institutional lender or trustee providing synthetic lease financing or other institutional financing to Lessee in connection with its acquisition of the Property; provided, however, use of such designee will not affect (or operate as a release of) Lessee's obligations or liability under the Lease, including the Option to Purchase provisions of the Lease." 1.4 Lease Termination. The following is added as a new Section 6.4.7 to the Lease: "6.4.7 Termination of Lease. This Lease shall automatically terminate effective upon the Closing of the sale of the Property from Lessor to Lessee pursuant to this Section 6; provided, however, the Survival Provision of Section 50 shall apply in connection with any such termination. If requested by Lessee, Lessor shall enter into a lease termination agreement with Lessee to evidence the agreement of the parties in this Section 6.4.7, and Lessee shall have the right to record such lease termination agreement in the records of Washington County, Oregon at any time following the recording of the statutory special warranty deed referenced in Section 6.4.4." 1.5 Traffic Signal. The following is added as a new Section 51 to the Lease: "51 Traffic Signal. Lessor and Lessee agree that the cost to install a traffic signal (the "Signal") at the intersection of Koll Parkway, Walker Road and SW 150th Avenue shall be treated as a Special Common Area Assessment pursuant to the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions dated March 12, 1986, as amended by First Amendment thereto dated October 28, 1996 and Second Amendment thereto dated March 13, 1998 (collectively, the "Declaration"), which Declaration encumbers the Property and other property. Once the Signal has been installed and is operational (the "Signal Completion Date"), Lessor shall furnish to Lessee a statement in commercially reasonable detail showing the portion of the cost to install such Signal (the "Signal Cost") that is allocated to the Property as a Special Common Area Assessment pursuant to the Declaration, and, upon request from Lessee, shall furnish copies of invoices received and paid by Lessor in connection with the installation of the Signal. Lessee agrees to reimburse Lessor for the portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property, provided, however, that, except as provided herein, Lessee shall not be required to pay such cost in a lump sum, but rather such cost, together with a financing charge of ten percent (10%) per annum, shall be amortized over an estimated useful life of ten (10) years and Lessee shall reimburse Lessor for such cost by paying Lessor in equal monthly installments beginning on the first day of the second calendar month following the Signal Completion Date (or on the first day of the next calendar month if the Signal Completion Date is the first day of a calendar month) and on the first day of each month thereafter during the remaining term of this Lease that portion of such cost attributable to the month preceding such payment based on such amortization plan. If the Signal Completion Date is a day other than the first day of a calendar month, then on the first day of the calendar month following the Signal Completion Date, Lessee shall pay to Lessor interest at the rate provided herein from the Signal Completion Date through the last day of the month in which the Signal Completion Date occurs. In the alternative, Lessee shall have the right to prepay all or any portion of the outstanding balance of such cost at any time without any prepayment charge. If Lessee purchases the Property pursuant to the Option to Purchase in this Lease and the Signal has been installed and is operational, upon the Closing of such purchase Lessee shall pay to Lessor the outstanding balance of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property. If Lessee does not purchase the Property pursuant to the Option to Purchase in this Lease and this Lease expires or otherwise terminates, then (I) Lessee shall pay to Lessor within ten (10) days of such expiration or termination that portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property that is attributable to the period commencing with the first day of the month in which this Lease expires or otherwise terminates through the date the Lease expires or otherwise terminates, and (ii) Lessee's obligation to reimburse Lessor for the remaining balance of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property shall cease upon such expiration or termination of this Lease with respect to any portion of the Signal Cost that is attributable to any period from and after the expiration or termination of this Lease, provided, however, that if this Lease terminates due to the default of Lessee, Lessor may recover from Lessee the unpaid portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property, if any, in addition to other amounts allowed under Section 20.2 of this Lease. Nothing herein shall be deemed an agreement by Lessee that the cost of any other traffic signal(s) installed near the Property in the future should be passed through to Lessee under this Lease." 1.6 The following is added at the end of Section 6.8.1.2 of the Lease and is made a part of such Section: "No rescission notice given by Lessee to Lessor pursuant to this Section 6.8.1.2 will be valid unless Lessee simultaneously gives to Lessor a rescission notice to rescind its exercise of the Option to Purchase under the Third Lease and the Fourth Lease." 1.7 The last sentence of Section 6.9 of the Lease is hereby deleted and the following is inserted in its place: "In such event, Lessor shall accept the payment of costs under Section 6.8.2 above as liquidated damages and as its sole remedy for such a failure of Lessee to Close, and Lessor shall continue to lease to Lessee and Lessee shall continue to lease from Lessor the Premises for the term, at the rental, and upon all of the terms and conditions set forth in this Lease, except that the Option to Purchase in Section 6 shall terminate and Lessor shall not have any obligation to convey the Property to Lessee." 2. STATUS OF LEASE. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Lease remains in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and affirmed. 3. COUNTERPARTS. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously or in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Amendment. 4. FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION. Facsimile transmission of and signed original document, and retransmission of any signed facsimile transmission, shall be the same as delivery of an original. At the request of either party, the parties shall confirm facsimile transmitted signatures by signing an original document. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Sixth Amendment to Lease has been executed as of the date set forth above. LESSOR: PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Iowa corporation By: /s/ Donna Lutcavish Name: Donna Lutcavish Title: Assistant Director, Commercial Real Estate By: /s/ Ken Dubas Name: Ken Dubas Title: Director, Commercial Real Estate PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation By: /s/ Michael S. Duffy Name: Michael S. Duffy Title: Vice President By: /s/ Gregory S. Hauser Name: Gregory S. Hauser Title: Vice President LESSEE: SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., An Oregon corporation By: /s/ Robert B. Witt Name: Robert B. Witt Title: Vice President & CIO EX-10.4 6 SIXTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE THIS SIXTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE is made as of March 26, 1998 between PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation and EQUITY FC, LTD., an Iowa corporation (collectively, "Lessor"), and SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation ("Lessee"). RECITALS A. Lessor and Lessee are parties to that certain Lease Agreement dated May 8, 1987 (the "Lease Agreement") and the following documents (the "Amendments"), which amend such Lease Agreement (the Lease Agreement and all such Amendments are herein collectively referred to as the "Lease"): 1. First Amendment dated September 13, 1991; 2. Second Amendment dated August 13, 1992; 3. Third Amendment dated December 2, 1992; 4. Fourth Amendment dated April 5, 1993; and 5. Fifth Amendment dated September 30, 1997. B. Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment have the meanings set forth in the Lease. C. Lessor and Lessee desire to amend the Lease as set forth herein. AGREEMENT 1. LEASE REVISIONS. 1.1 Exercise Notice. Section 6.2.1 of the Lease is hereby deleted and the following is inserted in its place: "6.2.1 Lessee must give written notice (herein the "Notice") of the exercise of the Option to Purchase, which Notice shall be delivered to Lessor no earlier than February 1, 1998 and no later than April 1, 1998, and any attempted exercise of the Option to Purchase at any other time shall be null, void and of no legal effect; and" 1.2 Defined Term Change. All references in Section 6.3.2 and 6.4.2 of the Lease to the "Expiration Date of the Initial Term" or the "Expiration Date" are hereby changed to references to April 1, 1998. 1.3 Title. Section 6.4.1 of the Lease is hereby deleted and the following is inserted in its place: "6.4.1 Title. The closing of the purchase and sale of the Property (herein the "Closing") shall take place in escrow at a title company selected by Lessor (herein the "Escrow Agent"). The date that the Statutory Special Warranty Deed referenced in Section 6.4.4 is recorded and the Escrow Agent is in a position to disburse all funds to Lessor is herein referred to as the "Date of Closing" or the "Closing Date." Lessor has furnished to Lessee and Lessee has reviewed that 6th Supplemental Preliminary Title Report dated March 18, 1998, Title Number W186736H, issued by Transnation Title Insurance Company (the "Title Report") which Title Report describes the condition of title to the Property and other property. Lessor and Lessee agree that the following exceptions in the Title Report are herein referred to as "Permitted Exceptions:" 7 and 8 (provided the reference to each exception in the Statutory Special Warranty Deed described in Section 6.4.4 and the Owner's Policy of Title Insurance described in Section 6.4.3 states that all assessments have been paid in full as of Closing), 54, 55, 56, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 66 and 67. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein set forth, the following are and shall be deemed to be Permitted Exceptions: reservations in Federal patents; Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions; beneficial easements; easements that serve real property in the general vicinity of the Property and that do not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of the Premises; and, if the purchase price is the Set Option Price, all local improvement district assessments levied against the Property or any portion thereof. Lessor agrees not to place any mortgage or trust deed upon the Property to secure payment of a sum in excess of the Set Option Price unless the same contains a covenant that the Property will be released or reconveyed upon payment to the holder thereof of an amount equal to or less than the Set Option Price." 1.4 Delays in Closing. Section 6.4.2 of the Lease is hereby deleted and the following is inserted in its place: "6.4.2 Delays in Closing. The Closing shall occur on April 1, 1998. Lessee shall have no right to close the purchase of the Property absent simultaneously closing the purchase of (i) the land and improvements covered by the second building lease between Lessor and Lessee dated May 8, 1987, as amended by letter dated January 12, 1988, Addendum of 1987 (undated) and amendments dated July 28, 1988, September 13, 1991, December 2, 1992, April 5, 1993, September 30, 1997 and of even date with this Amendment (collectively, the "Second Lease") and (ii) the land and improvements covered by the third building lease between Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company and Petula Associates, Ltd., together as lessor, and Lessee, as lessee, dated July 28, 1988, as amended by amendments dated July 28, 1989, September 13, 1991, December 2, 1992, April 5, 1993, September 30, 1997 and of even date with this Amendment (collectively, the "Third Lease"). Any failure by Lessee to close the purchase of the land and improvements covered by the Second Lease and Third Lease on April 1, 1998 shall be deemed a rescission of the exercise of the Option to Purchase the Property pursuant to Section 6. "In the event the Closing does not occur on April 1, 1998, then (i) Lessor shall continue to lease to Lessee and Lessee shall continue to lease from Lessor the Premises at the rental and upon all of the terms and conditions set forth in this Lease until the Closing occurs as provided herein or until the expiration or termination of this Lease, whichever occurs first, and (ii) if the Closing does not occur on April 1, 1998 for any reason attributable to Lessee, Lessee shall have an additional fifteen- (15-) day period during which Lessee shall exert best efforts to close the purchase of the Property. If the Closing does not occur within such fifteen- (15-) day period for any reason attributable to Lessee, the Option to Purchase shall terminate, Lessor shall not have any obligation to convey the Property to Lessee and Lessor shall have all remedies available to Lessor under Section 6.9 of the Lease. If the delay in Closing is attributable to Lessor or to a third party not in relationship with Lessee, then the fifteen- (15-) day period shall be extended, on the same terms until a Closing can be accomplished and Lessee shall have all remedies available to it under this Lease." 1.5 Closing Costs and Title Insurance. The following is added after the last sentence of Section 6.4.3 of the Lease and is hereby made a part of Section 6.4.3: "If available from Escrow Agent and if requested by Lessor, Escrow Agent shall issue to Lessor at its expense a 'simultaneous issue' seller's policy of title insurance." 1.6 Conveyance. The following shall be added after the last sentence of Section 6.4.4 of the Lease and is hereby made a part of Section 6.4.4: "At Lessee's request, Lessor shall convey title to the Property to an institutional lender or trustee providing synthetic lease financing or other institutional financing to Lessee in connection with its acquisition of the Property; provided, however, use of such designee will not affect (or operate as a release of) Lessee's obligations or liability under the Lease, including the Option to Purchase provisions of the Lease." 1.7 Lease Termination. The following is added as a new Section 6.4.7 to the Lease: "6.4.7 Termination of Lease. This Lease shall automatically terminate effective upon the Closing of the sale of the Property from Lessor to Lessee pursuant to this Section 6; provided, however, the Survival Provisions of Section 50 shall apply in connection with any such termination. If requested by Lessee, Lessor shall enter into a lease termination agreement with Lessee to evidence the agreement of the parties in this Section 6.4.7, and Lessee shall have the right to record such lease termination agreement in the records of Washington County, Oregon at any time following the recording of the statutory special warranty deed referenced in Section 6.4.4." 