XML 46 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Sep. 28, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements:
The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) relating to fair value measurements emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions (inputs) that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. Inputs may be observable or unobservable, and valuation techniques used to measure fair value should maximize the use of relevant observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Accordingly, the FASB’s ASC establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework that ranks the quality and reliability of information used to determine fair values. The hierarchy is associated with the level of pricing observability utilized in measuring fair value and defines three levels of inputs to the fair value measurement process—quoted prices are the most reliable valuation inputs, whereas model values that include inputs based on unobservable data are the least reliable. Each fair value measurement must be assigned to a level corresponding to the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
The three broad levels of inputs defined by the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
 
Level 1 – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
 
Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
 
Level 3 – inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The table below presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of September 28, 2014, December 31, 2013, and September 29, 2013 on a recurring basis:
 
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
September 28, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(In thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap agreements (1)
 
$
(10,044
)
 
$

 
$
(10,044
)
 
$

Interest rate swap agreements (2)
 
(15,758
)
 

 
(15,758
)
 

Net derivative liability
 
$
(25,802
)
 
$

 
$
(25,802
)
 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap agreements (1)
 
$
(3,916
)
 
$

 
$
(3,916
)
 
$

Interest rate swap agreements (2)
 
$
(22,746
)
 
$

 
$
(22,746
)
 
$

Net derivative liability
 
$
(26,662
)
 
$

 
$
(26,662
)
 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
September 29, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap agreements (1)
 
$
(5,483
)
 
$

 
$
(5,483
)
 
$

Interest rate swap agreements (2)
 
$
(26,163
)
 
$

 
$
(26,163
)
 
$

Net derivative liability
 
$
(31,646
)
 
$

 
$
(31,646
)
 
$

(1)
Designated as cash flow hedges and are included in “Derivative Liability” on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
(2)
Not designated as cash flow hedges and are included in "Derivative Liability" on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
Fair values of the interest rate swap agreements are determined using significant inputs, including the LIBOR forward curves, which are considered Level 2 observable market inputs. In addition, the Partnership considered the effect of its credit and non-performance risk on the fair values provided, and recognized an adjustment decreasing the net derivative liability by approximately $0.6 million as of September 28, 2014.
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, revolver, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.
There were no assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at September 28, 2014, December 31, 2013, or September 29, 2013, except for as described below.
The fair value of term debt at September 28, 2014 was approximately $614.2 million based on borrowing rates currently available to the Partnership on long-term debt with similar terms and average maturities. The fair value of the Partnership's notes at September 28, 2014 was approximately $919.5 million based on public trading levels as of that date. The fair value of the term debt and June 2014 notes were based on Level 2 inputs and the March 2013 notes were based on Level 1 inputs.