1.8 Committee Approval. The following is added as new Section 6.4.8 to the Lease: "6.4.8 Committee Approval. Lessor shall not have any obligation to close the purchase and sale of the Property unless, as of the Closing Date, Lessor has obtained approval of the Investment Committee of Petula Associates, Ltd. to such purchase and sale, provided, however, that if Lessor is unable to obtain such Committee approval, (i) such failure to obtain approval shall not affect Lessee's right to purchase the land and improvements covered by the Second Lease and Third Lease pursuant to the terms thereof; (ii) Lessee shall not be responsible for the costs described in Section 6.8.2 and (iii) Lessee shall continue to lease the property pursuant to the terms of the Lease. If Lessee closes the purchase of the land and improvements covered by the Second Lease and Third Lease but not the Property covered by this Lease, the parties shall enter into (i) a skybridge easement agreement with respect to the bridge connecting the improvements covered by the Third Lease and this Lease in form mutually agreeable to the parties and (ii) an easement agreement with respect to a trench across the Property covered by this Lease in form mutually agreeable to the parties." 1.9 The following is added at the end of Section 6.8.1.2 of the Lease and is made a part of such Section: "No rescission notice given by Lessee to Lessor pursuant to this Section 6.8.1.2 will be valid unless Lessee simultaneously gives to Lessor a rescission notice to rescind its exercise of the Option to Purchase under the Second Lease and the Third Lease." 1.10 The last sentence of Section 6.9 of the Lease is hereby deleted and the following is inserted in its place: "In such event, Lessor shall accept the payment of costs under Section 6.8.2 above as liquidated damages and as its sole remedy for such a failure of Lessee to Close, and Lessor shall continue to lease to Lessee and Lessee shall continue to lease from Lessor the Premises for the term, at the rental, and upon all of the terms and conditions set forth in this Lease, except that the Option to Purchase in Section 6 shall terminate and Lessor shall not have any obligation to convey the Property to Lessee." 1.11 Skybridge. The following is added at the end of the second sentence of Section 47.3.4 of the Lease and is made a part of such sentence: "provided, if Lessee purchases the Property and the Third Building simultaneously, the Skybridge shall be included in the sale of the Property." 1.12 Traffic Signal. The following is added as a new Section 51 to the Lease: "51 Traffic Signal. Lessor and Lessee agree that the cost to install a traffic signal (the "Signal") at the intersection of Koll Parkway, Walker Road and SW 150th Avenue shall be treated as a Special Common Area Assessment pursuant to the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions dated March 12, 1986, as amended by First Amendment thereto dated October 28, 1996 and Section Amendment thereto dated March 13, 1998 (collectively, the "Declaration"), which Declaration encumbers the Property and other property. Once the Signal has been installed and is operational (the "Signal Completion Date"), Lessor shall furnish to Lessee a statement in commercially reasonable detail showing the portion of the cost to install such Signal (the "Signal Cost") that is allocated to the Property as a Special Common Area Assessment pursuant to the Declaration and, upon request from Lessee, shall furnish copies of invoices received and paid by Lessor in connection with the installation of the Signal. Lessee agrees to reimburse Lessor for the portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property, provided, however, that, except as provided herein, Lessee shall not be required to pay such cost in a lump sum, but rather such cost, together with a financing charge of ten percent (10%) per annum, shall be amortized over an estimated useful life of ten (10) years and Lessee shall reimburse Lessor for such cost by paying Lessor in equal monthly installments beginning on the first day of the second calendar month following the Signal Completion Date (or on the first day of the next calendar month if the Signal Completion Date is the first day of a calendar month) and on the first day of each month thereafter during the remaining term of this Lease that portion of such cost attributable to the month preceding such payment based on such amortization plan. If the Signal Completion Date is a day other than the first day of a calendar month, then on the first day of the calendar month following the Signal Completion Date, Lessee shall pay to Lessor interest at the rate provided herein from the Signal Completion Date through the last day of the month in which the Signal Completion Date occurs. In the alternative, Lessee shall have the right to prepay all or any portion of the outstanding balance of such cost at any time without any prepayment charge. If Lessee purchases the Property pursuant to the Option to Purchase in this Lease and the Signal has been installed and is operational, upon the closing of such purchase Lessee shall pay to Lessor the outstanding balance of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property. If Lessee does not purchase the Property pursuant to the Option to Purchase in this Lease and this Lease expires or otherwise terminates, the (i) Lessee shall pay to Lessor within ten (10) days of such expiration or termination that portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property that is attributable to the period commencing with the first day of the month in which this Lease expires or otherwise terminates, and (ii) Lessee's obligation to reimburse Lessor for the remaining balance of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property shall cease upon such expiration or termination of this Lease, provided, however, that if this Lease terminates due to the default of Lessee, Lessor may recover from Lessee the unpaid portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property, if any, in addition to other amounts allowed under Section 20.2 of this Lease. Nothing herein shall be deemed an agreement by Lessee that the cost of any other traffic signal(s) installed near the Property in the future should be passed through to Lessee under this Lease." 2. STATUS OF LEASE. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Lease remains in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and affirmed. 3. COUNTERPARTS. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously or in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Amendment. 4. FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION. Facsimile transmission of any signed original document, and retransmission of any signed facsimile transmission, shall be the same as delivery of an original. At the request of either party, the parties shall confirm facsimile transmitted signatures by signing an original document. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Eighth Amendment to Lease has been executed as of the date set forth above. LESSOR: PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation By: /s/ MICHAEL S. DUFFY Name: MICHAEL S. DUFFY Title: VICE PRESIDENT By: /s/ GREGORY C. HAUSER Name: GREGORY C. HAUSER Title: VICE PRESIDENT EQUITY FC, LTD., an Iowa corporation By: /s/ L.S. VALENTINO Name: L.S. VALENTINO Title: COUNSEL By: /s/ RONALD B. FRANKLIN Name: RONALD B. FRANKLIN Title: VICE PRESIDENT LESSEE: SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation By: /s/ ROBERT B. WITT Name: ROBERT B. WITT Title: VICE PRESIDENT & CIO EX-10.5 7 EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE THIS EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE is made as of March 26, 1998 between PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation and EQUITY FC, LTD., an Iowa corporation (collectively, "Lessor"), and SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation ("Lessee"). RECITALS A. Lessor and Lessee are parties to that certain Lease Agreement dated July 9, 1990 (the "Lease Agreement") and the following documents (the "Amendments"), which amend such Lease Agreement (the Lease Agreement and all such Amendments are herein collectively referred to as the "Lease"): 1. First Amendment dated April 29, 1990; 2. Second Amendment dated April 29, 1991; 3. Third Amendment dated June 10, 1991; 4. Fourth Amendment dated July 3, 1991; 5. Fifth Amendment dated August __, 1991; 6. Sixth Amendment dated December 2, 1992; and 7. Seventh Amendment dated April 5, 1993 B. Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment have the meanings set forth in the Lease. C. Lessor and Lessee desire to amend the Lease as set forth herein. AGREEMENT 1. LEASE REVISIONS. 1.1 Closing Costs and Title Insurance. The following is added after the last sentence of Section 6.4.3 of the Lease and is hereby made a part of Section 6.4.3: "If available from Escrow Agent and if requested by Lessor, Escrow Agent shall issue to Lessor at its expense a 'simultaneous issue' seller's policy of title insurance." 1.2 Conveyance. The following shall be added after the last sentence of Section 6.4.4 of the Lease and is hereby made a part of Section 6.4.4: "At Lessee's request, Lessor shall convey title to the Property to an institutional lender or trustee providing synthetic lease financing or other institutional financing to Lessee in connection with its acquisition of the Property; provided, however, use of such designee will not affect (or operate as a release of) Lessee's obligations or liability under the Lease, including the Option to Purchase provisions of the Lease." 1.3 Lease Termination. The following is added as a new Section 6.4.8 to the Lease: "6.4.8 Termination of Lease. This Lease shall automatically terminate effective upon the Closing of the sale of the Property from Lessor to Lessee pursuant to this Section 6; provided, however, the Survival Provisions of Section 50 shall apply in connection with any such termination. If requested by Lessee, Lessor shall enter into a lease termination agreement with Lessee to evidence the agreement of the parties in this Section 6.4.8, and Lessee shall have the right to record such lease termination agreement in the records of Washington County, Oregon at any time following the recording of the statutory special warranty deed referenced in Section 6.4.4." 1.4 Traffic Signal. The following is added as a new Section 52 to the Lease: "52 Traffic Signal. Lessor and Lessee agree that the cost to install a traffic signal (the "Signal") at the intersection of Koll Parkway, Walker Road and SW 150th Avenue shall be treated as a Special Common Area Assessment pursuant to the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions dated March 12, 1986, as amended by First Amendment thereto dated October 28, 1996 and Section Amendment thereto dated March 13, 1998 (collectively, the "Declaration"), which Declaration encumbers the Property and other property. Once the Signal has been installed and is operational (the "Signal Completion Date"), Lessor shall furnish to Lessee a statement in commercially reasonable detail showing the portion of the cost to install such Signal (the "Signal Cost") that is allocated to the Property as a Special Common Area Assessment pursuant to the Declaration and, upon request from Lessee, shall furnish copies of invoices received and paid by Lessor in connection with the installation of the Signal. Lessee agrees to reimburse Lessor for the portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property, provided, however, that, except as provided herein, Lessee shall not be required to pay such cost in a lump sum, but rather such cost, together with a financing charge of ten percent (10%) per annum, shall be amortized over an estimated useful life of ten (10) years and Lessee shall reimburse Lessor for such cost by paying Lessor in equal monthly installments beginning on the first day of the second calendar month following the Signal Completion Date (or on the first day of the next calendar month if the Signal Completion Date is the first day of a calendar month) and on the first day of each month thereafter during the remaining term of this Lease that portion of such cost attributable to the month preceding such payment based on such amortization plan. If the Signal Completion Date is a day other than the first day of a calendar month, then on the first day of the calendar month following the Signal Completion Date, Lessee shall pay to Lessor interest at the rate provided herein from the Signal Completion Date through the last day of the month in which the Signal Completion Date occurs. In the alternative, Lessee shall have the right to prepay all or any portion of the outstanding balance of such cost at any time without any prepayment charge. If Lessee purchases the Property pursuant to the Option to Purchase in this Lease and the Signal has been installed and is operational, upon the closing of such purchase Lessee shall pay to Lessor the outstanding balance of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property. If Lessee does not purchase the Property pursuant to the Option to Purchase in this Lease and this Lease expires or otherwise terminates, the (i) Lessee shall pay to Lessor within ten (10) days of such expiration or termination that portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property that is attributable to the period commencing with the first day of the month in which this Lease expires or otherwise terminates, and (ii) Lessee's obligation to reimburse Lessor for the remaining balance of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property shall cease upon such expiration or termination of this Lease, provided, however, that if this Lease terminates due to the default of Lessee, Lessor may recover from Lessee the unpaid portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property, if any, in addition to other amounts allowed under Section 20.2 of this Lease. Nothing herein shall be deemed an agreement by Lessee that the cost of any other traffic signal(s) installed near the Property in the future should be passed through to Lessee under this Lease." 1.5 Monument Sign/Landscape Strip. Notwithstanding that the monument sign used by Lessee in connection with its use of the Premises is located within an area designated as common area under the Declaration, during the term of this Lease the expense of maintaining the sign shall not be treated as a common area expense, but rather shall be the responsibility of Lessee. Upon termination of this Lease, the expense of maintaining the sign shall be treated as a common area expense under the Declaration unless the sign is used exclusively by the owner of the Premises or any new tenant of such owner, in which case such expense shall be the responsibility of such owner or such tenant. 2. STATUS OF LEASE. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Lease remains in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and affirmed. 3. COUNTERPARTS. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously or in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Amendment. 4. FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION. Facsimile transmission of any signed original document, and retransmission of any signed facsimile transmission, shall be the same as delivery of an original. At the request of either party, the parties shall confirm facsimile transmitted signatures by signing an original document. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Eighth Amendment to Lease has been executed as of the date set forth above. LESSOR: PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation By: /s/ MICHAEL S. DUFFY Name: MICHAEL S. DUFFY Title: VICE PRESIDENT By: /s/ GREGORY C. HAUSER Name: GREGORY C. HAUSER Title: VICE PRESIDENT EQUITY FC, LTD., an Iowa corporation By: /s/ LS VALENTINO Name: LS VALENTINO Title: COUNSEL By: /s/ RONALD B. FRANKLIN Name: RONALD B. FRANKLIN Title: VICE PRESIDENT LESSEE: SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation By: /s/ ROBERT B. WITT Name: ROBERT B. WITT Title: VICE PRESIDENT & CIO EX-10.6 8 FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE is made as of March 26, 1998 between PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation and EQUITY FC, LTD., an Iowa corporation, tenants-in-common (collectively, "Landlord"), and SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation ("Tenant"). RECITALS A. Landlord and Tenant are parties to that certain Lease Agreement dated June 10, 1991 (the "Lease"). B. Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment have the meanings set forth in the Lease. C. Landlord and Tenant desire to amend the Lease as set forth herein. AGREEMENT In consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Amendment, Landlord and Tenant agree to amend the Lease as follows: 1. Traffic Signal. Landlord and Tenant agree that the cost to install a traffic signal (the "Signal") at the intersection of Koll Parkway, Walker Road and SW 150th Avenue shall be treated as a Special Common Area Assessment pursuant to the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions dated March 12, 1986, as amended by First Amendment thereto dated October 28, 1996 and Section Amendment thereto dated March 13, 1998 (collectively, the "Declaration"), which Declaration encumbers the Property and other property. Once the Signal has been installed and is operational (the "Signal Completion Date"), Landlord shall furnish to Tenant a statement in commercially reasonable detail showing the portion of the cost to install such Signal (the "Signal Cost") that is allocated to the Property as a Special Common Area Assessment pursuant to the Declaration and, upon request from Tenant, shall furnish copies of invoices received and paid by Landlord in connection with the installation of the Signal. Tenant agrees to reimburse Landlord for the portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property, provided, however, that, except as provided herein, Tenant shall not be required to pay such cost in a lump sum, but rather such cost, together with a financing charge of ten percent (10%) per annum, shall be amortized over an estimated useful life of ten (10) years and Tenant shall reimburse Landlord for such cost by paying Landlord in equal monthly installments beginning on the first day of the second calendar month following the Signal Completion Date (or on the first day of the next calendar month if the Signal Completion Date is the first day of a calendar month) and on the first day of each month thereafter during the remaining term of this Lease that portion of such cost attributable to the month preceding such payment based on such amortization plan. If the Signal Completion Date is a day other than the first day of a calendar month, then on the first day of the calendar month following the Signal Completion Date, Tenant shall pay to Landlord interest at the rate provided herein from the Signal Completion Date through the last day of the month in which the Signal Completion Date occurs. In the alternative, Tenant shall have the right to prepay all or any portion of the outstanding balance of such cost at any time without any prepayment charge. If Tenant purchases the Property pursuant to the Option to Purchase in this Lease and the Signal has been installed and is operational, upon the closing of such purchase Tenant shall pay to Landlord the outstanding balance of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property. If Tenant does not purchase the Property pursuant to the Option to Purchase in this Lease and this Lease expires or otherwise terminates, the (i) Tenant shall pay to Landlord within ten (10) days of such expiration or termination that portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property that is attributable to the period commencing with the first day of the month in which this Lease expires or otherwise terminates, and (ii) Tenant's obligation to reimburse Landlord for the remaining balance of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property shall cease upon such expiration or termination of this Lease, provided, however, that if this Lease terminates due to the default of Tenant, Landlord may recover from Tenant the unpaid portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property, if any, in addition to other amounts allowed under Section 20.2 of this Lease. Nothing herein shall be deemed an agreement by Tenant that the cost of any other traffic signal(s) installed near the Property in the future should be passed through to Tenant under this Lease." 2. STATUS OF LEASE. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Lease remains in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and affirmed. 3. COUNTERPARTS. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously or in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Amendment. 4. FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION. Facsimile transmission of any signed original document, and retransmission of any signed facsimile transmission, shall be the same as delivery of an original. At the request of either party, the parties shall confirm facsimile transmitted signatures by signing an original document. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Eighth Amendment to Lease has been executed as of the date set forth above. LANDLORD: PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: EQUITY FC, LTD., an Iowa corporation By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: TENANT: SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation By: /s/ ROBERT B. WITT Name: ROBERT B. WITT Title: VICE PRESIDENT & CIO EX-10.7 9 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE is made as of March 26, 1998 between PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation, EQUITY FC, LTD., an Iowa corporation, tenants-in-common (collectively, "Landlord"), and SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation ("Tenant"). RECITALS A. Landlord and Tenant are parties to that certain Lease Agreement dated June 10, 1991 (the "Lease Agreement") and the following documents (the "Amendment"), which amend such Lease Agreement (the Lease Agreement and all such Amendments are herein collectively referred to as the "Lease"): 1. First Amendment dated October 31, 1991; 2. Second Amendment dated May 6, 1992; 3. Third Amendment dated January 8, 1993; and 4. Fourth Amendment dated July 21, 1995. B. Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment have the meanings set forth in the Lease. C. Landlord and Tenant desire to amend the Lease as set forth herein. AGREEMENT In consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Amendment, Landlord and Tenant agree to amend the Lease as follows: 1. Traffic Signal. Landlord and Tenant agree that the cost to install a traffic signal (the "Signal") at the intersection of Koll Parkway, Walker Road and SW 150th Avenue shall be treated as a Special Common Area Assessment pursuant to the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions dated March 12, 1986, as amended by First Amendment thereto dated October 28, 1996 and Section Amendment thereto dated March 13, 1998 (collectively, the "Declaration"), which Declaration encumbers the Property and other property. Once the Signal has been installed and is operational (the "Signal Completion Date"), Landlord shall furnish to Tenant a statement in commercially reasonable detail showing the portion of the cost to install such Signal (the "Signal Cost") that is allocated to the Property as a Special Common Area Assessment pursuant to the Declaration and, upon request from Tenant, shall furnish copies of invoices received and paid by Landlord in connection with the installation of the Signal. Tenant agrees to reimburse Landlord for the portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property, provided, however, that, except as provided herein, Tenant shall not be required to pay such cost in a lump sum, but rather such cost, together with a financing charge of ten percent (10%) per annum, shall be amortized over an estimated useful life of ten (10) years and Tenant shall reimburse Landlord for such cost by paying Landlord in equal monthly installments beginning on the first day of the second calendar month following the Signal Completion Date (or on the first day of the next calendar month if the Signal Completion Date is the first day of a calendar month) and on the first day of each month thereafter during the remaining term of this Lease that portion of such cost attributable to the month preceding such payment based on such amortization plan. If the Signal Completion Date is a day other than the first day of a calendar month, then on the first day of the calendar month following the Signal Completion Date, Tenant shall pay to Landlord interest at the rate provided herein from the Signal Completion Date through the last day of the month in which the Signal Completion Date occurs. In the alternative, Tenant shall have the right to prepay all or any portion of the outstanding balance of such cost at any time without any prepayment charge. If Tenant purchases the Property pursuant to the Option to Purchase in this Lease and the Signal has been installed and is operational, upon the closing of such purchase Tenant shall pay to Landlord the outstanding balance of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property. If Tenant does not purchase the Property pursuant to the Option to Purchase in this Lease and this Lease expires or otherwise terminates, the (i) Tenant shall pay to Landlord within ten (10) days of such expiration or termination that portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property that is attributable to the period commencing with the first day of the month in which this Lease expires or otherwise terminates, and (ii) Tenant's obligation to reimburse Landlord for the remaining balance of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property shall cease upon such expiration or termination of this Lease, provided, however, that if this Lease terminates due to the default of Tenant, Landlord may recover from Tenant the unpaid portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property, if any, in addition to other amounts allowed under Section 20.2 of this Lease. Nothing herein shall be deemed an agreement by Tenant that the cost of any other traffic signal(s) installed near the Property in the future should be passed through to Tenant under this Lease. 2. STATUS OF LEASE. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Lease remains in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and affirmed. 3. COUNTERPARTS. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously or in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Amendment. 4. FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION. Facsimile transmission of any signed original document, and retransmission of any signed facsimile transmission, shall be the same as delivery of an original. At the request of either party, the parties shall confirm facsimile transmitted signatures by signing an original document. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Eighth Amendment to Lease has been executed as of the date set forth above. LANDLORD: PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: EQUITY FC, LTD., an Iowa corporation By: Name: Title: TENANT: SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation By: /s/ ROBERT B. WITT Name: ROBERT B. WITT Title: VICE PRESIDENT & CIO EX-10.8 10 THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE is made as of March 26, 1998 between PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation, EQUITY FC, LTD., an Iowa corporation, tenants-in-common (collectively, "Landlord"), and SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation ("Tenant"). RECITALS A. Landlord and Tenant are parties to that certain Lease Agreement dated June 10, 1991 (the "Lease Agreement") and the following documents (the "Amendment"), which amend such Lease Agreement (the Lease Agreement and all such Amendments are herein collectively referred to as the "Lease"): 1. First Amendment dated July 21, 1995; and 2. Second Amendment dated March 1, 1997, effective April 1, 1997. B. Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment have the meanings set forth in the Lease. C. Landlord and Tenant desire to amend the Lease as set forth herein. AGREEMENT In consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Amendment, Landlord and Tenant agree to amend the Lease as follows: 1. Traffic Signal. Landlord and Tenant agree that the cost to install a traffic signal (the "Signal") at the intersection of Koll Parkway, Walker Road and SW 150th Avenue shall be treated as a Special Common Area Assessment pursuant to the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions dated March 12, 1986, as amended by First Amendment thereto dated October 28, 1996 and Section Amendment thereto dated March 13, 1998 (collectively, the "Declaration"), which Declaration encumbers the Property and other property. Once the Signal has been installed and is operational (the "Signal Completion Date"), Landlord shall furnish to Tenant a statement in commercially reasonable detail showing the portion of the cost to install such Signal (the "Signal Cost") that is allocated to the Property as a Special Common Area Assessment pursuant to the Declaration and, upon request from Tenant, shall furnish copies of invoices received and paid by Landlord in connection with the installation of the Signal. Tenant agrees to reimburse Landlord for the portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property, provided, however, that, except as provided herein, Tenant shall not be required to pay such cost in a lump sum, but rather such cost, together with a financing charge of ten percent (10%) per annum, shall be amortized over an estimated useful life of ten (10) years and Tenant shall reimburse Landlord for such cost by paying Landlord in equal monthly installments beginning on the first day of the second calendar month following the Signal Completion Date (or on the first day of the next calendar month if the Signal Completion Date is the first day of a calendar month) and on the first day of each month thereafter during the remaining term of this Lease that portion of such cost attributable to the month preceding such payment based on such amortization plan. If the Signal Completion Date is a day other than the first day of a calendar month, then on the first day of the calendar month following the Signal Completion Date, Tenant shall pay to Landlord interest at the rate provided herein from the Signal Completion Date through the last day of the month in which the Signal Completion Date occurs. In the alternative, Tenant shall have the right to prepay all or any portion of the outstanding balance of such cost at any time without any prepayment charge. If Tenant purchases the Property pursuant to the Option to Purchase in this Lease and the Signal has been installed and is operational, upon the closing of such purchase Tenant shall pay to Landlord the outstanding balance of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property. If Tenant does not purchase the Property pursuant to the Option to Purchase in this Lease and this Lease expires or otherwise terminates, the (i) Tenant shall pay to Landlord within ten (10) days of such expiration or termination that portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property that is attributable to the period commencing with the first day of the month in which this Lease expires or otherwise terminates, and (ii) Tenant's obligation to reimburse Landlord for the remaining balance of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property shall cease upon such expiration or termination of this Lease, provided, however, that if this Lease terminates due to the default of Tenant, Landlord may recover from Tenant the unpaid portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property, if any, in addition to other amounts allowed under Section 20.2 of this Lease. Nothing herein shall be deemed an agreement by Tenant that the cost of any other traffic signal(s) installed near the Property in the future should be passed through to Tenant under this Lease." 2. STATUS OF LEASE. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Lease remains in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and affirmed. 3. COUNTERPARTS. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously or in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Amendment. 4. FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION. Facsimile transmission of any signed original document, and retransmission of any signed facsimile transmission, shall be the same as delivery of an original. At the request of either party, the parties shall confirm facsimile transmitted signatures by signing an original document. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Eighth Amendment to Lease has been executed as of the date set forth above. LANDLORD: PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: EQUITY FC, LTD., an Iowa corporation By: Name: Title: TENANT: SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation By: /s/ ROBERT B. WITT Name: ROBERT B. WITT Title: VICE PRESIDENT & CIO EX-10.9 11 THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE is made as of March 26, 1998 between PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation, EQUITY FC, LTD., an Iowa corporation, tenants-in-common (collectively, "Landlord"), and SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation ("Tenant"). RECITALS A. Landlord and Tenant are parties to that certain Lease Agreement dated June 10, 1991 (the "Lease Agreement") and the following documents (the "Amendment"), which amend such Lease Agreement (the Lease Agreement and all such Amendments are herein collectively referred to as the "Lease"): 1. First Amendment dated March 1, 1996, effective February 1, 1996; and 2. Second Amendment dated October 1, 1996. B. Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment have the meanings set forth in the Lease. C. Landlord and Tenant desire to amend the Lease as set forth herein. AGREEMENT In consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Amendment, Landlord and Tenant agree to amend the Lease as follows: 1. Traffic Signal. Landlord and Tenant agree that the cost to install a traffic signal (the "Signal") at the intersection of Koll Parkway, Walker Road and SW 150th Avenue shall be treated as a Special Common Area Assessment pursuant to the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions dated March 12, 1986, as amended by First Amendment thereto dated October 28, 1996 and Section Amendment thereto dated March 13, 1998 (collectively, the "Declaration"), which Declaration encumbers the Property and other property. Once the Signal has been installed and is operational (the "Signal Completion Date"), Landlord shall furnish to Tenant a statement in commercially reasonable detail showing the portion of the cost to install such Signal (the "Signal Cost") that is allocated to the Property as a Special Common Area Assessment pursuant to the Declaration and, upon request from Tenant, shall furnish copies of invoices received and paid by Landlord in connection with the installation of the Signal. Tenant agrees to reimburse Landlord for the portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property, provided, however, that, except as provided herein, Tenant shall not be required to pay such cost in a lump sum, but rather such cost, together with a financing charge of ten percent (10%) per annum, shall be amortized over an estimated useful life of ten (10) years and Tenant shall reimburse Landlord for such cost by paying Landlord in equal monthly installments beginning on the first day of the second calendar month following the Signal Completion Date (or on the first day of the next calendar month if the Signal Completion Date is the first day of a calendar month) and on the first day of each month thereafter during the remaining term of this Lease that portion of such cost attributable to the month preceding such payment based on such amortization plan. If the Signal Completion Date is a day other than the first day of a calendar month, then on the first day of the calendar month following the Signal Completion Date, Tenant shall pay to Landlord interest at the rate provided herein from the Signal Completion Date through the last day of the month in which the Signal Completion Date occurs. In the alternative, Tenant shall have the right to prepay all or any portion of the outstanding balance of such cost at any time without any prepayment charge. If Tenant purchases the Property pursuant to the Option to Purchase in this Lease and the Signal has been installed and is operational, upon the closing of such purchase Tenant shall pay to Landlord the outstanding balance of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property. If Tenant does not purchase the Property pursuant to the Option to Purchase in this Lease and this Lease expires or otherwise terminates, the (i) Tenant shall pay to Landlord within ten (10) days of such expiration or termination that portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property that is attributable to the period commencing with the first day of the month in which this Lease expires or otherwise terminates, and (ii) Tenant's obligation to reimburse Landlord for the remaining balance of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property shall cease upon such expiration or termination of this Lease, provided, however, that if this Lease terminates due to the default of Tenant, Landlord may recover from Tenant the unpaid portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property, if any, in addition to other amounts allowed under Section 20.2 of this Lease. Nothing herein shall be deemed an agreement by Tenant that the cost of any other traffic signal(s) installed near the Property in the future should be passed through to Tenant under this Lease." 2. STATUS OF LEASE. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Lease remains in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and affirmed. 3. COUNTERPARTS. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously or in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Amendment. 4. FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION. Facsimile transmission of any signed original document, and retransmission of any signed facsimile transmission, shall be the same as delivery of an original. At the request of either party, the parties shall confirm facsimile transmitted signatures by signing an original document. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Eighth Amendment to Lease has been executed as of the date set forth above. LANDLORD: PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: EQUITY FC, LTD., an Iowa corporation By: Name: Title: TENANT: SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation By: /s/ ROBERT B. WITT Name: ROBERT B. WITT Title: VICE PRESIDENT & CIO EX-10.10 12 FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE is made as of March 26, 1998 between PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation, EQUITY FC, LTD., an Iowa corporation, and DK NORTHWEST HOLDINGS, L.P., a California limited partnership (collectively, "Landlord"), and SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation ("Tenant"). RECITALS A. Landlord and Tenant are parties to that certain Lease Agreement dated June 10, 1991 (the "Lease"). B. Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment have the meanings set forth in the Lease. C. Landlord and Tenant desire to amend the Lease as set forth herein. AGREEMENT In consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Amendment, Landlord and Tenant agree to amend the Lease as follows: 1. Traffic Signal. Landlord and Tenant agree that the cost to install a traffic signal (the "Signal") at the intersection of Koll Parkway, Walker Road and SW 150th Avenue shall be treated as a Special Common Area Assessment pursuant to the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions dated March 12, 1986, as amended by First Amendment thereto dated October 28, 1996 and Section Amendment thereto dated March 13, 1998 (collectively, the "Declaration"), which Declaration encumbers the Property and other property. Once the Signal has been installed and is operational (the "Signal Completion Date"), Landlord shall furnish to Tenant a statement in commercially reasonable detail showing the portion of the cost to install such Signal (the "Signal Cost") that is allocated to the Property as a Special Common Area Assessment pursuant to the Declaration and, upon request from Tenant, shall furnish copies of invoices received and paid by Landlord in connection with the installation of the Signal. Tenant agrees to reimburse Landlord for the portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property, provided, however, that, except as provided herein, Tenant shall not be required to pay such cost in a lump sum, but rather such cost, together with a financing charge of ten percent (10%) per annum, shall be amortized over an estimated useful life of ten (10) years and Tenant shall reimburse Landlord for such cost by paying Landlord in equal monthly installments beginning on the first day of the second calendar month following the Signal Completion Date (or on the first day of the next calendar month if the Signal Completion Date is the first day of a calendar month) and on the first day of each month thereafter during the remaining term of this Lease that portion of such cost attributable to the month preceding such payment based on such amortization plan. If the Signal Completion Date is a day other than the first day of a calendar month, then on the first day of the calendar month following the Signal Completion Date, Tenant shall pay to Landlord interest at the rate provided herein from the Signal Completion Date through the last day of the month in which the Signal Completion Date occurs. In the alternative, Tenant shall have the right to prepay all or any portion of the outstanding balance of such cost at any time without any prepayment charge. If Tenant purchases the Property pursuant to the Option to Purchase in this Lease and the Signal has been installed and is operational, upon the closing of such purchase Tenant shall pay to Landlord the outstanding balance of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property. If Tenant does not purchase the Property pursuant to the Option to Purchase in this Lease and this Lease expires or otherwise terminates, the (i) Tenant shall pay to Landlord within ten (10) days of such expiration or termination that portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property that is attributable to the period commencing with the first day of the month in which this Lease expires or otherwise terminates, and (ii) Tenant's obligation to reimburse Landlord for the remaining balance of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property shall cease upon such expiration or termination of this Lease, provided, however, that if this Lease terminates due to the default of Tenant, Landlord may recover from Tenant the unpaid portion of the Signal Cost allocated to the Property, if any, in addition to other amounts allowed under Section 20.2 of this Lease. Nothing herein shall be deemed an agreement by Tenant that the cost of any other traffic signal(s) installed near the Property in the future should be passed through to Tenant under this Lease." 2. STATUS OF LEASE. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Lease remains in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and affirmed. 3. COUNTERPARTS. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously or in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Amendment. 4. FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION. Facsimile transmission of any signed original document, and retransmission of any signed facsimile transmission, shall be the same as delivery of an original. At the request of either party, the parties shall confirm facsimile transmitted signatures by signing an original document. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Eighth Amendment to Lease has been executed as of the date set forth above. LANDLORD: PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: EQUITY FC, LTD., an Iowa corporation By: Name: Title: DK NORTHWEST HOLDINGS, L.P., a California limited partnership By: PETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD., an Iowa corporation, Attorney-in-Fact for DK Northwest Holdings, L.P. By: Name: Title: TENANT: SEQUENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation By: /s/ ROBERT B. WITT Name: ROBERT B. WITT Title: VICE PRESIDENT & CIO EX-27 13
5 12-MOS JAN-02-1999 JAN-02-1999 192,876,000 0 225,480,000 3,869,000 86,333,000 552,382,000 350,323,000 216,492,000 796,115,000 227,708,000 7,480,000 0 0 435,000 511,169,000 796,115,000 509,830,000 784,156,000 311,705,000 510,498,000 351,516,000 3,161,000 3,533,000 (76,071,000) (23,552,000) (52,519,000) 0 0 0 (52,519,000) (1.21) (1.21)
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----